Council on Foreign Relations: “Death’s Public Relations Firm”

The Abstract episode 37 “Death’s Public Relations Firm”

by Peter A. Kirby, Activist Post
July 7, 2024

Routinely spraying us and all of earth’s biota with tens of thousands of megatons of toxic materials from jet aircraft is, on its face, a psychotic proposition. Such a proposition presumes untold megadeath and destruction. And yet, unbelievably, for decades now, time and time again, this is exactly what members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as well as people presented by the CFR have been proposing. The Council on Foreign Relations has been acting like a public relations firm engaged in the selling of mass murder. Let us examine the supporting evidence, shall we? For the whole story here, please buy and read my book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.

Time and time again, members of the CFR or people presented by the CFR have advocated for Solar Radiation Management (SRM) geoengineering. SRM geoengineering is officially acknowledged as the spraying of particulate matter from aircraft. Exposure to any type of particulate matter is known to be detrimental to human health and have a causal relationship to many deadly diseases. For more about this, please see my previous article and video “Chemtrails = DEATH.” Further, many times the CFR has presented advocates for SRM geoengineering who suggest the spraying of toxic substances from aircraft. Spraying toxic substances from aircraft presumes a lot more death and destruction than the spraying of non-toxic substances and yet, we find the CFR effectively promoting all of it.

Yes, we understand that the CFR’s geoengineers provide a reason for spraying us. They say that SRM geoengineering can prevent future death and destruction from the dreaded ‘climate change.’ So, in other words, they suggest killing and destroying in order to avoid death and destruction. Does that make sense to you? Such a hugely powerful organization promoting such a fundamentally flawed (and quite frankly, evil) policy deserves a closer look.

~ ~ ~

The Council on Foreign Relations serves a dual purpose. It is at once a globalist think-tank and an establishment mouthpiece. Most other high-profile think-tanks are not nearly as vocal. The CFR enjoys an extremely cozy relationship with both our U.S. State Department and the CIA. With alarming frequency, the ideas emanating from CFR study groups become official United States government policy. CFR study groups not only produce suggested policy, but also tactics for confounding and discrediting any opposition to their suggestions. Financing for these CFR study groups comes from the Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundations. Policy and strategy worked out by the CFR reaches the President by way of the State Department.

The CFR was formed in order to influence public opinion. In 1919 American and British members of the Pilgrim Society met at the Majestic Hotel in Paris to create the Council on Foreign Relations as a think tank for the U.S. State Department. We covered the Pilgrim Societies in an article and video two weeks ago. The founders of the CFR felt compelled to create their organization because of their recent failure to establish the post-WWI League of Nations. The Council on Foreign Relations was established as a sister organization to the British Royal Institute of International Affairs on July 29, 1921. Carrol Quigley in his book Tragedy and Hope describes the purpose of the CFR:

“The CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), established six years after the Federal Reserve was created, worked to promote an internationalist agenda on behalf of the international banking elite. Where the Fed took control of money and debt, the CFR took control of the ideological foundations of such an empire – encompassing the corporate, banking, political, foreign policy, military, media, and academic elite of the nation into a generally cohesive overall world view.”

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director Allen Dulles (1893-1969) and his more famous brother, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles (1888-1959) were among a small group of influential and wealthy individuals who founded the CFR. John Foster Dulles, beginning with the first issue, regularly contributed articles to the Council’s most widely-read publication called Foreign Affairs. In 1926 his brother Allen joined the CFR and in 1927 he was elected as the Council’s first president. From his soundproof room at Pratt House (CFR headquarters), Allen Dulles wielded tremendous power. Top secret CIA planning meetings chaired by Dulles were held at Pratt House. We covered the CIA’s extensive connections to today’s chemtrail spraying operations last week.

In their epic masterpiece Killing the Planet Williams and Howard-Browne write, “By 2017, twenty secretaries of state, nineteen secretaries of the treasury, fifteen secretaries of defense, and hundreds of other federal department heads have been CFR members, along with twenty-one of the twenty-four CIA directors, and every chairman of the Federal Reserve since 1951.” The authors also note that, “Mike Pompeo … is the only Secretary of State within the past 85 years without any known ties to the CFR.”

Many people implicated in the New Manhattan Project have been CFR members such as: Lauchlin Currie, Gordon J.F. ‘How to Wreck the Environment’ MacDonald, Henry Loomis, Glenn Seaborg, Alfred Lee Loomis, James Killian, Harlan Cleveland, James Conant, John Deutch, George H. W. Bush and Frank Wisner. Many corporations implicated in the production of the NMP are (or have been) corporate members of the CFR such as Boeing, Raytheon, IBM, the Carlyle Group and General Electric. Five of GE’s directors and three of Boeing’s have been CFR directors as well. For more details, please refer to my book.

