69 Health/Science Institutions Globally All Failed to Cite Even 1 Record of “SARS-Cov-2” Purification, by Anyone, Anywhere, Ever

by Christine, Flouride Free Peel
June 6, 2021

69 health/science FOI’s institutions globally had all failed to provide or cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification, by anyone, anywhere, ever.

Click this link to see the actual responses: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Below is a list of the institutions.

Connect with Flouride Free Peel

6/10/2021 — Update by Truth Comes to Light editor:

See related Freedom of Information Act response from Melbourne, Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services as shared with us by a reader. The closing statement is most relevant:

Florida Takes the Lead in Protecting Individual Rights

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
May 7, 2021



After passing a bill to ensure individual rights and cast aside vaccine passports, FL state Gov. Ron DeSantis issued an executive order to further ensure an end to all emergency measures related to Covid-19.

Connect with The HighWire

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Refutes “Isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; He Does Step-by-Step Analysis of a Typical Claim of Isolation; There Is No Proof That the Virus Exists

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
April 21, 2021

The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”

But what if the virus doesn’t exist?

People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.

“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”

I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [1], and he provided his analysis in detail.

I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [2].

First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.

The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.

They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.

There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.

Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”

Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:

STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage…”

KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”

STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”

KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”

STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”

KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”

STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”

KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”

KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [3]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”

STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”

STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”

KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”

STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”

KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”

—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—

My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.

Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.

And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?

Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [4]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?

The answer is no.

SOURCES:

[1] https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/

[2] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

[3] https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home.html

[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/

Connect with Jon Rappoport

Chelsea Clinton Performs Emergency Brain Surgery on Joe Biden While Refuting Tucker Carlson

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
April 19, 2021

Dear Reader, you may have seen reports detailing Chelsea Clinton’s demand that FOX’s Tucker Carlson be removed from his job, because he questioned the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine.

But wait. There’s more…

CNN News Item: Here’s the untold inside story on Chelsea Clinton’s slam-dunk refutation of Tucker Carlson, who has been questioning the efficacy of the COVID vaccine, since, he claims, the need to wear a mask and avoid large gatherings after vaccination makes the injection-solution to COVID-19 dubious and untenable.

Of course, Clinton was correct in pointing out that public health experts know what’s what and should be obeyed without question or thought. This stinging rebuke to Carlson for his incitement to insurrection should be applauded for its perspicacity. But…

What people haven’t understood until now is: Clinton made her remarks to the press in the Rose Garden, after President Biden fainted, and as she was performing emergency brain surgery to save his life.

Clinton told CNN White House correspondent, Carl Potato, “I had read about surgery and stuff in books and things, and I had a pretty good idea on what to do and all. When Joe finished his remarks about cooperating with China to win a land war against the Russians, and he, like, fell down, I rushed to his side…”

As Biden was lying on his back on the lawn, Clinton removed a pin from her hair and inserted it in Biden’s right ear. She pushed in the pin, impaled his earpiece, which the President uses to receive instructions from Susan Rice, and slowly guided the earpiece out of the aforementioned ear.

Clinton later said, “I sensed the earpiece was putting pressure on his brain and stopping blood flow. I could see redness above his ear and slight swelling and a telltale purple dot on his lip. It was really easy. Textbook. So while I was doing all this, I answered a question from the press about Tucker Carlson and his conspiratorial statements against the vaccine, because I thought he needed to be…he needs to be taken off the air and deplatformed. Censored. He’s a very dangerous man. He has no right to ask these leading questions about the vaccine which, like, all the experts know, is effective and safe.”

CNN has also learned that, as the President was recovering in the White House residence, and a new communication/navigation device was being placed in his elbow, the president’s surgeon, Randall K Cutt, was awarding Chelsea a special certificate for her service. The award permits her to perform operations in area hospitals when COVID-patient overloads leave wards short-staffed.

Cutt told Carl Potato, “This woman is a natural-born healer. She intuitively knows what the rest of us study for years to attain. I would gladly work alongside her performing a heart bypass or a blood clot removal…”

When informed of Clinton’s feat in the Rose Garden, Tucker Carlson said, “This changes everything. I had no idea Chelsea was so talented. I’m going to revisit my understanding of the First Amendment and free speech. It may turn out that silent obedience is what our Forefathers intended. If so, I’ll be downgrading my show to Public Access.”

When reached for comment, Anthony Fauci said, “I certainly applaud Chelsea’s work in the Rose Garden. I hope, as she was saving the President, she was wearing a mask. Maybe two or three. Brain swelling plus SARS-CoV-2 can induce pregnancy in some males…”

Reached at his bunker in Florida, Donald Trump responded, “Warp Speed, Warp Speed, I did it, Fauci wanted to wait, all the big vaccine companies are terrific, the shot in the arm makes America great, I take a booster every week…”

The day after his brain surgery, President Biden told his immediate staff, “I had doubts about Chelsea when she stuck that pin in my ear, but now I’m thinking I want to appoint her Vaccine Czar. The young lady knows injections. They have to be delivered gently. Too many people are stabbing other people. Vaccination isn’t an organization, it’s an idea. You need intellectuals to handle it.”

Chelsea’s press aide informed CNN she was resting after the double effort of saving the President and employing Aristotelian logic to defeat Tucker Carlson, after which she’ll be traveling to a seltzer factory in Ohio to measure CO2 levels, prior to her speech before the United Nations on her climate proposal to reduce oxygen levels in major US cities.

Next week, The New England Journal of Medicine will publish her new study, “Utilizing Gene Replacement to Reduce Whiteness in Hetero-Identifying Women under the Age of 30: Preliminary Results from Albino Mice.”

Celebrating the 25th anniversary of the transfer of missile-guidance technology from the US to China, under her father’s guidance, Chelsea has announced a deal with Northwest Dragon Fashion Limited, a subsidiary of the People’s Republic of China, to produce a line of red surgical scrubs emblazoned with the tag line, “Nuke SARS-CoV-2 with the vaccine today.”

Connect with Jon Rappoport

Latest VAERS Data Show Reports of Blood Clotting Disorders After All Three Emergency Use Authorization Vaccines

VAERS data released today showed 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders with 400 attributed to Pfizer, 337 to Moderna and 56 to Johnson & Johnson between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 8, 2021.

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
April 16, 2021

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the number of injuries and deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccines revealed reports of blood clots and other related blood disorders associated with all three vaccines approved for Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S. — Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J). So far, only the J&J vaccine has been paused because of blood clot concerns.

VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received through a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Today’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 8, a total of 68,347 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 2,602 deaths — an increase of 260 over the previous week — and 8,285 serious injuries, up 314 since last week.

Of the 2,602 deaths reported as of April 8, 27% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 19% occurred within 24 hours and 41% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 174.9 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of April 8. This includes 79.6 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 90.3 million doses of Pfizer and 4.9 million doses of the J&J COVID vaccine.

This week’s VAERS data show:

• 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
• 55% of those who died were male, 43% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
• The average age of those who died was 77 and the youngest death was an 18-year-old. There are a few reported deaths in children under 18, but these reports contained errors.
• As of April 8, 408 pregnant women had reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 114 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
• Of the 678 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 59% of cases were reported after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations, 38% following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine and 24 cases (4%) of Bell’s Palsy were reported with J&J.
• There were 77 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome with 55% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 40% to Moderna and 10% to J&J.
• There were 20,021 reports of anaphylaxis with 47% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 46% to Moderna and 7% to J&J.

Reports of blood clotting disorders in VAERS

Children’s Health Defense queried the VAERS data for a series of adverse events associated with the formation of clotting disorders and other related conditions. VAERS yielded a total of 795 reports for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through April 8.

Of the 795 cases reported, there were 400 reports attributed to Pfizer, 337 reports with Moderna and 56 reports with J&J — far more than the eight J&J cases under investigation, including the two additional cases added Wednesday.

As The Defender reported today, although the J&J and AstraZeneca COVID vaccines have been under the microscope for their potential to cause blood clots, mounting evidence suggests the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines also cause clots and related blood disorders. U.S. regulatory officials were alerted to the problem as far back as December 2020.

CDC ignores The Defender, no response after 39 days 

According to the CDC’s website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”

On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We requested information about how the CDC conducts investigations into reported deaths, the status of ongoing investigations reported in the media, if autopsies are being done, the standard for determining whether an injury is causally connected to a vaccine, and education initiatives to encourage and facilitate proper and accurate reporting.

After many attempts to get a response from the CDC, 22 days after our initial outreach a representative from the CDC’s Vaccine Task Force responded, saying the agency had never received our questions — even though the employees we talked to several times said their press officers were working through the questions we sent.

We provided the questions again and set a new deadline of April 7. We’ve reached out multiple times since, but the representative has not answered our emails or returned our calls.

On April 15 we called the CDC’s general media line again and were told they had our list of questions and were unsure why the representative told us she never received them. We were told the COVID response team would be informed and that we should follow up in a few days.

It has been 39 days since we first reached out and have yet to receive answers to our questions.

Johnson & Johnson paused over reports of blood clot

On April 15, The Defender reported that a healthy 43-year old man in Mississippi suffered a stroke hours after being vaccinated with J&J’s COVID vaccine. Brad Malagarie, father of seven, had received the vaccine a little after Noon and was found unresponsive by co-workers at his desk.

Also on April 15, the  Cincinnati Enquirer reported that the Ohio Department of Health is monitoring the investigation into what may have caused a 21-year-old University of Cincinnati student to die suddenly last Sunday, about a day after he received the J&J vaccine.

Alicia Shoults, a spokeswoman for the state health department, said the agency is waiting for the completion of a Hamilton County coroner’s report, and “if necessary,” further guidance from the CDC.

The two news stories came just days after federal health officials paused the J&J vaccine.

As The Defender reported April 13, the CDC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) called for a temporary but immediate halt to the use of J&J’s COVID vaccine while the agencies investigated the vaccine’s possible link to potentially dangerous blood clots.

In a joint statement, the agencies said the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was reviewing clinical data gathered on six women, one who died, between the ages of 18 and 48 years who developed blood clots after receiving the single-dose J&J vaccine.

On April 14, the ACIP held an emergency meeting to vote on whether to lift the pause on J&J’s vaccine or change recommendations for its use. As The Defender reported, the ACIP postponed the vote, extending the pause pending further analysis of data relating to blood clots. The ACIP said it would reconvene for a vote in one week to 10 days.

That same day, J&J revealed two more cases of blood clots — one that occurred in a 25-year-old man who suffered a cerebral hemorrhage during a clinical trial and another case of deep-vein-thrombosis in a 59-year-old woman.

In its review of J&J’s submission for Emergency Use Authorization in February, the FDA initially urged further surveillance of a slight “numerical imbalance” in blood clotting events after receiving the shot. At the time, it was concluded there was “insufficient” data to determine “a causal relationship” with the vaccine and the drugmaker resumed the trial.

As The Defender reported April 12, the rollout of J&J’s COVID vaccine has not been smooth. At the beginning of the month the vaccine maker had to throw out 15 million doses of its vaccine after they were contaminated with AstraZeneca vaccine ingredients at an unapproved manufacturing plant in Baltimore.

The vaccine maker also has been plagued with shutdowns of its vaccine sites prior to the vaccine being paused, multiple reports of COVID breakthrough cases and criticism over its CEO’s $30 million pay package while the company pays out billions for its role in the opioid epidemic.

CDC, multiple states report ‘breakthrough’ COVID cases among fully vaccinated

Cases of fully vaccinated people getting COVID, referred to as “breakthrough” cases, continue to make news.

Calling it a “really good scenario,” the CDC yesterday reported 5,800 cases of COVID in fully vaccinated people. Of the 5,800 cases, 396 required hospitalization and 74 people died, the CDC said.

The CDC said it was “keeping a close eye” on the cases, but that breakthrough cases are to be expected. Tara Smith, a professor of epidemiology at the Kent State University College of Public Health in Ohio, told NBC News:

“This is a really good scenario, even with almost 6,000 breakthrough infections. Most of those have been mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic. That’s exactly what we were hoping for.”

On April 12, the Houston Health Department reported 142 breakthrough cases of COVID that occurred in fully vaccinated people since January, according to ABC 13 News. Vaccine recipients received either two doses of Moderna or Pfizer, or one dose of J&J. The report ruled out those who were said to have contracted the virus 45 days before their second scheduled shot date.

Houston Health Department said there were 2.46 positive cases out of every 10,000 fully-vaccinated people and it was unclear if those who tested positive contracted the original strand of COVID or a newer variant.

Last month, The Defender reported on breakthrough cases in Washington, Florida, South Carolina, Texas, New York, California and Minnesota. On April 6, The Defender reported on 246 breakthrough cases in Michigan, which included three people who died.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

© April 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 Connect with Children’s Health Defense

UK’s Office of National Statistics Admits (Without Explanation) the Number of Deaths Were About 30% Too High, Hospitalizations About 50% Too High

by Meryl Nass, ND
April 13, 2021

It is the darnedest thing.  The UK government flat out admits it has been lying to the public, but in such a bland manner that it is not at all clear why the official government numbers suddenly shifted.  And they didn’t shift a little.  Covid hospitalizations declined by 50%.

The way this is being presented is like something out of “1984.”  Yesterday we were at war with Oceana.  Today we are war with EastAsia.  Nothing changed. The reporters never ask, “Why?”

From the Telegraph:

Covid deaths in England and Wales

Daily death figures by “date of death” reveal that Britain has had no more than 28 deaths a day since the beginning of April, even though the government-announced deaths have been as high as 60…

Likewise, Oxford University has calculated that the number of people in hospital with an active Covid infection is likely to be around half the current published daily figure. Tuesday’s official figure showed there were 2,537 Covid patients in hospital, with 230 new admissions.

However, despite the positive statistics, Boris Johnson issued a warning over the lifting of lockdown as he said it was the restrictions, not the vaccine rollout, that had predominantly kept Covid numbers low…

Connect with Dr. Meryl Nass

What Does a Virologist Know About SARS-COV2 as of March 21, 2021?

by Dr. Tom Cowan
March 30, 2021

A virus is a particle wrapped in a protein coating containing genetic material, either RNA or DNA.   A virus is considered to be a physical thing.

How do virologists find a new virus, in this case, SARS-CoV-2?

Lay people and most medical providers assume virologists take fluid samples from the nose or lungs of many sick people with the same symptoms and examine them under a powerful microscope. They assume that the virologists actually see a virus that they’ve never seen before in these samples.

How do they know that virus causes the disease in question, in this case, Covid-19?

Most people — again, including medical providers — would assume that virologists prove causation by exposing nothing but the pure virus to healthy animals in the normal way that viruses supposedly spread.

In fact, here’s what they do, and here’s what they did again with SARS-CoV-2. Virologists took bronchoscopy-guided lung samples (BAL fluid) from people with pneumonia from an unknown cause.  They “washed” and filtered this fluid to remove large cellular debris, fungus and bacteria. Here’s where people’s assumptions of what happens and what actually happens diverge: They never examined this fluid under an electron microscope (the only type that can visualize something as small as a virus). In fact, virologists always skip examining this fluid under a microscope.

They then took this unpurified soluble fluid from the person with pneumonia of unknown origin and inoculated it onto tissue taken from an animal or human source. But first they added a variety of other fluids, including amniotic fluid, horse serum, bovine fetal serum, all of which are themselves rich sources of proteins and genetic material.  They do this because the “virus” they’re looking for won’t grow otherwise. In addition, the nutrients supporting the growth of the tissue in the culture were withdrawn. In other words, the tissue was starved.  Antibiotics, such as gentamicin and amphotericin, were added to the culture, both of which are known to be toxic to kidney tissue.

They then measured the ability of this unpurified mixture to lyse (or kill) the animal or human tissue in the culture. To date, the only tissue that was killed (called a cytopathic effect) came from Vero cells, which are taken from monkey kidneys. When the cultures contained only human or other animal-sourced tissues, little to no cytopathic effects were seen.¹

The Vero cell culture did, indeed, break down into millions of different sized and shaped particles.  The virologists took an electron-microscope picture of it, saw particles they said were budding out from the Vero cells, and they called those particles isolated SARS-Cov-2.

How do they know those particles in the culture are the culprits?

Here’s the problem: In reality, no accepted scientific protocol can distinguish a particle that emerges as a result of the breakdown of Vero cells or the other sources of genetic material added to the culture from a “virus” coming from the outside.² 

It gets worse. As of today, no particle with the characteristics or appearance of SAR-CoV-2 (as seen in electron micrographs) has been found in the results of this “culture” procedure, until a protein-digesting enzyme called trypsin is added to the mix.³ This enzyme digests the outer protein coating of these particles, resulting in the characteristic “spike” protein appearance of the alleged SARS-CoV-2.

The next step for virologists is to do a genetic analysis of the results of this “viral culture.”  Virologists have NOT and can NOT find any complete sequence in that culture that would represent the entire genome of any known virus.  Rather, the genome sequencing is performed inside a computer, which is called in silico genome.

In this culture, they find billions of various sized pieces of genetic material. They chop these pieces into smaller bits, and some are discarded if they are alleged to originate from human or other microbial origin. These small sequences are “aligned” inside the computer, meaning, they are reconstructed into a long genome that would be the size of a coronavirus genome, which has been previously published.⁴

In other words, a complete genome is sequenced based on the template of other such in silico genomes, thereby guaranteeing that the computer will “find” SARS-CoV-2 in this new sample.  Inevitably, there is some divergence in the new genome sequence as compared to the template. This is called a variant.  At no time has the virologist found the complete sequence of either of SARS-CoV-2 or the variant in the BAL fluid. It exists only in the computer.

The only reasonable conclusion that anyone examining this process would come to is that no evidence exists that a real particle in the real world that causes what they’re calling Covid-19 has been found.

Sources:

1 Wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

2  Gianessi, et al Viruses 2020 May; 12(5): 571. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV, and SARS Viruses

3 Caly et al, Med J Aust 2020, June; 212 (10) p. 459-462 PMID 3223727. Isolation and Rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with Covid-19 in Australia.

4  Ibid

Connect with Dr. Tom Cowan

Lawsuit Filed in France — Against the State, Prime Minister & Minister of Health — Challenging the Emergency Health Law

Lawsuit Against the Emergency Health Law (France)

by Children’s Health Defense Europe
March 29, 2021

On March 8, 2021, Me de Araujo-Recchia filed an interim summons before the president of the Paris judicial court against the health emergency law. This complaint was filed at the request of three associations and 1360 individuals against the State, Prime Minister Jean Castex and Minister of Health Olivier Véran. We reproduce the following elements for our readers. In conclusion, she states that:

For all of the reasons explained, we affirm that the Prime Minister and the Minister responsible for health have therefore clearly carried out the forced execution of administrative decisions in irregular conditions, thus clearly undermining freedom of the individual applicants.
In addition, given that the qualification of health disaster has absolutely not been demonstrated or justified by the executive power, common law applies.
These measures prohibiting leaving the home without health justification qualify in reality as house arrest measures, to use the terms commonly applicable in criminal law, because it is not something else.
These measures prohibiting leaving the home / house arrest have been taken against the entire population, in a general, arbitrary and indiscriminate manner, whereas the Constitution and international treaties require that they be taken into account the actions of individuals and recourse to the judicial judge.
Indeed, no administrative authority can decide to deprive the entire population of individual liberty on the sole basis of:

• computerized data, corresponding to a number of unreliable positive RT-PCR tests performed by laboratories, which cannot diagnose infection or disease.
• a doubtful and imprecise number of deaths since it is impossible today to know the exact number of people who died from the disease Covid-19 and not “with the Covid-19” (according to the results of tests once again unreliable).

The constitutional bloc and the conventional bloc have never given such power to administrative authorities.
These assaults clearly affected the individual liberty of the applicants and thereby their dignity and the physical, mental and moral integrity of each individual.
We therefore ask for the immediate cessation of these measures which violate individual liberty and we ask for reparation.

Originally published by France Soir

©March 2021, Children’s Health Defense Europe, A.S.B.L.. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, A.S.B.L.. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense Europe? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Senta Depuydt and the Children’s Health Defense Europe team. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Lockdown One Year On – It Doesn’t Work, It Never Worked & It Wasn’t Supposed to Work

Light up the lone candle on the saddest birthday cake in the world! The most destructive public policy of the century is growing up and doesn’t look like slowing down.

by Kit Knightly, OffGuardian
March 23, 2021

And so we come to March 23rd, and lockdown’s first birthday. Or, as we call it here, the longest two weeks in history.

1 year. 12 calendar months. 365 increasingly gruelling days.

It’s a long time since “2 weeks to flatten the curve”, became an obvious lie. Sometime in July it turned into a sick joke. The curve was flattened, the NHS protected and the clapping was hearty and meaningful.

…and none of it made any difference.

This was not a sacrifice for the “greater good”. It was not a hard decision with arguments on both sides. It was not a risk-benefit scenario. The “risks” were in fact certainties, and the “benefits” entirely fictional.

Because Lockdowns don’t work. It’s really important to remember that.

Even if you subscribe to the belief that “Sars-Cov-2” is a unique discrete entity (which is far from proven), or that it is incredibly dangerous (which is demonstrably untrue), the lockdown has not worked to, in any way, limit this supposed threat.

Lockdowns. Don’t. Work.

They don’t make any difference, the curves don’t flatten and the R0 number doesn’t drop and the lives aren’t saved (quite the opposite, as we’ve all seen).

Just look at the graphs.

This one, comparing “Covid deaths” in the UK (lockdown) and Sweden (no lockdown):

Or this one, comparing “Covid deaths” in California (lockdown) and Florida (no lockdown):

From Belarus to Sweden to Florida to Nicaragua to Tanzania, the evidence is clear. “Covid”, whatever that means in real terms, is not impacted by lockdowns.

Putting the entire population under house arrest doesn’t benefit public health. In fact, it’s (rather predictably) incredibly counter-productive.

The damage done by shuttering businesses, limiting access to healthcare, postponing treatments and diagnoses, postponed surgeries, increasing depression, soaring unemployment and mass poverty has been discussed to death. The scale of the impact cannot be overstated.

Dr David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy for Covid-19, said this of lockdowns back in October:

We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of the virus[…]just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry…look what’s happening to small-holding farmers[…]it seems we may have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe.”

A terrible, global catastrophe. A doubling of childhood malnutrition.

The “pandemic” didn’t do that, lockdowns did that. They were never going to achieve their stated aims. And what’s more, they were never intended to achieve those aims.

Too often soft language in the media talks about “misjudgments” or “mistakes” or “incompetence”. Supposed critics claim the government “panicked” or “over-reacted”. That is nonsense. The easiest, cheesiest excuse that has ever existed.

“Whoops”, they say, with an emphatic shrug and shit-eating grin “I guess we done messed up!”. Unflattering, but better than the truth.

Because the truth is that the government isn’t mistaken or scared or stupid…they are malign. And dishonest. And cruel.

All the suffering of lockdown was entirely predictable and deliberately imposed. For reasons that have nothing to do with helping people and everything to do controlling them.

It’s been more than apparent for most of the last fifty-two weeks that the agenda of lockdown was not public health, but laying the groundwork for the “new normal” and “the great reset”.

A series of programmes designed to completely undercut civil liberties all across the world, reversing decades (if not centuries) of social progress. A re-feudalisation of society, with the 99% cheerfully taking up their peasant smocks “to protect the vulnerable”, whilst the elite proselytise about the worth of rules they happily admit do not apply to them.

And we’ve all had lives ruined and a year of precious time wasted. For nothing. You’ve been locked up for two weeks that lasted 365 days. For nothing.

…or rather, for everything. Because that’s what they are trying to take from us. Everything. And the only way to stop them is not to let them. To simply refuse consent.

Let’s not let lockdown get a second birthday.

Lawsuit against Trudeau Government: Constitutional Lawyer Rocco Galati and the Lies and Crimes of the COVID Operation

by Rocco Galati and Mark Taliano
March 22, 2021

Celebrated Canadian Constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati characterizes the COVID Operation as “the biggest example of misinformation and lies on a global scale that we’ve seen.”

The Constitutional challenge that he is filing with the Ontario Superior Court seeks to pull back the shroud of secrecy imposed by the Trudeau and Ford governments which, he says, are currently and have been “ruling by decree” beneath the pretexts of “COVID Measures” and “Emergency Measures”.

Specifically, he is seeking “declatory and injunctive” relief against COVID measures. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) is also named as a defendant since it is publicly funded with a public mandate under the Broadcast Act and has a “duty of care.”

Both Prime Minister Trudeau and Premier Ford refuse to divulge the substance and source of their “medical advice”, and the media, including the CBC, are guilty of extraordinary censorship.

Whereas mayors in North America have proudly met with Bill Gates for advice, he has obvious conflicts of interest, and he is neither a doctor nor an expert.

Ontario’s world-renowned Sick Kid’s Hospital, on the other hand, is well qualified to weigh in on these matters. In a recent peer-reviewed study conducted by two expert virologists, aided by twenty experts, the hospital has advised against social distancing and masking, (1) saying that social distancing and masking import drastic psychological harm on children.

