Why Aren’t Insurers 9/11 Truthers?
by James Corbett, The Corbett Report
September 8, 2020
As we approach the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 false flag, Leonard writes in to ask about the insurers who paid Silverstein and his cohorts over four and a half billion dollars as a result of those attacks.
Why did the insurers never investigate the possibility of controlled demolition? Why did they pay out billions of dollars without calling the official 9/11 narrative into question?
James investigates.
Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds.com / YouTube or Download the mp4
SHOW NOTES:
9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
Insurers Agree to Pay Billions at Ground Zero
Shapiro admits Silverstein phoned insurers about demolishing WTC7
Silverstein says WTC7 redesign ready in April of 2000
World Trade Center owner suing airlines for billions for 9/11 attacks
World Trade Center owners’ bid to sue airlines for 9/11 attacks blocked
Airline defendants to pay $95 million in 9/11 settlement
Con Ed and Insurers Sue Port Authority Over 7 World Trade
Con Ed suit against Silverstein and Citigroup at 7 WTC dismissed
Silverstein cleared of blame for 7 World Trade’s fall on 9/11
10 Major Shareholders in Swiss Re (is actually one)
Meet The Billionaire Developer Who Rebuilt The World Trade Center To Heal New York After 9/11
The Bonds of August: Refinancing the Twin Towers on the eve of destruction
Insurers scramble to avoid 9/11-style coronavirus backlash
9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money
Truth Comes to Light highlights writers and video creators who ask the difficult questions while sharing their unique insights and visions.
Everything posted on this site is done in the spirit of conversation. Please do your own research and trust yourself when reading and giving consideration to anything that appears here or anywhere else.