~ ~ ~

Beginning in 1990, the Council started organizing study and discussion groups devoted to the topic of climate change and they have since gone on to issue many publications promoting SRM geoengineering – also known as chemtrails. Over the years, these publications have consistently used fundamentally deceptive arguments and a panoply of other psychological warfare tactics in their attempts to legitimize mass murder.

Among many other examples featuring top geoengineers like Ken Caldeira, in 2008 the CFR issued a paper titled “Unilateral Geoengineering: Non-technical Briefing Notes for a Workshop at the Council on Foreign Relations.” In this document, the authors propose spraying aluminum oxide dust into the stratosphere. We are only going over the most salient examples here. Many more CFR documents written in favor of SRM geoengineering can be found in my book.

CFR members Granger Morgan and John Steinbruner (1941-2015) held a panel discussion at Pratt House in 2010 titled “Developing an International Framework for Geoengineering.” During the discussion, Morgan stressed the urgency of the geoengineering situation as he raised the specter of a ‘black program’ currently conducting SRM geoengineering which everybody finds out about later. He said, “I think it would be truly disastrous if, you know, we discovered a few years from now that there was a black program that some government had stood up to sort of learn on the quiet how to do this.” Yes, we’ve found out about it already, Mr. Morgan and we plan to make this as disastrous as possible for your public relations effort.

CFR member Jay Apt wrote a 2012 paper with top geoengineer David Keith titled “Cost Analysis of Stratospheric Albedo Modification Delivery Systems” in which the authors write about spraying 1-5 million metric tons of materials from airplanes at an altitude of 18-30 km up in the sky every year. Their top choice for the job was the Boeing ‘747-400.’ The Boeing 747 is a close relative of the Boeing KC-135 which the author has identified as the most probable make and model of the most prevalent type of dedicated chemtrail fleet aircraft. Stay tuned for more about the proprietary chemtrail fleet.

In the Spring of 2013, CFR member Granger Morgan and two co-authors published an article in Issues in Science and Technology titled “Needed: Research Guidelines for Solar Radiation Management.” In it, they advocate for geoengineering research, call for help from the federal government, and write that, “a small fleet of specially designed aircraft could deliver enough mass to the stratosphere in the form of small reflecting particles to offset all of the warming anticipated by the end of this century for a cost of less than $10 billion per year.”

Another article published by CFR members Morgan, Apt, et al. in March of 2013 was titled “The Truth About Geoengineering: Science Fiction and Science Fact.” In it, they speculate that, “Flying a fleet of high-altitude aircraft that spray particles into the upper atmosphere would cost perhaps ten billion dollars per year” The authors also warn that, “Small-scale field trials in the upper atmosphere to test components of an SRM [Solar Radiation Management] system are particularly urgent.”

On November 3 of 2015, CFR member Katharine Ricke published a paper, along with two other authors, titled “Climate Engineering Economics.” In this paper the authors write, “The most likely approach to implementation is high-flying aircraft outfitted with aerosol precursor dispensing systems (McClellan, et al., 2012)” As have many other authors, Ricke, et al. found that using aircraft to achieve SRM is the cheapest way. In conclusion the authors urge, “Finally, we need to begin to explore specific mechanisms to ensure an efficient and equitable implementation of climate engineering technologies. While some early steps have been taken in this direction, we need to understand, from an economic perspective, how to create institutions that can accommodate these novel climate risk reduction strategies.”

On June 29 of 2016, the director of the CIA, John O. Brennan made a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations. He suggested that spraying the earth with tiny particles can save us from global warming. Since Brennan’s landmark speech, the CFR has continued to post various pro-geoengineering articles and videos on their website that largely repeat the themes of previous publications.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Find his books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco available now exclusively at Amazon. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com. Find his videos at Rumble.

Connect with Activist Post

A Brief History of the United States Corporation & the Hidden Contracts Tricking You Into ‘Voluntary Servitude’

A Brief History on the United States CORPORATION

by Jeremy Griffin, J-Griff
published March 18, 2022

In this episode, Jeremy dives into how this “Country” came to be, how the system is actually setup, and how the world got to where we are today.

Connect with J-Griff

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Hello, my friends. I am pretty excited to dive into today’s topic for you guys.

This is definitely going to challenge your belief systems if you’ve never heard this before. And you might find yourself upset or angry or triggered or whatever it may be. So this is my fair warning that if you don’t feel like keeping an open mind at this moment or during this season of your life, then maybe this episode isn’t for you.

Having said that, I know that if you appreciate my podcast and if you’re tuning in, you’re likely eager for the type of knowledge that tends to trigger and upset people because it conflicts with what we’ve been taught to believe.