Galati reminds us of the impacts of societies’ fascistic reactions to COVID.

• State diktats have assisted in premature deaths of people in Long Term Care Facilities.
• 170,000 scheduled surgeries (including heart and cancer surgeries) in Canada were postponed,
• suicides have spiked,

The Guardian reported that in the month of April 2020 alone, there were 10,000 extra dementia patient deaths in England and Wales. (2) The World Food Bank notes that 130 million additional people will be on the brink of starvation due to COVID measures (already one child starves to death every 29 seconds on planet earth).

Galati explains how all of the COVID statistics have been manipulated, saying, for example, that if the primary cause of death is cancer, but COVID is evident or presumed, then the Cause of Death is listed (falsely) as COVID.

The government’s reactions to COVID amount to “state crimes”. Galati’s lawsuit should be a strong step in freeing ourselves from these destructive globalist tentacles.

Rocco Galati is a Toronto-based Constitutional Lawyer. Connect with Rocco Galati at Constitutional Rights Centre.

Mark Taliano is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) and the author of Voices from Syria, Global Research Publishers, 2017.  Connect with Mark Italiano. 

Notes

(1) John C.A. Manley, “Toronto Children’s Hospital Recommends Back to School without Masks or Social Distancing. Detailed Report.” Global Research, 21 July, 2020.
(https://www.globalresearch.ca/back-school-without-masks-social-distancing-advises-sickkids-hospital/5719018) Accessed 22 July, 2020.

(2) The Guardian, “Extra 10,000 dementia deaths in England and Wales in April.” 5 June, 2020.
(https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/05/covid-19-causing-10000-dementia-deaths-beyond-infections-research-says) Accessed 22 July, 2020.

Connect with Vaccine Choice Canada

Why I’ve Come to Suspect That Covid-19 Doesn’t Even Exist

by Richie Allen
March 22, 2021

Until recently I believed that I may have had covid-19. Shortly after Christmas 2019 I became very ill. I spent the first three weeks of January 2020 in bed. I thought I was a goner. My GP was bewildered. He knew my lungs weren’t getting oxygen, but hadn’t a clue as to why.

There was no mucus on my chest and no fluid on my lungs, but I was turning blue. Steroids made little difference. Sitting up in bed alongside Caroline one night when it was really bad, I told her I was sorry and to take care of herself.

I came out of it. I still don’t know how. There’s a video of me on The Richie Allen Show Facebook page. I recorded it to explain my absence. I can’t watch it. I look like a corpse. I dropped nearly a stone and a half (20 lbs) and haven’t managed to put it back on.

Then Covid. Then lockdown. I wondered. Maybe I had it. I eventually satisfied myself that I must have had it. What else could it have been? I’ve had pneumonia in my lifetime and some very severe chest infections. Antibiotics and physiotherapy got me out of those jams.

This felt different. It wasn’t worse than pneumonia, it just felt like there was nothing that could relieve it. Like I said, fortunately I pulled through. I never smoked and I am very fit. I put it down to that.

Now though, I am not so sure that I had covid-19 or that it even exists. I’m saying I am not sure. I’m no expert. There’s a reason they call these opinion pieces.

The thing that bugs me most is the disappearance of the flu. I can’t get my head round that one. Governments all over the world have told the same story this Winter. Flu has been eradicated.

Public Health England (PHE) announced last month that not a single case of flu had been found in the UK in January/February 2021. PHE analyses thousands of swab samples every week for the prevalence of different respiratory viruses in the population.

685,243 samples were analysed over a seven week period from the second week in January. Guess what? There wasn’t a single case of the flu, or so they claimed. I don’t believe them. Asked to account for that, they said it was down to coronavirus restrictions.

I don’t believe that either. That’s a little too convenient. Flu has been eradicated because we worked from home, socially distanced and wore masks? No way. If they’d claimed to have found 500 flu cases, or 1000, I might have believed them. They found none. Something is up. Maybe flu is being diagnosed as covid-19. Maybe.

Writing in The Daily Mail today, NHS Consultant Pathologist Dr. John Lee challenged the UK’s covid death count. Lee writes:

“Some point to the Covid death toll, now over 125,000 in Britain, which is almost double the number of British civilians who died in the Second World War.

But we should remember that this represents two winter peaks (a time of year when it is not unusual for tens of thousands of Britons to die from respiratory diseases).

And that some of the total is due to the manner in which we record Covid deaths: there is a big difference between dying directly from Covid, and dying after testing positive for Covid within the last 28 days, where other illnesses may well be responsible.

Notably, we have never recorded respiratory deaths this way before.”

I’ve highlighted the points germane to my argument. Respiratory illnesses carry off thousands of our most vulnerable each and every Winter. But we are told that the only respiratory killer in town at the moment is coronavirus. That’s surely impossible?

Why did the government and Public Health England adopt a brand new method for recording covid deaths? As Lee says, there’s a very important distinction between dying of something and dying four weeks after testing positive for something. It’s tantamount to anti-science.

I’ve eliminated all the obvious possibilities as to the reason for making such a change in the method of recording deaths. I have concluded that the change was made to drive up the numbers. There can be no other explanation. It’s classic Occam’s razor.

Now why would anyone want to make it look like far more people are dying from an illness than actually are? There aren’t too many possibilities here. Someone is working to an agenda.

Maybe that agenda is to convince the public that they are in the midst of a deadly pandemic and therefore must accept radical changes to their lives, sacrifice their livelihoods and take experimental medicines? Sound far fetched? I would have thought so once upon a time.

Throughout most of 2020, people were diagnosed as having coronavirus, after having a PCR test. The test is redundant. The man who invented it, Dr. Kary B. Mullis, said it wasn’t made to detect any type of infectious disease.

A Portuguese Court ruled late last year that the PCR test is “unable to determine, beyond reasonable doubt, that a positive result corresponds to the infection of a person by the SARS-cov-2 virus.” The UK media ignored this.

Has SARS-cov-2 been isolated then? Does it even exist? Is the PCR test picking up fragments of other viruses in people, which testers are then labelling covid-19? The answer is yes and remember, this has been happening since day one.

I don’t know for sure that covid-19 doesn’t exist, but weighing up everything I know now, I must concede that it is a possibility. The question is, does it matter at this point?

Millions have already had the experimental “vaccines.” The damage done to children is immeasurable. The totalitarian tiptoe has become the totalitarian stampede. Vaccine passports are here. Social crediting is on the horizon. It hardly matters now, whether covid-19 is real or just the flu rebranded.

Connect with Richie Allen

The Crumbling Public Health PSYOP

by Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
March 16, 2021

The RAND corporation defines psychological warfare as involving the planned use of propaganda and other psychological operations, or PSYOPs, to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of opposition groups.

Meanwhile, Goarmy.gov defines individuals PSYOP operators as “Experts in their field, they specialize in unconventional capabilities, cultural expertise, language proficiency, military deception and advanced communications techniques encompassing all forms of media.”

From health officials to governments and corporate media outlets to social influencers, the general public has been the target of a sustained PSYOP in the guise of public health over the past year. Public heath officials have used the Covid-19 pandemic as a justification to green light several aspects of psychological warfare upon the public.

In the UK, it’s openly admitted that the secretive British Army unit’s 77th Brigade and Specialist Group Military Intelligence, once used against foreign enemy combatants, is now targeting its own public domestically in an aggressive more to shape public thought and neutralize independent voices.

Several aspects of the coronavirus response used by public health officials could be categorized as myopic, ham-fisted and shortsighted. For example, sustained global lockdowns of all society, never been done before for more destructive viruses and disease, should never have happened. The science was, and still is clear. The data now proves it and history warned against it.

A study published in Nature, one of many scientific examples of the failed lockdown strategies, found that staying at home did not play a dominant role in reducing COVID-19 transmission. The researchers  concluded “…using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.”

In short, the lockdowns have failed. Many governors are racing to reopen their states. Leaders are also hoping that regranting freedoms to their populace will erase any memory that they were the same people who put them in the social and economic chokehold in the first place. An overly aggressive, pointless move which suffocated their life, liberty and livelihoods for the past year while ignoring pleas and protests to stop.

As the lockdowns were being pushed as viable options by public health experts, countless global voices expressed widespread disagreement and caution to no avail.

The Great Barrington Declaration, with over 55,000 signatures from public health scientists and medical practitioners, stands as a testament and unheeded warning against widespread lockdowns – despite attempts by the media to vilify its scientific points and a push by Big Tech social media to censor its continued presence.

The public voice and scientific warnings of former Trump-administration Covid task force senior advisor Dr. Scott Atlas was targeted for social elimination. He questioned both the lockdowns and keeping kids out of school during his short tenure.

At the time, coordinated media attacks working in lockstep with focused social media censorship were able to manufacture a false consensus painting Dr. Atlas as promoting “dangerous falsehoods and behaviors and showing “disdain for established medical knowledge.” Nothing could have been further from the truth.

In the fast-moving flow of Covid information warfare, the astroturf campaign worked, even if only for a short period of time. Unfortunately for society, Atlas’s warnings based on readily available science have been continually proven right. In a recent piece, Atlas writes:

“…despite all efforts, there was an undeniable failure to stop cases from rapidly escalating and prevent hospitalizations and death.”

“All legitimate policy scholars should, today, be openly reexamining policies that severely harmed America’s families and children, while failing to save the elderly.”

What does the public have to show for allowing sustained lockdowns? Widespread harms and unnecessary deaths from missed hospital care for a myriad of critical health emergencies such as strokes, heart attacks, organ transplant surgeries and other vital issues.

Skyrocketing domestic and child abuse, a four-fold increases in depression, three-fold increases in anxiety symptoms and a doubling of suicidal ideation, particularly among young adults – college age – after the first few months of lockdowns. With an overall increase in drug overdoses and suicides.

Widespread unemployment leading to an additional 890,000 U.S. deaths over the next 15 years disproportionately affecting minorities and women.

If the devil is real, he would have been a big fan of the lockdowns.

Now society has entered an interesting junction. The PSYOP crowd is still operating. Moving away from hard-driving the lockdown messaging and into vaccine (mis)information. There’s a current window that allows for clarity to see the psychological warfare in action.

The golden ticket to reenter society and enjoy ‘normal’ again was supposed to be vaccine compliance and its accompanying electronic surveillance and tracking system to ensure it. That isn’t up and running yet.

The ‘Green Pass/Freedom Certificate’ narrative has fallen behind and is still being marketed with consent working to be manufactured in the media. There’s a bigger problem. The shots are still experimental under emergency use. In other words, despite how Fauci tried to spin it recently, they are not approved by the FDA.

People are asking too many inconvenient questions. Can it stop transmission? Can it stop infection? What about long-term safety? Can I sue the manufacturer if I get injured? If it works so well, why are boosters already being made?

In addition, the PSYOP crowd has been working nonstop, 24/7, day and night to explain away a laundry list of and illnesses and even deaths occurring shortly after the vaccine as mere coincidence. Their op has had little success with continually diminishing returns as time goes on. Especially as much of the data shows climbing peaks of severe illness and mortality following vaccine campaigns.

More stumbling blocks were added as Astrazenca’s shot has been shelved due to safety concerns by the following countries and counting daily:  Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Denmark, Ireland, Thailand, the Netherlands, Norway, Iceland, Congo, Bulgaria, Canada.

PSYOP public health officials are now trying to make two ends, drifting further away by the moment, meet. Masks are coming off, main street’s  are opening in states across America and summer is right around the corner.

The data, science and public distaste will not allow another large-scale lockdown to occur. In short, the incentives to get vaccinated is waning…fast. The op was laid bare by Washington Post opinion columnist Leana Wen, M.D. in her recent interview

Wen is a doctor and we are supposed to respect her expertise. But how educated and informed is she when one can simply look at any one of several ethics codes and doctrines from around the world and see that they all universally agree individuals should never be forced or coerced into an experimental medical produce without choice and informed consent?

When looking at the evidence of continued failure and extreme efforts of deception (and often violence) utilized, one must ask to what ends and to whose advantage are the public health PSYOP and its operators working towards?

Covid Vaccines: Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Describes the Many Mechanisms of Injury 

“This is a very well-designed killing machine.”

“They know exactly what they’re doing.”

The Top 10 Ways the Shot Will Affect You, Reinette Senum Interviews Dr Sherri Tenpenny 

by Reinette Senum, Reinette Senum’s Chew on This
March 12, 2021



Dr. Sherri Tenpenny gives step by step explanations of the Covid inoculations– what most medical professionals, and public health department directors either don’t know, or aren’t telling you.

Dr, Tenpenny breaks down the different inoculations, including the most recent Johnson & Johnson release, will do to unwitting individuals.

This interview is a staggering revelation of what the world’s largest biological experiment will do to the planet’s human population.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Connect with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny at Vaxxter

Connect with Reinette Senum at The Foghorn Express

Tanzania – The Second Covid Coup?

President John Magufuli’s disappearance makes him potentially the 2nd “Covid denier” head of state to lose power. 

by Kit Knightly, OffGuardian
March 12, 2021

John Magufuli, President of Tanzania, has disappeared. He’s not been seen in public for several weeks, and speculation is building as to where he might be.

The opposition has, at various times, accused the President of being hospitalised with “Covid19”, either in Kenya or India, although there remains no evidence this is the case.

To add some context, John Magufuli is one of the “Covid denier” heads of state from Africa.

He famously had his office submit five unlabelled samples for testing – goat, motor oil, papaya, quail and jackfruit – and when four came back positive and one “inconclusive”, he banned the testing kits and called for an investigation into their origin and manufacture.

In the past, he has also questioned the safety and efficacy of the supposed “covid vaccines”, and has not permitted their use in Tanzania.

In the Western press Magufuli has been portrayed as “anti-science” and “populist”, but it is not fair to suggest that the health of the people of Tanzania is a low priority for the President. In fact it’s quite the opposite.

After winning his first election in 2015 he slashed government salaries (including his own) in order to increase funding for hospitals and buying AIDs medication. In 2015 he cancelled the Independence Day celebrations and used the money to launch an anti-Cholera campaign. Healthcare has been one of his administration’s top priorities, and Tanzanian life expectancy has increased every year while he has been in office.

The negative coverage of President Magufuli is a very recent phenomenon. Early in his Presidency he even received glowing write-ups from the Western press and Soros-backed think tanks, praising his reforms and calling him an “example” to other African nations.

All that changed when he spoke out about Covid being hoax.

When he was re-elected in October 2020 the standard Western accusations of “voter suppression” and “electoral fraud” appeared in the Western press which had previously reported his approval rating as high as 96%.

And the anti-Magufuli campaign increased momentum in the new year, with Mike “we lied, we cheated, we stole” Pompeo initiating sanctions against Tanzanian government officials as one of his final acts as Secretary of State. The sanctions were notionally due to “electoral irregularities”, but the obvious reality is that it’s due to Tanzania’s refusal to toe the Covid line.

Just last month, The Guardian, always the tip of the spear when it comes to “progressive” regime change ran an article headlined:

It’s time for Africa to rein in Tanzania’s anti-vaxxer president

The article makes no mention of goats, papaya and motor oil testing positive for the coronavirus, but does ask – in a very non-partisan, journalistic way:

What is wrong with President John Magufuli? Many people in and outside Tanzania are asking this question.”

Before going on to conclude:

Magufuli [is] fuelling anti-vaxxers as the pandemic and its new variants continue to play out. He needs to be challenged openly and directly. To look on indifferently exposes millions of people in Tanzania and across Africa’s great lakes region – as well as communities across the world – to this deadly and devastating virus.

The author doesn’t say exactly how Magufuli should be “challenged openly and directly”, but that’s not what these articles are for. They exist simply to paint the subject as a villain, and create a climate where “something must be done”. What that “something” is – and, indeed, whether or not it is legal – are none of the Guardian-reading public’s business, and most of them don’t really care.

Oh, by the by, the article is part of the Guardian’s “Global Development” section, which is sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Just so you know.

So, within two weeks of The Guardian publishing a Gates-sponsored article calling for something to be done about President Magufuli, he has disappeared, allegedly due to Covid. Funny how that works out.

Even if Magufuli miraculously survives his bout of “suspected Covid19”, the writing is on the wall for his political career. The Council on Foreign Relations published this article just yesterday, which goes to great lengths arguing that the President has lost all authority, and concludes:

a bold figure within the ruling party could capitalize on the current episode to begin to reverse course.”

It’s not hard to read the subtext there, if you can even call it “subtext” at all.

If we are about to see the sudden death and/or replacement of the President of Tanzania, he will not be the first African head of state to suffer such a fate in the age of Covid.

Last summer Pierre Nkurunziza, the President of Burundi, refused to play along with Covid and instructed the WHO delegation to leave his country…before dying suddenly of a “heart attack” or “suspected Covid19”. His successor immediately reversed every single one of his Covid policies, including inviting the WHO back to the country.

That was our first Covid coup, and it looks like Tanzania could well be next.

If I were the President of Turkmenistan or Belarus, I wouldn’t be making any longterm plans.

Cancer Concern for Maskers

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
March 9, 2021



Video available at The HighWire Bitchute and Brighteon channels.

Put aside the obvious concerns mask wearers face: reduced oxygen levels, anxiety disorders, and scientific lack of efficacy.

Since 2012, research has shown that inhaling nanofibers can pose a serious risk to inflammation in the lungs, even mesothelioma (cancer) due to its similar shape to asbestos.

Jefferey Jaxen highlights a recent study showing the potential threat to inhaling nano plastics shed from masks.

UK Lawyers for Liberty Will Send Letter to Your Child’s School Challenging Mask & Vaccine Mandates (at No Charge)

by Lawyers for Liberty
sourced from DavidIcke.com
March 8, 2021

Although the UK Government only recommends face masks and testing in schools, many Heads have opted to make these mandatory. If your child’s school has a mandatory mask and/or testing policy and you are concerned, we can help.

You can request a letter to be sent to your child’s school from Lawyers for Liberty, completely free of charge and also completely anonymously on your part.

This letter will register a complaint about the school’s mask and/or testing policy, and will also inform the school’s Head of the potential risks and legal liabilities of their regime.

The letter will be sent from Lawyers for Liberty anonymously – please be assured that it will not mention you or your child by name.

This is the template letter we will be sending.

Request a letter from Lawyers for Liberty to your child’s school

Dr. David Martin w/ Hilda Labrada Gore: On Our Real State of Emergency — Medical Tyranny & the War Against Humanity

A Different Take On Our State Of Emergency

by Hilda Labrada Gore,  The Weston A. Price Foundation
February 8, 2021

There is much frustration and confusion surrounding everything that’s happened in the past 12+ months, related to COVID-19. Lockdowns, shuttered businesses, curfews and more have left a lot of us scratching our heads… and asking important questions. Dr. David Martin, the Founder and Chairman of M-CAM Inc., is an author, public speaker, and innovator who has done a lot of research on our current state of affairs.

Today, David offers key facts that help us understand this state of emergency from a different perspective. He reveals how the CDC filed a patent application on SARS-CoV in the early 2000s and explains why this is important. He discusses evidence that indicates that SARS-CoV2 has been manipulated to limit freedom and compromise our health. He unpacks the legal and health contradictions of new COVID treatments like the mask and the vaccines. And he offers insights on what each of us can do to fight for health freedom.

Listen to the episode here:



Episode Transcript

Within the below transcript the bolded text is Hilda Labrada Gore and the regular text is Dr. David Martin.

There is much frustration and confusion surrounding everything that’s happened related to COVID-19. Lockdowns, shuttered businesses, curfews and more have left a lot of us scratching our heads and asking important questions. This is Episode 294 and our guest is Dr. David Martin. He is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc, an international leader in innovation, finance trade and asset finance. He is an author, a public speaker and a man who has done a lot of research on current events.

In this episode, David offers key facts that help us understand our state of emergency from a very different perspective. He reveals how the CDC filed a patent application on SARS-CoV in the early 2000s. He explains why this is important. He discusses the evidence that indicates that SARS-CoV-2 has been manipulated to limit freedom and compromise our health. He unpacks the legal and health contradictions of new COVID treatments like masks and vaccines, and he offers insights on what each of us can do to fight for health freedom.

Welcome to the show, David.

Thank you so much. It’s great to be here

You’re not a health guy, you’re a legal guy, right?

No, my training was in medicine. I was on the faculty of the University of Virginia Medical School, Radiology Orthopedic Surgery. I ran the FDA clinical trials program for the medical devices for UVA for a decade. I have a lot of backgrounds but I have a legal background as well, but my professor position was in the medical school at the University of Virginia.

What’s your take on what’s happening with the virus right now?

Let’s start with I don’t think something’s happening with the virus right now. I think this is a very significant criminal operation, which is an act of terrorism. I think that’s what this is. The reason why I think that is because I’ve been monitoring since 1999. In 1999, we noticed that for the first time, the United States officially started funding work to what effectively was amplified biological toxins. They used the Coronavirus model as a way to do that. From 1999 to 2002, there was an explicit program to figure out how to get the coronavirus, which historically has been a nuisance to humans but not a big problem. It’s been a big problem to animals.

In fact, the fundamental research for a decade before the ‘90s was in cardiac myopathy in rabbits, not in people. The guy who was leading this program under the funding of NIAID with Anthony Fauci had gotten money to amplify the pathogenicity of a part of Coronavirus. He made it more toxic. Not surprisingly, the places where he was researching and the places where he was collaborating are where the Coronavirus outbreak allegedly started with the SARS outbreak in 2002 going into 2003. I have always said, I find it interesting that the official story we’re supposed to believe is that somehow or another, this mysteriously came out of the blue and it happened to come out of the blue where biological weapons labs were also happening.

It’s amazing how nature backed into the, “There’s a weapons lab. Why don’t we go ahead and have an outbreak there?” The fact of the matter is we, as humans, manipulated Coronavirus and then we had SARS. Here’s the funny thing. After 2003, the problem was Coronavirus resolved itself. It went through the population, had an effect and it resolved itself. Rather than celebrating, “We survived this thing,” some people got sick, some people died, that’s a tragedy but it was not the pandemic everybody thought it was going to be.

We survived it without a vaccine.

No vaccine, no intervention at all and they seriously publicly lamented the fact that it wasn’t virulent enough. Starting in 2005, there was an active program with the DARPA and with NIAID to begin work on figuring out ways to amplify the pathogenicity of this biological substance. They specifically focused on two pieces. One was the S1 spike protein and one was the ACE2 receptor. The ACE2 receptor is important because it’s the thing that makes lung tissue sensitive to this. That was the mysterious piece because it didn’t used to be a lung problem. It used to be a vascular problem but they amplified the ACE2 receptor component and they amplified the S1 spike protein, which is a very toxic component.

Those two amplifications started being amplified and funded through NIAID in 2005. In 2012 going into 2013, when we had the MERS outbreak in the Middle East, the National Science Foundation, National Academy of Science, NIAID and others started going, “Maybe we’re doing something we shouldn’t be doing.” There was a question of the ethics and the morals of doing this Gain-of-Function research leading to the 2013, 2014 decision to stop Gain-of-Function research is what the public was told. What the public wasn’t told was the people who were involved in the BSL-4 defense labs were allowed to keep amplifying this viral pathogen.

Let me interrupt you to ask a question. What was the justification they were giving for amplifying this virus?

The cover story is this. Biological weapons could be developed by some rogue nation or by some bad actors. If that happened, we should be prepared to develop vaccines. That’s what we were told. As early as March of 2005, I wrote in a public briefing to law enforcement intelligence agencies that this was not a just in case problem. It was, in fact, a program that included the dispersion of explosive biological material, such that you could put toxins into rocket-propelled grenades. I don’t know about you, but when I hear that, it doesn’t sound like a public health program to me. I published this book in March of 2005.

It doesn’t sound defensive. It sounds offensive.

When people tell me, “It’s all in the interest of public health. It was all about making sure we were safe from potentially rogue actor states.” I’m sitting there going, “That smells like BS,” because it is. We have the evidence that in fact these programs were dual-use programs. These were programs that in fact did have a public health vaccine development treatment program. That’s true but they also had an offensive military application as well. We’re tracking all this stuff and we’ve been tracking it since 1999. Lo and behold, we started looking at the fact that coming into the spring of 2019.

This is nine months before they’re supposed to be a thing, we start seeing a lot of documents start showing up with the language about an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. If that came out in one document and we go, “Somebody was concerned about that,” when it starts showing up in a bunch of documents, it shows up in March 2019, it shows up again in May 2019, it shows up again in September 2019 in the World Health Organization Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Program, you start going, “Hold on a minute, we’re being told something’s happening.”

It’s like they were hinting somehow.

Except they are not very much hinting. They are going, “You keep saying an accidental or intentional release of respiratory pathogen.” We were not surprised when we expected to see something happen in Wuhan or in Italy or in North Carolina or in any of the places where we know the BSL labs were manipulating the Coronavirus. For me, the whole idea that this was somehow an accidental thing fails on its face because you can’t get an accident with premeditated planning and then have nature come along and go, “By the way, humans are talking about doing something. Why don’t I fly a bat over a wet food market in Wuhan and somehow make this mysteriously happen?” The amount of improbabilities to land an accident of nature in a place where you also have a biological weapons lab is zero.

