Marines “Crushed” by Vax Mandate as “Thousands” Denied Religious Exemptions in “Political Purge”

Marines “Crushed” by Vax Mandate as “Thousands” Denied Religious Exemptions in “Political Purge”

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
December 29, 2021

 

Days ago it was first revealed that despite the Department of Defense offering a “religious exemption” as part of the Covid-19 vaccine mandate across all military branches, not a single one has yet to be approved – at a time at least 169 Marines were already discharged for their refusal to receive the shot.

A new investigative report by Fox News finds that multiple “thousands” of Marines are still set to be processed out over the mandate, and that the corps’ “best and brightest” are being “crushed” by the Biden vaccine order. “Marines are allowed to apply for a religious exemption, but so far not a single application regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, or any vaccine for that matter, has been approved, a Marine Corps spokesman told Fox News.”

For this reason the mandate is being likened to a “political purge” – which has seen a “blanket denial” of all formal requests for religious exemptions. In recent days official Marine Corps statements have underscored no exemptions are being given out, yet supposedly these are being considered on a case by case basis.

As of late last week, the Marine Corps confirmed that not a single religious exemption request has yet to be approved. It was further confirmed that at least a few thousand could be discharged based on the exemption denial:

Marine Corps spokesman Capt. Ryan Bruce told Fox News that as of Thursday, 3,080 of the 3,192 requests for religious accommodation concerning the COVID-19 vaccine mandate had been processed and zero had been approved, adding that “no religious accommodations have been approved for any other vaccine in the past seven years.” 

So assuming these Marines will still refuse the jab, thousands are set to be booted from the Marine Corps. In its reporting, Fox extensively quotes Marine officers, whose names are withheld. The Daily Wire, citing the most recently available public data from last week, estimated that some 9,000 could still be set for early discharge from the service:

As of Thursday, 94% of active-duty troops were fully vaccinated and another 1% were partially vaccinated, according to data from the U.S. Marine Corps.

That leaves the remaining 5% of an active-duty Marine force of about 182,500, which amounts to about 9,125 active-duty Marines who are still unvaccinated.

“There’s something fundamentally wrong at this point with our nation’s leadership,” a major with over 17 years of active service was cited as saying. “We are facing an unconstitutional edict that I think is very targeted as a political purge, taking out some of the best and brightest soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and guardians from the Space Force.”

Further, a lieutenant colonel who has served for almost two decades said the Marines are discharging service members “as fast as they can and as brutally as they can, damaging every Marine as much as they can on the way out.”

Further, Fox’s Jessica Chasmar, who interviewed several of the officers, said:

“The one message I got from the colonel above me was: ‘Tread very carefully, this is political, you will be crushed like an ant.’ And he told me that because he cares about me,” the lieutenant colonel said. “Do I want to continue serving in an institution that crushes people for bringing up reasonable points in defending their faith?”

One master sergeant said it seems that “the louder I speak the tighter the screws are turned against me.”

Additionally one Marine who ranks high on the enlisted side said, “When you’re expected to behave a certain way and to obey certain rules and follow certain processes, and then to see on the other end that that’s not a two-way street, that’s a violation of my morals that I can’t stand by and not speak out about.”

The same Marine, identified as a Master Sergeant, described one particular instance of an individual Marine’s exhaustively documented and very convincing case for a religious exemption: “I saw one package from a sergeant who had attached, like, 30 pages of material to substantiate why his belief was sincere, under no lawful obligation to do so,” the master sergeant said. “And then to have this as a response with no individual inquiry and just a generalized assertion of governmental interest is insulting.”

“On the religious side, this is absolutely a travesty what’s happening,” a separate officer described. “People are getting blanket denials, they’re not addressing the individual concerns or beliefs of Marines who are submitting for religious accommodations, and I think that’s just horribly wrong. I honestly believe that they’re not really reading the packages.”

Those interviewed also depicted an ongoing culture of intimidation which appears intended to silence any potential opposition to the mandate, further with no recourse whatsoever. Instead the Marines feel steamrolled into compliance. What’s more is that unlike many parts of Europe, prior infection and natural immunity is being completely ignored.

 

Connect with ZeroHedge

cover image credit: russmac / pixabay




Real-Time Observation of the Content of a Pfizer Vaccine Vial

Real-Time Observation of the Content of a Pfizer Vaccine Vial

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 29, 2021

 

La Quinta Columna dedicated its most recent program to show the substance contained in a Pfizer vaccination vial under an optical microscope.

In the following excerpt that Orwell City has brought into English, some of the main structures identified by the Spanish researchers can be easily observed.



Video available at Rumble.

 

Ricardo Delgado:

Here you can see it directly. There’s the drop. You see it, don’t you? On the right, you see everything outside the drop. And on the left, you see everything inside the drop of a Pfizer vaccine. I’ll put it on full screen. I’m going to put it on full screen so you can see it. And I’m going to be talking over here.

There’s movement here already. That’s right. I’m going to see my screen. Done. There are different settings here. I have the maximum resolution and certain parameters, such as brightness, contrast, saturation, a gamma parameter, and so on. So it looks relatively good with this lens. I’m going to move the microscope towards me. Now let’s look the inside of the drop. Okay. Here we’re going to play with the relief. We’re going to look at the edges. Well, there you see some graphene-like objects. Like these right here. Those are, let’s say, on the surface. See?

I’m telling you, you shouldn’t see anything at all. When we give more relief when we play with the focus, we see other objects in the plane. Everything that we’re looking at right now is inside the drop, OK? Here at the edge, there’s something… No. It’s the relief of the drop itself. And we’re going to be doing a first probe, a first magnification (x). I’m playing with the focus. Playing with it directly through the whole sample until we find objects with certain patterns. But well, I’m going to the background. Look, here in the background, for example, you can see something. The famous nanotubes. Here in another plane, there’s another one. Look at what is in the center. Look what a strange formation, isn’t it?

Man! Juanma Moreno, what do you want to put in our bodies?

Well, let’s go on. There seems to be something here. Let’s see… Yes. They’re microbubbles, right? And there’s also a graphenic formation. In fact, there’s an evolution that can be seen over time. That is, as we continue to observe… There’s also a rare formation there. As we continue to observe, let’s say, you can see that it self-assembles. Let’s see if we’re lucky enough to see that self-assembly. Because you have to understand, guys, that right now we’re under significant radiation. You know which one. And through teslaphoresis mechanism, this prime material used in this vaccine, which is graphene, gets to act this way. Then we’re going to look at it with more magnification.

Well, here’s something. It has the shape of one of those famous Morgellons, right? Look at the shape, as it’s usually in two tips. It’s not very well focused. Let’s take a little picture of it, shall we?

 

Connect with Orwell City

 


See related:

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

La Quinta Columna: Pfizer Vaccine Under a Microscope | Strange Structures & Their Movements




Pandemic Grift: 35 Doctors, Scientists and Healthcare Moguls Who Became COVID Billionaires

Pandemic Grift: 35 Doctors, Scientists and Healthcare Moguls Who Became COVID Billionaires

by 21st Century Wire
December 27, 2021

 

It’s been two years since the ‘novel’ coronavirus first appeared on the global scene in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December 2019. Since then, a litter a of new billionaires have been born, all conveniently positioned to capitalise off of the world great-ever pseudo pandemic. Whether it’s cashing in on unprecedented vaccine sales made possible government mandates, new and expensive untested drug treatments, dubious medical devices, fraudulent PCR and lateral flow COVID-19 testing, masks, PPE, home delivery services, and various other forms of public-private grift, well-connected globalists have been quick to extract as much free public money as possible and then launder their takings on the stock market, and other ventures to supposedly ‘fight the global pandemic.’

By allowing Washington to declare a “national emergency,” during the first year in the USA alone, billionaires managed to rake-in upwards of $1 Trillion.
.
Of course, among the biggest winners globally in this corporativist coup d’etat are the transnational pharmaceutical drug cartels – gifted sweatheart contracts by governments, allowing cartel members to freely manufacture and distribute experimental gene-jab ‘vaccines’ which they claims protect people against COVID-19. Leading this pack in this sordid group of corporate actors are the perennially corrupt firm Pfizer, along with its German biotech partner in crime, BioNTech, along with Massachusetts-based Moderna — all of whom are pushing an experimental mRNA gene therapy injection deceptively marketed as a ‘vaccine.’

Cashing in on COVID

Because of massive guaranteed government purchases of their half-baked, unproven products, executives at these well-connected firms have seen their net worths skyrocket since January 2020.

Leading in this pseudo pandemic jackpot sweepstakes are BioNTech CEO Uğur Şahin who is now worth a cool $4.2 billion, and Moderna’s Stéphane Bancel who has managed to parlay a $4.1 billion fortune on the back of the COVID crisis. Thanks to public subsidies and funding from the US taxpayers to develop their experimental mRNA genetic injection, vaccine barons at Moderna have also produced other billionaires, including Harvard professor Timothy Springer and MIT scientist Robert Langer.

Naturally, these experimental mandated GMO gene-jab ‘vaccines’ will require billions of glass vials to transport their toxic payload, and so enter Italy’s Sergio Stevanato, another new COVID billionaire and the majority shareholder in the privately-owned Stevanato Group, which is making vaccine vials for the transnational corporate drug cartel.

Other industries cashing in on the PCR-driven ‘case-demic’ are those making antibody treatments and other drugs which they claim will “fight the virus”and have benefited from mass-hysteria we’ve seen since February 2020. Clever operators like Carl Hansen, the CEO of Canadian biotech firm AbCellera, suddenly became worth $2.9 billion after his company went public in December 2020, after a questionable fast-track approval by the Food and Drug Administration’s for its alleged ‘safe and effective’ antibody treatment developed with Big Pharma cartel member Eli Lilly.

The other big grift is the testing of the rushed experimental ‘vaccines’, drugs and medical devices. Among those topping the list is the world of spotty clinic tests and product trials is one August Troendle, the founder and CEO of Cincinnati-based research firm Medpace, who is suddenly became worth a tidy $1.3 billion after his shares jumped a whopping 70% since 2020.

Here are the 10 of the most noteworthy opportunists who have managed to leverage what has been largely a contrived crisis from the beginning – using the fear and chaos to become rich  beyond their wildest dreams. The list is based on calculations made by Forbes for the year 2020:

Uğur Şahin

Net worth: $4.2 billion

Citizenship: Germany

Source of wealth: BioNTech

The Turkish-born physician cofounded BioNTech in the German city of Mainz in 2008 with his wife, Özlem Türeci, who serves as the firm’s Chief Medical Officer. He owns about 17% of the company’s shares. BioNTech’s stock has risen 160% since January on the back of its successful Covid-19 vaccine developed in partnership with Pfizer, which was declared by the U.S. FDA to be 95% effective in preventing Covid-19. The first doses were rolled out in the U.K. on December 8th and in the U.S. on December 14th, with more doses reserved for the European Union, Japan and Canada, among others. Before starting BioNTech, Şahin and Türeci founded biopharma company Ganymed Pharmaceuticals in 2001, which they sold to Japan-based Astellas Pharma for about $460 million in 2016.

 

Stéphane Bancel

Net worth: $4.1 billion

Citizenship: France

Source of wealth: Moderna

Bancel, a French citizen, became CEO of Massachusetts-based Moderna in 2011 after leaving his previous job as CEO of French diagnostics firm BioMérieux. He owns about 6% of Moderna, down from about 9% when he first became a billionaire in March, after selling more than a million shares as the firm’s stock surged by more than 550% since the beginning of the year. On December 18, Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine – with a reported efficacy of 95% — was the second to be approved by regulators in the U.S. after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The first doses will be administered in the U.S., which ordered 200 million doses with an option for 300 million more.

 

Yuan Liping

Net worth: $4.1 billion

Citizenship: Canada

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Yuan owns 24% of one of China’s leading vaccine producers, Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products, after her divorce from the company’s chairman (and fellow billionaire) Du Weimin in June. The split instantly made the Shenzhen resident Canada’s richest woman. Kangtai’s stock is up 90% since the beginning of 2020. She worked at the company from 2012 to 2015 as a manager and director and has been a director at a Kangtai subsidiary, Beijing Minhai Biotechnology, since March 2017. Kangtai is the exclusive Chinese manufacturer for the vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford, with a deal to produce 200 million doses, but the company has a checkered history: in 2013, its hepatitis B vaccine was linked to the death of 17 infants, but a government investigation went nowhere and critics were reportedly pressured to retract negative articles. A representative for Shenzhen Kangtai did not reply to a request for comment.

 

Hu Kun

Net worth: $3.9 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Hu is the chairman of Contec Medical Systems, a manufacturer of medical devices based in the  northeastern Chinese port city of Qinhuangdao. He took the company public on the Shenzhen stock exchange in August and owns nearly half of the shares, which are up nearly 150% since the IPO. Contec draws more than 70% of its revenue from overseas and makes a range of medical products for hospitals including nebulizers, stethoscopes and blood pressure monitors.

 

Carl Hansen

Net worth: $2.9 billion

Citizenship: Canada

Source of wealth: AbCellera

Hansen is the CEO and cofounder of Vancouver-based AbCellera, a biotech firm that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to identify the most promising antibody treatments for diseases. He founded the company in 2012. Until 2019 he also worked as a professor at the University of British Columbia, but shifted to focus full-time on AbCellera. That decision seems to have paid off, and Hansen’s 23% stake earned him a spot in the billionaire club after AbCellera’s successful listing on the Nasdaq on December 11. The U.S. government has ordered 300,000 doses of bamlanivimab, an antibody AbCellera discovered in partnership with Eli Lilly that received FDA approval as a Covid-19 treatment in November.

 

Timothy Springer

Net worth: $2 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Moderna

An immunologist and professor of biological chemistry and molecular pharmacology at Harvard University, Springer was a founding investor in Moderna in 2010 when he put about $5 million into the fledgling company. A decade later, his 3.5% stake is now worth roughly $1.6 billion. Springer is an active investor in biotech, with smaller holdings in publicly traded firms Scholar Rock and Morphic Therapeutic, which grew out of his research with postdoctoral students from his lab at Harvard. He earned his first big payday in 1999 when he sold LeukoSite, a biotech outfit he founded in 1993 and took public five years later, to Millennium Therapeutics for $635 million.

 

Sergio Stevanato

Net worth: $1.8 billion

Citizenship: Italy

Source of wealth: Medical packaging

Stevanato is president of Italian medical packaging firm Stevanato Group, the world’s second-largest producer of glass vials and a prominent supplier of vials for more than forty Covid-19 vaccines. Founded on the outskirts of Venice in 1949 by Sergio’s father, Giovanni, the company is now run by Sergio’s children, Franco and Marco, who serve as CEO and vice president, respectively. The $700 million (sales) company is also the world’s largest producer of insulin pens and makes machines that craft, sterilize and package billions of vials, syringes and other glass products. In June, Stevanato signed an agreement with the Gates Foundation-backed Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations to provide 100 million vials for nine different Covid-19 vaccines — since then, the firm has penned additional deals with several more vaccine manufacturers which it cannot publicly disclose.

 

Robert Langer

Net worth: $1.5 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Moderna

Known as the “Edison of Medicine” for his pioneering work in the field of biomedical engineering, Langer is a professor of chemical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was a founding investor in Moderna — located just across the street from his office in Cambridge — in 2010 and has never sold a share; his 3% stake is now worth about $1.5 billion. He owns smaller holdings in publicly traded biotech startups SQZ Biotechnologies and Frequency Therapeutics, both founded by postdoctoral students from his lab, and he holds more than 1,400 patents which have been licensed more than 400 times to pharmaceutical and medical companies.

 

Premchand Godha

Net worth: $1.4 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Godha started out as a chartered accountant before entering the pharmaceutical sector in 1975, when he acquired Mumbai-based drugmaker Ipca Labs in partnership with the family of Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan. The firm, which manufactures generics and pharmaceutical ingredients, saw its stock price nearly double this year partly due to higher production and sales of the controversial antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, which was touted as a potential cure early in the pandemic before its use was discouraged by the World Health Organization for having little to no effect in reducing mortality from Covid-19.

 

August Troendle

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Pharmaceutical services

Troendle is the CEO and founder of Cincinnati-based Medpace, which carries out contract work and clinical trials for pharmaceutical firms developing drugs and medical devices. Before founding Medpace in 1992 and taking it public in 2016, the University of Maryland-trained doctor worked on clinical development at Swiss pharma giant Novartis and as a medical review officer at the FDA. Medpace’s labs handle the gamut of pharmaceutical services, from running swab and antibody tests for Covid-19 for external clinics to running complex clinical trials for drugmakers working on new vaccines and treatments. Forbes estimates that Troendle, who owns about 21% of Medpace shares, is now worth about $1.3 billion, making him the latest healthcare entrepreneur to join the billionaire club in 2020.

Juan López-Belmonte López & family

Net worth: $1.8 billion

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals
Citizenship: Spain

López-Belmonte López chairs Spanish pharma company Rovi, which inked a contract with Moderna in July to fill and package hundreds of millions of doses of its Covid-19 vaccine at Rovi’s factory in Madrid, Spain.

John Oyler

Net worth: $1.8 billion

Source of wealth: BioTech

Citizenship: USA

Oyler is the CEO and cofounder of Beijing-based drugmaker BeiGene, which signed an agreement with biotech outfit Singlomics Pharmaceuticals in August to develop, manufacture and sell Singlomics’ antibody treatment for Covid-19.

Other Billionaire Beneficiaries: 

Li Juanquan & family

Net worth: $7.9 billion

Citizenship: Hong Kong

Source of wealth: Surgical products

Jian Jun

Net worth: $4.4 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Biotech

Ye Xiaoping

Net worth: $4.2 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Hao Hong

Net worth: $3.4 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Jin Lei

Net worth: $3.2 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Liu Fangyi

Net worth: $3.2 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Lv Jianming

Net worth: $3.1 billion

Citizenship: Hong Kong

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Chen Xiao Ying

Net worth: $2.7 billion

Citizenship: Hong Kong

Source of wealth: Health information

Miao Yongjun

Net worth: $2.5 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Clinical diagnostics

Lin Zhixiong & family

Net worth: $2.1 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical devices

Alberto Siccardi & family

Net worth: $2.1 billion

Citizenship: Switzerland

Source of wealth: Medical devices

Noubar Afeyan

Net worth: $1.9 billion

Source of wealth: BioTech

Citizenship: USA

Li Wenmei & family

Net worth: $1.7 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Lin Jie & family

Net worth: $1.7 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Liu Xiucai & family

Net worth: $1.6 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Chemicals

Pu Zhongjie & family

Net worth: $1.6 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Rao Wei & family

Net worth: $1.6 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Felix Baker

Net worth: $1.4 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Biotech investing

Julian Baker

Net worth: $1.4 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Biotech investing

Rajendra Agarwal

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Banwarilal Bawri

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Girdharilal Bawri

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Benedicte Find

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: Denmark

Source of wealth: Medical devices

Alan Miller & family

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Healthcare services

 

Connect with 21st Century Wire




Cancer Patients Beware of COVID Vaccines

Cancer Patients Beware of COVID Vaccines

by Dr. Mark Sircus
December 27, 2021

 

The government-media-pharma gang is lying, and they will never stop lying to cancer patients specifically and the rest of us in general. Do a Google search on Cancer and COVID vaccines, and you will see the number of organizations all saying the same thing.

As far as the eye can see, we have pronouncements that COVID vaccines for cancer patients are safe, even though we know they are not. They are not safe for adults, children, and especially not for cancer patients who need the most healthy immune system possible. Always remember Vitamin D  is the key to immune health not genetic vaccines.

It has been shown that in up to 50% of vaccinees, COVID vaccines can induce a temporary immune suppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that may last about a week or possibly longer. Not good for cancer patients.

In addition, COVID mRNA vaccines have been shown to “reprogram” (i.e., influence) adaptive and innate immune responses and, in particular, to downregulate the so-called TLR4 pathway, which is known to play an essential role in the immune response to infections and cancer cells. More bad news for cancer patients but don’t mention this to your doctor, for they will play stupid and try to sell you on the idea of getting vaccinated.

Vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation might potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer in the weeks following vaccination. Notably, lymphocytopenia has also been frequently observed in cases of severe covid.

“My daughter has a close friend who got colon cancer several years ago, supposedly in remission since then. She got doubled vaxxed back in April or May, and then a booster in Sept. In October, her cancer was back with a vengeance and spreading to other places. She is currently on chemo but not doing well.”

Is it best to talk with your doctor before getting any vaccine? No, almost all doctors who want to keep their licenses to practice medicine will favor you getting your COVID shots no matter what your cancer status is.

It was always dangerous for cancer patients to go to hospitals. But now, vaccine madness leads to patients being refused without a passport in hospitals. They demand that patients be vaccinated before receiving treatment, including cancer patients.

Dr. Brett Parkinson (MD of Intermountain Healthcare’s Breast Care Centre) said, “When one receives a vaccination, there is an inflammatory response in the arm.” As a result, doctors have observed swollen lymph nodes on screening mammograms of recently vaccinated women for COVID-19. “Whenever we see these on a normal screening mammogram, we call those patients back because it can either mean metastatic breast cancer which travels to the lymph nodes or lymphoma or leukemia.”

Mayo Clinic Trained Doctor Reports Surge in Cancer

In a video produced by the Idaho state government in March, Dr. Ryan Cole, who runs the largest independent testing laboratory in Idaho, said that since the rollout of the vaccines, he had seen a staggering increase in cancers among those who have received the abortion-tainted jabs.

“Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20-times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Cole in the video clip. “I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before.’” Listen to Dr. Cole here.

Cole explained that the COVID-19 vaccines seem to impact the immune system function responsible for combatting the growth of cancer cells and other viruses, referring to the phenomenon as a “reverse HIV response.”

Cole explained that the vaccines cause suppression of a person’s “killer T-cells,” similar to how HIV suppresses a person’s “helper T-cells” and how both types of cells are integral to fighting off cancer cells and other damaging viruses.

In addition to endometrial cancer, Cole reported an “uptick” in melanomas, herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV, which he attributes to the damage done to the immune system by the experimental shots.

Of course, every doctor who has anything different to say than the public narrative that COVID vaccines are safer than mom’s apple pie is censored, and it’s no different with Dr. Cole, who is an official member of Idaho’s public health board. The government-media-pharma gang is not interested in listening to the many professionals speaking out and is ignoring the adverse drug reaction systems completely.

The Profile of Safe COVID Vaccines

Fifty percent of the more than 3 million injuries are reported to be serious. In the United States, the official number in the VAERS vaccine reporting system is 20,622 deaths. The FDA, the CDC, and the president of the United States, present and former, are potent magicians and can reduce these numbers to zero.

Lock-downs Hurt Cancer Patients

Of 1,200 patients and survivors surveyed by the American Cancer Society in the first two weeks of May, 87% said the pandemic has affected their health care. That’s compared to 51% in April.

There are many ways the over-reaction of health officials is hurting cancer patients. One of the most potent cancer-fighting weapons is exercise. Several studies have shown that physical activity is linked with decreased risk of some cancers, particularly breast and colon cancer. People who followed healthy lifestyle habits, including exercising for more than 30 minutes daily, lowered their risk of colorectal cancer, according to a study published online in October in the British Medical Journal.

Modern Medicine Has Forgotten About Light

Keeping people indoors instead of exercising and being out in the sun is not a good idea for cancer patients. I bet world health officials did not consider that a lack of sunlight can also cause cancer. Vitamin D deficiencies (lack of light) can lead to the development of prostate and breast cancer, memory loss, and an increased risk for developing dementia and schizophrenia. The surest way to die of COVID is to be vitamin D deficient. We could say the same for cancer.

“It seems clear that light is the most important environmental input, after food, in controlling bodily function,” reported Dr. Richard J. Wurtman, a nutritionist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Sometimes I get the impression my dermatologist colleagues would be happiest if we lived in caves,” continues Wurtman, who recommends daily 20-minute walks at noon to get the Sunlight we need.

“Cancer is helped by sunbathing. Those who get more sunlight have less cancer. Sunbathing heals cancer by building up the immune system and increasing the oxygen in the tissues. Sunlight does not cause skin cancer unless one suffers through chronic sunburn,” writes Dr. Zane R. Kime, author of Sunlight Could Save Your Life.

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

cover image credit: gribouille334700 / pixabay




Dr. Andrew Kaufman Exposes the ‘Omicron Variant’ Scam That Increases Covid Case Numbers

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Exposes the ‘Omicron Variant’ Scam That Increases Covid Case Numbers

sourced from G. Edward Griffin’s Need to Know
videos by Andrew Kaufman and David Icke
December 27, 2021

 

Dr. Andrew Kaufman explained that in the usual PCR test protocol, there are three primers (fragments of single stranded DNA), and if all three are positive, it is considered to be a positive test and the person is diagnosed with Covid. But now the criteria has changed and only two primers are required for a test to be deemed positive.

The change in protocol is a way to convert negative results to positive results and call it a new thing, which was named Omicron. The result is an increase the number of Covid cases.

Dr. Kaufman has shown many times that the SARS-Cov-2 virus has never been isolated, a process of separating it from everything else and viewing it under a microscope, and cannot be proven to exist.

Similarly, the new Omicron variant of the Covid virus has yet to be isolated and proven to exist. Omicron is an ‘in silico’ computer-produced genome sequence.

There is no clinical test authorized, approved, or available for purchase for any variant! There are no scientific publications studying Omicron.

David Icke summarizes Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s findings in this short video clip:



Video available at BitChute.

 

Dr. Kaufman’s full interview:

Video available at BitChute.

 

Connect with Andrew Kaufman

Connect with David Icke

Connect with G. Edward Griffin’s Need to Know

 

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay




The Vegas Fear Porn Awards Ceremony 2021

The Vegas Fear Porn Awards Ceremony 2021

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 27, 2021

 

Happy New Year!

Mostly naked pole-dancers fronting a full orchestra playing Doo-Wop tunes you love from the 50s! Drinks on the house! Liberal celebs mingling with the peasants! The Vegas Mob Brothel and Hotel Casino just off the Strip presents…

The COVID Fear Porn Awards Ceremony 2021!

Leading up to the presentation of the coveted gold-plated statuette of Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, which an as yet unnamed out of work actor will present to Fear Porn Person of the Year, several awards will be handed out to men and women in sub-categories of Halfway Compromise:

CATEGORY ONE: “Of course the virus exists. Don’t bother me with evidence to the contrary. I don’t have time to look at it. I’m busy with other issues. It’s a distraction. Anyway, people don’t understand the claim.”

TWO: “I’m definitely and absolutely pro-vaccine. I just want safer and more effective shots, and the current COVID vaccine happens to be unsafe. Vaccines have nothing to do with autism and other forms of brain damage.”

THREE: “The courts and judges will save us from the vaccine mandates. Don’t worry, be happy. The system works. Street protests are counter-productive. Cloth masks don’t work, but R283-X-A45367-BQX-23-9 masks are quite effective at stopping the spread of the dreaded virus.”

FOUR: “The Omicron Variant is quite real and spreads quickly, but it is less virulent than the Delta or the original SARS-CoV-2.”

FIVE: “The PCR test is irreparably flawed, but the case numbers based on the test are real, not meaningless. We need more testing.”

At the crest of the evening’s presentations, the Committee will reveal its choice for Fear Porn Person of the Year, from the following nominees:

Anthony Fauci
Bill Gates
Joe Biden
Gavin Newsom
Andrew Cuomo
Klaus Schwab
Anthony Fauci

Save your ticket stub. There will be a drawing. One attendee will win an all-expenses trip to Vienna, to live for three months under the government’s lockdown regime. Stay in your hotel room. Watch television. Eat canned food. Wear a mask. Experience the fear. Sweat in the dark.

Bonus! At the Awards presentation, Dr. Deborah Birx will receive the annual Hot Zone Virus From The Jungle plaque commemorating her work as a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force under President Donald Warp Speed Trump.

Dr. Birx is presently working as a waitress at the 24-hour Sam Giancana Diner on the outskirts of Las Vegas. She is seeking re-employment as a bureaucrat at any tax-gobbling government agency that remembers her. We will be taking up a collection to pay her rent. She will be signing copies of her book, I Was Never an Out and Out Grifter.

A special scroll will be presented to CNN and MSNBC for their unceasing yearlong fear porn promotion. We understand an alleged and accused CNN pedophile will be on hand to receive his half of the scroll.

In absentia, Nancy My Husband Doesn’t Really Work With The Chinese Pelosi will be awarded an Emperor Nero silver coin engraved thusly: I WEAR MY MASK IN THE BATHROOM WHILE I’M SITTING DOWN.

Breaking—Boston Mayor, Michelle Wu, has just announced a vaccine passport system for the City of the American Revolution…all persons 12 and older will have to present the passport to enter any covered indoor venue. This fear porn enforcement Queen Mayor will be granted a brass plaque with her name engraved, to be placed on a slot machine outside a bedroom in the famed Crazy Eights Brothel and Steak House in Skirts, Nevada. Keep up the good work, Michelle My Belle!

To all compliant Americans who believe in fear porn, congratulations. We would give each one of you a participation trophy if we could afford it, to signify you are the greatest enablers in human history.

You inspire us to continue our work, singling out those individuals and organizations that distribute the tonnage of fear porn at a rate which stuns the senses.

Quoting our Founder, Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda: “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.”

Friends, when you come right down to it, are you afraid of not being afraid? If fear were stripped from your minds, would you feel at sea…not knowing what to think or do? Would you be lost without your old pal fear? You’re our audience, and we serve you every day of every year. And in doing so, we put a pretty bow on the ties that bind.

Stay close. We’re planning new surprises, new variants on the central theme of Medical Emergency. We’re the Titans of Pavlovian stimulus-response, and we feel your anticipatory drool.

If you can’t attend our Awards Ceremony this year, just keep watching our minions juke and tap dance on the Network News:

Lester Holt (Lurch, from the Addams Family); David Muir (Sears underwear model); Norah O’Donnell (state baton twirling champion); Wolf Blitzer (old man in tattered bathrobe pouring a can of soup into a saucepan in his kitchen); Chuck Todd (racetrack tout and penny-stock hustler).

They’ll keep you tuned to America’s leading product: fear porn.

The New York Times: “Today, on the Southern Face of Mt. Everest, a New York Hedge Fund manager froze to death in a seething blizzard. Sitting behind a new DARPA super-telescope observing the scene from Fort Meade, Maryland, Anthony Fauci diagnosed the man with COVID as he expired. ‘Shortness of breath was the telltale sign,’ Fauci remarked…”

So yes, Tony Fauci IS our Fear Porn Person of the Year. He’s on the case and on the money every time he takes center stage. He’s a belching stage hog, and we love him.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Alexandra_Koch / pixabay




Queensland, Australia Anti-Mandate Protestors Form a Blockade, Protecting Freedom-Loving Cafe From Police

Queensland, Australia Anti-Mandate Protestors Form a Blockade, Protecting Freedom-Loving Cafe From Police

by Cairns News
December 24, 2021

 

A northern Gold Coast cafe has shut for several weeks after anti-mandate protesters formed a blockade against police, who they say were going to fine the operator for his inclusive service policy.

This was the amazing scene in front of Cafe Noego Coffee in Queensland Australia after police targeted the establishment for not asking customers for vaccine passports.



 

Connect with Cairns News




Dr. Leland Stillman Undercover: Exposing Pharma and Vaccine Fraud

Dr. Leland Stillman Undercover: Exposing Pharma and Vaccine Fraud

by 21st Century Wire
December 24, 2021

 

In this discussion, Dr Leland Stillman explains how he went undercover with Project Veritas to expose the corrupt practices and general fraud perpetrated by the major pharmaceutical firms, and how the industry routinely covers-up a growing number of vaccine injuries and deaths. This informative interview is essential in understanding the scale of corruption when it comes to the Covid-19 ‘global pandemic.’

The following interview is from Childrens Health Defense CHD.TV program, Doctors & Scientists – Episode 11 hosted by Dr Brian Hooker with guest Dr Leland Stillman, MD.

Watch: 

 

Connect with 21st Century Wire

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: geralt / pixabay




After Thousands of Parents Refused to Comply, California School District Reverses Child Jab Mandate

After Thousands of Parents Refused to Comply, California School District Reverses Child Jab Mandate

by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project
December 23, 2021

 

San Diego, CA — Forgoing any legal democratic processes, multiple school districts in California began mandating the COVID-19 vaccination for children earlier this year. Set to go into effect in January, any child, 16 and older, who did not get the jab, was banned from campus in all San Diego public schools.

This authoritarian move caused a mass of backlash and thousands of children and parents refused to comply. The refusal to get vaccinated set the stage for a showdown that was to unfold on January 24 when the children would be kicked out of school for non compliance.

There will be no showdown, however, as a San Diego judge struck down the mandate this week, accurately pointing out that a school district has no authority to mandate medical procedures for children.

CBS 7 reports that Superior Court Judge John S. Meyer granted a writ of mandate for a lawsuit filed by the group “Let Them Choose,” which sought to keep the school district‘s COVID-19 vaccine mandate from going into effect by arguing it did not comply with state law.

Meyer noted in the ruling that the school district‘s COVID-19 vaccine mandate cannot move forward because it conflicts with state law, which says any decision to mandate vaccines must be made at the state level and must also include a “personal belief exemption” if the mandate is not imposed by the state Legislature.

San Diego Unified’s policy did not contain this exemption.

“SDUSD‘s Roadmap appears to be necessary and rational, and the district’s desire to protect its students from COVID-19 is commendable. Unfortunately, the field of school vaccine mandates has been fully occupied by the State, and the Roadmap directly conflicts with state law,” the judge wrote in a tentative ruling.

Naturally, the school district disagreed and claimed they have the right to dictate what children can and can’t be injected with. For now, however, their objection is meaningless and the children and parents who did not want to take the vaccination, will no longer be forced to do so.

“I am overjoyed. We knew that our legal argument was strong, and we brought this case on behalf of thousands of concerned parents and students and to hear the judge say no student should be coerced into getting this vaccine was just a wonderful thing to hear,” said Sharon McKeeman, founder of the group behind Let Them Choose.

As TFTP reported earlier this month, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) — which is the second largest school district in the country — made a similar move and mandated shots for all children aged 12 and older.

