A Billion Catholics, Covid Vaccines, and the Duty to Refuse Injection

A Billion Catholics, Covid Vaccines, and the Duty to Refuse Injection
Unless fear and comfort are the true pillars of the Church

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 8, 2021

 

Let me start by saying, everybody acts from faith. Faith in something, no matter what it is.

A billion Catholics are not the Vatican.

The Vatican, through the Pope, has made its position clear: take the COVID vaccines.

But then there are the consciences of a billion of the faithful.

In prior articles in this series (archive here), I’ve made it clear that COVID vaccines have, in fact, relied on a fetal-tissue cell line, HEK 293, for testing, and the cell line was originally obtained via an abortion.

Moreover, the evidence points to an abortion in which the infant was delivered from her mother’s womb, alive, and then was killed by a doctor removing her kidneys for fetal tissue. Infanticide. Murder.

Does it matter whether the abortion and the murder were committed yesterday, or in a room in a hospital in the Netherlands, in 1972? Are a billion Catholics willing to say, “It was so long ago, it doesn’t have meaning anymore”?

Is that a reasonable position of Faith?

My understanding is this: Catholics believe Jesus commanded the founding of His Church, which is their Church. Does that count now? Is it wrong to contemplate what He would advise? As opposed, for example, to what Anthony Fauci would advise?

I also understand the Pope, in telling Catholics to take the vaccine, was not claiming to speak from a position of infallibility. Doesn’t that leave the door open to the consciences of the billion members of the Church?

Is it archaic to speak about conscience? Is religious membership really an elaborate charade, a social stage play?

Suppose a high member of the Vatican said to the world: “There are many medical experiments that are used to develop and test vaccines and drugs. In these experiments, which have been performed for a hundred years, doctors remove an infant from his mother’s womb, ALIVE, and then take his kidneys or make a hole in his skull and vacuum out his brain, or cut out his heart. These killings are very real. Those of our faith should think deeply about whether they want to receive the medicines and vaccines associated with these murders…”

What would happen?

Suppose this esteemed member of the Vatican made this announcement, replete with details, every day for a month?

What would happen?

Suppose this esteemed priest decided to keep making the announcement until sufficient members of the congregation, worldwide, stepped forward, visibly, and made their voices heard and refused the vaccine?

What would happen?

As some people are reading this, they will answer, “This esteemed priest would be murdered.”

Yes? And? So?

Don’t the sacred vows of a priest go beyond loyalty to this world? Isn’t his conviction to his faith a thing larger than his life on Earth?

Would you expect or want a priest, who serves as a pipeline to God for his congregation, to be a materialist, a person inextricably bound to his comforts and duties here?

If by joining the Church as a member, a person comes closer to God, is he asked to pay no price for that gift? Is he asked to incur no risk in his life?

The Church is, in fact, founded on matters of life and death. That is where faith encounters a reckoning. And this is true of all religions.

But at their most profound pinnacle of teaching, where “the outer garments” are cut away, religions guide the individual soul to come to his own decision about what his faith means, and how far he will go in standing with it.

One person, a billion people.

The Power is always there.

One step across the threshold.

~

George Fox, the fiery 17th century preacher who founded the Quakers movement in England, traveled the countryside exhorting thousands of people to find Christ and God for themselves: “Why should any man have power over any other man’s faith, seeing [that] Christ Himself is the author of it?”

At the time, there were laws forbidding “unauthorized worship.” Fox constantly broke them. He was frequently arrested—at least twice for blasphemy, and on one of those occasions it was suggested he should be sentenced to death. Parliament intervened on his behalf.

He performed many healings and wrote a book listing and describing them. The book disappeared, and no copies ever surfaced.

Thinking about George Fox and his courage as background and example…

Now, in 2021, should believers grasp a destiny that outdistances the fear of being banned from Facebook; being “attacked” online for expressing an opinion about an election audit; being fired from a job; being “canceled” for telling a joke?

Has the need for security and comfort expanded to such a degree that people of faith are willing to abandon their beliefs on a moment’s notice?

~

If today you picked a few thousand people of faith and sent them back to the time of Moses, to live as Egyptians under the Pharaoh; it’s quite possible that when God loosed the 10 plagues against them—“water turning to blood, frogs, lice, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts, darkness and the killing of firstborn children”; the Pharaoh would simply say: “The only adverse effects are minor pain and swelling at the injection site and transient fatigue”; and these people would believe him.

How much faith is required in order to open one’s eyes?

And having opened them, to have a voice and make that voice heard?

And to endure against the consequences, because faith is not ultimately invested in material things?

~

Book of Revelation: “And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength. And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last: I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter; The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks…”

For those who believe these words, the majestic scope of these words, who take them as truth—

What will they do now?

Will they sit still, or will they rise up and take action?

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: RobertCheiab / pixabay




Let the Children Breathe — Breathing in Excessive CO2 & Hypercapnia

Let the Children Breathe — Breathing in Excessive CO2 & Hypercapnia

by Dr. Mark Sircus
November 8, 2021

 

Though CO2 is the primary gas that gives rise to life, few people on the planet understand much about CO2. It just so happens that life and health depend on high enough levels of CO2 in the blood and tissues. Carbon dioxide is a nutrient and a product of respiration and energy production in the cells, and its lack or deficiency is a starting point for profound disturbances in the body.

When it comes to CO2, you might as well be talking to fish about land and air. The biggest scam in the history of man is about CO2 and man-made global warming. Climate change is real, but it’s intense climate change and cold climate change.

CO2 is crucial to life, health, and even the safe use of oxygen in hospitals. CO2 is precious, so more is better; ask any plant on the planet.

“Over the oxygen supply of the body carbon
dioxide spreads its protecting wings.”
Friedrich Miescher
Swiss physiologist, 1885

Normal arterial levels of CO2 have antioxidant properties. Indeed, a group of Russian microbiologists discovered that “CO2 at a tension close to that observed in the blood (37.0 mm Hg) and high tensions (60 or 146 mm Hg) is a potent inhibitor of generation of the active oxygen forms (free radicals) by the cells and mitochondria of human tissues” (Kogan et al, 1997). Dozens of studies have shown that modern “normal subjects” breathe about 12 L/min at rest, while the medical norm is only 6 L/min. As a result, blood CO2 levels are less than usual.

Carbon dioxide is present in the blood in several forms, such as bicarbonate, dissolved carbon dioxide, and carbonic acid, of which 90% is bicarbonate or HCO3. Plants survive by extracting CO2 from the air using magnesium at the center of chlorophyll and sunlight to convert it into proteins and sugars. In medicine, up to 5% carbon dioxide is added to pure oxygen to stimulate breathing after apnea and stabilize the O2/CO2 balance in the blood.

There has never been much doubt that CO2 builds up behind a mask. New research published in JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) has found that wearing a face mask causes children to inhale dangerous carbon dioxide levels that become trapped behind the mask. (Fauci does not care and now planning to attack 25 million children ages 5-12 with unsafe vaccines they don’t need.)

The peer-reviewed research letter from Dr. Harald Walach and colleagues found that the air masked children inhaled contained more than six times the legal, safe limit for closed rooms as set down by the German Federal Environmental Office. The safe limit is 0.2%, whereas the air the masked children inhaled contained over 1.3% carbon dioxide.

The effect was worse for younger children, with one seven-year-old child inhaling air with 2.5% carbon dioxide, over 12 times the safe limit. The study looked at two types of masks, FFP2 masks and surgical masks, and found no significant difference between the two. The authors explained that this alarming result likely explains the complaints from children who wear face masks for long periods.

“Most of the complaints reported by children can be understood as consequences of elevated carbon dioxide levels in inhaled air. This is because of the dead-space volume of the masks, which collects exhaled carbon dioxide quickly after a short time. This carbon dioxide mixes with fresh air and elevates the carbon dioxide content of inhaled air under the mask, and this was more pronounced in this study for younger children.”

“This leads in turn to impairments attributable to hypercapnia. A recent review concluded that there was ample evidence for adverse effects of wearing such masks. We suggest that decision-makers weigh the hard evidence produced by these experimental measurements accordingly, which suggest that children should not be forced to wear face masks.”

The kinds of masks people are wearing were never (never!) designed to be worn for long periods, and doing so is very harmful. Are you aware that operating rooms are supplied extra oxygen to compensate for the reduction in oxygen flow from mask-wearing?

Hypercapnia

What has been in doubt is whether that would lead to a full-out case of hypercapnia. What this paper maintains is that mask-wearing leads to chronic but mild hypercapnia. However, the seriousness of hypercapnia is mitigated by widespread carbon dioxide deficiencies already existing in the blood. Nevertheless, that still does not make wearing masks a good idea, and for children, it marks health officials as inhumane stupid, or worse.

Chronic hidden hyperventilation (over-breathing) is very common among western populations leading to impaired oxygenation of body tissues. But what is driving down the O2 levels is hyperventilation. It is getting rid of too much CO2. Meaning we need the CO2 almost as much as we need the O2.

The Reuters Staff concedes that wearing a mask causes hypercapnia is partially accurate but not wholly true. They say:

A small study in 2006 looked at healthcare workers wearing N95 masks during the SARS epidemic. It concluded that using N95 masks might cause the healthcare workers to develop headaches, and wearing them for shorter amounts of time may reduce the frequency and severity of the headaches (here).

A representative from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told Reuters: “The CO2 will slowly build up in the mask over time. However, the level of CO2 likely to build up in the mask is mostly tolerable to people exposed to it. You might get a headache but you most likely [would] not suffer the symptoms observed at much higher levels of CO2. The mask can become uncomfortable for various reasons, including sensitivity to CO2, and the person will be motivated to remove the mask. It is unlikely that wearing a mask will cause hypercapnia.”

In the U.S. National Library of Medicine, we read, “Wearing N95 masks results in hypooxygenemia and hypercapnia which reduce working efficiency and the ability to make correct decisions. Medical staff are at increased risk of getting Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and wearing N95 masks is highly recommended by experts worldwide. However, dizziness, headache, and shortness of breath are commonly experienced by the medical staff wearing N95 masks. The ability to make a correct decision may be hampered, too.”

Dr. Baruch Vainshelboim, a well-published author from the Cardiology Division of Veterans Affairs, writes, “In addition to hypoxia and hypercapnia, breathing through facemask residues bacterial and germs components on the inner and outside layer of the facemask. These toxic components are repeatedly rebreathed back into the body, causing self-contamination. Breathing through facemasks also increases temperature and humidity in the space between the mouth and the mask, releasing toxic particles from the mask’s materials. Rebreathing contaminated air with high bacterial and toxic particle concentrations along with low O2 and high CO2 levels continuously challenge the body homeostasis, causing self-toxicity and immunosuppression.”

In 1904, Danish scientist Christian Bohr noticed that hemoglobin binds oxygen more tightly at high pH than at low pH. This phenomenon is called the Bohr effect. CO2 and bicarbonate, carbon dioxide’s twin sister, are the vital players in the pH balance in both cells, blood, and other bodily fluids meaning CO2 holds the keys to oxygen delivery. If the level of carbon dioxide in the blood is lower than normal, this leads to difficulties releasing oxygen from hemoglobin.

Death-Care Officials

The human race has made a huge mistake giving power and trust to healthcare officials who are more like death-care officials. Death and disease are the two overriding paradigms of modern civilization. Many of the wealthiest families in the world make their money poisoning humanity. The chemical and pharmaceutical industries have done tremendous harm, showing disease statistics, especially with cancer and autism.

This is a polite way of saying human beasts are at the helm of public health and their weapon of choice are vaccines backed up by muzzling and suffocation masks, social distancing, and lockdowns. These medical and health beasts are the same ones who favored gain of function viral research in a lust to attack the human herd.

It should be utterly clear that anyone connected to gain of function research should be rounded up and detained for Nuremberg-type trials. The lead guy in this large group is Fauci.

It is utterly absurd that we trust the very people and organizations that created the virus and caused the pandemic to protect us from the harm they made. However, for more on masks and the injury, read Mask Madness – The Death of Science and Mask Generated Infectious Pandemics.

FDA Approves Attacks on 25 Million Children

We have been betrayed on a scale that would make Judas look like a saint. The FDA and the CDC should be shipped off to hell where they can feel for the rest of eternity their actions against children. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was advised on Tuesday the 26th of October to authorize Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children between the ages of 5 and 11. They do not care how many kids will get hurt from the shot!

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee made the recommendation. Seventeen-panel members voted yes to recommend the authorization. One abstained. When are people going to start demonstrating in front of FDA offices?

Conclusion

“To my mind, it’s criminal (not hyperbole) to force children to wear masks all day. Setting aside the very real psychological effects, we’re going to have a generation of brain damaged children. Ever heard the expression, “Not enough oxygen at birth?” That’s a joke at the expense of a mentally challenged person, but that’s literally what we’re doing. And we’re told it’s to “keep us safe,” writes Guy Crittenden.

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

cover image credit: Stewardesign / pixabay




V Is for Vaccine: CNN and Sesame Street Host Town Hall Encouraging Kids Ages 5 to 11 to Get Vaccinated

V Is for Vaccine: CNN and Sesame Street Host Town Hall Encouraging Kids Ages 5 to 11 to Get Vaccinated
A play-by-play of Sesame Street’s town hall event on CNN.

by Beth Baisch, The Post Millenial
November 6, 2021

 

As the COVID-19 vaccine begins to be administered to children as young as 5-years-old, CNN hosted a town hall with the beloved inhabitants of Sesame Street to encourage children to get vaccinated.

“The ABCs of COVID Vaccines,” hosted by CNN’s Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta and journalist Erica Hill, opened with 5-year-old monster Rosita excitedly telling her friends how she just got her first dose of the COVID vaccine.



This led to scripted questions from 6-year-old Big Bird, whose Granny Bird wants him to get the shot.

The rest of the show went as follows:

Big Bird doesn’t even know what a vaccine is, prompting Gupta and Hill to bring in an “expert”: Super Grover, who is saddened to hear they did not want to talk about vacuums.

The mic is then handed off to Dr. Kizzmekia Corbett, who helped develop a COVID vaccine, who fielded several questions from children, describing the vaccine’s ingredients to one as “a message wrapped in a ball of fat” that tells the body how to fight COVID.

A father asks how parents can be certain children are getting the correct dose of the vaccine, and is simply told by “the color of the vial.”

Another child asks if the COVID vaccine is “a superhero for the villian coronavirus.” Corbett responds to say that “the vaccine is just your training camp for you to become the superhero.”

Big Bird’s Granny Bird—visibly flustered at the opportunity to talk to Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy—says she heard that COVID-19 “doesn’t make kids that sick.” Murthy acknowledges that it doesn’t, but that “COVID has taken a big toll on our children” and so they should still get the shot.Granny Bird gasps when Gupta tells her children can still spread the virus to others, including grandparents, and decides to take Big Bird for his shot.
Elmo becomes excited at the prospect of getting the vaccine after a child asks if he will get one. Gupta tells Elmo that the vaccine is only available to children 5 and older, but that “scientists are working hard” to change that. In the meantime, he is told to keep wearing a mask, which Elmo excitedly agrees to.

By the end of the special, Big Bird has been given his first COVID shot, and Elmo has a new favorite thing to dress as: Dr. Sanjay Gupta. The special closes with Elmo, in his Gupta costume, whispering “Elmo loves you” to the viewers.

 

Connect with The Post Millenial

cover image credit: ScribblingGeek / pixabay




Washington, DC: Heartbreaking, Powerful Testimonies on Covid Vaccine Injuries & Deaths

Washington, DC: Heartbreaking, Powerful Testimonies on Covid Vaccine Injuries & Deaths

 

“Now CDC can never say they didn’t know better. No matter what happens
going into the future, let it be known that this happened in Washington, DC.”
~ Del Bigtree

 

On November 2, 2021 U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) hosted a panel discussion in Washington, DC that addressed the serious issue of COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths.

In the video shared below, Del Bigtree interviews Brianne Dressen, a vaccine trial participant who was severely injured. The video also shares excerpts from other vaccine injured speakers and from a father whose teen son passed away following vaccination.

Vaccine injured who addressed the panel:

Cody Flint, airline pilot from Cleveland, MS who accumulated 10,000 hours of flight time diagnosed with left and right perilymphatic fistula, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and elevated intracranial pressure following Pfizer vaccination

Ernest Ramirez, father from Austin, TX whose only son collapsed playing basketball and passed away from myocarditis following Pfizer vaccination

Amy and Abby Alvo, family from Los Angeles, CA whose daughter suffered adverse reaction from first dose of Pfizer vaccine, having been denied a medical exemption twice, she will be kicked off her collegiate cheer team if she is not fully vaccinated

Doug Cameron, farm operations manager from Idaho, permanently paralyzed following vaccination

Kyle Werner, professional mountain bike racer from Boise, ID diagnosed with pericarditis following vaccination

Suzanna Newell, triathlete from Saint Paul, MN diagnosed with an autoimmune disease and reliant on a walker or cane to walk following vaccination

Kelly Ann Rodriguez, young mother from Tacoma, WA reliant on walker following vaccination

Maddie de Garay, 12-year old Pfizer clinical trial participant from Cincinnati, OH confined to wheelchair and feeding tube

Brianne Dressen, Astra Zeneca clinical trial participant from Utah, co-founded react19.org, a patient advocacy organization dedicated to increasing awareness of adverse events

Dr. Joel Wallskog, orthopedic surgeon from Mequon, WI diagnosed with transverse myelitis following Moderna vaccination

 


Vaccine Trial Participant Speaks Out

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
November 5, 2021



Video available at The HighWire BitChute, Rumble and Brighteon channels.

Brianne Dressen thought she was doing the right thing when she signed up for the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccine trial in 2020.

She now joins the growing number of severely vaccine-injured at a press conference in Washington D.C., and shares her heartfelt story in-studio on The HighWire.

 

Connect with The HighWire




Pfizer Has Secret Government Contracts for Covid Vaccines: Advocacy Group Says Company Puts Profits Over Public Health and Reveals Seven of Its Contracts Are Worth $5 Billion

Pfizer Has Secret Government Contracts for Covid Vaccines: Advocacy Group Says Company Puts Profits Over Public Health and Reveals Seven of Its Contracts Are Worth $5 Billion

by Natasha Anderson, Daily Mail
October 20, 2021
sourced from Global Research

 

Incisive report by the Daily Mail.

Excerpts below

A consumer rights advocacy group has released a report revealing that COVID vaccine producer Pfizer has secret government contracts and used power to ‘shift risk and maximize profits.’

Pfizer has 73 formalized deals for its COVID-19 vaccine but of those, only five have been formally published by governments and include ‘significant redactions,’ Public Citizen found.

The seven known contracts reviewed by Public Citizen are worth more than $5 billion.

The advocacy group – which gained access to several leaked, unredacted contracts – claims the Manhattan-based pharmaceutical giant’s contracts ‘consistently place Pfizer’s interests before public health imperatives.’

The report accuses Pfizer of including secret language blocking donations of its own doses, opposing an intellectual property waiver that could have allowed for the sharing of technology, having ‘unilateral authority for other decisions’ and more.

Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine – the first to receive emergency use authorization in the U.S. – has become the most popular worldwide, with 3.5 billion doses purchased.

Pfizer has 73 formalized deals for its COVID-19 vaccine but of those contracts, only five have been formally published by governments and are heavily redacted. The known contracts are worth $5 billion and were reviewed by Public Citizen, which outlined its findings (pictured)

Experts predict its sales to double in 2022, the Washington Post reported.

Due to the fact that information in several contracts remains redacted, it is unknown exactly what the total cost of all agreements are.

The details and obligations outlined in numerous contracts also remain undisclosed.

Experts allege that secret contracts poses risks to others.

‘Hiding contracts from public view or publishing documents filled with redacted text means we don’t know how or when vaccines will arrive, what happens if things go wrong and the level of financial risk buyers are absorbing,’ Tom Wright, research manager at the Transparency International Health Program, said.

Public Citizen gained access to Pfizer’s contracts with the US, UK, Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, European Commission and Peru.

‘The contracts offer a rare glimpse into the power one pharmaceutical corporation has gained to silence governments, throttle supply, shift risk and maximize profits in the worst public health crisis in a century,’ the group’s report alleges.

Contract experts, who reportedly analyzed the leaked documents, claim that Pfizer uses ‘unfair and abusive’ contractual terms in negotiations that give them the right to silence governments.

Read the complete Daily Mail Online article here.

Our thanks to the Daily Mail

 

cover image credit: x3 / pixabay




VAERS Reveals Death by Lot Number: Specific States Get Certain Vials

VAERS Reveals Death by Lot Number: Specific States Get Certain Vials

by Stew Peters
November 1, 2021

 



The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) collects information that the CDC is supposed to use to determine the safety of vaccines that have been released for the public.

That system has revealed some extremely SHOCKING information about specific lot numbers that seem to be causing more damage and death than others. Dr. Jane Ruby joined Stew Peters to discuss.

 

Connect with Stew Peters Show

cover image credit: ckstockphoto / pixabay




Murdering Infants to Obtain Fetal Tissue for Vaccine Research

Murdering Infants to Obtain Fetal Tissue for Vaccine Research

 

“…the more evidence arises supporting my worst fear—that a perfectly innocent
living child, a healthy little girl, born alive and outside the womb, was killed for
and by the harvest of her organs, and that this is a practice that may underlie
great parts of the research industry.”

~ AnnaMaria Cardinalli

 

 

Murdering Infants to Obtain Fetal Tissue for Vaccine Research
An interview with AnnaMaria Cardinalli

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 4, 2021

 

For my recent series of articles on the murder of infants to obtain fetal tissue for vaccine testing and research, I gained key information from investigative reporter AnnaMaria Cardinalli’s article, “Catholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine,” in Crisis magazine.

AnnaMaria agreed to do an interview on this and related subjects. The interview speaks for itself—and it should provide people a VERY fundamental reason for rejecting the COVID vaccine.

Q: It seems you’ve lived at least several lives side by side. You’ve earned a lofty worldwide reputation as an operatic contralto and classical guitarist; you’re a licensed private investigator; you carried out extensive research for the US military in Afghanistan; you own a private security firm; you donate all your earnings to a Catholic order which wants to start an orphanage for exploited children. And I’m not covering all the bases. It’s rather mind-blowing. Before we dive into the subject at hand, can you speak to this variety and achievement?

A: Ha! Your question is very flattering and I’m hardly at issue here, but I’ll be happy to answer. The variety of work I’ve been involved in is so wildly unlikely that I could have never sat down and come up with it as a plan! The one factor underlying all it is my incredible fortune to have been raised soundly in the Catholic Faith by my mom, so despite my own many failings, I knew enough to put my life completely at the disposal of God’s will from an early age. I find utterly astounding the adventures on which He’ll lead a soul when He’s given that freedom. Making music was always my personal hope, but the rest came as a natural consequence of responding to circumstances around me with whatever capacities I had the ability to respond. That’s the very definition of responsibility (“response ability”), and a real means by which God guides our lives, don’t you think?

Q: In your wide range of experiences, did medical issues ever pop up on your radar?

A: Medical issues arose in two ways. On one hand, when I worked for the FBI and was embedded with the Joint Special Operations Command In Iraq, I received truly fantastic, cutting-edge training in a collateral duty as a Tactical Operational Medic. Later, in Afghanistan, I participated in medical missions to help assess rural tribal community needs—particularly the medical needs of women and children. Through these military experiences, I found a passion for emergency medicine. I recently re-certified as an EMT to better assist my community’s current medical mission to the homeless (sosvan.org), and I continue to pursue more advanced certifications.

On the other hand, I do not approach the issue of the cell line origins as a practitioner or any sort of medical expert, but as an investigative journalist, simply seeking out the facts and holding them to the light of common logic. My thinking is that the factors necessary to understand the nature of what we put into our bodies must be, at least on a basic level, accessible and comprehensible to the general population, and one need not be a medical expert to grasp them. Otherwise, how could most of us make an informed decision? We can’t allow clear, critical truths to be obfuscated by the statement, “You’re not an expert. You wouldn’t understand.”

Q: How did you become interested in the very specific origin of the fetal cell line, HEK 293? What made you think it might be important?

A: I was led to interest in HEK 293 via a long path. My experience in Afghanistan imparted to me a particular investigative focus on Human Trafficking. I’ve written and worked extensively on the issue, and the more I learn, the more I am overwhelmed by its prevalence, both internationally and on our own soil. In recent years, while the China Tribunal brought the harvesting and sale of organs belonging to unwanted citizens into clear focus overseas, the Planned Parenthood expose by David Daleiden [more on that expose — covered by Celia Farber, here and here] and others brought the same practice to light in the US. Both these developments solidified the trafficking issue in my mind not only as one of forced labor or sexual exploitation but of the complete commoditization of the human person—the viewing of the human being as a mere collection of occasionally useful parts, lacking any other value. This should frighten every person, regardless of their faith background or lack of one, because history shows us over and over again that it’s when we fail to recognize our common humanity that atrocities prevail.

With regard to HEK 293 specifically, for Catholics like myself, it is a grave moral responsibility to examine whether any action one takes participates in, perpetuates, or encourages such evil. We are bound to inform our own individual consciences and act in accordance with them. So, when the COVID vaccine became available, I sought to find out all I could about the nature of its origins and was led right back into the human trafficking concerns that plague me. It was in this research that I came across the work of the biologist and vaccine developer Pamela Acker [author of “Vaccination: A Catholic Perspective”; more here]. Her public acknowledgement of the necessary procedure for ensuring the viability of Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) cells coincided with what medical professionals had shared with me privately.

For me, this was enough to raise concern that warranted further investigation before taking the vaccine. Sadly, the more the matter is investigated, as it was by the courageous, thorough, and insightful author of the Gateway Pundit article, the more evidence arises supporting my worst fear—that a perfectly innocent living child, a healthy little girl, born alive and outside the womb, was killed for and by the harvest of her organs, and that this is a practice that may underlie great parts of the research industry. Believe me, I am longing to find firm and indisputable confirmatory evidence that this nightmare scenario is NOT the case. However, your in-depth coverage of the subject following the Crisis and Gateway Pundit articles seems to continually contribute direct, expert-based medical evidence of the horrifying truth. Saddening as it is, I truly appreciate what you are accomplishing.

Q: The HEK (Human Embryo Kidney) 293 fetal cell line has been used to test COVID vaccines. That makes its origin vividly important now. How did you become convinced that the evidence pointed to the removal of an alive infant from her mother’s womb, and then the killing of that infant, in 1972, in the Netherlands, in order to harvest her kidneys—which would be used to create the HEK 293 cell line?

A: I reiterate that I had to be convinced by simple logic that anyone, not medical researchers exclusively, could follow. In fact, the more specialized the language describing a medical moral issue becomes, the more it can be used to obscure the facts. I would almost laugh, if not for the gravity of the issue, at hyper-euphemistic descriptions one finds in the medical literature. It discusses, for instance, situations like the finding of electrical impulses in the cardiac tissue of the POC.

First of all, “POC?” Product of conception? What a way to talk around an issue! I’m a proud product of conception and have never met anyone who wasn’t! Electrical impulses in the cardiac tissue? With fewer keystrokes, that could be called “a heartbeat.” So, I’m a POC with intact electrical impulses in my cardiac tissue or, if anyone were looking to save on ink, “alive.” Please, though, forgive my digression.

I worked to write very carefully in the Crisis article the simple facts that concerned me about the origins of the HEK 293 cell line. Rather than try to summarize that argument in this interview and thus potentially miss a critical component—may I please direct interested readers to the article at the link below?

Catholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine

I became further convinced of the reality following the publication of the Gateway Pundit exclusive which offered some insightful analysis taking into account the recent Pfizer whistleblower revelations. I’d also like to direct anyone interested to that great article with a link below.

Exclusive: Pfizer’s Nervousness About Its COVID Vaccine’s Origins Conceals a Horror Story

It’s not that I don’t want to answer the question, it’s that I want it to be answered as accurately as possible.

Q: When I read conventional medical literature that describes research on aborted fetuses, I see no mention of taking the infant from the mother’s womb, alive, and then killing him/her. Is this a research “open secret” that is held back from the public and even many doctors? I read a 1975 federal report on medical research using fetuses. It went on for a hundred pages, and there wasn’t one reference to killing infants in the process of removing their organs.

A: I think the first issue here is the extremely removed language typical of the descriptions of these procedures that I reference above, along with its tendency to state actions separate from their obvious consequences. It’s a linguistic tendency that may well reflect the thinking and training of researchers and abortionists. In Dr. Kathi A. Aultman’s testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on March 15th 2016, which you excerpted in your incredibly revealing post of October 27th [see here; more here], the doctor describes her initial fascination with the cellular perfection of the little bodies she dissected, and explains that it was only years later that was she able to overcome her scientific dissociation to make the intellectual connection that the tiny perfect bodies were those of people whose lives she had ended.

I worry our society has removed death so far from life that we don’t even recognize it, and that is a scary thing. Our grandparents die in facilities away from home rather than with their hands held in ours. Our food arrives packaged and devoid of any reminders of the animals from which it came. Fido moves to a faraway farm, while we play immersive games where graphically taken lives merely “reset.” Therefore, unlike any generation prior to ours, most of us can go through life without regularly witnessing the reality of death, which makes for a very unnatural understanding of it—one far from the Catholic motto of memento mori. It’s an understanding that might even allow a scientist to admire a human body on which she performed a procedure that ended the function of its “cellularly perfect” organs without grasping that she was its killer.

I suspect this kind of thinking in turn produces academic writing in which it is almost impossible to see anything untoward. Perhaps most authors themselves can’t see it, aside from the presumably rarer instances of dedicatedly evil individuals who do see things clearly and actively choose to obfuscate the reality. Either way, this is why the literature will never say, as you had difficulty finding, “in the next step, kill the newborn,” even if it is the obvious consequence of the procedure described.

If the doctors involved were capable of that kind of cause-and-effect thinking, perhaps they would have to first write, “in the next step, first anesthetize, then kill the newborn.” If some of those doctors believed themselves Christians, they would have to write “in the next step, first baptize, then anesthetize, and then kill the newborn.” Even if they believed themselves merely in possession of basic mammalian instincts, they would at least have to write “in the next step, first cuddle and comfort the crying newborn, then anesthetize and kill him.” Of course, they can’t go there without recognizing the child’s humanity, so instead, the scientific dissociation of cause-and-effect remains in place.

This critical thought barrier is evidenced particularly in the literature when we see organs harvested from living children outside the womb referred to as fresh “fetal” or even “embryonic” tissue. The biomedical research companies requisitioning the tissue make the same linguistic error and it goes constantly uncorrected. No. The medical term for a delivered fetus in its first moments and days of life outside the womb is a neonate. A newborn. Most of these people went to medical school and know the difference, but they persist in the error.

Perhaps if we could only require them to accurately use the language of “fresh neonatal tissue” in their requisitions and reports, some would be unable to proceed. Requesting a “heart of newborn” for the development of whatever a researcher might be concocting in the lab might finally sound to the ears of many too much like procuring the ingredients of a witch’s brew belonging to horror fiction. It certainly makes “eye of newt” sound resoundingly tame.

Other than the issue of logic and language, however, I don’t think the practice of infanticide by vivisection is particularly secret among those working closely in the arena of biomedical research, and it’s certainly known among the abortionists who supply the needs of the industry, although I agree with you that it’s not something that doctors whose scope never intersects the arena are aware of any more than most of us are. It’s simply not brought to our attention in the media. We focus where the media points us, and there appears some decided silence on the issue.

A breakthrough in public awareness of the direct killing of living unwanted newborns for the sake of biomedical research, which, almost incomprehensibly, generated far less media attention and public outcry than it should have, occurred with the David Daleiden hearings. There many doctors and scientific procurement company representatives spoke openly of the practice, though often in the detached terms that would require careful listening. For instance, the CEO of Stem Express admitted dryly that “fetal hearts were perfused using a Langendorff apparatus.”

Langendorff apparatus serves to preserve the functional viability of hearts ex-vivo (which means, literally, outside of a living body). That is, to specify the use of the Langendorff apparatus is to know that a heart requiring this preservation was, in fact, taken from a living body. To state the painfully obvious cause-and-effect reasoning generally left out here, the removal of a functioning vital organ from a living person (without the replacement of its function) is the direct killing of that person. No example is clearer than that of a beating heart. Ask an Aztec.

