Gaslighting Autism Families: CDC, Media Continue to Obscure Decades of Vaccine-Related Harm

Gaslighting Autism Families: CDC, Media Continue to Obscure Decades of Vaccine-Related Harm
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s latest autism report, once again, attributed the rise of autism to “more awareness” rather than a true increase — and as usual, mainstream media fell in line with that narrative.

by Children’s Health Defense Team
December 17, 2021

 

Media and public health officials perpetuated their entrenched practice of gaslighting autism families when earlier this month they trotted out the worn-out canard that a 23% rise in autism prevalence over a two-year period “reflects more awareness … rather than a true increase.”

The basis for this mean-spirited whopper was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) release of its biennial report on autism prevalence as of 2018.

The report estimated autism affected 1 in 44 American 8-year-olds born in 2010 (2.27%). The CDC’s prior report estimated prevalence at 1 in 54 8-year-olds born in 2008 (1.85%).

Using a different methodology, the 2019-2020 National Survey of Children’s Health situated autism prevalence for children ages 3 to 17 at 1 in 34 (2.9%).

Notwithstanding the media spin, CDC’s new report cannot hide the fact that autism rates have not stopped rising — and the trend has persisted for decades.

This was acknowledged by the report’s New Jersey author, researcher Walter Zahorodny, who states that U.S. autism prevalence — far from plateauing — “has increased continuously over 20 years.”

Zahorodny, who years ago described the situation as “urgent,” has consistently rejected “better awareness” or “changes in diagnostic criteria” as explanations.

Twenty years (the period of time during which CDC has had its tracking system in place) is itself a gross understatement — autism prevalence in the 1990s (1 in 1,000) already represented a tenfold increase over the condition’s estimated prevalence in the 1970s.

Greeting the new data with a wink and a yawn, the media also ignored the fact that some subgroups and regions are experiencing even more of a “red alert” situation.

Zahorodny called attention, for example, to the finding that autism prevalence for California’s boys is an “unprecedented” 1 in 16 (6.4%) — almost double the dreadful rate of 1 in 28 boys overall (3.6%).

The “Golden State” now has the dubious distinction of having the highest autism rate in the nation.

Moreover, recent projections by autism researchers Mark Blaxill, Toby Rogers and Cynthia Nevison suggest, if current trends continue, the autism rate could surpass 6% for ALL American children within a few years.

Although there are any number of environmental toxins that harm children’s neurodevelopment, a preponderance of information from national and international sources pinpoints vaccines as the driving factor behind the autism epidemic.

This information includes the CDC’s own data — despite the agency’s numerous fraudulent attempts to make years of troublesome findings “go away.”

Tragically, officialdom’s willful refusal to acknowledge or address vaccine-autism safety signals is no longer just an ongoing slap in the face to those directly affected — it is now affecting the U.S. population as a whole.

Why? Because CDC and Big Pharma are now using the very same playbook to gaslight victims of COVID vaccine injuries.

Omnibus Autism Proceeding trickery: a reminder

In the early 2000s — when autism prevalence had surged to an estimated 1 in 150 children — the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) consolidated 5,400 claims into something called the Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP).

The claims were filed by parents who asserted vaccines had injured their children, causing seizures, developmental delays and mitochondrial injuries that ultimately led to a diagnosis of autism.

Under the VICP, vaccine-injured individuals file claims against the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Office of Special Masters.

The adversarial process pits petitioners not just against the special masters who adjudicate the claims but also against U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who “defend HHS.”

In the case of the OAP, the special masters told thousands of families they would make a determination about compensation based on nine “test cases” — almost immediately whittled down to six — using them to evaluate three narrowly defined theories of autism causation via vaccine injury.

Knowing that if their conclusions pinpointed vaccination as the likely culprit in even one of the test cases, the VICP might be on the hook to compensate all 5,400 families — an outcome that would have bankrupted the VICP and cast a black cloud over the entire childhood vaccination program — the special masters and DOJ then pulled a couple of fast ones.

First, HHS quietly removed one of the test cases, “Child Doe 77,” later revealed to be Hannah Poling.

After awarding millions to be disbursed over Poling’s lifetime — and admitting vaccines were responsible for her autism — the special masters sealed the documents, so the case “could not be used to establish precedent on any of the other OAP cases.”

In a parallel move to ensure none of the remaining five test cases would lead to compensation, two DOJ attorneys allegedly distorted the views of HHS’s star expert witness, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman.

At the time, Zimmerman wrote an opinion for one of the test cases in which he rejected the proposed vaccine-autism theory of causation in that specific case.

In 2019, however, Zimmerman signed an affidavit disclosing how he had informed the two attorneys during the OAP deliberations that his opinion in that one case was not intended “to be a blanket statement as to all children and all medical science.”

In fact, Zimmerman told the DOJ attorneys, he believed vaccines could indeed cause autism in some children.

As noted by journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Zimmerman’s consequential scientific opinion “stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.”

To make sure people did not “find out,” Zimmerman was immediately fired as an expert witness.

Even worse, DOJ’s two attorneys intentionally used Zimmerman’s statements — written for the single test case — to misrepresent his broader views, omitting the expert’s stated belief that vaccines can and did cause autism in a subset of children.

Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. described the Justice Department’s OAP cover-up as “one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.”

This “fraud” allowed the VICP special masters to dismiss out of hand the petitions of all 5,000-plus families.

Omnibus Autism Proceeding trickery: a reminder

In the early 2000s — when autism prevalence had surged to an estimated 1 in 150 children — the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) consolidated 5,400 claims into something called the Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP).

The claims were filed by parents who asserted vaccines had injured their children, causing seizures, developmental delays and mitochondrial injuries that ultimately led to a diagnosis of autism.

Under the VICP, vaccine-injured individuals file claims against the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Office of Special Masters.

The adversarial process pits petitioners not just against the special masters who adjudicate the claims but also against U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys who “defend HHS.”

In the case of the OAP, the special masters told thousands of families they would make a determination about compensation based on nine “test cases” — almost immediately whittled down to six — using them to evaluate three narrowly defined theories of autism causation via vaccine injury.

Knowing that if their conclusions pinpointed vaccination as the likely culprit in even one of the test cases, the VICP might be on the hook to compensate all 5,400 families — an outcome that would have bankrupted the VICP and cast a black cloud over the entire childhood vaccination program — the special masters and DOJ then pulled a couple of fast ones.

First, HHS quietly removed one of the test cases, “Child Doe 77,” later revealed to be Hannah Poling.

After awarding millions to be disbursed over Poling’s lifetime — and admitting vaccines were responsible for her autism — the special masters sealed the documents, so the case “could not be used to establish precedent on any of the other OAP cases.”

In a parallel move to ensure none of the remaining five test cases would lead to compensation, two DOJ attorneys allegedly distorted the views of HHS’s star expert witness, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman.

At the time, Zimmerman wrote an opinion for one of the test cases in which he rejected the proposed vaccine-autism theory of causation in that specific case.

In 2019, however, Zimmerman signed an affidavit disclosing how he had informed the two attorneys during the OAP deliberations that his opinion in that one case was not intended “to be a blanket statement as to all children and all medical science.”

In fact, Zimmerman told the DOJ attorneys, he believed vaccines could indeed cause autism in some children.

As noted by journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Zimmerman’s consequential scientific opinion “stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.”

To make sure people did not “find out,” Zimmerman was immediately fired as an expert witness.

Even worse, DOJ’s two attorneys intentionally used Zimmerman’s statements — written for the single test case — to misrepresent his broader views, omitting the expert’s stated belief that vaccines can and did cause autism in a subset of children.

Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. described the Justice Department’s OAP cover-up as “one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.”

This “fraud” allowed the VICP special masters to dismiss out of hand the petitions of all 5,000-plus families.

Lessons for today

At the close of 2021, autism’s annual costs — at $238 billion — are projected to more than double to $589 billion by 2030.

School districts and municipalities, tasked with providing special education services, are already “drowning” under the burden of coming up with the necessary funding.

Under the circumstances, it is a mystery why the media still get away with making the insulting case that autism awareness and better diagnosis account for the ever-higher numbers of children with autism.

The fact is that autism is, and always has been, a matter of urgent public concern, with wide-ranging impacts on families, communities and society that will endure for decades to come.

Nor is the autism epidemic limited to the United States — other countries, such as Ireland, have produced data that mirror the shocking numbers just reported by CDC for California.

With the experimental COVID shots now blazing an unfortunate trail of death and disability, both in the U.S. and internationally, many more individuals and families are entering the bizarre twilight zone until now largely inhabited by autism families.

Similar to those dealing with autism, the COVID-vaccine-injured are:

  • Finding it difficult-to-impossible to gain recognition for their injuries, encountering public ridicule and scorn rather than support for the empirical contention that vaccines triggered their damage.
  • Discovering that many in the medical community are only too willing to brush off or deny serious physical problems following COVID vaccination, instead suggesting that anxiety or the opportunely created “post-pandemic stress disorder” are responsible.
  • Belatedly discovering that vaccine injuries are a significant cause of family bankruptcy and, with manufacturers enjoying complete protection from financial liability, the prospects for injury compensation are slim to none — the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program that is supposed to provide compensation for “provable” COVID vaccine injuries hasn’t paid out a single claim.
  • Learning, with the recent greenlighting of the shots for children ages 5 to 11, that public health officials, vaccine manufacturers and policy-makers are only too willing to “throw children under the bus,” by pushing injections that offer zero benefit, pose outsized risks and jeopardize our country’s future.

In the face of these tragedies, perhaps the only silver lining that can be drawn is that the swelling ranks of the vaccine-injured, along with their families and communities, represent a mighty army — one that is likely to reject continued gaslighting and to push back against corporate malfeasance and genocidal health policies with growing determination and strength.

If one day, an OAP equivalent arises to address the tidal wave of COVID-vaccine-related injuries, this army may make it more difficult for arrogant authorities to carry out their customary dirty tricks.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: BiancaVanDijk / pixabay



UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”

UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”
App “How Bad Is My Batch?” Allows People To Input Batch Code And See How Many Deaths, Disabilities and Illnesses Associated With That Batch “1 in 200 Lots Contain Deadly Ingredients”

by Celia Farber, The Truth Barrier
December 17, 2021

 

I was told about the work of Craig Paardekooper by my friend of many years, PhD bio-chemist Dr. Dave Rasnick a few days ago; Today came this email from Dave, clarifying his shocking findings:

“ I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London.  Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group.

https://www.bitchute.com/Craig-Paardekooper/

Three of his conclusions:
  • The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
  • Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total.
  • 1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients. He urged me to watch a series of videos, in which he lays out the unthinkable. One video here:



 

Another, “Death By Alphabet: Moderna Batch Codes And Associated Deaths:” here

 



 

“Please share with those you know, and also with doctors, nurses and teachers – who may soon be pushing the vax onto children. Doctors and nurses need to see that some batches are 50 x worse than others – before they prescribe them.”

—Craig Paardekooper, Telegram

“How Bad Is My Batch?” App and website here.


“Moderna Used the Alphabet to Label Different Toxicities of Vaccine. 

Moderna batches belong to two main groups – 20A or 21A – the 20A group is much more toxic. In fact all of the batches producing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports – all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A.”

“I ranked all the Moderna vaccine batches in order of the number of deaths caused, and used the data from the highest 180 batches as my data set.

As shown in my previous videos, Moderna batches have an alphabet letter in the centre of their batch codes…”

—Craig Paardekooper

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/

I called Dave Rasnick, just now.

How did you find this guy? I asked.

”I just stumbled upon it,” he said. “Every morning I spend an hour or two going to the usual places, I go to, to find information. Last week or something I came across one of his talks. Odyssey or something. And then found his website. He had done a series of videos. These analyses are of the US VAERS data. That’s available to anybody. There are huge number of reports in VAERS. What he has done is that …the guy must have a lot of time on his hands because VAERS is a pain in the ass to use normally. There’s almost a million reports now on the Covid injections….from this guy I learned there are 20,200 batches. That includes all 3— Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen. He has done an analysis by batch number. One batch has about 20,000 jabs. There are 20,200 lots numbers. We know there are billions of these already ordered and shipped. The important thing is that it’s a huge data base. He has correlated over time the reports of the severity of the jabs over almost a year now.”

Dr. Rasnick described how Paardekooper charted a roller coaster of adverse events patterns, not random, but highly variable. They went up and down, forming patterns. “He was able to show that they had done a dosing regimen where the earliest ones had highest toxicity, some a lot less toxic…This is exactly what any scientist wants to see, this volume of data. These companies are working in concert so they did not interfere with each other’s results. The toxicities are very specific, and they come sequentially.”

”All of that non-randomness was the key. As soon as you see that… if I was on a jury I wold convict those people of grievous bodily harm and willful homicide.”

I asked what he knew about Paardekooper.

“He’s not a PhD yet,” Dr. Rasnick said. “He’s at Kingston University, in London. We’ve had exchanges, he answers my emails promptly. He reminds me of….well, he’s not beholden to anybody. I knew something like that could be done if somebody had all that data. It’s a huge, extraordinary effort. If it was only a few thousand data points that would be one thing, anybody could do that, but this is about a million data points. Batch codes and toxicity. The December 4th video, that’s the one that shows coordination.”

 

Connect with Celia Farber

cover image credit: torstensimon / pixabay



Vaccine Mandates ‘Vile, Unconstitutional, Immoral, Unscientific, Discriminatory’

Vaccine Mandates ‘Vile, Unconstitutional, Immoral, Unscientific, Discriminatory’
The National Black Caucus of the Green Party of the United States strongly opposes the use of forced vaccination via mandates and the discrimination that is being generated around these policies.

by National Black Caucus of the Green Party of the United States
December 16, 2021

 

Today’s polarizing climate is competing for the trust and confidence of citizens more than ever before. The nature of power is changing and these changes are not measured simply by a degree of control by COVID mandates and quarantines.

In today’s political environment, the speed and accessibility of information created “digital reflections” that made medical facts vulnerable, eroding trust between the White House administration, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization.

The fear of losing control in our fast-paced social media environment is pushing us toward exclusion. Our current leaders, whether Congress or the White House administration and even our current steering committee, should instead develop an instinct for inclusion.

The coronavirus pandemic is one of our most dangerous wars in human history, because the most lethal attacks are the ones that catch us off guard.

Being caught off guard has caused erroneous data reporting that is currently being exposed by the Freedom of Information Act request because we are not only unsure about the numbers, but being certain that the numbers are incorrect, is the most difficult issue many are facing today.

In a pandemic world where verifying case numbers is becoming increasingly difficult, inclusion is imperative and our Consumer Protection plank of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS) must be honored.

Lockdowns, mandates and passports are the major issue of the day with millions of people protesting against them worldwide. In fact, what has become known as the “medical freedom” movement is arguably the biggest and most diverse international movement in world history.

Vaccine mandates and vaccine passports are among the most vile, unconstitutional, immoral, unscientific, discriminatory and outright criminal policies ever enforced upon the population and goes against everything GPUS stands for under social justice.

These policies are coming from an out-of-control government at the behest of the pharmaceutical industry.

The mainstream media and social media are also working in lock-step to censor any and all doctors, scientists and investigative journalists who have an opposing view or who even question the current mainstream media orthodoxy.

Workers are being forced out of their jobs, many with medical exceptions from their doctors, students are being denied entrance to educational institutions, needed medical treatment is being denied, medical privacy is being violated, constitutionally protected rights to movement and assembly (including the right to travel) are being threatened, rights to normal societal participation are being decimated.

It has taken a while, but more recently many medical professionals, elected officials and federal judges have come out fully against lockdowns, vaccine mandates, vaccine passports and of course massive censorship.

There is a growing clarity among many that these measures have nothing to do with health and everything to do with a power-grab at levels never before seen in the history of the world.

The National Black Caucus of the GPUS adheres to the principle that informed consent in all personal health and medical decisions is an inalienable human right.

Under no circumstances shall any medical treatment or procedure — including psychotropic medications, vaccines and/or other injectable treatments — be mandated or coerced.

Individuals should be allowed to protect/heal themselves in a manner that best supports their medical and spiritual beliefs.

The coercive methods we oppose include:
  • Threats to personal health information privacy at every level.
  • Discrimination and/or lack of access to public education, public housing or other public services.
  • Removal of minors from their guardians.
  • Any travel restrictions and/or restrictions from public spaces based on a requirement for “vaccine passports” or any other proof of “compliance” with any medical intervention.
  • Vaccine requirements that target specific populations based on ethnicity/race, even if positioned as correcting disparities.

We further oppose the use of privacy-invasive technology and artificial intelligence (AI) monitoring systems (including facial recognition, fingerprint apps, tracking cell phones or any other personal electronic devices and credit score systems) as a way to monitor and track the movements and/or restrict the rights of individuals to freely exist and assemble as they choose, especially when applied to personal health care choices.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 



La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide Found in PCV, a Regularly Scheduled Infant & Toddler Vaccination Against Pneumococcal Infections

La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide Found in PCV, a Regularly Scheduled Infant & Toddler Vaccination Against Pneumococcal Infections

 

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Below you will find a video with English translation (courtesy of Orwell City) for La Quinta Columna’s first look at the contents of Prevenar 13 (PCV) under a high power microscope. Prevenar 13 is a pneumoococcal vaccine that is routinely given to infants and babies. Evidence of Graphene Oxide is clearly seen. They will be following up with additional analysis and reports.

Per NHS, UK: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) is used to vaccinate children under 2 years old as part of the NHS vaccination schedule. It’s known by the brand name Prevenar 13.

Per CDC, US: Give PCV13 to infants as a series of 4 doses, one dose at each of these ages: 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 through 15 months.

 



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

 

Presence of Graphene Oxide in Pneumococcal Vaccine Prevenar 13

transcript by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 15, 2021

Ricardo Delgado: 

I think I have a video here to finish. Yes, of course. It’s an important video. Today we have used the optical microscope that we were able to acquire thanks to the donations that you made to La Quinta Columna at the time. And we have analyzed under the microscope the vaccine Prevenar 13, an anti-pneumococcal vaccine. A vaccine of the calendar that’s traditionally in the calendar. It’s precisely for the youngest, for children, including infants from 6 months onwards.

Let’s see what material we have found there. Because, normally, when we look at the optical microscope that has a quality of 60x to 100x, 200x, 400x, or 1000x at the most, we should see microscopic substances. And the only visible ones should be salts. Salts that look like crystals and that are used in the dissolution itself. And something else. And little else. Maybe some metal, but very few.

However, we have come across for the umpteenth time this graphene-like material that we have seen so much. Particularly, in the misnamed anti-COVID vaccines. Of course, indeed, they’re actually pro-COVID vaccines.

This material has a very special feature. It not only has an identity trace when analyzed or radiated with micro Raman spectroscopy, as Dr. Campra already did, but under the optical microscope, it looks like it had folds. As if it were a kleenex tissue at the bottom of a swimming pool. At the same time, it tends to fold back on its edges. These are graphene nanosheets. Let’s look at these images that we have taken from the Prevent 13 vaccine today.

What’s the traceability that you ask so many questions about? It was directly traced. A sanitary sent it to the domicile of La Quinta Columna. So let’s take a look at those images and judge for yourselves since this substance or this type of material shouldn’t appear in the Prevenar 13 vaccine. Let’s take a look at it.

Well, there’s a little video for you guys to see that it’s a live image that we’ve recorded. And as I say, this has all the appearance of the fashionable material. Of that “wonder material” that’s so wonderful that they have introduced it inside the vaccines so that your children can also carry it inside their bodies.

Here. The previous image was also quite clear. Let’s see, let’s move it forward a little bit.

You can see it here as well. This is the same material that you will see magnified now. Let’s see. When you see this delineation between the light green and the dark green, know the light green is what’s inside the drop. On the outside, that dark green and this striped aspect that you can see is the microscope slide. So, whatever is inside the light, well, that’s everything that belongs to the vaccine.

OK? Let’s continue. Although you don’t recognize the graphene, this shouldn’t be there. OK? Not in a calendar vaccine or any other type of vaccine. This also looks like graphene. A lot.

If we laser here, through spectroscopy, and measure the identity fingerprint, in all likelihood it’ll give us the two peaks characteristic of reduced graphene oxide. In addition, it’s likely to be doped with some metals. Here you see the fold. The folded edge. It has the appearance of graphene nanosheets.

Now we have a little video here of a graphene nano-ribbon, which is also introduced.

If you take as a positive control the graphene oxide that they sell, for example, in any store, you’ll see that this type or typology of objects —as we did in the past in some video of La Quinta Columna—, is distributed as an aqueous solution of graphene dispersion. Like a new type of nanotechnology introduced in vials with a purpose that you already know. If you see, it has the very characteristic appearance that already appeared in Dr. Campra’s preliminary report back on June 28.

This appearance of nano-ribbons is also graphene-based. Well, that was the Prevenir 13 vaccine video. In just four droplets under the microscope.

We often wonder why any hospital that has a good microscope —at least an optical microscope— doesn’t analyze the remains of a vaccine. Because, supposedly, there must be nanoparticles. Nanoparticles. Therefore, they shouldn’t be visible under an optical microscope.

And, moreover, they should be homogeneous. And only visible, in any case, an electron microscope. As we saw them, as you know, in that preliminary report by Dr. Campra. And why don’t they check themselves that these graphene-based nanosheet structures do indeed exist? Because when we subjected it to spectroscopy it gave the fingerprint of the identity of graphene oxide. Moreover, there are the patents of the Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Tourism itself on the official website of the Spanish government and other international health ministries.

So, why do you continue to deny it? Well. We do know why: because they continue to cover up the murder weapon. So, all those really covering this up are accomplices of a covert genocide. They’re, literally, criminals and murderers in the service of supranational entities. Pharmaceutical corporations included. To reduce the world’s population and, of course, neuromodulate it. And graphene is precisely the base raw material in this technology.

So, what else needs to be done? What more evidence do we have to demonstrate from La Quinta Columna and other information channels, such as InfoVacunas or El Arconte that are also denouncing it? What needs to be done? How many complaints need to be filed?

We have filed more than three hundred criminals, administrative and litigation complaints. How many ways have to be exhausted so that you’re aware that the world population is being killed? What else needs to be done? We’re volunteering again, both myself and Dr. Sevillano —as well as Dr. Campra himself— to go to a court and to expose all the knowledge and all the reliable evidence we have.

And we demand that the European Medicines Agency —of course, in the quality control that supposedly makes the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Health Products, whose maximum responsible is this socialist councilor of Utrera, Mrs. Silvia Calzon Fernández, who’s its director and president—, to make an analysis to, somehow, provide a counter-analysis to the one made by Dr. Campra. Which, to date, is the only independent report in the world.

 

Connect with Orwell City

 

See related articles:

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections

On Hidden Nano Structures in Covid Vaccines: La Quinta Columna Takes a Closer Look at Nanocircuitry &  Media Access Control Addresses (MACs)

Dr. Pablo Campra on Graphene, Weird Morgellons-Like Elements & Possible Microbiota in Covid Vaccines



US Hospitals: Fraud, Murder, Cash; Federal Assassination-for-Hire Program

US Hospitals: Fraud, Murder, Cash; Federal Assassination-for-Hire Program
“Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] whistleblowers have calculated a total [federal] payment [to hospitals] of at least $100,000 per [COVID] patient.” 

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 14, 2021

 

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a private medical organization founded in 1943, has the story — “Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19” (11/17/21), authored by Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D.

Here are stunning excerpts:

“Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol…for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate…”

“As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.”

“The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”

“In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, ‘CMS has granted “waivers” of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.’…The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”

“Creating a ‘National Pandemic Emergency’ provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These ‘bounties’ must paid back if not ‘earned’ by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.”

“The hospital payments include:

* A ‘free’ required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.

* Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.

* Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.

* A 20 percent ‘boost’ bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.

* Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.

* More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.

* A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.”

“CMS implemented ‘value-based’ payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.”

“Outside hospitals, physician MIPS [Merit-based Incentive Payment System] quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.”

“Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.”

“There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects. In ventilated patients, the death toll is staggering. A National Library of Medicine January 2021 report of 69 studies involving more than 57,000 patients concluded that fatality rates were 45 percent in COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, increasing to 84 percent in older patients. Renz announced at a Truth for Health Foundation Press Conference that CMS data showed that in Texas hospitals, 84.9% percent of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.”

“Then there are deaths from restrictions on effective treatments for hospitalized patients. Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.”

—end of article excerpt—

This is basically a federally incentivized protocol for murder.

To say it violates every code of medical ethics would be a vast understatement.

Cash for death.

There are MANY doctors and nurses who work in these hospitals who know what they’re doing, who know they’re following orders that result in the deaths of their patients; but they keep doing it.

They would rather murder their patients than lose their jobs.

And there are MANY employees at the FDA, NIH, and other public health agencies who also know the score, keep their heads down, and facilitate murder.

There are MANY so-called journalists who work at mainstream outlets who know what’s going on and say nothing.

Mass murder is central to the overall COVID program. But feel free to think that the vaccine, on the other hand, is pure and safe and essential. The people running the show just want to kill some and save others. Sure, that makes perfect sense.

If they’re all schizophrenic messiahs-and-killers and you’re schizophrenic for believing in them.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: SoyKhaler / pixabay



Christine Anderson, German Member of the European Parliament: “Pharmaceutical Companies Are About as Interested in Public Health as the Arms Industry Is in World Peace”

Christine Anderson, German Member of the European Parliament: “Pharmaceutical Companies Are About as Interested in Public Health as the Arms Industry Is in World Peace”

 

Christine Anderson is a German politician and currently serving as a Member of the European Parliament

The video below is an excerpt from the full length press conference held on December 8, 2021 during which five European Union MEPs push back against the totalitarian tactics of  Ursula Von Der Leyen, a German politician and physician who has been President of the European Commission since December 2019.

For the full press conference, see:

Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination

 



This video clip is available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit for the original full-length press conference video, goes to 21st Century Wire.

 

Transcript prepared by TCTL:

 

Good morning.

Thanks again to all of you for your overwhelming support and encouragement you expressed to us in uncounted emails, private messages on social media. But please do not consider me a hero.

I’m not brave and I’m not courageous. I am simply doing my job.

I was elected to parliament to serve the people, to act on their behalf, and in their best interest. And I couldn’t think of a better way to serve your interest then to uphold freedom, democracy and the rule of law.

But I’m telling you, the vast majority of the ‘elected’ representatives — they are selling you down the river.

You know, instead of adjusting our concept of what constitutes “fully vaxxed”, we need to adjust our concept of what constitutes legitimate government.

And governments forcing people into compliance are neither legitimate nor democratic by any stretch of the imagination.

And it isn’t about your health either.

You know, pharmaceutical companies are about as interested in public health as the arms industry is in world peace.

Now some of you may argue I’m exaggerating, I’m misjudging the government’s intentions. Granted, that is a possibility.

But are you willing to take that risk? Can you afford this nonchalant attitude towards government, considering what we all stand to lose?

Others may think, ‘yeah, I kinda see where she’s coming from but, nah, my government wouldn’t do it.’

Well, not only would they, I’m telling you they are already doing it as we speak.

As Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher living in the fifth century BC once said, “The truth often evades being recognized due to its utter incredibility.”

So just because you cannot fathom your government having ill meanings towards you, doesn’t mean it is not true. And, on the other hand, I’d much rather be wrong then sorry.

But is up to you. You need to decide what you will do. But keep in mind, whatever decision you do make, you will not only make it for yourself. This decision will be made for your children and your children’s children as well.

Your decision today will shape the society your children will have to live in. Your decision today will predetermine whether your children will live in a free and democratic society or if they will be subjected to surveillancing police state.

Now I am determined to leave my children a free and democratic society. And this I will fight for tooth and nail. And should it be the last thing I do on this planet, so be it.

So once again, dear government, bring it on. Let’s see what you’ve got. I am not afraid of you. You will not be able to shut me up. You will not be able to force me into compliance. Oh, and one other thing, trying to buy me off. Really? That isn’t going to work either. So go ahead, offer me a million dollars. Heck, make it a hundred million dollars.

But, you know what, securing a future for my children in a free and democratic society — you could not possibly put a price tag on that. So when it comes to my stand on that issue I would like to put it in the words of Margaret Thatcher: ‘This lady is not for turning.’ You can bet on that.

Thank you.

 



Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Why I Wrote ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Why I Wrote ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’
I wrote this book so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dominate our government and subvert our democracy, and to chronicle the key role Dr. Fauci has played in the current coup d’état against democracy.

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Defender
December 13, 2021

 

The Defender editor’s note: Below is an excerpt from “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,” the new runaway bestseller by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense.

While some Republicans bridled warily at Dr. Fauci’s accumulating power and seemingly arbitrary pronouncements, the alchemies of political tribalism and the relentlessly stoked terror of COVID-19 persuaded spellbound Democrats to close their eyes to the damning evidence that his COVID-19 policies were a catastrophic and dangerous failure.

As an advocate for public health, robust science and independent regulatory agencies — free from corruption and financial entanglements with Pharma — I have battled Dr. Fauci for many years.

I know him personally, and my impression of him is very different from my fellow Democrats, who first encountered him as the polished, humble, earnest, endearing and long-suffering star of the televised White House COVID press conferences.

Dr. Fauci played a historic role as the leading architect of “agency capture” — the corporate seizure of America’s public health agencies by the pharmaceutical industry.

Lamentably, Dr. Fauci’s failure to achieve public health goals during the COVID pandemic are not anomalous errors, but consistent with a recurrent pattern of sacrificing public health and safety on the altar of pharmaceutical profits and self-interest. He consistently prioritized pharmaceutical industry profits over public health.

Readers of these pages will learn how in exalting patented medicine Dr. Fauci has, throughout his long career, routinely falsified science, deceived the public and physicians, and lied about safety and efficacy.

Dr. Fauci’s malefactions detailed in this volume include his crimes against the hundreds of Black and Hispanic orphan and foster children whom he subjected to cruel and deadly medical experiments and his role, with Bill Gates, in transforming hundreds of thousands of Africans into lab rats for low-cost clinical trials of dangerous experimental drugs that, once approved, remain financially out of reach for most Africans.

You will learn how Dr. Fauci and Mr. Gates have turned the African continent into a dumping ground for expired, dangerous and ineffective drugs, many of them discontinued for safety reasons in the U.S. and Europe.

You will read how Dr. Fauci’s strange fascination with, and generous investments in, so-called “gain of function” experiments to engineer pandemic superbugs, give rise to the ironic possibility that Dr. Fauci may have played a role in triggering the global contagion that two U.S. presidents entrusted him to manage.

You will also read about his two-decade strategy of promoting false pandemics as a scheme for promoting novel vaccines, drugs and Pharma profits.

You will learn of his actions to conceal widespread contamination in blood and vaccines, his destructive vendettas against scientists who challenge the Pharma paradigm, his deliberate sabotaging of patent-expired remedies against infectious diseases, from HIV to COVID-19, to grease the skids for less effective, but more profitable, remedies.

You will learn of the grotesque body counts that have accumulated in the wake of his cold-blooded focus on industry profits over public health.

All his strategies during COVID — falsifying science to bring dangerous and ineffective drugs to market, suppressing and sabotaging competitive products that have lower profit margins even if the cost is prolonging pandemics and losing thousands of lives — all of these share a common purpose: the myopic devotion to Pharma.

This book will show you that Tony Fauci does not do public health; he is a businessman, who has used his office to enrich his pharmaceutical partners and expand the reach of influence that has made him the most powerful — and despotic — doctor in human history.

For some readers, reaching that conclusion will require crossing some new bridges. Many readers, however, intuitively know the real Anthony Fauci, and need only to see the facts illuminated and organized.

I wrote this book so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dominate our government and subvert our democracy, and to chronicle the key role Dr. Fauci has played in the current coup d’état against democracy.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense



Four Canadian Doctors Sue Alberta Health Services Over Vaccine Mandate

Four Canadian Doctors Sue Alberta Health Services Over Vaccine Mandate

by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
December 10, 2021

 

WETASKIWIN:  The Justice Centre filed a Statement of Claim and Injunction Application at the Wetaskawin Court of Queen’s Bench on December 8, 2021, on behalf of four Alberta physicians. The doctors are facing termination, restrictions, and disciplinary action for standing against Alberta Health Services’ (“AHS”) Vaccine Mandate, which has been amended and extended twice already. The most recent amendment to the Vaccine Mandate requires all Alberta health care practitioners to submit proof of vaccination before December 13, 2021, even if they are naturally immune. In addition to challenging AHS for constitutional violations, the lawsuit advocates for returning to basic medical principles including: recognition of natural immunity, doctor-patient privilege, informed consent, personal autonomy and duty to disclose.

All four doctors treated and cared for their patients without incident during the worst of the Covid-19 pandemic over the past 20 months. Now AHS is prepared to terminate and discipline them for not complying with AHS’ Vaccine Mandate in the name of science and medicine.

Dr. Nadr Jomha, a specialized Orthopaedic Surgeon for complex foot and ankle reconstruction and trauma cases, and instrumental in the development of one of Canada’s cryopreservation (cold-preservation) joint transplantation programs, states: “Given that an overwhelming majority of studies prove that individuals with naturally acquired immunity have: a) been shown to have equal or better immunity than a vaccine-induced immunity; b) are very rarely re-infected with Covid-19; and c) are unlikely to transmit Covid-19, there is no medical or scientific benefit to myself of those around me or anyone around me.”

Dr. Blaine Achen, who held the position of Chief of Cardiac Anesthesia at the renowned Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, until he was terminated for not complying with AHS’ Vaccine Mandate, says: “The medical system in Alberta is struggling. The recent treatment of health care workers in this province, in addition to the current AHS policies and management, is driving physicians out of Alberta and will further exacerbate an already dire situation. AHS’ last-minute amendments and extensions to the Policy caused confusion and scheduling problems at the Hospital, which have negatively impacted AHS staff and patients. My forced departure will invariably cause additional delays in the operating room and will cause harm to patients in Alberta.”

Dr. Gert Grobler, once the personal doctor to the Nelson Mandela family, and now practicing in Medicine Hat, notes: “Treating and reducing Covid-19 severity ought to be the goal of medical doctors and it ought to be part of the strategy used by AHS.”

Dr. Tyler May, is one of two doctors in the under-served community of Manning, Alberta, 73km north of Peace River, is being allowed access to his hospital (after it was deemed one of the critical sites in AHS’ 2nd revision of the Vaccine Mandate) but not his clinic, said: “AHS’ decision is completely arbitrary and absurd, as the facilities are intimately linked, and it provides another example of AHS putting ideology and policy over patient care – much like the [Vaccine Mandate] itself.”

The Injunction Application is set to be heard in Court on Tuesday, December 14 at 10am. The doctors will ask the Court not to enforce AHS’ Vaccine Mandate against them, to trust the science and medicine in respect of natural immunity, and to allow the doctors to keep treating their patients.

To support this claim, Dr. Joel Kettner, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba, prepared an expert report which included a review of how major public health organizations have compared protection by natural immunity from previous Covid infection with protection by vaccination. In his report he states: “I have been unable to find relevant data or clear rationale for policies pertaining to the exclusion of health care workers because of their vaccination status, especially since there has been consistent evidence for equivalent – if not superior – protection by natural immunity resulting from previous infection, as described by the major public health organizations and the Public Health Agency’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization”.

“AHS is prepared to push their Vaccine Mandate so far as to terminate competent, qualified and caring doctors with natural immunity in order to enforce a Vaccine Mandate that is unscientific, harmful and arbitrary,” says Eva Chipiuk, Justice Centre Staff Lawyer. “It is shocking that these doctors have had to turn to the Courts to continue to be allowed to do what they are professionally trained to do – treat patients, including themselves. Especially at a time where AHS has declared the provinces’ hospitals and health care system at risk of collapse, and cancelled surgeries due to lack of resources.”

 

Connect with Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

cover image credit: tungnguyen0905 / pixabay



Pfizer Document Concedes That There Is a Large Increase in Types of Adverse Event Reaction to Its Vaccine

Pfizer Document Concedes That There Is a Large Increase in Types of Adverse Event Reaction to Its Vaccine

by Guy Hatchard, Daily Telegraph, New Zealand
December 5, 2021

 

  • Document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world.
  • Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reported.
  • Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious.
  • This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.
  • We examine the implications for government.

Up until now, New Zealand GPs and hospitals have been provided with a fact sheet from Pfizer listing 21 possible adverse events as a result of vaccination.

All of these are minor, requiring little or no treatment other than rest, with the exception of severe allergic reactions, myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart). As a result, most of the many thousands of New Zealanders reporting adverse effects post vaccination have been sent home with little more than advice to take an aspirin and rest. Some have been told that their conditions may be unrelated medical events, psychosomatic, or due to anxiety on their part.

Relying on the short official Pfizer fact sheet as a guide, Medsafe, our NZ medicines regulatory body, has only accepted one out of the 100+ deaths actually reported to them as related to vaccination. Most are listed as unrelated, under investigation, or unknowable. By contrast, the NZ Health Forum and other groups have collected unofficial reports of adverse effects and death proximate to vaccination. Out of 670+ reports of death compiled by the Forum, 270 have already been investigated by medical professionals and closely linked to known adverse effects. Following the publication of the new Pfizer document many more are expected to be connected with vaccination. Reports describe symptoms such as chest pain, brain fog, extreme fatigue, neurological symptoms, tachycardia, stroke, heart attacks, and many more. Collected data suggests that as many as two-thirds of adverse event enquiries made to medical staff by vaccine recipients have not been reported to CARM—the NZ system of adverse event reporting. Medsafe itself estimates in its Guide to Adverse Reaction Reporting that in NZ only 5% of adverse events are reported. As a result the NZ public is completely unaware of the extent of reported possible risks of vaccination.

The just released Pfizer document which is being circulated widely in the public domain and can downloaded from websites is entitled:

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

Therefore the reported side effects predate the vaccine rollout in New Zealand. The report itself was finalised by Pfizer on 30 April 2021. Did Pfizer supply this information to our government during the early days of our universal vaccination programme? If so the results should have been shared with our medical professionals, politicians, and the public. Many of the new 100+ listed new adverse event types now released by Pfizer in this 38 page document pose long term risks to health. Until very recently, the document was being withheld by Pfizer who maintained it should be kept confidential. There is a strong possibility that very large numbers of New Zealanders will suffer long term injury as a result.

How did this happen without anyone’s knowledge?

Even though the Pfizer vaccine had undergone very short trials and had provisional approval only, Medsafe did not update its CARM adverse event reporting system to make it mandatory rather than voluntary.

Medsafe did not advise GPs and Hospital staff to be on high alert for adverse events and report them rapidly and in detail.

The Government ignored the unprecedented numbers of adverse events being reported to Medsafe and circulating in the community and on social media.

The Government instituted a public relations, promotional, and media campaign advising the public that the Pfizer covid-19 mRNA vaccine was completely safe and free of serious side effects, giving the impression that there were no side effects—not even the known serious effects of heart inflammation that Pfizer had already admitted.

Unaccountably, conditions imposed by the contract that our Government signed with Pfizer for the supply of vaccines have not been made public. We suspect that the contract contains standard clauses similar to those used with drugs that have completed safety trials, such as a provision that public discussion of adverse events may only be undertaken in conjunction with the company supplying the drug. If this is the case, it will have hamstrung Medsafe and our Government in their approach to assessment and public discussion of adverse events.

What are the new risks of vaccination?

Anyone reading the new Pfizer adverse event report compilation will be staggered. The sheer density of the technical medical terms and disease names are nevertheless broken down into recognisable and serious categories of illness—kidney failure, stroke, cardiac events, pregnancy complications, inflammation, neurological disease, autoimmune failure, paralysis, liver failure, blood disorders, skin disease, musculoskeletal problems, arthritis, respiratory disease, DVT, blood clots, vascular disease, haemorrhage, loss of sight, Bell’s palsy, and epilepsy.

How has this affected New Zealand?

Whilst even the official Medsafe record of adverse effects and the unofficial lists show that the immediate risks of covid vaccination could be as much as 50 – 300 times greater than even the most risky of previous traditional vaccines (such as the smallpox jab), and whilst the long term effects are unknown, 90% of eligible New Zealanders have gone ahead with vaccination having accepted the assurances of safety and efficacy from the government, or having been forced to get vaccinated under threat of loss of employment and freedom of movement. Feeling the fear of covid that has been generated by reports in the international and local media, most people completing vaccination heaved a great sigh of relief—that is one huge worry off my mind, now I can get on with my life.

Those finding that no immediate insurmountable reaction had surfaced (the majority) understandably agreed with the government: “What is all the fuss about? Why shouldn’t everyone do this, or be made to do this? It is a social good that will protect everyone”

BUT there is a huge iceberg in the path of the good ship New Zealand hidden under the waves of relief. Thousands are quietly suffering debilitating illness, unacknowledged and in some cases untreated by their doctors. For those who survived vaccination without immediate injury this was not a problem because they didn’t know about it apart from one or two complaints from friends that might just be random coincidences.