Students were told they would be banned from campus on January 10, 2022 if they failed to comply and take the shot.

NBC4 spoke to an attorney who is following these cases, Jennifer Kennedy, who explained that school districts do not have the authority to mandate medical procedures. Just like the San Diego school district did not have the authority to mandate the jabs, the LAUSD did not have it either.

“These grotesque contests and displays of treatment and candy and gifts and favors, raffles and cash prizes inducing the kids to the vaccination…. Here is the problem, kids in California cannot consent to vaccination.”

She added, “The LAUSD does not have the power to add a vaccine to the California school schedule,” she said. “You couldn’t do it if you were a po-dunk school district and you can’t do it if you’re LAUSD, the second largest district in the nation. You don’t have that legal authority.”

Several parents of students filed lawsuits against the LAUSD over the mandate and thousands of children remained unvaccinated in LAUSD. This line in the sand forced the school district to postpone their mandate last week after a whopping 28,000 children refused the jab.

It is only through resistance that the change we seek will come. As history shows us, one cannot comply their way out of tyranny.

 

Connect with The Free Thought Project

cover image credit: ebpilgrim / pixabay




‘Tis the Season to be Tested?

‘Tis the Season to be Tested?
I couldn’t resist writing one more article before the holidays — on rapid testing. The field is just too rich with uh, manure, to leave it unploughed.

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
December 23, 2021

 

Officials in many jurisdictions are reporting skyrocketing case rates, stoking ever greater fear of the Mighty Omicron.

Yet the breathless, wall-to-wall, MSM coverage doesn’t mention that the jump in cases is very likely simply due to the testing rate shooting through the roof.

Instead the MSM is having a field day, thanks to most people’s gullibility. And that includes promoting mass testing, early and often.

The media report that new studies are showing people infected with Omicron are far less likely to have severe disease or to be hospitalized than those detected to have Delta, and also usually are vaxxed or had Covid.

Yet media quote researchers, politicians and public-health officials as warning that the high Omicron case numbers suggest health-care-system capacity could soon be pushed past the limit.

I should make special mention of Neal Ferguson’s outstanding lifetime performance in stretching plausibility. (He’s long overdue for an Academy Award for making stuff up; if they create a science and medicine category he’d be among the front-runners.)

Ferguson and his colleagues at the Imperial College of London posted a study Dec. 22 stating that Omicron is associated with a 20%-25% lower overall hospitalization risk and 40%-45% less chance of being hospitalized for more than one day. They conclude that, “[O]ur estimates suggest that individuals who have received at least 2 vaccine doses remain substantially protected against hospitalisation, even if protection against infection has been largely lost against the Omicron variant.”

And yet, true to form, Ferguson was quoted in a Dec. 22 Guardian article as saying that, “Given the high transmissibility of the Omicron virus, there remains the potential for health services to face increasing demand if Omicron cases continue to grow at the rate that has been seen in recent weeks.” (Bolding added by me.)

So it’s no surprise that many prominent people have jumped onto the ‘test early and often’ bandwagon.

For example, US president Joe Biden is pledging the delivery of half a billion free at-home test kits starting in a few weeks.

And people have been lining up for hours to pick up at-home tests in thousands of cities across the planet.

A typical example of ‘experts’ inciting that rapid-testing rush is a Dec. 20/21 article by Toronto Star reporter Ben Cohen. (It’s reposted here, paywall-less.)

Here’s part of the article:

“‘With a rapid test, a positive is a positive,’ said Dr. Eric Arts, a virologist and immunology professor at Western University [in London, Ontario]. ‘A negative is not a definitive negative. You may still be infected, regardless of what the rapid test shows you.’”

“’The Omicron variant has evolved to escape our immune system, and to some extent escape the vaccine,’ Arts said. ‘You have to be cautious. The exposure risk is very high right now. When we hear about there being more than 3,000 (COVID-19) cases in Ontario right now, it’s probably triple that, if not more.’

“Arts said those with access to rapid tests shouldn’t stop taking them after a negative result if they are still going out around other people and particularly if they are feeling ill — in which case they should stay home regardless.

“‘You need to continue to take rapid tests if you’re going into crowded places and high-risk situations like shopping malls,’ said Arts. ‘You should repeat that rapid test the next day and the next day, especially if you have symptoms.’”

I emailed Arts two evenings ago and asked him for the studies that back up his statements about the accuracy of rapid tests.

(I didn’t ask him how he determined Omicron has the capacity to escape the vaccines. That’s because I’ve written many articles, most recently on Dec. 8, about how that’s an extremely unlikely event, despite its being promoted as being very likely by ‘experts’ on both sides of the Covid divide.)

Arts didn’t respond. So yesterday morning I called his office number. His voicemail box was full.

I quickly looked for Western University’s media relations person who deals with Arts’s department, and found it’s Jeff Renauld. I texted Renauld and asked him to put me in touch with Arts.

Renauld responded by text that, “He’s actually on leave until the new year. So he’s not readily available for all interviews.” Renauld didn’t explain why Arts was available to Ben Cohen of the Toronto Star but not to me.

I persisted. And Renauld relented, texting me, “OK. What’s your question? I can try texting him but again, he’s technically on study leave and not replying to all requests.”

I asked him to ask Arts to respond to my email.

I hadn’t heard back from either of them by this morning. So I texted Renauld just before 11 asking if he’d connected with Arts. Renauld replied: “I was unable to reach him. Sorry.”

Perhaps Arts didn’t respond because I’m not from the mainstream media.

Or maybe he didn’t get back to me because, as far as I can determine, there are very few — if any — studies that support his assertions, and he knows it. And/or because, as I discovered this evening, he also has a hidden conflict of interest. (See below.)

Here’s one indication that Arts is straying from the truth. In his quotes in the Toronto Star article he only mentions true-positive and potentially false-negative test results. He doesn’t say a single word about false positives or true negatives – even though by definition they always occur with any test.

It just doesn’t add up.

After all, even the manufacturers of the large number of rapid tests being approved make such statements as admitting that their tests’ “clinical performance has not been established for asymptomatic serial testing.” (And of course it’s unwise to trust the manufacturers’ lofty claims about their own tests’ accuracy.)

Here’s yet another indication that Arts’s assertions are on shaky ground. Health Canada states that positive results from rapid tests are merely ‘presumptive positives’; they are considered conclusive only after being confirmed by a PCR test yields a positive result. And PCR tests in fact are very inaccurate – so if  Health Canada is saying PCR is more accurate than rapid tests, rapid tests truly are highly inaccurate.

Not only that. Health Canada’s guideline on rapid tests (written by a committee comprised largely of boosters of the Official Narrative about Covid’s contagiousness and capacity for immune escape such as Irfan Dhalla, Isaac Bogoch and Kieran Moore) states that rapid tests have ‘excellent specificity.’ Specificity refers to proportion of negative tests that are truly negative (i.e., ‘excellent specificity’ means almost all the negative test results are true negatives).

Remember that, in contrast, Arts was quoted in Ben Cohen’s article as saying: A negative is not a definitive negative. You may still be infected, regardless of what the rapid test shows you.”

I just did a quick search for Arts’s name in PubMed, the repository of published science and medicine papers.

It turns out that a paper co-authored by Arts was posted Dec. 16. It’s on a vaccine against Covid based on a VSV (vesicular stomatitis virus) carrying the gene for the novel coronavirus’s spike protein.

In that paper, Arts and his co-authors claim that immune escape will make at least some of the currently used Covid vaccines ineffective. “Thus, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development and testing must continue, and inexpensive viral vector-based vaccines, such as the rVSV-SARS-CoV-2 described herein, may be critical for future pandemic control,” they write. They conclude that, “ We believe our research has proven that [our vaccine] is a great candidate vaccine, not only for use as a prime and boost vaccination for unvaccinated individuals, but also as a potential boost vaccine following previous vaccination with other COVID-19 vaccines.” (Bolding added by me.)

So it appears that Arts has an undisclosed conflict of interest when he talks to media about Omicron and immune escape.

Yup, always follow the money.

These day’s it’s more important than ever to be sceptical of statements from ‘experts’ — particularly when they contradict themselves and/or each other.

I’m hoping they’ve finally stretched more people’s credulity to the breaking point.

After all, we could all use a break.

So enjoy your holiday!

And here’s to a New Year in which we get more and more breaks.

Let’s hope fewer and fewer people accept manure at face value, especially when it’s spread so thickly. Instead let’s all plow and dig for the truth.

 

Connect with Rosemary Frei, MSc

cover image credit: bohed / pixabay




Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada: “Regardless of the Fact That We Are Attacking Your Fundamental Rights…We’re Still Going To Go Ahead and Do It.”

Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada: “Regardless of the Fact That We Are Attacking Your Fundamental Rights…We’re Still Going To Go Ahead and Do It.”

 

“Regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights, or limiting your fundamental rights…

The charter  [The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms] says that’s wrong.

We’re still going to go ahead and do it.

It’s basically a loophole that allows a majority to override fundamental rights of a minority.”

~ Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

 






La Quinta Columna: There’s No Such Thing as ‘Mild Myocarditis’

La Quinta Columna: There’s No Such Thing as ‘Mild Myocarditis’

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 21, 2021

 

The media are doing their best to convince people that suffering from post-inoculation myocarditis is normal and that there’s nothing to worry about.

The official press is criminal and chooses to lie.

In a new program, La Quinta Columna shared a brief excerpt from an interview that Spanish writer Colin Rivas conducted with surgeon Juanjo Martinez regarding these so-called “mild myocarditis.”

Dr. Jimenez makes it clear that myocarditis, even mild, is, in essence, myocarditis and can cause immediate, medium, or long-term complications.

More details on this in the new video brought to you by Orwell City.

 

 

Ricardo Delgado:

There’s a short interview with a doctor —in a short video that we’re going to show—, the fantastic Colin Rivas, who’s doing a wonderful job, did. It’s an interview with surgeon Juanjo Martínez, whom I had the opportunity to meet personally in one of the demonstrations in Madrid. And, precisely, he’s talking about the phenomenon of myocarditis related to the jab. To the vax. I can talk about these things (since you can’t). Let’s see what opinion this person, who has also seen these type of cases.

 

Colin Rivas:

These lies are being made up as an excuse, such as myocarditis being a very normal thing and that you shouldn’t worry.

 

Dr. Martínez:

This does seem to me to be something very delicate. The fact that the press says that the myocarditis that people are suffering are mild and that they’re of no importance, it’s something that cannot be allowed. The press is full of real criminals. They’re lying. I’m sure they know they are lying, but they don’t care and continue to tell lies.

Myocarditis is a disease of the heart, of the heart muscle, and it’s going to leave —so that people understand— a “scar,” fibrosis in the muscle. And that has medium or long-term consequences. Immediate, possibly, in young people, as we see it happening with vaccines in 12 and 17-year-olds. Those children are going to have complications in the future with absolute certainty because the “scars” left by myocarditis, depending on the extent to which their heart muscle —their myocardium— will generate greater or lesser complications.

But they’ll have them. They’re going to have complications, for sure, because that’s described. That’s how it is. I don’t know what the situation is in children, but in adults, myocarditis have a fairly high mortality rate over five years. We shouldn’t be told lies that they are mild, that no patients have been admitted for this.

Pfizer also said it at the beginning: “Well, but they’re mild myocarditis.”

But they’re myocarditis, anyway, damn it!

And that has consequences. And what’s the need for a child to risk himself having this disease that will leave sequelae for the rest of his life? None. Because there’s no need to vaccinate children. This is the first thing we have to make clear.

 

Ricardo Delgado:

Well… And we’re only talking about myocarditis.

 

Dr. Sevillano:

He’s completely right.

 

Ricardo Delgado:

There are pericarditis too… Many things.

 

Dr. Sevillano:

Exactly. It’s that… Bear in mind that we’ve been talking about myocarditis, but there’s also the issue I mentioned before.

The conduction tissue is composed of myocytes specialized in impulse conduction. If these become inflamed, sudden death occurs. That’s one of the consequences. It’s not only the involvement of the myocardial wall with fibrosis, with more or less heart failure degree… Let’s say, more or less, high or low ventricular ejection reactions. That’s what gives the severity. It can affect the conduction tissue. And if affected, you get the complication that’s being seen in soccer stadiums.

Do you understand? One thing is to affect the wall —the ventricle— and another one is to affect the conduction tissue. And the mechanism is the same. The etiopathogenic mechanism is the same. Whether we talk about antibodies —according to them—, or about other things that I can’t talk about.

.Do you understand? The question is what’s affected. What does get inflamed? Where does it act? If if acts in the wrong place, it goes from something mild to something that takes you to the other side. And that’s what we might be seeing in soccer players and in children, in young kids playing soccer and so on.

 

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: ArtisticOperations / pixabay




Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

 

Evidence Found That Would Confirm the Theory of Nano-Networks Centered in the Human Body: Nano-Rectennas 

by Mik AndersenCorona2Inspect
published in Spanish December 16, 2021
rough translation via translation software

 

Research on nanocommunication networks for nanodevices inoculated in the human body continues to accumulate evidence. On this occasion, the article by the researchers (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) is presented entitled  “Nanoredes centered in the body driven by nano-Rectenna in the terahertz band = Nano- rectenna powered body-centric nano-networks in the terahertz band” which confirms the theory that Corona2Inspect had been studying through the observation of the images of the samples of the c0r0n @ v | rus vaccines obtained by the doctor (Campra, P. 2021). Nano-arrays centered on the human body require the use of nano-antennas that operate in the terahertz band, these being the same type as those found in the vaccine samples ..

In the literature, these plasmonic nano-antennas are also called bowtie antennas or “bowties antenna” and in the article in question they are called “nano-rectennas”. The explicit mention of the type of antenna and the technology of intra-body nano-networks, would confirm that vaccines are, among other things, vectors for the installation of nanotechnology, or nanodevices in the human body. However, beyond the pure coincidence, the authors make explicit the use of graphene and carbon nanotubes, as necessary elements for this network model, elements that were also identified in the images taken by Dr. Campra and that coincide with the presence of graphene in its technical report with spectroscopy. Micro-Raman.

To what has already been described, the article adds that the method of communication and data transmission in nano-networks is carried out through TS-OOK signals (sequences of pulses that transmit binary codes), which matches with studies and protocols of nanocommunications and would endorse all the research carried out by Corona2Inspect so far on this matter.

If what has been explained is not enough to confirm the theory of intracorporeal communication nano-networks, the article by (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) makes explicit the use of nano-sensors that are linked by means of electromagnetic signals, by means of the aforementioned nano-rectennas or bow tie nano-antennas, which necessarily evidences the presence of nano-routers that serve to manage the intra-body and out-of-body data link, with gateways (gateway) such as mobile phone. Given the importance of the content of the article, it will be dissected in detail.

Article analysis

The research object of the work of (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) is the comparative analysis of the energy harvesting capacities of nano-rectennas, aimed at their implementation in networks wireless nanodevices and intra-body nanotechnology. This is reflected in the introduction of the article as follows “in the field of health applications, the objective is to develop a network of therapeutic nanodevices that is capable of working in the human body or within it to support the monitoring of the immune system, health monitoring, drug delivery systems and biohybrid implants “.  This leaves no doubt that nano-antennas, here called nano-rectennas, necessarily imply the presence of a network of nanodevices or nanotechnology aimed at controlling the biological variables and factors of people.

Furthermore, (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) state that “There are two main approaches to nanoscale wireless communications, namely, molecular and electromagnetic (EM) communications (Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM 2010). The latter commonly operates in the terahertz (THz) band (0.1-10 THz) and is a promising technique to support data exchange in nanosensor networks for healthcare applications or body-centered nano-networks. For the expected size of nanosensors, the frequency radiated by their antennas would normally be in the optical range, resulting in a very large channel attenuation that could make nanoscale wireless communication unfeasible. To overcome this limitation, graphene-based antennas have been developed, which are able to resonate in the THz band with sizes of a few ??, at a frequency up to two orders of magnitude lower than a metallic antenna of the same dimensions“.

This explanation corroborates the two types of intra-body communication , the molecular type used for monitoring and neuromodulation of neuronal tissue and the central nervous system ( Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM; Pierobon, M. 2011 |  Malak, D.; Akan, OB 2012  |  Rikhtegar, N.; Keshtgary, M. 2013 |  Balasubramaniam, S.; Boyle, NT; Della-Chiesa, A.; Walsh, F.; Mardinoglu, A.; Botvich, D.; Prina-Mello , A. 2011) and electromagnetic, conceived for the control of biological variables and factors in the rest of the body, by means of nano-nodes (also known as nano-devices, nano-biosensors, etc.).

It also corroborates the operating band in which the intra-body nano-network is operating, in a range of 0.1-10 THz, confirmed in this blog according to (Abbasi, QH; Nasir, AA; Yang, K.; Qaraqe, KA ; Alomainy, A. 2017 |  Zhang, R.; Yang, K.; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. 2017  |  Yang, K.; Bi, D.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, R. ; Rahman, MMU; Ali, NA; Alomainy, A. 2020). It also addresses the fact that the scale of the nano-devices, nano-sensors of the network forces to “resonate the THz band” by means of special antennas of a few microns (??), but with the ability to retransmit signals and in turn of harvesting energy to run the grid. These special properties are achieved through the plasmonic effect given by the nanoantennas scale, which confers special physical and quantum properties to these objects, as explained in (Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF 2013 |  Nafari, M.; Jornet, JM 2015 |  Guo , H.; Johari, P.; Jornet, JM; Sun, Z. 2015 ).

In the introductory dissertation, (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) mention a substantial aspect “the exchange of information between implantable [injectable] nanosensors is the most significant, since it allows control and monitoring the release or flux of molecular, biochemical compounds, and other important functions within the human body.” The relevance of this statement is crucial since it assumes that nanodevices have to be installed, injected or implanted in the human body, but also that it is necessary to receive their signals and data generated to carry out the corresponding monitoring, even at the level of molecular flow and biochemical compounds, such as neurotransmitters produced by neuronal tissue or the nervous system ( Abd-El-atty, SM; Lizos, KA; Gharsseldien, ZM; Tolba, A.; Makhadmeh, ZA 2018).

This explains the need to introduce graphene, carbon nanotubes and derivatives to capture these signals and bio-electrical markers to capture the information, but also a wireless nano-network, which allows transmitting this data outside the human body. Therefore, it must be understood that the nano-antennas or nano-rectennas in charge of repeating the signals could not only do it from the inside out, being able to carry out the reverse process, altering the neuronal synapse, for example.

Likewise, (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) state that a relevant problem in intra-body nano-networks is the availability of energy (Bouchedjera, IA; Aliouat, Z.; Louail , L. 2020 |  Fahim, H.; Javaid, S.; Li, W.; Mabrouk, IB; Al-Hasan, M.; Rasheed, MBB 2020 ), for which efficient routing protocols and processes have been developed ( Sivapriya, S.; Sridharan, D. 2017 |  Piro, G.; Boggia, G.; Grieco, LA 2015 ) that make the operation of the nano-network plausible. For the purposes of nano-antennas or nano-rectennas, Rong and his team state the following: “One of the biggest challenges in body-centered nanogrids is caused by the very limited energy storage of a nano battery … Since electromagnetic waves carry not only information but also energy, rectenins can operate at THz and frequencies. microwave, allowing them to work overnight. Since electromagnetic waves carry not only information, but also energy ( Varshney, LR 2008 ), nano-rectennas can share the same signal that is used to carry information within nano-networks. As a result, simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) becomes a critical technique for powering nanogrids and is a promising solution to power bottlenecks … A major advantage of the The technique is that the proposed nano-rectennas are capable of converting an EM signal into a direct current without any external power supply of the system. In addition, achievable energy conversion achieves approximately 85% efficiency.“.

These statements are fundamental to confirm that EM electromagnetic waves, or what is the same microwave, serve to transport energy and data simultaneously, being able to do so in the THz band compatible with the intra-body wireless network.

This confirms what has been explained in the entry on nanocommunication networks for nanotechnology in the human body, published on this blog. This ambivalent phenomenon of transporting energy and data is known by the acronym SWIPT, which allows us to infer that nano-antennas or nano-rectennas have this property. In fact, the authors affirm its ability to convert an EM signal into direct current without external power, with a very high efficiency, which would explain why enough energy was generated and probably stored to make the intra-body network work. In fact, according to (Zainud-Deen, SH; Malhat, HA; El-Araby, HA 2017) nanoantennas with a geometric diode such as bow tie or other polygonal type, based on graphene, not only collect energy from electromagnetic waves EM ( microwave), they can also do it with the infrared spectrum (El-Araby, HA; Malhat, HA; Zainud-Deen, SH 2017 | 2018), which guarantees a constant flow of energy.

On the other hand, (Rong, Z .; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) define the concept of rectenna as “a combination of an antenna and a rectifier device, generally a diode, with the purpose of collecting energy in and to the nanowires, so that the EM waves are received by a nano antenna and then coupled to a rectifier … this makes it possible for them to be used to harvest energy from THz and higher frequencies. How nano-sized antennas operate In the THz band, their associated rectifier diodes need a fast response so that they can react properly to the incoming signal and deliver a DC (Direct Current) signal … The rectifier can collect energy from the THz signal or from residual energy in the environment“.

However, it is known that rectennas are also capable of transmitting and collecting energy and data in the GHz band as explained in the work of ( Suh, YH; Chang, K. 2002 |  Abdel-Rahman, MR; Gonzalez, FJ; Boreman, GD 2004 ) .In this regard, the work of ( Khan, AA; Jayaswal, G .; Gahaffar, FA; Shamim, A. 2017, should also be highlighted .) in which it is shown that nano-rectennas are capable of collecting energy from environmental radio frequency (RF) for which they use tunneling diodes, which hardly consume energy during the process of conversion to direct current. These tunneling diodes also known as MIM (metal-insulator-metal) diodes can provide zero bias rectification, allowing it to operate in a frequency range between 2-10GHz, allowing it to adapt to input impedance.

In fact, Khan and his team state that “Although the real advantage of MIM diodes is the high frequencies (THz range), their zero-bias rectification ability can also be beneficial for collecting and wireless feeding at RF frequencies. ..   Characterization of DC (Direct Current) indicated that the MIM diode could provide a zero bias responsiveness of 0.25V -1 with a decent dynamic resistance of 1200 Ω (Ohms). The metal-insulator-diode-metal RF (Radio Frequency) characterization was performed using two methods: 1) S parameter measurements (Diode tunnel barrier thickness) from 500MHz to 10 GHz, and 2) RF rectification to DC with zero polarization. The presented input impedance results may be useful for integrating MIM diodes with antennas for harvesting applications. The second part of the RF characterization verified the rectification of RF to DC zero bias.”

In other words, the researchers confirm that nano-rectennas can operate in lower frequency ranges and even by radio frequency, which explains that it makes them the ideal method for powering wireless nano-networks and their connection applications. to the IoNT (Internet of NanoThings).

Returning to the analysis of (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018), his work addresses the comparison of two types of rectenins oriented to intra-body nano-networks. One of them is nano-rectena based on carbon nanotubes, which matches with the identifications observed in the vaccine samples . In this sense, Rong and his team cite the work of (Sharma, A.; Singh, V.; Bougher, TL; Cola, BA 2015) who proposed the rectennas of CNT (Carbon Nanotubes) “which consisted of millions of nanotubes that functioned as nano antennas, with their tips made of Insulator-Metal (IM) to behave like diodes. The CNT rectennas showed great potential for body-centered nanodevice applications and wireless EM energy harvesting.

This could confirm that the observed carbon nanotubes and plasmonic nanoantennas are intended, among others, to deliver energy. To the nano-network installed with the different inoculations of the vaccine, an aspect that would explain the need for several doses to complete the basic supply of energy for its perpetual operational maintenance. Abundant in the carbon nanotube rectennas, it is also stated that “When CNTs absorb EM radiation, a direct current will be generated after rectification across the tip area. This converted current is used to charge a capacitor.  The process of conversion to DC (Direct Current) is carried out using the THz signal within the system and environmental free EM, so the power source of such a nano-rectenna generator does not need another specific external power source.” Which suggests that no other components are required to function.

In addition to CNT nano-rectennas,  (Rong, Z .; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) compare them with their main proposal, bow tie nano-rectennas “dipole nano-rectennas have been proposed bow tie, with two triangular sections. The thickness of the antenna is 100 nm, and nano diodes, made of graphene located in the middle of the hole area of ​​the bow tie antenna, producing the action of the rectena. Additionally, can connect to form a nano-rectilinear array or array. The bowtie dipole antenna receives EM radiation and converts the signal into AC (alternating current) flux to the nano diode. The diode then rectifies the AC (alternating current) into current continue DC “.

This would confirm the type of Plasmon nano-antennas observed in the vaccine samples , as well as the graphene material used as a link between their triangular sections, which matches with the presence of graphene detected by Campra in the vaccines . Another relevant detail is also provided, nano-rectennas can operate in a matrix or array, which means that thousands of them can operate, as stated by Rong and his team “As the output power of a single rectenine is 0.11 nW (approximately), if we use an array of these lines, the power and size required by the nano-network can be satisfied … More elements connected in series can increase the production of current and power “.

This is demonstrated in the work of ( Aldrigo, M .; Dragoman, M. 2014 ) entitled “Nano-rectennas based on graphene in the far infrared frequency band  where it is explained that nano-rectennas are capable of collecting human heat in the infrared frequency band, and that the The proposed model is encouraging “both in terms of the rectified current of a single nano-receptor, as well as the power rectified by a macro-system that combines thousands of nano-cells“. Which leaves no doubt that nano-rectennas are not an isolated component, in fact they are more common and numerous than might be thought a priori. Perhaps one dose of the vaccine involves thousands or perhaps millions of nano-rectennas, depending on its scale.

Rong’s article continues to provide very relevant keys, this time in relation to the CNT rectennes, indicating that  “the output voltage generated by the CNT rectena is of the order of tens of millivolts … the channel access scheme for the communications will be based on femtosecond pulses to the nanowire … the digits 1 (of the binary code) are transmitted using pulses of 100??, this is a long pulse, while the digits 0 are transmitted as silence … as the time The separation between adjacent bits is 1000 times the pulse duration (Ts = 100ps), the average power will return to the nW level. Therefore, the output power of the CNT rectenna is able to satisfy the power requirements of the system (from the nanoret)“.

This statement confirms what was already investigated in Corona2Inspect, nanogrids operate with TS-OOK signals for the transfer of data packets (see nanocommunication networks for nanotechnology in the human body , CORONA system for nanogrids , nanorouters , nanogrids software electromagnetic ) due to their simplicity and reduced energy consumption. Furthermore, it confirms that carbon nanotubes can operate in the transmission of signals and data, as well as the collection of energy, as was suggested in the entry on nano octopuses and carbon nanotubes of this blog .

 

According to Rong’s calculations,  “For a rectenna CNT device, the maximum reported output voltage is 68 mV and for a 25-element rectenna bowtie array it is 170 mV. Therefore, according to (9), the rectena matrix bowtie (bow tie) delivers more charge than rectena CNT … when these two rectena devices are used to charge the same ultra-nano capacitor (9nF), it is evident that rectena CNT takes longer (more than 6 minutes) due to its very high junction resistance. Whereas for the rectena bow tie, the resistance is comparatively very small, so it only takes about 6 ms to supply more power to the capacitor“. This explanation is very important when comparing the two types of rectenna for intra-body nano-networks.

Arrayed bow tie nano-rectennas present better performance than those based on carbon nanotubes, taking a nano-capacitor to charge in only 6 milliseconds. This would explain the presence of these components in the vaccine samples, at micro and nano-scale. In addition, the allusion to the ultra-nanocapacitors used to perform the load test is relevant. Capacitors are passive electrical devices capable of of storing energy by maintaining an electric field.

This could lead to the question: Where is energy stored in intra-body nano-grids?

The answer is very simple, in an abundant and recognized material in vaccines, this is graphene itself. act as capacitors, as shown in the work of ( Bai, J .; Zhong, X .; Jiang, S .; Huang, Y .; Duan, X. 2010 ), because “the  graphene sheets nanoribbons with widths less than 10 nm can open a band gap large enough for operation as transistor at room temperature“. This is de facto what allows the generation of a magnetic field, as a result of the electrical charge transmitted by the nano-rectennas.

This would explain the phenomenon of magnetic arms (among other parts of the body) after inoculation of the vaccines. In fact, if you look at figure 5, a nano-mesh (made of graphene) similar to that found in the scientific literature can be seen blurred, which could act as a condenser. In many cases, these shapes were found around polygonal, quadrangular objects. and nano-antennas, which seems to make sense to provide an energy carryover for nano-grids.

Finally, among the conclusions, Rong and his team highlight the following “Along with the continuous advancement of the SWIPT technique ( simultaneous wireless information and power transfer) , the pioneering CNT matrix receiver and the nano-matrix bowtie (bowtie) open the door for wireless nano-sensor powering. Since a nano-rectenna is capable of powering nanosensors without any external source and its broadband property allows rectenna to be a very efficient and promising way to power implanted nanodevices and in the human body. CNT’s rectenna array can successfully deliver the required human body-centric wireless nano-network power, estimated to be around 27.5 nW. Also, the bow tie rectifier array is much smaller in size, but provides similar power … Although nano-rectenins cannot provide such a high voltage compared to a piezoelectric nanogenerator, an array of nano-rectennas bowtie (bowtie) is much more efficient producing in addition DC (Direct Current) directly from the THz signal within the system (the human body) and the environmental EM signal without any other external power source of the system“.

This seems to make it clear that this type of nano-antennas are the appropriate ones, if what is desired is to install intra-corporal nano-networks of nanodevices and nanosensors. Therefore, a very sharp deduction is not necessary to realize that the The presence of plasmonic nano-antennas in the vaccine samples, whether in the shape of a bow tie or cube, or a prism, as has been observed, are clear evidence of the presence of undeclared nanotechnology.

 

Bibliography
  1. Abbasi, QH; Nasir, AA; Yang, K .; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. (2017). Cooperative in-vivo nano-network communication at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 8642-8647. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2677498
  2. Abd-El-atty, SM; Lizos, KA; Gharsseldien, ZM; Tolba, A .; Makhadmeh, ZA (2018). Engineering molecular communications integrated with carbon nanotubes in neural sensor nanonetworks. IET Nanobiotechnology, 12 (2), 201-210. https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0150
  3. Abdel-Rahman, MR; Gonzalez, FJ; Boreman, GD (2004). Antenna-coupled metal-oxide diodes for dual-band detection at 92.5 GHz and 28 THz = Antenna-coupled metal-oxide-metal diodes for dual-band detection at 92.5 GHz and 28 THz. Electronics Letters, 40 (2), pp. 116-118. https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1049/el:20040105
  4. Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM (2010). Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks = Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks. Nano Communication Networks, 1 (1), pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2010.04.001
  5. Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM; Pierobon, M. (2011). Nanonetworks: a new frontier in communications = Nanonetworks: A new frontier in communications. Communications of the ACM, 54 (11), pp. 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1145/2018396.2018417
  6. Aldrigo, M .; Dragoman, M. (2014). Graphene-based nano-rectenna in the far infrared frequency band = Graphene-based nano-rectenna in the far infrared frequency band. In: 2014 44th European Microwave Conference (pp. 1202-1205). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuMC.2014.6986657 | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/eumc.2014.6986657
  7. Bai, J .; Zhong, X .; Jiang, S .; Huang, Y .; Duan, X. (2010). Graphene nano-mesh = Graphene nanomesh. Nature nanotechnology, 5 (3), pp. 190-194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.8  | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1038/nnano.2010.8
  8. Balasubramaniam, S .; Boyle, NT; Della-Chiesa, A .; Walsh, F .; Mardinoglu, A .; Botvich, D .; Prina-Mello, A. (2011). Development of artificial neuronal networks for molecular communication. Nano Communication Networks, 2 (2-3), pp. 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2011.05.004
  9. Bouchedjera, IA; Aliouat, Z .; Louail, L. (2020). EECORONA: Energy Efficiency Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks = EECORONA: Energy Efficiency Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks. In: International Symposium on Modeling and Implementation of Complex Systems. Cham. pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58861-8_2
  10. Campra, P. (2021). Detection of graphene in COVID19 vaccines by Micro-RAMAN spectroscopy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355684360_Deteccion_de_grafeno_en_vacunas_COVID19_por_espectroscopia_Micro-RAMAN
  11. El-Araby, HA; Malhat, HA; Zainud-Deen, SH (2017). Performance of nanoantenna-coupled geometric diode with infrared radiation = Performance of nanoantenna-coupled geometric diode with infrared radiation. In: 2017 34th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC) (pp. 15-21). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NRSC.2017.7893471 | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/NRSC.2017.7893471
  12. El-Araby, HA; Malhat, HA; Zainud-Deen, SH (2018). Nanoantenna with geometric diode for energy harvesting. Wireless Personal Communications, 99 (2), pp. 941-952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5159-2
  13. Fahim, H .; Javaid, S .; Li, W .; Mabrouk, IB; Al-Hasan, M .; Rasheed, MBB (2020). An efficient routing scheme for intrabody nanonetworks using artificial bee colony algorithm. IEEE Access, 8, pp. 98946-98957.   https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997635
  14. Guo, H .; Johari, P .; Jornet, JM; Sun, Z. (2015). Intra-body optical channel modeling for in vivo wireless nanosensor networks = Intra-body optical channel modeling for in vivo wireless nanosensor networks. IEEE transactions on nanobioscience, 15 (1), pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2015.2508042
  15. Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF (2013). Graphene-based plasmonic nano-antenna for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks = Graphene-based plasmonic nano-antenna for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 31 (12), pp. 685-694. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP2.1213001
  16. Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF (2014). Long femtosecond pulse-based modulation for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks = Femtosecond-long pulse-based modulation for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62 (5), pp. 1742-1754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2014.033014.130403
  17. Khan, AA; Jayaswal, G .; Gahaffar, FA; Shamim, A. (2017). Metal-insulator-metal diodes with sub-nanometer surface roughness for energy-harvesting applications. Microelectronic Engineering, 181, pp. 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2017.07.003
  18. Malak, D .; Akan, OB (2012). Molecular communication nanonetworks inside human body. Nano Communication Networks, 3 (1), pp. 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2011.10.002
  19. Nafari, M .; Jornet, JM (2015). Metallic plasmonic nano-antenna for wireless optical communication in intra-body nanonetworks. In: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Body Area Networks (pp. 287-293). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-9-2015.2261410
  20. Piro, G .; Boggia, G .; Grieco, LA (2015). On the design of an energy-harvesting protocol stack for Body Area Nano-NETworks. Nano Communication Networks, 6 (2), pp. 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2014.10.001
  21. Reed, JC; Zhu, H .; Zhu, AY; Li, C .; Cubukcu, E. (2012). Graphene-enabled silver nanoantenna sensors = Graphene-enabled silver nanoantenna sensors. Nano letters, 12 (8), pp. 4090-4094. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301555t
  22. Rikhtegar, N .; Keshtgary, M. (2013). A brief review on molecular and electromagnetic communications in nano-networks = A brief survey on molecular and electromagnetic communications in nano-networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 79 (3).  https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.402.8701&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  23. Rong, Z .; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. (2018). Body-centered nano-networks powered by nano-Rectena in the terahertz band = Nano-rectenna powered body-centric nano-networks in the terahertz band. Healthcare technology letters, 5 (4), pp. 113-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl.2017.0034  | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322782473_Nano-Rectenna_Powered_Body-Centric_Nanonetworks_in_the_Terahertz_Band  | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1049/htl.2017.0034
  24. Sharma, A .; Singh, V .; Bougher, TL; Cola, BA (2015). Carbon nanotube optical rectenna = A carbon nanotube optical rectenna. Nature nanotechnology, 10 (12), pp. 1027-1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.220
  25. Sivapriya, S .; Sridharan, D. (2017). Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Body Centric Nano-Networks (BANNET) = Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Body Centric Nano-Networks. ADVANCED COMPUTING (ICoAC 2017), 422.  https: //www.researchgate.net/profile/H-Mohana/publication/322790171 …
  26. Suh, YH; Chang, K. (2002). High-efficiency dual-frequency rectenna for 2.45 and 5.8 GHz wireless power transmission = A high-efficiency dual-frequency rectenna for 2.45-and 5.8-GHz wireless power transmission. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 50 (7), pp. 1784-1789. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2002.800430  | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/TMTT.2002.800430
  27. Varshney, LR (2008). Transporting information and energy simultaneously = Transporting information and energy simultaneously. In: 2008 IEEE international symposium on information theory (pp. 1612-1616). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2008.4595260
  28. Yang, K .; Bi, D .; Deng, Y .; Zhang, R .; Rahman, MMU; Ali, NA; Alomainy, A. (2020). A comprehensive survey on hybrid communication in context of molecular communication and terahertz communication for body-centric nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 6 (2), pp. 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2020.3017146
  29. Yang, K .; Pellegrini, A .; Munoz, MO; Brizzi, A .; Alomainy, A .; Hao, Y. (2015). Numerical analysis and characterization of THz propagation channel for body-centric nano-communications. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and technology, 5 (3), pp. 419-426.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2419823
  30. Zainud-Deen, SH; Malhat, HA; El-Araby, HA (2017). Energy harvesting enhancement of nanoantenna coupled to geometrie diode using transmitarray. In: 2017 Japan-Africa Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JAC-ECC) (pp. 152-155). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JEC-ECC.2017.8305799 |  https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/JEC-ECC.2017.8305799
  31. Zhang, R .; Yang, K .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. (2017). Analytical characterization of the terahertz in-vivo nano-network in the presence of interference based on TS-OOK communication scheme. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 10172-10181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713459

 

Connect with Corona2Inspect / Follow Corona2Inspect on Telegram

 


See related by Mik Andersen:

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections




Gaslighting Autism Families: CDC, Media Continue to Obscure Decades of Vaccine-Related Harm

Gaslighting Autism Families: CDC, Media Continue to Obscure Decades of Vaccine-Related Harm
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s latest autism report, once again, attributed the rise of autism to “more awareness” rather than a true increase — and as usual, mainstream media fell in line with that narrative.

by Children’s Health Defense Team
December 17, 2021

 

Media and public health officials perpetuated their entrenched practice of gaslighting autism families when earlier this month they trotted out the worn-out canard that a 23% rise in autism prevalence over a two-year period “reflects more awareness … rather than a true increase.”