What are the implications of something being done deliberately?

This is an act of war is what it is. It’s war in the new way we’re doing war because the new way we’re doing more is with financial, biologic, health and living standards and everything else. War in the old lineup the muskets and shoot people, it’s not how we’re doing war anymore. We’re doing war by depriving people of their liberty, of their livelihoods, of their access to medicine, the access to health, to life and to whatever they’re doing. That’s the new war.

Who is coming to war against us?

This is a massive transition between what used to be what I refer to as the Westphalian Nation-State Model, where it used to be you took the map and you drew lines on the map and you said, “That’s France. That’s Britain.” That era has come to an end quite a long time ago, probably around the time that Nixon took us off the gold standard. What’s happened is slowly corporations and corporate interests and financial interests have moved in as the thing that makes the difference. This is a war against the Westphalian Nation-State Model. It’s a coup of that model where corporations and financial interests have said, “We’re the ones that call the shots.”

Now we know that there are hosts of individuals who manipulate elections, who buy politicians and who buy everybody. We know that those organizations don’t officially have nation-states standing. When you know that a person like Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos or Anthony Fauci, never elected, never appointed, never anything that has a legal democratic process around it. When you have those people who show up on every head of state stage, whispering in the ear of every head of state and saying, “This is how you’re going to act,” that’s not they’re advising and giving their best input. They’re running the show.

What we’re experiencing right now is the most insidious form of what is effectively a civil war where the democratic nation-states are being erased by corporate interests and financial interests who have decided they are going to be taking the position that they’ve already paid for. They bought Congress and legislatures. They bought Governor’s offices all over the country. They’ve bought heads of state around the world and now they’re moving in and taking what they bought.

It’s not the sickness that’s the element of war as much as also the collapse of the economy and fear that is running rampant. I see these as tools as well.

This is more a financial crisis than a health crisis. Now we could both agree that our definition of health has been corrupted a long time ago. Health as a construct probably was hijacked somewhere around the 1770s when we started manipulating and this is Thomas Jefferson and others started manipulating pathogens to try to figure out how to control the epidemic-type and plague-type experiences. Whether it’s the poxes that came over from Europe, whether it’s the animal to human transfers that were a concern at the end of the 18th century, what happened was we decided that somehow or another chemistry was the basis of health. We stopped looking at the vitality like we’re standing out in the cold.

Our bodies have adapted for the cold. What has happened? Our blood supply is out of our faces. It’s going into our core because that’s how bodies were designed to deal with cold. That’s not a bad thing. That’s health. In fact, we would be unhealthy if that didn’t happen but that’s not a chemistry thing. That’s neurologic. That’s physiologic. That’s all kinds of systems engaged. The problem is you can’t meter those systems. You can’t dose those systems, which means you can’t monetize them. What happened was we started saying health was about things you could monetize because if I can dose you something, then I can charge you something. If your body is working, my body’s working, then nobody can make any money off it.

I’ve thought of that before. The hospitals only make money if they’re full of sick people.

By the way, all the nonsense about wellness and all this stuff that you hear about, that is a cover story. It’s a fraction of a fraction of a percent of what’s spent in what we call healthcare. Healthcare is about end-of-life extension. It’s not about living, it’s not about health. It’s about disease management. It’s not about living in health. I am 53 years old, almost 54 in 2021. I have the vitality that I had when I was in my twenties. Why? It’s because I care about my health and my vitality. How often do I go to a doctor? With the exception of trauma surgeries that I’ve had a couple of times where I’m very grateful that there were doctors, I just don’t go. Why? It’s because I’m not consuming a dependency on chemistry or consuming a dependency on a metered version of what health is.

I’m actually living health, which means I’m walking and I’m cycling and I’m doing yoga. I’m doing exercise. I’m eating well. I’m doing all the things I’m doing because that’s health. The problem is you can’t meter people like me. You can’t put a tax on me because I’m not getting a syringe every day for my diabetes. I’m not taking a pill every day for my other chronic disease and because of that, I’m not controllable. What we’re doing now in the guise of health is we’re saying, “If you don’t have something that needs metering, you’re not healthy and you’re going to have to get something that needs metering.”

This helps me understand the asymptomatic carrier BS, if you will. I’m like, “How can someone who has no symptoms be sick?” It’s like a mental game they’re playing on us.

If you think of women who get pap smears and they get an abnormal cell. For a long time, you just had a hyperplastic cell or you might have atypical cell, but now what do you call it? It’s precancerous. It’s not cancer. It’s not pre-something. It’s not the thing. What’s to happen, just like an asymptomatic carrier. What’s an asymptomatic carrier? What a crazy notion. I don’t not have a thing. I don’t not have cancer. I don’t not have a thing and I’m an asymptomatic, soon-to-be something patient. I’m a healthy person. My immune system is working and my body was working.

This whole idea of asymptomatic pathogen vector that is now what each one of us is supposedly is so nonsensical but it’s there so that we have to now be a consumer of face masks, social distancing, hand sanitizer or whatever else. Even if we’re perfectly healthy, we still have to buy something, which is the metered definition of health. That’s the big breakthrough and we need to call it what it is. This is the manipulation of health for metering commerce around an illusion built on chemistry.

Now that we’re aware of it or at least starting to become aware of it, the fact that we’re in a war right now, how do we fight against it, David?

What I’m doing here in DC, what we’re doing all over the world right now is we’re exposing all of the evidence that’s required for people to take legal action from both criminal and civil statutes. The majority of even legal experts fail to understand the complexity of these laws simply because the average person has no experience with anti-trust, terrorism, terrorism finance and with all of the kinds of laws that are germane to what’s going on here. A huge amount of our efforts right now is to educate people on what the law is to help them support their cases that they are filing. Gradually, what we’re doing is we’re getting the legal side of this conversation along the lines of where it needs to go. The other thing is we have to ask people to start talking about health the right way.

We’re not doing that. We’re still in this politically correct era where it’s unfashionable to be well. We supposedly are supposed to be, “We can’t say obese anymore. We can’t say a lifestyle disorder because that’s being insensitive.” That’s nonsense. We need to model what health is. We need to live what health is. We need to experience what health is and we then have to go forward with a lived experience of what good health and vitality is all about. There’s an individual role each one of us plays and there’s the community role that we’re trying to lead right now which is to say, people who’ve violated the laws need to be held accountable for what they’ve done to hijack your and my experience of living.

In The Weston Price Foundation, we are always talking about health and how to take our health back into our own hands. As you’re saying, living empowered, healthy lives that are vibrant, not just disease-free but living optimally. Speak to us a little bit about this legal bit because our folks don’t know what the legal implications are of what’s happening right now.

There’s a bunch of things. First of all, the Center for Disease Control in 2003 violated the law. They patented the Coronavirus isolated from humans. A lot of people have had issues with me saying that but here’s the problem. The problem is under Section 101 of US Code 35, you are not allowed to patent nature. That’s a statement. That’s a fact. You can’t alter that fact. One of two things occurred, either SARS Coronavirus was made in a lab, in which case it violated biological and chemical weapons laws, or it was natural and CDC should never have filed a patent on it. The actual sequence ID in which the patent includes not only the whole genome but also all nucleic acid sequences associated with SARS.

This is a thing where one of two things happened and both of them are illegal. You either patented the genome, and if you did that, that’s a violation of law or you made it, in which case you’ve also violated laws. Neither way is acceptable. Why would the CDC want a patent on the genome of the virus? It turns out that if you control the genome, you control the ability to test for it. You control the ability to trade it. You control the ability to develop vaccines for it. All of which they, in collusion with NIAID, controlled for eighteen years. For eighteen years, they have manipulated and controlled 100% of this entire campaign, which means that we get to 2020, we’re told how we are going to measure Coronavirus. It turns out, the only thing we could do is use CDC’s patented RT-PCR technology because they controlled the technology and they could never get it approved without Emergency Use Authorization.

When Alexander Azar in January of 2020 declared a national emergency, what happened in the first week of February is that all of a sudden the FDA comes along and says, “What never was legal to use RT-PCR as a diagnostic, because of the emergency, it now has become legal.” This is the most egregious violation of the law you could hope for. The fact of the matter is that’s what happened. If we wanted to end this epidemic, by the way right now, lift the state of emergency because the minute you lift the state of emergency, you can’t use the RT-PCR test. You can’t use the vaccine. You can’t use any of these things because they’re only legally used if the state of emergency is in place. If anybody wanted to change this right now, like literally now, lift the state of emergency and now it’s illegal to use RT-PCR. It’s illegal to use what is being called vaccines that aren’t vaccines that are genetically-modified toxins that are going into your cells. It’s illegal to do it. It’s solvable and no one is solving it.

I feel like the medical professionals and government officials have been persuaded that this is a legitimate virus. They may be doing the lockdown and all of these restrictions in the state of emergency because they think they’re protecting the public that way.

I don’t believe any of that. I can accept maybe a few people here and there might accidentally be doing the wrong thing because they’re trying to do the best thing. I think this is a criminal collusion and I’ve got all the evidence that says that it is. Let’s start with the Federal Trade Commission. The Federal Trade Commission makes it illegal to say that you can treat or diagnose a disease with the medical technologies unproven. Face masks have never been proven to stop a single viral transmission ever. That has never happened. Every governor is telling you that your face mask is somehow going to stop a viral transmission. It turns out that’s empirically false and it violates the Federal Trade Commission Act, which says you’re not allowed to say something has a treatment that does not in fact have medical, empirical proof that says it’s a treatment.

I feel like I’m living in an upside-down world right now.

You are and we are. The cool thing is we’re going to turn it on the right side.

You said you have all this evidence. I have to ask, are you pursuing any lawsuits to rectify things?

We are involved in several lawsuits and we’re working right now to build out a case, which is in fact, the Federal criminal case, which is going to be the Federal criminal case against Anthony Fauci, Robert Redfield, Alexander Azar, the Secretary of Health and Human Services. We’re building that case right now.

Who is that ‘we’ that you keep referring to?

Me and the team of lawyers that are doing it. I’m leading it.

We will look for that. Is there anything else, David, that you can tell the ordinary citizen right now who’s like, “How can I fight for my freedoms and my right to live healthily right now?”

Two things. One is stop talking about vaccines that aren’t vaccines. The thing that’s being sold by Pfizer and Moderna is not a vaccine. It’s a pathogen that is injected into your cell to elicit the creation of a toxin. That’s what it is. Vaccines are legally defined as a thing that interrupts the immune process in your system and prevents transmission. Neither one of those things is what’s happening. What they’re calling a vaccine isn’t and we need to stop calling it a vaccine. That’s number one. Number two, about your own life, what you need to be is you need to take the legal documents, including things that I’ve posted on Inverted Alchemy, which is a place where I posted a legal action.

Every single person in America can download and use that which says you cannot violate the Federal Trade Commission Act by saying that my mask works, my social distancing works, any of these things work because it violates the law. 21 Code of Federal Regulations, 18 US Code, 8 US Code, tons of US codes, 15 US codes, all being violated and all of those are itemized. If anybody wants to take action, take action. Go make the effort. Inverted Alchemy’s not hard to type into the browser. It’s all there. People can do stuff. They need to be doing it, not wait for somebody else.

I want to wrap up by asking the question I always ask my guests. If the reader could do one thing to improve their health, and you talked about meditation and the things that you do, what would you recommend they do?

There’s no question. Take your shoes off and put your feet back on the ground. Find a place where you can put your feet on the ground. Remember what it’s like to be human. Feel the Earth, feel your ecosystem. Once you do, let yourself breathe into that because the minute you do, you realize you’re a wonderful human being. You’re on a beautiful planet and you can make the best of it.

Thank you for your time. I appreciate it.

You’re most welcome. Thanks very much.

Connect with Dr. David Martin

Connect with The Weston A. Price Foundation

The Stats on Covid-Vaccine Injury and Death Don’t Add Up

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
February 24, 2021



There’s a big mystery that needs to be solved.

It’s how many people are getting sick and dying from the Covid vaccines.

There are reports from around the world of large numbers of elderly people dying right around the time they’re vaccinated.

On rare occasions those reports of those deaths even percolate into the mainstream press. An example is this January 16, 2021, Bloomberg article. It quotes the Norwegian Medicines Agency as attributing more than a dozen deaths, perhaps many more, among people 75 and over to effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine such as nausea and vomiting.

And I’ve heard first-hand that a lot of people are getting sick after vaccination, particularly seniors. I’ve heard this also from others, including health care professionals.

But officials almost always quickly proclaim that deaths aren’t caused by the vaccines. Instead they tell us that serious injuries are extremely rare.

For example, at a February 11, 2021, Ontario’s top public-health official, Dr. David Williams, said there had been just four serious adverse events so far from more than 380,000 vaccine doses administered.

Two of the four were severe allergic reactions, he reported. One was a “renal injury.” The fourth was “an unusual event. And the details [of it] are not available,” Dr. Williams said. He didn’t mention any deaths.

So that’s four serious adverse events in 380,000 injections, which equates to about 1 in 100,000 or 0.001%.

That doesn’t fit with the facts on the ground.

There are at least three clues to why there is dramatic under-reporting of serious illness and death from the vaccine.

One clue is that for years now politicians and public-health bureaucrats have been saturating the airwaves, academe and health-care institutions with the messaging that vaccines are safe and effective. They tell us ceaselessly that serious adverse events are one in a million.

The same goes for the Covid vaccines. We’re told the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and other shots were thoroughly tested in “large clinical trials” before being used in the populace at large. And that they had to be rushed into use because they’re critical for saving lives in the midst of the worldwide Covid emergency.

The second clue for here in Ontario is that the same person who’s in charge of the rushing of vaccines into millions of people’s arms also heads the office that’s leads death investigations, including deaths of people who died from Covid or who passed away shortly after receiving a Covid vaccine.

That person is Dirk Huyer. I’ve written previously about his prominence in pushing the official Covid narrative and rushing Covid vaccines into millions of Ontarians’ arms. (On May 11 and May 26, 2020, I documented his role in drastically changing the way detahs are handled in Ontario, making it far harder to determine whether a death attributed to Covid was instead caused by something else; and on October 20, 2020, I wrote about how Huyer has attained climbed the bureaucratic ladder by serving the powerful rather than the populace).

Others have also written about how Huyer’s Office of the Chief Coroner for Ontario has performed shockingly poorly under his watch. For example, investigative journalists at the National Post, Toronto Star and Hamilton Spectator showed that Huyer and a  colleague likely shut down a busy forensic-pathology unit in southwestern Ontario as revenge for the unit’s staff lodging official complaints about the pair’s bullying behaviour including interference in evidence-based decision-making.

And the Ontario Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk’s 2019 annual report devotes a chapter to the Office of the Chief Coroner and the Ontario Forensic Pathology Service. Among the serious deficits she documented were that, “The Office misses the opportunity to make more effective use of its death investigation data to identify actions to improve public safety and reduce preventable deaths.”

Officially, Dirk Huyer doesn’t have a direct role in investigations of deaths related to Covid. Stephanie Rea, a spokesperson for Huyer and his office, responded to a question from me about this; she indicated that Huyer stepped back from such investigations last August.

“The Chief Coroner for Ontario has recused himself from any work the Office of the Chief Coroner is doing in regard to COVID-19 to maintain the impartiality of the death investigation system. COVID-19 related work with the Office of the Chief Coroner is overseen by two Deputy Chief Coroners,” Rea wrote in an email to me.

However, Dr. Huyer doesn’t say he’s recused himself. And he seemed to indicate in a press conference that he was involved in the investigation of a person who died after getting one of the Covid vaccines.

The third clue is that doctors seldom report adverse events. When people get really sick or die after getting a vaccination the docs attribute that to anything but the vaccines. It’s been that way for years. Anyone who wonders aloud whether the Covid vaccines or other shots cause harm is immediately branded as “anti-vax” and “anti-science.” That’s a career-threatening consequence for health professionals.

And of course on top of that there’s huge pressure to go along with the push to vaccinate billions of people in as short a time as possible.

So that’s where we’re at today. More than half a million vaccine doses have been given to people in Ontario alone. The rush is on to vaccinate all 15 million of us in the province by September. And the mainstream media are screaming for this to be sped up even more.

That all adds up to only a very slim likelihood that we’re going to be told the truth by officials about how many people are gretting sick or dying from the vaccines.

So we’ll have to solve the mystery ourselves.

I just heard that an organization called VaxxTracker has stepped into the breach. The organization’s website says they “provide those who have received any vaccination a safe place to report negative side-effects and assist developers as they work to perfect it. The VaxxTracker web site acts independently from all government, pharmaceutical, or lobbying groups. We represent those who have already received or those who are considering taking taking a vaccination.”

Perhaps with collective efforts like this we can we can bring the true stats to light.

Global Movement of Frontline Nurses Exposes COVID Pandemic Lies & Cover Up

Nurse Whistleblowers Destroy the Covid-19(84) Narrative Sparking a Movement That Can’t Be Stopped!!! 

by Dan Dicks, Press for Truth
February 23, 2021

“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell

Kristen Nagle, a neonatal ICU nurse from London, Ont., and Sarah Choujounian, a registered practical nurse from Toronto, traveled to BC this past weekend to speak on behalf of the Canadian Frontline Nurses who are exposing the corruption of the Covid-19(84) nightmare from the inside.

According to their website “We have risked everything because we care and you, the people, need to know what’s really going on.  We continue to battle through rampant censorship from the media, nursing colleges, employers, fellow staff and complete strangers. Our families are being threatened, all because we witnessed some serious cover-ups regarding the real truth about COVID in various Hospitals and Care Homes.”

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with the nurses about what they’ve seen, how other nurses are handling this and most importantly how health care professionals can join this movement of brave frontline workers who dare to challenge the current status quo.



Video available at Press for Truth LBRY and BitChute channels.

Connect with Global Frontline Nurses

COVID-19 Vaccine To Be Tested on 6-Year-Olds

by Dr. Joseph Mercola, Mercola.com
February 23, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Netherlands: 22 Nursing Home Residents Dead Within Two Weeks of First mRNA Shots

by TheCOVIDBlog.com
February 23, 2020

AMERSFOORT, NETHERLANDS — St. Elisabeth Nursing and Guest House residents received their first mRNA shots on January 30. What happened thereafter shocked staff and the families of residents.

At least 22 residents died in the last two weeks at the facility, according to RTV Ultrecht in the Netherlands. St. Elisabeth houses elderly people with dementia and other cognitive disorders. It’s unclear whether the Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna shot was the culprit, as the country is utilizing both. Board member Evelien Bongers believed the shots would eradicate the threat of COVID-19 within the facility. But it had the exact opposite effect.

“It is very intense and very intensive. For the residents, for their families and loved ones and for our staff,” she told RTV. “It is not only intense because of last week, but also because the virus has been asking a lot of us for so long.” The carnage may not be over, as more deaths “cannot be ruled out.”

Similar incidents are happening across Europe. A Spain nursing home stopped administering Pfizer BioNTech shots after 46 residents died within days of the first jab. At least 10 senior citizens in Germany died within four days after Pfizer shots. Norway reported 23 deaths in early January, mostly elderly, after Pfizer shots.

Once is a mistake, twice is a coincidence, three times…

The mRNA shots are causing myriad adverse effects and deaths, regardless of age. But it’s clear people over age 60 are highly vulnerable to adverse reactions. Make certain to educate your loved ones so they can make informed decisions when the time comes.

Poll: Half of U.S. Military Families Do Not Want COVID-19 Vaccine

A survey conducted in December 2020 by the Blue Star Families, a non-profit military advocacy organization, found that 53 percent of U.S. military families do not want to get the experimental COVID-19 vaccines being distributed under an  Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) granted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).¹

 The survey included a total of 674 respondents representing active-duty families, of which 33 percent said that they would get a COVID-19 vaccine approved by the FDA should it become available for free.² Of the of 53 percent of military families who responded to the survey indicating that they would not get the vaccine, nearly three-quarters cited a distrust of the development process or timeline.³

Kathy Roth-Douquet, CEO of Blue Star Families said that:

What we’ve seen is that military families are expressing a lot of concern about the vaccine. We’re seeing that people don’t have a sense of trust about the vaccine. They have strong concerns about the development process and timeline.⁴

One military spouse wrote in the comments section of the survey that, “I am looking for long term placebo controlled studies. I do not want my family, or service members to be guinea pigs.”⁵ About 14 percent of the survey respondents said they remain undecided on whether they would take get the COVID-19 vaccine, with most respondents saying they would like more information of side effects to make that decision.⁶

Jennifer Akin, a Blue Star Families researcher said that Blue Star Families survey is not a scientific poll; however, the results provide a baseline for observing acceptance or reluctance over time.⁷

Most Deployed Troops and National Security Personnel are Declining COVID-19 Vaccines

According to the Pentagon, U.S. troops deployed overseas and those charged with critical national security missions are declining to get vaccinated for COVID-19.⁸ Some 320,000 service members and civilian personnel have been vaccinated, leaving a significant amount of the 769,000 doses available to Department of Defense (DoD) unused.⁹

Pentagon officials said as long as the COVID-19 vaccines are classified as EUA by the FDA and not fully licensed, the DoD cannot mandate service members to take the vaccine.¹⁰ Air Force Brigadier General Paul Friedrichs said that even those personnel responsible for manning America’s nuclear weapons are refusing to get the vaccine. Air Force Global Strike Command spokeswoman Chief Master Sergeant Jill M. LaVoie added:

Because we believe that the COVID-19 vaccine is the important next step to fortifying our forces, we are encouraging our Airmen receive the vaccination but this is a personal decision for each of our Strikers to make.¹¹

LaVoie added, “Our medical professionals will continue to educate our personnel on the vaccination so that they can best make that decision for themselves.”¹²

Corona Investigative Committee w/ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & RFK, Jr.: 1st International Livestream

by Corona Investigative Committee with Oval Media
February 17, 2021



Original video is available at Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – Live Streams YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Commentary and excerpts by Truth Comes to Light editor.

This is the first time The Berlin Corona Investigative Committee is being broadcast internationally. Conversation and testimony is shared with lawyers from around the world.

This livestream is 4 hours long. The first hour of this livestream involves conversation between attorneys Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Dr. Fuellmich translates RFK, Jr.’s statements into German as they go along.

Later in the video, testimonies are made in German and periodically Dr. Fuellmich translates a summary into English.

Included are two lawyers from the Austrian Corona Committee who have won 22 cases before the Austrian Constitutional Court.

A high-ranking justice from Italy shares, in Italian, evidence that he and his collegues have gathered which is relevant internationally. English translation is provided.

Senta Depuydt, a journalist with Children’s Health Defense Europe, shares updates for France and Belgium, and European Union.

The participants reveal the deaths and atrocities related to covid vaccines and detail many successes that have already taken place in the courts.  Discussion includes ways to continue and expand international cooperation for challenging global medical tyranny via the COVID-19 mandates.

Inspiring examples are shared of how people throughout the world are rising up and gathering together to stand against the lockdowns and tyrannical mandates.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich addresses the question from Austrian lawyers about how people who have been damaged by lockdowns and mandates might receive compensation. His suggestion is to  focus on going after the corporations and the individuals who are responsible, not the governments.

A lawyer from the Netherlands describes his challenges — with dramatic ups and downs — in taking on the mandatory curfew.

A lawyer from Spain shares small, yet significant, successes.

The situation in Israel was discussed, including a social experiment called “consciousness engineering“, which focuses on the entire population. The horrific unfolding experience for all Israeli citizens, along with serious vaccine injuries, was shared.

Conversation with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich also addressed the attempted global takeover via The World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and much more.

Excerpts from conversation between Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

RFK, Jr. shares a clip from a video  “where a whistleblower from a nursing home in Germany reported some atrocities in that nursing home in conjunction with the administration of vaccines.” [see this short segment of the livestream event, with the shared whistleblower video and comments by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich HERE.]

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich responds:

“The thing that is disturbing about this is because we are getting more and more calls from other whistleblowers — from other nursing homes in this country. Plus we’re getting information from other countries. Sweden, for example. Norway, for example. Gibraltar, for example. There are also incidents in England and in the United States that match these descriptions…

It means that people are dying because of the vaccine.

So, of course, we’re going to have to go and look into the details. We’re going to have to have autopsies performed.

But what we’re seeing in this video clip is worse than anything we ever expected.

And, if that is true, and if this is representative for what’s going on in the other nursing homes and in other countries, then we have a very serious problem.

And so do the people who make the vaccines, so do the people who administer the vaccines…

It looks more and more as though we’re dealing with homicide, maybe even murder.

We’re going to have to look into the details.”

RFK, Jr. speaks of the economic devastation for the average person, while at the same time those who are orchestrating the lockdowns are making billions of dollars.  He also speaks on the media (and social media) censorship of information related to the vaccine

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich responds:

“The odd thing is that this very same thing is going on, not just in the United States, not just here in Germany, but all over the world — which does seem to point at some kind of, shall I say “lockstep”, or plan behind this.