This has brought about a division in New Zealand society which the government created in the name of public safety. Thousands of dedicated servants of the nation including teachers, health workers, and others are being stigmatised and forced out of their jobs in a manner horrifyingly reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany. The government did this despite knowing that the Pfizer vaccine was neither fully tested, safe, nor particularly effective. Judges handed down decisions in courts supporting the government mandates unaware of crucial mRNA vaccine safety data, all because Pfizer had withheld this information, and the government had not done its due diligence. Had the true position been known, the High Court’s NZ Bill of Rights analysis may well have been different and its provision which guarantees that every individual should be able to make their own medical choices might still be intact.

Pfizer’s conclusions

Pfizer concludes the released document with a statement “Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit:risk balance for BNT162b2.” PM stands for the Post Marketing data set they are evaluating of 42,086 reported adverse events. Pfizer makes this bald claim of benefit despite admitting that “the magnitude of underreporting is unknown”. This document contains no further substantive information in support of this claim of benefit:risk balance other than a mysterious reference to “the known safety profile of the vaccine”.

The benefit:risk argument is in essence saying: covid-19 is a serious illness and our calculations show that more people will be injured by the disease than are being injured by the vaccine, therefore there will be a net benefit. This argument falls over because of at least three very important factors: Firstly treatment options have improved and thereby the risk of serious illness and death from covid has been greatly reduced.

Secondly the risk of covid is not evenly spread. People with comorbidities (other conditions) and the elderly are at very high risk. Most other people are at very low risk. Thus vaccination could subject people at low risk from covid to a higher risk from vaccination. Approaches to preventive health education can reduce the covid risk to people with comorbidities more than vaccination can. For example a study published in the BMJ found that people following a plant based diet have a 73% reduced risk of serious illness. Data from the UK Biobank has been analysed by researchers from Manchester and Oxford Universities and the West Indies who found that shift workers (who typically have disrupted bioclocks) have three times the risk of being hospitalised with covid. Preventive remedies include changes in diet such as the introduction of more fresh fruit, vegetables, and fibre, and reductions in known unhealthy habits such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption, an overly sedentary lifestyle, a predominance of ultra processed foods, and many more.

The third and most significant reason the benefit:risk argument falls over is the sheer range of adverse reaction types observed by Pfizer and kept hidden until now.

Read full article here

 

Connect with Daily Telegraph, New Zealand

©Guy Hatchard, Daily Telegraph New Zealand, 2021

 

cover image credit: WiR_Pixs / pixabay



Update on the Mighty Omicron

Update on the Mighty Omicron
Omicron supposedly lurks among us – but a peek behind the curtain shows the ‘evidence’ surrounding its detection and reinfection rate is simply more dissociation from reality. 

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
December 8, 2021

 

You’re likely drowning in the ocean of information coming out about everything C-word-related including this ‘new variant.’ I know I am.

So I’ll keep this brief. Beer, dinner and sleep await, not necessarily in that order.

In my Nov. 27 article about Byram Bridle I showed that he and some of his collaborators are developing a nasal vaxx for Covid, and are poised to potentially profit from it. Here’s what I wrote about the already-infamous Omicron:

“I won’t be very surprised if developers and marketers of these new [intranasal] vaxxes [such as Bridle and co.] soon also claim they could help curb the Nu/Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) that’s received a great deal of attention in the last few days. B.1.1.529 already has been declared of “huge international concern” because it ostensibly has a “horrific spike[-protein-gene-mutation] profile,” spreads very fast and has the potential to evade the currently used vaxxes. Predictably there’s been panic such as long lines at airports in the very rapidly growing list of African countries subject to travel bans by other governments — along with a renewed push for more people to get vaxxed….

“Yet there hasn’t been a single published scientific report, as far as I know, which would allow objective/outside verification of whether there is any real evidence to support these drastic claims and actions. And I remain very sceptical about the hype regarding all variants and the methods used to detect them, including the false narrative about ‘immune escape’; see my Feb. 3, 2021, Feb. 11, March 16, May 24 and Oct. 24 pieces.

“And as I wrote in that March 16 article (about Geert Vanden Bossche): ‘We … need to stop production and use of antivirals and antibodies and all other parts of the Covid-industrial complex. Covid has an extremely high survival rate. So why develop yet another expensive, invasive and experimental solution to a problem that barely exists, if it does at all?‘”

Since then, there’s been a flood of papers, articles and news releases on Omicron. Researchers are working feverishly to characterize the latest ‘new variant,’ and create and test therapies for it.

You can find their prodigious science-paper output by looking here — https://www.medrxiv.org/search/b.1.1.529 — here — https://www.biorxiv.org/search/b.1.1.529 – and here – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=b.1.1.529&sort=date.

Yet to the best of my knowledge none of the scientists who have been studying the novel coronavirus has even attempted to show directly whether there is any transmission at all, never mind any reinfection. To study transmission or reinfection they’d need, just for starters, to do a genotype of the virus harboured in one person, then genotype the virus in people who have frequent close contact with the first person and see if those genotypes match extremely closely.

And that assumes the virus exists at all. This is how Jon Rappaport succinctly sums up the need to write articles (such as this one) as if it’s clear the virus exists, in his blog entry today:

“I frequently put on my hazmat suit and enter the crazy world where all ‘the experts’ claim the virus is real. I make these forays to show that, even within their fantasy bubble, and by their own standards, the pros are fatally contradicting themselves and lying constantly.”

Here’s a dip into the first Omicron paper that made the news everywhere.

It was posted on Dec. 1 in medRχiv — and spawned a thousand scary-sounding headlines such as ‘Omicron Covid variant three times more likely to cause reinfection than Delta, S. African study says.’

In fact it’s a South African-Canadian version of the ‘Modelling Paper Mafiosi’ – my name for the English clique that kicked off the new-variant parade back in January of this year.

Here are just five of the many unsupported assumptions and leaps of logic in the Dec. 1, 2021, Omicron paper:
  1. Introduction – 1st paragraph – page 5 – “While the proportion of positive PCR tests with S-gene target failure (SGTF) associated with Omicron has subsequently increased in most provinces …”

There’s no mention of the fact that the first variant that came on the scene – B.1.1.7, subsequently dubbed Beta – also apparently is detected via this same SGTF (I cover this in my Feb. 3, 2021, article-video combination titled, ‘Is it True that the New Variants are Very Dangerous?’).  So how do they know whether it’s Beta, Omicron, something else — or nothing at all? It just doesn’t add up!

  1. Introduction – 3rd paragraph – page 5: “Many of the mutations [that they purportedly found in the Omicron gene coding for the spike protein (added Dec. 18 – I noticed that I’d dropped a few of these words in parentheses out of the article by mistake before posting it)] are either known or predicted to contribute to escape from neutralizing antibodies.”  See the information/articles above that I cited in my Bridle article showing this is false. (And unfortunately parroted by many other leaders in the Covid-sceptic ranks, for example Robert Malone, and Mark Trozzi in his blog post today, leaning on the highly dubious claims of the now-omnipresent Vanden Bossche: https://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/08/the-omicron-variant/.  I’ll soon write an in-depth article about all this.)
  1. Methods – Data sources – first paragraph – page 6:”All positive tests conducted in South Africa appear in the combined data set, regardless of the reason for testing or type of test (PCR or antigen detection), and include the large number of positive tests that were retrospectively added to the data set on 23 November 2021 (11).“They’re mixing together different tests and test results. They’re also assuming that all the positive PCR test results were true positives — they don’t mention the extremely high false-positive rate of the PCR test.
  1. Methods – Data sources – third paragraph – page 7: “If the time between sequential positive tests was at least 90 days, the more recent positive test was considered to indicate a suspected new infection. We present a descriptive analysis of suspected third and fourth infections, although only suspected second infections (which we refer to as ‘reinfections’) were considered in the analyses of temporal trends.”

Wow – where do I start? They don’t supply any clinical evidence that there is any reinfection at all.

Their attitude seems to be, ‘No proof? No problem!”

  1. The key Methods subsection, titled ‘Statistical analysis of reinfection trends,’ is littered with clues that this paper was designed to arrive at pre-determined conclusions.

Here’s how it starts – page 8 (with some of the clue words bolded by me): ‘First, we constructed a simple null model based on the assumption that the reinfection hazard experienced by previously diagnosed individuals is proportional to the incidence of detected cases and fit this model to the pattern of reinfections observed before the emergence of the Beta variant (through 30 September 2020). The null model assumes no change in the reinfection hazard coefficient through time. We then compared observed reinfections after September 2020 to expected reinfections under the null model.”

And it spirals downhill from there into even more disassociation from reality.

You can bet that the other papers published on Omicron amplify and embellish these leaps without offering a shred of solid clinical evidence to support them.

Yet tens of millions of people’s lives have been negatively effected by the rapid-fire restrictions imposed, such as travel bans.

And we’re being told, of course, that more treatments, such as having a booster shot of a vaxx, will take care of the Mighty Omicron.

It seems unfortunately I was correct in almost all of the predictions in my April 2020 article, ‘The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism.

For example, in Step 7 as soon as the first cycle of the new virus and accompanying roll-out of antivirals and vaxxes is done, another starts. And in response “They rapidly roll out virus and antibody testing again, while companies sell billions more doses of antivirals and booster vaccines.”

I wager that my analysis of Omicron is right too.

I challenge anybody to prove me wrong. Dinner and beer are on me if they do.

 

Connect with Rosemary Frei

cover image credit: Alexandra_Koch / pixabay



‘We’re Approaching a Million Vaccine Injuries in the U.S.’

‘We’re Approaching a Million Vaccine Injuries in the U.S.’

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
December 6, 2021

 



Noted Cardiologist, Peter McCullough, returns to The Highwire to discuss new data on the dangerous side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine on the heart.

 

Connect with The HighWire



World’s First Vaccine Murder Case Against Bill Gates

World’s First Vaccine Murder Case Against Bill Gates

by Patricia Harrity, The Daily Exposé
December 4, 2021

 

The world’s first vaccine murder case has been filed in India’s High Court against Bill Gates, as the AstraZeneca’s (Covishield) manufacturer and his partner Adar Poonawalla, who is the chief executive officer of a biopharmaceutical company, Serum Institute of India, and other Government officials and leaders involved in what they state is the murder of a 23-year-old man, Mr. Hitesh Kadve, who died as a result of the AstraZeneca vaccination.

Mr. Kadve had taken the vaccine due to the restrictions set by the railways that only double vaccinated individuals were able to travel and the belief that the vaccine is completely safe, now as a result of another death finally being reported as an adverse reaction, his mother has sought justice.

India’s Adverse Event Following Immunisation

The Government of India’s Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) Committee recently admitted that the death of 33-year-old Dr. SnehalL Lunawat was due to side effects of the AstraZeneca Covishield: vaccine, which is India’s most widely used vaccine.

The family of Dr. Snehal Lunawat had approached the World Health Organisation (WHO) to intervene due to the death not being reported by the Indian Officials as an adverse event. The family was then to follow up with the ministry and Serum Institute of India who had manufactured the vaccine but still did not receive a satisfactory response.

Despite the India Drugs Network (AIDN) helping the Lunawat family in successfully reporting the case as an AEFI, it was to take close to seven months after Dr. Lunawat’s death for the AEFI to accept that she had died due to a blood clot from the Covishield vaccine (Source).

The report to the AEFI has raised awareness and the court case may now be the first of many as a result.

The information in this article can be found on the website for the Indian Bar Association (here)

Unlawful Promotion of Prescription Drugs

The Indian Bar Association point out previous underhand behaviour of Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK), stating that the company is guilty of unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices.

Additionally, they state that the United States alleges that GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents. GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of doctors and paid for the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended.

Missing Data

Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes drug. The missing information included data regarding certain post-marketing studies, as well as data regarding two studies undertaken in response to European regulators’ concerns about the cardiovascular safety of Avandia. Since 2007, the FDA has added two black box warnings to the Avandia label to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1) congestive heart failure, and (2) myocardial infarction (heart attack).

The Indian Bar Association cited two cases that went before the American Court regarding the side effects of previous MR vaccine in one case, the Court accepted the settlement of compensation of 101 Million US Dollars to the victim.

Also, in another case in America, the CIA, FDA’s office of criminal investigation, recovered around 10.2 Billion US Dollar from Pharma Company GlaxoSmithKline for various offences including suppression of side effects of the medicines and putting the lives of Americans in danger.

Paid Kickbacks

It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent, and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programmes.

Vaccination by Deception is a Criminal Wrong

The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO, makes it clear that before giving a vaccine or any treatment to a person, he should be informed about the side effects of the medicine and also about the alternate remedies available.

If any person is vaccinated by suppressing the facts or by telling a lie that the said vaccines are completely safe, amount to the consent being obtained under deception. In India, vaccination under deception or by force/coercion, or by putting certain stifling conditions is a civil and criminal wrong.

From the Indian Bar Association (source)

The Petitioner raised previous alleged criminal antecedents of Bill Gates which is a “strong proof against Bill Gates and his vaccine syndicate”.

The Indian Bar Association has said therefore that Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, are “accused of their involvement in the conspiracy.” In India, the person allowing the false marketing of his product is also held to be guilty due to his act of commission and omission and that both Gates and Poonawalla are guilty of mass murders (here)   The case is thought to be heard soon, regardless of the outcome, it will, at last, raise the much-needed awareness of both the adverse reactions caused by the vaccinations and the alleged criminal behaviour of the manufacturers and Bill Gates.

 

Connect with The Daily Exposé



Pfizer’s Unconscionable Crimes, Past and Present

Pfizer’s Unconscionable Crimes, Past and Present

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 4, 2021

 



STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • In a November 9, 2021, interview with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe, Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla claimed “a small part of professionals” intentionally circulate “misinformation … so that they will mislead those that have concerns.” Such medical professionals are not just bad people, Bourla said, “they’re criminals, because they have literally cost millions of lives”
  • The criminals’ playbook includes the dictum to always blame the other side for what they themselves are guilty of
  • Pfizer has a long history of criminal activity. The company has been sued in multiple venues over unethical drug testing, illegal marketing practices, bribery in multiple countries, environmental violations — including illegal dumping of PCBs and other toxic waste — labor and worker safety violations and more. It’s also been criticized for price gouging that threatens the lives of patients with chronic diseases such as epilepsy
  • Between 2002 and 2010, Pfizer was fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards, including a $2.3 billion fine in 2009, the then-largest health care fraud fine in American history. In 2011, Pfizer paid $14.5 million to settle charges of illegal marketing, and in 2014 they settled charges relating to unlawful marketing of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million. None of it deterred future bad behavior
  • According to a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, data were falsified, patients were unblinded and follow-up on reported side effects lagged way behind

 

In a November 9, 2021, interview with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe,1 Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla claimed “a small part of professionals” intentionally circulate “misinformation … so that they will mislead those that have concerns.”2

Such medical professionals, Bourla said, are not just bad people, “they’re criminals, because they have literally cost millions of lives.” Bourla is one to talk, being the CEO of a company the name of which is synonymous with corporate crime.

Bourla’s comments were made on the same day Pfizer and its partner BioNTech asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to broaden its authorization for booster shots to everyone over the age of 18.3

Pot Calling the Kettle Black

I guess we can’t be too surprised, though, as the primary defense strategy people like Bourla have is to blame the opposition for their own misdeeds. He even claims the company is being targeted by “dark organizations,” meaning organizations that aren’t transparent about their funding.

This is precisely what the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is, the fabrications4 of which are being used to prop up the official narrative that those who present evidence showing the COVID shots are dangerous are domestic terrorists5 out to worsen the pandemic death toll.

No one knows who funds this group, but it has plenty of connections to war hawks and Great Reset promoters — including the Atlantic Council, to which Bourla is making these statements.

By way of its board members, the CCDH can be linked to the Trilateral Commission, the Atlantic Council, the European Council of Foreign Relations, Save the Children Fund (funded by the Gates Foundation and a partner of Gates’ GAVI Vaccine Alliance), the British Parliament, CIA and Event 201,6,7 Microsoft,8 and the Center for American Progress9 (another organization funded by dark money10).

And Bourla wants us to believe Pfizer is under attack from dark money groups? Again, the playbook of these wolves includes the dictum to always blame the other side for what they themselves are guilty of.

More on the Atlantic Council

In August 2018, Facebook claimed an “influence campaign” by Russian “bad actors” had been carried out on its platform leading up to the 2018 midterm elections. However, it turned out these pages weren’t identified by Facebook. They came primarily from the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab.

In her article, “Hysteria Over Newly Revealed Facebook ‘Influence Campaign’ Doesn’t Fit the Facts,”11 investigative reporter Whitney Webb took a deep-dive into this inane propaganda effort, pointing out that:

“… despite the lawmakers’ claims, Facebook has established no links to the Russian government or even Russian nationals.

The only ‘evidence’ to back up the claim of Russian-involvement is that one of the pages identified ‘had an IRA [Internet Research Agency, a Russian ‘troll farm’ named in a Mueller-probe indictment] account as one of its admins for ‘only seven minutes’ and ‘one of the IRA accounts we disabled in 2017 shared a Facebook Event hosted by’ one of the pages.

Beyond the fact that accusations of Russian involvement are highly politicized given the lack of current evidence, there is hardly any indication that this ‘influence campaign’ was even influential at all.

Indeed, most of the ‘bad actor’ pages and accounts had hardly any followers, with most of them having no followers. For instance, only four of the 32 total social-media pages and accounts had more than 10 followers, with all other pages — i.e., the remaining 28 — having between 10 and zero, according to Facebook’s statements.

All of the Instagram accounts identified had zero followers and, among those seven accounts, only one of them had made a single post on the platform. By Facebook’s own admission, only four of the pages named were even remotely significant in terms of followers and thus ‘influence.’”

Why do I mention this? Because this is the same tactic used to frame a small number of individuals with limited social media reach as domestic terrorists, simply for sharing counter-narratives about the COVID pandemic.

False Allegations Used to Quench Freedom of Speech

According to the CCDH,12 a dozen individuals, including me, were responsible for 65% of all anti-vaccine content on social media and should therefore be banned from all platforms. Most social media companies have since complied, deplatforming most of us. This despite a public denouncement of the CCDH’s accusations by Monika Bickert, vice president of Facebook content policy, who stated that:13

“… these 12 people are responsible for about just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true or false, as well as URLs associated with these people.

The report14 upon which the faulty narrative is based analyzed only a narrow set of 483 pieces of content over six weeks from only 30 groups, some of which are as small as 2,500 users.

They are in no way representative of the hundreds of millions of posts that people have shared about COVID-19 vaccines in the past months on Facebook.

Further, there is no explanation for how the organization behind the report identified the content they describe as ‘anti-vax’ or how they chose the 30 groups they included in their analysis. There is no justification for their claim that their data constitute a ‘representative sample’ of the content shared across our apps.”

Information Warfare

Getting back to the Atlantic Council, Webb noted that:15

“Facebook officially partnered with the Atlantic Council this past May in order to tackle so-called ‘fake news,’ adding that the hawkish think-tank would serve as its ‘eyes and ears’ in identifying alleged foreign-influence operations …

The Atlantic Council itself is led by a mix of retired military officers, former politicians, and Western business elites. And the think-tank’s financial sponsors include top U.S. defense contractors; agencies aligned with Washington and the Pentagon; the United Arab Emirates; major transnational corporations; and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

One can think of several reasons why such a group would be interested in fomenting anti-Russian hysteria … The Atlantic Council’s conflicts of interest are certainly worth keeping in mind …”

The same must be said about the CCDH, and Pfizer too. Both are glaringly biased and in no position to judge what is misinformation and what isn’t. But then, this is war, after all. We’re in an information war, and the term “misinformation” is lobbed in lieu of grenades. Discernment and some basic wisdom is required to avoid becoming a victim.

Fact checking organizations are another weapon designed and deployed to control the narrative. They exist as gatekeepers to funnel readers and viewers to the official narrative and away from anything that might raise inconvenient questions. The largest and most influential fact checker is NewsGuard, which hands out “trustworthiness” ratings to websites.

NewsGuard cofounder Louis Crovitz is a member of the Council on Foreign relations — another Great Reset supporter — and primary advisers include Tom Ridge, former secretary of Homeland Security, and Ret. Gen. Michael Hayden, a former director of both the CIA and NSA.16

Knowing that, it makes it easier to understand how everyday people who share information that veers from the official narrative can be labeled and treated as a national security threat.

The COVID pandemic is a militarized operation. We’re at war, and the designated enemy (looking at it from the side that started this war without telling anyone) are the citizens of the world who want to hold on to their freedom and human rights.

Pfizer Has a Long History of Criminal Behavior

Pfizer is on the other side — the side that is seeking to install an unelected technocratic regime based on the idea that we need a global biosecurity, biosurveillance apparatus or we’ll all die.

This is not a new position for them. During the American Civil War, which began in 1862, the need for massive amounts of painkillers and antiseptics allowed Pfizer to flourish and expand during wartime.17 Today, the manufactured “need” for COVID-19 vaccine is allowing Pfizer to make out like a bandit yet again, and as I’ve already stated, we are again at war, albeit an undeclared one.

To achieve that, Pfizer is willing to “blackmail” countries into accepting its COVID shot terms, as reviewed in the Gravitas report above — terms that make sure Pfizer always comes out on top.

A key term is no liability, which is understandable considering the amount of harm Pfizer’s COVID jab is causing. Pfizer went so far as to bully nations into putting up sovereign assets like military bases as collateral to pay for any vaccine injury lawsuits that might result from their COVID jab.

While that might not be illegal, it’s unethical, and so is researching on people without informed consent. Everyone who gets these emergency use authorized injections are part of that research, while simultaneously being prevented from seeing anything but propaganda.

Without truthful and transparent disclosure of both risks and benefits, there is no informed consent. Pfizer is even experimenting on children and pregnant women without informed consent, two categories that historically have been off-limits for drug experimentation.

Whistleblower Claims Data Were Falsified

According to a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, data were falsified and patients were unblinded. Follow-up on reported side effects also lagged behind.18 This isn’t the first time such unsavory have been levied against Pfizer.

In 2014, Pfizer was ordered to pay $75 million to settle charges relating to its unlawful testing of a new broad spectrum antibiotic on critically ill Nigerian children. As reported by the Independent19 at the time, Pfizer sent a team of doctors into Nigeria in the midst of a meningitis epidemic.

For two weeks, the team set up right next to a medical station run by Doctors Without Borders and began dispensing the experimental drug, Trovan. Of the 200 children picked, half got the experimental drug and the other half the already licensed antibiotic Rocephin.

Eleven of the children treated by the Pfizer team died, and many others suffered side effects such as brain damage and organ failure. Pfizer denied wrongdoing. According to the company, only five of the children given Trovan died, compared to six who received Rocephin, so their drug was not to blame.

The problem was they never told the parents that their children were being given an experimental drug, let alone ask them if they wanted their child to take part in the trial.

What’s more, while Pfizer produced a permission letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, the letter turned out to have been backdated. The ethics committee itself wasn’t set up until a year after the trial had already taken place.

State Department cables also revealed Pfizer hired spies with a plan to frame a Nigerian attorney general and get him to drop the parents’ lawsuit.20 Pfizer even tried to avoid responsibility by falsely accusing Doctors Without Borders of dispensing the experimental drug.21

An ‘Habitual Offender’

In his 2010 paper,22 “Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR,” Robert G. Evans, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor at Vancouver School of Economics, described Pfizer as “a ‘habitual offender,’ persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.”

Pfizer has been sued in multiple venues over unethical drug testing, illegal marketing practices,23 bribery in multiple countries,24 environmental violations — including illegal dumping of PCBs and other toxic waste25 — labor and worker safety violations and more.26,27,28 It’s also been criticized for price gouging that threatens the lives of patients with chronic diseases such as epilepsy.29

Between 2002 and 2010 alone, Pfizer and its subsidiaries were fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. This included $2.3 billion for the illegal marketing of the arthritis drug, Bextra, levied in 2009.30,31 It was the largest health care fraud settlement in American history.

According to the Global Justice report, “The Horrible History of Big Pharma: Why We Can’t Leave Pharmaceutical Corporations in the Driving Seat of the COVID-19 Response:”32

“A whistleblower claimed that sales staff were incentivized to sell Bextra to doctors for conditions for which the drug wasn’t approved and at doses up to eight times those recommended. ‘At Pfizer I was expected to increase profits at all costs, even when sales meant endangering lives. I couldn’t do that,’ he stated.”

In 2011, Pfizer agreed to pay another $14.5 million to settle federal charges of illegal marketing,33 and in 2014 they settled federal charges relating to improper marketing of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million.34

None of those legal actions deterred future bad behavior. To Pfizer, paying fines to sweep illegalities under the rug has become part of the cost of doing business, and they can afford it. While the fines may sound extraordinary, they’re tiny when compared to the company’s profits.

Pfizer was among the top 30 most profitable companies in the world in 2020, with profits reaching $16 billion, and its COVID jab alone is predicted to make $13 billion in 2021.35

As noted by the law firm Matthews and Associates, “the history of Pfizer is rife with so much subterfuge and under-the-table dealing that the company will need all the help it can get to promote confidence in its hastily assembled COVID vaccine.”36 The key strategy to boost confidence, unfortunately, is censorship.

What ‘New Way of Life’ Is Pfizer Promising?

The fastest way to get back to normal, Bourla claims in his Atlantic Council interview, is for everyone to get vaccinated. Considering how little things have changed despite massive vaccination rates, it seems clear the globalists in charge of The Great Reset — and Pfizer is part of that pack — have no intention of allowing anything go back to normal. It won’t matter how many comply, or how many times we comply

Australia is perhaps the clearest illustration of what the whole world will face. Even though a majority are “vaccinated,” their freedoms have not been returned, and now they have to submit to boosters or lose what semblance of freedom the initial round of shots gave them. The Australian government is confiscating and blocking people’s bank accounts, withholding unemployment benefits and more — all in the name of “public health.”

Bourla even indicates that there is no going back to the old normal when he states, “The only thing that stands between the new way of life and the current way of life is … hesitancy to vaccinations.”

New way of life. What does this “new way of life” look like? It looks like Australia. It looks like Israel. It looks like Lithuania,37 where your “right” to frequent restaurants, stores, shopping malls, beauty salons, libraries, banks, insurance agencies and universities, and your “right” to inpatient medical care and travel, all depend on your willingness to participate in a medical experiment that can kill or disable you.

The “new way of life” Bourla is talking about involves repeatedly playing lethal Russian Roulette just to “earn” the right to be part of society. No thank you. Bourla can keep his “new way of life.”

 

Connect with Dr. Joseph Mercola

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay



5-Year-Old Died 4 Days After Pfizer Shot, CDC VAERS Data Show

5-Year-Old Died 4 Days After Pfizer Shot, CDC VAERS Data Show
VAERS data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 927,740 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 19,532 deaths and 146,720 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021.

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
December 3, 2021

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention today released new data showing a total of 927,740 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 19,532 reports of deaths — an increase of 283 over the previous week — and 146,720 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 3,325 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 672,373 adverse events, including 8,986 deaths and 57,143 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 8,986 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 26, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 26% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 454 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 24. This includes 264 million doses of Pfizer, 173 million doses of Moderna and 16 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021 for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

The second death (VAERS I.D. 1890705) occurred in a 5-year-old girl who died four days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.

  • 1,581 adverse events have been reported in the 5 to 11 age group since Nov. 1.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021 for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

The most recent death involves a 16-year-old girl from Georgia (VAERS I.D. 1865389) who died reportedly from a heart condition and multi-organ failure two days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

  • 60 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
    attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 563 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 553 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 139 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
Athletes experience devastating injuries following COVID vaccines

As The Defender reported Dec. 2, several high-performing professional athletes are facing the end of their careers after COVID vaccines destroyed their health.

Florian Dagoury, a world record-holder in static breath-hold freediving, who once held his breath for a shocking 10 minutes and 30 seconds, was diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Dagoury said he now struggles to reach an 8-minute breath-hold, feels an urge to breathe doing 40-minute dives, can’t keep his heart rate low and experienced a 30% decrease in his diving performance.

Veteran triathlete Antoine Méchin, 32, is also facing the potential end to his career after experiencing a pulmonary embolism after receiving Moderna’s COVID vaccine.

The symptoms, which included breathing problems and arm pain, started after the first dose, but doctors brushed off his shortness of breath as related to stress and fatigue.

Jeremy Chardy, a 34-year old professional tennis player ranked 73rd in the world, suspended his season due to a severe adverse reaction to a COVID vaccine, which left him unable to engage in intense activity.

Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Warner’s reaction was so severe that, as of October, he was still spending days in bed, overwhelmed by too much mental or physical exertion.

Two professional soccer players collapse during games

A professional soccer player collapsed suddenly on Nov. 25, during a Real Madrid’s Champions League game with Sheriff Tiraspol, a Moldovan soccer club, ZeroHedge reported.

Adama Traore, 26, a winger for Sherriff Tiraspol, was seen clutching his chest as he slumped to the ground in the middle of the game as medics rushed to revive him. The reasons behind Traore’s collapse and why he was suffering from chest pains have not been confirmed.

​​Traore’s collapse occurred the night after another player, Sheffield United’s John Fleck, went down during a match against Reading. Fleck was taken off on a stretcher after receiving lengthy treatment.

When a radio pundit questioned whether Fleck had received the COVID vaccine, his live feed to the show was cut.

A major German newspaper, Berliner Zeitung, recently published a report attempting to answer why an “unusually large number of professional and amateur soccer players have collapsed recently.”

The article listed many recent cases of players who experienced heart problems or collapsed on the field — in some cases resulting in death.

Pfizer seeks authorization for boosters shots for 16- and 17-year-olds

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said in a tweet on Tuesday the pharma giant, along with BioNTech, formally asked the FDA to authorize COVID booster doses for 16- and 17-year olds.

If approved, the shot would be the first booster available to people under 18.

The FDA could approve Pfizer’s booster doses for 16- and 17-year olds as soon as next week, according to people familiar with the matter.

COVID vaccines may be associated with heightened risk of myopericarditis among men

To help determine whether a correlation exists between COVID vaccines and myopericarditis, researchers tracked data from more than 268,000 adults in Massachusetts who received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine between August 2020 and May 2021.

The researchers compared the data to a control group made up of 235,000 of the same patients — from 2018 and 2019, well before they had received any doses of a COVID vaccine.

In a study published in the American Journal of Cardiology, the researchers found the age-adjusted incidence rate of myopericarditis in men was higher in the vaccinated than the control population, while the incidence rate of myopericarditis in women was the same between the vaccinated and control populations.

They also found an increased incidence of myocardial injury in both men and women in 2021 compared to 2019, although they suggested some of the apparent increase in the diagnosis of myopericarditis after vaccination may be attributable to factors unrelated to the COVID vaccines.

Moderna CEO says Omicron COVID booster could be ready by March

Moderna President Stephen Hoge said Wednesday boosters of its COVID vaccine targeting the Omicron variant could be ready for U.S. authorization as early as March.

Moderna is also developing a multivalent vaccine targeting Omicron and three other COVID variants, although the shot will not be available for several more months, Forbes reported.

March is the earliest date an Omicron booster could be approved under current FDA guidelines, though the company can start manufacturing the vaccine during testing.

Hoge said he thinks existing vaccines “will be able to slow down, if not completely stop, the Omicron variant.”

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

 

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: KitzD66 / pixabay



Fauci’s Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past

Fauci’s Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
December 3, 2021

 



Original video available at Reese Report Rumble and Banned.video

 

Connect with Greg Reese

 

Transcript provided by Truth Comes to Light

 

The reception of Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s book,”The Real Anthony Fauci”, is clear evidence of a mass awakening.
The people are waking up to see Fauci for what he is — an absolute psychopath.
We’ve learned of how he directed experiments at the NIAID in which beagles had their vocal cords removed and their heads enclosed in cages where sand fleas ate them alive.

 

 

And we’ve learned of how he fraudulently used PCR tests to illegitimately push a known deadly drug upon tens of thousands of people.
And many are now learning that in 1992 under the direction of Anthony Fauci the NIAID funded drug trials on HIV positive children, although many of the children were healthy and asymptomatic. They had merely tested positive via faulty PCR tests administered through New York’s Child Welfare Department, who then handed them over to the deadly experiments.
Most of the drugs being tested on the children were already known to cause deformities, organ failure, brain damage and other lethal side effects.
And yet the children were required to continue with the drugs regardless of negative side effects.

 

 

Those administering the drugs were explicitly told that all adverse side effects they witnessed in the children were being caused by the HIV infection and not the drugs.
When parents refused to consent to these barbaric trials children services took their kids and placed them with foster families for children’s homes where participation in the trial would be assured.
When the children resisted the deadly drugs, they were brought to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital where plastic tubes were surgically inserted into their stomachs and the deadly drugs they were trying to escape we’re pumped directly into their bodies.
Once the children died, their bodies were added to a mass grave in Hawthorne, New York — a large pit with astroturf thrown over it.

 

image credit: Anthony22, Wikimedia Commons

To get around the Nuremberg Code and other laws the state of New York created a special review board comprised of the hospital stakeholders.
May one wonder, other than torturing and killing innocent children, what were they trying to accomplish?
They already knew of the negative side effects that these drugs are having on adults. But the more we learn about Anthony Fauci, the more we realize that he is an absolute psychopath.
And it doesn’t matter why psychopaths do what they do. Fauci and his criminal cohorts belong in cages at the very least.
Anthon Fauci is just one old crook in a mass of conspiracy that is aggressively pushing to inject everyone’s children with the new deadly and debilitating mRNA experimental jabs. Whether you like it or not.
Going after Fauci is a drop in the bucket but at least it’s a start.

 

 See related articles:

‘Guinea Pig Kids’: Fauci’s Legacy of Cruel Experiments on Kids
Beyond #BeagleGate: Fauci’s Long History of Atrocities, Including Torturing Children
Fauci, Dead Orphans, AIDS Drug Trials, and the Lies
“Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde” – RFK, Jr. in Conversation With James Corbett: “There’s an Entire Coalition of Sinister Forces… Which Are All Wrapped Up in This Obliteration of Constitutional Rights…”
The Real Anthony Fauci
My New Book — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

 



As Australians Seek Compensation for Vaccine Injuries Under New Plan, Here’s a Look at COVID Vaccine Liability Laws Around the World

As Australians Seek Compensation for Vaccine Injuries Under New Plan, Here’s a Look at COVID Vaccine Liability Laws Around the World
More than 10,000 Australians so far requested compensation for COVID vaccine injuries under the country’s vaccine injury compensation scheme. What types of compensation programs exist in other countries?

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., The Defender
December 2, 2021

 

Recent reports from Australia indicate more than 10,000 Australians are requesting compensation for vaccine injuries that they received following inoculation with the COVID-19 vaccine.

The claims come as part of an Australian government program allowing individuals to be compensated for lost income after being hospitalized for “rare but significant” side effects resulting from the vaccination.

As originally conceived, compensation through the program was available to people who incurred A$5,000 or more in vaccine injury-related medical costs. However, the government enacted a reduction in the compensation threshold, permitting claims for the cost of vaccine injuries beginning at A$1,000.

The 10,000-plus compensation claims were submitted as almost 79,000 adverse side effects after COVID vaccines were reported to the country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, as of mid-November.

No-fault vaccine liability: what is it?

Australia’s vaccine injury compensation program is an example of a “no-fault compensation program.”

This refers to a measure put in place by public health authorities, private insurance companies, manufacturers, and/or other stakeholders to compensate individuals harmed by vaccines. Such programs allow a person who has sustained a vaccine injury to be compensated financially, without having to attribute fault or error to a specific manufacturer or individual.

No-fault compensation schemes are one of three options used by various countries to handle vaccine injury claims.

The other two options include allowing vaccine-injured people to sue private-sector actors, such as vaccine manufacturers or their insurers, or to place the full financial burden on the patient.

Australia’s no-fault compensation program is fairly new. It was launched in August 2021, despite longstanding calls for the development of such a scheme well before COVID.

A 2020 study found 25 countries with a no-fault program in place, with 15 of these programs administered at the government level.

In some countries, such programs are administered at the provincial level or at multiple levels of government, while two countries (Sweden and Finland) were identified by the study as having no-fault programs fully administered by the insurance sector.

The exact nature of such no-fault schemes, however, can differ significantly from one country to another. As explained in the 2020 study:

  • In Sweden and Finland, pharmaceutical companies who market their products in these jurisdictions provide insurance contributions which fund those countries’ no-fault programs.
  • Similarly, Norway’s no-fault program is funded by a special insurance organization known as the Drug Liability Association.
  • Latvia’s Treatment Risk Fund is funded through contributions from medical institutions, acting as professional indemnity insurance.
  • In China and South Korea, there are two separate programs, covering those vaccines in each country’s national immunization program (NIP) and those not included in the respective country’s NIP. Each government funds injury claims for NIP vaccines, while pharmaceutical companies or those holding a drug’s market authorization are responsible for funding injury claims regarding non-NIP vaccines.
  • The U.S. no-fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is funded by a flat-rate tax of 75 cents for each disease covered in each vaccine dose.
  • New Zealand has set up an Accident Compensation Corporation, which acts as a general compensation fund for accidents stemming from vaccinations, and treatment injuries. The program is funded through general tax contributions and levies on employee wages, businesses, vehicle licenses and fuel sales.

Not all no-fault programs compensate for injuries arising from all vaccines. For instance, according to the 2020 study:

  • Only five (Japan, France, Italy, Hungary, and Slovenia) of the 23 programs specifically examined by the study covered injuries arising from mandatory vaccines or vaccines recommended by law — of particular significance in a world where more and more countries are attempting to implement COVID vaccine mandates.
  • Just over half (57%) of the programs examined provide compensation for injuries arising from registered and recommended vaccines for children, pregnant women or adults and for special indication, such as occupation or travel, within the jurisdiction. This latter point is also significant in an era where many COVID vaccine mandates are being imposed on specific occupations or as a means of being “allowed” to travel.

Different no-fault programs also have differing rules with regard to when claims can be filed.

Referring again to the 2020 study, in certain countries, claims have to be filed within a certain number of years of vaccination or, in some cases, of the initial onset of vaccine injury symptoms. This ranges from 20 years (Norway), to six years (UK, for adults), to three years (U.S. and several other countries).

In some other countries, the maximum interval varies by province (China), or there is no specific deadline for filing a claim (including Sweden, Germany, New Zealand and Japan for NIP vaccines).

As seen with the example of Australia above, no-fault programs also set compensation thresholds. This is true in all no-fault countries examined by the 2020 study.

Thresholds of eligibility also exist, which may include injuries resulting in financial loss or permanent or significant injury (such as a medical disability), serious health damage or death, severe injuries surpassing normal post-vaccination reactions or other degrees of injury.

Just over half (52%) of the programs studied also provided compensation for claims regarding vaccine defects or immunization errors, while in the remaining countries, these types of claims are covered separately, through civil litigation or medical malpractice indemnity.

The 2020 study also noted that in almost all no-fault jurisdictions, such programs are non-judicial in nature and are instead administrative in scope, typically involving panels of medical experts who review each individual vaccine injury claim.

In a minority of countries, the administrative program is combined with a legal approach and the involvement of legal experts, while in Finland and Sweden, compensation decisions are made based on civil liability (tort) laws.

The standard of proof the claimant is required to demonstrate is generally similar across most no-fault programs, according to the 2020 study. These programs tend to employ a “balance of probabilities” approach that weighs whether it is “more likely than not” that the vaccination led to the injury in question.

This approach takes into consideration such factors as the time interval since vaccination, and existing medical evidence establishing a connection between the vaccine and that type of injury.

A country-by-country look

The above provides a general overview of how no-fault compensation programs work. However, it is also worth examining the specific rules in place in major countries and blocs of nations around the world.

United States:

In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, often simply referred to as the Vaccine Act. Under this act, a no-fault program for administering vaccine claims, known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established.

Through this program, any individual claiming a vaccine injury (or a parent or guardian of a child) can file a petition with the U.S.Court of Federal Claims. The petition is reviewed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which makes a preliminary recommendation.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) then prepares a legal report, which includes the medical recommendation, and submits it to the court. The court then appoints a special master, who may convene a hearing, and who decides whether the petitioner should be compensated, and if so, what the level of compensation will be.

This compensation is then disbursed to the petitioner through HHS. Petitioners may also appeal a decision that isn’t in their favor, and by rejecting the decision of the court, may then file a lawsuit in civil court against the vaccine maker and/or the healthcare provider who administered the vaccine.

VICP, however, does not encompass all vaccines. It covers vaccines that are routinely administered to children and to pregnant women, and that are subject to the previously-mentioned 75-cent excise tax.

To date, more than 8,400 VICP claims have been settled, out of more than 24,000 petitions, with a total of $4.6 billion issued in settlements.

Compensation has also been issued. However, most such settlements were reached following negotiations instead of a hearing, with no admission on the part of HHS that vaccines were ultimately responsible for the injuries in question.

A different category of vaccines, including, at present, the existing COVID-19 vaccines, are covered under what is known as the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

This program was established under the aegis of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005. The PREP act was developed to coordinate the response to a “public health emergency.” The law is scheduled to remain in place until 2024.