So without further ado, what I’m going to be diving into today has everything to do with the history of the United States of America.

And if you’re anything like me, you were taught all about our forefathers, and our presidents, and Lincoln freeing the slaves, and maybe the Revolutionary War. And you were taught that the United States of America is a nation, that it’s a country, and that we should be proud to, you know, wear our flag or whatever it may be.

And what I have come to learn in my own self-education, when I stopped letting people feed me what I’m supposed to believe, and I actually went out to seek all sides of the argument and put together my own beliefs, I have come to find that the United States of America isn’t a nation at all. It’s a corporation. It’s a business.

And when I say that, I’m not saying that figuratively. I’m not saying, you know, politics are business as usual. No, no, I’m not saying that as a clever statement. I’m being literal.

The United States is no longer a nation. It is a corporation. And the sooner you realize that, the sooner you can free yourself, your family, and your loved ones from unnecessary oppression. Because as we’re going to dive into today, so much of what is going on in this 2022 world, which is when I’m filming this, has to do with the fact that we are property of the United States, Inc. corporation. And we don’t know that.

So we think that we’re supposed to have rights. We think that we’re ‘we the people’ under the Constitution, and we think that our vote actually matters. And we think that things are going to get better. But what we don’t understand is that this was all masterfully planned and executed and continues to be.

And so I’m going to be outlining some of the basics of our history. And I’m going to keep this as short as I can. I don’t want this to be longer than maybe 40 minute episode. So I’m going to do my best. So let’s dive in.

We’re going to start around the Civil War, and I’m just going to keep things at a very macro level.

So during the Civil War, the constitutional republic, which is what we had at the time, abandoned Congress, which forced President Lincoln to issue martial law. At this time, the republic was taken over by foreign insurgents who replaced it with the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Inc. (in all caps). This occurred in 1871.

This corporation was later purchased by the banking powers that were behind the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1912.

Wait, what? Yes. So let me recap that.

What am I saying here? And I’m not really saying this. I’m just translating it for you. I didn’t make this up. I wish this weren’t true, honestly, but I’m not ever going to live in ‘ignorance is bliss’ land. This is what I know to be true.

So what I just laid out to translate, make it a little more simple: We were a nation. We were a country. But what happened was foreign insurgents took over the constitutional republic that we used to have — which was based off of the Constitution, which was a nation with free sovereign people, individuals — and replaced it with a corporation that had the same name.

It’s just like when a magician is doing a card check on you and they want you to pay attention to their right hand so that you don’t notice the slight of hand that they’re doing with their left hand. That’s exactly how manipulation is often done.

So the United States, what better way to replace it without anyone noticing that they just got turned into a business and commercialized? Just call it the same exact thing, the United States of America Inc. And this occurred in 1871.

Now this corporation was later purchased by the banking powers behind the Fed in 1912. Now the Fed was created in 1913.

So if you do your due diligence on your history, and more so on the financial side, on the commerce side of history, you’re going to start to put together… Wait a minute. So this aligns perfectly.

The United States corporation was purchased by the same few wealthy families who are behind the IMF [International Monetary Fund], such as the Rothschilds. And they basically purchased the United States of America one year or less before the creation of the Federal Reserve, which we have witnessed what that has done to our dollar supply inflation, the average living wage, et cetera, et cetera.

Hmm. Okay. So let’s go a little bit more into that.

When they purchased this, why did this happen? Well, the US was bankrupt. We went straight up bankrupt and could not afford to carry on business as usual. So they had to do something about that. And so they were in a position where they were actually willing to sell the United States and basically commercialize it, turn it into a corporation.

So when we sold this (I say ‘we’, but just, you know, didn’t have to do with me, but we’ll say ‘we’ because I am American) — When we sold the United States to foreign banking cartels, if you will, salvage liens — (for those of you who are familiar with a lien, that’s basically a security interest, like the bank has on your house, if you have a mortgage or your car if you have a unpaid-off car) — salvage liens were placed on every asset — check this out — including the people of the new federalized states.

Now let’s fast forward to 1933. The USA Inc. went bankrupt. Seems to be a recurring theme, huh.

So the USA Inc. goes bankrupt and an income tax was placed on the people to pay these foreign bankers who own the IMF, which owns the IRS.

And I try to educate people who want to try to have debates with me about paying taxes. Just look into what the IRS actually is. Go deeper than googling ‘ what is the IRS?’ or trusting that it says IRS.gov so it’s a government organization. You got to go deeper. Of course, it’s going to say dot gov. This is a private corporation that is owned by the IMF. Who is the IMF owned by? You got to follow the money. You can’t just search that. You have to follow the money. Who funds it. Go find those things out.

It’s the same people that own the United States, Inc. Same few families and they’re not American. So when I say foreign insurgents, that’s what I mean.

