Yesterday [Nov 26] the WHO labelled the sars-cov-2 variant B.1.1.529 as a “variant of concern” and officially named it “Omicron”.
This was as entirely predictable as it is completely meaningless. The “variants” are just tools to stretch the story out and keep people on their toes.
The Omicron variant is more transmissable, but they don’t know if it’s more dangerous yet (keeping their options open).
It originated in Africa, possible mutating in an “untreated AIDS patient” (sick people are breeding grounds for dangerous “mutations”).
“it has more than double the mutations of Delta…scientists anticipate that the virus will be more likely to infect – or reinfect – people who have immunity to earlier variants. (undermining natural immunity, selling more boosters, keeping the scarefest going).
“Scientists are concerned” that current vaccines may not be as effective against the new strain, they may need to be “tweaked” (get your boosters, and the new booster we haven’t invented yet)
“Scientists expect that recently approved antiviral drugs, such as Merck’s pill, will work as effectively against the new variant” (more on this later)
It’s already spreading around the world, and travel bans may be needed to prevent the need for another lockdown
We’re already seeing preparations for more “public health measures”, with the press breathlessly quoting “concerned” public health officials. We’re being told that a new lockdown won’t be necessary…as long as we remember to get boosted and wear masks and blah blah blah.
Generally speaking, it’s all fairly boilerplate scary nonsense. Although it is quite funny that the Biden administration has already put a bunch of African nations on a travel ban list, when Biden called Trump a racist for doing the same thing in 2020.
It’s interesting that the new variant has allegedly come from Africa, perhaps “mutating in the body of an AIDS patient”, since Africa has been the biggest hole in the Covid narrative for well over a year.
Africa is by far the poorest continent, it is densely populated, malnourishment and extreme poverty are endemic across many African nations, and it is home to more AIDS patients than the entire rest of the world combined. And yet, no Covid crisis.
This is a weak point in the story, and always has been.
Last Summer, the UK’s virus modeller-in-chief Neil Ferguson attempted to explain it by arguing that African nations have, on average, younger populations than the rest of the world, and Covid is only a threat to the elderly. But five minutes of common sense debunks that idea.
The reason Africa has a younger population, on average, is that – on average – they are much sicker.
There are diseases endemic to large parts of Africa that are all but wiped out in most of the Western world. Cholera, typhus, yellow fever, tuberculosis, malaria. Access to clean water, and healthcare are also much more limited.
And while it has been nailed into the public mind that being elderly is the biggest risk factor for Covid, that is inaccurate. In fact, the biggest risk factor for dying “of Covid” is, and always has been, already dying of something else.
The truth is that any REAL dangerous respiratory virus would have cut a bloody swath across the entire continent.
Instead, as recently as last week, we were getting articles about how Africa “escaped Covid”, and the continent’s low covid deaths with only 6% of people vaccinated is “mystifying” and “baffling” scientists.
Politically, African nations have shown themselves far less likely to buy into the “pandemic” narrative than their European, Asian or American counterparts. At least two “Covid denying” African presidents – Pierre Nkurunziza of Burundi and John Magufuli of Tanzania – have died suddenly in the last year, and seen their successors immediately reverse their covid policies.
So maybe the Omicron Variant is a way of trying to fold Africa into the covid narrative that the other continents have already fully embraced. That will become clear as the story develops.
Of course, it’s also true that being “African” is media shorthand for being scary, relying on the deeply-seated xenophobia of Western audiences. See: “Africanized killer bees”.
But, either way, Africa is the long game. There’s a more obvious, and more cynical, short term agenda here.
The Magic Pills
Let’s go back to the Guardian’s “Omicron” bullet points, above:
Scientists are concerned by the number of mutations and the fact some of them have already been linked to an ability to evade existing [vaccine-created] immune protection.
Scientists expect that recently approved antiviral drugs, such as Merck’s pill, [will work effectively] against the new variant
The “new variant” is already being described as potentially resistant to the vaccines, but NOT the new anti-viral medications.
Pharmaceutical giants Merck and Pfizer are both working on “Covid pills”, which as recently as three days ago, were being hyped up in the press:
US may have a ‘game changer’ new Covid pill soon, but its success will hinge on rapid testing
In the US, an emergency use authorisation can only be issued if there is no effective medication or treatment already available, so the vaccines not being proof against Omicron would be vital to rushing the pills onto the US market, at least.
If Omicron is found to be “resistant to the vaccines”, but NOT the pills, that will give governments an excuse to rush through approving the pills on an EUA, just as they did with the vaccines.
So, you bet your ass that testing is gonna be “rapid”. Super rapid. Blink-and-you’ll-miss-it rapid. Rapid to the point you’re not even sure it definitely happened. And now they have an excuse.
Really, it’s all just more of the same.
A scare before the new year. An excuse to make people believe their Christmas could be in peril. An exercise in flexing their control muscles a bit, milking even more money out of the double-jabbed and boosted crowd, now newly terrified of the Omicron variant, and a nice holiday bump to Pfizer’s ever-inflating stock price.
At this point either you can see the pattern, or you can’t. You’re free of the fear machinery, or you’re not.
There is one potential silver lining here: It feels rushed and frantic. Discovered on Tuesday, named on Friday, travel bans on Saturday. It is hurried, and maybe that’s a reaction to feeling like the “pandemic” is losing its grip on the public mind.
Hopefully, as the narrative becomes more and more absurd, more and more people will wake up to reality.
Because there is no virus. SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve spent the past year and a half proving that. [0]
But fantasies do exist. So do covert ops with intentions to deceive.
Thus, the “scientific world” is agog over the new South African variant, named B11529 (aka Omicron, Botswana). Woo. The ghost is coming out of the closet. Beware. COVID cases are rising…
“We don’t know whether the vaccine will be effective in the face of the new variant. New lockdowns may be necessary. Travel restrictions are coming. Batten down the hatches.”
I mean, really.
As you know, for the past few months stories in the press have been claiming the vaccine-conferred immunity is sinking like a stone. This story is absurd because, again, there is no virus. So there was no conferred immunity to begin with. But anyway, that’s the story that’s been circulating. So NOW…
“It turns out one major reason for the diminished effectiveness of the vaccine is…
“The NEW VARIANT. The South African B11529.”
Uh-huh. “The vaccine is having a tough time preventing infection caused by the new variant. We may need to enforce boosters every three months…”
Keep the fear going. Push harder for the vaccine. Explain away its failures. Fabricate rising case numbers, blaming them on the new variant. Institute heavy new lockdowns.
“The South African variant is deadlier than the Delta, which is deadlier than the original.”
And none of the three exists.
What does exist is fantasy, piled higher and deeper and thicker.
The variant is Fauci. The variant is Bill Gates. The variant is CDC/WHO. The variant is the World Economic Forum. And the Chinese regime. And presidents and governors. And the mainstream press.
And don’t forget this. Vaccine injuries and deaths have been escalating all over the world. In the US alone, reported injuries have broken above 600,000 [1]. As I’ve mentioned, the well-known Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare study [2] concluded that, to obtain a true number of injuries, multiply the reported figure by 100.
Something is needed to explain all these injuries and deaths. That is, to lie about them.
And right on time, here comes the new variant.
“These people who seem to be injured by the vaccine are really keeling over from the original virus, the Delta, and woo, the South African B11529.”
Also: Recently, we’ve seen a spate of press stories with the theme—“scientists are mystified by the low COVID case numbers in Africa, where the vaccination rates are very low.” [3] Boom. That story is now gone. Wiped out. Now it’s THE WORLD IS BEING ATTACKED BY THE SOUTH AFRICAN B111529 VARIANT.
Here is one of my articles covering the non-existence of SARS-CoV-2:
—Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists—
The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”
But what if the virus doesn’t exist?
People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.
“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”
I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [4], and he provided his analysis in detail.
I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [5].
First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.
The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.
They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.
There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.
Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”
Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:
STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”
KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”
STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”
KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”
STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”
KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”
STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”
KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”
KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [6]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”
STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”
STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”
KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”
STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”
—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—
My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.
Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.
And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?
Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [7]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?
The answer is no.
—end of Kaufman article—
And while I’m at it, here is another piece I wrote last year about how virus-propaganda (fairy tales) must be managed, in order to make the masses stand up and salute:
—The “hot zone” theory of new frightening diseases—
Remember? There was a 1994 book by that name— and then “experts” began piling on—it went something like this:
“Out of the deep dark rainforests of Earth (cue sounds of native drumming), as a result of modern plane travel, viruses we’ve never encountered before will spread epidemics across the globe. Our immune systems, ill-equipped to recognize or deal with these strange killer germs, will fold up under the pressure, and all of civilization will be threatened with extinction.”
Let’s see. Since planes fly back and forth, and since all sorts of Westerners travel TO the rainforests, why haven’t we seen whole native tribes wiped out by viruses from the deep dark streets of Brooklyn?
It would even seem that viruses, common in, say, Norway, would cause trouble in Oregon.
Why does it have to be “viruses from jungles?” Or other faraway places like China? Why can’t we have the Second City Virus, emanating from a slaughterhouse in Chicago and infecting people in Nigeria? Why can’t we have a Big Easy virus from New Orleans traveling to Beijing?
Is it possible that jungles and Africa and China and Mexico are typically chosen for virus fairy tales because, in the minds of many Westerners, they satisfy a requirement of “strange,” “different,” “primitive,” and so on? We’re talking theater here—and when you stage a propaganda play (fiction), you want to tap into the reflex instincts of the audience. The Hartford Virus, the Des Moines Virus, the Vancouver Virus just don’t fit the bill.
Because they can’t drive up the fear that jungles or Africa or China can.
Unless you’ve been living in an ice cave in the Arctic, you know selling fear of THE VIRUS is big business. To do that, you have to strike the right notes.
I personally would be interested in a Beverly Hills or a Scarsdale or a Park Avenue epidemic virus story. I’d like to see the media try to sell that one.
What about a Bill Gates Seattle virus that some Patient Zero unknowingly carries on a plane flight to Mexico City?
Think it through. We NEVER hear killer virus stories about germs traveling from Europe and America to Asia and Africa. Why not? Because such a story won’t sell. It won’t bite.
This is called a clue.
It tells you that virus-stories are shaped and managed and written and managed and broadcast according to a plan that has nothing to do with actual disease.
If a monkey in Africa can bite a man and thus transmit a virus to the West, then a salesman in Duluth can sneeze on a man at a local airport and thus send a virus to Ethiopia.
But amazingly, through secret communication among viruses, it never happens that way. The germs have decided what the traffic pattern is, and the CDC and the World Health Organization are just discovering What Is.
Sure they are. And if you buy that, I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon.
On Nov. 4 I posted an article with some questions about Byram Bridle.
After speaking to Bridle I took it down.
The vaccine developer and viral-immunology associate professor based at the University of Guelph is very popular in the Covid-questioning community.
He is a high-profile member of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance and gives many interviews. In addition, he was an expert witness in the mid-2021 Adamson Barbecue case and in the mid-November 2021 legal pursuit of an interim injunction against mandatory vaxxing of some Toronto workers.
He’s been banned from the U of Guelph campus because he’s not vaxxed. And he’s harassed by some of his colleagues and others — including people who created both an anonymously written website byrambridle.com critiquing Bridle’s claims and an accompanying Twitter account. (They’ve also linked from the website to a GitLab section on him.)
Bridle overall is a big promoter of vaxxes. He’s developing several new ones, including working on new Covid vaxxes since at least since the spring of 2020.
And he readily uses the term “anti-vaxxer” to discredit people who have very sceptical or negative views about most vaccines.
I am among the many millions of people who hold such negative views about vaxxes. That’s because there is a great deal of solid evidence showing that many vaxxes are not safe. (More about this in the ‘Continued Push’ section below.)
The only vaccines Bridle critiques are the current crop of Covid mRNA shots. He has posted several documents — such as his Nov. 12, 2021, expert report for the interim-injunction case in Toronto – and given many interviews about this.
In my Nov. 4 article I said I believed he has a conflict of interest that he doesn’t disclose to the general public with respect to his critique of the Covid mRNA jabs. I posited that Bridle is poised to potentially make a lot of profit from six of the eight US patents (and a Canadian patent that’s identical to one of those six) that I discovered he is a co-inventor of. They’re all cancer-related. [Sentence added Dec. 1 when I re-re-read the article and realized I’d omitted this.]
I hypothesized that Bridle and his colleagues could develop, based on some of their existing patents, alternative vaxxes against Covid.
I deduced the profit motive from the fact that some of Bridle’s co-inventors on the US patents are principals in a company called Turnstone Biologics (which is a sister company to the firm listed as the patents’ owners, Turnstone Limited Partnership) — and that Turnstone Biologics is working together with international giants like Takeda to commercialize their vaxx platforms via at least one huge business deal.
I also wrote that some of Bridle’s main assertions are on very weak ground. That includes his claim that the spike protein produced by the injection of the mRNA Covid shots spreads throughout the body where it becomes a “dangerous toxin” and therefore is responsible for most of the serious injuries and deaths associated with the mRNA jabs.
I emailed the article to Bridle after I posted it. (That was a mistake – I’ve now truly learned my lesson to never again omit the step of at least attempting to talk to or email people before posting an article about them.)
In his email response he accused me of making “egregious errors” – including “mixing up my cancer research-related patents with my COVID-19-focused research; they are entirely separate.” He wrote that his patent relating to the avian reovirus is an example of my very serious error of asserting that his cancer patents are connected to his Covid-vaxx work.
He also said my article was a “one-sided piece of libel [that] represents nothing short of harassment,” and that I was conducting a “witch hunt.” He threatened legal action.
I’ve never received an email like that before. It intimidated me and shook my confidence.
In his email Bridle also asked me to call him on his cell, and provided that number. So I dialed it right away.
During our ensuing hour-long conversation I was persuaded further that I’d made huge errors by his fast-paced and confidently-delivered words – which started with his saying, “I have to say you screwed up big-time on this article. You’ve got a lot of stuff – like it [the article]’s completely wrong; you’ve completely misinterpreted everything.”
I then emailed everyone I’d sent the article to, saying I’d screwed up majorly and would write a follow-up article to set the record straight. I also took the article off my website.
I did make some errors in that Nov. 4 article.
For example, Bridle told me in his Nov. 4 email and our phone call that he has a very strained relationship with the principals of Turnstone — rather than being closely involved with them with respect to patents and potential profits from them as I’d suggested in my article — because they’ve mistreated him. I believe him. (Although he also said in that same phone call that he still holds at least one patent in conjunction with Turnstone.) I reached out to Turnstone later that day for a comment but they have not yet responded. I also seem to have made the wrong deductions about the specifics of the relationship between his cancer-vaxx patents and his Covid-vaxx work.
I apologize again for my errors.
But I did not get everything wrong, by any means.
And I still have many questions about Bridle
They include:
Why do a very large number of vaccine sceptics embrace Bridle – who is very strongly pro-vaccine, readily uses the term ‘anti-vaxxer’ to disparage people who are sceptical about the safety and efficacy of many vaccines, and is developing new Covid vaxxes even though there’s been an extremely low death rate from Covid?
Why is Bridle not disclosing in his interviews and articles/documents for the general public that he’s working toward an intranasal vaxx for Covid (which carries the genetic code for the novel coronavirus’s spike protein) – and for which he has a provisional patent application dated June 3, 2021, that very likely is a spin-off of his cancer-vaxx research, and that could ostensibly solve some of the main problems associated with Covid mRNA shots? Shouldn’t he be highlighting that when he critiques the mRNA jabs?
Why does he use tenuous evidence to support his assertion that when the spike protein spreads throughout the body it becomes a “dangerous toxin” and therefore is responsible for most of the serious injuries and deaths caused by the mRNA vaxxes (yet when questioned about this assertion admits it is only theoretical)?
And as it happens, intranasal vaxxes are gaining traction rapidly. That’s in part because they’re a spray and don’t involve use of a syringe to deliver a shot/jab the arm.
Russian President Vladimir Putin took an experimental intranasal vaxx against Covid on Nov. 23, 2021, according to newsreports. (I asked a Russian friend to read the Russian TASS article about this; she said the English translations are accurate.) It was an intranasal version of the Sputnik V shot. And it was given to Putin ‘off-label’ – that is, in the absence of formal approval of the vaxx. Human trials of it are just starting.
There are also many claims, such as in a Nov. 19, 2021, scientific paper Bridle co-authored, that intranasal shots can produce ‘sterilizing immunity’ and therefore curtail the problem of potential ‘vaccine escape variants.’
So I won’t be very surprised if developers and marketers of these new vaxxes soon also claim they could help curb the Nu/Omnicron variant (B.1.1.529) that’s received a great deal of attention in the last few days. B.1.1.529 already has been declared of “huge international concern” because it ostensibly has a “horrific spike[-protein-gene-mutation] profile,” spreads very fast and has the potential to evade the currently used vaxxes. Predictably there’s been panic such as long lines at airports in the very rapidly growing list of African countries subject to travel bans by other governments — along with a renewed push for more people to get vaxxed. [And just as I was ready to post this article I found out that B.1.1.529 may in fact first have surfaced in July. I may write about this in a future article.]
Yet there hasn’t been a single published scientific report, as far as I know, which would allow objective/outside verification of whether there is any real evidence to support these drastic claims and actions. And I remain very sceptical about the hype regarding all variants and the methods used to detect them, including the false narrative about ‘immune escape’; see my Feb. 3, 2021, Feb. 11, March 16, May 24 and Oct. 24 pieces.
And as I wrote in that March 16 article (about Geert Vanden Bossche): “We … need to stop production and use of antivirals and antibodies and all other parts of the Covid-industrial complex. Covid has an extremely high survival rate. So why develop yet another expensive, invasive and experimental solution to a problem that barely exists, if it does at all?”
Let’s dive into trying to answer those questions, and in the process solve the riddle of Byram Bridle.
Bridle Is Creating Fast-track Covid Vaxxes Based on His Team’s Cancer-Vaxx Tech
He doesn’t hide this. And his statements in news reports about this clearly show Bridle believes he and his collaborators can use the methodology they’d already developed for making cancer vaxxes to very quickly create vaxxes for the novel coronavirus (and for an array of iterations of it and of other viruses).
In my Nov. 4 article I cited two May 21, 2020, news pieces about Bridle and several of his collaborators receiving a one-year, $230,000 grant from the Ontario government. He was given the grant together with Leonardo Susta and Sarah Wooton — both also at the University of Guelph — and Darwyn Kobasa from the Winnipeg National Microbiology Lab (NML). (The May 21, 2020, Ontario-government news release about this also announced Covid-related grants to other researchers across the province.)
The section of the news release about the U of Guelph/NML project said they were given the money to test vaxxes containing a virus (avian avulavirus or the adenovirus) into which they spliced the genetic code for the novel coronavirus’s spike protein. First they’d do preliminary mouse testing of the shots at the University of Guelph. Then “after optimization, these vaccines will be evaluated [for efficacy] in a hamster challenge model at the” NML.
CBC reporter Kate Bueckert in her May 21, 2020, report quoted Bridle as saying, “We’ve had to, over the years, develop all kinds of ideas and methods to optimize cancer vaccines. Because we have these technological platforms, we realized we could quickly, through the virology expertise, switch our cancer vaccines over to vaccines against infectious diseases.” (Bolding added by me.)
Bridle also said, “‘Our plan is, by the end of the year [of funding], so this would be in 2021, to have completely vetted the science and identified an optimal vaccine strategy to protect against infection with the virus that causes Covid-19 and at that point … our goal would be to start talking to Health Canada.’” (Bolding added by me.)
A Guelph Today piece about this said Bridle believes “that unlike other ‘one-off’ approaches to developing a Covid-19 vaccine, the team’s platforms can be adapted to develop vaccines for future versions of a coronavirus. That means future vaccines might be made more quickly and cheaply, giving Canada a foundation for subsequent vaccine development. ‘With these vaccine vectors, we designed them to be “plug and play.” You can put any gene into the vectors within two weeks. It could be a target protein in a cancer cell, but it could just as easily be a protein on a virus,’” Bridle said. (Bolding added by me.)
The piece also said he “hopes to see a viable [Covid] vaccine based on the technology ready for Health Canada approval in 2021…. The team will work with Health Canada to ensure ‘fast tracking‘ for any potential vaccine to be released to the public.” (Bolding added by me.)
Hamsters Setting the Pace in the Covid-vaxx-development Race
The timeline given by Bridle in those May 2020 media pieces may be somewhat optimistic (and indeed in this June 21, 2020, Global TV interview, he said that vaxxes would take more than a year to be ready for widespread use).
However, there are the strong indications that he and his colleagues are moving quickly.
Hamsters play a key role in this. (Not because they move fast in their cages; rather, they – specifically, Syrian hamsters – have immune systems that are said to respond to infectious agents in very similar ways to humans’ immune systems.)
In my Nov. 4 article I said I’d found a scientific paper co-authored by, among others, Bridle, Wooton and Susta. It’s dated Nov. 19, 2021 (with an e-publishing date of Oct. 6, 2021) and is titled, ‘Intranasal vaccination with a Newcastle disease virus-vectored vaccine protects hamsters from SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease.’
In that paper, the Newcastle-disease virus/spike-protein Covid intranasal vaxx that Bridle, Wooton, Susta and their colleagues tested in Syrian hamsters came out looking rosy. For example, they concluded that spraying two doses of the vaxx (containing the full length of the spike-protein gene spliced into a Newcastle-disease virus) into the noses of a total of 10 hamsters resulted in a “clear increase of S[spike-protein]-specific antibodies after the second dose.” They also wrote that the vaxx was safe and, in addition, stopped the virus from multiplying to high levels in the hamsters.
This must be one of the results of the developing and testing of experimental Covid vaxxes by Bridle and his colleagues that started by or before the spring of 2020. In other words, at some point they must have included in their testing this experimental Newcastle-disease-virus/novel coronavirus spike-protein vaxx, either in parallel with, or as part of, the work they did using the Ontario-government grant.
In our Nov. 4 phone call Bridle dismissed this study as being at only a very early stage of development. He said, “clearly you don’t have an understanding of what it takes to get a vaccine from the pre-clinical stage to the place where it can go into a rollout into the public.”
Yet that ignores his quotes in the May 2020 articles about seeking to have their experimental vaxxes fast-tracked in 2021.
It also doesn’t seem to take into account other things such as the fact that the Canadian and other governments put into warp speed the testing and approving Covid vaxxes and are continuing to do so.
Follow the Patent Trail
Then a couple of days later, while reviewing all the material I’d gathered for the Nov. 4 article, I discovered at bottom of that Nov. 19 paper by Bridle and collaborators the following ‘Conflict of interest statement’: “L.A.S., Y.P., B.W.B. [Byram Bridle], P.P.M., L.S. [Leonardo Susta], and S.K.W. [Sarah Wooton] are co-inventors on a United States Provisional [Patent] Application No. 63/196,489 entitled ‘ENGINEERED NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS VECTOR AND USES THEREOF,’ which was filed June 3, 2021.” (Bolding added by me.)
So they are moving apace on the pathway to patent their approach.
As I noted above, Bridle had commented in our Nov. 4 phone call on that Nov. 19 paper — but only to say it’s very early-stage (i.e., pre-clinical) research. He didn’t mention any provisional patent applications.
I tried to find the June 3 provisional patent application online but didn’t succeed. There doesn’t seem to be a publicly accessible database of provisional patent applications.
But I did find this website that gives information on provisional patent applications. It describes how to get one. It also lists the benefits of a provisional patent application. These include that it allows “the term ‘Patent Pending’ to be applied for 12 months in connection with the description of the invention,” and “enables immediate commercial promotion of [the] invention with greater security against having the invention stolen.“) (Bolding added by me.)
I emailed Bridle on the evening of Nov. 23. I asked him to send me the June 3 provisional patent application, along with any other provisional patent applications he has. And I emailed him again a few minutes later saying, “Further to the email I sent you a few minutes ago, if the information in the provisional patent application isn’t public then of course I’m not asking you to send it to me. Only what you’re able to – ie what’s available to the public. And if you have other provisional patent applications I’m only looking for their titles, assuming the titles are publicly available (and nothing else is).”
He replied the next morning:
“I’m not sure what the status of this provisional patent application is; two of my colleagues (equal inventors) took the lead on this. Anything that is publicly available would be searchable in the US patent database. If it isn’t there, then it isn’t publicly available yet.”
So he’s not disclosing anything about this provisional patent application, nor saying whether he has more of them.
He’s not obliged to, of course. But why he wouldn’t at least answer my question about whether he has any other provisional patent applications?
And by the way, I believe his and his colleagues’ June 3, 2021, provisional patent application is to some extent related to two US patents — 10829786 and 20200190538 — that are among the eight US patents that have Bridle’s name on them that I mentioned in my Nov. 4 article. Those two US patents are both titled, ‘Avian oncolytic virus having modified sequences and uses thereof.’ (The word oncolytic means tumour-infecting and -killing.) The patents’ description highlights the avian reovirus and the Newcastle-disease virus vector as the central part of this vaxx-tech platform.
(Bridle told me in his Nov. 4 email and our Nov. 4 phone call that he holds a patent related to the avian reovirus. One [or both] of 10829786 and 20200190538 is [are] very likely the one[s] he was referring to, because none of the other six US patents that I’ve found with his name on them mention the avian reovirus.)
They’re actually the two that in my Nov. 4 article I said I believed were not related to his Covid-vaxx work. And Bridle told me in his Nov. 4 email that his avian-reovirus patent[s] are not related to his Covid-vaxx work, because, among other things, “did you notice in the title that the claims are based on it[‘s written as] being an ‘oncolytic’ virus; that means for the treatment of cancers.”
But I believe they may well be related to his Covid-vaxx work. Because as I noted above, the information on these two US patents says they relate not only to the avian reovirus but also to the Newcastle-disease virus. And the Newcastle-disease virus is what his June 3, 2021, provisional patent application and Nov. 19 paper are focused on. There’s no way for me to know for sure, though, without seeing the provisional patent application and/or any subsequent patent application he and his colleagues may file.
Intranasal Vaxxes Gaining Traction
Intranasal vaxxes, like the Newcastle-disease-virus-based one that Bridle and his colleagues have been working on, just happen to perhaps not have the problems that Bridle ascribes to the mRNA jabs.
Intranasal vaxxes aren’t new. AstraZeneca’s intranasal flu vaxx FluMist has been used in the US since 2003 (with the exception of a two-year pause from 2016 to 2018, apparently because it wasn’t effective in kids aged two to 17).
And as I noted earlier in this article, the intranasal route is likely to become extremely popular. Intranasal-vaxx developers are counting on their being much more palatable to the public, including ‘vaccine sceptics,’ because these vaxxes aren’t jabs/shots and people can administer them themselves.
(And many have long being used for livestock – for example Merck’s – and also for dogs – here are Merck’s canine nose vaxxes.)
There already are eight intranasal vaxxes in clinical trials to date, according to the World Health Organization’s ‘COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape.’ (Click on the ‘Download’ button near the top left of the page; double-click to open the document that appears; scroll down to the table labelled ‘4. Number of doses, schedule and route of administration of candidates in clinical’; then look at the ‘IN’ – ‘intra nasal’ [sic] – line in the ‘Route of Injection’ section.)
That’s a small fraction of the more than 350 Covid vaxxes being tested so far.
But many more intranasals are sure to follow. For example, according to this Nov. 11, 2021, article, a Stanford University team is teeing up an intranasal spike-protein shot against Covid.
Their Oct. 27, 2021, mouse-experiment paper the article is based on states, in the abstract at the beginning of the article, that such “an alternative self-administrable vaccine capable of mounting long-lasting immunity via sterilizing neutralizing antibodies [i.e., antibodies that ostensibly prevent the virus from multiplying] would be hugely advantageous in tackling emerging mutant SC2 [SARS-CoV-2] variants. This could also diminish the possibility of vaccinated individuals acting as passive carriers of COVID-19” (Bolding added by me.)
They further note, in the third paragraph of the paper’s second page, that another advantage of the intranasal route is “the avoidance of injections, and a likely high tolerance and compliance in clinical practice.” (Bolding added by me.)
And indeed, Bridle told me in our Nov. 4 phone call that, “If somebody comes up with a vaccine [for Covid] that has properly demonstrated a good safety profile … addressing all of the safety issues, legitimate safety issues, that I and many other international colleagues have raised. And until we see that data, presented to us, and alongside the efficacy data, none of us, including myself, are going to stand behind any of these other vaccines. So yes, but could there be a future vaccine for SARS-coronavirus-2 that we would stand behind? Yes. I would be happy to do so. Because I am a virologist.”
Shaky Spike-Protein-Related Assertions
Let’s now switch gears a bit to address one of Bridle’s central claims about the mRNA Covid shots.
He lays the lion’s share of the blame for the serious injuries, such as myocarditis, and deaths from those jabs on the spike protein — which is produced in the body after the jabs — entering the bloodstream. He suggests that other shots do not lead to this type of spread.
He makes sweeping statements about this — in for example his Nov. 12, 2021, expert report and his June 15, 2021, Covid-shot guide for parents. In the middle of page 40 of the Nov. 12 report, after citing eight studies (see five paragraphs below), Bridle writes:
‘Conclusion: the spike protein, if it gets into circulation, has the potential to cause damage to the cardiovascular system and other tissues.’
And just one sentence later, at the start of the next section, he states:
“Now that there is a clear understanding that the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 is a dangerous toxin when it gets into the blood and is distributed throughout the body, we can continue with the story about COVID-19 vaccines.” (Bolding added by me.)
On what basis did he make this leap?
He cites eight studies to support this claim. (The studies are references 84-91; you can see their details such as authors, title and publication name, on page 133 of the document.) But they’re all related to Covid, not to vaxxes for it. Plus: five of those studies are in vitro (i.e., in test tubes and/or petri dishes) and one study was done in mice (the spike protein was injected directly into their veins). The other two were on human-autopsies (which have some overlapping authors with each other). Note also that Bridle states that one of these human-autopsy papers (ref. 84) shows the free spike protein rather than the whole virus was found in various tissues. But this isn’t really accurate: the authors said that they found the spike protein grouped together with other proteins from the virus. (For example, on the fifth page of the paper the authors write, “in both the skin and brain … the spike protein co-localized with both the envelope and membrane proteins, suggesting that the capsid proteins [i.e., envelope protein, membrane proteins and the spike protein] circulated as a unit”).
And indeed, when in a September 24, 2021, interview on Rebel News, Tamara Ugolini asked Bridle how he knows it’s the spike protein and not something else causing injuries and deaths in people who have received the Covid vaccines, since we don’t know all the ingredients in the vaccines (at 30:27 in the video), Bridle admitted his evidence is purely theoretical.
“That’s a great point,” Bridle replied. “… We have to depend on the companies really – the companies, the onus is on them to evaluate the safety. So we’ve been raising all these questions. And these can readily be addressed in studies — properly conducted experiments.”
He went on to say that (at 32:05) it “is a big if if the mechanism of damage that [is] causing things like the blood clots [is] the spike getting freely into circulation.”
[And unfortunately he’s not alone in his seemingly faulty reasoning. For example, I emailed Sucharit Bhakdi to ask why, in the July 23, 2021, paper that Bhakdi co-wrote with Michael Palmer claiming the spike protein is the root of virtually all of the evils of the mRNA Covid shots, they didn’t use any information on the pattern of injuries among the many millions of people who’d already been jabbed by then. Bhakdi replied in a Sept. 9 email to me that, “Our predictions regarding development of adverse effects are based on general textbook knowledge of immunobiology and medicine. They are currently being verified.” (Bolding added by me.) Yet I’ve checked subsequent posts on doctors4covidethics.org, and as far as I can see Bhakdi and other authors still have not verified this using any clinical data in jabbed people.]
Bridle is Part of the Continued Push to Trust Vaccines
On page 5 of his June 15, 2021, vaccines guide Bridle wrote, “I consider vaccines that have been developed on a foundation of sound science to be the most efficient type of medicine; they have cost-effectively saved millions of people from sickness and/or death.” A very similar sentence is on page 5 of his Nov. 12, 2021, expert report. And he repeats this message in many other forums.
The Canadian Covid Care Alliance – of which Bridle is a key and outspoken member — also strongly promotes vaccines. For example the Alliance’s Sept. 24, 2021, ‘COVID-19 Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration’ notes (bolding and underlining in the original):
“Without full transparency and informed consent, and without a full appreciation and proper evaluation of the safety of these novel vaccines (both short- and long-term) the current COVID-19 vaccination programs should be paused immediately. We greatly support classical vaccine programs as developed over past decades and are therefore deeply concerned that this blatant disregard for medical ethics and most recent scientific data during COVID-19 vaccinations will irreparably damage Canadians’ trust in the traditional vaccine programs.”
And unfortunately other high-profile organizations also have been giving Bridle an uncritical platform. That includes, among others, TrialSiteNews (see for example Bridle speaking at 12:50 in this June 4, 2021, ‘Expert Panel’ video) — and Children’s Health Defense and Del Bigtree’s ‘The Highwire,’ via pieces such as this one, this one and this one.
As a result, large numbers of people and organizations who previously were standing firm in their knowledge based on a large body of evidence that vaccines are unsafe – people labelled ‘anti-vaxxers’ by Bridle and others — are being lulled into thinking Bridle is on our side because he’s vocally opposing the mRNA Covid shots.
Therefore they may well be led to believe that virtually all other vaccines are okay.
I recommend several pieces of reading material that show the clear and present dangers of many vaccines.
This is among the material that helped open my eyes 2.5 years ago to the dangers of vaccines. Contact me if you’d like other book or article recommendations.
By asking questions we can start to solve the riddle of Byram Bridle.
Don’t let ‘experts’ on either side of any issue lull or push you into giving away your power to think for yourself. Follow the money trail and potential conflicts of interest.
Work to find the real truth – it’s hard work but vital. Check the primary-source material used to make assertions, no matter who’s making them.
The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 31,014 fatalities, and 2,890,600 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.
A Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.
The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)
So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.
The EudraVigilance database reports that through November 20, 2021 there are 31,014 deaths and 2,890,600 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,355,192) are serious injuries.
“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*
Here is the summary data through November 20, 2021.
Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2, Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 14,526 deaths and 1,323,370 injuries to 20/11/2021
35,826 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 207 deaths
40,230 Cardiac disorders incl. 2,128 deaths
376 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 33 deaths
17,995 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 10 deaths
283,288 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,469 deaths
950 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 60 deaths
4,834 Immune system disorders incl. 29 deaths
32,441 Infections and infestations incl. 413 deaths
12,358 Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 177 deaths
23,611 Investigations incl. 150 deaths
12,369 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 91 deaths
159,668 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 94 deaths
624 Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 22 deaths
221,536 Nervous system disorders incl. 958 deaths
521 Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 12 deaths
188 Product issues incl. 1 death
19,933 Psychiatric disorders incl. 58 deaths
4,031 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 58 deaths
15,124 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
37,980 Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 735 deaths
49,247 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 48 deaths
1,498 Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
1,404 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 25 deaths
26,696 Vascular disorders incl. 437 deaths
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 1,825 deaths and 101,732 injuries to 20/11/2021
986 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 40 deaths
1,837 Cardiac disorders incl. 155 deaths
35 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
1,033 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 2 deaths
69 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
1,351 Eye disorders incl. 7 deaths
8,500 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 75 deaths
26,871 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 488 deaths
121 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 11 deaths
445 Immune system disorders incl. 9 deaths
4,315 Infections and infestations incl. 143 deaths
920 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 18 deaths
4,766 Investigations incl. 103 deaths
625 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 45 deaths
14,897 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 43 deaths
54 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 3 deaths
20,097 Nervous system disorders incl. 197 deaths
41 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
26 Product issues
1,407 Psychiatric disorders incl. 16 deaths
417 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 22 deaths
2,059 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 6 deaths
3,617 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 234 deaths
3,094 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 8 deaths
319 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
690 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 54 deaths
3,140 Vascular disorders incl. 140 deaths
*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.
Here are some faces and stories to attach to these cold statistics from those who paid the ultimate price to receive an experimental COVID-19 shot. All of these people were reportedly healthy prior to taking the shots, and they ended up dying very young, or became crippled and lost their careers.
First, we have a very emotional video posted online by a Canadian mother who mourns her daughter’s 13-year-old friend who did not want to take the COVID-19 shot, but finally gave in and took it as it was mandatory for her to continue participating in sports. Her heart stopped and now she is in critical condition.
“The totalitarian path we are unquestionably on has never ended well.”
– MP George Robert Christensen
Queensland MP George Robert Christensen has called on citizens to rise up against coronavirus lockdown measures and vaccination mandates. He compared governments promulgating such measures to totalitarian regimes responsible for the most horrific atrocities.
On Wednesday, Christensen said in parliament that Australian State Premiers are “drunk on power” and “trying to out tyrant each other”. He also noted that non-vaccinated Australians are increasingly “demonized, ostracized, and socially eradicated.”
No Justification
The MP explained that totalitarian regimes responsible for the most heinous atrocities of the Twentieth Century: Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot, didn’t get there overnight.
They used fear to control, excluded the “dirty” people (softly at first), justified the exclusion, moved to harder exclusions, and eventually eliminated people either socially, or physically.
In Twenty-First Century Australia, State Premiers are racing down that familiar path, setting up their own bio-security police states complete with medical apartheid,
Sadly, we have enabled it, refusing to rein them in and, worse, supplying the Australian Immunisation Register data that underpins this medical apartheid. Fear is a justification of choice for coercion and control, with non-vaccinated Australians increasingly demonised, ostracised and socially eradicated.
The establishment claims that the virus is now a pandemic of the unvaccinated, but Christensen said there is no justification for such demonization.
He referred to a German study showing that 55 percent of symptomatic patients over 60 are fully “vaccinated”. In Gibraltar, where all 34,000 residents have been fully vaccinated, 60 new cases are registered daily.
We are undoubtedly on the totalitarian path, and that never ends well, said the MP. “The solution is a rediscovery of human dignity, along with, and I don’t say this lightly — civil disobedience.”
Watch Liberal Party of Australia MP, George Robert Christensen impassioned speech:
Large-scale protests continued across Australia today as hundreds of thousands again turned out in the nation’s cities and towns to protest against mandatory vaccines.
The protests this week were organised by the Millions March Against Mandatory Vaccination group which were scheduled today across 30 Australian cities and towns.
Flags from nations and people across the globe continued to be featured as protesters represent their heritage, standing in support and solidarity with those affected by mandates and with the indigenous community who have expressed concern from within their own communities.
In Melbourne, huge crowds marched to the steps of Victorian parliament again, a scene where many diehard protesters have been camping out in protest of Premier Daniel Andrews’ controversial pandemic powers legislation, which has been the subject of intense angst in the community.