Because it cannot be a coincidence — at least, not in my mind as an attorney, as a lawyer. It cannot be a coincidence that this is going on worldwide.

Now we know that the people who we were just talking about — the people who are profiting from this crisis — have so much money that they also, of course, have invested in the so-called mainstream media.

But…isn’t anybody worried about the fact that the notion of free speech, the idea of free speech as the very basis for any functioning democracy, is now in the hands of private corporations who have never been elected by anyone?”

RFK, Jr.:

“One of the problems that we have in the United States that you don’t have in Europe is that in 1997 we changed the law in our country to allow pharmaceutical companies to do direct consumer advertising on television.

So, today the big television networks can make up to 70% of their revenues on pharmaceutical products. What it means is that pharmaceutical companies are dictating the content of what we see on the news…

Anderson Cooper gets 12 million dollars a year and about 10 million of that comes from pharmaceutical companies…

Rupert Murdock, who runs Fox News also runs/owns the biggest vaccine company in Australia.

And so you have the press in our country that has absolutely been taken over by the pharmaceutical industry.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“This problem seems so big, and the resulting damage seems so horrendous all over the world, that many of us have been thinking that maybe the national courts will not be able to cope with this. So the idea has been floating — and we’ve been discussing this with a number of our colleagues from all over the world — that maybe we’re going to need — once we get this to stop — we’re going to need, in order to go and deliver justice, we’re going to need something like a Nuremberg trial, second generation. Is that something that lawyers you work with have also been thinking about?”

RFK, Jr. explains the obstacles that have been created globally that would make it difficult to be treated fairly and the challenges we face.  He focuses on getting the public involved and focusing on the parts of the national and local court systems that still have integrity.

“We need to try to figure out ways, first of all, of communicating to the public.

So, we’re off of social media. The mainstream press is now captured by the pharmaceutical industry. But there are now other, evolving, ways for people who are learning to communicate to each in other ways.

We need to establish credible ways for people who care about democracy, who care about civil rights, who are concerned about the ascendency of the medical cartel to begin really revolting against the increase and unacceptable power of those power centers.

And one of those ways in through communication.

The other is, in many of our independent nations, there are opportunities in the courts — where you still have integrity in the courts and judicial system of some of our countries. And it’s getting smaller and smaller, more constricted.

But, to me those present the best opportunity. Public organizing, public communication and the use of the courts.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“And I think what also makes sense — what we’ve been doing for months now…

I think it also makes a lot sense for all of us to continue to cooperate and share the evidence that we have, so that we’re all on the same page and that we’re all on the same level… Because the problem is universal. It’s almost identical worldwide…

I think it’s really important to show that, as you said, those parts of the judicial system that still have integrity are still functioning — and that we — you and I and the rest of the people who are working with us — are doing the best we can to show and to get as many decisions as possible from the courts of law that say:

PCR tests cannot tell you anything about infections. And that there are no asymptomatic infections. And even if there were that doesn’t play a role. As many of these decisions as possible.

Because the PCR test. the Drosten PCR test, was and still is the centerpiece of this whole thing.

If we destroy that narrative, I think this house of cards is going to come down crashing soon.”

 

Connect with the Corona Investigative Committee

Connect with RFK, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense

One-Third of Deaths Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Occurred Within 48 Hours of Vaccination

The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Feb. 12 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website.
Of the 929 reported deaths, about one-third occurred within 48 hours.

by Children’s Health Defense Team, The Defender
February 19, 2021

According to new data released today, as of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since Dec. 14, 2020.

VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a determination can be made as to whether the reported adverse event was directly or indirectly caused by the vaccine.

The latest VAERS data show that 799 of the deaths were reported in the U.S., and that about one-third of those deaths occurred within 48 hours of the individual receiving the vaccination.

As is consistent with previous VAERS data reports, 192 of the reported deaths — or 21% — were cardiac-related. As The Defender reported earlier this month, Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist, warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December that mRNA vaccines like those developed by Pfizer and Moderna could cause heart attacks and other injuries in ways not assessed in safety trials.

Of the 929 deaths reported since Dec. 14, 2020, the average age of the deceased was 77.8 and the youngest was 23. Fifty-two percent of the reported deaths were among men, 45% were women and 3% are unknown. Fifty-eight percent of the deaths were reported in people who received the Pfizer vaccine, and 41% were related to the Moderna vaccine.

States with the highest reported number of deaths were: California (71); Florida (50); Ohio (38); New York (31); Kentucky (41); Michigan (31); and Texas (31).

CBS Detroit reported this week that a 68-year old news anchor died one day after being vaccinated for COVID of a suspected stroke.

Reports of deaths among elderly people after being vaccinated for COVID continue to surface, including the article published this week by The Defender about 46 nursing home residents in Spain who died within one month of receiving the Pfizer vaccine.

According to the latest data, 3,126 “serious” adverse reactions have been reported. Adverse reaction reports from the latest CDC data also include:

• 34 miscarriages
• 917 anaphylactic reactions, 70% of which were reported after a Pfizer vaccine and 30% after the Moderna vaccine
• Bell’s palsy (Pfizer 75%; Moderna: 25%)

So far, only Pfizer and Moderna vaccines — approved for emergency use, but not fully licensed — are being used in the U.S.

AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine, which does not use mRNA technology, was approved for emergency use this week by the World Health Organization, paving the way for some countries to start using it. However, as The Defender reported this week, some nations have said they won’t use it, citing safety and efficacy concerns.

FiercePharma reported today that the FDA may reject the AstraZeneca vaccine over concerns relating to efficacy, especially against new COVID variants, and manufacturing issues.

News reports indicate that a growing number of people, including nearly 30% of healthcare workers, now say they don’t want the COVID vaccine, citing safety concerns.

The Washington Post reported this week that nearly a third of military personnel are opting out of the vaccines, and ESPN reported that top NBA players are reluctant to promote the vaccine.

Meanwhile, the FDA has not yet implemented systems to monitor the safety of the experimental COVID vaccines. FDA officials told The New York Times they don’t expect the systems to be up and running before the Biden administration reaches its goal of vaccinating 100 million Americans — nearly one third of the U.S. population.

As of Feb. 19, about 56.3 million people in the U.S. had received one or both doses of a COVID vaccine.

While the VAERS database numbers may seem sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.

According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:

• Any adverse event listed in the VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination that occurs within the specified time period after vaccination
• An adverse event listed by the vaccine manufacturer as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine

The CDC says healthcare providers are strongly encouraged to report:

• Any adverse event that occurs after the administration of a vaccine licensed in the United States, whether or not it is clear that a vaccine caused the adverse event
• Vaccine administration errors

However, “within the specified time” means that reactions occurring outside that timeframe may not be reported, in addition to reactions suffered hours or days later by people who don’t report those reactions to their healthcare provider.

Vaccine manufacturers are required to report to VAERS “all adverse events that come to their attention.”

Historically, however, fewer than fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS, a system that Children’s Health Defense has previously referred to as an “abject failure,” including in a December 2020 letter to Dr. David  Kessler, former FDA director and now co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and President Biden’s version of Operation Warp Speed.

A critic familiar with VAERS’ shortcomings bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”

CHD is calling for complete transparency. The children’s health organization is asking Kessler and the federal government to release all of the data from the clinical trials and suspend COVID-19 vaccine use in any group not adequately represented in the clinical trials, including the elderly, frail and anyone with comorbidities.

CHD is also asking for full transparency in post-marketing data that reports all health outcomes, including new diagnoses of autoimmune disorders, adverse events and deaths from COVID vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

Add your voice to show support.

Connect with Dr. Tom Cowan

Connect with Dr. Andrew Kaufman

Connect with Sally Fallon Morell

Covid Vaccine Safety Systems Failing

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
February 19, 2021



Video available at The HighWire BitChute and Brighteon channels.

Health officials are coming forward to criticize a lackluster effort by health agencies to implement adequate Covid vaccine safety monitoring and reporting systems ahead of the largest vaccine rollout in history.

Del brings to light a shocking 2010 study revealing the current primary system, VAERS, may only capture less than 1% of actual injuries from vaccines, which begs the question:

Are we seeing only the tip of a massive Covid vaccine injury iceberg?

“Build Back Better” From COVID-19?

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
February 18, 2021



Video available at The HighWire BitChute and Brighteon channels.

Political leaders and billionaires around the globe have doubled down on the “build back better” strategy and it’s beginning to sound a little too similar to the World Economic Forum’s world socialization mission.

It’s hard not to wonder how #covid19 has played into the plan.

Nursing Home Nightmare

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
February 18, 2021



Video available at The HighWire BitChute and Brighteon channels.

Headlines in the US and UK continue to report dozens of nursing home deaths after receiving their first round of the #Covid19 vaccine.

Data out of England shows that elderly care home deaths as much as tripled when the vaccine rolled out in January.

Talk about a coincidence.

 

Attorney Thomas Renz w/ Dr. Peter Breggin: A Call to Join Others Fighting for Human Freedom | Update on Ongoing Lawsuits

by Dr. Peter Breggin
February 18, 2021



Original video available at Peter Breggin MD YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Attorney Tom Renz is a Godsend for human freedom. Initially single-handed, but gaining more widespread support, Tom is leading a defensive legal assault on the those in the state and federal governments who want to destroy our freedom in the name of the public health “emergency” surrounding COVID-19. You will be moved and enlightened and inspired by his work. I am honored to share my hour with him with you. You will enlarge your understanding of COVID-19 and confirm that there is hope for better times. Please watch this, for all our sakes, and perhaps add your energy to his work. He needs good people to volunteer to help him in every possible way. If you help to advance the work of Tom Renz, you join the pantheon of people who have and who are advancing human freedom.

Ohio Stands Up!

Tom Renz website

Dr. Peter Breggin’s Website

Peter R. Breggin MD Expert Legal Report

Overview of Breggin’s Report

Legal Complaint

 See related:

COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society by Dr. Peter Breggin

From September 1, 2020 Courageous “Humble Hero” Attorney Tom Renz w/ Dr. Peter Breggin: Covid-19 Lawsuit Update

The Covid-19 Jabs Could Kill More Than Covid-19

by Dr. Vernon Coleman
February 16, 2021



Original video available at Dr Vernon Coleman BrandNewTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Transcript:

Like many others I have for months been warning that the covid-19 jabs would cause numerous deaths and serious health problems. In videos and articles I have outlined the deaths and the serious injuries caused by the jabs. My website contains a list of the evidence. Just go to the Health page and there, right at the top, you will find a terrifying list of the people who have already been killed by these experimental jabs.

Care home deaths, you will be saddened but not surprised to hear have soared. At care homes everywhere elder citizens are having their jab and then dying within days. And still the Government and the media claim the jabs and immediate sudden deaths are all a coincidence. The call is for more jabs, more jabs, jab harder, faster and more.

It gives me absolutely no pleasure to know now that my warnings were absolutely right.

The Government agencies and the BBC continue to provide bland, unscientific reassurance, of course, insisting there have been no deaths and no side effects other than a little soreness here or a little soreness there. On the 5th February the BBC website responded to the question, `Is the Covid-19 vaccine safe?’ with the astonishing reply `Although some people get mild side effects, both vaccines are extremely safe’ – with the words extremely safe printed in bold just so that we’d be sure to notice. The BBC, financially linked to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, gave as the source for this staggering nonsense the UK’s Bill Gates funded drug regulator. And the Government, the regulator and the BBC will doubtless continue to suppress the truth right up until the end – when millions are dead. Indeed, they will doubtless continue to do what they’re doing now – blaming covid-19 and not blaming the jabs. Governments, regulators and the media seem to me to be involved in massive triple headed fraud.

We are presumably expected to ignore the hundreds of deaths and the tens of thousands of serious injuries now linked to the vaccines around the world. In the US, the CDC has so far reported 653 deaths and 12,044 other injuries. It’s interesting that some people seem to me to define death as a mild side effect. I think I’d call it a bit more than mild, but then I don’t have BBC standards. I wonder if those claiming there are no side effects would feel the same if a loved one had died – or was lying paralysed in bed.

And remember in the USA the authorities admit that doctors miss more than 99% of vaccine related injuries.

The authorities claim that anyone who dies within 60 or 28 days of a positive PCR test must have died of covid-19 but if a healthy person drops dead within five minutes of having a covid-19 jab then it’s just another unfortunate coincidence. People die all the time, they say, so why blame the jab. That they manage to do this with a straight face suggests to me that quite a few of them must have taken acting lessons.

Safe and effective is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation line, of course.

And it is no coincidence that government agencies such as Public Health England and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency have received millions of dollars from Gates. It’s well known too, that the BBC has a financial relationship with the Gates Foundation.

Indeed, it’s difficult these days to find a part of the media or the health industry which doesn’t have a link to the viper filled cesspit that is Bill Gates’ pocket.

Even the Guardian newspaper, which used to fancy itself as a champion of the oppressed and downtrodden little guy has teamed up with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, perhaps unable to resist the allure of a few lorry-loads of that delicious software money.

The official party line, of course, is that those of us warning that the jabs can kill and maim are dangerous conspiracy theorists who must be ignored or, preferably, silenced.

Just the other day, a Guardian writer called for what he called `dangerous falsehoods’ to be prohibited.’

So, there we are. He didn’t say what he thought the dangerous falsehoods to be but presumably he meant things that he didn’t agree with.

Anyway, it seems that at least one person at the Guardian now supports censorship. And presumably wants to choose what we should all be told about covid-19 and the covid-19 vaccines. It’s perhaps not surprising now that the Guardian is linked to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Everyone who gets close to the ‘Gatesean’ viper filled pit must expect to be damned when they call for censorship and prohibitions.

In previous videos and articles I’ve outlined the very real dangers of these experimental jabs. I have constantly warned that the big problems aren’t likely to be the ones we’re seeing now but the ones which will appear in 3, 6 or 12 months’ time – possibly when the person who has been jabbed comes into contact with a coronavirus – or even in 2, 5 or 10 years’ time. And every day I find yet more evidence of the problems which lie ahead and which are being ignored or suppressed by governments, regulators and the media. Indeed, while the BBC continues to spread false comfort and to demonise the truth-tellers, the medical journals are full of doubters expressing real fears about the lies being told about covid-19 and about the jab.

There is, for example, a huge potential problem facing those who have a second jab. Doctors have known since 1913 that a second injection of what we will call for simplicity a poison can sensitise the patient and produce a greater chance of an anaphylactic reaction. And interestingly, there needs to be a delay of three to four weeks before the patient is truly vulnerable to an anaphylactic state. I’ll come back to this another time but this is a very sensitive reaction and needs only a minute amount of the trigger substance. Once that has happened the patient is changed forever. They can never return to normal. And if you’re wondering who said all this by the way it was Charles Richet and he was giving his Nobel Lecture. If you wait at least three weeks then the reaction after the second jab is much commoner.

The drug industry is currently being praised to the skies for making these terrible jabs though this makes as much sense as praising arms companies for making a new and better hand grenade which removes children’s limbs with great precision but as I have shown before the drug industry is the dirtiest industry in the world. I have long believed that Pablo Escobar and the cartels in Columbia cared more for the people than the drug companies do. Watch my videos or read my articles about GSK, Astra Zeneca or Pfizer.

Meanwhile, here’s a favourite drug company trick.

When they test a new anti-arthritis drug they will test it against a well-established drug to see how their product stands up. So, they’ll perhaps test it against aspirin. But they won’t test it against coated or soluble aspirin. They’ll test it against the common or garden stuff that burns holes in your stomach and that no one with their brain in the right way round prescribes any more. And then they can say that their drug is safer.

When they test a new vaccine they use a similar trick. They won’t test it against a placebo. They’ll test it against some grotty vaccine that is known to produce terrible side effects. Then they can say that their nice new vaccine is safe. The people in the media don’t know any of this, of course. They just put their name on the top of the latest press release and then totter off to the canteen.

An article entitled, `Covid -19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease’ has just been accepted for the journal `Microbiology and Infectious Diseases’.

The author concludes that `regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines…was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit’.

In the introduction to his article, Dr Classen points out that `vaccines have been found to cause a host of chronic, late developing adverse events. Some adverse events like type 1 diabetes may not occur until 3-4 years after a vaccine is administered.’ That incidentally is a problem which has been known since 2002.

Dr Classen goes on to say that `the frequency of cases of adverse events may surpass the frequency of cases of severe infectious disease the vaccine was designed to prevent. Given that type 1 diabetes is only one of many immune mediated diseases potentially caused by vaccines, chronic late occurring adverse events are a serious public health issue.’

And the paper goes on to repeat a warning that covid-19 vaccines could induce prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

There was a paper in the BMJ in October in which the authors reported on a study to determine whether sufficient literature existed `to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that covid-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus’. The authors concluded that it did.

The BMJ also carried an article headlined: `Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.’

But the Government, the regulators and the ‘Gatesian’ poodles ignore all this, of course. You might have thought that one poodle might have thought a small bark worthwhile. But nothing.

This is the biggest fraud, the biggest cover up and the biggest scandal in history. The media hide behind their sponsors and refuse to give space to the truth-tellers. The fact that they won’t debate tells us everything we need to know. The BBC is supposed to inform and educate but it does neither. Thousands of people will die because they’ve trusted the lies on the state broadcaster.

Anyone who speaks out is likely to be damned by the so-called fact checkers. Worldwide there are thousands of them and they are about as reputable and reliable as race course tipsters. Find out who pays them and the same names appear time and time again. It’s a scamming industry but it works, of course. People who don’t know what is going on assume that the fact checkers must know what they’re doing. Most of them probably need help putting their shoes on in the morning. The thousands of fact checkers are paid for by the people who are suppressing the truth. It’s not surprising that I’m banned from just about everywhere now.

Anyone who dares to share the truth will be lied about, demonised and banned. Many doctors don’t dare to say a word. But that’s the plan, of course.

And yet despite all this banning and suppressing and demonisation, a third of Britons still don’t believe what the Government tells them about the vaccines. And a report from India shows that most government hospital health workers in Delhi have refused to take the covid-19 vaccine. Wise people. `I am not yet ready to take a vaccine for which the trials have not even been completed,’ said one. In India, of course, people know about Bill Gates supported vaccines and, as a result, know to be careful about what they trust.

Vaccines have always been dangerous. The Centers for Disease and Prevention, CDC, in the US has 16 recommended vaccines for children. And the leaflets that go with those vaccines list 400 ways that vaccines can kill or injure. These include heart attacks, strokes, allergies, nerve and brain disorders, inflammation and death.

Don’t forget death.

The truth, for those who are interested, is that it is reported that trials for the Moderna vaccine didn’t include people over 80 and included only 20 over the age of 70. On the basis of that small trial, the CDC is giving the vaccine to 34 million Americans over the age of 70.

If the vaccine kills one in every 30 people, there’s a good chance that the trial wouldn’t have picked it up. And over a million over 70s could be killed by the vaccine. Is that the aim?

In America the authorities admit, as I have said, that they collect fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries. The manufacturers have said that there is a fifty fold underreporting of vaccine adverse events. Doctors are not really encouraged to report or talk about vaccine problems. Indeed, anyone who speaks out about problems with vaccines is likely to find themselves in trouble.

And it’s in the same in the UK and elsewhere.

Doctors, regulators and journalists don’t tell people the truth because they don’t know or because it’s just too scary.

In 2017, the Danish government and a Danish vaccine maker, funded a study of the DTP vaccine. Gates and his pet WHO claim that the DTP vaccine saves millions of lives but the truth seems to be very different. After looking at 30 years of data, the scientists concluded that the DTP vaccine was probably killing more children than died from diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus prior to the vaccines introduction. The vaccine had ruined the immune systems of children rendering them susceptible to death from pneumonia, leukaemia, bilharzia, malaria and dysentery. None of those diseases is officially recognised as vaccine injuries but they are.

The vast majority of illnesses and deaths caused by vaccines go unreported. And yet we are still seeing hundreds of deaths and tens of thousands of adverse events with covid-19 vaccines.

But anyone who reports the facts is banned by YouTube, Facebook and the BBC – and branded a conspiracy theorist. That’s the upside down world we are living in: a world where lies are praised as truths and truths are branded lies.

Please share this article with everyone you can reach.

Copyright Vernon Coleman February 16th 2021

Huge Victory: Under Pressure, New York Ends Mandatory COVID Testing in Schools

The new guidance follows in the wake of a lawsuit by CHD and eight parents of New York schoolchildren challenging mandatory COVID testing and closing of New York City Schools. 

by Children’s Health Defense, The Defender
February 17, 2021

The New York State Education Department issued a letter Feb. 16 informing all public schools in the state that parental consent to COVID-19 tests for their children is not required for in-person instruction, or for participation in any school activities, including extracurricular activities.

The letter, which applies only to public and charter schools, follows in the wake of a lawsuit challenging the closing of New York City Schools and the mandatory testing for students.

The lawsuit was filed Dec.16, 2020, by eight New York City parents and Children’s Health Defense (CHD) against the New York City Department of Education and Mayor Bill de Blasio. The parents are represented by Attorneys James Mermigis, Ray L. Flores II, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and chief legal counsel, and Mary Holland, CHD president and general counsel.

The Feb. 16 letter from Kathleen R. Cataldo, assistant commissioner, Office of Student Support Services said:

“The Department has received reports from the field that some school districts are requiring parents’ consent on behalf of their children, to COVID-19 testing as a condition of activities including in-person learning and extracurricular activities. The Department hereby clarifies that parent/guardian consent for COVID 19 resting of students may not be a condition of in-person learning or other school activities.” (Underlining from the original.)

Since Nov. 19, 2020, children in grades 6-12 have been completely excluded from all in-school education. NYC has provided no specific date by which these students will be back in school.

Since early December, K-5 and special needs students have been able to attend “blended learning,” usually just 1-2 days per week, but only if they submit to in-school polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genetic testing for COVID-19. If parents refused, the education department relegated their kids to remote learning for at least the next 10 months.

NYC schools were open to all students for blended learning September through mid-November, even though all families had the option of remote learning. Mayor de Blasio shut schools down again because of a rise in the city-wide PCR positivity rate.

As plaintiffs’ experts declared in their lawsuit, PCR testing does not diagnose COVID infection, even though NYC has represented to parents that it does. PCR testing generates many false positive results, leading to disruptive and expensive isolation and quarantine, the plaintiffs allege.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that in-school testing without voluntary consent is “unethical and illegal.” Coercing parents to sign consent forms on threat of exclusion is not voluntary, the plaintiffs allege, and the education department is acting in flagrant disregard of federal public health guidance.

As the lawsuit outlined, remote learning disproportionately harms those who can’t afford access to modern technology, including high-speed internet, computers, tablets, printers, scanners and more. Further, most students in NYC are Black and Hispanic, and many parents are wary to submit their kids to medical procedures without their oversight. They wonder what really happens with their children’s test results and DNA samples

The United Federations of Teachers (UFT), the New York City Teachers Union issued a statement that the state’s letter contradicts a plan agreed to by the schools and the union. “We will fight to make sure these protocols stay in place” according to a statement on the UFT Facebook page.

NY Teachers for Choice responded to UFT with an open letter to UFT President Michael Mulgrew outlining why NY Teachers for Choice supports the new guidance. The letter ended with:

“Virtually every other school district in New York, and across the country, does not force COVID testing on staff or students because doing so is illegal. I understand and respect that you are trying to do what you believe is best and safest for your membership. However, the UFT should not stand on the side of forcing an illegal practice to take place under its watch. Please accept the new guidance from NYSED and expand upon it to ensure teachers and staff rights are respected as well.”

The lawsuit by CHD and New York parents will continue until the school closure issue is resolved.

 “They didn’t isolate the virus,”
Chief Chinese epidemiologist tells NBC News — referring to
samples taken from the Wuhan market a year ago

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News

February 16, 2021

The Chinese scientist’s name is Dr. Wu Zunyou. He is the chief epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. NBC News reporter, Janis Mackey Frayer, conducted a brief interview with Dr. Zunyou on January 23, 2021.

Frayer mentioned that “samples” were taken, a year ago, at the beginning of the “outbreak,” from the infamous Huanan market in Wuhan. She then asked Dr. Zunyou, “Why has the data not been shared?”

He answered, “They didn’t isolate the virus.” He was referring to tissue samples taken from animals sold at the market.

That’s an interesting answer. Why have researchers and scientists claimed SARS-CoV-2 crossed species from animals to humans at that market, when no one ever isolated the virus from samples taken at the market?

The next, and far bigger question, is: When Dr. Zunyou says, “They didn’t isolate the virus,” is he ONLY referring to tissue samples taken from animals at the market? Or does his answer also apply to the first 40 human cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, which were claimed to result from a newly discovered coronavirus?

I’ve queried Dr. Zunyou. We’ll see if he replies.