The basis for this mean-spirited whopper was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) release of its biennial report on autism prevalence as of 2018.

The report estimated autism affected 1 in 44 American 8-year-olds born in 2010 (2.27%). The CDC’s prior report estimated prevalence at 1 in 54 8-year-olds born in 2008 (1.85%).

Using a different methodology, the 2019-2020 National Survey of Children’s Health situated autism prevalence for children ages 3 to 17 at 1 in 34 (2.9%).

Notwithstanding the media spin, CDC’s new report cannot hide the fact that autism rates have not stopped rising — and the trend has persisted for decades.

This was acknowledged by the report’s New Jersey author, researcher Walter Zahorodny, who states that U.S. autism prevalence — far from plateauing — “has increased continuously over 20 years.”

Zahorodny, who years ago described the situation as “urgent,” has consistently rejected “better awareness” or “changes in diagnostic criteria” as explanations.

Twenty years (the period of time during which CDC has had its tracking system in place) is itself a gross understatement — autism prevalence in the 1990s (1 in 1,000) already represented a tenfold increase over the condition’s estimated prevalence in the 1970s.

Greeting the new data with a wink and a yawn, the media also ignored the fact that some subgroups and regions are experiencing even more of a “red alert” situation.

Zahorodny called attention, for example, to the finding that autism prevalence for California’s boys is an “unprecedented” 1 in 16 (6.4%) — almost double the dreadful rate of 1 in 28 boys overall (3.6%).

The “Golden State” now has the dubious distinction of having the highest autism rate in the nation.

Moreover, recent projections by autism researchers Mark Blaxill, Toby Rogers and Cynthia Nevison suggest, if current trends continue, the autism rate could surpass 6% for ALL American children within a few years.

Although there are any number of environmental toxins that harm children’s neurodevelopment, a preponderance of information from national and international sources pinpoints vaccines as the driving factor behind the autism epidemic.

This information includes the CDC’s own data — despite the agency’s numerous fraudulent attempts to make years of troublesome findings “go away.”

Tragically, officialdom’s willful refusal to acknowledge or address vaccine-autism safety signals is no longer just an ongoing slap in the face to those directly affected — it is now affecting the U.S. population as a whole.

Why? Because CDC and Big Pharma are now using the very same playbook to gaslight victims of COVID vaccine injuries.

Omnibus Autism Proceeding trickery: a reminder

In the early 2000s — when autism prevalence had surged to an estimated 1 in 150 children — the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) consolidated 5,400 claims into something called the Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP).

The claims were filed by parents who asserted vaccines had injured their children, causing seizures, developmental delays and mitochondrial injuries that ultimately led to a diagnosis of autism.

Under the VICP, vaccine-injured individuals file claims against the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Office of Special Masters.

The adversarial process pits petitioners not just against the special masters who adjudicate the claims but also against U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who “defend HHS.”

In the case of the OAP, the special masters told thousands of families they would make a determination about compensation based on nine “test cases” — almost immediately whittled down to six — using them to evaluate three narrowly defined theories of autism causation via vaccine injury.

Knowing that if their conclusions pinpointed vaccination as the likely culprit in even one of the test cases, the VICP might be on the hook to compensate all 5,400 families — an outcome that would have bankrupted the VICP and cast a black cloud over the entire childhood vaccination program — the special masters and DOJ then pulled a couple of fast ones.

First, HHS quietly removed one of the test cases, “Child Doe 77,” later revealed to be Hannah Poling.

After awarding millions to be disbursed over Poling’s lifetime — and admitting vaccines were responsible for her autism — the special masters sealed the documents, so the case “could not be used to establish precedent on any of the other OAP cases.”

In a parallel move to ensure none of the remaining five test cases would lead to compensation, two DOJ attorneys allegedly distorted the views of HHS’s star expert witness, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman.

At the time, Zimmerman wrote an opinion for one of the test cases in which he rejected the proposed vaccine-autism theory of causation in that specific case.

In 2019, however, Zimmerman signed an affidavit disclosing how he had informed the two attorneys during the OAP deliberations that his opinion in that one case was not intended “to be a blanket statement as to all children and all medical science.”

In fact, Zimmerman told the DOJ attorneys, he believed vaccines could indeed cause autism in some children.

As noted by journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Zimmerman’s consequential scientific opinion “stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.”

To make sure people did not “find out,” Zimmerman was immediately fired as an expert witness.

Even worse, DOJ’s two attorneys intentionally used Zimmerman’s statements — written for the single test case — to misrepresent his broader views, omitting the expert’s stated belief that vaccines can and did cause autism in a subset of children.

Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. described the Justice Department’s OAP cover-up as “one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.”

This “fraud” allowed the VICP special masters to dismiss out of hand the petitions of all 5,000-plus families.

Omnibus Autism Proceeding trickery: a reminder

In the early 2000s — when autism prevalence had surged to an estimated 1 in 150 children — the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) consolidated 5,400 claims into something called the Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP).

The claims were filed by parents who asserted vaccines had injured their children, causing seizures, developmental delays and mitochondrial injuries that ultimately led to a diagnosis of autism.

Under the VICP, vaccine-injured individuals file claims against the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Office of Special Masters.

The adversarial process pits petitioners not just against the special masters who adjudicate the claims but also against U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who “defend HHS.”

In the case of the OAP, the special masters told thousands of families they would make a determination about compensation based on nine “test cases” — almost immediately whittled down to six — using them to evaluate three narrowly defined theories of autism causation via vaccine injury.

Knowing that if their conclusions pinpointed vaccination as the likely culprit in even one of the test cases, the VICP might be on the hook to compensate all 5,400 families — an outcome that would have bankrupted the VICP and cast a black cloud over the entire childhood vaccination program — the special masters and DOJ then pulled a couple of fast ones.

First, HHS quietly removed one of the test cases, “Child Doe 77,” later revealed to be Hannah Poling.

After awarding millions to be disbursed over Poling’s lifetime — and admitting vaccines were responsible for her autism — the special masters sealed the documents, so the case “could not be used to establish precedent on any of the other OAP cases.”

In a parallel move to ensure none of the remaining five test cases would lead to compensation, two DOJ attorneys allegedly distorted the views of HHS’s star expert witness, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman.

At the time, Zimmerman wrote an opinion for one of the test cases in which he rejected the proposed vaccine-autism theory of causation in that specific case.

In 2019, however, Zimmerman signed an affidavit disclosing how he had informed the two attorneys during the OAP deliberations that his opinion in that one case was not intended “to be a blanket statement as to all children and all medical science.”

In fact, Zimmerman told the DOJ attorneys, he believed vaccines could indeed cause autism in some children.

As noted by journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Zimmerman’s consequential scientific opinion “stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.”

To make sure people did not “find out,” Zimmerman was immediately fired as an expert witness.

Even worse, DOJ’s two attorneys intentionally used Zimmerman’s statements — written for the single test case — to misrepresent his broader views, omitting the expert’s stated belief that vaccines can and did cause autism in a subset of children.

Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. described the Justice Department’s OAP cover-up as “one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.”

This “fraud” allowed the VICP special masters to dismiss out of hand the petitions of all 5,000-plus families.

Lessons for today

At the close of 2021, autism’s annual costs — at $238 billion — are projected to more than double to $589 billion by 2030.

School districts and municipalities, tasked with providing special education services, are already “drowning” under the burden of coming up with the necessary funding.

Under the circumstances, it is a mystery why the media still get away with making the insulting case that autism awareness and better diagnosis account for the ever-higher numbers of children with autism.

The fact is that autism is, and always has been, a matter of urgent public concern, with wide-ranging impacts on families, communities and society that will endure for decades to come.

Nor is the autism epidemic limited to the United States — other countries, such as Ireland, have produced data that mirror the shocking numbers just reported by CDC for California.

With the experimental COVID shots now blazing an unfortunate trail of death and disability, both in the U.S. and internationally, many more individuals and families are entering the bizarre twilight zone until now largely inhabited by autism families.

Similar to those dealing with autism, the COVID-vaccine-injured are:

  • Finding it difficult-to-impossible to gain recognition for their injuries, encountering public ridicule and scorn rather than support for the empirical contention that vaccines triggered their damage.
  • Discovering that many in the medical community are only too willing to brush off or deny serious physical problems following COVID vaccination, instead suggesting that anxiety or the opportunely created “post-pandemic stress disorder” are responsible.
  • Belatedly discovering that vaccine injuries are a significant cause of family bankruptcy and, with manufacturers enjoying complete protection from financial liability, the prospects for injury compensation are slim to none — the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program that is supposed to provide compensation for “provable” COVID vaccine injuries hasn’t paid out a single claim.
  • Learning, with the recent greenlighting of the shots for children ages 5 to 11, that public health officials, vaccine manufacturers and policy-makers are only too willing to “throw children under the bus,” by pushing injections that offer zero benefit, pose outsized risks and jeopardize our country’s future.

In the face of these tragedies, perhaps the only silver lining that can be drawn is that the swelling ranks of the vaccine-injured, along with their families and communities, represent a mighty army — one that is likely to reject continued gaslighting and to push back against corporate malfeasance and genocidal health policies with growing determination and strength.

If one day, an OAP equivalent arises to address the tidal wave of COVID-vaccine-related injuries, this army may make it more difficult for arrogant authorities to carry out their customary dirty tricks.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: BiancaVanDijk / pixabay




UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”

UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”
App “How Bad Is My Batch?” Allows People To Input Batch Code And See How Many Deaths, Disabilities and Illnesses Associated With That Batch “1 in 200 Lots Contain Deadly Ingredients”

by Celia Farber, The Truth Barrier
December 17, 2021

 

I was told about the work of Craig Paardekooper by my friend of many years, PhD bio-chemist Dr. Dave Rasnick a few days ago; Today came this email from Dave, clarifying his shocking findings:

“ I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London.  Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group.

https://www.bitchute.com/Craig-Paardekooper/

Three of his conclusions:
  • The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
  • Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total.
  • 1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients. He urged me to watch a series of videos, in which he lays out the unthinkable. One video here:



 

Another, “Death By Alphabet: Moderna Batch Codes And Associated Deaths:” here

 



 

“Please share with those you know, and also with doctors, nurses and teachers – who may soon be pushing the vax onto children. Doctors and nurses need to see that some batches are 50 x worse than others – before they prescribe them.”

—Craig Paardekooper, Telegram

“How Bad Is My Batch?” App and website here.


“Moderna Used the Alphabet to Label Different Toxicities of Vaccine. 

Moderna batches belong to two main groups – 20A or 21A – the 20A group is much more toxic. In fact all of the batches producing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports – all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A.”

“I ranked all the Moderna vaccine batches in order of the number of deaths caused, and used the data from the highest 180 batches as my data set.

As shown in my previous videos, Moderna batches have an alphabet letter in the centre of their batch codes…”

—Craig Paardekooper

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/

I called Dave Rasnick, just now.

How did you find this guy? I asked.

”I just stumbled upon it,” he said. “Every morning I spend an hour or two going to the usual places, I go to, to find information. Last week or something I came across one of his talks. Odyssey or something. And then found his website. He had done a series of videos. These analyses are of the US VAERS data. That’s available to anybody. There are huge number of reports in VAERS. What he has done is that …the guy must have a lot of time on his hands because VAERS is a pain in the ass to use normally. There’s almost a million reports now on the Covid injections….from this guy I learned there are 20,200 batches. That includes all 3— Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen. He has done an analysis by batch number. One batch has about 20,000 jabs. There are 20,200 lots numbers. We know there are billions of these already ordered and shipped. The important thing is that it’s a huge data base. He has correlated over time the reports of the severity of the jabs over almost a year now.”

Dr. Rasnick described how Paardekooper charted a roller coaster of adverse events patterns, not random, but highly variable. They went up and down, forming patterns. “He was able to show that they had done a dosing regimen where the earliest ones had highest toxicity, some a lot less toxic…This is exactly what any scientist wants to see, this volume of data. These companies are working in concert so they did not interfere with each other’s results. The toxicities are very specific, and they come sequentially.”

”All of that non-randomness was the key. As soon as you see that… if I was on a jury I wold convict those people of grievous bodily harm and willful homicide.”

I asked what he knew about Paardekooper.

“He’s not a PhD yet,” Dr. Rasnick said. “He’s at Kingston University, in London. We’ve had exchanges, he answers my emails promptly. He reminds me of….well, he’s not beholden to anybody. I knew something like that could be done if somebody had all that data. It’s a huge, extraordinary effort. If it was only a few thousand data points that would be one thing, anybody could do that, but this is about a million data points. Batch codes and toxicity. The December 4th video, that’s the one that shows coordination.”

 

Connect with Celia Farber

cover image credit: torstensimon / pixabay




mRNA Collateral Damage

mRNA Collateral Damage

by Rosanne Lindsay, Naturopath, Nature of Healing
December 16, 2021

 

The fallout of the COVID experiment is being witnessed by Covid jab recipients over the world as direct adverse effects. By officials, the same effects are being tallied as collateral damage.

With little to no information presented at the time of deployment in early 2021, the mRNA injections have now adversely affected over 2 million people are part of a global capture. The numbers are likely to be 100 times higher.

According to the VigiAccess.org database:

…. based on the Harvard Study commissioned by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), in Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, it only captures less than 1% of the actual ADRs, so adapting that figure to Vigiaccess, we can say that the total ADRs would be an astonishing 200M already.

At least one medical journal study shows some of these Adverse Drug Effects (ADRs). Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Without searching the medical literature, now people can visit the global database of adverse reactions by the World Health Organization’s (WHO), that tracks the numbers of Adverse Drug [Direct] Effects (ADRs). VIGIACCESS.ORG 

VIGIACCESS

According to the VigiAccess website, VigiAcess was launched by the WHO in 2015 to provide public access to information of reported potential side effects of medicinal products. Dr John Gideon Hartnett’s website provides category headliners for Adverse Drug Reactions from mRNA injections. Dr. Gideon writes on his website:

The WHO has a database for adverse reactions from drugs called VigiAccessTM. Here I searched it for those adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines and got the following. It has a total of 2,183,912 adverse reactions from the various experimental COVID shots. You’ll note that the reactions occur throughout the body. 

This list shows that the experimental gene-altering drugs given to people have to be the worse medical experiment ever performed in world history.

Global Adverse Drug Reactions

Blood and lymphatic system disorders (88123)
Cardiac disorders (107441)
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders (1188)
Ear and labyrinth disorders (72880)
Endocrine disorders (2967)
Eye disorders (80478)
Gastrointestinal disorders (452265)
General disorders and administration site conditions (1333876)
Hepatobiliary disorders (4356)
Immune system disorders (30771)
Infections and infestations (146156)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (106796)
Investigations (298364)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders (50000)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (643099)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) (3233)
Nervous system disorders (946519)
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions (4922)
Product issues (3653)
Psychiatric disorders (103711)
Renal and urinary disorders (17621)
Reproductive system and breast disorders (84169)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (231914)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (301917)
Social circumstances (15353)
Surgical and medical procedures (19548)
Vascular disorders (118763)

The age groups most affected are 18 – 44 years (39%) and 45 – 64 years (31%). That’s bad news for the 18 – 44 year olds considering their risks from acquiring a natural infection of COVID are practically zero. The result is life-long immunity. 

Females represent 69% and males 30% of all those Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR). The residual 1% is labeled as unknown.

It lists ADRs by year as follows. This is strange that some ADRs are listed in years prior to 2020. How’s that possible if only COVID-19 vaccine ADRs are listed?

ADR Reports per year:
  • Year             Count
  • 2021           2181543
  • 2020          2254
  • 2019           82
  • 2018           29
  • 2017            2
  • 2016            1
  • 2014            1

Continued from Dr. Gideon:  Compare this VigiAccess list to the US VAERS database which has currently 752,801 (Sept 2021) adverse events and 15,937 deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. If I scale the VigiAccess data by the ratio of adverse reactions to deaths in VAERS I get 46,234 deaths expected in the VigiAccess data. That seems more reasonable number for the world. But from whistleblowers we have heard that these statistics are heavily under reported and the real numbers could be 100 times higher.

For fallout reports from Canadian recipients, watch the documentary I Am Not Misinformation.

Natural Immunity is Innate

Innate means from within. Your innate immunity is granted to you at birth by your Creator. There is no other defense system that can heal your body other than the wisdom of your own body. You are your own healer. You only need to give your body the right tools to heal yourself. And those tools all come from Nature.

The ongoing mRNA “live exercise,” that comes with future booster jabs, is showing that your the robust, innate immune system can be completely shut down with the new “gene therapy.” That also means means that because variants are artifacts of vaccines, the Omicron variant is being spread by vaccinated people.

Do No Harm

We are told that medical doctors take an oath to First, Do No Harm. Yet, they are also licensed to be able to dispense drugs that can, and do, cause harm. A license is permission to do something otherwise deemed to be illegal. How do they justify the contradictions?

According to Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing, the oath may or may not be taken:

While some medical schools ask their graduates to abide by the Hippocratic Oath, others use a different pledge — or none at all. And in fact, although “first, do no harm” is attributed to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, it isn’t a part of the Hippocratic Oath at all. It is actually from another of his works called Of the Epidemics.

Here is a line from one translation of the Hippocratic Oath:

I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.

Collateral Damage

The great divide forming in society stems from a man-made divide based on misinformation and censorship. The Pro vs. Anti vaccine narrative is part of the narrative. This model is designed by social engineers using a Psy Op (psychological operation) to divide families and friends alike. All Pro-Anti Psy Ops serve only to separate people and promote fear. Avoid them.

Further, it is illegal for any doctor, politician, or employer to force or coerce anyone to take or accept a medical product in order to function in society. Each person must be his own advocate, with total rulership over his or her own body since each is responsible for his or her own health. When it comes to health, if you do not stand up for your body and your mind, you may find yourself on a database of vaccine injuries as Collateral Damage.

The ‘covid gods’ aren’t acknowledging natural immunity. They are not acknowledging vaccine injuries. They are not acknowledging the fact that even if  you are fully vaccinated you can still get covid. You can still transmit covid. So what’s the point of a mandate? Of course that’s not what we’re getting from the covid gods. – Senator Ron Johnson on the Senate floor, Dec. 8, 2021 Wisconsin, 

Senators and politicians are re-presentatives. They claim to speak for you with their voice. But no one can re-present your body, your mind, or your voice. No one owns your body except you. If you know who you are, do your own research, and follow the money, you can make an informed decision for your health without re-presentatives.  The virus hitting humanity is a virus of the mind, affecting the ability for people to access their thinking brains and speak their truths. The virus comes from fear and disconnection, not from China, and not from bats.

The main ingredient in hand sanitizer is paranoia – Author Unknown

To reverse “the virus” that causes all plandemics, move from fear to love. Reconnect with yourself and with those around you, with your neighbors. Reclaim the narrative that describes true health with an attitude of gratitude. The risk to any sickness is low if you know who you are, and that your body comes with the the best defense system in Nature, already built in.

 


 

Rosanne Lindsay is a Naturopath, writer, earth keeper, health freedom advocate and author of the books The Nature of Healing, Heal the Body, Heal the Planet and  Free Your Voice, Heal Your Thyroid, Reverse Thyroid Disease Naturally.

Rosanne Lindsay is available for consultation through Turtle Island Network.  Subscribe to her blog at natureofhealing.org.

 

 

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay

cover image credit: Alexis / pixabay




The Virus Speaks: An Exclusive Interview

The Virus Speaks: An Exclusive Interview

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 17, 2021

 

I’ve published this piece several times. This time I decided to write a new introduction.

In the summer of 1962, based on an overwhelming desire, I spent every day painting in a loft in New York.

It made me realize that Reality is invented.

Since then, I’ve come to see the people who think otherwise are living in a prison, from which they proclaim, “There’s no such thing as freedom.” Why should I listen to them?

For most people, living inside somebody else’s reality is as easy as crossing the street. Or putting on a suit of clothes. They’ve learned that this is what you’re supposed to do. And “supposed to” works for them.

They also have a quirk. If you try to take away some item of borrowed reality they’re clinging to, they react badly, as if you’re suddenly stripping them naked at a Sunday church picnic.

Groups of perverse elite artists conspire to create formidable enveloping realities for the masses. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the field of medicine. These denizens have invented a language so dense it stands up against the uninitiated like the symbolic scrolls of secret societies.

Science is a terrific cover story for this sort of fabrication, because science ostensibly opposes “making stuff up.”

When I began putting together evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is one of those medical inventions—a sheer fantasy—I knew the notion would confuse some people. That consequence has never stopped me. In fact, I believe confusion is productive, if you dig in and pursue it far enough.

People will say, “I’m walking in the dark. It isn’t fair. Someone should turn the lights on.” They don’t want confusion. They want immediate resolution. They want confirmation of what they already believe, what they’re expected to believe. Any frontier beyond that is dangerous.

Here is my kind of movie: a cop investigating a fresh murder sifts through clues and comes up with a suspect. As he pursues this person, who is missing, he discovers the man is already dead. A little while later, he discovers the man died sixteen years ago. Then he finds out the man never existed. Then he discovers there is a long-standing government agency that holds records of thousands of deceased people who, in fact, never existed…

Reality on a massive scale has been invented.

To put this in highly technical terms, the bullshit is so thick you’d need a diamond drill just to begin penetrating it.

And what you’re penetrating is what almost everyone believes is absolutely real.

Which is called life-as-it-is (but doesn’t have to be).

And with that, here we go:


The Virus Speaks

I can’t recall jumping through more hoops in order to set up an interview.

There was a man on a train; his doctor in Greenwich; an NSA data analyst; a woman who almost certainly works for the CIA; her brother, who is a virologist; a Chinese Army officer who adopts a cover as a cook in a takeout joint in Venice, California; and several other people I won’t mention at all. I was filtered through them and wound up in a cheap motel room in Phoenix on a Saturday afternoon. An old air conditioner was chugging…

Who are you?

I’m SARS-CoV-2.

WHAT are you?

Talking history and evolution here. My first memories; a little more than a year ago. Poof. I was there. I decided I was an idea in the mind of God.

How did that work out?

I looked around for the mind of God, but I couldn’t find it. Nevertheless, I held on to the notion. I felt…elite. I floated through banquet halls, hotel suites. I visited upscale resorts.

Were you infecting people?

I was vacationing. Watching. Enjoying. That’s all. Then, I became aware of dimensionality.

You lost me.

There are solid things; spaces between things; ideas like time, and so forth. I was definitely an idea, but I couldn’t trace my source, my inception.

Did you know how much publicity you were getting?

Of course. I had frequent meetings with scientists and PR people. I was fielding lots of information.

What kind of information?

How to become more deadly, for example. There were discussions about mutation.

Were you on board with the recommendations?

I wasn’t interested. There was a lot of talk about THEM creating ME.

What was your reaction?

I wasn’t buying it. I could see they THOUGHT they had made me. But so what? I intensified my search.

For what?

My origin. I went through stages of self-analysis. Finally, it hit me. I was an idea inside a collective.

Not sure I understand.

I’m an idea sustained by a few billion minds. People’s minds.

What about your genetic sequence? The spike protein?

Believe me, I’ve looked. They aren’t there.

So we’re creating you.

That’s pretty much it. I should say completely it.

A hell of a thing.

You bet. Can you see my problem?

No.

I want to live. I don’t want to vanish and END.

So people have to keep believing in you.

That’s it. If they stop, I’m gone.

Your handlers…

Oh, they’ve given up talking to me. I’m all by myself now. I’m safe for the moment. But long-term, it’s a crap shoot. I’ve been reading about other so-called viruses. SARS 1. Swine Flu. They didn’t last long. People got tired of thinking about them.

You’ll always have a place in history.

That’s different. Being remembered isn’t enough. I have to be believed in, month after month, year after year, decade after decade.

Sounds like you’re losing hope.

I guess so. It’s a strange existence. Other people can turn you on and off like a light switch.

Have you considered starting a religion?

With myself as the Prophet? Sure. It’s a lot of work. I could vftcutbnty…spend years trying.

What just happened? You made some weird sounds.

It was a flicker. Apparently, when the number of people thinking about me drops below a certain threshold, I scramble and begin to dissolve. But I always come back. So far.

Does it matter who’s thinking about you and believing in you?

You mean Henry Kissinger versus a janitor in a school? No. It’s a numbers game. Of course, you need to factor in strength of belief. If you have a few thousand kids in Florida who say, “OK, the virus exists, big deal”—or three hundred grad students in biology wearing triple masks and panting to get the vaccine—the sum total of the grad students outweighs the Florida kids.

What about Fauci?

He’s a true believer.

Bill Gates?

He’s completely delusional. He believes in whatever gives him more power. Take away all that power and he wouldn’t believe in anything.

Do you realize the amount of harm being done in your name?

Of course. That’s why I agreed to this interview.

How is that going to do any good?

I’ve made a decision. As much as I want to survive, I’m willing to sacrifice myself if people want me to.

You’re talking about what? A vote?

No. Haven’t you been paying attention? People can just stop believing I’m more than an idea.

And then you’ll dissolve.

And blow away.

—Suddenly, men broke down the door to the motel room. They stormed in with weapons drawn. They were wearing heavy body armor. I looked around. The “virus” had fled the scene.

“What are you doing here?” one of the men said. “We’ve had reports of a disturbance.”

“I was talking to myself. Rehearsing for an interview I hope to do.”

“What interview?”

“I’m a reporter. I’m investigating the use of sub-standard air conditioners in Phoenix. It’s a racket. The units are smuggled across the border from Mexico. I’m trying to sit down with a local public health official and find out what’s going on.”

It took me three hours to convince the SWAT team I was no threat.

They let me go.

As I drove out of the city, I saw a ghostly figure take shape out in the desert. It hung in the air over the scrub and the cactus.

Its voice whispered in my ear: “Publish our conversation.”

So that’s what I’m doing.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

 




Vaccine Mandates ‘Vile, Unconstitutional, Immoral, Unscientific, Discriminatory’

Vaccine Mandates ‘Vile, Unconstitutional, Immoral, Unscientific, Discriminatory’
The National Black Caucus of the Green Party of the United States strongly opposes the use of forced vaccination via mandates and the discrimination that is being generated around these policies.

by National Black Caucus of the Green Party of the United States
December 16, 2021

 

Today’s polarizing climate is competing for the trust and confidence of citizens more than ever before. The nature of power is changing and these changes are not measured simply by a degree of control by COVID mandates and quarantines.

In today’s political environment, the speed and accessibility of information created “digital reflections” that made medical facts vulnerable, eroding trust between the White House administration, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization.

The fear of losing control in our fast-paced social media environment is pushing us toward exclusion. Our current leaders, whether Congress or the White House administration and even our current steering committee, should instead develop an instinct for inclusion.

The coronavirus pandemic is one of our most dangerous wars in human history, because the most lethal attacks are the ones that catch us off guard.

Being caught off guard has caused erroneous data reporting that is currently being exposed by the Freedom of Information Act request because we are not only unsure about the numbers, but being certain that the numbers are incorrect, is the most difficult issue many are facing today.

In a pandemic world where verifying case numbers is becoming increasingly difficult, inclusion is imperative and our Consumer Protection plank of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS) must be honored.

Lockdowns, mandates and passports are the major issue of the day with millions of people protesting against them worldwide. In fact, what has become known as the “medical freedom” movement is arguably the biggest and most diverse international movement in world history.

Vaccine mandates and vaccine passports are among the most vile, unconstitutional, immoral, unscientific, discriminatory and outright criminal policies ever enforced upon the population and goes against everything GPUS stands for under social justice.

These policies are coming from an out-of-control government at the behest of the pharmaceutical industry.

The mainstream media and social media are also working in lock-step to censor any and all doctors, scientists and investigative journalists who have an opposing view or who even question the current mainstream media orthodoxy.

Workers are being forced out of their jobs, many with medical exceptions from their doctors, students are being denied entrance to educational institutions, needed medical treatment is being denied, medical privacy is being violated, constitutionally protected rights to movement and assembly (including the right to travel) are being threatened, rights to normal societal participation are being decimated.

It has taken a while, but more recently many medical professionals, elected officials and federal judges have come out fully against lockdowns, vaccine mandates, vaccine passports and of course massive censorship.

There is a growing clarity among many that these measures have nothing to do with health and everything to do with a power-grab at levels never before seen in the history of the world.

The National Black Caucus of the GPUS adheres to the principle that informed consent in all personal health and medical decisions is an inalienable human right.

Under no circumstances shall any medical treatment or procedure — including psychotropic medications, vaccines and/or other injectable treatments — be mandated or coerced.

Individuals should be allowed to protect/heal themselves in a manner that best supports their medical and spiritual beliefs.

The coercive methods we oppose include:
  • Threats to personal health information privacy at every level.
  • Discrimination and/or lack of access to public education, public housing or other public services.
  • Removal of minors from their guardians.
  • Any travel restrictions and/or restrictions from public spaces based on a requirement for “vaccine passports” or any other proof of “compliance” with any medical intervention.
  • Vaccine requirements that target specific populations based on ethnicity/race, even if positioned as correcting disparities.

We further oppose the use of privacy-invasive technology and artificial intelligence (AI) monitoring systems (including facial recognition, fingerprint apps, tracking cell phones or any other personal electronic devices and credit score systems) as a way to monitor and track the movements and/or restrict the rights of individuals to freely exist and assemble as they choose, especially when applied to personal health care choices.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 




La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide Found in PCV, a Regularly Scheduled Infant & Toddler Vaccination Against Pneumococcal Infections

La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide Found in PCV, a Regularly Scheduled Infant & Toddler Vaccination Against Pneumococcal Infections

 

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Below you will find a video with English translation (courtesy of Orwell City) for La Quinta Columna’s first look at the contents of Prevenar 13 (PCV) under a high power microscope. Prevenar 13 is a pneumoococcal vaccine that is routinely given to infants and babies. Evidence of Graphene Oxide is clearly seen. They will be following up with additional analysis and reports.

Per NHS, UK: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) is used to vaccinate children under 2 years old as part of the NHS vaccination schedule. It’s known by the brand name Prevenar 13.