A diverse range of protesters chanted ‘Kill The Bill’ and called for Andrews’ resignation as they marched through the cities streets to the cheering and beeping of car horns.
It was again a carnival atmosphere in the city with music, stilt-walkers, bagpipes, drums and more. Some even brought pots and pans to tap along to the beat.
Despite inclement weather, huge crowds again swarmed Sydney, with the nation’s biggest city putting on a show of defiance against government over-reach.
There were some tense moments as police appeared to take a more heavy-handed approach than seen in recent weeks, and of the hundreds of thousands marching across the nation, the crowds were largely peaceful.
It was the first weekend where smaller protests have been staged across towns and regional centres, including Adelaide, Darwin, Alice Springs, Perth, Canberra, Newcastle, Ballina, Inverell, Tamworth, Wagga Wagga, Bermagui, Launceston, Bunbury, Albany, Esperance, Kalgoorlie, Geraldton, Carnarvon, Port Hedland, Broome, and Kununurra.
Austria recently announced a total lockdown of the entire population, vaxxed or unvaxxed, and compulsory vaccination as of 1 February 2022, see this. Both of these measures have raised a lot of resistance, especially the second one; it is a direct interference in people’s basic Human Rights.
This is however not enough for Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg, to withdraw the draconian and illegal request for obligatory vaccination. Instead, the Austrian Government, like so many other western governments in Europe and the US, has initiated an incentive scheme for the non-vaxxed that basically works as a lottery.
For example, under a vaccination lottery, the unvaxxed can now win a house, for a “limited time” if they submit to the jab. The news was announced on 23 November and is apparently valid until just before Christmas. See this.
But the most hilarious, and as far as I know, never heard-of before “incentive scheme” is a 30-minute free-brothel time with a prostitute, if one accepts the jab. Yes, you have read correctly: Austria offers the unvaxxed – presumably primarily men – a prostitute, free for 30 minutes, meaning the government pays for the prostitute’s time. See this CNN report.
The CNN reporter – a lady – pointedly, with a smile, says it’s a win-win solution: More men get vaxxed and the brothel makes more business. Fabulous.
This just shows how desperate governments around the world get to meet their “outside” imposed “vaxx-quotas”.
What’s the real agenda?
It becomes increasingly clear that this vaccination campaign – one can no longer call it a campaign, it is rather coercion of the worst kind with a specific goal – has a clear plan: implement as fast as possible a eugenist agenda. And that before people wake up to realize what they have been forced to accept – a highly probable lethal shot, or series of shots.
According to Dr. Elisabeth Eads, these mRNA Covid jabs are diminishing your immune system drastically, the first one by about 30%, the second one another 30% and the so-called “booster” shot by about 20%. Since the West is in the midst of the “booster campaign”, on average the western population may be losing about 80% of its immune system after receiving the three injections. Of course, there are different reactions by different people. This is an average. This means, a considerably higher vulnerability to ANY viral and infectious disease, including the common flu – which is, as we know, registered as Covid.
Would this, plus the endlessly propagated and forced “testing-testing-testing”, maybe account for what they say is an almost exponentially increased “case” load? And this, of course, in the Northern Hemisphere’s flu season. – See this.
In healthy people, and especially younger people, like children, the immune system recovers over time, more or less rapidly. Is this the reason, why some “scientists” predict already that a “booster” shot will be necessary at least once a year? And that children are coerced to get a “booster” jab?
To be repeated: The agenda is massive depopulation, as fast as possible, before people wake up.
In other disturbing but related news, the professional Journal “Circulation” offers a molecular biological explanation on how Covid vaxxes may harm people lethally. See this, as well as the short abstract below (published 8 November 2021).
*
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.
The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients. This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot.
Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac. We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
*
In a 4-min video, Dr. Vernon Coleman calls this mRNA mechanism sheer murder. He also calls for an immediate stop to all “vaccination”.
It is high time that people collectively around the world stand up – at once — against this murderous tyranny and vaccination, and that everybody rejects further vaccination. It’s not just tyranny for total domination and the implementation of the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution – it is tyranny to drive people to walk or run into their own grave by fear.
It is more than evident that a significant part of humanity is stampeding to take experimental vaccines for COVID-19. However, the “experimental” vaccines violate all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes, which carry the death penalty for those who seek to break these International Laws. Now, more than ever, we need new trials, not after the fact, as was the situation after WWII, but while the crimes against humanity are in progress.
Instead of these Nazis above the tables would be full of executives from Pfizer, Moderna, Johnston and Johnston, Dr. Fauci and the infamous Bill Gates, and many others. Even the politicians, who pretended to play doctor and healthcare official, promoting life-threatening and depressing masks, lockdowns, and death shots, should be held accountable. Dr. David Martin clearly shows that all of them are guilty of breaking American laws.
Front and center should be multiple members of the FDA and CDC, who are not trustful governmental agencies but richly paid whores for the vaccine companies.
American Heart Association Journal Publishes Data that U.K. Medical Doctor Claims are “Proof” that COVID-19 Vaccines are “Murder.” `We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’
23 Nazi doctors were charged with conducting experiments on prisoners without consent, most at concentration camps. The aftermath of the trials led to creation of the Nuremberg Code, which the FDA and CDC do not follow. The Dr. Rath Health Foundation tells us that, “After six decades of silence, the historical records of the key war crimes tribunal that determined the responsibility for WWII were finally made available. Currently, history books teach that WWII was launched by a lunatic dictator, Hitler, and his ruthless Nazi henchmen.
However, tens of thousands of historical documents from the Nuremberg Tribunal – newly released online – unequivocally document that:
WWII – a war that cost the lives of more than 60 million people – was planned and financed by the world’s largest chemical/ pharmaceutical cartel. At that time, Germany’s I.G. Farben consisted of Bayer, BASF, Hoechst, and others.
The driving force behind WWII was I.G. Farben’s ambition to control the global oil and drug markets and eliminate, by force, any competition.
The I.G. Farben companies financed the rise to power of the Nazi party and transformed German democracy into a dictatorship.
“The pharmaceutical industry does not act in the tradition of the protector of humanity, but in the tradition of I.G. Farben, a group of organized criminals willing to sacrifice countless human lives to maintain their profits,” writes Dr. Mathias Rath. Listen to him pleading in 2012 with his fellow Germans to not go down the same road that Germans have traveled twice before. He, too, claims that the two world wars were driven by the insatiable greed of the pharmaceutical and chemical cartels. The legacy of I.G. Farben is carried on by Bayer/Monsanto, Pfizer, and the other COVID vaccine companies.
Telford Taylor was an American lawyer best known for his role as Counsel for the Prosecution at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II.
Telford Taylor, US Chief Prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against the executives of great I.G. Farben, wrote, “The crimes with which these men are charged were not committed in rage or under the stress of sudden temptation. One does not build a great war machine in a fit of passion nor an Auschwitz factory during a passing spasm of brutality. Their purpose was to turn the German nation into a military machine so it could impose its dominion on Europe and other nations beyond the seas. They were the warp and woof of the dark mantle of death that settled over Europe.”
The Nuremberg War Criminal Tribunal convicted 24 I.G. Farben board members and executives based on mass murder, slavery, and other crimes against humanity. Amazingly, however, by 1951, all of them had already been released and continued to consult with German corporations. The Nuremberg Tribunal dissolved IG Farben into Bayer, Hoechst, and BASF. Moreover, today each of the three daughters of I.G. Farben is 20 times as big as the I.G. Farben mother was at its height in 1944, the last year of the Second World War.
There are people on this planet that take pleasure in hurting other people. They injured others from sheer psychological habit. The general nature of ‘evil’ is not to have consciousness of the effect our actions have on the feelings and emotional world of others, which is the definition or defining characteristic of both psychopaths and sociopaths.
Dr. Russell Blaylock says that it was the Rockefeller Foundation that created orthodox Medicine back in 1901. “Rockefeller owned what was called the drug trust: that’s the major drug manufacturing firms all over the world: Merck Pharmaceuticals, Lederle, all of these pharmaceutical companies. And, of course, the aim was to remove all nutrition references to nutritional type treatments from the medical schools. They closed down half the medical schools in the United States. There were 165 medical schools at the time. Then he had his anointed medical schools, which he poured his money into, appointed the professors from his stock of professors. And so, they created an educational system that taught the things that he wanted to be taught. And therefore, every professor that came out of those programs taught the same thing.”
Dead Doctors
According to the American Medical Association (AMA), a whopping 96 percent of United States doctors as of June have been “vaccinated” for COVID-19. And now many are dead. Vaccinated Doctors are Dying, and Unvaccinated Doctors are Quitting or Being Fired: Who will Run the Hospitals?
Contemporary Medicine has been on quicksand for over 100 years, and as it sinks to the bottom, it is pulling down with it millions of humans into misery and death. We have known for a decade, thanks to the work of Dr. Gary Null, Dr. Carolyn Dean, and Dr. Barbara Starfield, that properly prescribed pharmaceutical medications are killing over 100,000 Americans each year.
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
Dr. Barbara Starfield of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR: 12,000 —– unnecessary surgery 7,000 —– medication errors in hospitals 20,000 —– other errors in hospitals 80,000 —– infections in hospitals 106,000 —– non-error, adverse effects of drugs
James Howard Kunstler writes that modern Medicine is a hostage racket; “Medicine is now a catastrophe every bit as pernicious as the illnesses it is supposed to treat, and a grave threat to a nation that we’re supposed to care about. If you thought banking in our time was a miserable racket — which it is, of course, and by “racket” I mean a criminal enterprise — then so-called health care has it beat by a country mile, with an added layer of sadism and cruelty built into its operations.”
It Is Worse Than All The Above
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of health at the Council of Europe, explains that a pandemic used to be associated with widespread severe illness and death, but by changing the definition, removing the severity and high mortality criteria, World Health Organization (WHO) can now make a pandemic whenever it wants. One of the most respected men in Europe, he maintains that the “World Health Organization is an institution of corruption.”
“The scientific data overwhelmingly shows how probably millions have died from the covid injections, and hundreds of millions are suffering crippling side effects that often permanently disable the victims for life. The Vaccine Death Report provides all the data, along with hundreds of references, for further investigation.”
At the above link, one must scroll down to the first video but be prepared for a shock as the entire world’s elite are exposed for who and what they are, what they own, and what they have planned for most of the rest of us. Naturally, after watching, one is tempted to run and hide, but in the end, courage is encouraged.
It will be a miracle if the 99 percent of us persevere against the elite, the Deep State, the three or four companies that seem to own most of the other mega-corporations. Add God into the equation, add truth, reason, insight, and love for each other, and perhaps a much-needed miracle will occur.
I also recommend a video exposing the lies and stupidity of Gates, Fauci, Biden, the head of the CDC, and Biden, who cannot make up their minds about what is true or not about COVID vaccines.
About 47 million adults in the U.S. remain unvaccinated, according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A Chicago-area judge saved a grandfather’s life with the single question that exposes hospitals blocking doctors from using a safe, FDA-approved drug: Why?
by Mik Andersen, Corona2Inspect
published in Spanish November 2021 rough translation via translation software
Since graphene oxide was discovered in coronavirus vaccines, all the findings and discoveries made only confirm its presence (Campra, P. 2021). To date, more than reasonable evidence and indications have also been found for the existence of carbon nanotubes and nano-octopuses, mesoporous spheres, colloidal nano-robots; objects that should not be part of any vaccine and that are not declared among the components of the same. Additionally, other types of objects have been identified and evidenced in images of blood samples, of people vaccinated with the coronavirus vaccines, specifically micro-swimmers, nano-antennas of crystallized graphene and graphene quantum dots, as well, known as GQD.
On this occasion, analyzing one of the images obtained by Dr. Campra, corresponding to a sample of the Pfizer vaccine, see figure 1, it has been discovered, which with great probability, is a nanorouter or part of its circuitry. In the original image, a well-defined drop can be seen in which crystalline structures of a quadrangular or cubic format appear. If you look closely, you can see some marks on these crystals, with a regular pattern, well defined in some cases, but limited by the microscope optics.
Fig. 1. Crystalline formations that show markings of what appear to be circuits. Among these objects, the circuit of what could be a nanorouter has been discovered. Image of a sample of the Pfizer vaccine, obtained by (Campra, P. 2021)
The finding has been possible by isolating each quadrangular crystal, applying a process of rasterizing, focusing and delineating the edges of the image, in order to further pronounce the observed marks. Once this process was completed, a rough draft was drawn with the lines and patterns inscribed on the glass, creating a clean outline of what actually looked like a circuit. The fact of finding parallel and perpendicular lines with a distribution far from the fractal patterns was very striking, which allowed us to automatically infer the possibility that it had been a product of manufacture. For this reason, similar patterns were searched in the scientific literature, which had a similar scheme, similar to the circuit that had just been drawn. The search result was almost immediate, as the pattern of a quantum dot nanorouter was found, as seen in Figure 2.
Fig. 2. Possible quantum dot nanorouter observed in a quadrangular crystal, in an image obtained by the doctor (Campra, P. 2021). In the lower right corner, the quantum dot nanorouter circuit published by (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013) is observed. Note the obvious similarity between the sketch, the shape inscribed in the crystal, and the quantum dot circuit.
This discovery is of fundamental relevance, not only to understand the true purpose and components of the coronavirus vaccines, but also to explain the existence of the phenomenon of MAC addresses, visible through the bluetooth of many mobile devices.
Discovery context
Before proceeding with the explanation of the finding, it is convenient to remember the context in which it is framed, in order to ensure its understanding and subsequent deepening.
In the first place, it should be borne in mind that graphene and its derivatives, graphene oxide (GO) and carbon nanotubes (CNT), are part of the components of vaccines, according to what has already been stated in this blog. The properties of graphene are exceptional from the physical point of view, but also thermodynamic, electronic, mechanical and magnetic. Its characteristics allow its use as a superconductor, electromagnetic wave absorbing material (microwave EM), emitter, signal receiver, quantum antenna, which makes it possible to create advanced electronics on a nano and micrometric scale. Such is the case, that it is the fundamental nanomaterial for the development of nano-biomedicine (Mitragotri, S .; Anderson, DG; Chen, X .; Chow, EK; Ho, D .; Kabanov, AV; Xu, C. 2015 ), nano-communication networks (Kumar, MR 2019), new drug delivery therapies (Yu, J .; Zhang, Y .; Yan, J .; Kahkoska, AR; Gu, Z. 2018) and treatments against cancer (Huang, G .; Huang, H. 2018) and the neurological treatment of neurodegenerative diseases (John, AA; Subramanian, AP; Vellayappan, MV; Balaji, A .; Mohandas, H .; Jaganathan, SK 2015 ). However, all the benefits aside, the scientific literature is very clear regarding the health implications for the human body. It is well known that graphene (G), graphene oxide (GO) and other derivatives such as carbon nanotubes (CNT) are toxic in almost all their forms, causing mutagenesis, cell death (apoptosis), release of free radicals, lung toxicity , bilateral pneumonia, genotoxicity or DNA damage, inflammation, immunosuppression, damage to the nervous system, the circulatory, endocrine, reproductive, and urinary systems, which can cause anaphylactic death and multi-organ dysfunction, see page “Damages and toxicity of graphene oxide” and from “Damage and toxicity of carbon-graphene nanotubes“.
Second, graphene is a radio-modulable nanomaterial, capable of absorbing electromagnetic waves and multiplying radiation, acting as a nano-antenna, or a signal repeater (Chen, Y .; Fu, X .; Liu, L .; Zhang , Y .; Cao, L .; Yuan, D .; Liu, P. 2019). Exposure to electromagnetic radiation can cause exfoliation of the material in smaller particles (Lu, J .; Yeo, PSE; Gan, CK; Wu, P .; Loh, KP 2011), called graphene quantum dots or GQD (Graphene Quantum Dots), whose physical properties and particularities improve due to their even smaller scale, due to the “Quantum Hall” effect, since they act by amplifying electromagnetic signals (Massicotte, M .; Yu, V .; Whiteway, E .; Vatnik , D .; Hilke, M. 2013 | Zhang, X .; Zhou, Q .; Yuan, M .; Liao, B .; Wu, X .; Ying, M. 2020), and with it the emission distance, especially in environments such as the human body (Chopra, N .; Phipott, M .; Alomainy, A .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, K .; Shubair, RM 2016). GQDs can acquire various morphologies, for example hexagonal, triangular, circular or irregular polygon (Tian, P .; Tang, L .; Teng, K.S .; Lau, S.P. 2018).
The superconducting and transducing capacity make graphene one of the most suitable materials to create wireless nanocommunication networks for the administration of nanotechnology in the human body. This approach has been intensively worked by the scientific community, after having found and analyzed the available protocols and specifications, but also the routing systems for the data packets that nano-devices and nano-nodes would generate within the body, in a system complex called CORONA, whose objective is the effective transmission of signals and data on the network, optimizing energy consumption (to the minimum possible), and also reducing failures in the transmission of data packets (Bouchedjera, IA ; Aliouat, Z .; Louail, L. 2020 | Bouchedjera, IA; Louail, L .; Aliouat, Z .; Harous, S. 2020 | Tsioliaridou, A .; Liaskos, C .; Ioannidis, S .; Pitsillides, A . 2015). In this nanocommunications network, a type of signal TS-OOK (Time-Spread On-Off Keying) is used that allows transmitting binary codes of 0 and 1, through short pulses that involve the activation and deactivation of the signal during time intervals very small of a few femtoseconds (Zhang, R .; Yang, K .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. 2017 | Vavouris, AK; Dervisi, FD; Papanikolaou, VK; Karagiannidis, GK 2018). Due to the complexity of nanocommunications in the human body, where the nano-nodes of the network are distributed throughout the body, in many cases in motion, due to blood flow, and in others attached to the endothelium to the arterial walls and capillaries or in the tissues of other organs, researchers have required the development of software for the simulation of such conditions, in order to verify and validate the nanocommunication protocols that were being developed (Dhoutaut, D .; Arrabal, T .; Dedu, E. 2018).
On the other hand, the nanocommunications network oriented to the human body (Balghusoon, A.O .; Mahfoudh, S. 2020), has been carefully designed in its topological aspects, conceiving specialized components in the performance of this task. For example, electromagnetic nanocommunication is made up in its most basic layer by nano-nodes that are devices (presumably made of graphene, carbon nanotubes, GQD, among other objects and materials) that have the ability to interact as nanosensors, piezo-electric actuators , and in any case as nano-antennas that propagate the signals to the rest of the nano-nodes. The nano-nodes, find in the nano-routers (also called nano-controllers) the next step in the topology. Its function is to receive the signals emitted by the nano-nodes, process them and send them to the nano-interfaces, which will emit them to the outside of the body with the necessary frequency and scope, since it must overcome the skin barrier without losing clarity in the signal, so that it can be received by a mobile device at a close enough distance (usually a few meters). That mobile device would actually be a smartphone or any other device with an Internet connection, which allows it to act as a “Gateway”. The topology also defines the possibility that the entire nano-node, nanorouter and nano-interface infrastructure is unified in a single nano-device, called pole or metamaterial defined by SDM software (Lee, SJ; Jung, C. ; Choi, K .; Kim, S. 2015). This model simplifies the topology, but increases the size of the device and the complexity of its construction, conceived in several layers of graphene. In any case, regardless of the topology, nanorouters are necessary to route and decode the signals correctly, for their sending, but also for their reception, since they can be designed for a bidirectional service, which de facto implies the ability to receive signals. of commands, orders, operations that interact with the objects of the network.
To electromagnetic nanocommunication, we must add molecular nanocommunication, addressed in the entry on carbon nanotubes and new evidence in vaccine samples. In both publications, the implications of these objects in the field of neuroscience, neuromodulation and neurostimulation are analyzed, since if they are located in the neuronal tissue (something very likely, given the ability to overcome the blood-brain barrier), they can establish connections that bridge the neuronal synapse. This means that they link neurons with different shortcuts, shorter than natural axons (Fabbro, A .; Cellot, G .; Prato, M .; Ballerini, L. 2011). Although this can be used in experimental treatments to mitigate the effects of neurodegenerative diseases, it can also be used to directly interfere with neurons, the secretion of neurotransmitters such as dopamine, the involuntary activation of certain areas of the brain, their neurostimulation or modulation, through electrical impulses, generated from carbon nanotubes (Suzuki, J .; Budiman, H .; Carr, TA; DeBlois, JH 2013 | Balasubramaniam, S .; Boyle, NT; Della-Chiesa, A .; Walsh, F .; Mardinoglu, A .; Botvich, D .; Prina-Mello, A. 2011), as a result of the reception of electromagnetic signals and pulses from the nanocommunications network (Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM 2010). It is not necessary to warn about what it means that an external signal, not controlled by the inoculated person, is the one that governs the segregation of neurotransmitters. Take an example to raise awareness; carbon nanotubes housed in neuronal tissue could interfere with the natural functioning of the secretion of neurotransmitters such as dopamine, which is partly responsible for cognitive processes, socialization, the reward system, desire, pleasure, conditioned learning or inhibition (Beyene, AG; Delevich, K .; Del Bonis-O’Donnell, JT; Piekarski, DJ; Lin, WC; Thomas, AW; Landry, MP 2019 | Sun, F .; Zhou, J .; Dai, B .; Qian, T .; Zeng, J .; Li, X .; Li, Y. 2020 | Sun, F .; Zeng, J .; Jing, M .; Zhou, J .; Feng, J .; Owen, SF; Li, Y. 2018 | Patriarchi, T .; Mohebi, A .; Sun, J .; Marley, A .; Liang, R .; Dong, C .; Tian, L. 2020 | Patriarchi, T .; Cho , JR; Merten, K .; Howe, MW; Marley, A .; Xiong, WH; Tian, L. 2018). This means that it could be inferred in the normal behavior patterns of people, their feelings and thoughts, and even force subliminal conditioned learning, without the individual being aware of what is happening. In addition to the properties already mentioned, carbon nanotubes not only open the doors to the wireless interaction of the human brain, they can also receive electrical signals from neurons and propagate them to nanorouters, since they also have the same properties as GQD graphene nano-antennas and quantum dots, as explained in (Demoustier, S .; Minoux, E .; Le Baillif, M .; Charles, M .; Ziaei, A. 2008 | Wang, Y .; Wu, Q .; Shi, W .; He, X .; Sun, X .; Gui, T. 2008 | Da-Costa, MR; Kibis, OV; Portnoi, ME 2009). This means that they can transmit and monitor the neuronal activity of individuals.
For the data packets emitted and received from the nanocommunications network to reach their destination, it is essential that the communication protocol implements in some way the unique identification of the nanodevices (that is, through MAC) and transmits the information to an IP address. default. In this sense, the human body becomes an IoNT server (from the Internet of NanoThings) in which the communication client / server model can be assimilated. The mechanisms, commands or types of request remain to be determined, as well as the exact frequency and type of signal that operates the wireless nanocommunications network that would be installed with each vaccine, although obviously this information must be very confidential, given the possible consequences of biohacking. (Vassiliou, V. 2011) that could happen. In fact, in the work of (Al-Turjman, F. 2020) the problems and circumstances of the security of nanocommunication networks connected to 5G (confidentiality, authentication, privacy, trust, intrusions, repudiation) are linked and additionally, it presents a summary of the operation of electromagnetic communication between nano-nodes, nano-sensors and nano-routers, using graphene antennas and transceivers for their link with data servers, in order to develop Big-data projects. It should be noted that the risks of network hacking are very similar to those that can be perpetrated in any network connected to the Internet (masquerade attack, location tracking, information traps, denial of service, nano-device hijacking, wormhole, MITM broker attack, malware, spam, sybil, spoofing, neurostimulation illusion attack), which means a potential and additional, very serious risk for people inoculated with the hardware of a nanocommunication network.
In this context, it is in which the discovery of the circuits of a nanorouter in the samples of the Pfizer vaccine is found, which is a key piece in all the research that has been carried out and that would confirm the installation of a hardware in the body of inoculated people, without their informed consent, which executes collection and interaction processes that are completely beyond its control.
Nanorouters QCA
The discovered circuit, see figure 3, corresponds to the field of quantum dot cellular automata, also known as QCA (Quantum Cellular Automata), characterized by its nanometric scale and a very low energy consumption, as an alternative for the replacement of technology based on transistors. This is how it is defined by the work of (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013) from which the scheme of said circuit was obtained. The nanorouter referred to by the researchers is characterized by an ultra-low consumption factor, high processing speed (its frequency clock operates in a range of 1-2 THz), which is consistent with the power conditions and data transfer requirements. , in the context of nanocommunication networks for the human body described by (Pierobon, M .; Jornet, JM; Akkari, N .; Almasri, S .; Akyildiz, IF 2014).
Fig. 3. Graphene quantum dot circuit in QCA cells. Circuit diagram of (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013) observed in a sample of the Pfizer vaccine.
According to the explanations of the work of (Sardinha, LH; Costa, AM; Neto, OPV; Vieira, LF; Vieira, MA 2013), the concept of quantum dot and quantum dot cell is distinguished, see figure 4. The QCA cell It is made up of four quantum dots whose polarization is variable. This makes it possible to distinguish the binary code of 0 and 1 based on the positive or negative charge of the quantum dots. In the words of the authors it is explained as follows “The basic units of QCA circuits are cells made of quantum dots. A point, in this context, is just a region where an electrical charge can be located or not. A cell QCA has four quantum dots located in the corners. Each cell has two free and moving electrons that can tunnel between the quantum dots. It is assumed that tunneling to the outside of the cell is not allowed due to a high barrier potential”. Extrapolated to graphene quantum dots, known as GQDs, which were identified in blood samples (due to emitted fluorescence), a QCA cell would require four GQDs to compose, which is perfectly consistent with the description given by the researchers. This is also corroborated by (Wang, Z.F .; Liu, F. 2011) in his work entitled “Graphene quantum dots as building blocks for quantum cellular automata”, where the use of graphene to create this type of circuit is confirmed.
Fig. 4. Scheme of a QCA cell made up of four quantum dots (which can be graphene, among other materials). Note the great resemblance to memristors, in fact QCAs and memristors are transistors. (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013 | Strukov, D.B .; Snider, G.S .; Stewart, D.R .; Williams, R.S. 2009)
When the QCA cells are combined, cables and circuits are created, with a wide variety of shapes, schemes and applications, as can be seen in figure 5, where inverters, crossovers and logic gates are observed, also addressed by other authors such as ( Xia, Y .; Qiu, K. 2008). This gives rise to more complex structures, which allow to reproduce the electronic diagrams of the transistors, processors, transceivers, multiplexers, demultiplexers and consequently of any router.
Fig. 5. QCAs can form various types of circuits, for example logic gates, cable crossovers, inverters or cables. (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013)
It is important to explain that QCA cell-based circuits can operate in several superimposed layers, which allows a 3D (three-dimensional) structure to create much more complex and compressed electronics, see figure 6.
Fig. 6. According to (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013) more complex circuits can be built by annexing several superimposed layers. This is identified by the symbol of a circle in the design. There are also three artistic illustrations that represent various levels of circuits (own elaboration).
To develop a nanorouter, according to the researchers (Sardinha, LH; Costa, AM; Neto, OPV; Vieira, LF; Vieira, MA 2013), several circuit structures are needed, specifically, cable crossings (which form logic gates ), demultiplexers (demux) and parallel to serial converters, see figure X. “Demux” are electronic devices capable of receiving a signal at the input QCA (input) and sending it to one of several available output lines. (output), which allows the signal to be routed for further processing. The parallel-to-series converter is a circuit capable of taking several sets of data in an input (input), transporting them through different QCA cables and transmitting them at different instants of time through the output cables (output). This would be very, the component noticed in the vaccine samples, see figure 7.
Fig. 7. Details of the circuit for converting TS-OOK signals in series to a parallel output, confirming one of the typical tasks of a router. (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013)
Another relevant aspect of the work of (Sardinha, LH; Costa, AM; Neto, OPV; Vieira, LF; Vieira, MA 2013) is the demonstration of the operation of the circuit, where the reception of a TS-OOK signal and its conversion to binary code, see figure 8. Once the binary code is obtained, the “demux” circuit is responsible for generating the data packets, according to the structure of the corresponding communications protocol.
Fig. 8. The tests of the demux circuit, already observed in figure 7, provide the proof of how the TS-OOK signals are interpreted and converted to the binary code, to finally generate the data packets of the corresponding nanocommunications protocol. (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013)
Everything explained by (Sardinha, LH; Costa, AM; Neto, OPV; Vieira, LF; Vieira, MA 2013) is also corroborated by (Das, B .; Das, JC; De, D .; Paul, AK 2017) In whose research, QCA circuit designs for demux and nanorouters are observed, with very similar schemes, to those already presented, which confirms the search for solutions for the problem of the transmission and simple processing of signals and data at the nanometric scale, at in order to make nanocommunication networks effective.
Finally, although it can already be deduced from the nature, characteristics and properties of QCA cell circuits, the concept of clock speed must be highlighted. In fact, interesting is the ability of these electronic components to operate almost autonomously, without the need for a dedicated processor. This is because the QCA cell cables can measure the transfer time of the signals between the different cells, in what is called “clock zones”, see figure 9 and the following investigations (Sadeghi, M .; Navi, K .; Dolatshahi, M. 2020 | Laajimi, R .; Niu, M. 2018 | Reis, DA; Torres, FS 2016 | Mohammadyan, S .; Angizi, S .; Navi, K. (2015). This effect allows the transmission of signals through the circuit, but it also allows creating a clock frequency, which is its own process speed. If this concept is joined, the use of superconducting materials such as graphene and more specifically graphene quantum dots Then very high processing speeds can be achieved.
Fig. 9. The nanorouter does not require an independent processor, because the QCA cells organized in the circuit cables already perform this function due to the superconducting and polarization properties of the quantum dots, which allows to infer a clock speed by phases or zones. circuit physics. (Sardinha, L.H .; Costa, A.M .; Neto, O.P.V .; Vieira, L.F .; Vieira, M.A. 2013 | Sadeghi, M .; Navi, K .; Dolatshahi, M. 2020)
Circuit self-assembly
Although it seems impossible, the self-assembly of circuits is a possibility to consider in the hypothesis that has been explained. According to (Huang, J .; Momenzadeh, M .; Lombardi, F. 2007) “Recent developments in QCA manufacturing (involving molecular implementations) have substantially changed the nature of processing. At very small feature sizes, it is anticipated self-assembly or large-scale cell deposition on isolated substrates will be used. In these implementations, QCA cells (each composed of two dipoles) are deposited in parallel V-shaped tracks. QCA cells are arranged in a dense pattern and the computation occurs between adjacent cells. These fabrication techniques are well suited for molecular implementation. ” However, there are also other methods, such as DNA nanopatterns (Hu, W .; Sarveswaran, K .; Lieberman, M .; Bernstein, GH 2005), with which a template is created for the alignment of the quantum dots of graphene, forming the QCA cells, thereby generating the aforementioned circuitry, see figure 10.
Fig. 10. Self-assembly of a circuit with quantum dots from a DNA pattern. The lines of the circuit cables are very similar to those observed in the vaccine sample, see figure 2 and 3. (Hu, W .; Sarveswaran, K .; Lieberman, M .; Bernstein, G.H. 2005)
According to (Hu, W .; Sarveswaran, K .; Lieberman, M .; Bernstein, GH 2005) “Four-tile DNA rafts have been successfully synthesized and characterized by the gel electrophoresis method in our previous work” according to the work of (Sarveswaran, K. 2004). This fits with the very possible existence of a gel / hydrogel in the vaccine composition, after the doctor’s micro-Raman analysis (Campra, P. 2021) in which peaks with values close to 1450 were obtained, which could correspond to PVA, PQT-12, polyolefin, polyacrylamide or polypyrrole, all of them components recognized in the scientific literature as gels and derivatives. On the other hand, it explicitly alludes to the electrophoresis method, or what is the same, the electrical polarization process that causes teslaphoresis, on carbon nanotubes, graphene, quantum dots and other semiconductors, as described (Bornhoeft, LR; Castillo, AC; Smalley, PR; Kittrell, C .; James, DK; Brinson, BE; Cherukuri, P. 2016) in his research. This would confirm that teslaphoresis plays a fundamental role in the composition of circuits, along with DNA patterns. If this is confirmed, it would mean that the circuits could self-assemble in the presence of electric fields or even the reception of electromagnetic waves (microwave EM). The study by (Pillers, M .; Goss, V .; Lieberman, M. 2014) also confirms the construction of nanostructures and CQA using in this case graphene, graphene oxide (GO), electrophoresis and gel, causing controlled deposition in the areas indicated by the DNA pattern, reproducing results similar to those presented in the study by Hu and Sarveswaran, thus making it possible to create the electronic circuits already mentioned, see figure 11.
Fig. 11. Advances in the field of self-assembly of quantum dots and QCA cells can be observed in the scientific literature using the DNA template method to mark the order of construction and electrophoresis to initiate or trigger the process in the materials of the solution. (Pillers, M .; Goss, V .; Lieberman, M. 2014)
Plasmonic nano-emitters
Another issue that requires an explanation in the discovery of the circuit of a nanorouter, in the vaccine sample, is its location in what appears to be a quadrangular crystal. Although it could be thought that it is a randomly generated form, the bibliographic review reveals and justifies this type of form that serves as a framework for this type of circuit. In reality it is a “plasmonic nano-emitter”, in other words, it would correspond to a cubic-shaped nano-antenna (single crystal) of variable size on the nano-micrometric scale, which can emit, receive or repeat signals. This is possible through the plasmon activation property of its surface (that of the nanoemitter cube) that is locally excited to generate an oscillatory signal, as explained (Ge, D .; Marguet, S .; Issa, A .; Jradi, S .; Nguyen, TH; Nahra, M .; Bachelot, R. 2020), see figure 12. This agrees with the type of TS-OOK signals, which are transmitted through the intra-body nanocommunication network, being a requirement indispensable for a nano-router, to have a method to capture them. In other words, the crystalline cube acts as a transceiver for the nanorouter, due to its special properties, derived from the physics of the plasmon. This is corroborated when the scientific literature on electromagnetic nano-networks for the human body is consulted (Balghusoon, AO; Mahfoudh, S. 2020), the MAC protocols applied to the case (Jornet, JM; Pujol, JC; Pareta, JS 2012 ), the methods for the debugging of errors in the signals (Jornet, JM; Pierobon, M .; Akyildiz, IF 2008), or the modulation of pulses in femtoseconds in the terahertz band for nano-communication networks (Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF 2014), the parameterization of nano-networks for their perpetual operation (Yao, XW; Wang, WL; Yang, SH 2015), the performance in the modulation of wireless signals for nano-networks (Zarepour, E .; Hassan, M .; Chou, CT; Bayat, S. 2015). In all cases, nano-transceivers are essential to be able to receive or emit a TS-OOK signal.
Fig. 12. Nano-micrometric scale crystals can play the role of an antenna or a transceiver, which makes it possible to imagine that finding the circuit in a quadrangular structure is not the product of chance. (Ge, D .; Marguet, S .; Issa, A .; Jradi, S .; Nguyen, T.H .; Nahra, M .; Bachelot, R. 2020)
Plasmonic nanoemitters can acquire a cube shape, which would be the case observed in the vaccine sample, but also spherical and discoidal shape, being able to be self-assembled, to form larger nano-microstructures (Devaraj, V .; Lee, JM; Kim , YJ; Jeong, H .; Oh, JW 2021). Among the materials with which this plasmonic nano-emitter could be produced are gold, silver, perovskites and graphene, see (Oh, DK; Jeong, H .; Kim, J .; Kim, Y .; Kim, I .; Ok, JG; Rho, J. 2021 | Hamedi, HR; Paspalakis, E .; Yannopapas, V. 2021 | Gritsienko, AV; Kurochkin, NS; Lega, PV; Orlov, AP; Ilin, AS; Eliseev, SP; Vitukhnovsky , AG 2021 | Pierini, S. 2021), although it is likely that many others can be used.
CAM and TCAM memory for MAC and IP
If the presence of nanorouters in vaccines is considered, the hypothesis of the existence of one or more MAC addresses (fixed or dynamic) could be confirmed, which could be emitted from vaccinated people or through some other intermediary device (for example a mobile phone ). This approach is in line with what has already been explained and evidenced in this publication, but also according to scientific publications on nano-communication networks for the human body. According to (Abadal, S .; Liaskos, C .; Tsioliaridou, A .; Ioannidis, S .; Pitsillides, A .; Solé-Pareta, J .; Cabellos-Aparicio, A. 2017) these MAC addresses allow the nano- network can transmit and receive data, because the individual has a unique identifier that allows him to access the medium, this is the Internet. In this way, the nano-router can receive the signals corresponding to the data from the nano-sensors and nano-nodes of the nano-network to transmit them to the outside of the body, as long as there is a mobile device in the vicinity, which serves gateway to the Internet. Therefore, the hypothesis that MAC addresses of vaccinated people can be observed (through bluetooth signal tracking applications), when there is some type of interaction with the mobile media that act as a link. This does not mean that there is permanent communication, due to the need to save and optimize energy consumption (Mohrehkesh, S .; Weigle, MC 2014 | Mohrehkesh, S .; Weigle, MC; Das, SK 2015), which could explain intermittence in communications, periods of connection and inactivity.
The novelty in the field of MAC addresses, which comes together with the QCA circuits, with which nanorouters can be developed, is that memory circuits can also be created. The same researchers (Sardinha, LH; Silva, DS; Vieira, MA; Vieira, LF; Neto, OPV 2015) developed a new type of CAM memory that “unlike random access memory (RAM), which returns data which are stored at the given address. CAM, however, receives the data as input and returns where the data can be found. CAM is useful for many applications that need fast searches, such as Hought transforms, Huffman encoding, Lempel-compression. Ziv and network switches to map MAC addresses to IP addresses and vice versa. CAM is most useful for creating tables that look for exact matches, such as MAC address tables. ” This statement was extracted and copied verbatim to highlight that QCA circuits are the answer to the storage and management of MAC addresses for data transmission in nano-networks, which would confirm that vaccines are, among other things, a means of installing hardware for the control, modulation and monitoring of people.