I’ve spent the last year demonstrating that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists. I’ve also explained why people are dying, why the PCR test is meaningless and useless and deceptive, why the case and death numbers are meaningless, and why the con is being foisted on the global population.

Since the early days of the “pandemic,” many scientists authoring papers have claimed they isolated the virus. However, I’ve explained how, in Orwellian fashion, they torture and twist and reverse the meaning of the word, “isolate,” so it signifies the opposite of what it ACTUALLY means.

I’ve also explained that the so-called genetic sequencing of the virus is another con. It isn’t the result of looking through some sort of cosmic microscope at genes lined up like cars in a supermarket parking lot. It’s a process using a computer program to stitch together DATA— PRESUMED pieces of a virus—based on speculation, bias, pretension, and sheer hype. Rather than science.

Based on no evidence of a new virus, the Chinese regime locked down 50 million citizens. Fairly soon, they lifted the lockdowns and pushed their economy into high gear again.

They provided the model of lockdowns to the West, where elite players—Bill Gates, the CDC, the World Health Organization, the United Nations—praised the Chinese regime and adopted their lockdown strategy; thus wrecking national economies and hundreds of millions of lives.

This is called a COVERT OPERATION. It had nothing to do with science. The operation was based on selling A STORY ABOUT A VIRUS.

For literate people, the word “isolate” indicates: a thing is separated from all other material surrounding it. Very simple. However, for virologists, the word means: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab.” UN-ISOLATED.

Virologists state: The soup consists of the virus, plus human and animal cells, plus (toxic) drugs and chemicals, plus all sorts of other genetic material.

They know the virus is in the soup, because some of the cells are dying. The virus must be killing the cells.

WRONG. The toxic drugs and chemicals could certainly be killing the cells. The cells are also being starved of vital nutrients, and that fact alone could account for cell-death.

There is no isolation. There is no proof a virus is in the soup. There is no proof a virus is killing cells. There is no proof the virus exists.

Double Masking for Dummies

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
February 12, 2021



Video available at The HighWire BitChute and Brighteon channels.

After Fauci admitted last week there’s no science to support “double masking,” the CDC has now officially ruled that wearing two masks can decrease exposure to infectious aerosols by up to 95%…after lab testing on dummies.

653 Deaths + 12,044 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show

The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Feb. 4 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 653 reported deaths, 602 were from the U.S. The average age of those who died was 77, the youngest was 23. 

by Children’s Health Defense Team, The Defender
February 12, 2021

As of Jan. Feb. 4, 653 deaths — a subset of 12,697 total adverse events — had been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccinations. The numbers reflect reports filed between Dec. 14, 2020 and Feb. 4, 2021.

VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before confirmation can be made that the reported adverse event was caused by the vaccine.

As of Feb. 10, about 44.77 million people in the U.S. had received one or both doses of a COVID vaccine. So far, only the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been granted Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). By the FDA’s own definition, the vaccines are still considered experimental until fully licensed.

According to the latest data, 602 of the 653 reported deaths were in the U.S, and 137 of the deaths were related to cardiac disorder. Fifty-three percent of those who died were male, 44% were female, the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased. The average age of those who died was 77, the youngest reported death was of a 23-year-old. The Pfizer vaccine was taken by 58% of those who died, while the Moderna vaccine was taken by 41%.

As or Feb. 4, there had been 163 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported and 775 reports of anaphylaxis.

As The Defender reported today, the CDC is investigating the Feb. 8 death of a 36-year-old doctor in Tennessee who died about a month after receiving the second dose of a COVID vaccination. According to news reports, Dr. Barton Williams died from the adult form of multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-A), a condition caused when the immune system attacks the body resulting in multi-system organ failure. New reports attributed the death to a reaction to an asymptomatic case of COVID, although Williams never tested positive for the virus.

On Feb. 8, Fox5 reported the death of a man in his 70s who collapsed and died Feb. 7 as he was leaving the Javits Center in Manhattan about 25 minutes after receiving a COVID vaccination.

On Feb. 7, a local Villa Hills, Kentucky news site reported on the deaths of two nuns following a “COVID-19 outbreak” that occurred two days after the nuns were vaccinated. Prior to beginning the vaccination program, there had been no cases of COVID at the monastery, which has been shut down to visitors during the pandemic. After vaccinations began, 28 of the women had tested positive for COVID as of Feb. 7.

The clinical trials suggested that almost all the benefits of COVID vaccination and the vast majority of injuries were associated with the second dose.

The Defender also reported this week that according to the New York Times, several doctors now link the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines to immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a condition that develops when the immune system attacks platelets (blood component essential for clotting) or the cells that create them. The Times article featured two women who are recovering from ITP after being vaccinated. Last month, Dr. Gregory Michaels died from ITP two weeks after he got the Pfizer vaccine.

While the VAERS database numbers may seem sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.

According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:

• Any adverse event listed in the VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination that occurs within the specified time period after vaccination.
• An adverse event listed by the vaccine manufacturer as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine.

The CDC says healthcare providers are strongly encouraged to report:

• Any adverse event that occurs after the administration of a vaccine licensed in the United States, whether or not it is clear that a vaccine caused the adverse event.
• Vaccine administration errors.

However, “within the specified time” means that reactions occurring outside that timeframe may not be reported, in addition to reactions suffered hours or days later by people who don’t report those reactions to their healthcare provider.

Vaccine manufacturers are required to report to VAERS “all adverse events that come to their attention.”

Historically, fewer than fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS, a system that Children’s Health Defense has previously referred to as an “abject failure,” including in a December 2020 letter to Dr. David Kessler, former FDA director and now co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and President Biden’s version of Operation Warp Speed.

A critic familiar with VAERS’ shortcomings bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”

CHD is calling for complete transparency. The children’s health organization is asking Kessler and the federal government to release all of the data from the clinical trials and suspend COVID-19 vaccine use in any group not adequately represented in the clinical trials, including the elderly, frail and anyone with comorbidities.

CHD is also asking for full transparency in post-marketing data that reports all health outcomes, including new diagnoses of autoimmune disorders, adverse events and deaths from COVID vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

James Corbett: What About Excess Mortality?

by James Corbett, The Corbett Report
February 12, 2021

What About Excess Mortality? – Questions For Corbett #073

Stephen writes in to ask about excess mortality. What is this number, how do we find it, and what does it tell us (or fail to tell us) about what happened in 2020? Is there a slam dunk argument here to destroy the COVID narrative? And, if not, what is the real lesson of this hunt for excess deaths? Join James for an in-depth exploration of these issues in this week’s Questions For Corbett.



Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds.com / YouTube or Download the mp4

SHOW NOTES

Excess mortality during the Coronavirus pandemic (Our World in Data)

The deadly toll of Covid-19 in Spain’s care homes: 29,800 fatalities

COVID-19: How mortality rates in 2020 compare with past decades and centuries

Excess Mortality – What You Aren’t Being Told ?

Study: Most N.Y. COVID Patients on Ventilators Died

The 4th Annual Fake News Awards!

Perspectives on the Pandemic | The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse | Episode Nine

COVID-19 Linked Hunger Could Cause More Deaths Than The Disease Itself, New Report Finds

SA researchers say lockdown ‘nearly 30 times more deadly’ than disease

2020 Was Especially Deadly. Covid Wasn’t the Only Culprit.

What NO ONE is Saying About The Corona Crisis

Same Facts, Opposite Conclusions – #PropagandaWatch

Gunshots, Motorcycle Deaths Count as COVID Casualties

Johns Hopkins Researcher: No Excess Deaths from COVID-19; Official Stats Are Misleading, Indicating Misclassification

https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps

cover image credit soumen82hazra / pixabay

No Masks for Kids: Gathering Evidence of Harm Done to Your Children by School Mask Mandates

by Patrick Wood, Citizens for Free Speech
sourced from Citizens for Free Speech newsletter
February 11. 2021

Many parents are asking what they can do for their school-age children who are being forced to wear face masks in school. Schools are not listening to parents and are refusing to accommodate those who physically cannot or don’t want to wear masks.

We have received some anecdotal stories that wearing a mask at school is causing physical or psychological harm to some children. We want to dig deeper, and ask you to help.

If you have a first-hand story that you can share, CFFS has set up a new web site to collect such reports.

By first-hand, we mean that you must be directly involved with the student and are not making a second-hand report of something you have heard from someone else. Reports for any other reason or topic will be deleted without notice or apology.  

Visit No Masks for Kids to Share Your Story

If you know other parents who have experienced problems with their own students, please tell them about our new site.

For Liberty,

Patrick Wood
Executive Director

http://www.citizensforfreespeech.org/

cover image credit pixabay

Red Alert Warning About Pfizer and Moderna COVID Inoculations

by Stephen Lendman, Global Research
February 11, 2021

Pfizer and Moderna mRNA inoculations aren’t what they’re promoted to be.

As medically defined by the CDC, vaccines are supposed to stimulate the “immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

Immunization is a “process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination.”

The above is not what mRNA inoculations are designed to do. They’re something else entirely.

They’re gene modifying delivery systems that don’t produce immunity —what Moderna calls “gene therapy technology.”

Not designed to prevent seasonal flu-renamed covid illness, at most they may somewhat reduce symptoms short-term.

Promoting mRNA technology as vaccine protection from covid is part of a state-approved/media proliferated mass deception scam.

The above technology is unapproved by the FDA for human use because it’s experimental, inadequately tested, and high-risk — especially for the elderly with weakened immune systems.

The nanoparticle-based delivery system is unapproved.

mRNA inoculations contain hazardous polyethylene glycol (PEG) to deliver their DNA-altering technology to human cells.

The risk of adverse events increases greatly from follow-up inoculations, including to potentially life-threatening anaphylactic shock.

In 2017, Moderna abandoned mRNA technology and lipid nanoparticles because tests caused large numbers of adverse effects.

Yet the same gene therapy and nanoparticle delivery system are used by Moderna and Pfizer in their misnamed mRNA “vaccines” that aren’t what they’re called.

According to statnews.com, “mRNA is a tricky technology.”

“Several major pharmaceutical companies have tried and abandoned the idea, struggling to get mRNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects.”

“(N)anoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease.”

“(D)ose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients.”

“Moderna could not make its therapy work, former employees and collaborators said.”

“The safe dose was too weak, and repeat injections of a dose strong enough to be effective had troubling effects on the liver in animal studies.”

Moderna earlier admitted that its lipid nanoparticles (LNP) risked “significant adverse events,” adding:

“No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential category of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us.”

“mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new category of medicines.”

“(T)here can be no assurance that our LNPs will not have undesired effects.”

According to virologist Judy Mikovits, LNPs can enter the brain, risking pathologic neuro-inflammation that could cause multiple sclerosis, ALS, or other serious diseases.

Johns Hopkins explained that potentially serious adverse events may occur after receiving follow-up mRNA inoculations.

According to Children’s Health Defense, “doctors link Pfizer (and) Moderna ‘vaccines’ to (a) life-threatening blood disorder.”

Health Impact News reported the following:

“An entire school district in Ohio canceled classes on Monday this week after so many of the staff suffered side effects from one of the experimental COVID mRNA injections over the weekend.”

Fox News Cleveland reported that “(t)wo days after employees were given their first round of COVID-19 vaccinations, the Fairless Local School District canceled classes, attributing it to many developing side effects and becoming ill.”

Similar events to the above are happening in the US and European countries after Pfizer and Moderna inoculations.

The more people jabbed, the more adverse events that at times are fatal.

Going along with experimental mRNA inoculations is playing Russian roulette with human health.

There’s high risk of things turning out badly in the short or longer-term.

Deceased 39-year-old Dr. Keshav Raman Sharma is an mRNA statistic.

Inoculated on January 5, he was found dead at home five days later.

He’s not alone. Others suffered the same fate.

Protecting health and well-being requires avoidance of these experimental, inadequately tested high-risk, unapproved inoculations.

Connect with Stephen Lendman at Global Research

“Never-Before-Seen Strange COVID Symptoms”? Try Using Logic

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
February 10, 2021

UPDATE: one of the “strange and unique” COVID symptoms, cited to prove “the virus must be the cause,” is loss of the sense of smell. Try this. On a search engine, type in, “Mayo Clinic, loss of smell, causes.” You’ll find a long list of conventional explanations. [1] Nothing new or unique…

Recently, I published an article explaining why people are dying without the presence of a virus. It’s the great COVID re-labeling scam. [2]

All sorts of traditional lung problems are re-packaged as “COVID.”

Of course, I’ve also been writing many articles showing that SARS-CoV-2 has never been proven to exist. [3]

I’ve made it clear that in every so-called epidemic, there are “outlier cases.” People with unusual symptoms. Commenters pick up on these outliers and weave all sorts of stories around them.

COVID is no different in this respect. The stories begin with reports that “some patients” have extreme shortness of breath, or their chest X-rays reveal “ground glass” lung patterns.

Therefore, the stories go, SARS-CoV-2 must exist, or another massive and singular cause is creating these highly unusual symptoms.

First of all, in the reports, we don’t know HOW MANY patients have the unusual symptoms. Is it 10? 50? 500? And are they all from the same city or town? We’re fed a generality.

And second, no one bothers to look for prosaic causes of these “strange symptoms.” Of course not. That would be too obvious. Too simple. Less interesting.

Let me give you an example. Extreme shortness of breath. Hypoxia. Low oxygen levels in the blood. That’s one of the “strange symptoms.”

Patients in New York have mystified ER doctors because they show up with this condition.

But WebMD lists a number of obvious causes for hypoxia: asthma attack; trauma (injury); COPD; emphysema; bronchitis; pain medicines, “and other drugs that hold back breathing”; heart problems; anemia, “a low number of red blood cells, which carry oxygen.” [4]

Among the drugs that can cause the oxygen deprivation known as hypoxia? From drugabuse.com: “…opiate [opioid] drugs also slow your breathing…and in case of an overdose, your breathing is slowed to a virtually non-existent and lethal level.” [5]

Is anyone looking into THAT, in New York?

More from drugabuse.com: “In the U.S., a whopping 44 people die each and every day as a result of respiratory arrest brought on by prescription opioid overdose. The opioids depress your breathing, bring on heavy sedation and make it impossible to wake up. What’s more, the opioids found in painkillers are the same ones found in heroin, which caused over 8,000 overdose deaths in 2013.”

2018 estimate of deaths from opioid overdoses in New York: 3000. Many more people in the New York area are addicted to these drugs. In New York State, in 2017, the number of people discharged from hospitals, after treatment for opioid overdose or dependency: 25,000. [6]

In 2020, people who have developed opioid hypoxia are misdiagnosed with “COVID-19 lung problems.” Some of these people would be sedated further, put on ventilators—ignoring the need to deal with their overdose, their addiction, their withdrawal—and they die. [7] [8]

New York City, opioids, heroin, severe breathing problems, hypoxia, ventilators with sedation, death.

None of this requires the existence or transmission of a purported coronavirus.

And hypoxia can be alleviated with oxygen delivered through means other than ventilators.

So…it turns out that extreme shortness of breath is not unusual. It has a number of causes. None of them requires the existence of a virus.

Now let’s consider the so-called “ground glass” phenomenon. From MEDPAGE Today: “The term [ground glass] refers to the hazy, white-flecked pattern seen on lung CT scans, indicative of increased density.” [9]

“Chest radiologists adopted it [the term] in the 1980s, with a first appearance in the Fleischner Society Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Radiology in 1984.”

“’We see [ground-glass opacities] so often in chest imaging,’ Guo [‘Henry Guo, MD, PhD, of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California’] told MedPage Today. “They come in different shapes, sizes, quantities, and locations, and they can indicate many different underlying pathologies — including other viral infections, chronic lung disease, fibrosis, other inflammatory conditions, and cancers.”

So there’s nothing new or highly strange about the ground glass phenomenon.

But wait. There’s more. “Adam Bernheim, MD, of the Mount Sinai system in New York City, authored one of the early papers on chest CT findings in COVID-19. He and his colleagues studied images captured from 121 patients at four centers in China mostly in late January [2020].”

“’There are a lot of diseases that can cause ground-glass opacities, but in COVID-19, there’s a distinct distribution, a preference for certain parts of the lung,’ chiefly in the lower lobes and periphery, and it appears multifocally and bilaterally, Bernheim said.”

“COVID-related ground-glass opacities also have a very round shape that’s ‘really unusual compared with other ground-glass opacities,’ he said.”

Aha. So maybe COVID patients ARE exhibiting an outlier pattern of ground glass.

Alas, there are several problems with that assertion:

First of all, how do we define a “COVID patient?” Through a PCR test for a virus that has never been proved to exist.

The second problem with the doctor’s statement in the MEDPAGE article? All the patients came from China, and they were diagnosed very early, at the beginning of the “outbreak.” How were they diagnosed?

“Guess what? We have 20 patients with unusual CT lung scans. We’re going to call them ‘pandemic victims of a new virus.’ Why? Because they have unusual CT lung scans.” This is called circular reasoning. It’s a chapter in a subject called logic, which used to be taught in schools, before “I’m triggered” and “I want to cancel everything” became major courses on the way to a PhD in Grunge. [10]

The other problem has to do with deadly pollution, and what lung X-ray patterns it can cause. In China, for example, above large cities like Wuhan, there is a unique mixture of early industrial and modern industrial pollutants—never before seen in human history. [11]

The synergistic effects of these individually toxic compounds have never been studied. Therefore, it’s quite possible that the outlier ground glass patterns are the result of this new and different air pollution mixture.

What I’m reporting, in this article, needs to be understood, before making bald claims that a new virus, or some other esoteric cause, is responsible for “ground glass in COVID patients” or “low oxygen levels.”

Getting the picture?

Going off on tangents—claiming that “some COVID patients” are showing astounding symptoms—makes for shocking stories, but it doesn’t take into account far more likely explanations.

People with a propensity for launching shocking stories will never be satisfied with ordinary answers. They’ll keep driving their tales forward. They’ll keep claiming patients are showing symptoms that have never been seen before.

Some shocking stories are true. Some aren’t. I suggest using a degree of rationality and logic, to differentiate between what is merely bizarre for its own sake, and what is strange AND true.

SOURCES:

[1] https://www.mayoclinic.org/symptoms/loss-of-smell/basics/causes/sym-20050804

[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/03/covid-a-disease-in-name-only/

[3] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/01/the-non-existent-virus-it-undercuts-all-other-stories/

[4] https://www.webmd.com/asthma/guide/hypoxia-hypoxemia#1

[5] https://drugabuse.com/take-my-breath-away-a-deadly-warning-about-opiates/

[6] https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/opioid/data/pdf/nys_opioid_annual_report_2019.pdf

[7] https://nypost.com/2020/04/06/nyc-doctor-says-coronavirus-ventilator-settings-are-too-high/

[8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/08/covid-breathing-ventilators-new-york-death-rate/

[9] https://www.medpagetoday.com/pulmonology/generalpulmonary/86751

[10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/02/13/sudden-spike-in-coronavirus-cases-only-means-new-method-of-counting/

[11] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/02/23/wuhan-and-the-polluted-air-as-a-cause-of-epidemic-illness/

The Great RESIST: “Wake Up Call” Documentary with World Freedom Alliance

by Oracle Films
February 4, 2021



Original video available at Oracle Films BrandNewTube and Oracle Films Uncensored YouTube channels.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

WAKE UP CALL | Documentary 4K | World Freedom Alliance: Copenhagen

The World Freedom Alliance gathers in Copenhagen, Denmark to bring together the world’s most prolific freedom-fighters.

Centring around a political rally of JFK21, this documentary features the latest comments from Andrew Kaufman, Catherin Austin Fitts, Dolores Cahill and many other members of the WFA in 2021.

Support the work of Oracle Films: https://paypal.me/oraclefilms

(See partial transcript below.)

__________

This documentary, created by Oracle Films, features many speakers including:

• Mads Palsvig, Former Investment Banker
• Dr. Mikael Nordfors, Medical doctor from Sweden
• Dr. Heiko Schoning, Medical Doctor from Germany
• Monique Janssen, Psychologist from Holland
• Agathe Levi Palsvig, Psychology Student
• Maneka Helleberg, Chairman of WFA from Sweden
• Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., American lawyer, chairman of Children’s Health Defense
• Mick Stott, British Army Veteran
• Mathias Levi Palsvig, Political Party Member — JFK21
• Prof . Dolores Cahill, Molecular Biologist & Immunologist
• Dr. Johan Denis, Medical Doctor from Belgium
• Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Medical Doctor & Forensic Psychiatrist from America
• Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson, Neurologist from Germany
• Catherine Austin Fitts, Investment Advisor & former U.S. Asst Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
• Dr. Scott Jensen, Minnesota State Senator & Medical Doctor
• Dr. Heiko Santelmann, Medical Doctor from Germany
• Dr. Elke F. De Klerk, Medical Doctor from Netherlands
• Justyna Walker, Political Activist & Singer/Songwriter
• Senta Depyydt, Journalist from Belgium

The following unofficial, partial transcript is provided by Truth Comes to Light.

Dr. Mikael Nordfors

We are lots of experts here in our organization — lots of professors, nobel prize winners, doctors — and we agree on very strongly on some points like the PCR test is not reliable and the lockdown measures has no scientific background. Actually, they are proven to not work in the multiple studies published now. And still we do it. And these experts, when WHO they are paid to say a certain agenda and they don’t dare to have a debate with us. They only use censorship to silence us down. And that shows that we are right and they are wrong, because if they were right and we were wrong they could easily challenge us in a debate. And then people could decide for themselves. But we’re not even allowed to have the right to have a debate today.

_____

Monique Janssen

And you know how the brain works, pictures go straight into our unconscious brain. We are being brainwashed wherever we go. This is not humanity. We should stop this immediately. This is child abuse. And they really believe that they have to do this in order to keep us safe because they are so loyal to us (our children). They want to keep us safe. And it’s not their job. So we have to show them what it is to be courageous, so they can mirror that. We have to show them to be loving people, to help each other, to hold hands, to make jokes, to love, to make serotonin, to make endorphins, to make dopamines, to make oxytocin. We have to show them. They learn from us how it is to be humans.

_____

Agathe Levi Palsvig

They take us by our empathy and morals and say things like ‘keep each other safe’ and ‘follow the rules’. And, of course, an empathic person would fall for that. While these rules are getting more and more preposterous for a virus with a survival rate of 99%. We are not stupid!

Human beings are hardwired for connection and we have a fundamental need to belong. We are here to love, to connect, to learn and to be in service — something that is being made almost impossible for all of us to fulfill right now. So I just want to remind everybody that we’re not up against people who are asleep. Okay? We’re up against those people who would pay any price to keep the good people, our people, asleep. We are the minority until we become the majority. We are here to win.

_____

Mads Palsvig

We have started the 4th of November. We copied the success from Iceland in 2008. So we are doing a lot of pots and pans noise. And we call it the clinky clunky. And the atmosphere is really something everybody should try. Because I thought we do the pots and pans to wake up the politicians, to make a statement that they don’t pay attention to the people, they don’t listen. I thought it would just be a lot of noise. But actually you get into a rhythm. And it’s actually very very pleasurable actually.

_____

Maneka Helleberg

There is not like one scientific truth. Science is turning into religion right now. Science is not a religion. It’s not supposed to be. Science should be a discussion, an open debate. In a democracy there is a debate. Period. If we don’t have an open debate, it’s not a democracy. And that’s what we need to reclaim again, over and over.

_____

Mads Palsvig

I’m a former investment banker and it was a total shock to me when I realized that the stories we hear about money creation was not true. But it is the privately owned banks that are creating money. And then I stumbled upon Executive Order 11110 by your uncle, John F. Kennedy, who produced money the way it should be, by the government, for the people, debt-free money.

We have now started political party where we want to issue money the same way. And also I’ve been looking on Occupy Wall Street and the Yellow Vest Movement in France, and I strongly believe that one of the reasons it’s not working is because there’s no political platform. So we are now working within the World Freedom Alliance to support and encourage political movement — so that all the movements come together.

But actually also have a plan for how we can get rid of the politicians who are starting wars left right and center, poisoning our food, our air, our water, our medicine and certainly also our vaccines.

_____

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

I’m very, very heartened by what I see happening in Denmark — the commitment to human rights, civil rights, to democracy. To resistance to this medical cartel, to the imposition of totalitarian controls and the creation of the surveillance state.

You were talking about my uncle, John Kennedy… He said the primary job of every American president is to keep the country out of war. He had been in a war himself and he saw, not only the brutality of war, but he also saw what war and global war and a waging of war does to civil society and to democracies.

_____

Mick Stott

I’m a grandfather. I’m a father. But I’m also an ex-soldier and I served for 30 years. I’m here to speak to the veterans and the military people whom I’ve grown to love, know and help. And what I would say is that we are in danger as a police force and a group of soldiers of becoming agents. We’re becoming order followers.

And I can say this to you from the heart, the most dangerous group of people that exist today are the ones that follow orders without questioning those orders. As veterans we’ve been lied to for years. We know what that feels like. Veterans are the intermediary group of people that stand between the politicians and the people we signed up to protect and serve. As did police officers.