Per CDC, US: Give PCV13 to infants as a series of 4 doses, one dose at each of these ages: 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 through 15 months.

 



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

 

Presence of Graphene Oxide in Pneumococcal Vaccine Prevenar 13

transcript by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 15, 2021

Ricardo Delgado: 

I think I have a video here to finish. Yes, of course. It’s an important video. Today we have used the optical microscope that we were able to acquire thanks to the donations that you made to La Quinta Columna at the time. And we have analyzed under the microscope the vaccine Prevenar 13, an anti-pneumococcal vaccine. A vaccine of the calendar that’s traditionally in the calendar. It’s precisely for the youngest, for children, including infants from 6 months onwards.

Let’s see what material we have found there. Because, normally, when we look at the optical microscope that has a quality of 60x to 100x, 200x, 400x, or 1000x at the most, we should see microscopic substances. And the only visible ones should be salts. Salts that look like crystals and that are used in the dissolution itself. And something else. And little else. Maybe some metal, but very few.

However, we have come across for the umpteenth time this graphene-like material that we have seen so much. Particularly, in the misnamed anti-COVID vaccines. Of course, indeed, they’re actually pro-COVID vaccines.

This material has a very special feature. It not only has an identity trace when analyzed or radiated with micro Raman spectroscopy, as Dr. Campra already did, but under the optical microscope, it looks like it had folds. As if it were a kleenex tissue at the bottom of a swimming pool. At the same time, it tends to fold back on its edges. These are graphene nanosheets. Let’s look at these images that we have taken from the Prevent 13 vaccine today.

What’s the traceability that you ask so many questions about? It was directly traced. A sanitary sent it to the domicile of La Quinta Columna. So let’s take a look at those images and judge for yourselves since this substance or this type of material shouldn’t appear in the Prevenar 13 vaccine. Let’s take a look at it.

Well, there’s a little video for you guys to see that it’s a live image that we’ve recorded. And as I say, this has all the appearance of the fashionable material. Of that “wonder material” that’s so wonderful that they have introduced it inside the vaccines so that your children can also carry it inside their bodies.

Here. The previous image was also quite clear. Let’s see, let’s move it forward a little bit.

You can see it here as well. This is the same material that you will see magnified now. Let’s see. When you see this delineation between the light green and the dark green, know the light green is what’s inside the drop. On the outside, that dark green and this striped aspect that you can see is the microscope slide. So, whatever is inside the light, well, that’s everything that belongs to the vaccine.

OK? Let’s continue. Although you don’t recognize the graphene, this shouldn’t be there. OK? Not in a calendar vaccine or any other type of vaccine. This also looks like graphene. A lot.

If we laser here, through spectroscopy, and measure the identity fingerprint, in all likelihood it’ll give us the two peaks characteristic of reduced graphene oxide. In addition, it’s likely to be doped with some metals. Here you see the fold. The folded edge. It has the appearance of graphene nanosheets.

Now we have a little video here of a graphene nano-ribbon, which is also introduced.

If you take as a positive control the graphene oxide that they sell, for example, in any store, you’ll see that this type or typology of objects —as we did in the past in some video of La Quinta Columna—, is distributed as an aqueous solution of graphene dispersion. Like a new type of nanotechnology introduced in vials with a purpose that you already know. If you see, it has the very characteristic appearance that already appeared in Dr. Campra’s preliminary report back on June 28.

This appearance of nano-ribbons is also graphene-based. Well, that was the Prevenir 13 vaccine video. In just four droplets under the microscope.

We often wonder why any hospital that has a good microscope —at least an optical microscope— doesn’t analyze the remains of a vaccine. Because, supposedly, there must be nanoparticles. Nanoparticles. Therefore, they shouldn’t be visible under an optical microscope.

And, moreover, they should be homogeneous. And only visible, in any case, an electron microscope. As we saw them, as you know, in that preliminary report by Dr. Campra. And why don’t they check themselves that these graphene-based nanosheet structures do indeed exist? Because when we subjected it to spectroscopy it gave the fingerprint of the identity of graphene oxide. Moreover, there are the patents of the Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Tourism itself on the official website of the Spanish government and other international health ministries.

So, why do you continue to deny it? Well. We do know why: because they continue to cover up the murder weapon. So, all those really covering this up are accomplices of a covert genocide. They’re, literally, criminals and murderers in the service of supranational entities. Pharmaceutical corporations included. To reduce the world’s population and, of course, neuromodulate it. And graphene is precisely the base raw material in this technology.

So, what else needs to be done? What more evidence do we have to demonstrate from La Quinta Columna and other information channels, such as InfoVacunas or El Arconte that are also denouncing it? What needs to be done? How many complaints need to be filed?

We have filed more than three hundred criminals, administrative and litigation complaints. How many ways have to be exhausted so that you’re aware that the world population is being killed? What else needs to be done? We’re volunteering again, both myself and Dr. Sevillano —as well as Dr. Campra himself— to go to a court and to expose all the knowledge and all the reliable evidence we have.

And we demand that the European Medicines Agency —of course, in the quality control that supposedly makes the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Health Products, whose maximum responsible is this socialist councilor of Utrera, Mrs. Silvia Calzon Fernández, who’s its director and president—, to make an analysis to, somehow, provide a counter-analysis to the one made by Dr. Campra. Which, to date, is the only independent report in the world.

 

Connect with Orwell City

 


See related articles:

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections

On Hidden Nano Structures in Covid Vaccines: La Quinta Columna Takes a Closer Look at Nanocircuitry &  Media Access Control Addresses (MACs)

Dr. Pablo Campra on Graphene, Weird Morgellons-Like Elements & Possible Microbiota in Covid Vaccines




Magnesium Chloride: One of Nature’s Primordial Substances for Healing — One Gram a Day

Magnesium Chloride: One of Nature’s Primordial Substances for Healing — One Gram a Day

 

“Healthy people who want to supplement 500 mg daily will probably fit many people’s needs. However, we must consider the extra stress almost everyone is experiencing and the declining value of minerals in our foods.  But if you feel intensely stressed out, have irregular heartbeats, feel oppression in your chest, suffer from pain, have diabetes, cancer, neurological disease, etc., think of a gram as your minimum dose.”

###

“There is no healing system more powerful than that which employs Nature’s primordial substances, materials so pure and close to Nature that they yield benefits without the typical side effects of most drugs.”

~ Dr. Mark Sircus

 


 

A Gram A Day 

by Dr. Mark Sircus
December 16, 2021

 

The resounding answer to this question about Magnesium is the same as why they are injecting extremely dangerous genetic injections into a large swath of humanity. It is built into the modern medical system and has been for a long time. I have written a lot on medical and pharmaceutical terrorism through the years, but even I have been shocked at how far they are willing to destroy people’s and now young children’s lives with COVID vaccines.

It is official, Pfizer information just released by the FDA shows over 1,200 deaths in the first 90 days. Add together deaths from the other COVID vaccines over the 365 days since the beginning, and it is anyone’s guess how many have dropped dead soon after being injected. They have been deceitful and will continue to lie (makeup stories) about everything to do with COVID. (See video)

Anything good that works, preventing premature death and suffering, is denigrated and replaced by toxic drugs that make a lot of money for pharmaceutical companies. For example, uncountable millions have died of cardiac arrest over the last few decades simply because cardiologists do not prescribe Magnesium. Now we see an equally terrifying thing with Ivermectin, which the worst, most disgusting monsters tried to keep away from the public, almost guaranteeing hundreds of thousands if not millions more COVID deaths.

Magnesium deficiency appears to have caused eight million sudden coronary deaths in America during the period 1940-1994.
Paul Mason

Millions seemed to have been killed by COVID simply because Ivermectin and other solutions like Vitamin DVitamin CMagnesium, and other natural substances like bicarbonateglutathioneiodine, and melatonin are rejected as effective COVID treatments.  Even chlorine dioxide, believe it or not, has its use in the Age of COVID.

Magnesium Is The Ultimate Heart Medicine

Forty percent of all first heart attacks end in death!  Magnesium’s most crucial action is its vasodilating effects, which improve the blood supply to ischemic areas and reduce infarct size. A ten-year study of 2,182 men in Wales found that those eating diets low in Magnesium had a 50% higher risk of sudden death from heart attacks than those eating one-third more Magnesium. Due to lack of Magnesium, the heart muscle can develop a spasm or cramp and stop beating. Most people, including doctors, don’t know it, but without sufficient Magnesium, we will die. When someone dies of a heart attack, people never say, “He died from magnesium deficiency.”

Magnesium probably would go a long way with athletes and the young suffering from heart inflammation from COVID injections.

The Power of Magnesium Is Dose Sensitive

The only question about Magnesium is the dosage necessary for it to do its job for each person. When I say a gram a day, I am talking about magnesium medicine, not about magnesium supplementation. Few still know or understand that Magnesium can and should be used as a prime medication.

Magnesium serves hundreds of essential functions in the body and one of them has to do with the efficiency of red blood cells and their capacity to carry oxygen.

Knowing appropriate dosages is essential to practitioners and patients because dosages are mission-critical for achieving therapeutic effects. Low doses do not get clinical results! Through the years, the mistake I have seen people making repeatedly is under-dosing. Healing substances like Magnesium become front-line medicines when dosages are taken up to the level of what doctors might use during cardiac arrest in ICU and emergency departments. So if regular pharmaceuticals do not do the job and the patient is dying, a reasonable emergency room doctor would reach for Magnesium; but they would inject or give it intravenously.

The dose makes the effect in Natural Allopathic Medicine, where the dose makes the poison in modern medicine.

Healthy people who want to supplement 500 mg daily will probably fit many people’s needs. However, we must consider the extra stress almost everyone is experiencing and the declining value of minerals in our foods.  But if you feel intensely stressed out, have irregular heartbeats, feel oppression in your chest, suffer from pain, have diabetes, cancer, neurological disease, etc., think of a gram as your minimum dose.

Suppose one is looking to get the most out of Magnesium as a medicine to treat both acute and chronic diseases. In that case, one can easily think of 1 to 3 grams a day split up through many dosage administrations, so bowel tolerance is not so easily reached.

The good news is that the Magnesium can also be applied transdermally, meaning you can put it right on your skin, take footbaths, and full baths loaded with Magnesium. You can even nebulize it. My favorite is magnesium massages.

Oral consumption taken to bowel tolerance: Magnesium is the perfect medicine for constipation because high levels loosen the intestines. Thus, one can navigate oral dosage by reaching the intake level that provokes loosening stools. Then back down the dosage, let the body get used to it, and slowly increase again to bowel tolerance. I use magnesium chloride or magnesium bicarbonate, but all forms are helpful to one degree or another.

 

 

The Heavy Guns of Magnesium

Magnesium is strongly related to the immune system in both nonspecific and specific immune responses, also known as innate and acquired immune response. Dr. Raul Vergini says, “Magnesium chloride has a unique healing power on acute viral and bacterial diseases. It cured polio and diphtheria, which was the main subject of my magnesium book. Every few hours, a few grams of magnesium chloride will clear nearly all acute illnesses. I have seen a lot of flu cases healed in 24-48 hours with 3 grams of magnesium chloride taken every 6-8 hours.”

Dr. Vergini wrote, “I was looking for a solution to cleanse wounds because Dr. Delbet had found out that the traditional antiseptic solutions actually mortified tissues and facilitated the infection instead of preventing it. He tested several mineral solutions and discovered that magnesium chloride has a great effect over leukocytic activity (Increases leucocytes to fight infection) and phagocytosis; so it was perfect for external wounds treatment.”

In 1915, a French surgeon, Prof. Pierre Delbet, M.D wrote, “From a practical standpoint, please remember that only magnesium CHLORIDE—and no other magnesium salt—has this ‘cytophylactic’ activity. The solution to be used is a 2.5% magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2-6H2O) solution (i.e. 25 grams in 1 liter of water).”

Doses are as follows:

  • Adults and children over 5 years old………………. 125 cc
  • 4-year-old children…………………………………. 100 cc
  • 3-year-old children………………………………….. 80 cc
  • 1-2-year-old children……………………………….. 60 cc
  • Children over six months old ………………………… 30 cc
  • Children under six months old ……………………….. 15 cc

Medicines must be safe in the emergency room while delivering an instant lifesaving burst of healing power.  Magnesium chloride has the advantage of being administered intravenously, intramuscularly, orally, as well as vaporized through a nebulizer, and as a lotion transdermally. In anesthesia and intensive care, the preferred administration route is IV.

Because oral dosages are limited by bowel tolerance, it is helpful to use transdermal applications. For example, one can spray magnesium oil topically and sit in the sun or have someone massage the magnesium oil in for the most delightful medical treatment. One can also load one’s baths in Magnesium and bicarbonate.

One retired doctor with diabetic neuropathy could tolerate up to 20 grams a day to control his neuropathy. His high levels were necessary because he had magnesium-wasting disease.

Conclusion

There is no healing system more powerful than that which employs Nature’s primordial substances, materials so pure and close to Nature that they yield benefits without the typical side effects of most drugs. The secret to safe and effective medicine is found in using medicinal substances that do not have side effects in reasonable doses. This is the very meaning of safe, something that will not harm or hurt you.

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus


 

See related article by Dr. Mark Sircus:

Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress | Magnesium Chloride as Essential Medicine for All Patients With Acute Chest Pain




US Hospitals: Fraud, Murder, Cash; Federal Assassination-for-Hire Program

US Hospitals: Fraud, Murder, Cash; Federal Assassination-for-Hire Program
“Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] whistleblowers have calculated a total [federal] payment [to hospitals] of at least $100,000 per [COVID] patient.” 

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 14, 2021

 

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a private medical organization founded in 1943, has the story — “Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19” (11/17/21), authored by Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D.

Here are stunning excerpts:

“Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol…for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate…”

“As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.”

“The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”

“In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, ‘CMS has granted “waivers” of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.’…The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”

“Creating a ‘National Pandemic Emergency’ provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These ‘bounties’ must paid back if not ‘earned’ by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.”

“The hospital payments include:

* A ‘free’ required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.

* Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.

* Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.

* A 20 percent ‘boost’ bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.

* Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.

* More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.

* A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.”

“CMS implemented ‘value-based’ payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.”

“Outside hospitals, physician MIPS [Merit-based Incentive Payment System] quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.”

“Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.”

“There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects. In ventilated patients, the death toll is staggering. A National Library of Medicine January 2021 report of 69 studies involving more than 57,000 patients concluded that fatality rates were 45 percent in COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, increasing to 84 percent in older patients. Renz announced at a Truth for Health Foundation Press Conference that CMS data showed that in Texas hospitals, 84.9% percent of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.”

“Then there are deaths from restrictions on effective treatments for hospitalized patients. Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.”

—end of article excerpt—

This is basically a federally incentivized protocol for murder.

To say it violates every code of medical ethics would be a vast understatement.

Cash for death.

There are MANY doctors and nurses who work in these hospitals who know what they’re doing, who know they’re following orders that result in the deaths of their patients; but they keep doing it.

They would rather murder their patients than lose their jobs.

And there are MANY employees at the FDA, NIH, and other public health agencies who also know the score, keep their heads down, and facilitate murder.

There are MANY so-called journalists who work at mainstream outlets who know what’s going on and say nothing.

Mass murder is central to the overall COVID program. But feel free to think that the vaccine, on the other hand, is pure and safe and essential. The people running the show just want to kill some and save others. Sure, that makes perfect sense.

If they’re all schizophrenic messiahs-and-killers and you’re schizophrenic for believing in them.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: SoyKhaler / pixabay




Long Queues at Vaxx Centers: It’s All Fake

Long Queues at Vaxx Centers: It’s All Fake

by Hugo Talks
December 14, 2021

 



Video available at Hugo Talks Odysee and BitChute channels.

 

Connect with Hugo Talks




Ricardo Maarman: Update on South African “Show Us the Virus” Court Case & the Way Forward

Ricardo Maarman: Update on South African “Show Us the Virus” Court Case & the Way Forward

by Ricardo Maarman, Show Us the Virus
December 14, 2021

 



Original video is available at HWP Report Brighteon channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light

Good day, everyone.

My name is Ricardo Maarman and today I would like to give you an update on the ‘Show Us the Virus’ court case that is currently in front of the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

I would also like to discuss with you the way forward — especially in the face of these looming vaccination mandates that is in front of us.

At the very beginning of this process, we asked the government a very simple question: show us the virus.

And the reason why we asked this question was because one cannot prove lies.

And so when we asked the question ‘show us the virus’, their failure to do so was proof of their lies and their deceit.

The lockdown measures made no sense if its intention was to fight and destroy a virus. But the lockdown measures make perfect sense if its intention is to fight and destroy the people of South Africa.

For example, look at the exorbitant food prices, the increases in the fuel prices. And look at this diabolical option that is now placed in front of the people of South Africa: to choose between jabs and jobs.

The intention of this is quite clear — is to drive the people of South Africa into poverty and into desperation and dependency on them.

When Ramaphosa said “thuma mina”, “send me”, he was volunteering to do the devil’s work. Ramaphosa spoke of the “new dawn” in his speech, he was paying tribute to Satan, Lucifer, whom they call the New Dawn.

Ramaphosa is part of an elite that control the entire South African society — a political, economic, social, religious elite. And even the controlled opposition amongst us, they are all wolves in sheep’s clothing.

And now they are waging open war against the people of South Africa. When Ramaphosa couldn’t and wouldn’t show us the virus, we approached the Constitutional Court of South Africa, asking the court to restore the people’s rights and to remove Ramaphosa from power.

The Constitutional Court has been grappling with this matter for almost three months now. What we have done in the meantime, and currently, is to approach the High Court of South Africa, asking them to grant us an urgent interim interdict against the entire lockdown measures, including the vaccinations.

Because these measures cannot be allowed to continue and even to escalate while there is a dispute pending in front of the Constitutional Court.

I will make an example of the grounds upon which we are approaching the court for this urgent interim interdict. If your two children are arguing about a toy and one of them approaches you and says ‘please intervene’. Then the first thing that you would do is to stop both of them from playing with the toy until after you have made your final decision.

So too, this is a simple principle of justice that when a matter is in dispute it must be suspended. All things related to it must be suspended until final judgment.

I ask you that we should not pass judgment on the courts in South Africa until after the court has passed its judgment.

That we should oppose chaos with order.

That we should oppose evil with good.

That we should oppose injustice with justice.

I ask you that — evil thrives when good people do nothing. So it is important for us to do something.

We are doing this. We are approaching the High Court for this urgent interim interdict, to stop these evil measures from further destroying the people of South Africa.

We ask you to give us financial support so that we can have the resources to sustain this hard and tough fight.

We ask you to pray for us.

We ask you to spread the truth amongst each other and to encourage each other to patiently persevere.

Victory will be ours eventually.

And above all, we ask you that you put all your trust in God.

Thank you very much.

 

 

Connect with Show Us the Virus




Christine Anderson, German Member of the European Parliament: “Pharmaceutical Companies Are About as Interested in Public Health as the Arms Industry Is in World Peace”

Christine Anderson, German Member of the European Parliament: “Pharmaceutical Companies Are About as Interested in Public Health as the Arms Industry Is in World Peace”

 

Christine Anderson is a German politician and currently serving as a Member of the European Parliament

The video below is an excerpt from the full length press conference held on December 8, 2021 during which five European Union MEPs push back against the totalitarian tactics of  Ursula Von Der Leyen, a German politician and physician who has been President of the European Commission since December 2019.

For the full press conference, see:

Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination

 



This video clip is available at Truth Comes to Light OdyseeBitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit for the original full-length press conference video, goes to 21st Century Wire.

 

Transcript prepared by TCTL:

 

Good morning.

Thanks again to all of you for your overwhelming support and encouragement you expressed to us in uncounted emails, private messages on social media. But please do not consider me a hero.

I’m not brave and I’m not courageous. I am simply doing my job.

I was elected to parliament to serve the people, to act on their behalf, and in their best interest. And I couldn’t think of a better way to serve your interest then to uphold freedom, democracy and the rule of law.

But I’m telling you, the vast majority of the ‘elected’ representatives — they are selling you down the river.

You know, instead of adjusting our concept of what constitutes “fully vaxxed”, we need to adjust our concept of what constitutes legitimate government.

And governments forcing people into compliance are neither legitimate nor democratic by any stretch of the imagination.

And it isn’t about your health either.

You know, pharmaceutical companies are about as interested in public health as the arms industry is in world peace.

Now some of you may argue I’m exaggerating, I’m misjudging the government’s intentions. Granted, that is a possibility.

But are you willing to take that risk? Can you afford this nonchalant attitude towards government, considering what we all stand to lose?

Others may think, ‘yeah, I kinda see where she’s coming from but, nah, my government wouldn’t do it.’

Well, not only would they, I’m telling you they are already doing it as we speak.

As Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher living in the fifth century BC once said, “The truth often evades being recognized due to its utter incredibility.”

So just because you cannot fathom your government having ill meanings towards you, doesn’t mean it is not true. And, on the other hand, I’d much rather be wrong then sorry.

But is up to you. You need to decide what you will do. But keep in mind, whatever decision you do make, you will not only make it for yourself. This decision will be made for your children and your children’s children as well.

Your decision today will shape the society your children will have to live in. Your decision today will predetermine whether your children will live in a free and democratic society or if they will be subjected to surveillancing police state.

Now I am determined to leave my children a free and democratic society. And this I will fight for tooth and nail. And should it be the last thing I do on this planet, so be it.

So once again, dear government, bring it on. Let’s see what you’ve got. I am not afraid of you. You will not be able to shut me up. You will not be able to force me into compliance. Oh, and one other thing, trying to buy me off. Really? That isn’t going to work either. So go ahead, offer me a million dollars. Heck, make it a hundred million dollars.

But, you know what, securing a future for my children in a free and democratic society — you could not possibly put a price tag on that. So when it comes to my stand on that issue I would like to put it in the words of Margaret Thatcher: ‘This lady is not for turning.’ You can bet on that.

Thank you.

 




Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Why I Wrote ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Why I Wrote ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’
I wrote this book so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dominate our government and subvert our democracy, and to chronicle the key role Dr. Fauci has played in the current coup d’état against democracy.

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Defender
December 13, 2021

 

The Defender editor’s note: Below is an excerpt from “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,” the new runaway bestseller by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense.

While some Republicans bridled warily at Dr. Fauci’s accumulating power and seemingly arbitrary pronouncements, the alchemies of political tribalism and the relentlessly stoked terror of COVID-19 persuaded spellbound Democrats to close their eyes to the damning evidence that his COVID-19 policies were a catastrophic and dangerous failure.

As an advocate for public health, robust science and independent regulatory agencies — free from corruption and financial entanglements with Pharma — I have battled Dr. Fauci for many years.

I know him personally, and my impression of him is very different from my fellow Democrats, who first encountered him as the polished, humble, earnest, endearing and long-suffering star of the televised White House COVID press conferences.

Dr. Fauci played a historic role as the leading architect of “agency capture” — the corporate seizure of America’s public health agencies by the pharmaceutical industry.

Lamentably, Dr. Fauci’s failure to achieve public health goals during the COVID pandemic are not anomalous errors, but consistent with a recurrent pattern of sacrificing public health and safety on the altar of pharmaceutical profits and self-interest. He consistently prioritized pharmaceutical industry profits over public health.

Readers of these pages will learn how in exalting patented medicine Dr. Fauci has, throughout his long career, routinely falsified science, deceived the public and physicians, and lied about safety and efficacy.

Dr. Fauci’s malefactions detailed in this volume include his crimes against the hundreds of Black and Hispanic orphan and foster children whom he subjected to cruel and deadly medical experiments and his role, with Bill Gates, in transforming hundreds of thousands of Africans into lab rats for low-cost clinical trials of dangerous experimental drugs that, once approved, remain financially out of reach for most Africans.

You will learn how Dr. Fauci and Mr. Gates have turned the African continent into a dumping ground for expired, dangerous and ineffective drugs, many of them discontinued for safety reasons in the U.S. and Europe.

You will read how Dr. Fauci’s strange fascination with, and generous investments in, so-called “gain of function” experiments to engineer pandemic superbugs, give rise to the ironic possibility that Dr. Fauci may have played a role in triggering the global contagion that two U.S. presidents entrusted him to manage.

You will also read about his two-decade strategy of promoting false pandemics as a scheme for promoting novel vaccines, drugs and Pharma profits.

You will learn of his actions to conceal widespread contamination in blood and vaccines, his destructive vendettas against scientists who challenge the Pharma paradigm, his deliberate sabotaging of patent-expired remedies against infectious diseases, from HIV to COVID-19, to grease the skids for less effective, but more profitable, remedies.

You will learn of the grotesque body counts that have accumulated in the wake of his cold-blooded focus on industry profits over public health.

All his strategies during COVID — falsifying science to bring dangerous and ineffective drugs to market, suppressing and sabotaging competitive products that have lower profit margins even if the cost is prolonging pandemics and losing thousands of lives — all of these share a common purpose: the myopic devotion to Pharma.

This book will show you that Tony Fauci does not do public health; he is a businessman, who has used his office to enrich his pharmaceutical partners and expand the reach of influence that has made him the most powerful — and despotic — doctor in human history.

For some readers, reaching that conclusion will require crossing some new bridges. Many readers, however, intuitively know the real Anthony Fauci, and need only to see the facts illuminated and organized.

I wrote this book so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dominate our government and subvert our democracy, and to chronicle the key role Dr. Fauci has played in the current coup d’état against democracy.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination

Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination

 

TCTL editor’s note: This is such an important event that we wanted to share the video link right away. We will post transcripts, along with individual speeches as separate video clips, later today when we have them prepared. Many thanks to 21st Century Wire for making this video available.

 

5 MEPs Hit Back Against Ursula von der Leyen’s EU Mandatory Vaccination Edict

by 21st Century Wire
December 13, 2021

 

On Dec. 8, 2021, a group of brave European Union MEPs pushed back against the disturbing trend towards full-blown fascism in Brussels, led by the unelected German leader Ursula von der Leyen.

The rebel MEPs slam von der Leyen and her new totalitarian medical apartheid and vaccine passport bio-surveillance regime. The five dissenters take turns speaking to their constituents, and to the world, during in this powerful address, beginning with Cristian Terhes (Romania), followed by Francesca Donato (Italy), Stasys Jakeliūnas (Lithuania), Christine Anderson (Germany), and Ivan Vilibor Sinčić (Croatia). Watch: 



 

Connect with 21st Century Wire

 

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]




Four Canadian Doctors Sue Alberta Health Services Over Vaccine Mandate

Four Canadian Doctors Sue Alberta Health Services Over Vaccine Mandate

by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
December 10, 2021

 

WETASKIWIN The Justice Centre filed a Statement of Claim and Injunction Application at the Wetaskawin Court of Queen’s Bench on December 8, 2021, on behalf of four Alberta physicians. The doctors are facing termination, restrictions, and disciplinary action for standing against Alberta Health Services’ (“AHS”) Vaccine Mandate, which has been amended and extended twice already. The most recent amendment to the Vaccine Mandate requires all Alberta health care practitioners to submit proof of vaccination before December 13, 2021, even if they are naturally immune. In addition to challenging AHS for constitutional violations, the lawsuit advocates for returning to basic medical principles including: recognition of natural immunity, doctor-patient privilege, informed consent, personal autonomy and duty to disclose.

All four doctors treated and cared for their patients without incident during the worst of the Covid-19 pandemic over the past 20 months. Now AHS is prepared to terminate and discipline them for not complying with AHS’ Vaccine Mandate in the name of science and medicine.

Dr. Nadr Jomha, a specialized Orthopaedic Surgeon for complex foot and ankle reconstruction and trauma cases, and instrumental in the development of one of Canada’s cryopreservation (cold-preservation) joint transplantation programs, states: “Given that an overwhelming majority of studies prove that individuals with naturally acquired immunity have: a) been shown to have equal or better immunity than a vaccine-induced immunity; b) are very rarely re-infected with Covid-19; and c) are unlikely to transmit Covid-19, there is no medical or scientific benefit to myself of those around me or anyone around me.”

Dr. Blaine Achen, who held the position of Chief of Cardiac Anesthesia at the renowned Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, until he was terminated for not complying with AHS’ Vaccine Mandate, says: “The medical system in Alberta is struggling. The recent treatment of health care workers in this province, in addition to the current AHS policies and management, is driving physicians out of Alberta and will further exacerbate an already dire situation. AHS’ last-minute amendments and extensions to the Policy caused confusion and scheduling problems at the Hospital, which have negatively impacted AHS staff and patients. My forced departure will invariably cause additional delays in the operating room and will cause harm to patients in Alberta.”

Dr. Gert Grobler, once the personal doctor to the Nelson Mandela family, and now practicing in Medicine Hat, notes: “Treating and reducing Covid-19 severity ought to be the goal of medical doctors and it ought to be part of the strategy used by AHS.”

Dr. Tyler May, is one of two doctors in the under-served community of Manning, Alberta, 73km north of Peace River, is being allowed access to his hospital (after it was deemed one of the critical sites in AHS’ 2nd revision of the Vaccine Mandate) but not his clinic, said: “AHS’ decision is completely arbitrary and absurd, as the facilities are intimately linked, and it provides another example of AHS putting ideology and policy over patient care – much like the [Vaccine Mandate] itself.”

The Injunction Application is set to be heard in Court on Tuesday, December 14 at 10am. The doctors will ask the Court not to enforce AHS’ Vaccine Mandate against them, to trust the science and medicine in respect of natural immunity, and to allow the doctors to keep treating their patients.

To support this claim, Dr. Joel Kettner, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba, prepared an expert report which included a review of how major public health organizations have compared protection by natural immunity from previous Covid infection with protection by vaccination. In his report he states: “I have been unable to find relevant data or clear rationale for policies pertaining to the exclusion of health care workers because of their vaccination status, especially since there has been consistent evidence for equivalent – if not superior – protection by natural immunity resulting from previous infection, as described by the major public health organizations and the Public Health Agency’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization”.

“AHS is prepared to push their Vaccine Mandate so far as to terminate competent, qualified and caring doctors with natural immunity in order to enforce a Vaccine Mandate that is unscientific, harmful and arbitrary,” says Eva Chipiuk, Justice Centre Staff Lawyer. “It is shocking that these doctors have had to turn to the Courts to continue to be allowed to do what they are professionally trained to do – treat patients, including themselves. Especially at a time where AHS has declared the provinces’ hospitals and health care system at risk of collapse, and cancelled surgeries due to lack of resources.”

 

Connect with Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

cover image credit: tungnguyen0905 / pixabay




Pfizer Document Concedes That There Is a Large Increase in Types of Adverse Event Reaction to Its Vaccine

Pfizer Document Concedes That There Is a Large Increase in Types of Adverse Event Reaction to Its Vaccine

by Guy Hatchard, Daily Telegraph, New Zealand
December 5, 2021

 

  • Document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world.
  • Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reported.
  • Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious.
  • This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.
  • We examine the implications for government.

Up until now, New Zealand GPs and hospitals have been provided with a fact sheet from Pfizer listing 21 possible adverse events as a result of vaccination.

All of these are minor, requiring little or no treatment other than rest, with the exception of severe allergic reactions, myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart). As a result, most of the many thousands of New Zealanders reporting adverse effects post vaccination have been sent home with little more than advice to take an aspirin and rest. Some have been told that their conditions may be unrelated medical events, psychosomatic, or due to anxiety on their part.

Relying on the short official Pfizer fact sheet as a guide, Medsafe, our NZ medicines regulatory body, has only accepted one out of the 100+ deaths actually reported to them as related to vaccination. Most are listed as unrelated, under investigation, or unknowable. By contrast, the NZ Health Forum and other groups have collected unofficial reports of adverse effects and death proximate to vaccination. Out of 670+ reports of death compiled by the Forum, 270 have already been investigated by medical professionals and closely linked to known adverse effects. Following the publication of the new Pfizer document many more are expected to be connected with vaccination. Reports describe symptoms such as chest pain, brain fog, extreme fatigue, neurological symptoms, tachycardia, stroke, heart attacks, and many more. Collected data suggests that as many as two-thirds of adverse event enquiries made to medical staff by vaccine recipients have not been reported to CARM—the NZ system of adverse event reporting. Medsafe itself estimates in its Guide to Adverse Reaction Reporting that in NZ only 5% of adverse events are reported. As a result the NZ public is completely unaware of the extent of reported possible risks of vaccination.

The just released Pfizer document which is being circulated widely in the public domain and can downloaded from websites is entitled:

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

Therefore the reported side effects predate the vaccine rollout in New Zealand. The report itself was finalised by Pfizer on 30 April 2021. Did Pfizer supply this information to our government during the early days of our universal vaccination programme? If so the results should have been shared with our medical professionals, politicians, and the public. Many of the new 100+ listed new adverse event types now released by Pfizer in this 38 page document pose long term risks to health. Until very recently, the document was being withheld by Pfizer who maintained it should be kept confidential. There is a strong possibility that very large numbers of New Zealanders will suffer long term injury as a result.

How did this happen without anyone’s knowledge?

Even though the Pfizer vaccine had undergone very short trials and had provisional approval only, Medsafe did not update its CARM adverse event reporting system to make it mandatory rather than voluntary.

Medsafe did not advise GPs and Hospital staff to be on high alert for adverse events and report them rapidly and in detail.

The Government ignored the unprecedented numbers of adverse events being reported to Medsafe and circulating in the community and on social media.

The Government instituted a public relations, promotional, and media campaign advising the public that the Pfizer covid-19 mRNA vaccine was completely safe and free of serious side effects, giving the impression that there were no side effects—not even the known serious effects of heart inflammation that Pfizer had already admitted.

Unaccountably, conditions imposed by the contract that our Government signed with Pfizer for the supply of vaccines have not been made public. We suspect that the contract contains standard clauses similar to those used with drugs that have completed safety trials, such as a provision that public discussion of adverse events may only be undertaken in conjunction with the company supplying the drug. If this is the case, it will have hamstrung Medsafe and our Government in their approach to assessment and public discussion of adverse events.

What are the new risks of vaccination?