CICP specifically focuses on countermeasures, that is, “a vaccination, medication, device or other item recommended to diagnose, prevent or treat a declared pandemic, epidemic or security threat.”

Under CICP, a different claims process exists as compared to the VICP. The process for claimants is more cumbersome, and individuals have only one year after the administration of the vaccine to file a claim. Injuries whose symptoms materialize later in life, for instance, would presumably not be covered under this process.

Moreover, the likelihood of success, if past precedent is any indication, is slim. As previously reported by The Defender:

“The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.”

Notably, vaccines with full FDA approval but which are not placed on a vaccination schedule for children or pregnant women are subject to ordinary product liability laws, while vaccines administered under an Emergency Use Authorization are protected from legal liability.

Furthermore, a 2011 Supreme Court decision, Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, held that the Vaccine Act preempts claims made under state-designed defect laws, against vaccines covered by the Act. The decision stated that ““[The Vaccine Act] reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.”

Until the 1980s, a series of successful lawsuits against vaccine makers was seen as resulting in increasing vaccine hesitancy and declining vaccination rates, as indicated in a 1985 National Research Council publication, released just one year before the passage of the Vaccine Act.

Canada:

In recent years, Canada was the only G7 country without a nationwide no-fault vaccine injury compensation program. On a provincial level, Quebec established such a program in 1985, at which time calls for the creation of a national program followed. Attempts were made to develop a national program at this time, which ultimately failed.

As of 2018, Quebec’s program had approved a total of 43 claims, paying $5.49 million (CAD) in compensation.

In June 2021, launched a national vaccine injury compensation program, the Vaccine Injury Support Program. The program covers all provinces except Quebec, whose provincial program will continue to operate.

While this program is funded by Public Health Canada, it is administered by a private company, RCGT Consulting.

The program covers claimants who received a Health Canada-authorized vaccine (on or after Dec. 8, 2020), administered in Canada, with a resulting injury that is serious and permanent or which has resulted in death, and which was reported to the healthcare provider that administered the vaccine.

Though it wasn’t until a few months ago that Canada was able to establish a nationwide vaccine compensation program, COVID vaccine manufacturers were already, as of December 2020, indemnified against claims of vaccine injuries.

United Kingdom:

In the UK, the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) provides compensation totaling £120,000 to anyone who suffers a disability of 60% or more, as a result of their vaccination.

The percentage figure refers to a severe disability resulting in such injuries as the loss of a limb, an amputation, losing 60% or more of normal vision or severe narcolepsy.

Additionally, the 1987 Consumer Protection Act also applies to those who have sustained a vaccine injury, if is found that the product in question did not meet safety standards or was defective. This is further strengthened by the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations.

Consumer protection rights still apply for people injured by the COVID vaccine, as the government wasn’t allowed to take those away. But due to the legal definition of defects, and a rule known as the state-of-the-art defense, it is difficult to get compensation when specific problems with the vaccine are not yet known.

COVID vaccines have been added to the VDPS. However, according to the Human Medicines Regulation of 2012, protection against civil liability is provided to vaccine manufacturers for unlicensed products issued under a temporary use authorization by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.

This regulation was further amended by the Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, providing extended immunity from civil liability to vaccine makers and those administering vaccinations. However, the consumer protection laws mentioned above still apply.

Legal indemnity has also been directly provided to vaccine manufacturers in the case of the COVID-19 vaccine.

European Union:

The UK laws are based largely on EU legislation, which was codified into British law prior to Brexit.

For instance, the UK Human Medicines Regulations of 2012 and 2020 are largely based on their EU equivalent, EU Directive 2001/83/EC relating to medicinal products for human use. This includes protections against civil actions for products released under temporary or emergency authorizations.

The 1987 Consumer Protection Act in the UK is, in turn, equivalent to the EU’s Directive 85/374/ECC of 1985, on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, while the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations were harmonized with EU Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety.

At the EU level, immunity for vaccine manufacturers was not standard prior to COVID, when legal responsibility tended to lie with the companies.

This, however, is not the case with the COVID vaccines. Under pressure from Vaccines Europe, a trade organization representing vaccine manufacturers in the EU, and under the guide of “ensuring access” to vaccines, exemptions from liability were granted to companies such as AstraZeneca.

Notably, a question posed in August to the European Parliament by one of its elected representatives, Ivan Vilibor Sinčić of Croatia, regarding liability for COVID-19 vaccine side effects, remains unanswered as of this writing.

Within the EU, different member states have enacted their own legislation with regard to vaccine injury compensation claims. These programs were summarized in a 2021 study examining such policies on a global basis. They can be summarized as follows:

  • Austria: The Vaccine Damage Act is a public-law system for the payment of compensation for vaccine injuries by the state. COVID vaccines are included in this program.
  • Belgium: No vaccine compensation legislation exists.
  • France: The existing vaccine injury compensation program provides relief only for injuries related to mandatory vaccinations. Claims for injuries resulting from non-compulsory vaccinations fall under the general principles of French civil law. For COVID vaccines, claims can be lodged with the National Office for Compensation of Medical Accidents, without having to prove a defect with the vaccine or fault on the part of healthcare providers.
  • Germany: A flat-rate no-fault compensation program exists for vaccines that are mandatory or that are publicly recommended, including COVID vaccines.
  • Greece: A no-fault program doesn’t exist, but a May 2021 high court ruling held that those who sustained vaccine injuries are entitled to state compensation.
  • Italy: A no-fault program providing state compensation for injuries stemming from required or highly recommended vaccines exists, although it is unclear if this extends to COVID vaccines. Claimants are also free to pursue claims under tort law.
  • Netherlands, Portugal: There is no specific no-fault scheme, but vaccine injury claims can be filed via provisions of the civil code.
  • Sweden: An insurance fund, Swedish Pharmaceutical Insurance, handles vaccine injury claims out of court. However, new legislation which took effect Dec. 1 will provide additional state compensation for injuries arising from COVID-19 vaccinations.

Israel:

In Israel, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Law was passed in 1989, providing compensation to those injured by vaccines, without having to prove negligence.

Earlier this year, COVID-19 vaccines were included under this law.

New Zealand:

New Zealand maintains a no-fault system for accident compensation, including vaccine injuries, under the aegis of the previously-mentioned Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC).

Although most information on claims appears to be classified, financial compensation totaling $1.6 million (NZD) was provided between 2005 and 2019.

The ACC also handles claims related to COVID-19 vaccination.

China:

China’s vaccination program differentiates between mandatory and non-mandatory vaccinations, for the purposes of vaccine injury claims.

The 2019 Law on Vaccine Administration establishes a compensation system for deaths or significant injuries, such as organ or tissue damage, stemming from vaccines. Compensation is paid from the vaccination funds of the country’s provincial governments.

Draft legislation in 2020 called for mandatory liability insurance for vaccine manufacturers distributing vaccines in mainland China. However, it is unclear if this legislation was enacted.

Japan:

Until recently, Japan did not have a specific no-fault compensation program for vaccine injuries. But temporary programs where the government would provide compensation to vaccine makers for legal claims they sustained due to vaccine injuries had previously been passed in 2009, for the H1N1 vaccine, and again in 2011 until 2016.

However, a 2020 amendment to Japan’s Immunization Act now allows the government to take on the liability risks for COVID-19 vaccines.

India:

India has no specific no-fault legislation under the Drugs and Cosmetic Act for injuries stemming from vaccines that are fully licensed by the country’s regulator.

Claimants are, however, able to file claims in consumer courts or in India’s High Court, and the country’s drug regulator can also take action against vaccine manufacturers for violations of the law.

Indian law does provide for compensation in the event of injury or death following participation in clinical trials.

Notably, the Indian government’s negotiations with Pfizer fell through earlier this year when Indian regulators refused to provide it legal protection via indemnity.

Such protection was not provided to the three COVID-19 vaccines which received an emergency use authorization in India: Covishield, Covaxin and Sputnik V.

Adar Poonawalla, the head of the India-based Serum Institute, the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer, had previously called for protection from lawsuits for COVID vaccine injuries.

Malaysia and Singapore:

The country has not developed a no-fault vaccination program, unlike nearby Singapore.

Instead, a variety of legal remedies exist for claimants under civil law, including the Sales of Goods Act of 1957, the Consumer Protection Act of 1999, and the Contracts Act of 1950, and under criminal law, including the Poisons Act of 1952 and the Sale of Drugs Act of 1952.

South Africa:

South Africa is another country that did not develop a no-fault vaccine injury compensation fund until recently, but did so as a result of COVID and, apparently, pressure from vaccine manufacturers.

The fund is meant to provide compensation for “serious adverse responses” which lead to “permanent or significant injury, serious harm to a person’s health, other damage or death,” assuming these injuries were caused by vaccination.

Philippines:

Similar to South Africa, the Philippines only recently set up a no-fault indemnity program, shielding vaccine manufacturers, as well as public officials, from lawsuits, except in instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct.

This same program will also set up a state fund to provide compensation for vaccine injury claims.

Developing world:

Finally, for 92 low- and middle-income countries, the World Health Organization (WHO), along with a private company, Chubb Limited, has begun to administer a no-fault compensation program.

The countries in question are receiving COVID vaccines via the Gavi Alliance’s COVAX Advanced Market Commitment (AMC) program, with vaccine injury claims processed through the WHO’s new program, which is set to remain in effect until June 30, 2022.

No-fault schemes are increasing, but questions remain

With the recent examples of countries such as Canada and Australia, as well as South Africa and the Philippines, developing their own no-fault vaccine injury compensation funds, as well as their further extension to 92 low- and middle-income countries via the WHO, this type of compensation scheme is clearly the predominant method of dealing with financial claims stemming from vaccine injury claims.

As seen in the case of the U.S., such no-fault programs were developed to address claims of increased vaccine hesitancy, as a result of high-profile lawsuits against vaccine makers, and a decline in vaccine production from hesitant pharmaceutical companies which did not want to shoulder the legal and financial risks involved with releasing a new vaccine to the public.

What, however, goes unaddressed in such claims is the vaccine hesitancy, or outright refusals to get vaccinated, as people question why vaccine makers and, in many cases, everyone involved in distributing and administering vaccines, are shielded from legal action.

Such legal shields cast, for some people at least, a net of doubt, calling into question the safety of such vaccines if their manufacturers, distributors, and public health officials involved in their administration feel the need for legal protections. They may wonder why a product that is said to be safe requires such legal shields.

Such doubts further increase when governments and their agencies, which are essentially acting as guarantors of these vaccines through various no-fault schemes, redact critical information about these products, including their ingredients, and claims that releasing such documentation will take several decades, as the FDA did recently regarding its documents related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.

This is despite the fact that in the 2011 Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision, the U.S. Supreme Court gave considerable latitude to the FDA for, essentially, knowing better than judges and juries, or state lawmakers, how to regulate vaccines.

Despite this legal shielding, plenty of coverage of adverse reactions, and even deaths, following vaccinations is making its way into the media, and to the public consciousness, seemingly negating yet another argument in favor of indemnity.

Furthermore, as many no-fault schemes place the burden on taxpayers and government coffers, these financial costs are ultimately borne by the public.

Arguments that claim shielding vaccine makers from lawsuits also helps to keep the cost of these products down can be called into question on such grounds, especially if the government is the one making deals with vaccine manufacturers and paying for these vaccines.

Costs may be reduced in their purchase price, but the same government and same funds are then used to settle vaccine injury claims.

Such claims from vaccine makers, such as Pfizer for instance, also appear to be disingenuous when considering their high marketing budgets, which in the U.S., far exceed their research and innovation expenditures.

Arguments can be made that such funding could be redirected towards legal claims, towards reducing vaccine and drug prices, or both.

 

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: mohamed_hassan & torstensimon / pixabay

 



“The Omicron Variant” – Magic Pills, or Solving the Africa Problem?

“The Omicron Variant” – Magic Pills, or Solving the Africa Problem?

by Kit Knightly, OffGuardian
November 27, 2021

 

Yesterday [Nov 26] the WHO labelled the sars-cov-2 variant B.1.1.529 as a “variant of concern” and officially named it “Omicron”.

This was as entirely predictable as it is completely meaningless. The “variants” are just tools to stretch the story out and keep people on their toes.

If you want to know exactly how the Omicron variant is going to affect the narrative, well The Guardian has done a handy “here’s all the bullshit we’re gonna sell you over the next couple of weeks” guide:

  • The Omicron variant is more transmissable, but they don’t know if it’s more dangerous yet (keeping their options open).
  • It originated in Africa, possible mutating in an “untreated AIDS patient” (sick people are breeding grounds for dangerous “mutations”).
  • “it has more than double the mutations of Delta…scientists anticipate that the virus will be more likely to infect – or reinfect – people who have immunity to earlier variants. (undermining natural immunity, selling more boosters, keeping the scarefest going).
  • “Scientists are concerned” that current vaccines may not be as effective against the new strain, they may need to be “tweaked” (get your boosters, and the new booster we haven’t invented yet)
  • “Scientists expect that recently approved antiviral drugs, such as Merck’s pill, will work as effectively against the new variant” (more on this later)
  • It’s already spreading around the world, and travel bans may be needed to prevent the need for another lockdown

We’re already seeing preparations for more “public health measures”, with the press breathlessly quoting “concerned” public health officials. We’re being told that a new lockdown won’t be necessary…as long as we remember to get boosted and wear masks and blah blah blah.

Generally speaking, it’s all fairly boilerplate scary nonsense. Although it is quite funny that the Biden administration has already put a bunch of African nations on a travel ban list, when Biden called Trump a racist for doing the same thing in 2020.

Africa

It’s interesting that the new variant has allegedly come from Africa, perhaps “mutating in the body of an AIDS patient”, since Africa has been the biggest hole in the Covid narrative for well over a year.

Africa is by far the poorest continent, it is densely populated, malnourishment and extreme poverty are endemic across many African nations, and it is home to more AIDS patients than the entire rest of the world combined. And yet, no Covid crisis.

This is a weak point in the story, and always has been.

Last Summer, the UK’s virus modeller-in-chief Neil Ferguson attempted to explain it by arguing that African nations have, on average, younger populations than the rest of the world, and Covid is only a threat to the elderly. But five minutes of common sense debunks that idea.

The reason Africa has a younger population, on average, is that – on average – they are much sicker.

There are diseases endemic to large parts of Africa that are all but wiped out in most of the Western world. Cholera, typhus, yellow fever, tuberculosis, malaria. Access to clean water, and healthcare are also much more limited.

And while it has been nailed into the public mind that being elderly is the biggest risk factor for Covid, that is inaccurate. In fact, the biggest risk factor for dying “of Covid” is, and always has been, already dying of something else.

The truth is that any REAL dangerous respiratory virus would have cut a bloody swath across the entire continent.

Instead, as recently as last week, we were getting articles about how Africa “escaped Covid”, and the continent’s low covid deaths with only 6% of people vaccinated is “mystifying” and “baffling” scientists.

Politically, African nations have shown themselves far less likely to buy into the “pandemic” narrative than their European, Asian or American counterparts. At least two “Covid denying” African presidents – Pierre Nkurunziza of Burundi and John Magufuli of Tanzania – have died suddenly in the last year, and seen their successors immediately reverse their covid policies.

So maybe the Omicron Variant is a way of trying to fold Africa into the covid narrative that the other continents have already fully embraced. That will become clear as the story develops.

Of course, it’s also true that being “African” is media shorthand for being scary, relying on the deeply-seated xenophobia of Western audiences. See: “Africanized killer bees”.

But, either way, Africa is the long game. There’s a more obvious, and more cynical, short term agenda here.

The Magic Pills

Let’s go back to the Guardian’s “Omicron” bullet points, above:

  • Scientists are concerned by the number of mutations and the fact some of them have already been linked to an ability to evade existing [vaccine-created] immune protection.
  • Scientists expect that recently approved antiviral drugs, such as Merck’s pill, [will work effectively] against the new variant

The “new variant” is already being described as potentially resistant to the vaccines, but NOT the new anti-viral medications.

Pharmaceutical giants Merck and Pfizer are both working on “Covid pills”, which as recently as three days ago, were being hyped up in the press:

US may have a ‘game changer’ new Covid pill soon, but its success will hinge on rapid testing

In the US, an emergency use authorisation can only be issued if there is no effective medication or treatment already available, so the vaccines not being proof against Omicron would be vital to rushing the pills onto the US market, at least.

If Omicron is found to be “resistant to the vaccines”, but NOT the pills, that will give governments an excuse to rush through approving the pills on an EUA, just as they did with the vaccines.

So, you bet your ass that testing is gonna be “rapid”. Super rapid. Blink-and-you’ll-miss-it rapid. Rapid to the point you’re not even sure it definitely happened. And now they have an excuse.

Really, it’s all just more of the same.

A scare before the new year. An excuse to make people believe their Christmas could be in peril. An exercise in flexing their control muscles a bit, milking even more money out of the double-jabbed and boosted crowd, now newly terrified of the Omicron variant, and a nice holiday bump to Pfizer’s ever-inflating stock price.

At this point either you can see the pattern, or you can’t. You’re free of the fear machinery, or you’re not.

There is one potential silver lining here: It feels rushed and frantic. Discovered on Tuesday, named on Friday, travel bans on Saturday. It is hurried, and maybe that’s a reaction to feeling like the “pandemic” is losing its grip on the public mind.

Hopefully, as the narrative becomes more and more absurd, more and more people will wake up to reality.

It has been pointed out that “Omicron” is an anagram of “moronic”.

One wonders if that’s deliberate and they’re making fun of us.

 

Connect with OffGuardian

cover image based on creative commons work of 494640  / pixabay



The New African Virus Mutation: Right on Time; a Kindergarten Covert Op for the Ignorant

The New African Virus Mutation: Right on Time; a Kindergarten Covert Op for the Ignorant

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 29, 2021

 

There are no variants.

Because there is no virus. SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve spent the past year and a half proving that. [0]

But fantasies do exist. So do covert ops with intentions to deceive.

Thus, the “scientific world” is agog over the new South African variant, named B11529 (aka Omicron, Botswana). Woo. The ghost is coming out of the closet. Beware. COVID cases are rising…

“We don’t know whether the vaccine will be effective in the face of the new variant. New lockdowns may be necessary. Travel restrictions are coming. Batten down the hatches.”

I mean, really.

As you know, for the past few months stories in the press have been claiming the vaccine-conferred immunity is sinking like a stone. This story is absurd because, again, there is no virus. So there was no conferred immunity to begin with. But anyway, that’s the story that’s been circulating. So NOW…

“It turns out one major reason for the diminished effectiveness of the vaccine is…

“The NEW VARIANT. The South African B11529.”

Uh-huh. “The vaccine is having a tough time preventing infection caused by the new variant. We may need to enforce boosters every three months…”

Keep the fear going. Push harder for the vaccine. Explain away its failures. Fabricate rising case numbers, blaming them on the new variant. Institute heavy new lockdowns.

“The South African variant is deadlier than the Delta, which is deadlier than the original.”

And none of the three exists.

What does exist is fantasy, piled higher and deeper and thicker.

The variant is Fauci. The variant is Bill Gates. The variant is CDC/WHO. The variant is the World Economic Forum. And the Chinese regime. And presidents and governors. And the mainstream press.

And don’t forget this. Vaccine injuries and deaths have been escalating all over the world. In the US alone, reported injuries have broken above 600,000 [1]. As I’ve mentioned, the well-known Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare study [2] concluded that, to obtain a true number of injuries, multiply the reported figure by 100.

Something is needed to explain all these injuries and deaths. That is, to lie about them.

And right on time, here comes the new variant.

“These people who seem to be injured by the vaccine are really keeling over from the original virus, the Delta, and woo, the South African B11529.”

Also: Recently, we’ve seen a spate of press stories with the theme—“scientists are mystified by the low COVID case numbers in Africa, where the vaccination rates are very low.” [3] Boom. That story is now gone. Wiped out. Now it’s THE WORLD IS BEING ATTACKED BY THE SOUTH AFRICAN B111529 VARIANT.

Here is one of my articles covering the non-existence of SARS-CoV-2:

—Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists—

The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”

But what if the virus doesn’t exist?

People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.

“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”

I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [4], and he provided his analysis in detail.

I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [5].

First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.

The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.

They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.

There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.

Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”

Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:

STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”

KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”

STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”

KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”

STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”

KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”

STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”

KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”

KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [6]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”

STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”

STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”

KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”

STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”

KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”

—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—

My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.

Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.

And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?

Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [7]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?

The answer is no.

—end of Kaufman article—

And while I’m at it, here is another piece I wrote last year about how virus-propaganda (fairy tales) must be managed, in order to make the masses stand up and salute:

—The “hot zone” theory of new frightening diseases—

Remember? There was a 1994 book by that name— and then “experts” began piling on—it went something like this:

“Out of the deep dark rainforests of Earth (cue sounds of native drumming), as a result of modern plane travel, viruses we’ve never encountered before will spread epidemics across the globe. Our immune systems, ill-equipped to recognize or deal with these strange killer germs, will fold up under the pressure, and all of civilization will be threatened with extinction.”

Let’s see. Since planes fly back and forth, and since all sorts of Westerners travel TO the rainforests, why haven’t we seen whole native tribes wiped out by viruses from the deep dark streets of Brooklyn?

It would even seem that viruses, common in, say, Norway, would cause trouble in Oregon.

Why does it have to be “viruses from jungles?” Or other faraway places like China? Why can’t we have the Second City Virus, emanating from a slaughterhouse in Chicago and infecting people in Nigeria? Why can’t we have a Big Easy virus from New Orleans traveling to Beijing?

Is it possible that jungles and Africa and China and Mexico are typically chosen for virus fairy tales because, in the minds of many Westerners, they satisfy a requirement of “strange,” “different,” “primitive,” and so on? We’re talking theater here—and when you stage a propaganda play (fiction), you want to tap into the reflex instincts of the audience. The Hartford Virus, the Des Moines Virus, the Vancouver Virus just don’t fit the bill.

Because they can’t drive up the fear that jungles or Africa or China can.

Unless you’ve been living in an ice cave in the Arctic, you know selling fear of THE VIRUS is big business. To do that, you have to strike the right notes.

I personally would be interested in a Beverly Hills or a Scarsdale or a Park Avenue epidemic virus story. I’d like to see the media try to sell that one.

What about a Bill Gates Seattle virus that some Patient Zero unknowingly carries on a plane flight to Mexico City?

Think it through. We NEVER hear killer virus stories about germs traveling from Europe and America to Asia and Africa. Why not? Because such a story won’t sell. It won’t bite.

This is called a clue.

It tells you that virus-stories are shaped and managed and written and managed and broadcast according to a plan that has nothing to do with actual disease.

If a monkey in Africa can bite a man and thus transmit a virus to the West, then a salesman in Duluth can sneeze on a man at a local airport and thus send a virus to Ethiopia.

But amazingly, through secret communication among viruses, it never happens that way. The germs have decided what the traffic pattern is, and the CDC and the World Health Organization are just discovering What Is.

Sure they are. And if you buy that, I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon.

SOURCES:

[0] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/virus/

[1] https://rickjaffeesq.com/2021/02/19/what-the-heck-is-the-harvard-pilgrim-study-and-did-it-really-say-that-about-the-underreporting-of-vaccine-adverse-events/

[2] https://openvaers.com/covid-data

[3] https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-science-health-pandemics-united-nations-fcf28a83c9352a67e50aa2172eb01a2f

[4] https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/

[5] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

[6] https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home.html

[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image based on African mask by Viscious-Speed



Solving the Riddle of Byram Bridle

Solving the Riddle of Byram Bridle

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
November 27, 2021

 

On Nov. 4 I posted an article with some questions about Byram Bridle.

After speaking to Bridle I took it down.

 

The vaccine developer and viral-immunology associate professor based at the University of Guelph is very popular in the Covid-questioning community.

He is a high-profile member of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance and gives many interviews. In addition, he was an expert witness in the mid-2021 Adamson Barbecue case and in the mid-November 2021 legal pursuit of an interim injunction against mandatory vaxxing of some Toronto workers.

He’s been banned from the U of Guelph campus because he’s not vaxxed. And he’s harassed by some of his colleagues and others — including people who created both an anonymously written website byrambridle.com critiquing Bridle’s claims and an accompanying Twitter account. (They’ve also linked from the website to a GitLab section on him.)

Bridle overall is a big promoter of vaxxes. He’s developing several new ones, including working on new Covid vaxxes since at least since the spring of 2020.

And he readily uses the term “anti-vaxxer” to discredit people who have very sceptical or negative views about most vaccines.

I am among the many millions of people who hold such negative views about vaxxes. That’s because there is a great deal of solid evidence showing that many vaxxes are not safe. (More about this in the ‘Continued Push’ section below.)

The only vaccines Bridle critiques are the current crop of Covid mRNA shots. He has posted several documents — such as his Nov. 12, 2021, expert report for the interim-injunction case in Toronto – and given many interviews about this.

In my Nov. 4 article I said I believed he has a conflict of interest that he doesn’t disclose to the general public with respect to his critique of the Covid mRNA jabs. I posited that Bridle is poised to potentially make a lot of profit from six of the eight US patents (and a Canadian patent that’s identical to one of those six) that I discovered he is a co-inventor of. They’re all cancer-related. [Sentence added Dec. 1 when I re-re-read the article and realized I’d omitted this.]

I hypothesized that Bridle and his colleagues could develop, based on some of their existing patents, alternative vaxxes against Covid.

I deduced the profit motive from the fact that some of Bridle’s co-inventors on the US patents are principals in a company called Turnstone Biologics (which is a sister company to the firm listed as the patents’ owners, Turnstone Limited Partnership) — and that Turnstone Biologics is working together with international giants like Takeda to commercialize their vaxx platforms via at least one huge business deal.

I also wrote that some of Bridle’s main assertions are on very weak ground. That includes his claim that the spike protein produced by the injection of the mRNA Covid shots spreads throughout the body where it becomes a “dangerous toxin” and therefore is responsible for most of the serious injuries and deaths associated with the mRNA jabs.

 

I emailed the article to Bridle after I posted it. (That was a mistake – I’ve now truly learned my lesson to never again omit the step of at least attempting to talk to or email people before posting an article about them.)

In his email response he accused me of making “egregious errors” – including “mixing up my cancer research-related patents with my COVID-19-focused research; they are entirely separate.” He wrote that his patent relating to the avian reovirus is an example of my very serious error of asserting that his cancer patents are connected to his Covid-vaxx work.

He also said my article was a “one-sided piece of libel [that] represents nothing short of harassment,” and that I was conducting a “witch hunt.” He threatened legal action.

 

I’ve never received an email like that before. It intimidated me and shook my confidence.

In his email Bridle also asked me to call him on his cell, and provided that number. So I dialed it right away.

During our ensuing hour-long conversation I was persuaded further that I’d made huge errors by his fast-paced and confidently-delivered words – which started with his saying, “I have to say you screwed up big-time on this article. You’ve got a lot of stuff – like it [the article]’s completely wrong; you’ve completely misinterpreted everything.”

I then emailed everyone I’d sent the article to, saying I’d screwed up majorly and would write a follow-up article to set the record straight. I also took the article off my website.

I did make some errors in that Nov. 4 article.

For example, Bridle told me in his Nov. 4 email and our phone call that he has a very strained relationship with the principals of Turnstone — rather than being closely involved with them with respect to patents and potential profits from them as I’d suggested in my article — because they’ve mistreated him. I believe him. (Although he also said in that same phone call that he still holds at least one patent in conjunction with Turnstone.) I reached out to Turnstone later that day for a comment but they have not yet responded. I also seem to have made the wrong deductions about the specifics of the relationship between his cancer-vaxx patents and his Covid-vaxx work.

I apologize again for my errors.

But I did not get everything wrong, by any means.

And I still have many questions about Bridle

They include:

  • Why do a very large number of vaccine sceptics embrace Bridle – who is very strongly pro-vaccine, readily uses the term ‘anti-vaxxer’ to disparage people who are sceptical about the safety and efficacy of many vaccines, and is developing new Covid vaxxes even though there’s been an extremely low death rate from Covid?
  • Why is Bridle not disclosing in his interviews and articles/documents for the general public that he’s working toward an intranasal vaxx for Covid (which carries the genetic code for the novel coronavirus’s spike protein) – and for which he has a provisional patent application dated June 3, 2021, that very likely is a spin-off of his cancer-vaxx research, and that could ostensibly solve some of the main problems associated with Covid mRNA shots? Shouldn’t he be highlighting that when he critiques the mRNA jabs?
  • Why does he use tenuous evidence to support his assertion that when the spike protein spreads throughout the body it becomes a “dangerous toxin” and therefore is responsible for most of the serious injuries and deaths caused by the mRNA vaxxes (yet when questioned about this assertion admits it is only theoretical)?

 

And as it happens, intranasal vaxxes are gaining traction rapidly. That’s in part because they’re a spray and don’t involve use of a syringe to deliver a shot/jab the arm.

Russian President Vladimir Putin took an experimental intranasal vaxx against Covid on Nov. 23, 2021, according to news reports. (I asked a Russian friend to read the Russian TASS article about this; she said the English translations are accurate.) It was an intranasal version of the Sputnik V shot. And it was given to Putin ‘off-label’ – that is, in the absence of formal approval of the vaxx. Human trials of it are just starting.

There are also many claims, such as in a Nov. 19, 2021, scientific paper Bridle co-authored, that intranasal shots can produce ‘sterilizing immunity’ and therefore curtail the problem of potential ‘vaccine escape variants.’

So I won’t be very surprised if developers and marketers of these new vaxxes soon also claim they could help curb the Nu/Omnicron variant (B.1.1.529) that’s received a great deal of attention in the last few days. B.1.1.529 already has been declared of “huge international concern” because it ostensibly has a “horrific spike[-protein-gene-mutation] profile,” spreads very fast and has the potential to evade the currently used vaxxes. Predictably there’s been panic such as long lines at airports in the very rapidly growing list of African countries subject to travel bans by other governments — along with a renewed push for more people to get vaxxed. [And just as I was ready to post this article I found out that B.1.1.529 may in fact first have surfaced in July. I may write about this in a future article.]

Yet there hasn’t been a single published scientific report, as far as I know, which would allow objective/outside verification of whether there is any real evidence to support these drastic claims and actions. And I remain very sceptical about the hype regarding all variants and the methods used to detect them, including the false narrative about ‘immune escape’; see my Feb. 3, 2021, Feb. 11, March 16, May 24 and Oct. 24 pieces.

And as I wrote in that March 16 article (about Geert Vanden Bossche): “We … need to stop production and use of antivirals and antibodies and all other parts of the Covid-industrial complex. Covid has an extremely high survival rate. So why develop yet another expensive, invasive and experimental solution to a problem that barely exists, if it does at all?”

 

Let’s dive into trying to answer those questions, and in the process solve the riddle of Byram Bridle.

 

Bridle Is Creating Fast-track Covid Vaxxes Based on His Team’s Cancer-Vaxx Tech

He doesn’t hide this. And his statements in news reports about this clearly show Bridle believes he and his collaborators can use the methodology they’d already developed for making cancer vaxxes to very quickly create vaxxes for the  novel coronavirus (and for an array of iterations of it and of other viruses).

In my Nov. 4 article I cited two May 21, 2020, news pieces about Bridle and several of his collaborators receiving a one-year, $230,000 grant from the Ontario government. He was given the grant together with Leonardo Susta and Sarah Wooton — both also at the University of Guelph — and Darwyn Kobasa from the Winnipeg National Microbiology Lab (NML). (The May 21, 2020, Ontario-government news release about this also announced Covid-related grants to other researchers across the province.)

The section of the news release about the U of Guelph/NML project said they were given the money to test vaxxes containing a virus (avian avulavirus or the adenovirus) into which they spliced the genetic code for the novel coronavirus’s spike protein. First they’d do preliminary mouse testing of the shots at the University of Guelph. Then “after optimization, these vaccines will be evaluated [for efficacy] in a hamster challenge model at the” NML.

CBC reporter Kate Bueckert in her May 21, 2020, report quoted Bridle as saying, “We’ve had to, over the years, develop all kinds of ideas and methods to optimize cancer vaccines. Because we have these technological platforms, we realized we could quickly, through the virology expertise, switch our cancer vaccines over to vaccines against infectious diseases.” (Bolding added by me.)

Bridle also said, “‘Our plan is, by the end of the year [of funding], so this would be in 2021, to have completely vetted the science and identified an optimal vaccine strategy to protect against infection with the virus that causes Covid-19 and at that point … our goal would be to start talking to Health Canada.’” (Bolding added by me.)

A Guelph Today piece about this said Bridle believes “that unlike other ‘one-off’ approaches to developing a Covid-19 vaccine, the team’s platforms can be adapted to develop vaccines for future versions of a coronavirus. That means future vaccines might be made more quickly and cheaply, giving Canada a foundation for subsequent vaccine development. ‘With these vaccine vectors, we designed them to be “plug and play.” You can put any gene into the vectors within two weeks. It could be a target protein in a cancer cell, but it could just as easily be a protein on a virus,’” Bridle said. (Bolding added by me.)

The piece also said he “hopes to see a viable [Covid] vaccine based on the technology ready for Health Canada approval in 2021…. The team will work with Health Canada to ensure ‘fast tracking‘ for any potential vaccine to be released to the public.” (Bolding added by me.)

 

Hamsters Setting the Pace in the Covid-vaxx-development Race

The timeline given by Bridle in those May 2020 media pieces may be somewhat optimistic (and indeed in this June 21, 2020, Global TV interview, he said that vaxxes would take more than a year to be ready for widespread use).

However, there are the strong indications that he and his colleagues are moving quickly.

Hamsters play a key role in this. (Not because they move fast in their cages; rather, they – specifically, Syrian hamsters – have immune systems that are said to respond to infectious agents in very similar ways to humans’ immune systems.)

In my Nov. 4 article I said I’d found a scientific paper co-authored by, among others, Bridle, Wooton and Susta. It’s dated Nov. 19, 2021 (with an e-publishing date of Oct. 6, 2021) and is titled, ‘Intranasal vaccination with a Newcastle disease virus-vectored vaccine protects hamsters from SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease.’

In that paper, the Newcastle-disease virus/spike-protein Covid intranasal vaxx that Bridle, Wooton, Susta and their colleagues tested in Syrian hamsters came out looking rosy. For example, they concluded that spraying two doses of the vaxx (containing the full length of the spike-protein gene spliced into a Newcastle-disease virus) into the noses of a total of 10 hamsters resulted in a “clear increase of S[spike-protein]-specific antibodies after the second dose.” They also wrote that the vaxx was safe and, in addition, stopped the virus from multiplying to high levels in the hamsters.

 

This must be one of the results of the developing and testing of experimental Covid vaxxes by Bridle and his colleagues that started by or before the spring of 2020. In other words, at some point they must have included in their testing this experimental Newcastle-disease-virus/novel coronavirus spike-protein vaxx, either in parallel with, or as part of, the work they did using the Ontario-government grant.

In our Nov. 4 phone call Bridle dismissed this study as being at only a very early stage of development. He said, “clearly you don’t have an understanding of what it takes to get a vaccine from the pre-clinical stage to the place where it can go into a rollout into the public.”

Yet that ignores his quotes in the May 2020 articles about seeking to have their experimental vaxxes fast-tracked in 2021.

It also doesn’t seem to take into account other things such as the fact that the Canadian and other governments put into warp speed the testing and approving Covid vaxxes and are continuing to do so.

 

Follow the Patent Trail

Then a couple of days later, while reviewing all the material I’d gathered for the Nov. 4 article, I discovered at bottom of that Nov. 19 paper by Bridle and collaborators the following ‘Conflict of interest statement’: “L.A.S., Y.P., B.W.B. [Byram Bridle], P.P.M., L.S. [Leonardo Susta], and S.K.W. [Sarah Wooton] are co-inventors on a United States Provisional [Patent] Application No. 63/196,489 entitled ‘ENGINEERED NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS VECTOR AND USES THEREOF,’ which was filed June 3, 2021.” (Bolding added by me.)

So they are moving apace on the pathway to patent their approach.

As I noted above, Bridle had commented in our Nov. 4 phone call on that Nov. 19 paper — but only to say it’s very early-stage (i.e., pre-clinical) research. He didn’t mention any provisional patent applications.

I tried to find the June 3 provisional patent application online but didn’t succeed. There doesn’t seem to be a publicly accessible database of provisional patent applications.

But I did find this website that gives information on provisional patent applications. It describes how to get one. It also lists the benefits of a provisional patent application. These include that it allows “the term ‘Patent Pending’ to be applied for 12 months in connection with the description of the invention,” and “enables immediate commercial promotion of [the] invention with greater security against having the invention stolen.“) (Bolding added by me.)

I emailed Bridle on the evening of Nov. 23. I asked him to send me the June 3 provisional patent application, along with any other provisional patent applications he has. And I emailed him again a few minutes later saying, “Further to the email I sent you a few minutes ago, if the information in the provisional patent application isn’t public then of course I’m not asking you to send it to me. Only what you’re able to – ie what’s available to the public. And if you have other provisional patent applications I’m only looking for their titles, assuming the titles are publicly available (and nothing else is).”

He replied the next morning:

“I’m not sure what the status of this provisional patent application is; two of my colleagues (equal inventors) took the lead on this. Anything that is publicly available would be searchable in the US patent database. If it isn’t there, then it isn’t publicly available yet.”

So he’s not disclosing anything about this provisional patent application, nor saying whether he has more of them.

He’s not obliged to, of course. But why he wouldn’t at least answer my question about whether he has any other provisional patent applications?

And by the way, I believe his and his colleagues’ June 3, 2021, provisional patent application is to some extent related to two US patents — 10829786 and 20200190538 — that are among the eight US patents that have Bridle’s name on them that I mentioned in my Nov. 4 article. Those two US patents are both titled, ‘Avian oncolytic virus having modified sequences and uses thereof.’  (The word oncolytic means tumour-infecting and -killing.) The patents’ description highlights the avian reovirus and the Newcastle-disease virus vector as the central part of this vaxx-tech platform.

(Bridle told me in his Nov. 4 email and our Nov. 4 phone call that he holds a patent related to the avian reovirus. One [or both] of 10829786 and 20200190538 is [are] very likely the one[s] he was referring to, because none of the other six US patents that I’ve found with his name on them mention the avian reovirus.)

They’re actually the two that in my Nov. 4 article I said I believed were not related to his Covid-vaxx work. And Bridle told me in his Nov. 4 email that his avian-reovirus patent[s] are not related to his Covid-vaxx work, because, among other things, “did you notice in the title that the claims are based on it[‘s written as] being an ‘oncolytic’ virus; that means for the treatment of cancers.”

But I believe they may well be related to his Covid-vaxx work. Because as I noted above, the information on these two US patents says they relate not only to the avian reovirus but also to the Newcastle-disease virus. And the Newcastle-disease virus is what his June 3, 2021, provisional patent application and Nov. 19 paper are focused on. There’s no way for me to know for sure, though, without seeing the provisional patent application and/or any subsequent patent application he and his colleagues may file.

 

Intranasal Vaxxes Gaining Traction

Intranasal vaxxes, like the Newcastle-disease-virus-based one that Bridle and his colleagues have been working on, just happen to perhaps not have the problems that Bridle ascribes to the mRNA jabs.

Intranasal vaxxes aren’t new. AstraZeneca’s intranasal flu vaxx FluMist has been used in the US since 2003 (with the exception of a two-year pause from 2016 to 2018, apparently because it wasn’t effective in kids aged two to 17).

And as I noted earlier in this article, the intranasal route is likely to become extremely popular. Intranasal-vaxx developers are counting on their being much more palatable to the public, including ‘vaccine sceptics,’ because these vaxxes aren’t jabs/shots and people can administer them themselves.

(And many have long being used for livestock – for example Merck’s – and also for dogs – here are Merck’s canine nose vaxxes.)

There already are eight intranasal vaxxes in clinical trials to date, according to the World Health Organization’s ‘COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape.’  (Click on the ‘Download’ button near the top left of the page; double-click to open the document that appears; scroll down to the table labelled ‘4. Number of doses, schedule and route of administration of candidates in clinical’; then look at the ‘IN’ – ‘intra nasal’ [sic] – line in the ‘Route of Injection’ section.)

That’s a small fraction of the more than 350 Covid vaxxes being tested so far.

But many more intranasals are sure to follow. For example, according to this Nov. 11, 2021, article, a Stanford University team is teeing up an intranasal spike-protein shot against Covid.

Their Oct. 27, 2021, mouse-experiment paper the article is based on states, in the abstract at the beginning of the article, that such “an alternative self-administrable vaccine capable of mounting long-lasting immunity via sterilizing neutralizing antibodies [i.e., antibodies that ostensibly prevent the virus from multiplying] would be hugely advantageous in tackling emerging mutant SC2 [SARS-CoV-2] variants. This could also diminish the possibility of vaccinated individuals acting as passive carriers of COVID-19” (Bolding added by me.)