Fig. 13. Memory circuits for the storage of MAC and IP addresses made with the same QCA technology of the nanorouter observed in the Pfizer vaccine samples. (Sardinha, L.H .; Silva, D.S .; Vieira, M.A .; Vieira, L.F .; Neto, O.P.V. 2015)
Additionally, (Sardinha, LH; Silva, DS; Vieira, MA; Vieira, LF; Neto, OPV 2015) also developed the TCAM memory, which is a special type of CAM memory that would be useful to “create tables to search for longer matches such as IP routing tables organized by IP prefixes. To reduce latency and make communication faster, routers use TCAM. ” This statement clearly affects its use in nano-routers in order to be able to transmit the data obtained in the nano-network to a specific recipient server accessible on the Internet. In other words, the data collected by the nano-network should be stored / registered in a database, of which the recipient of the vaccine would not have knowledge of its existence, of which it was not informed, and in the It is unknown what information is used.
Bibliography
Akyildiz, I.F.; Jornet, J.M. (2010). Redes de nanosensores inalámbricos electromagnéticos = Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks. Nano Communication Networks, 1(1), pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2010.04.001
Al-Turjman, F. (2020). Inteligencia y seguridad en un gran IoNT orientado a 5G: descripción general = Intelligence and security in big 5G-oriented IoNT: An overview. Future Generation Computer Systems, 102, pp. 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.08.009
Balasubramaniam, S.; Boyle, N.T.; Della-Chiesa, A.; Walsh, F.; Mardinoglu, A.; Botvich, D.; Prina-Mello, A. (2011). Desarrollo de redes neuronales artificiales para la comunicación molecular = Development of artificial neuronal networks for molecular communication. Nano Communication Networks, 2(2-3), pp. 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2011.05.004
Balghusoon, A.O.; Mahfoudh, S. (2020). Protocolos de enrutamiento para redes inalámbricas de nanosensores e Internet de las nano cosas: una revisión completa = Routing Protocols for Wireless Nanosensor Networks and Internet of Nano Things: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access, 8, pp. 200724-200748. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035646
Beyene, A.G.; Delevich, K.; Del Bonis-O’Donnell, J.T.; Piekarski, D.J.; Lin, W.C.; Thomas, A.W.; Landry, M.P. (2019). Obtención de imágenes de la liberación de dopamina estriatal utilizando un nanosensor de catecolamina fluorescente de infrarrojo cercano no codificado genéticamente = Imaging striatal dopamine release using a nongenetically encoded near infrared fluorescent catecholamine nanosensor. Science advances, 5(7), eaaw3108. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3108
Bornhoeft, L.R.; Castillo, A.C.; Smalley, P.R.; Kittrell, C.; James, D.K.; Brinson, B.E.; Cherukuri, P. (2016). Teslaforesis de nanotubos de carbono = Teslaphoresis of carbon nanotubes. ACS nano, 10(4), pp. 4873-4881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b02313
Bouchedjera, I.A.; Aliouat, Z.; Louail, L. (2020). EECORONA: Sistema de Coordinación y Enrutamiento de Eficiencia Energética para Nanoredes = EECORONA: Energy Efficiency Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks. En: International Symposium on Modelling and Implementation of Complex Systems. Cham. pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58861-8_2
Bouchedjera, I.A.; Louail, L.; Aliouat, Z.; Harous, S. (2020). DCCORONA: Sistema distribuido de enrutamiento y coordenadas basado en clústeres para nanorredes = DCCORONA: Distributed Cluster-based Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks. En: 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). IEEE. pp. 0939-0945. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298084
Campra, P. (2021a). Observaciones de posible microbiótica en vacunas COVID RNAm Version 1. [Observations of possible microbiotics in COVID mRNA vaccines] http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13875.55840
Chopra, N.; Phipott, M.; Alomainy, A.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Qaraqe, K.; Shubair, R.M. (2016). THz time domain characterization of human skin tissue for nano-electromagnetic communication. En: 2016 16th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS) (pp. 1-3). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMS.2016.7803787
Da-Costa, M.R.; Kibis, O.V.; Portnoi, M.E. (2009). Nanotubos de carbono como base para emisores y detectores de terahercios = Carbon nanotubes as a basis for terahertz emitters and detectors. Microelectronics Journal, 40(4-5), pp. 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2008.11.016
Das, B.; Das, J.C.; De, D.; Paul, A.K. (2017). Diseño de nanoenrutador para nanocomunicación en autómatas celulares cuánticos de una sola capa =Nano-Router Design for Nano-Communication in Single Layer Quantum Cellular Automata. En: International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communications, and Business Analytics (pp. 121-133). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6430-2_11
Demoustier, S.; Minoux, E.; Le Baillif, M.; Charles, M.; Ziaei, A. (2008). Revisión de dos aplicaciones de microondas de nanotubos de carbono: nano antenas y nanointerruptores = Revue d’applications des nanotubes de carbone aux micro-ondes: nano-antennes et nano-commutateurs = Review of two microwave applications of carbon nanotubes: nano-antennas and nano-switches. Comptes Rendus Physique, 9(1), pp. 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2008.01.001
Devaraj, V.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Jeong, H.; Oh, J.W. (2021). [Pre-print]. Diseño de nanoestructuras plasmónicas autoensambladas eficientes a partir de nanopartículas de forma esférica = Designing an Efficient Self-Assembled Plasmonic Nanostructures from Spherical Shaped Nanoparticles. International Journal of Molecular Science. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202109.0225/v1
Dhoutaut, D.; Arrabal, T.; Dedu, E. (2018). Bit Simulator, un simulador de nanorredes electromagnéticas = Bit simulator, an electromagnetic nanonetworks simulator. En: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3233188.3233205
Fabbro, A.; Cellot, G.; Prato, M.; Ballerini, L. (2011). Interconexión de neuronas con nanotubos de carbono: (re) ingeniería de la señalización neuronal = Interfacing neurons with carbon nanotubes: (re) engineering neuronal signaling. Progress in brain research, 194, pp. 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00003-0
Ferjani, H.; Touati, H. (2019). Comunicación de datos en nano-redes electromagnéticas para aplicaciones sanitarias = Data communication in electromagnetic nano-networks for healthcare applications. En: International Conference on Mobile, Secure, and Programmable Networking (pp. 140-152). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22885-9_13
Ge, D.; Marguet, S.; Issa, A.; Jradi, S.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nahra, M.; Bachelot, R. (2020). Nanoemisores plasmónicos híbridos con posicionamiento controlado de un único emisor cuántico en el campo de excitación local = Hybrid plasmonic nano-emitters with controlled single quantum emitter positioning on the local excitation field. Nature communications, 11(1), pp1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17248-8
Gritsienko, A.V.; Kurochkin, N.S.; Lega, P.V.; Orlov, A.P.; Ilin, A.S.; Eliseev, S.P.; Vitukhnovsky, A.G. (2021). Propiedades ópticas de la nueva nanoantena híbrida en cavidad submicrónica = Optical properties of new hybrid nanoantenna in submicron cavity. En: Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 012052). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2015/1/012052
Hamedi, H.R.; Paspalakis, E.; Yannopapas, V. (2021). Control efectivo de la biestabilidad óptica de un emisor cuántico de tres niveles cerca de una metauperficie plasmónica nanoestructurada = Effective Control of the Optical Bistability of a Three-Level Quantum Emitter near a Nanostructured Plasmonic Metasurface. En: Photonics (Vol. 8, No. 7, p. 285). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070285
Hu, W.; Sarveswaran, K.; Lieberman, M.; Bernstein, G.H. (2005). Litografía por haz de electrones de alta resolución y nanopatrones de ADN para QCA molecular. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 4(3), pp. 312-316. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2005.847034
Huang, G.; Huang, H. (2018). Aplicación de dextrano como portadores de fármacos a nanoescala = Application of dextran as nanoscale drug carriers. Nanomedicine, 13(24), pp. 3149-3158. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0331
Huang, J.; Momenzadeh, M.; Lombardi, F. (2007). Diseño de circuitos secuenciales por autómatas celulares de puntos cuánticos = Design of sequential circuits by quantum-dot cellular automata. Microelectronics Journal, 38(4-5), pp. 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2007.03.013
Huang, J.; Xie, G.; Kuang, R.; Deng, F.; Zhang, Y. (2021). Circuito de código Hamming basado en QCA para redes de nanocomunicación = QCA-based Hamming code circuit for nano communication network. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 84, 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104237
John, A.A.; Subramanian, A.P.; Vellayappan, M.V.; Balaji, A.; Mohandas, H.; Jaganathan, S.K. (2015). Los nanotubos de carbono y el grafeno como candidatos emergentes en la neurorregeneración y la administración de neurofármacos = Carbon nanotubes and graphene as emerging candidates in neuroregeneration and neurodrug delivery. International journal of nanomedicine, 10, 4267. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FIJN.S83777
Jornet, J.M.; Akyildiz, I.F. (2014). Modulación basada en pulsos de femtosegundo largo para comunicación en banda de terahercios en nanorredes = Femtosecond-long pulse-based modulation for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(5), pp. 1742-1754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2014.033014.130403
Jornet, J.M.; Pierobon, M.; Akyildiz, I.F. (2008). Redes de nanocomunicación = Nano Communication Networks. Networks (Elsevier), 52, pp. 2260-2279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2014.04.001
Jornet, J.M.; Pujol, J.C.; Pareta, J.S. (2012). PHLAME: un protocolo MAC consciente de la capa física para nanorredes electromagnéticas en la banda de terahercios = Phlame: A physical layer aware mac protocol for electromagnetic nanonetworks in the terahertz band. Nano Communication Networks, 3(1), pp. 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2012.01.006
Kumar, M.R. (2019). Una nano-antena compacta basada en grafeno para la comunicación en nano-redes = A Compact Graphene Based Nano-Antenna for Communication in Nano-Network. Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Computer, 1(1), pp. 17-27. https://doi.org/10.33969/JIEC.2019.11003
Laajimi, R.; Niu, M. (2018). Nanoarquitectura de autómatas celulares de puntos cuánticos (QCA) que utilizan áreas pequeñas para circuitos digitales = Nanoarchitecture of Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (QCA) Using Small Area for Digital Circuits. Advanced Electronics Circuits–Principles, Architectures and Applications on Emerging Technologies, pp. 67-84. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/58619
Lee, S.J.; Jung, C.; Choi, K.; Kim, S. (2015). Diseño de redes inalámbricas de nanosensores para aplicaciones intracuerpo = Design of wireless nanosensor networks for intrabody application. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 11(7), 176761. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/176761
Lu, J.; Yeo, P.S.E.; Gan, C.K.; Wu, P.; Loh, K.P. (2011). Transformando moléculas C60 en puntos cuánticos de grafeno = Transforming C60 molecules into graphene quantum dots. Nature nanotechnology, 6(4), pp. 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.30
Massicotte, M.; Yu, V.; Whiteway, E.; Vatnik, D.; Hilke, M. (2013). Efecto Hall cuántico en el grafeno fractal: crecimiento y propiedades de los grafloconos = Quantum Hall effect in fractal graphene: growth and properties of graphlocons. Nanotechnology, 24(32), 325601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/32/325601
Mitragotri, S.; Anderson, D.G.; Chen, X.; Chow, E.K.; Ho, D.; Kabanov, A.V.; Xu, C. (2015). Acelerando la traducción de nanomateriales en biomedicina = Accelerating the translation of nanomaterials in biomedicine. ACS nano, 9(7), pp. 6644-6654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03569
Mohammadyan, S.; Angizi, S.; Navi, K. (2015). Nueva celda sumadora completa QCA de una sola capa basada en el modelo de retroalimentación = New fully single layer QCA full-adder cell based on feedback model. International Journal of High Performance Systems Architecture, 5(4), pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHPSA.2015.072847
Mohrehkesh, S.; Weigle, M.C. (2014). Optimización del consumo de energía en nanorredes de banda de terahercios = Optimizing energy consumption in terahertz band nanonetworks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(12), pp. 2432-2441. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2014.2367668
Mohrehkesh, S.; Weigle, M.C.; Das, S.K. (2015). DRIH-MAC: una MAC de recolección iniciada por un receptor distribuido para nanorredes = DRIH-MAC: A distributed receiver-initiated harvesting-aware MAC for nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 1(1), pp. 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2015.2465519
Oh, D.K.; Jeong, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, I.; Ok, J.G.; Rho, J. (2021). Enfoques de nanofabricación de arriba hacia abajo hacia estructuras de escala nanométrica de un solo dígito = Top-down nanofabrication approaches toward single-digit-nanometer scale structures. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0243-7
Patriarchi, T.; Cho, J.R.; Merten, K.; Howe, M.W.; Marley, A.; Xiong, W.H.; Tian, L. (2018). Imágenes neuronales ultrarrápidas de la dinámica de la dopamina con sensores codificados genéticamente diseñados = Ultrafast neuronal imaging of dopamine dynamics with designed genetically encoded sensors. Science, 360(6396). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4422
Patriarchi, T.; Mohebi, A.; Sun, J.; Marley, A.; Liang, R.; Dong, C.; Tian, L. (2020). Una paleta ampliada de sensores de dopamina para imágenes multiplex in vivo = An expanded palette of dopamine sensors for multiplex imaging in vivo. Nature methods, 17(11), pp. 1147-1155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0936-3
Pierini, S. (2021). [Preprint]. Estudio experimental de nanocristales de perovskita como fuentes de fotón único para fotónica cuántica integrada = Experimental study of perovskite nanocrystals as single photon sources for integrated quantum photonics. Arxiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.14245.pdf
Pierobon, M.; Jornet, J.M.; Akkari, N.; Almasri, S.; Akyildiz, I.F. (2014). Un marco de enrutamiento para redes de nanosensores inalámbricos de recolección de energía en la banda de terahercios = A routing framework for energy harvesting wireless nanosensor networks in the Terahertz Band. Wireless networks, 20(5), pp. 1169-1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-013-0665-y
Pillers, M.; Goss, V.; Lieberman, M. (2014). Litografía por haz de electrones y despegue molecular para la fijación dirigida de nanoestructuras de ADN sobre silicio: de arriba hacia abajo se encuentra con de abajo hacia arriba = Electron-beam lithography and molecular liftoff for directed attachment of DNA nanostructures on silicon: Top-down meets bottom-up. Accounts of chemical research, 47(6), pp. 1759-1767. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar500001e
Reis, D.A.; Torres, F.S. (2016). Un simulador de defectos para el análisis de robustez de circuitos QCA = A Defects Simulator for Robustness Analysis of QCA Circuits. Journal of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 11(2), pp. 86-96. https://doi.org/10.29292/jics.v11i2.433
Sadeghi, M.; Navi, K.; Dolatshahi, M. (2020). Nuevos diseños eficientes de sumador completo y restador completo en autómatas celulares cuánticos = Novel efficient full adder and full subtractor designs in quantum cellular automata. The Journal of Supercomputing, 76(3), pp. 2191-2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03073-4
Sardinha, L.H.; Costa, A.M.; Neto, O.P.V.; Vieira, L.F.; Vieira, M.A. (2013). NanoRouter: un diseño de autómatas celulares de puntos cuánticos = Nanorouter: a quantum-dot cellular automata design. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(12), pp. 825-834. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP2.12130015
Sardinha, L.H.; Silva, D.S.; Vieira, M.A.; Vieira, L.F.; Neto, O.P.V. (2015). TCAM / CAM-QCA: Memoria direccionable de contenido (ternario) utilizando autómatas celulares de punto cuántico = Tcam/cam-qca:(ternary) content addressable memory using quantum-dot cellular automata. Microelectronics Journal, 46(7), pp. 563-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2015.03.020
Sarveswaran, K. (2004). [Documento reservado]. Self-assembly and lithographic patterning of DNA rafts. DARPA Conf. Foundations of Nanoscience: Self-Assembled Architectures and Devices, Snowbird, UT. [Enlace no disponible]
Sun, F.; Zhou, J.; Dai, B.; Qian, T.; Zeng, J.; Li, X.; Li, Y. (2020). Sensores GRAB de próxima generación para monitorear la actividad dopaminérgica in vivo = Next-generation GRAB sensors for monitoring dopaminergic activity in vivo. Nature methods, 17(11), pp. 1156-1166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-00981-9
Suzuki, J.; Budiman, H.; Carr, T.A.; DeBlois, J.H. (2013). Un marco de simulación para la comunicación molecular basada en neuronas = A simulation framework for neuron-based molecular communication. Procedia Computer Science, 24, pp. 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.10.032
Tsioliaridou, A.; Liaskos, C.; Ioannidis, S.; Pitsillides, A. (2015). CORONA: un sistema de coordenadas y enrutamiento para nanorredes = CORONA: A Coordinate and Routing system for Nanonetworks. En: Proceedings of the second annual international conference on nanoscale computing and communication. pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800795.2800809 | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1145/2800795.2800809
Vavouris, A.K.; Dervisi, F.D.; Papanikolaou, V.K.; Karagiannidis, G.K. (2018). Un esquema de modulación energéticamente eficiente para nanocomunicaciones centradas en el cuerpo en la banda THz = An energy efficient modulation scheme for body-centric nano-communications in the THz band. En: 2018 7th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST.2018.8376563
Wang, Z.F.; Liu, F. (2011). Puntos de cuánticos de grafeno como bloques de construcción para autómatas celulares cuánticos = Nanopatterned graphene quantum dots as building blocks for quantum cellular automata. Nanoscale, 3(10), pp. 4201-4205. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR10489F
Wang, W.L.; Wang, C.C.; Yao, X.W. (2019). Protocolo MAC basado en autoasignación de ranuras para nano-redes de recolección de energía = Slot self-allocation based mac protocol for energy harvesting nano-networks. Sensors, 19(21), 4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214646
Wang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Shi, W.; He, X.; Sun, X.; Gui, T. (2008). Propiedades de radiación de la antena de nanotubos de carbono en el rango de terahercios / infrarrojos = Radiation properties of carbon nanotubes antenna at terahertz/infrared range. International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 29(1), pp. 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-007-9306-9
Xia, Y.; Qiu, K. (2008). Diseño y aplicación de puerta lógica universal basada en autómatas celulares de puntos cuánticos = Design and application of universal logic gate based on quantum-dot cellular automata. En: 2008 11th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology (pp. 335-338). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2008.4716260 | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/ICCT.2008.4716260
Yao, X.W.; Wang, W.L.; Yang, S.H. (2015). Optimización de parámetros conjuntos para redes perpetuas y capacidad máxima de red = Joint parameter optimization for perpetual nanonetworks and maximum network capacity. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 1(4), pp. 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2016.2564967
Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, J.; Kahkoska, A.R.; Gu, Z. (2018). Advances in bioresponsive closed-loop drug delivery systems. International journal of pharmaceutics, 544(2), pp. 350-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.064
Zarepour, E.; Hassan, M.; Chou, C.T.; Bayat, S. (2015). Análisis de rendimiento de esquemas de modulación sin portadora para redes inalámbricas de nanosensores = Performance analysis of carrier-less modulation schemes for wireless nanosensor networks. En: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO) (pp. 45-50). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NANO.2015.7388653
Zhang, R.; Yang, K.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Qaraqe, K.A.; Alomainy, A. (2017). Caracterización analítica de la nanored In-Vivo de Terahercios en presencia de interferencia basada en el esquema de comunicación TS-OOK = Analytical characterisation of the terahertz in-vivo nano-network in the presence of interference based on TS-OOK communication scheme. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 10172-10181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713459
I wouldn’t ordinarily write about football; but the sport illustrates how vaunted Public Health Officials look the other way, when they’re supposed to. They have as much integrity as thieves in the night. Only idiots would pay attention to anything they say or claim or demand.
According to the government narrative, fully vaccinated people still spread “the virus.” That’s why, in many places, they’re supposed to wear masks.
Recently, Green Bay quarterback Aaron Rogers was mercilessly attacked for claiming he was vaccinated when he wasn’t; and for freely mingling with opposing team players after games and appearing before reporters without a mask.
Of course, no one mentioned that, DURING THE GAME, all players grab, breathe on, spit on, bleed on, pile on, scratch and claw one another. That’s permitted because it’s the source of MONEY. Lots of money.
And, in both college and pro games across the country, stadiums fill up with anywhere from 40,000 to 100,000 screaming, coughing, spitting, drinking, cursing fans, who sit cheek to jowl with one another. But that’s all right, too, because it’s MONEY.
This situation is pretty much like the US southern border, where thousands (millions?) of immigrants come into the US “with the virus.”
But that’s all right, too, because, well, it’s policy, one aspect of which is welcoming drugs into America. Drugs are MONEY. Big money.
Sports “journalists” don’t discuss what I’m writing about in this article. They’re not supposed to. It might turn off the audience. And yes, again, their audience is MONEY.
“Hey, Jim. Did you see what just happened down on the field during that last play? The big offensive left tackle bit the arm of the Rams linebacker. Blood is flowing. I wonder how much virus is being transmitted.”
“A ton, Frank. We really should have a graphic that illustrates it. Heck, there’s gobs of spit all over the field. So when a player falls down, he’s getting 100 percent pure from-the-lung SARS-CoV-2 rubbed in his face.”
“You and I are sitting in a veritable mist of virus engulfing the stadium.”
“That’s why your ex wants you to take out a bigger life insurance policy naming her as beneficiary.”
Where are the little prissy public health demons? Nowhere.
But they’ll tell YOU to take the highly destructive vaccine and then wear a mask and get ready for the boosters every six months and lock down and isolate whenever they deem it necessary.
They’ll collude with politicians to destroy all sorts of businesses and lives with these lockdowns.
But not the football business.
Despite his bitching and whining and moaning about crowds at large events, I assure you that if little Anthony Fauci suddenly ascended to the positon of Commissioner of the National Football League, he would find a way to keep the game going and the stadiums full of fans. He’d change his tune.
He’s the head of a public health mafia, and the mafia knows money.
La Quinta Columna has gained the support of several researchers both in Spain and around the world.
A prominent researcher among those collaborating with them is the author of the Corona2Inspect blog, Mik Andersen, who’s carrying out “high-level research work“, as described by Dr. Pablo Campra during the presentation he gave on November 2.
On this occasion, the featured blog published an article about possible nanorouters that can be seen in some of the photographs taken by Dr. Campra. These nanostructures, most likely, would be part of the system that would allow the generation of MAC addresses in inoculated individuals.
Orwell City brings below the comments made by La Quinta Columna on this remarkable research entitled:
Well, you know there’s a blog called Corona2Inspect. The author is Mik Andersen. He writes under this pseudonym. He’s an important person. On this occasion, he has posted an article today, November 25. It’s titled “Pattern identification in coronavirus vaccines: nanorouters.” And the images he presents are very curious because he’s taking images out of the scientific literature and comparing them to what Dr. Campra found in different vials.
“Since the discovery of graphene oxide in coronavirus vaccines, all the findings and the discovery made only confirm its presence (Campra 2021). To date, we’ve also found evidence of more than reasonable indications of the existence of nanotubes, carbon nanoribbons, mesoporous spheres, colloidal nanoribbons…”
Here are the different links.
“Objects that shouldn’t be part of any vaccine and that aren’t declared among the components of the vaccines. Additionally, other types of objects have been identified and evidenced in images of blood samples from people vaccinated with coronavirus vaccines. Specifically, micronadators, crystallized graphene nanoantennas, and the famous graphene quantum dots, also known as GQD. On this occasion, analyzing one of the images obtained by Dr. Campra, I remember seeing this, corresponding to a sample of the Pfizer vaccine. See Figure 1, which is this one here, has discovered what’s most likely a nanorouter or part of its circuitry.
And this is where it gets interesting because they did indeed appear to have typically printed circuit designs. Especially those of us who have worked with electronics and draw the tracks were reminded of that.
“In the original image, a well-delimited drop can be seen in which there’s a crystalline structure of quadrangular or cubic shape. If you look closely, you can see some marks in these crystals with a regular pattern, well delimited in some cases, but limited by the optics of the microscope. The finding has been possible by isolating each quadrangular crystal by applying a process of rastering, focusing, and delimitation of the edges of the image…”
José Luis, this is also being analyzed by another chemist. We’ve got to have a meeting with Campra.
“…To further pronounce the observed marks.” “Once this process was completed, a draft was drawn with the lines and patterns inscribed on the crystal, creating a clean outline of what actually looked like a circuit. It was very striking to find parallel and perpendicular lines with a distribution far from what would be fractal patterns —which would correspond, then, to crystals’ randomness—, which allowed us to automatically infer the possibility that it had been the product of manufacturing.”
At that level!
“Therefore, we looked for similar patterns in the scientific literature that had a similar scheme to the circuit that had just been drawn.”
I’m going to zoom in a little bit more so you can see it better. There. I’ve gone a little too far.
“The result of the search was almost immediate since the pattern of a quantum dot nanorouter was found, as shown in Figure 2.”
Take a look.
The images have been enlarged here. See, for example, this one here, which is very clear. It has these things like printed circuit board tracks. And this, what you see here on the right, is taken from the scientific literature. It’s a circuit of a quantum dot nanorouter. It actually has a very striking resemblance.
“Possible quantum dot nanorouters were observed in a quadrangular crystal in an image obtained by Dr. Campra.”
I seem to remember that it was the Pfizer vaccine. Precisely the first one, I think.
“In the lower right corner is the quantum dot nanorouter circuit published by Sardinha in 2013. Note the obvious resemblance between the sketch, the shape written on the crystal, and the quantum dot circuit.”
See? It’s very similar. Very similar even in the distribution it has. Quite similar.
“This discovery is of fundamental relevance. Not only to understand the true purpose and components of coronavirus vaccines, but also to explain the existence of the phenomenon of MAC addresses visible through the Bluetooth of many mobile devices. Because nanorouters, then, will, like routers, broadcast visible MAC addresses in, in this case, Bluetooth wireless technology, as is being proven, as well. The context of the discovery is as follows. Before proceeding to the explanation of the finding, it’s worth recalling the context in which it is framed, to ensure its understanding and subsequent deepening. First of all, it should be borne in mind that graphene and its derivatives, graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes, form part of the components of vaccines, as has already been explained in this blog. The properties of graphene are exceptional from a physical, thermodynamic, electronic, mechanical, and magnetic point of view. Its characteristics allow it to be used as a superconductor. It’s an electromagnetic wave absorbing material, a signal emitter-receiver, a quantum antenna which makes it possible to create advanced nano and micrometric scale electronics.”
Well, remember that these images were seen under the optical microscope. Those that you see in pink.
“So we would be talking, in this case, about micro-metric structures. So, the fundamental material for the development of nanobiomedicine…”
Here he talks about a paper.
“…Communication nanonetworks, new drug delivery therapies, cancer treatments, and neurological treatment of neurodegenerative diseases…”
Well, he talks about different studies.
“However, aside from all the benefits, the scientific literature is very clear about the health implications for the human body. It’s notorious that graphene, graphene oxide (GO), and other derivatives such as carbon nanotubes (CNT) are toxic in almost all their forms, causing mutagenesis (or cancer, chromosomal alteration), cell death, apoptosis, necrosis, the release of free radicals. And as a consequence of that, it increases toxicity rapidly in the lungs, favoring the cytokine storm that you know as bilateral pneumonia, genotoxicity, or DNA damage.”
All those studies that we have reviewed. “Systemic inflammation…”
That’s COVID-19.
“Immunosuppression, damage to the central nervous system, circulatory, endocrine, reproductive, urinary system, which can cause anaphylactic death (we also saw another study on that), and multi-organ dysfunction.”
And here it says: see the article on “Damage and toxicity of graphene oxide” and “Damage and toxicity of carbon-graphene nanotubes”. They’re also in La Quinta Columna.
“Secondly, graphene is a radiomodulatable nanomaterial.”
This is very important and one that people need to understand. And here’s the interaction with those radio frequency antennas.
“It’s able to absorb electromagnetic waves.”
All the links are here. This blog is very, very important to go deeper.
“It can also multiply radiation, acting as a nanoantenna, or else a signal repeater, a transistor. Exposure to electromagnetic radiation can cause the exfoliation of the material into smaller particles called GQDs (Graphene Quantum Dots), whose properties and physical peculiarities are enhanced due to their even smaller scale due to the “quantum hall effect,” since they act by amplifying electromagnetic signals and, with that, the emission distance, especially in environments such as the human body. Graphene quantum dots can acquire various morphologies, for example, hexagonal, triangular, circular, or irregular polygon.”
The truth is that this article is very long, but extremely interesting from beginning to end. And here, what’s most striking from the optical-visual point of view is the comparison, José Luis. If we compare the image of what’s in the scientific literature, you can see that it’s practically the same. Notice that it has… It’s the same!
Dr. Sevillano:
I recall that when we started to see the images, at first, we thought that those structures that appeared there were sugar crystals or something like that. Heh, sugar crystals are a thing of the past.
Here… Everything in the vaccine is introduced and has a purpose. And it has a purpose. Everything. Even genetic material has a purpose and, surely, it has the purpose to mutate people, the new generations. Almost certainly.
Ricardo Delgado:
That given what we’re seeing.
Dr. Sevillano:
Exactly. Given what we’re seeing. It’s just that people don’t understand this. That’s why they’ve been pounding our brains for 20 or 30 years since the X-Files started. Mulder and Scully started to tell us fictional movie stuff, that this Mothman, that I don’t know what, that this and that. Crazy fiction stuff.
But they were preparing us psychologically for the mess they were going to make. All they do is watch weird series of strange things and, in the end, they say: “All this that these people are telling us is crazy.”
Of course, they have been preparing us this way so that when you talk about this and complain, they call you crazy. So that they call you crazy, literally.
But that’s what they’re doing. They’re injecting something into people that, at the moment, is killing them. At some point, surely, they’re going to modulate them with it. At the same time, they’re mutating us for future generations.
On Nov. 2, members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s pediatric COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old. Were their decisions driven by science and conscience — or their ties to drugmakers?
CHD EDITOR’S NOTE: Following the Oct. 26 meeting of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), Children’s Health Defense argued it is time to shun the individuals — and institutions — that are selling out America’s children without even a prick of conscience. At the close of this article about the members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), we reiterate our list of suggestions for shunning.
On Nov. 2, the members of ACIP voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old.
Neither the disgracefully unscientific vote nor CDC Director Rochelle Walensky’s prompt endorsement came as a surprise. Though billed as “independent,” the 14 ACIP members — like the 17 members of FDA’s VRBPAC who voted the same way the previous week — have deep ties to pharma, with careers that hinge on promoting and rubber-stamping the United States’ destructive one-size-fits-all vaccination agenda.
Describing the VRBPAC and ACIP meetings as “a total sham,” Children’s Health Defense President Mary Holland said, “Sadly, approval from these committees means nothing in terms of safety.”
Political scientist Toby Rogers agreed, stating the ACIP meeting “was not a scientific review. It was banal bureaucrats announcing plans for a Blitzkrieg and the bought white coats were cheering them on.”
With their vote to give young children the dangerous injections, ACIP members signaled that they, too, deserve to be shunned, along with the powerful institutions with which they are affiliated. The latter include the nation’s top universities and leading pediatric hospitals.
Pediatric hospitals, meanwhile, are playing a frontline role as COVID vaccination sites. Promoting the injection for 5-year-olds, First Lady Jill Biden visited Texas Children’s Hospital straight away, applauding the hospital for the 39,000 pediatric vaccine appointments it had already scheduled.
Also worthy of shunning are the 20,000 individual vaccine providers who were pre-positioned to “hit the ground running” and “get shots in little arms.”
Within two days of ACIP’s and Walensky’s verdicts, these providers had administered the jab to thousands of 5- to 11-year-olds, and within the first week, according to the White House, 900,000 children had been injected.
New dangers emerging
Community vaccination sites such as pharmacies and pop-up clinics have attracted recent attention for egregious vaccine administration errors in young children:
In Texas, a pop-up clinic gave adult doses of the Pfizer jab to 6- and 7-year-old boys “two days before a proper dose of the vaccine was even approved for that age range.”
In Virginia, a pharmacy (subsequently ordered to stop administering the shots) gave 112 children in the 5–11 age group the wrong COVID vaccine formulation.
A pediatric practice in California also gave 14 children an incorrect dose of the Pfizer jab, not disclosing “whether the kids got too much or too little.”
In addition, pharmacies have “mistakenly” given adult COVID shots to children under age 5 whose parents had requested flu shots.
With censorship rampant, many parents may be unaware of these transgressions. They also may not know that the experimental product FDA and CDC are unleashing on children is coming under increasing fire from Pfizer whistleblowers.
The same day as the ACIP vote, The BMJ published a whistleblower’s hair-raising account of “data integrity issues” in Pfizer’s “helter-skelter” clinical trials. According to Brook Jackson — a trained clinical trial auditor — Ventavia Research Group (one of the contract research organizations engaged by Pfizer) “falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events.” Quality control staff, Jackson further reported, were “overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.”
When Jackson shared her concerns with both Ventavia and FDA in September 2020, Ventavia fired her. FDA ignored her warnings and granted EUA status to Pfizer’s injection in December.
Melissa Strickler McAtee, until recently a quality control employee at Pfizer’s plant in McPherson, Kansas, described, in an interview with Project Veritas, Pfizer’s efforts to deceive the public about the use of fetal cell lines in creating the COVID shot.
Equally disturbingly, Strickler McAtee told other journalists that Pfizer’s vaccine exhibits an unusual fluorescent blue glow, stating she had “never once [previously] seen anything do that, not even close” during her 10-year career inspecting “hundreds of thousands of units” of vaccines. She also reports that her co-workers at the plant are being unprecedentedly kept in the dark about what the vaccine’s ingredients are.
Pfizer has a lengthy history of quality control problems in addition to a business model predicated on habitual fraud. The Kansas plant, which Pfizer acquired when it strategically purchased injectable drug company Hospira in 2015, has been repeatedly “dinged” by FDA for problems with quality, cleanliness and contamination.
In the three years leading up to its acquisition by Pfizer, Hospira had to issue more than 40 recalls, and Pfizer/Hospira has continued to be a frequent offender on FDA’s recall list since 2015, receiving another warning letter from FDA in 2017.
FDA’s tsk-tsking of Pfizer clearly represents a hollow rebuke, however, as this week’s FDA request to a federal judge made plain: FDA is asking for 55 years to make public the data and information it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
These and other clinical trial shenanigans strongly intimate that “the data that the FDA and CDC have been pretending to base their decisions on for the last year, are fiction.”
Below are the ACIP members who signed off on Pfizer’s pediatric vaccine, and their conflicts of interest.
ACIP Chair Grace Lee
Dr. Grace Lee (gmlee@stanford.edu) chaired the November ACIP deliberations. Lee has been associate chief medical officer for practice innovation at Stanford Children’s Health and a pediatrics professor at Stanford School of Medicine since 2017, after having spent two decades at Harvard and Boston-area hospitals.
In addition to policy work focusing on financial rewards and penalties to reshape hospital performance, Lee has built her reputation by shoring up the pretense that the nation has a functioning vaccine safety surveillance system.
Lee served as past principal investigator for the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a large database that includes comprehensive longitudinal medical and vaccination records for two million children and seven million adults. Although VSD analyses have the potential to permit enlightening vaccinated-unvaccinated comparisons of health outcomes, the CDC has sole access to the data.
In the words of CHD’s chief scientific officer Dr. Brian Hooker, CDC has “shut [VSD] up like a fortress, despite the fact that it’s taxpayer-funded.”
In VSD-based publications — some of which include fellow ACIP member Matthew Daly — Lee has made a habit of downplaying vaccine risks. For example, she encourages women to get Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) shots during pregnancy, even while data show an increased risk of placental and amniotic fluid infection in vaccinated pregnant women.
She also has whitewashed risks of flu shots in children under age 5 despite finding “an apparent dose-response for vaccine and allergic reactions in the 1- to 3-day risk window.” She dismisses post-vaccination anaphylaxis risks as “rare,” though the package inserts for most vaccines on the childhood schedule prominently list anaphylaxis as an adverse event.
Another VSD study co-authored by Lee documented a safety signal for febrile seizures linked to influenza vaccination of children in their first five years, particularly if administered along with pneumococcal vaccination; massaging the troubling conclusion with vaccine doublespeak, Lee and colleagues proposed placing their findings “in a benefit-risk framework to ensure that population health benefits are maximized.”
While in Boston, Lee served as associate director of the FDA-funded Mini-Sentinel Project, one of several newer vaccine safety surveillance mechanisms trotted out over the past decade.
As noted by CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in a letter to Biden advisor David Kessler in December 2020, studies published using Sentinel data — all authored by the same small pool of insiders — focus on an extremely narrow subset of adverse outcomes and reflect methodological decisions “that could easily constrain researchers’ ability to detect outcomes of interest.”
When a Sentinel study of the two rotavirus vaccines routinely given to American children identified a “significant risk” of intussusception after dose 2 — a bowel complication that forced CDC to revoke its recommendation for an earlier rotavirus vaccine — Lee and co-authors deployed more doublespeak, once again advising the public to consider the risk “in light of the demonstrated benefits of rotavirus vaccination.”
Discussing myocarditis last June, Lee admitted, “clinical presentation of myocarditis cases following vaccination has been distinct, occurring most often within 1 week after dose two, with chest pain as the most common presentation.”
This did not stop Lee from joining with other public health officials in passing off myocarditis as “an extremely rare side effect” and claiming that young people are likely to “recover on their own or with minimal treatment.”
In September of this year, Lee co-authored a paper in JAMA belatedly conceding that a large segment of the population (“women and those with a history of allergic reactions”) is at “elevated risk” of experiencing allergic reactions to mRNA COVID vaccines due to the presence in the injections of polyethylene glycol (PEG). CHD issued urgent warnings about PEG and its entirely predictable anaphylaxis risks a full year earlier, in September 2020.
Stanford receives extensive vaccine funding from the Gates Foundation, including for the development of 3D-printed vaccine microneedle patches (a strategy that would allow “vaccination without a shot”).
Not only does Stanford require all students to be COVID-vaccinated, but it also urges vaccination for students’ children.
Lynn Bahta
Lynn Bahta, RN, MPH (lynn.bahta@state.mn.us) is an immunization program clinical consultant for the Minnesota Department of Health, with a 25-year career focused on promoting vaccination.
During the pandemic, Bahta has been giving talks about “vaccine hesitancy in the time of COVID,” offering “key communication strategies to build confidence among those who are hesitant.”
Vaccine “hesitancy” appears to have been her bailiwick long before COVID, however, and her publications suggest a particular interest in coaxing Minnesota’s immigrant, migrant and refugee populations into higher vaccination rates.
Loyal to the fraudulent CDC party line that denies any link between MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccination and autism, Bahta has published articles dismissing the well-founded autism concerns of Minnesota’s Somali community as “misinformation.”
Somali children in Minneapolis suffer the highest known rate of severe autism in the world. Somali parents allege that the reaction of public health officials like Bahta has been one of indifference.
Discussing COVID vaccines, Bahta claims that the “great majority, usually over 90%” of adverse reactions “are not serious.”