Dr. Theresa Deisher, a Stanford University School of Medicine researcher heavily involved with the use of adult stem cells, describes exactly how that killing must take place in order for the Langendorff perfusion to function. Both in her September 19th, 2019 testimony at the Daleiden trial and in a same-day interview with Lifesite News, she explained that the individuals performing the vivisection would necessarily “cut open the baby’s chest and they would take the heart out beating and drop it in a buffer with potassium. She went on to state with rare clarity, “of course, if the heart isn’t beating, they can’t get any of these cells. Nobody wants a stopped heart.”

At another point in her testimony she explained again that, “some of the babies had to have beating hearts when they were harvested.” Logic alone dictates this fact, as she explained “once the heart goes into contraction, you can’t get it to come out of that position.” It “has to be beating and be arrested in a relaxed position” to be of use for research purposes.

Again, just with the use of basic reason, it goes without saying that not only are breathing hearts being removed, but that these procedures occur on living children outside the womb, not within it. The people doing the dissection are not opening the chest of the child in the sort of incredibly rare and highly specialized in utero surgery that might be done to repair a fetal heart condition. The cost and specialization would be astronomical and nonsensical, as they intend to destroy the child, not save it.

So, just by using the single example of hearts on the Langendorff apparatus, which is to say nothing of the “embryonic” kidney cells, (which may more accurately be called “neonatal” kidney cells) used in the COVID vaccine testing and development, I think I can answer your question by saying there is no “open secret” regarding infanticide for medical research. There is no secret at all. I am not revealing anything that is not already obvious, even to a non-expert, given to looking at the simple facts.

The shocking thing, at this point, is not that this is happening, but that we have yet to react, as a whole, in opposition to it. In fact, we accept it by welcoming into our lives the “benefits” of the tortuous murders of innocent children. If we are doing this unknowingly, then perhaps it is because we have bought into the suspension of cause-and-effect reasoning like that to which the researchers subscribe.

Your question leads me, however, to one more point, which I hope provides a wake-up point if nothing else has. Even more shocking than our acceptance of this evil is the fact that it is entirely unnecessary. We could have the same or perhaps greater benefits by other means, but we don’t pursue the course of action that has proven successful in halting unethical bioresearch before and redirecting the course of the industry.

Why don’t we do for our own species what we have succeeded in doing for animals? Most people recognize that animal advocacy and speaking with our wallets through the boycotting of unethically-produced products is genuinely critical because lab animals are innocent creatures who cannot speak for themselves. Isn’t that true of human “lab babies” too?

Also in the expert testimony cited above, Dr. Deisher made the point that using human fetal tissue for research has become more prevalent because increasing regulations on the welfare of animals have made the use of humans more convenient. More convenient! In a way, while horrifying, this is also wonderful news, because it means that animal activists successfully changed things, albeit with a terrible unexpected outcome. However, it means that we can do the same for our species too!

Does that mean that the kind of beneficial research advances which have previously come from the study of neonatal tissue need to stop? Do we have to decide on a sacrificial trade off, with improvement in the lives of those with debilitating illnesses on one hand and the murder of human babies with less compassion than lab rats on the other? Is that how science must proceed—in sanitized facilities behind closed doors that, just in case we become personally in need of its “benefits,” we prefer not to give much thought?

Here’s another shocker. Not at all. Adult pluripotent stem cells, obtained with adult consent and with no need for tortuous murders, actually negate the necessity of the use of fetal organs for stem cell research, because they can be cultured into any type of body cell. This technology exists now, but its use is more costly and less common than the worn-in ease of the baby butchering business. However, like any emerging technology, the more its use expands, the lower its costs become.

We can be the drivers of the expansion of its use, by making unethical research the expensive and inconvenient option. When I was a little girl, I was horrified to learn that lipsticks were tested on mistreated lab rabbits and resolved to never condone that practice with my purchase. So did every little girl I knew. Now cruelty-free cosmetics are the expected and affordable norm. Please, if we could ban together as a caring society to save the bunnies, what should we be willing to do to save the babies?

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: modified from creative commons work of FamilyPhotoStudio / pixabay




Vaccine-Injured Speak Out, Feel Abandoned by Government Who Told Them COVID Shot Was Safe

Vaccine-Injured Speak Out, Feel Abandoned by Government Who Told Them COVID Shot Was Safe
During an event hosted Tuesday by U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), people whose lives were ruined by COVID vaccines said they feel abandoned by a government that told them it was their patriotic duty to get the shot. 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
November 3, 2021

 

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Tuesday held a discussion with a panel of experts, including clinicians, scientists, lawyers and patient advocates, and with people injured by COVID vaccines, who gave powerful testimonies about their experiences.

Johnson and the expert panel discussed the importance of early treatment for COVID, healthcare freedom and natural immunity, the impacts of mandates on the American workforce and the economy, COVID vaccine safety concerns and the lack of transparency from federal health agencies in response to his COVID oversight requests.

None of the major mainstream media outlets picked up the event, but Children’s Health Defense hosted Johnson’s live panel discussion on CHD.TV.

Cody Flint [57.20], a 33-year-old airline pilot from Cleveland, Mississippi, was among those who spoke out about their injuries. Flint was healthy and had no underlying health conditions prior to receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Within 30 minutes of getting his first dose on Feb. 1, Flint developed a severe stabbing headache that later became a burning sensation in the back of his neck.

Two days later, he got into his airplane to do a job and quickly realized something wasn’t right.

Flint explained:

“I was starting to develop tunnel vision and my headache was getting worse. Approximately two hours into my flying I pulled my airplane up to turn around and felt an extreme burst of pressure in my ears. Instantly I was nearly blacked out, dizzy, disoriented, nauseous and shaking uncontrollably. By the grace of God I was able to land my plane without incident, though I do not remember doing this.

“My initial diagnosis of vertigo and a severe panic attack — although I’ve never had a history of either of these — was later replaced with left and right perilymphatic fistula, eustachian tube dysfunction and elevated intracranial pressure due to brain swelling. My condition continued to decline and my doctors told me only an adverse reaction to the Pfizer vaccination or major head trauma could have caused this much spontaneous damage.”

Flint underwent numerous spinal taps and two surgeries to address the fistulas and intracranial pressure. He said he has more questions than answers, does not know if he will ever be able to fly a plane again, lost a year of his life and part of his children’s lives.

“This vaccine has taken my career from me, and the future I have worked so hard to build,” Flint said. “I used all my savings just to pay medical bills just to be able to survive. My family is on the verge of losing everything we have.”

Flint, who is pro-science and pro-vaccine, said the main issue rests squarely on the fact that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and NIH (National Institutes of Health) refuse to acknowledge that real lives are being absolutely destroyed by this vaccine.

“The federal government has yet to help a single one of the vaccine-injured,” Flint said. “It was my understanding the federal government accepted the responsibility of helping people injured by vaccines, considering they gave pharmaceutical companies fully legal immunity from people like me.”

Flint said it is time for the government to stop silencing vaccine injuries like his, and it is unconscionable for these agencies not to help.

​​Lt. Col. Theresa Long [101:00], a U.S. Army surgeon, said she believes the COVID vaccine is a greater threat to a soldier’s health and military readiness than the virus itself.

“Over 200,000 service members have rejected the vaccine yet the military is pressing forward without regard to the damage to the morale and readiness to process these soldiers out,” Long said. “We have never lost 200,000 soldiers on the battlefield in a few months. Taking soldiers out of uniform has the same impact on readiness as losing them on the battlefield.”

Long explained she tried to get senior leadership within the military to inform military members of the risks of vaccines, as required by informed consent.

She said in one day, she had to ground three out of three pilots due to COVID vaccine injuries. When she told her command, her patients were canceled, her charts were pulled for review and Long was told she would not be seeing acute patients anymore — just healthy pilots who needed physicals.

Ernest Ramirez [1:16:40], from Texas, said his only son, 16 years old, collapsed while playing basketball and passed away from myocarditis following Pfizer vaccination. Ramirez got his son the Pfizer vaccine to protect him because it was the right thing to do.

“My government lied to me,” Ramirez said. “They said it was safe, and now I go home to an empty house,” Ramirez said. “They need to quit pushing this on children. I lost mine and you need to protect yours.”

Ramirez said the vaccine isn’t worth the risks, and all he wants is his son back. “Do not make the mistake I made. I did it because I thought it was a great thing to do. It wasn’t.”

“On Dec. 17, 2020, they did a study and they knew it [the COVID vaccine] was causing heart problems in teenagers. Why wasn’t it released until October of this year?” Ramirez asked. “This is murder.”

“I love the “hell out of my country,” Ramirez said, “but I do not trust my government anymore.”

Kyle Werner [123:40:40] is a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer and three-time national champion from Idaho who was diagnosed with pericarditis following vaccination.

Werner said he got vaccinated because his country asked him to and he believed the vaccine was safe and effective.

“In June, I joined the rapidly growing number of young men who developed pericarditis — inflammation of the lining surrounding the heart — post mRNA vaccine,” Werner said. “That condition, along with POTS [postural orthostatic tachycardia] and reactive arthritis, have completely brought an end to life as I knew it.”

Werner said he has since been bedridden, is unable to work and unable to exercise for months. He fears his career “has been officially ended.”

Werner said he isn’t asking the government to end the vaccine program, he just wants some transparency and acknowledgment of what’s happening so that “we as a country” can have an honest discussion of the risks.

“Where there is risk, there must be choice, and without acknowledging people are being seriously injured and dying, we are doing a great disservice to the American people,” Werner said.

“It is estimated Moderna and Pfizer will make $60 billion this year on COVID vaccines,” Werner said. “With the roll-out of boosters and mandates, it seems like much of that is destined to be recurring revenue.”

Werner suggested a portion of the profits should be set aside to study vaccine injuries and to compensate the vaccine-injured.

Douglas Cameron [127:29] was a healthy and physically active 64-year-old before he received the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) shot at his workplace on April 5. The day after his vaccination he started experiencing side effects he believed were due to the vaccine.

“I lost bladder control, suffered ED [erectile dysfunction], my legs felt odd, I had a […] sensation in my hips” and “over the next few days my symptoms worsened and I became alarmed.”

Cameron went to the ER where he explained to doctors he had recently received J&J’s vaccine. He tested positive for COVID and underwent a battery of tests before being sent home.

Three days later Cameron told his wife he felt like he drank poison. “My whole body felt different,” Cameron said. “I went to bed at 10:00 pm at night and woke up at 2 am paralyzed from the diaphragm down.”

Doctors discovered Cameron had a blood clot in his leg and his entire spinal cord had swollen and hemorrhaged. He was placed on a ventilator, was in the ICU for two weeks and spent 105 days in the hospital and rehab centers.

“I have had multiple MRIs, CT scans, EKGs, x-rays, spinal angiograms, spinal taps, autoimmune blood tests, muscle biopsies — everything has come back negative in an attempt to pin my paralysis on my body and not the J&J vaccine,” Cameron said. “Today I am an unemployed paraplegic who is learning an entirely new lifestyle and the only thing I did between full health and my current condition was take a shot.”

Suzanna Newell [1:32:30] a former triathlete from Minnesota, was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease after receiving her second dose of Pfizer on April 13. She now needs a walker or cane to get around.

Since Newell was injured she has very little motivation or energy. She has extreme fatigue, struggles to retrieve words, can’t concentrate or focus, has ringing in her ears, blurred vision, muscle spasms, internal vibrations and joint pain. Newell was diagnosed with small-fiber neuropathy, an autoimmune disorder, and is now on disability.

“This is not a pandemic of the unvaccinated. This is a pandemic of trauma.” Newell said. “We are unnecessarily being traumatized due to our cases being overlooked, misdiagnosed and hidden. We aren’t being believed and our trust in the media and government is faltering.”

Newell said at a minimum, the public has a right to know that injuries are a possibility before they’re vaccinated. Newell said she was excited to get the vaccine to do her part for her country, but “where is my country now?”

Kelly Ann Rodriguez [1:43:30], a 35-year-old mother from Washington, needs a walker after her second Pfizer vaccine dose on May 5.

“On June 29, my predictable life came to a screeching halt,” Rodriguez said. “I lost my ability to speak naturally. I have become unable to walk without a walker and I do not know if or when the tremors will come or go. I can no longer cook, clean or even pick up or hold my baby for too long before my body starts to shake uncontrollably or is thrown into excruciating pain.”

Rodriguez explained:

“This has become the most lonely and isolating experience in my 35 years of life. I have been made to feel that I do not matter to those in western medicine. That I am nothing more than an annoyance and waste of time. I deserve to be heard and treated with compassion, but instead, I have been called a liar and a fake and I have even been told by the ER doctors that this is all in my head and there is nothing medically wrong with me, to the point where they called a social worker to have me evaluated and committed to a […] mental health hospital.”

Maddie de Garay from Ohio volunteered for the Pfizer vaccine trial when she was 12. On Jan. 20, Maddie received her second dose of the Pfizer COVID vaccine as a participant in the clinical trial for 12- to 15-year-olds and is now in a wheelchair.

Her vaccine adverse reaction has been completely ignored by the FDA, CDC, Pfizer and the mainstream media.

Maddie and her mother, Stephanie de Garay also participated in Johnson’s June 29 press conference for vaccine-injured families. De Garay’s mother said neither Pfizer, the FDA or CDC have contacted her about her daughter’s condition, and Maddie’s adverse event was excluded from the data Pfizer reported about its clinical trial.

Dr. Joe Wallskog [3:01:00], an orthopedic surgeon from Wisconsin, was diagnosed with transverse myelitis after receiving Moderna vaccination on Dec. 30. Wallskog has been off work since attempting to go back two weeks after his diagnosis, as he is no longer safe to work as an orthopedic surgeon.

Wallskog has not been contacted by U.S. health agencies, other than the CDC verifying  his report was submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting stem (VAERS). His injury was not classified as “serious,” because he was not hospitalized and did not die.

“My life has dramatically changed after this adverse reaction,” Wallskog said. “The career I’ve had for 19 years, that I took 14 years to train for is likely over.”

Brianne Dressen [2:40:00], a clinical trial participant in the U.S. AstraZeneca trial, is co-founder of react19.org — a patient advocacy organization dedicated to increasing awareness of adverse events.

Dressen participated in Johnson’s June 29 press conference, and her husband provided public comment to the FDA during their recent hearing on the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for 5 to 11-year-olds.

Dressen suffered an adverse event in Nov. 2020 during the AstraZeneca clinical trial, was dropped from the trial and her reaction was excluded from AstraZeneca’s reported data.

Dressen said:

“The heads of the NIH, FDA and CDC have known first-hand about my case and thousands of others,” Dressen said. “These direct reports began as early as last December. I along with several injured physicians continued to reach out to the FDA through emails and phone calls. We did emails and video conferences with Peter Marks and Janet Woodcock.”

Dressen said she has “asked and begged repeatedly for them to acknowledge these reactions,” but they declined.

“They know their lack of acknowledgment has created an insurmountable barrier to our ability to receive medical care from doctors who rely on these agencies for information,” Dressen said.

Dressen said U.S. health agencies are aware of vaccine injuries, deaths, the lack of follow-up on VAERS, injuries to children, problems with clinical trials, the scientific and media censorship and mandates imposed on the injured. “They know all of it,” Dressen said, “and they have for months.”

Dressen said the NIH, an institute many turned to for help, is no longer accepting calls from the vaccine-injured.

“Here’s your proper informed consent. If you get COVID, you will get medical help,” Dressen said. “But I’m afraid to tell you” if you have an adverse reaction, “you’re on your own. The government won’t help you. The drug companies won’t help you. The medical teams will have no idea how to help you. Financially you will on your own. You will be completely on your own.”

Dressen ended her testimony by sharing a letter from a friend who committed suicide because she could no longer endure her COVID vaccine injury.

 

©November 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




‘I Consider It Murder!’: A Grieving Father Cries Out to Warn Others About Covid Vaccine

‘I Consider It Murder!’: A Grieving Father Cries Out to Warn Others About Covid Vaccine

 

 

by LifeSiteNews
November 1, 2021



Ernest Ramirez, whose 15 year old son was killed by the Pfizer vaccine, has traveled all the way from McAllen, Texas to Washington, D.C. to share his pain and suffering with other victims, and to bring attention to the scandal of the massive coverup to hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths.

 

Connect with LifeSiteNews




Creepy Pfizer Ad Tells Kids They Are “Superheroes” for Taking Jab, Ignores Injuries of Others

Creepy Pfizer Ad Tells Kids They Are “Superheroes” for Taking Jab, Ignores Injuries of Others

by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project
November 3. 2021

 

The multi-billion dollar pharma giant with an incredibly tainted past, who has seen exponential profits during the pandemic as a result of taxpayers being forced to pay for the jab, has also enjoyed billions in taxpayer dollars to advertise said jab. The windfall of profits realized from vaccinating adults quickly turned the company’s sights to children as their customer base waned. Despite children facing a near zero chance of dying from COVID-19, the FDA jumped on board and quickly approved Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine for children ages 5-11.

After spending billions in taxpayer funded advertisements to convince adults to take the jab, Pfizer launched a new ad this week, which seemingly targets their new customer base — children. The company held back nothing and referred to children who got the vaccine as part of the experiment as “superheroes” with “superpowers”

Superheroes come in all sizes ??‍♀️????‍♂️??‍♀️ Watch as real kids express thanks to their superheroes; the 5-11 year old #Covid19 vaccine clinical trial volunteers. We’re incredibly grateful to the trial participants and their families ? #ScienceWillWin

Watch the creepy video below:

Sadly, the kids in the video above are not heroes. None of them are of the age to consent to take a jab and they were all offered up to the pharma giant as guinea pigs by their parents.

While this ad is specifically referring to the kids whose parents allowed them to be guinea pigs as “superheroes,” the underlying tone is meant to appeal to all children.

“If I take the vaccine, I will be a superhero!”

Naturally, this ad is not very appealing to many who have a family member or friend who has suffered an adverse reaction to the jab. As a result, the dislikes on the video have already surpassed the likes and are climbing fast.

It is important to point out that the overwhelming majority of folks who get vaccinated have little to no side effect. However, to say it carries no risk and to censor those who point out those risks is highly unethical at best and downright insidious at worst.

As TFTP reported, this push to vaccinate children is in spite of the fact that children face a near-zero threat from the virus. What’s more, as Americans are quickly learning, the vaccine loses efficacy over time leading to a large number of breakthrough cases which the Centers for Disease Control can no longer sweep under the rug.

On top of breakthrough cases, there has been a record number of adverse reactions reported to the CDC and many of them include children. One of those children — who participated in the Pfizer trial and is a “superhero” according to the ad above — is Maddie de Garay, who received the Pfizer vaccine when she was 12. She is now is in a wheelchair.

Like Pfizer, Maddie’s family made an advertisement to tell her story about her experience with the vaccine. Unlike, Pfizer, however, Maddie’s ad is and has been actively censored on YouTube. What’s more, Comcast pulled the ad last week as it was slated to run before the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee met to discuss COVID-19 vaccines for children.



Another one of these “superheroes” who has been censored into oblivion is Ernesto Ramirez Jr. who was one of hundreds of children like Maddie who took the jab early on. Sadly, however, unlike Maddie, he did not survive and five days after the shot, according to his father, Ernesto dropped dead.

“I kept hearing more advertisements about how it was safe for the teenagers, so I said ‘OK,’” Ernesto’s father, Ernesto Ramirez told Fox 26 Houston journalist Ivory Hecker earlier this year. “Two or three weeks later the CDC started announcing children were having enlarged hearts.”

“A typical heart for a boy this age would be less than 250 grams,” said Dr. Peter McCullough, a Dallas physician featured in Hecker’s video. “In this case it was more than 500 grams.”

Ramirez tried to raise money for his deceased son’s funeral but because he claimed the jab killed his son, GoFundMe deleted it.

Apparently, according to big tech, only those who praise the vaccine’s efficacy are allowed a platform. If you or your child was injured by it, you have no right to speak. If you doubt why that is, try watching the video below.

 

Connect with The Free Thought Project

cover image based on work of Eleatell & MaxPrst / pixabay 




Malfeasance Behind the FDA Vax OK for Children

Malfeasance Behind the FDA Vax OK for Children

by F. William Engdahl, Global Research
November 2, 2021

 

On October 27 the US Food and Drug Administration Advisory Panel on Vaccines recommended the agency allow Pfizer to amend its Emergency Use Authorization for its COVID vaccine to include children 5 through 11 years old. Two days later the FDA officially approved the rollout. Major media are treating this as a positive development to protect young children. On closer inspection it is anything but that. The FDA is today shockingly corrupt under the Acting Director and is little more than a rubber stamp for Big Pharma, and especially Pfizer, where the former FDA head sits on the board.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee voted 17 to 0, with one abstention, to give a green light allowing Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech experimental mRNA to children between 5 and 12 years. The expert who abstained later explained he did so because of limited safety and efficacy data provided. Previously the FDA had approved the vaccine for 12 and older. Adding to the stench of corruption around the latest vote, the Biden Administration a week earlier announced it had already purchased enough Pfizer vaccine to inoculate all 28 million 5- to 11-year-olds in the US. Did they know the fix was in?

‘…Just the Way it Goes’

The record of the FDA, the major drug oversight agency in the US Government, regarding safety and risks of the experimental gene-altered mRNA vaccines of Pfizer, is one of criminal malfeasance, defined as willful violation of a public trust or obligation that causes harm or death. Their latest ruling is even more egregious for blatant conflicts of interest and scientific fraud. Both Pfizer, who conducted the tests on the efficacy of their own vaccine on the 5-11 year age group, and the FDA experts, admitted that they had no idea if the vaccine was safe for such a young population.

Dr. Eric Rubin, professor of immunology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health voted to approve the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, noting, “The data show that the vaccine works and is pretty safe … and yet we’re worried about a side effect that we can’t measure yet, but it’s probably real.” That is hardly confidence-building. He then stated, “we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.”

This cold-blooded nonchalance is even more astonishing in light of the fact that the incidence of serious side effects in the 5-11 age group who allegedly have tested positive for the corona virus is essentially zero. According to data of the US Government Centers for Disease Control, the Infection Fatality Rate for children from 0-17 years is 0.0002 per 100,000 and far lower for the 5-11 years. A research study by Johns Hopkins University found that risk of severe illness or death from covid19 in a study of 48,000 children is essentially zero if no other morbidity risk such as leukemia, diabetes or asthma is present. Moreover, risk of infecting other children is also very low.

In their submission to FDA for approval, Pfizer stated the vaccination was needed for the 5-11 age group to prevent covid disease transmission. Yet in their FDA hearing on questioning, Dr. William Gruber, senior vice president of Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Research and Development, said they did not even assess whether the vaccine prevents transmission. We might ask why is this at all needed then if the risk to children is zero and there is no evidence of children transmission?

Even more shocking is the statement by Pfizer about its tests. First there were no animal tests on rats or such first. They admitted that the tested human group was so small that they could not test for myocarditis or pericarditis. Yet those are among the most reported negative effects for all others that have had the Pfizer jab. In its FDA application Pfizer noted that the number of participants in the current clinical development program was “too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination,” and that “to evaluate long-term sequelae of post-vaccination myocarditis/pericarditis” in participants 5 to <12 years of age will not be studied until after the vaccine is authorized for children.”

Flawed Pfizer Tests

The tests Pfizer made were also fatally flawed. According to Dr. Josh Guetzkow, of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Pfizer study was not double-blind. Further, Pfizer cherry-picked subjects to evidently better their results. Three thousand children age 5-11 received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, but only 750 of those children were selectively included in the company’s safety analysis. And Pfizer dismissed cases with adverse vaccine effects in their FDA filing: “Few serious Adverse Events, none of which were related to vaccine, and no AEs leading to withdrawal were reported.” They give no explanation how that was determined. Just trust Pfizer.

And post-vaccination follow up was less than 2 months for one test cohort and only 2.4 weeks for a second. The Pfizer report to FDA read, “Supplemental safety expansion group data were analyzed from approximately 1500 vaccine recipients with a median follow-up time of 2.4 weeks after Dose 2. These supplemental data demonstrate an acceptable safety profile…” It can take months or longer for side effects to manifest. Vaccine experts recommend at least 18-24 month post-vaccine follow up, not 3 months or 2.4 weeks. This is not serious science.

As well, it seems the FDA and or Pfizer wrongly name the vaccine in the title as “BNT162B2 [COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, MRNA)] .“Yet the actual FDA text calls it “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2).”

The separate company, BioNTech of Mainz, Germany, has a similar but “legally different” vaccine, trade-named Comirnaty, that is not available in the USA. The distinction is essential as it was the basis in August for the corrupt FDA to give Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine an extension of Emergency Use Authorization but to misleadingly declare its full approval for Comirnaty vaccine of BioNTech. This is deliberate fraud and allowed the Biden Administration to mandate vaccination of US government workers (curiously except for White House and Congress), military, and any company with more than 100 employees.

Conflicts of Interest?

The corruption of the FDA extends to the members of the Vaccine Advisory Committee. Many of the members of the current 18 person committee have direct ties to Pfizer or to the pro-Pfizer Gates Foundation.

Prof. Holly Janes of the Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center in Seattle designed the flawed Pfizer tests. Her institute is funded by Gates Foundation money. FDA committee member Dr. Steven Pergam is also with the Gates-funded Fred Hutch center. Acting committee chair, Arnold S. Monto was a paid consultant to Pfizer. Committee member Archana Chatterjee worked on a Pfizer research project related to vaccines for infants between 2018-2020. Geeta K. Swamy is chair of the “Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program,” a committee sponsored by Pfizer. Duke University states that “Dr. Swamy serves as a co-investigator for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial.” FDA Committee member Gregg Sylvester was a vice president for Pfizer Vaccines. Ofer Levy, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School is on record vigorously supporting Pfizer covid vaccines for children 12 and older. And FDA committee member Paul Offit professor of pediatrics at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia called openly last June for covid vaccine permission for children.

When we compare the actions of corrupt FDA Acting Director Janet Woodcock during the August FDA extension of emergency use authorization for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, she refused then to even allow the vaccine committee to meet to debate the issue. Several months before in June 2021 three members of the FDA Vaccine Committee resigned in protest over Woodcock’s refusal to heed the near unanimous vote of the advisory committee to approve an Alzheimer’s drug called Aduhelm against the wishes of nearly every member on the panel.

Clearly Woodcock has been busy in the meantime stacking the advisory committee with pro-Pfizer members. Not to be forgotten is the fact that after he left as head of the FDA under Trump, Scott Gottlieb immediately joined the board of directors of…Pfizer Inc. Woodcock served under him at FDA.Woodcock has been at FDA since 1986, almost as long as Fauci at NIAID. Woodcock was Biden’s choice to head FDA, but a massive opposition from 28 groups including state attorneys general and citizen groups forced him to name her “acting,” which does not need Congressional scrutiny. Woodcock was directly responsible for the original FDA approval of deadly opioids over the objections of her own scientists and other advisors.

Already California has moved to make public school admission contingent on covid vaccination, anticipating Pfizer approval. This spread of the deadly Pfizer vaccine to children who have near zero risk of serious disease makes no public health sense. It is simply prima facie evidence of medical malfeasance at the highest levels of the US Government including FDA, with plausible criminal intent. The FDA decision will now be used to argue for similar inclusion of essentially no risk children for the vaccine jab.

 

Connect with Global Research

cover image credit: squarefrog / pixabay




Whistleblower Exposes Fake Data Behind Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine Trial

Whistleblower Exposes Fake Data Behind Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine Trial

by GreatGameIndia
November 3, 2021

 

Leading medical journal The BMJ has published an incendiary report exposing faked data, blind trial failures, poorly trained vaccinators, and a slow follow-up on adverse reactions in the phase-three trial of Pfizer’s Covid jab.

Central to the exposé is Brook Jackson, who, for two weeks, served as regional director at Ventavia Research Group, the company contracted to assist with the pivotal trial. She provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails supporting her concerns.

Jackson reveals that Ventavia staff who conducted quality-control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were identifying. She repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, and patient safety and data integrity issues.

In a cited internal document from August 2020, shortly after the Pfizer trial began, a Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to “go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.” One employee was said to have been subsequently “verbally counseled for changing data” and “not noting late entry.”

Jackson reported her concerns to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but was fired later the same day on the basis that she was “not a good fit.”

 

Connect with GreatGameIndia

cover image credit: ErikaWittlieb / pixabay




Project Contamination and Indemnity

Project Contamination and Indemnity

by Rosanne Lindsay, ND, Nature of Healing
November 2, 2021

 

Contamination

In August of 2021, Japan suspended Moderna’s COVID vaccine after another million doses were found to be “contaminated” with ‘black substances, foreign substances, and pink material.” By September, Moderna recalled their vaccines after stainless steel was found inside vials.

At that time, Japanese officials had administered 118,310,106 doses of the COVID vaccine. If they suspended more than two million doses due to contamination, just how many contaminated doses had been administered? How many people received a contaminated jab?

Nobody knows. That’s above their pay grade.

What about monitoring recipients who might have been contaminated?

What is the definition of a contaminant? Why the mystery?

According to some, popular contaminants already exist in vaccines, including mercuryaluminumformaldehydenano-contamination of metals and polysorbate 80, to name a few. However, the CDC and FDA do not consider these CDC-known toxins / carcinogens as “contaminants.” For instance, aluminum is not a neurotoxin. In a vaccine, aluminum is an adjuvant to stimulate the immune response.

So who is responsible for the contamination of COVID products that are injected?

Indemnity Scheme

In our “advanced world,” no one is responsible. Furthermore, there is never enough evidence that will ever prove a cause for adverse effects when it comes to vaccines, including COVID vaccines. Just calling an injection a “VACCINE” automatically makes it immune from any liability.

Since 1986, The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (H.R. 5546) makes vaccines and their makers, including the doctors who inject them, exempt from all liability for damages from their products.

Under the PREP Act, companies such as Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability if something unintentionally (or intentionally) goes wrong with their COVID vaccines. That means that you cannot sue them if you have severe COVID vaccine side-or-direct effects, and the government likely won’t compensate you for damages. What other industry or company has that kind of protection?

No other.

What is the difference between the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act and The PREP Act?  The script? The actors?

The 1986 Act works as a remedial measure, under which vaccine-manufacturers are not be held responsible for compensating any vaccine-related injury claims. Instead, the Act is supposed to provide compensation to eligible individuals for damaging effects of their vaccines. The program covers 16 routine vaccines for children entering public schools. However, as claims have mounted, few are ever paid out in the private vaccine court. There is no provision for damages based on pain and suffering. However, the vaccine court is profitable for vaccine lawyers who get paid no matter who wins or loses.

The PREP Act is an expansion of the 1986 Act, as it shields companies manufacturing the experimental COVID vaccines not approved by the FDA, called Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) vaccines. The justification this time? The Act is meant to jumpstart U.S. defenses against an outbreak like COVID-19 by shielding from lawsuits makers of critical products, from diagnostic tests to vaccines, as well as doctors and drug distributors.

Both Acts require claimants to prove their injuries are “the direct result” of a vaccine. So far, most COVID vaccine cases have been denied compensation for the simple reason that, according to the lawyers, there is virtually no definitive research on injury causation to reference.

Meanwhile, the medical literature all but points to vaccines as the cause of autoimmune disease in a syndrome known as A.S.I.A. or Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, as in vaccine adjuvants. [See study 1(autoimmune), study 2 (Shoenfeld’s)study 3 (thyroid)study 4 (neurological), and hundreds more].

A scheme is a scheme is a scheme.

Swine Flu

As a result of human complacency to schemes, any vaccine adverse side-or-direct effects may not become apparent until millions of people have received the vaccine. Recall the fiasco of the Swine Flu epidemic that threatened to become a pandemic? Remember the inaccuracy of case definitions and “mistakes” that blew the whole thing out of proportion? Is it happening again?

According to Science, The WireIndia has the world’s largest childhood immunisation scheme, larger than all the European and Middle Eastern countries combined. 

The Prime Minister of Australia, Scott Morrison, says the new “COVID-19 vaccine indemnity scheme will provide confidence to medical practitioners to administer both AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines to Australians,” as long as there is informed consent.

Why is there is no informed consent prior to injection, only after?

When the leaders of “the free world” call a mass injection campaign a schemethe people need to pay attention.

In May 2021, the New York Times reported that Emergent BioSolutions, whose Baltimore plant ruined millions of coronavirus vaccine doses, disclosed for the first time on Wednesday that more than 100 million doses of Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine are now on hold as regulators check them for possible contamination.  In June, the FDA instructed Johnson & Johnson to throw out 60 million doses of the COVID-19 vaccine produced at a Baltimore plant out of concern that they may have been contaminated, and because they were not suitable for use. 