So 1933, USA Inc. goes bankrupt. So an income tax is placed on its people, we the people. And this income tax is basically used to pay the foreign insurgents back. That’s basically how they’re using it.

So in other words, you and I were turned into property, aka chattel. C-H-A-T-T-E-L. Look it up. Sounds like cattle, doesn’t it? Spelled just like it.

We were turned into cattle, property. And we were collateralized in order to turn us, humans, flesh and blood, into a means of paying off a massive debt to foreign banking powers, foreign money, European money, those who actually run the world.

So it’s important to have this minimal, minimal background. You notice I didn’t need to go super deep at all. We’re not going to be going super deep in any of this. These are just foundational things that we need to understand. Because if you can understand that, then you can understand now why you’re taxed.

You can understand why you don’t actually have rights. Because this whole time you’ve been thinking that you’re a person, a person with feelings who has rights, who gets to vote and stand up for what they believe in. But the problem is, is that while you are technically a person, you’ve entered into contracts that you’re completely unaware of — such as your birth certificate, social security number, marriage, etc. that have consented (oh, driver’s licenses, passports, etc.) — that are all saying I consent to being collateralized, digitized and turned into a fictitious entity, a.k.a. a corporation. And this corporation is the property of the United States, Inc. which is the property of European money.

So when you think you’re pledging allegiance to the flag or you think you’re being patriotic about America, we have to realize what we’re actually pledging to or supporting. America is a business. It would be like if you were a really, really, really loyal follower of Apple, the publicly traded company. Well if you’re supporting Apple, well you would want to know who is the largest owner or shareholder of Apple. And that is who you would actually be supporting by supporting Apple. Do you see what I mean? That’s a publicly traded company.

Well this is no different. The only difference is that America isn’t on the publicly-traded stock market in the same way. Even though you can look this up on Dun and Bradstreet, and I would encourage you to. And if you don’t know what Dun & Bradstreet is, that’s a basically business credit — uses a completely different credit score and scoring system. And instead of a FICO, they go off of a Dun & Bradstreet number. And so you enter in an EIN or you can search different businesses and you can see if they exist or the name or where they’re located or blah, blah, blah. And you can look into it.

The United States corporation, the In God We Trust, Cede & Co. I’m just saying y’all.

So if you own something — let’s circle back to this property discussion. If you own something, that thing doesn’t have rights. I want you to think about it. You have 100% say over how your property is treated. And that is the situation that we’re in today.

You don’t get to choose what goes in your arm, or your mind, or how much you get taxed, or any of that, because you’re living as property as opposed to living as a blood and flesh natural being, a child of God, the most high.

And this is literally why commerce and law is spiritual. Because we are sinning when we are not living in alignment with the most high. Right?

Problem is is religion taught us that that meant one thing. But what that actually means is allowing situations like this to occur. That’s a great example.

When you’re living as property, when you’re allowing the system to categorize you as cattle — once again, I’m not being metaphorical. I’m not being cute here. I’m being literal. There are serious implications to these things.

On paper, you are property. You are a corporation right now. And people have no idea.

And before we can get into getting all pissed off, what do I do about it, Jeremy? I know I’m going to have so many messages after you guys hear this episode. All right. ‘I’m pissed off. What do I do about this?’. Well, before we can even get into all that, you need to firmly, firmly understand your roots. And your roots are the history, the history of all of this.

How did this situation come to be? It’s very, very fascinating stuff.

So something that’s important to understand on this topic is that none of this was done with full disclosure when it was being done.

I mentioned that we entered into contracts because we didn’t know what we were entering into. For example, a birth certificate, social security number, a driver’s license, checking that you’re a US citizen on certain boxes, just different situations, right? We don’t understand what these words actually mean. Therefore, when we look at contracts, we think they mean one thing, but they mean another. And even further than that, even outside of written contracts, we’re entering into contracts every single day of our life, constantly.

Contracts can be written. They can be something you’re aware of, something you’re unaware of. So we’re constantly entering into contracts. And what happened in this type of a situation when we got turned into property is this wasn’t fully disclosed. It was somewhat trickery, right? And so because of this, it’s not legally binding. And this is why taxes and many laws are voluntary, regardless of how many people try to argue with me or fight me on that. Taxes are voluntary.

And to go a little bit further into this, I would encourage you guys to look up what fraud in the inducement means. I-N-D-U-C-E-M-E-N-T, fraud in the inducement. Look up what that term means on Cornell Law website. And I want you to think about the implications of that.