In fact, while stating that she “never disagrees with people who believe they were injured by vaccines because it’s difficult to know,” she clearly sides with public health officials in viewing “unverified reports” to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as “misunderstood by the public and exploited by skeptics in a way that is undermining immunization efforts against COVID-19.”
Bahta disingenuously opines that “people naturally but incorrectly associate injuries with recent events.”
Also of note:
Bahta’s was one of the core “yes” votes in favor of recommending Moderna’s COVID shot last December.
When ACIP deliberated over COVID booster shots in September, Bahta was willing to recommend boosters for adults age 50 and up and individuals with underlying conditions but not for some groups of younger adults. At the time, Bahta argued for the need to “stay with the science,” stating, “I don’t think we have the data.”
By November, Bahta apparently was untroubled by the paucity of safety data available for the 5–11 age group, stating, “We know more than what we don’t know.”
Beth Bell
Beth Bell, M.D., MPH (bzb8@uw.edu) is a clinical professor in the Department of Global Health at the University of Washington (UW) School of Public Health. Until 2017, Bell spent most of her career at CDC, including as Director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic [animal/insect-to-human] Infectious Diseases.
“Health security” and biosecurity are the linchpin buzzwords that global technocrats are using to push for complete control over people’s “ability to work, to socialize, to travel, conduct business, access public services and to purchase essential goods and services.”
Like many of the individuals who make their way onto FDA and CDC committees, Bell started her CDC career as an officer in the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS), a branch that journalist Jon Rappoport has dubbed the “medical CIA.”
As Rappoport notes, EIS graduates’ occupancy of “key positions in the overall medical cartel” furnishes an “unparalleled opportunity” to control information — and disseminate disinformation.
During COVID, Bell has positioned herself as a champion for vaccination “equity,” stating “If we’re serious about valuing equity, we need to have that baked in early in the vaccination process.”
Bell’s comments about wanting to make sure “socially vulnerable” communities and people of color have access to COVID shots echo troubling racially oriented remarks made by Melinda Gates early on in the pandemic. Located in Gates’ backyard, UW not only benefits from close ties with and extensive funding from the Gates Foundation — an organization tainted by allegations of medical experimentation and an underlying eugenicist ideology — but also enjoys extensive support from Microsoft.
Also of note:
As co-author of a CDC paper summarizing ACIP’s May recommendation that 12- to 15-year-olds get the Pfizer shot, Bell and colleagues inaccurately argued that “COVID-19 in adolescents is a major public health problem” and that “desirable [vaccine] effects” outweigh “any undesirable effects in most settings.” The authors did not mention the teens who are dying of post-vaccination cardiac arrest.
Regarding COVID booster shots, Bell first stated, “I have my own concerns that we appear to be recommending vaccines for people who I don’t think need it”; she later agreed, however, that “moving forward with the recommendations makes sense for the sake of being clear.”
Regarding COVID jabs for young children, Bell claimed, after the November vote, “if she had a grandchild, she’d get the grandchild vaccinated as soon as possible.”
Oliver Brooks
Oliver Brooks, M.D. (oliver.brooks@wattshealth.org) is chief medical officer and a member of the executive team at Watts Healthcare Corporation in Los Angeles. Watts Healthcare provides primary care services under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and also receives federal funding for other services, including those related to HIV/AIDS.
Brooks is immediate past president of the National Medical Association (NMA), which he describes as “the oldest and largest organization representing African-America’s physicians and the guardians of the health of African-Americans.” As such, Brooks — like Beth Bell — made “health equity” his calling card, with vaccination of minority groups one of his signature goals as NMA president.
CDC celebrates Brooks’ “leadership roles focusing on disparities in vaccine coverage rates.”
Brooks speaks frequently “on the science and the implementation perspective of vaccine utilization,” is a board member and past president of the California Immunization Coalition, chairman of the Immunize LA Families Coalition and member of the national Leadership Panel for the Adolescent Immunization Initiative.
During the pandemic, Watts Healthcare has received millions in funding from Kaiser Permanente to promote COVID vaccination in L.A.’s Hispanic and African American communities.
In March 2021, Watts Healthcare also received $4.3 million via the American Rescue Plan to increase the federally qualified health center’s “ability to get more shots in arms.” The nonprofit is further beholden to the federal government for a $5.18 million coronavirus-related Paycheck Protection Loan approved in April 2020.
Brooks co-chaired California’s COVID-19 Vaccine Work Group, working to “get the vaccine out more rapidly” through “more points of distribution.” Early on in the vaccine rollout, one of those “points of distribution” in San Diego was forced to pause vaccine administration when numerous recipients suffered severe allergic reactions.
Since 2014, Brooks has received $118,439 (350 general payments primarily for consulting or speaking engagements) from biopharmaceutical companies that include Pfizer as well as Sanofi Pasteur, Novartis, Seqirus, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Meda, AbbVie and Theratechnologies.
Also of note:
At over $271,000, Brooks’ annual salary is second only to that of the Watts Healthcare CEO.
Watts Healthcare and another South LA nonprofit received $3 million in COVID-related funding from the Oprah Winfrey Charitable Foundation in July 2020. The media tycoon — one-time member (along with Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, George Soros, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner and others) of an elite “club” of billionaire philanthropists — urges compliance with mask mandates and uses her influential platform to tell those who are not vaccinated to “reconsider.”
Wilbur Chen
Wilbur Chen, M.D. (wchen@som.umaryland.edu) is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, with research interests “in developing vaccines against pathogens which afflict low- and middle-income countries” as well as in vaccine development for the elderly. Chen has headed up vaccine trials for influenza viruses, enteric pathogens and “agents of bioterror.”
Chen is co-investigator for two entities funded by the Anthony-Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): the Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Unit (composed of 10 academic centers throughout the U.S.) and the Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers (a network of research centers developing “novel vaccine candidates and delivery platforms”).
In advance of the ACIP vote on the 5–11 age group, CHD joined numerous citizens in arguing (unsuccessfully) that Chen be removed from the committee for blatant financial conflicts of interest. In 2020 alone, Chen accepted $437,251 from vaccine makers GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Emergent BioSolutions — a fact “researched and exposed by average citizens” rather than disclosed by CDC. Chen’s payments since 2014 total over $476,880 and include monies from Janssen, Seqirus, MedImmune, Astellas Pharma, Valneva Austria and BioFire Diagnostics in addition to the two companies already mentioned.
Chen also receives research funding from the Gates Foundation and from the Seattle-based global health organization PATH. PATH’s former CEO, Christopher Elias, now serves as president of the Gates Foundation’s Global Development Division, leading efforts in areas such as vaccine delivery and family planning; Elias was a leading Event 201 participant.
Also of note:
In addition to serving as a voting member of ACIP, Chen is a core member of NIAID’s Data and Safety Advisory Board.
During COVID, Chen has been a staunch advocate of “aggressive nonpharmacologic intervention and control measures,” including “aggressive recognition and isolation and quarantine of cases and contacts.”
Despite the well-documented risks and failures of influenza vaccination, Chen continues to insist that “Vaccination is by far the best method to prevent and control influenza.”
Chen recently voted to make a highly reactogenic Ebola vaccine obligatory for healthcare personnel, lab workers and support staff at facilities that handle Ebola specimens, arguing against letting workers make their own risk-benefit decisions.
Sybil Cineas
Sybil Cineas, M.D. (sybil_cineas@brown.edu), a Harvard Medical School graduate, is an associate professor of medicine, pediatrics and medical science at Brown University, and, as associate program director of Brown’s combined residency program in internal medicine and pediatrics, is “highly involved in the training of residents and medical students.”
According to CDC, Cineas has “20+ years of experience teaching about and promoting vaccination.”
Like fellow ACIP members Beth Bell and Oliver Brooks, Cineas frequently cites health equity to justify her vaccine votes. For example, as a member of the ACIP Hepatitis Work Group, which recently recommended hepatitis B vaccines for everyone age 59 and younger while issuing a more qualified risk-based recommendation for adults age 60 and up, Cineas wanted to recommend universal hepatitis B vaccination for all ages. She argued, “A simplification of this recommendation [would] reach more individuals at risk … and promote health equity.”
Also of note:
CDC has given Brown researchers $4.9 million to study COVID vaccine effectiveness in seniors; the researchers state that “the urgently needed research will be used to inform recommendations about vaccine booster shots for nursing home residents.”
Matthew Daley
Matthew Daley, M.D. (matthew.f.daley@kp.org) is a senior investigator and practicing pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, described by CDC as having “extensive research experience in the areas of vaccine safety, parental vaccine hesitancy, and immunization services delivery.”
Daley’s published studies on vaccine “hesitancy” cover topics such as social media interventions to increase vaccine acceptance, barriers to adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, under vaccination patterns and parent-provider trust. (In one study, parents reported trusting pediatricians on topics such as nutrition but “did not believe their pediatrician provided ‘balanced’ information on both the benefits and risks of vaccination.”)
Daley also conducts Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) studies on a variety of topics, including safety of newly licensed vaccines, vaccine safety during pregnancy and, according to the CDC, safety of the childhood immunization schedule.
After the Institute of Medicine acknowledged that studies “to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted” — and identified the VSD as “an important resource for conducting this research” — Daley and CDC co-authors wrote a white paper to describe how this could be done but shrouded their remarks in so many caveats about potential studies’ “inherent complexity” as to make their feasibility seem highly doubtful.
Daley’s VSD studies, some co-authored with ACIP colleague Grace Lee, have identified potential safety signals, but in each case, Daley and co-authors have found reasons to reject or mask their own conclusions.
Examples include attributing a statistically significant association between hepatitis A vaccination during pregnancy and small-for-gestational-age infants to “unmeasured confounding”; putting forth “seasonality” as the likely contributor to a statistical signal for Bell’s palsy in adults age 25 and up following H1N1 influenza vaccination; and dismissing as “rare” two types of adverse events (anaphylaxis and fainting) significantly associated with live attenuated influenza vaccination in children 2 through 17 years of age.
Also of note:
After the vote recommending the COVID shots for younger children, Daly professed to not be surprised by parents’ hesitation, stating that parents “may be more risk-averse about their child.” However, though Pfizer’s clinical trial in children was too short and too small to assess the risk of myocarditis, Daley confidently asserted that “younger children are at a greater risk of developing myocarditis after a COVID infection than from the vaccine.”
A current VSD/CDC study by Daley is assessing “factors associated with COVID vaccination or non-vaccination” in the general population and among pregnant women.
Camille Kotton
Camille N. Kotton, M.D. (ckotton@partners.org) is clinical director for Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor at Harvard Medical School. CDC describes Kotton as a “national expert in vaccination and zoonotic infectious diseases in the immunocompromised,” including solid organ transplant recipients.
Since 2014, Kotton has received over $304,000 in general payments and associated research funding from companies like Merck, GSK, Roche, Quiagen Sciences, Oxford Immunotec, Astellas Pharma, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene and Biotest.
In voting to give younger children the COVID injections, Kotton stated, “the safety data in children looked very good” and added, “she would feel comfortable having her own children immunized if they were in that age group.”
Although few children suffer ill effects from COVID-19, Kotton argued that children should be vaccinated “both to prevent death as well as to prevent major long-term effects of having this devastating infection.”
In the past, Kotton has disclosed conflicts of interest due to her financial relationships with (and vaccine “adjudication” for) companies like Merck, Astellas, Roche and others.
James Loehr
James Loehr, M.D. (staff@cayugafamilymedicine.com) owns Cayuga Family Medicine in Ithaca, New York. According to CDC, for 30 years Loehr has counseled patients “every day on the benefits of vaccines.” Loehr was a member of ACIP’s influenza working group for more than 10 years.
In 2015, Loehr authored an article with detailed instructions telling physicians how to “minimiz[e] costs and maximiz[e] reimbursement” to “make immunizations profitable.”
Describing how Cayuga Family Medicine “enjoys steady revenue from immunizations, with vaccine reimbursement sometimes exceeding that for the rest of the visit,” Loehr outlined a series of strategies to improve a practice’s financial viability through vaccination, including becoming a “savvy vaccine shopper,” taking advantage of manufacturer discounts and doing “a bit of additional work” when coding for the service to obtain extra reimbursement for “brief counseling” and multiple vaccine components.
At an October ACIP meeting focused on Moderna boosters that was, according to Stat, driven by a “sense of the inevitability of [the] outcome,” Loehr stated, “There are probably many people who are going to get a Moderna booster who don’t need it. However, given the situation that we’ve already approved a Pfizer [booster] and there are enough people who are looking for a booster, I am inclined, reluctantly, to just go ahead and recommend a similar pattern for the Moderna booster.”
Loehr was similarly wishy-washy the previous month when he stated, “I … feel that we’re getting too much ahead of ourselves and that we have too much hope on the line with these boosters.”
He then added, “However, having said that, we shouldn’t let the perfect be in the way of the good. And if we can do a little bit of good by giving boosters to people over 65 I’m in favor of that.”
Like most of his ACIP peers, Loehr promotes himself as an expert on “strategies for addressing and overcoming vaccine hesitancy,” stating that “most patients…are not truly resistant to immunization” but just want “clarification and reassurance.”
Sarah Long
Sarah Long, M.D. is a professor of pediatrics at Drexel University College of Medicine and a physician at St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children in Philadelphia. In addition to her role on ACIP, Long has served on VRBPAC and as a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases.
Long was widely quoted in the press following her “yes” vote on COVID injections for children. Though she expressed several concerns and voted “no” in September regarding Pfizer boosters for healthcare workers, Long “threw her full support behind the pediatric recommendation.”
Fully aware that “CDC was not able to conduct a full benefit-risk analysis for myocarditis post-vaccination in this age group,” Long is nevertheless telling mothers that the shot’s risks are preferable to the myocarditis that could arise from COVID illness.
Without citing any evidence, Long states that “vaccine-related events are completely different, and much less dire, than typical myocarditis,” adding that “she’d rather treat many people with vaccine-associated myopericarditis than a single case of viral myocarditis.”
Claiming that “Nobody has died of myopericarditis, and children are dying of coronavirus,” Long has concluded that “of course it’s a benefit-risk ratio that comes out in the direction of vaccination.”
The hundreds of teens who have experienced post-vaccination myocarditis — some now dead — might beg to differ.
Ironically, Long’s bio includes numerous “awards and honors for her outstanding work to improve the health and well-being of children.” After the “yes” vote on COVID shots, she reportedly joked, “I, believe it or not, have no questions. I have just a comment: I am very supportive of this recommendation in its fullest extent, as a ‘should,’ not a ‘may,’ for all children in this age group.”
Long continued, “I think the data support that we have one more vaccine that saves lives of children, and that we should be very confident to employ it to the maximum to do what it is meant to do, without significant concerns of serious adverse events. So, I couldn’t be more supportive.”
Also of note:
Drexel University received half a million dollars from the Gates Foundation in June 2020 “to evaluate the use of a digital health platform to make care for COVID more accessible to marginalized populations.”
The Gates Foundation is also supporting the work of other Drexel researchers in areas such as diagnostic test development.
Having lost an infant to pertussis, McNally describes herself as a “public health advocate” in addition to being an attorney.
She is founder and president of the Franny Strong Foundation — framing a mission to “promote pertussis awareness and boost childhood immunization rates for all vaccine-preventable diseases” — and founded the I Vaccinate Campaign, which, on November 16, excitedly reported that “nearly 1 million kids ages 5-11 will have their first COVID shots by the end of today.”
McNally is seemingly unaware of the many failures of a pertussis vaccination program that is widely acknowledged to be making vaccinated children more rather than less susceptible to pertussis over their lifetimes.
Also of note:
McNally is a CDC darling, having been named “Childhood Immunization Champion” for Michigan in 2018 — the same year in which she was appointed to her four-year term on ACIP.
Katherine Poehling
Katherine A. Poehling, M.D., MPH (kpoehlin@wakehealth.edu) is a professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at North Carolina’s Wake Forest University School of Medicine. CDC cites her expertise “on the community impact of vaccines, specifically pneumococcal and influenza vaccines.”
As an ACIP insider, Poehling has headed up past ACIP presentations on pneumococcal vaccines.
Poehling has published on “ethics and academic pediatrics” but apparently sees no conflict in sitting on ACIP while receiving, according to Open Payments, over $523,000 in general payments and associated research funding from MedImmune and AstraZeneca since 2014.
Poehling endorses CDC’s astonishingly fact-free claim that COVID has caused “substantially more misery than other childhood diseases,” stating, “that information helped convince her to strongly support COVID-19 vaccines for elementary school children.”
Poehling also buys into Long’s non-evidence-based assertion that COVID-19 disease is responsible for more heart problems than the vaccine. During a May review of Moderna data, Poehling enthusiastically favored making multiple vaccines available — to “increase access.”
Also of note:
When endorsing COVID boosters for the immunocompromised, Poehling stated, “the benefits are tremendous and the potential negative impacts are minimal and so I agree that we should recommend.”
Many of Poehling’s publications seem intended to address the burden of diseases such as influenza for which vaccine “solutions” can then be promoted. It seems likely that her published articles about respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) will be used to lay the groundwork for an mRNA vaccine for RSV.
Pablo Sanchez
Pablo J. Sanchez, M.D. (sanchez.940@osu.edu) has been a professor of pediatrics at Ohio State University since 2013 and directs Clinical and Translational Research in Neonatology at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus. Sanchez previously held positions at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Sanchez’s 80-page self-congratulatory curriculum vitae reveals that he is a consummate insider fluidly bridging academia, public health agencies and private industry. Sanchez’s invited participation and lectures include appearances at public health agencies like CDC, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); COVID-vaccine-promoting trade groups like the AAP and March of Dimes; and biopharma companies like AbbVie, GSK (formerly Smithkline Beecham), ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inhibitex, MedImmune and Ross Laboratories.
Sanchez also lists hundreds of thousands in research monies received from these same entities.
Since the 1990s, Sanchez has been funded by Abbott Laboratories, American Lung Association, BioStar, Biosynexus, Burroughs Wellcome, CDC, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Gerber Foundation, MedImmune, NIAID, NICHD [National Institute of Child Health and Human Development], Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Ross Laboratories and Smithkline Beecham/Glaxo/GSK.
According to Open Payments, since 2014, Sanchez has pocketed roughly $221,000 in general payments and associated research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, MedImmune, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqirus and Sobi.
The database lists AstraZeneca, MedImmune and Merck as the “top companies making associated payments,” with notable payments from Merck in Fall 2020.
In June, Sanchez hedged his bets on the topic of COVID vaccines and myocarditis. While declaring that the benefits of vaccination outweigh myocarditis risks, he also noted, “we need to be very upfront in terms of mentioning this as a potential risk of COVID messenger RNA vaccination. Hopefully, the parents and patients are aware of this before vaccination.”
Sanchez did not repeat these remarks at the November meeting when he okayed the jab for 5-year-olds.
Also of note:
In 2010, Sanchez served as a “Pfizer visiting professor.”
Sanchez served on VRBPAC from 2007–2010 as well as on FDA’s vaccine-focused Pediatric Advisory Committee from 2010–2012. In Texas, he chaired the Texas Pediatric Society’s Committee of Infectious Diseases and Immunizations from 2004–2009 and served on the committee from 1995–2013.
Many of Sanchez’s publications focus on amplifying concern about illnesses attributed to viruses— such as cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, RSV and Zika — for which Moderna and other companies now anticipate developing mRNA vaccines.
Helen Keipp Talbot
Helen Keipp Talbot, M.D., MPH (keipp.talbot@vumc.org) is associate professor of medicine at Nashville’s Vanderbilt University, where she has held various appointments since 2002. Talbot’s research and publications (sometimes co-authored with fellow ACIP member Poehling) center on adult vaccination, influenza vaccination, human coronaviruses and vaccine trials for respiratory illnesses such as RSV. The focus on coronaviruses pre-dates COVID; from 2007–2009, Talbot was principal investigator on an NIH-funded study on the “epidemiology of human coronaviruses.”
According to Talbot’s curriculum vitae, her recent research funding comes from both the federal government (CDC, National Institutes of Health [NIH]) and Sanofi Pasteur, primarily for the study of pandemic preparedness (in 2015) and influenza vaccination. Sanofi and MedImmune have been recurrent funders since 2009, along with AstraZeneca, Gilead, Protein Sciences, VaxInnate and Wyeth (since acquired by Pfizer).
Open Payments lists Talbot’s receipt of roughly $1.4 million in research payments and associated research funding since 2014 (417 total payments) from these companies, along with 29 general payments totaling $17,000.
In December 2020, Talbot was the “lone dissenter” objecting to ACIP’s recommendation that long-term care residents “be at the front of the line” for COVID vaccines. At the time, Talbot argued that vaccination of long-term care residents was “risky” because they “have a high rate of medical events that could be confused as side effects of vaccination and undermine confidence in the vaccines.”
Talbot stated, “And I think you’re going to have a very striking backlash of, ‘My grandmother got the vaccine and she passed away.’” Talbot elaborated: “I fear a loss of confidence in the vaccine…. [T]here will be temporally associated events and people will be scared to use the vaccine.”
Talbot exhibited no scruples in voting to administer COVID vaccines to young children. On the same day as the “yes” vote, Talbot told the press, “I have vaccinated my kids” (who, presumably, were at least 12 years of age at the time of injection).
Also of note:
In 2008, Talbot received a Sanofi Pasteur Advanced Vaccinology Course travel grant.
No overview of ACIP would be complete without noting the conflicts of interest surrounding CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, who used ACIP’s vote to immediately green-light vaccination of younger children.
As reported by independent media outlet RedState (but not by the mainstream media), Walensky’s husband, Loren Walensky, became scientific co-founder and board member of early-stage biotech company Lytica Therapeutics in October 2019.
In December, the Biden administration announced Rochelle Walensky’s pending appointment as CDC director, and in February 2020, Lytica received the first installment ($5.3 million) of a $16.9 million grant from HHS, representing the “only funding this new company [had] received to date — nearly two years after its founding.”
Even before becoming CDC director, Walensky had been “directly associated with HHS for more than a decade,” including close participation on committees and panels with Anthony “Tony” Fauci. According to RedState’s exposé, “when ‘insiders’ were surprised that Walensky was picked [to head CDC], it was revealed that Fauci had a lot to do with her appointment.”
Loyal to Fauci, Walensky has written opinion pieces for leading media outlets “about how to fairly and effectively distribute Remdesivir,” the ineffective, expensive and dangerous drug promoted by NIAID and Fauci as virtually the sole treatment option for hospitalized COVID patients.
A former Boston colleague of Walensky’s stated the CDC director “has a lot of Tony in her,” including the “ability to take complex information and convey it in clear and concise messaging.”
Shunning and Nuremberg 2.0
As bad as the ACIP (and VRBPAC) decisions were, vaccine-risk-aware observers are even more shocked that CDC and FDA are “blithely” allowing Pfizer’s shot to be administered to children and adolescents with other vaccines at the same time.
As Informed Choice Washington put it last May regarding the authorization for kids ages 12 and up:
“As unethical as it is to expose children to investigational liability-free products that have seen unprecedented levels of vaccine adverse reactions and deaths reported … when ACIP opened up the shots to be co-administered with other vaccines, including those with adjuvants, they stepped fully into crimes against humanity. Not a single clinical trial has been done administering the COVID-19 shots with any other vaccine. There is zero safety data.”
Other observers agree with this assessment, arguing that “Every single person associated with the ACIP meeting today must be tried for crimes against humanity at Nuremberg 2.0.” Some are also calling for a second Nuremberg trial for “perpetration of COVID-response policies that led to forced shutdowns, destroyed businesses, impoverished families, broken lives and a spike in suicide rates.”
In the meantime, it is time to shun ACIP members. And because it is inconceivable that ACIP members would behave in such a corrupt manner without the approval and say-so of their institutions, shunning actions necessarily must also extend to the universities and other institutions that have these individuals’ backs.
Send a Notice of Liability to each ACIP member — see examples at the Doctors for Covid Ethics website.
Check the campaign contributions of ACIP members at OpenSecrets.org. If they are donating to a politician who represents your state or Congressional District, call or write your representative and ask why they are accepting donations from people who are seriously compromised by the pharmaceutical industry and harming our children.
Refrain from appointing ACIP members to the Boards of community organizations — or revoke their current Board appointments. These types of “good citizen” positions should not be offered to people who are not behaving as “good citizens.”
All universities benefit from state and local appropriations; contact your legislators, explain that academic operations at these universities are clearly supporting federal corruption and demand that the legislators revoke the appropriations.
Write to the board of trustees or person who manages the university endowment. Demand they disclose their investments in companies that are harming our children and explain how these investments support active participation in federal corruption by those affiliated with the university.
Stop donating to the universities and academic departments in question and let them know why. When asked for an update by your university alumni group, ask to be removed from the alumni email list and database, and explain you have stopped donating to the university as a result of its support of federal corruption.
Cancel your season tickets and other participation in sports and cultural events at the university. Explain why.
If you are involved in recruiting for your company, remove these universities from your recruiting lists. Write to the university’s placement office to explain why.
Ask local newspapers to publish copies of the letters you write to university officials. Organize to support members of the independent media in researching and publishing information regarding ACIP members’ conflicts of interest, as well as the university conflicts of interest that compromise the institutions’ intellectual resources and activities in science, medicine and technology.
Write to the university chaplain and ask for prayers for the university to be released from the spirit of corruption. Provide details.
Identify the banks involved in managing the university’s bank accounts, financial assets, endowment and pension funds; where applicable, demand to know why the university is doing business with banks that have compromised our federal government accounts and are financing policies at the federal level that are harming our children.
Do not buy or hold stocks in companies with which ACIP members are connected.
Do not buy products or drugs that ACIP members have developed or patented.
Make it clear — through letters to the editor and letters to the institutions — that you will not forget ACIP members’ decision to enable the needless harming of young children.
“Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde” – RFK, Jr. in Conversation With James Corbett: “There’s an Entire Coalition of Sinister Forces… Which Are All Wrapped Up in This Obliteration of Constitutional Rights…”
On a recent episode of “The Corbett Report,” journalist and researcher James Corbett interviewed Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. about his latest book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”
On a recent episode of “The Corbett Report,” journalist and researcher James Corbett interviewed Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. about his latest book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”
“Over the past 20 months [there’s been] a coup d’état against liberal democracy, and one of the key players in this medical cartel or medical technocracy is Dr. Anthony Fauci.
“There’s an entire coalition of sinister forces [including] pharmaceutical companies, the intelligence agencies, the medical bureaucracies, the social media titans, the mainstream media and the military, which are all wrapped up in this obliteration of constitutional rights and the use of a health crisis to impose totalitarian controls.”
Kennedy described Fauci as “this sort of avuncular presence who is the face of the technocracy and the demolition of constitutional rights.”
Kennedy discussed Fauci’s role in helping Big Pharma capture federal regulatory agencies. “Fauci is the spearhead of an agency that has experienced regulatory capture on steroids,” he said.
Kennedy told Corbett the financial links between the federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical companies are unlike any other federal regulatory regime. The metrics used within these agencies to measure whether or not an employee will get promoted, advanced or get a salary raise revolve almost entirely around how well the employee promotes vaccine uptake.
[These] people do not get rewarded for finding problems with vaccines — they get rewarded for covering up problems with vaccines … and some of the agencies directly profit from vaccine sales,” Kennedy said.
“For example, the [National Institutes of Health] owns thousands of medical patents, including half of the patent for the Moderna vaccine,” Kennedy said. “So Tony Fauci’s agency stands to make billions and billions of dollars. And Fauci was able to choose four of his high-level employees who each get their own individual patent shares and who’ll collect $150,000 per year for life.”
Corbett said the chapter of Kennedy’s book he found the “most difficult to read through” was the one titled, “Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde: NIAID’s Barbaric and Illegal Experiments on Children,” which details the role of Fauci and the organization he heads up — the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases — in illegal experiments on foster children.
“In this case [Fauci] was able to get control of different foster homes in seven states and essentially turn these pharmaceutical companies loose onto these children,” Kennedy said. “The experiments were absolutely barbaric … the children were tortured and they did not have legal representation.”
Kennedy added:
“The children who stopped taking the drugs because they were making them sick were sent to Columbia Hospital to have feeding tubes installed so the drug companies could [continue testing on them] even when they fought back. At least 85 of these kids died.”
Kennedy also cited the dramatic rise in chronic illness since Fauci took office, pointing out that Fauci has failed to protect the public from environmental health threats.
Other topics covered by Kennedy and Corbett include how Fauci was “locked into” carrying out controversial gain-of-function research for the military, how a large portion of Fauci’s salary comes from the Pentagon and the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency in pandemic planning and policy.
Ricardo Delgado: ‘What would be the reason why the vaccine attacks different organs in different people?’ Because it’s a toxicant…
Dr. Sevillano: Well, very good question. That’s a very good one. At the moment, this has two targets. One is the heart —you’re seeing what’s happening at the moment— and the head. What’s happening is that as we’re realizing, it seems to be that the heart is suffering more damage than the head and the cardiovascular.
That’s to say, the product is going into the blood, and in the blood, it’s generating thrombosis. Don’t lose any more. First, there are thrombi, and then there are the different places where this thrombus can do damage.
The first thing: it causes damage in the blood, it causes coagulation, but then, when it can cross, let us say, the capillaries, and it starts to localize in many places, it starts looking for, it stays, it tries to get into the places where there’s an important electrophysiological activity, such as the heart and the head.
But in the head, it has the blood-brain barrier, and if the size of the particle is very high, it doesn’t cross it. We don’t know if it’s entering or not. It seems to be entering the heart more than the head, but in reality, it goes everywhere. It goes everywhere. It goes following… What happens is that it’s attracted to the places where there is great electrophysiological activity. A great activity, such as the nerves, the nervous system, and the heart.
Why? Because they’re cells that are constantly working, constantly launching electrical stimuli. The heart and the nerves. Muscles need a tone for that, they need a rhythm, but they don’t have the intensity, let’s say, they don’t do the same work that the heart does, which is constant and permanent, of contraction and relaxation, and it is completely directed by electrical polarization of its cells. Those polarizations aren’t done by the muscles of the skeletal muscle system. It’s a much less powerful activity.
That’s why people suffer, above all, from nerve problems, Guillain-Barré —like what this guy told us earlier— and in the heart more than in other places. But it does go elsewhere. And it’s responsible for hepatitis that has been seen and continues to be seen. And pancreatitis. And what else has it triggered? The meningoencephalitis that we’ve seen. I mean, that does go everywhere, but particularly, it goes to you know where.
Ricardo Delgado: Heart and head.
Dr. Sevillano: Exactly. And be careful because people who drink it or swallow it … When they ingest it develop gastroenteritis of those that give diarrhea of those in which you spend four or five months with your pants down looking for the toilet all the time. And they say that they don’t know where it comes from either.
There are quite a few of this type of colitis they haven’t seen, and they don’t know where it comes from. They don’t know.
They do the biopsies, and they say, “This was colitis that I don’t know how it came about.”
In other words, it was an inflammation of the colon and so long. But we do know. Especially, when you see those kinds of patients fall near antennas.
Those people drink it somehow in some product, whether it’s in the water or in the food. That’s where those kinds of problems come from. But it does affect, mostly, the heart and the head. And what makes me think that right now we’re not seeing people losing their minds completely, is that I get the feeling that the particles are too big to get through the barrier. And that’s why little material gets through, at the moment. But wait until the new doses start to contain smaller-sized particles.
Zero Hedge, November 22, 2021: “The Australian army has begun forcibly removing residents in the Northern Territories to the Howard Springs quarantine camp located in Darwin, after nine new Covid-19 cases were identified in the community of Binjari. The move comes after hard lockdowns were instituted in the communities of both Binjari and nearby Rockhole on Saturday night.”
“’Residents of Binjari and Rockhole no longer have the five reasons to leave their homes,’ said Northern Territory chief minister, Michael Gunner, referring to the country’s five allowable reasons to avoid lockdown (buying food and supplies, exercising for up to two hours, care or caregiving, work or education if it can’t be done from home, and to get vaccinated at the nearest possible location).”
“’They can only leave [home] for medical treatment, in an emergency, or as required by law’.”
“’It’s highly likely that more residents will be transferred to Howard Springs today, either as positive cases or close contacts,’ he continued, adding ‘We have already identified 38 close contacts from Binjari but that number will go up. Those 38 are being transferred now’.”
“’I contacted the Prime Minister last night. We are grateful for the support of about 20 ADF personnel, as well as army trucks to assist with the transfer of positive cases and close contacts – and to support the communities’.”
“’We are doing an assessment today of what extra resources we might need from the Feds, and the Prime Minister is ready to help further – I thank him for that’.”
“Five days ago, NT [Northern Territories] Senator Malarndirri McCarthy told ABC that over crowding in Indigenous communities was a ‘massive problem,’ pointing to the region’s second cluster of new infections – which included nine members of McCarthy’s direct family, including her sister who flew from Katherine to Robinson River while unknowingly bringing COVID-19 with her, per the report.”
The sociopaths and their stormtroopers who run Australia would make Hitler and Stalin envious. “You mean you can exercise iron control over a whole nation based on a STORY ABOUT A VIRUS?”
I’ve received a report from Australia showing numbers of protesters against the national vaccine mandate, in key cities, for the weekend of November 20-21. The total is close to a million people—in a nation of 25 million. That’s stunning.
Hopefully, those numbers will increase.
Update: another report from Australia; the military have begun forcing vaccinations on the aborigines in the Northern Territory.
It’s abundantly clear we’re not living in the same world we were two years ago. That world doesn’t exist anymore.
Watch this shocking video made by June Mills, an aboriginal elder in the Northern Territory. As she excoriates the fascist Chief Minister of the Territory, Michael Gunner, and calls on her people in other towns to report on what’s happening to them and what the Army is doing, ask yourself: Is this the irrational raving of a woman who’s gone over the edge, or is this exactly how a sane person would react when government killers are loose in her neighborhood?
Disturbing news has surfaced from the Northern Territory where the army has been brought in to round up 38 indigenous Covid contacts and escort them to compulsory quarantine camps.
“It’s highly likely that more residents will be transferred to Howard Springs today, either as positive cases or close contacts,” said Michael Gunner, Chief Minister of the Northern Territory. “We have already identified 38 close contacts, but that number will go up. Those 38 are being transferred now.”
The Howard Springs quarantine facility in Darwin was set up to process travellers coming into the state domestically and internationally. Expensive quarantine periods are enforced on those attempting to enter the Northern Territory which must be paid for by the traveller.
However, removing Indigenous people from their homes into an government-operated facility has been branded as both disturbing and a violation of human rights.
🇦🇺 #Australia: Quarantine Camps. The 'conspiracy theory' comes true.
Michael Gunner: "We’re grateful for the support of about twenty ADF personnel as well as army trucks to assist with the transfer of positive cases and close contacts".
This comes after the Northern Territory issued a hard lockdown on remote communities, preventing residents from leaving their homes to buy food or supplies, exercise, give care, work, or access education.
“Residents of Binjari and Rockhole no longer have the five reasons to leave their homes,” announced Michael Gunner.
People inside the lockdown area can only leave their homes for medical treatment, an emergency situation, or if the law requires it.
Although Michael Gunner continues to enforce some of the strictest Covid health orders in Australia, vaccination rates for the Indigenous community lags behind. This is partly due to vaccine hesitancy in remote communities where many have said that they do not want to partake in Covid vaccines.
The government and Indigenous health groups have been setting up information campaigns inside these communities.
“It [the ‘Spread the Freedom’ campaign] is designed to really highlight the close links between vaccination and either regaining those freedoms that we all want to enjoy, or protecting those freedoms in the states where we haven’t yet seen outbreaks,” said Lieutenant General Frewen.
A second campaign ‘For All Of Us’ is also attempting to reach these populations.
Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander people have over 60,000 years of history. 60,000 years of culture, art, song, dance & language. But let’s not forget where we’re going—with vaccination, the future is bright☀️
— Australian Department of Health and Aged Care (@healthgovau) October 23, 2021
The general message of both government-operated advertising initiatives is that if you want to have your freedom back, get vaccinated.
“I’ve always said that I wanted 100% vaccination of our people before the country opened up. Well, obviously that hasn’t happened,” said Pat Turner, CEO of the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation. “The Northern Territory have now got their wake-up call and we should not have to wait until these infections get in before the health authorities get in and start the vaccinations. They’ve got to do it now.”
While the messaging from the government may be about ‘All Of Us’, it’s clear that some in the political class are privileged not to have to play by the same rules.
There does not appear to be any serious discussion, either from Indigenous advisory groups or the Northern Territory government, about valid informed consent or the ability for Indigenous people to say ‘no’.
The Federal government, under the direction of Greg Hunt the Minister for Health and Aged Care, has extended Covid measures introduced to protect remote communities in the Northern Territories.
Communities surrounding the Robinson River will be sealed off under section 477 of the Commonwealth Biosecurity Act 2015 until 6pm, 1 December 2021 as requested by the Northern Territory government.
Despite building and operating quarantine facilities, the Northern Territory has not significantly expanded its critical care or intensive bed capacity in the two years since Covid first appeared.
“The Doherty Institute modelling shows that we can have between 30 and 100 cases a day at an 80% vaccination rate across the Northern Territory, and our health system can manage,” said Northern Territory Health Minister Natasha Fyles. “But it means we’ve had to make changes, so in the Top End we’ve gone to tier 3 and deferred elective surgery.”
“The PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick”.
Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.
“…All or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what’s called false positives tests.”
Dr. Michael Yeadon: former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer
This misuse of the PCR-RT technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governmentsto justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.
.Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.
Media lies coupled with a systemic and carefully engineered fear campaign have sustained the image of a killer virus which is relentlessly spreading to all major regions of the World.
Several billion people in more than 190 countries have been tested (as well as retested) for Covid-19.
At the time of writing, approximately 260 million people Worldwide have been categorized as “confirmed Covid-19 cases”. The alleged pandemic is said to have resulted in more than 5 million Covid-19 related deaths.
Both sets of figures: morbidity and mortality are fabricated. A highly organized Covid testing apparatus (part of which is funded by the billionaire foundations) has been established with a view to driving up the numbers of “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”, which are then used as a justification to impose the “vaccine” passport coupled with the repeal of fundamental human rights.
A so-called “Global Tracker System” has been established with an interactive map pointing to global as well as country level trends and weekly tendencies.
A Fourth Wave has been announced. Invalid figures pertaining to Covid-19 are routinely plastered on the news tabloids.
Meanwhile, both the media and the governments have turned a blind eye to the rising trend of Covid-19 vaccine deaths and adverse events, which are confirmed by “official” government agencies. (See below)
TOTAL for EU/UK/USA
45,250 Covid-19 injection related deaths, 7,418,980 injuries
The Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR)
The slanted methodology applied under WHO guidance for detecting the alleged spread of the virus is the Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR), which is routinely applied all over the World.