Contamination or Additive?

Accident or Project?

Truth or lie?

In any good mystery there are always more questions than answers. And there are always criminals who plan not to get caught. Expect that criminals of this scheme have covered their trails (indemnity) and made others vulnerable (contamination) so they get away when their scheme begins to unravel.

Next The Children

As of September 2021, with reports of widespread contamination, and ongoing investigations, the FDA has told journals such as Scientific American to promote the expansion of injections to children ages 5 to 11.

By appointment only, Pfizer Friday Nights For Kids began at area Fire Stations across the U.S. during Halloween weekend, a time for rituals and blood sacrifices. What better way for kids to spend a Friday night than getting their first COVID jab?

Parents, are you paying attention?

 


Rosanne Lindsay is a Naturopath, writer, earth keeper, health freedom advocate and author of the books The Nature of Healing, Heal the Body, Heal the Planet and  Free Your Voice, Heal Your Thyroid, Reverse Thyroid Disease Naturally.

Rosanne Lindsay is available for consultation through Turtle Island Network.  Subscribe to her blog at natureofhealing.org.

 

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay, ND

cover image credit: CDD20 / pixabay




The Pope: A Conversation in Hell

The Pope: A Conversation in Hell

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 3, 2021

 

Within an hour of passing from this life, Pope Francis found himself in a small office. Worn carpet, a desk, two chairs. The wall paint was peeling. A young man wearing a white tropical suit walked in and sat down behind the desk. He motioned the Pope to the chair across from him.

Where am I?

In Hell, Francis.

That’s impossible.

Why?

I’m the Pope.

There’s another way to look at it. Why wouldn’t you be here?

No, really. There’s obviously been an error. A tragic mistake.

I’m afraid not. Our transport system is bulletproof. It runs on AI.

Then…then you’re Satan?

Good one, Francis. No. I’m Sid, the assistant director of Human Resources.

Where is Satan? I demand to speak with him.

Satan doesn’t do celebrity intake. He didn’t even speak with Stalin. Or Torquemada.

Look, I don’t care about your system. I’ve been sent to the wrong place. I’m destined to meet with the Savior and His Father.

Yeah, well, that’s not going to happen. You’re here, this is Hell, and that’s that.

Baloney. How do I get a message through to God?

After all this time, you don’t know how? Anyway, we’re blocked off. No service from here to there.

There must be an angel I can talk to.

Another good one. No, Francis, we’re all out of angels.

I have resources. Art, gold, manuscripts.

You HAD them.

Get the Vatican on the phone.

We used to have a direct line. But then they stopped paying their bill.

I’m…stuck…here?

I’m afraid so. For the duration.

This is unconscionable. Somebody has their wires crossed. There are millions of people named Francis. I was switched out.

Or you deserve to be here. Let’s talk about that.

There must be something I can offer you.

In the abstract, bribery is an interesting conversation, but we’re way past that.

What’s the set-up here? Who needs favors and blessings?

We run a tight ship. We have a schedule. Monday is medical day. Right now, we’re performing a series of experiments on brain-computer interface. Volunteers are attached through skull probes to a program that loads them up with advanced mathematics. The integration phase has run into serious problems. Instead of data, people are experiencing raw electronics. The pain levels are exceedingly high. So we’re trying to counteract that with drugs.

You’re not serious.

This is Hell.

You said “volunteers.”

On Mondays, you could opt for a clinical trial of high-dose AZT. We’re measuring the timeline of cell death. AZT essentially stops cells from replicating. In layman’s terms, the body decays rapidly and falls apart.

This must be a dream.

On Tuesday, we strap you to a treadmill traveling 37 miles an hour for two hours, while gradually lowering you into the lake of fire.

What have I done? What have I done to deserve this?

Let’s talk about that. For instance, the deal with the Chinese.

The Chinese are a wonderful people.

Sure. We’re all wonderful, Francis. I’m talking about the Chinese regime and Xi Jinping.

You mean the Vatican support for abortion? Our endorsement of their social credit score system? The conferences on integrating Catholicism and Communism?

That would be a start.

So what? So what if we made those accommodations? China is a powerhouse. I wasn’t just going to sit there and watch them roll over us. Sid, they already control half of Italy. Why do you think the first COVID lockdowns in the West started in my backyard?

Your allegiance was to Jesus and God.

You’re joking, right? Even God makes deals. He applies pressure, gets what he wants, and then he backs off. Send a plague, obtain compliance, declare a truce. It’s all about the action. One player gets one piece, another player gets another. You spread out the baksheesh, you pocket the vig.

Now we’re getting somewhere. Similar situation with climate change, right?

Just another deal. Another hustle. These flim-flam artists really believe they can measure the Earth’s overall temperature? Are you kidding me? Much less the HISTORY of the temperature? But that’s the play now. The UN Panel. They’ll package the threat of a planetary collision between the Earth and Mars, if it’ll give them a leg up.

You saw an opportunity.

Of course. I’m the number one humanitarian in the world when it comes to hunger and inequality. Those are my talking points. I can do a bang-up job of faking a connection between them and climate change. So I’m needed. The grifters involved are all already making out like bandits on climate. So they sit down with me, I negotiate my ten percent. Plus they get to reduce energy production all over the world. You know, as the “solution.” This gives them more poverty and debilitation, which are good for their business—Control. I’m in the same business. We see eye to eye.

I like it, Francis.

Wait a minute. I’m losing the thread. I mean, you’re on my side, right? You get an insight into my strategy and you approve. Yes?

Absolutely. You’re talking our language.

So then why are you talking about Monday and Tuesday and subjecting me to all kinds of torture on your schedule, if I’m not here to pay for my sins?

Francis, I would have thought you’d figured that out a long time ago. We’re sadists. We enjoy our work. That’s all. We don’t truck with Heaven. We have no opinion or knowledge about them. We just accept the souls who show up here. I’m happy you’re with us. But we need raw material. You’re it.

What?! There’s nothing moral about punishment in this place?

Moral? Think it through, Francis. Again, this is Hell.

All right. I’m a fast adapter. There are things, then. Things I could teach you, Sid.

I don’t think so. We’ve been around the block a few million times. We know our business.

There’s no money involved?

We’re cashless. Let me show you to your room. It has a view of the lake…

I’m having a mental health problem. Can I see a doctor?

This place is filled with doctors. I can get you in this afternoon. You supported psychiatric treatment while you were at the Vatican, right? Here, though, the doctors tend to be a little bent. They go to extremes with their treatments. I’ll make a few calls and find you an unenthusiastic straight shooter. Of course, experiencing what a standard protocol of Haldol does to the nervous system…the tranquilizing effect is only stage one. After that, the neurons start firing randomly. Impulse control goes out the window…

I want out!

Ah, but you’re in, Francis.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Comfreak / pixabay




Most Doctors and Hospitals Have Become Paid Assassins of the State!

Most Doctors and Hospitals Have Become Paid Assassins of the State!

by Gary D. Barnett
November 1, 2021

 

Doctors are just the same as lawyers; the only difference is that lawyers merely rob you, whereas doctors rob you
and kill you too.
~ Anton Chekhov

 

Germ theory was the downfall of modern medicine, and most all of any honest approach to health was lost, while prevention, natural remedies, and the wonder of the human immune system were forgotten in favor of money, prescription drugs, deadly ‘vaccination,’ and unnecessary surgery. Doctors became the tools of the corporate medical system, the pharmaceutical industry, and the hospital industrial complex. As time passed, this situation only worsened, and now this fraudulent ‘Covid’ pandemic scare has led to doctors and hospitals becoming voluntary paid assassins of the state, whether knowingly or not.

Regardless of circumstance, it has become extremely dangerous to go to or be admitted to any hospital, especially if symptoms expressed are considered ‘Covid’ related, such as cold, flu, pneumonia, or any respiratory ailments. Going to a hospital under these circumstances is life-threatening, and not due to sickness, but to ‘medical’ protocols meant to harm, not heal. In fact, these protocols in many if not most hospital settings, especially for any considered elderly, which now means anyone over 50, are meant to kill the patient, which should be considered an act of murder.

This is a time when any good doctors and medical personnel left could and should be exposing this heinous fraud and evil intent by the so-called medical system, but those willing to tell the truth are few and far between, and in many cases, those actually doing so are threatened or silenced, and any risk of job loss seems to take total priority over all decisions made. Consider the implications of this situation; as it indicates that doctors and hospitals are beholding only to their employers or to the system that feeds them, not to the Hypocritic Oath or any desire whatsoever to help those in need. In other words, money power, and control are now the underlying aspects of the health and medical system’s core structure; the good of the patient be damned. Consider the use of remdesivir as treatment for what is falsely referred to as ‘Covid?’ As I wrote some time ago:

“Consider the fact that remdesivir, an experimental drug, was fast-tracked as the “standard of care” for ‘Covid’ early on by Anthony Fauci, and was originally the only approved ‘Covid” treatment for American hospitals, even though this drug does not work against anything, and causes many adverse reactions, body organ failure, and a high incidence of death. “Remdesivir was one of four drugs in a clinical trial for Ebola in 2018, and was dropped from the study before it was over, after a safety review revealed that it had the highest death rate of the drugs being tested.” One of only two studies cited by Fauci for the recommended use of this toxic drug was the Ebola Trial in 2018, and in that trial, the manufacturer, Gilead Sciences, only tested 53 patients for just 28 days. Gilead had close ties, monetary interests, and partnership with the CDC and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed up by Fauci.”

“Fauci knew of the deadly nature of the poisonous remdesivir at least as early as 2018, but chose to use this dangerous drug with fast-track FDA approval in October of 2020 as the “standard of care,” and the primary treatment in all U.S. hospitals for all “Covid” patients. That means that American patients across this country were not treated, but murdered.”

This drug is still in use in hospitals today, authorized by Fauci, alleged ‘health’ organizations, hospitals, and doctors across the country.

Consider the use of ventilators for all those very ill due to flu-like symptoms who were isolated in hospitals and nursing homes nationwide, especially those in New York and other high population centers? Death occurred for most all of those patients, so how could the doctors not have understood that killing all the patients by very invasive and dangerous ventilator use was not a way to help or save them? If 76% to 97% of all patients treated in this manner died, how could any doctor or hospital not only question, but stop this madness to find out why extreme death rates were the result?

Now, rationing of care based on age, mental condition, and considered use to society or the greater good, a communistic approach, have become the norm. How can this be supported by any claiming to be doctors or ‘health’ administrators, when the main purpose of care is supposed to be about helping all patients? The incentives that drive this insanity are certainly tied to money and financial gain to those going along with this slaughter of innocents, but other nefarious factors are also evident. The elimination of the old and those approaching retirement is of major concern to the ruling class, so killing off this unwanted part of society as the state sees it, is a plus. The funds stolen in the process are redirected into the pockets of government and the rich benefactors of government policy. The ruling sector, the corporate whores, almost the entirety of the medical system, and others benefit from the murder of certain groups of people, so the killing continues unabated.

In the midst of all this evil behavior, and in the middle of what is falsely labeled a ‘pandemic’, a time when immune system destruction and extreme stress due only to government mandates that isolate individuals and families, destroy any financial security for the masses, and control of most aspects of life are present, a poisonous and deadly ‘vaccine’ protocol has been heavily marketed, mandated in very many circumstances, and pushed on the public as the only way to survive what is obviously a completely fake and purposely manufactured ‘crisis.’ While doctors and hospitals continue to rake in millions upon millions of dollars due to this fraud, and do so willingly, the torture of many, financial destruction, and death continues among the general population; not due to any bogus ‘virus,’ but to a planned outcome due to a plot to control all, long considered and sought by the state, its controllers, the pharmaceutical industry criminals, the health and medical complex, and all the corporate and government support systems, including the ludicrous and despicable sector called enforcement.

The doctors and hospitals must not be allowed to willingly continue to maim and kill those it is charged with helping. They must be stopped from ignoring every aspect of proper care for their patients in order to gain more wealth, or retain their positions only by contradicting every medical ethical standard ever set by sane and caring individuals. There is no excuse for this behavior, and every single person in the ‘health’ and medical profession that consciously accepts and goes along with this practice of harm and deceit should face prosecution. Nothing less will be of value to society.

The next target of this murderous nation-state and all its partners are the children; all the children. The injection of toxic and deadly poisons in children from infancy to adult is not only desired, but already underway in some areas, with a goal of ‘vaccinating’ every child in this country over the next year and after. If this is allowed to go forward by the sheep in this country, what future is possible for this and any upcoming generations? Freedom cannot be won or exist in any system that has taken control of the young through gene-altering, immune system destructive protocols, and experimental control technology, administered by state mandate in order to either, maim, kill, or control the bulk of society.

In order for this plot against mankind to go forward, the people have to voluntarily submit to the state’s agenda. Without this voluntary submission, the state will fail, but with continued compliance and strict obedience by the masses, nothing of what has been known in the past as a normal life in a somewhat free country will remain. All that can be expected in any passive, indifferent, and docile society of a collective mass of ignorance, is a life in a technocratic matrix of total control and dependence on the evil few. This is our future if mass resistance is not forthcoming!

“Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious
objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defense of their conviction.”
~ Mahatma Gandhi

 

Source links:

The coverup of state murder

Hospitals are now prisons

 Antoine Béchamp, champion of natural medicine

The purposeful killing of the old in nursing homes

Death by ventilator, not ‘Covid’

Death rates in care homes created on purpose: Murder by stealth

The non-existent virus

Pfizer’s immoral ’Covid vaccine’ trials on children

 

Connect with Gary D. Barnett

cover image based on creative commons work of MichaelWuensch & pendleburyannette / pixabay




If I Were an Atheist Materialist Biological Machine

If I Were an Atheist Materialist Biological Machine

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
November 1, 2021

 

If I were an atheist materialist who believed all humans were nothing more than biological machines, the practice of delivering an infant whole and alive, through Caesarean Section, and then cutting out his heart and removing tissue for medical research would still make me turn away and want to forget I had ever heard this was happening in the world. (My series on medical infanticide, here [1])

Because a click would go off inside me.

I wouldn’t know what the click was, or why it happened, but I would feel something. And if I were a creature living in Huxley’s Brave New World, I would know the feeling was a signal I should go to the medical dispensary and obtain the drug Soma, which would put me in a pleasant forgetful state…

And yet in our world, there are doctors and nurses and technicians and researchers who don’t even experience the click. They participate in the murders of the infants. They do the work. [2]

They are backed up by bureaucrats and elected officials and ethicists and pharmaceutical executives and medical school teachers and deans and medical journal editors and medical journalists and even religious leaders.

How is it that people of faith, billions of them, are not standing up together against this establishment?

Obviously, something has gone wrong with religion. That is the only conclusion.

In organizing itself, it has become concerned with perpetuating itself. It has built a wall between its people and what faith means.

Jesus threw the money changers out of the Temple, but what happens when the money changers ARE the Temple?

What happens when pastors fail to inspire their congregations to take action in the world and stand up against their oppressors?

Vaccine companies used fetal cell line HEK 293 to test their COVID vaccines. That cell line was surely obtained through the medical murder of an infant, in 1972, in the Netherlands. Her kidneys were removed for the tissue, killing her.

Religious people can say that’s none of their business. They can say anything that will close them off from action.

But ABIDING FAITH is supposed to triumph over society and government, the “things of this world.” That’s one of the sacred points of faith. It’s supposed to allow a person to go to the wall for his beliefs.

A Pope carrying all the accoutrement of the Roman Church can issue a statement supporting the COVID vaccine. This tells you how much of the material world the Pope pays homage to. How much he has sold of himself. He is not an illustration of the test of faith.

If I were an atheist materialist who believed all humans were biological machines, there are churches and temples I could walk into; and feel at home.

The Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute “is a 501 (c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to end human trafficking and exploitation for the purposes of biomedical research and commercial products. Our President and Founder, Theresa Deisher Ph.D., has over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience. She discovered adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked on their therapeutic uses as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and leads a team of scientists at AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing what a diagnosis of cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease means to patients and their loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr. Deisher is named as an inventor on over 47 patents.” [3]

I’m going to give you a few important quotes from their published material. Wherever “fetal cells” and “cell line” are mentioned, this indicates material obtained from an aborted fetus. Were these infants removed from their mothers’ wombs, alive, and then murdered? Except in one instance, this is not covered. However, Sound Choice founder, Dr. Deisher, in a devastating interview with Robert Kennedy [4], makes it clear that the practice of removing infants, alive, from the womb, extracting their tissue to make cell lines, and killing them is a widespread practice.

In the first 15 minutes of the interview [4], Deisher discusses infants in the womb for 20 weeks, even 32 weeks, being taken out alive, with their blood supply functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will be turned into fetal cell lines.

At the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn’t want to get into the moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral aspect.

Here are Sound Choice Institute statements: [5]

“Today, more than 23 vaccines are contaminated by the use of aborted fetal cells. There is no law that requires that consumers be informed that some vaccines are made using aborted fetal cells and contain residual aborted fetal DNA. While newer vaccines produced using aborted fetal cells do inform consumers, in their package inserts, that the vaccines contain contaminating DNA from the cell used to produce the vaccine, they do not identify the cells as being derived from electively aborted human fetuses.”

“The United States government has known about the dangers of human DNA from aborted fetal cell-lines since at least 2005. They set guidelines which are supposed to keep the DNA at a specific limit, which they hypothesize will not cause cancer. There is no monitoring of vaccines by our government agencies to ensure those limits are adhered to. Vaccines (MMR, Varicella, and Hepatitis A) sent for independent analysis have consistently shown levels of human fetal DNA that are far beyond the ‘established safety limits’.”

“Instead of conducting safety studies the FDA regulated the amount of human DNA that could be present in a vaccine to no greater than 10ng.”

“Unfortunately, the Sound Choice team discovered that the fetal DNA levels ranged anywhere from 142ng – 2000ng per dose, way beyond the so-called ‘safe’ level.”

“Human fetal cell lines are used to culture some vaccines. They are listed on the CDCs Vaccine Excipient list as [cell lines] WI-38, MRC-5, HEK293, PERC.6.

* WI-38 is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of an aborted female fetus.

* MRC-5 (Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted male fetus.

* Human embryonic kidney cells 293, also often referred to as HEK 293, HEK-293, 293 cells, or less precisely as HEK cells, are a specific cell line originally derived from human embryonic kidney cells grown in a tissue culture.

* PERC.6 cell line was derived from human embryonic retinal cells taken from an elective abortion.

* The newest cell line created in 2015 for vaccines: WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3-month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a ‘water bag’ abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.” [6]

“Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal material) provide the ‘cell culture’ in which vaccine formulas are often grown or nurtured. Current vaccines in circulation which were manufactured using aborted fetal material include:

* Polio vaccine (inactivated/IPV) & Oral Polio (live virus) drops : Sanofi Pasteur recently announced they are discontinuing the use of aborted fetal cells in the manufacturing of Poliovax, Pentacel, and Quadracel polio vaccines. Ask before receiving these vaccines as it will take some time for the ethically available options to be widely available.

* Measles, Mumps, Rubella vaccine/MMR (Rubella component)

* Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis vaccine (DTaP/TdP)

* Varicella (Chickenpox) vaccine & Shingles (zoster) vaccine

* Hepatitis A and Hepatitis A & B vaccines

* Rabies vaccine

* Shingles

* Some Coronavirus vaccines”

VACCINE REFUSAL AND RESISTANCE ARE ACTS OF CONSCIENCE, SCIENCE, AND FAITH.


SOURCES:

[1] blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/medical-infanticide/

[2] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/27/the-abortion-culture/

[3] https://soundchoice.org/about/

[4] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-q-a-with-dr-theresa-deisher/

[5] https://soundchoice.org/vaccines/

[6] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25803132/

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Yuri_B / pixabay




Coercing Children, Scaring the Elderly: How New Zealand, Sweden and Canada Are Responding to the Pandemic

Coercing Children, Scaring the Elderly: How New Zealand, Sweden and Canada Are Responding to the Pandemic
On the first three episodes of CHD.TV’s “Around The World,” host Amanda Forbes interviewed a medical doctor in New Zealand, a humanitarian in Sweden and a journalist in Canada who described their governments’ pandemic response policies.

by Children’s Health Defense Team, The Defender
October 29, 2020

 

The first three episodes of CHD.TV’s “Around the World” with Amanda Forbes, Forbes interviewed a medical doctor in New Zealand, a humanitarian in Sweden and a journalist in Canada who described their governments’ pandemic response policies.

New Zealand

The latest episode featured an interview with Dr. Samantha Bailey, a New Zealand mother and co-author of “Virus Mania: Corona/COVID-19, Measles, Swine Flu, Cervical Cancer, Avian Flu, SARS, BSE, Hepatitis C, AIDS, Polio, Spanish Flu. How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits at Our Expense.”

Forbes and Bailey discussed the latest news on lockdowns, mandates, passports, police enforcement and vaccines. Bailey said New Zealand is a test subject for many experiments due to its isolation, and children as young as 12 in are able to consent to COVID vaccination.

Describing New Zealand’s push to get as many people vaccinated as possible, Bailey said, “They were doing all these carnival kind of things. Free ice cream for poor people, bouncy castles and making it a fun kind of thing.”

She said her “awakening” as a doctor occurred when she realized the government, Big Pharma and the medical establishment were all “in” on a complex, planned response to COVID.

Bailey said her medical license was suspended after she spoke out against the media and medical narrative.

Watch the New Zealand episode of “Around the Word” here:

Sweden

On Episode 2 of CHD.TV’s “Around the World,” Forbes interviewed Aga Wilson, a humanitarian, news reporter and New Yorker who moved to Sweden to escape New York’s COVID restrictions.

Forbes and Wilson discussed the similarities and differences between Sweden’s response to COVID and the policies implemented by other countries. They covered what’s going on with schools, vaccines, protests and talking with medical professionals.

“The government has written a proposal saying that they definitely want to implement COVID passports and take away the testing altogether,” Wilson said.

Wilson described why the Swedish people get out and protest. Because the police cannot legally lock anyone up for protesting, officers drive protesters far away, and drop them off so they’re out-of-sight.

Watch the Sweden episode of “Around the Word” here:



Canada

On the premier episode 1 of CHD.TV’s “Around the World,” Forbes interviewed Ontario-based Rajie Kabli, co-founder of WholeHearted Media and journalist who has covered the Canadian government’s response to COVID since the onset of the pandemic.

Forbes and Kabli discussed how the Canadian response is beginning to look a lot like Australia.

They took a close look at all the contradictory restrictions, from province to province, and discussed protests, police and propaganda as well as the vaccine passport.

Kabli shared the shocking story of an 80-year-old woman who ran from authorities after being apprehended at a provincial border.

“In that third lockdown, the most severe for us were checkpoints.” Kabli said. “You can’t even travel out of your jurisdiction — where you live.”

Watch the Canada episode of “Around the Word” here:



Watch a new episode of  “Around the World” with Amanda Forbes every Friday on CHD TV at 8:30 a.m. PT / 11:30 a.m. ET.

 

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: Matryx / pixabay




The Nazi Medical Plan for Control of the Planet; World War Two Never Ended

The Nazi Medical Plan for Control of the Planet; World War Two Never Ended
At the end of the War, IG Farben executives were put on trial and, despite the efforts of Telford Taylor, the chief US prosecutor, and assistant prosecutor, Josiah DuBois, the sentences handed out were light.
For example, Fritz Ter Meer, a high-ranking Farben executive, was tried for mass medical murder and slavery, and sentenced to a paltry seven years in jail. He was released after three years, and went on to occupy a post as chairman of the advisory board of Bayer, a corporate branch on the tree of the infamous IG Farben, which supposedly had been disbanded…

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 29, 2021

 

I started writing about this subject 20 years ago, when I launched NoMoreFakeNews.com.

In this article, I’ll present an overview.

In 1933, the largest cartel in the world, IG Farben, pushed Hitler over the top, enabling him to become Chancellor of Germany.

Farben was a global colossus. Pharmaceuticals, dyes, oil, rubber. It forged partnerships with Standard Oil, Dow, Dupont, Imperial Chemical Industries, Rhone-Poulenc.

US government official, Josiah DuBois, sent on a fact-finding mission to Guatemala, returned saying, “As far as I can tell, the nation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Farben.”

The brilliant Farben chemists were modern alchemists. They were researching and producing synthetics far in advance of products formulated anywhere else in the world.

Their dream was material transformation: the ability to convert any element on the Periodic Table into any other element.

Meanwhile, Hitler was obsessed with another transformation: resurrecting what he believed was the lost Aryan Master Race. Through selective breeding, the elimination of lesser and unwanted human types, and other “scientific methods,” a revival of Supermen would occur. And of course, they would then control the destiny of the planet.

Near the close of World War 2 in Europe, the leading lights of Farben and other German corporations, knowing that Hitler was a madman and a rank failure as a military strategist, decided they would have to redirect their efforts, go underground, remain invisible, and from the shadows carry on their war by other means. They were not done. Far from it. They had money, resources, brains, allies. And time.

But what would this new war look like? How would it proceed? Whose strings would they be pulling, and for what purpose?

Should they align themselves with a political movement?

There was one possibility. Socialism. Communism. It would be a convenient ruse. After all, Europe was devastated and exhausted by the War. The prevailing attitude was: “anything to avoid another armed conflict.”

If the nations of Europe could enter into a cooperative future, link hands, bury long-standing enmities, soften geo-borders, engage in free trade, eventually adopt a common currency…

Thus, over a period of decades, the European Union was created. It was what Hitler had been aiming for: a merged continent.

And Germany assumed leadership, as the strongest economic powerhouse in Europe.

All without a shot being fired.

Socialism was spreading, in one form or another, all over the world. For the invisible Nazi architects, this was further evidence they should temporarily hitch their wagon to that star. After all, what was Socialism, really? Just a label for top-down control. The Marxist ideology was unimportant. Domination of populations was all that mattered.

And yet, something was missing. A method. A means. A non-political force that could gradually envelop the world and subdue it, torture it, assert control over billions of minds.

The Farben chiefs had the solution right in front of them. During the War, they had paid a pittance to the managers at Auschwitz, across the road, to send prisoners every day to their medical facility for “tests.” Experiments. Vile grotesque experiments.

And going back several decades, the Nazi leadership had joined elite American eugenicists—the Rockefeller-Harriman forces—to investigate, promote, and utilize sterilization, abortion, medical murder to rid society of its “unfit members.” Those Nazi-American connections still existed.

A branch of modern medicine was on the rise: psychiatry. This was a perfect opportunity to introduce, through completely arbitrary diagnoses of “mental disorders,” debilitating brain-damaging drugs to whole populations. For purposes of pacification.

In fact, the whole Rockefeller model of medicine—one disease caused by one germ—a preposterous form of reductionism—was coming into its own. This meant massive numbers of drugs to treat patients.

Surely, these drugs could be made into toxic destroyers.

A plan was taking shape. A medical plan. THIS would be the invisible conquering force, flying under a politically neutral banner of “healing.”

Create, in the long run, a cradle to grave system enrolling every human, who would trudge, during his lifetime, along a bleak road of 40 or 50 disease-diagnoses and toxic treatments—each treatment giving rise to new symptoms which would be labeled new diseases, requiring treatments…

As for the rank elimination of huge numbers of people on the planet—depopulation—this was a thornier problem. How to arrange it? How to conceal it?

The choice was clear: so-called pandemics. But how would they be staged? Microorganisms, those that actually existed and weren’t mere fantasies, were notoriously unpredictable. The human body, despite all attacks against it, was strong and resilient.

There was no super-germ that could be released which would wipe out a few billion people. That was a dead end. Researchers in their labs, fabricating absurd tests for fairy-tale viruses, and failing to isolate viruses at all, weren’t a help.

But a story about a virus, a story sold with enough fervor by controlled media and cooperating governments…that had possibilities, because the solution would be a vaccine.

The invisible architects would need a whole parade of these fake pandemics, over a long period of time, in order to convince the world population that such scenarios were real.

One by one, pandemic stories could appear and be sold. And DOCTORS would be the messiahs.

COVID is of course the strongest story to date. And the vaccines will, in the long term, be the most debilitating and destructive of all shots.

But it’s doubtful COVID will be the last pandemic story. If a product is a major winner, sell a variation of it. And another.

When we look at and examine horrific events of varying dimensions—the medical experiments in the Nazi concentration camps; the infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment; the murder of many live infants aborted to obtain their organs for research; the use of high-dose AZT to kill people diagnosed with AIDS; the vaccine campaigns in the Philippines and Kenya designed to cause future miscarriages in pregnant women; the CIA MKULTRA mind control program…

These are glimpses into an overall medical war aimed at humanity.

The alchemical program of IG Farben is now supplemented with technological advances in the fields of genetics and computer science. The envisioned transformation of humans into Brave New World androids and brain-computer hybrids are medical assaults.

The Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele, known as the Angel of Death, said: “The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

This is the slogan of the Nazi-Rockefeller medical cartel.

The hypnotic power of The Doctor needs to be dismantled and broken to pieces.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: WikiImages / pixabay




Behind Closed Doors: Medical Research Labs

Behind Closed Doors: Medical Research Labs

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 28, 2021

 

During the past two years, I’ve made comments about what goes on in research labs. The lunatic “science,” the cruelty visited on humans and animals, who are the test subjects.

My work on this goes back to the 1980s, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC. After reading renegade and leaked literature at that time, I made the following assessment:

To prove their hypotheses about germs causing diseases, researchers will first do anything to weaken animals, so it then seems injecting them with (purported) germs is infecting them and making them sick.

This “prep work” to weaken animals includes:

Destructive genetic modification;

The injection of toxic chemicals and drugs;

The removal of the animals’ immune systems;

The injection of toxic serums composed of material taken from other animal species;

Exposing the animals to high doses of radiation;

The grafting of material on to the animals from other species;

The caging and isolation of the animals for long periods, which produces great stress and immune-system suppression;

Drilling holes in animals and attaching restraints and sensors to them and inside them;

Berating the animals, treating them as objects;

Conducting research in unsanitary and unclean facilities.

And then, finally—issuing falsified records to support lies about outcomes, in order to prove pre-destined conclusions.

The entire catalog of torture is couched and concealed in dry technical language and euphemism. Medical journals describe NOTHING about the animals’ reactions to this brutal savagery. If they did, the researchers would be exposed as rank sadists, their work would be discredited, and eventually there would be a public uproar.

As for human test subjects, perhaps you’ve heard of the radiation experiments performed on patients in US hospitals during World War 2.

Bottom line: Scientists and government officials decided they needed to know how much radiation would kill a human. After all, workers at The Manhattan Project were trying to build an atomic bomb. They were being exposed to radiation.

So “terminally ill” patients were selected. Informed consent was out of the question. The unknowing patients were secretly injected with high doses of radioactive elements. Tissue samples were taken and analyzed. As it turned out, some of the patients were not terminal. They had been misdiagnosed, or doctors knew up front that they were relatively healthy. The whole study was highly classified, and few people knew of its existence.

From the Atomic Heritage Foundation’s 2017 report, Human Radiation Experiments, here are descriptions of two of the patients:

“Ebb Cade was the first test subject. Cade was a 53-year-old African American male who worked for an Oak Ridge construction company as a cement mixer. On March 24, 1945, he was involved in an auto accident, which caused fractures in his arm and leg. Documents from the time show that he was otherwise healthy. Over the next two weeks, he was given the codename HP-12, with HP standing for Human Product [!]. Dr. Friedell wrote to Dr. Hempelmann at Los Alamos that he had found a primary subject for the plutonium experiment.”

“On April 10, 1945, Dr. Joseph Howland administered a plutonium dose of 4.7 micrograms to Cade, who was awaiting a procedure to set his bones. From 1943-1945, the maximum possible body burden (MPBB) for plutonium had been 5 micrograms, based on limits adopted for radium. Based on animal experimentation, Langham and Friedell had recently concluded that because plutonium remained in the bone for longer than radium, the MPBB should actually be set at 1 microgram. Cade’s dose was nearly five times that limit.”

“Cade was not treated for his arm and leg injuries until April 15, five days after the injection, so that the doctors would be able to biopsy his bone samples. This included extracting 15 of his teeth, which were subsequently shipped to Wright Langham at Los Alamos. It is unclear if Cade suffered from legitimate tooth decay. Shortly after his bones had been set, Cade suddenly discharged himself from the hospital. He moved out of Tennessee and died of heart failure on April 13, 1953, 8 years after the Oak Ridge injection.”