Now that you understand the background and the history of the United States of America — which once again, you think we’re talking about a nation, but multiple United States of America’s exist. And as far as the politicians are concerned, as far as taxes are concerned, as far as speeding tickets are concerned, as far as voting is concerned, as far as your wages are concerned, as far as your rights are concerned, as far as your freedoms and your sovereignty and what happens to your children, as far as all of these things are concerned, which is basically everything, the United States is a corporation. And you need to start understanding that and exercising your rights and treating everything you do as if it is a contract, as if it is commercial, as if you’re a corporation doing business and engaging in commerce with another corporation, because that’s exactly what’s happening.

Anytime you, who you think is a person, but you’re actually operating as a corporation, does or speaks to or communicates with or engages with any other entity, you’re doing business and creating contracts. And you don’t even realize it.

And a lot of the reason that we’re in the situations we’re in today, many of us, is because we’ve consented to things that we don’t realize we’ve consented to — because we don’t understand our rights, we don’t understand what hat we’re wearing, we don’t even understand that the game’s being played. The other team knows the game’s being played. They made the rules and they’re playing it. But we don’t even know that the game started, so how could we possibly win?

That’s the situation that many Americans are finding themselves in right now. And no, this is not just specific to Americans. I’m going into the history of America, but as you can see, this has heavy implications into Europe. And these things are just as applicable, whether you’re in Australia, whether you’re in Europe, whether you’re in Canada. Those are the main ones that I will speak to as those are going to be the most relevant tied into America.

So as a natural person (which is what we actually are, we are natural persons), we are in fact creditors in life, but we have been programmed that we’re debtors. And due to ignorance and inaction, we the people have given our sheepish consent to pay back this fraudulent debt, and these fraudulent debts, and remain under control of this foreign government.

Now I’m going to wrap things up in the next few minutes here and I want to kind of bring this full circle so that you guys can understand. On the one hand, you might be hearing this and thinking, ‘we’re fucked. We’re property. Are you kidding me? We have so basically we have no rights because we’re property.’

And that’s true. We are property and property doesn’t have rights. But here is both the blessing and the curse. There are multiple of you, just like there’s multiple United States of Americas. Slight of hand, remember. What hat do they want to wear?

There are multiple of you. There’s the lower case you, the natural person. There’s the upper, all caps. Upper case, all caps you, which is your straw man. And there’s many other hats you could wear to be honest. The executor, the administrator, trustee. It just depends. Beneficiary. I’m not going to get into those, but if you know, you know.

Now the insane irony in all of this is the fact that because the United States Inc. has turned you into property, they are actually now liable for all of your alleged obligations, aka debts. That’s what a debt means. Go look up on Cornell Law what a debt means. Any obligation or alleged obligation.

So I want you to think about this. If you want to be pessimistic, yes, you were turned into property. If you have children right now, they are property. If you got them a birth certificate, you killed them and turned them into a fictitious entity, a corporation, which is a debt entity, corp-oration coming from corpse and oration meaning speak. Dead speak. Yes, that’s true. And you can wallow in that if you want. But is all hope lost? Are you screwed? Is it all over? No. No.

You can play a wrong move in chess and still win the game. And commerce is chess. So yes, you’ve been turned into property. And yes, you’re currently a corporation who doesn’t have rights, you’re property. Because the United States Inc. owns your corporation, aka what you think is you, what you’re used to doing business as.

Anytime you’ve ever filled out an application, they have your name in all caps, don’t they? They want your social, don’t they? There you go. That’s what I’m talking about. That’s you as a corporation.

Now that same thing — their greatest attempt to set us back, to trick us, to oppress us, to keep you in bondage, right? — actually is their greatest weakness. Because since they turned us into property, I want you to think about what happens to the property that you own. Aren’t you liable for it? If you own a car, don’t you have to pay taxes and insurance on that? Yeah. Interesting.

So the United States Inc., because they turned us into property, is actually liable for all of our alleged obligations, aka debts. So this is why it’s so important to understand foundational history before we can talk about: ‘Jeremy, I heard you discharged a car. How do you, how can I do that? Jeremy, I heard, I see you posting you discharge credit card debt. How can I do that?’. Before we get into that, we need to understand the history of this stuff and the foundations of this stuff at a deep, deep level.

So how can we owe debt if the United States is liable for all of its property? If we’re its property, then it’s the United States’ burden to pay our debt. And that is exactly what the law says. So to wrap things up, I’m going to leave you guys with two different codes that I highly recommend you look into and study until you understand what you’re actually reading.

First is going to be the House Joint Resolution Act 192. HJR 192, and I believe that is from 1933. I really recommend you look into that. And what you will find is quite interesting to give you a quick, tiny bit of context. And I’m not going to go too much into it because I want you guys to do your own studying… The dollar is no longer worth any amount of money, right? We know that it was taken off the gold standard. And when that occurred, the dollar was turned into what is called Federal Reserve Debt Notes. So if we’re being asked to pay debts, but all we are given from the system is debt notes, aka fiat money, to pay back those debts, how can we pay a debt with a debt? I just want you to sit with that.