So what I would say to veterans, serving soldiers and the police people out there is: Remember why you signed your oath. Remember why you took that oath. And why you took the shilling. And you decided to fight abroad for these people. It’s us that are going to step in into that gap that exists — to make sure that we fulfill our promise to our communities. And to keep those communities what they’re meant to be, which is a community.

And I’m going to say to veterans out there, and you will totally understand this, but a civilian group might not understand this, I’m saying to you guys: Get ready to stand too.

_____

Mathias Levi Palsvig

A lot of people are following orders and are wearing masks out of empathy. And they have good intentions. And they are doing it because they think that wearing a mask will help save grandma’s life. But I can tell you my grandma has been isolated for months. I call her every day and I think it is absolutely devastating that she has to be isolated.

And if I was an old man who grew up during fascism and war, I think I would take the chance and see my grandchildren. And take the chance, maybe die happy, rather than live as an isolated slave. I think that there are a lot of people here who are more qualified than I am to tell you about the virus or about law. We have here world famous immunologists, virologists, doctors, researchers. And for that reason, I would like to talk about something else.

My great-grandfather was in a concentration camp. My mother is from Moscow and, in World War II, 30 million Russians died for our freedom. And that’s only one country, from one war. Now if you look over time, all the wars, there have been in all countries, how many millions of people or probably billions of people have died for our fundamental freedom and for our rights? And I’ll be honest. It is — it’s absolutely heartbreaking to see so many people I know, so many people I love, who are willing to give away their freedom because the government tells them to do it, because of a virus.

Well, I have one thing to say: If they want to take away my rights and my freedom, they can come and take it from me — over my dead body!

_____

Dr. Johan Denis

Trying to keep the light out on a sunny day, in a dark room, is very difficult. You really have to cover everything up, and be vigilant, because the smallest and the slightest crack will let the light in and reveal brightly what is inside. Truth is this shining light.

Therefore, every voice that speaks the truth becomes a beam of light that make all dark coverings crumble.

Dear friends, let’s be courageous. L.et us stand firm for this truth. Those who have been misled are our brothers and sisters too. And we welcome them. We hold no grudges. We believe in unity. Let us connect to our brothers and sisters in union and rejoice our connection and togetherness.

_____

Dr. Andrew Kaufman

We’ve been patient. We’ve been tolerant. We’ve even been, at least some of us to some degree, compliant. But this has got to end now. You’ve been on the streets telling your government this and it has worked so far. Now is the time to keep going. You have the momentum. You have the numbers. You have the heart. I’m grateful you’re standing up.

Your government has tried to oppress you with the proposed epidemic law. They want you to take the vaccine. If you refuse, they want to prohibit you from shopping, working and traveling. If that fails, they want to put you into concentration — I mean quarantine camps. If that fails, they’ll have the police force you into the camps. And if that fails, they want to have the police force you down and give you the vaccine. But you won’t let that happen.

You told them and they backed down. But you have to keep telling them because they will keep trying. As many of you know, it turns out this whole pandemic of COVID-19 is a fabricated web of deception. It is a tool of manipulation and control.

Picture for a moment that there were no news reports, no masks, no social distancing, lockdowns or store closings. Would we see that anything was different from all the past years of our collective experience? Have we seen people dying in the streets? Have we all lost people unexpectedly who are in good health? Are we burying bodies in our backyards? Or is there only the illusion of a pandemic?

At present, these tyrannical policies are based only upon so-called cases. This is not the same as when a doctor diagnoses you with an illness. To be a case, you can be completely healthy no symptoms at all. All that is required for a case is to have a positive test. You don’t need a test to tell you when someone has a fatal disease. The reason they’re using this test is to manipulate us. Let me tell you about this so-called PCR test. It stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction. This test, as discussed many times by its inventor Kary Mullis, is not suited to diagnose an illness or prove the cause of a disease.

“If they could find this virus in you at all. And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else. Right? I mean because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body. Okay? So that could be thought of as a misuse of it. Just to claim that it’s meaningful.”

It is a research and manufacturing tool. Yes — manufacturing DNA or RNA sequences. In this situation, it’s manufacturing a fake disease. So what this test actually does is make a lot of something out of a little of that something. That’s it. It takes a short sequence of DNA or RNA and replicates it over and over. It’s like looking for a needle in a haystack by making that one needle magically turn into 100 million needles. Certainly you would be able to see that many. One problem is, however, that when you amplify those needles, you also amplify twigs ,spider webs, lint, pebbles, dust, ants, hair and anything else that’s close to size of the needle.

So when you see the thing in large quantities are you seeing the needles or are you seeing pebbles and twigs? According to Dr. Fauci in the United States, if you amplify more than 35 cycle thresholds then all your results are twigs and pebbles.

“If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule. You almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38 even 36 you got to say, you know, it’s just it’s just dead nucleotides. Period.”

But that is exactly what they’re doing in many countries — like in England where they’re using a whopping 45 cycles. All their results are junk.

But there’s more. The particular RNA sequences this test looks at are based upon a theoretical model of a theoretical virus’ genes. It uses short sequences called primers to find the target of a so-called virus. A group of researchers in Spain recently searched these primers in a special database open to the public called BLAST and found that they are identical, not only to several different human sequences, but also to as many as 100 different bacteria. That means that almost anything like a fruit, a puddle of water, a sheep, or another animal, could test positive. And, in fact, they all have.

Since bacteria are ubiquitous, virtually anything could be positive for this PCR test. But based on this fraudulent and worthless test, your rights have been compromised. The more testing that is done, the worse it has gotten and will get.

You must resist and say no to the swab. Do not get tested or allow your children or family to get tested. They control the game through testing. If they set the cycles high, the number of positives will be high. Then they will order more lockdowns and other tyrannical policies.

One of those policies is about wearing masks. In my opinion, masks are one of the most heinous parts of this crisis. They make us alienated and estranged from our brothers and sisters. They tell us to hide our identity in shame. They tell us to be afraid of our neighbors. They tell us to shut our mouths. They tell us not to smile. It’s time to throw away those masks forever.

Thanks to Danish scientists, Dr. Bundgaard et al., we now have for the first time high quality randomized controlled trial data on masks for COVID-19. After being refused by three major journals, this paper was finally published earlier this week. I must note that the authors had to write up their discussion with some ridiculous statements just to make it look more favorable to the mainstream to get published. But their scientific conclusions were very clear. There was no evidence that masks reduce infection. I repeat, no evidence. Thank you, Denmark, for this major contribution.

_____

Dr. Mikael Nordfors

There might be some kind of new virus out there. And there is some new disease that I didn’t see so much before, so many patients. But on the other hand, it’s not hard to heal it. I for me, I know how to heal COVID-19. And you’re not allowed to talk about this. Because you can do vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, malaria medicines like hydroxychloroquine, and also awesome treatment vitamin C infusions, and the corticosteroid inhalation. And if you combine all these things and some anticoagulants very few people have to die from this disease. And if they are so bad that they die, they will probably die anyway in a couple of months. It’s undeniable now.

I mean you can see it so clearly how this totally well-known medicine hydroxychloroquine suddenly it becomes the devil and you cannot take it. I say, they will never find any vaccine that is even close to vitamin D. So you just take vitamin D and the COVID problem is solved. That’s why we don’t have any COVID in the summer because you get sun. That’s proven in many, many studies. There is a linear relationship between vitamin D level and COVID-19 mortality.

_____

Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson

I would like to appeal to the physicians and to our leading medical groups, please show some character and some backbone. The pandemic is a medical issue and it has to be solved medically. Please stop the madness and behave professionally.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

If you say to yourself, who are the people who are censoring our debate? All of those people are the people who are making money on the lockdown. Facebook. You know they have permanently bankrupted half the businesses in America [voice from audience: “and in Europe”].

And what’s happening, these are all small businesses. And guess who’s replacing them? Amazon. What’s happening now is a giant shift in wealth from the middle class in America, which is being obliterated and disempowered. And our constitutional rights are being robbed. That wealth is being shifted to this very rich group of robber barons from Silicon Valley, and from the banking industry, and from the pharmaceutical industry, and the medical cartel.

_____

Mads Palsvig

The harsh reality is that our media — they are lying to us. And the government is also lying. They are collaborators with foreign powers. But it’s clear that there has been a coup d’etat in every single country in the world. Who benefits? It seems to be the large multinational corporations and the super rich. And the people who are decimated and destroyed is the middle class.

_____

Catherine Austin Fitts

What they are doing is moving to destroy as much independent income as possible. Because independent income is what has been supporting the democratic process. And if they can force everybody onto their centralized, or centrally-controlled, transaction systems, then they can proceed to have complete control. So they don’t want independent producers, they don’t want independent income. They want a centralized control.

So, since March 2019, global billionaires are up 27% net worth and hundreds of thousands of small businesses and farms have been put out of business. And that’s not an accident. That’s intentional. What you’re trying to do is shift all the income into your platforms, starve your enemy, and basically put them in a position where they’re dependent.

I think one of the things that has made it difficult for all of us to push back on this is they’re working on multiple tracks. The central bankers are working on one track. The pharmaceutical companies are working another track. The military is working another track. The tech guys are working in another track. The telecommunications people are working in another track. And if you’re not integrating across all those silos, you don’t see how the vision is going to come together in the future.

You know, so this is a battle about everything, if you will. But it comes down to two visions. One is a vision of humans who are sovereign under what I would describe as divine intelligence or authority. And the other is humans are a resource, like a barrel of oil. So it’s transhumanism technocracy against freedom and belief that we are capable of civilization.

_____

Heiko Schoning

We are free people. We do have the choice to choose the freedom or to choose a tyranny. And, I kid you not. Nobody should say that he was not informed because it’s all written in a book. They call it “COVID-19 The Great Reset”. Do we want this? We are the Great Resist!

_____

Dr. Scott Jensen

Edmund Burke said something like this: “All it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.”

I’m so glad that you’re not doing nothing. You’re addressing a contrarian narrative. You’re questioning the conventional narrative. You’re seeing data corrupted and saying ‘why?’. You’re seeing individual rights stripped away from people and saying ‘why?’. And you’re seeing transparency absolutely thrown out the window and you’re saying ‘why?’.

I have absolute confidence that at some point in time the truth will come out. What price will we pay along the way? I’m not certain. We’ve already paid a price.

We’ve shut down schools and damaged children’s education at a level we may never be able to quantify. We have put in place policies that have encouraged mental health despair and suicide. We have caused people to postpone critical health care needs, including the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and heart disease, and many other human maladies. These are dark days. But I’m absolutely confident that we will get through this.

And a big part of the reason I share that confidence with you today is because you matter. Your motivation, your willingness to get up and do something, to speak to the issue, to leave your home and the comfort of it, and demonstrate or speak out. This matters.

_____

Dr. Mikael Nordfors

Most decisions should be made on the individual level, as low level as possible. And the politicians are only those decisions when it’s really necessary. For example, vaccinating children for COVID-19 is absolutely bullshit.

_____

Dr. Heiko Santelmann

Nobody needs a vaccine which is not a vaccine. But everybody needs hugs and fresh air, vitamin D-3 and zinc.

_____

Dr. Elke F. De Klerk

The government seems to want to own our bodies and is putting laws in place to take away our human rights, take away our bodily integrity. They want to vaccinate us. They want to track and trace us. It is a torture and a humiliation for humanity. And we are going to stop it.

_____

Prof. Dolores Cahill

If you paid me one million, I wouldn’t take it. If you paid me 10 million, I wouldn’t take it. I would go to prison first. And if somebody vaccinates me, I will be suing them for attempted murder.

_____

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

You know, we have a First Amendment in our country that protects freedom of speech. And we were the first nation to have that. The founders of my country did not pass the First Amendment to protect speech when it is convenient, when it doesn’t offend anybody, when it’s safe.

The First Amendment is there to protect speech when it’s obnoxious, when it’s dangerous, when people don’t want to hear it. That’s why we have rights.

We have religious rights. Not when everybody likes the same religion but when you don’t like that religion. They have to right anyway.

We have the right to assembly. Not when we like your protest or when we don’t, when the government doesn’t like your protest. That’s why we have it — when they say the protest is dangerous because there’s a pandemic.

That’s what the First Amendment is for. It’s not there to protect protests that everybody agrees with. It’s there to protect the protest that nobody agrees with — a minority.

[…]

And then everybody says ‘well, trust the experts.’

I can tell you something. For 40 years I’ve been suing chemical companies and oil companies and big polluters like Monsanto. When we go to court, they have an expert there. And if you listen to that guy, you’re going to believe everything they say — because they’re smart and they have credentials. Luckily, we get to bring our experts in who shows our data. And the jury gets to decide.

On any issue that you have, there’s experts diametrically opposed to each other. You can’t say trust the experts. … So, let’s have some democracy. Let’s have an open debate. Anything they tell us to do is illegitimate if it is not the product of open debate and democratic process. Let’s debate it and let’s find out the truth.

501 Deaths + 10,748 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show

The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Jan. 29 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 501 reported deaths, 453 were from the U.S. The average age of those who died was 77, the youngest was 23. 

by Children’s Health Defense Team, The Defender
February 5, 2021

As of Jan. 29, 501 deaths — a subset of 11,249 total adverse events — had been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccinations. The numbers reflect reports filed between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 29, 2021.

VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before confirmation can be made that an adverse event was linked to a vaccine.

As of Jan. 29, about 35 million people in the U.S. had received one or both doses of a COVID vaccine. So far, only the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been granted Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). By the FDA’s own definition, the vaccines are still considered experimental until fully licensed.

According to the latest data, 453 of the 501 reported deaths were in the U.S. Fifty-three percent of those who died were male, 43% were female, the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased. The average age of those who died was 77, the youngest reported death was of a 23-year-old. The Pfizer vaccine was taken by 59% of those who died, while the Moderna vaccine was taken by 41%.

The latest data also included 690 reports of anaphylactic reactions to either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Of those, the Pfizer vaccine accounted for 76% of the reactions, and the Moderna vaccine for 24%.

As The Defender reported today, a 56-year-old woman in Virginia died Jan. 30, hours after receiving her first dose of the Pfizer vaccine. Doctors told Drene Keyes’ daughter that her mother died of flash pulmonary edema likely caused by anaphylaxis. The death is under investigation by Virginia’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and the CDC.

Last week, the CDC told USA TODAY that based on “early safety data from the first month” of COVID-19 vaccination the vaccines are “as safe as the studies suggested they’d be” and that “everyone who had experienced an allergic response has been treated successfully, and no other serious problems have turned up among the first 22 million people vaccinated.

Other vaccine injury reports updated this week on VAERS include 139 cases of facial asymmetry, or Bell’s palsy type symptoms, and 13 miscarriages.

States reporting the most deaths were: California (45), Florida (22), Ohio (25), New York (22) and KY (22).

The Moderna vaccine lot numbers associated with the highest number of deaths were: 025L20A (20 deaths), 037K20A (21 deaths) and 011J2A (16 deaths), 025J20A (16 deaths) . For Pfizer, the lot numbers associated with the most reports of deaths were: EK5730 (10 deaths), EJ1685 (23 deaths), EL0140 (19 deaths), EK 9231 (17 deaths) and EL1284 (13 deaths). For 135 of the reported deaths, the lot numbers were unknown.

The clinical trials suggested that almost all the benefits of COVID vaccination and the vast majority of injuries were associated with the second dose.

While the VAERS database numbers are sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.

According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS:

• Any adverse event listed in the VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination that occurs within the specified time period after vaccination
• An adverse event listed by the vaccine manufacturer as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine

The CDC says healthcare providers are strongly encouraged to report:

• Any adverse event that occurs after the administration of a vaccine licensed in the United States, whether or not it is clear that a vaccine caused the adverse event
• Vaccine administration errors

However, “within the specified time” means that reactions occurring outside that timeframe may not be reported, in addition to reactions suffered hours or days later by people who don’t report those reactions to their healthcare provider.

Vaccine manufacturers are required to report to VAERS “all adverse events that come to their attention.”

Historically, fewer than fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS, a system that Children’s Health Defense has previously referred to as an “abject failure,” including in a December 2020 letter to Dr. David Kessler, former FDA director and now co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and President Biden’s version of Operation Warp Speed.

A critic familiar with VAERS’ shortcomings bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”

CHD is calling for complete transparency. The children’s health organization is asking Kessler and the federal government to release all of the data from the clinical trials and suspend COVID-19 vaccine use in any group not adequately represented in the clinical trials, including the elderly, frail and anyone with comorbidities.

CHD is also asking for full transparency in post-marketing data that reports all health outcomes, including new diagnoses of autoimmune disorders, adverse events and deaths from COVID vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

Children’s Health Defense – California Chapter Sends Letter to All California Superintendents Regarding Medical Ethics, Emergency Use Products, Voluntary Testing & Vaccine Safety

by Children’s Health Defense California Chapter
January 29, 2021

A Letter to CA Superintendents

Today, Children’s Health Defense – California Chapter sent a letter to 1,100 California Superintendents to let them know that Emergency Use Authorization products, like the RT-PCR test and COVID vaccines, cannot be mandated, as they are investigational and experimental. They must be voluntary. Further, according to both the CDC and WHO, if RT-PCR testing is offered voluntarily, it must only be offered to those with symptoms through their own doctor. This letter also contains science showing that children are not asymptomatic carriers of COVID, and that COVID vaccines have not been proven to prevent person-to-person transmission. Please share this letter, either using the article’s link or the PDF (CDE Superintendent Letter from Childrens Health Defense – California Chapter) with your own school district to educate them on medical ethics, the science, and the law.

Dear Superintendent,

Children’s Health Defense is a global leader in science, law, public policy and medical ethics. I am the President of the California Chapter of Children’s Health Defense, a 501(c)(3), and I write on behalf of our organization.

The purpose of this letter is to help you to understand the science, law and policy as summarized below and in the PDF enclosure. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to open safely, legally and ethically.

As the world learns to navigate COVID-19, opening schools safely is in everyone’s best interest. We have learned some California public school districts, such as LAUSD, and the California Department of Education (CDE) intend to mandate frequent Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) testing¹ on students and, when investigational COVID-19 vaccines are available to children, intend to mandate students and employees be vaccinated before they can return to campus. We are also monitoring CDE efforts to set up testing and vaccination centers on campuses.

Protracted school closures have created an educational and mental health emergency among students, due to learning loss from remote learning and isolation from their peers, sports, cultural activities, jobs and other support systems. Teen suicides are at an all-time high.² One of many tragic losses, teenager Dylan Buckner had “depression worsen significantly after COVID hit,” which led to his suicide. His father stated, “The family believes that had COVID not happened, or the country’s response to COVID had been more effective, Dylan would still be alive today.”³ In contrast, we invite you to learn more about how Alsea School Superintendent Marc Thielman opened schools in an Oregon county in Fall 2020 without incident.⁴

Mandating products approved for emergency use violates federal and state law since Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) means the products are investigational and experimental. Federal and state law is very clear that mandates are illegal for EUA products. Both the RT-PCR test and all COVID vaccines are not FDA-approved; they are available under an EUA.

The right to fully-informed consent has roots in the Nuremberg Code, which states the consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.”⁵ If an intervention causes greater harm, is ineffective for the stated aim, and illegal, as such you must re-evaluate implementing the proposed interventions as a condition for students to return to in-person learning.

Below we address the issues with your intended approach in four sections:

1. 1. The law surrounding Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA), under which both the RT-PCR and COVID investigational vaccines are being used on the public;
   2. Peer-reviewed science regarding
      1. (2a) The RT-PCR test, demonstrating that it is not a diagnostic tool and cannot determine if someone is sick or infectious, and;
      2. (2b) Emerging issues with the investigational COVID vaccine;
   3. Creation of on-campus COVID testing and vaccination centers; and
   4. Your institution’s real legal liability should you proceed with any plans to mandate investigational testing protocols or vaccines.

Note that while vaccine manufacturers may be shielded from liability by 42 USC 300aa-11 and 42 USC 300aa-22, your institution is not protected.⁶

You are hereby officially on notice that if you illegally or irresponsibly mandate products on students or public school employees, we may have no recourse but to take legal action. As an example, Children’s Health Defense has initiated a related suit in New York against the NYC Department of Education and Mayor de Blasio for arbitrary school closures and coerced PCR testing as a condition to in-person learning privileges.⁷ (Aviles, et al. V. de Blasio, et al. 20-CV-09829 (PGG)) 

(1) Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA): Illegal to Mandate Products Under EUA

PCR testing and COVID vaccines are not fully licensed products. They are EUA products,⁸ which by their very nature are legally considered investigational. As these are experimental medical products, it is unlawful and unethical for schools to mandate either the RT-PCR test or any currently available COVID vaccine. Federal law confirms explicitly that an EUA product must be voluntary because the federal statute requires “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”⁹

Mandating the RT-PCR and experimental COVID vaccines also violates California State law (CA Health & Safety Code § 24172).¹⁰ Federal and State law on this matter rest on the first principle of the Nuremberg Code requiring that the human subject be “so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice without undue inducement or any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress or other forms of constraint or coercion.” This is a bright line that cannot be blurred.

Of note, specific laws such as the US Federal Regulations, notably the National Research Act [Title II, Public Law 93-348],¹¹ Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research [45 CFR 46]¹² and revisions of various regulations, rules, and laws ([21 CFR 50]¹³, [21 CFR 56]¹⁴, [45 CFR 46 Subpart D]¹⁵, [10 CFR 745]¹⁶, [45 CFR 46 Subpart B]¹⁷, [45 CFR 46 Subpart D]¹⁸) specifically and permanently guarantee that all persons in the United States are entitled to exercise the right of informed consent to accept or to refuse to enroll in any medical experiment.

The CDC admits that it is illegal and unethical to mandate PCR testing in schools.¹⁹ Moreover, the States, and therefore public schools, cannot mandate the PCR test or COVID vaccines because the FDA and courts have found the federal preemption doctrine prevents States, and therefore public schools, from going outside the bounds of the Emergency Use Authorization law.²⁰

This was also confirmed again last year at a CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting in August 2020, where ACIP Executive Secretary Amanda Cohn, MD stated:

“I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated.”²¹

In conclusion, the law is clear that States, and therefore public schools, cannot mandate experimental products and are preempted from mandating an EUA product.²²  The soonest the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech experimental vaccines could be considered by FDA for full licensure (in adults only) is when the trials are expected to conclude, on October 27, 2022 and January 31, 2023, respectively.

(2) The Faults with RT-PCR Testing and Emerging Dangers of the COVID Vaccines

The FDA may someday grant full licensure to the RT-PCR test and some COVID vaccines. For now, these products are approved for investigational emergency use only, as described above, so the problems with the reliability of the test and vaccine efficacy and safety are not technically relevant to the illegality of mandates.

Since the FDA may grant full licensure at some point, which may make it legal to consider mandating them, we must also advise you of the medical and scientific issues that make school mandates dangerous to the health and safety of the educational community under any circumstances.

Below we detail (a) documented issues with the reliability of the PCR test; and (b) COVID vaccine science showing no disruption of person-to-person transmission, concerning safety data, and other issues regarding COVID vaccines and children.

(a) Issues with PCR Testing as a Condition for In-person Learning or Teaching

We understand that California Public Schools intend to mandate regular RT-PCR testing on children, with the penalty of withholding access to in-person education if testing is not completed.  The CDC has declared mandatory PCR testing unethical and illegal.

The RT-PCR test does not confirm infectiousness. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) guidance states the RT-PCR test must only be used in the presence of symptoms. As such, the RT-PCR should never be used on healthy people, and should only be used in a clinical setting combined with an exam by a licensed medical professional.

On July 17, 2020 and updated on July 20, 2020, the CDC recommends a symptoms-based strategy for testing, meaning only those with symptoms should consider being tested.²³

The EUA for the Roche PCR test states “positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status.”²⁴

The Roche EUA also states “positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses.” Any positive PCR test is unconfirmed if the patient is not also tested for flu, pertussis, tuberculosis, or many of the other 1400 human pathogens associated with symptoms similar to COVID-19. Skipping this standard differential diagnosis results in confirmation bias, attributing all symptoms like cough or a fever to COVID.

Since the RT-PCR test Cycle threshold (Ct) in the U.S. is set too high – at a Ct of 40 –  it can amplify a low viral load and be erroneously conflated with infectiousness.²⁵   On January 21, 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) further clarified that “careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed. The Ct needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different nucleic acid test (NAT) technology.”²⁶

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, acknowledged in July 2020 that a positive RT-PCR test above a 35 Ct is meaningless.

(“[I]f you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, …the chance of it being replication-competent are [sic] miniscule. And we have patients – and it’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians – somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus for a 37 cycle threshold. So I think if someone does come in with 37-38, even 36, you got to say, ‘You know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.”²⁷

In fact, 97% of PCR positives are false positives if the cycle threshold is higher than 35. A critical review of the seminal Corman-Drosten study which established PCR testing standards concluded:

“In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”²⁸

If you only read one reference in this entire letter, it should be the above to the Corman-Drosten Review: www.cormandrostenreview.com.  This paper describes in detail most of the shortcomings of the PCR test that is driving the fear of SARS CoV-2, the virus said to cause the symptoms called COVID-19.