“Another questionable case was CAL-2, a four-year old boy named Simeon Shaw suffering from terminal bone cancer. He was flown with his mother to the UCSF hospital in a US military plane from Australia, apparently under the advisement of a physician in Australia. He arrived in California in April 1946 and was admitted to the hospital. For some time, he was separated [from] his mother, who was only allowed visits periodically. Simeon received a plutonium injection at UCSF under the oversight of Joseph Hamilton and was discharged from the hospital within a month. The Shaws returned to Australia and no follow-ups were ever conducted. Simeon died eight months later.”

“The physicians involved [in the entire project] knew that the procedures had no therapeutic benefits and would be detrimental in the long run if the patients lived. Human experimentation was justified by the claim that the patients were terminally ill; however, this was not true in all cases. Repeated errors in diagnosis, procedure, documentation, and research were made, ultimately calling into question the efficacy of the experiments themselves.”

The doctors and bureaucrats didn’t even have the ethics or common sense to make their reports usable.

Nothing has changed. The COVID vaccines are injuring and killing huge numbers of people all over the world—and governments and media insist on covering up and twisting the facts about the largest grand experiment in human history.

From government leaders in scores of countries, down to decrepit pundits like Noam Chomsky, the word is out: the unvaccinated are lepers and must be isolated from the rest of society.

But sometimes the test subjects rebel and break out of their cages. When they do, they aren’t good little boys and girls.

Then they’re called insurrectionists and terrorists. But the truth is much simpler.

Living beings don’t like to be tortured.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Tama66 / pixabay




Murdering Millions of Newborn Calves for Vaccines and Other Medical Research

Murdering Millions of Newborn Calves for Vaccines and Other Medical Research
cc: Vegan Hollywood Celebrities and Animal Rights Advocates Who Are Taking the Covid Vaccine

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 28, 2021

 

In my recent series of articles on the murder of aborted live human infants for vaccine research, I made no mention of animal research.

Now I will.

The product is called Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). It is used all over the world.

How is it obtained?

Slate News: “FBS, as the name implies, is a byproduct made from the blood of cow fetuses. If a cow coming for slaughter happens to be pregnant, the cow is slaughtered and bled, and then the fetus is removed from its mother and brought into a blood collection room. The fetus, which remains alive during the following process to ensure blood quality, has a needle inserted into its heart. Its blood is then drained until the fetus dies, a death that usually takes about five minutes. This blood is then refined, and the resulting extract is FBS. Millions of fetuses are slaughtered this way.”

Think about that.

—Medical research, vaccine research, and a blood-soaked landscape. The murder of living human infants for their tissue; the murder of newborn calves for their tissue.

Slate: “FBS is also special because it is a universal growth medium. You can take almost any cell type, toss it into a petri dish with FBS, and the cells will grow. The use of the serum is extensive, with FBS being cited in more than 10,000 research papers…”

Was FBS used in the development of COVID vaccines? Yes and no statements proliferate.

However, if you take the research and development back far enough into the virology lab, the answer would be an unqualified yes.

Cell cultures in dishes are starting points for all vaccines. Virologists believe they are isolating viruses in those dishes. The purported viruses are the reasons, in the first place, for all vaccines—including COVID.

Those cell cultures in dishes need a substance that promotes the growth of the cells. Enter Fetal Bovine Serum as that substance.

In medical literature and news media, you’ll find many euphemisms and generalities that obscure the murdering of newborn calves. Animal-derived products; serum; organisms in development; growth factor; universal medium; humane treatment.

“Don’t tell the children.” In this case, everyone is supposed to be a child kept in ignorance.

And medical murder is supposed to be a special scientific procedure. Separate, remote, sanitized.

It is—until people find out what’s actually going on.

The devil is in the details.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: YvonneHuijbens / pixabay




Children’s Health Defense Joins Citizens for ‘Worldwide Walkout!’ on November 3 to Demand a Return to Freedom and Democratic Principles

Children’s Health Defense Joins Citizens for ‘Worldwide Walkout!’ on November 3 to Demand a Return to Freedom and Democratic Principles

by Children’s Health Defense
October 27, 2021

 

People around the globe are protesting the loss of liberty, illegal mandates and tyrannical government overreach.

We have been battered during the epidemic for the last 1.5 years. And now our jobs, livelihoods, education for our children and way of life are being threatened because we refuse to take a government and employer-mandated injection.

Religious and medical exemptions are being rejected, but that is a false choice anyway. Since when does anyone need an exemption to exercise their personal right to reject a foreign substance being injected into their body by the government?

Americans and the world need to stand up, walk out and just say NO.

Children’s Health Defense is encouraging regularly scheduled walkouts where citizens ban together as a powerful voting block to apply pressure.

Children’s Health Defense and our State and International Chapters are joining citizens and organizations from all over the world to come together for a WORLDWIDE WALKOUT on November 3rd.

“No government in history has ever surrendered power in the absence of a demand,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD Board Chair and Lead Counsel. “We need to tell these governments and their friends in the technocracy, the Silicon Valley billionaire boys club, the mainstream media, and the pharmaceutical industry that we will no longer tolerate their trampling of our rights.”

WORLDWIDE WALKOUT is a call for a global shut down to stop business as usual, protesting these unlawful mandates and to celebrate human rights.

Citizens around the world will be asked to unify for freedom and commit acts of civil disobedience to make their point: no masks, no vaccines, no testing. No coercion. No mandates.

“Coercive mandates of shoddily tested medical products and segregationist passports violate international human rights law,” said CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland. “We need brave citizens to peacefully refuse to comply with unlawful and unethical edicts that for the past year and a half have been allowed to trump individual rights and freedoms. Those days are over. There will be no business as usual until segregationist and coercive medical policies advanced by government authorities end once and for all.”

The potential headlines: thousands of towns in America and around the world come to a stand still while doctors, nurses, educators, first responders, police officers, firemen all walk out for freedom.

Where will this take place? Community organizers are planning mass gatherings of people in peaceful noncompliance to take place in high-exposure areas in many cities and states. Check back here for locations and details. If you’re not seeing one for your area, reach out to others in your community to plan an event. Pick a place that is easy to get to and can be seen by many.

Encourage everyone you know to join in. Tell them to refuse to show up for work, take a sick day and pull their kids from school. Ban together to work with as many groups in your community concerned with freedom and our right to choose what goes on and in our bodies.

Share this video message from the Chairman of Children’s Health Defense, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to encourage everyone you know to participate.



Never has there been a more important time to fight back and protect our rights to stop this tyranny and government overreach.

Be a defender of truth, freedom and health. Join us on November 3rd for the WORLDWIDE WALKOUT.

 

Link to Worldwide Walkout Nov. 3rd  locations and updates.

 

Follow Children’s Health Defense on Telegram

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: fotshot / pixabay




Scientist Whose Wife Was Injured by COVID Vaccine Tells FDA: ‘Please Do Not Give This to Kids’

Scientist Whose Wife Was Injured by COVID Vaccine Tells FDA: ‘Please Do Not Give This to Kids’
Brian Dressen, Ph.D., who is a chemist with an extensive background in researching and assessing the degree of efficacy in new technologies, told the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Pfizer’s vaccine “failed any reasonable risk-benefit calculus in connection with children.” 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
October 27, 2021

 

 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) advisory committee on Tuesday endorsed Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for children ages 5 to 11, despite strong objections raised during the meeting by multiple scientists and physicians.

Brian Dressen, Ph.D., is one of the scientists who testified during the 8-hour hearing.

Dressen is also the husband of Brianne Dressen, who developed a severe neurological injury during the Utah-based portion of the U.S. AstraZeneca COVID vaccine trial in 2020. After being injured by the first dose, Brianne withdrew from the trial.

During his 3-minute testimony, Dressen, a chemist with an extensive background in researching and assessing the degree of efficacy in new technologies, told the FDA advisory panel Pfizer’s vaccine “failed any reasonable risk-benefit calculus in connection with children.”

Dressen said:

“Your decision is being rushed, based on incomplete data from underpowered trials, insufficient to predict rates of severe and long-lasting adverse reactions. I urge the committee to reject the EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] modification and direct Pfizer to perform trials that will decisively demonstrate that the benefits outweigh the risks for children. I understand firsthand the impact that you will or will not have with the decision you’re going to make today.”

Dressen told the FDA how his wife was severely injured last November by a single dose of a COVID vaccine administered during a clinical trial. He said:

“Because study protocol requires two doses, she was dropped from the trial, and her access to the study app deleted. Her reaction is not described in the recently released clinical trial report — 266 participants are described as having an adverse event leading to discontinuation, with 56 neurological reactions tallied.”

He said he and his wife have since met participants from other vaccination trials — including Pfizer’s trial for 12- to 15-year-olds — who suffered similar reactions and fate.

Dressen said:

“Injured support groups are growing. Memberships number into at least the tens of thousands. We must do better. Those injured in a trial are a critical piece of vaccine safety data. They are being tossed aside and forgotten. The FDA has known first-hand about her case and thousands of others. The FDA has also stated that their own systems are not identifying this issue and that VAERS is not designed to identify any multi-symptom signals. The system is broken.”

Dressen said his family’s lives have changed forever. “The clinical trials are not appropriately evaluating the data,” he said. “The FDA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the drug companies continue to deflect the persistent and repeated cries for help and acknowledgment, leaving the injured as collateral damage.”

He added:

“Until we appropriately care for those already injured, acknowledge the full scope of injuries that are happening to adults, please do not give this to kids. You have a very clear responsibility to appropriately assess the risks and benefits to these vaccines. It is obvious that isn’t happening.

“The suffering of thousands continues to repeatedly fall on deaf ears at the FDA. Each of you hold a significant responsibility today and know that without a doubt, when you approve this for the 5-11-year old’s, you are signing innocent kids and uninformed parents to a fate that will undoubtedly rob some of them of their life.”

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense

 

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: sippakorn / pixabay




The Abortion Culture

The Abortion Culture

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 27, 2021

 

From Worldometers.info: “According to WHO [World Health Organization], every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.”

“In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion, there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion.”

In researching my current series of articles on abortionin which infants are removed, alive, from the womb, and their organs cut out, killing them—for medical research—I’ve come across information about what I would call the culture of abortion.

In this article, I’m just going to quote others and make no comments.

Investigate Magazine, Ian Wishart, 3/7/12: “[Abortion clinic technician Dean] Alberty told of seeing babies wounded but alive after abortion procedures, and in one case a set of twins ‘still moving on the table’ when clinicians from AGF began dissecting the children to harvest their organs. The children, he said, were ‘cuddling each other’ and ‘gasping for breath’ when medics moved in for the kill.”

The following quotes are collected at clinicquotes.com, an astonishing resource (for starters, see this link):

A Year in the Life of an Abortion Clinic, Peter Korn, 1996: “Although the operation is over, the fetus is still a matter of concern…Rhonda, a medical assistant who also works for a biological supply company, takes the surgical tray in another room where she uses a plastic colander to strain out the blood, leaving only the separated parts of the fetus. These she places in a glass dish, taking a moment to measure one of the feet against a transparent plastic ruler to establish exact gestational age. Earlier in the day she received her regular fax detailing what body parts are needed by which researchers around the country. The researchers specify preferences for age and, in some cases, sex. Liver, spleen, pancreas, and brain are the organs most often requested.”

Is Abortion Good for Women, Rachel MacNair, Angela Kennedy; Swimming Against the Tide: Feminist Dissent on the Issue of Abortion, 1997; from abortion worker Judith Fetrow, who worked for Planned Parenthood:

“When I started at Planned Parenthood, I saw two types of women working at the clinic. One group were women who had found some way to deal with the emotional and spiritual toll of working with abortion. The second group were women who had closed themselves off emotionally. They were the walking wounded. You could look in their eyes, and see that they were emotionally dead. Unavailable for themselves, or for anyone else.”

Abortion at Work: Ideology and Practice in a Feminist Clinic, Wendy Simonds, 1996; quoting an abortion clinic employee: “It’s just—I mean it looks like a baby. It looks like a baby. And especially if you get one that comes out, that’s not piecemeal. And you know, I saw this one, and it had its fingers in its mouth…it makes me really sad that that had to happen, you know, but it doesn’t change my mind. It’s just hard. And it makes me just sort of stop and feel sad about it, the whole necessity of it. And also….it’s very warm when it comes into the sterile room because it’s been in the mother’s stomach. It feels like flesh, you know…”

Interview of Joy Davis done by Life Dynamics in 1993; Joy Davis, a former abortion worker, wrote about her fellow clinic workers: “We don’t have conversations. Sometimes the employees faint. Sometimes they throw up. Sometimes they have to leave the room. It’s just problems that we deal with, but it’s not talked about…If you really dwell on it, and talk about it all the time, then it gets more personal. It gets more real to you. You just don’t talk about it, try not to think about it…If [the abortionist] ever caught you discussing something like that, he’d fire you.”

Sadja Goldsmith “Second Trimester Abortion by Dilation and Extraction (Evacuation) [D&E]: Surgical Techniques and Psychological Reactions”; Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Planned Parenthood Physicians in Atlanta, Georgia Oct 13-14 1977; In a paper on the D&E abortion method, which at the time was new, an abortionist wrote: “The fetus was extracted in small pieces to minimize cervical trauma. The fetal head was often the most difficult object to crush and remove, because of its size and contour. The operator kept track of each portion of the fetal skeleton….”

“Selective Abortion, AKA Pregnancy Reduction.” New England Journal of Medicine, April 21, 1988; Two abortionists describing selective abortions done on multiple pregnancies: “Using ultra-sound to locate each fetus, the doctors would insert a needle into the chest cavity of the most accessible fetus and place the needle tip directly into the heart of the baby. Potassium chloride was then injected into the heart and the heart was viewed on the ultrasound screen until it stopped beating. Even at 9 weeks, 3 of the 12 fetuses selected for elimination presented problems. The heart continued to beat and the procedure had to be repeated.”

Kenneth Paul Fye, PhD, Obvious Murder: The March From Abortion to Infanticide (May 30, 2016) 253; Jewish former abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathanson [who had performed thousands of abortions] said to an audience in Canada, where he was speaking: “I’m going to set it against my Jewish heritage and the Holocaust in Europe. The abortion holocaust is beyond the ordinary discourse of morality and rational condemnation. It is not enough to pronounce it absolutely evil… The abortion industry is a new event, severed from connections with traditional presuppositions of history, psychology, politics, and morality…This is an evil torn free of its moorings in reason and causality, and ordinary secular corruption raised to unimaginable powers of magnification and limitless extremity.”

Written Testimony of Kathi A. Aultman, MD Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing March 15th 2016:

Chairman Grassley, I would like to thank you for inviting me to participate in this hearing today. I have spent my entire career as a women’s advocate and have a keen interest in issues that impact women’s health. I come to you as someone who has done 1st and 2nd trimester abortions and who has treated women with the medical and psychological complications of abortions. I have cared for women and their babies throughout normal pregnancies, medically complicated ones, and those with fetal anomalies. I have taken care of women who decided to keep their unplanned pregnancies and those who aborted them. I have given birth vaginally twice and I have had an abortion. I also have a cousin who survived an abortion. I have testified on issues related to abortion in state courts and legislatures, and before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.

At the time I entered medical school I believed that the availability of abortion on demand was an issue of women’s rights. I felt that a woman should have control over her body and not be forced to bear a child she didn’t want. My commitment to women’s issues was strengthened as I was exposed to the discrimination inherent in medical school and residency at that time, and to the plight of the indigent women we served in our program. I also believed it was wrong to bring unwanted children into an overpopulated world where they were likely to be neglected or abused.

During my residency I was trained in 1st trimester abortions using the D&C with suction technique. I then sought and received special training in 2nd trimester D&E procedures during which the fetus is crushed and removed in pieces. After each procedure I had to examine the tissue carefully to account for all the body parts to make sure nothing was left to cause infection or bleeding. I was fascinated by the tiny but perfectly formed intestines, kidneys, and other organs and I enjoyed looking at their amazing cellular detail under the microscope. I realize it is hard to imagine someone being able to do that and be so detached but because of my training and conditioning a human fetus seemed no different than the chick embryos I dissected in college. I could view them with strictly scientific interest devoid of any of the emotions with which I would normally view a baby. I wasn’t heartless I just had been trained to compartmentalize these things.

If I had a woman come in with a miscarriage or a still birth and she had wanted the baby I was distraught with her and felt her pain. The difference in my mind was whether the baby was wanted or unwanted.

After my first year of training I got my medical license and was able to get a job moonlighting at a women’s clinic in Gainesville, Florida doing abortions. I reasoned that although the need for abortion was unfortunate, it was the lesser of two evils, and I was doing something for the wellbeing of women. I also could make a lot more money doing abortions than I could make working in an emergency room. I enjoyed the technical challenges of the procedure and prided myself on being really good at what I did. The only time I experienced any qualms about what I was doing was when I had my neonatal care rotation and I realized that I was trying to save babies in the NICU that were the same age as babies I was aborting, but I rationalized it, and was able to push the feelings to the back of my mind. My last year in residency I became pregnant but continued to do abortions without any reservations.

The first time I returned to the clinic after my delivery, however, I was confronted with 3 cases that broke my heart and changed my opinion about abortion. In the first case I discovered that I had personally done 3 abortions on a girl scheduled that morning. When I protested about doing the abortion, I was told by the clinic staff that it was her right to choose to use abortion as her method of birth control and that I had no right to pass judgment on her or to refuse to do the procedure. I told them it was fine for them to say but that I was the one who had to do the killing. Of course she got her abortion and despite my urging she told me she had no desire to use birth control. The next situation involved a woman who when asked by her friend if she wanted to see the tissue she replied “No! I just want to kill it!” I was taken aback by her hostility and lack of compassion towards the fetus.

The last case brought me to tears. This was a mother of four who didn’t feel she and her husband could support another child. How I hurt for that mother. What a terrible decision to have to make. She cried throughout her time at the clinic and that was the end of my abortion career. I had finally had made the obvious connection between fetus and baby.

I found out later that few doctors are able to do abortions for very long. Physicians are taught to heal, not harm. OB/GYNs especially, often experience a conflict of conscience because they are normally are concerned about the welfare of both their patients but in an abortion they are killing one of them.

Although many people view an abortion as just removing a blob of tissue, the abortionist knows exactly what he or she is doing because they must count the body parts after each procedure. Eventually the truth sinks in and if they have a conscience they can no longer do them.

My views also changed as I saw young women in my practice who did amazingly well after deciding to keep their unplanned pregnancies and those who were struggling with the emotional aftermath of abortion. It was not what I expected to see.

I will never forget one woman who had gone to the Orlando area for a late term abortion. She had not recovered from the horror of delivering her live 20+ week baby boy into the toilet. Her agony was compounded by the fact that her baby brother had died by drowning.

Another woman told me that she was seeing a psychiatrist because although she strongly believed in a woman’s right to choose abortion she couldn’t cope with the realization that she had killed her child. Some of my patients didn’t express any remorse until they realized they would never get pregnant either because of medical problems, advancing age, or personal issues. I personally didn’t have any concern or remorse about having had an abortion until after I had my first child. It was then that I mourned the child that would have been.

As a society we have shifted our priorities from basic human rights to women’s rights and have taught our young women that nothing should interfere with their right to do whatever they want with their bodies, especially when it comes to pregnancy. We have also done a good job of sanitizing our language to make abortion more palatable. We don’t speak about the “baby”, rather we talk about the “fetus”. The abortionist “terminates the pregnancy” rather than “killing the baby”. As medical doctors and as a society we have moved away from the idea that life is precious and closer to the utilitarian attitudes which wreaked so much havoc during the last century. In most ethical dilemmas we must weigh the rights of one person against the rights of another.

Even for the most staunch abortion supporter there is a line somewhere that they feel shouldn’t be crossed. I would agree that we need to give a women as much choice as possible in determining her future and what she does with her body but we must also recognize the truth that there are at least 2 people involved in a pregnancy and that at some point the rights of the weaker one deserve some consideration. Some people believe life begins at conception when the egg and sperm meet and should be safe guarded at that point. Others feel it isn’t until it is safely implanted it its mother’s uterus that it deserves protection. Many feel it should have some rights once it is viable or old enough to live outside the womb. Yet there are some who feel that the baby has no rights even in process of being born. Should a baby that can live outside the womb be given no consideration, no protection, and no rights, just because it is unwanted? Should we not at least have compassion on babies at 20 weeks gestation when their nervous systems are developed enough for them to experience pain and protect them from the excruciating pain of being dismembered or killed in other ways?

Hopefully we all agree that a mother should not be able to kill her 3 year old child; but what about an infant? There are some who advocate that a mother should have the right to euthanize her infant up until 3 months of age because there may be a defect that didn’t express itself at birth. I think most Americans would say that once a baby is born there is no question it should be protected and yet there are those who say that if it is unwanted but managed to survive an abortion it does not qualify for the same care that any other baby would get at the same gestation and it is OK to kill it. Is it the child’s fault that it is unwanted? Should it lose its rights simply for that reason? Doesn’t the government have a responsibility to protect that child even if its parents won’t? What if a baby is defective when it is born? We have laws to protect people with disabilities. Are we going to exclude babies, our most vulnerable citizens, from that protection? The problem is where does it stop? Where does a civilized society draw the line?

As legislators you have the burdensome task of writing the laws that govern our society and that the majority of people will accept. At the same time you must protect the most vulnerable among us. You are ultimately the ones who will determine where that line is drawn. It’s a difficult job. We are a people of many religions and traditions with different needs and wants.

In making your decision you should not forget that abortion generates a lot of money. Much of the power and influence behind the drive to prevent any restriction on abortion comes from those who make a profit on it and I am sad to say they have used a distorted view of women’s rights as a cover.

I have always thought of myself as a good person but at one point I was horrified by the realization that I had killed more people than most mass murderers. Today when I meet young men and women that I delivered, the joy of meeting them and knowing that I played a part in bringing them into the world safely, is clouded by the thought of all the ones I will never meet because I terminated their lives. I would not want to be in your shoes and have the burden of knowing that I could have prevented the deaths of thousands even millions and did nothing. I would encourage you to vote for both of these bills.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: hhach / pixabay




California Father & Daughter Stand Against Medical Tyranny: “All of You Have the Power…to Stand Up and to Be the Voice When You Think You Don’t.”

California Father & Daughter Stand Against Medical Tyranny: “All of You Have the Power…to Stand Up and to Be the Voice When You Think You Don’t.”
Redding, CA father, inspired by daughter, speaks strongly from the heart at local meeting with the board of supervisors.

 

[For background on this story, see article at Global Research.]

His 11-Yr-Old Daughter Inspired Him to Speak Out Against Vaccine Mandates…and When He Did,
His Comments Went Viral

by 100PercentFedUp
October 21, 2021



Video available at 100PercentFedUp Rumble channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

 


Transcript  prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

 

Emma Watson

I don’t know a lot about what’s going on but I know enough that, you know, we need to fight for our rights.

 

Josh Watson

Her name is Emma. My name is Josh Watkins. And I am up here because she had the courage to say that she wanted to say something.
And — I’ve alternated in the last year between anger and sadness.
I hated politics growing up. I hated my parents talking about and I wouldn’t even watch the news. That’s changed a lot in the last couple years.
I’m up here today because I am a health care worker. I’ve been in my profession for almost 20 years.
None of you probably know what I do. I run the heart-lung bypass machine open heart surgery.
There’s two of us in this town. We are both in this room today.
When we can’t show up for work, the hospital goes on diversion — which means that the ER can’t take critical patients and helicopters fly right over us.
Neither one of us are getting this vaccine. Neither one of us are willing to take that — because we know what’s… at stake for freedoms past that.
I’ve alternated between: ‘Should I just keep providing for my family? should I take the job and just keep getting my paycheck? I’ll take it for the team. If I die at least they’ll get provision for as long as it takes — until I may or may not have symptoms.’
But then I’m like: ‘No, that can’t happen because if I fold here I don’t know what’s going to happen.’
I’m here because the board of supervisors is failing…Patrick.
I’m closely related to the recall. I supported 100 percent.
If I don’t show up for my job, as I just explained to you, people die.
On Saturday night at 10:00 PM I got a page. I did not want to go to work. Somebody was having a very critical problem. They were dying. I worked until 6:00 AM the next day. If I had not have showed up there would be nobody to do my job.
These guys can’t… and I’m sorry your jobs are not as important as mine.
I’m not here for recognition. You’ll never remember what a perfusionist is after this — maybe you will. I don’t like being in front. I do like supporting. I’m really good at supporting.
My encouragement is that all of you have the power that I’m talking about to stand up and to be the voice when you think you don’t.
You’re more valuable than you think you are. And the team that I work with at both hospitals in this town feel very strongly and very similar.
And if this mandate goes through and these people don’t show up for work, people are going to start dying for other reasons. And it’s because there’s gonna be nobody take care of them.

 

 

Connect with 100PercentFedUp

cover image credit:  screenshots from 100PercentFedUp video




Beyond #BeagleGate: Fauci’s Long History of Atrocities, Including Torturing Children

Beyond #BeagleGate: Fauci’s Long History of Atrocities, Including Torturing Children
The public is just now learning that Dr. Anthony Fauci used U.S. taxpayer money to fund atrocious experiments on beagles, but as my new book, due out Nov. 16, reveals, torturing animals for drug company profits is just the tip of the iceberg.

 

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Defender
October 25, 2021

 

After an investigation revealed Dr. Anthony Fauci used U.S. taxpayer money for an experiment that involved torturing beagles, a bipartisan group of Congress members last week wrote to Fauci to express their “grave concerns.”

I was not surprised by the news — it’s one of many examples of atrocities, approved by Fauci and funded by taxpayers — that I write about in my upcoming book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”

#BeagleGate made headlines this weekend after the White Coat Waste Project, the nonprofit organization that first pointed out that U.S. taxpayers were funding the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology, revealed experiments on 44 beagle puppies in a Tunisia, North Africa, laboratory. To conduct the experiments, researchers removed the dogs’ vocal cords, allegedly so scientists could work without incessant barking.

In their letter, the members of Congress asked Fauci — director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and President Biden’s chief medical adviser — why the need for such testing, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not require drugs to be tested on dogs.

According to the letter:

“While the documents state that the ostensible purpose of this study was to ‘provide data of suitable quality and integrity to support the application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies,’ the FDA itself has recently stated that ‘it does not mandate that human drugs be tested on dogs.’ This is apparently not the first time the NIAID has commissioned drug tests on dogs in recent years.”

As I learned during research for my book, Fauci hasn’t just experimented on dogs — he’s also experimented on humans, including children.

My book comes out Nov. 16, but today I’m releasing the excerpt below where I write about some of the atrocities attributed to Fauci and the NIAID over his long tenure with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Read the excerpt from my book, “The Real Anthony Fauci”:

In 1965, my father kicked down the door of the Willowbrook State School on Staten Island, where pharmaceutical companies were conducting cruel and often-deadly vaccine experiments on incarcerated children.

Robert Kennedy declared Willowbrook a “snake pit” and promoted legislation to close the institution and end the exploitation of children.

Fifty-five years later, national media and Democratic Party sachems have beatified a man who presided over similar atrocities, somehow elevating him to a kind of secular sainthood.

What dark flaw in Anthony Fauci’s character allowed him to oversee — and then cover up — the atrocities at Incarnation Children’s Center?

At very best, there must be some arrogance or imperiousness that enables Dr. Fauci to rationalize the suffering and deaths of children as acceptable collateral damage in what he sees as his noble search for new public health innovations.

At worst, he is a sociopath who has pushed science into the realm of sadism.

Recent disclosures support the latter interpretation. Freedom of Information documents obtained in January 2021 by the White Coat Waste project show that Dr. Fauci approved a $424,000 NIAID grant in 2020 for experiments in which dogs were bitten to death by flies.

The insects carried a disease-carrying parasite that can affect humans. The researchers strapped capsules containing infected flies to the bare skin of twenty-eight healthy beagle puppies and kept them in agonizing suffering for 196 days before euthanizing them. NIAID acknowledged it subjected other animals, including mice, Mongolian gerbils, and rhesus monkeys to similar experiments.

That same year, Dr. Fauci’s agency gave $400,000 to University of Pittsburgh scientists to graft the scalps of aborted fetuses onto living mice and rats. NIAID sought to develop rat and mouse “models” using “full-thickness fetal skin” to “provide a platform for studying human skin infections.”

Dr. Fauci’s sidekick and putative boss, Francis Collins — who casts himself as a pious Catholic — kicked in a $1.1 million sweetener from NIH for this malignant project.

Of all the desperate public health needs in America, of all the pain that a well spent $2 million might alleviate, Tony Fauci and his government confederates deemed these demented and inhumane experiments the most worthwhile expenditures of America’s taxpayer dollars.

These disclosures beg many other questions: From what moral wilderness did the monsters who devised and condoned these experiments descend upon our idealistic country? How have they lately come to exercise such tyrannical power over our citizens?

What sort of nation are we if we allow them to continue? Most trenchantly, does it not make sense that the malevolent minds, the elastic ethics, the appalling judgment, the arrogance, and savagery that sanctioned the barbaric brutalization of children at the Incarceration Convent House, and the torture of animals for industry profit, could also concoct a moral justification for suppressing lifesaving remedies and prolonging a deadly epidemic?

Could these same dark alchemists justify a strategy of prioritizing their $48 billion vaccine project ahead of public health and human life?

Did similar hubris — that deadly human impulse to play God — pave the lethal path to Wuhan and fuel the reckless decision to hack the codes of Creation and fabricate diabolical new forms of life — pandemic superbugs — in a ramshackle laboratory with scientists linked to the Chinese military?

On my birthday in January 1961, three days before I watched my uncle John F. Kennedy take his oath as president of the United States, outgoing President Dwight Eisenhower, in his farewell address, warned our country about the emergence of a Military Industrial Complex that would obliterate our democracy.

In that speech, Eisenhower made an equally urgent — although less celebrated — warning against the emergence of a federal bureaucracy, which, he believed, posed an equally dire threat to America’s Constitution and her values:

“In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. . . . [We] must . . . be alert to the danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.”

Eisenhower demanded that we guard against this insipid brand of tyranny, by entrusting our government to responsible officials ever-vigilant against the deadly gravities of technocratic power and industry money that would pull our nation away from democracy and humanity and into diabolical dystopian savagery:

“It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system — ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.”

During his half-century as a government official, Dr. Fauci has utterly failed in this charge. As we shall see, he has used his control of billions of dollars to manipulate and control scientific research to promote his own, and NIAID’s, institutional self-interest and private profits for his pharma partners to the detriment of America’s values, her health and her liberties.

Of late, he has played a central role in undermining public health and subverting democracy and constitutional governance around the globe and in transitioning our civil governance toward medical totalitarianism.

Just as President Eisenhower warned, Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 response has steadily deconstructed our democracy and elevated the powers of a tyrannical medical technocracy.

 

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: Activedia / pixabay




If You Were a Pregnant Mother and Smiling Doctors Came to You With Murder on Their Minds

If You Were a Pregnant Mother and Smiling Doctors Came to You With Murder on Their Minds

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 26, 2021

 

I’ve been writing a series of articles demonstrating that much medical research rests on the murder of infants.

In particular, vaccine research.

Several key cell lines are derived from fetal tissue. And doctors obtain that tissue by removing fetuses from pregnant mothers; the fetuses are alive; the doctors then kill the fetuses by cutting out their kidneys or their brains or hearts.

How were (and are) these pregnant mothers approached by doctors?

Are the mothers provided with anything resembling informed consent? Do the mothers sign agreements to keep quiet about what the doctors are going to do to their babies? How many of the mothers have no idea what is about to happen? Are the mothers paid?

There are mothers out there who can speak up. They should.

If YOU were a pregnant mother, what would you say if a doctor told you: “We understand you don’t want your baby. Fine. We want to plan your abortion and schedule it. We’ll be there. You can contribute to medical research by allowing us to remove your infant from your womb, fully intact, and alive. Then we will take your infant’s kidneys, to obtain tissue for research on vaccines. By removing your baby’s kidneys, we will be killing him or her. He or she will be on the table, breathing, heart beating, and we will kill him or her.”

What would you say?

How many mothers in the past hundred years do you think were informed in this way—after which they gave their consent? Zero?

THIS is what my series of current articles is about.