How can you possibly pay your taxes, for example, with a debt? Because that’s what debt notes are. They never gave you lawful money. They never gave you gold. They never gave you silver. That’s sound money. That’s real money. They stopped circulating that. There is no peg for the dollar anymore.

So that’s one side of it. The other side of it is looking into 18 USC 8, 18 United States Code 8. And you read that enough times and decipher what each and every word in there means first, under a legal dictionary like Black’s Law or see how Cornell defines it, until you can piece together what this is actually saying. And you’re going to come to find out that that’s literally telling you that the United States is liable for all debt.

All of your debt, the United States is liable for it. So why are you paying it? Someone else should be paying it. And that someone isn’t you. So in this episode, I hope you’re at least walking away with a few simple understandings now.

Number one, how can you pay a debt with debt notes? Don’t let that go over your head.

Number two, if you’re the property of the United States, then the United States is liable for all of your alleged debts and anything you may owe. So why would you be paying it twice? They already got paid. Whoever’s coming after you saying you owe debt whatever, they already got paid. Why would you be paying it twice?

And then number three, the United States is not what you think it is. Your day to day life is not what you think it is. You’re entering into business contracts every day of your life, whether you’re on the phone, whether you’re having a conversation, whether a cop pulls you over, whether you apply for a credit card, whether you… literally anything, you’re entering into contracts constantly. And many of them, you have no idea what you’re entering into or that you’re even entering into one because you would not think of it as a contract. But it is, it is, and no signature is required.

Words bond as well. Words are very powerful. So is the pen and our ink, but words are very powerful. And all of this started because we are ignorant to the law. And before we can learn law, we have to learn the history of how the laws were created and what the laws are actually used for.

The laws are not used for what you think they’re used for. The laws are used to keep the property of the United States within certain confines so they don’t get out of hand — to regulate the chattel. The laws are not for the natural blood and flesh man.

Common law, a completely different higher level set of law that comes from God, the Creator, is for a natural blood and flesh man. And yet you have been following legal law your entire life.

And that is why you have things forced in your arm. That is why you might have lost your job if you refuse to get vaccinated. That is why maybe you did get vaccinated and you betrayed yourself just for some fake debt notes. That is why you’re having to make decisions with your children that you’re extremely uncomfortable with. That is why you’re paying taxes. And I could go on.

So I’m going to stop there guys. Very powerful episode. We’re going to build on this, but I’m just going to give you guys breadcrumbs, things that are digestible one at a time and we’re going to take you on a journey.

So if you found this valuable, please do me a favor and leave me a review. [Leave feedback at J-Griff YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZGN_01vCc4 or at J-Griff website.https://www.jgriff.org/] Let me know your honest thoughts. Any feedback you have for me, super open to it as well. But I really want to hear you guys honest thoughts. As far as I know, no one else is putting out this information. And I’m taking on a lot of energetic risk by putting this information out there. This is not something I need to put out. This is not something that the system wants me to put out at all. And I’m definitely going out on a limb to help you guys. So please help me help you by allowing this to reach more people. And the few ways in which you can do that are number one, leaving me a quality review. Number two, screenshotting this and sharing it on your social media and tagging me in it. And then number three, sending it to a friend whom you know would be open to this information or whom really needs this information.

The world we’re living in right now is not what you think. And the way out of the situation or the situations that you may be in right now, that your loved ones may be in right now, that your family may be in right now, is not praying or wishing on a star. We can be a lot more specific, tangible and practical than that.

And it all starts with the foundations of understanding what is actually going on so that we can understand the game before. And then once we understand the game, we can start playing the game so that we can start winning at the game.

The problem with most people I see is that they don’t even understand that there’s a game going on right now. And so of course you’re losing the game. How could you possibly win a game that you don’t even know is going on? So with that, I bid you all well, peace and love, and we will see you guys next time.

And then once we understand the game, we can start playing the game so that we can start winning at the game. The problem with most people I see is that they don’t even understand that there’s a game going on right now. And so of course you’re losing the game. How could you possibly win a game that you don’t even know is going on? So with that, I bid you all well, peace and love, and we will see you guys next time.

Cover image based on creative commons work of geert_roeffen & hankaverzichova

See related:

The United States Is Running Parallel Governments

The U.S. Is Running Parallel Governments. All U.S. Citizens Have Dual Citizenship & Are “Volunteered” as Property. How to Unvolunteer: “U.S. National / State Citizen Comprehensive Guide (Non Citizen National)”

Julian Assange – Do the Trusting Fall?

by Francis O’Neill, OffGuardian
July 3, 2024

In recent years the lockdowns, mandates, and toxic injections, have served to reveal the true nature of people in positions of influence.