Anyone reading the new Pfizer adverse event report compilation will be staggered. The sheer density of the technical medical terms and disease names are nevertheless broken down into recognisable and serious categories of illness—kidney failure, stroke, cardiac events, pregnancy complications, inflammation, neurological disease, autoimmune failure, paralysis, liver failure, blood disorders, skin disease, musculoskeletal problems, arthritis, respiratory disease, DVT, blood clots, vascular disease, haemorrhage, loss of sight, Bell’s palsy, and epilepsy.

How has this affected New Zealand?

Whilst even the official Medsafe record of adverse effects and the unofficial lists show that the immediate risks of covid vaccination could be as much as 50 – 300 times greater than even the most risky of previous traditional vaccines (such as the smallpox jab), and whilst the long term effects are unknown, 90% of eligible New Zealanders have gone ahead with vaccination having accepted the assurances of safety and efficacy from the government, or having been forced to get vaccinated under threat of loss of employment and freedom of movement. Feeling the fear of covid that has been generated by reports in the international and local media, most people completing vaccination heaved a great sigh of relief—that is one huge worry off my mind, now I can get on with my life.

Those finding that no immediate insurmountable reaction had surfaced (the majority) understandably agreed with the government: “What is all the fuss about? Why shouldn’t everyone do this, or be made to do this? It is a social good that will protect everyone”

BUT there is a huge iceberg in the path of the good ship New Zealand hidden under the waves of relief. Thousands are quietly suffering debilitating illness, unacknowledged and in some cases untreated by their doctors. For those who survived vaccination without immediate injury this was not a problem because they didn’t know about it apart from one or two complaints from friends that might just be random coincidences.

This has brought about a division in New Zealand society which the government created in the name of public safety. Thousands of dedicated servants of the nation including teachers, health workers, and others are being stigmatised and forced out of their jobs in a manner horrifyingly reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany. The government did this despite knowing that the Pfizer vaccine was neither fully tested, safe, nor particularly effective. Judges handed down decisions in courts supporting the government mandates unaware of crucial mRNA vaccine safety data, all because Pfizer had withheld this information, and the government had not done its due diligence. Had the true position been known, the High Court’s NZ Bill of Rights analysis may well have been different and its provision which guarantees that every individual should be able to make their own medical choices might still be intact.

Pfizer’s conclusions

Pfizer concludes the released document with a statement “Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit:risk balance for BNT162b2.” PM stands for the Post Marketing data set they are evaluating of 42,086 reported adverse events. Pfizer makes this bald claim of benefit despite admitting that “the magnitude of underreporting is unknown”. This document contains no further substantive information in support of this claim of benefit:risk balance other than a mysterious reference to “the known safety profile of the vaccine”.

The benefit:risk argument is in essence saying: covid-19 is a serious illness and our calculations show that more people will be injured by the disease than are being injured by the vaccine, therefore there will be a net benefit. This argument falls over because of at least three very important factors: Firstly treatment options have improved and thereby the risk of serious illness and death from covid has been greatly reduced.

Secondly the risk of covid is not evenly spread. People with comorbidities (other conditions) and the elderly are at very high risk. Most other people are at very low risk. Thus vaccination could subject people at low risk from covid to a higher risk from vaccination. Approaches to preventive health education can reduce the covid risk to people with comorbidities more than vaccination can. For example a study published in the BMJ found that people following a plant based diet have a 73% reduced risk of serious illness. Data from the UK Biobank has been analysed by researchers from Manchester and Oxford Universities and the West Indies who found that shift workers (who typically have disrupted bioclocks) have three times the risk of being hospitalised with covid. Preventive remedies include changes in diet such as the introduction of more fresh fruit, vegetables, and fibre, and reductions in known unhealthy habits such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption, an overly sedentary lifestyle, a predominance of ultra processed foods, and many more.

The third and most significant reason the benefit:risk argument falls over is the sheer range of adverse reaction types observed by Pfizer and kept hidden until now.

Read full article here

 

Connect with Daily Telegraph, New Zealand

©Guy Hatchard, Daily Telegraph New Zealand, 2021

 

cover image credit: WiR_Pixs / pixabay




Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress | Magnesium Chloride as Essential Medicine for All Patients With Acute Chest Pain

Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress | Magnesium Chloride as Essential Medicine for All Patients With Acute Chest Pain

 

“The essential medicine for coronavirus hospital patients is magnesium chloride given intravenously or injected. Magnesium administration for COVID would reduce the progression of the disease to severe or fatal stages when caught earlier enough and keep heart patients from dying in the later stages.

Studies show that combinations of Vitamin D, Magnesium and B12 administered to older COVID-19 patients were associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen and intensive care support.”

~ Dr. Mark Sircus

 

Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress

by Dr. Mark Sircus
December 10, 2021

 

Pandemic, epidemic, or a medical emergency. No matter what we call it, people suffering from vascular disease have dramatically increased, and too many are dying from it. Not only is there no vaccine possible for heart disease, but in all probability, the COVID vaccines are driving the pain, suffering, and death through sudden onset heart disease. In the week ending November 12, 2021, the U.K. reported 2,047 more deaths than occurred during the same period between 2015 and 2019; heart disease and strokes appear to be behind many of the excess deaths.

“I watched Roy die, and I could not get to him. We were about to leave for the hospital, and he was in the toilet, and I heard a thud. He had fallen, his body was blocking the door, his full weight was against it, and I couldn’t get it open. I could see him through a crack in the door. I could see that he was gone.”

Rory had received his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine on November 5 and started feeling ‘heart flutters’ that evening. The symptoms continued, and 12 days later, he began to suffer heart palpitations and an ‘uncomfortable’ feeling in his chest.

Inside the emergency department at Sparrow Hospital in Lansing, Michigan, staff members are struggling to care for patients showing up much sicker than they’ve ever seen. Patients are showing up to the E.R. sicker than before the pandemic; their diseases are more advanced and need more complicated care. “We are hearing from members in every part of the country,” said Dr. Lisa Moreno, president of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. “The Midwest, the South, the Northeast, the West … they are seeing this exact same phenomenon.” And already-overwhelmed staffers are burning out.

Things are so bad that Maine Gov. Janet Mills on Dec. 8 activated the state’s National Guard to assist at hospitals. Dr. Andrew Mueller, CEO of MaineHealth, told reporters in a virtual briefing that hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the health care system are at their highest level even though Maine has a high vaccination rate.

Focusing on Heart Disease

A 33-year-old registered nurse in New Zealand recently went public on social media to share her story of being diagnosed with pericarditis after being injected with a second dose of a COVID-19 shot. She states that she was placed in a section of the hospital that was treating vaccine injuries, and that she was the 7th person admitted that day suffering a heart problem following a Pfizer shot.

The COVID-19 shots cause heart disease, mainly myocarditis and pericarditis, which destroys our young people’s health. This is a fact that is no longer in dispute, as even the CDC admits this, as their most recent report states: As of November 24, 2021, VAERS has received 1,949 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 and younger who received COVID-19 vaccine. Most cases have been reported after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), particularly in male adolescents and young adults. (Source.)

At the beginning of December, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration added a warning to patient and provider fact sheets for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines to indicate a risk of heart inflammation. The CDC agrees, saying that a higher-than-usual number of cases of a type of heart inflammation has been reported following the Covid-19 vaccination, especially among young men following their second dose of an mRNA vaccine.

In the last 13 weeks alone, in England, about 107,700 seniors died above the normal rate, despite a 98.7% injection rate.

A new study and warning from the American Heart Association: mRNA vaccines dramatically increase risk of developing heart disease — “The PLUS Cardiac Test score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for eight years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.” Twitter, the new heavyweight medical know everything platform, disagrees and put a warning about this information.

Heart inflammation has three main types: myocarditis (inflamed heart muscles), pericarditis (inflamed outer linings of the heart), and endocarditis (inflamed inner linings of the heart). But only myocarditis and pericarditis have been associated with mRNA vaccine.

Common clinical signs of mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis and pericarditis are elevated troponin (a blood biomarker of heart muscle damage) levels, abnormal cardiac imaging, and chest pain. Other rarer symptoms include headache, breathlessness, fatigue, and body ache.

In one study, researchers from Israel found that individuals vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine had a 3.24-times increased risk of myocarditis within 21 days of either the first or second dose compared to unvaccinated individuals. This equated to an excess of 2.7 events per 100,000 persons. About 90% of those myocarditis cases happened to males aged 20–34 years.

Pfizer vaccine has triggered inflammation of the heart! Do you doubt that and swear allegiance to Twitter? Or are you one of many ridiculous doctors and health officials who hides behind the “rare” word that describes vaccine reactions?

For another study, researchers from the U.S. calculated that 12–39-year-olds had a 9.8-times increased risk of myocarditis/pericarditis at days 1–21 of vaccination compared to those at days 22–42 of vaccination. This gives an excess of 6.3 cases per million doses. More specifically, 85% of cases affected males, 85% occurred within seven days of vaccination (more commonly after the second dose), 82% led to hospitalization, and 6% led to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Since the COVID vaccines became available, nearly 300 athletes have experienced cardiac arrest, and over 167 have died.

Dr. Joseph Mercola reports that “many athletes are now losing their careers due to COVID jab injuries. For example, Florian Dagoury is the world record holder in static breath-hold freediving. Before his Pfizer jabs, he was able to hold his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds. After his second dose, his diving performance was slashed by about 30%, and he’s been diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis, and trivial mitral regurgitation. Others include tennis player Jeremy Chardy and 32-year-old triathlete Antoine Mechin. Both were severely injured by their COVID jabs. Both now regret taking the shot. “Damaging healthy people to preserve the health of the weakest,” Mechin now says, is “a choice of backward logic.”

Former Australian pro-basketball player Ben Madgen, 36, was diagnosed with pericarditis after receiving his second shot of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in a report from the Covid worldAfter taking the Pfizer shot, the doctor told him that having pericarditis is now common to teenage boys and young males.

A London Evening Standard report quotes senior vascular surgeon Tahir Hussain, who works at an NHS hospital in London. “I’ve seen a big increase in thrombotic-related vascular conditions in my practice,” said Hussain. “Far younger patients are being admitted and requiring surgical and medical intervention than prior to the pandemic.”

Of course, this has nothing to do with dangerous COVID vaccines. Hussain said that the cases are “a direct result of the increased stress and anxiety levels caused from the effects of PPSD (post-pandemic stress disorder).” He also said that people dying at home “from conditions such as pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction” were down to self-isolating and not seeking the medical care they needed.

A ‘”HEALTHY” single mom with no pre-existing medical conditions has died four days after receiving the second dose of the Moderna coronavirus vaccine. Kassidi Kurill, 39, suddenly passed away on February 5 after she complained to her parents that “her heart was racing and she felt like she needed to get to the emergency room.”

Former senior NHS psychological therapist Mark Rayner said as many as 300,000 heart ailments could be due to “post-pandemic stress disorder.” No matter what the cause, these numbers suggest an epidemic, in little England, of heart disorders, all of them calling for intense magnesium administration. Now try to imagine what is going on around the world. Yes, with pandemic health responses and vaccines leading the way, stress levels are going through the roof. People certainly do not like their freedom taken away from them and do not enjoy the world’s changes being forced down their collective throats.

“I had my 1st Pfizer shot on Friday, and I’ve had an elevated heart rate between 90 and 104 since Saturday. It’s now Tuesday. It kind of feels like it skips a beat sometimes. It’s making me apprehensive about getting the 2nd shot.”

Doctors and health officials are not interested in measuring the reactions of the heart post-COVID vaccination. Still, I imagine if a study were quickly done measuring the heart rate variability (HRV), we would see the vaccine disaster unfolding when we calculate the timing of each beat of the heart. The heart is super sensitive and vulnerable to any adverse events, but there is little to no interest in looking carefully at what is going on.

My heart rate is elevated. Like goes up to 125 to do a flight of stairs. I am on day three since the shot. My doctor says I am fine. Should I be worried?

HRV is a scientifically researched phenomenon that measures the variability in the R portion of the QRST wave of a regular heartbeat. Over time, even with a normal heartbeat, there is variability between the beats. The more variability, the healthier the heart. The higher the heart rate variability, the greater are the potential reserves of the body to adapt. HRV and vagus nerve activity are helpful as long-term measures of inflammation in chronic diseases.

Our heart does not lie, not when you look at what it says on a beat-to-beat basis (HRV). It is our most honest digital code, and doctors can read it using the VedaPulse (which happens to be on sale). A five-minute test can be done in the comfort of one’s own home or doctor’s office, and one has a five-minute readout of the code the heart is putting out. When I do my readouts, I use only two minutes to see how stressed my heart is.

It is sad how much Magnesium is ignored by mainstream medicine. In the case of male teenagers and athletes developing heart inflammation after taking the COVID injection, it is tragic. Magnesium is one of the best medications to cool the fires of inflammation because it isMagnesium that modulates cellular events involved in inflammation.

Inflammatory indicators in the body such as CRP (C-reactive protein), TNF (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), and IL6 (interleukin 6) are reduced when magnesium intake is increased. In addition, inflammation in the arterial walls was also reduced with magnesium intake, and without enough Magnesium, the heart goes into cardiac arrest or many other heart disorders.

The essential medicine for coronavirus hospital patients is magnesium chloride given intravenously or injected. Magnesium administration for COVID would reduce the progression of the disease to severe or fatal stages when caught earlier enough and keep heart patients from dying in the later stages.

Studies show that combinations of Vitamin D, Magnesium and B12 administered to older COVID-19 patients were associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen and intensive care support.

Dr. Sarah Myhill has been using I.V. magnesium in her general practice for over 20 years for both acute and chronic problems. She uses it for all patients with acute chest pain (unless the blood pressure is low), acute heart failure, pulmonary embolus, and acute asthma. Myhill says, “It is a potent vasodilator – i.e., it opens up all the blood vessels. Indeed patients can feel their blood vessels dilating as I give them the Magnesium – they warm up all over! This has the immediate effect of reducing the work of the heart and opening up the collateral circulation of the heart. Most patients with acute heart attacks have their pain completely relieved by I.V. magnesium.”

Magnesium oil is magnesium chloride and is terrific for all forms of magnesium administration. It is the most flexible form of magnesium.

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

cover image credit: sbtlneet / pixabay




La Quinta Columna: How Can Graphene Oxide Be Activated?

La Quinta Columna: How Can Graphene Oxide Be Activated?

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 9, 2021

 

While electrofrequencies are used to activate graphene oxide outside and inside the human body, there are also other ways to do so, such as sound or temperature. As a result of research carried out by the Spanish research duo of La Quinta Columna, it can be hypothesized that this nanomaterial would absorb any type of energy or signal.

In the following brief excerpt that Orwell City brings today, Dr. Sevillano explains this phenomenon.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel. 

 

Ricardo Delgado: 

This is a question by Dani from Esplugas, Barcelona. “Could graphene be activated with temperatures applying high electromotive force? (As an experiment).”

Dr. Sevillano:

Of course, you activate it with temperature. And with electromagnetic fields that are neither high nor very low frequency. I get the feeling that graphene absorbs any electromagnetic field. Looking at the picture and what it does.

Ricardo Delgado:

We have also seen experiments with sound. Graphene oxide activated with sound. I mean, it starts dancing, practically.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Yes, that’s it. Yes, just like that. It’s activated by anything that’s energy. It doesn’t have to be a precise quality of electrofrequency. However, I think these people know at what qualities the type of graphene they’ve put in is particularly toxic. They must have knowledge of it. That’s why they play these kinds of qualities when they want to.

But in reality, any kind of energy and certainly any kind of signal can be absorbed by graphene. Based on what we see what it does and how it seems to me that it absorbs everything it picks up.

 

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay




La Quinta Columna: Why Do Some Inoculated People Not Get Sick?

La Quinta Columna: Why Do Some Inoculated People Not Get Sick?

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 8, 2021

 



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel. 

 

Ricardo Delgado:

The next question says, “Why do some vaccinated people not get sick?” Assuming they carry graphene oxide in their body. There’s a lot of variables.

Dr. Sevillano:

The question is that the current dose they were injected, surely, doesn’t carry the product since some people are vaccinated and don’t express biomagnetism. But then, they can express biomagnetism and not get sick, for the moment. But they’re exposed to the disease anyway.

Remember that soccer players are jabbed or vaccinated, and the guys are there, maybe for two, three, or four months playing and running at full speed. You know how much these people force the “machine.” Until one day, arrhythmia appears.

That is, it’s a matter of time for the graphene oxide to structure or organize itself around the heart and start generating anomalous currents and circuits. It needs time. But other people, as soon as they go out for a walk, take a few steps and drop dead. Or others, two or three days later, they develop pneumonia and are admitted to the hospital. Or they can develop thrombi. In other words, it’s fast.

What does it depend on? Well, probably, on the amount of energy absorbed by the graphene. Those who live near antennas absorb very quickly and can drop dead, generate thrombi, heart attack, etc… And those who play a lot of soccer, but perhaps aren’t very close to antennas, their heart begins to change because of the energy introduced into it. It depends on the energy.

If you have graphene in you, it depends on the energy with which your heart is being charged. Hence the variation from one person to another.

 

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: Robystarm / pixabay




Update on the Mighty Omicron

Update on the Mighty Omicron
Omicron supposedly lurks among us – but a peek behind the curtain shows the ‘evidence’ surrounding its detection and reinfection rate is simply more dissociation from reality. 

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
December 8, 2021

 

You’re likely drowning in the ocean of information coming out about everything C-word-related including this ‘new variant.’ I know I am.

So I’ll keep this brief. Beer, dinner and sleep await, not necessarily in that order.

In my Nov. 27 article about Byram Bridle I showed that he and some of his collaborators are developing a nasal vaxx for Covid, and are poised to potentially profit from it. Here’s what I wrote about the already-infamous Omicron:

“I won’t be very surprised if developers and marketers of these new [intranasal] vaxxes [such as Bridle and co.] soon also claim they could help curb the Nu/Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) that’s received a great deal of attention in the last few days. B.1.1.529 already has been declared of “huge international concern” because it ostensibly has a “horrific spike[-protein-gene-mutation] profile,” spreads very fast and has the potential to evade the currently used vaxxes. Predictably there’s been panic such as long lines at airports in the very rapidly growing list of African countries subject to travel bans by other governments — along with a renewed push for more people to get vaxxed….

“Yet there hasn’t been a single published scientific report, as far as I know, which would allow objective/outside verification of whether there is any real evidence to support these drastic claims and actions. And I remain very sceptical about the hype regarding all variants and the methods used to detect them, including the false narrative about ‘immune escape’; see my Feb. 3, 2021Feb. 11March 16May 24 and Oct. 24 pieces.

“And as I wrote in that March 16 article (about Geert Vanden Bossche): ‘We … need to stop production and use of antivirals and antibodies and all other parts of the Covid-industrial complex. Covid has an extremely high survival rate. So why develop yet another expensive, invasive and experimental solution to a problem that barely exists, if it does at all?‘”

Since then, there’s been a flood of papers, articles and news releases on Omicron. Researchers are working feverishly to characterize the latest ‘new variant,’ and create and test therapies for it.

You can find their prodigious science-paper output by looking here — https://www.medrxiv.org/search/b.1.1.529 — here — https://www.biorxiv.org/search/b.1.1.529 – and here – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=b.1.1.529&sort=date.

Yet to the best of my knowledge none of the scientists who have been studying the novel coronavirus has even attempted to show directly whether there is any transmission at all, never mind any reinfection. To study transmission or reinfection they’d need, just for starters, to do a genotype of the virus harboured in one person, then genotype the virus in people who have frequent close contact with the first person and see if those genotypes match extremely closely.

And that assumes the virus exists at all. This is how Jon Rappaport succinctly sums up the need to write articles (such as this one) as if it’s clear the virus exists, in his blog entry today:

“I frequently put on my hazmat suit and enter the crazy world where all ‘the experts’ claim the virus is real. I make these forays to show that, even within their fantasy bubble, and by their own standards, the pros are fatally contradicting themselves and lying constantly.”

Here’s a dip into the first Omicron paper that made the news everywhere.

It was posted on Dec. 1 in medRχiv — and spawned a thousand scary-sounding headlines such as ‘Omicron Covid variant three times more likely to cause reinfection than Delta, S. African study says.

In fact it’s a South African-Canadian version of the ‘Modelling Paper Mafiosi’ – my name for the English clique that kicked off the new-variant parade back in January of this year.

Here are just five of the many unsupported assumptions and leaps of logic in the Dec. 1, 2021, Omicron paper:
  1. Introduction – 1st paragraph – page 5 – “While the proportion of positive PCR tests with S-gene target failure (SGTF) associated with Omicron has subsequently increased in most provinces …”

There’s no mention of the fact that the first variant that came on the scene – B.1.1.7, subsequently dubbed Beta – also apparently is detected via this same SGTF (I cover this in my Feb. 3, 2021, article-video combination titled, ‘Is it True that the New Variants are Very Dangerous?’).  So how do they know whether it’s Beta, Omicron, something else — or nothing at all? It just doesn’t add up!

  1. Introduction – 3rd paragraph – page 5: “Many of the mutations [that they purportedly found in the Omicron gene coding for the spike protein (added Dec. 18 – I noticed that I’d dropped a few of these words in parentheses out of the article by mistake before posting it)] are either known or predicted to contribute to escape from neutralizing antibodies.”  See the information/articles above that I cited in my Bridle article showing this is false. (And unfortunately parroted by many other leaders in the Covid-sceptic ranks, for example Robert Malone, and Mark Trozzi in his blog post today, leaning on the highly dubious claims of the now-omnipresent Vanden Bosschehttps://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/08/the-omicron-variant/.  I’ll soon write an in-depth article about all this.)
  1. Methods – Data sources – first paragraph – page 6:”All positive tests conducted in South Africa appear in the combined data set, regardless of the reason for testing or type of test (PCR or antigen detection), and include the large number of positive tests that were retrospectively added to the data set on 23 November 2021 (11).“They’re mixing together different tests and test results. They’re also assuming that all the positive PCR test results were true positives — they don’t mention the extremely high false-positive rate of the PCR test.
  1. Methods – Data sources – third paragraph – page 7: “If the time between sequential positive tests was at least 90 days, the more recent positive test was considered to indicate a suspected new infection. We present a descriptive analysis of suspected third and fourth infections, although only suspected second infections (which we refer to as ‘reinfections’) were considered in the analyses of temporal trends.”

Wow – where do I start? They don’t supply any clinical evidence that there is any reinfection at all.

Their attitude seems to be, ‘No proof? No problem!”

  1. The key Methods subsection, titled ‘Statistical analysis of reinfection trends,’ is littered with clues that this paper was designed to arrive at pre-determined conclusions.

Here’s how it starts – page 8 (with some of the clue words bolded by me): ‘First, we constructed a simple null model based on the assumption that the reinfection hazard experienced by previously diagnosed individuals is proportional to the incidence of detected cases and fit this model to the pattern of reinfections observed before the emergence of the Beta variant (through 30 September 2020). The null model assumes no change in the reinfection hazard coefficient through time. We then compared observed reinfections after September 2020 to expected reinfections under the null model.”

And it spirals downhill from there into even more disassociation from reality.

You can bet that the other papers published on Omicron amplify and embellish these leaps without offering a shred of solid clinical evidence to support them.

Yet tens of millions of people’s lives have been negatively effected by the rapid-fire restrictions imposed, such as travel bans.

And we’re being told, of course, that more treatments, such as having a booster shot of a vaxx, will take care of the Mighty Omicron.

It seems unfortunately I was correct in almost all of the predictions in my April 2020 article, ‘The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism.

For example, in Step 7 as soon as the first cycle of the new virus and accompanying roll-out of antivirals and vaxxes is done, another starts. And in response “They rapidly roll out virus and antibody testing again, while companies sell billions more doses of antivirals and booster vaccines.”

I wager that my analysis of Omicron is right too.

I challenge anybody to prove me wrong. Dinner and beer are on me if they do.

 

Connect with Rosemary Frei

cover image credit: Alexandra_Koch / pixabay




Smoking Gun: Fauci States Covid PCR Test Has Fatal Flaw; Confession From the “Beloved” Expert of Experts

Smoking Gun: Fauci States Covid PCR Test Has Fatal Flaw; Confession From the “Beloved” Expert of Experts
The COVID PCR test is a complete fraud

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 8, 2021

 

As my readers know, I’ve been proving for well over a year that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.

Therefore, any test for it would be absurd.

However, I frequently put on my hazmat suit and enter the crazy world where all “the experts” claim the virus is real. I make these forays to show that, even within their fantasy bubble, and by their own standards, the pros are fatally contradicting themselves and lying constantly.

That’s what I’m doing in this article. I’ve got my hazmat suit on and I’m exploring the crazy landscape. I’ve published this piece several times, but I want to make sure people understand how the test has been used to manufacture the false appearance of a pandemic.

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

Well, how about THIS?

July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at the 4m01s mark through to the 5m45s mark) — Fauci begins his first answer to the first question at the 4m20s mark and begins his second answer to the second question at the 5m26s mark:

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That’s called a false positive.

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US following the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the global economy and its 8 billion citizens.

All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).”

Naturally, testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17, 2020) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” Here are money quotes:

“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

“Set-the-limit” would mean, We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.

The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients.”

Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

Get the picture?

I hope so.

If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.

2021 CODA: Recently, Florida, a state which has remained far more open and free from COVID restrictions and mandates than most other states, is reporting very low COVID case numbers. Why?

Because as of December 3, 2020, the state of Florida started doing something unheard of. It demanded that labs report the number of cycles (“cycle threshold”) for every test they run.

Here is the relevant wording in a release from the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, and the state Department of Health:

“Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.”

“If your laboratory is not currently reporting CT values and their reference ranges, the lab should begin reporting this information to FDOH within seven days of the date of this memorandum.”

We can assume there is only one reason for this order. The Florida governor and the Department of Health are aware that tests run at 35 cycles or higher are useless and misleading, creating a mountain of false-positives, and they want to stop this crime.

And with the Governor’s recent appointment of a new state Surgeon General, who is well aware of certain aspects of the COVID fraud, the requirement for labs to start telling the truth is taking hold.

Hence, lower case numbers.



SOURCES:

youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=241

blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/pcr/

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download (document page 35 (pdf page 36), “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, For Emergency Use Only, Instructions for Use, Catalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01, 1000 reactions, For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use, Rx Only”; CDC-006-00019, Revision: 07 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 07/21/2021)

nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/24/gov-ron-desantis-this-is-how-you-win-against-the-wolves/

 

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport




Northern Territory, Australia Police Detective Sergeant Resigns: “I Can No Longer, in Good Conscience, Continue to Be Part of This Descent Into Totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in This Territory.”

Northern Territory, Australia Police Detective Sergeant Resigns: “I Can No Longer, in Good Conscience, Continue to Be Part of This Descent Into Totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in This Territory.”

 

 



“Hold the line. This far and no further.”

 

TCTL editor’s note: On December 2, 2021 Detective Sergeant Leith Phillips resigned from the Northern Territory, Australia police force in response to “the erosion of trust, respect, integrity, and the lack of compassion and common decency”.

“I can no longer, in good conscience, continue to be part of this descent into totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in this Territory. Further, the manipulation, coercion, force, and bullying tactics used in the forced standing down of good people and members of the Northern Territory Police, Fire & Emergency Service (sworn & unsworn), medical practitioners, teachers and others in the public service is simply irrational, without thought, logic or common-sense.

In any other time, the actions of our executive and government would be deemed unlawful and as an abuse of office and put simply, would result in multiple counts of unlawful dismissal.”

Sgt. Phillips had submitted his letter of resignation on December 2, citing a finish date of January 3, after 24 years working in the southern part of the Northern Territory. On December 3, he was escorted out of the Alice Springs police station  when he went to collect some personal possessions. On December 4 Commander Craig Laidler and Acting Commander Kirsten Engels came to his house to hand him a notice for two alleged serious breaches of discipline. The disciplinary action has now been dropped because, based on legal advice from the NT Police Association, he re-submitted his resignation as effective immediately. As a civilian he is not now subject to disciplinary action.

As a follow-up to these events, Sgt. Phillips wrote an email to the commissioner of police, expressing his thoughts on all that had occurred and reiterating his reasons for resignation. See that letter below.

See these articles by David Wood, NT Independent which detail the series of events.

‘An erosion of trust, respect, integrity, and the lack of compassion and decency’: NT Police Sergeant’s resignation letter

‘He was one of the best police officers in Australia’: Colleagues on suspended Detective Sergeant

Police executive forced to drop disciplinary action against outspoken Detective Sergeant

 


The following is Ex-(Det.) Sgt. Leith Phillips’s email to Jamie Chalker, Northern Territory Commissioner of Police and Chief Executive Officer of Fire and Emergency Services:

Commissioner of Police,

Excuse Provision

Firstly, I invoke the ‘SMALLPAGE’ defence and apologise in advance for any offence I may cause in this email and in any attachment. I trust this is a sufficient defence for any intended disciplinary action.

Formal Notice of Resignation

I gave formal notice of resignation from the Northern Territory Police Force on Thursday 02 December 2021, effective as of close of business 03 January 2022, the last day of my current personal leave.

Friday 03 December 2021

For my 24 years’ service I had my computer and swipe card access revoked, I was then tracked down inside the Alice Springs Police Station by Acting Commander Kirsten Engles who feigned compassion, instructed not to touch the computer, escorted to collect the last of my personal belongings and escorted to the front door of the police station.

The reason given, that ‘they’ (presumably the executive) were concerned as to who I would speak with whilst inside the police station and what I might do (presumably via email or other).

So, here is the ‘what I might do’ part of ‘their’ concern.

Erosion of trust

Sir, and I use this honorific purely due to the respect I hold for the office of the Commissioner of Police (COP), not the person who currently holds this position, as I no longer have any confidence in your ability to lead this organisation with respect, honour, and integrity.

I have come to the position of resigning from the Northern Territory Police Force in my 24th year of service, having commenced on 05 October 1998. I have been pushed into and forced to undertake this action due to the erosion of trust, respect, integrity, and the lack of compassion and common decency which is no longer an integral part of your decision making or that of your executive leadership team.

In the mess that followed Saturday 09 November 2019, and the tumultuous circumstances of your first days in office, I supported and vouched for you when others were against you through the first six (6) months of your commencement as COP. I did this because I knew you and was hopeful of positive change as I had observed your progression through the ranks since you were a plain clothes Sergeant in Alice Springs CIB.

However, since this time, I have borne witness and been subject to your leadership group undertaking persistent executive overreach into police investigations whereby it has become blindingly obvious that very few of your executives have any confidence in the investigative experience and skillset of the police officers under their commands. Nor does it appear that they display any current investigative skill themselves and appear to have lost complete touch with the realities of current day policing.

Subsequently, under your leadership, we have seen the loss of numerous skilled Detectives and general duty police officers to other jurisdictions and fields of investigation around the country, leaving our small force depleted of skilled senior Detectives and senior officers on the ground. It has been a deplorable loss of experience over a very short period for which you have presided and appeared to have encouraged those members to leave. One can only ask why a leader would be so willing to deplete his workforce of its experience base? Would it be so that those who have the experience and therefore the courage and integrity to speak against poor policy are no longer around, leaving a junior group who are more willing to comply with poor leadership because they do not know any better?

The ‘brain drain’ from our organisation has impacted and will continue to impact investigations into the future. How many homicides and critical incidents have this executive specifically been involved with in their career? I was part of the Alice Springs CIB during the infamous 2006-2008 period where we investigated some 9+ homicides in that 18 month period and for the most part, ran them autonomously from Darwin. This was when the Stuart Highway was dubbed the ‘Cannabis Highway to the stabbing capital of Australia’ (thank you SC Deanne Horwood for coining that phrase). How many in the executive have been involved in Supreme Court trials where, regardless of the outcome, it is the EXPERIENCE gained from these cases that helps develop investigative skill sets? There are some executive members, but not many, and this is something that can NEVER be trained for.  It is this EXPERIENCE we are losing and to have a Commander or above dictate or question my ability (or that of the Senior Investigating team) as to how to undertake an impartial investigation is insulting at the least and evidence of a lack of experience and trust from those asking the question.

COVID-19 Response

The erosion of trust has been further enhanced by the continuous and heavy-handed police response starting in early 2020 to Covid-19, whereby we have seen hard working members of our community fined exorbitant sums of money for breaching a Chief Health Officer (CHO) direction, which is not a law, but simply a CHO directive enforceable only for the duration of an ‘Emergency Declaration’.  We have been used as the ‘big stick’ in a health response where these same hard-working citizens of our community have borne the brunt of ‘flattening the curve’, and then have been forced to undergo quarantine for weeks at a time. In Alice Springs, citizens are detained at the ‘Todd Facility’ where they have less rights and freedom than a prisoner being held in ‘G’ block or in an isolation cell at the Alice Springs Correctional Centre. The abuse of basic civil / human rights is beyond me, and I am ashamed to wear the uniform where it says that I am to ‘Serve and Protect’ the people of the Northern Territory.  The degradation of trust and the division created between the police and the public will be generational.

In the early parts of this year, I had communicated with you (COP) regarding the way in which police had been used in the Northern Territory and around Australia in relation to the Covid-19 response. This had been done via email and SMS, to which you had replied. This ended when you obviously took offence at being provided information which was not in accordance with the current public narrative and therefore had me counselled through the chain of command by an ASCOM with the instruction that I was to not communicate with you any further. I have not done so until now. This was a further erosion of that trust in the office of the Commissioner of Police.

Further, in response to the Assistant Commissioner, People & Cultural Reform, request for consultation into mask and vaccine mandates, I attach the memorandum I submitted on 05 October 2021 detailing my concern. To date I have not received any response to this memorandum, not even an acknowledgement of receipt by that office. Note also that I included the NTPA in this memorandum for which our association has been found significantly wanting by its silence on this issue until the eleventh hour. I provide it in full now for all members to see part of my thought process and decision making and why I am taking this stand.

Just for the record, I am double vaxxed, however because I am anti-mandate and am providing comfort to those who are not vaxxed, I am a tin foil hat wearing ‘Anti-Vaxxer’.  I am not an ‘Anti-Vaxxer’, I am pro choice and I believe in informed consent – the right for everyone to conduct a risk assessment of their personal circumstances and proceed if the benefit outweighs the risk.  A right that no longer appears to be an option in society.