The RT-PCR Test has been used Worldwide to generate millions of erroneous “Confirmed Covid-19 cases”, which are thenused to sustain the illusion that the alleged pandemic is Real.
This assessment based on erroneous numbers has been used in the course of the last 20 months to spearhead and sustain the fear campaign.
And people are now led to believe that the Covid-19 “vaccine” is the “solution”. And that “normality” will be restored once the entire population of Planet Earth has been vaccinated.
“Confirmed” is a misnomer: A “Confirmed RT-PCR Positive Case” does not Imply a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”.
Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health to confirm its value [reliability] (Dr. Pascal Sacré)
The procedure used by the national health authorities is to categorize all RT-PCR positive cases, as “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” (with or without a medical diagnosis).Ironically, this routine process of identifying “confirmed cases” . is in derogation of the CDC’s own guidelines:
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” (emphasis added)
In this article we will present detailed evidence that the methodology used to detect and estimate the spread of the virus is flawed and invalid.
1. False Positives
The earlier debate at the outset of the crisis focused on the issue of “False Positives”.
Acknowledged by the WHO and the CDC, the RT-PCR Test was known to produce a high percentage of false positives. According to Dr. Pascal Sacré:
“Today, as authorities test more people, there are bound to be more positive RT-PCR tests. This does not mean that COVID-19 is coming back, or that the epidemic is moving in waves. There are more people being tested, that’s all.”
The debate on false positives (acknowledged by the health authorities) points to so-called errors without necessarily questioning the overall validity of the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the alleged spread of the CoV-SARS-2 virus.
2. The PCR-Test Does Not Detect the Identity of the Virus
The RT-PCR test does not identify/ detect the virus. What the PCR test identifies are genetic fragments of numerous viruses (including influenza viruses types A and B, and coronaviruses which trigger common colds).
The results of the TR-PCR test cannot “confirm” whether an individual who undertakes the test is infected with Covid-19.
According to Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR technique: “The PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself.”According to renowned Swiss immunologist Dr B. Stadler
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
Dr. Pascal Sacré concurs: “These tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.”
In an attempt to quantify the viral load, these sequences are then amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject to errors, sterility errors and contamination.
3. The WHO’s “Customized” RT-PCR Covid-19 “Test”
Two important and related issues.
The PCR Test does not identify the virus as outlined above. Moreover, the WHO in January 2020, did not possess an isolate and purified sample of the novel 2019-nCov virus.
What was contemplated in January 2020 was a “customization”of the PCR test by the WHO, under the scientific guidance of the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital.
The title of the Berlin Virology Institute Study is an obvious misnomer. The PCR test cannot “detect” the 2019 novel coronavirus. (See Dr. Kary Mullis, Dr. B. Stadler, Dr. Pascal Sacré quoted in Section 2).
Moreover, the study, published by Eurosurveillance acknowledges that the WHO did not possess an isolate and purified sample of the novel 2019-nCov virus:
[While]… several viral genome sequences had been released,… virus isolates or samples [of 2019-nCoV] from infected patients were not available …”
The Drosten et al team report then recommended to the WHO, that in the absence of an isolate of the 2019-nCoV virus, a similar 2003-SARS-CoV should be used as a “proxy” of the novel virus:
“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].
We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).
What this ambiguous statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” (aka infection resulting from the novel 2019 coronavirus) would be validated by “the close genetic relatedness to the 2003-SARS-CoV.”
What this means is that a coronavirus detected 19 years ago (2003-SARS-CoV) is being used to “validate” the identity of a so-called “novel coronavirus” first detected in China’s Hubei Province in late December 2019.
The recommendations of the Drosten study (generously supported and financed by the Gates Foundation) were then transmitted to the WHO. They were subsequently endorsed by the Director General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom.
The WHO did not have in its possession the “virus isolate” required to identify the virus. It was decided that an isolate of the new coronavirus was not required.
The Drosten et al article pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test Worldwide (under WHO guidance) was challenged in a November 27, 2020 study by a group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists et al.
It stands to reason that if the PCR test uses the 2003 SARS- CoV virus as “a point of reference”, there can be no “confirmed” Covid-19 cases resulting from the novel virus 2019-nCoV, subsequently renamed SARS-CoV-2.
4. Has the Identity of the 2019-nCoV Been Confirmed? Does the Virus Exist?
The Chinese authorities announced on January 7, 2020 that “a new type of virus” had been “identified” “similar to the one associated with SARS and MERS” (related report, not original Chinese government source). The underlying method adopted by the Chinese research team is described below:
We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing.
Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. (emphasis added)
The above study (quotation above as well as other documents consulted ) suggest that China’s health authorities did not undertake an isolation / purification of a patient’s specimen.
Using“laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR” is an obvious misnomer, i.e. the RT-PCR test cannot under any circumstances be used to identify the virus. (see section 2 above). The isolate of the virus by the Chinese authorities is unconfirmed.
Freedom of Information Pertaining to the Isolate of SARS-CoV-2
Freedom of Information (FOI) requests were addressed to ninety Health /Science institutions in a large number of countries.
The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation / purification of SARS-CoV-2 “having been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.”
“The 90 Health /Science institutions that have responded thus far have provided and/or cited, in total, zero such records:
Our requests [under “freedom of information”] have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.”
5. The Threshold Amplification Cycles. The WHO Admits that the The Results of the RT-PCR “Test” are Totally Invalid
The rRT-PCR test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of the Berlin Virology research group (quoted above).
Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. (See original WHO document here)
The contentious issue pertains to the number of amplification threshold cycles (Ct). According to Pieter Borger, et al
The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles. In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture…(Critique of Drosten Study)
The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), genetic segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” tabulated Worldwide in the course of the last 22 months are invalid.
Below is the WHO’s carefully formulated “Retraction”.
“WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology. (emphasis added)
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.”
“Invalid Positives” is the Underlying Concept
This is not an issue of “Weak Positives” and “Risk of False Positive Increases”. What is at stake is a “Flawed Methodology” which leads to invalid estimates of “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”.
What this admission of the WHO confirms is that the estimate of covid positive from a PCR test (with an amplification threshold of 35 cycles or higher) is invalid. In which case, the WHO recommends retesting: “a new specimen should be taken and retested…”.
The WHO calls for “Retesting”, which is tantamount to saying “We Screwed Up”.
That recommendation is pro-forma. It won’t happen. Several billion people Worldwide have already been tested, starting in early February 2020. Nonetheless,we must conclude that unless retested, those estimates (according to the WHO) are invalid.
From the outset, the PCR test has routinely been applied at a Ct amplification threshold of 35 or higher, following the January 2020 recommendations of the WHO. What this means is that the PCR methodology as applied Worldwide has in the course of the last 20 months led to the compilation of faulty and misleading Covid statistics.
And these are the statistics which are used to measure the progression of the so-called “pandemic”. Above an amplification cycle of 35 or higher, the test will not detect fragments of the virus. Therefore, the official “covid numbers” (Confirmed Covid-19 Cases) are meaningless.
It follows that there is no scientific basis for confirming the existence of a pandemic.
Which in turn means that the lockdown / economic measures which have resulted in social panic, mass poverty and unemployment (allegedly to curtail the spread of the virus) have no justification whatsoever.
As outlined above, “the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%”: It follows that using the >35 cycles detection will indelibly contribute to “hiking up” the number of “fake positives”.
The WHO’ Mea Culpa confirms that the Covid-19 PCR test procedure as applied is invalid.
Concluding Remarks
The RT-PCR Test is the Smoking Gun. It invalidates Everything.
There is no such thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. The entire data bank is invalid.
At the time of writing, the number of tabulated so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” is of the order of 260 million Worldwide. These numbers are totally meaningless.
None of this data can be categorized as “Confirmed”.
The PCR Test does not identify the novel virus, and the genetic fragments of a so-called “similar” 2003 coronavirus (SARS-1) cannot be used as a means to identify the virus which causes Covid-19, nor can it be used to identify the deadly variants of the 2019 novel coronavirus.
Moreover, according to the Freedom of Information (FOI) study quoted above, the isolate of the novel coronavirus is unconfirmed.
Sustained by a complexity of lies, the covid-19 narrative is extremely fragile. This consensus relies on fake science and a totally invalid data bank of alleged “confirmed Covid-19 cases”.
How did Big Pharma manage to develop a vaccine (sponsored by the WHO, GAVI, the Gates Foundation, et al) with a mandate “to protect people” against a virus which has not been isolated/ purified from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?
Vaccine in relation to What? The virus has not been identified.
Moreover, 2019SARS-CoV-2 has been categorized as similar to the 2003 SARS-CoV which means that the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 is not a novel virus.
The legitimacy of the Covid vaccine project hinges upon the validity of hundreds of thousands of RT-PCR fake positive cases Worldwide combined with fake Covid related mortality data. ( See Michel Chossudovsky, Does the Virus Exist)
What lies ahead?
National governments have announced a Fifth Wave, focussing on the deadly variants of SARS-CoV-2, including the Delta variant.
The variant is a scam. How do they identify the “variants”. The PCR test neither detects the virus nor the variants of the virus.
There is no isolate of the novel coronavirus on record. Moreover, the WHO’s “customized” PCR test uses as a proxy a similar 2003 SARS-CoV virus (which no doubt has mutated extensively over the last 19 years).
“Restrictions would have to be reintroduced”. … the Delta variant poses a “higher risk of hospitalisations”
These announcements are intended to justify a continuation of repressive policy measures, the speeding up of the vaccination program as well as the repression of the protest movement.
There is no Pandemic. The Endgame is Tyranny.
The Pandemic is being used to Impose a New World Order.
When the Lie Becomes the Truth, There is Moving Backwards.
The first Step is to Dismantle the Propaganda Apparatus.
The Elite’s Covid Consensus is Extremely Fragile.
There is no Pandemic. They Do not have a Leg to Stand on.
That Consensus must be broken.
See Michel Chossudovsky’s E-Book (13 Chapters) entitled
Independent small and medium sized farms have been handed a death sentence by Klaus Schwab head of The World Economic Forum. Schwab, and fellow architects of top-down control, have officially let it be known that under the policy known as ‘Green Deal’ traditional family farms are no longer wanted and the foods they produce are to be replaced by laboratory and genetically engineered synthetic lookalikes. This policy is spelled-out in the pages of Klaus Schwab’s book ‘The Great Reset’ which is part of the envisaged ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’.
The British government and the European Commission are committed to adopting this insane agenda in which working farmers are to be replaced by digitalised precision robots, as part of a so called Global Warming mitigation crusade. When properly analysed, this is revealed as a totalitarian programme for complete corporate and banking control of the food chain. A programme that is designed to eliminate the independent farmer.
What Are We Going to Do About It?
There is a very straight forward answer to this question. We are going come together at the local level and launch a mutually supportive initiative which will guarantee both the farmer and the purchaser of the farmer’s food a fair and mutually beneficial exchange.
How does it work?
Very simple. The purchaser (consumer) approaches his or her local responsible farmer and asks to buy some fresh produce. The farmer considers this proposition. Some may decline, but this will be because it has not occurred to them that the future of their current dependency on a corporate controlled marketing regime is completely untenable under the programme proposed by Mr Schwab.
Any good farmer will not turn down an opportunity to do business with near neighbours who are in search of positive and value-for-money farm-raised foods. Especially once the farming community realises that their future income will depend more and more upon establishing a market place amongst those in the immediate vicinity of his/her farm. Those who do not wish – or cannot any longer – purchase their staple food requirements from corporate owned super and hyper market food chains.
The Savvy Farmer
The savvy farmer can see the writing on the wall. Can see that slavery to a system of national and global manipulation – totally out of his/her hands – is a recipe for disaster. Such a farmer will be on the look-out for a secure local market; one where purchasers want to buy direct from the farm with no middle-man taking a cut. This must be the way forward if a secure future on the land is the desired outcome. Any intelligent farmer will recognise this and will take seriously a bona fide request to supply farm-raised produce to those eager to buy it.
The Savvy Consumer
The savvy consumer will be looking for fresh, healthy, flavourful good quality foods upon which to raise their family, or simply to feed themselves. They will recognise that the chance to acquire such food ‘direct from the farm’ represents the best possible outcome. A bond built-up with a local farmer, via regular purchasing of their farm raised products provides a powerful ally for times ahead when the commercial food chain is subjected to the brutal intervention of the architects of global control and shortages become the norm. Such times are no longer speculative. They are on our doorstep.
The Savvy Farmer and the Savvy Consumer – getting together
Either the consumer or the farmer can can take the initiative of bringing both parties together.
How?
By calling a ‘round table’ meeting in the local village/town hall or simply in your home. Invite one or two farmers to sit round that table with some individuals eager to obtain food direct from the farm. Some might even be ready to discuss contracting a farmer to grow the staple foods they require. Good quality food grown without recourse to chemical pesticides.
Farmers need a secure income and the buyers a secure local source of nutritious food. Fair prices for both parties and delivery or ‘pick-up from the farm’ can be negotiated in a friendly and informal manner. This is not purely ‘business’ in the old sense of the term; it is forming a common bond in a time when such bonds have been tragically neglected and supermarket convenience cultures have destroyed the links that hold communities together.
A new trading, bartering and sharing practice will be built around the adoption of this ‘proximity principle’. This is the one sure way of effectively resisting the Klaus Schwab farm killer and the New World Order plan for global domination of the food chain.
Other ways of supporting local trading include: farm shops, farmers markets, box schemes, food cooperatives. Get onto the front foot and regenerate your community – from the ground up!
It’s the 22nd November 2021 and this is the moment when the jabbing has to stop.
A couple of hours ago Darren Smith, the editor of the excellent The Light Paper, sent me a paper from the medical journal Circulation which proves that the covid-19 jabbing experiment has to stop today. I believe that any doctor or nurse who gives one of the mRNA covid jabs after today will in due course be struck off the appropriate register and arrested.
The journal Circulation is a well-respected publication. It’s 71-years-old, its articles are peer reviewed and in one survey it was rated the world’s no 1 journal in the cardiac and cardiovascular system category.
I’m going to quote the final sentence of the abstract which appears at the beginning of the article. This is all I, you – or anyone else – needs to know.
`We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’
That’s it. That’s the death bell for the covid-19 mRNA jabs.
The endothelium is a layer of cells lining blood vessels and lymphatic vessels. T cells are a type of white cell.
We always knew these jabs were experimental. My video in December 2020, just under a year ago, warned about these specific risks. I read out a list of possible adverse events published officially by the American Government.
But now we have the proof of the link.
The mRNA jab is, remember, known not to stop people catching covid. And it is known not to stop people spreading it. I don’t believe anyone disputes these facts.
And yet vast numbers of deaths and serious injuries have occurred among people who have been jabbed. Look at the item entitled ‘Updated: how many are the vaccines killing?’ on my websites.
Now we have the evidence to stop the jabbing programmes.
In the study quoted in Circulation, a total of 566 patients aged 28 to 97 were tested. They were equally divided among men and women.
‘At the time of this report,’ says the author, ‘these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vaccine.’
At the very least, the use of these jabs must stop now. Immediately, until more long-term tests are done.
If there were any journalists left in the mainstream media, this news would be lead item on all TV and radio programmes and be on the front pages of all newspapers.
Thank heavens for free speech platforms such as BNT which enables me to bring you this news.
I’ve said for a year that this jab was an experiment – certain to kill and injure.
We’ve always known that to experiment on people without their full consent and understanding – after disclosing all the risks and potential side effects – is a crime.
Now the evidence exists that must stop this experiment.
If the covid jab experiment continues after today then we know for absolute sure that this is not a medical treatment, it is a cull.
Please share this video immediately with everyone you know.
Daily Mail, November 18, 2021: “Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said waning immunity from the initial shots is leading to a rise in severe cases among immunized Americans. ‘What we’re starting to see now is an uptick in hospitalizations among people who’ve been vaccinated but not boosted’…”
NY Times podcast, November 12, 2021; Fauci states: “They are seeing a waning of [vaccine-induced] immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn’t just the elderly.”
Translation: The vaccine is severely injuring and killing MANY people, but of course we’re calling those injuries and deaths “COVID-19 disease.” Also, our solution to this catastrophe is piling on MORE injections (boosters), which will hospitalize and kill even MORE people.
The dailyexpose.uk has the much deeper story:
“The public are being repeatedly lied to by elected officials, unelected advisors, and the mainstream media, with all of them claiming that the world is currently experiencing a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated. This could not be further from the truth.”
“But the lie has now been used to justify locking down the unvaccinated in Austria, and locking the unvaccinated out of society in Australia.”
“Now Germany is about to follow suit, Scotland is about to ban the unvaccinated from pubs and restaurants under the advice of a qualified nutritionist posing as a Pandemic expert who goes by the name of Devi Sridhar, and the authorities and media in England have gone into overdrive on the advice of the ‘nudge unit’ to sway the population into supporting a lockdown for only the unvaccinated.”
“But it all makes absolutely no sense because official Public Health data shows that over the past three months… two-thirds of Covid-19 hospitalisations [people who get very sick from the shot] have been among the fully vaccinated, and a frightening 91% of Covid-19 deaths [people who die from the shot] have been among the fully vaccinated, and projections shows things are about to get a lot worse.”
“…in the week beginning November 6th a total of 773 Covid-19 hospitalisations [people injured by the shot] were confirmed in Scotland. Of these 137 were among the unvaccinated population, whilst 363 were among the vaccinated population.”
“…the fully vaccinated accounted for the majority of hospitalisations [in Scotland] between October 16th and November 12th, and again by taking into account hospitalisations as far back as August 23rd we can see that things have been getting progressively worse for the fully vaccinated by the week.”
“In the week beginning August 21st the vaccinated accounted for 68% of hospitalisations, but fast forward to the week beginning November 6th and we can see that the vaccinated accounted for 73% of hospitalisations.”
“The worst week so far for the vaccinated however, in terms of hospitalisations, came in the week beginning October 16th which saw the vaccinated population account for 79% of Covid-19 hospitalisations [people injured by the shot].”
“[In Scotland]…the fully vaccinated accounted for the overwhelming majority of Covid-19 deaths [deaths from the shot] between October 9th and November 5th 2021. But by also taking into account the number of…deaths by vaccination status as far back as August 14th we’re able to see that things are getting significantly worse for the fully vaccinated population by the week…”
“…the week beginning August 14th the vaccinated accounted for 78% of deaths, but fast forward to the week beginning October 30th and we can see that the vaccinated accounted for 85% of deaths.”
Switching from Scotland to England: “The latest Public Health England technical briefing on Covid-19 variants of concern has been published and it reveals that up to the 12th September 2021, 74% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since August 2nd 2021 [people killed by the shot] have been among the vaccinated population, confirming the UK is currently experiencing a pandemic of the vaccinated.”
But don’t worry, be happy. The solution—endless toxic boosters—will surely save the day. And by “save the day,” I mean tens or even hundreds of millions of lives will be ruined and ended.
And by “save the day,” I also mean the news media will cover all this up and continue to promote an alternative fantasy of a universe, in which the vaccine is a rescuing rainbow and the unvaccinated are terrorists.
There’s magic at work here. If you believe what the news media are telling you, then you’ll remain vibrant and healthy (if you take the vaccine and all the boosters). If you don’t take the vaccine, you’re doomed. It’s really quite something. Those talking news heads are elves from the forest. With every word they utter, they cast powerful spells.
That’s why the really smart people trust the news and embrace the elves.
Howard Springs Quarantine Facility has a capacity for 2,000 overseas arrivals and about 1,000 domestic travelers. (AAP, Glenn Campbell)
The Australian army has begun forcibly removing residents in the Northern Territories to the Howard Springs quarantine camp located in Darwin, after nine new Covid-19 cases were identified in the community of Binjari. The move comes after hard lockdowns were instituted in the communities of both Binjari and nearby Rockhole on Saturday night.
“Residents of Binjari and Rockhole no longer have the five reasons to leave their homes,” said Northern Territory chief minister, Michael Gunner, referring to the country’s five allowable reasons to avoid lockdown (buying food and supplies, exercising for up to two hours, care or caregiving, work or education if it can’t be done from home, and to get vaccinated at the nearest possible location).
“They can only leave for medical treatment, in an emergency, or as required by law.”
“It’s highly likely that more residents will be transferred to Howard Springs today, either as positive cases or close contacts,” he continued, adding “We have already identified 38 close contacts from Binjari but that number will go up. Those 38 are being transferred now.”
“I contacted the Prime Minister last night. We are grateful for the support of about 20 ADF personnel, as well as army trucks to assist with the transfer of positive cases and close contacts – and to support the communities.
We are doing an assessment today of what extra resources we might need from the Feds, and the Prime Minister is ready to help further – I thank him for that.”
“We’re conscious of the fact that this can have some impacts on people’s mental health as well as their general well being,” Police Commissioner Jamie Chalkner told NT News.
Of note, the Northern Territories are home to a large percentage of indigenous Australians. As the Epoch Times‘ Steve Milne notes:
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, in 2018-19, almost one in five Indigenous Australians lived in overcrowded dwellings (18 percent), compared to 5 percent of non-Indigenous Australians. Although this percentage had decreased from 27 percent in 2004, it still meant an estimated 145,340 Indigenous Australians were living in overcrowded dwellings in 2018-19.
In addition, the more remote an area, the higher the proportion of Indigenous Australians living in overcrowded dwellings (26 percent in remote areas and 51 percent in “very remote” areas), compared to 8 and 22 percent in non-remote areas.
Five days ago, NT Senator Malarndirri McCarthy told ABC that over crowding in Indigenous communities was a “massive problem,” pointing to the region’s second cluster of new infections – which included nine members of McCarthy’s direct family, including her sister who flew from Katherine to Robinson River while unknowingly bringing COVID-19 with her, per the report.
“If we could get housing in there right now, I would be pushing that straight away to the federal government and the NT government to work on that, but we obviously need the resources to do so,” she said.
Of the nine new cases in Binjari, four are women and five are men, including a 78-year-old woman who has been transported to Darwin Hospital.
There were zero new COVID-19 cases reported on Sunday, however Minister Gunner said he was worried about ‘mingling between households’ in Binjari and Rockhole, whose populations are around 220 and 130 respectively.
On Sunday, Gunner said: “Yes, these are strong measures, but the threat to lives is extreme.”
ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq. breaks down three big ICAN Legal Updates.
In response to a recent ICAN petition CDC revealed it didn’t have records of a single documented case of a person with natural immunity to Covid, transmitting the virus to another.
Then, The Biden Vaccine Mandate is Stayed.
Finally, the FDA requested a federal judge give it until the year 2076 to disclose all of Pfizer’s Covid Vaccine Data.
After eight hours of hearing a Halachic court in New York City ruled that “it is absolutely forbidden to administer or even to promote this (COVID-19) injection to children, adolescents, young men or women.”
The court also implored “all healthy adults who are of child-bearing age” to “stay away” from the abortion-tainted jab. The Jewish group sees the injection as intentionally practice of “sterilization or preventing fertility.” Due to concerns about what the jab might do to fertile women – including risks of severe blood-clotting – “it is forbidden for them to take this injection.”
The ruling referred to “breakthrough cases” as evidence that “there is no substantial difference between those who receive the injection and those who did not.” And “the number of COVID patients are about the same, comparatively, in both demographics.” Thus “further clarification is needed” for administering the jab to the elderly.
Halachic stands for the legal part of the Old Testament, the principles of right and wrong that have worked for mankind for over 5,000 years, and upon which some of our most fundamental legal concepts are based. Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology, was one of the recognized, renowned experts who testified before the court.
Mandatory COVID-19 “vaccines” transgress Halachic law, which means it could be anti-Semitic to enforce it on Jews who have no wish to take it. Given that the rabbinical courts in Israel are part of the formal legal system, further decrees forbidding mandatory Covid-19 vaccines might have the power to dissolve the infamous green pass system.
The official translation of Halachic delineation is available for view and download.
Leaks are turning into floods. We are hearing about brutal clinical studies on puppies and other animals, and now a study involving orphans in New York.
These studies were funded, in whole or part, by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a federal agency headed up by Anthony Fauci since 1984.
In 2014, investigative reporter, Liam Scheff, wrote an article at omsj.org, looking back on the orphan scandal. Ten years earlier, he had broken the story, and was then subjected to multiple attacks in the press.
Here is Liam’s 2014 article. As you read it, remember where the funding for the orphan drug trial came from:
“In 2004, I broke open the NIH Clinical Trial Scandal, the internationally-covered story of hundreds of New York City orphans used by government agencies and pharmaceutical companies in deadly AIDS drug trials.”
“In reporting this issue, I entered the orphanage where children were being used as guinea pigs, and over a period of several years, took interviews with mothers, children and childcare workers at the Incarnation Children’s Center. I also interviewed the medical director, and investigated the FDA documentation and published medical literature on the tests and drugs used, drugs which were often force-fed through nasal and gastric tubes to the children. I reported several deaths in children, and although the mainstream denied that any deaths were due to drug toxicity, they admit that over 200 children died.”
“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008. They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”
“The WIKIPEDIA writers cover up all details, as is expected.”
[Wikipedia:] “’No payment or compensation has been paid to any of the children used in the trials, or to their families’.”
“The New York Times, which was instrumental in covering up the story, hired Janny Scott and Leslie Kaufman to write a hit piece on me in 2005. They declared the following about using orphans in drug trials:”
“’It was seen as one of the great successes of AIDS treatment. In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, hundreds of children in New York City were dying of AIDS. The only approved drugs were for adults, and many of the patients were foster children. So doctors obtained permission to include foster children in what they regarded as promising drug trials’.”
“Later in the article, Scott admits that the ‘permissions’ for many of these children are ‘missing,’ (or were never there).”
“She continued:”
“’[T]here is little evidence that the trials were anything but a medical success’.“
“In 2009, she responded to my persistent queries about their investigation method. They had taken at least 40 documents from me and buried them; what else had they buried? Her answers to me were clarifying:”
“’No, we did not review patients’ medical files…I would be surprised if that would not have been a breach of patient confidentiality if someone had shown them to us…An unexpected side effect would have been a side effect not previously seen in response to those drugs, presumably. Advanced testing methods were the methods available at the time for diagnosing HIV infection…I do not recall interviewing Dr. Painter [the doctor in charge of the orphanage and orphans] but I may simply not remember. As you know, the Times moved to a new office a year ago. It was not possible to move all of our files. In my case, I threw away files that were more than 12 months old. As you know, the story you are asking about was done in 2005…I do not recall which studies we looked at. There were a lot of them — some more easily accessible than others, as you know…As for mentioning side-effects and FDA warnings, there are side-effects and FDA warnings on many if not most drugs. The side-effects of early AIDS drugs have been written about extensively…And, as I have said before, we were not presuming to judge whether or not experimental AIDS drugs should have been tried on children — a question that I suspect few journalists would be qualified to answer; we were attempting to put a public controversy in context…If you have further objections to the way the story was handled, I suggest you contact Joe Sexton, the editor of the metropolitan news section of the paper and the editor on that story’.”
“In 2009, the Times admitted that many children had died – but the VERA Institute, hired to ‘investigate’ the trials, was also forbidden from looking at medical records. Their ‘investigator’ also refused to take data from me on the trials – lists of the trials themselves, the drugs used, and their recorded ‘black box’ warnings. In a follow-up interview with Vera Myles of WBAI, the head of the VERA Institute admitted that many more children had died.”
“The Wikipedia is not able to talk about AIDS drugs, which kill people. But, of course, take them if you really want to.”
Dr. Pablo Campra has been interviewed by different media to date. In each of the interviews, he has provided valuable information regarding his research on the real content of vaccines. A very interesting interview was the one he gave for El Arconte TV. In this interview, Dr. Pablo Campra talked about the possible microbiota that he detected some time ago and whose photographs he shared at the time.
In the interview, Dr. Campra shared his hypotheses about what the detected objects may be. While there’s uncertainty with some of them, the doctor holds a hypothesis that he’ll continue to share in other media: graphene Morgellons.
Below, Orwell City brings the key excerpt of the interview for all his followers and the scientific community interested in this topic.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): This. For example, this would also be graphene, in theory. This is AstraZeneca.
Dr. Pablo Campra: Well, the one above is. In the one above is clear because graphene… Show the one above. It’s just that a lot of people get confused if they don’t have experience seeing it a lot. I’ve had to develop it myself. Many times it looks like crystallites, like pebbles. What’s indeed graphene, most probably —I don’t know if I have the spectrum— are objects that look like a handkerchief, like a kleenex that has folds, shadows, wrinkles. That could be graphene. It could be graphene if the spectrum confirms it. What can’t be graphene is…
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): And these ones that look like that? With those folds.
Dr. Pablo Campra: What gives the graphene peaks, I’ll tell you now… The one above… Can you show the one above? Well, that one. That one. Well, these are rare objects. This is not the technical report. These are the rare objects I found, which I find more interesting than graphene.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): If you want, let’s go to the report. Want to see it?
Dr. Pablo Campra: I’m more interested in this, but well, if you want to clarify something in the report because I’ve already talked enough about graphene. Now, the most important thing is what we have already said: magnetism, Bluetooth, and these rare objects. Graphene is there. I already know it’s there. Now, what relationship does graphene have with strange phenomena and thrombosis? Well, it seems to be related to thrombosis, but it’s not the only material that produces thrombosis. And all those strange things have the size of tens of microns. Look, it’s there. I have it measured. I can’t get a good look. 184 microns. That’s quite big. But that’s the spectrum that’s there. I’ve put these spectra up to show that they’re not graphene. If you zoom out we can see the spectroscopy.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): That one there looks like it has folds in it.
Dr. Pablo Campra: You have to show the spectrum to see if it’s graphene or not. Then, if you want, I’ll explain the peaks.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): And what is this we see here?
Well, that looks like the wings of an archon. When I saw it, I thought of you.
Dr. Campra makes a joke about the name Pedro Rosillo uses for his channel (El Arconte = The Archon).
That’s seen when the drop dries. Some material drags and stays like mud. I put the spectrum in, and it didn’t give the graphene peak, but it gave a very strange peak at 1450 cm-1, which is the clue. It’s that little ghost that appears there. That little ghost appears all over the sample. So, I think it’s the medium because there’s a gel there. A kind of strange hydrogel that never dries completely. And I think that’s what’s there because it appears a lot, is that hydrogel. And here there are some strange peaks, the one at 1450 cm-1 and the other one. They’re not graphene peaks, but they’re from some material we have there, and there are several hypotheses about them. This is really weird. What about this? Well, these are strange fibers that appear a lot. They’re a very intense color, like blue and red. Sometimes, they also look green or yellow.
They aren’t fibers from my sweater because there’s another doctor in Tenerife and other people who’re seeing them too. They have also taken samples of this from the masks, and… Is this one of the many weird things you say you have seen? This is the most intriguing thing. I’ll share with you the hypothesis, but it’s not confirmed. These are hypotheses derived from my work, and I’m going to share them with you. And when I’m interviewed by the American Stew Peters, I’ll also share it. Because I know that many people are working on this subject. So, these could be plant fibers that have gotten there through the air. But when they appear so frequently and are seen by so many researchers and in so many vaccines… And you see that they have some luminescence, too. That light there. No matter how many times I rotated the light source of the microscope, that luminiscence was still there. Well, is that until you see it there like…
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Is this something biological or not? This looks like…
Dr. Pablo Campra: It’s either a textile fiber or a plant or fungal fiber. Or nanotechnology. Because here, what you have to do… These, I think, haven’t given me the graphene signal. But there’s a theory that we’re handling. And it could be the famous Morgellons. Mysterious Morgellons, which I don’t want to talk about because they would put us on the same level as Iker Jiménez and the like. But this is a disease. It’s a lot like those fibers that appear on people’s skin. It’s like hives, a bad disease. It appears… The only thing missing is that they put a router in the vaccine. They’ve put everything in there, haven’t they? Those are other theories. The fact is that it gives a Bluetooth signal. That’s confirmed.
This fiber… Well, there’s a theory which is that of the Morgellons. It’s a real disease that people suffer from it manifests on the skin as an itch. It’s not luciferase, which I have used a lot. That’s a test that’s done a lot to detect some substance. That’s something else. And then, regarding the origin of the Morgellons’ disease, there are all kinds of more or less bizarre hypotheses: that they come from outer space, that they’re extraterrestrials, that they’re demons… I don’t want to go into this subject. When you come here, we’ll have a beer and talk about whatever you want. But they really look very, very much like the Morgellons. Above all, because of the intense blue or red color that the famous Morgellons usually have. The Morgellons are cited as having electromagnetic properties. Of interacting with electromagnetic fields. So, it’s a hypothesis derived from my work that I’m going to state, but I don’t have it worked out.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): But of course. But those Morgellons in which I’ve been particularly interested… I’ve investigated, and they say that it’s not biological, that it’s something artificial. And I wonder: How can it be artificial if it reacts with the environment? It’s like it’s looking for… It moves like it’s looking for you.
Dr. Pablo Campra: I know… some doctors who have been working…
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): But they say they aren’t biological, but that…
Dr. Pablo Campra: I know some doctors… There are some doctors who have worked on it a lot. They have treated people and are still treating them. There’s a doctor in Seville, but I don’t know her name. It’s a real disease. Now, whether it comes from space or not, I don’t go into that subject. But it’s a real disease, and they shouldn’t be in the vaccine. And we have to see if they really are because I want to analyze Morgellon’s hair and analyze this to see if it has the same structure. Because it does appear, over there, cited that there are graphene Morgellons. We can see the relationship with graphene.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): So, there are graphene Morgellons.
Dr. Pablo Campra: Yes. That’s cited. But if I do analysis…
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): But of course, you can’t rule out anything.
Dr. Pablo Campra: Exactly. In science, nothing is ruled out. That’s a common mistake: to close oneself to hypotheses. Hypotheses are put on the table, and then you analyze them. And you state them with supporting data. If you don’t, then let those of us who are working do their job. One doesn’t close oneself to a hypothesis. So, is there the Morgellons? I’ve stated the hypothesis because people who work with Morgellons have told me that they are. I have shown them my photos of the fibers, and they have told me: ‘Man, those are Morgellons! That’s really bad.’ So, I don’t say that vaccines have Morgellons, but needs to be studied. You cannot close yourself to the possibility. Of course. Now, if people start searching the net for ‘Morgellons’, they’ll find a German saying that this is extraterrestrial technology and that the demons are this and that. I’m neither in nor out. I have to know what that fiber is and what it is doing there. Yes. The other thing is philosophizing, let’s say. That’s all. In science, you only talk about what you can prove with certainty, right? Exactly.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Let’s see more photos because I hallucinate. I hallucinate with everything you see around here. -This, for example…
Dr. Pablo Campra: Some say that these are vegetable fibers, trichomes, textile fibers… I’m not the only one who has seen these things with such an intense color. This is what a Polish guy over there said they are like octopuses. Here, everybody is naming them. But I think the most plausible clue, for the moment, is that of the Morgellons. Anyway, we have to check it out.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): This is the same kind of thing, isn’t it?
That isn’t contamination that has come from the air to my sample, because they appear too many times. And these things can cause thrombi, I guess. Because they’re pretty big. I’m not a doctor, but thrombi are any clumping of platelets.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): I don’t know if they’re are Morgellons or not, but the tought is terrifying.
Dr. Pablo Campra: What you see there is kind of embedded in the gel. It’s like that’s kind of ‘sucking’ on the gel. And that’s when the people who grow these things come along. Some people grow them. And they say they, in fact, grow. Look at that… Here are things like… Also, there’s one thing… If you want, I’ll show you a picture taken by the German guy. It’s very curious. He has them very well studied. And the life cycle is like a fungus, but then it’s like nanotechnology. And then, the sporangia, which are the structures that release spores, it turns out that has a hexagonal mesh.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Holy cow.
Dr. Pablo Campra: A big mesh. Not like graphene, which is atomic. No. This one is big and hexagonal. Curious, isn’t it? It’s not a coincidence. None of this is on the package insert. But how much crap they’ve put in the vaccine! They’re never going to tell you that the vaccine is full of ‘hairs.’
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Mother of God!
Dr. Pablo Campra: Well, I’m not saying that in vaccines in general, but they’re present in the ones I’ve seen. Look at this one that looks like an intestine… People are speculating that it could be Morgellons or something else. But the important thing, really, is that none of this should be in the vaccine. That’s true. That’s a fact. The important thing is that it shouldn’t be in them and that there’s no comprehensive batch control system in continuous to see if this is or isn’t there. To rule out that it was only in the batches they sent me. Or that they added it in the batches they sent me. This is classic Morgellon.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Mother of God! It’s scary. It’s really scary. This is in Moderna. But they’re in all the vaccines! Well, Janssen, Moderna…
Dr. Pablo Campra: Well, I haven’t seen it myself, but this doctor from Tenerife… I don’t want to give the other people’s names, but well… He doesn’t care if I say it. He has a very nice name, though. Well, he has detected these hairs in graphene solutions. Of course, I don’t know if they’re made of this stuff. There, next to it, goes the spectrum. Look at the spectrum. There you have a peak. The one at 1611 cm-1 could be graphene or not. I’ve put it in the grid. And the important peak is the other one, the one at 1450 cm-1, and something because that one isn’t graphene. And we’re investigating what it is. There are 4 or 5 things that may be. It could be polyvinyl alcohol or some polymers. All of those are cited in interaction with graphene. Anyway. We don’t know what it is. But that peak comes up very frequently, and we have to find out what it is, which isn’t difficult if we’re allowed to work.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): My goodness!
Dr. Pablo Campra: Here’s another peak. That’s a huge peak. That could be a ‘pollen’ right there. I haven’t seen much, but if you keep going… Well, now we’re talking about it.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): And this is seen in Pfizer. And what is this roundel that you see here that has more roundels in it?
Dr. Pablo Campra: That could be pollen that’s gotten on me or somebody. But the thing is that it’s not Easter week to be struggling with pollen. But if you go down, you’ll see there’s more. Yes. I call this structure ‘morula.’ I don’t know what they are. Some can tell you that are bubbles, that they have air. These are things you have to check. I don’t say anything about it in this document that I have shared because I don’t know what they are. I put it there because someone with experience in this type of thing can formulate a hypothesis we can corroborate. What you can’t do is to go around pontificating, as there are many experts out there… Not even a Nobel laureate is an ‘expert.’ That laureate is just an expert in the research that has led him to the Nobel Prize. But if you take him out of his field, he is lost. So, an expert…
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Here the followers say ‘spores.’