They further note, in the third paragraph of the paper’s second page, that another advantage of the intranasal route is “the avoidance of injections, and a likely high tolerance and compliance in clinical practice.” (Bolding added by me.)

And indeed, Bridle told me in our Nov. 4 phone call that, “If somebody comes up with a vaccine [for Covid] that has properly demonstrated a good safety profile … addressing all of the safety issues, legitimate safety issues, that I and many other international colleagues have raised. And until we see that data, presented to us, and alongside the efficacy data, none of us, including myself, are going to stand behind any of these other vaccines. So yes, but could there be a future vaccine for SARS-coronavirus-2 that we would stand behind? Yes. I would be happy to do so. Because I am a virologist.”

 

Shaky Spike-Protein-Related Assertions

Let’s now switch gears a bit to address one of Bridle’s central claims about the mRNA Covid shots.

He lays the lion’s share of the blame for the serious injuries, such as myocarditis, and deaths from those jabs on the spike protein — which is produced in the body after the jabs — entering the bloodstream. He suggests that other shots do not lead to this type of spread.

He makes sweeping statements about this — in for example his Nov. 12, 2021, expert report and his June 15, 2021, Covid-shot guide for parents. In the middle of page 40 of the Nov. 12 report, after citing eight studies (see five paragraphs below), Bridle writes:

‘Conclusion: the spike protein, if it gets into circulation, has the potential to cause damage to the cardiovascular system and other tissues.’

And just one sentence later, at the start of the next section, he states:

“Now that there is a clear understanding that the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 is a dangerous toxin when it gets into the blood and is distributed throughout the body, we can continue with the story about COVID-19 vaccines.” (Bolding added by me.)

On what basis did he make this leap?

He cites eight studies to support this claim. (The studies are references 84-91; you can see their details such as authors, title and publication name, on page 133 of the document.) But they’re all related to Covid, not to vaxxes for it. Plus: five of those studies are in vitro (i.e., in test tubes and/or petri dishes) and one study was done in mice (the spike protein was injected directly into their veins). The other two were on human-autopsies (which have some overlapping authors with each other). Note also that Bridle states that one of these human-autopsy papers (ref. 84) shows the free spike protein rather than the whole virus was found in various tissues. But this isn’t really accurate: the authors said that they found the spike protein grouped together with other proteins from the virus. (For example, on the fifth page of the paper the authors write, “in both the skin and brain … the spike protein co-localized with both the envelope and membrane proteins, suggesting that the capsid proteins [i.e., envelope protein, membrane proteins and the spike protein] circulated as a unit”).

 

And indeed, when in a September 24, 2021, interview on Rebel News, Tamara Ugolini asked Bridle how he knows it’s the spike protein and not something else causing injuries and deaths in people who have received the Covid vaccines, since we don’t know all the ingredients in the vaccines (at 30:27 in the video), Bridle admitted his evidence is purely theoretical.

“That’s a great point,” Bridle replied. “… We have to depend on the companies really – the companies, the onus is on them to evaluate the safety. So we’ve been raising all these questions. And these can readily be addressed in studies — properly conducted experiments.”

He went on to say that (at 32:05) it “is a big if if the mechanism of damage that [is] causing things like the blood clots [is] the spike getting freely into circulation.”

[And unfortunately he’s not alone in his seemingly faulty reasoning. For example, I emailed Sucharit Bhakdi to ask why, in the July 23, 2021, paper that Bhakdi co-wrote with Michael Palmer claiming the spike protein is the root of virtually all of the evils of the mRNA Covid shots, they didn’t use any information on the pattern of injuries among the many millions of people who’d already been jabbed by then. Bhakdi replied in a Sept. 9 email to me that, “Our predictions regarding development of adverse effects are based on general textbook knowledge of immunobiology and medicine. They are currently being verified.” (Bolding added by me.) Yet I’ve checked subsequent posts on doctors4covidethics.org, and as far as I can see Bhakdi and other authors still have not verified this using any clinical data in jabbed people.]

 

Bridle is Part of the Continued Push to Trust Vaccines

On page 5 of his June 15, 2021, vaccines guide Bridle wrote, “I consider vaccines that have been developed on a foundation of sound science to be the most efficient type of medicine; they have cost-effectively saved millions of people from sickness and/or death.” A very similar sentence is on page 5 of his Nov. 12, 2021, expert report. And he repeats this message in many other forums.

The Canadian Covid Care Alliance – of which Bridle is a key and outspoken member — also strongly promotes vaccines. For example the Alliance’s Sept. 24, 2021, ‘COVID-19 Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration’ notes (bolding and underlining in the original):

“Without full transparency and informed consent, and without a full appreciation and proper evaluation of the safety of these novel vaccines (both short- and long-term) the current COVID-19 vaccination programs should be paused immediately. We greatly support classical vaccine programs as developed over past decades and are therefore deeply concerned that this blatant disregard for medical ethics and most recent scientific data during COVID-19 vaccinations will irreparably damage Canadians’ trust in the traditional vaccine programs.”

And unfortunately other high-profile organizations also have been giving Bridle an uncritical platform. That includes, among others, TrialSiteNews (see for example Bridle speaking at 12:50 in this June 4, 2021, ‘Expert Panel’ video) — and Children’s Health Defense and Del Bigtree’s ‘The Highwire,’ via pieces such as this one, this one and this one.

As a result, large numbers of people and organizations who previously were standing firm in their knowledge based on a large body of evidence that vaccines are unsafe – people labelled ‘anti-vaxxers’ by Bridle and  others — are being lulled into thinking Bridle is on our side because he’s vocally opposing the mRNA Covid shots.

Therefore they may well be led to believe that virtually all other vaccines are okay.

 

I recommend several pieces of reading material that show the clear and present dangers of many vaccines.

One is the book The Peanut Allergy Epidemic: What’s Causing It and How to Stop It by Heather Fraser. Another is the book Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History by Suzanne Humphries, MD, and Roman Bystrianyk.

This is among the material that helped open my eyes 2.5 years ago to the dangers of vaccines. Contact me if you’d like other book or article recommendations.

 

By asking questions we can start to solve the riddle of Byram Bridle.

Don’t let ‘experts’ on either side of any issue lull or push you into giving away your power to think for yourself. Follow the money trail and potential conflicts of interest.

Work to find the real truth – it’s hard work but vital. Check the primary-source material used to make assertions, no matter who’s making them.

 

Connect with Rosemary Frei



Nuremberg II in 2022?

Nuremberg II in 2022?

by Dr. Mark Sircus
November 25, 2021

 

It is more than evident that a significant part of humanity is stampeding to take experimental vaccines for COVID-19. However, the “experimental” vaccines violate all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes, which carry the death penalty for those who seek to break these International Laws. Now, more than ever, we need new trials, not after the fact, as was the situation after WWII, but while the crimes against humanity are in progress.

Instead of these Nazis above the tables would be full of executives from Pfizer, Moderna, Johnston and Johnston, Dr. Fauci and the infamous Bill Gates, and many others. Even the politicians, who pretended to play doctor and healthcare official, promoting life-threatening and depressing masks, lockdowns, and death shots, should be held accountable. Dr. David Martin clearly shows that all of them are guilty of breaking American laws.

Front and center should be multiple members of the FDA and CDC, who are not trustful governmental agencies but richly paid whores for the vaccine companies.

American Heart Association Journal Publishes Data that U.K. Medical Doctor Claims are “Proof” that COVID-19 Vaccines are “Murder.” `We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’

23 Nazi doctors were charged with conducting experiments on prisoners without consent, most at concentration camps. The aftermath of the trials led to creation of the Nuremberg Code, which the FDA and CDC do not follow. The Dr. Rath Health Foundation tells us that, “After six decades of silence, the historical records of the key war crimes tribunal that determined the responsibility for WWII were finally made available. Currently, history books teach that WWII was launched by a lunatic dictator, Hitler, and his ruthless Nazi henchmen.

However, tens of thousands of historical documents from the Nuremberg Tribunal – newly released online – unequivocally document that:

  • WWII – a war that cost the lives of more than 60 million people – was planned and financed by the world’s largest chemical/ pharmaceutical cartel. At that time, Germany’s I.G. Farben consisted of Bayer, BASF, Hoechst, and others.
  • The driving force behind WWII was I.G. Farben’s ambition to control the global oil and drug markets and eliminate, by force, any competition.
  • The I.G. Farben companies financed the rise to power of the Nazi party and transformed German democracy into a dictatorship.

“The pharmaceutical industry does not act in the tradition of the protector of humanity, but in the tradition of I.G. Farben, a group of organized criminals willing to sacrifice countless human lives to maintain their profits,” writes Dr. Mathias Rath. Listen to him pleading in 2012 with his fellow Germans to not go down the same road that Germans have traveled twice before. He, too, claims that the two world wars were driven by the insatiable greed of the pharmaceutical and chemical cartels. The legacy of I.G. Farben is carried on by Bayer/Monsanto, Pfizer, and the other COVID vaccine companies.

Telford Taylor was an American lawyer best known for his role as Counsel for the Prosecution at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II.

Telford Taylor, US Chief Prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal against the executives of great I.G. Farben, wrote, “The crimes with which these men are charged were not committed in rage or under the stress of sudden temptation. One does not build a great war machine in a fit of passion nor an Auschwitz factory during a passing spasm of brutality. Their purpose was to turn the German nation into a military machine so it could impose its dominion on Europe and other nations beyond the seas. They were the warp and woof of the dark mantle of death that settled over Europe.”

The Nuremberg War Criminal Tribunal convicted 24 I.G. Farben board members and executives based on mass murder, slavery, and other crimes against humanity. Amazingly, however, by 1951, all of them had already been released and continued to consult with German corporations. The Nuremberg Tribunal dissolved IG Farben into Bayer, Hoechst, and BASF. Moreover, today each of the three daughters of I.G. Farben is 20 times as big as the I.G. Farben mother was at its height in 1944, the last year of the Second World War.

There are people on this planet that take pleasure in hurting other people. They injured others from sheer psychological habit. The general nature of ‘evil’ is not to have consciousness of the effect our actions have on the feelings and emotional world of others, which is the definition or defining characteristic of both psychopaths and sociopaths.

Dr. Russell Blaylock says that it was the Rockefeller Foundation that created orthodox Medicine back in 1901. “Rockefeller owned what was called the drug trust: that’s the major drug manufacturing firms all over the world: Merck Pharmaceuticals, Lederle, all of these pharmaceutical companies. And, of course, the aim was to remove all nutrition references to nutritional type treatments from the medical schools. They closed down half the medical schools in the United States. There were 165 medical schools at the time. Then he had his anointed medical schools, which he poured his money into, appointed the professors from his stock of professors. And so, they created an educational system that taught the things that he wanted to be taught. And therefore, every professor that came out of those programs taught the same thing.”

Dead Doctors

According to the American Medical Association (AMA), a whopping 96 percent of United States doctors as of June have been “vaccinated” for COVID-19. And now many are dead. Vaccinated Doctors are Dying, and Unvaccinated Doctors are Quitting or Being Fired: Who will Run the Hospitals?

Dr. David Martin has been spending the past year and a half fighting to unravel what he says is the global criminal conspiracy of coronavirus. Parties include the American and Chinese governments, the International Monetary Fund, and Blackrock. Martin says these groups are guilty of criminal conspiracy in a terrorist plot against the American people.

Contemporary Medicine has been on quicksand for over 100 years, and as it sinks to the bottom, it is pulling down with it millions of humans into misery and death. We have known for a decade, thanks to the work of  Dr. Gary Null, Dr. Carolyn Dean, and Dr. Barbara Starfield, that properly prescribed pharmaceutical medications are killing over 100,000 Americans each year.

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

Dr. Barbara Starfield of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:
12,000 —– unnecessary surgery
7,000 —– medication errors in hospitals
20,000 —– other errors in hospitals
80,000 —– infections in hospitals
106,000 —– non-error, adverse effects of drugs

James Howard Kunstler writes that modern Medicine is a hostage racket; “Medicine is now a catastrophe every bit as pernicious as the illnesses it is supposed to treat, and a grave threat to a nation that we’re supposed to care about. If you thought banking in our time was a miserable racket — which it is, of course, and by “racket” I mean a criminal enterprise — then so-called health care has it beat by a country mile, with an added layer of sadism and cruelty built into its operations.”

It Is Worse Than All The Above



Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of health at the Council of Europe, explains that a pandemic used to be associated with widespread severe illness and death, but by changing the definition, removing the severity and high mortality criteria, World Health Organization (WHO) can now make a pandemic whenever it wants. One of the most respected men in Europe, he maintains that the “World Health Organization is an institution of corruption.”

“The scientific data overwhelmingly shows how probably millions have died from the covid injections, and hundreds of millions are suffering crippling side effects that often permanently disable the victims for life. The Vaccine Death Report provides all the data, along with hundreds of references, for further investigation.”

At the above link, one must scroll down to the first video but be prepared for a shock as the entire world’s elite are exposed for who and what they are, what they own,  and what they have planned for most of the rest of us. Naturally, after watching, one is tempted to run and hide, but in the end, courage is encouraged.

It will be a miracle if the 99 percent of us persevere against the elite, the Deep State, the three or four companies that seem to own most of the other mega-corporations. Add God into the equation, add truth, reason, insight, and love for each other, and perhaps a much-needed miracle will occur.

I also recommend a video exposing the lies and stupidity of Gates, Fauci, Biden, the head of the CDC, and Biden, who cannot make up their minds about what is true or not about COVID vaccines.

About 47 million adults in the U.S. remain unvaccinated, according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Medical Murder

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin.

A Chicago-area judge saved a grandfather’s life with the single question that exposes hospitals blocking doctors from using a safe, FDA-approved drug: Why?

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

cover image credit:  Wikimedia Commons



14 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children — and Their Big Ties to Big Pharma

14 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children — and Their Big Ties to Big Pharma
On Nov. 2, members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s pediatric COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old. Were their decisions driven by science and conscience — or their ties to drugmakers? 

by Children’s Health Defense Team
November 24, 2021

 

CHD EDITOR’S NOTE: Following the Oct. 26 meeting of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), Children’s Health Defense argued it is time to shun the individuals — and institutions — that are selling out America’s children without even a prick of conscience. At the close of this article about the members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), we reiterate our list of suggestions for shunning.

 

On Nov. 2, the members of ACIP voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old.

Committee members readily voted “yes” despite many unknowns about long-term safety, including a complete lack of data on the risk of heart problems like the ones experienced by some adolescents who received COVID vaccines.

Neither the disgracefully unscientific vote nor CDC Director Rochelle Walensky’s prompt endorsement came as a surprise. Though billed as “independent,” the 14 ACIP members — like the 17 members of FDA’s VRBPAC who voted the same way the previous week — have deep ties to pharma, with careers that hinge on promoting and rubber-stamping the United States’ destructive one-size-fits-all vaccination agenda.

Describing the VRBPAC and ACIP meetings as “a total sham,” Children’s Health Defense President Mary Holland said, “Sadly, approval from these committees means nothing in terms of safety.”

Political scientist Toby Rogers agreed, stating the ACIP meeting “was not a scientific review. It was banal bureaucrats announcing plans for a Blitzkrieg and the bought white coats were cheering them on.”

With their vote to give young children the dangerous injections, ACIP members signaled that they, too, deserve to be shunned, along with the powerful institutions with which they are affiliated. The latter include the nation’s top universities and leading pediatric hospitals.

Without exception, all the universities at which ACIP members have appointments — Brown, Drexel, Harvard, Michigan State, Ohio State, Stanford, University of Maryland, University of Washington, Vanderbilt and Wake Forest — have mandated COVID vaccines.

Pediatric hospitals, meanwhile, are playing a frontline role as COVID vaccination sites. Promoting the injection for 5-year-olds, First Lady Jill Biden visited Texas Children’s Hospital straight away, applauding the hospital for the 39,000 pediatric vaccine appointments it had already scheduled.

Also worthy of shunning are the 20,000 individual vaccine providers who were pre-positioned to “hit the ground running” and “get shots in little arms.”

Within two days of ACIP’s and Walensky’s verdicts, these providers had administered the jab to thousands of 5- to 11-year-olds, and within the first week, according to the White House, 900,000 children had been injected.

New dangers emerging

Community vaccination sites such as pharmacies and pop-up clinics have attracted recent attention for egregious vaccine administration errors in young children:

  • In Texas, a pop-up clinic gave adult doses of the Pfizer jab to 6- and 7-year-old boys “two days before a proper dose of the vaccine was even approved for that age range.”
  • In Virginia, a pharmacy (subsequently ordered to stop administering the shots) gave 112 children in the 5–11 age group the wrong COVID vaccine formulation.
  • A pediatric practice in California also gave 14 children an incorrect dose of the Pfizer jab, not disclosing “whether the kids got too much or too little.”
  • In addition, pharmacies have “mistakenly” given adult COVID shots to children under age 5 whose parents had requested flu shots.

With censorship rampant, many parents may be unaware of these transgressions. They also may not know that the experimental product FDA and CDC are unleashing on children is coming under increasing fire from Pfizer whistleblowers.

The same day as the ACIP vote, The BMJ published a whistleblower’s hair-raising account of “data integrity issues” in Pfizer’s “helter-skelter” clinical trials. According to Brook Jackson — a trained clinical trial auditor — Ventavia Research Group (one of the contract research organizations engaged by Pfizer) “falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events.” Quality control staff, Jackson further reported, were “overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.”

When Jackson shared her concerns with both Ventavia and FDA in September 2020, Ventavia fired her. FDA ignored her warnings and granted EUA status to Pfizer’s injection in December.

Melissa Strickler McAtee, until recently a quality control employee at Pfizer’s plant in McPherson, Kansas, described, in an interview with Project Veritas, Pfizer’s efforts to deceive the public about the use of fetal cell lines in creating the COVID shot.

Equally disturbingly, Strickler McAtee told other journalists that Pfizer’s vaccine exhibits an unusual fluorescent blue glow, stating she had “never once [previously] seen anything do that, not even close” during her 10-year career inspecting “hundreds of thousands of units” of vaccines. She also reports that her co-workers at the plant are being unprecedentedly kept in the dark about what the vaccine’s ingredients are.

Pfizer has a lengthy history of quality control problems in addition to a business model predicated on habitual fraud. The Kansas plant, which Pfizer acquired when it strategically purchased injectable drug company Hospira in 2015, has been repeatedly “dinged” by FDA for problems with quality, cleanliness and contamination.

In the three years leading up to its acquisition by Pfizer, Hospira had to issue more than 40 recalls, and Pfizer/Hospira has continued to be a frequent offender on FDA’s recall list since 2015, receiving another warning letter from FDA in 2017.

FDA’s tsk-tsking of Pfizer clearly represents a hollow rebuke, however, as this week’s FDA request to a federal judge made plain: FDA is asking for 55 years to make public the data and information it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

These and other clinical trial shenanigans strongly intimate that “the data that the FDA and CDC have been pretending to base their decisions on for the last year, are fiction.”

Below are the ACIP members who signed off on Pfizer’s pediatric vaccine, and their conflicts of interest.

ACIP Chair Grace Lee

Dr. Grace Lee (gmlee@stanford.edu) chaired the November ACIP deliberations. Lee has been associate chief medical officer for practice innovation at Stanford Children’s Health and a pediatrics professor at Stanford School of Medicine since 2017, after having spent two decades at Harvard and Boston-area hospitals.

In addition to policy work focusing on financial rewards and penalties to reshape hospital performance, Lee has built her reputation by shoring up the pretense that the nation has a functioning vaccine safety surveillance system.

Lee served as past principal investigator for the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a large database that includes comprehensive longitudinal medical and vaccination records for two million children and seven million adults. Although VSD analyses have the potential to permit enlightening vaccinated-unvaccinated comparisons of health outcomes, the CDC has sole access to the data.

In the words of CHD’s chief scientific officer Dr. Brian Hooker, CDC has “shut [VSD] up like a fortress, despite the fact that it’s taxpayer-funded.”

In VSD-based publications — some of which include fellow ACIP member Matthew Daly — Lee has made a habit of downplaying vaccine risks. For example, she encourages women to get Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) shots during pregnancy, even while data show an increased risk of placental and amniotic fluid infection in vaccinated pregnant women.

She also has whitewashed risks of flu shots in children under age 5 despite finding “an apparent dose-response for vaccine and allergic reactions in the 1- to 3-day risk window.” She dismisses post-vaccination anaphylaxis risks as “rare,” though the package inserts for most vaccines on the childhood schedule prominently list anaphylaxis as an adverse event.

Another VSD study co-authored by Lee documented a safety signal for febrile seizures linked to influenza vaccination of children in their first five years, particularly if administered along with pneumococcal vaccination; massaging the troubling conclusion with vaccine doublespeak, Lee and colleagues proposed placing their findings “in a benefit-risk framework to ensure that population health benefits are maximized.”

While in Boston, Lee served as associate director of the FDA-funded Mini-Sentinel Project, one of several newer vaccine safety surveillance mechanisms trotted out over the past decade.

As noted by CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in a letter to Biden advisor David Kessler in December 2020, studies published using Sentinel data — all authored by the same small pool of insiders — focus on an extremely narrow subset of adverse outcomes and reflect methodological decisions “that could easily constrain researchers’ ability to detect outcomes of interest.”

When a Sentinel study of the two rotavirus vaccines routinely given to American children identified a “significant risk” of intussusception after dose 2 — a bowel complication that forced CDC to revoke its recommendation for an earlier rotavirus vaccine — Lee and co-authors deployed more doublespeak, once again advising the public to consider the risk “in light of the demonstrated benefits of rotavirus vaccination.”

Discussing myocarditis last June, Lee admitted, “clinical presentation of myocarditis cases following vaccination has been distinct, occurring most often within 1 week after dose two, with chest pain as the most common presentation.”

This did not stop Lee from joining with other public health officials in passing off myocarditis as “an extremely rare side effect” and claiming that young people are likely to “recover on their own or with minimal treatment.”

Many experienced health professionals, including Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and Dr. Steven Pelech, fiercely dispute the notion of “mild” myocarditis.

Also of note:

  • In September of this year, Lee co-authored a paper in JAMA belatedly conceding that a large segment of the population (“women and those with a history of allergic reactions”) is at “elevated risk” of experiencing allergic reactions to mRNA COVID vaccines due to the presence in the injections of polyethylene glycol (PEG). CHD issued urgent warnings about PEG and its entirely predictable anaphylaxis risks a full year earlier, in September 2020.
  • Stanford receives extensive vaccine funding from the Gates Foundation, including for the development of 3D-printed vaccine microneedle patches (a strategy that would allow “vaccination without a shot”).
  • Stanford is the second-largest university beneficiary of funding from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, which is aggressively funding COVID vaccination of U.S. Latinos.
  • Not only does Stanford require all students to be COVID-vaccinated, but it also urges vaccination for students’ children.
Lynn Bahta

Lynn Bahta, RN, MPH (lynn.bahta@state.mn.us) is an immunization program clinical consultant for the Minnesota Department of Health, with a 25-year career focused on promoting vaccination.

During the pandemic, Bahta has been giving talks about “vaccine hesitancy in the time of COVID,” offering “key communication strategies to build confidence among those who are hesitant.”

Vaccine “hesitancy” appears to have been her bailiwick long before COVID, however, and her publications suggest a particular interest in coaxing Minnesota’s immigrant, migrant and refugee populations into higher vaccination rates.

Loyal to the fraudulent CDC party line that denies any link between MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccination and autism, Bahta has published articles dismissing the well-founded autism concerns of Minnesota’s Somali community as “misinformation.”

Somali children in Minneapolis suffer the highest known rate of severe autism in the world. Somali parents allege that the reaction of public health officials like Bahta has been one of indifference.

Discussing COVID vaccines, Bahta claims that the “great majority, usually over 90%” of adverse reactions “are not serious.”

In fact, while stating that she “never disagrees with people who believe they were injured by vaccines because it’s difficult to know,” she clearly sides with public health officials in viewing “unverified reports” to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as “misunderstood by the public and exploited by skeptics in a way that is undermining immunization efforts against COVID-19.”

Bahta disingenuously opines that “people naturally but incorrectly associate injuries with recent events.”

Also of note:

  • Bahta’s was one of the core “yes” votes in favor of recommending Moderna’s COVID shot last December.
  • When ACIP deliberated over COVID booster shots in September, Bahta was willing to recommend boosters for adults age 50 and up and individuals with underlying conditions but not for some groups of younger adults. At the time, Bahta argued for the need to “stay with the science,” stating, “I don’t think we have the data.”
  • By November, Bahta apparently was untroubled by the paucity of safety data available for the 5–11 age group, stating, “We know more than what we don’t know.”
Beth Bell

Beth Bell, M.D., MPH (bzb8@uw.edu) is a clinical professor in the Department of Global Health at the University of Washington (UW) School of Public Health. Until 2017, Bell spent most of her career at CDC, including as Director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic [animal/insect-to-human] Infectious Diseases.

At UW, Bell is on faculty at the UW Alliance for Pandemic Preparedness (formerly called, until fall 2020, the MetaCenter for Pandemic Preparedness and Global Health Security), which “harness[es] big data and forward-thinking strategies to devise more unified approaches to current and future health security risks.”

“Health security” and biosecurity are the linchpin buzzwords that global technocrats are using to push for complete control over people’s “ability to work, to socialize, to travel, conduct business, access public services and to purchase essential goods and services.”

Like many of the individuals who make their way onto FDA and CDC committees, Bell started her CDC career as an officer in the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS), a branch that journalist Jon Rappoport has dubbed the “medical CIA.”

As Rappoport notes, EIS graduates’ occupancy of “key positions in the overall medical cartel” furnishes an “unparalleled opportunity” to control information — and disseminate disinformation.

During COVID, Bell has positioned herself as a champion for vaccination “equity,” stating “If we’re serious about valuing equity, we need to have that baked in early in the vaccination process.”

Bell’s comments about wanting to make sure “socially vulnerable” communities and people of color have access to COVID shots echo troubling racially oriented remarks made by Melinda Gates early on in the pandemic. Located in Gates’ backyard, UW not only benefits from close ties with and extensive funding from the Gates Foundation — an organization tainted by allegations of medical experimentation and an underlying eugenicist ideology — but also enjoys extensive support from Microsoft.

Also of note:

  • As co-author of a CDC paper summarizing ACIP’s May recommendation that 12- to 15-year-olds get the Pfizer shot, Bell and colleagues inaccurately argued that “COVID-19 in adolescents is a major public health problem” and that “desirable [vaccine] effects” outweigh “any undesirable effects in most settings.” The authors did not mention the teens who are dying of post-vaccination cardiac arrest.
  • Regarding COVID booster shots, Bell first stated, “I have my own concerns that we appear to be recommending vaccines for people who I don’t think need it”; she later agreed, however, that “moving forward with the recommendations makes sense for the sake of being clear.”
  • Regarding COVID jabs for young children, Bell claimed, after the November vote, “if she had a grandchild, she’d get the grandchild vaccinated as soon as possible.”
Oliver Brooks

Oliver Brooks, M.D. (oliver.brooks@wattshealth.org) is chief medical officer and a member of the executive team at Watts Healthcare Corporation in Los Angeles. Watts Healthcare provides primary care services under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and also receives federal funding for other services, including those related to HIV/AIDS.

Brooks is immediate past president of the National Medical Association (NMA), which he describes as “the oldest and largest organization representing African-America’s physicians and the guardians of the health of African-Americans.” As such, Brooks — like Beth Bell — made “health equity” his calling card, with vaccination of minority groups one of his signature goals as NMA president.

CDC celebrates Brooks’ “leadership roles focusing on disparities in vaccine coverage rates.”

Brooks speaks frequently “on the science and the implementation perspective of vaccine utilization,” is a board member and past president of the California Immunization Coalition, chairman of the Immunize LA Families Coalition and member of the national Leadership Panel for the Adolescent Immunization Initiative.

During the pandemic, Watts Healthcare has received millions in funding from Kaiser Permanente to promote COVID vaccination in L.A.’s Hispanic and African American communities.

In March 2021, Watts Healthcare also received $4.3 million via the American Rescue Plan to increase the federally qualified health center’s “ability to get more shots in arms.” The nonprofit is further beholden to the federal government for a $5.18 million coronavirus-related Paycheck Protection Loan approved in April 2020.

Brooks co-chaired California’s COVID-19 Vaccine Work Group, working to “get the vaccine out more rapidly” through “more points of distribution.” Early on in the vaccine rollout, one of those “points of distribution” in San Diego was forced to pause vaccine administration when numerous recipients suffered severe allergic reactions.

Since 2014, Brooks has received $118,439 (350 general payments primarily for consulting or speaking engagements) from biopharmaceutical companies that include Pfizer as well as Sanofi Pasteur, Novartis, Seqirus, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Meda, AbbVie and Theratechnologies.

Also of note:

  • At over $271,000, Brooks’ annual salary is second only to that of the Watts Healthcare CEO.
  • Watts Healthcare and another South LA nonprofit received $3 million in COVID-related funding from the Oprah Winfrey Charitable Foundation in July 2020. The media tycoon — one-time member (along with Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, George Soros, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner and others) of an elite “club” of billionaire philanthropists — urges compliance with mask mandates and uses her influential platform to tell those who are not vaccinated to “reconsider.”
Wilbur Chen

Wilbur Chen, M.D. (wchen@som.umaryland.edu) is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, with research interests “in developing vaccines against pathogens which afflict low- and middle-income countries” as well as in vaccine development for the elderly. Chen has headed up vaccine trials for influenza viruses, enteric pathogens and “agents of bioterror.”

Chen is co-investigator for two entities funded by the Anthony-Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): the Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Unit (composed of 10 academic centers throughout the U.S.) and the Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers (a network of research centers developing “novel vaccine candidates and delivery platforms”).

In advance of the ACIP vote on the 5–11 age group, CHD joined numerous citizens in arguing (unsuccessfully) that Chen be removed from the committee for blatant financial conflicts of interest. In 2020 alone, Chen accepted $437,251 from vaccine makers GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Emergent BioSolutions — a fact “researched and exposed by average citizens” rather than disclosed by CDC. Chen’s payments since 2014 total over $476,880 and include monies from Janssen, Seqirus, MedImmune, Astellas Pharma, Valneva Austria and BioFire Diagnostics in addition to the two companies already mentioned.

Chen also receives research funding from the Gates Foundation and from the Seattle-based global health organization PATH. PATH’s former CEO, Christopher Elias, now serves as president of the Gates Foundation’s Global Development Division, leading efforts in areas such as vaccine delivery and family planning; Elias was a leading Event 201 participant.

Also of note:

  • In addition to serving as a voting member of ACIP, Chen is a core member of NIAID’s Data and Safety Advisory Board.
  • During COVID, Chen has been a staunch advocate of “aggressive nonpharmacologic intervention and control measures,” including “aggressive recognition and isolation and quarantine of cases and contacts.”
  • Despite the well-documented risks and failures of influenza vaccination, Chen continues to insist that “Vaccination is by far the best method to prevent and control influenza.”
  • Chen recently voted to make a highly reactogenic Ebola vaccine obligatory for healthcare personnel, lab workers and support staff at facilities that handle Ebola specimens, arguing against letting workers make their own risk-benefit decisions.
Sybil Cineas

Sybil Cineas, M.D. (sybil_cineas@brown.edu), a Harvard Medical School graduate, is an associate professor of medicine, pediatrics and medical science at Brown University, and, as associate program director of Brown’s combined residency program in internal medicine and pediatrics, is “highly involved in the training of residents and medical students.”

According to CDC, Cineas has “20+ years of experience teaching about and promoting vaccination.”

Like fellow ACIP members Beth Bell and Oliver Brooks, Cineas frequently cites health equity to justify her vaccine votes. For example, as a member of the ACIP Hepatitis Work Group, which recently recommended hepatitis B vaccines for everyone age 59 and younger while issuing a more qualified risk-based recommendation for adults age 60 and up, Cineas wanted to recommend universal hepatitis B vaccination for all ages. She argued, “A simplification of this recommendation [would] reach more individuals at risk … and promote health equity.”

Also of note:

  • CDC has given Brown researchers $4.9 million to study COVID vaccine effectiveness in seniors; the researchers state that “the urgently needed research will be used to inform recommendations about vaccine booster shots for nursing home residents.”
Matthew Daley

Matthew Daley, M.D. (matthew.f.daley@kp.org) is a senior investigator and practicing pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, described by CDC as having “extensive research experience in the areas of vaccine safety, parental vaccine hesitancy, and immunization services delivery.”

Daley’s published studies on vaccine “hesitancy” cover topics such as social media interventions to increase vaccine acceptance, barriers to adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, under vaccination patterns and parent-provider trust. (In one study, parents reported trusting pediatricians on topics such as nutrition but “did not believe their pediatrician provided ‘balanced’ information on both the benefits and risks of vaccination.”)

Daley also conducts Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) studies on a variety of topics, including safety of newly licensed vaccines, vaccine safety during pregnancy and, according to the CDC, safety of the childhood immunization schedule.

After the Institute of Medicine acknowledged that studies “to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted” — and identified the VSD as “an important resource for conducting this research” — Daley and CDC co-authors wrote a white paper to describe how this could be done but shrouded their remarks in so many caveats about potential studies’ “inherent complexity” as to make their feasibility seem highly doubtful.

Daley’s VSD studies, some co-authored with ACIP colleague Grace Lee, have identified potential safety signals, but in each case, Daley and co-authors have found reasons to reject or mask their own conclusions.

Examples include attributing a statistically significant association between hepatitis A vaccination during pregnancy and small-for-gestational-age infants to “unmeasured confounding”; putting forth “seasonality” as the likely contributor to a statistical signal for Bell’s palsy in adults age 25 and up following H1N1 influenza vaccination; and dismissing as “rare” two types of adverse events (anaphylaxis and fainting) significantly associated with live attenuated influenza vaccination in children 2 through 17 years of age.

Also of note:

  • After the vote recommending the COVID shots for younger children, Daly professed to not be surprised by parents’ hesitation, stating that parents “may be more risk-averse about their child.” However, though Pfizer’s clinical trial in children was too short and too small to assess the risk of myocarditis, Daley confidently asserted that “younger children are at a greater risk of developing myocarditis after a COVID infection than from the vaccine.”
  • A current VSD/CDC study by Daley is assessing “factors associated with COVID vaccination or non-vaccination” in the general population and among pregnant women.
Camille Kotton

Camille N. Kotton, M.D. (ckotton@partners.org) is clinical director for Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor at Harvard Medical School. CDC describes Kotton as a “national expert in vaccination and zoonotic infectious diseases in the immunocompromised,” including solid organ transplant recipients.

Since 2014, Kotton has received over $304,000 in general payments and associated research funding from companies like Merck, GSK, Roche, Quiagen Sciences, Oxford Immunotec, Astellas Pharma, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene and Biotest.

In voting to give younger children the COVID injections, Kotton stated, “the safety data in children looked very good” and added, “she would feel comfortable having her own children immunized if they were in that age group.”

Although few children suffer ill effects from COVID-19, Kotton argued that children should be vaccinated “both to prevent death as well as to prevent major long-term effects of having this devastating infection.”

Also of note:

James Loehr

James Loehr, M.D. (staff@cayugafamilymedicine.com) owns Cayuga Family Medicine in Ithaca, New York. According to CDC, for 30 years Loehr has counseled patients “every day on the benefits of vaccines.” Loehr was a member of ACIP’s influenza working group for more than 10 years.

In 2015, Loehr authored an article with detailed instructions telling physicians how to “minimiz[e] costs and maximiz[e] reimbursement” to “make immunizations profitable.”

Describing how Cayuga Family Medicine “enjoys steady revenue from immunizations, with vaccine reimbursement sometimes exceeding that for the rest of the visit,” Loehr outlined a series of strategies to improve a practice’s financial viability through vaccination, including becoming a “savvy vaccine shopper,” taking advantage of manufacturer discounts and doing “a bit of additional work” when coding for the service to obtain extra reimbursement for “brief counseling” and multiple vaccine components.

At an October ACIP meeting focused on Moderna boosters that was, according to Stat, driven by a “sense of the inevitability of [the] outcome,” Loehr stated, “There are probably many people who are going to get a Moderna booster who don’t need it. However, given the situation that we’ve already approved a Pfizer [booster] and there are enough people who are looking for a booster, I am inclined, reluctantly, to just go ahead and recommend a similar pattern for the Moderna booster.”

Loehr was similarly wishy-washy the previous month when he stated, “I … feel that we’re getting too much ahead of ourselves and that we have too much hope on the line with these boosters.”

He then added, “However, having said that, we shouldn’t let the perfect be in the way of the good. And if we can do a little bit of good by giving boosters to people over 65 I’m in favor of that.”

Loehr is a past Vaccine Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Speaking for AAFP, Loehr has noted that the medical trade group “does not support nonmedical immunization exemption policies.” AAFP does support COVID-19 vaccine mandates for health and long-term care workers, and last August, it also started lobbying FDA to authorize the vaccines for children under age 12.

Also of note:

  • Like most of his ACIP peers, Loehr promotes himself as an expert on “strategies for addressing and overcoming vaccine hesitancy,” stating that “most patients…are not truly resistant to immunization” but just want “clarification and reassurance.”
Sarah Long

Sarah Long, M.D. is a professor of pediatrics at Drexel University College of Medicine and a physician at St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children in Philadelphia. In addition to her role on ACIP, Long has served on VRBPAC and as a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases.

Long was widely quoted in the press following her “yes” vote on COVID injections for children. Though she expressed several concerns and voted “no” in September regarding Pfizer boosters for healthcare workers, Long “threw her full support behind the pediatric recommendation.”

Fully aware that “CDC was not able to conduct a full benefit-risk analysis for myocarditis post-vaccination in this age group,” Long is nevertheless telling mothers that the shot’s risks are preferable to the myocarditis that could arise from COVID illness.

Without citing any evidence, Long states that “vaccine-related events are completely different, and much less dire, than typical myocarditis,” adding that “she’d rather treat many people with vaccine-associated myopericarditis than a single case of viral myocarditis.”

Claiming that “Nobody has died of myopericarditis, and children are dying of coronavirus,” Long has concluded that “of course it’s a benefit-risk ratio that comes out in the direction of vaccination.”

The hundreds of teens who have experienced post-vaccination myocarditis — some now dead — might beg to differ.

Ironically, Long’s bio includes numerous “awards and honors for her outstanding work to improve the health and well-being of children.” After the “yes” vote on COVID shots, she reportedly joked, “I, believe it or not, have no questions. I have just a comment: I am very supportive of this recommendation in its fullest extent, as a ‘should,’ not a ‘may,’ for all children in this age group.”

Long continued, “I think the data support that we have one more vaccine that saves lives of children, and that we should be very confident to employ it to the maximum to do what it is meant to do, without significant concerns of serious adverse events. So, I couldn’t be more supportive.”

Also of note:

  • Drexel University received half a million dollars from the Gates Foundation in June 2020 “to evaluate the use of a digital health platform to make care for COVID more accessible to marginalized populations.”
  • The Gates Foundation is also supporting the work of other Drexel researchers in areas such as diagnostic test development.
Veronica McNally

Veronica V. McNally, JD (valent29@law.msu.edu) is a law professor and an assistant dean at Michigan State University. McNally is ACIP’s “consumer representative.”

Having lost an infant to pertussis, McNally describes herself as a “public health advocate” in addition to being an attorney.

She is founder and president of the Franny Strong Foundation — framing a mission to “promote pertussis awareness and boost childhood immunization rates for all vaccine-preventable diseases” — and founded the I Vaccinate Campaign, which, on November 16, excitedly reported that “nearly 1 million kids ages 5-11 will have their first COVID shots by the end of today.”

McNally is seemingly unaware of the many failures of a pertussis vaccination program that is widely acknowledged to be making vaccinated children more rather than less susceptible to pertussis over their lifetimes.

Also of note:

  • McNally is a CDC darling, having been named “Childhood Immunization Champion” for Michigan in 2018 — the same year in which she was appointed to her four-year term on ACIP.
Katherine Poehling

Katherine A. Poehling, M.D., MPH (kpoehlin@wakehealth.edu) is a professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at North Carolina’s Wake Forest University School of Medicine. CDC cites her expertise “on the community impact of vaccines, specifically pneumococcal and influenza vaccines.”

As an ACIP insider, Poehling has headed up past ACIP presentations on pneumococcal vaccines.

Poehling has published on “ethics and academic pediatrics” but apparently sees no conflict in sitting on ACIP while receiving, according to Open Payments, over $523,000 in general payments and associated research funding from MedImmune and AstraZeneca since 2014.

Poehling endorses CDC’s astonishingly fact-free claim that COVID has caused “substantially more misery than other childhood diseases,” stating, “that information helped convince her to strongly support COVID-19 vaccines for elementary school children.”

Poehling also buys into Long’s non-evidence-based assertion that COVID-19 disease is responsible for more heart problems than the vaccine. During a May review of Moderna data, Poehling enthusiastically favored making multiple vaccines available — to “increase access.”