The fetal cell line called HEK 293 has been used to test COVID vaccines. The available evidence, and obvious physiological factors, point to the murder of a female baby to harvest her tissue for HEK 293.

I’ve emphasized, and will continue to emphasize, that this horrific serial murder of infants surely demands all people of faith reject the vaccine.

But of course, I’m not just talking about the 5 billion people in the world who claim to be religious. I’m talking about everybody. Everybody with a shed of conscience has a compelling and urgent reason to turn away from the vaccine. A vaccine which, by the way, is demonstrably destructive.

The doctors who have performed these abortions and carried out these murders have many allies who are protecting them. Medical, political, media, and religious allies, who tap dance, lie, obfuscate, deny, confuse the uninformed.

In my opinion, and in the opinion of others, the internal advice at pharmaceutical companies to stay away from talking about fetal tissue research comes down to wanting to hide murder.

That’s the secret at the bottom of the putrid “science.”

So when you hear government officials attacking vaccine refusers and piling blame on them, and saying the unvaccinated are keeping the world from solving the “pandemic”; when you hear the US Attorney General ordering his FBI troops to investigate parents who come into school board meetings and protest, among other issues, a vaccine mandate targeting their children; when you hear suggestions that these parents might be “domestic terrorists”; KNOW WHERE THE TRUE HORRIFIC CRIME IS TO BE FOUND.

See something; say something. Keep saying it.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: seth0s / pixabay




CHD to Sue FDA for ‘Recklessly Endangering’ Children if Agency Authorizes Pfizer Vaccine for Children 5 to 11 Years Old

CHD to Sue FDA for ‘Recklessly Endangering’ Children if Agency Authorizes Pfizer Vaccine for Children 5 to 11 Years Old
An advisory committee to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will meet Tuesday to consider emergency authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for young children. In a letter to the FDA, Children’s Health Defense outlines why such a move would be reckless. 

by Children’s Health Defense Team
October 25, 2021

 

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) today said it will take legal action against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) if the agency grants Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5-11.

In a letter signed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD chairman and chief legal counsel, and Dr. Meryl Nass, CHD board member, Kennedy and Nass wrote:

“CHD will seek to hold you accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little efficacy but which may put them, without warning, at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke, and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.”

The letter was addressed to Dr. Arnold Monto, chairman of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), committee members and all FDA staff.

VRBPAC members are set to meet Tuesday to consider and likely vote on whether to grant EUA for the Pfizer vaccine for 5- to 11-year olds.

In May, the FDA authorized Pfizer’s vaccine for 12- to 15-year-oldsModerna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines have not yet been authorized for children under 18.

The letter outlines 12 reasons the FDA should not authorize the pediatric vaccine and provides supporting evidence to back up each argument.

Read the letter:

Dear Chairman Monto, VRBPAC Members and FDA Staff:

We write to you on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a non-profit organization devoted to the health of people and the planet. We have actively followed your work to evaluate, authorize and approve vaccines for the American public and particularly children.

We are aware that you are likely to authorize Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5-11 at your meeting on Oct. 26. Your authorization thus will expose over 20 million children in the U.S., and millions more around the world, to potential COVID-19 vaccination of an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) product.

We are writing to put you on notice that should you grant EUA status to this pediatric EUA vaccine, CHD is poised to take legal action against you and other Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voting members as well as the FDA.

CHD will seek to hold you accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little efficacy but which may put them, without warning, at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.

We briefly outline why such authorization would be reckless:

1. The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID vaccination for young children. Deaths and hospitalizations are rare and have been inflated inaccurately.

2. Nearly half of all children have natural immunity to COVID, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). There is no ethical justification for superfluous vaccination that will put children at elevated risk of vaccine harm.

3. Some children likely will die or be permanently injured from these vaccines based on the authorization for children 12-16.

4. The clinical trials for the pediatric vaccine were too small to detect safety signals for a population in the millions.

5. There are no long-term safety data for COVID vaccination of young children, making this an experiment rather than appropriate medical prevention.

6. Unethical coercive pressure will be applied to children and their parents, as has occurred with older children and adults. To grant authorization is to abet this unethical coercion that violates the Nuremberg Code’s first principle.

7. There is no available care for children injured by COVID shots. The science and medicine have not yet developed, and most families will be unable to cover the costs of potential catastrophic injuries.

8. VRBPAC members should not participate in an exercise disguising a foregone conclusion. The president’s purchase of 65 million pediatric doses, the CDC guidance for COVID vaccine delivery, the American Academy of Pediatrics’s promotion of COVID vaccination for children all call into question whether this committee’s deliberations mean anything.

If the administration is unprepared to wait for your advice, let alone heed it, you should signify your disapproval on behalf of the country the FDA is meant to protect.

9. First, do no harm. You are physicians who owe a duty to patients and medical ethics. If you authorize these shots, given all you know, will you be upholding your oath? If not, is it possible that your acts could later be seen as reason to remove your medical licenses?

10. The liability-free nature of your deliberations may not stand the test of time. In the fullness of time, your decisions may not have the liability protection that they currently enjoy. Under the PREP Act of 2005, all actors advancing an EUA agenda for medical countermeasures enjoy liability protection, absent willful misconduct.

Nonetheless, if at a later point these shots are deemed non-therapeutic gene products that you knowingly and recklessly authorized, and which were then distributed to children as a direct result of your decision, it is possible that liability could later attach.

11. There is no COVID emergency for children of this age.

12. There are safer drugs that could be used prophylactically and therapeutically for COVID in children. There is extensive and compelling medical evidence for this assertion — and the choice to eschew use of these drugs in favor of a demonstrably dangerous vaccine is arbitrary and capricious.

We ask that you carefully consider all the information above before making any recommendation to authorize Pfizer’s vaccine in the 5 through 11 year age group at your meeting on Tuesday, Oct. 26.

Sincerely yours,

Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense

 

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense 

cover image credit: KlausHausmann / pixabay




Australian ‘National Treasure’ Cartoonist Loses Job After Comparing Vaccine Mandates to Tiananmen Square Crackdown

Australian ‘National Treasure’ Cartoonist Loses Job After Comparing Vaccine Mandates to Tiananmen Square Crackdown

by RT
October 25, 2021

 

A renowned Australian cartoonist has said he lost his prime spot in a Melbourne-based newspaper after he drew parallels between the Tiananmen Square protests and Covid-19 vaccine mandates in a new cartoon.

Cartoonist Michael Leunig, sometimes referred to as Australia’s “living national treasure,” has revealed that he was forced out of his position on the editorial page of The Age daily newspaper after publishing a political cartoon criticizing the government’s push for mandatory vaccination.

Speaking to The Australian on Monday, Leunig said that while the editorial team has censored about a dozen of his works this year, the last straw appeared to be an anti-mandate cartoon which was a play on the iconic ‘tank man’ photo. Leunig’s cartoon shows a man staring down a tank, with its main gun being replaced by a syringe.

The original photo depicts a lone Chinese protester standing before a line of tanks during the 1989 pro-democracy protests at Tiananmen Square.

While his cartoon was rejected by The Age, Leunig published the drawing on Instagram, triggering backlash from the proponents of vaccine mandates.

Shortly after the controversy erupted, Leuning, who worked at the newspaper for over 20 years, was told that his services as a political cartoonist were no longer needed. The Age’s editor, Gay Alcorn, reportedly told the artist that he was “out of touch” with readers before notifying him of his dismissal. While Alcorn praised Leuning as “brilliant” in a comment to The Australian, he confirmed that his works would no longer appear on the editorial page. The newspaper still plans to commision lifestyle cartoons from Leuning, however.

Leuning accused the newspaper of “wokeism and humorlessness,” defending the cartoon as an accurate reflection of the times.

“The Tiananmen Square image is often used in cartoons around the world as a Charlie Chaplin-like metaphor for overwhelming force meeting the innocent powerless individual. In my view, it is a fair enough issue to raise in the most locked-down city in the world,” the cartoonist said, referring to Melbourne, which set a record for the longest cumulative Covid-19 lockdown after shutting down for 262 days.

Read more at RT

 

Connect with RT




People of Faith and the COVID Vaccine

People of Faith and the COVID Vaccine 
Refusing the COVID vaccine should be a personal mandate
Vaccines, live infants, and fetal tissue research: shedding light on the darkness 

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 25, 2021

 

“Well, I mean, sure, maybe some of the research behind the COVID vaccine involved aborted fetuses, but that was a long time ago, and really, I can’t think about that, I need to take the vaccine to protect myself, and besides, abortion is legal…”

Read on.

Today, I’m featuring the work of journalist Monica Seeley, and her stunning article“Exploring the dark world of vaccines and fetal tissue research, Part 1,” published at catholicworldreport.com.

Seeley had considerable help, as she details, from investigative reporter, Pamela Acker. Acker has weathered attacks from several quarters—including critics within the Catholic Church structure.

She has stood firm, and deserves high praise for her seminal work on fetal tissue research, vaccines, and medical murder.

It turns out that much of the best analysis of fetal tissue research, medical abortions, vaccines, and the medical killing of infants comes from writers publishing at independent Catholic outlets. Just to mention one website—Children of God For Life.

These writers and their publishers obviously take their faith seriously. They’re not bent on compromise or adjustment to trends of the times. Unlike the Vatican hierarchy, they have no qualms about exposing deep medical crimes.

I’m going to quote from Monica Seeley’s article and add my own comments along the way. I strongly urge you to read her whole piece.

You should understand that researchers who extract tissue and organs from aborted fetuses are using those parts for the development of drugs and vaccines—including the COVID vaccine.

Abortion is a religious issue of conscience for many people. When the fetus is extracted alive, from the mother’s womb, then murdered in the process of removing his/her organs, the crime is so horrific that people who have very little conscience at all should be shocked to the core.

Since these crimes form a significant part of the research-basis for many vaccines, refusing the vaccines as a matter of conscience and conviction should be a personal decision for ANYONE.

And now, to Monica Seeley’s article. She reveals these medical crimes stretch back in time:

“…newspapers reported matter of factly on fetal vivisection, as in this article from the San Francisco Chronicle, April 19, 1973, entitled ‘Operations on Live Fetuses’:”

“’Dr. Jerald Gaull in periodic trips to Finland injects a radioactive chemical into the fragile umbilical cords of fetuses freshly removed from their mothers’ wombs in abortions. The fetus in each case is far too young to survive, but in the brief period that its heart is still beating, Gaull, chief of pediatrics research at the New York State Institute for Basic Research in Mental Retardation on Staten Island—then operates to remove its brain, lung, liver and kidneys for study’.”

In other words, Gaull tortures and murders the infant. But of course, the Chronicle article doesn’t explore this fact. It’s all “medical,” you see. So it must make sense. Somehow.

Seeley: “A 1976 report by drug manufacturer Batelle-Columbus Laboratories acknowledged the role of live fetal research in four medical advances: amniocentesis, respiratory distress syndrome, and, significantly for this article, the rubella and Rh vaccines: ‘It is apparent from a study of the development of the four selected cases… that research on living human fetuses played a significant role in each.’ The report recommended against restrictions on such research.”

The term “living human fetuses” doesn’t register with many people. And they certainly don’t realize these infants have been taken alive, from their mother’s womb, and then stripped of their body parts for research—killing them. Or if death is not immediate result, the murder is committed by cutting out their hearts or vacuuming their brains from their skulls.

Again, the ensuing research contributes to the development of vaccines and drugs—including the COVID vaccines (as I’ve covered in previous articles).

Seeley: “…seeing a report on cardiac stem cell research in which human fetal hearts were hooked up to a Lagendorff assembly—which can keep a heart beating artificially outside the body—I did not at first realize that these hearts must come from live subjects.”

Yes. The report, on first reading, comes across as neutral and technical and medical. But then—WHAT? The heart was taken from the infant while he/she was ALIVE. —Aborted, alive, then killed by taking the beating heart.

Seeley: “A 1988 article in the Hastings Journal assumed that tissue removal from live, nonviable fetuses was already taking place:”

“[The Hastings Journal:] ’Perhaps the most pertinent federal restriction is the ban on research of any kind on a live nonviable fetus ex utero that would prematurely terminate the fetus’ life. This ban may be significant because the procedure required for removing fetal brain tissue transplantation would hasten the death of a live fetus. Thus, if a similar restriction were imposed on fetal tissue transplants, it would prohibit the removal of fetal brain tissue and, potentially, other types of tissue, from live nonviable fetuses’.”

The above quote is crucial. By non-viable, the article means a live fetus removed from the womb that will die very soon. In that short span of life remaining, researchers want to be able to torture the infant in many ways, by cutting out parts of the body, killing him/her. And don’t assume that a 1988 ban on this “research” stopped what was happening and still happens in closed labs.

Given the (planned) ignorance on the part of the public, people will say, “But we need all this vital medical research so our doctors can treat us…”

To reply, I’ll cite one study out of several I have written about many times in these pages:

Author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, a respected and revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”; Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000:

Starfield concludes that, every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people. 106,000 as a result of the administration of medical drugs, and 119,000 from medical errors and mistreatment in hospitals.

That adds up to 2.25 million deaths per decade.

When I interviewed Dr. Starfield, she said her estimate of deaths was conservative, and succeeding studies put the number higher.

Her shocking finding becomes more understandable, when we realize a significant amount of underlying medical research comes from professionals who murder infants.

Why would we expect the work of these people to be useful and valuable?

Why would we expect their drugs and vaccines to be safe?

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: rainhard2 / pixabay




Canada’s Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms: “Canada Now Has Medical Apartheid…Did We Learn Nothing From History?”

Canada’s Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms: “Canada Now Has Medical Apartheid…Did We Learn Nothing From History?”

 

Justice Matters with John Carpay: Medical Apartheid

by John Carpay, Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
October 22, 2021

 

Canada now has medical apartheid. The vaccinated and unvaccinated are now legally segregated. Unvaccinated Canadians are second class citizens denied their civil liberties, human rights and Charter freedoms. Did we learn nothing from history?

 



Video available at JusticeCentre Rumble channel.

 

Connect with Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms




Canadian Librarians Join Country-wide Walkout Against Mandated Toxic Injections

Canadian Librarians Join Country-wide Walkout Against Mandated Toxic Injections

 

Librarians Rising Up
A group of librarians from the Toronto Public Library is saying no to being forced to take the jab as a condition of employment. Other librarians across Canada are doing the same. And together with other workers they’re participating in a country-wide walkout on Monday.

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
October 22, 2021

 

A group of librarians from the Toronto Public Library is saying no to being forced to take the jab as a condition of employment. Librarians elsewhere are doing the same.

And they – along with thousands of others from coast to coast to coast — are also participating in a nation-wide strike this coming Monday.

Some of the Toronto Public Library (TPL) employees wrote an open letter standing against the library’s draconian Covid vaccination policy. The library’s directors posted the policy on the TPL website on August 19, stating it was effective as of Sept. 2. But it wasn’t easy to find. And it wasn’t until Sept. 2 [corrected Oct. 23 (previously had ‘Sept. 22’] that the directors informed the employees about it via email.

The policy matches that of the City of Toronto. It requires all employees to have disclosed their vaccination status by September 20 and to be double-jabbed by October 30.

It was imposed despite extremely few library staff testing positive for Covid.

And instead of working with employees, the library has hired a high-priced law firm to punch back at anyone who challenges the policy.

Management is softening their language a little bit —  for example now saying disclosure of vaxx status is voluntary rather than mandatory. But they are poised to fire anyone who doesn’t comply. They’re also severely harassing anyone who resists.

They’re also not honouring employees’ medical or religious exemptions. And they don’t care if employees have had severe reactions to vaccines in the past, or they are pregnant and are about to go on maternity leave.

One person who was resisting the jab felt she had no choice and got it – only to end up in an emergency room with a heart condition. Her family doctor was afraid to write an exemption letter for her, but maybe her cardiologist will be brave enough to write one. It’s doubtful, though, whether the TPL will accept it.

As a direct consequence of all of this some librarians have become clinically suicidal.

Those unwilling to get the shots are continuing to talk and email with management to try to come to some compromise, but the deadline is looming. Their union also is not helping them.

In their open letter, the librarians who are pushing back called out the highly paid directors who “are now threatening, bullying and intimidating us with discipline, up to and including dismissal, for not disclosing our medical records and/or not choosing to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

“Hundreds, if not thousands of us, are now facing coercive policies that disregard foundational principles of library work, privacy and democracy,” they wrote.

In their open letter, they also point out that, “In 2019 the City Librarian Vickery Bowles made a public show of defending feminist Meghan Murphy’s right to free speech, but now will not respect the right to medical freedom and privacy of library workers.”

The letter explains that Bowles and the other directors have refused to answer “direct, specific questions related to the legality of their own COVID-19 vaccination policy.”

Those questions include, “Can you advise if any of the laws which protect an individual’s rights to privacy and medical confidentiality in Canada have been repealed?” and, “Are you claiming the TPL’s COVID-19 Vaccination policy nullifies an individual’s privacy under the [federal] Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, 2020 (PIPEDA)?”

They also ask about other major documents the policy contravenes such as Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act and library workers’ contracts.

One of the librarians who is resisting told me in a telephone interview that, “We do not want to be seen as non-compliant or insubordinate or ignoring the policy or ignoring the mandatory training for those who don’t disclose their status. … Instead we are asking questions, and … that changes the power dynamics” and puts the burden of proof on the directors.

However, rather than responding to these questions, the directors have “dismissed, gaslit and completely ignored [the library workers],” the open letter points out. “[In addition,] our medical and religious exemptions that we were assured would be honoured have been denied, without cause.”

The open letter includes a call to action to the public: “If you love the library and what it should stand for, freedom, democracy, and the right to privacy, please consider making your voices heard and letting these directors know” via https://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/contact/.

The letter ends by saying, “If you would like to reach out to the librarians and library workers who are being censored please contact us here: torontobodylibrary@gmail.com.”

Another librarian created the website ethicallibrarian.com to push back.

Yet others have initiated a petition against the policy – https://chng.it/XFp4rQ8fmF

And I’ve also heard from librarians elsewhere in Canada who similarly have been betrayed by their managers and unions.

“Being a librarian is a dream job,” one Toronto librarian told me. “I love doing programs for children, and helping them pick their next favourite book. …

“My co-workers say, ‘You made a choice [to not get vaxxed].’ I say, ‘No. I’m living my life – and the library made a choice. I’m not planning to get fired based on not taking a medication.’ And the crazy thing is that six months ago my colleagues would have agreed with me that what’s happening is insane.”

But they’ve succumbed to the constant stream of fear and pro-vaxx propaganda.

  Let’s all support the librarians and others standing up for their rights by participating in the cross-country walkout on Monday! Look online for information about the event in your area.

 

Connect with Rosemary Frei

cover image credit: StockSnap / pixabay




Dissolving Illusions About the Role of Vaccines in Protecting Us From Disease

Dissolving Illusions About the Role of Vaccines in Protecting Us From Disease
Jeremy Nell in Conversation with Roman Bystrianyk

 

 

Dissolving Vaccine Illusions

by Jeremy NellJerm Warfare
October 20, 2021

 

From the book’s website,

“Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?”

The word “vaccine” is like a swearword. It triggers all sorts of emotions for reasons I don’t understand. In fact, the vaccine industry is akin to a religious cult.

 

 

Before this plandemic I didn’t ask the questions that I do now.

Thankfully, I’m not alone.

Many people have begun thinking critically about what’s going on.

Enter Dissolving Illusions co-author Roman Bystrianyk, who joined me for a conversation about the history of vaccines and the fake claims made about them.

 



Video available at Jerm Warfare Odysee channel.

 

Connect with Jerm Warfare

Dissolving Illusions Website




When “Fully Informed” Consent Is Always a Lie

When “Fully Informed” Consent Is Always a Lie

by Watchdog, UK Reloaded
October 22, 2021

 

Fully informed consent in the matter of Covid vaxes is IMPOSSIBLE.

ANY assertion that fully informed consent was given is FALSE

Why?

Because being FULLY INFORMED is impossible. Factual and fully verified information (as opposed to opinion, assertion, conjecture or alleged statistical projections) as to the short, medium and long term effects, adverse reactions, efficacy and so forth of the so-called vaccines is NOT KNOWN.

The vaccines were introduced as an “emergency” measure whilst still experimental.

Leaving aside the fact that the “emergency” that supposedly justified the use of experimental injections has since been clearly shown to have been FALSE (a crime in its own right that will be discussed elsewhere), by definition when something is experimental, it means that the experiments that would enable us to predict, among other things, any long term harm have not been started or are still ongoing and have not been completed.

This means that we DO NOT YET KNOW what these vaccines will do.

Therefore it is impossible to FULLY INFORM anyone because the full information is not yet there.

Therefore it is impossible for anyone to give their fully informed consent.

At best only partially informed consent can be given.

Therefore, for example, ANY CHILD VACCINATED has NOT given their fully informed consent and to assert or contend otherwise is a LIE.

Therefore those who injected any child did so without the child’s full informed consent.

Therefore they or any person who aided and abetted the injection is in breach of the law. Indeed ANY INJECTION WITH THE COVID “VACCINES”TO DATE HAS BEEN ADMINISTERED WITHOT FULLY INFORMED CONSENT.

Where a child is injured or killed as a consequence of injection, the person administering or assisting the administration of the injection must be prosecuted on charges of assault or manslaughter, malfeasance and so forth.

Accessories to these crimes include school boards, head teachers, education officials and ministers.

 

Connect with UK Reloaded

cover image credit: BlueHawk99 / pixabay




The Murdered Infant Comes to the Virology Lab; the Ivory Tower Is Befouled

The Murdered Infant Comes to the Virology Lab; the Ivory Tower Is Befouled

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 22, 2021

 

In a groundbreaking article for Children of God For Life, titled “Forsaking God For the Sake of Science,” [1] [1b] Debra Vinnedge outlines how the Rockefeller-Harriman eugenics movement gave rise to the practice of medical abortions for research purposes, including live births during which the infant was murdered and its organs harvested:

“…Abortion wasn’t legal yet; this was 1936. But abortion was most certainly legal and acceptable [to eugenicists] if it meant ending the life of a child who would be born to a ‘feeble-minded’ woman, one who might end up less than perfect or who might have to rely on society to pay for their care.”

And therefore, why not perform abortions for medical research? Behind closed doors, out of view, this was happening in several countries, including the US.

Consider this research report: “Human embryos of two and one-half to five months gestation were obtained from the gynaecological department of the Toronto General Hospital…No macerated specimens were used and in many of the embryos the heart was still beating at the time of receipt in the virus laboratory.”

Here is the citation [2]: Joan C. Thicke, Darline Duncan, William Wood, A. E. Franklin and A. J. Rhodes; Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Virus in Tissue Culture; Growth of the Lansing Strain in Human Embryonic Tissue, Canadian Journal of Medical Science, Vol. 30, pg 231-245. [June 1952]

The authors are certainly describing an infant who was taken from the womb alive, and after cells were harvested, was killed. For research on “growing virus in cell culture.”

Here is another research report that indicates the infant was born alive, its tissues taken, and then killed:

“Embryos of between 12-18 weeks gestation have been utilized. Rarely tissues were obtained from stillborn fetuses, or from premature infants at autopsy…In the experiments 3 sorts of embryonic materials were used: elements of skin, connective tissue, muscle; intestinal tissue; brain tissue…Whenever possible the embryo was removed from the amniotic sac.., transferred to a sterile towel and kept at 5 C until dissected.”

The citation [3]: Thomas H. Weller, John F. Enders, Studies on the Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Viruses in Tissue Culture : I. The Propagation of Poliomyelitis Viruses in Suspended Cell Cultures of Various Human Tissue; Journal of Immunology 1952;69;645-671. [June 1952]

Again, the infant’s tissue was used, in the lab, to “grow virus in cell culture.” The cells were from the infant.

My readers know that, for the past year, I’ve been exposing virologists’ absurd claims that they’re isolating viruses in their labs. [4] [4b] [4c]

In fact, they create soups in dishes, containing toxic drugs and chemicals, monkey cells and human cells, and a mucus sample from a patient. When the cells start dying, they claim this is proof the virus is in the mucus, in the soup, and is deadly.

Of course, this is nonsense, because the toxic drugs and chemicals are perfectly capable of killing the cells; and the cells in the soup are being starved of nutrients, which would also lead to cell-death.

The isolation of viruses is no isolation at all. It’s a fraud.

But it never occurred to me, until now, that some of these human cells in the soup in the lab came from infants, taken from the mother’s womb alive, for harvesting, who were then killed.

This completes a circle of evil.

Of course, out of the virological research fraud and infant murder come THE VACCINES, including the COVID vaccines, which are causing huge numbers of injuries and deaths across the world.

People of faith everywhere must see that declaring a religious exemption from the shots is a DUTY, whether or not the authorities allow the exemption.

The last time I looked, appealing to Pontius Pilate for an exemption didn’t work, and the status of Anthony Fauci is not higher than the Authority to whom, at minimum, four billion people of faith pray.


SOURCES:

[1] https://cogforlife.org/2012/06/13/forsaking-god-for-science/

[1b] https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/AbortedFetalCellLines.pdf

[2] https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjms52-031

[3] https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/poliovax1952.pdf

[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/26/covid-the-virus-was-never-proven-to-exist-a-statement/

[4b] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/21/isolation-of-sars-cov-2-refuted-in-step-by-step-analysis-of-claim/

[4c] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/20/the-failure-to-prove-the-virus-exists/

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: norberthentges / pixabay




Autism and Vaccination

Autism and Vaccination

by Dr. Vernon Coleman
October 29, 2021

 

I believe, and have believed for many years, that autism is caused by vaccination.

The word autism is used, like the word cancer, as an umbrella term for a range of different problems.

Patients with autism are said to have development disorders which affect their ability to interact socially and to communicate with other people though this is a fairly recent interpretation and the word is used as a catch-all for a whole range of problems. (In one medical dictionary on my shelf, autism is defined as ‘morbid self-absorption’.)

These days, I suspect that the word is used more as a dustbin word rather than an umbrella word. It helps the profession appear to know what is the matter when they don’t and, at the same time, it enables them to avoid taking any responsibility for what has happened. The word is used to describe almost any symptoms which doctors cannot explain.

Autism can be anything from a mild behavioural problem to severe brain damage. Social workers and others play the game because it enables them to build well-funded empires around the ‘care’ of autistic patients. For governments it is, of course, a lot cheaper to provide ‘care’ for autistic patients than to acknowledge that these children have been made ill by official vaccination policies and should have been provided with vast amounts of compensation.

I believe that the epidemiological evidence supports the idea of there being a link between vaccines and autism.

The number of children being diagnosed as suffering from autism has rocketed as the number of children being vaccinated has rocketed. Once rare (as recently as the 1990s it was generally accepted that autism affected no more than 4 or 5 people in every 10,000) but it is now officially accepted that it affects far more than this – and is constantly rising.

Indeed, figures in other countries show that the incidence of autism is rising in all developed countries, and how anyone can deny the possibility of a link between vaccination and autism is quite beyond me. The epidemiological evidence is overwhelming. If vaccines are known to cause brain damage isn’t it logical to assume that they can also cause the disease which is known as autism but which would in many cases, I believe, be more properly and honestly known as brain damage?

I have been suggesting that there is a link between ‘autism’ and vaccination for decades and no one has yet discredited my theories.

Doctors and drug companies and politicians much prefer to talk about autism rather than brain damage because the former suggests a natural disease while the latter suggests that there may be an external cause. I’m afraid that innocent and desperate parents collude with this nonsense because they prefer to describe their children as autistic rather than as brain damaged.

The drug companies (and the doctors, hospitals and politicians who support them) all claim that there is no link between autism and vaccination. (But then they would, wouldn’t they?). They claim that there is no convincing scientific evidence proving a link between the two.

On the other hand there is no convincing scientific evidence disproving a link between vaccination and autism.

When a research project was set up to investigate the link, drug companies applied to a London court for an injunction to stop the research. Now why would they do that?

The fact is that it isn’t up to me to prove that vaccines cause autism.

Given the overwhelmingly convincing epidemiological evidence it is up to drug companies and governments to prove that vaccines don’t cause autism.

 

Vernon Coleman’s bestselling book on vaccines and vaccination is entitled Anyone who tells you vaccines are safe and effective is lying: here’s the proof. It is available as a paperback and an eBook.

 

Connect with Dr. Vernon Coleman

cover image credit: PublicDomainPictures / pixabay




Some Facts About Graphene Oxide

Some Facts About Graphene Oxide

by James Herer, Weblyf
October 21, 2021

 

Known as the thinnest and the strongest material found on earth, graphene oxide (GO) has now become more popular not because of its benefits but because of its dangers to the human body. graphene oxide is a nanoparticle discovered by Andrew Geim and Konstantin Novoselov in 2004. As written in www.graphene.manchester.ac.uk:

“Fascination with this material stems from its remarkable physical properties and the potential applications these properties offer for the future. Although scientists knew one atom thick, two-dimensional crystal graphene existed, no-one had worked out how to extract it from graphite. That was until it was isolated in 2004 by two researchers at The University of Manchester, Professor Andre Geim and Professor Kostya Novoselov.

One Friday, the two scientists removed some flakes from a lump of bulk graphite with sticky tape. They noticed some flakes were thinner than others. By separating the graphite fragments repeatedly, they managed to create flakes that were just one atom thick. Their experiment had led to graphene being isolated for the very first time.”

Another interesting characteristic of graphene oxide is that it could change shape and also interact with light, magnetism, and electrons. It’s also a semiconductor and like metals, it can transmit electricity. It’s like a transparent material but way stronger than steel that’s why it is being used in car coating products and as explained in https://radiopatriot.net:

“Graphene oxide is also extremely lightweight and conductive, with its temperature thresholds ranging anywhere from 2200-3300°F, which hypothetically speaking, means that it outperforms all other known materials. As an electrical conductor, graphene performs as well as copper, and despite being almost completely transparent, remains so dense that not even helium, the smallest gas atom, can pass through it.”

In late June, the founder and director of Quinta Columna, Ricardo Delgado Martin, published a study conducted by the Spanish research team at the University of Almeria claiming that Pfizer’s COVID vaccines contain graphene oxide. Martin is “specialized in biostatistics, clinical microbiology, clinical genetics, and immunology”. Using electron microscopy and spectroscopy, he and his team have confirmed that graphene oxide is present in Pfizer’s COVID vaccines and that it’s likely that it has something to do with the reported adverse effects and deaths.

Meanwhile, another expert named Dr. Robert Young, a biochemist, microbiologist, and clinical nutritionist, along with his team, also conducted research to classify the specific ingredients in vaccines created by Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer and they’ve discovered that high levels of graphene oxide are present in all of these four vaccines. Their findings were published on the 20th of August, showing that “toxic nanometallic content which are magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plants, insects, birds, animals and humans” are present on these jabs. One of these injections even contained life-threatening parasites called Trypanosoma cruzi.

Graphene oxide can impact the immune system and when accumulated in the lungs, it can be very deadly. It is “a toxin which triggers thrombi and blood coagulation”. It has never been used on humans before but “it’s been extensively researched for intended use on humans”. According to Dr. Ariyana Love, ND:

“There are over 2000 studies on Graphene Oxide Toxicity and 500 of them were published in 2017.”

Registered as big pharma’s intellectual property, graphene oxide was secretly approved therefore it was never disclosed as an ingredient for COVID vaccines. As acknowledged by national health authorities, graphene oxide is also contained in the face mask. Meanwhile, Dr. Ariyana Love also reported:

“Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, etc, were in a race to research and development Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles as a cancer cure. So, Graphene oxide was injected into animals and used as the vector to deliver a novel mRNA drug technology directly into cells. At first, the animals seemed fine and the cancer cells were successfully destroyed. But two months after inoculation all the animals got sick and DIED from Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)! Healthy cells were destroyed by the Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles.

Safety and toxicity were the pharma cartel’s main challenges in using this novel technology for biomedical applications such as gene therapy. After two animal trials that resulted in the death of all the animals, graphene oxide could not be approved for use in humans due to its toxicity to healthy cells and due to ADE, which is where the immune system destroys itself. Front line doctors are already seeing ADE in these unapproved Covid-19 human trials. Experts such as Europe’s leading virologist Professor Dolores Cahill, world-renown scientist Mike Adams of Natural News, world’s leading virologist Geert Vanden Bossche and Pfizer whistleblower, Dr. Michael Yeadon warned us that ADE would come!”