Dr. Pablo Campra: An expert has to tell you, exactly, if this can be Morgellons or what they say here about ‘spores’ of Morgellons. I don’t know. I’m not an expert on Morgellons either. It’s necessary to leave all the hypotheses open and to observe this with the available analytical techniques and go discarding or accepting things. One cannot close oneself to anything and, above all, one cannot block an investigation of this type, as is being done at the level of the scientific system with coercion of all kinds that violate academic freedom and many others.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Someone asks: Has Dr. Campra received threats or pressures for his research?
No threats, but institutional pressures, of course. But it’s because the whole scientific system has bet on vaccination. So anyone who calls it into question… As the UNESCO treaties say about the rights of university researchers, among them is the right to question public policies with research free of coercion. Threats haven’t been made. But we’re under as much pressure as journalists, doctors… Everyone is under pressure here. The only thing missing here is pressure on the judges, which will come when this reaches the courts. This need to be investigated as well. Someone told me that they could be Morgellons’ eggs. I don’t know what they are, but they aren’t bubbles. And they usually have that little dot that looks like an embryo. Anyway. I have contacted people who know more about Morgellons, to see if we close the hypothesis. Let’s see if we confirm it, disprove it, or whatever. In other words, we cannot rule out anything here.
(Dr. Campra is making reference to the book of Revelation).
That’s why I tell you that there’s nothing definitive, only the second death, but for that, we have to wait a thousand years.
(Dr. Campra is making reference to the book of Revelation).
What about this? It’s the same thing, isn’t it? That’s a strange thing. Besides, I have many videos where they appear surrounded by those little dots. I mean, it’s like a nano-sized microorganism that you can’t see with the naked eye, and they move and interact with that. They appear there moving.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Question: Have you seen magnetism in people, Dr. Campra?
Dr. Pablo Campra: Yes, I’ve seen the magnetism. I have measured it. Now, I have seen very few cases. Of all the people I know, only in one person did I see it. But it’s what we all have seen. And the instrument did beep when I brought it close to the whole body. And then, over time, it went away. In most of the people I have passed the instrument over, I haven’t seen the phenomenon of magnetism. But, in short, magnetism is a real thing. What I’m seeing a lot is the phenomenon of Bluetooth. That’s easy to see. Anybody who has a cell phone with Bluetooth, which is not all of them… I don’t think the iPhone or the Samsungs. But the Chinese ones do. In the Resmi that I have, if I choose to locate Bluetooth without a name and go to a place where there’re many people, I check it. Some say that contactless credit card readers and smartwatches detect it. But well, you see this as Dr. Luis De Benito is researching it.
Well, this is a very curious thing. It looks like a Klimt painting. Curious, isn’t it? It seems to be reminiscent of 50 years ago. I don’t know how long ago. These are some rare discs. This was also shown by Dr. Carrie Madej on Stew Peters’ show. I’ve been watching it for a while. These are from AstraZeneca, and I’ve also seen them in Pfizer when the samples dry. And they’re like discs. I call them discs. Some said it could be graphene, that it was a variant of graphene.
However, I put the laser on it, and I don’t know if you see the spectrum, but it’s not graphene. It’s something else. And some say they are bubbles, for example, this researcher from Info….. I don’t know if it’s InfoVacunas or InfoCorona… There are two very good blogs: Corona2Inspect and InfoVacunas. Both are doing quite a commendable job, technically speaking. Of literature review and comparing photos. Well, but there’s a lack of analytics, isn’t there? But they find things similar to all these objects we are seeing now. The comparison of photos isn’t enough. You have to do an analysis. And those who’re saying that this is graphene, well, it doesn’t give me a spectrum.
If you show the spectrum, for example, it seems to me that the peak was at 1450 cm-1. So I haven’t seen the graphene peak. That’s one of the hypotheses of this man from InfoVacunas, whose name is Dani. And he’s doing a good job. Very few people are doing research, of course. Of those scientists from the system, only two have answered me. And one hasn’t even told me his name, so you can see what’s going on. Well, I don’t know what this is either.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Come on, I’m amazed because it turns out that graphene is the last thing to worry about.
Dr. Pablo Campra: I don’t care about graphene because it has already been detected. What matters in all this are the adverse and anomalous effects. The least important thing is graphene, which is present, but given the number of strange objects we see, it means that graphene is the least important thing. In other words… Once the regulatory system starts to get off its butt, it will make any court-appointed judge or the military, as you said, say, ‘Okay, let’s see, let’s do analysis. Meaningful sampling. Come on, do it to hundreds of vaccines. Do it to all the departments in all the universities that can do this. Each one with its own technique.’ In two days, we’re going to find out for sure.
On top of that, we’re talking about drugs that come, as you say, from foreign powers and are controlled by European drug agencies. Of course. For example, food. If something comes from abroad, the first thing you have to do is analysis because you don’t know if it can bring something… The agricultural sector of Almeria, which has been much vilified because decades ago a lot of agrochemicals were used, it’s the most controlled thing in the world. You would be amazed at the controls we have here to eat a tomato. On the other hand, a German is taking a shot of anything.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Question: Can graphene cross barriers until it reaches the brain? Does the intramuscular puncture reach the bloodstream? I don’t know much about that, I’m not an expert either, but the little I’ve read in papers says that it does. Because there may be graphene nanoparticles that are even called… What was the name? Quantum dots. Look at how big it can get, and it can go through barriers. You can take a look at the papers that are published. But I don’t think they the particles I saw can, because they’re too big. The ones I was able to locate were the size of tens of microns. I don’t know if they do or don’t pass through.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): They say here: ‘Russian roulette is more reliable than inoculation’. But come on, I think that after what we’re seeing tonight, the last thing to worry about is graphene. The last thing!
Dr. Pablo Campra: Let’s see. Here are the major adverse effects that I don’t know how many are going. About 40,000 official deaths in VAERS. I don’t know how many are in Europe. Why do they occur? We don’t know. I don’t know. There’s a lack of a control system. Of continuous monitoring. And then, we have the issue of magnetism and Bluetooth. If it’s denied, then it’s not investigated. But both phenomena are a fact. Well… That’s the serious thing, not whether it’s graphene or Spike protein.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): That’s the least worrisome issue here. Well, this is the same thing…
Dr. Pablo Campra: Yes, but I put the spectrum there, I think. Show the spectrum. It’s on the right. Not that one. It seems to me that, also, you’ve enlarged the PDF a lot. On the right is the spectrum of the phantom peak, a peak at 1450 cm-1, another at 1355 cm-1, and another at 1200 cm-1. As I’m not a Raman expert, I’m waiting for someone expert in Raman or who has software to analyze the spectra well to do it. I don’t have such software because it has to have a big data database. And boom, boom, boom! It tells you what it is because it compares it with thousands of substances and tells you more or less which of them it might be, with a margin of error. I think that, as I see a lot of this subject of the peak but not graphene, it could be the above gel, which is the one that is mentioned together with graphene for a series of biomedical applications.
And it’s a peak that I get too much. I think that it may be, that this signal is masking the disk below. These lumps show up a lot. Then, if you enlarge it, you will see that there are some dots there, like a dope. And this could be something doped with heavy metals, which you know, have been found in the vaccine. I don’t do that, but this Antonieta Gatti, an Italian woman with whom I was working at the beginning… Then, we had a fight because she leaked photos for others to plagiarize, like Dr. Young, do you realize? Well, she had detected heavy metals in all the vaccines, and she had already published it some time ago.
But there are also heavy metals in these. You detect them with a technique that is similar to this one. In which you introduce an electron microscopic spectroscopy, you put them… It’s called EDS, you introduce electron spectroscopy, and you know what heavy metal is present. Now, with this technique, you cannot see graphene. So, several heavy metals have been detected.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): So what is this?
Dr. Pablo Campra: This is a rare thing. This weird thing that you see here is seen in dark-field microscopy. If you look at the picture below, you’ll see it’s the same thing, but in a bright field.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): It looks a little different, doesn’t it?
Dr. Pablo Campra: That’s what I call a mushroom. This one I’ve only been able to see at AstraZeneca. It appears —as you know— when the drop is drying out. There’s a carryover and, in the end, objects just sit there. Like that gel that never dries. And that crystallizes. This can be either an inorganic crystal or an organic crystal. I don’t know what it is. I’ve even shown it to mushroom experts. I have no idea what it is. That only appears in the AstraZeneca. And, again, there’s the mysterious peak at 1450 cm-1. And that’s a big object. Anyway. You have to enter the values of those peaks in a database, a suitable software, to know which substances are compatible with that spectrum. And I couldn’t do that because I don’t have the means to do that. I don’t have the range of spectra. To me, the machine has given me the minimum analysis. This is the same thing. They look like arborescent forms. They may be a crystallization of salts that go in the vaccine. The manufacturer is the one who has to tell us. What’s surreal here is that we’re breaking our heads while everyone is silent: manufacturers, regulatory agencies, and, on top of that, all the media do nothing more than to crush us. That’s what’s not normal.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): You saw this in Janssen.
Dr. Pablo Campra: This is very rare. This has only been seen in Janssen. This has a very strange insectoid look. This is indeed cited in the Morgellons. Morgellons look like these insectoid structures. That’s what I call ‘noodles,’ because they look like noodles. Now, we’ll look at it in more detail. Go down in the document. OK. This appears when it dries. It’s also quoted as appearing when you dry graphene suspensions. Someone sent me that information. I think it was Corona2Inspect, Mike Andersen. These weird noodles appear when the droplet dries. This isn’t a crystal. Crystals don’t form that. This is something else. And if you go further down in the document, it appears larger. That there grows when the drop dries. They are like nuclei that are condensing. If you go down further, you’ll see them even bigger. There’s a kind of a nucleus from which they start to grow. And if you look further down, you’ll see… this. This is much more magnified and with their appearance next to it. And, again, we have the same little ghost peak.
1457 cm-1.
Dr. Pablo Campra: It’s not just the peak. It’s that phantom appears to me in everything I looked at in Janssen. So, here it appears as a rosary of little balls. It could be Morgellons. It could be. It’s certainly not what it says on the package insert. These are not nanoparticles with RNA related to the protein Spike. Nor is it any salt that is cited in the package insert that dries that way. These are dark fields. These are videos, actually. I haven’t embedded them because they’re heavy. But in the dark field, you can see all these little dots quite frequently. This is what’s called symbionts. I’ve been seeing this for a long time in cell culture. But they’re living things. That’s not in random Brownian motion.
And well, I don’t know if it’s the result of contamination or not, but it appears quite frequently. And there you have a sign, for example… Look at that one that looks like a rhombus. The bug or whatever it is. That little dot or nanobots or whatever. I don’t know what it is. These little dots are always kind of ‘fiddling’ with those little crystals. They go like dragging them as if it were a layer. These crystallites always have that rhomboid shape. And these little dots are playing with them. These are microbiota. It doesn’t float around and moves. I can’t put videos in the document, though. If you go further down, there’s another strange shape. See? Here’s one that’s a little bit bigger, and the little dot is always clinging to the little crystal. Here you see another one.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Yes, yes, yes. Keep scrolling. As I’m Andalusian, I speak as such. The good thing about talking to you is that I don’t have to pronounce the ‘s’.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): I understand you. I ‘peak.
Dr. Pablo Campra: Look at this circle. This is a very strange thing. The little I’ve read says there’s nanotechnology called ‘SiN cells,’ which are these weird spheres. These spheres appear and, sometimes, they have the diamond inside with the little dot moving.
El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Well, some people say it’s alien technology. Well, all I know…
Dr. Pablo Campra: Bring me a beer, and you and I can talk all you want. But here… The only thing we know for sure is that this shouldn’t be in the vaccine. The rest is philosophizing. It’s not just that it shouldn’t be. It’s that there’s no one monitoring it. The fact that they don’t test for it or the FDA… Look, here’s what I’m telling you. That circle that has that little diamond inside it with the little dot moving. I’m not a microbiologist, but no microbiologist has been able to tell me what the hell that is.
AP News calls them “far-right,” but tens of thousands of freedom-loving people marched against new tyrannical public health measures, such as partial and full lockdowns and health passports and mandatory vaccinations, across Europe.
Demonstrations against new virus restrictions were observed in Austria, Croatia, Italy, Northern Ireland, the UK, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Outside of Europe, protesters were seen in several cities across Canada, Australia, Japan, and even the US. Some marked Saturday as part of a “Worldwide Freedom” rally to protest COVID-19 restrictions and vaccine mandates.
Some of the most intense rallies, which turned into riots, were in the port city of Rotterdam. Clashes between protesters and police began Friday and continued through Saturday night.
"COVID-19 protests in Rotterdam, Netherlands turn violent as demonstrators clash with police" https://t.co/x6nGwBwr8r
Protesters across many European cities shared commonalities as they marched to preserve their lives and liberty. Governments are attempting to plunder that via increased COVID restrictions, mandatory health passports, and forced vaccinations.
The worst of restrictions, or rather the government’s plundering of liberties, was in Austria, where full lockdowns begin Monday. Nationwide lockdowns are expected for at least ten days but can be extended to more than two weeks. Then by Feb. 1, the government will make vaccinations mandatory (only 66% of Austria’s 8.9 million people are fully vaccinated). Good luck with that one.
Saturday’s march in Vienna’s massive Heldenplatz square had many chanting “My Body, My Choice,” “We’re Standing Up for Our Kids!,” and “Resistance!”
One of the biggest protests might have been in Zagreb, Croatia’s northwestern capital, where Citizen Free Press reports as many as 100,000 flooded streets to protest the government’s health passports and new COVID measures.
In Rome, thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital’s Circus Maximus to protest against “Green Pass” certificates required at workplaces, restaurants, cinemas, theaters, sports venues, and gyms, as well as for public transportation.
“People like us never give up,” read a protester’s sign.
The pushback against totalitarianism is spreading across Europe. Usually, “Europeans generally are more compliant than Americans when it comes to government orders. But even there, citizens are protesting governments seizing power in the name of public health,” said American Thinker’s Thomas Lifson.
People of the world are awakening to government tyranny plundering their life and liberties as the Davos Man, the world’s elites, and their political puppet officials are becoming more unfavorable than ever. The increasing discontent among citizens and their respective governments is dangerous – this is how revolutions begin.
The Covid-19 Pfizer and Moderna RNA vaccines “dramatically increase” a common measure of heart risk in people.
That’s according to a recently-published “warning” in the journal Circulation by cardiologist Dr. Steven Gundry, who is called a pioneer in infant heart transplant surgery.
The analysis was presented at the recent meeting of the American Heart Association.
The “dramatic changes in most patients” means they are at higher risk of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome, such as heart attack, according to Gundry.
In part, the analysis states:
“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients
Scientists have already established a myriad of heart and blood related effects of Covid-19 vaccines in some patients, including young people. Among the adverse events linked to the vaccines are thrombosis blood clots and heart inflammation known as myocarditis and pericarditis.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) say the vaccines are safe and effective for everyone they are recommended for, and that the benefits outweigh the known risks, which will be emerging for some years as more people get vaccinated.
There are millions of adverse events officially reported by people after vaccination, including thousands of heart-related injuries.
The PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature) Test measures the most clinically-significant protein biomarkers that measure the body’s immune system response to arterial injury. These injuries lead to the formation and progression of cardiac lesions which may become unstable and rupture, leading to cardiac event.
In June 2021, a Notice-of-Liability letter was sent to physicians in Germany. This reminder letter includes the recent findings and results that further strengthen the conclusion that the gene-based COVID vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective, and dangerous, as stated in the June letter.
“We would also like to ask you, beyond the legal level, that you, as physicians and also human beings, once again thoroughly examine whether you can reconcile your attitude and your medical practice with your conscience. Our first principle is that we must do no harm.”
Special thanks to Mascha Orel and her team for the excellent translation.
This letter is to remind you that you may be held personally liable for vaccine injuries if you administer any of the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines to your patients. In our previous letter this June, we outlined that these vaccines are all unnecessary, ineffective, and dangerous. The contents of that letter can be found at the following web address:
Along with the June letter, you received a detailed liability notice to make you aware of the legal risks. In the meantime, there have been public attempts to downplay this issue and dismiss our warning as “misinformation”. We would like to remind you that the initial situation with the Covid-19 vaccines is completely different than with the swine flu vaccines.
In the current situation, it is not to be expected that the state will take over the injury compensation payments to the people harmed by the Covid-19 vaccinations, as it did after the swine flu. The only certain thing is that the manufacturers enjoy “immunity” and cannot be held liable. You are hopefully aware that the contracts and the terms of the contracts contained therein have now become public. At the end of our letter today, we also address the fact that in the meantime, more and more is becoming known about how Pfizer simply falsified and deceived data in the approval process, which adds a completely new dimension to the current situation. Please take our reminder seriously and carefully consider our letter today, as well as the one from June of this year.
We would also like to ask you, beyond the legal level, that you, as physicians and also human beings, once again thoroughly examine whether you can reconcile your attitude and your medical practice with your conscience. Our first principle is that we must do no harm. Please check carefully if you really fully inform your patients before vaccination and if they can really give an understanding consent. Please check to see if patients are being pressured by third parties or are able to make a true free choice. And in particular, please check as carefully and thoroughly as you can whether you can really ethically and scientifically justify vaccinating pregnant women, adolescents, and children. We would like to briefly present recent findings and results that reinforce and expand on these points in the following.
1. The vaccines are unnecessary
It should be common knowledge by now that COVID-19 carries only an extremely small risk of death or serious, irreversible damage to health for people without serious pre-existing or concomitant diseases. This is true even for people over 65 years of age, and especially for young people. [1] For example, only a full 11 COVID deaths in the 10- to 19-year-old age group have been reported to the Robert Koch Institute in the period ending July 13, 2021.
The main reason for the very low overall mortality is cross-immunity brought about by the previous infection with other beta-coronaviruses. The wide distribution of this immunity [2, 3] and its clinical efficacy [4-7] have been adequately confirmed.
2. The vaccines are ineffective
The reports on the so-called clinical trials that were supposed to prove the effectiveness of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines [8, 9] are full of contradictions and, therefore, not credible [10, 11]. However, the failure of the vaccines has now been documented in practice.
The U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) published a study that included 469 COVID cases [12] – this number is more than double the sum of cases reported in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s clinical trials. Of these 469 cases, 74% involved previously vaccinated individuals, whereas only 69% had been vaccinated in the general population during the period. These apparent vaccine failures affected all three vaccines covered, those from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. Since the vaccine produced by AstraZeneca is very similar to that produced by Johnson & Johnson, one must assume that AstraZeneca vaccine would not have performed any better.
The ineffectiveness of the vaccines can further be demonstrated by international comparison. Plotting the number of new COVID cases against the population vaccination rate for 68 countries yields only a weak but positive correlation [13] – even high vaccination rates in the 60-80% range fail to reduce the number of new infections.
If their benefit is zero, the benefit-risk analysis of the “COVID-19 vaccines” is negative even if their adverse side effects are overestimated, which is hardly possible since experience shows that only about 1-3 % of adverse effects are reported at all.
3. The vaccines are dangerous
As with any other treatment, an honest weighing of benefits and risks is essential for COVID vaccination. The work of Kostoff et al. [1] on this topic makes it clear that the harms far outweigh the benefits – and this is true in every age group, even in seniors.
Severe side effects of vaccination are common. Canadian general practitioner Dr. Charles Hoffe wrote an open letter to the British Columbia provincial health minister back in April, pointing out four such cases among a total of 900 patients; these had occurred after the first injection of Moderna vaccine [14]. One of these cases was fatal; the other three had severe, probably permanent, neurological damage. Hoffe has since reported other such cases in the same group of patients.
The U.S. (VAERS) and European Union Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Sites have recorded tens of thousands of deaths and a much larger number of serious illnesses, mostly vascular and inflammatory. Table 1 summarizes the status of reports in the VAERS database. As expected, the number of deaths recorded so far in 2021 that occurred after the administration of other vaccines is about three-quarters the value for the entire previous year. In comparison, the number of deaths following COVID vaccination is huge – it is over 50 times greater.
VAERS data released today by the CDC included a total of 894,145 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 18,853 deaths and 139,126 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 12, 2021.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released new data today showing a total of 894,145 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 12, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.
Of the 8,664 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 12, 10% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 26% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
In the U.S., 436.9 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 12. This includes: 254.5 million doses of Pfizer, 166.3 million doses of Moderna and 16.1 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
This week’s U.S. data for 5- to 11-year-olds show:
1,426 total adverse events, including 9 rated as serious and 1 reported death that occurred in an 11-year-old girl from Georgia vaccinated Sept. 14, prior to the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine in the 5 to 11 age group.
444 adverse events have been reported in the 5 to 11 age group since Nov. 1.
The rest of the reports in VAERS for children in the 5 to 11 age group occurred prior to the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, and are due to ”product administered to patient of inappropriate age.”
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
The most recent death includes a 16-year-old girl from Missouri (VAERS I.D. 1823671) who died after receiving her second dose of Pfizer.
Other reported deaths include a 17-year-old female from Washington (VAERS I.D. 1828901) who died Oct. 29 reportedly from a heart condition after receiving her second dose of Pfizer; a 12-year-old girl from South Carolina (VAERS I.D. 1784945) who hemorrhaged 22 days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine; and a 13-year-old girl from Maryland (VAERS I.D. 1815096) who died from a heart condition 15 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.
59 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
559 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 549 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
134 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
This week’s U.S. VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 12, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
54% of those who died were male, 42% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
FDA, CDC sign off on Pfizer, Moderna COVID boosters for all adults
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today authorized Moderna and Pfizer COVID boosters for all adults. The agency made its decision without input from its advisory committee, whose members, on Sept. 17, voted 16 to 2 against recommending boosters, citing a lack of long-term data and stating the risks did not outweigh the benefits.
Hours after the FDA announced its decision, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) signed off with an unanimous endorsement.
The ACIP said 18- to 49-year-olds “may” get a booster, but people 50 and older should get one. CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky is expected to clear the doses, which will allow boosters to be administered broadly to the general public.
Speaking for the FDA, Dr. Peter Marks, head of the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement:
“The FDA has determined that the currently available data support expanding the eligibility of a single booster dose of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines to individuals 18 years of age and older.”
Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and an FDA advisory panel member took issue with how the FDA arrived at its decision.
In an email to The Epoch Times, Offit said, “I think it would have been of value for the public to hear an open discussion about the need for boosters. I wish we had had the chance to discuss this.”
The FDA said it did not hold a meeting because “the agency previously convened the committee for extensive discussions regarding the use of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines and, after review of both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s [Emergency Use Authorization] requests, the FDA concluded that the requests do not raise questions that would benefit from additional discussion by committee members.”
Pfizer and BioNTech requested authorization last week after submitting the results of a phase 3 trial involving more than 10,000 participants.
Moderna resubmitted its application for its 50-microgram booster dose for all adults just two days ago. The company said the FDA based its decision on the “totality of scientific evidence shared by the company,” including data that showed neutralizing antibodies had waned at about six months.
14-year-old Kentucky girl mistakenly given J&J vaccine
A 14-year-old Kentucky girl was mistakenly given J&J’s COVID vaccine, which is not authorized for anyone under the age of 18, International Business Times reported.
The girl was given the jab Oct. 16 at a vaccine drive-in at a high school in Covington.
The girl’s mother, Rolina Mason, said her daughter was reluctant to get vaccinated and wanted the J&J vaccine because it was only one dose. Mason agreed that the nurse could administer J&J, but didn’t realize it wasn’t authorized for use in children.
Mason said she trusted the nurse who told them that it was okay for her daughter to get it.
The health department contacted Mason a week later and informed her that her daughter should have received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine instead. Mason’s daughter reportedly experienced skin rashes after receiving the shot.
States bypass CDC, gave out COVID boosters to all adults before authorization
State officials from California to Maine encouraged and allowed adult residents to get COVID vaccine boosters despite recommendations by the FDA and CDC to reserve the shots for elderly and high-risk groups, CNBC reported.
California also told medical providers not to turn away any adults who requested a booster.
Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Mexico, Vermont and West Virginia are also promoting widespread rollout of boosters for any fully vaccinated adult, with governors in Colorado and New Mexico signing executive orders a week before the FDA authorized the shots for the general population.
Gov. Jim Justice of West Virginia called for all adults in-state to get their boosters, adding that fully vaccinated residents would be “very foolish” not to register for the third dose.
Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said during a briefing Monday she wanted to make sure everybody 18 and over was eligible and encouraged to get a booster. Danyelle McNeill, a spokesperson for the Arkansas Department of Health, told CNBC in an email “the great majority of adults in Arkansas” were already considered high risk by the CDC before Hutchinson issued his recommendation.
Kentucky approved boosters for fully vaccinated adults on Wednesday, while Connecticut, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts and Vermont expanded their booster programs this week before the FDA and CDC signed off, today.
Several children in California sick after receiving wrong COVID vaccine doses
At least two children in California are sick after a clinic administered the wrong doses of a COVID vaccine to 14 kids.
Denise Iserloth said she took her two children, ages 8 and 11, to a clinic where they received 20 micrograms of dosage instead of the recommended 10 micrograms.
Sutter Health said in a statement it warned parents of the mistake as soon as they learned of it, and contacted parents to advise them of CDC guidance. But Iserloth said she wasn’t made aware of the error until 10 hours after her children were vaccinated.
Both of her children stayed home from school on Monday with bad stomach aches, and her oldest child fell down twice in the hours following the shot, Iseroth said.
“I understand the mandate, I tried to comply with it, and my children now have been given a double dose and I don’t know the long-term side effects,” Iserloth said. “[…] It is unacceptable and negligent, completely negligent on their part.”
COVID hospitalizations on the rise among fully vaccinated
COVID hospitalizations and emergency room visits are on the rise among people who are fully vaccinated, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
“What we’re starting to see now is an uptick in hospitalizations among people who’ve been vaccinated but not boosted,” Fauci said Tuesday. “It’s a significant proportion, but not the majority by any means.”
In a White House COVID-19 Response Team briefing Wednesday, Fauci stressed the importance of vaccines and highlighted how well they work. At the same panel, CDC Director Walensky reported a decline in vaccine effectiveness among the elderly and residents of long-term care facilities, many of whom were the first to be eligible to be vaccinated last winter.
The current seven-day rate of COVID hospital admissions is about 5,300 per day, according to the CDC.
It’s not clear how many hospitalizations are breakthrough cases as the agency stopped reporting hospitalizations among fully vaccinated people and its website shows data only through Aug. 28.
CDC admits to not tracking data on natural immunity
In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, the CDC said it has no record of an individual previously infected with COVID becoming reinfected or transmitting the virus to others — because the agency doesn’t collect that data.
The FOIA request, submitted Sept. 2 by attorney Aaron Siri of the Siri & Glimstad law firm on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network, sought documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.
“A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”
According to Siri, the revelation that the CDC does not collect data on people who have acquired natural immunity to the virus raises questions about vaccine mandates, specifically how the government or employers can mandate vaccines for people who may not need them and who could be at a greater-than-average risk of experiencing an adverse reaction to the shots.
Dr Sevillano is one of the key people in a Spanish speaking ad hoc group of researchers called the Fifth Column or La Quinta Columna.
They were the ones that arrange for the examination of vials of various brands of the Covid vaccines at a Spanish University laboratory and released a report on it at the beginning of July 2021 revealing the presence of graphic oxide in all the vials examined.
This material is heavily referenced in endless scientific studies, with a preponderance of applications in the field of bio-sensing, e-medicine and nano-medicine. It is a very hot high tech material now and fits the bill as a possible purpose for this obsessive global vaccination push.
Late Friday November 12th, 2021, Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), Federal Employees for Freedom (FEFF), and several individuals filed suit in the Middle District of Florida against President Biden and the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force (Case 8:21-cv-02679), challenging the federal vaccination mandate for all federal employees, announced on September 9th, 2021 through Executive Order No. 14043.
HFDF is a nonprofit that advocates for and educates the public on the topics of medical choice, bodily autonomy, and self-determination. Health Freedom Defense Fund opposes laws and regulations that force Americans to submit to the administration of medical products, procedures, and devices against their will and has filed several other lawsuits challenging mask and vaccine mandates at the local, state and federal level.
This legal action challenges Biden’s sweeping mandate which violates not only various elements of the Federal Code of Regulations and U.S. Supreme Court rulings, but also doesn’t take into account the individual beliefs, morals, and medical situations of each person.
“If the President has the power to dictate medical treatment to individual Americans, the United States of America is no longer a constitutional republic but a kingdom led by a ruler,” said HFDF president Leslie Manookian.
HFDF is joined by FEFF, a group representing approximately 6000 employees of various agencies in the federal government, and advocating for constitutional rights and freedoms concerning bodily autonomy, self-determination, privacy, and religious freedom, in particular as these relate to governmental mandates requiring vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 disease.
The lawsuit contends that “Private matters of personal, bodily choice are retained by the governed and to be decided by the individual, on a case-by-case basis. The people have never delegated those rights to the government. As such, the government has neither the just power, nor the consent of the governed, to forcibly decide for them.”
HFDF attorney John Howard, of JW Howard Attorneys said, “The issue to be decided here then is not whether the emerging science and statistics support, or refute, the use, efficacy, and safety of the vaccines, but whether that decision remains with, and is reserved by, the individual into whose body the vaccine will be injected, and whether the people gave that right to the government to decide for them through sweeping Executive Orders.”
Plaintiffs include two Department of Defense- Air Force Fire Captains, an Air Traffic Controller, a purple-hearted Afghanistan veteran employed as an Analyst for the Defense Intelligence Agency, a Deputy U.S. Marshal, and an Intelligence Research Specialist with the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration, and Customs Enforcement, Office of Professional Responsibility who regularly investigates the misuse of government databases, is familiar with their vulnerabilities, and cites grave privacy and security concerns relating to employees submitting private medical information to government databases.
This week, tens of thousands of protesters gathered in Melbourne, Victoria State, to oppose their government’s new pandemic laws and vaccination mandates. Mainstream media outlets appear to be upset that attendees are daring to compare the decrees of their government to that of the Nazis, specifically citing state policies of targeted discrimination and medical apartheid.
The latest round of protests comes after the government’s push to enact new draconian legislation meant to ‘fight the pandemic.’
Australian public health authorities are claiming that vaccinations are voluntary, and that 83% of its population aged 16 and above have been ‘fully inoculated’ against the coronavirus. However, states and territories have had to deploy coercive and intimidating policies in order to enforce vaccine mandates, including threats by the state to prevent any employee from the right to work if they refuse to accept the experimental gene-based pharmaceutical injection, as well as policies which prohibit ‘the unvaccinated’ from participating in basic activities such as eating out and attending concerts and other public facilities.
The Melbourne demonstration against the vaccination mandate that came into effect on Saturday – requiring construction workers in Victoria state to be fully inoculated – was peaceful, with no immediate reports of unruly behaviour or arrests.
But a reporter at The Age posted video on Twitter of a protester carrying a mock gallows with three nooses hanging from it, and the newspaper showed a protester carrying a poster depicting Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews with a Hitler moustache and the hashtag #DictatorDan.
“We’re being governed by insane medical bureaucrats,” Craig Kelly, former Liberal Party member of parliament and now the leader of United Australia Party, told the rally, media reported.
The Age said some protesters called for violence against politicians but did not offer specifics.
Australia has captured global attention as one of worst violators of human rights, and where governments have all but abandoned any pretence of civil liberties and rights, and regularly deploying police forces in violent attacks against protesters, and to break up any pro-freedom rallies.
Since the beginning of the alleged ‘global pandemic’, Victoria’s Premier Dan Andrews has enacted no less than six COVID-19 lockdowns, totalling nearly nine months – despite the fact that there was never any significant number of deaths from COVID-19 among the general population outside of the elderly with comorbidities.
Still, the main justification for continuing anti-democratic policies is the state’s ongoing coronavirus testing regime. Authorities in Victoria are claiming there have been 1,221 new coronavirus “cases” (PCR positive tests) and 4 deaths ‘from’ (or ‘with’, officials will not specify precisely which) COVID. In New South Wales state officials are claiming to have 250 daily ‘cases.’
Recently, Victoria State’s lower house had passed the latest version of its disturbing coronavirus state of emergency law, the Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021, which gives the government near unlimited power to declare a ‘pandemic’ at any time and for any reason. The draconian legislation also gives the state new powers to levy crippling fines against any individuals or businesses who do not obey the state’s new restrictions, and also gives the state the power to send its residents to internment facilities – which the individual will be forced to pay for.
Recent revelations about Dr. Anthony Fauci shed new light on a 2004 BBC documentary, “Guinea Pig Kids.” The film exposed the cruel experiments — approved by Fauci and funded by U.S. taxpayers — on poor minority children as part of Fauci’s search for a cure for AIDS.
The recent #BeagleGate scandal accomplished what a global COVID pandemic, a “gain-of-function” research scandal, worldwide vaccine mandates and a career of squandering American tax dollars could not: It got the world to stop and question the integrity of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
In recent weeks, mainstream and social media have exploded with accounts of the cruel animal experiments funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) using American tax dollars.
The NIAID, a division of the National Institutes of Health, operates under the direction of Fauci.
Viral social media posts described how — after being starved and having their vocal cords removed so that they couldn’t howl or bark — beagles had their heads trapped in cages with hungry sand fleas that ate their hosts alive.
Other puppies were injected with lab-made “mutant” variants of tick-borne bacteria before being exposed to hundreds of ticks that then sucked their blood for up to a week. Their blood was drawn twice a week for eight weeks and then they were sacrificed.
In yet another experiment, beagles were injected with heartworm larvae and later euthanized so the larvae could be used in other experiments.
The White Coat Waste Project (WCW) investigation that broke these stories triggered a public outcry and a bipartisan effort to hold Fauci accountable for the unnecessary and abusive experiments he signed off on using millions of taxpayer dollars.
The subsequent mainstream media hit pieces on WCW are evidence of the impact #BeagleGate had public perception.
It’s not that Sharav doesn’t care about puppies. She is frustrated, however, that she has been unable to generate the same public outcry when it comes to her lifelong mission to end cruel medical experimentation on children.
“Animals have powerful advocates, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, fighting to protect them from this kind of abuse,” Sharav said. “But these children are disposable. It’s a travesty.”
As a child survivor of the Holocaust, Sharav witnessed first hand how a corrupt system can systematically obliterate moral norms and human empathy in the name of public health.
She has worked for decades to put a stop to unethical and abusive medical practices, including those subsidized and facilitated by government agencies and Big Pharma.
Her battle to break through conspiratorial silence and get the attention of the media and regulatory authorities has been an uphill battle, spanning decades.
But in 2004 there was a glimmer of hope. The BBC reached out to Sharav as part of an investigation for a documentary film, “Guinea Pig Kids.”
Based on the findings of investigative journalist Liam Scheff, the gut-wrenching documentary exposed Fauci’s torturous clandestine medical experiments on HIV-infected children in the care of Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC).
Sharav teamed up with Scheff, investigative reporter Celia Farber and the film’s director, Jamie Doran. For a brief time, the three believed the truth might finally come to light.
But as they all discovered, shedding light is not for the faint of heart.
Who were the ‘Guinea Pig Kids’?
The ICC, which marketed itself as “New York City’s only skilled nursing facility providing specialized care for children and adolescents living with HIV/AIDS,” was the scene of these crimes against humanity.
In 1992, NIAID provided funding to reintroduce the ICC as “an outpatient clinic for HIV-positive children” and the clinic became part of Columbia University’s Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Unit.
New York’s child welfare department, the Administration for Children’s Services, was empowered to offer up the vulnerable and underprivileged children under its care as lab rats to test toxic AIDS drugs like AZT, Nevirapine and various protease inhibitors, as well as experimental AIDS vaccines.
Most of the children were Black, Hispanic and poor, often born to drug-addicted mothers.
NIAID, capitalizing on the prevailing AIDS orthodoxy, justified the unethical experiments performed on these kids as the only chance they had to survive.
Jacklyn Hoerger, whose job it was to administer the drugs to the children, said:
“We were told that if they were vomiting, if they lost their ability to walk, if they were having diarrhea, if they were dying, then all of this was because of their HIV infection. I just faithfully gave it as I was told by doctors.”
Compliance, as a unidirectional principle, has been a recurring theme throughout Fauci’s career. According to ICC Medical Director Dr. Katherine Painter, the “biggest problem facing families with HIV-positive children is adherence.”
Hoerger learned this lesson the hard way, when she began the process of adopting two half sisters from the program. Applying a much more compassionate scientific method at home, Hoerger deduced that it was the medications that were causing the children’s ailments. So she took them off the drug regimens.
She described the improvements as “almost instantaneous” and noted the girls began eating properly for the first time in their lives. But her non-compliance deemed her a negligent parent and she lost custody of the girls. She was never permitted to see them again.
At ICC, the cooperation of experimental subjects consistently took precedence over their wellbeing. Children were required to take these medications regardless of their negative impacts, and adverse effects were attributed to their presumed illness (AHRP discovered that NIAID allowed its pharma partners to experiment on children without lab-confirmed HIV infections).
When some parents refused to consent to the trials, children’s services officials would promptly remove them and place them with foster families, or in children’s homes where a child’s participation would then be authorized.
When children resisted or refused their medications they were brought to Columbia Presbyterian hospital, where plastic tubes were surgically inserted into their stomachs for drug administration.
According to Sharav, at least 80 children died over the course of these clinical trials.
“Fauci just brushed all those dead babies under the rug,” Sharav said. “They were collateral damage in his career ambitions. They were throw-away children.”
A visit to ICC’s mass grave at Gate of Heaven cemetery in Hawthorne, New York, drove that point home for Celia Farber, an investigative reporter who conducted research for the film.
“I couldn’t believe my eyes,” Farber said. “It was a very large pit with AstroTuft thrown over it, which you could actually lift up. Under it, one could see dozens of plain wooden coffins, haphazardly stacked. There may have been 100 of them. I learned there was more than one child’s body in each.”
Compliance also was an issue when it came to adhering to the Nuremberg Code or even following federal regulations related to clinical trial participation.
Instead of adhering to requirements put in place to protect foster children, New York created an institutional review board, an ethics committee comprised of representatives from the same hospitals who were conducting the research to grant approvals.
In other words, approval was put in the hands of the stakeholders.
In March 2004, Sharav’s organization filed a complaint with both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the federal office of human research protection.
The complaint focused on the unlawful enrollment of foster children in these trials and systemwide institutional failure to protect them in accordance with federal regulations mandating an independent advocate for each child.
These kids, some as young as 3 months old, had no independent voice. The ACS, the same organization that essentially put them on a conveyor belt for clinical trials, was also their legal guardians.