Also of note:

  • When endorsing COVID boosters for the immunocompromised, Poehling stated, “the benefits are tremendous and the potential negative impacts are minimal and so I agree that we should recommend.”
  • Many of Poehling’s publications seem intended to address the burden of diseases such as influenza for which vaccine “solutions” can then be promoted. It seems likely that her published articles about respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) will be used to lay the groundwork for an mRNA vaccine for RSV.
Pablo Sanchez

Pablo J. Sanchez, M.D. (sanchez.940@osu.edu) has been a professor of pediatrics at Ohio State University since 2013 and directs Clinical and Translational Research in Neonatology at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus. Sanchez previously held positions at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Sanchez’s 80-page self-congratulatory curriculum vitae reveals that he is a consummate insider fluidly bridging academia, public health agencies and private industry. Sanchez’s invited participation and lectures include appearances at public health agencies like CDC, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); COVID-vaccine-promoting trade groups like the AAP and March of Dimes; and biopharma companies like AbbVie, GSK (formerly Smithkline Beecham), ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inhibitex, MedImmune and Ross Laboratories.

Sanchez also lists hundreds of thousands in research monies received from these same entities.

Since the 1990s, Sanchez has been funded by Abbott Laboratories, American Lung Association, BioStar, Biosynexus, Burroughs Wellcome, CDC, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Gerber Foundation, MedImmune, NIAID, NICHD [National Institute of Child Health and Human Development], Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Ross Laboratories and Smithkline Beecham/Glaxo/GSK.

According to Open Payments, since 2014, Sanchez has pocketed roughly $221,000 in general payments and associated research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, MedImmune, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqirus and Sobi.

The database lists AstraZeneca, MedImmune and Merck as the “top companies making associated payments,” with notable payments from Merck in Fall 2020.

In June, Sanchez hedged his bets on the topic of COVID vaccines and myocarditis. While declaring that the benefits of vaccination outweigh myocarditis risks, he also noted, “we need to be very upfront in terms of mentioning this as a potential risk of COVID messenger RNA vaccination. Hopefully, the parents and patients are aware of this before vaccination.”

Sanchez did not repeat these remarks at the November meeting when he okayed the jab for 5-year-olds.

Also of note:

  • In 2010, Sanchez served as a “Pfizer visiting professor.”
  • Sanchez served on VRBPAC from 2007–2010 as well as on FDA’s vaccine-focused Pediatric Advisory Committee from 2010–2012. In Texas, he chaired the Texas Pediatric Society’s Committee of Infectious Diseases and Immunizations from 2004–2009 and served on the committee from 1995–2013.
  • Many of Sanchez’s publications focus on amplifying concern about illnesses attributed to viruses— such as cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, RSV and Zika — for which Moderna and other companies now anticipate developing mRNA vaccines.
Helen Keipp Talbot

Helen Keipp Talbot, M.D., MPH (keipp.talbot@vumc.org) is associate professor of medicine at Nashville’s Vanderbilt University, where she has held various appointments since 2002. Talbot’s research and publications (sometimes co-authored with fellow ACIP member Poehling) center on adult vaccination, influenza vaccination, human coronaviruses and vaccine trials for respiratory illnesses such as RSV. The focus on coronaviruses pre-dates COVID; from 2007–2009, Talbot was principal investigator on an NIH-funded study on the “epidemiology of human coronaviruses.”

According to Talbot’s curriculum vitae, her recent research funding comes from both the federal government (CDC, National Institutes of Health [NIH]) and Sanofi Pasteur, primarily for the study of pandemic preparedness (in 2015) and influenza vaccination. Sanofi and MedImmune have been recurrent funders since 2009, along with AstraZeneca, Gilead, Protein Sciences, VaxInnate and Wyeth (since acquired by Pfizer).

Open Payments lists Talbot’s receipt of roughly $1.4 million in research payments and associated research funding since 2014 (417 total payments) from these companies, along with 29 general payments totaling $17,000.

In December 2020, Talbot was the “lone dissenter” objecting to ACIP’s recommendation that long-term care residents “be at the front of the line” for COVID vaccines. At the time, Talbot argued that vaccination of long-term care residents was “risky” because they “have a high rate of medical events that could be confused as side effects of vaccination and undermine confidence in the vaccines.”

Talbot stated, “And I think you’re going to have a very striking backlash of, ‘My grandmother got the vaccine and she passed away.’” Talbot elaborated: “I fear a loss of confidence in the vaccine…. [T]here will be temporally associated events and people will be scared to use the vaccine.”

Talbot exhibited no scruples in voting to administer COVID vaccines to young children. On the same day as the “yes” vote, Talbot told the press, “I have vaccinated my kids” (who, presumably, were at least 12 years of age at the time of injection).

Also of note:

  • In 2008, Talbot received a Sanofi Pasteur Advanced Vaccinology Course travel grant.
  • Talbot is on the editorial board of the journal Vaccine.
And … Rochelle Walensky

No overview of ACIP would be complete without noting the conflicts of interest surrounding CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, who used ACIP’s vote to immediately green-light vaccination of younger children.

As reported by independent media outlet RedState (but not by the mainstream media), Walensky’s husband, Loren Walensky, became scientific co-founder and board member of early-stage biotech company Lytica Therapeutics in October 2019.

In December, the Biden administration announced Rochelle Walensky’s pending appointment as CDC director, and in February 2020, Lytica received the first installment ($5.3 million) of a $16.9 million grant from HHS, representing the “only funding this new company [had] received to date — nearly two years after its founding.”

Even before becoming CDC director, Walensky had been “directly associated with HHS for more than a decade,” including close participation on committees and panels with Anthony “Tony” Fauci. According to RedState’s exposé, “when ‘insiders’ were surprised that Walensky was picked [to head CDC], it was revealed that Fauci had a lot to do with her appointment.”

Loyal to Fauci, Walensky has written opinion pieces for leading media outlets “about how to fairly and effectively distribute Remdesivir,” the ineffective, expensive and dangerous drug promoted by NIAID and Fauci as virtually the sole treatment option for hospitalized COVID patients.

A former Boston colleague of Walensky’s stated the CDC director “has a lot of Tony in her,” including the “ability to take complex information and convey it in clear and concise messaging.”

Shunning and Nuremberg 2.0

As bad as the ACIP (and VRBPAC) decisions were, vaccine-risk-aware observers are even more shocked that CDC and FDA are “blithely” allowing Pfizer’s shot to be administered to children and adolescents with other vaccines at the same time.

As Informed Choice Washington put it last May regarding the authorization for kids ages 12 and up:

“As unethical as it is to expose children to investigational liability-free products that have seen unprecedented levels of vaccine adverse reactions and deaths reported … when ACIP opened up the shots to be co-administered with other vaccines, including those with adjuvants, they stepped fully into crimes against humanity. Not a single clinical trial has been done administering the COVID-19 shots with any other vaccine. There is zero safety data.”

Other observers agree with this assessment, arguing that “Every single person associated with the ACIP meeting today must be tried for crimes against humanity at Nuremberg 2.0.” Some are also calling for a second Nuremberg trial for “perpetration of COVID-response policies that led to forced shutdowns, destroyed businesses, impoverished families, broken lives and a spike in suicide rates.”

In the meantime, it is time to shun ACIP members. And because it is inconceivable that ACIP members would behave in such a corrupt manner without the approval and say-so of their institutions, shunning actions necessarily must also extend to the universities and other institutions that have these individuals’ backs.

  • Send a Notice of Liability to each ACIP member — see examples at the Doctors for Covid Ethics website.
  • Check the campaign contributions of ACIP members at OpenSecrets.org. If they are donating to a politician who represents your state or Congressional District, call or write your representative and ask why they are accepting donations from people who are seriously compromised by the pharmaceutical industry and harming our children.
  • Refrain from appointing ACIP members to the Boards of community organizations — or revoke their current Board appointments. These types of “good citizen” positions should not be offered to people who are not behaving as “good citizens.”
  • All universities benefit from state and local appropriations; contact your legislators, explain that academic operations at these universities are clearly supporting federal corruption and demand that the legislators revoke the appropriations.
  • Write to the board of trustees or person who manages the university endowment. Demand they disclose their investments in companies that are harming our children and explain how these investments support active participation in federal corruption by those affiliated with the university.
  • Stop donating to the universities and academic departments in question and let them know why. When asked for an update by your university alumni group, ask to be removed from the alumni email list and database, and explain you have stopped donating to the university as a result of its support of federal corruption.
  • Cancel your season tickets and other participation in sports and cultural events at the university. Explain why.
  • If you are involved in recruiting for your company, remove these universities from your recruiting lists. Write to the university’s placement office to explain why.
  • Ask local newspapers to publish copies of the letters you write to university officials. Organize to support members of the independent media in researching and publishing information regarding ACIP members’ conflicts of interest, as well as the university conflicts of interest that compromise the institutions’ intellectual resources and activities in science, medicine and technology.
  • Write to the university chaplain and ask for prayers for the university to be released from the spirit of corruption. Provide details.
  • Identify the banks involved in managing the university’s bank accounts, financial assets, endowment and pension funds; where applicable, demand to know why the university is doing business with banks that have compromised our federal government accounts and are financing policies at the federal level that are harming our children.
  • Do not buy or hold stocks in companies with which ACIP members are connected.
  • Do not buy products or drugs that ACIP members have developed or patented.
  • Make it clear — through letters to the editor and letters to the institutions — that you will not forget ACIP members’ decision to enable the needless harming of young children.

 

©November 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense



“Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde” – RFK, Jr. in Conversation With James Corbett: “There’s an Entire Coalition of Sinister Forces… Which Are All Wrapped Up in This Obliteration of Constitutional Rights…”

“Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde” – RFK, Jr. in Conversation With James Corbett: “There’s an Entire Coalition of Sinister Forces… Which Are All Wrapped Up in This Obliteration of Constitutional Rights…”

 

 

‘Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde’: RFK, Jr. Shares Details About New Book on ‘The Corbett Report’

On a recent episode of “The Corbett Report,” journalist and researcher James Corbett interviewed Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. about his latest book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.” 

by Jeremy Loffredo, The Defender
November 24, 2021

 

On a recent episode of “The Corbett Report,” journalist and researcher James Corbett interviewed Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. about his latest book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”

Asked why he wrote the book, Kennedy said:

“Over the past 20 months [there’s been] a coup d’état against liberal democracy, and one of the key players in this medical cartel or medical technocracy is Dr. Anthony Fauci.

“There’s an entire coalition of sinister forces [including] pharmaceutical companies, the intelligence agencies, the medical bureaucracies, the social media titans, the mainstream media and the military, which are all wrapped up in this obliteration of constitutional rights and the use of a health crisis to impose totalitarian controls.”

Kennedy described Fauci as “this sort of avuncular presence who is the face of the technocracy and the demolition of constitutional rights.”

Kennedy discussed Fauci’s role in helping Big Pharma capture federal regulatory agencies.  “Fauci is the spearhead of an agency that has experienced regulatory capture on steroids,” he said.

Kennedy told Corbett the financial links between the federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical companies are unlike any other federal regulatory regime. The metrics used within these agencies to measure whether or not an employee will get promoted, advanced or get a salary raise revolve almost entirely around how well the employee promotes vaccine uptake.

[These] people do not get rewarded for finding problems with vaccines — they get rewarded for covering up problems with vaccines … and some of the agencies directly profit from vaccine sales,” Kennedy said.

“For example, the [National Institutes of Health] owns thousands of medical patents, including half of the patent for the Moderna vaccine,” Kennedy said. “So Tony Fauci’s agency stands to make billions and billions of dollars. And Fauci was able to choose four of his high-level employees who each get their own individual patent shares and who’ll collect $150,000 per year for life.”

Corbett said the chapter of Kennedy’s book he found the “most difficult to read through” was the one titled, “Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde: NIAID’s Barbaric and Illegal Experiments on Children,” which details the role of Fauci and the organization he heads up — the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases — in illegal experiments on foster children.

“In this case [Fauci] was able to get control of different foster homes in seven states and essentially turn these pharmaceutical companies loose onto these children,” Kennedy said. “The experiments were absolutely barbaric … the children were tortured and they did not have legal representation.”

Kennedy added:

“The children who stopped taking the drugs because they were making them sick were sent to Columbia Hospital to have feeding tubes installed so the drug companies could [continue testing on them] even when they fought back. At least 85 of these kids died.”

Kennedy also cited the dramatic rise in chronic illness since Fauci took office, pointing out that Fauci has failed to protect the public from environmental health threats.

Other topics covered by Kennedy and Corbett include how Fauci was “locked into” carrying out controversial gain-of-function research for the military, how a large portion of Fauci’s salary comes from the Pentagon and the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency in pandemic planning and policy.

Watch the interview here + buy the book here:



 

©November 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense



Finally! Medical Proof the Covid Jab Is “Murder”

Finally! Medical Proof the Covid Jab Is “Murder”

by Dr. Vernon Coleman
November 22, 2021

 



 

It’s the 22nd November 2021 and this is the moment when the jabbing has to stop.

A couple of hours ago Darren Smith, the editor of the excellent The Light Paper, sent me a paper from the medical journal Circulation which proves that the covid-19 jabbing experiment has to stop today. I believe that any doctor or nurse who gives one of the mRNA covid jabs after today will in due course be struck off the appropriate register and arrested.

The journal Circulation is a well-respected publication. It’s 71-years-old, its articles are peer reviewed and in one survey it was rated the world’s no 1 journal in the cardiac and cardiovascular system category.

I’m going to quote the final sentence of the abstract which appears at the beginning of the article. This is all I, you – or anyone else – needs to know.

`We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’

That’s it. That’s the death bell for the covid-19 mRNA jabs.

The endothelium is a layer of cells lining blood vessels and lymphatic vessels. T cells are a type of white cell.

We always knew these jabs were experimental. My video in December 2020, just under a year ago, warned about these specific risks. I read out a list of possible adverse events published officially by the American Government.

But now we have the proof of the link.

The mRNA jab is, remember, known not to stop people catching covid. And it is known not to stop people spreading it. I don’t believe anyone disputes these facts.

And yet vast numbers of deaths and serious injuries have occurred among people who have been jabbed. Look at the item entitled ‘Updated: how many are the vaccines killing?’ on my websites.

Now we have the evidence to stop the jabbing programmes.

In the study quoted in Circulation, a total of 566 patients aged 28 to 97 were tested. They were equally divided among men and women.

‘At the time of this report,’ says the author, ‘these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vaccine.’

At the very least, the use of these jabs must stop now. Immediately, until more long-term tests are done.

If there were any journalists left in the mainstream media, this news would be lead item on all TV and radio programmes and be on the front pages of all newspapers.

Thank heavens for free speech platforms such as BNT which enables me to bring you this news.

I’ve said for a year that this jab was an experiment – certain to kill and injure.

We’ve always known that to experiment on people without their full consent and understanding – after disclosing all the risks and potential side effects – is a crime.

Now the evidence exists that must stop this experiment.

If the covid jab experiment continues after today then we know for absolute sure that this is not a medical treatment, it is a cull.

Please share this video immediately with everyone you know.

Thank you.

 

Connect with Dr. Vernon Coleman

cover image credit: geralt / pixabay



A Pandemic of the Vaccinated

A Pandemic of the Vaccinated
And to keep the REAL pandemic going, we must have vaccine mandates and passports and crackdowns on the unvaccinated

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 23, 2021

 

Daily Mail, November 18, 2021: “Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said waning immunity from the initial shots is leading to a rise in severe cases among immunized Americans. ‘What we’re starting to see now is an uptick in hospitalizations among people who’ve been vaccinated but not boosted’…”

NY Times podcast, November 12, 2021; Fauci states: “They are seeing a waning of [vaccine-induced] immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn’t just the elderly.”

Translation: The vaccine is severely injuring and killing MANY people, but of course we’re calling those injuries and deaths “COVID-19 disease.” Also, our solution to this catastrophe is piling on MORE injections (boosters), which will hospitalize and kill even MORE people.

The dailyexpose.uk has the much deeper story:

“The public are being repeatedly lied to by elected officials, unelected advisors, and the mainstream media, with all of them claiming that the world is currently experiencing a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated. This could not be further from the truth.”

“But the lie has now been used to justify locking down the unvaccinated in Austria, and locking the unvaccinated out of society in Australia.”

“Now Germany is about to follow suit, Scotland is about to ban the unvaccinated from pubs and restaurants under the advice of a qualified nutritionist posing as a Pandemic expert who goes by the name of Devi Sridhar, and the authorities and media in England have gone into overdrive on the advice of the ‘nudge unit’ to sway the population into supporting a lockdown for only the unvaccinated.”

“But it all makes absolutely no sense because official Public Health data shows that over the past three months… two-thirds of Covid-19 hospitalisations [people who get very sick from the shot] have been among the fully vaccinated, and a frightening 91% of Covid-19 deaths [people who die from the shot] have been among the fully vaccinated, and projections shows things are about to get a lot worse.”

“…in the week beginning November 6th a total of 773 Covid-19 hospitalisations [people injured by the shot] were confirmed in Scotland. Of these 137 were among the unvaccinated population, whilst 363 were among the vaccinated population.”

“…the fully vaccinated accounted for the majority of hospitalisations [in Scotland] between October 16th and November 12th, and again by taking into account hospitalisations as far back as August 23rd we can see that things have been getting progressively worse for the fully vaccinated by the week.”

“In the week beginning August 21st the vaccinated accounted for 68% of hospitalisations, but fast forward to the week beginning November 6th and we can see that the vaccinated accounted for 73% of hospitalisations.”

“The worst week so far for the vaccinated however, in terms of hospitalisations, came in the week beginning October 16th which saw the vaccinated population account for 79% of Covid-19 hospitalisations [people injured by the shot].”

“[In Scotland]…the fully vaccinated accounted for the overwhelming majority of Covid-19 deaths [deaths from the shot] between October 9th and November 5th 2021. But by also taking into account the number of…deaths by vaccination status as far back as August 14th we’re able to see that things are getting significantly worse for the fully vaccinated population by the week…”

“…the week beginning August 14th the vaccinated accounted for 78% of deaths, but fast forward to the week beginning October 30th and we can see that the vaccinated accounted for 85% of deaths.”

Switching from Scotland to England: “The latest Public Health England technical briefing on Covid-19 variants of concern has been published and it reveals that up to the 12th September 2021, 74% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since August 2nd 2021 [people killed by the shot] have been among the vaccinated population, confirming the UK is currently experiencing a pandemic of the vaccinated.”

But don’t worry, be happy. The solution—endless toxic boosters—will surely save the day. And by “save the day,” I mean tens or even hundreds of millions of lives will be ruined and ended.

And by “save the day,” I also mean the news media will cover all this up and continue to promote an alternative fantasy of a universe, in which the vaccine is a rescuing rainbow and the unvaccinated are terrorists.

There’s magic at work here. If you believe what the news media are telling you, then you’ll remain vibrant and healthy (if you take the vaccine and all the boosters). If you don’t take the vaccine, you’re doomed. It’s really quite something. Those talking news heads are elves from the forest. With every word they utter, they cast powerful spells.

That’s why the really smart people trust the news and embrace the elves.

 

SOURCES:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10217977/Fauci-says-Covid-hospitalizations-rising-fully-vaccinated-people.html

nytimes.com/2021/11/12/podcasts/the-daily/anthony-fauci-vaccine-mandates-booster-shots.html?showTranscript=1

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/18/91-percent-covid-19-deaths-among-the-fully-vaccinated/ 

 

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: geralt / pixabay



FDA to Disclose Pfizer Vaccine Data…in 2076?

FDA to Disclose Pfizer Vaccine Data…in 2076?

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
November 20, 2021

 



ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq. breaks down three big ICAN Legal Updates.

In response to a recent ICAN petition CDC revealed it didn’t have records of a single documented case of a person with natural immunity to Covid, transmitting the virus to another.

Then, The Biden Vaccine Mandate is Stayed.

Finally, the FDA requested a federal judge give it until the year 2076 to disclose all of Pfizer’s Covid Vaccine Data.

That’s 55 years!

Support ICAN’s legal work at icandecide.org

 

Connect with The HighWire



“Absolutely Forbidden to Give COVID Shots to Kids, Young Men and Women”, Jewish Court Rules

“Absolutely Forbidden to Give COVID Shots to Kids, Young Men and Women”, Jewish Court Rules

by Doctors for Covid Ethics
November 22, 2021

 

After eight hours of hearing a Halachic court in New York City ruled that “it is absolutely forbidden to administer or even to promote this (COVID-19) injection to children, adolescents, young men or women.”

The court also implored “all healthy adults who are of child-bearing age” to “stay away” from the abortion-tainted jab. The Jewish group sees the injection as intentionally practice of “sterilization or preventing fertility.” Due to concerns about what the jab might do to fertile women – including risks of severe blood-clotting – “it is forbidden for them to take this injection.”

The ruling referred to “breakthrough cases” as evidence that “there is no substantial difference between those who receive the injection and those who did not.” And “the number of COVID patients are about the same, comparatively, in both demographics.” Thus “further clarification is needed” for administering the jab to the elderly.

Halachic stands for the legal part of the Old Testament, the principles of right and wrong that have worked for mankind for over 5,000 years, and upon which some of our most fundamental legal concepts are based. Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology, was one of the recognized, renowned experts who testified before the court.

Mandatory COVID-19 “vaccines” transgress Halachic law, which means it could be anti-Semitic to enforce it on Jews who have no wish to take it. Given that the rabbinical courts in Israel are part of the formal legal system, further decrees forbidding mandatory Covid-19 vaccines might have the power to dissolve the infamous green pass system.

The official translation of Halachic delineation is available for view and download.

Download official translation of Halachic delineation

 

Connect with Doctors for Covid Ethics

cover image credit: hurk / pixabay



Fauci, Dead Orphans, AIDS Drug Trials, and the Lies

Fauci, Dead Orphans, AIDS Drug Trials, and the Lies

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 22, 2021

 

Leaks are turning into floods. We are hearing about brutal clinical studies on puppies and other animals, and now a study involving orphans in New York.

These studies were funded, in whole or part, by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a federal agency headed up by Anthony Fauci since 1984.

In 2014, investigative reporter, Liam Scheff, wrote an article at omsj.org, looking back on the orphan scandal. Ten years earlier, he had broken the story, and was then subjected to multiple attacks in the press.

Here is Liam’s 2014 article. As you read it, remember where the funding for the orphan drug trial came from:

“In 2004, I broke open the NIH Clinical Trial Scandal, the internationally-covered story of hundreds of New York City orphans used by government agencies and pharmaceutical companies in deadly AIDS drug trials.”

“In reporting this issue, I entered the orphanage where children were being used as guinea pigs, and over a period of several years, took interviews with mothers, children and childcare workers at the Incarnation Children’s Center. I also interviewed the medical director, and investigated the FDA documentation and published medical literature on the tests and drugs used, drugs which were often force-fed through nasal and gastric tubes to the children. I reported several deaths in children, and although the mainstream denied that any deaths were due to drug toxicity, they admit that over 200 children died.”

“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008. They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”

“The WIKIPEDIA writers cover up all details, as is expected.”

[Wikipedia:] “’No payment or compensation has been paid to any of the children used in the trials, or to their families’.”

“The New York Times, which was instrumental in covering up the story, hired Janny Scott and Leslie Kaufman to write a hit piece on me in 2005. They declared the following about using orphans in drug trials:”

“’It was seen as one of the great successes of AIDS treatment. In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, hundreds of children in New York City were dying of AIDS. The only approved drugs were for adults, and many of the patients were foster children. So doctors obtained permission to include foster children in what they regarded as promising drug trials’.”

“Later in the article, Scott admits that the ‘permissions’ for many of these children are ‘missing,’ (or were never there).”

“She continued:”

“’[T]here is little evidence that the trials were anything but a medical success’.“

“In 2009, she responded to my persistent queries about their investigation method. They had taken at least 40 documents from me and buried them; what else had they buried? Her answers to me were clarifying:”

“’No, we did not review patients’ medical files…I would be surprised if that would not have been a breach of patient confidentiality if someone had shown them to us…An unexpected side effect would have been a side effect not previously seen in response to those drugs, presumably. Advanced testing methods were the methods available at the time for diagnosing HIV infection…I do not recall interviewing Dr. Painter [the doctor in charge of the orphanage and orphans] but I may simply not remember. As you know, the Times moved to a new office a year ago. It was not possible to move all of our files. In my case, I threw away files that were more than 12 months old. As you know, the story you are asking about was done in 2005…I do not recall which studies we looked at. There were a lot of them — some more easily accessible than others, as you know…As for mentioning side-effects and FDA warnings, there are side-effects and FDA warnings on many if not most drugs. The side-effects of early AIDS drugs have been written about extensively…And, as I have said before, we were not presuming to judge whether or not experimental AIDS drugs should have been tried on children — a question that I suspect few journalists would be qualified to answer; we were attempting to put a public controversy in context…If you have further objections to the way the story was handled, I suggest you contact Joe Sexton, the editor of the metropolitan news section of the paper and the editor on that story’.”

“In 2009, the Times admitted that many children had died – but the VERA Institute, hired to ‘investigate’ the trials, was also forbidden from looking at medical records. Their ‘investigator’ also refused to take data from me on the trials – lists of the trials themselves, the drugs used, and their recorded ‘black box’ warnings. In a follow-up interview with Vera Myles of WBAI, the head of the VERA Institute admitted that many more children had died.”

“The Wikipedia is not able to talk about AIDS drugs, which kill people. But, of course, take them if you really want to.”

“Happy Anniversary.”

—end of Liam Scheff article—

FAUCI.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: hunny0001 / pixabay



Dr. Pablo Campra on Graphene, Weird Morgellons-Like Elements & Possible Microbiota in Covid Vaccines

Dr. Pablo Campra on Graphene, Weird Morgellons-Like Elements & Possible Microbiota in Covid Vaccines

 

See full collection of images — download PDF
Observations of Possible Microbiota in Covid mRNA Vaccines
Graphene Morgellons: Dr. Pablo Campra on the Weird Elements He Saw in Vaccination Vials

by Orwellito, Orwell City
November 21, 2021

 

Dr. Pablo Campra has been interviewed by different media to date. In each of the interviews, he has provided valuable information regarding his research on the real content of vaccines. A very interesting interview was the one he gave for El Arconte TV. In this interview, Dr. Pablo Campra talked about the possible microbiota that he detected some time ago and whose photographs he shared at the time.

In the interview, Dr. Campra shared his hypotheses about what the detected objects may be. While there’s uncertainty with some of them, the doctor holds a hypothesis that he’ll continue to share in other media: graphene Morgellons.

Below, Orwell City brings the key excerpt of the interview for all his followers and the scientific community interested in this topic.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel

Transcript:

 

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): This. For example, this would also be graphene, in theory. This is AstraZeneca.

Dr. Pablo Campra: Well, the one above is. In the one above is clear because graphene… Show the one above. It’s just that a lot of people get confused if they don’t have experience seeing it a lot. I’ve had to develop it myself. Many times it looks like crystallites, like pebbles. What’s indeed graphene, most probably —I don’t know if I have the spectrum— are objects that look like a handkerchief, like a kleenex that has folds, shadows, wrinkles. That could be graphene. It could be graphene if the spectrum confirms it. What can’t be graphene is…

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): And these ones that look like that? With those folds.

Dr. Pablo Campra: What gives the graphene peaks, I’ll tell you now… The one above… Can you show the one above? Well, that one. That one. Well, these are rare objects. This is not the technical report. These are the rare objects I found, which I find more interesting than graphene.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): If you want, let’s go to the report. Want to see it?

Dr. Pablo Campra: I’m more interested in this, but well, if you want to clarify something in the report because I’ve already talked enough about graphene. Now, the most important thing is what we have already said: magnetism, Bluetooth, and these rare objects. Graphene is there. I already know it’s there. Now, what relationship does graphene have with strange phenomena and thrombosis? Well, it seems to be related to thrombosis, but it’s not the only material that produces thrombosis. And all those strange things have the size of tens of microns. Look, it’s there. I have it measured. I can’t get a good look. 184 microns. That’s quite big. But that’s the spectrum that’s there. I’ve put these spectra up to show that they’re not graphene. If you zoom out we can see the spectroscopy.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): That one there looks like it has folds in it.

Dr. Pablo Campra: You have to show the spectrum to see if it’s graphene or not. Then, if you want, I’ll explain the peaks.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo):  And what is this we see here?

Well, that looks like the wings of an archon. When I saw it, I thought of you.

Dr. Campra makes a joke about the name Pedro Rosillo uses for his channel (El Arconte = The Archon).

That’s seen when the drop dries. Some material drags and stays like mud. I put the spectrum in, and it didn’t give the graphene peak, but it gave a very strange peak at 1450 cm-1, which is the clue. It’s that little ghost that appears there. That little ghost appears all over the sample. So, I think it’s the medium because there’s a gel there. A kind of strange hydrogel that never dries completely. And I think that’s what’s there because it appears a lot, is that hydrogel. And here there are some strange peaks, the one at 1450 cm-1 and the other one. They’re not graphene peaks, but they’re from some material we have there, and there are several hypotheses about them. This is really weird. What about this? Well, these are strange fibers that appear a lot. They’re a very intense color, like blue and red. Sometimes, they also look green or yellow.

They aren’t fibers from my sweater because there’s another doctor in Tenerife and other people who’re seeing them too. They have also taken samples of this from the masks, and… Is this one of the many weird things you say you have seen? This is the most intriguing thing. I’ll share with you the hypothesis, but it’s not confirmed. These are hypotheses derived from my work, and I’m going to share them with you. And when I’m interviewed by the American Stew Peters, I’ll also share it. Because I know that many people are working on this subject. So, these could be plant fibers that have gotten there through the air. But when they appear so frequently and are seen by so many researchers and in so many vaccines… And you see that they have some luminescence, too. That light there. No matter how many times I rotated the light source of the microscope, that luminiscence was still there. Well, is that until you see it there like…

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Is this something biological or not? This looks like…

Dr. Pablo Campra: It’s either a textile fiber or a plant or fungal fiber. Or nanotechnology. Because here, what you have to do… These, I think, haven’t given me the graphene signal. But there’s a theory that we’re handling. And it could be the famous Morgellons. Mysterious Morgellons, which I don’t want to talk about because they would put us on the same level as Iker Jiménez and the like. But this is a disease. It’s a lot like those fibers that appear on people’s skin. It’s like hives, a bad disease. It appears… The only thing missing is that they put a router in the vaccine. They’ve put everything in there, haven’t they? Those are other theories. The fact is that it gives a Bluetooth signal. That’s confirmed.

This fiber… Well, there’s a theory which is that of the Morgellons. It’s a real disease that people suffer from it manifests on the skin as an itch. It’s not luciferase, which I have used a lot. That’s a test that’s done a lot to detect some substance. That’s something else. And then, regarding the origin of the Morgellons’ disease, there are all kinds of more or less bizarre hypotheses: that they come from outer space, that they’re extraterrestrials, that they’re demons… I don’t want to go into this subject. When you come here, we’ll have a beer and talk about whatever you want. But they really look very, very much like the Morgellons. Above all, because of the intense blue or red color that the famous Morgellons usually have. The Morgellons are cited as having electromagnetic properties. Of interacting with electromagnetic fields. So, it’s a hypothesis derived from my work that I’m going to state, but I don’t have it worked out.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): But of course. But those Morgellons in which I’ve been particularly interested… I’ve investigated, and they say that it’s not biological, that it’s something artificial. And I wonder: How can it be artificial if it reacts with the environment? It’s like it’s looking for… It moves like it’s looking for you.

Dr. Pablo Campra: I know… some doctors who have been working…

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): But they say they aren’t biological, but that…

Dr. Pablo Campra: I know some doctors… There are some doctors who have worked on it a lot. They have treated people and are still treating them. There’s a doctor in Seville, but I don’t know her name. It’s a real disease. Now, whether it comes from space or not, I don’t go into that subject. But it’s a real disease, and they shouldn’t be in the vaccine. And we have to see if they really are because I want to analyze Morgellon’s hair and analyze this to see if it has the same structure. Because it does appear, over there, cited that there are graphene Morgellons. We can see the relationship with graphene.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): So, there are graphene Morgellons.

Dr. Pablo Campra: Yes. That’s cited. But if I do analysis…

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): But of course, you can’t rule out anything.

Dr. Pablo Campra: Exactly. In science, nothing is ruled out. That’s a common mistake: to close oneself to hypotheses. Hypotheses are put on the table, and then you analyze them. And you state them with supporting data. If you don’t, then let those of us who are working do their job. One doesn’t close oneself to a hypothesis. So, is there the Morgellons? I’ve stated the hypothesis because people who work with Morgellons have told me that they are. I have shown them my photos of the fibers, and they have told me: ‘Man, those are Morgellons! That’s really bad.’ So, I don’t say that vaccines have Morgellons, but needs to be studied. You cannot close yourself to the possibility. Of course. Now, if people start searching the net for ‘Morgellons’, they’ll find a German saying that this is extraterrestrial technology and that the demons are this and that. I’m neither in nor out. I have to know what that fiber is and what it is doing there. Yes. The other thing is philosophizing, let’s say. That’s all. In science, you only talk about what you can prove with certainty, right? Exactly.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Let’s see more photos because I hallucinate. I hallucinate with everything you see around here. -This, for example…

Dr. Pablo Campra: Some say that these are vegetable fibers, trichomes, textile fibers… I’m not the only one who has seen these things with such an intense color. This is what a Polish guy over there said they are like octopuses. Here, everybody is naming them. But I think the most plausible clue, for the moment, is that of the Morgellons. Anyway, we have to check it out.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): This is the same kind of thing, isn’t it?

That isn’t contamination that has come from the air to my sample, because they appear too many times. And these things can cause thrombi, I guess. Because they’re pretty big. I’m not a doctor, but thrombi are any clumping of platelets.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): I don’t know if they’re are Morgellons or not, but the tought is terrifying.

Dr. Pablo Campra: What you see there is kind of embedded in the gel. It’s like that’s kind of ‘sucking’ on the gel. And that’s when the people who grow these things come along. Some people grow them. And they say they, in fact, grow. Look at that… Here are things like… Also, there’s one thing… If you want, I’ll show you a picture taken by the German guy. It’s very curious. He has them very well studied. And the life cycle is like a fungus, but then it’s like nanotechnology. And then, the sporangia, which are the structures that release spores, it turns out that has a hexagonal mesh.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Holy cow.

Dr. Pablo Campra: A big mesh. Not like graphene, which is atomic. No. This one is big and hexagonal. Curious, isn’t it? It’s not a coincidence. None of this is on the package insert. But how much crap they’ve put in the vaccine! They’re never going to tell you that the vaccine is full of ‘hairs.’

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Mother of God!

Dr. Pablo Campra: Well, I’m not saying that in vaccines in general, but they’re present in the ones I’ve seen. Look at this one that looks like an intestine… People are speculating that it could be Morgellons or something else. But the important thing, really, is that none of this should be in the vaccine. That’s true. That’s a fact. The important thing is that it shouldn’t be in them and that there’s no comprehensive batch control system in continuous to see if this is or isn’t there. To rule out that it was only in the batches they sent me. Or that they added it in the batches they sent me. This is classic Morgellon.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Mother of God! It’s scary. It’s really scary. This is in Moderna. But they’re in all the vaccines! Well, Janssen, Moderna…

Dr. Pablo Campra: Well, I haven’t seen it myself, but this doctor from Tenerife… I don’t want to give the other people’s names, but well… He doesn’t care if I say it. He has a very nice name, though. Well, he has detected these hairs in graphene solutions. Of course, I don’t know if they’re made of this stuff. There, next to it, goes the spectrum. Look at the spectrum. There you have a peak. The one at 1611 cm-1 could be graphene or not. I’ve put it in the grid. And the important peak is the other one, the one at 1450 cm-1, and something because that one isn’t graphene. And we’re investigating what it is. There are 4 or 5 things that may be. It could be polyvinyl alcohol or some polymers. All of those are cited in interaction with graphene. Anyway. We don’t know what it is. But that peak comes up very frequently, and we have to find out what it is, which isn’t difficult if we’re allowed to work.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): My goodness!

Dr. Pablo Campra: Here’s another peak. That’s a huge peak. That could be a ‘pollen’ right there. I haven’t seen much, but if you keep going… Well, now we’re talking about it.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): And this is seen in Pfizer. And what is this roundel that you see here that has more roundels in it?

Dr. Pablo Campra: That could be pollen that’s gotten on me or somebody. But the thing is that it’s not Easter week to be struggling with pollen. But if you go down, you’ll see there’s more. Yes. I call this structure ‘morula.’ I don’t know what they are. Some can tell you that are bubbles, that they have air. These are things you have to check. I don’t say anything about it in this document that I have shared because I don’t know what they are. I put it there because someone with experience in this type of thing can formulate a hypothesis we can corroborate. What you can’t do is to go around pontificating, as there are many experts out there… Not even a Nobel laureate is an ‘expert.’ That laureate is just an expert in the research that has led him to the Nobel Prize. But if you take him out of his field, he is lost. So, an expert…

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Here the followers say ‘spores.’

Dr. Pablo Campra: An expert has to tell you, exactly, if this can be Morgellons or what they say here about ‘spores’ of Morgellons. I don’t know. I’m not an expert on Morgellons either. It’s necessary to leave all the hypotheses open and to observe this with the available analytical techniques and go discarding or accepting things. One cannot close oneself to anything and, above all, one cannot block an investigation of this type, as is being done at the level of the scientific system with coercion of all kinds that violate academic freedom and many others.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Someone asks: Has Dr. Campra received threats or pressures for his research?

No threats, but institutional pressures, of course. But it’s because the whole scientific system has bet on vaccination. So anyone who calls it into question… As the UNESCO treaties say about the rights of university researchers, among them is the right to question public policies with research free of coercion. Threats haven’t been made. But we’re under as much pressure as journalists, doctors… Everyone is under pressure here. The only thing missing here is pressure on the judges, which will come when this reaches the courts. This need to be investigated as well. Someone told me that they could be Morgellons’ eggs. I don’t know what they are, but they aren’t bubbles. And they usually have that little dot that looks like an embryo. Anyway. I have contacted people who know more about Morgellons, to see if we close the hypothesis. Let’s see if we confirm it, disprove it, or whatever. In other words, we cannot rule out anything here.

(Dr. Campra is making reference to the book of Revelation).

That’s why I tell you that there’s nothing definitive, only the second death, but for that, we have to wait a thousand years.

(Dr. Campra is making reference to the book of Revelation).

What about this? It’s the same thing, isn’t it? That’s a strange thing. Besides, I have many videos where they appear surrounded by those little dots. I mean, it’s like a nano-sized microorganism that you can’t see with the naked eye, and they move and interact with that. They appear there moving.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Question: Have you seen magnetism in people, Dr. Campra?

Dr. Pablo Campra: Yes, I’ve seen the magnetism. I have measured it. Now, I have seen very few cases. Of all the people I know, only in one person did I see it. But it’s what we all have seen. And the instrument did beep when I brought it close to the whole body. And then, over time, it went away. In most of the people I have passed the instrument over, I haven’t seen the phenomenon of magnetism. But, in short, magnetism is a real thing. What I’m seeing a lot is the phenomenon of Bluetooth. That’s easy to see. Anybody who has a cell phone with Bluetooth, which is not all of them… I don’t think the iPhone or the Samsungs. But the Chinese ones do. In the Resmi that I have, if I choose to locate Bluetooth without a name and go to a place where there’re many people, I check it. Some say that contactless credit card readers and smartwatches detect it. But well, you see this as Dr. Luis De Benito is researching it.

Well, this is a very curious thing. It looks like a Klimt painting. Curious, isn’t it? It seems to be reminiscent of 50 years ago. I don’t know how long ago. These are some rare discs. This was also shown by Dr. Carrie Madej on Stew Peters’ show. I’ve been watching it for a while. These are from AstraZeneca, and I’ve also seen them in Pfizer when the samples dry. And they’re like discs. I call them discs. Some said it could be graphene, that it was a variant of graphene.

However, I put the laser on it, and I don’t know if you see the spectrum, but it’s not graphene. It’s something else. And some say they are bubbles, for example, this researcher from Info….. I don’t know if it’s InfoVacunas or InfoCorona… There are two very good blogs: Corona2Inspect and InfoVacunas. Both are doing quite a commendable job, technically speaking. Of literature review and comparing photos. Well, but there’s a lack of analytics, isn’t there? But they find things similar to all these objects we are seeing now. The comparison of photos isn’t enough. You have to do an analysis. And those who’re saying that this is graphene, well, it doesn’t give me a spectrum.

If you show the spectrum, for example, it seems to me that the peak was at 1450 cm-1. So I haven’t seen the graphene peak. That’s one of the hypotheses of this man from InfoVacunas, whose name is Dani. And he’s doing a good job. Very few people are doing research, of course. Of those scientists from the system, only two have answered me. And one hasn’t even told me his name, so you can see what’s going on. Well, I don’t know what this is either.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Come on, I’m amazed because it turns out that graphene is the last thing to worry about.