 

Connect with James Herer

cover image credit: seagul / pixabay

 




Michigan Woman Died From Blood Clots After J&J Vaccine, Autopsy Confirms

Michigan Woman Died From Blood Clots After J&J Vaccine, Autopsy Confirms
A Michigan pathologist confirmed 60-year-old Sandra Jacobs died from cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a rare blood-clotting disorder, after receiving Johnson & Johnson’s COVID vaccine. 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
October 21, 2021

 

A 60-year-old woman died from blood clots after receiving Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) COVID vaccine, according to an autopsy report released Sept. 20 by Dr. Michael Caplan, a forensic pathologist for Michigan Medicine.

Sandra Jacobs “appears to have succumbed” to a “rare but nevertheless documented” complication associated with the viral vector vaccine — cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) — Caplan wrote in the summary.

According to Johns Hopkins Medicine, CVST occurs when a “blood clot forms in the brain’s venous sinuses,” preventing blood from draining out of the brain. “As a result, blood cells may break and leak blood into the brain tissues, forming a hemorrhage.”

This condition brought about “hemorrhagic cerebral infarct,” or stroke caused by brain bleeding, and brain swelling, Caplan wrote.

The death certificate, obtained after some difficulty by Jacobs’ daughter, Tatum Strieter-Byron, lists the cause of death as “complications of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis” and “recent administration” of a COVID vaccine as the contributing condition.

Caplan deemed the manner of death “natural.” It may also be considered a “therapeutic complication” since this is a known vaccine issue, he wrote. Under “final diagnosis,” Caplan first listed the COVID vaccine.

Jacobs died 13 days after receiving the single-dose J&J vaccine at a CVS pharmacy on April 8 — just five days before federal health agencies temporarily paused the vaccine while they examined an unusual blood-clotting disorder, Michigan Live reported.

Though it took months to confirm it, Strieter-Byron knew from the start her mother died from the vaccine.

“She was a real person. She is not a piece of, just like fictitious political propaganda, where they’re saying it doesn’t exist,” Strieter-Byron said. “It’s not true. It does exist. She was a real person with a real life.”

Michigan Live reached out to Caplan for comment, but efforts were unsuccessful. “In conjunction with the Washtenaw County Health Department, we have decided not to have Dr. Caplan or the medical examiner’s office provide comment on the case,” Dr. Allecia Wilson, the county’s chief medical examiner, wrote in an email.

J&J also did not respond to a request for comment. A doctor with the manufacturer’s COVID vaccine safety team called a reporter, but only to obtain Strieter-Byron’s information, who as of Oct. 15 had not heard from the doctor.

On April 13, federal agencies paused J&J’s COVID vaccine, marketed under its Janssen subsidiary, while they investigated the vaccine’s possible link to potentially dangerous blood clots.

During the April 23 meeting, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) said it had identified 15 women diagnosed with rare blood clots, including three who died. Only two of the women were older than 50, with the risk highest in women ages 30 to 39.

The ACIP said the link between blood clots and J&J’s COVID vaccine was “plausible,” but concluded the vaccine’s “benefits outweighed the risks” and recommended the vaccine for persons 18 and older in the U.S. under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

On April 26, the FDA amended its EUA for the J&J vaccine to reflect the risk of rare blood clots and said vaccinations could resume immediately.

According to the most recent data from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), between Dec. 14, 2020 and Oct. 8, 2021, there were 22,896 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 15,190 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 5,092 reports to Moderna and 2,551 reports to J&J.

Excluding foreign reports — those reports submitted to VAERS from outside the U.S. — there have been 10,131 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 4,407 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 3,654 reports to Moderna and 2,018 reports to J&J.

​​The Defender has reported on numerous cases of blood clots following COVID vaccination:

  • Jessica Berg Wilson, a 37-year-old mother who died from vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia after she received J&J’s COVID vaccine as a condition of volunteering at her child’s school.
  • Emma Burkey, an 18-year-old teen was put on a respirator and underwent three brain surgeries from blood clots after receiving J&J’s vaccine.
  • Anne VanGeest, a healthy 35-year-old, died of a brain hemorrhage 11 days after receiving J&J’s COVID vaccine.
  • Brad Malagarie, 43, suffered a stroke from blood clots hours after receiving J&J’s COVID vaccine. The stroke left him unable to walk, talk and with paralysis on the left side of his body.
  • Everest Romney, 17, developed blood clots after his first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.

J&J’s vaccine has also been linked to Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), a “serious but rare” neurological disorder in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks part of its peripheral nervous system — the network of nerves located outside of the brain and spinal cord. GBS can range from a very mild case with brief weakness, to paralysis, which can leave the person unable to breathe independently.

The FDA concluded the benefits of the vaccine outweigh any danger but added a warning in fact sheets about the drug for providers and patients.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

 

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




Dr. Zach Bush Tells RFK, Jr.: ‘By Deleting the Alphabet of Human Biology, We Ended Up With a Chronic Disease Epidemic on a Grand Scale’

Dr. Zach Bush Tells RFK, Jr.: ‘By Deleting the Alphabet of Human Biology, We Ended Up With a Chronic Disease Epidemic on a Grand Scale’
On “The Defender Show,” Dr. Zach Bush, triple-board-certified physician, and host Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., discussed immunity, herbicides, gut health and the need to end chemical food systems “extremely quickly.” 

by Children’s Health Defense Team
October 21, 2021

 

To explain why the shikimate pathway is so vital to our microbiome, Bush described the process of a ripple effect. By adding glyphosate, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and other environmental toxins to soils, air and water, the shikimate pathway, which contains the 22 amino acids that exist for all proteins, can no longer utilize most of those amino acids.

“The way glyphosate injures people is really by the microbiome,” Kennedy clarified. “And by rewarding the bacteria that caused inflammation and making a much more hostile environment in your gut and in your body.”

You are “removing the police force for the invaders,” Kennedy said, allowing inflammation to take over the body.

Bush likened the 22 amino acids in the body to the alphabet. “You’ve only got these few letters that produce hundreds of thousands of words.”

In the same way vowels are critical to the English language, the 22 essential amino acids are critical for the shikimate pathway. Without vowels most words will be misspelled. By eliminating four or more of the critical amino acids, the body is “misspelled” at the protein level.

“And when we miss the proteins, we lose detoxification capacity,” Bush said. He described the ripple effect, adding that without repair capacity, people age at an accelerated rate, which leads to the emergence of diseases such as sarcomas.

“And so in just a single generation, by deleting the alphabet of human biology, we ended up with a chronic disease epidemic on a grand scale,” he said.

Glyphosate “breaks the tight junctions of the Velcro between our body and the outside world,” Bush said. “And, when you lose the tight junctions, you turn into a leaky sieve. And what you’ve just destroyed is the very front line of a whole category of human immunity that we call the innate immune system.”

Bush shared an uplifting story about working with pre-diabetic children in a classroom in Hawaii, and how eating food grown from a regenerative school garden rebalanced their bodies so they no longer were predisposed for diabetes. His nonprofit focuses on planting regenerative gardens in food desert environments.

Kennedy told Bush he’s glad his work addresses both policy and practical solutions. “I wish you were secretary of HHS [Health and Human Services] and you were redirecting this thing to actually saving humanity,” Kennedy said.

“We can do it faster than HHS can,” said Bush. We need to end chemical food systems and we have to do it “extremely quickly,” he added.

“Now it’s time for mobilization and a coherent plan for the public,” said Bush, who has great faith in the power of our innate immune system. “It’s so easy to get stressed out over the powers that be when you hear things about the ‘deep state’ or a ‘cabal,’ but we’re in the driver’s seat — literally, we can go into their fear and guilt paradigm and play into the whole thing, or we can just create an alternative pathway.”

Watch the interview here:

“The Defender Show” is hosted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder, chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense, and author of multiple books, including the New York Times bestseller, “Crimes Against Nature.” Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. He is founder of Waterkeeper Alliance, and of counsel to Morgan and Morgan, a nationwide law firm.

©October 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

Connect with Dr. Zach Bush

cover image credit: GDJ / pixabay




High Rate of Foster Care Children Are Prescribed Mind-Altering Drugs Despite Government Pledges to Prevent This: Minorities Targeted

High Rate of Foster Care Children Are Prescribed Mind-Altering Drugs Despite Government Pledges to Prevent This: Minorities Targeted

In an ongoing campaign to protect foster care youth from dangerous psychotropic drugs, CCHR and the Task Force Against Racism are calling for an investigation into government and mental health industry decades-old, failed oversight. Native and African Americans are at highest risk.

 

by Jan Eastgate, Citizens Commission on Human Rights International [CCHR]
and Rev. Frederick Shaw, founder, Task Force Against Racism and Modern-Day Eugenics
October 20, 2021

 

More than one-third of children on Medicaid in the foster care system are prescribed psychotropic drugs, a higher amount than non-foster children under Medicaid, according to a study led by an assistant professor of pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine and pediatrician at Texas Children’s Hospital.[1] This is a shocking finding given the outcry over psychotropic drugging of foster children in 2004 and again in 2011-2015. Governments promised greater oversight but clearly this has been ineffective and vulnerable children are still at risk.

The study found that about 35% of children in foster care are prescribed psychotropic medications in comparison to 8% not in foster care under Medicaid. The study, “Psychotropic Medication Usage Among Foster and Non-Foster Youth on Medicaid,” was presented during the virtual American Academy of Pediatrics 2021 National Conference and Exhibition in October.[2]

Rachael J. Keefe, MD, MPH, FAAP and colleagues analyzed claims data from two Medicaid managed care organizations in southeast Texas and stated: “I think you need increased oversight, increased awareness of this overmedication.”[3]

Other studies show that children on Medicaid receive more psychiatric drugs and prolonged mental health treatment, when compared to their privately insured counterparts.[4]

There are ethical and racial concerns about the poor, near-poor, and minorities in foster care that are most prevalently prescribed psychotropic drugs.

The majority of those treated are predominantly African American.[5] African American children and youths represent 23% of the foster care population yet comprise only 14% of the child and adolescent population. As part of the foster care population they are at risk of being given five or more psychotropic drugs at a time, with some younger than five.[6]

Native Americans are up to four times more likely to have their children taken and placed into foster care than their non-Native counterparts. Oklahoma Department of Human Services reported in 2020 that Native children represented more than 35% of those in foster care, yet Native Americans comprise only around 9% of Oklahoma’s population. “That is the definition of racial disproportionality,” said Citizen Potawatomi Nation FireLodge Children & Family Services Foster Care/Adoption Manager Kendra Lowden.[7]

The Lakota People’s Law Project has long raised concerns about this, reporting to Congress its findings pertaining to what it called South Dakota’s corrupt foster system, especially the over prescription of medications to Native American youth. American Indian children make up 13.4% of South Dakota’s population, yet 56.3% of the foster system is comprised of Native youth. Psychotropic or antipsychotic drugs were the most often prescribed. The Medicaid spending which paralleled this trend grew from $300,987 to $4,016,148, or 1,334%, during a ten-year period.[8]

“In the particular case of South Dakota, the medication was being used to subdue rather than treat children, vastly enriching both the state workers, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies at the direct expense of the foster care children,” according to Lakota People’s Law Project.[9]

In 2018, there were 99,025 Black or African American children and 90,688 Hispanic children in foster care.[10] These are at risk of being harmed by psychotropic drugs.

JAMA Pediatrics study that investigated the patterns of mental health diagnosis and medication treatment within a cohort of children from birth to 8 years old insured by Medicaid, reported that “20% of medication users received two or more medication classes concurrently for 60 days or more.” Further, “At age 7 years, half or more of the medicated children had more than 200 days of drug exposure.”[11]

The study pointed out concerns that “early exposure to such medications in utero or in the preschool years could potentially alter physical, cognitive, and emotional development.”[12]

A Failure to Protect

The epidemic of drugging foster care children was exposed over a decade ago with federal and state proposals and agreements that there would be greater oversight, which has failed.

In 2004, the drugging of foster care children in Texas—representative of the entire country—was so bad that the then-Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn investigated, releasing “Forgotten Children,” a damning report on her findings. It was found that foster parents were incentivized to find “mental health problems” in the children in their care because they received up to $1,000 a day for children labeled with a mental disorder compared to $17 a day per child without such issues.[13]

The Texas Legislature responded, passing a bill which required a study of the use of psychotropic medication in foster care, strengthened medical consent requirements, and required the development of a new medical system that would give the state the ability to track and oversee each foster child’s diagnoses and prescriptions. But the problem persisted.

In 2011, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) stepped in, evaluating five states (Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Oregon, and Texas). The data revealed that foster children were prescribed psychotropic drugs at rates 2.7 to 4.5 times higher than non-foster children in Medicaid. Many were subjected to cocktails of psychotropics. The GAO explained that “no evidence supports the concomitant use of five or more psychotropic drugs in adults or children, yet hundreds of both foster and non-foster children in the five states had such a drug regimen.”[14]

In 2014, JooYeun Chang, Associate Commissioner of the Children’s Bureau in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration (HHS) for Children, Youth, and Families testified before Congress that despite steps taken by the Administration and Congress to promote the monitoring and management of psychotropic medications, there remained an over-use of psychotropic drugs for children in foster care.[15]

A year later, an HHS Inspector General report again showed matters had not changed. It flagged 67% of those being drugged as problematic, including prescriptions to kids who were too young and prescriptions for the wrong dose or as a wrong treatment.[16] Over half of kids receiving antipsychotics were victimized by “poor monitoring” of the drugs’ risky health side effects—which include breast growth in boys [gynecomastia], cardiac arrest, extreme weight gain and diabetes, it was reported.[17]

In 2015, a San Jose Mercury News investigation into foster children in California found that about one in four adolescents in California’s foster care system was prescribed at least one psychiatric drug—3½ times the rate for all adolescents nationwide. There were incentives for doctors to prescribe the drugs: of those doctors with financial ties to pharmaceutical companies in the state, the higher prescribers collected almost four times—or about $10,000 more—in pharmaceutical funding than the lower prescribers.[18]

A 2018 JAMA Pediatrics study that investigated the patterns of mental health diagnosis and medication treatment within a cohort of children from birth to 8 years old insured by Medicaid, reported that “20% of medication users received two or more medication classes concurrently for 60 days or more.” Further, “At age 7 years, half or more of the medicated children had more than 200 days of drug exposure.” Particular attention was given to the use of antipsychotics for behavioral management in children as, “most pediatric psychotropic medication use (67%) is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.”[19]

A study released in September 2018 bolstered concerns raised for years by foster care advocates, several of which have filed a class-action lawsuit against the state of Missouri, claiming that foster children’s constitutional rights are violated because of the overuse of drugs and the lack of oversight. Another estimate put the range of psychotropic drug use by foster children at 13 to 52% compared with about 4% for other youth.[20]

Speaking about other antipsychotic drug risks, Harrisburg-based psychiatrist and whistleblower Dr. Stephan Kruszewski said: “Boys with gynecomastia have had breast lumps and have been lactating, and some of them have had mastectomies.”[21]

Children and youths are also put at risk of a lifetime antipsychotic side effect, tardive dyskinesia, an irreversible movement disorder.[22]

Psychiatric drugs are among Medicaid’s most costly and commonly prescribed drugs.[23] Among the different classes of psychotropic drugs, antipsychotics are the most commonly prescribed and have the highest cost per claim, accounting for 58% of the total costs.[24]

State Medicaid programs spent over $2.8 billion on antipsychotics for all ages in 2007, the single largest drug expenditure category for Medicaid.[25] A decade later it was reported to be $3.5 billion—a 25% increase.[26] Nationally, about 12% of all the nation’s 500,000 foster care children had received Medicaid-paid antipsychotics at some point.[27]

Georgia spent $7.87 million a year on psychotropic drugs, according to Medicaid records and more than a third of foster children were prescribed the drugs, compared with about 4% of the general youth population.[28]

Sara Bartosz, writing for the American Bar Association website about “Protecting Foster Youth from Unsafely Administered Psychotropic Drugs,” noted: “Though the federal government has placed increased focus on the vital need for structured oversight of psychotropic medication usage in foster care, many state child welfare agencies are behind in implementing such safety mechanisms.”[29]

Further, “Secrecy, lack of transparency and lack of accountability makes a perfect environment for human rights violations of the mentally disabled. Problems of patient abuse occur including: excessive dosing for purposes of chemical restraint, poly-pharmacy with multiple medications, lack of informed consent and the use of medication with little or no direct doctor/patient contract.”[30]

The federal government’s lax monitoring of state Medicaid foster care programs has been faulted for the increase in psychotropic drug prescriptions.[31]

Carolyn Barcus of the Society of Indian Psychologists, also cited criteria presented in the widespread use of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which she said is severely biased against minorities.[32] Consider the comments made by Prof. Allen Frances, M.D., chair of the DSM-IV Task Force, was a highly vocal critic of the DSM-5 published in 2013: “The Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association has given its final approval to a deeply flawed DSM 5 containing many changes that seem clearly unsafe and scientifically unsound. My best advice to clinicians, to the press, and to the general public – be skeptical and don’t follow DSM 5 blindly down a road likely to lead to massive over-diagnosis and harmful over-medication.”[33]

Edward Opton, an attorney with the National Center for Youth Law’s PsychDrugs Action Campaign underscored why foster care kids are especially vulnerable: “Foster children are a lucrative market for psychotropic drug sales. Unlike adults, they can’t say, ‘No, I won’t take any more of that drug,’” he wrote.[34]

“Kids’ bodies aren’t meant to take that many meds,” said Susan Rogers, a leading reformer who served on the board of the Texas Federation for Children’s Mental Health and was a foster care parent for nearly 30 years. “We would take in kids so strung out and crazy on meds that we had to try to make their psychiatrists back off,” she said. She found that state-funded psychiatrists and social workers were too often indifferent to the disastrous side effects of the antipsychotics they gave to troubled kids who shouldn’t have gotten them in the first place.[35]

Sara Bartosz, writing for the American Bar Association website, warned: “Given that a child’s brain remains in development well into the teen years, a risk of permanent neurological damage may well accompany the ill-advised use of psychotropic medications within the child population. Moreover, children on these drugs often report feeling drowsy, listless, detached, and emotionally flat over the course of their day-to-day lives.”[36]

“Tragically,” Bartosz also stated, “the disruptive nature of foster care also spawns a cycle in which the use of psychotropic medications is accelerated. Each placement move or change in social worker creates additional trauma and instability for a child, whose behaviors predictably may deteriorate. In an effort to ameliorate these difficult behaviors and to prevent additional placement disruption, a course of psychotropic medication often follows.”[37]

Dr. Janet Parker, Executive Director of Medical Whistleblower, writing in OpEdNews said: “As a nation, we must not only look to the human rights ethics of whether psychiatric drugs should be prescribed with such frequency but also consider the ultimate cost to our nation’s health care budget.”[38]

According to HHS Inspector General, 2016 data, the following are the top and bottom states for percentage of foster children treated with psychotropic drugs:

  1. North Dakota: 2,734, 37.3%
  2. Virginia: 14,999, 37.2%
  3. New Hampshire: 2,614, 36.1%
  4. Iowa: 13,951, 35.7%
  5. Maine: 3,527, 32.7%
  6. Alaska: 4,175, 16.1%
  7. Nevada, 12,100, 15.1%
  8. New Jersey, 27,856, 13.9%
  9. California: 147,806, 13.6%
  10. Hawaii: 5,912, 9.7%.[39]

Michigan civil and children’s rights attorney Allison Folmar and a member of the Task Force Against Racism is intimately aware of the devastation caused by the use of antipsychotics on children. “Foster children are prescribed psychotropic drugs…that can cause life-threatening diabetes, violent and suicidal behavior and even brain shrinkage. That is being done to children who already are traumatized…. We need to turn such turmoil into triumph by changing the laws—state-by-state—until every child is protected.”[40]

We are working together to achieve those protections. There must be accountable oversight of psychotropic drug use in the foster care system, penalties for high prescribers and the use of antipsychotics reduced to zero.

References:

[1] “‘Increased oversight’ needed: One in three kids in foster care prescribed psychotropics,” Healio, 12 Oct. 2021, https://www.healio.com/news/pediatrics/20211012/increased-oversight-needed-one-in-three-kids-in-foster-care-prescribed-psychotropics

[2] “Children in foster care much more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications compared with non-foster children in Medicaid program,” EurekAlert!, 8 Oct. 2021, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/930197

[3] Op. cit., Healio, 12 Oct. 2021

[4] Hannah Emerson, “Study details Medicaid- Open Excellence insured birth cohort’s exposure to psychiatric medications and mental health services,” Open Excellence, 11 July 2018, https://openexcellence.org/poor-foster-care-children-likely-diagnosed-treated-psychiatric-drugs/

[5] Ibid.

[6] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/02/09/cchr-reports-1-million-decline-in-us-children-on-mind-altering-drugs/#_edn8 citing, https://www.childrensdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2017-soac.pdf, p. 14; “Foster Care Statistics 2017: Numbers and Trends,” March 2019, p. 8, https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/foster.pdf; Elaine Korry, “California Moves To Stop Misuse Of Psychiatric Meds In Foster Care,” NPR, 2 Sept. 2015, http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/09/02/436350334/california-moves-to-stop-misuse-of-psychiatric-meds-in-foster-care

[7] “Disproportionate representation of Native Americans in foster care across United States,” Citizen Potawatomi Nation FireLodge, 6 Apr. 2021, https://www.potawatomi.org/blog/2021/04/06/disproportionate-representation-of-native-americans-in-foster-care-across-united-states/

[8] “Foster care children plagued by overmedication,” Bringing Lakota Children Home, 12 Feb. 2015, https://lakotalawproject.wordpress.com/2015/02/12/foster-care-children-plagued-by-overmedication/

[9] Ibid.

[10] https://www.cchrtaskforce.org/articles/mental-health-racism

[11] Op. cit., Open Excellence, 11 July 2018

[12] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/02/09/cchr-reports-1-million-decline-in-us-children-on-mind-altering-drugs/#_edn8 citing, https://www.childrensdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2017-soac.pdf, p. 14; “Foster Care Statistics 2017: Numbers and Trends,” March 2019, p. 8, https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/foster.pdf; Elaine Korry, “California Moves To Stop Misuse Of Psychiatric Meds In Foster Care,” NPR, 2 Sept. 2015, http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/09/02/436350334/california-moves-to-stop-misuse-of-psychiatric-meds-in-foster-care

[13] https://jonisaloom.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/forgotten-children-carole-keeton-strayhorn-texas-comptroller-forgotten-children-2004.pdf; https://reason.com/2013/08/07/foster-children-put-on-psychotropic-medi/

[14] Kelly O/Meara, “National Child Abuse Prevention Month: Stop Mass Drugging of Foster Care Kids,” CCHRint.org, 28 Apr. 2015, https://www.cchrint.org/2015/04/28/national-child-abuse-prevention-month-stop-mass-drugging-of-foster-care-kids/; “FOSTER CHILDREN: HHS Guidance Could Help States Improve Oversight of Psychotropic Prescriptions,” Statement of Gregory D. Kutz, Director Forensic Audits and Investigative Service, Government Accounting Office, 1 Dec. 2011, https://www.gao.gov/assets/files.gao.gov/assets/gao-12-270t.pdf

[15] Marian Wright Edelman, “Overmedicating Children in Foster Care,” 22 May 2015, https://www.childrensdefense.org/child-watch-columns/health/2015/overmedicating-children-in-foster-care/

[16] Nidhi Subbaraman, “Missouri Has 23% of Its Foster Kids on Strong Psychoactive Drugs. A Lawsuit Claims the State Isn’t Keeping Records,” BuzzFeedNews, 2 Aug. 2018, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nidhisubbaraman/missouri-foster-kids-psychotropic-drugs

[17] Art Levine, “Feds Pay for Drug Fraud: 92 Percent of Foster Care, Poor Kids Prescribed Antipsychotics Get Them for Unaccepted Uses,” HuffPost, 30 Apr. 2015, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/feds-pay-for-drug-fraud-9_b_6966454

[18] Kelly O/Meara, “National Child Abuse Prevention Month: Stop Mass Drugging of Foster Care Kids,” CCHRint.org, 28 Apr. 2015, https://www.cchrint.org/2015/04/28/national-child-abuse-prevention-month-stop-mass-drugging-of-foster-care-kids/

[19] Hannah Emerson, “Study details Medicaid- Open Excellence insured birth cohort’s exposure to psychiatric medications and mental health services,” 11 July 2018, https://openexcellence.org/poor-foster-care-children-likely-diagnosed-treated-psychiatric-drugs/

[20] “A third of foster children on psychotropic drugs in some states received no oversight, study finds,” USA Today, 23 Sept. 2018, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/21/foster-children-one-third-psychotropic-drugs-have-no-oversight/1380756002/

[21] Op. cit., HuffPost, 30 Apr. 2015, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/feds-pay-for-drug-fraud-9_b_6966454

[22] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/10/11/consumers-beware-of-antipsychotics-long-term-debilitating-effects/

[23] Janet Parker, “Wasting the Taxpayers Medicaid Dollars on Psychiatric Drugs,” OpEdNews, “Rethinking Psychiatry,” https://www.rethinkingpsychiatry.org/wasting-the-taxpayers-medicaid-dollars-on-psychiatric-drugs/ citing: L. Elam, B. Bruen, and J. Tilly, “Medicaid and the Prescription Drug Benefit: Cost Containment Strategies and State Experiences” (Washington: Kaiser Commission, September 2002).

[24] R Khanna, et al., “Use and cost of psychotropic drugs among recipients with autism in a state Medicaid fee-for-service programme,” J Intellect Disabil Res., Feb. 2013, 57(2):161-71, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22471524/

[25] “Children’s Mental Health: Concerns Remain about Appropriate Services for Children in Medicaid and Foster Care,” GAO report, 2012, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-13-15.pdf

[26] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/feds-pay-for-drug-fraud-9_b_6966454; Nidhi Subbaraman, “Missouri Has 23% Of Its Foster Kids On Strong Psychoactive Drugs. A Lawsuit Claims The State Isn’t Keeping Records,” BuzzFeedNews, 2 Aug. 2018,https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nidhisubbaraman/missouri-foster-kids-psychotropic-drugs

[27] Op. cit., HuffPost, 30 Apr. 2015

[28] “Foster Children On Psychotropic Medication – 1/2 of group home children use them,” Invisible Children, 15 June 2020, https://www.invisiblechildren.org/2020/06/15/foster-children-on-psychotropic-medication/

[29] Sara Bartosz, “Protecting Foster Youth from Unsafely Administered Psychotropic Drugs,” American Bar Association, 13 Jan 2016, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/childrens-rights/articles/2016/protecting-foster-youth-from-unsafely-administered-psychotropic-drugs/

[30] Op. cit., OpEdNews, “Rethinking Psychiatry”

[31] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/feds-pay-for-drug-fraud-9_b_6966454; Nidhi Subbaraman, “Missouri Has 23% Of Its Foster Kids On Strong Psychoactive Drugs. A Lawsuit Claims The State Isn’t Keeping Records,” BuzzFeedNews, 2 Aug. 2018, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nidhisubbaraman/missouri-foster-kids-psychotropic-drugs

[32] Op. cit., Bringing Lakota Children Home, 12 Feb. 2015

[33] https://www.zurinstitute.com/dsm-critique/

[34] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/feds-pay-for-drug-fraud-9_b_6966454

[35] Ibid.

[36] Sara Bartosz, “Protecting Foster Youth from Unsafely Administered Psychotropic Drugs,” American Bar Association, 13 Jan 2016, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/childrens-rights/articles/2016/protecting-foster-youth-from-unsafely-administered-psychotropic-drugs/

[37] Ibid.

[38] Op. cit., OpEdNews, “Rethinking Psychiatry”

[39] “A third of foster children on psychotropic drugs in some states received no oversight, study finds,” USA Today, 23 Sept, 2018, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/21/foster-children-one-third-psychotropic-drugs-have-no-oversight/1380756002/

[40] https://www.cchrint.org/2015/03/20/finally-a-foster-care-bill-to-help-children-not-big-pharma/

 

Connect with Citizens Commission on Human Rights International

cover image credit: LysogSalt / pixabay




New Evidence for Infanticide in the Creation of the Fetal Cell Line Used for COVID Vaccine Testing

New Evidence for Infanticide in the Creation of the Fetal Cell Line Used for COVID Vaccine Testing

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 20, 2021

 

“To obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used, nor can those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms.”

“The correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be guaranteed.”

“In either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture a programmed abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting it while still alive, in order to remove tissues to be placed in culture media.”

“Given these premises, we face the dilemma of whether the deliberate systematic destruction of a human creature to obtain cell material can be justified, when it is recognized that this is of great interest to fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human diseases. Are research and diagnosis of such great value that they justify the destruction of human beings?”

“The Geneva Declaration affirms that the doctor has the duty to take the greatest care to safeguard the life of a human being from its conception and will not, even under threat, use his knowledge to infringe humanitarian laws.” (1986-04-26; Herranz, Gonzalo; Il Sabato, no.15…Professor Herranz was, at the time, president of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish Doctors and vice-president of the Permanent Committee of Medical Ethics of the European Community.)

What exactly happened in 1972 or 1973, in the Netherlands, where an infant girl was aborted, and her kidneys used to make a cell line that would be used, going forward, in the testing of vaccines?

That cell line is called HEK 293 (HEK stands for human embryonic kidney), and it has been used to test COVID vaccines.

I have already presented evidence for concluding the abortion involved removing the living infant from her mother’s womb, and taking her kidneys, which of course killed her.

This evidence rests on the realization that, in order to extract viable and useful kidney tissue, the baby had to have a functioning blood supply, which meant she was alive.

But the evidence ALSO comes from knowing many other abortions have been carried out, in order to harvest tissue for medical research, by murdering living babies.

I have found a very informative article (2/9/2021) at the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, by Christian Hacking, titled, “What the HEK?!” by Christian Hacking. Quoting from the article:

“HEK 293 is a human cell line created using a kidney from a dissected unborn baby in the Netherlands between 1972 and 1973. It is the second most common cell line and is used extensively in ‘pharmaceutical and biomedical research’. It is also used in vaccine creation and cancer research.”

“It was used, along with other human cell lines, to develop a genetically engineered spike protein (that the mRNA vaccine codes for) in the original development stage of the vaccine. The ‘new technology’ Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna Vaccine were tested on HEK 293 before they began human trials. This testing is ongoing for all new batches. Finally the ‘old technology’ Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine grew a weakened viral strain in HEK 293 cell culture…”

“The kidney in question was dissected from a healthy Dutch baby girl of unknown origin by the team at Leiden University in the Netherlands in 1972. Despite the inclusion of the term ‘embryonic’ in the title, the baby in question was probably 12-13 weeks old when she was killed so as to secure functioning kidney cells. The man in charge of the research was named Alex Jan Van der Eb; he is still alive and still based in Holland.”

“When questioned on the matter by the FDA in 2001, Dr Van der Eb confirmed it was an intentional abortion of a ‘fetus’ but gave hazy details of the exact experiments.”

“’So the kidney material, the fetal kidney material was as follows: the kidney of the fetus was, with an unknown family history, obtained in 1972 probably. The precise date is not known anymore. The fetus, as far as I can remember, was completely normal. Nothing was wrong. The reasons for the abortion were unknown to me. I probably knew it at that time, but it got lost, all this information’.”

Author Hacking continues: “…extracting and growing living cells is incredibly difficult. In order to give oneself the best chance of success you need to ensure the child is healthy, fresh, intact and sterile. As one embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy confirms:”

“’In order to sustain 95% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion. Within an hour the cells would continue to deteriorate, rendering the specimens useless’.”

[That statement was made by “Dr C Ward Kischer, embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy; specialist in Human Embryology, University of Arizona College of Medicine…”]

[My comment: This suggests the abortion, in the Netherlands, in 1972, was planned and technicians were standing by. I would say that, to ensure the viability of the tissue, the infant had a functioning blood supply and was alive when her kidneys were removed, killing her.]

Hacking: “In order for the organs to be at ‘optimal viability’, the child needs to be dissected and organs extracted within 5 minutes of delivery. Anaesthetic also cannot be used so as to not change the cellular activity of the organs the researcher wants to obtain.”

“Acclaimed Doctor, Ian Donald, the pioneer of the ultrasound scanner, also claims to have witnessed the WI-38 [another cell-line] dissections [1962], conducted at the Karolinska Institute; he described them such:

“’Experiments were being performed on near-term alive aborted babies who were not even afforded the mercy of anesthetic as they writhed and cried in agony, and when their usefulness had expired, they were executed and discarded as garbage’.”

