What ingredients are in the shot? What does it offer? Will you be invincible?
What are the known and unknown consequences of an experimental jab? What if something goes wrong?
To answer these questions, in defense of your health, it may be useful to apply Donald Rumsfeld’s famous axiom, that he shared during a 2002 Dept. of Defense briefing:
There are known knowns, things we know that we know; and there are known unknowns, things that we know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns, things we do not know we don’t know. ― Donald Rumsfeld, February 12, 2002, U.S. Department of Defense news briefing
If you consent to be a subject of an experiment, are you covered by your insurance company for any unforeseen damages? Are you in the realm of Known Knowns or Unknown Unknowns? Or somewhere in between?
I. Identify the Known Knowns:
For many months, mainstream media has announced itself as the gatekeeper of your health information for all things COVID. It first reported that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID injections do not prevent infection of the Coronavirus. Later, they were unsure if their products prevented transmission. Then an April 2021 study reported that COVID variants can still infect vaccinated people. The story changed again in the same month, “A new study shows the Pfizer vaccine does prevent transmission.”
This is the realm of the Known Knowns, with the caveat that what we know can shift at any given moment.
Transmission of what, exactly? Who knows.
For many months, mainstream media has promoted the transmission of a “deadly virus” but failed to mention that the Coronavirus, also known as Covid-19, has never been isolated. In December 2020 investigations, “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available.” See December 2020 CDC document, page 43. The document also mentions that testing for “the virus” is woefully inadequate. Page 41: “This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”
If there is no known virus, and no accurate test, how can there be an effective viral vaccine? Hence, an experimental vaccine!
Could the real threat instead be a bacterium, as Dr. Fauci suggested in a 2008 Journal of Infectious Diseases article, about the last major pandemic?
Could the real threat be the advertised cure?
In January 2021, CNN reported, “Don’t be alarmed if people start dying after taking the vaccine.” Is that why deaths are now soaring in Brazil?
Could the real threat be the Big Three vaccine makers, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Astra Zeneca, whose rap sheets are so long they make the mob look innocent? Moderna claims it’s vaccine is really “a computer operating system.” Is that the reason for more side effects than the others?
For many months, the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly reported on their website that only 6% of deaths over the last year are due to a syndrome of symptoms called ‘COVID.’ At the same time, the media and government reported that 97% of people with COVID survive COVID’s flu-like symptoms. And all this time, Anthony Fauci never retracted his opinion in the March 26, 2020 NEJM that “Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%).”
Stories are being posted about Covid-vaccinated people testing positive for Covid. There are two possible reasons for this outcome:
- recipients that wore the mask for months in an attempt to prevent transmission of SARS-COV just injected that protein sequence into their bodies.
- Microbes shift to adapt to their surroundings just like humans do. Variants are always expected, especially after vaccination.
It is well known among the vaccine science community that vaccines cause variants, just as they did with Bordetella pertussis, a bacterium blamed for whooping cough, which adapted itself to survive the vaccine. In other words, the vaccine ended up diminishing vaccine effectiveness by creating a stronger bacterium. According to the authors of the 2013 New England Journal of Medicine study, “adaptation of B. pertussis to vaccine selection pressure.” In fact, vaccines reduce the body’s innate immune system, your natural defense system.
II. Identify the Known Unknowns
Here come the Variants!
Experts say the recent UK B.1.1.7 variant is the most contagious and dominant variant of the virus they cannot isolate. Why do scientists sound an alarm over variants when they know how they are hatched?
It is to get people used to the idea of multiple future variant vaccines, which create new variants.
The media message is “Expect to be Sick.”
With what, exactly? Who knows.
Known Unknowns are mixed messages. Contradictory messages serve to maintain a specter of confusion and fear. It is all propaganda. In the U.S. it is legal for the government and the media, working together, to propagandize the American people. See The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012.
For many months, the government and media set up a plot to coerce U.S. citizens into accepting a new type of vaccine by reporting a national shortage of COVID shots, then a global shortage. At the same time they did not disclose that COVID shots are experimental, not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). An FDA “OK” is not a formal approval. As of April 2021, FDA has only approved one antiviral drug called Veklury (widely known as remdesivir) to treat COVID. All COVID injections are only Emergency Use Authorized (EUA). How does protect you? How does it affect your insurance coverage? See Part III
Is COVID a humanitarian or a military operation?
Why did Moderna fail to disclose $20 million from DARPA for the development of vaccine patent technology being used today? Analyze the language used in the media. Vaccine deployment in many parts of the world is used in the battle against COVID. As an example, listen to this interview with World Health Organization Chief Scientist:
These vaccines are widely deployed…… the benefits clearly outweigh the risks, nothing is 100% safe… We need to watch. We’ve asked countries to step up their safety surveillance…. But right now the benefit risk profile is clearly in favor of the vaccine…. Ten thousand people a day are dying and the vaccines are highly effective … *as effective in people over 65 as under 65.… We need to be careful. We don’t want to be confusing people of causing anxiety. Already there are a lot of people who have questions and are uncertain about the efficacy of the vaccines because they’ve been developed at record speed …. we need to reassure people and make sure that vaccines are taken up widely by the population otherwise we’re not going to achieve the goals we want to of controlling this pandemic.- Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, W.H.O. Chief Scientist
*Note: The CDC reports that 8 out of 10 COVID deaths are reported in people over 65.
The CDC and FDA tell you what they are injecting: Coronavirus Disease. Then, in a joint statement, they turn around and tell you not to get the injection due to “rare” cases of blood clots. First AstraZeneca confirmed a possible link between its shot and blood clots. Since then, 18 countries suspended its vaccine. Then, Johnson & Johnson was targeted and Wisconsin paused its use.
Still, the EU’s drug regulator advises taking alternative experimental vaccines. The W.H.O. assures the vaccines are all safe.
While mainstream medical officials such as Dr. Fauci insist mRNA will not modify a person’s DNA, the NIH (the organization Fauci is partnered with) openly admits that it does.
Mainstream media publicizes that you should expect to get sick after a injection if your immune system is working properly. Then confuses the message by asking, If you don’t get sick after your injection, does it mean your immune system isn’t working? See Part IV for another answer.
While many people Know vaccines and their adjuvants cause harm, commonly autoimmune disease, a major Unknown is that vaccine companies are not liable for injuries or deaths resulting from their products. In other words, you cannot sue vaccine makers for side effects or direct effects from their products. Neither will the government compensate you for any damages. So who is responsible for damages?
You, the recipient, assume all the risk.