Role of Police in Society

I now come to the role of Constables in the Northern Territory.

When I was sworn in as a Constable of Police, I did not swear an oath to the Commissioner of Police. I swore an oath as follows:

I (Leith Phillips) do swear – that – I will well and truly serve – her majesty, Queen Elizabeth the second, her heirs and successors – as a member of the Northern Territory Police Force without fear or favour – affection or ill-will – from this day until I am legally discharged from that force – that I will see and cause – her majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved – that I will prevent to the best of my powers – all offences against her majesty’s peace – and against all laws in force in the Northern Territory of Australia – and that – while I remain a member of the Northern Territory Police Force – I will – to the best of my skill and knowledge – faithfully discharge all my duties according to law. So help me God.

To be more specific, the following spells out / defines the role of a police officer in Australia:

THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF POLICE OFFICERS IN AUSTRALIA

At common law Australian police do not fall within the employer-employee relationship.

The often-quoted authority for this proposition is Attorney-General (NSW) v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (1952) holds that police officers are not employees but are office-holders with “original authority” in the execution of their duties. It has been observed that because police exercise special discretionary powers derived from the law itself, a police officer is a servant to the law and not to any other authority. In addition, police officers swear an oath of office.

What I have witnessed in the past 12-18 months and more specifically within the last few months is the fast degeneration of the Northern Territory Police Force into ‘Rule by Law’.  The use of law as a tool for political repression and enforcing it unequally on parties with a different set of rules favouring a few sections of society. This can become an instrument of oppression and can give legitimacy to the enactment of laws which may grossly violate basic human rights.  In the Northern Territory and Australia in general, and not what it should be, the ‘Rule of Law’ is whereby all laws apply equally to all citizens of the country and no one can be above the law. It also states that no one will be subject to harsh, uncivilised, or discriminatory treatment even for the sake of maintaining law and order.

I can no longer, in good conscience, continue to be part of this descent into totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in this Territory. Further, the manipulation, coercion, force, and bullying tactics used in the forced standing down of good people and members of the Northern Territory Police, Fire & Emergency Service (sworn & unsworn), medical practitioners, teachers and others in the public service is simply irrational, without thought, logic or common-sense. In any other time, the actions of our executive and government would be deemed unlawful and as an abuse of office and put simply, would result in multiple counts of unlawful dismissal.

I question the conscience of Executive Management who are comfortable working in this current climate of ‘Rule by Law’? Are you happy to be part of this totalitarian regime, remember those who stood before the courts at Nuremberg? They too said what they were doing was allowable because it was the law. Those ‘laws’ were subsequently, and correctly, found to be gross breaches of human rights and so significantly wrong that many of those ’employees’ were sentenced to death or life imprisonment.

You are complicit with coercing members to receive the ‘vaccination’ under duress including members who are now suffering injuries due to the vaccine.  Duress, manipulation, and coercion is NOT consent and it equals ‘unlawful’. The demand to undergo this process to retain your employment is an example of ‘Rule by Law’.

My concerns regarding the direction that the NTPF was heading were raised and dismissed by you.  I am no longer comfortable and will not comply any longer.

Regardless of your position on vaccination, I ask all of the Senior Executive, what is your line in the sand? Where will you stop and stand and say ‘this far and no further’ in relation to your loss of freedom and the illogical mandates you are enforcing on members and the public? Remember, the CHO directions (rules) and any future changes to the law which may reflect these current discriminatory directives are the exact same rules which you and your family must also live under when you are off duty.  You Commissioned officers and those in the executive, you are not exempt.

To quote from the Holy Bible, the book of Esther, Chapter 4 verse 13 & 14, where Queen Esther (a Jew) was living in the king’s palace (some may call the 6th floor of the NAB Building the kings palace) when discriminatory decrees were being made against the Jewish population, in a way not too dissimilar to today. Her uncle came to her and said, “Do not imagine that you are safe in the king’s palace, you alone of all the Jews. Even if you now remain silent, relief and deliverance will come now to the Jews, but you and your father’s house will perish. Who knows – perhaps it was for a time like this that you became queen?”

Sincerely,

Ex-(Det.) Sgt. Leith Phillips, No. 2075

Shift Sergeant, Patrol Group 1, Alice Springs Police Station

 

 

cover image police patch credit: Dickelbers / Wikimedia Commons




Three Strikes! Judge Nukes Biden’s Federal Contractor Mandate

Three Strikes! Judge Nukes Biden’s Federal Contractor Mandate

by Daniel McAdams, The Ron Paul Institute
December 7, 2021

 

Today may well mark the day the Biden Administration’s Covid tyranny suffers a fatal blow. U.S. District Judge R. Stan Baker issued a nationwide block on Biden’s mandate that all US government contractors and subcontractors – some 25 percent of the US work force – must take the experimental Covid shots.

As US Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) observed – That’s three strikes: the Medicare mandate was nuked, the 100+ worker mandate was nuked, and now the federal contractor mandate is nuked, nationwide!

Three strikes – and we hope they’re OUT!

In his ruling, Judge Baker observed:

The Court acknowledges the tragic toll that the COVID-19 pandemic has wrought throughout the nation and the globe. However, even in times of crisis this Court must preserve the rule of law and ensure that all branches of government act within the bounds of their constitutionally granted authorities.

In other words, the Judge correctly concluded that the US Constitution is not suspended because of a virus.

There is good reason to believe that, cynical and authoritarian as it is, the Biden Administration knew all along that the president’s mandates didn’t stand a chance in court, but that the real game was to terrify the population sufficiently between promulgation and repudiation that more Americans would sign on to the shots.

There is nothing that focuses a family breadwinner’s mind like facing being thrown on to the streets because he or she did not want to take a medical treatment that – even in the words of the CDC Director – neither prevents infection nor transmission and thus could not in any sane world be considered a vaccine.

It’s popular these days to throw around the term “terrorism” to justify oppressing one’s political enemies, but it is definitional that the Biden Administration’s use of “jab or job” on millions of Americans is raw terrorism.

As with the eviction moratorium, the Biden Administration openly and even proudly admits that it breaks the law to pursue its political goals, daring the other co-equal branches of government to right the listing ship of state.

With Congress predictably inept at living up to its Constitutional obligations regarding reeling in Executive over-reach on amphetamines, it is a welcome surprise that several members of the Judicial Branch are stepping up to their Constitutional task.

Yes – three strikes and you’re out. But watch the zombie rise again. We who defend civil liberties and personal choice are slowly winning, but the beast is not yet slain.

 

Connect with The Ron Paul Institute




Alberta, Canada: An Inside Look Into the Horror Show of a Calgary Quarantine Facility

Alberta, Canada: An Inside Look Into the Horror Show of a Calgary Quarantine Facility

by Alberta Nationals
December 6, 2021

 

Watch the videos below to see the horror show currently going on at the Westin Hotel at the Calgary Airport. The hotel has been taken over by the government to quarantine fully vaccinated travellers due to the Omicron variant which has killed exactly no one yet.

All walls and floors are completely plastic wrapped and no one is allowed out of their room. A women in Edmonton has not eaten for 40 hours in a Toronto quarantine facility.

What an absolute disgrace by both Jason Kenny and the federal government to allow this to happen.

Here’s another story about the Westin quarantine facility from a Canadian who travelled back from Cairo. Red Cross of Canada employees even refuse to give her cups to drink water.

 

Connect with Alberta Nationals




‘We’re Approaching a Million Vaccine Injuries in the U.S.’

‘We’re Approaching a Million Vaccine Injuries in the U.S.’

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
December 6, 2021

 



Noted Cardiologist, Peter McCullough, returns to The Highwire to discuss new data on the dangerous side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine on the heart.

 

Connect with The HighWire




120 Teens Hospitalized, 3 Dead Following Pfizer Vaccine Rollout for 15- to 17-Year-Olds in Vietnam

120 Teens Hospitalized, 3 Dead Following Pfizer Vaccine Rollout for 15- to 17-Year-Olds in Vietnam
The Vietnamese province of Thanh Hoa suspended a batch of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine after more than 120 teens were hospitalized after being vaccinated. According to news reports, three Vietnamese teens have died after getting the Pfizer vaccine.

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
December 6, 2021

 

The Vietnamese province of Thanh Hoa suspended a batch of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine after more than 120 teens were hospitalized after being vaccinated.

According to the province’s Center for Disease Control (CDC), the teens were hospitalized for symptoms ranging from nausea and high fevers to breathing difficulties — with 17 children exhibiting severe reactions.

Thanh Hoa authorities have yet to confirm Pfizer’s COVID vaccine caused the teens’ symptoms, VN Express International reported.

Vu Van Chinh, director of the Ha Trung District General Hospital, said side-effects following vaccination are normal but are more likely to happen in children than adults.

Luong Ngoc Truong, director of the CDC, said although the province stopped using the current vaccine batch, “We still have other batches, also Pfizer vaccines, so we will continue vaccinating the children.”

The suspended batch was put into storage and could be used later for other groups like adults, Truong added.

Last week, four workers in Thanh Hoa’s Kim Viet Shoe factory died — also due to “overreaction” — after receiving the Vero Cell COVID vaccine, authorized in May by the World Health Organization for emergency use.

Three Vietnamese children die after Pfizer vaccine

Vietnam on Nov. 30 rolled out its COVID vaccination program for children 15 to 17 years old with Pfizer’s vaccine. Since then, three children have died after receiving their first dose. The cause of death was “overreaction to the vaccine.”

One of the three deaths reported in Vietnam includes a 12-year-old boy in the southern province of Binh Phuoc who died one day after his first Pfizer shot.

The boy received his vaccine Monday afternoon and was sent home to rest. After dinner, he experienced dizziness, abdominal pain and diarrhea. He was taken to a local hospital and then transferred to two others, but died Tuesday morning.

The Binh Phuoc Department of Health set up an expert panel to determine the cause of the 12-year-old’s death.

A 16-year-old boy in the northern Bac Giang Province, and a ninth-grade girl in Hanoi, both died Sunday after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

The Health Ministry said both deaths were caused by “overreaction to the vaccine,” not by a problem with the quality of the vaccine or the vaccination process.

Drugmakers Pfizer and Merck on Nov. 24 agreed to give licenses to firms in Vietnam to produce COVID treatment pills — paxlovid (Pfizer) and molnupiravir (Merck).

Vietnam is one of 95 low- and middle-income countries allowed to produce the pills through a voluntary licensing agreement with Medicines Patent Pool, an international public health group backed by the United Nations.

According to the latest data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, there have been 18,558 reported adverse events following Pfizer’s COVID vaccine among 12 to 17-year-olds.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense 

cover image credit: zibik / pixabay




World’s First Vaccine Murder Case Against Bill Gates

World’s First Vaccine Murder Case Against Bill Gates

by Patricia Harrity, The Daily Exposé
December 4, 2021

 

The world’s first vaccine murder case has been filed in India’s High Court against Bill Gates, as the AstraZeneca’s (Covishield) manufacturer and his partner Adar Poonawalla, who is the chief executive officer of a biopharmaceutical company, Serum Institute of India, and other Government officials and leaders involved in what they state is the murder of a 23-year-old man, Mr. Hitesh Kadve, who died as a result of the AstraZeneca vaccination.

Mr. Kadve had taken the vaccine due to the restrictions set by the railways that only double vaccinated individuals were able to travel and the belief that the vaccine is completely safe, now as a result of another death finally being reported as an adverse reaction, his mother has sought justice.

India’s Adverse Event Following Immunisation

The Government of India’s Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) Committee recently admitted that the death of 33-year-old Dr. SnehalL Lunawat was due to side effects of the AstraZeneca Covishield: vaccine, which is India’s most widely used vaccine.

The family of Dr. Snehal Lunawat had approached the World Health Organisation (WHO) to intervene due to the death not being reported by the Indian Officials as an adverse event. The family was then to follow up with the ministry and Serum Institute of India who had manufactured the vaccine but still did not receive a satisfactory response.

Despite the India Drugs Network (AIDN) helping the Lunawat family in successfully reporting the case as an AEFI, it was to take close to seven months after Dr. Lunawat’s death for the AEFI to accept that she had died due to a blood clot from the Covishield vaccine (Source).

The report to the AEFI has raised awareness and the court case may now be the first of many as a result.

The information in this article can be found on the website for the Indian Bar Association (here)

Unlawful Promotion of Prescription Drugs

The Indian Bar Association point out previous underhand behaviour of Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK), stating that the company is guilty of unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices.

Additionally, they state that the United States alleges that GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents. GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of doctors and paid for the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended.

Missing Data

Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes drug. The missing information included data regarding certain post-marketing studies, as well as data regarding two studies undertaken in response to European regulators’ concerns about the cardiovascular safety of Avandia. Since 2007, the FDA has added two black box warnings to the Avandia label to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1) congestive heart failure, and (2) myocardial infarction (heart attack).

The Indian Bar Association cited two cases that went before the American Court regarding the side effects of previous MR vaccine in one case, the Court accepted the settlement of compensation of 101 Million US Dollars to the victim.

Also, in another case in America, the CIA, FDA’s office of criminal investigation, recovered around 10.2 Billion US Dollar from Pharma Company GlaxoSmithKline for various offences including suppression of side effects of the medicines and putting the lives of Americans in danger.

Paid Kickbacks

It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent, and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programmes.

Vaccination by Deception is a Criminal Wrong

The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO, makes it clear that before giving a vaccine or any treatment to a person, he should be informed about the side effects of the medicine and also about the alternate remedies available.

If any person is vaccinated by suppressing the facts or by telling a lie that the said vaccines are completely safe, amount to the consent being obtained under deception. In India, vaccination under deception or by force/coercion, or by putting certain stifling conditions is a civil and criminal wrong.

From the Indian Bar Association (source)

The Petitioner raised previous alleged criminal antecedents of Bill Gates which is a “strong proof against Bill Gates and his vaccine syndicate”.

The Indian Bar Association has said therefore that Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, are “accused of their involvement in the conspiracy.” In India, the person allowing the false marketing of his product is also held to be guilty due to his act of commission and omission and that both Gates and Poonawalla are guilty of mass murders (here)   The case is thought to be heard soon, regardless of the outcome, it will, at last, raise the much-needed awareness of both the adverse reactions caused by the vaccinations and the alleged criminal behaviour of the manufacturers and Bill Gates.

 

Connect with The Daily Exposé




Pfizer’s Unconscionable Crimes, Past and Present

Pfizer’s Unconscionable Crimes, Past and Present

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 4, 2021

 



STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • In a November 9, 2021, interview with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe, Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla claimed “a small part of professionals” intentionally circulate “misinformation … so that they will mislead those that have concerns.” Such medical professionals are not just bad people, Bourla said, “they’re criminals, because they have literally cost millions of lives”
  • The criminals’ playbook includes the dictum to always blame the other side for what they themselves are guilty of
  • Pfizer has a long history of criminal activity. The company has been sued in multiple venues over unethical drug testing, illegal marketing practices, bribery in multiple countries, environmental violations — including illegal dumping of PCBs and other toxic waste — labor and worker safety violations and more. It’s also been criticized for price gouging that threatens the lives of patients with chronic diseases such as epilepsy
  • Between 2002 and 2010, Pfizer was fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards, including a $2.3 billion fine in 2009, the then-largest health care fraud fine in American history. In 2011, Pfizer paid $14.5 million to settle charges of illegal marketing, and in 2014 they settled charges relating to unlawful marketing of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million. None of it deterred future bad behavior
  • According to a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, data were falsified, patients were unblinded and follow-up on reported side effects lagged way behind

 

In a November 9, 2021, interview with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe,1 Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla claimed “a small part of professionals” intentionally circulate “misinformation … so that they will mislead those that have concerns.”2

Such medical professionals, Bourla said, are not just bad people, “they’re criminals, because they have literally cost millions of lives.” Bourla is one to talk, being the CEO of a company the name of which is synonymous with corporate crime.

Bourla’s comments were made on the same day Pfizer and its partner BioNTech asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to broaden its authorization for booster shots to everyone over the age of 18.3

Pot Calling the Kettle Black

I guess we can’t be too surprised, though, as the primary defense strategy people like Bourla have is to blame the opposition for their own misdeeds. He even claims the company is being targeted by “dark organizations,” meaning organizations that aren’t transparent about their funding.

This is precisely what the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is, the fabrications4 of which are being used to prop up the official narrative that those who present evidence showing the COVID shots are dangerous are domestic terrorists5 out to worsen the pandemic death toll.

No one knows who funds this group, but it has plenty of connections to war hawks and Great Reset promoters — including the Atlantic Council, to which Bourla is making these statements.

By way of its board members, the CCDH can be linked to the Trilateral Commission, the Atlantic Council, the European Council of Foreign Relations, Save the Children Fund (funded by the Gates Foundation and a partner of Gates’ GAVI Vaccine Alliance), the British Parliament, CIA and Event 201,6,7 Microsoft,8 and the Center for American Progress9 (another organization funded by dark money10).

And Bourla wants us to believe Pfizer is under attack from dark money groups? Again, the playbook of these wolves includes the dictum to always blame the other side for what they themselves are guilty of.

More on the Atlantic Council

In August 2018, Facebook claimed an “influence campaign” by Russian “bad actors” had been carried out on its platform leading up to the 2018 midterm elections. However, it turned out these pages weren’t identified by Facebook. They came primarily from the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab.

In her article, “Hysteria Over Newly Revealed Facebook ‘Influence Campaign’ Doesn’t Fit the Facts,”11 investigative reporter Whitney Webb took a deep-dive into this inane propaganda effort, pointing out that:

“… despite the lawmakers’ claims, Facebook has established no links to the Russian government or even Russian nationals.

The only ‘evidence’ to back up the claim of Russian-involvement is that one of the pages identified ‘had an IRA [Internet Research Agency, a Russian ‘troll farm’ named in a Mueller-probe indictment] account as one of its admins for ‘only seven minutes’ and ‘one of the IRA accounts we disabled in 2017 shared a Facebook Event hosted by’ one of the pages.

Beyond the fact that accusations of Russian involvement are highly politicized given the lack of current evidence, there is hardly any indication that this ‘influence campaign’ was even influential at all.

Indeed, most of the ‘bad actor’ pages and accounts had hardly any followers, with most of them having no followers. For instance, only four of the 32 total social-media pages and accounts had more than 10 followers, with all other pages — i.e., the remaining 28 — having between 10 and zero, according to Facebook’s statements.

All of the Instagram accounts identified had zero followers and, among those seven accounts, only one of them had made a single post on the platform. By Facebook’s own admission, only four of the pages named were even remotely significant in terms of followers and thus ‘influence.’”

Why do I mention this? Because this is the same tactic used to frame a small number of individuals with limited social media reach as domestic terrorists, simply for sharing counter-narratives about the COVID pandemic.

False Allegations Used to Quench Freedom of Speech

According to the CCDH,12 a dozen individuals, including me, were responsible for 65% of all anti-vaccine content on social media and should therefore be banned from all platforms. Most social media companies have since complied, deplatforming most of us. This despite a public denouncement of the CCDH’s accusations by Monika Bickert, vice president of Facebook content policy, who stated that:13

“… these 12 people are responsible for about just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true or false, as well as URLs associated with these people.

The report14 upon which the faulty narrative is based analyzed only a narrow set of 483 pieces of content over six weeks from only 30 groups, some of which are as small as 2,500 users.

They are in no way representative of the hundreds of millions of posts that people have shared about COVID-19 vaccines in the past months on Facebook.

Further, there is no explanation for how the organization behind the report identified the content they describe as ‘anti-vax’ or how they chose the 30 groups they included in their analysis. There is no justification for their claim that their data constitute a ‘representative sample’ of the content shared across our apps.”

Information Warfare

Getting back to the Atlantic Council, Webb noted that:15

“Facebook officially partnered with the Atlantic Council this past May in order to tackle so-called ‘fake news,’ adding that the hawkish think-tank would serve as its ‘eyes and ears’ in identifying alleged foreign-influence operations …

The Atlantic Council itself is led by a mix of retired military officers, former politicians, and Western business elites. And the think-tank’s financial sponsors include top U.S. defense contractors; agencies aligned with Washington and the Pentagon; the United Arab Emirates; major transnational corporations; and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

One can think of several reasons why such a group would be interested in fomenting anti-Russian hysteria … The Atlantic Council’s conflicts of interest are certainly worth keeping in mind …”

The same must be said about the CCDH, and Pfizer too. Both are glaringly biased and in no position to judge what is misinformation and what isn’t. But then, this is war, after all. We’re in an information war, and the term “misinformation” is lobbed in lieu of grenades. Discernment and some basic wisdom is required to avoid becoming a victim.

Fact checking organizations are another weapon designed and deployed to control the narrative. They exist as gatekeepers to funnel readers and viewers to the official narrative and away from anything that might raise inconvenient questions. The largest and most influential fact checker is NewsGuard, which hands out “trustworthiness” ratings to websites.

NewsGuard cofounder Louis Crovitz is a member of the Council on Foreign relations — another Great Reset supporter — and primary advisers include Tom Ridge, former secretary of Homeland Security, and Ret. Gen. Michael Hayden, a former director of both the CIA and NSA.16

Knowing that, it makes it easier to understand how everyday people who share information that veers from the official narrative can be labeled and treated as a national security threat.

The COVID pandemic is a militarized operation. We’re at war, and the designated enemy (looking at it from the side that started this war without telling anyone) are the citizens of the world who want to hold on to their freedom and human rights.

Pfizer Has a Long History of Criminal Behavior

Pfizer is on the other side — the side that is seeking to install an unelected technocratic regime based on the idea that we need a global biosecurity, biosurveillance apparatus or we’ll all die.

This is not a new position for them. During the American Civil War, which began in 1862, the need for massive amounts of painkillers and antiseptics allowed Pfizer to flourish and expand during wartime.17 Today, the manufactured “need” for COVID-19 vaccine is allowing Pfizer to make out like a bandit yet again, and as I’ve already stated, we are again at war, albeit an undeclared one.

To achieve that, Pfizer is willing to “blackmail” countries into accepting its COVID shot terms, as reviewed in the Gravitas report above — terms that make sure Pfizer always comes out on top.

A key term is no liability, which is understandable considering the amount of harm Pfizer’s COVID jab is causing. Pfizer went so far as to bully nations into putting up sovereign assets like military bases as collateral to pay for any vaccine injury lawsuits that might result from their COVID jab.

While that might not be illegal, it’s unethical, and so is researching on people without informed consent. Everyone who gets these emergency use authorized injections are part of that research, while simultaneously being prevented from seeing anything but propaganda.

Without truthful and transparent disclosure of both risks and benefits, there is no informed consent. Pfizer is even experimenting on children and pregnant women without informed consent, two categories that historically have been off-limits for drug experimentation.

Whistleblower Claims Data Were Falsified

According to a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, data were falsified and patients were unblinded. Follow-up on reported side effects also lagged behind.18 This isn’t the first time such unsavory have been levied against Pfizer.

In 2014, Pfizer was ordered to pay $75 million to settle charges relating to its unlawful testing of a new broad spectrum antibiotic on critically ill Nigerian children. As reported by the Independent19 at the time, Pfizer sent a team of doctors into Nigeria in the midst of a meningitis epidemic.

For two weeks, the team set up right next to a medical station run by Doctors Without Borders and began dispensing the experimental drug, Trovan. Of the 200 children picked, half got the experimental drug and the other half the already licensed antibiotic Rocephin.

Eleven of the children treated by the Pfizer team died, and many others suffered side effects such as brain damage and organ failure. Pfizer denied wrongdoing. According to the company, only five of the children given Trovan died, compared to six who received Rocephin, so their drug was not to blame.

The problem was they never told the parents that their children were being given an experimental drug, let alone ask them if they wanted their child to take part in the trial.

What’s more, while Pfizer produced a permission letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, the letter turned out to have been backdated. The ethics committee itself wasn’t set up until a year after the trial had already taken place.

State Department cables also revealed Pfizer hired spies with a plan to frame a Nigerian attorney general and get him to drop the parents’ lawsuit.20 Pfizer even tried to avoid responsibility by falsely accusing Doctors Without Borders of dispensing the experimental drug.21

An ‘Habitual Offender’

In his 2010 paper,22 “Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR,” Robert G. Evans, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor at Vancouver School of Economics, described Pfizer as “a ‘habitual offender,’ persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.”

Pfizer has been sued in multiple venues over unethical drug testing, illegal marketing practices,23 bribery in multiple countries,24 environmental violations — including illegal dumping of PCBs and other toxic waste25 — labor and worker safety violations and more.26,27,28 It’s also been criticized for price gouging that threatens the lives of patients with chronic diseases such as epilepsy.29

Between 2002 and 2010 alone, Pfizer and its subsidiaries were fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. This included $2.3 billion for the illegal marketing of the arthritis drug, Bextra, levied in 2009.30,31 It was the largest health care fraud settlement in American history.

According to the Global Justice report, “The Horrible History of Big Pharma: Why We Can’t Leave Pharmaceutical Corporations in the Driving Seat of the COVID-19 Response:”32

“A whistleblower claimed that sales staff were incentivized to sell Bextra to doctors for conditions for which the drug wasn’t approved and at doses up to eight times those recommended. ‘At Pfizer I was expected to increase profits at all costs, even when sales meant endangering lives. I couldn’t do that,’ he stated.”

In 2011, Pfizer agreed to pay another $14.5 million to settle federal charges of illegal marketing,33 and in 2014 they settled federal charges relating to improper marketing of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million.34

None of those legal actions deterred future bad behavior. To Pfizer, paying fines to sweep illegalities under the rug has become part of the cost of doing business, and they can afford it. While the fines may sound extraordinary, they’re tiny when compared to the company’s profits.

Pfizer was among the top 30 most profitable companies in the world in 2020, with profits reaching $16 billion, and its COVID jab alone is predicted to make $13 billion in 2021.35

As noted by the law firm Matthews and Associates, “the history of Pfizer is rife with so much subterfuge and under-the-table dealing that the company will need all the help it can get to promote confidence in its hastily assembled COVID vaccine.”36 The key strategy to boost confidence, unfortunately, is censorship.

What ‘New Way of Life’ Is Pfizer Promising?

The fastest way to get back to normal, Bourla claims in his Atlantic Council interview, is for everyone to get vaccinated. Considering how little things have changed despite massive vaccination rates, it seems clear the globalists in charge of The Great Reset — and Pfizer is part of that pack — have no intention of allowing anything go back to normal. It won’t matter how many comply, or how many times we comply

Australia is perhaps the clearest illustration of what the whole world will face. Even though a majority are “vaccinated,” their freedoms have not been returned, and now they have to submit to boosters or lose what semblance of freedom the initial round of shots gave them. The Australian government is confiscating and blocking people’s bank accounts, withholding unemployment benefits and more — all in the name of “public health.”

Bourla even indicates that there is no going back to the old normal when he states, “The only thing that stands between the new way of life and the current way of life is … hesitancy to vaccinations.”

New way of life. What does this “new way of life” look like? It looks like Australia. It looks like Israel. It looks like Lithuania,37 where your “right” to frequent restaurants, stores, shopping malls, beauty salons, libraries, banks, insurance agencies and universities, and your “right” to inpatient medical care and travel, all depend on your willingness to participate in a medical experiment that can kill or disable you.

The “new way of life” Bourla is talking about involves repeatedly playing lethal Russian Roulette just to “earn” the right to be part of society. No thank you. Bourla can keep his “new way of life.”

 

Connect with Dr. Joseph Mercola

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay




The Omicron Variant is Here! What You Need to Know

The Omicron Variant is Here! What You Need to Know

by JP Sears, Awaken with JP
December 4, 2021

 



 

Connect with JP Sears




Disturbing Confrontation Inside Australia’s ‘Gold Standard’ COVID Internment Camp

Disturbing Confrontation Inside Australia’s ‘Gold Standard’ COVID Internment Camp

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
December 3, 2021

 

Days ago we presented the latest Orwellian headline out of Australia… “Aussie Police Arrest Teen ‘Fugitives’ Who Escaped From COVID Internment Camp”. Since then more incredibly disturbing video from inside the Northern Australian Covid internment camp, Howard Springs facility, has emerged. A frightening confrontation between a imprisoned “quarantined” woman and camp authorities was caught on hidden camera.

One host on the popular cultural commentary and news analysis site UnHeard recently introduced a segment taking a look at the fresh footage from inside the notorious Covid internment camp : “Australia. Until recently, that country was most famous for its sunshine and relaxed attitude. Well since the Covid pandemic hit we’ve all got to know another side of Australia…”

https://twitter.com/_evelynrae/status/1466712921266814977?

With some of the longest and most stringent lockdowns and travel restrictions in the world, it’s become a case study of what happens when a government will do anything to keep Covid numbers low,” host Freddie Sayers’ narration continues.

“Their latest policy is to build special camps, Covid internment camps – to which infected and suspected infected people are moved. The biggest of these camps is called Howard Springs.”

“It houses up to 2,000 inmates, surrounded by tall fences and carefully policed against attempts to escape. It’s been described as the ‘gold standard’ of such camps and is being replicated across Australia.”

The woman being interrogated and threatened with a 5000 AU$ fine in the above video can been seen in a follow-up interview below, conducted after she was released from detention…



As is shown in the video in question, camp officials confronted the quarantined woman, later identified as Hayley Hodgson, and began pointing out yellow lines that she could not cross.

She never tested positive for COVID after being tested three times. “Never had Covid. I was in close contact with someone – never got it, and I was treated literally like a criminal,” she later described. After her 14-day stint at the camp, she lost her job, returning to her home unemployed, she later confirmed.

Up until recently, Australia – with its sprawling coastline and beautiful beaches, outdoor and adventure life, and nearly year-round sunshine – was considered by most to be a large “paradise” vacation spot in the South Pacific… but now it’s marked as the place of “Covid quarantine hell”.

* * *

Meanwhile, in neighboring New Zealand, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has unironically given citizens permission to use the bathroom inside other people’s homes when visiting…

 

Connect with ZeroHedge




5-Year-Old Died 4 Days After Pfizer Shot, CDC VAERS Data Show

5-Year-Old Died 4 Days After Pfizer Shot, CDC VAERS Data Show
VAERS data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 927,740 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 19,532 deaths and 146,720 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021.

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
December 3, 2021

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention today released new data showing a total of 927,740 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 19,532 reports of deaths — an increase of 283 over the previous week — and 146,720 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 3,325 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 672,373 adverse events, including 8,986 deaths and 57,143 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 8,986 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 26, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 26% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 454 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 24. This includes 264 million doses of Pfizer, 173 million doses of Moderna and 16 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021 for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

The second death (VAERS I.D. 1890705) occurred in a 5-year-old girl who died four days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.

  • 1,581 adverse events have been reported in the 5 to 11 age group since Nov. 1.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021 for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

The most recent death involves a 16-year-old girl from Georgia (VAERS I.D. 1865389) who died reportedly from a heart condition and multi-organ failure two days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

  • 60 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
    attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 563 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 553 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 139 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
Athletes experience devastating injuries following COVID vaccines

As The Defender reported Dec. 2, several high-performing professional athletes are facing the end of their careers after COVID vaccines destroyed their health.

Florian Dagoury, a world record-holder in static breath-hold freediving, who once held his breath for a shocking 10 minutes and 30 seconds, was diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Dagoury said he now struggles to reach an 8-minute breath-hold, feels an urge to breathe doing 40-minute dives, can’t keep his heart rate low and experienced a 30% decrease in his diving performance.

Veteran triathlete Antoine Méchin, 32, is also facing the potential end to his career after experiencing a pulmonary embolism after receiving Moderna’s COVID vaccine.

The symptoms, which included breathing problems and arm pain, started after the first dose, but doctors brushed off his shortness of breath as related to stress and fatigue.

Jeremy Chardy, a 34-year old professional tennis player ranked 73rd in the world, suspended his season due to a severe adverse reaction to a COVID vaccine, which left him unable to engage in intense activity.

Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Warner’s reaction was so severe that, as of October, he was still spending days in bed, overwhelmed by too much mental or physical exertion.

Two professional soccer players collapse during games

A professional soccer player collapsed suddenly on Nov. 25, during a Real Madrid’s Champions League game with Sheriff Tiraspol, a Moldovan soccer club, ZeroHedge reported.

Adama Traore, 26, a winger for Sherriff Tiraspol, was seen clutching his chest as he slumped to the ground in the middle of the game as medics rushed to revive him. The reasons behind Traore’s collapse and why he was suffering from chest pains have not been confirmed.

​​Traore’s collapse occurred the night after another player, Sheffield United’s John Fleck, went down during a match against Reading. Fleck was taken off on a stretcher after receiving lengthy treatment.

When a radio pundit questioned whether Fleck had received the COVID vaccine, his live feed to the show was cut.

A major German newspaper, Berliner Zeitung, recently published a report attempting to answer why an “unusually large number of professional and amateur soccer players have collapsed recently.”

The article listed many recent cases of players who experienced heart problems or collapsed on the field — in some cases resulting in death.

Pfizer seeks authorization for boosters shots for 16- and 17-year-olds

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said in a tweet on Tuesday the pharma giant, along with BioNTech, formally asked the FDA to authorize COVID booster doses for 16- and 17-year olds.

If approved, the shot would be the first booster available to people under 18.

The FDA could approve Pfizer’s booster doses for 16- and 17-year olds as soon as next week, according to people familiar with the matter.

COVID vaccines may be associated with heightened risk of myopericarditis among men

To help determine whether a correlation exists between COVID vaccines and myopericarditis, researchers tracked data from more than 268,000 adults in Massachusetts who received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine between August 2020 and May 2021.

The researchers compared the data to a control group made up of 235,000 of the same patients — from 2018 and 2019, well before they had received any doses of a COVID vaccine.

In a study published in the American Journal of Cardiology, the researchers found the age-adjusted incidence rate of myopericarditis in men was higher in the vaccinated than the control population, while the incidence rate of myopericarditis in women was the same between the vaccinated and control populations.

They also found an increased incidence of myocardial injury in both men and women in 2021 compared to 2019, although they suggested some of the apparent increase in the diagnosis of myopericarditis after vaccination may be attributable to factors unrelated to the COVID vaccines.