Dr. Pablo Campra: I don’t care about graphene because it has already been detected. What matters in all this are the adverse and anomalous effects. The least important thing is graphene, which is present, but given the number of strange objects we see, it means that graphene is the least important thing. In other words… Once the regulatory system starts to get off its butt, it will make any court-appointed judge or the military, as you said, say, ‘Okay, let’s see, let’s do analysis. Meaningful sampling. Come on, do it to hundreds of vaccines. Do it to all the departments in all the universities that can do this. Each one with its own technique.’ In two days, we’re going to find out for sure.

On top of that, we’re talking about drugs that come, as you say, from foreign powers and are controlled by European drug agencies. Of course. For example, food. If something comes from abroad, the first thing you have to do is analysis because you don’t know if it can bring something… The agricultural sector of Almeria, which has been much vilified because decades ago a lot of agrochemicals were used, it’s the most controlled thing in the world. You would be amazed at the controls we have here to eat a tomato. On the other hand, a German is taking a shot of anything.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Question: Can graphene cross barriers until it reaches the brain? Does the intramuscular puncture reach the bloodstream? I don’t know much about that, I’m not an expert either, but the little I’ve read in papers says that it does. Because there may be graphene nanoparticles that are even called… What was the name? Quantum dots. Look at how big it can get, and it can go through barriers. You can take a look at the papers that are published. But I don’t think they the particles I saw can, because they’re too big. The ones I was able to locate were the size of tens of microns. I don’t know if they do or don’t pass through.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): They say here: ‘Russian roulette is more reliable than inoculation’. But come on, I think that after what we’re seeing tonight, the last thing to worry about is graphene. The last thing!

Dr. Pablo Campra: Let’s see. Here are the major adverse effects that I don’t know how many are going. About 40,000 official deaths in VAERS. I don’t know how many are in Europe. Why do they occur? We don’t know. I don’t know. There’s a lack of a control system. Of continuous monitoring. And then, we have the issue of magnetism and Bluetooth. If it’s denied, then it’s not investigated. But both phenomena are a fact. Well… That’s the serious thing, not whether it’s graphene or Spike protein.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): That’s the least worrisome issue here. Well, this is the same thing…

Dr. Pablo Campra: Yes, but I put the spectrum there, I think. Show the spectrum. It’s on the right. Not that one. It seems to me that, also, you’ve enlarged the PDF a lot. On the right is the spectrum of the phantom peak, a peak at 1450 cm-1, another at 1355 cm-1, and another at 1200 cm-1. As I’m not a Raman expert, I’m waiting for someone expert in Raman or who has software to analyze the spectra well to do it. I don’t have such software because it has to have a big data database. And boom, boom, boom! It tells you what it is because it compares it with thousands of substances and tells you more or less which of them it might be, with a margin of error. I think that, as I see a lot of this subject of the peak but not graphene, it could be the above gel, which is the one that is mentioned together with graphene for a series of biomedical applications.

And it’s a peak that I get too much. I think that it may be, that this signal is masking the disk below. These lumps show up a lot. Then, if you enlarge it, you will see that there are some dots there, like a dope. And this could be something doped with heavy metals, which you know, have been found in the vaccine. I don’t do that, but this Antonieta Gatti, an Italian woman with whom I was working at the beginning… Then, we had a fight because she leaked photos for others to plagiarize, like Dr. Young, do you realize? Well, she had detected heavy metals in all the vaccines, and she had already published it some time ago.

But there are also heavy metals in these. You detect them with a technique that is similar to this one. In which you introduce an electron microscopic spectroscopy, you put them… It’s called EDS, you introduce electron spectroscopy, and you know what heavy metal is present. Now, with this technique, you cannot see graphene. So, several heavy metals have been detected.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): So what is this?

Dr. Pablo Campra: This is a rare thing. This weird thing that you see here is seen in dark-field microscopy. If you look at the picture below, you’ll see it’s the same thing, but in a bright field.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): It looks a little different, doesn’t it?

Dr. Pablo Campra: That’s what I call a mushroom. This one I’ve only been able to see at AstraZeneca. It appears —as you know— when the drop is drying out. There’s a carryover and, in the end, objects just sit there. Like that gel that never dries. And that crystallizes. This can be either an inorganic crystal or an organic crystal. I don’t know what it is. I’ve even shown it to mushroom experts. I have no idea what it is. That only appears in the AstraZeneca. And, again, there’s the mysterious peak at 1450 cm-1. And that’s a big object. Anyway. You have to enter the values of those peaks in a database, a suitable software, to know which substances are compatible with that spectrum. And I couldn’t do that because I don’t have the means to do that. I don’t have the range of spectra. To me, the machine has given me the minimum analysis. This is the same thing. They look like arborescent forms. They may be a crystallization of salts that go in the vaccine. The manufacturer is the one who has to tell us. What’s surreal here is that we’re breaking our heads while everyone is silent: manufacturers, regulatory agencies, and, on top of that, all the media do nothing more than to crush us. That’s what’s not normal.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): You saw this in Janssen.

Dr. Pablo Campra: This is very rare. This has only been seen in Janssen. This has a very strange insectoid look. This is indeed cited in the Morgellons. Morgellons look like these insectoid structures. That’s what I call ‘noodles,’ because they look like noodles. Now, we’ll look at it in more detail. Go down in the document. OK. This appears when it dries. It’s also quoted as appearing when you dry graphene suspensions. Someone sent me that information. I think it was Corona2Inspect, Mike Andersen. These weird noodles appear when the droplet dries. This isn’t a crystal. Crystals don’t form that. This is something else. And if you go further down in the document, it appears larger. That there grows when the drop dries. They are like nuclei that are condensing. If you go down further, you’ll see them even bigger. There’s a kind of a nucleus from which they start to grow. And if you look further down, you’ll see… this. This is much more magnified and with their appearance next to it. And, again, we have the same little ghost peak.

1457 cm-1.

Dr. Pablo Campra: It’s not just the peak. It’s that phantom appears to me in everything I looked at in Janssen. So, here it appears as a rosary of little balls. It could be Morgellons. It could be. It’s certainly not what it says on the package insert. These are not nanoparticles with RNA related to the protein Spike. Nor is it any salt that is cited in the package insert that dries that way. These are dark fields. These are videos, actually. I haven’t embedded them because they’re heavy. But in the dark field, you can see all these little dots quite frequently. This is what’s called symbionts. I’ve been seeing this for a long time in cell culture. But they’re living things. That’s not in random Brownian motion.

And well, I don’t know if it’s the result of contamination or not, but it appears quite frequently. And there you have a sign, for example… Look at that one that looks like a rhombus. The bug or whatever it is. That little dot or nanobots or whatever. I don’t know what it is. These little dots are always kind of ‘fiddling’ with those little crystals. They go like dragging them as if it were a layer. These crystallites always have that rhomboid shape. And these little dots are playing with them. These are microbiota. It doesn’t float around and moves. I can’t put videos in the document, though. If you go further down, there’s another strange shape. See? Here’s one that’s a little bit bigger, and the little dot is always clinging to the little crystal. Here you see another one.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Yes, yes, yes. Keep scrolling. As I’m Andalusian, I speak as such. The good thing about talking to you is that I don’t have to pronounce the ‘s’.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo):  I understand you. I ‘peak.

Dr. Pablo Campra: Look at this circle. This is a very strange thing. The little I’ve read says there’s nanotechnology called ‘SiN cells,’ which are these weird spheres. These spheres appear and, sometimes, they have the diamond inside with the little dot moving.

El Arconte (Pedro Rosillo): Well, some people say it’s alien technology. Well, all I know…

Dr. Pablo Campra: Bring me a beer, and you and I can talk all you want. But here… The only thing we know for sure is that this shouldn’t be in the vaccine. The rest is philosophizing. It’s not just that it shouldn’t be. It’s that there’s no one monitoring it. The fact that they don’t test for it or the FDA… Look, here’s what I’m telling you. That circle that has that little diamond inside it with the little dot moving. I’m not a microbiologist, but no microbiologist has been able to tell me what the hell that is.

 

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: Dr. Pablo Campra



Cardiologist ‘Warning’: Heart Risk Measure ‘Dramatically’ Increases in Covid-19 Vaccinated Patients

Cardiologist ‘Warning’: Heart Risk Measure ‘Dramatically’ Increases in Covid-19 Vaccinated Patients

by Sharyl Attkisson
November 21, 2021

 

The Covid-19 Pfizer and Moderna RNA vaccines “dramatically increase” a common measure of heart risk in people.

That’s according to a recently-published “warning” in the journal Circulation by cardiologist Dr. Steven Gundry, who is called a pioneer in infant heart transplant surgery.

The analysis was presented at the recent meeting of the American Heart Association.

The “dramatic changes in most patients” means they are at higher risk of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome, such as heart attack, according to Gundry.

In part, the analysis states:

“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients

Dr. Steven R Gundry in Circulation

Scientists have already established a myriad of heart and blood related effects of Covid-19 vaccines in some patients, including young people. Among the adverse events linked to the vaccines are thrombosis blood clots and heart inflammation known as myocarditis and pericarditis.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) say the vaccines are safe and effective for everyone they are recommended for, and that the benefits outweigh the known risks, which will be emerging for some years as more people get vaccinated.

There are millions of adverse events officially reported by people after vaccination, including thousands of heart-related injuries.

The PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature) Test measures the most clinically-significant protein biomarkers that measure the body’s immune system response to arterial injury. These injuries lead to the formation and progression of cardiac lesions which may become unstable and rupture, leading to cardiac event.

PULS Cardiac Test

Read the full article here

 

Connect with Sharyl Attkisson

cover image credit: Pexels / pixabay



A Reminder of Liability Information for COVID-19 Vaccination Sent to German Physicians

A Reminder of Liability Information for COVID-19 Vaccination Sent to German Physicians

by Doctors for Covid Ethics
November 19, 2021

 

In June 2021, a Notice-of-Liability letter was sent to physicians in Germany. This reminder letter includes the recent findings and results that further strengthen the conclusion that the gene-based COVID vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective, and dangerous, as stated in the June letter.

“We would also like to ask you, beyond the legal level, that you, as physicians and also human beings, once again thoroughly examine whether you can reconcile your attitude and your medical practice with your conscience. Our first principle is that we must do no harm.”

Special thanks to Mascha Orel and her team for the excellent translation.

Read and download full letter

Excerpt from letter:

This letter is to remind you that you may be held personally liable for vaccine injuries if you administer any of the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines to your patients. In our previous letter this June, we outlined that these vaccines are all unnecessary, ineffective, and dangerous. The contents of that letter can be found at the following web address:

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/nol1-german.pdf

Along with the June letter, you received a detailed liability notice to make you aware of the legal risks. In the meantime, there have been public attempts to downplay this issue and dismiss our warning as “misinformation”. We would like to remind you that the initial situation with the Covid-19 vaccines is completely different than with the swine flu vaccines.

In the current situation, it is not to be expected that the state will take over the injury compensation payments to the people harmed by the Covid-19 vaccinations, as it did after the swine flu. The only certain thing is that the manufacturers enjoy “immunity” and cannot be held liable. You are hopefully aware that the contracts and the terms of the contracts contained therein have now become public. At the end of our letter today, we also address the fact that in the meantime, more and more is becoming known about how Pfizer simply falsified and deceived data in the approval process, which adds a completely new dimension to the current situation. Please take our reminder seriously and carefully consider our letter today, as well as the one from June of this year.

We would also like to ask you, beyond the legal level, that you, as physicians and also human beings, once again thoroughly examine whether you can reconcile your attitude and your medical practice with your conscience. Our first principle is that we must do no harm. Please check carefully if you really fully inform your patients before vaccination and if they can really give an understanding consent. Please check to see if patients are being pressured by third parties or are able to make a true free choice. And in particular, please check as carefully and thoroughly as you can whether you can really ethically and scientifically justify vaccinating pregnant women, adolescents, and children. We would like to briefly present recent findings and results that reinforce and expand on these points in the following.

1. The vaccines are unnecessary

It should be common knowledge by now that COVID-19 carries only an extremely small risk of death or serious, irreversible damage to health for people without serious pre-existing or concomitant diseases. This is true even for people over 65 years of age, and especially for young people. [1] For example, only a full 11 COVID deaths in the 10- to 19-year-old age group have been reported to the Robert Koch Institute in the period ending July 13, 2021.

The main reason for the very low overall mortality is cross-immunity brought about by the previous infection with other beta-coronaviruses. The wide distribution of this immunity [2, 3] and its clinical efficacy [4-7] have been adequately confirmed.

2. The vaccines are ineffective

The reports on the so-called clinical trials that were supposed to prove the effectiveness of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines [8, 9] are full of contradictions and, therefore, not credible [10, 11]. However, the failure of the vaccines has now been documented in practice.

The U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) published a study that included 469 COVID cases [12] – this number is more than double the sum of cases reported in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s clinical trials. Of these 469 cases, 74% involved previously vaccinated individuals, whereas only 69% had been vaccinated in the general population during the period. These apparent vaccine failures affected all three vaccines covered, those from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. Since the vaccine produced by AstraZeneca is very similar to that produced by Johnson & Johnson, one must assume that AstraZeneca vaccine would not have performed any better.

The ineffectiveness of the vaccines can further be demonstrated by international comparison. Plotting the number of new COVID cases against the population vaccination rate for 68 countries yields only a weak but positive correlation [13] – even high vaccination rates in the 60-80% range fail to reduce the number of new infections.

If their benefit is zero, the benefit-risk analysis of the “COVID-19 vaccines” is negative even if their adverse side effects are overestimated, which is hardly possible since experience shows that only about 1-3 % of adverse effects are reported at all.

3. The vaccines are dangerous

As with any other treatment, an honest weighing of benefits and risks is essential for COVID vaccination. The work of Kostoff et al. [1] on this topic makes it clear that the harms far outweigh the benefits – and this is true in every age group, even in seniors.

Severe side effects of vaccination are common. Canadian general practitioner Dr. Charles Hoffe wrote an open letter to the British Columbia provincial health minister back in April, pointing out four such cases among a total of 900 patients; these had occurred after the first injection of Moderna vaccine [14]. One of these cases was fatal; the other three had severe, probably permanent, neurological damage. Hoffe has since reported other such cases in the same group of patients.

The U.S. (VAERS) and European Union Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Sites have recorded tens of thousands of deaths and a much larger number of serious illnesses, mostly vascular and inflammatory. Table 1 summarizes the status of reports in the VAERS database. As expected, the number of deaths recorded so far in 2021 that occurred after the administration of other vaccines is about three-quarters the value for the entire previous year. In comparison, the number of deaths following COVID vaccination is huge – it is over 50 times greater.

Read and download full letter

 

The letter of Notice of Liability sent to German physicians in June is available for view and download.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/nol1-german.pdf

 

Connect with Doctors for Covid Ethics

cover image credit: laxman8 / pixabay



As Reports of Injuries After COVID Vaccines Near 1 Million Mark, CDC, FDA Clear Pfizer, Moderna Boosters for All Adults

As Reports of Injuries After COVID Vaccines Near 1 Million Mark, CDC, FDA Clear Pfizer, Moderna Boosters for All Adults
VAERS data released today by the CDC included a total of 894,145 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 18,853 deaths and 139,126 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 12, 2021. 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
November 19, 2021

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released new data today showing a total of 894,145 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 12, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 18,853 reports of deaths — an increase of 392 over the previous week — and 139,126 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 3,726 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 654,413 adverse events, including 8,664 deaths and 54,962 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 12, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 8,664 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 12, 10% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 15% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 26% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 436.9 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 12. This includes: 254.5 million doses of Pfizer, 166.3 million doses of Moderna and 16.1 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

This week’s U.S. data for 5- to 11-year-olds show:
  • 444 adverse events have been reported in the 5 to 11 age group since Nov. 1.
  • The rest of the reports in VAERS for children in the 5 to 11 age group occurred prior to the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, and are due to ”product administered to patient of inappropriate age.”
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:  

The most recent death includes a 16-year-old girl from Missouri (VAERS I.D. 1823671) who died after receiving her second dose of Pfizer.

Other reported deaths include a 17-year-old female from Washington (VAERS I.D. 1828901) who died Oct. 29 reportedly from a heart condition after receiving her second dose of Pfizer; a 12-year-old girl from South Carolina (VAERS I.D. 1784945) who hemorrhaged 22 days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine; and a 13-year-old girl from Maryland (VAERS I.D. 1815096) who died from a heart condition 15 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.

  • 59 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 559 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 549 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 134 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
This week’s U.S. VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 12, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
FDA, CDC sign off on Pfizer, Moderna COVID boosters for all adults

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today authorized Moderna and Pfizer COVID boosters for all adults. The agency made its decision without input from its advisory committee, whose members, on Sept. 17, voted 16 to 2 against recommending boosters, citing a lack of long-term data and stating the risks did not outweigh the benefits.

Hours after the FDA announced its decision, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) signed off with an unanimous endorsement.

The ACIP said 18- to 49-year-olds “may” get a booster, but people 50 and older should get one. CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky is expected to clear the doses, which will allow boosters to be administered broadly to the general public.

Speaking for the FDA, Dr. Peter Marks, head of the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement:

“The FDA has determined that the currently available data support expanding the eligibility of a single booster dose of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines to individuals 18 years of age and older.”

Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and an FDA advisory panel member took issue with how the FDA arrived at its decision.

In an email to The Epoch Times, Offit said, “I think it would have been of value for the public to hear an open discussion about the need for boosters. I wish we had had the chance to discuss this.”

The FDA said it did not hold a meeting because “the agency previously convened the committee for extensive discussions regarding the use of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines and, after review of both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s [Emergency Use Authorization] requests, the FDA concluded that the requests do not raise questions that would benefit from additional discussion by committee members.”

Pfizer and BioNTech requested authorization last week after submitting the results of a phase 3 trial involving more than 10,000 participants.

Moderna resubmitted its application for its 50-microgram booster dose for all adults just two days ago. The company said the FDA based its decision on the “totality of scientific evidence shared by the company,” including data that showed neutralizing antibodies had waned at about six months.

14-year-old Kentucky girl mistakenly given J&J vaccine

A 14-year-old Kentucky girl was mistakenly given J&J’s COVID vaccine, which is not authorized for anyone under the age of 18, International Business Times reported.

The girl was given the jab Oct. 16 at a vaccine drive-in at a high school in Covington.

The girl’s mother, Rolina Mason, said her daughter was reluctant to get vaccinated and wanted the J&J vaccine because it was only one dose. Mason agreed that the nurse could administer J&J, but didn’t realize it wasn’t authorized for use in children.

Mason said she trusted the nurse who told them that it was okay for her daughter to get it.

The health department contacted Mason a week later and informed her that her daughter should have received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine instead. Mason’s daughter reportedly experienced skin rashes after receiving the shot.

States bypass CDC, gave out COVID boosters to all adults before authorization

State officials from California to Maine encouraged and allowed adult residents to get COVID vaccine boosters despite recommendations by the FDA and CDC to reserve the shots for elderly and high-risk groups, CNBC reported.

California also told medical providers not to turn away any adults who requested a booster.

Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, New Mexico, Vermont and West Virginia are also promoting widespread rollout of boosters for any fully vaccinated adult, with governors in Colorado and New Mexico signing executive orders a week before the FDA authorized the shots for the general population.

Gov. Jim Justice of West Virginia called for all adults in-state to get their boosters, adding that fully vaccinated residents would be “very foolish” not to register for the third dose.

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said during a briefing Monday she wanted to make sure everybody 18 and over was eligible and encouraged to get a booster. Danyelle McNeill, a spokesperson for the Arkansas Department of Health, told CNBC in an email “the great majority of adults in Arkansas” were already considered high risk by the CDC before Hutchinson issued his recommendation.

Kentucky approved boosters for fully vaccinated adults on Wednesday, while Connecticut, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts and Vermont expanded their booster programs this week before the FDA and CDC signed off, today.

Several children in California sick after receiving wrong COVID vaccine doses

At least two children in California are sick after a clinic administered the wrong doses of a COVID vaccine to 14 kids.

Denise Iserloth said she took her two children, ages 8 and 11, to a clinic where they received 20 micrograms of dosage instead of the recommended 10 micrograms.

Sutter Health said in a statement it warned parents of the mistake as soon as they learned of it, and contacted parents to advise them of CDC guidance. But Iserloth said she wasn’t made aware of the error until 10 hours after her children were vaccinated.

Both of her children stayed home from school on Monday with bad stomach aches, and her oldest child fell down twice in the hours following the shot, Iseroth said.

“I understand the mandate, I tried to comply with it, and my children now have been given a double dose and I don’t know the long-term side effects,” Iserloth said. “[…] It is unacceptable and negligent, completely negligent on their part.”

COVID hospitalizations on the rise among fully vaccinated 

COVID hospitalizations and emergency room visits are on the rise among people who are fully vaccinated, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

“What we’re starting to see now is an uptick in hospitalizations among people who’ve been vaccinated but not boosted,” Fauci said Tuesday. “It’s a significant proportion, but not the majority by any means.”

In a White House COVID-19 Response Team briefing Wednesday, Fauci stressed the importance of vaccines and highlighted how well they work. At the same panel, CDC Director Walensky reported a decline in vaccine effectiveness among the elderly and residents of long-term care facilities, many of whom were the first to be eligible to be vaccinated last winter.

The current seven-day rate of COVID hospital admissions is about 5,300 per day, according to the CDC.

It’s not clear how many hospitalizations are breakthrough cases as the agency stopped reporting hospitalizations among fully vaccinated people and its website shows data only through Aug. 28.

CDC admits to not tracking data on natural immunity

In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, the CDC said it has no record of an individual previously infected with COVID becoming reinfected or transmitting the virus to others — because the agency doesn’t collect that data.

The FOIA request, submitted Sept. 2 by attorney Aaron Siri of the Siri & Glimstad law firm on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network, sought documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.

The CDC responded Nov. 5, stating:

“A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”

According to Siri, the revelation that the CDC does not collect data on people who have acquired natural immunity to the virus raises questions about vaccine mandates, specifically how the government or employers can mandate vaccines for people who may not need them and who could be at a greater-than-average risk of experiencing an adverse reaction to the shots.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

 

©November 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: ronstik / pixabay



Dr. Jose Luis Sevillano, La Quinta Columna: Planet Lockdown Full Interview

Dr. Jose Luis Sevillano, La Quinta Columna: Planet Lockdown Full Interview

by Planet Lockdown
November 17, 2021

 



Video available at Planet Lockdown Odysee channel.

Dr Sevillano is one of the key people in a Spanish speaking ad hoc group of researchers called the Fifth Column or La Quinta Columna.

They were the ones that arrange for the examination of vials of various brands of the Covid vaccines at a Spanish University laboratory and released a report on it at the beginning of July 2021 revealing the presence of graphic oxide in all the vials examined.

This material is heavily referenced in endless scientific studies, with a preponderance of applications in the field of bio-sensing, e-medicine and nano-medicine. It is a very hot high tech material now and fits the bill as a possible purpose for this obsessive global vaccination push.

Website: https://www.laquintacolumna.net/

Follow on Telegram: https://t.me/laquintacolumna

For English translations of much of La Quinta Columna’s work, see Orwell City.

Watch more full interviews and educate yourself!  https://planetlockdownfilm.com/full-interviews/

 

Connect with Planet Lockdown



‘Guinea Pig Kids’: Fauci’s Legacy of Cruel Experiments on Kids

‘Guinea Pig Kids’: Fauci’s Legacy of Cruel Experiments on Kids
Recent revelations about Dr. Anthony Fauci shed new light on a 2004 BBC documentary, “Guinea Pig Kids.” The film exposed the cruel experiments — approved by Fauci and funded by U.S. taxpayers — on poor minority children as part of Fauci’s search for a cure for AIDS.

by Ann Tomoko Rosen, The Defender
November 15, 2021

 

The recent #BeagleGate scandal accomplished what a global COVID pandemic, a “gain-of-function” research scandal, worldwide vaccine mandates and a career of squandering American tax dollars could not: It got the world to stop and question the integrity of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

In recent weeks, mainstream and social media have exploded with accounts of the cruel animal experiments funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) using American tax dollars.

The NIAID, a division of the National Institutes of Health, operates under the direction of Fauci.

Viral social media posts described how — after being starved and having their vocal cords removed so that they couldn’t howl or bark — beagles had their heads trapped in cages with hungry sand fleas that ate their hosts alive.

Other puppies were injected with lab-made “mutant” variants of tick-borne bacteria before being exposed to hundreds of ticks that then sucked their blood for up to a week. Their blood was drawn twice a week for eight weeks and then they were sacrificed.

In yet another experiment, beagles were injected with heartworm larvae and later euthanized so the larvae could be used in other experiments.

The White Coat Waste Project (WCW) investigation that broke these stories triggered a public outcry and a bipartisan effort to hold Fauci accountable for the unnecessary and abusive experiments he signed off on using millions of taxpayer dollars.

The subsequent mainstream media hit pieces on WCW are evidence of the impact #BeagleGate had public perception.

“The irony is that it’s these little puppies bringing the outrage,” said Vera Sharav, human rights activist and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP).

It’s not that Sharav doesn’t care about puppies. She is frustrated, however, that she has been unable to generate the same public outcry when it comes to her lifelong mission to end cruel medical experimentation on children.

“Animals have powerful advocates, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, fighting to protect them from this kind of abuse,” Sharav said. “But these children are disposable. It’s a travesty.”

As a child survivor of the Holocaust, Sharav witnessed first hand how a corrupt system can systematically obliterate moral norms and human empathy in the name of public health.

She has worked for decades to put a stop to unethical and abusive medical practices, including those subsidized and facilitated by government agencies and Big Pharma.

Her battle to break through conspiratorial silence and get the attention of the media and regulatory authorities has been an uphill battle, spanning decades.

But in 2004 there was a glimmer of hope. The BBC reached out to Sharav as part of an investigation for a documentary film, “Guinea Pig Kids.”

Based on the findings of investigative journalist Liam Scheff, the gut-wrenching documentary exposed Fauci’s torturous clandestine medical experiments on HIV-infected children in the care of Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC).

Sharav teamed up with Scheff, investigative reporter Celia Farber and the film’s director, Jamie Doran. For a brief time, the three believed the truth might finally come to light.

But as they all discovered, shedding light is not for the faint of heart.

Who were the ‘Guinea Pig Kids’? 

The ICC, which marketed itself as “New York City’s only skilled nursing facility providing specialized care for children and adolescents living with HIV/AIDS,” was the scene of these crimes against humanity.

In 1992, NIAID provided funding to reintroduce the ICC as “an outpatient clinic for HIV-positive children” and the clinic became part of Columbia University’s Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Unit.

New York’s child welfare department, the Administration for Children’s Services, was empowered to offer up the vulnerable and underprivileged children under its care as lab rats to test toxic AIDS drugs like AZT, Nevirapine and various protease inhibitors, as well as experimental AIDS vaccines.

Most of these drugs, approved for adults with AIDS, carried Black Box warnings and caused potentially lethal side effects, including bone marrow death, organ failure, deformities and brain damage.

Most of the children were Black, Hispanic and poor, often born to drug-addicted mothers.

NIAID, capitalizing on the prevailing AIDS orthodoxy, justified the unethical experiments performed on these kids as the only chance they had to survive.

Jacklyn Hoerger, whose job it was to administer the drugs to the children, said:

“We were told that if they were vomiting, if they lost their ability to walk, if they were having diarrhea, if they were dying, then all of this was because of their HIV infection. I just faithfully gave it as I was told by doctors.”

Compliance, as a unidirectional principle, has been a recurring theme throughout Fauci’s career. According to ICC Medical Director Dr. Katherine Painter, the “biggest problem facing families with HIV-positive children is adherence.”

Hoerger learned this lesson the hard way, when she began the process of adopting two half sisters from the program. Applying a much more compassionate scientific method at home, Hoerger deduced that it was the medications that were causing the children’s ailments. So she took them off the drug regimens.

She described the improvements as “almost instantaneous” and noted the girls began eating properly for the first time in their lives. But her non-compliance deemed her a negligent parent and she lost custody of the girls. She was never permitted to see them again.

At ICC, the cooperation of experimental subjects consistently took precedence over their wellbeing. Children were required to take these medications regardless of their negative impacts, and adverse effects were attributed to their presumed illness (AHRP discovered that NIAID allowed its pharma partners to experiment on children without lab-confirmed HIV infections).

When some parents refused to consent to the trials, children’s services officials would promptly remove them and place them with foster families, or in children’s homes where a child’s participation would then be authorized.

When children resisted or refused their medications they were brought to Columbia Presbyterian hospital, where plastic tubes were surgically inserted into their stomachs for drug administration.

According to Sharav, at least 80 children died over the course of these clinical trials.

“Fauci just brushed all those dead babies under the rug,” Sharav said. “They were collateral damage in his career ambitions. They were throw-away children.”

A visit to ICC’s mass grave at Gate of Heaven cemetery in Hawthorne, New York, drove that point home for Celia Farber, an investigative reporter who conducted research for the film.

“I couldn’t believe my eyes,” Farber said. “It was a very large pit with AstroTuft thrown over it, which you could actually lift up. Under it, one could see dozens of plain wooden coffins, haphazardly stacked. There may have been 100 of them. I learned there was more than one child’s body in each.”

Compliance also was an issue when it came to adhering to the Nuremberg Code or even following federal regulations related to clinical trial participation.

Instead of adhering to requirements put in place to protect foster children, New York  created an institutional review board, an ethics committee comprised of representatives from the same hospitals who were conducting the research to grant approvals.

In other words, approval was put in the hands of the stakeholders.

In March 2004, Sharav’s organization filed a complaint with both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the federal office of human research protection.

The complaint  focused on the unlawful enrollment of foster children in these trials and systemwide institutional failure to protect them in accordance with federal regulations mandating an independent advocate for each child.

These kids, some as young as 3 months old, had no independent voice. The ACS, the same organization that essentially put them on a conveyor belt for clinical trials, was also their legal guardians.

“It’s a complete abdication of ‘first do no harm’ and the dignity of human beings,” saif Sharav. “From a medical research perspective lab animals are expensive and these children are cheap. The government handed them over like a herd of animals.”

The campaign against ‘AIDS deniers’

“Guinea Pig Kids” debuted on BBC on Nov. 30, 2004, but was abruptly taken off the air.

A complaint filed by powerful AIDS activists led the BBC to pull the documentary and expunge the investigation. And it was far worse behind the scenes.

Celia Farber said she and others were “relentlessly brutalized at every level” for being so-called “AIDs deniers.”

“They came after us professionally, economically, spiritually, socially,” Farber recalled. “Nobody wanted to be an AIDS denier. It elicited such immediate hatred. That term cast a really deep spell and people couldn’t hear past it. It instantly shut people down.”

A 2005 subcommittee meeting hosted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) concluded that the protected rights of foster children had been violated in some of the AIDS drug trials — but nothing changed at the ICC and children continued to die.

The VERA Institute of Justice, which was tasked with investigating the death of the children used in these experiments, was prohibited from looking at medical records and refused to accept data from Scheff’s own investigation.

The efforts of Scheff, Sharav and Farber were plunged back into darkness. Until now.

“Fauci has headed this agency (NIAID) since 1984 and has never come up with a drug or vaccine,” Sharav said. “There has been no healing. He has only succeeded in terrorizing people.”

Sharav is ready for Fauci’s reign of terror to end.

But perhaps we can learn the most about Fauci and his cronies, not by looking at his failures, but directing our attention to his success. He and his colleagues at the NIH and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have perfected a pandemic paradigm using changing diagnostic paradigms and clinical definitions incorporating flawed testing methods.

This method was used to launch some of the most successful fear campaigns in global history. That fear was used to generate a medical warfare model that has been used to justify thousands of cruel, unnecessary and expensive experiments.

And while those experiments did not produce effective treatments or cures, they successfully desensitized researchers and healthcare workers and trained them to “just follow orders” regardless of health outcomes.

This was all accomplished at enormous expense to American taxpayers — and the resulting orthodoxy has caused millions of people their health.

Treatments come and go, but medical compliance and creating a “how dare you” culture to shame and silence the voices of dissent has likely remained the most successful and profitable scientific experiment in global history.

But there are two variables that Fauci didn’t accurately account for: the resilience of the human spirit and the power of a parent’s love.

Witnessing the unraveling of the narrative is surreal for Farber.

“I still feel this rage and disgust that this terrorist matrix of AIDS activists succeeded in convincing the public to look away, that they shouldn’t care about these children,” Farber said.

But despite everything she’s been through, there’s a spark of optimism.

“The spark of light is that so many people are embracing this now, are prepared minds for this now, if one can be a ‘prepared mind,’” Farber said.

 

©November 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit:  / pixabay



Catherine Austin Fitts: Vaccine Passports Will Absolutely End Human Liberty in the West. “This Is Not About Democracy Versus Fascism. This Is About Freedom Versus Slavery.”

Catherine Austin Fitts: Vaccine Passports Will Absolutely End Human Liberty in the West. “This Is Not About Democracy Versus Fascism. This Is About Freedom Versus Slavery.”

 

Catherine Austin Fitts Speaks to Switzerland – Press Conference 12/11/2021

by Oracle Films
November 12, 2021

 



Video available at Oracle Films BrandNewTube channel.

 

Transcript provided by Truth Comes to Light.

 

Well, first of all, I want to thank you very much for the opportunity to speak. And I finally get to meet Bobby Kennedy in person. That’s fantastic.

I represent and work with people all over the world who pray that the Swiss people vote ‘No’ on November 28th.

And I want to share with you why.

Wherever you travel throughout the world, Switzerland is viewed as the lighthouse of democracy. But also the lighthouse of the right to have family wealth and property rights, the lighthouse of human civilization, of freedom in many different respects including health freedom.

And so what you do here is very important for the Swiss people, but very important for people all around the world.

Again, think of yourself as the lighthouse.

Plague laws — this is not the first time in history that plague laws have been used to centralize control. Control of transportation, control of labor, control of banking and bank accounts, control of all the different kinds of capital that make up human civilization.

But the covid laws are particularly draconian in the history of plague laws because not only do they control labor, transportation, banking — but now, with advances in digital technology, we’re looking at complete control through the banking system of 100 percent of all assets ultimately.

So what happens here?

For many, many years most of us have grown up in a world in the western democracies where we have a balance of power between the bankers and the people. The central bankers control monetary policy and the people vote for an electorate that controls the fiscal policy.

Now what we’re watching with covid laws all around the world is the central bankers moving in and exercising essentially a coup d’état where they take control of fiscal policy as well.

And, again, with the advances in digital technology, vaccine passports will not be about health. Vaccine passports are part of a financial transaction control grid that will absolutely end human liberty in the west.

For many years I have fought and written against central control of the financial system. We’ve centralized more and more capital, more and more control. And we’ve done it with tactics called ‘divide and conquer’.

And we’ve all experienced many different divide and conquer tactics. Men against women. Black against white.

But now we have a new one called the vaccinated versus the non-vaccinated.

Because if you’re going to centralize control of every aspect of people’s lives, and literally strip them of their assets and their property rights, you need a new, more venal, divide and conquer. And we can’t let that happen.

Because, ultimately, we’re talking about all of our liberties, all of our human rights, all of our property rights.

So I would plead with you to look behind — so listen to what’s been said today and look behind what these laws are really about and where the vaccine passports lead.

The vaccine passports, along with additional control system, are the end of human liberty in the west.

And, as I said, this referendum on November 28th will be a very important signal to the world as to whether the most educated and intelligent populations in the world can see through the ruse of the plague laws — into what is really happening — and step up to protect our rights and the future of human civilization.

So this is not about democracy versus fascism. This is about freedom versus slavery.

Because when you institute a complete digital financial control you were talking about something much worse than any fascism we have seen yet in our history.

So please vote ‘No’ on November 28th for yourself, for your family, for your right to preserve and grow family wealth, your right to have health freedom, transportation freedom, labor freedom — but also to preserve your role as a lighthouse for democracy worldwide.

And, again, I just want to thank the tremendous leadership here who’s been leading this effort in Switzerland and and on behalf of all of worldwide.

 

Connect with Oracle Films

Connect with Catherine Austin Fitts

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]



Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Calls on Switzerland to Stand Up to This Global, Militarized & Monetized, Coup D’état Against Democracy: “Not Just for Switzerland, but for the Entire World”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Calls on Switzerland to Stand Up to This Global, Militarized & Monetized, Coup D’état Against Democracy: “Not Just for Switzerland, but for the Entire World”

 

Robert F Kennedy Jr. Speaks to Switzerland – Press Conference 12/11/2021 

by Oracle Films
November 12, 2021



Original video available at Oracle Films BrandNewTube

 

“For every life that they save from covid, four people are dying of heart attacks.
And that’s not a good bargain.”

 

Partial transcript provided by Truth Comes to Light:

 

I’m very, very proud to be here with all of these extraordinary Swiss leaders — people who are standing up for democracy.

But also my colleague here, Catherine Austin Fitts. This is the first time we’ve met in person, although we’ve talked over podcasts. And she’s an important leader in helping me build Children’s Health Defense and helping organize the resistance. She’s a unique individual. She’s really an international treasure. She came up at the center of what we would call the deep state in the 80s — as a high official at Dillon Read, which is one of the leading banking houses in our country, and then working as Assistant Secretary of Treasury at HUD. And has spent a lifetime exposing the corruption in the banking system, in the federal banking system. And she’s paid a very, very high price. And I want to thank her for her leadership… She understands what’s happening– mechanisms from a very, very high level above what we’re seeing here — which is this coup d’état, global coup d’état, against… democracy in all of Europe, and North America, and Australia, Canada, all over the world.

I want to make one comment on the medical issue. And I’m not a doctor but I read very, very carefully as a litigator. I read the preclinical studies, trial studies. And one of the data points that was not mentioned here, to me he is one of the data points we paid a lot of attention to in the United States, which is… Pfizer is the only company now that has received approval by the FDA.

We’ve looked very carefully at their data points and their report. And Pfizer had — originally it was going to do a three-year trial but it cut it to six months. It apparently cut it to six months because, as we now know, the vaccines lose effectiveness after six months. And it would be very difficult for them to justify an approval if they allowed the study to go more than six months. So they unblinded the study after six months and they gave the vaccine to the placebo group. So the study is effectively over. And then — but they did have to publish a study to justify their approval, their licensure by the FDA.

And one of the key tables in that study is a table called S4. And that shows one of the — probably to me the most important data point — which is ‘all cause mortality‘.

Were there more people who died in the placebo group or in the vaccine group?

Here’s what that graphs says. And you have to also read the footnotes to the graph because they omitted some information. And you can see why they did.

There were roughly 22,000 people in the vaccine group. There were 22,000 people, roughly, in the placebo group. At the end of six months, there was one death from covid in the vaccine group.

And there were two deaths from covid of the 22,000 people in the placebo group. So Pfizer was able to tell FDA and the American public, this vaccine is 100 percent effective against death — because two is 100 percent of one.

What most Americans, when they hear that data point, what they believe is that if they take the vaccine they have 100 percent chance of not getting covid.

But that’s not what it means. What it means is you have to give 22,000 vaccines to avert one death from covid. And so you have to make sure that nobody dies from those 22,000 vaccines.

Unfortunately, what their data show is that in the vaccine group there were 20 deaths. Among the 22,000 people over six months, 20 of them died. In the placebo group, 14 died. What that indicates, if you get the vaccine — and this is what Pfizer’s data is saying — you have a 48 percent greater chance of dying over the next six months… But in the placebo group there was one person who died of a heart attack.

In the vaccine group there were five people who died of a heart attack. What it indicates is that if you take the vaccine you have a 500% greater chance of dying of a heart attack over the next six months — according to Pfizer’s data. And what it also indicates — that for every life that they save from covid, four people are dying of heart attacks. And that’s not a good bargain.

I want to say, the principal point, the point that I came to Switzerland to talk about: You have a referendum on November 28th. Because Switzerland is not part of the EU, people of this country have retained their democratic rights to vote directly on the law. So this is the only country in Europe where democracy has a chance to stand up to what we call this global coup d’état against democracy.

And what we’ve seen since the beginning of covid is very strange. We did not see a medical response to the pandemic. We did not see doctors like Dr. Fauci going on TV and telling people to increase vitamin D, to avoid chemical residues in their food, to lose weight, to have lots of social interactions, reduce stress in their lives, to try to stay outside and get plenty of sunshine, and exercise — we never saw any of that.

It was a militarized and monetized response from the beginning. It was telling people — imposing draconian controls on human behavior with no scientific rationale given. And in our country we saw a direct assault on our Bill of Rights, beginning with freedom of speech.

We have amendments to our constitution that guarantee rights to the American people. The first amendment — the constitutional framers, the people who wrote our Constitution, put the most important right in the first amendment, which was the right to freedom of speech.

Because John Adams, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson said if government can restrict your speech, they can commit any atrocity. They can get rid of all of your other rights.

And they began using their alliance with the social media companies and the big media behemoths, and began censoring any criticism of government policies and any criticism or questions about a novel, zero-liability, experimental pharmaceutical product.