Before 2020 we had a different measure of people’s ethical standing -the 9/11 litmus test. This was articulated in a video, the transcript of which reads,

“Everyone in government and every field of endeavor the world over is defined by their position on this event…By what they have said and by what they have not said, one can accurately judge who is an enemy of the people’s of the world.”

In 2010, Julian Assange told the Belfast Telegraph,

“I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”

The litmus test continues,

“Anyone who promotes the official story; who accepts the official story, who oppresses those who doubt the official story, who does not question the official story, is involved or too stupid to pat their head and chew gum at the same time.”

At the Holberg Debate in 2017, Assange answered a question by saying,

“on the 9/11 issue generally I don’t think it is particularly important.”

The litmus test concludes,

“Everyone in government; in the media, in entertainment, in organized religion, in the public eye and in the public who accepts and promotes the official story is either a traitor or a tool.”

Assange’s views on 9/11 tally with those of his supporter, MIT professor Noam Chomsky, who despite knowing better, said of the case for controlled demolition,

I think it’s completely wrong- but also I think it’s diverting people away from serious issues. I mean even if it is true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean it doesn’t have any significance.”

There are those who consider the truth of the foundational event of the ‘War on Terror,’ to be important, and the concordant evidence that disproves the official 9/11 story to be significant.

As with others who failed the 9/11 litmus test, Chomsky went on to advocate for the medical tyranny of the 2020s, in relation to which Assange’s Wikileaks was notable only for selling masks.

Assange’s comments on 9/11 came after Barack Obama’s information czar, Cass Sunstein, addressed the question What can government do about conspiracy theories? in a paper that concluded,

“ that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories”

“-counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.”

“-formally hiring credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.”

“-informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.”

Sunstein announced the arrival of Wikileaks to the world in a 2007 Washington Post article and was co-author of the ‘nudge theory‘ utilised by governments during the lockdown era. ‘Nudge’ techniques had previously been known as propaganda, coercion, and brainwashing.

Interestingly, for a man with a messianic image, Assange’s mother’s partner was a member of a child-drugging cult called ‘The Family’. This cult had echoes of the CIA mind control programme ‘MK-Ultra’ that was officially winding down as ‘the Family’ was founded in Australia.

Though there are photographs of a boy who resembles Assange in the cult, he is instead said to have attended 37 separate schools, but,

“If Julian spent 4 years at one school…and the school year is only 9 months long… Julian was swapping schools every 6 weeks.”[source]

The Family disbanded in 1987 following a police raid when Assange was 16. Its founder,

“Anne Hamilton-Byrne … was never prosecuted for child abuse, false adoptions, forgery, social security fraud or for overseeing the administration of narcotics and psychiatric drugs on children.” [source]

Assange then operated under the hacker alias ‘Mendax’ which means ‘liar’ in Latin. He was caught and “in December 1996, he pleaded guilty to twenty-five charges. His ‘disrupted childhood’ was ‘cited to justify his lenient penalty.”

A relationship with the US government is suggested by Assange’s inclusion in a 1994 email with employees from NASA, Los Alamos Laboratories and SEMATECH. His former hacking comrade Pieter Zaitko, who went on to work for a DARPA military contractor, said,

“Julian told me that his graduate work had been funded by a US Government grant, specifically NSA and DARPA money which was supposed to be used for ‘fundamental security research.’”

John Young, an early Wikileaks collaborator who registered the wikileaks.org domain has subsequently been scathing in his criticism of the group, commenting that, “everyone associated with WL is a bald-faced liar, an agent of the authorities and the worst of the world,” and that ‘Wikileaks has always been a commercial enterprise hiding behind a narcissistic “public interest” PR.’ ”

In leaked emails Assange suggested wikileaks could run on $50,000 per year but his desire to secure $5 million led to “delicate negotiations with the Open Society (George Soros),” and a “strategy for division and support.” Assange was reported to own 94% of the (for profit) company that owns wikileaks. He planned that wikileaks would:

“appear to be, the reclusive ubermench of the 4th estate.”

and to,

“continually inject our informational strain…. to dominate the culture when opposed by relatively random influences of others… to push our desired perceptions of what WL is into the world, to set the key in which future bars of our song are to be played by the public orchestra, BEFORE it faces any serious opposition.”

The extensive media coverage Assange has received contrasts starkly with the way the truth of 9/11 or vaccine harms is ignored and censored.

Other whistleblowers remain largely unknown. Seeking to avoid being extradited to the US he was forced to stay in London, one of the media centres of the world, in the embassy of Ecuador, a US ally.