Moderna CEO says Omicron COVID booster could be ready by March

Moderna President Stephen Hoge said Wednesday boosters of its COVID vaccine targeting the Omicron variant could be ready for U.S. authorization as early as March.

Moderna is also developing a multivalent vaccine targeting Omicron and three other COVID variants, although the shot will not be available for several more months, Forbes reported.

March is the earliest date an Omicron booster could be approved under current FDA guidelines, though the company can start manufacturing the vaccine during testing.

Hoge said he thinks existing vaccines “will be able to slow down, if not completely stop, the Omicron variant.”

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: KitzD66 / pixabay




Global Civil Society and Indigenous Peoples Demand UN FAO Cuts Ties With Pesticide Industry

Global Civil Society and Indigenous Peoples Demand UN FAO Cuts Ties With Pesticide Industry

by Sustainable Pulse
December 3, 2021

 

In their petition, advocates argued that it is “deeply inappropriate” for the UN agency to partner with CropLife, whose member companies (Bayer, Syngenta, Corteva Agriscience, FMC and Sumitomo) make around one-third of their sales from Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs), or pesticides that pose the highest levels of risk to health and the environment.

Recent estimates show that there are 385 million cases of acute unintentional pesticide poisonings each year, up from an estimated 25 million cases in 1990. “This means that about 44% of farmers and agricultural workers around the world are poisoned each year by an industry dominated by CropLife members,” the petition said.

PAN Europe, along with other organizations, held a mobilization in front of the FAO headquarters in Rome to accompany the petition delivery and to mark the anniversary of the Bhopal tragedy, also commemorated as World No Pesticide Use Day. Advocates from around the world also participated in a Global Day of Action, including placard protests and a social media rally urging the FAO to stop the #ToxicAlliance.

“Pesticides have disastrous consequences on people’s health and biodiversity, while science shows agroecology can feed the world in a pesticide-free manner. There is no way FAO can justify its collaboration with CropLife. We will make sure the European Union reacts to this intolerable situation,” stated Martin Dermine, Policy officer at PAN Europe, who were among those gathered in Rome to urge the FAO leadership to abandon its controversial pesticide industry partnership.

“More than 187,000 people think that getting into bed with the pesticides industry is a bad move for the FAO. This partnership would turn the FAO into a marketing arm for these toxic companies whose products poison millions of farmers every year,” added Keith Tyrell, Director of PAN United Kingdom.

“The partnership between the FAO and CropLife will undermine all efforts made in Africa to ban dangerous pesticides, and will leave the door open to the export of pesticides banned in Europe such as atrazine, paraquat etc. We denounce and strongly reject this ‘Toxic Alliance’ as it is beset with conflict of interests not known to the public, to the detriment of health protection and environmental preservation,” said Maimouna Diene, coordinator of PAN Africa.

“The alliance between FAO and CropLife implies a greater influence on public policies by the companies that manufacture and sell pesticides, especially in the most vulnerable countries where the expansion of monocultures and the use of Highly Hazardous Pesticides is favored, which impacts socio-environmental health.  On the contrary, FAO and governments should favor agroecological production as the basis of a comprehensive link with the environment to achieve food sovereignty,” commented Javier Souza, Regional Coordinator of PAN Latin America (RAPAL).

“FAO should not jeopardise its integrity and its achievements in agroecology by cooperating with the very industry that is responsible for the production of HHPs that are known to cause severe or irreversible harm to peoples’ health or the environment worldwide. We need a strong FAO, independent from the market interests of global corporations, and which supports the establishment of safe, healthy and sustainable food and farming systems,” said Susan Haffmans, Pesticides Officer at PAN Germany.

“We cannot expect that partnering with an association of hundreds of subsidiaries to multinational giants like Bayer and Syngenta –who have vested interests in increasing the sales of their products– will support FAO’s own goals of reducing reliance on pesticides. It is incompatible with FAO’s mandate as a UN institution to protect human rights, including the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, which the UN Human Rights Council just recently recognized,” stated Simone Adler, Organizing Co-Director of PAN North America.

The global petition delivery follows letters of appeal submitted by over 350 international civil society and Indigenous peoples’ organizations and 250 scientists and academics last year, after the signing of the partnership agreement between FAO and CropLife in October 2020.  A coalition of 11 global organizations, including PAN, followed up with a formal request to meet with Director-General Qu to discuss their concerns, but has not received a response to date.

“It is alarming how big business dominates in setting the direction of policymaking, as we have seen with the corporate capture of the UN Food Systems Summit. We expect that CropLife will take full advantage of this partnership with FAO to expand and consolidate corporate control over food and agriculture. We cannot just take it sitting down,” concluded Sarojeni Rengam, Executive Director of PAN Asia Pacific.

On Friday, civil society and indigenous peoples organizations delivered more than 187,300 petition signatures from over 107 countries to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Director-General Qu Dongyu, demanding that the FAO end its partnership with CropLife International, an association representing the world’s largest agrochemical companies. The global petition was facilitated by Pesticide Action Network (PAN), Friends of the Earth, SumOfUs, and the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).

 

Connect with Sustainable Pulse




Fauci’s Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past

Fauci’s Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
December 3, 2021

 



Original video available at Reese Report Rumble and Banned.video

 

Connect with Greg Reese


 

Transcript provided by Truth Comes to Light

 

The reception of Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s book,”The Real Anthony Fauci”, is clear evidence of a mass awakening.
The people are waking up to see Fauci for what he is — an absolute psychopath.
We’ve learned of how he directed experiments at the NIAID in which beagles had their vocal cords removed and their heads enclosed in cages where sand fleas ate them alive.

 

 

And we’ve learned of how he fraudulently used PCR tests to illegitimately push a known deadly drug upon tens of thousands of people.
And many are now learning that in 1992 under the direction of Anthony Fauci the NIAID funded drug trials on HIV positive children, although many of the children were healthy and asymptomatic. They had merely tested positive via faulty PCR tests administered through New York’s Child Welfare Department, who then handed them over to the deadly experiments.
Most of the drugs being tested on the children were already known to cause deformities, organ failure, brain damage and other lethal side effects.
And yet the children were required to continue with the drugs regardless of negative side effects.

 

 

Those administering the drugs were explicitly told that all adverse side effects they witnessed in the children were being caused by the HIV infection and not the drugs.
When parents refused to consent to these barbaric trials children services took their kids and placed them with foster families for children’s homes where participation in the trial would be assured.
When the children resisted the deadly drugs, they were brought to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital where plastic tubes were surgically inserted into their stomachs and the deadly drugs they were trying to escape we’re pumped directly into their bodies.
Once the children died, their bodies were added to a mass grave in Hawthorne, New York — a large pit with astroturf thrown over it.

 

image credit: Anthony22, Wikimedia Commons

To get around the Nuremberg Code and other laws the state of New York created a special review board comprised of the hospital stakeholders.
May one wonder, other than torturing and killing innocent children, what were they trying to accomplish?
They already knew of the negative side effects that these drugs are having on adults. But the more we learn about Anthony Fauci, the more we realize that he is an absolute psychopath.
And it doesn’t matter why psychopaths do what they do. Fauci and his criminal cohorts belong in cages at the very least.
Anthon Fauci is just one old crook in a mass of conspiracy that is aggressively pushing to inject everyone’s children with the new deadly and debilitating mRNA experimental jabs. Whether you like it or not.
Going after Fauci is a drop in the bucket but at least it’s a start.

 


 See related articles:

‘Guinea Pig Kids’: Fauci’s Legacy of Cruel Experiments on Kids
Beyond #BeagleGate: Fauci’s Long History of Atrocities, Including Torturing Children
Fauci, Dead Orphans, AIDS Drug Trials, and the Lies
“Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde” – RFK, Jr. in Conversation With James Corbett: “There’s an Entire Coalition of Sinister Forces… Which Are All Wrapped Up in This Obliteration of Constitutional Rights…”
The Real Anthony Fauci
My New Book — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

 




As Australians Seek Compensation for Vaccine Injuries Under New Plan, Here’s a Look at COVID Vaccine Liability Laws Around the World

As Australians Seek Compensation for Vaccine Injuries Under New Plan, Here’s a Look at COVID Vaccine Liability Laws Around the World
More than 10,000 Australians so far requested compensation for COVID vaccine injuries under the country’s vaccine injury compensation scheme. What types of compensation programs exist in other countries?

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., The Defender
December 2, 2021

 

Recent reports from Australia indicate more than 10,000 Australians are requesting compensation for vaccine injuries that they received following inoculation with the COVID-19 vaccine.

The claims come as part of an Australian government program allowing individuals to be compensated for lost income after being hospitalized for “rare but significant” side effects resulting from the vaccination.

As originally conceived, compensation through the program was available to people who incurred A$5,000 or more in vaccine injury-related medical costs. However, the government enacted a reduction in the compensation threshold, permitting claims for the cost of vaccine injuries beginning at A$1,000.

The 10,000-plus compensation claims were submitted as almost 79,000 adverse side effects after COVID vaccines were reported to the country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, as of mid-November.

No-fault vaccine liability: what is it?

Australia’s vaccine injury compensation program is an example of a “no-fault compensation program.”

This refers to a measure put in place by public health authorities, private insurance companies, manufacturers, and/or other stakeholders to compensate individuals harmed by vaccines. Such programs allow a person who has sustained a vaccine injury to be compensated financially, without having to attribute fault or error to a specific manufacturer or individual.

No-fault compensation schemes are one of three options used by various countries to handle vaccine injury claims.

The other two options include allowing vaccine-injured people to sue private-sector actors, such as vaccine manufacturers or their insurers, or to place the full financial burden on the patient.

Australia’s no-fault compensation program is fairly new. It was launched in August 2021, despite longstanding calls for the development of such a scheme well before COVID.

A 2020 study found 25 countries with a no-fault program in place, with 15 of these programs administered at the government level.

In some countries, such programs are administered at the provincial level or at multiple levels of government, while two countries (Sweden and Finland) were identified by the study as having no-fault programs fully administered by the insurance sector.

The exact nature of such no-fault schemes, however, can differ significantly from one country to another. As explained in the 2020 study:

  • In Sweden and Finland, pharmaceutical companies who market their products in these jurisdictions provide insurance contributions which fund those countries’ no-fault programs.
  • Similarly, Norway’s no-fault program is funded by a special insurance organization known as the Drug Liability Association.
  • Latvia’s Treatment Risk Fund is funded through contributions from medical institutions, acting as professional indemnity insurance.
  • In China and South Korea, there are two separate programs, covering those vaccines in each country’s national immunization program (NIP) and those not included in the respective country’s NIP. Each government funds injury claims for NIP vaccines, while pharmaceutical companies or those holding a drug’s market authorization are responsible for funding injury claims regarding non-NIP vaccines.
  • The U.S. no-fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is funded by a flat-rate tax of 75 cents for each disease covered in each vaccine dose.
  • New Zealand has set up an Accident Compensation Corporation, which acts as a general compensation fund for accidents stemming from vaccinations, and treatment injuries. The program is funded through general tax contributions and levies on employee wages, businesses, vehicle licenses and fuel sales.

Not all no-fault programs compensate for injuries arising from all vaccines. For instance, according to the 2020 study:

  • Only five (Japan, France, Italy, Hungary, and Slovenia) of the 23 programs specifically examined by the study covered injuries arising from mandatory vaccines or vaccines recommended by law — of particular significance in a world where more and more countries are attempting to implement COVID vaccine mandates.
  • Just over half (57%) of the programs examined provide compensation for injuries arising from registered and recommended vaccines for children, pregnant women or adults and for special indication, such as occupation or travel, within the jurisdiction. This latter point is also significant in an era where many COVID vaccine mandates are being imposed on specific occupations or as a means of being “allowed” to travel.

Different no-fault programs also have differing rules with regard to when claims can be filed.

Referring again to the 2020 study, in certain countries, claims have to be filed within a certain number of years of vaccination or, in some cases, of the initial onset of vaccine injury symptoms. This ranges from 20 years (Norway), to six years (UK, for adults), to three years (U.S. and several other countries).

In some other countries, the maximum interval varies by province (China), or there is no specific deadline for filing a claim (including Sweden, Germany, New Zealand and Japan for NIP vaccines).

As seen with the example of Australia above, no-fault programs also set compensation thresholds. This is true in all no-fault countries examined by the 2020 study.

Thresholds of eligibility also exist, which may include injuries resulting in financial loss or permanent or significant injury (such as a medical disability), serious health damage or death, severe injuries surpassing normal post-vaccination reactions or other degrees of injury.

Just over half (52%) of the programs studied also provided compensation for claims regarding vaccine defects or immunization errors, while in the remaining countries, these types of claims are covered separately, through civil litigation or medical malpractice indemnity.

The 2020 study also noted that in almost all no-fault jurisdictions, such programs are non-judicial in nature and are instead administrative in scope, typically involving panels of medical experts who review each individual vaccine injury claim.

In a minority of countries, the administrative program is combined with a legal approach and the involvement of legal experts, while in Finland and Sweden, compensation decisions are made based on civil liability (tort) laws.

The standard of proof the claimant is required to demonstrate is generally similar across most no-fault programs, according to the 2020 study. These programs tend to employ a “balance of probabilities” approach that weighs whether it is “more likely than not” that the vaccination led to the injury in question.

This approach takes into consideration such factors as the time interval since vaccination, and existing medical evidence establishing a connection between the vaccine and that type of injury.

A country-by-country look

The above provides a general overview of how no-fault compensation programs work. However, it is also worth examining the specific rules in place in major countries and blocs of nations around the world.

United States:

In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, often simply referred to as the Vaccine Act. Under this act, a no-fault program for administering vaccine claims, known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established.

Through this program, any individual claiming a vaccine injury (or a parent or guardian of a child) can file a petition with the U.S.Court of Federal Claims. The petition is reviewed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which makes a preliminary recommendation.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) then prepares a legal report, which includes the medical recommendation, and submits it to the court. The court then appoints a special master, who may convene a hearing, and who decides whether the petitioner should be compensated, and if so, what the level of compensation will be.

This compensation is then disbursed to the petitioner through HHS. Petitioners may also appeal a decision that isn’t in their favor, and by rejecting the decision of the court, may then file a lawsuit in civil court against the vaccine maker and/or the healthcare provider who administered the vaccine.

VICP, however, does not encompass all vaccines. It covers vaccines that are routinely administered to children and to pregnant women, and that are subject to the previously-mentioned 75-cent excise tax.

To date, more than 8,400 VICP claims have been settled, out of more than 24,000 petitions, with a total of $4.6 billion issued in settlements.

Compensation has also been issued. However, most such settlements were reached following negotiations instead of a hearing, with no admission on the part of HHS that vaccines were ultimately responsible for the injuries in question.

A different category of vaccines, including, at present, the existing COVID-19 vaccines, are covered under what is known as the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

This program was established under the aegis of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005. The PREP act was developed to coordinate the response to a “public health emergency.” The law is scheduled to remain in place until 2024.

CICP specifically focuses on countermeasures, that is, “a vaccination, medication, device or other item recommended to diagnose, prevent or treat a declared pandemic, epidemic or security threat.”

Under CICP, a different claims process exists as compared to the VICP. The process for claimants is more cumbersome, and individuals have only one year after the administration of the vaccine to file a claim. Injuries whose symptoms materialize later in life, for instance, would presumably not be covered under this process.

Moreover, the likelihood of success, if past precedent is any indication, is slim. As previously reported by The Defender:

“The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.”

Notably, vaccines with full FDA approval but which are not placed on a vaccination schedule for children or pregnant women are subject to ordinary product liability laws, while vaccines administered under an Emergency Use Authorization are protected from legal liability.

Furthermore, a 2011 Supreme Court decision, Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, held that the Vaccine Act preempts claims made under state-designed defect laws, against vaccines covered by the Act. The decision stated that ““[The Vaccine Act] reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.”

Until the 1980s, a series of successful lawsuits against vaccine makers was seen as resulting in increasing vaccine hesitancy and declining vaccination rates, as indicated in a 1985 National Research Council publication, released just one year before the passage of the Vaccine Act.

Canada:

In recent years, Canada was the only G7 country without a nationwide no-fault vaccine injury compensation program. On a provincial level, Quebec established such a program in 1985, at which time calls for the creation of a national program followed. Attempts were made to develop a national program at this time, which ultimately failed.

As of 2018, Quebec’s program had approved a total of 43 claims, paying $5.49 million (CAD) in compensation.

In June 2021, launched a national vaccine injury compensation program, the Vaccine Injury Support Program. The program covers all provinces except Quebec, whose provincial program will continue to operate.

While this program is funded by Public Health Canada, it is administered by a private company, RCGT Consulting.

The program covers claimants who received a Health Canada-authorized vaccine (on or after Dec. 8, 2020), administered in Canada, with a resulting injury that is serious and permanent or which has resulted in death, and which was reported to the healthcare provider that administered the vaccine.

Though it wasn’t until a few months ago that Canada was able to establish a nationwide vaccine compensation program, COVID vaccine manufacturers were already, as of December 2020, indemnified against claims of vaccine injuries.

United Kingdom:

In the UK, the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) provides compensation totaling £120,000 to anyone who suffers a disability of 60% or more, as a result of their vaccination.

The percentage figure refers to a severe disability resulting in such injuries as the loss of a limb, an amputation, losing 60% or more of normal vision or severe narcolepsy.

Additionally, the 1987 Consumer Protection Act also applies to those who have sustained a vaccine injury, if is found that the product in question did not meet safety standards or was defective. This is further strengthened by the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations.

Consumer protection rights still apply for people injured by the COVID vaccine, as the government wasn’t allowed to take those away. But due to the legal definition of defects, and a rule known as the state-of-the-art defense, it is difficult to get compensation when specific problems with the vaccine are not yet known.

COVID vaccines have been added to the VDPS. However, according to the Human Medicines Regulation of 2012, protection against civil liability is provided to vaccine manufacturers for unlicensed products issued under a temporary use authorization by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.

This regulation was further amended by the Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, providing extended immunity from civil liability to vaccine makers and those administering vaccinations. However, the consumer protection laws mentioned above still apply.

Legal indemnity has also been directly provided to vaccine manufacturers in the case of the COVID-19 vaccine.

European Union:

The UK laws are based largely on EU legislation, which was codified into British law prior to Brexit.

For instance, the UK Human Medicines Regulations of 2012 and 2020 are largely based on their EU equivalent, EU Directive 2001/83/EC relating to medicinal products for human use. This includes protections against civil actions for products released under temporary or emergency authorizations.

The 1987 Consumer Protection Act in the UK is, in turn, equivalent to the EU’s Directive 85/374/ECC of 1985, on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, while the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations were harmonized with EU Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety.

At the EU level, immunity for vaccine manufacturers was not standard prior to COVID, when legal responsibility tended to lie with the companies.

This, however, is not the case with the COVID vaccines. Under pressure from Vaccines Europe, a trade organization representing vaccine manufacturers in the EU, and under the guide of “ensuring access” to vaccines, exemptions from liability were granted to companies such as AstraZeneca.

Notably, a question posed in August to the European Parliament by one of its elected representatives, Ivan Vilibor Sinčić of Croatia, regarding liability for COVID-19 vaccine side effects, remains unanswered as of this writing.

Within the EU, different member states have enacted their own legislation with regard to vaccine injury compensation claims. These programs were summarized in a 2021 study examining such policies on a global basis. They can be summarized as follows:

  • Austria: The Vaccine Damage Act is a public-law system for the payment of compensation for vaccine injuries by the state. COVID vaccines are included in this program.
  • Belgium: No vaccine compensation legislation exists.
  • France: The existing vaccine injury compensation program provides relief only for injuries related to mandatory vaccinations. Claims for injuries resulting from non-compulsory vaccinations fall under the general principles of French civil law. For COVID vaccines, claims can be lodged with the National Office for Compensation of Medical Accidents, without having to prove a defect with the vaccine or fault on the part of healthcare providers.
  • Germany: A flat-rate no-fault compensation program exists for vaccines that are mandatory or that are publicly recommended, including COVID vaccines.
  • Greece: A no-fault program doesn’t exist, but a May 2021 high court ruling held that those who sustained vaccine injuries are entitled to state compensation.
  • Italy: A no-fault program providing state compensation for injuries stemming from required or highly recommended vaccines exists, although it is unclear if this extends to COVID vaccines. Claimants are also free to pursue claims under tort law.
  • Netherlands, Portugal: There is no specific no-fault scheme, but vaccine injury claims can be filed via provisions of the civil code.
  • Sweden: An insurance fund, Swedish Pharmaceutical Insurance, handles vaccine injury claims out of court. However, new legislation which took effect Dec. 1 will provide additional state compensation for injuries arising from COVID-19 vaccinations.

Israel:

In Israel, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Law was passed in 1989, providing compensation to those injured by vaccines, without having to prove negligence.

Earlier this year, COVID-19 vaccines were included under this law.

New Zealand:

New Zealand maintains a no-fault system for accident compensation, including vaccine injuries, under the aegis of the previously-mentioned Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC).

Although most information on claims appears to be classified, financial compensation totaling $1.6 million (NZD) was provided between 2005 and 2019.

The ACC also handles claims related to COVID-19 vaccination.

China:

China’s vaccination program differentiates between mandatory and non-mandatory vaccinations, for the purposes of vaccine injury claims.

The 2019 Law on Vaccine Administration establishes a compensation system for deaths or significant injuries, such as organ or tissue damage, stemming from vaccines. Compensation is paid from the vaccination funds of the country’s provincial governments.

Draft legislation in 2020 called for mandatory liability insurance for vaccine manufacturers distributing vaccines in mainland China. However, it is unclear if this legislation was enacted.

Japan:

Until recently, Japan did not have a specific no-fault compensation program for vaccine injuries. But temporary programs where the government would provide compensation to vaccine makers for legal claims they sustained due to vaccine injuries had previously been passed in 2009, for the H1N1 vaccine, and again in 2011 until 2016.

However, a 2020 amendment to Japan’s Immunization Act now allows the government to take on the liability risks for COVID-19 vaccines.

India:

India has no specific no-fault legislation under the Drugs and Cosmetic Act for injuries stemming from vaccines that are fully licensed by the country’s regulator.

Claimants are, however, able to file claims in consumer courts or in India’s High Court, and the country’s drug regulator can also take action against vaccine manufacturers for violations of the law.

Indian law does provide for compensation in the event of injury or death following participation in clinical trials.

Notably, the Indian government’s negotiations with Pfizer fell through earlier this year when Indian regulators refused to provide it legal protection via indemnity.

Such protection was not provided to the three COVID-19 vaccines which received an emergency use authorization in India: Covishield, Covaxin and Sputnik V.

Adar Poonawalla, the head of the India-based Serum Institute, the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer, had previously called for protection from lawsuits for COVID vaccine injuries.

Malaysia and Singapore:

The country has not developed a no-fault vaccination program, unlike nearby Singapore.

Instead, a variety of legal remedies exist for claimants under civil law, including the Sales of Goods Act of 1957, the Consumer Protection Act of 1999, and the Contracts Act of 1950, and under criminal law, including the Poisons Act of 1952 and the Sale of Drugs Act of 1952.

South Africa:

South Africa is another country that did not develop a no-fault vaccine injury compensation fund until recently, but did so as a result of COVID and, apparently, pressure from vaccine manufacturers.

The fund is meant to provide compensation for “serious adverse responses” which lead to “permanent or significant injury, serious harm to a person’s health, other damage or death,” assuming these injuries were caused by vaccination.

Philippines:

Similar to South Africa, the Philippines only recently set up a no-fault indemnity program, shielding vaccine manufacturers, as well as public officials, from lawsuits, except in instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct.

This same program will also set up a state fund to provide compensation for vaccine injury claims.

Developing world:

Finally, for 92 low- and middle-income countries, the World Health Organization (WHO), along with a private company, Chubb Limited, has begun to administer a no-fault compensation program.

The countries in question are receiving COVID vaccines via the Gavi Alliance’s COVAX Advanced Market Commitment (AMC) program, with vaccine injury claims processed through the WHO’s new program, which is set to remain in effect until June 30, 2022.

No-fault schemes are increasing, but questions remain

With the recent examples of countries such as Canada and Australia, as well as South Africa and the Philippines, developing their own no-fault vaccine injury compensation funds, as well as their further extension to 92 low- and middle-income countries via the WHO, this type of compensation scheme is clearly the predominant method of dealing with financial claims stemming from vaccine injury claims.

As seen in the case of the U.S., such no-fault programs were developed to address claims of increased vaccine hesitancy, as a result of high-profile lawsuits against vaccine makers, and a decline in vaccine production from hesitant pharmaceutical companies which did not want to shoulder the legal and financial risks involved with releasing a new vaccine to the public.

What, however, goes unaddressed in such claims is the vaccine hesitancy, or outright refusals to get vaccinated, as people question why vaccine makers and, in many cases, everyone involved in distributing and administering vaccines, are shielded from legal action.

Such legal shields cast, for some people at least, a net of doubt, calling into question the safety of such vaccines if their manufacturers, distributors, and public health officials involved in their administration feel the need for legal protections. They may wonder why a product that is said to be safe requires such legal shields.

Such doubts further increase when governments and their agencies, which are essentially acting as guarantors of these vaccines through various no-fault schemes, redact critical information about these products, including their ingredients, and claims that releasing such documentation will take several decades, as the FDA did recently regarding its documents related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.

This is despite the fact that in the 2011 Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision, the U.S. Supreme Court gave considerable latitude to the FDA for, essentially, knowing better than judges and juries, or state lawmakers, how to regulate vaccines.

Despite this legal shielding, plenty of coverage of adverse reactions, and even deaths, following vaccinations is making its way into the media, and to the public consciousness, seemingly negating yet another argument in favor of indemnity.

Furthermore, as many no-fault schemes place the burden on taxpayers and government coffers, these financial costs are ultimately borne by the public.

Arguments that claim shielding vaccine makers from lawsuits also helps to keep the cost of these products down can be called into question on such grounds, especially if the government is the one making deals with vaccine manufacturers and paying for these vaccines.

Costs may be reduced in their purchase price, but the same government and same funds are then used to settle vaccine injury claims.

Such claims from vaccine makers, such as Pfizer for instance, also appear to be disingenuous when considering their high marketing budgets, which in the U.S., far exceed their research and innovation expenditures.

Arguments can be made that such funding could be redirected towards legal claims, towards reducing vaccine and drug prices, or both.

 

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: mohamed_hassan & torstensimon / pixabay

 




Kiwi Church Leaders Defy Ardern’s Threats to Vaccinate or Face a $15K Fine

Kiwi Church Leaders Defy Ardern’s Threats to Vaccinate or Face a $15K Fine

by Tony Mobilifonitis, Cairns News
December 2, 2021

 

A feisty Kiwi pastor has told Jacinda Ardern and her Labor Party vaccination cabal to shove their shots and get their noses out of church business. Ardern is threatening to fine church leaders $15,000 if they are not vaccinated by December 3.

Pastor Carl Bromley of the Life Connection Missionary Baptist Fellowship in Christchurch says Ardern has crossed the line of respect between church and state. Ardern’s socialist-fascist regime is also trying to silence another high-profile and outspoken pastor, Brian Tamaki, who has been loaded with onerous bail conditions on charges of breaching so-called health orders by running a protest rally.

Ardern’s corrupt Covid cabal primarily includes her “nice guy” chief health bureaucrat Ashley Bloomfield, Covid 19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins, and Health Minister Andrew Little. Just like the Australian state premiers and their Covid cabals, these sad specimens of Kiwi political corruption follow orders from above e.g. the WHO, the global banks, big pharma and the Fauci-Gates-Rockefeller operation.

They have dug themselves into a hole of blind obedience to a corrupt narrative and they have no alternative but to dig deeper in the hope that the populations will follow them into the dystopian hell they are creating.

The slick and slimy Hipkins says he expects children aged five to 11 to start being vaccinated before the end of January, based on the notoriously compromised US FDA giving Pfizer the go ahead for five to 11-year-olds, subject to New Zealand approval from their regulator Medsafe.

Ardern claims she won’t push vaccination for children, but protesters across the country are making their distrust of her “promises” known, forcing her to cancel her appearances at country vaccination centres. Ardern’s next PR project will be her marriage over Christmas to her spin doctor husband Clarke Gayford.

The media will fall over themselves portraying this “oh so lovely event” in the seaside city of Gisborne as almost the equivalent of a royal wedding. Ardern’s circle of leftie supporters in the international media will be on to it as well. But will it be a public relations coup that leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of the many Kiwis destroyed by lockdowns, fines and now coerced vaccination.

The protests of pastors Bromley and Tamaki and others like megachurch pastor Peter Mortlock, touch upon the fundamental battle for the rights and freedoms that Ardern is systematically destroying on behalf of her globalist masters.

Whether or not you agree with Bromley’s hard-line theology, freedom of religion, speech and thought are essentially the same thing, hence their inclusion in the US Constitution’s First Amendment. They are also fundamental to English common law in the English Bill of Rights 1688 and international law.

The right at common law to informed consent to medical treatment is based on the law of trespass ie you have the right to bodily integrity free from uninvited threats and assault from individuals or the state. This is also recognised in the Nuremberg Code.

“I’ve got a message for Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Ashleigh Bloomfield, Andrew Little and any other of their cronies: Get your noses out of God’s business. God has a message for them from His word: God is not mocked,” Bromley announced on a YouTube message below. He went on to accuse Ardern and company of shaking their fist at God and said this would induce divine judgment.



“So you can take your legislation, you can take your mandate and you can take a flying leap. And I suggest you pull your head in, otherwise you’re going to find yourself coming up against a judgment from God that you are just not prepared for … $15,000 fine for not taking a jab? You can go and take a flying leap because this pastor, this man of God is not bowing down to your tyranny, your evil, nor your ungodliness.”

Tamaki, the outspoken head of a South Auckland’s Destiny Church, told the New Zealand Herald he would rather “live in dangerous freedom than live in peaceful slavery”.

On Twitter he posted: “So a segregated, divided NZ is just around the corner with The Vaxxed No Vaxxed divide. We have been conditioned for some time now in the workplace, shops, businesses, services and among our own families. Is this what we want NZ? Is this the future for our kids?”

Mortlock, despite his megachurch’s corporate charity status with wages paid by the government, supported Tamaki’s recent protest and referred his congregation to the website of the organisers, the Freedom and Rights Coalition. “I was asked to be involved in it way back and I’ve taken a back seat in it, but enough to say if you want to go I just want to let you know about it. I think sooner or later we are going to have to make a stand – a stand for our rights, the way our freedoms are being stripped away.”

What makes it difficult for Tamaki, Bromley and Mortlock is that other churches are playing ball with the tyranny while a large, apathetic segment of the population simply go along with their mainstream media’s blatant lying and falling for Ardern’s sickly “charm”.

Bromley recently held a service in defiance of the country’s so-called “alert level 4” which bans gatherings outside of households. A YouTube post of a confrontation between Bromley and police was removed “for medical misinformation” – a code for Ardern’s censorship of anti-government information.

New Zealand’s NewsHub service made the following comment about anti-vaccine protests that would be laughable if it were not serious:

“Some anti-lockdown activists have compared New Zealand’s restrictions to the horrific Nazi regime of the 1930s, but there are marked differences between the two.

“While the Government’s alert level 4 regulations are designed to stop people falling ill and dying from COVID-19, the Nazi Party actively sought to marginalise, imprison and exterminate groups it deemed undesirable, particularly Jews and political dissidents.”

 

Connect with Cairns News

cover image of Pastor Carl Bromley is a screenshot from Is It Just Me NZ video




Test for New Omicron Variant? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Test

Test for New Omicron Variant? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Test

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 2, 2021

 

This is an article in three layers. I’ve already spelled out the first layer in my current series on the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (archive: Omicron).

In a nutshell, there is no Omicron because there is no SARS-CoV-2. The “pandemic virus” doesn’t exist. A variation of nothing equals nothing.

However, I often make forays into the bubble-world where most people, including “the experts,” believe the virus is real. I do this to show that, within their world, the experts are constantly lying in their own terms and contradicting themselves.

Within their world, you would think the pros have an easily accessible test to identify the new Omicron variant in thousands or millions of people. Otherwise, how can they claim it’s here and spreading?

But you would be wrong.

And I have the evidence, based on the prior variant, the Delta. That’s level two. I take you there now, with an article I wrote months ago:

—Bombshell: PCR tests can’t identify Delta Variant; it’s all fiction—

Oooo. The Delta Variant. It’s everywhere.

Watch out. It’s under your rug. It’s in the clothes closet. It’s on your toothbrush.

And it’s The Unvaccinated who are spreading it. Those devils. We, who are pure, must be protected from the unvaxxed Unclean.

Fauci, god of soccer moms, rises every morning saying DELTA, goes on television saying DELTA, and goes to sleep praying to DELTA.

But read this from the Texas Department of State Health Services FAQ: “How can I tell if I have the Delta variant? Do labs report that to the state?” That information may not be readily available. The [PCR] viral tests that are used to determine if a person has COVID-19 are not designed to tell you what variant is causing the infection. Detecting the Delta variant, or other variants, requires a special type of testing called genomic sequencing. Due to the volume of COVID-19 cases, sequencing is not performed on all viral samples. However, because the Delta variant now accounts for the majority of COVID-19 cases in the United States, there is a strong likelihood that a positive test result indicates infection with the Delta variant.”

Boom.

I can assure you, the number of patients whose samples are genetically sequenced is tiny, contrasted against the number whose samples are simply run through the standard PCR.

So there is no way to know that the Delta variant now accounts for the majority of COVID cases in the US. And using the standard PCR, there is no way to know ANY specific patient has the Delta. It’s all fiction.

We have this from the American Lung Association: “Regular COVID-19 tests do not detect which variant is involved in a patient’s case—that information does not change the approach to care or therapy. The variant identification requires genomic sequencing, a process separate from regular virus tests and one that not all labs are able to do or do not do on a routine basis for patient care but are done more for public health monitoring.”

Let me break down how this game works. To be excessively generous, let’s say that 3 out of every 1000 positive PCR tests in America are sent to high-level labs, where genetic sequencing is done.

A certain percentage of THOSE sequencing tests come up positive for the Delta Variant. Based on these results, MODELS are constructed.