Once they got rid of freedom of speech, so that people like me are not allowed to talk about it or criticize these policies or ask questions about these policies. None of these doctors are allowed to question these policies. People who are injured by vaccines cannot question the policies, cannot talk about their injuries in public. It cannot be reported by the press in our country.

Once they got rid of that, they went after religious freedom. They closed all the churches in America for a year — with no public hearings, no explanation, no science given.

They kept the liquor stores open as essential businesses. And I have no problem with that. But the liquor stores are not in the constitution. The churches are.

They got rid of private property rights. They closed a million businesses for a year — without just compensation, without due process of law. There was no hearing. There was no science debated. Just shut them down.

They got rid of jury trials. The sixth and seventh amendment guarantee jury trials in our country. Here’s what the seventh amendment says: No American shall be deprived of the right of a… trial before a jury of his peers in cases of controversy exceeding $25 in value. There is no pandemic exception. And, by the way, the people who wrote our Constitution knew all about pandemics. Because during the revolutionary war we had a smallpox pandemic that sidelined George Washington’s army for three months in New England, a malaria epidemic that sidelined the army of Virginia. So these two armies were both sidelined by pandemics. So the framers who wrote the Constitution knew all about pandemics. And they did not put an exception to pandemics.

They got rid of due process of law, which they’ve done in all the countries in Europe. Instead of having public hearings, where officials have to publish the proposed rule, they have to do some kind of environmental assessment that explains the rationale for the rule, they have to do a cost/benefit analysis that shows all of the science behind… that justifies the rule — that shows all the people who are going to be hurt but the rule, all the people who are going to gain from the rule. All of that has to be disclosed in a transparent way. And you have public hearings where people can come and say ‘I have my own science. I have my own experts. Let’s have this debate.’

Democracy flourishes on the free-flow of information. Free speech is the sunlight and water and fertilizer for democracy. We need to have ideas that can triumph in the marketplace of ideas — the basis of our policies.

All that has been obliterated. Instead, we have unelected technocrats, medical technocrats, who we know are captured and corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry and the banking interests. And they are simply telling us ‘put on the mask, lockdown, social distance, shut down the economy’. And they have demolished democracies, they have obliterated the middle class throughout the world, they have robbed us of our freedoms. And the one place. the frontline in this battle if we are going to win, is here in Switzerland…

In the one instance, across the globe, we had this — all of our liberal democracies pivot suddenly and obliterate democracy.

The one place where the people of a nation can stand up and say ‘we are not gonna be your slaves’, ‘we are gonna take back control of our government’, ‘we are going to reclaim our sovereignty’, ‘we are going to rebuild democracy’. The one place that can happen is Switzerland…

If we win, if democracy wins this vote in Switzerland, it will spread virally across the globe. If we lose here, we lose a lot of hope.

So it’s very, very important for the people of Switzerland to stand up and say: ‘It’s not that we don’t believe that covid is not dangerous. We have all different… It’s not that we don’t believe that vaccines may help. Some people may believe that. That’s okay. You can believe in vaccines or against vaccines but we all need to believe in democracy. And we all need to believe and respect each other, and to tolerate each other. And to say we are going to build communities that are dignified, that respect all of our citizens and make sure that all those diverse voices can be heard in the political process. We are not gonna turn our government over to pharmaceutical industries, to the big tech titans from Silicon Valley, to these medical technocrats and to the banking system’.

You think about this. I got expelled from Instagram because of “vaccine misinformation”. But Instagram and Facebook cannot point to one single erroneous statement that I ever made. Everything we post is vetted, it is sourced and cited to government databases or peer-reviewed publications.

When they use the term “vaccine misinformation” they are using it as a euphemism for any statement that departs from official government policies and pharmaceutical industry profit-taking. It has nothing to do whether it’s true or false. It only has to do with what the political implications are.

And who is doing the censorship?

It’s government officials in league with Bill Gates, with Larry Ellison, with Mark Zuckerberg, with Sergei Brin from Google, and with all of these internet titans. They they have engineered, not only the destruction of our democracy and our civil rights, but they have engineered the biggest shift of wealth in human history 3.8 trillion dollars from working people to these handful of billionaires — many of them from Silicon Valley.

This pandemic has impoverished the world and created 500 new billionaires. And those are the people who are strip-mining our economies and making themselves rich.

And is it a coincidence that these are same people who are censoring criticism of the government policies that are bringing them trillions of dollars?

The people aren’t stupid. We can see what’s happening. We can ask the question ‘Cui bono?’.

And the answer is that the people who are benefiting are the people who are squeezing away our constitutional rights and engineering the destruction of democracy worldwide.

Switzerland is the front lines for this battle. We need all the Swiss people to come out, not just for Switzerland, but for the entire world — for everybody, every man, woman and child who loves democracy globally, who respects their fellow man or woman.

Switzerland is the front line battle for reclaiming those rights.

 

Connect with Oracle Films

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]



The Real Anthony Fauci

The Real Anthony Fauci

by Dr. Joseph Mercola w/ Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
November 14, 2021

 

Video available at Mercola Bitchute channel. Download interview transcript.

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Fauci is the highest-paid federal employee in the U.S., and 68% of his $437,000 a year salary comes from bioweapons research
  • Instead of safeguarding public health, Dr. Anthony Fauci turned the National Institutes of Health into an incubator for pharmaceutical products, and essentially sold the entire country to the drug industry
  • Fauci has had a hand in creating the vaccine gold rush. In 2000, he met with Bill Gates, who asked to partner with the NIH in an agreement to vaccinate the world with a battery of new vaccines. In 2009, this agreement was rebranded as “The Decade of Vaccines,” the objective of which was to implement mandatory vaccinations for every adult and child on the planet by the year 2020
  • One of the darkest stains on Fauci’s career, aside from his role in the COVID pandemic, was his handling of the HIV epidemic. Suppressing the use of repurposed drugs, Fauci zeroed in on AZT, a toxic drug that has killed an estimated 300,000 AIDS patients
  • The similarities between the AZT scandal and what’s happening today with the COVID jab and remdesivir are striking. Again, Fauci has suppressed all treatments using inexpensive and nontoxic drugs. U.S. taxpayers have paid for research, while drug companies have raked in the profits, all while having zero liability for injuries and deaths

In this interview, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an environmental activist and attorney turned ultimate freedom fighter, discusses his latest book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,” which is a must-read if you want to know more about the behind-the-scenes of this giant fraud. We could talk for hours and not cover but a fraction of what’s in this book, which Kennedy calls a “devastating indictment of Tony Fauci.”

In a nutshell, Kennedy describes how Fauci turned the National Institutes of Health into an incubator for pharmaceutical products, and essentially sold the entire country to the drug industry. The book is an incredibly well-referenced record of his history of decimating human health, and exposes him as a self-serving charlatan.

Tony Fauci basically created this template that he then used over the next 45 years, to develop toxic drug after toxic drug. He killed early treatment, and killed any protocol that competed with his pharmaceutical enterprise. A lot of people have died [as a result]. ~ Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

I particularly enjoyed how Kennedy placed Fauci in the context of Rockefeller’s legacy with respect to Bill Gates, who developed an alliance with Fauci over 20 years ago. Rockefeller set us on a course of toxic, profit-driven medicines synthesized from the byproducts of the oil refinery process a century ago, and Gates picked up where he left off and then collaborated heavily with Fauci.

The Decade of Vaccines

Fauci, in turn, has had a hand in creating the vaccine gold rush. In 2000, he met with Bill Gates, who asked to partner with the NIH in an agreement to vaccinate the entire population of the world with a battery of new vaccines. In 2009, this agreement was rebranded as “The Decade of Vaccines,” the objective of which was to implement mandatory vaccinations for every adult and child on the planet by the year 2020.

“I show how they use the pandemic simulations, working very closely with the intelligence agencies, with the big media companies and the major pharmaceutical companies to make that happen,” Kennedy says.

“Gates calls what he does philanthropy capitalism, [the idea that] you can use philanthropy to make money. He had a foundation where he has sheltered $50 billion in tax-free money. And, he continues to have absolute control over it. He uses that money to gain control of public health agencies in our country and the World Health Organization.

He’s created a lot of his own [organizations] with Dr. Fauci and a lot of these quasi-governmental agencies that people think are governmental. They’re actually front groups of the pharmaceutical industry like GAVI and SEPI …

He uses this battery and this control of the WHO to set pharmaceutical or medical policy, public health policy around the globe, in a way that maximizes the profits from his stakeholding in these big pharmaceutical companies.

I also show he’s simultaneously doing the same thing to control the global food supply … [He’s] really trying to change both public health and food policies in ways that benefit corporations that he’s invested in and that he’s partnered with.”

Fauci’s Lethal Handling of the AIDS Epidemic

Gates didn’t lure Fauci to the dark side, however. Fauci had already spent decades playing with people’s lives and sacrificing public health for profit. One of the darkest stains on Fauci’s career, aside from his role in the COVID pandemic, was his handling of the HIV epidemic.

The first cases of AIDS surfaced in 1981. Initially, the AIDS program was run by the National Cancer Institute, a separate institute inside the Health and Human Services Department (HHS). The general belief was that AIDS had a chemical etiology caused by drug use. This all changed when the HIV virus was discovered.

Fauci started working for the NIH in 1968 as a clinical associate in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation at National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He became director of the NIAID in 1984, the year after the discovery of the HIV virus, and was appointed director of the Office of AIDS Research in 1988, when that office was established. As explained by Kennedy, Fauci essentially built the NIAID around an AIDS drug called AZT.

“AZT was a chemotherapy formulation that was so toxic it killed all the rats when they gave it to them. The inventor of AZT felt that it was unsafe for any human use, so he didn’t even patent it,” Kennedy says.

“Very early on, the National Cancer Institute had found that when you put AZT in a culture of HIV, that killed the HIV, not surprisingly. It killed anything it touched. And so, Fauci partnered with the manufacturer of AZT … He guided that formulation through the regulatory process and tried to fast track it. He cheated terribly on the clinical trials.

In the clinical trials, it was killing everybody. It literally kills everybody who takes it. But he was able to keep the people in the treatment group alive by giving them huge numbers of blood transfusions. It does keep them alive for the eight weeks, and based upon that eight-week trial, he got approval for AZT. It was unprecedented.

As Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for discovering the polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) technique, said, with any chemotherapy drug, you’re supposed to give it to somebody for two weeks. Chemotherapy is designed to kill every cell in the body, but hopefully it kills tumor cells first, and you can take the person off it. The tumor dies, if you time it right, and the person doesn’t die.

If you put somebody on that for life, like Tony Fauci was doing, every one of them is going to die. And that’s what happened. Meanwhile, there were a lot of drugs at that time that were being repurposed. Local, community-based doctors in San Francisco and New York who were treating the AIDS community were finding that these drugs treated the symptoms of AIDS, and they stopped people from dying.

Fauci made a deliberate crusade to sabotage those, to make sure they were not available to sick people, in order to make sure that AZT would be the only solution. And AZT was the most expensive drug in history. It was $10,000 for a one-year supply [while costing just $5 per dose to manufacture, plus U.S. taxpayers paid for all of the research and development of the drug] …

Tony Fauci basically created this template that he then used over the next 45 years, to develop toxic drug after toxic drug. He killed early treatment, and killed any protocol that competed with his pharmaceutical enterprise. A lot of people have died [as a result].”

Although a bonanza of money was made with AZT, it pales in comparison to Pfizer making out like a bandit with its COVID shot. The U.S. taxpayers paid $20 billion to fund the research, and another $10 billion to market the COVID jab. Pfizer created the best-selling drug in the world and will make $35 billion from it this year.1 Even better, unlike AZT, this is absolutely risk-free and they can never be sued for injuries.

Everything in Fauci’s Career Is Groundhog Day

An estimated 330,000 people have died from AZT alone. Overall, the similarities between the AZT scandal and what’s happening today with the COVID jab and remdesivir are striking. Again, Fauci has discouraged the use of any prevention for COVID-19, and any treatment using inexpensive and relatively nontoxic drugs such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.

U.S. taxpayers funded the research while drug companies have made an estimated $100 billion in profits from the shots in a single year, all while having zero liability for injuries and deaths even as people are being coerced into taking them.

“Everything in Tony Fauci’s career is Groundhog Day,” Kennedy says. “Again, and again, and again, he is repeating the same behavior and it is paying off. And he has this way of talking where he never really says anything. And this habit of just lying, and lying, and lying …

I knew a lot about what happened during the HIV crisis because my uncle, Ted Kennedy, was chair of a health committee at that time. Teddy was the first presidential candidate to court the gay vote, and I was running his campaign at that time …

In the health committee, his primary concern for most of the time was AIDS. I talk about this in my book.

Finally, Fauci was called in front of Congress, and was just fileted. Henry Waxman and all of these well-known Democratic congressmen were saying, ‘What the hell are you doing? You’ve produced nothing. You’re totally incompetent.’ After that, his career was over, and he decided at that point, ‘OK, I’m going to work on getting these repurposed drugs on the market.’

He did that for a couple of years, and he had a project, which was a dual track project where they could, without going through the clinical trials and FDA randomized, placebo controlled trials, they could get approval for these drugs, so that people could get insurance for them and pay for them. So, I was deeply involved in this for many, many years, and I’ve known Tony Fauci for a long time.

I have insights on who he really is, that most liberal Democrats are utterly ignorant of. He is the opposite of everything they believe. He is the architect who turned our public health system over to the pharmaceutical industry. He does not do public health. And there is no metric at NIH, where they look and say, ‘We are improving public health.’

The only metric they have is, ‘How many vaccines have we given? How many pharmaceutical drugs have we sold? How much kickback money are we getting into the agency?’ As I explain in the book, this agency has become an incubator for the pharmaceutical industry.”

Gain-of-Function Research Under Fauci’s Watch

Fauci is responsible for an annual budget of about $6.1 billion. He gets another $1.6 billion from the military to do bioweapons research, which is where 68% of his $437,000 a year salary comes from. (Fauci is the highest-paid federal employee in the U.S. Second-highest is the president, at $400,000 a year.)

“That’s why he had to do that gain-of-function shenanigans in Wuhan,” Kennedy says. “He had to do it, because he had to hold on to his salary. And most of his salary comes from bioweapons research …

Gain-of-function research has never provided a single scientific or medical development that has assisted us in responding to pandemics. Not one. But Fauci continues to do it, because it is critical to his salary. And it’s critical to that funding stream.”

Now, the bulk of the NIAID’s funding was intended to be used to study American health and to improve it; to eliminate infectious allergic diseases and autoimmune diseases. Instead, under Fauci’s watch, the chronic disease epidemic has exploded.

This, despite the fact that between Fauci, Gates and the U.K. Wellcome Trust, they control 63% of the biomedical research on earth through their funding. Over his career, Fauci alone has distributed more than $930 billion in research grants through the NIAID. You could say they control all of it, really, because they also have the capacity to dry up funding to projects they don’t want done.

Ruthless Fauci

Case in point: Something happened in 1989, triggering a series of epidemics — autism, food allergies, Tourette’s Syndrome, narcolepsy, ADD/ADHD, speech delay, language delay, rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune diseases like juvenile diabetes. All of them sprang up right around 1989. Why? What’s causing them? It’s Fauci’s job to find out, but he refuses to, and he blocks anyone else from digging too deep.

“Tony Fauci’s job is to say, why did that happen? It has to be an environmental toxin. Genes don’t cause epidemics. They provide the vulnerability, but they cannot cause an epidemic. You need an environmental toxin. All we have to do is figure out which one started in ’89, and became ubiquitous the same year. But if anybody tries to do that study, Fauci will ruin their career.”

Top suspects include vaccines, which dramatically increased in ’89, and virtually all of the chronic diseases that have skyrocketed are listed as potential side effects on the manufacturers’ inserts. The herbicide glyphosate also became ubiquitous around that time, and really exploded in 1993 when RoundUp Ready corn was invented. GMOs, other pesticides, ultrasound and PFOAs are other potential culprits.

“Our kids are swimming around in a toxic soup. And it could be all of those things, or it could be one or another, but it’s easy to find out. You just do the science. And that science is easy to do, but it will never be done as long as Tony Fauci’s in office, because he doesn’t want us to know — because those are the industries he has survived by protecting,” Kennedy says.

Fauci Works on Behalf of Big Pharma

Kennedy goes on to explain how Fauci works on behalf of Big Pharma, and why he’s become so important for the drug industry.

“Between 2009 and 2016, about 230 drugs were approved by the FDA, all of which came out of his shop. So, he is an incubator for Pharma.

And here’s what he does: At his lab, he has petri dishes filled with every virus [imaginable], and he has scientists that are messing around with different molecules and different poisons, and they’ll drop those poisons into a petri dish and see if it kills the culture. If it kills the culture, then he has a potential antiviral drug.

The next step is, they give it to rats, and see if it kills the rats. If most of the rats survive, now you have a potential antiviral that may work in humans. Then, he farms it out to a big university. Now the person it goes to at the university is usually a very powerful person. It’s the dean of the medical school, or the chair of one of the departments, and they run the clinical trials, which is extremely lucrative.

So, they will do the Phase 1 trial, and they’ll recruit maybe 100 people for the trial. Fauci gives that principal investigator maybe $20,000 per recruit. The university skims off 50% to 75% of that. So, now, that university is hooked into the system.

Then, if the drug works in Phase 1 and Phase 2, then they have to bring in big groups of people — 10,000 people — and you’re talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. And they have to bring in a pharmaceutical company that now takes control of about half the patent.

Tony Fauci’s agency keeps a share of the patent. For example, they now collect royalties on the Moderna [COVID] vaccine. [The NIAID] gets half the royalties, billions of dollars. The university researcher keeps some of the patent, so he is now permanently attached to Tony Fauci and will do anything he says, and the university itself is getting some of that patent.

So, it’s hundreds of millions of dollars that are going to these universities every year, in addition to the grants that he’s giving, and he can cut all that off if somebody at the university does the wrong study.

Once the drug goes through Phase 3, it goes to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Fauci says, ‘Well those are independent scientists at FDA.’ The panel is called VRBPAC [Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee], and they’re NOT people who work for the FDA. They’re outside persons who are brought in.

Well, where are they brought in from? They’re Tony Fauci’s principal investigators from all the universities, who are working on his other projects, and they’re brought in to rubber stamp the drug …

They OK it and give it a license, because they know that, next year, their drug is going to be in front of that committee, and they are going to want the committee to rubber stamp them. So, that committee never says no. It always green lights everything, and it’s completely controlled by Fauci. He controls the whole process …

Every expert you see on CNN is on Tony Fauci’s payroll, and CNN will never tell you that. It will say, ‘This is an independent virologist, he’s an immunologist at Baylor University, or Stanford, or Harvard.’ They’re not telling you where that guy’s bread is being buttered, and that the person who’s buttering it is Tony Fauci, with your taxpayer dollars. The whole system is just fixed.”

Fauci’s Past and Rotten Character Are Catching Up on Him

As more and more of Fauci’s lies and his funding of sadistic experiments on animals and aborted fetuses are coming to light, Kenney predicts Fauci will be forced to resign, especially as the book comes out and people really start to understand what he’s been up to all these years.

“Nobody who was not a sadist in his soul would allow [the beagles being eaten by sandflies] experiment to happen,” Kennedy says. “Yet, Tony Fauci deemed that the best use for $450,000 of U.S. taxpayer money, with all of the screaming needs in public health.

But it’s not just $450,000. Millions and millions [of dollars] he has put into these sadistic experiments where they’re torturing animals to death. Like you’d see in a schoolyard with little boys, who don’t know any better and need to be told, ‘You don’t do that to another creature.’ Fauci doesn’t have that instinct, it’s lacking.

It explains what he has done during COVID — denying early treatment to millions of Americans and forcing them to suffer and die in their homes, or on ventilators and remdesevir, which is a deadly toxic drug, rather than get treated and be healthy.

And punishing, silencing, censoring, delicensing, discrediting any doctor who tries to say, ‘Wait a minute, I’ve been treating patients, and my patients aren’t dying, because I’m using hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin’ and an entire battery of repurposed drugs that we now know treat virtually all COVID cases.

Seventy to 90% of COVID deaths and hospitalizations could have been prevented, and there are hundreds of studies that support that. Yet, he forbids people from doing it. That is a sociopath …

And shutting down a million businesses, is that really going to save lives? There’s no study that indicated it would … We have 4.2% of the global population, and we had 14.5% of the deaths. Why is anybody listening to this guy? There’s no Health Minister in the world who has a worse track record than Tony Fauci.

There are many countries that had 1/100th of our death rate per million in population. And guess what? Those are mainly the African and Asian countries, that as a matter of course are giving ivermectin for river blindness and hydroxychloroquine for malaria control.”



In support of Kennedy’s assertion that Fauci will be forced to resign, you can view his recent grilling November 4, 2021, by Sen. Rand Paul in front of Congress. What is most impressive are the comments, which are virtually unanimously disparaging Fauci.

Fauci’s Lethal, Illegal Experiments on Children

In his book, Kennedy includes a chapter on some of the animal trials Fauci funded. He also tells a far grimmer story, where the guinea pigs were Black and Hispanic children. At least 85 of these children died, but the number could be as high as 1,000 or so. Fauci got these children by arranging for foster care programs in New York and six other states to assign children who had lost their parents to AIDS to participate in drug studies.

These children had no guardian, so they were illegal studies. To do a clinical trial on children, you need to have a guardian appointed who puts their interests first, ahead of the drug companies. Fauci didn’t want that, so he allowed these studies to go forward without a legal guardian for any of these kids. No one was watching out for them. The trials weren’t even done by licensed medical professionals.

“They were mainly Dominican immigrants, who were deeply compassionate, who discovered in the middle that they were actually being hired to treat these children as guinea pigs, and they were killing huge numbers of them. Many of the kids didn’t even have HIV, so they had no possible benefit from the drug, which is illegal.

Yet Fauci got away with all of it. I believe there was a Congressional investigation for a brief time, but like everything that gets near him, it kind of peters out. The BBC did a documentary on these kids back in 2004 called ‘Guinea Pig Kids.’

They interviewed these children, [one] who said, ‘I took the drugs. They made me feel sick. I was vomiting, I couldn’t eat, I was tired all the time, it was painful, and I refused to take it.’

And when they refused, they were sent to another of Tony Fauci’s principal investigators at Columbia Presbyterian who installed a feeding tube to force feed these children these toxic chemotherapy drugs that they refused to take … As bad as Beagle gate is, what he did to these Black and Hispanic children is even worse.”

COVID-19 — The Culmination of Fauci’s Criminal Enterprise

As for the COVID-19 pandemic, Kennedy equates it to the culmination of Fauci’s career. In the book, he recounts how Fauci has been a key figure in pandemic planning — not necessarily how to prevent one, but how to create it, as infectious disease mortality had dropped so dramatically that infectious diseases were becoming an increasingly low priority.

So far, every single pandemic that has been dramatized has turned out to be a complete fraud, and the same can be said for COVID. All the while, billions of dollars were spent on vaccines.

“They’ve taken all of these lessons they learned from all the other fake pandemics and rolled it into coronavirus,” Kennedy says. “Now, I want to make clear, I’m not saying that coronavirus is not a pandemic, or that it doesn’t kill a lot of people. It does. But we’ve all been manipulated by an exaggeration of cases, the exaggeration of deaths, the obscuring of data, all of the manipulations that they’ve done to us.

[In the book] I have a picture that somebody got from a Freedom of Information Act request. It’s a March Madness graph of all of the different pandemics — fake pandemics — [Fauci] has tried during his career, all converging with the grand winner being coronavirus. And [Fauci] signed it, somebody on his staff made it.

But it was Tony Fauci’s triumph, winning March Madness. It’s basically a picture of his career. Him trying every three or four years a new fake pandemic, and finally hitting on all eight cylinders with coronavirus. It’s like it’s a joke, and we are the punchline …

Here’s what I would say to people. We have to stop this. This is the hill that we all have to die on. If you are a parent, and you let them give this [COVID shot] to your child, you are not doing your job as a parent. If you are a doctor, you are committing malpractice to give this to a child. We all need to resist.

I would say that every American who sees what’s happening has to start engaging in civil disobedience every day. And that may mean going to a store and telling them, if they demand a vaccine passport, that you are not going to patronize that store anymore. It may mean resisting on the job. Do not quit! Make them fire you. Because then you have a lawsuit.

Right now, the best thing is to make them fire you for not taking an emergency use authorization vaccine, because there are no approved vaccines in this country available to any American. It was a myth, it was a hoax, it was a chicanery for them to say, ‘We approved this Comirnaty vaccine.’ If you go on Pfizer’s website, it will tell you, ‘We do not make Comirnaty available in the United States.’

Why are they trying to go after our kids? Here’s why. The vaccines can only get liability protection once they are approved. The only way they get liability protection is if they’re on the child’s vaccination schedule. And then, once the CDC votes them onto the child vaccination schedule, then they get liability protection, even for adults.

One lawsuit can bankrupt the company if they didn’t have liability protection. So that’s why they’re going after our kids. They need it to get that liability protection. And we need to stop them from the collateral damage they’re going to cause to an entire generation of children; 26 million children will get a vaccine that’s been tested on 1,300 kids, with catastrophic results.”

To learn more, be sure to pick up a copy of “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.” You don’t want to miss this fascinating and carefully researched book.

 

Connect with Dr. Joseph Mercola

Connect with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

cover image credit: RandomUserGuy1738  / Wikimedia Commons



Peter Doshi, PhD Challenges the Majority Blind Acceptance of “Empirical” Narratives Around Covid Vaccines

Peter Doshi, PhD Challenges the Majority Blind Acceptance of “Empirical” Narratives Around Covid Vaccines

 

British Medical Journal Editor, Peter Doshi, Speaks Out 

by Doctors for Covid Ethics
November 13, 2021

 

On November 1, speaking at an expert panel convened by Senator Ron Johnson, British Medical Journal Editor Peter Doshi gave a groundbreaking presentation. Doshi, editor of one of the world’s premiere medical journals, summarised and critically evaluated empirical and conceptual information on COVID-19 ‘vaccination’, cleansed of political agenda and spin.

Watch the five-minute presentation here:



Video is available for download here.

He said “In pharmacy school, I teach a required course on how to critically appraise the medical literature… I am saddened that we are super-saturated as a society right now in the attitude of ‘everybody knows’, that has shut down intellectual curiosity, and led to self-censorship”.

Why, for instance, he asked, are we told that everybody knows that this is a ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’, when in reality, in the UK “most COVID hospitalisations and deaths are among the fully vaccinated”?

Doshi added:

  • Prominent published claims that ‘vaccines save lives’ were based on just one death across 70,000 Pfizer and Moderna trial participants
  • Clinical trials of COVID vaccines have not shown any reduction in death
  • The mRNA COVID products are qualitatively different from traditional vaccines
  • In January 2021 Mirriam-Webster changed its definition of vaccine to encompass the mRNA products
  • Entire countries, from the UK to Japan, meet the new Mirriam-Webster definition of ‘anti-vaxxer’, as would a substantial proportion, if not a majority, of the world’s population

 

Connect with Doctors for Covid Ethics

 

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]



Pfizer’s Vile Superhero Video: Luring Children With Deadly Lies

Pfizer’s Vile Superhero Video: Luring Children With Deadly Lies

 

 

Image credit: Screenshot from Pfizer propaganda video aimed at children

 

Image credit of assassination by injection: Dimhou, pixabay

 

 



 

Pfizer’s Vile Superhero Video: Children Guinea Pigs

by Amy Mek, RAIR Foundation
November 12, 2021

 

Children have become pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s next coronavirus cash cow. The company is now using small children to promote their controversial mRNA experimental jab. The aim is to give the impression that vaccinations are safe and brainwash children to desire the jab.

In a newly released Pfizer propaganda video, the little guinea pigs are portrayed as superheroes because they volunteered in clinical trials.

This year thousands of kids like us around the world joined the clover vaccine trial kid power, and when they did, they became all superheroes.

Pfizer is promoting the injection for children between the ages of five and 11. Shockingly, parents are allowing their children to let pharmaceutical companies experiment on them. Furthermore, these small study participants are also being used to lure other healthy children into being injected:

A superhero shot helps everybody fight coronavirus and helps others. You’re helping the whole entire world. Thank you. You are all superheroes.

On October 29, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 jab to include children 5 through 11 years of age. In addition, the company has applied for approval for children in the European Union. The shot’s ruling is expected before Christmas.

Profits take priority over children’s health as side effects continue to be ignored. Dead children and babies, facial paralysis, seizures, and heart muscle inflammation – over a thousand cases of children’s most severe side effects were documented in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) database. In some cases, the transfer of the spike proteins made by the mother’s breast milk could be the cause.

Bribing Parents to Jab Their Children

Many parents are skeptical of the experimental injection. Recent surveys show that most parents don’t plan to vaccinate young children against the coronavirus. States are going to great lengths to combat the parent’s fears with bribes.

In Austria, a brothel offers free sex ‘sessions’ to patrons as young as 14-years-old who get the shot on-site.

Governor Kathy Hochul announced Tuesday; New York will raffle off 50 full scholarships to any New York public college or university for children aged 5 to 11 as part of the state’s push to get more kids vaccinated.

Data from the New York City Department of Health shows children ages five to 12 have a .06 percent coronavirus positivity rate, and no child in that age group has died from the virus.

In Anderson, S.C., high school students are bribed with $100 if they receive the injection. In Phoenix, school leaders are also giving out $100 gift cards. In Los Angeles, students have the chance to win gift cards or free prom and homecoming tickets if they get the jab.

 

Connect with RAIR Foundation

cover image credit: GDJ / pixabay



Open Letter to a Billion Hindus: The Slaughter of Newborn Calves Is Basic to All Vaccine Research—Including the Covid Vaccines

Open Letter to a Billion Hindus: The Slaughter of Newborn Calves Is Basic to All Vaccine Research—Including the Covid Vaccines

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 11, 2021

 

I’m republishing my recent article about the ongoing slaughter of millions of newborn calves, because it occurred to me that your faith holds that cows are sacred, and should be protected from harm.

I doubt you would knowingly use a product who existence is based on the killing of cows.

Read on.

 

—Murdering millions of newborn calves for vaccines and other medical research—
Cc: vegan Hollywood celebrities and animal rights advocates who are taking the COVID vaccine

 

In my recent series of articles on the murder of aborted live human infants for vaccine research, I made no mention of animal research.

Now I will.

The product is called Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). It is used all over the world.

How is it obtained?

Slate News: “FBS, as the name implies, is a byproduct made from the blood of cow fetuses. If a cow coming for slaughter happens to be pregnant, the cow is slaughtered and bled, and then the fetus is removed from its mother and brought into a blood collection room. The fetus, which remains alive during the following process to ensure blood quality, has a needle inserted into its heart. Its blood is then drained until the fetus dies, a death that usually takes about five minutes. This blood is then refined, and the resulting extract is FBS. Millions of fetuses are slaughtered this way.”

Think about that.

—Medical research, vaccine research, and a blood-soaked landscape. The murder of living human infants for their tissue; the murder of newborn calves for their tissue.

Slate: “FBS is also special because it is a universal growth medium. You can take almost any cell type, toss it into a petri dish with FBS, and the cells will grow. The use of the serum is extensive, with FBS being cited in more than 10,000 research papers…”

Was FBS used in the development of COVID vaccines? Yes and no statements proliferate.

However, if you take the research and development back far enough into the virology lab, the answer would be an unqualified yes.

Cell cultures in dishes are starting points for all vaccines. Virologists believe they are isolating viruses in those dishes. The purported viruses are the reasons, in the first place, for all vaccines—including COVID.

Those cell cultures in dishes need a substance that promotes the growth of the cells. Enter Fetal Bovine Serum as that substance.

In medical literature and news media, you’ll find many euphemisms and generalities that obscure the murdering of newborn calves. Animal-derived products; serum; organisms in development; growth factor; universal medium; humane treatment.

“Don’t tell the children.” In this case, everyone is supposed to be a child kept in ignorance.

And medical murder is supposed to be a special scientific procedure. Separate, remote, sanitized.

It is—until people find out what’s actually going on.

The devil is in the details.

SOURCES:

https://slate.com/technology/2017/07/the-gruesome-truth-about-lab-grown-meat.html

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/questions-about-vaccines/bovine-derived-materials-used-vaccine-manufacturing-questions-and-answers

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/common-ingredients-us-licensed-vaccines

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Pezibear / pixabay



“Sad Little Man” by Five Times August — Music Video 2021

“Sad Little Man” by Five Times August — Music Video 2021

by Five Times August
November 12, 2021

 



Original video available at FiveTimesAugust YouTube channel.

 

Lyrics:

Sad little man sitting deep in a lie
He’s dead in his soul but he’ll keep you alive
Do what he says, not what he do
‘Cause the truth is for him and the lie is for you

Sad little man but he’s treated like a God
As the faithless pray to a fake and a fraud
Worship the man, pledge to his word
One shot, two shot, now you get a third

Sad little man
Sad little man
You better run now while you know you can
Sad little man
Sad little man
You don’t fool me you sad little man

Sad little man gonna trap you like a dog
Put your head in a net while they eat you raw
Don’t ask why, just comply
‘Cause fear is the drug that the doc prescribed

Sad little man, you can watch him on the news
Preaching to his choir while they learn the rules
Some feel safe and some feel healed
But they’ll all hold his hand as he makes the kill

Sad little man
Sad little man
You better run now while you know you can
Sad little man
Sad little man
You don’t fool me you sad little man

Sad little man and he wants your kids
Some might live while the rest get sick
So put them to the test and listen for the yell
When the truth comes out he’s gonna burn in hell

Sad little man
Sad little man
You better run now while you know you can
Sad little man
Sad little man
You don’t fool me you sad little man

You can’t fool me you sad little man

 

Download/Stream “Sad Little Man” on Spotify, Amazon, Apple Music and more: https://songwhip.com/fivetimesaugust/

Support Five Times August with artist tips/donation via PayPal.Me/BradleySkistimas or Venmo @fivetimesaugust

 

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

 

Connect with Five Times August

all images are screenshots from Five Times August music video



V Is for Vaccine: CNN and Sesame Street Host Town Hall Encouraging Kids Ages 5 to 11 to Get Vaccinated

V Is for Vaccine: CNN and Sesame Street Host Town Hall Encouraging Kids Ages 5 to 11 to Get Vaccinated
A play-by-play of Sesame Street’s town hall event on CNN.

by Beth Baisch, The Post Millenial
November 6, 2021

 

As the COVID-19 vaccine begins to be administered to children as young as 5-years-old, CNN hosted a town hall with the beloved inhabitants of Sesame Street to encourage children to get vaccinated.

“The ABCs of COVID Vaccines,” hosted by CNN’s Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta and journalist Erica Hill, opened with 5-year-old monster Rosita excitedly telling her friends how she just got her first dose of the COVID vaccine.



This led to scripted questions from 6-year-old Big Bird, whose Granny Bird wants him to get the shot.

The rest of the show went as follows:

Big Bird doesn’t even know what a vaccine is, prompting Gupta and Hill to bring in an “expert”: Super Grover, who is saddened to hear they did not want to talk about vacuums.

The mic is then handed off to Dr. Kizzmekia Corbett, who helped develop a COVID vaccine, who fielded several questions from children, describing the vaccine’s ingredients to one as “a message wrapped in a ball of fat” that tells the body how to fight COVID.

A father asks how parents can be certain children are getting the correct dose of the vaccine, and is simply told by “the color of the vial.”

Another child asks if the COVID vaccine is “a superhero for the villian coronavirus.” Corbett responds to say that “the vaccine is just your training camp for you to become the superhero.”

Big Bird’s Granny Bird—visibly flustered at the opportunity to talk to Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy—says she heard that COVID-19 “doesn’t make kids that sick.” Murthy acknowledges that it doesn’t, but that “COVID has taken a big toll on our children” and so they should still get the shot.Granny Bird gasps when Gupta tells her children can still spread the virus to others, including grandparents, and decides to take Big Bird for his shot.
Elmo becomes excited at the prospect of getting the vaccine after a child asks if he will get one. Gupta tells Elmo that the vaccine is only available to children 5 and older, but that “scientists are working hard” to change that. In the meantime, he is told to keep wearing a mask, which Elmo excitedly agrees to.

By the end of the special, Big Bird has been given his first COVID shot, and Elmo has a new favorite thing to dress as: Dr. Sanjay Gupta. The special closes with Elmo, in his Gupta costume, whispering “Elmo loves you” to the viewers.

 

Connect with The Post Millenial

cover image credit: ScribblingGeek / pixabay



Washington, DC: Heartbreaking, Powerful Testimonies on Covid Vaccine Injuries & Deaths

Washington, DC: Heartbreaking, Powerful Testimonies on Covid Vaccine Injuries & Deaths

 

“Now CDC can never say they didn’t know better. No matter what happens
going into the future, let it be known that this happened in Washington, DC.”
~ Del Bigtree

 

On November 2, 2021 U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) hosted a panel discussion in Washington, DC that addressed the serious issue of COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths.

In the video shared below, Del Bigtree interviews Brianne Dressen, a vaccine trial participant who was severely injured. The video also shares excerpts from other vaccine injured speakers and from a father whose teen son passed away following vaccination.

Vaccine injured who addressed the panel:

Cody Flint, airline pilot from Cleveland, MS who accumulated 10,000 hours of flight time diagnosed with left and right perilymphatic fistula, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and elevated intracranial pressure following Pfizer vaccination

Ernest Ramirez, father from Austin, TX whose only son collapsed playing basketball and passed away from myocarditis following Pfizer vaccination

Amy and Abby Alvo, family from Los Angeles, CA whose daughter suffered adverse reaction from first dose of Pfizer vaccine, having been denied a medical exemption twice, she will be kicked off her collegiate cheer team if she is not fully vaccinated

Doug Cameron, farm operations manager from Idaho, permanently paralyzed following vaccination

Kyle Werner, professional mountain bike racer from Boise, ID diagnosed with pericarditis following vaccination

Suzanna Newell, triathlete from Saint Paul, MN diagnosed with an autoimmune disease and reliant on a walker or cane to walk following vaccination

Kelly Ann Rodriguez, young mother from Tacoma, WA reliant on walker following vaccination

Maddie de Garay, 12-year old Pfizer clinical trial participant from Cincinnati, OH confined to wheelchair and feeding tube

Brianne Dressen, Astra Zeneca clinical trial participant from Utah, co-founded react19.org, a patient advocacy organization dedicated to increasing awareness of adverse events

Dr. Joel Wallskog, orthopedic surgeon from Mequon, WI diagnosed with transverse myelitis following Moderna vaccination

 

Vaccine Trial Participant Speaks Out

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
November 5, 2021



Video available at The HighWire BitChute, Rumble and Brighteon channels.

Brianne Dressen thought she was doing the right thing when she signed up for the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccine trial in 2020.

She now joins the growing number of severely vaccine-injured at a press conference in Washington D.C., and shares her heartfelt story in-studio on The HighWire.

 

Connect with The HighWire



Pfizer Has Secret Government Contracts for Covid Vaccines: Advocacy Group Says Company Puts Profits Over Public Health and Reveals Seven of Its Contracts Are Worth $5 Billion

Pfizer Has Secret Government Contracts for Covid Vaccines: Advocacy Group Says Company Puts Profits Over Public Health and Reveals Seven of Its Contracts Are Worth $5 Billion

by Natasha Anderson, Daily Mail
October 20, 2021
sourced from Global Research

 

Incisive report by the Daily Mail.

Excerpts below

A consumer rights advocacy group has released a report revealing that COVID vaccine producer Pfizer has secret government contracts and used power to ‘shift risk and maximize profits.’

Pfizer has 73 formalized deals for its COVID-19 vaccine but of those, only five have been formally published by governments and include ‘significant redactions,’ Public Citizen found.

The seven known contracts reviewed by Public Citizen are worth more than $5 billion.

The advocacy group – which gained access to several leaked, unredacted contracts – claims the Manhattan-based pharmaceutical giant’s contracts ‘consistently place Pfizer’s interests before public health imperatives.’

The report accuses Pfizer of including secret language blocking donations of its own doses, opposing an intellectual property waiver that could have allowed for the sharing of technology, having ‘unilateral authority for other decisions’ and more.

Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine – the first to receive emergency use authorization in the U.S. – has become the most popular worldwide, with 3.5 billion doses purchased.

Pfizer has 73 formalized deals for its COVID-19 vaccine but of those contracts, only five have been formally published by governments and are heavily redacted. The known contracts are worth $5 billion and were reviewed by Public Citizen, which outlined its findings (pictured)

Experts predict its sales to double in 2022, the Washington Post reported.

Due to the fact that information in several contracts remains redacted, it is unknown exactly what the total cost of all agreements are.

The details and obligations outlined in numerous contracts also remain undisclosed.

Experts allege that secret contracts poses risks to others.

‘Hiding contracts from public view or publishing documents filled with redacted text means we don’t know how or when vaccines will arrive, what happens if things go wrong and the level of financial risk buyers are absorbing,’ Tom Wright, research manager at the Transparency International Health Program, said.