“It’s a complete abdication of ‘first do no harm’ and the dignity of human beings,” saif Sharav. “From a medical research perspective lab animals are expensive and these children are cheap. The government handed them over like a herd of animals.”
The campaign against ‘AIDS deniers’
“Guinea Pig Kids” debuted on BBC on Nov. 30, 2004, but was abruptly taken off the air.
A complaint filed by powerful AIDS activists led the BBC to pull the documentary and expunge the investigation. And it was far worse behind the scenes.
Celia Farber said she and others were “relentlessly brutalized at every level” for being so-called “AIDs deniers.”
“They came after us professionally, economically, spiritually, socially,” Farber recalled. “Nobody wanted to be an AIDS denier. It elicited such immediate hatred. That term cast a really deep spell and people couldn’t hear past it. It instantly shut people down.”
A 2005 subcommittee meeting hosted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) concluded that the protected rights of foster children had been violated in some of the AIDS drug trials — but nothing changed at the ICC and children continued to die.
The VERA Institute of Justice, which was tasked with investigating the death of the children used in these experiments, was prohibited from looking at medical records and refused to accept data from Scheff’s own investigation.
The efforts of Scheff, Sharav and Farber were plunged back into darkness. Until now.
“Fauci has headed this agency (NIAID) since 1984 and has never come up with a drug or vaccine,” Sharav said. “There has been no healing. He has only succeeded in terrorizing people.”
Sharav is ready for Fauci’s reign of terror to end.
But perhaps we can learn the most about Fauci and his cronies, not by looking at his failures, but directing our attention to his success. He and his colleagues at the NIH and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have perfected a pandemic paradigm using changing diagnostic paradigms and clinical definitions incorporating flawed testing methods.
This method was used to launch some of the most successful fear campaigns in global history. That fear was used to generate a medical warfare model that has been used to justify thousands of cruel, unnecessary and expensive experiments.
And while those experiments did not produce effective treatments or cures, they successfully desensitized researchers and healthcare workers and trained them to “just follow orders” regardless of health outcomes.
This was all accomplished at enormous expense to American taxpayers — and the resulting orthodoxy has caused millions of people their health.
Treatments come and go, but medical compliance and creating a “how dare you” culture to shame and silence the voices of dissent has likely remained the most successful and profitable scientific experiment in global history.
But there are two variables that Fauci didn’t accurately account for: the resilience of the human spirit and the power of a parent’s love.
Witnessing the unraveling of the narrative is surreal for Farber.
“I still feel this rage and disgust that this terrorist matrix of AIDS activists succeeded in convincing the public to look away, that they shouldn’t care about these children,” Farber said.
But despite everything she’s been through, there’s a spark of optimism.
“The spark of light is that so many people are embracing this now, are prepared minds for this now, if one can be a ‘prepared mind,’” Farber said.
Catherine Austin Fitts: Vaccine Passports Will Absolutely End Human Liberty in the West. “This Is Not About Democracy Versus Fascism. This Is About Freedom Versus Slavery.”
Well, first of all, I want to thank you very much for the opportunity to speak. And I finally get to meet Bobby Kennedy in person. That’s fantastic.
I represent and work with people all over the world who pray that the Swiss people vote ‘No’ on November 28th.
And I want to share with you why.
Wherever you travel throughout the world, Switzerland is viewed as the lighthouse of democracy. But also the lighthouse of the right to have family wealth and property rights, the lighthouse of human civilization, of freedom in many different respects including health freedom.
And so what you do here is very important for the Swiss people, but very important for people all around the world.
Again, think of yourself as the lighthouse.
Plague laws — this is not the first time in history that plague laws have been used to centralize control. Control of transportation, control of labor, control of banking and bank accounts, control of all the different kinds of capital that make up human civilization.
But the covid laws are particularly draconian in the history of plague laws because not only do they control labor, transportation, banking — but now, with advances in digital technology, we’re looking at complete control through the banking system of 100 percent of all assets ultimately.
So what happens here?
For many, many years most of us have grown up in a world in the western democracies where we have a balance of power between the bankers and the people. The central bankers control monetary policy and the people vote for an electorate that controls the fiscal policy.
Now what we’re watching with covid laws all around the world is the central bankers moving in and exercising essentially a coup d’état where they take control of fiscal policy as well.
And, again, with the advances in digital technology, vaccine passports will not be about health. Vaccine passports are part of a financial transaction control grid that will absolutely end human liberty in the west.
For many years I have fought and written against central control of the financial system. We’ve centralized more and more capital, more and more control. And we’ve done it with tactics called ‘divide and conquer’.
And we’ve all experienced many different divide and conquer tactics. Men against women. Black against white.
But now we have a new one called the vaccinated versus the non-vaccinated.
Because if you’re going to centralize control of every aspect of people’s lives, and literally strip them of their assets and their property rights, you need a new, more venal, divide and conquer. And we can’t let that happen.
Because, ultimately, we’re talking about all of our liberties, all of our human rights, all of our property rights.
So I would plead with you to look behind — so listen to what’s been said today and look behind what these laws are really about and where the vaccine passports lead.
The vaccine passports, along with additional control system, are the end of human liberty in the west.
And, as I said, this referendum on November 28th will be a very important signal to the world as to whether the most educated and intelligent populations in the world can see through the ruse of the plague laws — into what is really happening — and step up to protect our rights and the future of human civilization.
So this is not about democracy versus fascism. This is about freedom versus slavery.
Because when you institute a complete digital financial control you were talking about something much worse than any fascism we have seen yet in our history.
So please vote ‘No’ on November 28th for yourself, for your family, for your right to preserve and grow family wealth, your right to have health freedom, transportation freedom, labor freedom — but also to preserve your role as a lighthouse for democracy worldwide.
And, again, I just want to thank the tremendous leadership here who’s been leading this effort in Switzerland and and on behalf of all of worldwide.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Calls on Switzerland to Stand Up to This Global, Militarized & Monetized, Coup D’état Against Democracy: “Not Just for Switzerland, but for the Entire World”
I’m very, very proud to be here with all of these extraordinary Swiss leaders — people who are standing up for democracy.
But also my colleague here, Catherine Austin Fitts. This is the first time we’ve met in person, although we’ve talked over podcasts. And she’s an important leader in helping me build Children’s Health Defense and helping organize the resistance. She’s a unique individual. She’s really an international treasure. She came up at the center of what we would call the deep state in the 80s — as a high official at Dillon Read, which is one of the leading banking houses in our country, and then working as Assistant Secretary of Treasury at HUD. And has spent a lifetime exposing the corruption in the banking system, in the federal banking system. And she’s paid a very, very high price. And I want to thank her for her leadership… She understands what’s happening– mechanisms from a very, very high level above what we’re seeing here — which is this coup d’état, global coup d’état, against… democracy in all of Europe, and North America, and Australia, Canada, all over the world.
I want to make one comment on the medical issue. And I’m not a doctor but I read very, very carefully as a litigator. I read the preclinical studies, trial studies. And one of the data points that was not mentioned here, to me he is one of the data points we paid a lot of attention to in the United States, which is… Pfizer is the only company now that has received approval by the FDA.
We’ve looked very carefully at their data points and their report. And Pfizer had — originally it was going to do a three-year trial but it cut it to six months. It apparently cut it to six months because, as we now know, the vaccines lose effectiveness after six months. And it would be very difficult for them to justify an approval if they allowed the study to go more than six months. So they unblinded the study after six months and they gave the vaccine to the placebo group. So the study is effectively over. And then — but they did have to publish a study to justify their approval, their licensure by the FDA.
And one of the key tables in that study is a table called S4. And that shows one of the — probably to me the most important data point — which is ‘all cause mortality‘.
Were there more people who died in the placebo group or in the vaccine group?
Here’s what that graphs says. And you have to also read the footnotes to the graph because they omitted some information. And you can see why they did.
There were roughly 22,000 people in the vaccine group. There were 22,000 people, roughly, in the placebo group. At the end of six months, there was one death from covid in the vaccine group.
And there were two deaths from covid of the 22,000 people in the placebo group. So Pfizer was able to tell FDA and the American public, this vaccine is 100 percent effective against death — because two is 100 percent of one.
What most Americans, when they hear that data point, what they believe is that if they take the vaccine they have 100 percent chance of not getting covid.
But that’s not what it means. What it means is you have to give 22,000 vaccines to avert one death from covid. And so you have to make sure that nobody dies from those 22,000 vaccines.
Unfortunately, what their data show is that in the vaccine group there were 20 deaths. Among the 22,000 people over six months, 20 of them died. In the placebo group, 14 died. What that indicates, if you get the vaccine — and this is what Pfizer’s data is saying — you have a 48 percent greater chance of dying over the next six months… But in the placebo group there was one person who died of a heart attack.
In the vaccine group there were five people who died of a heart attack. What it indicates is that if you take the vaccine you have a 500% greater chance of dying of a heart attack over the next six months — according to Pfizer’s data. And what it also indicates — that for every life that they save from covid, four people are dying of heart attacks. And that’s not a good bargain.
I want to say, the principal point, the point that I came to Switzerland to talk about: You have a referendum on November 28th. Because Switzerland is not part of the EU, people of this country have retained their democratic rights to vote directly on the law. So this is the only country in Europe where democracy has a chance to stand up to what we call this global coup d’état against democracy.
And what we’ve seen since the beginning of covid is very strange. We did not see a medical response to the pandemic. We did not see doctors like Dr. Fauci going on TV and telling people to increase vitamin D, to avoid chemical residues in their food, to lose weight, to have lots of social interactions, reduce stress in their lives, to try to stay outside and get plenty of sunshine, and exercise — we never saw any of that.
It was a militarized and monetized response from the beginning. It was telling people — imposing draconian controls on human behavior with no scientific rationale given. And in our country we saw a direct assault on our Bill of Rights, beginning with freedom of speech.
We have amendments to our constitution that guarantee rights to the American people. The first amendment — the constitutional framers, the people who wrote our Constitution, put the most important right in the first amendment, which was the right to freedom of speech.
Because John Adams, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson said if government can restrict your speech, they can commit any atrocity. They can get rid of all of your other rights.
And they began using their alliance with the social media companies and the big media behemoths, and began censoring any criticism of government policies and any criticism or questions about a novel, zero-liability, experimental pharmaceutical product.
Once they got rid of freedom of speech, so that people like me are not allowed to talk about it or criticize these policies or ask questions about these policies. None of these doctors are allowed to question these policies. People who are injured by vaccines cannot question the policies, cannot talk about their injuries in public. It cannot be reported by the press in our country.
Once they got rid of that, they went after religious freedom. They closed all the churches in America for a year — with no public hearings, no explanation, no science given.
They kept the liquor stores open as essential businesses. And I have no problem with that. But the liquor stores are not in the constitution. The churches are.
They got rid of private property rights. They closed a million businesses for a year — without just compensation, without due process of law. There was no hearing. There was no science debated. Just shut them down.
They got rid of jury trials. The sixth and seventh amendment guarantee jury trials in our country. Here’s what the seventh amendment says: No American shall be deprived of the right of a… trial before a jury of his peers in cases of controversy exceeding $25 in value. There is no pandemic exception. And, by the way, the people who wrote our Constitution knew all about pandemics. Because during the revolutionary war we had a smallpox pandemic that sidelined George Washington’s army for three months in New England, a malaria epidemic that sidelined the army of Virginia. So these two armies were both sidelined by pandemics. So the framers who wrote the Constitution knew all about pandemics. And they did not put an exception to pandemics.
They got rid of due process of law, which they’ve done in all the countries in Europe. Instead of having public hearings, where officials have to publish the proposed rule, they have to do some kind of environmental assessment that explains the rationale for the rule, they have to do a cost/benefit analysis that shows all of the science behind… that justifies the rule — that shows all the people who are going to be hurt but the rule, all the people who are going to gain from the rule. All of that has to be disclosed in a transparent way. And you have public hearings where people can come and say ‘I have my own science. I have my own experts. Let’s have this debate.’
Democracy flourishes on the free-flow of information. Free speech is the sunlight and water and fertilizer for democracy. We need to have ideas that can triumph in the marketplace of ideas — the basis of our policies.
All that has been obliterated. Instead, we have unelected technocrats, medical technocrats, who we know are captured and corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry and the banking interests. And they are simply telling us ‘put on the mask, lockdown, social distance, shut down the economy’. And they have demolished democracies, they have obliterated the middle class throughout the world, they have robbed us of our freedoms. And the one place. the frontline in this battle if we are going to win, is here in Switzerland…
In the one instance, across the globe, we had this — all of our liberal democracies pivot suddenly and obliterate democracy.
The one place where the people of a nation can stand up and say ‘we are not gonna be your slaves’, ‘we are gonna take back control of our government’, ‘we are going to reclaim our sovereignty’, ‘we are going to rebuild democracy’. The one place that can happen is Switzerland…
If we win, if democracy wins this vote in Switzerland, it will spread virally across the globe. If we lose here, we lose a lot of hope.
So it’s very, very important for the people of Switzerland to stand up and say: ‘It’s not that we don’t believe that covid is not dangerous. We have all different… It’s not that we don’t believe that vaccines may help. Some people may believe that. That’s okay. You can believe in vaccines or against vaccines but we all need to believe in democracy. And we all need to believe and respect each other, and to tolerate each other. And to say we are going to build communities that are dignified, that respect all of our citizens and make sure that all those diverse voices can be heard in the political process. We are not gonna turn our government over to pharmaceutical industries, to the big tech titans from Silicon Valley, to these medical technocrats and to the banking system’.
You think about this. I got expelled from Instagram because of “vaccine misinformation”. But Instagram and Facebook cannot point to one single erroneous statement that I ever made. Everything we post is vetted, it is sourced and cited to government databases or peer-reviewed publications.
When they use the term “vaccine misinformation” they are using it as a euphemism for any statement that departs from official government policies and pharmaceutical industry profit-taking. It has nothing to do whether it’s true or false. It only has to do with what the political implications are.
And who is doing the censorship?
It’s government officials in league with Bill Gates, with Larry Ellison, with Mark Zuckerberg, with Sergei Brin from Google, and with all of these internet titans. They they have engineered, not only the destruction of our democracy and our civil rights, but they have engineered the biggest shift of wealth in human history 3.8 trillion dollars from working people to these handful of billionaires — many of them from Silicon Valley.
This pandemic has impoverished the world and created 500 new billionaires. And those are the people who are strip-mining our economies and making themselves rich.
And is it a coincidence that these are same people who are censoring criticism of the government policies that are bringing them trillions of dollars?
The people aren’t stupid. We can see what’s happening. We can ask the question ‘Cui bono?’.
And the answer is that the people who are benefiting are the people who are squeezing away our constitutional rights and engineering the destruction of democracy worldwide.
Switzerland is the front lines for this battle. We need all the Swiss people to come out, not just for Switzerland, but for the entire world — for everybody, every man, woman and child who loves democracy globally, who respects their fellow man or woman.
Switzerland is the front line battle for reclaiming those rights.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Fauci is the highest-paid federal employee in the U.S., and 68% of his $437,000 a year salary comes from bioweapons research
Instead of safeguarding public health, Dr. Anthony Fauci turned the National Institutes of Health into an incubator for pharmaceutical products, and essentially sold the entire country to the drug industry
Fauci has had a hand in creating the vaccine gold rush. In 2000, he met with Bill Gates, who asked to partner with the NIH in an agreement to vaccinate the world with a battery of new vaccines. In 2009, this agreement was rebranded as “The Decade of Vaccines,” the objective of which was to implement mandatory vaccinations for every adult and child on the planet by the year 2020
One of the darkest stains on Fauci’s career, aside from his role in the COVID pandemic, was his handling of the HIV epidemic. Suppressing the use of repurposed drugs, Fauci zeroed in on AZT, a toxic drug that has killed an estimated 300,000 AIDS patients
The similarities between the AZT scandal and what’s happening today with the COVID jab and remdesivir are striking. Again, Fauci has suppressed all treatments using inexpensive and nontoxic drugs. U.S. taxpayers have paid for research, while drug companies have raked in the profits, all while having zero liability for injuries and deaths
In this interview, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an environmental activist and attorney turned ultimate freedom fighter, discusses his latest book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,” which is a must-read if you want to know more about the behind-the-scenes of this giant fraud. We could talk for hours and not cover but a fraction of what’s in this book, which Kennedy calls a “devastating indictment of Tony Fauci.”
In a nutshell, Kennedy describes how Fauci turned the National Institutes of Health into an incubator for pharmaceutical products, and essentially sold the entire country to the drug industry. The book is an incredibly well-referenced record of his history of decimating human health, and exposes him as a self-serving charlatan.
Tony Fauci basically created this template that he then used over the next 45 years, to develop toxic drug after toxic drug. He killed early treatment, and killed any protocol that competed with his pharmaceutical enterprise. A lot of people have died [as a result]. ~ Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
I particularly enjoyed how Kennedy placed Fauci in the context of Rockefeller’s legacy with respect to Bill Gates, who developed an alliance with Fauci over 20 years ago. Rockefeller set us on a course of toxic, profit-driven medicines synthesized from the byproducts of the oil refinery process a century ago, and Gates picked up where he left off and then collaborated heavily with Fauci.
The Decade of Vaccines
Fauci, in turn, has had a hand in creating the vaccine gold rush. In 2000, he met with Bill Gates, who asked to partner with the NIH in an agreement to vaccinate the entire population of the world with a battery of new vaccines. In 2009, this agreement was rebranded as “The Decade of Vaccines,” the objective of which was to implement mandatory vaccinations for every adult and child on the planet by the year 2020.
“I show how they use the pandemic simulations, working very closely with the intelligence agencies, with the big media companies and the major pharmaceutical companies to make that happen,” Kennedy says.
“Gates calls what he does philanthropy capitalism, [the idea that] you can use philanthropy to make money. He had a foundation where he has sheltered $50 billion in tax-free money. And, he continues to have absolute control over it. He uses that money to gain control of public health agencies in our country and the World Health Organization.
He’s created a lot of his own [organizations] with Dr. Fauci and a lot of these quasi-governmental agencies that people think are governmental. They’re actually front groups of the pharmaceutical industry like GAVI and SEPI …
He uses this battery and this control of the WHO to set pharmaceutical or medical policy, public health policy around the globe, in a way that maximizes the profits from his stakeholding in these big pharmaceutical companies.
I also show he’s simultaneously doing the same thing to control the global food supply … [He’s] really trying to change both public health and food policies in ways that benefit corporations that he’s invested in and that he’s partnered with.”
Fauci’s Lethal Handling of the AIDS Epidemic
Gates didn’t lure Fauci to the dark side, however. Fauci had already spent decades playing with people’s lives and sacrificing public health for profit. One of the darkest stains on Fauci’s career, aside from his role in the COVID pandemic, was his handling of the HIV epidemic.
The first cases of AIDS surfaced in 1981. Initially, the AIDS program was run by the National Cancer Institute, a separate institute inside the Health and Human Services Department (HHS). The general belief was that AIDS had a chemical etiology caused by drug use. This all changed when the HIV virus was discovered.
Fauci started working for the NIH in 1968 as a clinical associate in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation at National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He became director of the NIAID in 1984, the year after the discovery of the HIV virus, and was appointed director of the Office of AIDS Research in 1988, when that office was established. As explained by Kennedy, Fauci essentially built the NIAID around an AIDS drug called AZT.
“AZT was a chemotherapy formulation that was so toxic it killed all the rats when they gave it to them. The inventor of AZT felt that it was unsafe for any human use, so he didn’t even patent it,” Kennedy says.
“Very early on, the National Cancer Institute had found that when you put AZT in a culture of HIV, that killed the HIV, not surprisingly. It killed anything it touched. And so, Fauci partnered with the manufacturer of AZT … He guided that formulation through the regulatory process and tried to fast track it. He cheated terribly on the clinical trials.
In the clinical trials, it was killing everybody. It literally kills everybody who takes it. But he was able to keep the people in the treatment group alive by giving them huge numbers of blood transfusions. It does keep them alive for the eight weeks, and based upon that eight-week trial, he got approval for AZT. It was unprecedented.
As Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for discovering the polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) technique, said, with any chemotherapy drug, you’re supposed to give it to somebody for two weeks. Chemotherapy is designed to kill every cell in the body, but hopefully it kills tumor cells first, and you can take the person off it. The tumor dies, if you time it right, and the person doesn’t die.
If you put somebody on that for life, like Tony Fauci was doing, every one of them is going to die. And that’s what happened. Meanwhile, there were a lot of drugs at that time that were being repurposed. Local, community-based doctors in San Francisco and New York who were treating the AIDS community were finding that these drugs treated the symptoms of AIDS, and they stopped people from dying.
Fauci made a deliberate crusade to sabotage those, to make sure they were not available to sick people, in order to make sure that AZT would be the only solution. And AZT was the most expensive drug in history. It was $10,000 for a one-year supply [while costing just $5 per dose to manufacture, plus U.S. taxpayers paid for all of the research and development of the drug] …
Tony Fauci basically created this template that he then used over the next 45 years, to develop toxic drug after toxic drug. He killed early treatment, and killed any protocol that competed with his pharmaceutical enterprise. A lot of people have died [as a result].”
Although a bonanza of money was made with AZT, it pales in comparison to Pfizer making out like a bandit with its COVID shot. The U.S. taxpayers paid $20 billion to fund the research, and another $10 billion to market the COVID jab. Pfizer created the best-selling drug in the world and will make $35 billion from it this year.1 Even better, unlike AZT, this is absolutely risk-free and they can never be sued for injuries.
Everything in Fauci’s Career Is Groundhog Day
An estimated 330,000 people have died from AZT alone. Overall, the similarities between the AZT scandal and what’s happening today with the COVID jab and remdesivir are striking. Again, Fauci has discouraged the use of any prevention for COVID-19, and any treatment using inexpensive and relatively nontoxic drugs such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.
U.S. taxpayers funded the research while drug companies have made an estimated $100 billion in profits from the shots in a single year, all while having zero liability for injuries and deaths even as people are being coerced into taking them.
“Everything in Tony Fauci’s career is Groundhog Day,” Kennedy says. “Again, and again, and again, he is repeating the same behavior and it is paying off. And he has this way of talking where he never really says anything. And this habit of just lying, and lying, and lying …
I knew a lot about what happened during the HIV crisis because my uncle, Ted Kennedy, was chair of a health committee at that time. Teddy was the first presidential candidate to court the gay vote, and I was running his campaign at that time …
In the health committee, his primary concern for most of the time was AIDS. I talk about this in my book.
Finally, Fauci was called in front of Congress, and was just fileted. Henry Waxman and all of these well-known Democratic congressmen were saying, ‘What the hell are you doing? You’ve produced nothing. You’re totally incompetent.’ After that, his career was over, and he decided at that point, ‘OK, I’m going to work on getting these repurposed drugs on the market.’
He did that for a couple of years, and he had a project, which was a dual track project where they could, without going through the clinical trials and FDA randomized, placebo controlled trials, they could get approval for these drugs, so that people could get insurance for them and pay for them. So, I was deeply involved in this for many, many years, and I’ve known Tony Fauci for a long time.
I have insights on who he really is, that most liberal Democrats are utterly ignorant of. He is the opposite of everything they believe. He is the architect who turned our public health system over to the pharmaceutical industry. He does not do public health. And there is no metric at NIH, where they look and say, ‘We are improving public health.’
The only metric they have is, ‘How many vaccines have we given? How many pharmaceutical drugs have we sold? How much kickback money are we getting into the agency?’ As I explain in the book, this agency has become an incubator for the pharmaceutical industry.”
Gain-of-Function Research Under Fauci’s Watch
Fauci is responsible for an annual budget of about $6.1 billion. He gets another $1.6 billion from the military to do bioweapons research, which is where 68% of his $437,000 a year salary comes from. (Fauci is the highest-paid federal employee in the U.S. Second-highest is the president, at $400,000 a year.)
“That’s why he had to do that gain-of-function shenanigans in Wuhan,” Kennedy says. “He had to do it, because he had to hold on to his salary. And most of his salary comes from bioweapons research …
Gain-of-function research has never provided a single scientific or medical development that has assisted us in responding to pandemics. Not one. But Fauci continues to do it, because it is critical to his salary. And it’s critical to that funding stream.”
Now, the bulk of the NIAID’s funding was intended to be used to study American health and to improve it; to eliminate infectious allergic diseases and autoimmune diseases. Instead, under Fauci’s watch, the chronic disease epidemic has exploded.
This, despite the fact that between Fauci, Gates and the U.K. Wellcome Trust, they control 63% of the biomedical research on earth through their funding. Over his career, Fauci alone has distributed more than $930 billion in research grants through the NIAID. You could say they control all of it, really, because they also have the capacity to dry up funding to projects they don’t want done.
Ruthless Fauci
Case in point: Something happened in 1989, triggering a series of epidemics — autism, food allergies, Tourette’s Syndrome, narcolepsy, ADD/ADHD, speech delay, language delay, rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune diseases like juvenile diabetes. All of them sprang up right around 1989. Why? What’s causing them? It’s Fauci’s job to find out, but he refuses to, and he blocks anyone else from digging too deep.
“Tony Fauci’s job is to say, why did that happen? It has to be an environmental toxin. Genes don’t cause epidemics. They provide the vulnerability, but they cannot cause an epidemic. You need an environmental toxin. All we have to do is figure out which one started in ’89, and became ubiquitous the same year. But if anybody tries to do that study, Fauci will ruin their career.”
Top suspects include vaccines, which dramatically increased in ’89, and virtually all of the chronic diseases that have skyrocketed are listed as potential side effects on the manufacturers’ inserts. The herbicide glyphosate also became ubiquitous around that time, and really exploded in 1993 when RoundUp Ready corn was invented. GMOs, other pesticides, ultrasound and PFOAs are other potential culprits.
“Our kids are swimming around in a toxic soup. And it could be all of those things, or it could be one or another, but it’s easy to find out. You just do the science. And that science is easy to do, but it will never be done as long as Tony Fauci’s in office, because he doesn’t want us to know — because those are the industries he has survived by protecting,” Kennedy says.
Fauci Works on Behalf of Big Pharma
Kennedy goes on to explain how Fauci works on behalf of Big Pharma, and why he’s become so important for the drug industry.
“Between 2009 and 2016, about 230 drugs were approved by the FDA, all of which came out of his shop. So, he is an incubator for Pharma.
And here’s what he does: At his lab, he has petri dishes filled with every virus [imaginable], and he has scientists that are messing around with different molecules and different poisons, and they’ll drop those poisons into a petri dish and see if it kills the culture. If it kills the culture, then he has a potential antiviral drug.
The next step is, they give it to rats, and see if it kills the rats. If most of the rats survive, now you have a potential antiviral that may work in humans. Then, he farms it out to a big university. Now the person it goes to at the university is usually a very powerful person. It’s the dean of the medical school, or the chair of one of the departments, and they run the clinical trials, which is extremely lucrative.
So, they will do the Phase 1 trial, and they’ll recruit maybe 100 people for the trial. Fauci gives that principal investigator maybe $20,000 per recruit. The university skims off 50% to 75% of that. So, now, that university is hooked into the system.
Then, if the drug works in Phase 1 and Phase 2, then they have to bring in big groups of people — 10,000 people — and you’re talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. And they have to bring in a pharmaceutical company that now takes control of about half the patent.
Tony Fauci’s agency keeps a share of the patent. For example, they now collect royalties on the Moderna [COVID] vaccine. [The NIAID] gets half the royalties, billions of dollars. The university researcher keeps some of the patent, so he is now permanently attached to Tony Fauci and will do anything he says, and the university itself is getting some of that patent.
So, it’s hundreds of millions of dollars that are going to these universities every year, in addition to the grants that he’s giving, and he can cut all that off if somebody at the university does the wrong study.
Once the drug goes through Phase 3, it goes to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Fauci says, ‘Well those are independent scientists at FDA.’ The panel is called VRBPAC [Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee], and they’re NOT people who work for the FDA. They’re outside persons who are brought in.
Well, where are they brought in from? They’re Tony Fauci’s principal investigators from all the universities, who are working on his other projects, and they’re brought in to rubber stamp the drug …
They OK it and give it a license, because they know that, next year, their drug is going to be in front of that committee, and they are going to want the committee to rubber stamp them. So, that committee never says no. It always green lights everything, and it’s completely controlled by Fauci. He controls the whole process …
Every expert you see on CNN is on Tony Fauci’s payroll, and CNN will never tell you that. It will say, ‘This is an independent virologist, he’s an immunologist at Baylor University, or Stanford, or Harvard.’ They’re not telling you where that guy’s bread is being buttered, and that the person who’s buttering it is Tony Fauci, with your taxpayer dollars. The whole system is just fixed.”
Fauci’s Past and Rotten Character Are Catching Up on Him
As more and more of Fauci’s lies and his funding of sadistic experiments on animals and aborted fetuses are coming to light, Kenney predicts Fauci will be forced to resign, especially as the book comes out and people really start to understand what he’s been up to all these years.
“Nobody who was not a sadist in his soul would allow [the beagles being eaten by sandflies] experiment to happen,” Kennedy says. “Yet, Tony Fauci deemed that the best use for $450,000 of U.S. taxpayer money, with all of the screaming needs in public health.
But it’s not just $450,000. Millions and millions [of dollars] he has put into these sadistic experiments where they’re torturing animals to death. Like you’d see in a schoolyard with little boys, who don’t know any better and need to be told, ‘You don’t do that to another creature.’ Fauci doesn’t have that instinct, it’s lacking.
It explains what he has done during COVID — denying early treatment to millions of Americans and forcing them to suffer and die in their homes, or on ventilators and remdesevir, which is a deadly toxic drug, rather than get treated and be healthy.
And punishing, silencing, censoring, delicensing, discrediting any doctor who tries to say, ‘Wait a minute, I’ve been treating patients, and my patients aren’t dying, because I’m using hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin’ and an entire battery of repurposed drugs that we now know treat virtually all COVID cases.
Seventy to 90% of COVID deaths and hospitalizations could have been prevented, and there are hundreds of studies that support that. Yet, he forbids people from doing it. That is a sociopath …
And shutting down a million businesses, is that really going to save lives? There’s no study that indicated it would … We have 4.2% of the global population, and we had 14.5% of the deaths. Why is anybody listening to this guy? There’s no Health Minister in the world who has a worse track record than Tony Fauci.
There are many countries that had 1/100th of our death rate per million in population. And guess what? Those are mainly the African and Asian countries, that as a matter of course are giving ivermectin for river blindness and hydroxychloroquine for malaria control.”
In support of Kennedy’s assertion that Fauci will be forced to resign, you can view his recent grilling November 4, 2021, by Sen. Rand Paul in front of Congress. What is most impressive are the comments, which are virtually unanimously disparaging Fauci.
Fauci’s Lethal, Illegal Experiments on Children
In his book, Kennedy includes a chapter on some of the animal trials Fauci funded. He also tells a far grimmer story, where the guinea pigs were Black and Hispanic children. At least 85 of these children died, but the number could be as high as 1,000 or so. Fauci got these children by arranging for foster care programs in New York and six other states to assign children who had lost their parents to AIDS to participate in drug studies.
These children had no guardian, so they were illegal studies. To do a clinical trial on children, you need to have a guardian appointed who puts their interests first, ahead of the drug companies. Fauci didn’t want that, so he allowed these studies to go forward without a legal guardian for any of these kids. No one was watching out for them. The trials weren’t even done by licensed medical professionals.
“They were mainly Dominican immigrants, who were deeply compassionate, who discovered in the middle that they were actually being hired to treat these children as guinea pigs, and they were killing huge numbers of them. Many of the kids didn’t even have HIV, so they had no possible benefit from the drug, which is illegal.
Yet Fauci got away with all of it. I believe there was a Congressional investigation for a brief time, but like everything that gets near him, it kind of peters out. The BBC did a documentary on these kids back in 2004 called ‘Guinea Pig Kids.’
They interviewed these children, [one] who said, ‘I took the drugs. They made me feel sick. I was vomiting, I couldn’t eat, I was tired all the time, it was painful, and I refused to take it.’
And when they refused, they were sent to another of Tony Fauci’s principal investigators at Columbia Presbyterian who installed a feeding tube to force feed these children these toxic chemotherapy drugs that they refused to take … As bad as Beagle gate is, what he did to these Black and Hispanic children is even worse.”
COVID-19 — The Culmination of Fauci’s Criminal Enterprise
As for the COVID-19 pandemic, Kennedy equates it to the culmination of Fauci’s career. In the book, he recounts how Fauci has been a key figure in pandemic planning — not necessarily how to prevent one, but how to create it, as infectious disease mortality had dropped so dramatically that infectious diseases were becoming an increasingly low priority.
So far, every single pandemic that has been dramatized has turned out to be a complete fraud, and the same can be said for COVID. All the while, billions of dollars were spent on vaccines.
“They’ve taken all of these lessons they learned from all the other fake pandemics and rolled it into coronavirus,” Kennedy says. “Now, I want to make clear, I’m not saying that coronavirus is not a pandemic, or that it doesn’t kill a lot of people. It does. But we’ve all been manipulated by an exaggeration of cases, the exaggeration of deaths, the obscuring of data, all of the manipulations that they’ve done to us.
[In the book] I have a picture that somebody got from a Freedom of Information Act request. It’s a March Madness graph of all of the different pandemics — fake pandemics — [Fauci] has tried during his career, all converging with the grand winner being coronavirus. And [Fauci] signed it, somebody on his staff made it.
But it was Tony Fauci’s triumph, winning March Madness. It’s basically a picture of his career. Him trying every three or four years a new fake pandemic, and finally hitting on all eight cylinders with coronavirus. It’s like it’s a joke, and we are the punchline …
Here’s what I would say to people. We have to stop this. This is the hill that we all have to die on. If you are a parent, and you let them give this [COVID shot] to your child, you are not doing your job as a parent. If you are a doctor, you are committing malpractice to give this to a child. We all need to resist.
I would say that every American who sees what’s happening has to start engaging in civil disobedience every day. And that may mean going to a store and telling them, if they demand a vaccine passport, that you are not going to patronize that store anymore. It may mean resisting on the job. Do not quit! Make them fire you. Because then you have a lawsuit.
Right now, the best thing is to make them fire you for not taking an emergency use authorization vaccine, because there are no approved vaccines in this country available to any American. It was a myth, it was a hoax, it was a chicanery for them to say, ‘We approved this Comirnaty vaccine.’ If you go on Pfizer’s website, it will tell you, ‘We do not make Comirnaty available in the United States.’
Why are they trying to go after our kids? Here’s why. The vaccines can only get liability protection once they are approved. The only way they get liability protection is if they’re on the child’s vaccination schedule. And then, once the CDC votes them onto the child vaccination schedule, then they get liability protection, even for adults.
One lawsuit can bankrupt the company if they didn’t have liability protection. So that’s why they’re going after our kids. They need it to get that liability protection. And we need to stop them from the collateral damage they’re going to cause to an entire generation of children; 26 million children will get a vaccine that’s been tested on 1,300 kids, with catastrophic results.”
On November 1, speaking at an expert panel convened by Senator Ron Johnson, British Medical Journal Editor Peter Doshi gave a groundbreaking presentation. Doshi, editor of one of the world’s premiere medical journals, summarised and critically evaluated empirical and conceptual information on COVID-19 ‘vaccination’, cleansed of political agenda and spin.
He said “In pharmacy school, I teach a required course on how to critically appraise the medical literature… I am saddened that we are super-saturated as a society right now in the attitude of ‘everybody knows’, that has shut down intellectual curiosity, and led to self-censorship”.
Why, for instance, he asked, are we told that everybody knows that this is a ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’, when in reality, in the UK “most COVID hospitalisations and deaths are among the fully vaccinated”?
Doshi added:
Prominent published claims that ‘vaccines save lives’ were based on just one death across 70,000 Pfizer and Moderna trial participants
Clinical trials of COVID vaccines have not shown any reduction in death
The mRNA COVID products are qualitatively different from traditional vaccines
In January 2021 Mirriam-Webster changed its definition of vaccine to encompass the mRNA products
Entire countries, from the UK to Japan, meet the new Mirriam-Webster definition of ‘anti-vaxxer’, as would a substantial proportion, if not a majority, of the world’s population
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
US Federal Court Strikes Down Biden’s Vaccine Mandate
Yesterday, a US federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled against President Joe Biden’s draconian vaccine mandate policy, stating that it “grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority.” The ruling effectively halts Biden’s vaccine and testing requirement for private businesses, delivering a near fatal blow to the Democratic Party’s main ‘public health’ agenda set-piece.
On Friday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued its latest ruling, after temporarily halting the mandate last weekend in response to lawsuits filed by various businesses and citizen advocacy groups.
“Rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly ‘grave danger’ the Mandate purports to address,” they wrote.
They said they believed that the ruling imposed a financial burden on businesses and potentially violated the commerce clause of the Constitution.
“The Mandate imposes a financial burden upon them by deputizing their participation in OSHA’s regulatory scheme, exposes them to severe financial risk if they refuse or fail to comply, and threatens to decimate their workforces (and business prospects) by forcing unwilling employees to take their shots, take their tests, or hit the road,” they wrote.
(…) The court halted the policy, scheduled to take effect Jan. 4, and ordered the Occupational Safety and Health Administration not to take further steps to implement or enforce the mandate. It is not clear whether the 5th Circuit will determine the fate of the mandate. The Biden administration had asked the 5th Circuit to hold off on ruling until a judicial lottery can take place next week to consolidate several challenges to the mandate before a single appeals court.
The draconian mandate – which may soon be deemed illegal by the high courts, was not actually issued by the President, but by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) back in September – a strategic decision by the White House in order for the President to avoid excessive legal blowback for what is now being regarded as a highly dubious policy designed to reap record-breaking vaccine sales for the transnational pharmaceutical cartel and give the federal government unprecedented levels of control over individual citizens. The mandate states that employers must require all workers have the experimental COVID-19 injection, or submit to intrusive regime of weekly tests, to be implemented no later than by Jan. 4, or face a $14,000 fine per employee. It’s estimated that this would affect over 84 million workers.
Naturally, the move by the White House to impose medical apartheid in American has prompted an avalanche of legal challenges from numerous businesses, trade associations, religious groups, and several states who are vowing to protect the constitutional rights of the people.
This is being regarded as a crushing defeat for Biden and his backers from the pharmaceutical lobby.
The White House had issued no so far on the ruling.
GRAPH: The Measles Myth: one popular talking point is that the Measles vaccine has more or less eliminated Measles globally. However, real data shows that incidences began plummeting long before there was any mass-vaccination program for measles.