“In his dense book ‘The Foetus As Transplant Donor the Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives’, immunologist Dr Peter McCullagh relays detailed descriptions of the methods used on dozens of ‘fetal tissue donors’ from the 1970’s onward, including the deaths of babies between 7 and 26 weeks gestation by decapitations, exposure, dissection and drug testing. Gynaecologist and ex-abortionist Dr Bernard Nathanson, relaying his own understanding of abortion, and citing McCullagh’s book claims the Swedish experiments took place thus:

“’…in Sweden they have been puncturing the sac of a pregnant woman at let us say 14 to 16 weeks, and then they put a clamp on the head of the baby, pull the head down into the neck of the womb, drill a hole into the baby’s head, and then put a suction machine into the brain and suck out the brain cells….. Healthy human fetuses from 7 to 21 weeks from legal abortions were used. This is in Sweden. The conception age was estimated from crown rump length and so on. Fetal liver and kidney were rapidly removed and weighed. Now at 21 weeks, what they were doing, or 18 weeks, or 16 weeks, was what is called prostaglandin abortions. They would inject a substance into the womb. The woman would then go into mini-labor and pass this baby. 50% of the time, the baby would be born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would just simply open up the abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and kidneys, etc.’”

“A research paper from the University of Toronto from June 1952 commenting on the method of their experiments suggests that these techniques were universal with researchers working in close proximity to the abortions.”

“’No macerated [softened after death] specimens were used and in many of the embryos the heart was still beating at the time of receipt in the virus laboratory.”

“According to Gonzalo Herranz, former head of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish doctors, the best way to prevent ‘contamination by microorganisms’ is to deliver the child by caesarean section or the removal of the uterus.”

“A 1982 review of a history of tissue donation affirms this, and much of the above evidence:”

“’Fetal tissue for transplantation must be “harvested” within a few minutes of delivery. Ideally this is by hysterectomy, with the fetus delivered in utero. Drugs which reduce fetal physiological activity need to be avoided. The fetus is therefore in as alive and aware a state as possible when being opened’.”

From Hacking’s article, it’s quite clear how the standard procedure of infant-murder is carried out.

It’s entirely reasonable to assume fetal cell line HEK 293—used for COVID vaccine testing—was originally produced, in 1972, by the murder of an infant. Refusal to take a COVID vaccine on the basis of conscience and religion is more than justified.

Given the weight of the circumstantial case, I would say that for all people of faith, refusal is essential.

Lunatic medical murderers and their allies will say anything to avoid blame and the application of true justice to themselves. They will invent “science” at the drop of a hat and couch it in humanitarian terms. They will claim the ends justify the means. They will commit gross forgery to pretend those ends are vital.

But we don’t have to stand by and passively believe them.

Billions of people of faith can stand against them.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: TryJimmy / pixabay




The Contagion Myth: No Virus Has Ever Caused Disease

The Contagion Myth: No Virus Has Ever Caused Disease

by Jeremy Nell, Jerm Warfare
October 20, 2021

 

According to Dr Tom Cowan’s website, he is

a well-known alternative medicine doctor, author and speaker, with a common-sense, holistic approach to health and wellness.

But here’s the exciting bit.

Following my heart led me to a conception of science, medicine and the world at large that was radically different from anything I was taught in school. My ideas, such as the heart is not a pump, blocked arteries are not the main cause of heart attacks, vaccines are ineffective and unsafe, cancer is not a genetic disease, and the “war on cancer” has been an utter failure, have been the subjects of three of my books.
Recently, because of current events, I turned my questioning gaze on the widely accepted theory —so accepted that it now lives in our culture as truth — that germs (bacteria and viruses) cause disease.

Tom’s views echo those of Dr Andrew Kaufman and Dr Sam Bailey, and Dr Stefan Lanka who won a massive court case upholding his claim that there is no evidence linking measles to a virus.

I find their arguments fairly convincing because they’re based on evidential, observable science; not speculation. And once you realise that SARS-CoV-2 does not cause any disease, let alone “COVID-19”, a new paradigm of critical thought and interrogation emerges.

As the inventor of PCR – Kary Mullis – said, science is not about being right; it’s about being wrong.

 



Video available at Jerm Warfare Odysee channel.

Dr. Tom Cowan on New Biology

 


Download PDF

Measles virus put to the test. Dr. Stefan Lanka wins in court…

Since the early 1990s, German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka has been at the forefront of challenging the medical theory stating that viruses are the cause of infectious diseases such as hepatitis, AIDS, the flu, polio, herpes, or measles. Caroline Markolin has presented Dr. Lanka’s activities in her lecture video “Virus Mania” in great details (watch Part 2 of the recordings on this website – starting at 08:08).

Based on his studies in virology, Dr. Lanka discovered that viruses are vital components of simple life-forms that do not exist in complex organisms such as humans, animals, or plants. His research shows that the viruses believed to cause “viral infections” are in reality ordinary cell particles that have been misinterpreted as constituents of the viruses in question. Dr. Lanka also determined that viruses don’t have a destructive effect on the host, as commonly believed. These findings are in full accordance with the discoveries of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer who demonstrated already in the 1980s

that contrary to the standard theory, microbes do not harm the organism but play instead a supportive role during the healing process of diseases (see Fourth Biological Law of the New Medicine).

The “measles virus trial” between Dr. Stefan Lanka and German medical doctor David Bardens has by now received international attention (see the 2015 reports in CTV News Canada and BBC News). The court case has not only heated up the ongoing “virus debate”. It also fuelled the discussion about the justification of childhood vaccination and of vaccination in general.

Here is a brief overview of the court proceedings:

On November 24, 2011, Dr. Lanka announced on his website that he would offer a prize of € 100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. The announcement read as follows: “The reward will be paid, if a scientific publication is presented, in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven and in which, among other things, the diameter of the measles virus is determined.”

In January 2012, Dr. David Bardens took Dr. Lanka up on his pledge. He offered six papers on the subject and asked Dr. Lanka to transfer the € 100,000 to his bank account.

The six publications are:

  1. Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.

  2. Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85

  3. Horikami SM, Moyer SA. Structure, Transcription, and Replication of Measles Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 191: 35–50.


 

Connect with Jerm Warfare

Connect with Dr. Tom Cowan




The Sleeping Giant Awakens! New Yorkers Speak Out Against Draconian Vaccine Mandates at Massive Rally! Video Featuring RFK Jr. & New Yorkers Tell It Like It Is!

The Sleeping Giant Awakens! New Yorkers Speak Out Against Draconian Vaccine Mandates at Massive Rally! Video Featuring RFK Jr. & New Yorkers Tell It Like It Is!

by  Cara Castronuova, Gateway Pundit
October 19, 2021

 

In a city notorious for fierce political and ideological division, New York City has recently seen unity amongst groups perceived to be on different ends of the political spectrum, such as Freedom Patriot groups and Black Lives Matter.

Patriot Freedom Groups, Trump Supporters, Teachers, Labor Unions, Medical Freedom Advocates, Black Lives Latter Leaders and everyday New Yorkers came together in harmony this past weekend to demand the government reverse the vaccine mandates that have rocked New York City and the nation.

New Yorkers from every walk of life rallied and marched together this past Saturday in the ongoing battle to overturn what many perceive to be unconstitutional mandates and an infringement of civil liberties. New York City has the strictest vaccine passport rules in the nation and residents continue to face discharge from their workplaces and denied entry to restaurants for not complying with the mandates.

See interviews with rally goers:

The crowd gathered near Times Square before the march, chanting “We The People Will Not Comply”, “We Will Not Comply, We Do Not Consent”, “No Forced Vaccines”, “No Vaccine Mandates”, “Mr Body, My Choice”, “No Vaccine You Won’t Force, My Body My Choice”, “Wake up New York”, “F**k Joe Biden”, “Let’s Go Brandon” and “No Nazi Passport.”

See video of the march through the streets of New York:

Thousands gathered near Times Square to protest the unprecedented mandates, where speakers like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., NYC Artist Scott Lobaido, BLM Activist Reverend McCall, Children’s Health Defense Attorney Mary Holland, Dr. Lawrence Palevsky and Dr. Christiane Northrup spoke to the audience.  

More speakers:

According to activists, the anti-vaccine mandate movement in New York has been rapidly growing.

“We are extremely excited to see such a large and diverse crowd turning up for our events,” said rally organizer Kevin Peters of New York Freedom Rally. It is growing by the week and all credit it due to Bill de Blasio and Joe Biden who have inadvertently emerged as unifying figures because of the backlash they created with their absurd and illegal policies.”

Read more at Gateway Pundit

 

Connect with New York Freedom Rally

Connect with Gateway Pundit

 




The Vaccine: A Religious Exemption for the Whole World

The Vaccine: A Religious Exemption for the Whole World

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 19, 2021

 

Yesterday, I quoted extensively from AnnaMaria Cardinalli’s stunning Crisis article that concluded there was the murder of an infant, in order to obtain the cell line used in COVID vaccine testing.

I put out a call to medical professionals to weigh in on her analysis.

Here is the basic ramification: THERE IS A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FOR THE WHOLE WORLD.

For all people of faith. Every faith.

“According to my religious belief, the murder of an undeniably live infant for any reason is unconscionable and evil, and I refuse the vaccine.”

Here is a Force against which no government, no establishment, no secret society, no wealth can stand.

I fully understand all sorts of professionals will spout language that purports to show “the infant was not alive, the lab followed all the legal guidelines, this is an old argument that has been debunked…”

But this is not just an old argument. This is the equivalent of an opening statement in a murder trial. Nothing less.

If religious leaders will read AnnaMaria Cardinalli’s article, they will see how important her charge is.

The question isn’t “will people of faith wake up and do what they should”; the question is “how can any person of faith NOT do what they should”.

If they will make a stand; if all people of faith will; the entire dire situation we are facing changes in the blink of an eye.

Solomon to God: “You have made Your servant king instead of my father David, but I am a little child; I do not know how to go out or come in…Therefore give to Your servant an understanding heart to judge Your people, that I may discern between good and evil.”

Gautama Buddha: “To cease from evil, to do good, and to purify the mind yourself, this is the teaching of all the Buddhas.”

John 10:10: “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.”

Would any church, any religion in the world say that God wants the killing of live infants for the purpose of medical research?

In the midst of this COVID tyranny, haven’t we all been looking for an issue that will galvanize huge numbers of people?

And not as some kind of stunt. But rather as an inevitable outcome of deep faith.

Faith and justice come from the same everlasting tree.

I hear the voices that say we can never rouse a billion people from their slumber. But they are wrong. Nothing is impossible. The so-called evidence of history is never more than What Was. And even down through history, “what could never happen” was the status quo until a breakthrough shattered it.


For people who missed it, here is my article from yesterday:

Was COVID vaccine fetal tissue obtained by the murder of an infant?

With the release of COVID vaccines, and then the mandates, we’ve seen a new resurgence of people attempting to gain religious exemptions.

Many of these attempts focus on fetal tissue obtained through abortion.

On January 19, 2021, AnnaMaria Cardinalli published an explosive article in Crisis Magazine, headlined, “Catholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine.”

Cardinalli details the collection of fetal tissue for the cell line named HEK 293. This cell line was used for “testing” the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.

Cardinalli writes: “We know that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not use any cells derived from abortion in the production process. That is, we know that we are not being directly injected with fetal cells or their engineered descendants (though this fact differs with other manufacturers). We hear that the abortion-derived cell lines were only used in testing, which should somehow comfort us, though it still means that the vaccines from which we seek to benefit depend on the involvement of abortion. We are told that the cell line used in testing came from one abortion, which took place decades ago. These things are all true, but they do not serve to inform us fully.”

“What we may not know follows. The most prominent cell line, called HEK 293, comes from an abortion performed in the 1970’s. It’s labeled 293 because that’s how many experimental attempts the researchers needed to get a working cell line. Therefore, though the abortion-to-experiment ratio is not precisely one-to-one, hundreds of abortions went into the project, even if they didn’t result in the working line.”

“HEK stands for human embryonic kidney. To harvest a viable embryonic kidney for this purpose, sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which [anesthesia] would lessen the viability of the organs. Instead of being held, rocked, and comforted in the time intervening between their birth and their death, they have organs cut out of them alive.”

“There is no way that a spontaneous abortion could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested) or that some brilliant researcher found a way for great good to come out of a rare tragedy by making use of a child’s body donated to science after it was aborted. The deliberate killing of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.”

“I fear that Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this information when they received the vaccines. If we re-examine the Vatican statement that ‘it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and productions process,’ we see that it does not apply here. It does not imagine this scenario. To approve of the currently-available vaccines, it would have to read ‘it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from living persons, killed by the harvest of their organs for use in medical research and productions processes,’ but the Church’s moral teachings could never truly bend so far.”

“Similar to the human rights abuses exposed by international tribunal in today’s China, where unwanted individuals such as religious and political dissidents are executed by the harvest of their organs for profit, the little girl whose cells gave rise to the COVID-19 vaccines was brutally sacrificed for the purpose, as were all the children whose cell lines failed before her.”

If Cardinalli is correct in her analysis, not only is the granting of religious exemptions a foregone conclusion; the whole field of fetal tissue research, going back many years and involving many pharmaceutical products should be put on trial.

The people who have been carrying out the murders, the people who have been using the harvested tissue, the companies—all of them—on trial.

I hope many medical professionals will take Cardinalli’s article as a springboard, and weigh in on what she is very clearly stating.

And not just doctors. All people who are shocked by her conclusions.

So far, I see two counter-claims to Cardinalli’s assertions.

One: In the fetal cell line HEK 293, the number does not stand for the number of live-birth abortions performed, in order to obtain a functioning cell line. The number 293 refers to the number of “passages” of the one cell line obtained from one abortion. This difference doesn’t concern me. It’s not central to the fact of murdering babies. And of course, many such live abortions are performed all over the world with the goal of obtaining cells lines for research.

Two: Cardinalli’s claim that the kidneys of the aborted baby must be harvested very quickly is false. The kidneys can survive for a longer period.

On that score, I refer you to a devastating video interview conducted by Robert Kennedy Jr. His guest was SOUND CHOICE PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE “President and Founder, Dr. Theresa Deisher Ph.D., [with] over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience. She discovered adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked on their therapeutic uses as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and leads a team of scientists at AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing what a diagnosis of cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease means to patients and their loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr. Deisher is named as an inventor on over 47 patents.”

In the first 15 minutes of the interview, Deisher makes it quite clear that infants in the womb are taken out alive, with their blood supply functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will be turned into fetal cell lines.

Since this act of murder is standard practice, it would appear it was committed against the live baby whose kidney cells became cell line HEK 293, used in testing the COVID vaccines. (More evidence coming in future articles.)

At the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn’t want to get into the moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral aspect.

The whole world has to.


FURTHER READING:

Aborted fetal cells and vaccines – a scandal much bigger than Pfizer’s whistleblower ever imagined

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: KELLEPICS / pixabay




Cascade of Countries Withdraw Extreme COVID Measures

Cascade of Countries Withdraw Extreme COVID Measures
Scotland and Ireland reject vaccine passports, while New Zealand finally drops its ‘anti-science’ zero-Covid policy.

by Del Bigtree w/ Jefferey Jaxen, The HighWire
October 18, 2021

 

Video available at The HighWire BitChute and Brighteon channels.

 

Connect with The HighWire




Washington State Trooper Gives ‘Final Sign Off’ After Refusing to Take Vaccine; Tells Governor to Kiss His A**

Washington State Trooper Gives ‘Final Sign Off’ After Refusing to Take Vaccine; Tells Governor to Kiss His A**

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
October 17, 2021

 

A Washington state trooper released a video of his ‘final sign off’ after more than 22 years on the Yakima County force, after he was forced out of his job for refusing to take the Covid-19 vaccine by Oct. 18.

“This is my final sign-off after 22 years serving the citizens of the state of Washington, I’ve been asked to leave because I am dirty,” said the unnamed officer.

Numerous fatalities, injuries, I’ve worked sick, I’ve played sick, buried lots of friends over these years,” he continued. “I’d like to thank you guys, as well as the citizens of Yakima County as well as my fellow officers within the valley. Without you guys I wouldn’t have been very successful.”

“So State 1034 this is the last time you’ll hear me in a state patrol car… And [governor] Jay Inslee can kiss my ass,” he concluded.

In response, a dispatcher thanked him for his years of service.

“Thank you for your 22 years and five months of service to the citizens of Washington state,” she said. “You’ve taken on many roles in your time with the patrol. In your first year, you delivered a baby while on patrol. You’ve been a theory instructor and part of the chaplaincy board.”

“You’ve been a great role model and a mentor for all the young troopers serving in the area by sharing your knowledge and experience throughout the years,” she continued, adding: “Thank you for your service.

Governor Jay Inslee issued a sweeping order in August mandating that state government workers must “Show proof of vaccination on or before October 18 or lose your job.”

According to the Seattle Times, more than 90% of state govt. employees were fully vaccinated as of Saturday.

Last Monday we noted that up to 40% of Seattle PD may lose their job over the mandate. As of Oct. 6, 292 sworn personnel had yet to provide proof of a COVID-19 vaccination per the report, down from 354 on Tuesday. An additional 111 officers are awaiting the results of exemption requests, meaning the total number of potentially fired Seattle cops is as high as 403.

That said, the President of the Seattle Police Officers Guild, Mike Solan, said on Friday that officers who choose not to get vaccinated will not be terminated immediately on the Oct. 18 deadline – and will instead be given notice for a “Loudermill hearing” where they will be able to plead their case.

Meanwhile in Chicago, a Judge issued a temporary restraining order late Friday against the Chicago police union president prohibiting him from making public statements which encourage members not to report their Covid-19 vaccination status to authorities.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s high-stakes standoff with the police union over the city’s vaccine mandate landed in court Friday, with a judge doing what the mayor could not — temporarily silencing Fraternal Order of Police President John Catanzara.

Circuit Judge Cecilia Horan granted the city’s request for an injunction but only to the extent that Catanzara be precluded — at least until the next hearing Oct. 25 — from making any further YouTube videos or otherwise using social media platforms to encourage his members to defy the city’s mandate to enter their vaccine status on the city’s data portal.

Catanzara soon took to the union’s YouTube channel where he said the courts were attempting to muzzle him. He said he would comply and urged his members to “do what’s in their hearts and minds.” –Chicago Sun Times



 

“Enough is enough…”

 

Connect with ZeroHedge




Organizing Against Medical Mandates; Project Stand Together: “I Posted a Video on TikTok of Me Passing Out These Signs to Businesses in NYC and It Went Viral”

Organizing Against Medical Mandates; Project Stand Together: “I Posted a Video on TikTok of Me Passing Out These Signs to Businesses in NYC and It Went Viral”

 

 

 



 

 

Download and Print Your Own Signs

Order Pre-Printed Signs

Connect with Project Stand Together & Sign the Petition




Was COVID Vaccine Fetal Tissue Obtained by the Murder of an Infant?

Was COVID Vaccine Fetal Tissue Obtained by the Murder of an Infant?

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 18, 2021

 

With the release of COVID vaccines, and then the mandates, we’ve seen a new resurgence of people attempting to gain religious exemptions.

Many of these attempts focus on fetal tissue obtained through abortion.

On January 19, 2021, AnnaMaria Cardinalli published an explosive article in Crisis Magazine, headlined, “Catholic Conscience and the COVID-19 Vaccine.”

Cardinalli details the collection of fetal tissue for the cell line named HEK 293. This cell line was used for “testing” the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.

Cardinalli writes: “We know that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not use any cells derived from abortion in the production process. That is, we know that we are not being directly injected with fetal cells or their engineered descendants (though this fact differs with other manufacturers). We hear that the abortion-derived cell lines were only used in testing, which should somehow comfort us, though it still means that the vaccines from which we seek to benefit depend on the involvement of abortion. We are told that the cell line used in testing came from one abortion, which took place decades ago. These things are all true, but they do not serve to inform us fully.”

“What we may not know follows. The most prominent cell line, called HEK 293, comes from an abortion performed in the 1970’s. It’s labeled 293 because that’s how many experimental attempts the researchers needed to get a working cell line. Therefore, though the abortion-to-experiment ratio is not precisely one-to-one, hundreds of abortions went into the project, even if they didn’t result in the working line.”

“HEK stands for human embryonic kidney. To harvest a viable embryonic kidney for this purpose, sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which [anesthesia] would lessen the viability of the organs. Instead of being held, rocked, and comforted in the time intervening between their birth and their death, they have organs cut out of them alive.”

“There is no way that a spontaneous abortion could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested) or that some brilliant researcher found a way for great good to come out of a rare tragedy by making use of a child’s body donated to science after it was aborted. The deliberate killing of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.”

“I fear that Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this information when they received the vaccines. If we re-examine the Vatican statement that ‘it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and productions process,’ we see that it does not apply here. It does not imagine this scenario. To approve of the currently-available vaccines, it would have to read ‘it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from living persons, killed by the harvest of their organs for use in medical research and productions processes,’ but the Church’s moral teachings could never truly bend so far.”

“Similar to the human rights abuses exposed by international tribunal in today’s China, where unwanted individuals such as religious and political dissidents are executed by the harvest of their organs for profit, the little girl whose cells gave rise to the COVID-19 vaccines was brutally sacrificed for the purpose, as were all the children whose cell lines failed before her.”

If Cardinalli is correct in her analysis, not only is the granting of religious exemptions a foregone conclusion; the whole field of fetal tissue research, going back many years and involving many pharmaceutical products should be put on trial.

The people who have been carrying out the murders, the people who have been using the harvested tissue, the companies—all of them—on trial.

I hope many medical professionals will take Cardinalli’s article as a springboard, and weigh in on what she is very clearly stating.

And not just doctors. All people who are shocked by her conclusions.

So far, I see two counter-claims to Cardinalli’s assertions.

One: In the fetal cell line HEK 293, the number does not stand for the number of live-birth abortions performed, in order to obtain a functioning cell line. The number 293 refers to the number of “passages” of the one cell line obtained from one abortion. This difference doesn’t concern me. It’s not central to the fact of murdering babies. And of course, many such live abortions are performed all over the world with the goal of obtaining cells lines for research.

Two: Cardinalli’s claim that the kidneys of the aborted baby must be harvested very quickly is false. The kidneys can survive for a longer period.

On that score, I refer you to a devastating video interview conducted by Robert Kennedy Jr. His guest was SOUND CHOICE PHARMACEUTICAL INSTITUTE “President and Founder, Dr. Theresa Deisher Ph.D., [with] over 30 years of pharmaceutical research and leadership experience. She discovered adult cardiac derived stem cells, has worked on their therapeutic uses as an alternative to human fetal DNA, and leads a team of scientists at AVM Biotechnology dedicated to changing what a diagnosis of cancer, autoimmunity, or chronic infectious disease means to patients and their loved ones. As a result of this work, Dr. Deisher is named as an inventor on over 47 patents.”

In the first 15 minutes of the interview, Deisher makes it quite clear that infants in the womb are taken out alive, with their blood supply functioning (essential) and then killed by cutting out their hearts or their brains. This is what is done in order to obtain tissue that will be turned into fetal cell lines.

Since this act of murder is standard practice, it would appear it was committed against the live baby whose kidney cells became cell line HEK 293, used in testing the COVID vaccines. (More evidence coming in future articles.)

At the top of the interview, Kennedy said he didn’t want to get into the moral aspect of fetal cell lines. But after listening to Deisher, he was shaken. He said so. He said they would have to cover the moral aspect.

The whole world has to.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: sippakorn / pixabay




British Funeral Director John O’Looney: Deaths Skyrocketed 300% After Covid Vaccine Rollout

British Funeral Director John O’Looney: Deaths Skyrocketed 300% After Covid Vaccine Rollout

by Renee Nal, RAIR Foundation USA
October 14, 2021

 

Statements from a courageous funeral director went viral in September after he shared observations about those who died in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic.

John O’Looney, director of Milton Keynes Family Funeral Services, continues to crush the narrative in an exclusive RAIR Foundation USA interview. After O’Looney spoke out last month, “about 65 professionals from within the industry in various positions” have approached him with similar stories about the nature of the dead arriving at funeral homes.

Deaths Before and After Vaccine

In America, assisted living home deaths marked a huge amount, if not the majority, of coronavirus deaths, as reported at RAIR. But it is not just about elderly patients being more susceptible to the coronavirus, there is deep speculation that deaths of the elderly could have been prevented, and may have been deliberate.

John O’Looney and his colleagues noticed that for the first year, there were no surplus deaths at all and if anything, fewer deaths. Those who died supposedly from the coronavirus, O’Looney asserts, appear to have succumbed to a drug called Midazolam given to nursing home residents.

The funeral home director is not alone in his suspicion.

But after the vaccine was introduced to his area in January, O’Looney said that the calls made to his funeral home soared, going up “300 percent”. “I’ve never seen a death rate like it in 15 years,” he said. “Initially, [the deaths were] all exclusively care homes,” O’Looney said. But after the roll out of the mRNA injection, the deaths were no longer exclusively from nursing homes, and the ages of the dead varied significantly.

“I’ve got a 32-year-old, a 33-year-old and a 28-year-old in my care at the moment,” O’Looney explained as an example. “They’re all jab recipients and they all died unexpectedly and suddenly,” he continued.

The majority of deaths appear to be blood clots (heart attack and stroke) and organ failure, O’Looney said. He described one woman who passed away who was “in her fifties” without health issues, and “super fit” who “goes to the gym every day, runs six kilometers”. The funeral director said that the woman was given a booster and “died of liver failure the following week.”

People Are Waking Up

People are “waking up in large numbers,” asserts O’Looney, who is a fierce critic of vaccine mandates. But he is concerned that as people wake up, the government will “up their game” to silence dissent.

John O’Looney does not mince words about what he believes to be a depopulation agenda.

The funeral home director compared the deaths of innocents in nursing homes to those who were murdered by British serial killer Dr. Harold Shipman. People are being coerced to get the injection without informed consent. “They are no better than murderers, some of these people,” O’Looney said. “Some of the things they’ve done are unforgivable,” he continued.

Watch the powerful RAIR exclusive interview:



Video available at RAIR Foundation Rumble channel.

 

Connect with RAIR Foundation




New York City Rally for Freedom — Tomorrow, Saturday October 16: Join Robert F. Kennedy , Jr., Mary Holland, Kevin Jenkins, Christiane Northrup & Many More

New York City Rally for Freedom — Tomorrow, Saturday October 16: Join Robert F. Kennedy , Jr., Mary Holland, Kevin Jenkins, Christiane Northrup & Many More

Broadway Rally for Freedom With DJ, Dancing, Music, Speeches & March Against the Media

 

 

Tomorrow, Sat. 10/16, Broadway Rally for Freedom in NYC

What:    Broadway Rally for Freedom
Where:  Broadway between 41 St, and 42 St., New York, NY
Who:      Join with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mary Holland, Kevin Jenkins, Jo Speakstruth, Larry Palevsky MD, Christiane Northrup MD, Patricia Finn, John Maitland, Jason Shurka, Rev. Tom Mahairas, Rev. Kevin McCall, many more.
When:   Saturday, October 16, starting at 1 pm
1 pm          Gather at Broadway between 41 St. and 42 St.
1:30 pm   DJ/dancing/music
2 pm         Speeches
3:30 pm   March Against the Media

 

 

Connect with New York Freedom Rally at Telegram

Connect with Do We Need This?

cover image credit: Mr_Rohan / pixabay

 




The Needle and the Sword

The Needle and the Sword

by John Goss, All the Goss
October 14, 2021

 

Some two-thousand years ago the King of Judea, Herod, was fearful that a young prince had been born who would usurp his reign. As the story goes in an attempt to make sure this never came about Herod ordered all the male children in Bethlehem up to two years of age to be slaughtered. This has become known as the “slaughter of the innocents”. There are anomalies which scholars debate right down to the year of the event, whether it refers to Herod the Great, a totally ruthless man, or his son Herod Antipas, and even whether the slaughter actually took place.

Regardless of the historical accuracy there is no doubt that people in positions of power harbour no qualms about murdering or imprisoning potential challengers to, or critics of, their power. You only need to look at Julian Assange to see this. Although the control-by-any-means mindset of power-mongers has changed from taking out a sword in acts of infanticide to less conspicuous murders it is still going on. Today it is being administered by poisonous needles. It is another “slaughter of the innocents”.

From US records

Officially 36 children have now died following the Covid-19 injection in the US (you can see details and links to unique VAERS records by clicking on the manufacturer’s name). It is suspected there are an unknown number of “cause of death” certificates wrongly labelled. A father’s grief from his boy’s Pfizer jab says it all.

My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything. He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.

For every death at least one parent or guardian is left grieving, together with siblings, and close friends. The US has reported almost 24k cases of adverse reactions in children and those children have reported almost 75k injuries!

Many are life-limiting and life-altering. Short-term deaths of children jabbed by the killer shot for which reports have been logged are presented next. Some of the reports are obviously written by overworked, and no doubt emotionally affected, medical staff or parents.

 1.    13 year old boy – Moderna 

Write-up: Died three days after vaccine; 13 year old boy dies three days after the Moderna vaccine; This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of DEATH (Died three days after vaccine) in a 13-year-old male patient who received mRNA-1273 (Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine) for COVID-19 vaccination. The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below. No Medical History information was reported. On an unknown date, the patient received dose of mRNA-1273 (Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine) (unknown route) 1 dosage form. On an unknown date, the patient experienced PRODUCT ADMINISTERED TO PATIENT OF INAPPROPRIATE AGE (13 year old boy dies three days after the Moderna vaccine).

 2.    13 year old girl – Pfizer 

Write-up: dead from second dose of Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine; This is a spontaneous report from a Pfizer-sponsored program by a non-contactable consumer. This report reported same event for two patients. This is the first dose of two reports. A 13-year-old female patient received bnt162b2 (BNT162B2), dose 2 via an unspecified route of administration on an unspecified date (Batch/Lot number was not reported) as DOSE 2, SINGLE at the age of 13-year-old for covid-19 immunisation. The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The patient previously received the first dose of bnt162b2 (BNT162B2) for covid-19 immunisation. A 13 years old female is dead from second dose of Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine. Both had no prior conditions with the heart and now are dead.

 3.    11 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: Patient was 11 years old and 8 months at the time of vaccine No side effects noted.

 4.    17 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: had a reaction and is hospitalized in serious condition / the patient had died; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer received through COVAES portal (firstly by logistic colleague). A female patient of an unspecified age received first dose of bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY, Formulation: solution for injection, Lot number: unknown) via an unspecified route of administration on an unspecified date (age at the vaccination: 17-years-old) as DOSE 1, SINGLE for covid-19 immunisation.

 5.    5 month old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2020 while at work. March 18, 2020 her 5 month old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat, and developed a fever. Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away. Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother”s vaccination the previous day.

 6.    16 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: Patient was a 16yr female who received Pfizer vaccine 3/19/21 at vaccine clinic and presented with ongoing CPR to the ED 3/28/21 after cardiac arrest at home. Patient placed on ECMO and imaging revealed bilateral large pulmonary embolism as likely etiology of arrest. Risk factors included oral contraceptive use.

 7.    16 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: pulmonary embolism

 8.    16 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: ~4 weeks after the 2nd dose of Pfizer, patient presented to the hospital with chest pain; had pericardial effusion. Initially improved but then had decompensation, prolonged hospitalization. Diagnosed with hemophagocytic lymphohistocytosis (HLH) and ultimately died.

 9.    15 year old girl – Moderna

Write-up: I do not know the exact date of the first or second Moderna Vaccine. I am the PICU attending who cared for the patient after her cardiac arrest which we believe was about 3-4 days after her second Moderna Vaccine

10.    17 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: Patient reported difficulty breathing and chest pain; suffered cardiac arrest and death

11.    1 year old boy – Moderna

Write-up: increased body temperature, seizure, death

12.    15 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Heart failure

13.    16 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything. He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.

14.    15 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Unexplained death within 48 hours

15.    16 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Prodrome of headache and gastric upset over 2 days following second dose. Then felt fine. Found the following day dead in bed. Autopsy pending

16.    17 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: Patient had massive acute intracranial hemorrhage. Was found down in bathroom. In ED CT scan showed large intraventricular hemorrhage, EVD placed, patient progressed to massive brain swelling and infarctions, decompressive craniectomy, unable to control intracranial pressure, parents agreed to DNR status and patient is not expected to survive.