Returning to the most egregious problem with the RT-PCR test, a scientific literature review study by Tom Jefferson MD found specific Ct values correlate with infectiousness or lack thereof, and suggests that a Ct of 35 is still too high: “The inability of PCR to distinguish between the shedding of live virus or of viral debris, means that it cannot measure a person’s viral load (or quantity of virus present in a person’s excreta.” In the review, all tests with Ct >30 resulted in non-infectious specimen. Jefferson also stated “weak positives (those with high Ct) are unlikely to be infectious, as a whole live virus is the prime requirement for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.”²⁹

The RT-PCR test being set at a Ct of 40 in the United States is indeed far too high and creates what has been termed a “casedemic,” disrupting all of society but especially children’s education and mental health. We do not think California public schools should be furthering this problem by requiring a test that the scientific community has found to be utterly unreliable.

Even if RT-PCR tests do gain full licensure someday, California schools must certify to the students, staff and family the following, before our education system is further disrupted by a test that delivers a majority of false positives and doesn’t measure infectiousness:

1. 1. 1. Provide all students and staff with fully informed consent and advise them of their right to decline taking a test, and the right for asymptomatic students and teachers to be in the classroom. In other words, testing must be voluntary.
      2. Refer symptomatic children and staff to their primary care physician for voluntary testing and treatment. Students and staff can return to in-person learning or work when they are symptom-free or have quarantined for the recommended 7 to 10 days.
      3. The primary care physician must rule out – via antibody or PCR testing – the other human pathogens that can cause symptoms similar to COVID-19.
      4. For any tests run on a student or staff member by the primary care physician, confirm the RT-PCR Cycle threshold is 28 or less, since that is the highest Ct with proof of replication-competent virus.
      5. Confirm with a DNA or RAT test that the presumptively ‘positive’ sample is positive and not just picking up dead RNA fragments or background noise by using Sanger sequencing on every potentially positive test, and then confirming any potential positives with a human cell culture to verify the existence of replication competent virus. If the sample is unable to be cultured, then the individual is not infectious.
      6. Demand that the test report includes viral load information, and not just a binary reading.
      7. Per the 1/21/21 WHO guidance, perform a second test if the first one is positive.
      8. Do not rely on antigen tests which are also fraught with issues of false positives and false negatives.

Current CDC guidance on testing in school settings states:

If a school is implementing a testing strategy [i.e. testing healthy and sick, not based on symptoms,] testing should be offered on a voluntary basis.  It is unethical and illegal to test someone who does not want to be tested, including students whose parents or guardians do not want them to be tested.³⁰

Please also keep in mind that according to the CDC, schools should be the first to reopen and the last to close.³¹

Given the above, the best course of action for the CDE and Districts is to ensure that sick students stay home, as has been the policy for pre-COVID times. There are already many other evidence-based protocols in place to allow safe return to in-person schooling, such as: hand washing, temperature-taking, suggesting sick students stay home until symptoms have resolved, classroom disinfection, and improved HVAC systems. Students should not be the victims of an experimental test, which will lead to a furthering of the Educational Emergency and even more social isolation that leads to mental health issues and suicide.

(b) Children are Not Asymptomatic Vectors; Science Shows COVID Vaccines are Risky

It is well-accepted that children have a statistically zero chance of dying from COVID. The CDC shows the K-12 mortality rate from or with COVID is .00003.³² Any intervention, especially one that is prophylactic, must cause fewer harms to the recipients than the infection. Since children have the lowest death rate from COVID infection, the cost-benefit of administering to children an investigational vaccine with emerging safety issues is especially difficult to justify. Therefore, it is clearly irrational to vaccinate children with a COVID vaccine to protect them from death.

Given these facts, an unfounded theory has emerged to use students as pawns who, if vaccinated, could somehow stop transmission to teachers and school staff. However, the data show: students are not asymptomatic carriers, they and teachers have far lower rates of COVID diagnosis than the general population, and the vaccine does not prevent person-to-person transmission.

Contrary to popular opinion, asymptomatic transmission is unfounded. Students are not disease reservoirs and are clearly not COVID vectors. The School Response COVID Dashboard shows that students and staff are among the least likely to be diagnosed with COVID. Compared to the positivity rate of 8.1% in the general California population in the most recently available data period (12/13/20), only 0.56% of California students tested positive for COVID, and the staff positivity rate was only 1.46%, even though teachers are daily interacting with students. This proves it is a significant mistake to assume children are asymptomatic vectors.³³ In fact, in Germany, students are valued as the “brakes” to COVID transmission.³⁴

A recent CDC-funded study in Wisconsin concluded no staff members were infected by children, and transmission rates were very low:

In a setting of widespread community SARS-CoV-2 transmission, few instances of in-school transmission were identified among students and staff members, with limited spread among children within their cohorts and no documented transmission to or from staff members. Only seven of 191 cases (3.7%) were linked to in-school transmission, and all seven were among children.³⁵ 

You may be surprised to learn that Sweden – the country that famously did not lock down – had an excellent outcome among children. “Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Among the 1.95 million children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000.”³⁶

A meta-analysis of 54 studies on transmission amongst almost 78,000 participants found that only 0.7% of cases attributed to “household transmission” could have spread from pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers in the household.³⁷

Additionally, a study among 10 million residents of Wuhan China demonstrated that asymptomatic transmission was non-existent.³⁸ Among 300 possible carriers, “virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and re-positive cases, indicating no “viable virus” in positive cases detected in this study. All asymptomatic positive cases, re-positive cases and their close contacts were isolated for at least 2 weeks until the results of nucleic acid testing were negative. None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.”

In contrast, a widely-quoted CDC-endorsed study claiming 59% of cases were due to asymptomatic transmission enrolled no subjects and is merely a mathematical model.³⁹ To further clarify, here is a side-by-side comparison of the Wuhan study compared to the CDC study:

In a 2020 Health & Human Services press conference, Dr. Fauci stated “even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.⁴⁰ The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.”

Given the statistically zero COVID death rate in children, the low rate of COVID positivity in children, and the lack of asymptomatic spread, there is absolutely no case for the vaccination of children to protect them or others from COVID.

Should COVID vaccines become fully licensed in the future and still be (inexplicably) under consideration for schoolchildren and staff after reviewing the above, we explain below how the COVID investigational vaccines do not prevent person-to-person transmission and are fraught with mounting safety issues as reported in the media, in the V-Safe App (used post-vaccination by study participants,) and in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS.) Most significantly, the investigational vaccines have not been tested in children.

Since the COVID vaccines do not prevent person-to-person transmission, it is irresponsible to think this medical product could somehow protect adults by vaccinating children. Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted in October the goal of COVID vaccines is to provide personal protection only, not to prevent death, or person-to-person transmission. Fauci said he and his colleagues would “settle for … the primary endpoint to prevent clinically recognizable disease.”⁴¹ Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks stated “our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission, because … you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable,” citing the need for a five-to-ten times longer trial length and even higher costs.⁴²

Through January 15, 2021, 181 U.S. deaths⁴³ have been reported after COVID vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS.)⁴⁴ There are almost 8,000 total COVID vaccine reactions reported to VAERS so far, including 764 reports for serious adverse events.⁴⁵ A CDC-funded study at Harvard Pilgrim concluded that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” to VAERS, a passive reporting system.⁴⁶ Therefore, it is reasonable to multiply any reported events by 100 to approximate the actual number of deaths and adverse events after any vaccination. In fact, the COVID vaccine serious injury rate, based on the December Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting covering the first five days of COVID vaccination is 2.8%.⁴⁷ Note that all approved COVID vaccines require two doses, so these data are mostly based on one dose. In the trials, the second dose was much more reactogenic, so we expect the serious injury rate to be much higher after the second dose.

In addition to these government-documented safety issues, hundreds of catastrophic injuries – like life-threatening anaphylaxis and a bizarre shaking syndrome – and deaths have been reported in the media and on social media.⁴⁸ Most recently baseball great Hank Aaron died 18 days after receiving the first of two experimental COVID vaccines.⁴⁹ These vaccines use brand new mRNA technology with known complications — and we can certainly anticipate many more unforeseen complications.⁵⁰

In fact, today there are about two dozen vaccines in use in the United States and another 66 have been withdrawn, most for safety issues, such as LymeRix, RotaShield and DTP.⁵¹ These fully licensed vaccines were judged as safe with government approval. This shows a vaccine withdrawal rate of 73%. If three-quarters of fully licensed vaccines are withdrawn, the probability of a warp speed experimental vaccine being withdrawn is far higher.

We urge you not to put schoolchildren in harm’s way with an untested new technology in a quixotic attempt to prevent them from being asymptomatic vectors. COVID vaccines are more like a high-risk prophylactic drug that might only benefit the recipient, not anyone around them. There is no place for medical mandates, especially not for interventions that only provide personal protection. That is an individual choice. As mentioned above, manufacturers enjoy full liability protection when people are injured or killed by vaccines. The school district does not.

(3) On-Campus COVID Testing and Vaccination Sites

The CDE and some public school districts in California are contemplating or attempting to create COVID testing sites on school campuses. For all the reasons stated above, there should be no such sites established on any California public school campuses or school properties. While voluntary community or school testing might initially seem benign, these sites could easily be converted into vaccination centers for students, staff and the public. Again, because of the experimental nature of the vaccine, this too would be highly inappropriate.

(4) School District and California Department of Education Legal Liability 

In summary, mandating EUA products is illegal. Mandates do not allow for informed consent, which is spelled out clearly in California Health and Safety Code (CA Health & Saf Code § 24172).⁵² Relying on the RT-PCR or any other investigational testing product will lead to over-diagnosis and avoidable harms to many students and staff, including a discriminatory system where those who test negative can move freely while those who do not wish to be tested or those who test positive – even falsely positive – are denied their rights to an education and to work.

Those who are forced to learn remotely do not have equal access. Remote learning disadvantages the poor: some may not have a fast internet connection, and students may not have a quiet room with a computer to learn away from family distractions and household/neighborhood noise. Administering to students and staff a vaccine with known safety issues is reckless and will cause injury and death for which school districts and the CDE will be liable.

Being in the unenviable position of defending an illegal program in a Court of Law would certainly prove to be a distraction from your important work.

It is our sincere hope that your district would never seriously consider such mandates.

We respect your position and fully appreciate your duty to educate children safely. Children’s Health Defense – California Chapter will follow up with you to ensure you understand both the law and science. We aim to help you make the right decisions for the children of California. Please contact us at ca.team@childrenshealthdefense.org or 415-496-5301 should you need more information or if you would like scientific and legal help to operate lawfully and ethically.

Sincerely,

Alix Mayer, MBA
President & Board Director, Children’s Health Defense – California Chapter
Board Director, Children’s Health Defense

Cc: Ray L. Flores II, Attorney at Law

[1] Usually conducted via nasal swab.
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/24/us/politics/student-suicides-nevada-coronavirus.html?referringSource=articleShare&fbclid=IwAR1SFUKTqmfiJB1F3_lEv_Xf3YAh9sUamm2_giT3cu6T9jARY6sbIlmP20M
[3] https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/suburban-football-star-dies-in-apparent-suicide-family-says-covid-worsened-depression/2411545/
[4] https://www.instagram.com/tv/CKUYGZGn4O8/?igshid=9xmjnp23bd8
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code
[6] https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section300aa-22&num=0&edition=prelim
[7] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-sues-nyc-dept-of-education/?fbclid=IwAR3edlSvDa2QMqNAoCO5pSj4am0OPz9o-V9SMGkkTrdPoZJ-iFBD1lQmtOI
[8] (Decl. Varma ecf 19 P.43.)
[9] ” 21 USCS § 360bbb-3 (“Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies”).
[10] http://leginfo.legislature.cahttp://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=24172.&lawCode=HSC.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=24172.&lawCode=HSC
[11] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg342.pdf#page=5
[12] https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML
[13]https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=50&showFR=1&subpartNode=21:1.0.1.1.20.1
[14] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=56
[15] https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/special-protections-for-children/index.html
[16] https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2011-title10-vol4/CFR-2011-title10-vol4-part745
[17] https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#sp45.1.46.b
[18] https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/special-protections-for-children/index.html
[19] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/k-12-testing.html
[20] https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities
[21] US Centers for Disease Control (September 2020), August 2020 ACIP Meeting – COVID-19 vaccine supply & next steps.  https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/videos/low-res/acipaug2020/Covid-19Supply-NextSteps_3_LowRes.mp4 (@1:14:40)
[22] See e.g., Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525, 570-71 (2001)
[23] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/disposition-in-home-patients.html and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html
[24] https://diagnostics.roche.com/us/en/products/params/cobas-sars-cov-2-test.html
[25] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[26] https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05?fbclid=IwAR2FnuSklIn9qtxve9EEEK9ht5WVw-QzWyeRUJJ203q0II4YBJecbJRylrA
[27] TWiV 641: COVID-19, Video interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci, This Week in Virology, 4:22-5:10 (Jul. 16, 2020), at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE
[28] www.cormandrostenreview.com
[29] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
[30] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/k-12-testing.html
[31] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7003e1.htm?s_cid=mm7003e1_w
[32] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schoolschildcare/k-12-testing.html
[33] https://statsiq.co1.qualtrics.com/public-dashboard/v0/dashboard/5f78e5d4de521a001036f78e#/dashboard/5f78e5d4de521a001036f78e?pageId=Page_c0595a5e-9e70-4df2-ab0c-14860e84d36a
[34] https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2020-07-13/german-study-shows-low-coronavirus-infection-rate-in-schools and https://theweek.com/speedreads-amp/925304/german-researchers-argue-children-may-act-brake-coronavirus-infections
[35] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7004e3.htm?s_cid=mm7004e3_w#F2_down
[36] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2026670
[37] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774102
[38] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
[39] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774707
[40] https://youtu.be/vrAvjU2LBkg
[41] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fauci-vaccines-will-only-prevent-symptoms-not-block-the-virus-195051568.html
[42] https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
[43] https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=NONE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19
[44] https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&DIED=Yes
[45] https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&SERIOUS=ON
[46] https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
[47] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
[48] https://prezi.com/i/byzl22mqwfaa/experiences-following-cvv/
[49] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hank-aaron-dies-days-after-receiving-moderna-vaccine/?itm_term=home
[50] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-dengue-vaccine-a-cautionary-tale/
[51] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/discontinued-vac.pdf
[52] http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=24172.&lawCode=HSC

Police Are Kidnapping Healthy Canadians & Forcing Them Into Isolation Camps!! Where’s Your Freedom?!

by Dan Dicks, Press for Truth
February 3, 2021

“Radisson Hotel is owned by the Chinese. The Chinese government owns the facilities that Canadians are being held in isolation camps. Just let that sink in for a second, guys. Maybe you’ll start to understand where this is all heading.”

 



Video available at Press for Truth BitChute channel.

Canada is no longer a free country, when you’re innocent and healthy but are forced into isolation camps, that’s tyranny, not freedom. Under the guise of a “pandemic” the Canadian government has introduced insanely Draconian laws that completely obliterates the rights of every single person living in Canada.

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth covers the Canadian Gestapo and how they’re scooping up innocent and healthy Canadians at their discretion precisely as we’ve WARNED they would.

___

Link to Toronto Sun article: 

https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-man-in-forced-detention-in-a-canada-covid-camp

COVID, a Disease in Name Only

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
February 3, 2021

The official definition of a “COVID-19 case” is so broad, it allows pretty much anything through the door.

A COUGH, or CHILLS AND FEVER, for example. Either of these is sufficient for a diagnosis of COVID.

The requirement of a positive PCR test for the virus—even that isn’t absolutely necessary.

Besides which—as I’ve been demonstrating in many articles—the PCR is riddled with irreparable flaws, leading to millions of false-positives.

On top of all this, as I’ve been writing (with details), the very existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is unproven.

So there is a perfect recipe for a false pandemic.

A person who, in 2018, would be diagnosed with the flu turns into a person who, in 2020, is diagnosed with COVID-19.

Ordinary pneumonia suddenly turns into COVID pneumonia.

All sorts of other lung infections are now COVID.

“I have a cold, Doctor.”

“No, it’s COVID.”

“It’s a sniffle.”

“A COVID sniffle.”

STAR ATHLETE: “Thanks to all my fans who supported me through this time. After my COVID diagnosis, I was really sick for three days. I mean, it was really bad. I could hardly get out of bed.”

SPORTS REPORTER (who will be fired five minutes after submitting this interview to his editor): Have you ever had a bad case of the flu, Charlie?”

STAR ATHLETE: “Well, sure. Back in 2015, I was really sick for three days. I mean, it was really bad. I could hardly get out of bed.”

SPORTS REPORTER: “That’s called a clue, pal. Think it through.”

STAR ATHLETE: What? Oh…you mean…?”

The disease labeling and relabeling game has been going on since the dawn of priest classes. Modern medicine has refined it somewhat, but it’s still a quite obvious con.

I first encountered the modern version in 1987. In Central Africa, there was “wasting disease.” Then it was called “Slim disease.” And finally, AIDS.

Actually, it was a relabeling of protein-calorie malnutrition, hunger, and starvation.

But the truth was too stark. It implicated local dictators and predatory transnational agriculture corporations who specialized in stealing good farmland from the people.

Today, COVID-19 is a label that conceals another stark truth: the real “disease” is an assault on national economies and every human who works for a living, through lockdowns.

cover image credit GDJ / pixabay

Thousands Of Maskless Orthodox Jews Ignore Israeli Lockdown to Attend Funerals

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
February 1, 2021

Thousands of Orthodox Israelis poured into Jerusalem’s streets to attend two separate funerals Sunday despite the country’s ban on large public gatherings, according to AP News.

The first funeral procession was for Rabbi Meshulam Dovid Soloveitchik, who died at the age of 99 after contracting COVID-19 three months ago.

Photographs from Soloveitchik’s funeral procession showed a large group of ultra-Orthodox Israelis’ winding down city streets without face masks nor properly social distancing.

Many of the Orthodox Jews in attendance defied the country’s third coronavirus lockdown. Local media reported police set up roadblocks and were able to turn away twenty tour busses heading to the ceremony.

… but still, thousands of Orthodox Jews flooded the streets of Jerusalem.

עכשיו בירושלים: אלפי בני אדם משתתפים בהלוויה המונית של ראש ישיבה pic.twitter.com/5Gq65ct3LS

— החדשות – N12 (@N12News) January 31, 2021

Deputy Health Minister Yoav Kisch tweeted that the gathering was “very bad in every way.” 

On Sunday evening, thousands of mourners attended a second funeral for rabbi, Yitzhok Scheiner, 98, who died from virus-related complications.

Thousands of ultra-Orthodox Jews flout #lockdown restrictions to attend funeral of Rabbi Yitzchok Scheiner in #Jerusalem#Israel pic.twitter.com/0DT9zY9UGg

— Ruptly (@Ruptly) February 1, 2021

Alon Halfon, a Jerusalem police official, told Channel 13 TV that police were overwhelmed by the crowd size and that health violations were issued.

Orthodox Jews have been in strong opposition to face masks and pandemic restrictions. Many of them have refused to abide by the rules in Israel and also in New York City.

Israel’s Health Ministry recorded 640,000 infections and nearly 5,000 deaths since the start of the pandemic. The country has been averaging around 6,000 infections per day, one of the highest in the world.

Time will tell, it could take weeks for infections to flare up following the mass gathering events this weekend.

Read more from Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge

The Non-Existent Virus: It Undercuts All Other Stories

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
February 1, 2021

In this article, I continue to trace the implications of the missing virus; I’m referring to the fact the no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists.

Here I take a wider look at the situation.

Apparently, the notion of a virus was born when germ theorists ran out of bacteria to explain illnesses. So they claimed there had to be a smaller invisible particle, which came to be called “virus.”

Since that fateful choice, researchers have encountered various problems. Chief among them: how do you to prove, in specific instances, that these viruses exist and cause illness?

Flashing forward—two modern avenues of proof have been invented. One, twist and reverse the meaning of “isolation.” And two, sequence the genetic structure of viruses by using pre-set computer programs to build, out of thin air, without justification, collections of genetic information, ending up with nothing more than virtual entities.

In past articles, I’ve analyzed and rejected both avenues of “research.”

In the first case, there is the unjustified presumption that the virus is contained in a soup in a dish in a lab, and this is called “isolation,” when it is actually non-isolation. In the second case, there is no true sequencing. It’s all made up out of unmerited supposition and guesswork.

However, 99.9% of mainstream scientists are true believers in their own methods and fabrications. They actually accept what they’re doing as science.

Therefore, in virology labs all over the world—including bio-weapons facilities—THE RESEARCHERS HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY’RE DOING. THEY DON’T KNOW HOW FAR FROM REALITY THEY ACTUALLY ARE.

THEY HAVE NO CLUE AS TO THE ABSURDITY OF THEIR OWN WORK.

They’re taken in and fooled and bamboozled by their own theories.

It’s as if explorers tasked with mapping the moon, on site, up close and personal, are carrying out their jobs in underground coal mines. And they don’t recognize there is a problem.

The tenth of one percent of the researchers who do see a problem understand they have to keep their mouths shut.

Am I claiming, with finality, that ALL “viruses” have no physical existence? No. At least, not yet. That’s an open question.

In the case of SARS-CoV-2, I see no legitimate evidence for its existence.

And what’s worse, scientists are hypnotized by their own assumptions; and therefore, they’re immune from re-thinking what they’re doing.

It certainly wouldn’t be the first time a system trapped the practitioners working inside it.

It’s how you train humans to be robots.

At first, the humans follow the rules that define the system. Then they graduate to enforcing the rules. Their minds become excessively literal. They view alternatives as heresies.

“Sir, you have no idea what you’re doing. You think you’re discovering new viruses. You think you’re manipulating them to create new forms.”

“Don’t bother me, I’m busy.”

“You’re saying non-isolation is isolation. You’re using algorithms to invent ‘viruses’ made up of irrelevant data. They’re data constructs, nothing more.”

“You’re a blasphemer. Don’t bother me, I’m busy.”

“You’re fiddling with processes that have nothing to do with what you think they have to do with…”

“How did you get into my lab?”

“I brought a camera crew. We want to film and document every single step you take to ‘discover a new virus’.”

“Absolutely not. You’re not official. This is a high-security facility.”

“In other words, sight unseen, we have to accept your claims as if they were law.”

“Yes, that’s the rule. We’re not running a debating society. We’re doing science.”

“But you see, that’s the point. You’re NOT doing science.”

“What are you saying?”

“You have no idea what you’re doing. You THINK you’re discovering new viruses. You BELIEVE you’re manipulating them. But you’re only working with self-generated fantasies.”

“I’ll tell you what. I’ll inject you with one of these fantasies and let’s see what happens.”

“You don’t possess an actual specimen of an isolated and purified virus, separated from all other material.”

“Here it is, in this dish.”

“No. LOOK AT IT. In that dish, there’s a soup. It contains human and monkey cells, toxic drugs and chemicals, and other genetic material. It’s the furthest thing from ‘isolated’.”

“We know the virus is there. Some of the cells are dying. The virus must be doing the killing.”

“No. The toxic drugs and chemicals could be doing the killing. Furthermore, the cells are being starved of nutrients. That alone can explain their death. Think it through.”

“There’s nothing to think about. Our procedures have been verified by thousands of studies and published scientific papers.”

“Consensus is not the same thing as truth.”

“Security, come to the lab. We have a non-certified intruder. Escort him from the premises.”

“That’s your bottom line?”

“Our work is classified. You’re a civilian. We pronounce; you obey.”

“And that’s science?”

“Absolutely. Didn’t they teach you that in school?”

“YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU’RE DOING IN THIS LAB. You’re a prisoner of your own illusions.”

“Security, hurry it up. This man is a subversive…”

“Suppose you believe you’re working with viruses, but you’re only working with IDEAS AND STORIES ABOUT VIRUSES?”

“What do you mean?”

“You’re not really isolating anything. And you’re not sequencing anything. The sequences are just INFORMATION cobbled together from genetic reference libraries by computer programs. It’s all, at best, a digital metaphor for what you believe exists. You’re generating fairy tales.”

“Even if that were true, it would be the closest we could come to reality. Nothing is perfect.”

“A rock is perfect. You see it, you kick it, you sit on it.”

“Viruses are very small.”

“Even more reason to be sure you’re dealing with something actual.”

“We use PCR technology.”

“But it only looks for a piece of RNA you ASSUME comes from ‘the virus’. Since you don’t have an isolated and purified virus, you have no reason to assume the RNA comes from ‘the virus’.”

“Security, take this man to his car. Take the film crew with him. They have no right to be here. This is a government-funded facility. Private citizens have no access to government.”

CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER: “Actually, I’d like to hear the rest of the conversation. My sister just took the vaccine to protect her against ‘the virus’, and now she’s in the hospital…”

COVID: If There Is No Virus, Why Are People Dying?

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 29, 2021

Since the beginning of this false pandemic, I’ve been offering compelling evidence that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists.

Then people ask, “So why are all these people dying?”

I have explained that, many times, and in this article I’ll explain it again.

First of all, the whole notion that COVID-19 is one health condition is a lie. COVID IS NOT ONE THING.

This is both the hardest and simplest point to accept and understand.

Don’t reject the existence of the virus and then say, “So what is THE cause of people dying?” There is no ONE CAUSE. There is no one illness. There is no “it.”

By far, the biggest sources of illness we are dealing with are lung conditions: various kinds of pneumonia; flu and flu-like disease; TB; other unnamed lung/respiratory problems.

THESE ARE BEING RELABELED “COVID.” It’s a repackaging scheme. People are dying for those traditional reasons, and their deaths are being called “COVID.”

Thus, the old is artificially made new. It’s still old.

In this wide-ranging group of people who have traditional lung conditions, by far the largest component is the elderly and frail.

They are dying in nursing homes, in hospitals, in their houses and apartments. In addition to their lung problems, they have been suffering from a whole host of other conditions, for a long time, and they’ve been treated with toxic drugs.

They’re terrified that they might receive a diagnosis of “COVID,” and then they are given that diagnosis. THEN they’re isolated, cut off from friends and family. They give up and die.

This is forced premature death.

Some of these elderly and frail people are heavily sedated and put on breathing ventilators—which is a killing treatment. In a large New York study, it was discovered that patients over the age of 64, who were put on ventilators, died 97.2 % of the time. Staggering.

Some of these elderly and frail patients are now dying from reactions to the COVID vaccine—and of course, their deaths are listed as “COVID.”

Why else are people dying? In many cases, it’s a simple matter of bookkeeping. They die in hospitals for a variety of reasons, and staff write “COVID death” on their files. In the US, states receive federal money based on these statistics.

Let’s say that, in certain places around the world, there are clusters of deaths (being called COVID) that can’t be explained in the ways I’ve just described.

In those situations, you would have to examine EACH situation closely. For example, just prior to an outbreak in Northern Italy, was there a vaccination campaign? What was in the vaccine? A new breed of toxic substances?

You have to consider each cluster independently.

Getting the picture?

None of the “COVID deaths” anywhere in the world requires the existence of a new virus.

For instance, in Wuhan, where the whole business began, the first “COVID” cases of pneumonia occurred in a city whose air is HEAVILY polluted. In China, every year, roughly 300,000 people die from pneumonia. That means millions of cases. None of those deaths need to be explained by invoking a new virus.

Now, add to all this the fact that the PCR test for the virus is irreparably flawed and useless (for a variety of reasons I’ve explained in other articles). The test spits out false-positives like a fire hose. Thus, the high case numbers. If the authorities have to go to such extremes to paint a picture of a spreading viral epidemic…

There is no evidence that an actual germ is traveling around the world felling people. The “evidence” is invented.

The “pandemic” is invented.

The fraud is promoted.

During these fake epidemics (there have been many), someone will say: “But my neighbor’s son, who was very healthy, died suddenly. It must be the virus.”

No. People who appear to be healthy do die. Not just today, but going back in history as far as you want to go. No one has an explanation. They might have an explanation if they looked very closely, but they don’t look closely.

Favoring the “virus explanation” is a bias, a knee-jerk reaction, a response to propaganda.

If you think there must be other major reasons to explain “why all these people are dying,” keep in mind that “lung conditions” is a category that expands all over the globe. For instance, there are about one BILLION cases of flu-like illness EVERY YEAR on planet Earth.

Repackaging/relabeling just a small percentage of those cases alone would account for all official COVID death numbers.

What’s new about COVID is the STORY. That’s what’s being sold: a STORY about a virus.

Individual Rights and Freedoms Under Siege in Era of COVID

“The COVID-19 pandemic has proven an opportunity of convenience for totalitarian elements who have put individual rights and freedoms globally under siege,” said CHD chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in his letter to 100,000 lawyers.

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Defender, Children’s Health Defense
January 26, 2021

In a letter to 100,000 lawyers, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chairman and chief legal counsel, urges his fellow attorneys to read “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19,” a special report prepared by the CHD team.

The report explores the legal rights to informed consent, bodily integrity, the right to refuse unwanted medical interventions, religious expression and autonomy. All of these rights will be “dramatically constricted” if employers, states and/or the federal government impose vaccine mandates.

Dear Colleague,

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven an opportunity of convenience for totalitarian elements who have put individual rights and freedoms globally under siege. A medical cartel composed of pharmaceutical industry, government regulators, financial houses, and telecom and internet billionaires are systematically obliterating freedom of speech and assembly, religious worship, property rights, jury trial, due process, and — ultimately — America’s exemplary democracy.

That’s why I am sending you this new Special Report, “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19.”

As a fellow lawyer who has practiced in our country’s courts for more than 40 years, I am alarmed by the growing power of global corporations to overwhelm our justice system, obliterate our constitutional liberty, and destroy public health. Throughout my career as a litigator, law professor, public advocate and author, I have worked to hold corporate giants and government institutions accountable. My life’s work has provided me with a unique perspective on our individual rights to clean air, clean water, unobstructed access to the commons, and our rights to make our own decisions about our bodies.

As chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), I have now dedicated myself to protecting children’s health by ending harmful environmental exposures to children, ending the exploding chronic disease epidemic that has debilitated over half of American kids born after 1989, and to holding those responsible accountable.

A 2006 Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) study found that 54% of America’s children today have chronic health conditions — allergies, ADHD, autism, eczema, asthma, obesity, autoimmune conditions and more. When I was growing up, most of these conditions were rare or unknown. When I was a boy, I received three vaccines. Today, children receive 72 mandated doses of 16 vaccines, prior to age 18. A mountain of peer-reviewed studies points to vaccines as the primary culprit in this public health calamity. That isn’t stopping our health authorities from mandating more hugely subsidized, shoddily tested, zero-liability vaccines for children. Our vaccine safety program falls dangerously short of what our children deserve.

The COVID-19 pandemic has allowed captive corporate regulators to hold the population hostage to justify the transfer of $45 billion of taxpayer money to pharmaceutical companies to finance a gold rush of new vaccines.

Protecting individual rights in the era of COVID-19 is essential 

I urge you to read this short legal dossier, “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19”, with an open mind and to draw your own conclusion about the legal and ethical implications of one-size-fits-all vaccine mandates for zero-liability, heavily subsidized mandatory vaccines.

Current vaccine mandates now require most school children to receive between 50-75 shots just to attend school. A vaccine-injured child, or adult, cannot sue the healthcare provider or the vaccine producer — but rather must go to a rigged national injury compensation program to sue the very government that ordered vaccine compliance in the first place. After studying this subject for years, I am more horrified than ever by the system’s pervasive corruption.

Given existing federal legislation and judicial precedents, it is all but impossible to hold vaccine manufacturers or healthcare providers accountable for vaccine injury in the courts. Vaccine injuries are not rare — HHS’s own studies show that the agency claims that injuries only occur with “1 in a million” vaccines is a mendacious canard. The true injury rate is actually 1 in every 39 vaccines, according to the Federal Agency for Health Research Quality.

Problems with vaccine safety aren’t isolated just to children 

Federal and State officials are considering mandates for the new COVID-19 vaccine. The New York State Bar Association, an organization for which I have great respect, has given its imprimatur to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for all New Yorkers if “experts” deem that necessary. But those experts are mainly regulators from captured public health agencies with pervasive and corrupt financial entanglements with pharmaceutical manufacturers.

The pharma-controlled media’s advice that we “trust the experts” is anti-democratic and anti-science. You and I know that “experts” can differ on scientific questions and that their opinions can vary in accordance with and demands of politics, power, and financial self-interest. In every lawsuit, leading, highly credentialed experts from opposite sides routinely offer diametrically antithetical positions based on the same set of facts. The trouble is that today, in the political arena, dissenting voices that question government policies and corporate proclamations are silenced by censorship and vilification.

In this special report, our CHD Team explores the legal rights to informed consent, bodily integrity, the right to refuse unwanted medical interventions, religious expression and autonomy. All of these rights will be dramatically constricted if employers, states and/or the federal government impose vaccine mandates.

I hope that “Protecting Individual Rights in the Era of COVID-19” can help you work with any future clients as you navigate the uncertain COVID-19/vaccine mandates landscape.

Sincerely yours,

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

CNA Nursing Home Whistleblower: Seniors Are Dying Like Flies After COVID Injections

by Brian Shilhavy, Vaccine Impact
January 26, 2021

James (he gives his last name in the video) is a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), and he recorded this video as a whistleblower because he could not keep silent any longer.

James reports that in 2020 very few residents in the nursing home where he works got sick with COVID, and none of them died during the entire year of 2020.

However, shortly after administering the Pfizer experimental mRNA injections, 14 died within two weeks, and he reports that many others are near death.

The video is long (47 minutes), and it is clear that James is suffering from emotional stress, and he admits that he has nothing to gain from going public, and that he will probably lose his job for doing so.

But he makes it very clear that these were patients he knew and cared for (he is also a “lay pastor”), and that after being injected with the mRNA shot, residents who used to walk on their own can no longer walk. Residents who used to carry on an intelligent conversation with him could no longer talk.

And now they are dying. “They’re dropping like flies.”

His superiors are explaining the deaths as being caused by a COVID19 “super-spreader.”

However, the residents who refused to take the injections, are not sick, according to James.

James makes it very clear that as a Christian, he cannot live with his conscience anymore, and that he can no longer remain silent.

He is not anti-vaccine, but just sharing what he knows is true, regarding the people he has cared for in his profession for over 10 years now.

This is a very clear pattern now. Inject the elderly with the mRNA injections, then blame their illnesses and deaths on the COVID virus.

The only reason Big Pharma and their sponsored corporate media are getting away with this, is because more healthcare workers like James are not coming forward to speak up for the helpless.

Even many in the Alternative Media are guilty for not covering this genocide against our seniors, as James states, because people are more concerned with Donald Trump and Joe Biden political news, while people’s grandmother, grandfather, and others are being killed by these injections.

James calls upon other CNAs, nurses, and family members to go public and tell the world what is going on with these experimental mRNA COVID injections.

How many more lives need to be lost before we say something?

If you know what is happening, but are not speaking out, then you are part of the problem.

And shame on you in the Alternative Media who are more concerned about which tyrant should be president than you are about covering the greatest crime of genocide this country has ever seen.

Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.

If you say, “But we knew nothing about this,” does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who guards your life know it? Will he not repay each person according to what he has done? (Proverbs 24:11-12)



Original video available at HealthImpactNews BitChute channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Connect with Brian Shilhavy at Health Impact News 

cover image credit VaccineImpact.com

When Fascism Comes, It Will Be Wearing a Mask

by Ron Paul, Ron Paul Institute
January 26, 2021

Almost immediately after his inauguration, President Joe Biden began creating new government dictates via executive orders. Many of these executive orders concern coronavirus, fulfilling Biden’s promise to make ramping up a coronavirus-inspired attack on liberty a focus of his first 100 days.

One of Biden’s executive orders imposes mask and social distancing mandates on anyone in a federal building or on federal land. The mandates also apply to federal employees when they are “on-duty” anywhere. Members of the military are included in the definition of federal employees. Will citizens of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries where US troops are or will be “spreading democracy” be happy to learn the troops shooting up their towns are wearing masks and practicing social distancing?

Another one of Biden’s executive orders forces passengers on airplanes, trains, and other public transportation to wear masks.

Biden’s mask mandates contradict his pledge to follow the science. Studies have not established that masks are effective at preventing the spread of coronavirus. Regularly wearing a mask, though, can cause health problems.

Biden’s mask mandates are also an unconstitutional power grab. Some say these mandates are an exercise of the federal government’s constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce. However, the Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to regulate interstate commerce. The president does not have the authority to issue executive orders regulating interstate commerce absent authorization by a valid law passed by Congress. The Founders gave Congress sole law-making authority, and they would be horrified by the modern practice of presidents creating law with a “stroke of a pen.”

Just as important, the Commerce Clause was not intended to give the federal government vast regulatory power. Far from giving the US government powers such as the power to require people to wear masks, the Commerce Clause was simply intended to ensure Congress could protect free trade among the states.

Biden also signed an executive order supporting using the Defense Production Act to increase the supply of vaccines, testing supplies, and other items deemed essential to respond to coronavirus. The Defense Production Act is a Cold War relic that gives the president what can fairly be called dictatorial authority to order private businesses to alter their production plans, and violate existing contracts with private customers, in order to produce goods for the government.

Mask and social distancing mandates, government control of private industry, and some of Biden’s other executive actions, such as one creating a new “Public Health Jobs Corps” with responsibilities including performing “contact tracing” on American citizens, are the type of actions one would expect from a fascist government, not a constitutional republic.

Joe Biden, who is heralded by many of his supporters as saving democracy from fascist Trump, could not even wait one day before beginning to implement fascistic measures that are completely unnecessary to protect public health. Biden will no doubt use other manufactured crises, including “climate change” and “domestic terrorism,” to expand government power and further restrict our liberty. Under Biden, fascism will not just carry an American flag. It will also wear a mask.

cover image credit naturalnews.com

David Rasnick: New Strain of the Coronavirus, or a Giant Con? How Deep Do the Lies Go?

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 25, 2021

David Rasnick [1], PhD chemist, with a long history working in the pharmaceutical industry (Abbott, Prototek, Arris), broke away from official science and served as the president of Rethinking AIDS: the group for the scientific reappraisal of the HIV hypothesis. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.

Here is a recent explosive statement Rasnick made [2] about SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. Digesting it brings about a breakthrough revelation:

“Viruses are unstable, RNA [e.g, SARS-Cov-2] viruses especially. They are so unstable, there is no such thing as an un-mutated RNA virus. They are like snow flakes, no two are identical.”

“HIV is an RNA virus with 9,800 nucleotides. You can download the HIV Sequence Compendium here:” [3]

“In the Preface it says:”

“’The number of [genetic] sequences in the HIV database is still increasing. In total, at the end of 2017, there were 812,586 sequences in the HIV Sequence Database, an increase of 8.5% since the previous year.”

“None of the sequences of the world destroying [sarcasm], computer generated coronavirus with its 30,000 or so nucleotides, are identical.”

“The virus maniacs use computers to compare the menagerie of sequences to come up with ‘A Consensus Sequence’ for HIV, Coronavirus, and all the rest. The consensus sequence exists in two places: in computers and in strings of RNA synthesized in the lab.”

“Even consensus sequences are not stable. Different groups, using a variety of computer algorithms will invariably come up with different ‘consensus sequences’.”

The implications of Rasnick’s statement are enormous.

First of all, forget about the idea that SARS-Cov-2 has one genetic sequence.

And these multiple sequences aren’t assembled by looking through a magic microscope. They’re put together by computer programs which have pre-set algorithms.

In other words, the sequences are built by ASSUMPTIONS (not evidence) embedded in the algorithms.

ANY vaccine developed for SARS-Cov-2 (even if you believe in the theory of how vaccines are supposed to work) would face the task of producing immunity to an ever-mutating virus—not just one mutated strain, but endless numbers of mutations.

You would have an analog to seasonal flu, in which researchers make a guess about what the new version of the virus will look like every year and develop a new vaccine for that guess.

How well is this working out? Public health agencies report that, each and every year, there are a BILLION cases of seasonal flu, worldwide.

Going still deeper, if the genetic sequences of the ever-mutating viruses are not discovered, but concocted via computer programs, how likely is it that a vaccine utilizing that “data” would work?

And at the bottom of the whole pile of guesswork, is, of course, the realization that, if these genetic sequences are concocted—where is the ACTUAL isolated virus? WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT IT EXISTS?

Where is it, when, as I’ve been reporting for months now, researchers twist and torture the meaning of “isolated,” so that it indicates “the virus is somewhere in a soup in a dish in a lab”—definitely UN-isolated.

Such is the “science” of modern virology.

But don’t worry, be happy, the test “for the coronavirus” must be accurate, the case and death numbers must be accurate, and the consequent lockdowns which are destroying national economies and hundreds of millions of lives are necessary…right?

Sure. Why not? Let’s say it’s all, all right. Everybody can go back to sleep and let tyrants demolish Earth civilization.

OR, you can REBEL against the Police State built on a house-of-cards hoax called “science.”

As opposed to “the virus,” liberty and freedom are quite real. People can feel them in their bones, in their minds and souls. Even and especially if they are slaves, they can feel them.

Speaking of whether a virus actually exists, here is an article I’ve reposted several times:

DOES HIV EXIST? AN EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW

Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.

My first book, AIDS INC., was published in 1988. The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19.

In 1987-88, my main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, I had blithely assumed the obvious answer was yes. This created havoc in my investigation, because I was facing contradictions I couldn’t solve.

For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.

Finally, in the summer of 1987, I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.

I’m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here, but once HIV was out of the picture for me, many pieces fell into place. I discovered that, in EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus.

AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”

Several years after the publication of AIDS INC., I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research: DOES HIV EXIST?

Was the purported virus ever truly discovered?

And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?

The following 1997 interview, conducted by brilliant freelance journalist, Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:

How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?

These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.

Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”

Here I’m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview [4] [5]. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.

CJ: Does HIV cause AIDS?

EP: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.

CJ: Why not?

EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists.

… CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?

EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]

CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.

EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.

CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s a virus in the cultures?

EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.

… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [an enzyme] and will replicate when placed in new cultures. Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate.

EP: Exactly. It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other material in cell cultures. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.

The technology is complicated, but the concept is extremely simple. You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose, ordinary table sugar, made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier, or more dense, towards the bottom. Meanwhile, you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus. If you’re right, retroviral particles will be released from the cells and pass into the culture fluids. When you think everything is ready, you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further. In other words, they drift down the density gradient until they reach a spot where their own density is the same as that region of the sugar solution. When they get there they stop, all together. To use virological jargon, that’s where they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.

That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.

CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you’ve caught?

EP: Not only that. It’s the only way to know if you’ve caught a fish. Or anything at all.

CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?

EP: This is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.

CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.

EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.

CJ: And what was that method?

EP: All the steps I have just told you. The only scientific method that exists. Culture cells, find a particle, isolate the particle, take it to pieces, find out what’s inside, and then prove those particles are able to make more of the same with the same constituents when they’re added to a culture of uninfected cells.

CJ: So before AIDS came along there was a well-tried method for proving the existence of a retrovirus, but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method?

EP: They used some of the techniques, but they did not undertake every step including proving what particles, if any, are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient, the density that defines retroviral particles.

CJ: But what about their pictures?

EP: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…”

—end of interview excerpt—

If you grasp the essentials of this discussion, you’ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV, because the methods for proving its existence were not followed.

And so…as I’ve reported these past few months, there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus, since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done.

I kept the Christine Johnson interview, and other similar information, in mind when, for example, I explored the dud epidemics called SARS and 2009 Swine Flu.

How many viruses have been named as causes of disease, when in fact those viruses have never been isolated or proved to exist?

Of course, conventional-consensus researchers and doctors will scoff at any attempt to raise these issues. For them, “the science is settled.” Meaning: they don’t want to think. They don’t want to stir the waters.

A few years ago, chemist David Rasnick sent a request to the CDC, asking for evidence demonstrating that the Ebola virus had ever been isolated from a human. The answers he received did not begin to approach a level of certainty.

After 30 years working as a reporter in the area of deep medical-research fraud, I’ve seen that false science occurs in levels.

The deeper you go, the stranger it gets. To put it another way: the deeper you go, the worse it gets.

SOURCES:

[1] https://www.davidrasnick.com/

[2] personal communication

[3] https://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-18-25673

[4] http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjinterviewep.htm

[5] https://www.immunity.org.uk/articles/christine-johnson/

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit squarefrog, pixabay 

Healthcare Workers in India Fake COVID-19 Vaccine Jabs Concerned With Side Effects

by GreatGameIndia
January 23, 2021

Numerous healthcare workers in India have been reported to fake taking the COVID-19 vaccine shots due to concerns of side-effects and pressure from the administration to take it.

Healthcare workers across Bengaluru are faking getting the Covid-19 vaccine, officials in Bengaluru admitted.

A senior BBMP health officer told the Times of India they have come across at least 20 instances where workers have not taken the vaccine, although they claimed to have.

This is because many healthcare workers have doubts about the safety and efficacy of the jab and are hesitant to take it.

“One medical officer said he did not trust the vaccine and did not want it, so he instructed the nurse to hold a small ball of cotton to his arm to make it look like he took the jab,” said the source.

Kamala (name changed), a nurse at a PHC in Shivajinagar, said a health worker who was afraid of getting the jab, faked the act by getting her colleague to simulate injecting the vaccine.

“Many are unhappy over being asked to take the vaccine as they do not trust it yet. The two deaths that were reported have added to fears,” Kamala said.

Class Warfare: Students in Anchorage Will Be Forced to Kneel for Hours, No Recess

by Suzanne Downing, Must Read Alaska
sourced from DavidIcke.com
January 19, 2021

Some of the youngest students returning to classes today in Anchorage will enter a dystopian classroom world, where they must kneel for hours on end on the floor while masked, and have no recess or art or physical expression.

Pre-K–2, K–6, self-contained special needs programs, and the Whaley School are returning to in-person learning at Anchorage School District classes on Tuesday, Jan. 19.

Parents who viewed the classroom their students will be returning to expressed shock: All desks have been removed. Students will kneel on gardening pads and use chairs as their desks for 5.5 hours.

Rather than lockers, they will have to bring a five-gallon utility bucket to store their lunch, jackets, and supplies in. The parents were told all students will be masked over their nose and mouth.

“We wouldn’t allow terrorists to be treated like this,” said one concerned parent, who asked to be kept anonymous.

The new classroom design represents one solution to keeping children apart so they do not spread the COVID-19 virus.

Some of these young students have never been to school before, so they may not see the situation as abnormal. Anchorage schools have been closed due to the coronavirus since last March.

In at least one Ohio school, the desks are in place, but plastic barriers have been placed around each one, to contain moisture coming from students as they breathe through their masks, as shown from this parent’s photograph:

Grades 3–6 will continue with current Zoom and online classes for now in Anchorage. The District has a goal of bringing them back “as soon as possible after our first tier of students.”

Select middle and high school students who need extra support will also begin in-person, small-group classes for 5.5 hours each day on Jan. 19. All middle and high school students will return to in-person learning at the beginning of the fourth quarter, the District says.

“It may be hard to remember what ‘school in school’ was like. That’s okay! We will transition to a new routine together. We are paving the way for a new approach to learning in-person. The District is prepared with Individual School Safety and Mitigation Plans that are in line with CDC guidelines and customized by school principals and staff to ensure the mitigation works for each unique schools’ building and culture,” the district said.

Meanwhile, Anchorage Education Association, the union for teachers and staff, has sent highly detailed instructions to all of its members telling them exactly how to document their discontent with returning to in-person learning, so that they may file a successful grievance against the school district.

AEA has already filed its first grievance, demanding that teachers may refuse to carry out orders that they feel threaten health. The letter to teachers points out the dangerous situation that will occur when students remove their masks to eat and drink in the classrooms:

“With many students returning to buildings next Tuesday, many of you will have difficult decisions to make regarding your health and safety. The District’s position is that they have plans in place that mitigate and minimize exposure to COVID-19. AEA is focusing on student and staff safety as we return to face-to-face learning.

“AEA has filed a grievance asserting violations of Article 421B: “A member may refuse to carry out an order that threatens health (excluding normal childhood diseases including but not limited to colds, flu, mumps, measles, chicken pox) or physical safety; or which is a violation of federal or state statutes. If the member refuses, the member shall have the burden of proof.” Page 48 in the AEA Contract.

“This grievance includes any members who refuse to carry out an order that they believe threatens their health or physical safety. The specific safety violations are in these areas:

• “Classrooms are being set up that do not have six feet of distance between students.
• “Student are being allowed to remove masks and eat in the classroom.
• “SEL mask breaks in buildings do not comply with CDC guidelines.
• “Classrooms may not meet CDC, OSHA, or other regulatory requirements for proper air circulation and filtration to minimize COVID-19 exposure.”

The entire union letter to teachers and staff is at this link:
AEA-Instructions-to-teachers

cover image credit educadormarcossv / pixabay

13,000 NY Nursing Home Residents and Nearly Half of Staff Decline COVID-19 Vaccine

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
January 18, 2021

New York will be reallocating unused COVID-19 vaccines after more than ten thousand nursing home residents and nearly half of staffers declined the jab, according to Gareth Rhodes, a member of Governor Andrew Cuomo’s COVID-19 Response Task Force.

Read more by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge

New Science Outlines Risks of Masking Children

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
January 18, 2021

Jefferey Jaxen reports on new mask studies that support the available data on children, showing that we are putting children at risk by forcing masks on them.



Video available at The HighWire BitChute and Brighteon channels.