According the leading public health bodies like the World Health Organisation, the Measles virus is an ongoing deadly epidemic which kills more than 140 000 people globally per year, mostly among children under the age of five. It is also claimed that Measles were eliminated from the United States in 2000, but continue to be ‘reintroduced’ by international travelers into the country. In 2019 there were claimed to be a minuscule 1,241 cases spread across the United States.
Yet, despite all of these official claims, there seems to be very little scientific evidence that clearly shows Measles being an infectious agent in a host. Rather, it is just widely assumed to be the case.
Here’s what modern virology and public health mavens cannot seem to answer: what causes Measles?
We are told that it is a virus, but is there any evidence for this?
In this video, Dr Sam Bailey examines the evidence presented by Measles experts and the media, as well as the court case where Dr. Stefan Lanka offered €100k euros for proof of a Measles virus. Watch:
Children have become pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s next coronavirus cash cow. The company is now using small children to promote their controversial mRNA experimental jab. The aim is to give the impression that vaccinations are safe and brainwash children to desire the jab.
In a newly released Pfizer propaganda video, the little guinea pigs are portrayed as superheroes because they volunteered in clinical trials.
This year thousands of kids like us around the world joined the clover vaccine trial kid power, and when they did, they became all superheroes.
Pfizer is promoting the injection for children between the ages of five and 11. Shockingly, parents are allowing their children to let pharmaceutical companies experiment on them. Furthermore, these small study participants are also being used to lure other healthy children into being injected:
A superhero shot helps everybody fight coronavirus and helps others. You’re helping the whole entire world. Thank you. You are all superheroes.
On October 29, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 jab to include children 5 through 11 years of age. In addition, the company has applied for approval for children in the European Union. The shot’s ruling is expected before Christmas.
Profits take priority over children’s health as side effects continue to be ignored. Dead children and babies, facial paralysis, seizures, and heart muscle inflammation – over a thousand cases of children’s most severe side effects were documented in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) database. In some cases, the transfer of the spike proteins made by the mother’s breast milk could be the cause.
Bribing Parents to Jab Their Children
Many parents are skeptical of the experimental injection. Recent surveys show that most parents don’t plan to vaccinate young children against the coronavirus. States are going to great lengths to combat the parent’s fears with bribes.
In Austria, a brothel offers free sex ‘sessions’ to patrons as young as 14-years-old who get the shot on-site.
Governor Kathy Hochul announced Tuesday; New York will raffle off 50 full scholarships to any New York public college or university for children aged 5 to 11 as part of the state’s push to get more kids vaccinated.
Data from the New York City Department of Health shows children ages five to 12 have a .06 percent coronavirus positivity rate, and no child in that age group has died from the virus.
In Anderson, S.C., high school students are bribed with $100 if they receive the injection. In Phoenix, school leaders are also giving out $100 gift cards. In Los Angeles, students have the chance to win gift cards or free prom and homecoming tickets if they get the jab.
I’m republishing my recent article about the ongoing slaughter of millions of newborn calves, because it occurred to me that your faith holds that cows are sacred, and should be protected from harm.
I doubt you would knowingly use a product who existence is based on the killing of cows.
Read on.
—Murdering millions of newborn calves for vaccines and other medical research—
Cc: vegan Hollywood celebrities and animal rights advocates who are taking the COVID vaccine
The product is called Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). It is used all over the world.
How is it obtained?
Slate News: “FBS, as the name implies, is a byproduct made from the blood of cow fetuses. If a cow coming for slaughter happens to be pregnant, the cow is slaughtered and bled, and then the fetus is removed from its mother and brought into a blood collection room. The fetus, which remains alive during the following process to ensure blood quality, has a needle inserted into its heart. Its blood is then drained until the fetus dies, a death that usually takes about five minutes. This blood is then refined, and the resulting extract is FBS. Millions of fetuses are slaughtered this way.”
Think about that.
—Medical research, vaccine research, and a blood-soaked landscape. The murder of living human infants for their tissue; the murder of newborn calves for their tissue.
Slate: “FBS is also special because it is a universal growth medium. You can take almost any cell type, toss it into a petri dish with FBS, and the cells will grow. The use of the serum is extensive, with FBS being cited in more than 10,000 research papers…”
Was FBS used in the development of COVID vaccines? Yes and no statements proliferate.
However, if you take the research and development back far enough into the virology lab, the answer would be an unqualified yes.
Cell cultures in dishes are starting points for all vaccines. Virologists believe they are isolating viruses in those dishes. The purported viruses are the reasons, in the first place, for all vaccines—including COVID.
Those cell cultures in dishes need a substance that promotes the growth of the cells. Enter Fetal Bovine Serum as that substance.
In medical literature and news media, you’ll find many euphemisms and generalities that obscure the murdering of newborn calves. Animal-derived products; serum; organisms in development; growth factor; universal medium; humane treatment.
“Don’t tell the children.” In this case, everyone is supposed to be a child kept in ignorance.
And medical murder is supposed to be a special scientific procedure. Separate, remote, sanitized.
It is—until people find out what’s actually going on.
Sad little man sitting deep in a lie He’s dead in his soul but he’ll keep you alive Do what he says, not what he do ‘Cause the truth is for him and the lie is for you
Sad little man but he’s treated like a God As the faithless pray to a fake and a fraud Worship the man, pledge to his word One shot, two shot, now you get a third
Sad little man Sad little man You better run now while you know you can Sad little man Sad little man You don’t fool me you sad little man
Sad little man gonna trap you like a dog Put your head in a net while they eat you raw Don’t ask why, just comply ‘Cause fear is the drug that the doc prescribed
Sad little man, you can watch him on the news Preaching to his choir while they learn the rules Some feel safe and some feel healed But they’ll all hold his hand as he makes the kill
Sad little man Sad little man You better run now while you know you can Sad little man Sad little man You don’t fool me you sad little man
Sad little man and he wants your kids Some might live while the rest get sick So put them to the test and listen for the yell When the truth comes out he’s gonna burn in hell
Sad little man Sad little man You better run now while you know you can Sad little man Sad little man You don’t fool me you sad little man
Support Five Times August with artist tips/donation via PayPal.Me/BradleySkistimas or Venmo @fivetimesaugust
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
The contents list and abstract of the 46-page “The Covid-19 Fraud & War on Humanity” is found below.
To read and download the full document in pdf form, click on the box above.
Contents
Part One
The globalist agenda
The Trojan Horse
Virology’s double deception
The four pillars of the COVID-19 fraud
The first pillar: Isolation
Part Two
The second pillar: Genomic sequencing
The third pillar: PCR
The fourth pillar: Outbreak modelling
Part Three
In summary
Conclusion
Post Script
Crimes against humanity
The final insult
Abstract:
COVID-19 is a fraud because its alleged causal agent, a purported novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, has not been proven to exist in nature and therefore has not been established as the cause of COVID-19, the disease and pandemic invented by the World Health Organisation (WHO). For the selfsame reason there are no variants of the “virus”, which likewise exist only hypothetically in computers, cloud-based gene banks and in the minds of innocent people who have been comprehensively gulled by their governments.
The COVID-19 fraud, comprised of numerous preposterous claims, constitutes nothing less than a war on humanity by organisations such as Anser, Fors Marsh, and Palantir that conduct the scam through Big Pharma, with its backers and enablers, including the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WHO, technology conglomerates, the mainstream media, complicit governments, and COVID “pirates” such as UNC Chapel Hill and Imperial College London, to a one beneficiaries of the fraud.
COVID-19 is a war on humanity because politicians and their governments continue to use this imaginary disease to terrorise and imprison their citizens, denying them guaranteed human rights and freedoms, and violating their once inviolable bodies with highly experimental and hazardous injections that contain a computer-generated spike protein mRNA sequence that instructs the body to poison itself. These nefarious injections, which also contain undeclared non-biological objects for undeclared purposes, are injuring millions and killing many thousands of people around the world, including up to 218 New Zealanders as at 2 October 2021.
A virological fraud lies at the heart of these crimes against humanity – that SARS-CoV-2 has never been physically isolated or shown to be the aetiological (causal) agent of COVID-19. In this article, the authors examine the illusory world of virology to explain how a virus that no one has seen or knows where it has come from, that no one knows what it does or where it is going, is, according to the fraudsters, stealing across borders and boundaries and coming to get you no matter where you are. How can it be, the authors ask, that this phantasmagorical madness has morphed into a world redolent with fear in which democratic governments have abandoned democratic principles to engage in the control and “deletion of human beings” that may be just a “variant” away from turning into World War III?
About the Authors
Dr Mark Bailey MB ChB, PGDipMSM, MHealSc (Otago)
Is a microbiology, medical industry and health researcher who worked in medical practice, including clinical trials, for two decades.
Dr John Bevan-Smith BA (Hons) First Class, PhD (Auckland)
Is a business owner, author and researcher, who has undertaken research for the Waitangi Tribunal Te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Ministry of Justice Te Tāhū o te Ture.
The incident of the ‘heart attack avalanches’ that occurred in Texas while Travis Scott was performing a concert at Astroworld has caught the attention of the whole world.
What could have happened that caused such a chain reaction in people? One of the hypotheses that La Quinta Columna has is that the graphene in the body of the inoculated people present at the concert was stimulated by sound. Sound crazy? Not to those who know that it’s, in fact, highly probable.
Below, Orwell City brings a video in which biostatistician Ricardo Delgado and Dr. Sevillano discuss a study that could explain the phenomenon.
Well. That’s, precisely, what we were talking about. I found an article —which we also discussed at the time— that talks about graphene and sound waves. How do they affect graphene?
The finding could find applications in electronics and in the design of smart materials. In recent years, materials with a single-layer thickness of two-dimensional atoms have sparked a revolution in nanotechnology.
Well, here’s a little bit of the story.
The ability to control the behavior of electrons in these materials is of fundamental interest. Graphene has been dubbed the wonder material. It is the best-known conductor of electricity and heat. And combines the lightness of graphite with the strength of diamond. Let’s see what else it says. Graphene’s deformations generate all sorts of changes in the behavior of its electrons. This has led to the idea of developing smart materials that, in a controlled manner, modify their electronic properties according to the stress applied.
Let’s see.
In a recent theoretical work carried out together with Maurice Oliva-Leyva, from the Materials Research Institute of the UNAM, we have analyzed the effect of sound waves on the electronic behavior of graphene. Our results, published in the Journal of Physics, suggest the possibility of using mechanical deformations to calibrate the electrons of the material. That is, to generate a beam that propagates in a given direction. The finding represents a first step toward the manipulation of electrons and graphene by sound waves and opens the door to several applications.
Here it is. That is, electrons in graphene can be manipulated by sound waves.
Dr. Sevillano:
That’s it. The moment you can vary the molecular configuration of a molecule of this material through sound waves means that graphene also absorbs the energy that comes through sound waves. My friend, you know how it can be excited in front of a loudspeaker, for example. It can be excited there. That’s where it can. You have it there.
There is so much scientific communication published on the non-mainstream media, pointing repeatedly and again and again to the absolute lack of justification for vaccinating children, for vaccinating adults, there is simply no justification for vaccination. Period. And this especially not with an experimental mRNA-genome altering injection – there is no justification for the entire criminal Covid hoax, period.
Covid’s mortality rate is about 0.07%, or less. Anything else is a lie.
The very Dr. Anthony Fauci said so in a peer-reviewed paper, New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), “Navigating the Uncharted”, March 2020.
Yet the steamroller bulldozes on, rolling over all the scientific evidence, and since the steamroller pays and corrupts the media, the media keep lying and corrupting people, and the governments keep corrupting, threatening, blackmailing, coercing certain vulnerable scientists into continuing with the lie despite their better knowledge.
Deceit-propaganda has no end with a narrative that is a total lie. The steamroller consists of the governments and their corrupted media, the entire UN system, in particular WHO and this powerful elitist cult, whose members are not be named, but are generally known.
This is all fact.
Repeating the “non-justification” over and over again — that it is unconstitutional, that it is illegal, that it is criminal, that it is against human rights, that it is not justified by any science that holds its ground – is useless. As only the converted will listen. While the steamroller doesn’t listen, rolls on, rolls over everything, over any opposing opinion, doesn’t even seek dialogue. The steamroller is right – by sheer crushing any opposition, and forcing them into tyranny.
Some may spread the truth. But we see what damage has already been done in the course of less than 2 years — millions, perhaps tens of millions have died — not from Covid, but from the poison that is called Covid vaccine. Yet, the steamroller ignores all that… never mentions this fact, just forces more and more people into getting the poison jab. And it rolls on over all the evidence, lying to you, to us, that’s what the very governments, elected and paid for by us, the people, are doing – all of them, all 193 UN member countries.
The few honest and transparent ones (most of them in Africa, one in Haiti), they were punished by death, through poison, by strangulation, by guns — they are to be deterrents for others, who may possibly want to follow in their footsteps and defy the Big Crime UN Agenda 2030.
This has to be said.
This has to be known by the people.
It’s not just a question of vaccination or not vaccination.
YOU must understand what is behind the false vaccination, to understand that it is much more than believing the governments nice-talk of protecting your health – all these governments have sold themselves to the devil, to hell, to say it bluntly, because they all know the true agenda behind this UN Agenda 2030, that started with the midnight gong of entering 1 January 2020 – not by accident. The vaxx agenda is a question of life and death.
No pandemic starts at once worldwide…. except when it had been prepared by a long hand before, through several publicly known events, but not disseminated by the bought mainstream media, such as the 2010 Rockefeller Report, Event 201 of 18 October, 2019 in NYC sponsored by the Gates Foundation, by Rockefeller funded Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and by – who else – the all-commanding NGO – the World Economic Forum, the WEF.
Believe it or not, the WEF is an NGO of the elite, of the richest of the rich, of the Wall Street heads, Corporate Heads, Hollywood Heads – and some other heads. Yes, the WEF is an NGO that orders the UN to behave and to tell lies they (the WEF) want them (Guterres and his UN clan) to tell the world, and to repeat the lies over and over again.
And the real agenda is:
1) Massive population reduction – as part of the Gates, Rockefeller, Kissinger, et al eugenist agenda. That’s their number one goal. That’s why you are not getting a true vaccine, but a killer vaccine, it undermines your immune system, it results in mortality and morbidity. Deaths and injuries may occur within 2 to 3 years, so that strong believers in the vaccine, and deniers of the truth, will never accuse the vaccine, or the vaccine manufacturers, or WHO, of your or your relative’s death – that’s part of the plan, because the consequences of the “vaxx” are multiple but some of their main characteristics are:
i) the substances in the injection attack the human reproductive systems, male and female, often by cancer, miscarriages and more;
ii) they cause blood clots – that lodge mainly in the lungs, impairing your breathing capacity, but they can and often do migrate to the heart, causing heart strokes, or heart embolies, or heart attacks, or they move to the brain, where they may cause a brain stroke, or death;
iii) they may attack — and often do — your immune system through the overproduction of Spike proteins created by the “vaccine”, so you may fall for any infectious disease, that otherwise you would have resisted by your natural immune system.
2) They convert your body through the graphene oxide in the injection into a magnetic field that will respond to 5G and soon 6G ultra-microwaves’ commands, converting your brain into a computer and converting you, Humans, into robots or Transhumans, that can be surveyed and controlled by every step “it” takes – no longer you but the transhuman. If not behaving according to orders, it, the transhuman, may also be extinguished, by remote-control.
Sounds too fantastic to be true? Read Klaus Schwab’s book, “Covid-19: The Great Reset“, and watch his 2016 interview (less than 2 min) with the Swiss French TV (see also first segment in video below), where he intimates and predicts that by about 2025 humans will be chipped, so they can receive commands from 5G / 6G waves, and, he literally adds, will become Transhumans.
3) The fabricated Covid crisis is bankrupting as many small and medium and even large enterprises as possible around the globe, creating untold unemployment and misery and leaving a stock of bankrupted assets to be transferred for a penny on the dollar – or less – to the top elite, to those who are engineering the biblical crime we are experiencing since almost two years.
This is not conspiracy, these are facts, facts which we, the People, still may stop if we wake up NOW and act in solidarity.
Getting back to the beginning, where the point is made, that it is no good to keep endlessly repeating the illegality of the “Covid measures”, the unconstitutionality of the Covid passes, or the Green Passes, or the vaxx-passes, or all that is stored in the infamous QR-code, for now on your cell phone, soon to be implanted under your skin, already predicted in 2016, by Klaus Schwab.
Repeating what those of us, who do not follow the mainstream have captured long ago, is no good, unless you also explain the whole story, namely that Covid and the vaxx hoax around it, is but an instrument for a much larger agenda, of which the number one goal is massive population reduction, and you may be part of it. Knowing what the eugenists real goal is, you might faint. Let it suffice to say that their objective is reducing the world population by considerably more than half. And that beginning by the rich western world, where most unrenewable resources are used, where most capital can be stolen and transferred to the top elitist cult-clan, so that you, surviving citizen, may be happy with a basic income, that allows you to survive.
Or, as Klaus Schwab says: “You will own nothing and be Happy.”
Unless you are aware of this entire background, not only of the unconstitutionality of the fake and deadly “vaccine”, you will just roll over in your comfort zone, letting it happen, being tyrannized, without noticing – and at the end, when it is too late, you will wake up and say “nobody told me” — exactly. Doesn’t that sound familiar? As familiar as to almost believe that Hitler’s Nazi Germany and the ensuing WWII was just a trial run for what is unfolding in front of our eyes – as UN Agenda 2030.
Be aware. We can stop it. If we want to. We are many. They are few.
We still have 9 years to go. But once you have been jabbed – you have lost a fair amount of your capacity to resist, of your autonomy, as you may die, or become incapacitated. So, don’t get vaxxed, don’t accept tyranny, don’t accept a discriminating vaxx- certificate. Say NO – to the covid crime being committed by “our” authorities upon us, the People.
And talk to the police, the military. They should also know. Because in the end, they are sitting in the same boat as we, the People, especially since their constitutional role is defending the people, not the tyrants at the head of governments. Talk to them. Peacefully – with reason. As they are also being lied to.
A source close to California Gov. Gavin Newsom today told The Defender the governor experienced an adverse reaction to the Moderna COVID vaccine he received Oct. 27, the last day he was seen in public.
A source close to California Gov. Gavin Newsom today told The Defender the governor experienced an adverse reaction to the Moderna COVID vaccine he received Oct. 27.
The source, who asked not to be identified, said Newsom’s symptoms were similar to those associated with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), a known side effect of many vaccines.
GBS is a neurological disorder in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks part of its peripheral nervous system — the network of nerves located outside of the brain and spinal cord — and can range from a very mild case with brief weakness to paralysis to leaving the person unable to breathe independently.
The governor has not been seen in public since he was photographed Oct. 27 getting his COVID booster.
On Oct. 29, Newsom’s office issued a statement referring to unspecified “family obligations” as the reason the governor canceled his scheduled appearances, including his planned meetings at the global COP 26 climate conference in Glasgow, Scotland.
A local ABC News outlet reported that when “the surprising announcement was made,” a spokesperson said Newsom planned to participate virtually in the climate conference. However, Newsom’s name was removed from the schedule and he did not participate.
The Defender reached out to Newsom’s office today by phone and email, but the office did not respond before publication.
According to Fox News, Newsom’s wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, on Sunday tweeted — then quickly deleted — a message urging people to “stop hating” while her husband has been out of the public eye since canceling plans, including his appearances at COP 26.
Commenting on the situation, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman of Children’s Health Defense, today said he “prays for Newsom’s family” and wishes him a quick recovery.
Kennedy added:
“However, if it’s true the governor has suffered debilitating neurological injuries following vaccination, it raises grave ethical questions about his seemingly dishonest efforts to conceal his injuries while implementing aggressive policies to force the children and working people of California to endure similar risks.”
Newsom has been an outspoken advocate of COVID vaccines and mandates. On Oct. 1, he announced California’s schoolchildren will be required to get the COVID vaccine once it is fully approved by the FDA. It’s the first such mandate in the country.
In a Nov. 3 press release, the governor’s office said California was launching a “robust” vaccination program for 5- to 11-year-olds. The governor has allocated more than 1.2 million vaccines for the 5-11 age group and is setting up 4,000 vaccine sites throughout the state.
According to Times of San Diego, Newsome got the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine in April 2021 when his age group became eligible. In July, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration added a warning to the J&J COVID vaccine noting the vaccine had been linked to GBS.
The latest data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System show that between Dec. 14, 2020, and Oct. 29, 2021, there were 705 reports of GBS following COVID vaccines, with 41% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 31% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.
In April, The Defender reported on a teen who was diagnosed with GBS after his first dose of a COVID vaccine. And last week, The Defender reported on a 63-year-old cancer survivor diagnosed with GBS after her second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.
GBS is included as a possible risk for many vaccines including Adacel, Afluria, Engerix-B, Fluarix, Flulaval, FluMist, Fluzone, Gardasil/Gardasil 9, Havrix, Menactra, Menomune, MMR-II, PedvaxHIB, Pneumovax-23, ProQuad, Recombivax, Tenivac, Vaqta and Varivax.
A senior bioethicist and director of the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health — who said he’s willing to risk his medical license — will argue against vaccine mandates during a Dec. 1 livestreamed roundtable.
A senior bioethicist who heads a research team at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is taking the lead at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the debate over the ethics of COVID vaccine mandates.
Dr. Matthew Memoli, director of the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases at NIH, will argue against vaccine mandates during a Dec. 1 livestreamed roundtable session, which will be open to the public.
“There’s a lot of debate within the NIH about whether [a vaccine mandate] is appropriate,” David Wendler, a senior NIH bioethicist in charge of planning the session, told the WSJ. “It’s an important, hot topic.”
Memoli opposes mandates for the COVID vaccines authorized for emergency use in the U.S., and has chosen not to be vaccinated.
Memoli sought a religious exemption from the mandatory vaccine requirements imposed by health authorities in the District of Columbia, where he is licensed to practice medicine.
Memoli said he is willing to risk his job and his license for the right not to receive a COVID vaccine. During the scheduled roundtable early next month, he will make the case against mandates.
“I think the way we are using the vaccines is wrong,” Memoli said in a July 30 email to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID, and two of his lieutenants. Memoli called mandated vaccination “extraordinarily problematic.”
Memoli told the WSJ one of Fauci’s colleagues thanked him for his email. Memoli said he supports COVID vaccines for high-risk populations including the elderly and obese, but said, “blanket vaccination of people at low risk of severe illness could hamper the development of more-robust immunity gained across a population from infection.”
Memoli, a 16-year veteran at the NIH was selected this month for a 2021 NIH director’s award — a top recognition from the head of the agency, for his supervision of a national study into undiagnosed COVID cases early in the pandemic.
Memoli said his children have received their childhood vaccines, and he will support the results of the ethics discussion regardless of the outcome.
“I do vaccine trials. I, in fact, help create vaccines,” Memoli told the WSJ. “Part of my career is to share my expert opinions, right or wrong … I mean, if they all end up saying I’m wrong, that’s fine. I want to have the discussion.”
Christine Grady, head of NIH’s Clinical Center bioethics department and Fauci’s wife, approved the Dec. 1 seminar — a session called “Grand Rounds.”
Grady said in an email she believes there is interest in the topic across the agency.
“Our hope is that the December Grand Rounds will be relevant to the debates that are going on around the country regarding vaccine mandates,” an agency spokeswoman said on Grady’s behalf.
A federal appeals court on Saturday issued a stay temporarily halting the Biden administration’s private-employer COVID vaccine mandate, citing, “grave statutory and constitutional” issues with the requirement.
“Because the petitions give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the mandate, the mandate is hereby stayed pending further action by this court,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said in the order.
The case was brought by multiple businesses and several states, including Texas, Utah, Louisiana, South Carolina and Mississippi. They argued the requirements exceed the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which will enforce the mandates, and amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power to the executive branch by Congress.
The Biden administration on Monday asked the federal court to lift the order blocking the mandate for large private employers. The administration said the petitioners were not claiming a “major prospect of harm” from the rule, so the court should allow the mandate to proceed while the case makes its way through the system.
“Accordingly, there is no need to address petitioners’ stay motions now, and the court should lift its administrative stay and allow this matter to proceed under the process that Congress set forth for judicial review of OSHA standards,” lawyers for the administration argued.
The White House on Monday said businesses should move forward with Biden’s vaccine mandate for private businesses, despite a federal court order temporarily halting the rules, CNBC reported.
“People should not wait,” White House Deputy Press Sec. Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters during a press briefing. “They should continue to move forward and make sure they’re getting their workplace vaccinated.”
The OSHA regulation applies to employers with at least 100 workers, creating an emergency temporary rule that will require employers to mandate workers be vaccinated against COVID or submit to regular testing. A deadline for companies to comply with the regulation was set for Jan. 4.
More than two dozen states have filed lawsuits against the Biden administration over the vaccine mandate for large private employers in the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 11th and D.C. Circuits. Federal law dictates cases be consolidated and heard by one federal appeals court chosen by a lottery.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the lottery could take place on or around Nov. 16, and the case could make its way to the Supreme Court.
When you turn on the television or scroll your social media feed, the controllers of information seek make you feel isolated, alone, and defeated for not getting behind the massive push to forcibly vaccinate every American against their will. Mass protests are ignored across the planet.
The anti-establishment voice is muted by big tech but to those who know how to listen, we can hear through the noise and on the other side, the battle for medical freedom wages on — and we are winning.
Before going on any further, it is important to point out that this is not an “antivax” stance. It is pro-choice. If you want to take the vaccine, it is your right to do so. However, when you move from making your own personal medical decisions, to forcing them on others, the argument is no longer about health, it is about attacking an individual’s right to bodily autonomy. Those who seek to remove our rights to bodily autonomy are enemies to freedom and would do well to study history and the horrifying implications from similar movements in the past.
Despite the utter insanity of forcing millions of people to undergo a medical procedure against their will, the Biden administration’s plan was rolling ahead, full steam. Though the establishment attempts to silence the opposition, their attempts are futile and massive resistance is growing.
Last week, Seema Nanda, solicitor for the U.S. Department of Labor, said that the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act gives OSHA the authority to act quickly during an emergency if it finds workers are subject to a grave danger. The agency contends its temporary rule also preempts any state or local bans on employers’ ability to require vaccines.
“We are fully prepared to defend this standard in court,” Nanda said.
Nanda is about to have to stand by those words as 27 states have since filed lawsuits against the federal government over the mandate. The Biden administration’s unconstitutional deadline for taking the jab is January 4, 2021. Those who do not comply will face a slew of fines, other mandates, and insane testing requirements.
“This mandate is unconstitutional, unlawful, and unwise,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt said in a court filing in the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of 11 states last week.
So far, the opposition is winning.
On Saturday, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeal halted the OSHA mandate, delaying it until there has been further judicial review.
In their decision, the judges said the petitions gave them “cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the mandate.”
Indeed, there have already been grave consequences with Biden’s plan as it has triggered mass resignations, and an upsurge of employee layoffs at companies as vaccine-hesitant Americans question the infringement of their civil liberties and human rights.
“There should be no reason for hesitation in passing a ban on vaccine mandates or passport requirements or, at a minimum, requiring religious or medical exemptions in such requirements. OSHA’s vaccination mandate represents a real threat to individual liberty,” West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said in a statement, cited by the Hill.
“As we have seen throughout the country, it is also a public policy disaster that displaces vulnerable workers and exacerbates a nationwide shortage of front-line workers, with severe consequences for all Americans,” he went on to add.
“Its unlawful mandate will cause injuries and hardship to the working families, inflict economic disruption and staffing shortages on the States and private employers, and impose even greater strains on struggling labor markets and supply chains,” the attorney general said in the lawsuit, according to The Hill.
This is why people are in the streets across the country and all over the world. Civil disobedience is their only option left as they are forced out of their jobs, denied entry into public places, and forbidden from travelling.
Freedom comes not from cheerleading forced medication and government tyranny but from those who resist it. It is quite heartening to see this resistance growing though you should not expect the revolution to be televised.
As the mainstream media refuses to question the idea behind mandating vaccinations, they have made their role clear in this tyranny as enablers. This should come as no surprise either given the money that pours into their coffers from the ones who stand to gain the most from vaccine mandates — big pharma.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates on Tuesday warned that international authorities, including the World Health Organization, need to take action against the threat posed by bioterrorism and said “germ games” is the best way to prevent it.
“It’ll take probably about a billion a year for a pandemic Task Force at the WHO level, which is doing the surveillance and actually doing what I call ‘germ games’ where you practice,” Gates during an interview with the chair of the Health Select Committee, Jeremy Hunt, for the think tank Policy Exchange, according to Sky News.
Germ games are when government agencies and militaries practice scenarios of a pandemic.
Gates then asked: “You say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that?”
The world’s fourth-richest noted that to prepare for a doomsday scenario, the United States and United Kingdom would have to spend “tens of billions” on research and development.
“There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today and yet, the advances in medical science should give us tools that, you know, we could do dramatically better,” Gates also remarked.
During his interview with Hunt, Gates also said there should be a “new way” to manufacture vaccines that can stop the transmission of a virus better. That also would require global research and development, he said.
“You know, we didn’t have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduced transmission,” he explained. “We need a new way of doing the vaccines.”
“The nice thing is a lot of the [research and development] we need to do to be ready for the next pandemic are things like making vaccines cheap, having big factories, eradicating the flu, getting rid of the common cold, making vaccines just a little patch you put on your arm, things that will be incredibly beneficial even in the years when we don’t have pandemics,” Gates said, without elaborating how it could be accomplished.
The billionaire’s comments come as it was revealed last month that the World Economic Forum, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a “high-level pandemic exercise” known as “Event 201” in October 2019 to simulate a pandemic.
The participants in the scenario were presented with a simulated outbreak of “novel zoonotic coronavirus” that was transmitted from bats to pigs to people, causing a pandemic.
“The disease starts in pig farms in Brazil, quietly and slowly at first, but then it starts to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings,” according to the Event 201 scenario.
“When government and technology are working together, the potential for abuse increases exponentially. To save ourselves, both of these forces must be permanently put in their place.”
A month ago, illegal and criminal coercion toward covid injections in the workplace was announced by the Biden Administration. Many have lost their jobs for rightly refusing this unsafe, ineffective, and possibly life-changing medical procedure. Now it has been announced by the pharma-owned FDA and CDC that children 5 to 11 years old may be given the shot. Comments from the public and renowned doctors and scientists were overwhelmingly against this, but as with so may other boards across the country, the officials at the table voted unanimously in favor, as if they never heard a thing. This shot will now be mandated in spite of the fact that older children who have already been injected have experienced heart problems and other serious reactions, including death. Neither of these age groups have ever been in danger, and the shots can only hurt them. Next it will be children newborn to 4. What are we to make of a government willing to sacrifice children to pharmaceutical company profits, or ends even worse?
Coerced injections, worthless for their stated purpose, and now provably harmful, are clearly a means to some end. This might include social control through digital passports, totalitarian surveillance, the re-engineering of humanity through genetic manipulation, the reduction of the world’s population (a longtime dream of eugenicists), hooking people up to the “internet of bodies”, or all of the above. One thing is certain — none of this was ever about public health. That lie is impossible to believe as we watch health care workers being fired, leaving hospitals understaffed; as news of injection injuries is censored; as ER doctors ignore injection injuries and fail to report them; as the medical establishment is seen to be under the obvious control of politics and corporations; as goalposts are moved, new rules invented, and definitions changed; as sanitation workers are let go and garbage piles up in the streets; as fire fighters and first responders are put on “leave without pay;” as workers across the country lose their jobs and can no longer provide for themselves or their families; as mental health declines from isolation, fear, and stress; as natural immunity is suddenly no longer recognized; and as effective medicines are withheld while harmful medicines are protocol. The goal is apparently not to promote public health, or indeed social order, but to destroy it. One might think that government would respond to the obvious deterioration of society, but the last two years have shown that this is actually what governments want. This is a war from the inside out. Our own government is trying to kill us.
We have been fed a string of lies 20 months long, but lies over time have a way of wearing thin. In the attempt to explain contradictory evidence, official explanations become more and more elaborate, and the more this happens the easier it is for us to see both the lies and the liars. Our great advantage is that the truth doesn’t need the vast resources of states and corporate media to be told. When it came to the point where the state was forced to just censor the truth outright, this was just another lesson for us. The bigger the coverup, the more obvious the crime. Clarity grows every day.
The tyranny we are facing didn’t just start in March 2020. We are in the midst of a system that had already surrounded us when the “pandemic” operation began. This is why such an obvious hoax gained so much territory so quickly across the world. The operation itself was carefully planned, but it was built on an established foundation. For almost 60 years — counting back to the John F. Kennedy assassination — the world has been subjected to a long list of planned attacks in which black operators created a traumatic public event, manipulated the public into believing the event was carried out by a selected patsy, and made desired institutional changes on the basis of that event. The September 11, 2001 attack seemed the pinnacle of any ambition these operators could possibly have, until covid 19 came along and somehow struck 193 countries with the same catastrophic results all at the same time. Manufactured case and death statistics then started rolling in, videos of people dying in the streets were produced, and the narrative of a terrible, unprecedented public health emergency was everywhere around us. The real event was seasonal respiratory illness hyped as a “pandemic”, with maybe a dash of real bioweapon thrown in. The patsy was bats in China spreading a mysterious deadly virus. And the deep institutional change looks like a wholesale re-organization of national economies, resources, and populations to suit the one-world-government fantasy of Vanguard investment bankers, secret cabals, and the openly conniving Davos elite. Far more people were immediately killed by health care policy and medical malpractice in the early days of the covid operation — for example, the elderly sent to die in nursing homes, the ventilator murders — than the 3,000 who died on September 11. Without death and gore, there is no trauma, and the scale of this op required plenty of trauma. As intended in the 9-11 operation, the US proceeded with a series of wars against the enemies of Israel. As intended in the Covid 19 operation, the oligarchs have proceeded to destroy economies worldwide. 9-11 led to millions of deaths; covid 19 (the operation) will bring many more.
Dark actors with evil schemes have been honing their craft throughout history, but have never been able to fool more people than in the age of Edward Bernays, mass media, and social engineering. Today, a world-shaking falsity can be created out of thin air. The 1969 “moon landing” is a good example. Fortunately that psy-op was carried out without mass murder. It was an astounding feat. From the battleship Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin, to “weapons of mass destruction”, to the 7-7 London bus bombing, to 9-11, to the Boston Marathon bombing, to the Las Vegas hotel shooter massacre, to the January 6 “insurrection”, and scores of other entrapments, fakes, and shootings; served by a veritable industry of crisis actors, informants, patsies, undercover police, agents, infiltrators, provocateurs, assassins, and spies; huge lies have been relentlessly sprung upon an unwitting, crisis-weary public, and the lies have succeeded for the most part because people can’t believe anyone would commit crimes of such magnitude.
Perhaps it’s time to rethink our relationship to the source of much of this manipulation — the TV screen. We literally are not seeing something real when it comes to us through this medium. The image on the screen is not reality. It may easily show us what someone else wants us to believe. The format is a wide open field for propagandists. Our personal experience is limited. TV makes our experience seem almost unlimited and we come to believe this expanded experience is authentic. We have been seduced by media and technology to such an extent that today much of our “reality” is not even real — it is virtual. It all comes down to epistemology — what is real and what we actually know is one of the central questions of philosophy. But for the sake of our survival, gaining knowledge through our own direct experience, dealing with people face to face, being there in person, interacting with the natural world in our immediate (non-mediated) surroundings, seems like the first step to take to escape the brainwashing that we get from electronic media. Like junk food, electronic media is pervasive and addictive. We are not physically or psychologically prepared to deal with it. We are simply not capable of ‘knowing’ all the people, places, ideas, and events brought to us in the avalanche of content on the internet. The hosts of the virtual world, like Facebook and Google, are happy to see us occupied on smart phones and social media with a previously unimaginable circle of hundreds of “friends.” We may even organize with our hundred friends to break Facebook and Google into a thousand pieces, but Silicon Valley doesn’t care because they gain so much more from collecting and selling our data.
Technology once seemed to be there to make life easier, but then it quietly enslaved us. To fight technocracy — that is, government which derives its power from technology — we have only to look at the technocrats’ means of control — QR codes, data bases, surveillance cameras, license plate readers, algorithms, artificial intelligence, body scanners, microchips, video games, blockbuster movies, cable TV, smartphones, and credit scores — and get them one by one out of our lives. It is certainly within our means to get rid of the devices we ourselves carry. Are you opposed to “vaccine passports”? Then don’t carry or own the smartphone that makes them possible.
Facebook recently announced it wants to change its name to “Meta”, the Latin word for ‘beyond.’ To the forward-thinking predators running Facebook, the “metaverse” is the next frontier in the attempt to capture and control human minds. With a VR (virtual reality) headset, one actually believes he’s in a given program, and may even believe he’s interacting with the program. The next step will be ano-headset, or wireless, VR platform. Since the oligarchs want to use those of us who survive the Frankenshots as slave labor, they would want us to be more than just passive batteries in a pod with cables stuck to our heads, as in The Matrix. Mobile humans having reality fed to them wirelessly would be a huge improvement. Perhaps the technology for that is contained in the “vaccines”, with their strange magnetic effects, so far unacknowledged and unexplained. Indeed, this may be why Bill Gates said that “unfortunately everyone on the planet will have to be vaccinated.” Obviously, the privileged few can’t have unauthorized humans walking around in their own reality!
The ongoing operation for the digital enslavement of humanity is insane. We are not a Frankenstein experiment. We are not software programs. We are not computers. We are not ones and zeros. We are not transhuman. We are miracles created by God, not to be tampered with. It is time to de-digitize the world around us and return to our spiritual connections and our humanity. Like government, technology is there to serve us, not the other way around. Like government, technology is not to be trusted. When government and technology are working together, the potential for abuse increases exponentially. To save ourselves, both of these forces must be permanently put in their place.
These days many of us are in the streets protesting. The benefit of this is not that we might attract the attention of politicians who hold us in contempt, but that we see and talk to each other in person, and give those on the sidelines strength in seeing healthy and strong opposition to the madness. When it comes time to actually confront the authorities, they will have no choice but to listen, and they aren’t going to like it. On the way to that day, and perhaps in order to reach it, we have to get 60 years of very sophisticated, highly manipulative media programming well out of our heads. Hoaxes and false flags will then be immediately obvious, and will no longer be used against us. The “pandemic” and the cast of characters fomenting this two year atrocity will disappear like a bad dream. It’s as if we can beat this operation simply by evolving.
Richard Hugus is the founder of Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates. “We are residents of Cape Cod, Massachusetts who support freedom of choice in all matters having to do with our own and our childrens’ health.” Connect with them here.
.jpg){kind=link}