17.    13 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Flu like symptoms for 2 days then was found deceased

18.    13 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Date of Admission: 6/19/2021 Date of Death: 6/20/2021 Primary Care Physician: No primary care provider on file. REASON FOR ADMISSION: Patient is a 13-year-old previously healthy male who was admitted after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC after CPR for 15 minutes in the field, found to be in the context of large cerebellar hemorrhage secondary to brain lesion (AVM vs tumor).

19.    17 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: Cardiac arrest without resuscitation. Unknown cause of cardiac arrest. Awaiting autopsy report.

20.    15 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up:  A 15-year-old female patient received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY), intramuscular on 11Jul2021 07:30 (Lot Number: Unknown) (at the age of 15-year-old) as dose 1, single for COVID-19 immunization. Medical history included ongoing asthma, ongoing Barlow”s syndrome, ongoing Marfan”s syndrome. T. Father watered the garden and she cleaned the garage to prepare for her birthday party. On 13Jul2021 17:20, her father found her in cardio respiratory arrest, back to the ground, next to a ladder.Cause of Death: Anoxia cerebral and Cardiac arrest while outcome of the other events was unknown. No follow-up attempts are possible; information about lot/batch number cannot be obtained. No further information is expected.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: Cardiac arrest; Anoxia cerebral

21.    16 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: The patient died 6 days after receiving dose #2

22.    17 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: SARS COV2 POSITIVE ON 7/20; EXPIRED 8/29/2021

23.    15 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: 7/22/2021 Child collapsed on soccer field while playing soccer at a local camp. CPR was initiated immediately. EMS arrived and found patient in vtac. Shock x 5. ACLS, intubation attempted. Transported to Medical Center. Patient had covid in April 2021. Dx in May 2021 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Started on lopressor 25mg BID. Patient had reported to parents that he had not recently taken his medications. Patient had his second covid vaccine on Sunday 7/18/2021.

24.    13 year old girl – Pfizer

Write-up: patient arrived in ventricular tachycardia via EMS, but responsive. deteoriarated to pulseless ventricular tachycardia, PEA and ultimately death.

25.    13 year old boy –Pfizer

Write-up: Disseminated intravascular coagulation; Lung hemorrhage; Pyrexia; Multiorgan failure; Septic shock; This is a spontaneous report from a non-contactable other HCP. DE-PEI-202100168078. A 13-yars-old male patient received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY, Formulation: Solution for Injection, Batch/Lot Number: 10020A) dose 2 0.3 mL via an unknown route of administration on 11Aug2021 (at the age of 13-years-old) as dose 1, single for COVID-19 immunisation. Reported Cause(s) of Death: Unknown cause of death

26.    15 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Death/passed away;  A 15-year-old male patient received the first dose of bnt162b2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE), via an unspecified route of administration in the left arm on 09Aug2021 at 09:00 AM (at the age of 15-year-old; lot number: FF2154) as DOSE 1, SINGLE for COVID-19 immunisation. The patient”s medical history and concomitant medications were not provided. The patient did not receive any other vaccines within 4 weeks prior to the COVID vaccine. The father reported that the patient (the son) received the dose 1 of the Pfizer vaccine on 09Aug2021 at 9AM on left arm. Unfortunately, patient passed away (death) on Friday 13Aug2021 at 04:30 without any history of illness.

27.    16 year old boy –Pfizer

Write-up: Cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary arrest; NOMI(Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia); ventricular fibrillation;  A 16-year-old (also reported as 16-year and 6-month-old) male patient received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY, Lot Number: FF0843; Expiration Date: 31Oct2021), dose 1 via an unspecified route of administration on 10Aug2021 13:00 as single dose for covid-19 immunisation. Medical history was none. The patient had no family history. There were no points to be considered on the vaccine screening questionnaire (primary diseases, allergies, vaccinations and illnesses within the last one month, medications the patient was taking, past adverse effect history, growth status). The patient”s concomitant medications were not reported. Body temperature before vaccination was 36.2 degrees Centigrade. On 10Aug2021 at 13:00 (the day of vaccination), the patient received the first dose of BNT162b2. On 16Aug2021 at 16:40 (6 days, 3 hours and 40 minutes after the vaccination), the patient experienced cardiac arrest. The patient was immediately transported and admitted to the reporting hospital. On 01Sep2021 (22 days after the vaccination), the outcome of the event was fatal. The course of the event was as follows: On 16Aug2021 at 16:40 (6 days, 3 hours and 40 minutes after the vaccination), the patient was immediately transported the reporting hospital because of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Before arrival to the hospital, automatic external defibrillator (AED) was conducted once. After the arrival, asystole, then VF(ventricular fibrillation) were noted. And return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after the one attempt of direct-current defibrillator (DC). The patient was hospitalized after resuscitated from the CPA. An obvious cause of cardiac arrest was unknown on computerised tomogram (CT), the blood test and electrocardiogram. The patient underwent tracheal intubation, and was managed by artificial respiration under hospitalization. Although targeted temperature management (TTM) was performed, there was no recovery of consciousness. On 31Aug2021 (21 days after the vaccination), blood pressure decreased. NOMI(Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia) was diagnosed through CT. On 01Sep2021 (22 days after the vaccination), the death was confirmed. The reporting physician classified the event as serious (Hospitalized) and assessed that the causality between the event and BNT162b2 as unassessable. Other possible cause of the event such as any other diseases was not reported. The patient died on 01Sep2021. It was not reported if an autopsy was performed. The outcome of event ventricular fibrillation was recovered on 16Aug2021, the rest of events was fatal.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: Cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary arrest; Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia

28.    1 month old – Pfizer

Write-up: The baby”s heart stopped beating; The baby”s heart stopped beating; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer. This is the second of two reports. The first report is a report downloaded from the Regulatory Authority FR-AFSSAPS-LL20216048. This consumer reported information for both mother and fetus/baby. This is the fetus/baby report. A fetus patient of an unspecified gender received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY), dose 1 transplacental on 12Aug2021 (Lot Number: FE7C1BSA) as dose 1, single for COVID-19 immunisation. The patient”s medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The mother pregnant in her 1st trimester, vaccinated on 12Aug2021 at 6 weeks pregnant. On 19Aug2021 the parent had a miscarriage (metrorrhagia presenting symptom). The baby”s heart stopped beating. Though on her follow-up visit on 10Aug2021 the heart was beating. Ultrasound on 19Aug2021: interrupted pregnancy at 9 weeks. The baby died on an unspecified date. It was not reported if an autopsy was performed. No follow-up attempts are possible. No further information is expected.; Sender”s Comments: Linked Report(s) : FR-PFIZER INC-202101166496 Maternal/baby case; Reported Cause(s) of Death: The baby”s heart stopped beating; The baby”s heart stopped beating

29.    14 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: pulmonary edema; This is a spontaneous report from a Pfizer-sponsored program, from a contactable consumer (patent”s uncle) through the Pfizer company doctor. A 14-year-old male patient received bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY), 1st dose on 06Jul2021 (Lot Number: EX0893) and 2nd dose on 27Jul2021 (Lot Number: EW2246, both via an unspecified route of administration as single dose for COVID-19 immunization. Medical history none. Concomitant medications were not reported. The patient experienced pulmonary edema (death) on 03Sep2021. The patient died on 03Sep2021. The autopsy revealed that the cause of death was pulmonary edema.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: pulmonary edema

30.    15 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Patient Committed Suicide with a firearm.

32.    16 year old boy – Pfizer

Write-up: Suicide; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable physician received from the Regulatory Authority. Regulatory authority report number is v21122543. The 16-year and 5-month-old male patient received first dose of bnt162b2 (COMIRNATY) at 16-year-old on 15-JUL-2021 12:00 as dose 1, single (lot number: EY0583, expiration date: 31Oct2021) for COVID-19 immunisation. Body temperature before vaccination was 36.2 degrees Centigrade. Medical history included attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Self injurious behaviour. Concomitant medications and family history were not provided. The course of the events was as follows: On 15Jul2021 at 12:00 (the day of vaccination), the patient received the first dose of BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY, Solution for injection, Lot# EY0583, Expiration date 31Oct2021) via an unspecified route of administration as a single dose for COVID-19 immunization. On 23Jul2021 at 18:30 (8 days after the vaccination), the patient experienced suicide and died. The outcome of the event was fatal. It was not reported if an autopsy was performed. The course of the event was as follows: On 23Jul2021, the patient jumped off the top floor of the apartment and died. It was assumed the he killed himself. The reporting physician classified the event as serious (fatal) and assessed that the event was not related to BNT162b2. Other possible cause of the event such as any other diseases was ADHD. The reporting physician commented as follows: The patient was prescribed oral medicines for ADHD at a psychiatry department, but recently he had stopped taking them, and self injurious behaviour had been noted.; Sender”s Comments: Event suicide represents an intercurrent medical condition and unrelated to bnt162b2 . The underlying history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Self injurious behavior may play a explanation.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: Suicide

33.    Girl – Pfizer age unknown

Write-up: death by suicide Narrative: death by suicide; 12/26/20, self inflicted gun shot wound; found deceased by family member

34.    Girl – Pfizer 16 years

Write-up: Patient was a 16yr female who received Pfizer vaccine 3/19/21 at vaccine clinic and presented with ongoing CPR to the ED 3/28/21 after cardiac arrest at home. Patient placed on ECMO and imaging revealed bilateral large pulmonary embolism as likely etiology of arrest. Risk factors included oral contraceptive use. Labs have since confirmed absence of Factor V leiden or prothrombin gene mutation. Patient declared dead by neurologic criteria 3/30/21.

35.    Girl – Pfizer 16 years

Write-up: death; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable physician based on information received by Pfizer from Biontech [manufacturer control number: 88130], license party for BNT162B2 (COMIRNATY). A 16-year-old female patient received BNT162B2 (COMIRNATY, Batch/Lot number was not reported), via an unspecified route of administration on an unspecified date (at 16-year-old) as dose number unknown, single for COVID-19 immunisation. The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. It was reported that parents stated on 16 years old female patient who received a vaccination in the morning and was found dead in her bed in the afternoon. No further details and no cause of death could be obtained by reporting physician. The patient died on an unspecified date. It was not reported if an autopsy was performed. The lot number for BNT162B2, was not provided and will be requested during follow up.; Sender”s Comments: The information on the circumstances of the patient”s death is too limited to perform a meaningful company causality assessment: this event is handled as related to the suspect product BNT162B2 as a cautionary measure and for reporting purposes. The impact of this report on the benefit/risk profile of the Pfizer product is evaluated as part of Pfizer procedures for safety evaluation, including the review and analysis of aggregate data for adverse events. Any safety concern identified as part of this review, as well as any appropriate action in response, will be promptly notified to regulatory authorities, Ethics Committees, and Investigators, as appropriate.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: death

36.    Boy – Pfizer 16 years

Write-up: killed this young man/he died of an enlarged heart (500+ grams); The initial case was missing the following minimum criteria: unidentified reporter. Upon receipt of follow-up information on 20Sep2021, this case now contains all required information to be valid. This is a spontaneous report from Pfizer sponsored Program, via contactable consumers. A 16-year-old male patient received BNT162B2 via an unspecified route of administration on 19Apr2021 (Lot Number: ER8731; Expiration Date: Jul2021) (at 16-year-old) as dose 1, single for COVID-19 immunisation. The patient”s medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The patient died in 24Apr2021. His father claimed he took the Pfizer vaccine five days before (24Apr2021) he died and that he died of an enlarged heart (500+grams) from Apr2021. It”s not reported if autopsy performed. Follow-up attempts are completed. No further information is expected. ; Reported Cause(s) of Death: died of an enlarged heart.

Shamefully the UK does not separate child deaths from adult deaths.

As well as the deaths reported above there are deaths and life-changing events caused by the vaccine in pregnant women. See here. And here.

Changing numbers and removing records in damage limitation exercise

Finally there are the ones they are removing from the VAERS system. Great Game India covered the death of a two year old baby girl. I followed this up. The case number was 1074247 but now draws a blank. It is the same as this one which has a different number: 1255745. You can see the history right up to the removal of the record on 21 May 2021.

How many more like this have been removed we may never know.

Some of the child-deaths reported on All the Goss, like this one, is included in the above records.

Whether a child is murdered with a sword or by a needle it still amounts to the slaughter of an innocent.

Research credit: Mairead

 

Connect with All the Goss

cover image credit: Bru-nO & Dimhou / pixabay

 




If the Virus Actually Existed

If the Virus Actually Existed

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
October 14, 2021

 

…and it doesn’t…

There would be no way to stop it.

It would have spread so far and so deep…

The only answer would be: LIVE THROUGH IT.

Period.

Have a look at the open borders of the US. Have a look at the packed football stands every weekend across the US. Have a look at Israel, where lockdowns and high vaccination rates have failed to stop the progression of cases. Of course, those cases are nothing more than false positive tests. Nevertheless, you get the idea.

The very concept of a virus and its spread implies: UNSTOPPABLE.

The war against the virus was always a losing idea. And it was never that war anyway. It was always a war against the people and against freedom.

The planners calculated that freedom had withered to such an advanced degree that it would be possible to take away what was left of it.

The war against the virus is very much like the war against freedom of speech, aka censorship. Governments are never going to be able to stop the flow of independent ideas. The seal is never air-tight.

Of course, as I’ve been proving for the past year, the virus doesn’t exist. It’s a fantasy. It’s the ghost in the dark closet at night, when the child is lying in bed thinking that random noises are a threat to his safety.

A well-known scientist with impressive mainstream credentials recently confided to me that he believes the virus (which he accepts as real) will eventually infect everyone. EVERYONE. Therefore…

There is nothing to be done. LIVE WITH IT. LIVE THROUGH IT.

Even the false premise that the virus exists implies the continuation of freedom.

The notion that a war against a virus can be won is on the level of the notion that a war against the natural flow of air on the planet can be won.

Nations that have fought a relatively mild battle against the virus—Sweden, Denmark, and Norway—have officially stated they’re ending that battle. Why? Because only small numbers of people are becoming ill. Those numbers mirror the recent years before the pandemic was declared.

In those countries, the nightmare of the ghost in the closet is over, for now.

The leading pornographer of fear in the US, Anthony Fauci, is still turning out his little movies. Every week, he “adjusts the data,” in order to bolster his claims. And every week, his sales force of media personnel put him on television to spread the message:

OBEDIENCE IS VICTORY.

Fauci is the envy of sadists everywhere.

For the past year and a half, he has been the de facto president of the United States.

His style reflects the decades-long machinations of the CIA: invent endless enemies, and then attack them. All for the purpose of establishing CONTROL.

On some nights, while I’m asleep, a part of my mind that operates on entirely conventional premises calculates the odds in the war against the virus. It spins, all on its own, fragmented scenarios: the infection rate, the degree and extent of lockdowns, the barriers against the virus created by masks, the vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated, and so on. That ridiculous piece of my mind is a cameo Pentagon.

As I wake up, I realize the fantastical nature of these wartime calculations. I see them clearly for what they signify. A rooting interest, no more meaningful than sitting on the sidelines watching a contest of tiddlywinks, with a bet of a few pennies riding on the outcome.

It’s instructive to have these dreams. They convey an insane fool’s errand.

If the virus existed, there would be no way to stop it. Since it doesn’t exist, there is no “it” to stop.

However, the war against freedom is an entirely different matter. It has always existed, and it always will.

There are certain men who have lost their own vivid life-breathing creative freedom, and they have chosen, as their only substitute, the path of destroying freedom wherever they find it.

They are the virus.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: RichardsDrawings / pixabay




Australia Building Quarantine Camps for “Ongoing Operations”

Australia Building Quarantine Camps for “Ongoing Operations”
Facility being built to house those “who have not had access to vaccination.”

by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News
October 14, 2021

 

Despite some states tentatively beginning to lift lockdown restrictions, Australian authorities are building quarantine camps that won’t be completed until next year in order to prepare for “ongoing operations” and to house those “who have not had access to vaccination.”

According to ABC Australia, one such 1,000-bed quarantine facility at Wellcamp Airport outside Toowoomba will be fully completed by the end of March 2022.

“At this stage, the cabins will be used by domestic travellers returning from COVID hotspots,” states the report.

However, it also makes clear that the camp will be used for “ongoing operations” and will be a source of employment for the local area.

The camps is split into different zones and accommodates singles, doubles, and family rooms while being patrolled by police and security guards 24/7.

Citing new strains of COVID and people “who have not had access to vaccination,” Queensland Deputy Premier Steven Miles told the media outlet, “We anticipate there to be a continuing need for quarantine facilities.”

The government is leasing the land on which the camp is being built from the Wagner Corporation for 12 months with an option for a further 12 months after that.

Another 1,000-bed quarantine facility is also being built on a 30-hectare Army barracks site in the industrial area of Pinkenba, near Brisbane Airport.

“Why anyone who had left Australia would come back again is unclear,” writes Dave Blount. “It is possibly the most repressive country in the world regarding Covid tyranny.”



As we previously highlighted, state authorities in America are also constructing new “quarantine facilities” for Americans who are “unable to quarantine at home.”

As we reported last year, Authorities in Quebec City, Canada announced they will isolate “uncooperative” citizens in a coronavirus facility, the location of which remains a secret.

New Zealand also announced plans to place COVID infectees and their family members in “quarantine facilities.”

Back in January, German authorities also announced they would hold COVID dissidents who repeatedly fail to properly follow the rules in what was described as a ‘detention camp’ located in Dresden.

 

Connect with Summit News




The “Skam” of the Century

The “Skam” of the Century

by Rosanne Lindsay, ND, Nature of Healing
October 13, 2021

 

The Skam (mask) Skript

Many people assume the history of the current pandemic is a mere two years long. But did you know that mask mandates are a repeat from a century ago? Did you know that the script of the Coronavirus flu pandemic is recycled from the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918? For what purpose? Read on…

In April, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged the use of  cloth face masks in public settings to slow the spread of “Coronavirus,” a virus which has never been isolated. In fact the CDC admits no virus has EVER been isolated based upon Koch’s postulates, the gold standard.

With no proof of any viral threat, many state Governors “acted” in unison to implement executive orders or official guidelines to wear masks or face coverings.  As illegal lockdowns (i.e., house arrests) were lifted at the end of May 2020, and people returned to work, governments again advised Americans to wear “the skam.”

On October 8 2020, Randell Kelton filed a complaint against Texas Governor Greg Abbot because he exceeded his authority under the rule of law.  A dozen states followed suit by ending their own mandates.  However, Kelton’s complaint was followed by federal lawsuits by various groups urging the governors to continue mandating “skams” in schools and other places.

Back and forth went the mandates, a masked distraction for two years. Yet, history has shown that masks failed in 1918 [see 1919 study by Wilfred H. Kellogg] just as they are failing now.

Who to trust? What does W.H.O. say?

Mask Failure

The World Health Organization (W.H.O) recommended that people do NOT wear masks unless they are sick or caring for someone who is sick. Mike Ryan, Exec. Dir. of WHO Health Emergencies program said, “There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there is some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly.”

Anthony Fauci and the New England Journal of Medicine wrote that mask are symbolic. Virtue signaling. Fauci published:

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…. It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.

According to the UK Stay at Home Guidance, “We do not recommend the use of facemasks as an effective means of preventing infection. Face masks play an important role in clinical settings, such as hospitals, but there is very little evidence of benefit from their use outside these clinical settings.

A March 5th, 2020 article from the Mayo Clinic stated:

The current recommendations regarding masks is that if you yourself are sick with fever, you can wear a surgical mask to prevent transmission to other people. If you are healthy, there is not thought to be any additional benefit to wearing a mask yourself because the mask is not airtight and does not necessarily prevent breathing in of these viral particles. – Dr. Nipunie Rajapakse, a Mayo Clinic infectious diseases specialist.

An April 6th study from the Annals of Internal Medicine concluded:

We do not know whether masks shorten the travel distance of droplets during coughing. Further study is needed to recommend whether face masks decrease transmission of virus from asymptomatic individuals or those with suspected COVID-19 who are not coughing.In conclusion, both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.

Even a March 4th Journal Of the American Medical Association (JAMA) article regarding Covid-19 clarified, When Should A Mask Be Used:

Face masks should be used only by individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever. Face masks should also be worn by health care workers, by individuals who are taking care of or are in close contact with people who have respiratory infections, or otherwise as directed by a doctor. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill. Face masks should be reserved for those who need them because masks can be in short supply during periods of widespread respiratory infection. Because N95 respirators require special fit testing, they are not recommended for use by the general public.

An April 14, 2020 article in Stanford News disclosed that face masks come with their own risks to health:

By filtering particles, face masks makes it harder to breathe. “N95 masks are estimated to reduce oxygen intake by anywhere from 5 to 20 percent. That’s significant, even for a healthy person. It can cause dizziness and lightheadedness. If you wear a mask long enough, it can damage the lungs. For a patient in respiratory distress, it can even be life threatening.”

Experts make it sound that eye goggles would offer more protection than a cloth mask.

Truth Disclosed

Why is the medical narrative purposely contrary to the government narrative? Why does the mask skam continue, even after the “safe and effective” experimental vaccine was deployed?

Because the truth must be disclosed somewhere.

The Coronavirus is not a true virus, nor is it infectious. There is no proof. Therefore, the mask is a test of the people’s ability to discern the truth with their eyes wide open, even if their mouths are concealed.

Know that truth can be disclosed in any form, including fiction, science fiction, and as published medical studies. But truth is not disclosed in the media.

With media dishing up propaganda, it is time to be discerning. Inconsistencies and contradictions in media are there to create a diversion and an emotional response known as a Psychological Operation. A Psy Op. As with any PsyOp, people must be able to parse truth from fiction. You can do this by considering that everything is reversed.

If there is no infectious virus, there is no need to wear a mask. Masks are a test to see who follows orders for the new Global Reset, a new system of rules. To see what is coming next, you only need to look beyond the diversion.

Techno Reset

The hidden connection between the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic and the previous 1918-20 Spanish Flu pandemic is not found in an invisible virus that does not exist.

No, the hidden connection is found in the roll out of “next generation wireless communications technology.” In 1900, wireless radio transmission had just been invented and hailed as a miracle. Then, broadcast radiation spread across the continents. Soon after, reports of 50 million people died as a result of the “1920 pandemic.” Everything was reset, from medicine to the economy to expectations to the population itself.

Fast-forward to 2020 and 5G, the 5th generation radiation technology that has also spread across continents and is being dialed up now. Along with the 5G rollout spreads a strange condition among the public with similar symptoms to the 1920 pandemic: headaches, nausea, fever, dizziness, weakness, dry cough, runny nose, shortness of breath, and death.  The flu? Covid19?…

Or the effects of radiation poisoning, transmitted unseen through the airwaves by the same organizations, the same propaganda, the same coverup?

Is the novel Coronavirus just a new version of the Spanish flu, aka an invisible enemy that is not a virus? While everyone has been sleeping under house arrest, donning and debating masks, 5G towers and power lines have been installed, deployed, and activated in schools, church parking lots, and farm fields.

How will people escape 5G radiation when AT&T has plans, using 500 patents, to transfer WiFi and wireless data over power lines using 4LTE and 5G millimeter waves. Project 5G “AirGig” is being deployed without the need for any new fiber -to-the-home equipment and could replace cell towers. Powerful radiowaves are also heating the ionosphere, among other technologies, to control terrestrial, atmospheric, and oceanic weather patterns.

The Threat to Freedom

There is no overt war.  But there is a covert war under the guise of an unseeable virus that never existed. The true threats are not only to health, under the guise of an “FDA-approved vaccine,” but also to freedom.

Be ready for Google and Apple apps that track your every move. Prepare for Artificial Intelligence, or A.I, running the show such as the Covi Pass digital health passport with RFID chip technology, approved by the United Nations. Be ready for a crypto-currency system tied to your body. Investment advisor, Catherine Austin Fitts, says:

When they decide to shut down our bank accounts and say you all get on crypto, universal basic income and take that injection or you can’t transact on the financial system, this is instituting a totalitarian system through the financial system. . . . When they shut that trap door, what you need to think about is where are you going to buy food?

In this century, you will have a choice to accept or reject the new tools becoming available. These tools will convince you to sacrifice freedom for security as a new Technocratic society is revealed.

Technocracy: A global system designed to implement central resource and control through rule-based micromanagement. The growth of Technocracy is made possible by digital systems and software, artificial intelligence, and the “one-way mirror” managed through 24/7 surveillance by intelligence and enforcement agencies-funded by our tax dollars. – Patrick M. Wood, with Catherine Austin Fitts, May 26, 2019

 


Rosanne Lindsay is a Naturopath, writer, earth keeper, health freedom advocate and author of the books The Nature of Healing, Heal the Body, Heal the Planet and  Free Your Voice, Heal Your Thyroid, Reverse Thyroid Disease Naturally.

Rosanne Lindsay is available for consultation through Turtle Island Network.  Subscribe to her blog at natureofhealing.org.

 

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay, ND

cover image credit: 愚木混株CDD20 / pixabay




“Stop the Shots”: Stand With Massachusetts Against Medical Mandates — Saturday, October 16, 2021

“Stop the Shots”: Stand With Massachusetts Against Medical Mandates — Saturday, October 16, 2021

 

Sept. 18, 2021, Hyannis (photo by James M)


 

Have you lost your job or your enrollment in college because of vaccine mandates?
Are you a parent who doesn’t want your child to be forced to wear a mask in school?
Are you worried about having to wear a mask and show your papers in order to shop, travel, or enter a restaurant?
Have you been affected by a vaccine injury?
Do you believe no one has the right to force you to accept any medical procedure?
Then this protest is for you. The tyranny has to stop.

 

The evidence is in. Gene-manipulating injections advertised as a “vaccine for covid 19” have killed and injured millions of people. Instead of providing immunity to an alleged virus, the shots actually harm the immune system and turn it against us.

The spike proteins created by the shots spread out to attack major organs in the body, leading to a thousand and one different health problems, including heart attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis, strokes, blood clots, spontaneous abortions, neurological disorders, depression, and death. Yet the medical establishment is urging everyone, including pregnant women and children, to get the jab.

The ghost standing in as US President recently decreed that if people refuse the shot they will lose their job. This is coercion to accept a medical intervention known to be a danger to human health — a crime against humanity. Half the population of the country is now facing this coercion.

This only makes sense if we reason that the authorities want to harm us, or that there is something so important in the injection that they don’t mind harming us, as long as we get the injection.

Bill Gates said early in 2020 that everyone on the planet should be “vaccinated.” Perhaps his dream was that when that is accomplished there will be no one left who will not be genetically modified (to Gates’s secret specifications) and thus no one left to hold him to account.

One of the most insidious arguments put forward by the authorities is that we are facing a health crisis so serious that individual freedom must be sacrificed for the common good, and therefore no one has a moral right to refuse the Frankenshot.

This argument quickly comes down to whether human beings have inalienable rights — rights given to us by God, which the state does not have the power to take away or overrule. To accept or reject any substance being given to us is obviously such a right.

And after this we can discuss the details — that the purpose of the “vaccine” is unclear, that its contents are unknown, that it has proven harmful to millions of people, that we were not informed of adverse effects, that natural immunity should be recognized, that tests establishing the alleged disease were fraudulent, that there is no emergency, that there are safe alternative treatments, et cetera.

But if we understand that the state is a lesser power, then we understand that it does not have the authority to order substances injected into our bodies.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

~ U.S. Declaration of Independence

The cabal behind the medical tyranny we are facing doesn’t believe we have God-given rights because they don’t believe there’s a God in the first place. They apparently think that since they are billionaires, and billionaires have a lot of weight to throw around, that they can be gods. They also seem to believe there is nothing they are forbidden to do to other people because other people do not have souls — they are just biological entities evolved through random nature which the rich, by virtue of their power, are free to manipulate and improve upon.

To technocrats, nothing is sacred. So it makes sense to them to risk injuring pregnant women and children and even experiment on the whole human race (beside their chosen few). Those who resist are now being segregated and punished, like Palestinians in their own land. Perhaps occupied Palestine is the oligarchs’ model for our future.

The ultimate goal may be the power that previous master-slave relationships were not able to achieve — a “read/write” capability in which the master has full surveillance power over the slaves and gives the orders for them else to follow.

Subtracted from the slave population, of course, will be those few billion dissidents and “useless eaters” who don’t fit in with the plan. They will be terminated.

From this point of view it also follows that the genetic makeup of any living thing is just software which today’s sophisticated scientists can splice, delete, modify, or re-create as the masters see fit. From this point of view humans are no different than GM corn, soy, or cotton. GM humans can be used to bring in a nice profit as well because the masters will own their patents. Perhaps Monsanto agribusiness is another model for our future.

Taken to its logical extreme, reality itself is in the hands of our would-be masters.

With proper control of the media, people can be made to believe anything, like that an illness similar to the flu is a “pandemic,” or that someone who has no symptoms of illness is actually sick, or that the unvaccinated are selfishly threatening everyone else with death, or that anyone who strays from the narrative is spreading “misinformation,” or that if someone goes into convulsions directly after getting jabbed it is not due to the poison that was just injected into them, or that a serum that injures and kills is “safe and effective.”

In this world, the truth is what the powerful say it is, regardless of the facts. The powerful are a locomotive big enough to just run past any anomalies and contradictions, leaving us bewildered.

However, the ambitiousness of this insane program foretells its failure. History is full of great tyrants with grand plans who came in with spectacular fame but suddenly fell in disgrace, erased by time.

The oligarchs’ main weakness is their lack of any sense of limits. Gaining some power, they then want it all. They reach too far, too soon, and expose themselves in the process. And then common humanity — always patient to a fault — finally decides to stand up and become a locomotive itself, running back over the entire plan and returning us to sanity.

If the world is going to see a great reset, it will not be the one Klaus Schwab and his Davos gangsters had in mind.

We should take heart. So much has been revealed! It’s as if the world’s worst criminals burst into the courtroom and made a horrendous public confession.


 

Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates has been holding monthly demonstrations since December 2020. We are not funded and not affiliated with any political party or organization.

We stand for:

— the right to remain human — i.e., not to be genetically modified or made “transhuman.” The openly declared transhumanist agenda of the Great Reset and its plan for “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity” is absolutely insane.

— the right to live. These injections are killing people. We obviously have the right to reject them for ourselves and our children

— the right to the pursuit of happiness. Happiness will not be achievable if we have lost our health to medically induced chronic disease.

— the right to work. Government mandating employers to require vaccination means anyone asserting the natural right to bodily autonomy will lose their job. Governments do not have this power, nor, obviously, do employers.

— our right to refuse medical interventions. No to vaccine mandates by which state and federal government orders employers, colleges, and businesses to require vaccination certificates (or torture us with testing).

— ending mask requirements on public transportation, in healthcare facilities, and especially in schools. Forcing children to wear masks is child abuse.

— the right to bodily autonomy. No one should be forced to take a vaccine, wear a mask, be swabbed, tested, or scanned.

— the Nuremberg code and the right to informed consent. No substance should be injected into anyone’s body without their full understanding of all possible harmful effects (which are as yet unknown with experimental mRNA injections). There should be no negative consequences should we refuse a medical intervention. Violations of this code should be prosecuted.

— parental rights. The state has no right to bypass parents’ authority on whether their minor child should wear a mask, be tested, or be given any pharmaceutical product.

— the right to education. Education at K-12 schools, universities, and colleges should not be withheld as leverage to enforce government medical decrees.

— the right to freedom of movement. This right is violated when any kind of travel requires masking, testing, or proof of vaccination.

— the right to privacy: “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” (4th Amendment). Our vaccine status and medical history is no one else’s business.

— the right to due process. Open meeting laws continue to be illegally suspended in towns, counties, and states across the country “due to coronavirus” and elected officials seem to like it that way. Virtual meetings undermine democracy. Government-sponsored medical procedures without informed consent, and government edicts bypassing the legislative process are also a violation of the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments.

— the 1st Amendment freedom of speech and press. End the blatant Soviet-style government-media censorship of people with dissenting views about the covid narrative

— the right to equal protection of our civil and Constitutional rights. Refusal of service by any transport company, public venue, ticket vendor, grocery store, or other business on the basis of arbitrary “vaccine passports” is a form of discrimination which we should be protected from under the law. Loss of this right amounts to coercion through medical tyranny and will lay the groundwork for a “social credit score” system in which all citizens do not have equal rights.

 

Connect with Massachusetts Against Medical Mandates

cover image credit: holidave / pixabay