Public Citizen gained access to Pfizer’s contracts with the US, UK, Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, European Commission and Peru.

‘The contracts offer a rare glimpse into the power one pharmaceutical corporation has gained to silence governments, throttle supply, shift risk and maximize profits in the worst public health crisis in a century,’ the group’s report alleges.

Contract experts, who reportedly analyzed the leaked documents, claim that Pfizer uses ‘unfair and abusive’ contractual terms in negotiations that give them the right to silence governments.

Read the complete Daily Mail Online article here.

Our thanks to the Daily Mail

 

cover image credit: x3 / pixabay



VAERS Reveals Death by Lot Number: Specific States Get Certain Vials

VAERS Reveals Death by Lot Number: Specific States Get Certain Vials

by Stew Peters
November 1, 2021

 



The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) collects information that the CDC is supposed to use to determine the safety of vaccines that have been released for the public.

That system has revealed some extremely SHOCKING information about specific lot numbers that seem to be causing more damage and death than others. Dr. Jane Ruby joined Stew Peters to discuss.

 

Connect with Stew Peters Show

cover image credit: ckstockphoto / pixabay



‘I Consider It Murder!’: A Grieving Father Cries Out to Warn Others About Covid Vaccine

‘I Consider It Murder!’: A Grieving Father Cries Out to Warn Others About Covid Vaccine

 

 

by LifeSiteNews
November 1, 2021



Ernest Ramirez, whose 15 year old son was killed by the Pfizer vaccine, has traveled all the way from McAllen, Texas to Washington, D.C. to share his pain and suffering with other victims, and to bring attention to the scandal of the massive coverup to hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths.

 

Connect with LifeSiteNews



Creepy Pfizer Ad Tells Kids They Are “Superheroes” for Taking Jab, Ignores Injuries of Others

Creepy Pfizer Ad Tells Kids They Are “Superheroes” for Taking Jab, Ignores Injuries of Others

by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project
November 3. 2021

 

The multi-billion dollar pharma giant with an incredibly tainted past, who has seen exponential profits during the pandemic as a result of taxpayers being forced to pay for the jab, has also enjoyed billions in taxpayer dollars to advertise said jab. The windfall of profits realized from vaccinating adults quickly turned the company’s sights to children as their customer base waned. Despite children facing a near zero chance of dying from COVID-19, the FDA jumped on board and quickly approved Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine for children ages 5-11.

After spending billions in taxpayer funded advertisements to convince adults to take the jab, Pfizer launched a new ad this week, which seemingly targets their new customer base — children. The company held back nothing and referred to children who got the vaccine as part of the experiment as “superheroes” with “superpowers”

“Superheroes come in all sizes ??‍♀️????‍♂️??‍♀️ Watch as real kids express thanks to their superheroes; the 5-11 year old #Covid19 vaccine clinical trial volunteers. We’re incredibly grateful to the trial participants and their families ? #ScienceWillWin

Watch the creepy video below:

Sadly, the kids in the video above are not heroes. None of them are of the age to consent to take a jab and they were all offered up to the pharma giant as guinea pigs by their parents.

While this ad is specifically referring to the kids whose parents allowed them to be guinea pigs as “superheroes,” the underlying tone is meant to appeal to all children.

“If I take the vaccine, I will be a superhero!”

Naturally, this ad is not very appealing to many who have a family member or friend who has suffered an adverse reaction to the jab. As a result, the dislikes on the video have already surpassed the likes and are climbing fast.

It is important to point out that the overwhelming majority of folks who get vaccinated have little to no side effect. However, to say it carries no risk and to censor those who point out those risks is highly unethical at best and downright insidious at worst.

As TFTP reported, this push to vaccinate children is in spite of the fact that children face a near-zero threat from the virus. What’s more, as Americans are quickly learning, the vaccine loses efficacy over time leading to a large number of breakthrough cases which the Centers for Disease Control can no longer sweep under the rug.

On top of breakthrough cases, there has been a record number of adverse reactions reported to the CDC and many of them include children. One of those children — who participated in the Pfizer trial and is a “superhero” according to the ad above — is Maddie de Garay, who received the Pfizer vaccine when she was 12. She is now is in a wheelchair.

Like Pfizer, Maddie’s family made an advertisement to tell her story about her experience with the vaccine. Unlike, Pfizer, however, Maddie’s ad is and has been actively censored on YouTube. What’s more, Comcast pulled the ad last week as it was slated to run before the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee met to discuss COVID-19 vaccines for children.



Another one of these “superheroes” who has been censored into oblivion is Ernesto Ramirez Jr. who was one of hundreds of children like Maddie who took the jab early on. Sadly, however, unlike Maddie, he did not survive and five days after the shot, according to his father, Ernesto dropped dead.

“I kept hearing more advertisements about how it was safe for the teenagers, so I said ‘OK,’” Ernesto’s father, Ernesto Ramirez told Fox 26 Houston journalist Ivory Hecker earlier this year. “Two or three weeks later the CDC started announcing children were having enlarged hearts.”

“A typical heart for a boy this age would be less than 250 grams,” said Dr. Peter McCullough, a Dallas physician featured in Hecker’s video. “In this case it was more than 500 grams.”

Ramirez tried to raise money for his deceased son’s funeral but because he claimed the jab killed his son, GoFundMe deleted it.

Apparently, according to big tech, only those who praise the vaccine’s efficacy are allowed a platform. If you or your child was injured by it, you have no right to speak. If you doubt why that is, try watching the video below.

 

Connect with The Free Thought Project

cover image based on work of Eleatell & MaxPrst / pixabay 



Whistleblower Exposes Fake Data Behind Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine Trial

Whistleblower Exposes Fake Data Behind Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine Trial

by GreatGameIndia
November 3, 2021

 

Leading medical journal The BMJ has published an incendiary report exposing faked data, blind trial failures, poorly trained vaccinators, and a slow follow-up on adverse reactions in the phase-three trial of Pfizer’s Covid jab.

Central to the exposé is Brook Jackson, who, for two weeks, served as regional director at Ventavia Research Group, the company contracted to assist with the pivotal trial. She provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails supporting her concerns.

Jackson reveals that Ventavia staff who conducted quality-control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were identifying. She repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, and patient safety and data integrity issues.

In a cited internal document from August 2020, shortly after the Pfizer trial began, a Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to “go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.” One employee was said to have been subsequently “verbally counseled for changing data” and “not noting late entry.”

Jackson reported her concerns to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but was fired later the same day on the basis that she was “not a good fit.”

 

Connect with GreatGameIndia

cover image credit: ErikaWittlieb / pixabay



Project Contamination and Indemnity

Project Contamination and Indemnity

by Rosanne Lindsay, ND, Nature of Healing
November 2, 2021

 

Contamination

In August of 2021, Japan suspended Moderna’s COVID vaccine after another million doses were found to be “contaminated” with ‘black substances, foreign substances, and pink material.” By September, Moderna recalled their vaccines after stainless steel was found inside vials.

At that time, Japanese officials had administered 118,310,106 doses of the COVID vaccine. If they suspended more than two million doses due to contamination, just how many contaminated doses had been administered? How many people received a contaminated jab?

Nobody knows. That’s above their pay grade.

What about monitoring recipients who might have been contaminated?

What is the definition of a contaminant? Why the mystery?

According to some, popular contaminants already exist in vaccines, including mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, nano-contamination of metals and polysorbate 80, to name a few. However, the CDC and FDA do not consider these CDC-known toxins / carcinogens as “contaminants.” For instance, aluminum is not a neurotoxin. In a vaccine, aluminum is an adjuvant to stimulate the immune response.

So who is responsible for the contamination of COVID products that are injected?

Indemnity Scheme

In our “advanced world,” no one is responsible. Furthermore, there is never enough evidence that will ever prove a cause for adverse effects when it comes to vaccines, including COVID vaccines. Just calling an injection a “VACCINE” automatically makes it immune from any liability.

Since 1986, The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (H.R. 5546) makes vaccines and their makers, including the doctors who inject them, exempt from all liability for damages from their products.

Under the PREP Act, companies such as Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability if something unintentionally (or intentionally) goes wrong with their COVID vaccines. That means that you cannot sue them if you have severe COVID vaccine side-or-direct effects, and the government likely won’t compensate you for damages. What other industry or company has that kind of protection?

No other.

What is the difference between the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act and The PREP Act?  The script? The actors?

The 1986 Act works as a remedial measure, under which vaccine-manufacturers are not be held responsible for compensating any vaccine-related injury claims. Instead, the Act is supposed to provide compensation to eligible individuals for damaging effects of their vaccines. The program covers 16 routine vaccines for children entering public schools. However, as claims have mounted, few are ever paid out in the private vaccine court. There is no provision for damages based on pain and suffering. However, the vaccine court is profitable for vaccine lawyers who get paid no matter who wins or loses.

The PREP Act is an expansion of the 1986 Act, as it shields companies manufacturing the experimental COVID vaccines not approved by the FDA, called Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) vaccines. The justification this time? The Act is meant to jumpstart U.S. defenses against an outbreak like COVID-19 by shielding from lawsuits makers of critical products, from diagnostic tests to vaccines, as well as doctors and drug distributors.

Both Acts require claimants to prove their injuries are “the direct result” of a vaccine. So far, most COVID vaccine cases have been denied compensation for the simple reason that, according to the lawyers, there is virtually no definitive research on injury causation to reference.

Meanwhile, the medical literature all but points to vaccines as the cause of autoimmune disease in a syndrome known as A.S.I.A. or Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, as in vaccine adjuvants. [See study 1(autoimmune), study 2 (Shoenfeld’s), study 3 (thyroid), study 4 (neurological), and hundreds more].

A scheme is a scheme is a scheme.

Swine Flu

As a result of human complacency to schemes, any vaccine adverse side-or-direct effects may not become apparent until millions of people have received the vaccine. Recall the fiasco of the Swine Flu epidemic that threatened to become a pandemic? Remember the inaccuracy of case definitions and “mistakes” that blew the whole thing out of proportion? Is it happening again?

According to Science, The Wire, India has the world’s largest childhood immunisation scheme, larger than all the European and Middle Eastern countries combined. 

The Prime Minister of Australia, Scott Morrison, says the new “COVID-19 vaccine indemnity scheme will provide confidence to medical practitioners to administer both AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines to Australians,” as long as there is informed consent.

Why is there is no informed consent prior to injection, only after?

When the leaders of “the free world” call a mass injection campaign a scheme, the people need to pay attention.

In May 2021, the New York Times reported that Emergent BioSolutions, whose Baltimore plant ruined millions of coronavirus vaccine doses, disclosed for the first time on Wednesday that more than 100 million doses of Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine are now on hold as regulators check them for possible contamination.  In June, the FDA instructed Johnson & Johnson to throw out 60 million doses of the COVID-19 vaccine produced at a Baltimore plant out of concern that they may have been contaminated, and because they were not suitable for use. 

Contamination or Additive?

Accident or Project?

Truth or lie?

In any good mystery there are always more questions than answers. And there are always criminals who plan not to get caught. Expect that criminals of this scheme have covered their trails (indemnity) and made others vulnerable (contamination) so they get away when their scheme begins to unravel.

Next The Children

As of September 2021, with reports of widespread contamination, and ongoing investigations, the FDA has told journals such as Scientific American to promote the expansion of injections to children ages 5 to 11.

By appointment only, Pfizer Friday Nights For Kids began at area Fire Stations across the U.S. during Halloween weekend, a time for rituals and blood sacrifices. What better way for kids to spend a Friday night than getting their first COVID jab?

Parents, are you paying attention?

 

Rosanne Lindsay is a Naturopath, writer, earth keeper, health freedom advocate and author of the books The Nature of Healing, Heal the Body, Heal the Planet and  Free Your Voice, Heal Your Thyroid, Reverse Thyroid Disease Naturally.

Rosanne Lindsay is available for consultation through Turtle Island Network.  Subscribe to her blog at natureofhealing.org.

 

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay, ND

cover image credit: CDD20 / pixabay



Most Doctors and Hospitals Have Become Paid Assassins of the State!

Most Doctors and Hospitals Have Become Paid Assassins of the State!

by Gary D. Barnett
November 1, 2021

 

Doctors are just the same as lawyers; the only difference is that lawyers merely rob you, whereas doctors rob you
and kill you too.
~ Anton Chekhov

 

Germ theory was the downfall of modern medicine, and most all of any honest approach to health was lost, while prevention, natural remedies, and the wonder of the human immune system were forgotten in favor of money, prescription drugs, deadly ‘vaccination,’ and unnecessary surgery. Doctors became the tools of the corporate medical system, the pharmaceutical industry, and the hospital industrial complex. As time passed, this situation only worsened, and now this fraudulent ‘Covid’ pandemic scare has led to doctors and hospitals becoming voluntary paid assassins of the state, whether knowingly or not.

Regardless of circumstance, it has become extremely dangerous to go to or be admitted to any hospital, especially if symptoms expressed are considered ‘Covid’ related, such as cold, flu, pneumonia, or any respiratory ailments. Going to a hospital under these circumstances is life-threatening, and not due to sickness, but to ‘medical’ protocols meant to harm, not heal. In fact, these protocols in many if not most hospital settings, especially for any considered elderly, which now means anyone over 50, are meant to kill the patient, which should be considered an act of murder.

This is a time when any good doctors and medical personnel left could and should be exposing this heinous fraud and evil intent by the so-called medical system, but those willing to tell the truth are few and far between, and in many cases, those actually doing so are threatened or silenced, and any risk of job loss seems to take total priority over all decisions made. Consider the implications of this situation; as it indicates that doctors and hospitals are beholding only to their employers or to the system that feeds them, not to the Hypocritic Oath or any desire whatsoever to help those in need. In other words, money power, and control are now the underlying aspects of the health and medical system’s core structure; the good of the patient be damned. Consider the use of remdesivir as treatment for what is falsely referred to as ‘Covid?’ As I wrote some time ago:

“Consider the fact that remdesivir, an experimental drug, was fast-tracked as the “standard of care” for ‘Covid’ early on by Anthony Fauci, and was originally the only approved ‘Covid” treatment for American hospitals, even though this drug does not work against anything, and causes many adverse reactions, body organ failure, and a high incidence of death. “Remdesivir was one of four drugs in a clinical trial for Ebola in 2018, and was dropped from the study before it was over, after a safety review revealed that it had the highest death rate of the drugs being tested.” One of only two studies cited by Fauci for the recommended use of this toxic drug was the Ebola Trial in 2018, and in that trial, the manufacturer, Gilead Sciences, only tested 53 patients for just 28 days. Gilead had close ties, monetary interests, and partnership with the CDC and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed up by Fauci.”

“Fauci knew of the deadly nature of the poisonous remdesivir at least as early as 2018, but chose to use this dangerous drug with fast-track FDA approval in October of 2020 as the “standard of care,” and the primary treatment in all U.S. hospitals for all “Covid” patients. That means that American patients across this country were not treated, but murdered.”

This drug is still in use in hospitals today, authorized by Fauci, alleged ‘health’ organizations, hospitals, and doctors across the country.

Consider the use of ventilators for all those very ill due to flu-like symptoms who were isolated in hospitals and nursing homes nationwide, especially those in New York and other high population centers? Death occurred for most all of those patients, so how could the doctors not have understood that killing all the patients by very invasive and dangerous ventilator use was not a way to help or save them? If 76% to 97% of all patients treated in this manner died, how could any doctor or hospital not only question, but stop this madness to find out why extreme death rates were the result?

Now, rationing of care based on age, mental condition, and considered use to society or the greater good, a communistic approach, have become the norm. How can this be supported by any claiming to be doctors or ‘health’ administrators, when the main purpose of care is supposed to be about helping all patients? The incentives that drive this insanity are certainly tied to money and financial gain to those going along with this slaughter of innocents, but other nefarious factors are also evident. The elimination of the old and those approaching retirement is of major concern to the ruling class, so killing off this unwanted part of society as the state sees it, is a plus. The funds stolen in the process are redirected into the pockets of government and the rich benefactors of government policy. The ruling sector, the corporate whores, almost the entirety of the medical system, and others benefit from the murder of certain groups of people, so the killing continues unabated.

In the midst of all this evil behavior, and in the middle of what is falsely labeled a ‘pandemic’, a time when immune system destruction and extreme stress due only to government mandates that isolate individuals and families, destroy any financial security for the masses, and control of most aspects of life are present, a poisonous and deadly ‘vaccine’ protocol has been heavily marketed, mandated in very many circumstances, and pushed on the public as the only way to survive what is obviously a completely fake and purposely manufactured ‘crisis.’ While doctors and hospitals continue to rake in millions upon millions of dollars due to this fraud, and do so willingly, the torture of many, financial destruction, and death continues among the general population; not due to any bogus ‘virus,’ but to a planned outcome due to a plot to control all, long considered and sought by the state, its controllers, the pharmaceutical industry criminals, the health and medical complex, and all the corporate and government support systems, including the ludicrous and despicable sector called enforcement.

The doctors and hospitals must not be allowed to willingly continue to maim and kill those it is charged with helping. They must be stopped from ignoring every aspect of proper care for their patients in order to gain more wealth, or retain their positions only by contradicting every medical ethical standard ever set by sane and caring individuals. There is no excuse for this behavior, and every single person in the ‘health’ and medical profession that consciously accepts and goes along with this practice of harm and deceit should face prosecution. Nothing less will be of value to society.

The next target of this murderous nation-state and all its partners are the children; all the children. The injection of toxic and deadly poisons in children from infancy to adult is not only desired, but already underway in some areas, with a goal of ‘vaccinating’ every child in this country over the next year and after. If this is allowed to go forward by the sheep in this country, what future is possible for this and any upcoming generations? Freedom cannot be won or exist in any system that has taken control of the young through gene-altering, immune system destructive protocols, and experimental control technology, administered by state mandate in order to either, maim, kill, or control the bulk of society.

In order for this plot against mankind to go forward, the people have to voluntarily submit to the state’s agenda. Without this voluntary submission, the state will fail, but with continued compliance and strict obedience by the masses, nothing of what has been known in the past as a normal life in a somewhat free country will remain. All that can be expected in any passive, indifferent, and docile society of a collective mass of ignorance, is a life in a technocratic matrix of total control and dependence on the evil few. This is our future if mass resistance is not forthcoming!

“Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious
objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defense of their conviction.”
~ Mahatma Gandhi

 

Source links:

The coverup of state murder

Hospitals are now prisons

 Antoine Béchamp, champion of natural medicine

The purposeful killing of the old in nursing homes

Death by ventilator, not ‘Covid’

Death rates in care homes created on purpose: Murder by stealth

The non-existent virus

Pfizer’s immoral ’Covid vaccine’ trials on children

 

Connect with Gary D. Barnett

cover image based on creative commons work of MichaelWuensch & pendleburyannette / pixabay



If I Were an Atheist Materialist Biological Machine

If I Were an Atheist Materialist Biological Machine

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 1, 2021

 

If I were an atheist materialist who believed all humans were nothing more than biological machines, the practice of delivering an infant whole and alive, through Caesarean Section, and then cutting out his heart and removing tissue for medical research would still make me turn away and want to forget I had ever heard this was happening in the world. (My series on medical infanticide, here [1])

Because a click would go off inside me.

I wouldn’t know what the click was, or why it happened, but I would feel something. And if I were a creature living in Huxley’s Brave New World, I would know the feeling was a signal I should go to the medical dispensary and obtain the drug Soma, which would put me in a pleasant forgetful state…

And yet in our world, there are doctors and nurses and technicians and researchers who don’t even experience the click. They participate in the murders of the infants. They do the work. [2]

They are backed up by bureaucrats and elected officials and ethicists and pharmaceutical executives and medical school teachers and deans and medical journal editors and medical journalists and even religious leaders.

How is it that people of faith, billions of them, are not standing up together against this establishment?

Obviously, something has gone wrong with religion. That is the only conclusion.

In organizing itself, it has become concerned with perpetuating itself. It has built a wall between its people and what faith means.

Jesus threw the money changers out of the Temple, but what happens when the money changers ARE the Temple?

What happens when pastors fail to inspire their congregations to take action in the world and stand up against their oppressors?

Vaccine companies used fetal cell line HEK 293 to test their COVID vaccines. That cell line was surely obtained through the medical murder of an infant, in 1972, in the Netherlands. Her kidneys were removed for the tissue, killing her.

Religious people can say that’s none of their business. They can say anything that will close them off from action.

But ABIDING FAITH is supposed to triumph over society and government, the “things of this world.” That’s one of the sacred points of faith. It’s supposed to allow a person to go to the wall for his beliefs.

A Pope carrying all the accoutrement of the Roman Church can issue a statement supporting the COVID vaccine. This tells you how much of the material world the Pope pays homage to. How much he has sold of himself. He is not an illustration of the test of faith.

If I were an atheist materialist who believed all humans were biological machines, there are churches and temples I could walk into; and feel at home.

The Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute “is a 501 (c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to end human trafficking and exploitation for the purposes of biomedical research and commercial products. Our President and Founder, Theresa Deisher Ph.D., has over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience. She discovered adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked on their therapeutic uses as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and leads a team of scientists at AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing what a diagnosis of cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease means to patients and their loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr. Deisher is named as an inventor on over 47 patents.” [3]

I’m going to give you a few important quotes from their published material. Wherever “fetal cells” and “cell line” are mentioned, this indicates material obtained from an aborted fetus. Were these infants removed from their mothers’ wombs, alive, and then murdered? Except in one instance, this is not covered. However, Sound Choice founder, Dr. Deisher, in a devastating interview with Robert Kennedy [4], makes it clear that the practice of removing infants, alive, from the womb, extracting their tissue to make cell lines, and killing them is a widespread practice.

In the first 15 minutes of the interview [4], Deisher discusses infants in the womb for 20 weeks, even 32 weeks, being taken out alive, with their blood supply functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will be turned into fetal cell lines.

At the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn’t want to get into the moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral aspect.

Here are Sound Choice Institute statements: [5]

“Today, more than 23 vaccines are contaminated by the use of aborted fetal cells. There is no law that requires that consumers be informed that some vaccines are made using aborted fetal cells and contain residual aborted fetal DNA. While newer vaccines produced using aborted fetal cells do inform consumers, in their package inserts, that the vaccines contain contaminating DNA from the cell used to produce the vaccine, they do not identify the cells as being derived from electively aborted human fetuses.”

“The United States government has known about the dangers of human DNA from aborted fetal cell-lines since at least 2005. They set guidelines which are supposed to keep the DNA at a specific limit, which they hypothesize will not cause cancer. There is no monitoring of vaccines by our government agencies to ensure those limits are adhered to. Vaccines (MMR, Varicella, and Hepatitis A) sent for independent analysis have consistently shown levels of human fetal DNA that are far beyond the ‘established safety limits’.”

“Instead of conducting safety studies the FDA regulated the amount of human DNA that could be present in a vaccine to no greater than 10ng.”

“Unfortunately, the Sound Choice team discovered that the fetal DNA levels ranged anywhere from 142ng – 2000ng per dose, way beyond the so-called ‘safe’ level.”

“Human fetal cell lines are used to culture some vaccines. They are listed on the CDCs Vaccine Excipient list as [cell lines] WI-38, MRC-5, HEK293, PERC.6.

* WI-38 is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of an aborted female fetus.

* MRC-5 (Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted male fetus.

* Human embryonic kidney cells 293, also often referred to as HEK 293, HEK-293, 293 cells, or less precisely as HEK cells, are a specific cell line originally derived from human embryonic kidney cells grown in a tissue culture.

* PERC.6 cell line was derived from human embryonic retinal cells taken from an elective abortion.

* The newest cell line created in 2015 for vaccines: WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3-month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a ‘water bag’ abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.” [6]

“Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal material) provide the ‘cell culture’ in which vaccine formulas are often grown or nurtured. Current vaccines in circulation which were manufactured using aborted fetal material include:

* Polio vaccine (inactivated/IPV) & Oral Polio (live virus) drops : Sanofi Pasteur recently announced they are discontinuing the use of aborted fetal cells in the manufacturing of Poliovax, Pentacel, and Quadracel polio vaccines. Ask before receiving these vaccines as it will take some time for the ethically available options to be widely available.

* Measles, Mumps, Rubella vaccine/MMR (Rubella component)

* Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis vaccine (DTaP/TdP)

* Varicella (Chickenpox) vaccine & Shingles (zoster) vaccine

* Hepatitis A and Hepatitis A & B vaccines

* Rabies vaccine

* Shingles

* Some Coronavirus vaccines”

VACCINE REFUSAL AND RESISTANCE ARE ACTS OF CONSCIENCE, SCIENCE, AND FAITH.

SOURCES:

[1] blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/medical-infanticide/

[2] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/27/the-abortion-culture/

[3] https://soundchoice.org/about/

[4] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-q-a-with-dr-theresa-deisher/

[5] https://soundchoice.org/vaccines/

[6] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25803132/

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Yuri_B / pixabay



The Nazi Medical Plan for Control of the Planet; World War Two Never Ended

The Nazi Medical Plan for Control of the Planet; World War Two Never Ended
At the end of the War, IG Farben executives were put on trial and, despite the efforts of Telford Taylor, the chief US prosecutor, and assistant prosecutor, Josiah DuBois, the sentences handed out were light.
For example, Fritz Ter Meer, a high-ranking Farben executive, was tried for mass medical murder and slavery, and sentenced to a paltry seven years in jail. He was released after three years, and went on to occupy a post as chairman of the advisory board of Bayer, a corporate branch on the tree of the infamous IG Farben, which supposedly had been disbanded…

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 29, 2021

 

I started writing about this subject 20 years ago, when I launched NoMoreFakeNews.com.

In this article, I’ll present an overview.

In 1933, the largest cartel in the world, IG Farben, pushed Hitler over the top, enabling him to become Chancellor of Germany.

Farben was a global colossus. Pharmaceuticals, dyes, oil, rubber. It forged partnerships with Standard Oil, Dow, Dupont, Imperial Chemical Industries, Rhone-Poulenc.

US government official, Josiah DuBois, sent on a fact-finding mission to Guatemala, returned saying, “As far as I can tell, the nation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Farben.”

The brilliant Farben chemists were modern alchemists. They were researching and producing synthetics far in advance of products formulated anywhere else in the world.

Their dream was material transformation: the ability to convert any element on the Periodic Table into any other element.

Meanwhile, Hitler was obsessed with another transformation: resurrecting what he believed was the lost Aryan Master Race. Through selective breeding, the elimination of lesser and unwanted human types, and other “scientific methods,” a revival of Supermen would occur. And of course, they would then control the destiny of the planet.

Near the close of World War 2 in Europe, the leading lights of Farben and other German corporations, knowing that Hitler was a madman and a rank failure as a military strategist, decided they would have to redirect their efforts, go underground, remain invisible, and from the shadows carry on their war by other means. They were not done. Far from it. They had money, resources, brains, allies. And time.

But what would this new war look like? How would it proceed? Whose strings would they be pulling, and for what purpose?

Should they align themselves with a political movement?

There was one possibility. Socialism. Communism. It would be a convenient ruse. After all, Europe was devastated and exhausted by the War. The prevailing attitude was: “anything to avoid another armed conflict.”

If the nations of Europe could enter into a cooperative future, link hands, bury long-standing enmities, soften geo-borders, engage in free trade, eventually adopt a common currency…

Thus, over a period of decades, the European Union was created. It was what Hitler had been aiming for: a merged continent.

And Germany assumed leadership, as the strongest economic powerhouse in Europe.

All without a shot being fired.

Socialism was spreading, in one form or another, all over the world. For the invisible Nazi architects, this was further evidence they should temporarily hitch their wagon to that star. After all, what was Socialism, really? Just a label for top-down control. The Marxist ideology was unimportant. Domination of populations was all that mattered.

And yet, something was missing. A method. A means. A non-political force that could gradually envelop the world and subdue it, torture it, assert control over billions of minds.

The Farben chiefs had the solution right in front of them. During the War, they had paid a pittance to the managers at Auschwitz, across the road, to send prisoners every day to their medical facility for “tests.” Experiments. Vile grotesque experiments.

And going back several decades, the Nazi leadership had joined elite American eugenicists—the Rockefeller-Harriman forces—to investigate, promote, and utilize sterilization, abortion, medical murder to rid society of its “unfit members.” Those Nazi-American connections still existed.

A branch of modern medicine was on the rise: psychiatry. This was a perfect opportunity to introduce, through completely arbitrary diagnoses of “mental disorders,” debilitating brain-damaging drugs to whole populations. For purposes of pacification.

In fact, the whole Rockefeller model of medicine—one disease caused by one germ—a preposterous form of reductionism—was coming into its own. This meant massive numbers of drugs to treat patients.

Surely, these drugs could be made into toxic destroyers.

A plan was taking shape. A medical plan. THIS would be the invisible conquering force, flying under a politically neutral banner of “healing.”

Create, in the long run, a cradle to grave system enrolling every human, who would trudge, during his lifetime, along a bleak road of 40 or 50 disease-diagnoses and toxic treatments—each treatment giving rise to new symptoms which would be labeled new diseases, requiring treatments…

As for the rank elimination of huge numbers of people on the planet—depopulation—this was a thornier problem. How to arrange it? How to conceal it?

The choice was clear: so-called pandemics. But how would they be staged? Microorganisms, those that actually existed and weren’t mere fantasies, were notoriously unpredictable. The human body, despite all attacks against it, was strong and resilient.

There was no super-germ that could be released which would wipe out a few billion people. That was a dead end. Researchers in their labs, fabricating absurd tests for fairy-tale viruses, and failing to isolate viruses at all, weren’t a help.

But a story about a virus, a story sold with enough fervor by controlled media and cooperating governments…that had possibilities, because the solution would be a vaccine.

The invisible architects would need a whole parade of these fake pandemics, over a long period of time, in order to convince the world population that such scenarios were real.

One by one, pandemic stories could appear and be sold. And DOCTORS would be the messiahs.

COVID is of course the strongest story to date. And the vaccines will, in the long term, be the most debilitating and destructive of all shots.

But it’s doubtful COVID will be the last pandemic story. If a product is a major winner, sell a variation of it. And another.

When we look at and examine horrific events of varying dimensions—the medical experiments in the Nazi concentration camps; the infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment; the murder of many live infants aborted to obtain their organs for research; the use of high-dose AZT to kill people diagnosed with AIDS; the vaccine campaigns in the Philippines and Kenya designed to cause future miscarriages in pregnant women; the CIA MKULTRA mind control program…

These are glimpses into an overall medical war aimed at humanity.

The alchemical program of IG Farben is now supplemented with technological advances in the fields of genetics and computer science. The envisioned transformation of humans into Brave New World androids and brain-computer hybrids are medical assaults.

The Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele, known as the Angel of Death, said: “The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

This is the slogan of the Nazi-Rockefeller medical cartel.

The hypnotic power of The Doctor needs to be dismantled and broken to pieces.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: WikiImages / pixabay



Behind Closed Doors: Medical Research Labs

Behind Closed Doors: Medical Research Labs

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 28, 2021

 

During the past two years, I’ve made comments about what goes on in research labs. The lunatic “science,” the cruelty visited on humans and animals, who are the test subjects.

My work on this goes back to the 1980s, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC. After reading renegade and leaked literature at that time, I made the following assessment:

To prove their hypotheses about germs causing diseases, researchers will first do anything to weaken animals, so it then seems injecting them with (purported) germs is infecting them and making them sick.

This “prep work” to weaken animals includes:

Destructive genetic modification;

The injection of toxic chemicals and drugs;

The removal of the animals’ immune systems;

The injection of toxic serums composed of material taken from other animal species;

Exposing the animals to high doses of radiation;

The grafting of material on to the animals from other species;

The caging and isolation of the animals for long periods, which produces great stress and immune-system suppression;

Drilling holes in animals and attaching restraints and sensors to them and inside them;

Berating the animals, treating them as objects;

Conducting research in unsanitary and unclean facilities.

And then, finally—issuing falsified records to support lies about outcomes, in order to prove pre-destined conclusions.

The entire catalog of torture is couched and concealed in dry technical language and euphemism. Medical journals describe NOTHING about the animals’ reactions to this brutal savagery. If they did, the researchers would be exposed as rank sadists, their work would be discredited, and eventually there would be a public uproar.

As for human test subjects, perhaps you’ve heard of the radiation experiments performed on patients in US hospitals during World War 2.

Bottom line: Scientists and government officials decided they needed to know how much radiation would kill a human. After all, workers at The Manhattan Project were trying to build an atomic bomb. They were being exposed to radiation.

So “terminally ill” patients were selected. Informed consent was out of the question. The unknowing patients were secretly injected with high doses of radioactive elements. Tissue samples were taken and analyzed. As it turned out, some of the patients were not terminal. They had been misdiagnosed, or doctors knew up front that they were relatively healthy. The whole study was highly classified, and few people knew of its existence.

From the Atomic Heritage Foundation’s 2017 report, Human Radiation Experiments, here are descriptions of two of the patients:

“Ebb Cade was the first test subject. Cade was a 53-year-old African American male who worked for an Oak Ridge construction company as a cement mixer. On March 24, 1945, he was involved in an auto accident, which caused fractures in his arm and leg. Documents from the time show that he was otherwise healthy. Over the next two weeks, he was given the codename HP-12, with HP standing for Human Product [!]. Dr. Friedell wrote to Dr. Hempelmann at Los Alamos that he had found a primary subject for the plutonium experiment.”

“On April 10, 1945, Dr. Joseph Howland administered a plutonium dose of 4.7 micrograms to Cade, who was awaiting a procedure to set his bones. From 1943-1945, the maximum possible body burden (MPBB) for plutonium had been 5 micrograms, based on limits adopted for radium. Based on animal experimentation, Langham and Friedell had recently concluded that because plutonium remained in the bone for longer than radium, the MPBB should actually be set at 1 microgram. Cade’s dose was nearly five times that limit.”

“Cade was not treated for his arm and leg injuries until April 15, five days after the injection, so that the doctors would be able to biopsy his bone samples. This included extracting 15 of his teeth, which were subsequently shipped to Wright Langham at Los Alamos. It is unclear if Cade suffered from legitimate tooth decay. Shortly after his bones had been set, Cade suddenly discharged himself from the hospital. He moved out of Tennessee and died of heart failure on April 13, 1953, 8 years after the Oak Ridge injection.”

“Another questionable case was CAL-2, a four-year old boy named Simeon Shaw suffering from terminal bone cancer. He was flown with his mother to the UCSF hospital in a US military plane from Australia, apparently under the advisement of a physician in Australia. He arrived in California in April 1946 and was admitted to the hospital. For some time, he was separated [from] his mother, who was only allowed visits periodically. Simeon received a plutonium injection at UCSF under the oversight of Joseph Hamilton and was discharged from the hospital within a month. The Shaws returned to Australia and no follow-ups were ever conducted. Simeon died eight months later.”

“The physicians involved [in the entire project] knew that the procedures had no therapeutic benefits and would be detrimental in the long run if the patients lived. Human experimentation was justified by the claim that the patients were terminally ill; however, this was not true in all cases. Repeated errors in diagnosis, procedure, documentation, and research were made, ultimately calling into question the efficacy of the experiments themselves.”

The doctors and bureaucrats didn’t even have the ethics or common sense to make their reports usable.

Nothing has changed. The COVID vaccines are injuring and killing huge numbers of people all over the world—and governments and media insist on covering up and twisting the facts about the largest grand experiment in human history.

From government leaders in scores of countries, down to decrepit pundits like Noam Chomsky, the word is out: the unvaccinated are lepers and must be isolated from the rest of society.

But sometimes the test subjects rebel and break out of their cages. When they do, they aren’t good little boys and girls.

Then they’re called insurrectionists and terrorists. But the truth is much simpler.

Living beings don’t like to be tortured.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Tama66 / pixabay



Murdering Millions of Newborn Calves for Vaccines and Other Medical Research

Murdering Millions of Newborn Calves for Vaccines and Other Medical Research
cc: Vegan Hollywood Celebrities and Animal Rights Advocates Who Are Taking the Covid Vaccine

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 28, 2021

 

In my recent series of articles on the murder of aborted live human infants for vaccine research, I made no mention of animal research.

Now I will.

The product is called Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). It is used all over the world.

How is it obtained?

Slate News: “FBS, as the name implies, is a byproduct made from the blood of cow fetuses. If a cow coming for slaughter happens to be pregnant, the cow is slaughtered and bled, and then the fetus is removed from its mother and brought into a blood collection room. The fetus, which remains alive during the following process to ensure blood quality, has a needle inserted into its heart. Its blood is then drained until the fetus dies, a death that usually takes about five minutes. This blood is then refined, and the resulting extract is FBS. Millions of fetuses are slaughtered this way.”

Think about that.

—Medical research, vaccine research, and a blood-soaked landscape. The murder of living human infants for their tissue; the murder of newborn calves for their tissue.

Slate: “FBS is also special because it is a universal growth medium. You can take almost any cell type, toss it into a petri dish with FBS, and the cells will grow. The use of the serum is extensive, with FBS being cited in more than 10,000 research papers…”

Was FBS used in the development of COVID vaccines? Yes and no statements proliferate.

However, if you take the research and development back far enough into the virology lab, the answer would be an unqualified yes.

Cell cultures in dishes are starting points for all vaccines. Virologists believe they are isolating viruses in those dishes. The purported viruses are the reasons, in the first place, for all vaccines—including COVID.

Those cell cultures in dishes need a substance that promotes the growth of the cells. Enter Fetal Bovine Serum as that substance.

In medical literature and news media, you’ll find many euphemisms and generalities that obscure the murdering of newborn calves. Animal-derived products; serum; organisms in development; growth factor; universal medium; humane treatment.

“Don’t tell the children.” In this case, everyone is supposed to be a child kept in ignorance.

And medical murder is supposed to be a special scientific procedure. Separate, remote, sanitized.

It is—until people find out what’s actually going on.

The devil is in the details.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: YvonneHuijbens / pixabay



Scientist Whose Wife Was Injured by COVID Vaccine Tells FDA: ‘Please Do Not Give This to Kids’

Scientist Whose Wife Was Injured by COVID Vaccine Tells FDA: ‘Please Do Not Give This to Kids’
Brian Dressen, Ph.D., who is a chemist with an extensive background in researching and assessing the degree of efficacy in new technologies, told the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Pfizer’s vaccine “failed any reasonable risk-benefit calculus in connection with children.” 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
October 27, 2021

 

 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) advisory committee on Tuesday endorsed Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for children ages 5 to 11, despite strong objections raised during the meeting by multiple scientists and physicians.

Brian Dressen, Ph.D., is one of the scientists who testified during the 8-hour hearing.

Dressen is also the husband of Brianne Dressen, who developed a severe neurological injury during the Utah-based portion of the U.S. AstraZeneca COVID vaccine trial in 2020. After being injured by the first dose, Brianne withdrew from the trial.

During his 3-minute testimony, Dressen, a chemist with an extensive background in researching and assessing the degree of efficacy in new technologies, told the FDA advisory panel Pfizer’s vaccine “failed any reasonable risk-benefit calculus in connection with children.”

Dressen said:

“Your decision is being rushed, based on incomplete data from underpowered trials, insufficient to predict rates of severe and long-lasting adverse reactions. I urge the committee to reject the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] modification and direct Pfizer to perform trials that will decisively demonstrate that the benefits outweigh the risks for children. I understand firsthand the impact that you will or will not have with the decision you’re going to make today.”

Dressen told the FDA how his wife was severely injured last November by a single dose of a COVID vaccine administered during a clinical trial. He said:

“Because study protocol requires two doses, she was dropped from the trial, and her access to the study app deleted. Her reaction is not described in the recently released clinical trial report — 266 participants are described as having an adverse event leading to discontinuation, with 56 neurological reactions tallied.”

He said he and his wife have since met participants from other vaccination trials — including Pfizer’s trial for 12- to 15-year-olds — who suffered similar reactions and fate.

Dressen said:

“Injured support groups are growing. Memberships number into at least the tens of thousands. We must do better. Those injured in a trial are a critical piece of vaccine safety data. They are being tossed aside and forgotten. The FDA has known first-hand about her case and thousands of others. The FDA has also stated that their own systems are not identifying this issue and that VAERS is not designed to identify any multi-symptom signals. The system is broken.”

Dressen said his family’s lives have changed forever. “The clinical trials are not appropriately evaluating the data,” he said. “The FDA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the drug companies continue to deflect the persistent and repeated cries for help and acknowledgment, leaving the injured as collateral damage.”

He added:

“Until we appropriately care for those already injured, acknowledge the full scope of injuries that are happening to adults, please do not give this to kids. You have a very clear responsibility to appropriately assess the risks and benefits to these vaccines. It is obvious that isn’t happening.

“The suffering of thousands continues to repeatedly fall on deaf ears at the FDA. Each of you hold a significant responsibility today and know that without a doubt, when you approve this for the 5-11-year old’s, you are signing innocent kids and uninformed parents to a fate that will undoubtedly rob some of them of their life.”

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense

 

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: sippakorn / pixabay