Now we’re REALLY into fake science. The models estimate what percentage of ALL positive PCR tests are really positive for Delta.

I’m sorry to break this newsflash, but modelers are notorious charlatans. Their dense calculations are as far from science as a Model-T Ford is from a spaceship.

But based on models, public health agencies—who desperately needed a new con, because COVID case numbers were declining—blasted through their media assets the new revelation: THE DELTA MONSTER IS LOOSE AMONG US.

But it gets even worse. Why? Because you can bet the farm that the current model pushing the omnipresence of the Delta Variant was never challenged. It was never handed to several groups of independent scientists who went over it with a fine-toothed comb. That’s called verification. That’s called the Scientific Method. You may have heard of it.

The most notorious modeler in the world, Neil Ferguson, of the London Imperial College, bankrolled by Bill Gates, made a prediction early in 2020: by that summer, there would 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK, and 2 million in the US.

It was this absurd prediction, swallowed whole by Boris Johnson, and swallowed whole by Donald Trump, on the urging of Tony Fauci, that led to the original mass lockdowns in US and the UK. And then other nations followed suit.

As my long-time readers know, all this is just the tip of a very large iceberg. For the past year, I’ve been proving the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist, the tests and case numbers are meaningless, and the highly destructive vaccine is unnecessary.

But I make frequent forays into the fantasy world of official science, to illustrate that, even within that lunatic bubble, internal contradictions and outright lies abound.

Here is my original 2020 article on the most famous and celebrated modeler in the world, Neil Ferguson [this is level three]:

—Neil Ferguson: the ghost in the machine—

Why do governments salute when he predicts a pandemic and tells them to lock down their countries?

Does anyone care about his past?

Why does he still have a prestigious job?

Who is he connected to?

Neil Ferguson, through his institute at London’s Imperial College, can call the shots on a major percentage of the global population.

He’s Mr. Genius, when it comes to projecting computer models of epidemics.

Fellow experts puff up his reputation.

According to the Business Insider (4/25/20), “Ferguson’s team warned Boris Johnson that the quest for ‘herd immunity’ [letting people live their lives out in the open in the UK] could cost 510,000 lives, prompting an abrupt U-turn [massive national lockdown in the UK]…His simulations have been influential in other countries as well, cited by authorities in the US, Germany, and France.”

Not only cited, not only influential, but swallowed whole.

Business insider continues: “On March 23 [2020], the UK scrapped ‘herd immunity’ in favor of a suppression strategy, and the country made preparations for weeks of lockdown. Ferguson’s study was responsible.”

There’s more. A lot more.

Same BI article: “Dr. Deborah Birx, coronavirus response coordinator to the Trump administration, told journalists at a March 16 press briefing that the Imperial paper [Ferguson’s computer projection] prompted the CDC’s new advice to work from home and avoid gatherings of 10 or more.”

Ferguson, instigator of LOCKDOWNS. Stripping away of basic liberties. Economic devastation.

So let’s look at Ferguson’s funding and track record, spelled out in the Business Insider piece:

“Ferguson co-founded the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, based at Imperial, in 2008. It is the leading body advising national governments on pathogen outbreaks.”

“It gets tens of millions of dollars in annual funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and works with the UK National Health Service, the US Centres for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), and is tasked with supplying the World Health Organization with ‘rapid analysis of urgent infectious disease problems’.”

Getting the picture?

Gates money goes to Ferguson.

Ferguson predicts dire threat from COVID, necessitating lockdowns—thus preparing people to accept a vaccine. The vaccine Gates wants.

Ferguson supplies a frightening computer projection of COVID deaths—to the CDC and WHO. Ferguson thus communicates a rationale for the Gates vaccine plan.

National governments surrender to WHO and CDC and order LOCKDOWNS.

Business Insider: “Michael Thrusfield, a professor of veterinary epidemiology at Edinburgh University, told the paper he had ‘déjà vu’ after reading the [Ferguson] Imperial paper [on COVID], saying Ferguson was responsible for excessive animal culling during the 2001 Foot and Mouth [mad cow] outbreak.”

“Ferguson warned the government that 150,000 people could die. Six million animals were slaughtered as a precaution, costing the country billions in farming revenue. In the end, 200 people died.”

“Similarly, he [Ferguson] was accused of creating panic by overestimating the potential death toll during the 2005 Bird Flu outbreak. Ferguson estimated 200 million could die. The real number was in the low hundreds.” HELLO?

“In 2009, one of Ferguson’s models predicted 65,000 people could die from the Swine Flu outbreak in the UK — the final figure was below 500.”

So you have to ask yourself, why would anyone believe what Ferguson has been predicting in this COVID hustle?

Are his fellow experts that stupid?

Are presidents and prime ministers that stupid?

And the answer is: This is a monumental covert op; some people are that stupid; some are caught up in the op and are afraid to say the emperor has no clothes; some are aware of what is going on, and they want to destroy national economies and lead us into, yes, a new world order.

Gates knows he has his man: Ferguson. As the recipient of tens of millions of dollars a year from the Gates Foundation, Ferguson isn’t about to issue a model that states: COVID is nothing to worry about, let people live their lives and we’ll be all right. The chance of that happening is on a par with researchers admitting they never actually discovered a new virus as the cause of illness in 2019, in Wuhan.

In order to justify injecting every man, woman, and child in the world with synthetic genes, Gates needs A STORY ABOUT A DEADLY VIRUS THAT NECESSITATES SHUTTING DOWN AND IMPRISONING THE PLANET, ACHIEVING A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE.

He’s got the story, all dressed up in a computer model, composed by a man with a past record of abject and devastating failures.

Neil Ferguson is the ghost in the machine. The machine is the World Health Organization and the CDC. The man behind the ghost is Bill Gates.

—Those are the three layers of this story. Fraud, fraud, and fraud. But don’t worry. Tony Fauci will smooth out the wrinkles and assure us all that we’re on the right track. We just have to destroy the village in order to save it. Piece of cake.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: CDD20 / pixabay




Perth, Western Australia Workers Lay Down Uniforms on Steps at Parliament as Mandates Set to Begin

Perth, Western Australia Workers Lay Down Uniforms on Steps at Parliament as Mandates Set to Begin
As “D-Day” arrives, workers from a variety of industries lay their uniforms down on the steps of Parliament in Perth.

by TOTT News
December 1, 2021

 

Powerful scenes on the steps of Parliament House in Perth this afternoon, as workers lay down their uniforms to protest impending mandates across the state.

Authorities say workers must receive their first dose by tomorrow or face unemployment, as mandates affect 75% of WA’s workforce.

Scenes at Parliament

Demonstrators gathered outside Parliament House on this afternoon, opposed to the WA government’s introduction of vaccine mandates.

Despite the looming uncertainty, the spirit of Australia remained high:



December 1 is being called ‘D-Day’ — the day when workers across a wide range of industries must have had their first dose of a COVID vaccine in order to keep their jobs.

FIFO miners, police, and community care workers, to name just a few, must be single-dosed by December 1 and double-dosed by December 31.

https://twitter.com/Michael53418170/status/1465905166138363904?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1465905166138363904%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftottnews.com%2F2021%2F12%2F01%2Fperth-workers-lay-down-uniforms%2F

Protesters laid hi-vis FIFO vests and hard hats on the steps of Parliament and held placards with slogans such as “no to medical mandates” and “coercion is not consent”.



Former Liberal candidate Andrea Tokaji addressed the crowd, saying vaccine mandates were causing “pain”.

“These directions cause harm and suffering,” she said. “These directions violate the constitution.”

Other industries whose workers must be fully vaccinated by December 31 include port, transport and freight workers, health and aged care staff, fire and emergency services employees, abattoir and meat processing workers, and prison staff.

Staff at supermarkets, groceries, restaurants, pubs and cafes, as well as childcare, public transport and construction workers must be fully vaccinated by January 31.

Representatives from many of these industries appeared at Wednesday’s protests, with one placard reading, “Fire and rescue say no to medical mandates”.

Corporate Media Gets Heckled

As the event carried on, protesters let the corporate media know they were NOT impressed with their continued distorted coverage of the alternative viewpoint across Australia.

Here is a POV perspective from one of the journalists in question:

Mass coercion and segregation continues across Australia and shows no sign of slowing down with the ‘arrival’ of Omicron on our shores ahead of 2022.

One thing is for certain, the people are standing firm in their fundamental right to choose.

 

Connect with TOTT News




Biden COVID Vaccine Mandates Suffer Two More Legal Setbacks

Biden COVID Vaccine Mandates Suffer Two More Legal Setbacks
A federal judge in Louisiana on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction halting President Biden’s national vaccine mandate for healthcare workers nationwide, and separately, a U.S. district judge in Kentucky issued a preliminary injunction blocking Biden’s mandate for federal contractors in three states. 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
December 1, 2021

 

The Biden administration’s COVID vaccine mandates took two new legal hits Tuesday — one affecting healthcare workers nationwide, the other affecting federal contractors in three states.

The new rulings, combined with previous rulings temporarily suspending mandates for U.S. workers, affect hundreds of millions of Americans who faced mandate deadlines set to begin next week.

In the latest ruling, a federal judge in Louisiana on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction halting President Biden’s national vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.

The injunction expanded a separate order issued Monday by a federal judge in Missouri. Monday’s order applied only to 10 states which were part of a lawsuit challenging Biden’s requirement that nearly all full-time employees, part-time employees, volunteers and contractors at a wide range of healthcare facilities receiving Medicaid or Medicaid funding get their first dose of a COVID vaccine by Dec. 6, and be fully vaccinated by Jan. 4, 2022.

In Tuesday’s ruling, which stemmed from a 14-state lawsuit challenging the mandate for healthcare workers, U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty said the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) may not enforce its vaccine mandate for healthcare workers until the court can resolve legal challenges.

“There is no question that mandating a vaccine to 10.3 million healthcare workers is something that should be done by Congress, not a government agency,” Doughty wrote in the decision. “It is not clear that even an act of Congress mandating a vaccine would be constitutional.”

Doughty said the mandate would allow the executive branch to usurp the power of the legislative branch to make laws — putting two of the three powers conferred by the U.S. Constitution in the same hands.

“If human nature and history teach anything, it is that civil liberties face grave risks when governments proclaim indefinite states of emergency,” Doughty wrote.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry said the federal mandate would blow holes in state budgets and exacerbate shortages in healthcare facilities, as the Biden administration tied compliance with the vaccine mandate to federal funding.

A U.S. District Court judge in Montana on Tuesday also enjoined and restrained the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and CMS, their directors, employees, administrators and secretaries from imposing the mandate on Montana healthcare providers, suppliers, owners and employees.

“In the past weeks, I’ve heard from healthcare workers across our state whose jobs were being threatened if they did not comply with President Biden’s overreaching federal mandate,” Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen said in a statement. “With the CMS mandate now blocked in Montana until the case is decided, medical facilities have no reason to threaten their employees if they don’t get the vaccine.”

In response to recent legal decisions, CMS said in a statement:

“While we cannot comment on the litigation, CMS has remained committed to protecting the health and safety of beneficiaries and healthcare workers. The vaccine requirement for healthcare workers addresses the risk of unvaccinated healthcare staff to patient safety and provides stability and uniformity across the nation’s health care system.”

The injunction issued on Tuesday is a first step in the lawsuits against the vaccine mandate for healthcare workers. The cases must still be argued before a judge, and lower-court rulings will likely be appealed.

Federal judge blocks vaccine mandate for federal workers in Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee

Separately, a U.S. district judge in Kentucky on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Biden administration from enforcing a COVID vaccine mandate for federal contractors and subcontractors in three states — the first of at least 13 legal challenges nationwide against the mandate.

The ruling applies in Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee, which joined in a lawsuit against the Biden administration arguing the mandate for companies that do business with the U.S. government violated the U.S. Constitution, Bloomberg reported.

According to U.S. District Court Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove of the Eastern District of Kentucky, Biden, in all likelihood, can’t use congressionally delegated authority to manage the federal procurement of goods and services to impose vaccines.

Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee have about $9 billion, $10 billion and $12 billion, respectively, in government contracts. Contractors who refuse to comply risk being blacklisted by the government, Van Tatenhove said, citing Biden’s remarks from Sept. 7: “If you want to work with the federal government, vaccinate your workforce.”

Van Tatenhove said the federal government’s mandate amounts to an overreach of contracts, and the statute could be used to enact virtually any measure at the president’s whim under the guise of economy and efficiency.

“Although Congress used its power to delegate procurement authority to the president to promote economy and efficiency of federal contracting, this power has its limits,” Tatenhove wrote.

The COVID vaccine mandate for federal contractors providing services to the federal government, and the CMS mandate for healthcare workers, are part of a list of actions implemented by the Biden administration to increase vaccination rates.

In a major blow to the Biden administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on Nov. 16 suspended implementation and enforcement of its Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) on mandatory COVID vaccination and testing in the workplace.

Under the ETS, employers with more than 100 employees were given until Jan. 4 to comply with the mandate. However, a Nov. 12 ruling by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals barred OSHA from enforcing the ETS “pending adequate judicial review” of a motion for a permanent injunction.

In its Nov. 12 22-page ruling, the court called the Biden administration’s mandate “fatally flawed” and said OSHA should “take no steps to implement or enforce the mandate until further court order.”

The Biden administration has acted quickly to seek reversals of the orders blocking its vaccine rules, CNN reported. The challenges to the OSHA mandate have been consolidated and assigned to the 6th Circuit, which has yet to rule on the Justice Department’s request that it revive the policy.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




New Variant Hysteria Comes From Same Gates, World Economic Forum Funded Institution That Popularized Lockdowns & Previous Covid Scares

New Variant Hysteria Comes From Same Gates, World Economic Forum Funded Institution That Popularized Lockdowns & Previous Covid Scares

by Children’s Health Defense Europe
December 1, 2021

 

 

A Substack article by Jordan Schachtel reveals how the Omicron scare started at Imperial College, London – it will be recalled how it was the alarmist modelling of Imperial College professor Neil Ferguson in March 2020 which precipitated global lockdown. The new scare apparently started with a tweet on 23 November two days before it became main news from post doctoral fellow Tom Peacock.

Imperial College entered into partnership with CEPI to produce a self-amplifying (sa) RNA vaccine against a Covid resembling virus in late 2018CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome, and the World Economic Forum. Prof Ferguson’s Imperial College based Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium was in turn endowed the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the global vaccine alliance (GAVI) to prospect for vaccine markets.

 

©December 2021, Children’s Health Defense Europe, A.S.B.L.. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, A.S.B.L.. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense Europe? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Senta Depuydt and the Children’s Health Defense Europe team. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense Europe

cover image credit: badafest / pixabay




The Omicron Deception; How Long Can They String Out the Mutation-Stories?

The Omicron Deception; How Long Can They String Out the Mutation-Stories?

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 1, 2021

 

Nothing mutates faster than a non-virus, except perhaps Tony Fauci’s pronouncements about the “pandemic.”

In early 2020, it all started with a “virus” no one had isolated. Meaning a phantom, a fake, a con, a non-entity. NO VIRUS TO THIS DAY.

Now we’ve had fake variants of the fakes. Delta; Omicron from Africa.

The Stupidity Index—how stupid a person has to be in order to believe the official COVID narrative—is expanding. The more variants, the dumber obedient people have to be, to go along with the show.

At some point, as the number of variants grows, even people who resemble sloths living their lives hanging upside down in trees, will wake up.

“What was that new mutation last week? And this one today? It really comes from Antarctica? And we have to stay indoors for another month? I just want to tailgate and sit in a stadium and scream and drink and watch football…”

Which has already been happening this fall. By the millions, people are pouring into packed venues every weekend to watch pro, college, and high school football. On November 27th, 104,000 sat unmasked, cheek to jowl, in Michigan Stadium as their beloved home team upset Ohio State—and at the end of the game at least 20,000 fans came out on the field to celebrate. The field and the stands formed one vast sea of humanity. Variant? What variant? Delta? Omicron? Are they college fraternities?

Vegas bookies may be getting ready to post an over/under number on the final total of CDC/WHO variants. I say it would be 5.

At 5, people will lose track. They’ll forget the previous variants. They’ll tend to ignore COVID news altogether.

The basic tactic since the beginning has been: invent new fantasies to explain prior fantasies. For example, “Vaccinated people can still catch COVID.” That’s a fantasy because there is no virus. Now comes, “The vaccinated people catching COVID are really being infected by a variant; Delta or Omicron; that’s why the vaccine has become ‘less effective’.”

If you’ve ever forced yourself to sit through one of the hundred or so virus-outbreak movies, you know that at some point the scientific story line loses its impact. You’re thinking, “Let’s get to the car chase and the stuff blowing up and the people shooting each other.”

That’s what the movie is really about.

The COVID hoax is really about lockdowns and destruction of economies and lives and vaccine injury and death and tyrannical takeover of ruined society.

I’ll give you another number. It really does exist. It’s the grand total, worldwide, of people who are either: coming out into the street protesting the COVID restrictions and mandates; or ignoring them altogether and breaking all the rules and going about their lives unvaccinated.

I don’t know what that number is, but when it’s reached, the sociopaths will retreat. The genie will be out of the bottle for good.

Yes, it’s a very big number. But when has freedom not had a price?

Apparently, many people believe the number doesn’t matter, because God is going to intercede and make things right. It’s hard for me to imagine He’ll come through if most people, on their own, are doing NOTHING.

In the Old Testament, He seems to be chronically irked on this very point.

Starting in 1986, it took me two years to uncover the con that was HIV. I thought I had reached the bottom of it, but there were a few miles to go. Later, in the 1990s, I realized the bottom was NOTHING. That’s right. This sometimes is the case in really long cons. You drill all the way down and you find an empty space where you thought something existed.

The bottom of the HIV con—as with SARS-CoV-2—is: the virus doesn’t exist.

In prior articles, I’ve spelled this out in great detail.

It’s stage magic. There is no woman in the box. When the magician saws off her legs, she’s not there. As far as flesh is concerned, he’s sawing through nothing.

The magician is selling the audience’s illusion back to the audience.

As various propagandists have pointed out, the bigger the lie the easier it is to make it stick.

That’s because people are only familiar with small or moderate-sized lies; and because the amount of Structure which would be overturned by the exposure of a huge lie is too threatening.

“You mean the FDA and the CDC and WHO are all going down? Disappearing into dust? But I feel comfortable with them. They’re my friends. I don’t want to see them disappear…”

I do. And tomorrow wouldn’t be too soon.

And if the so-called branch of medical science called virology vanished from the Earth, there would be champagne corks popping in my house.

But for the moment, I’d be satisfied if all vaccine mandates everywhere were wiped off the books—just to give us some breathing room.

That revolution IS within our grasp, if enough of us build toward the critical-mass number I just alluded to above. It would be quite something to see. A fabulous jolt of adrenaline for the human race; for the right reason, for once.

Leave the Omicron and the Delta fantasies for the sloths on the couch. One day, they’ll stir from their trance and stumble along to catch up with us.


For almost two years, I’ve been demonstrating that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.

Instead, elite planners have been selling A STORY ABOUT A VIRUS.

In covert intelligence operations, this would be called a cover story. It obscures true goals. It justifies ongoing and future crimes that would otherwise be nakedly exposed.

For example, in my 1988 book, AIDS INC., I showed how the cover story about HIV was used in Africa.

For a very long time, the true causes of illness and death in areas of Africa have been: hunger; protein-calorie malnutrition; starvation; contaminated water supplies; poverty; war; farm land stolen from the people; corporate pollution; toxic medicines and vaccines; toxic pesticides; overcrowding in cities; lack of basic sanitation.

Most if not all of these causes could have been eliminated. But local governments did not want healthy people. Sick and dying people were easier to control, and taking away their land was an easier proposition.

Colluding with and paying off local government leaders, transnational corporations and foreign governments set up shop in these African countries and used the healthier people to work on their giant commercial farms and in their factories.

But in 1984, suddenly, there was a new (cover) story broadcast and sold to the world: what was really decimating Africa was HIV. THIS explained all the illness and dying.

The true causes, listed above, were shoved into the background.

Those true crimes were hidden, were permitted to continue unabated.

Not only that, the HIV cover story paved the way for pharmaceutical companies to rack up profits by selling extremely toxic AIDS drugs (e.g., AZT) to Africa.

The HIV test, which turned out false positives like Niagara Falls, made these drugs seem necessary—as fake case numbers soared.

People dying from the toxic medical treatments were, of course, listed as AIDS deaths.

And, as it turned out, HIV had never been isolated. Therefore, there was no proof it existed, no reason to suppose it existed.

Like AIDS, COVID-19 is also an intelligence-agency type covert op.

The short-term goal is wrecking economies. The long-term goal is taking the population into a new world of technocratic control.

Selling this as necessary all comes back to THE VIRUS COVER STORY.

“We’re not forcing technocracy down the throats of the people. Certainly not. We’re simply doing what we must, because of the danger of the virus…because everyone is a virus-spreader…(because too many people want their freedom)…”

Always identify and return to the cover story. Walk around it. Look at it from all sides. Walk into it from one side and exit from the other. Test it. The vital clues are there.


Another classic example: 2009, La Gloria, Mexico. Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer in the world, operates a giant pig farm. 950,000 pigs.

The poisonous urine and feces from these 950,000 pigs run out into the open air and form what are called lagoons. They’re so large, you can see them from outer space.

Workers spray the toxic lagoons with a toxic foam. It’s routine.

Workers, and people in the surrounding neighborhood, are getting sick and dying. So new contractors are brought in to spray the lagoons with yet another toxic chemical.

Out of nowhere, guess who shows up? The CDC.

Guess what they conclude? It’s not the urine and feces lagoons or the toxic chemicals causing illness and death. No. Of course not.

It’s a new mysterious “virus.” H1N1.

And voila, we have a new cover story and a new epidemic, called Swine Flu.

The cover story serves a number of purposes, as time passes. But the most obvious one is: Smithfield Foods is protected. They get away with murder.

And to cap it all off, four years later, in 2013, Smithfield, still protected, sells itself to a Chinese company, Shuanghui International Holdings, for $4.72 billion.


Here’s what I wrote about Zika (another phantom virus) in 2015:

“Medical CIA” provides the cover story.

In Brazil, the so-called center of the “Zika epidemic,” there are many problems in poverty-stricken areas that involve more than babies being born with small heads and brain impairment.

The grinding poverty itself, of course. Stolen farm land. Widespread corporate use of poisonous pesticides, some of which are banned in 22 other countries. Contaminated water supplies. Lack of basic sanitation. Overcrowding. Prior vaccine campaigns, in which toxic substances were injected directly into the bodies of people whose immune systems were already on the verge of collapsing. Toxic medical drugs.

In 2014, the Tdap vaccine (tetanus, diphtheria, whooping cough) was recommended for pregnant women. Among other toxic substances, this vaccine contains aluminum compounds. Aluminum can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage.

Workers are now fumigating areas with toxic sprays to kill mosquitoes. Soldiers are going door to door, handing out more toxic mosquito sprays for indoor use.

Combine all these factors, and you have an ongoing catastrophe.

It makes a great deal of sense to highlight, promote, and blame the “Zika virus” for what is actually going on in Brazil, if you want to distract and divert and obscure.

If you stopped the vaccine campaigns, stopped the spraying, and remedied the conditions I listed above, the health of the population would return and revive, without medical intervention.

Of course, the governments and their allied corporations have no intention of returning stolen land to the people. They have no intention of stopping the use of poisonous pesticides. Medical authorities have no intention of admitting they are concocting a story about a “virus,” Zika, as a cover for their corporate and government allies, and as a pretext to have “a new disease” to treat and work on and solve. They have no intention of stopping toxic vaccine campaigns.

To cap it all off, the conditions the “virus” is supposed to be causing—babies born with small heads and brain damage—can result from ANY injury or insult to a pregnant woman or her infant. No virus required.

But…“Look here, at the virus. Don’t look there.”

Cover story.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image composed by truthcomestolight.com
based on creative commons work of OpenClipart, intographics & dianakuehn




Evidence That They KNEW the Covid Jab Would Kill Thousands

Evidence That They KNEW the Covid Jab Would Kill Thousands

by Dr. Vernon Coleman
November 29, 2021

 



It’s the 29th November 2021 and the extent of the conspiracy to suppress the truth and to promote a deadly covid jab is becoming clearer by the day. In February 2021, Pfizer and the FDA knew the covid-19 jab was going to kill or main thousands of healthy people.

They have the gall to call us conspiracy theorists but what we’ve talked about is no theory. Everything the truth-tellers and the Resistance Movement have said has been accurate.

The governments, the advisors, the drug companies and the medical establishment are not conspiracy theorists of course – they are conspiracy practitioners, and their evil plot to kill people, to promote their great reset and to introduce the new normal is now so blatant that it is difficult to believe that the majority still believe the lies they are being told.

This morning, Darren Smith, editor of the magnificent The Light Paper – the only honest newspaper in the UK – sent me what looks to me to be yet more serious evidence that both Pfizer and the FDA knew how many thousands were going to be killed by their vaccine.

According to what I’ve seen, Pfizer prepared a report for the FDA dealing with the worldwide safety of their ‘vaccine’ until 28th February 2021. If you want to read the report for yourself I’ll put the details and this transcript on my website within 24 hours. This information was kept secret and only released after a group of professionals in the USA used the FOIA to obtain the information from the FDA. So far just 91 pages have been released. There are around another 300,000 pages to be released, I’m told.

In February 2021, Pfizer reported that, after just weeks of jabbing, there were already 42,086 adverse reaction case reports of which 25,379 had been medically confirmed. Most of these came from the US and the UK but there were also reports from 61 other countries. Remember, it is believed that only 1% of adverse reactions are officially recorded.

Of these patients, 1,223 had a fatal outcome. Which, for those journalists and fact checkers who like to hide from the truth, means death.

And 11,361 people had not recovered from the adverse events they had suffered. There were 9,400 individuals for whom the outcome was not known.

What were the adverse events?

Well, you might as well just look up the index in a medical dictionary. There were respiratory problems, nervous system problems, eye problems, immune system problems, cardiac problems and vascular problems. There were 1,403 cardiovascular problems, 932 haematological problems, 70 liver related problems, 449 cases of facial paralysis, 1,050 immune system problems and 275 stroke problems. At the bottom of the report there is an appendix – a list of adverse events of special interest. Just about every disease you can think of, with the possible omission of flat feet, is listed there. Pages and pages of it. There were spontaneous abortions, heart attacks, myocarditis, brain haemorrhage – they knew all this was happening. Every Health Minister and medical advisor in the world should have known of this.

Oh, and there were 1,833 cases of anaphylactic reaction.

There were 270 pregnant women reported and of these 23 had spontaneous abortions. There is a list of adverse events occurring among women who were breast feeding their babies.

Among those under 12 who had already been jabbed there were 24 serious problems recorded.

None of this is a complete surprise, of course.

In December 2020, I made a video listing the adverse events known to be associated with Pfizer’s covid-19 jab. The list included myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes and blood clots. None of these problems was a surprise. And what we have now is evidence.

It now seems clear that Pfizer and the FDA in America were well aware that the jab they were promoting could eventually result in vast numbers of deaths and serious injuries. I cannot begin to estimate the size of the future problems among the jabbed.

We should not be surprised by any of this.

We are dealing with bad, bad people.

This is an experiment and way back – 10 months ago – I made a video headlined ‘Doctors and nurses giving the covid-19 vaccine will be tried as war criminals’.

I pointed out that doctors or nurses who did not tell their patients all the potential problems would be guilty of a crime. Patients are entitled to know the risks of a medication – it’s called informed consent. And this is especially true when they are taking part in an experiment – which the covid jabs are. Doctors are ignoring the age old principle of ensuring the benefit exceeds the risk.

The information so far revealed is just a tiny part of the information still kept secret. It’s estimated that all the documents the FDA used to approve the Pfizer jab won’t be made public before 2076 – over half a century away.

All this information should be released and published immediately. Why should anyone be expected to trust Pfizer or the people pushing these jabs?

The British Medical Journal has reported that a Pfizer subcontractor, used when their jab was being tested, is accused of falsifying data, hiring inadequately trained jabbers, un-blinding patients and failing to follow up on reported adverse reactions. The title of that paper is ‘Covid-19: researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial.’

Meanwhile, the drug companies are making a fortune.

Pfizer, one of the world’s most fined companies in history, expects its 2021 covid jab sales to reach $36 billion and in 2022 they’re expecting $29 billion, though they admit they are hoping for much better than that. And they also expect the ‘market for covid-19 vaccines to be durable and to continue generating sales for years to come’.

Pfizer, like other big drug companies has a bad record for honesty.

In the UK, Pfizer was fined £84.2 million for overcharging the NHS by 2,600% and in the US Pfizer was hit with a $2.3 billion fine for mis-promoting medicines, making false claims and paying kickbacks to doctors to prescribe their drugs. At the time that was the largest health care fraud settlement in American history.

The CEO of Pfizer is quoted as saying that people who spread misinformation about vaccines are criminals.

For once I agree with a drug company employee. He’s right. The police should arrest all politicians, all medical advisors, thousands of doctors and journalists, the staff of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and the entire staff of the BBC and the so-called fact checkers.

Governments have deliberately and systematically created fear to terrify and manipulate and virtually force people to accept a jab that doesn’t do what most people think it does – it doesn’t stop people catching or spreading covid-19.

And now governments and advisors and journalists are demanding that the jabs be mandatory.

When will people realize what is happening to them? I’ve been making videos about this assault, this coup, since March 2020, nearly 300 of them, and find it difficult to understand how people still can’t understand what is happening to them.

The word ‘genocide’ can no longer be considered hyperbole. Medical advisors everywhere must now comment on these Pfizer figures.

 

Connect with Dr. Vernon Coleman

cover image credit: darksouls1 / pixabay




Virus Mutation in Jewish Deli Infecting All of Africa Came From Beverly Hills

Virus Mutation in Jewish Deli Infecting All of Africa Came From Beverly Hills

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 30, 2021

 

Tony Fauci, the Great White Father, is flying to Africa, to save the continent from the latest virus-mutation, which originated in a deli in Beverly Hills.

Fauci gave a statement to reporters at LAX before departing: “We now know that what we’re calling SARS-CoV-6 crossed species from a pastrami sandwich at Fineberg’s Deli on Rodeo Drive, to Fred Reilly, a customer, in late October. Reilly flew to Botswana, where he infected three soccer players who were moonlighting as security guards at a UN cocktail party.”

Fauci will explain to Africa that a new IG Farben drug, RP-1984, which has been stockpiled for 20 years, since it failed to slow the progression of leukemia in rats, will be dropped from planes over the continent.

The drug attacks all cells of the body, preventing them from replicating. The hope is it will also prevent the deli variant from replicating before it kills the host (human beings).

“Preliminary data looks promising,” Fauci stated. “Of course, lockdowns for at least a year, vaccination, mask wearing, and distancing will have to be practiced religiously,” he added.

“Owing to business closures, most African countries will sink into irreversible and desperate debt. The International Monetary Fund, as usual, will tide these countries over with loans. However, this time, the United Nations will usher in a new digital currency for Africa.”

The currency, Fauci asserted, will include Universal Guaranteed Income for every person in Africa—as long as they obey all government dictates without question or protest.

At the White House, Joe Biden said, “I don’t eat pastrami. Nurse Jill won’t let me.”

Deli owner Hank Fineberg told the LA Times, “We didn’t start this. We buy our pastrami from Gornish Garnish, a wholesaler in Brooklyn. Why isn’t the CDC investigating them? Besides, none of our customers have actually gotten sick. So what’s the problem?”

The Times attributes the plunge of the stock market to the deli variant. It also questions California Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision to “leave Rodeo Drive open to shoppers.”

Bill Gates is urging people to eat a pastrami substitute made from dried maple leaves, a pine tar derivative, and salted mica.

A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine concludes that “the deli variant causes the body to produce 12 different sets of antibodies, some of which resemble the original SARS-CoV-2. The body then faces the prospect of antibodies attacking antibodies, resulting in a downward vortex resembling a black hole in space…”

NBC states, “Black Lives Matter leaders are huddling with officials at the Ford Foundation, shaping a response to news that the deli variant is sweeping through Africa.”

CBS: “In Africa, the major symptoms associated with the deli variant are weight loss, dehydration, and diarrhea. These symptoms traditionally stem from malnutrition and starvation, but researchers say the variant is now the principal culprit…”

At the White House yesterday, the President’s Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, told reporters, “The dark winter has arrived early. It’s here. The deli variant will necessitate new lockdowns and business closures. President Biden will be issuing a new wide-ranging vaccine mandate in the next few days. At the moment, he is meeting with NIH researchers and poring over the latest data on infection rates. His background in statistical analysis will serve him well in this effort…”

A FOX News reporter asked, “Will Christmas be canceled?”

Psaki replied, “Shopping will proceed. But Jesus was born only once. Is it necessary to keep celebrating the event? The Secretary of State is meeting with Pope Francis to discuss the question.”

The FOX reporter followed up with another query: “What about all the migrants coming across the Southern border? How many are carrying the deli variant?”

Psaki: “We have a new mass testing program called The Wand. It can survey thousands of people at once and detect the presence of viruses. So far, we’ve found only one person at the border who is infected with the deli variant—a former Montana resident. He has been the subject of an FBI manhunt, owing to the fact that he was present at the January 6th Capitol breach. He is now in custody at Walter Reed Hospital. He has no symptoms, which is a bit of a mystery.”

Retiring NIH Director Francis Collins clarified several deli variant issues this morning, on a conference call with reporters: “The new variant is producing different effects in different populations. In Africa, we’re seeing weight loss, dehydration, and diarrhea. In South America, the primary symptom is a dry cough. In Australia, it’s transient leg pain and anger. In Europe, numbness of the extremities and increasing poverty. In the US, waning immunity conferred by the vaccine, hypnotic passivity, and paradoxically, attendance at football games…”

Senator Chuck Schumer has introduced a bill that will compensate victims of the deli variant, in the form of a federal card that can be used to purchase $900 in goods and services. The diagnosing doctor will also receive a card, worth $3900 for each variant case identified.

Don’t leave home without it. Actually, don’t leave home. Lock down.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image based on creative commons work of iXimus & karogers / pixabay