During the lockdown period the media highlighted prominent figures campaigning for his release whilst demonstrations against the incarceration of the wider public were under-reported.

Assange is said to have endured a lack of daylight at the embassy -which has windows and where he appeared on a balcony. Similarly, he is said to have suffered constant surveillance but also to have sired two sons in a relationship that was kept secret until 2020 and during which he enjoyed visits from Pamela Anderson. He apparently married in prison but we are told the photographs of the event are too grainy to be recognisable. When he was forcibly carried from the embassy in full public view a Gore Vidal book was not dislodged from his grip.

Assange remains the only one of the wikileaks team to be given a high profile and pursued by the authorities. Alongside dissidents Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning, he has been depicted in a statue that has been given prominence around the world. The trio operate as examples to those in the respective fields of journalism, intelligence, and the military.

Like Snowden, who also fails the 9/11 litmus test, Assange has had a Hollywood movie made about him.

Despite the reported psychological torture imposed upon him, Manning was permitted to pursue his trans-gender inclinations whilst in custody, setting a precedent for the US military.

Critics of Wikileaks observe that its leaks do not pack a punch that western imperialists cannot stomach, and instead they seem to support narratives concerning western targets such as Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran, and favour allies such as Israel. Concerns have been raised that Wikileaks could serve as a filtering system for disclosures and a honey-trap for whistleblowers.

As the Assange story provides a long-running cautionary tale for journalists, its most infamous leak features the murder of war correspondents. Wikileaks’ revelations of spying, torture, and war crimes, expose those lower down the chain of command and address the symptoms of the ‘war of terror,’ but not its instigators or its cause.

Connect with OffGuardian

All images credit: original OffGuardian article post

Populations Sucked Into the Vortex of…Medical Labels

by Jon Rappoport
July 3, 2024

Take these disasters: pesticides that disrupt hormone levels; plastics everywhere; chemicals in dead processed foods; infant formula replacing breast milk; vaccines that disrupt and shred the immune system.

THEN researchers come along.

They take the symptoms these disasters create and cluster them in groups and put medical labels on them.

ADHD, depression, Bipolar, gender dysphoria…

When it comes to disruption of the immune system from pesticides, plastics, no breast milk, dead processed food, etc., look at this boggling list of “immune system diseases” the medical system has invented:

Autoimmune Diseases:
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis
Graves’ Disease
Psoriasis
Celiac Disease
Sjogren’s Syndrome
Myasthenia Gravis

Immunodeficiencies:
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID)
Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID)
Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD)
X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA)
Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS)
Hyper IgM Syndrome
DiGeorge Syndrome
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) leading to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)

Hypersensitivities:
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever)
Asthma
Anaphylaxis
Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
Food Allergies
Contact Dermatitis

Other Conditions:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), including Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Dermatomyositis
Scleroderma

These guys really know how to label.

They’re experts.

They can cluster and carve up symptoms and come up with medical names from here to the horizon.

They can resist any attempt to see how pesticides or infant formula or processed foods are the actual realities.

You can see why.

For every disease label, there are medical treatments. Drugs.

Treatments and drugs=$$$.

Plus control over the lives of patients.

There’s a much longer list than the one I just published above. It’s the total of diseases based on…

Viruses that don’t exist.

Brought to you by The Label Kings.

If I were a greedy young psychopath starting out in the world today, I would major in Communications at a prestigious college and write a thesis titled:

“100 ways to recycle death and label it with many disease names.”

With that thesis in hand, I would land a very nice starting position with one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world.

They would see my value immediately.

Now consider a doctor’s point of view. A patient comes in with complaints. The doctor can listen, run a few tests, slap on a disease label, and prescribe a drug, or he can say:

“Looks to me like you have pesticide poisoning. I don’t know what to do about that. I don’t have a remedy that takes the poison out of your body.”

He wouldn’t say THAT if you had him in chains and were beating him with a club.

If he had that degree of honesty, he’d be out of business pretty quick. And eventually he’d find himself in front of a state medical board trying (and failing) to keep his license.

The board idiots and sold out quacks would rake him over the coals.

Why not take easy road instead? He closes his eyes, throws an imaginary dart at an imaginary dart board and comes up with a disease name the patient never heard of.

“This is what you’ve got,” he says to the patient. “We have a course of treatment for it. Let’s begin.”

And so they do.

On the long march to nowhere.

CODA: To explore the fake science that led to the fake pandemic that led to the COVID “vaccines,” read Dr. Mark Bailey’s and Dr Sam Bailey’s book, The Final Pandemic. This dynamic duo has their hands on real science. It’s a powerful antidote to mainstream nonsense.

Connect with Jon Rappoport

Cover image credit: fszalai

The Current Assange Screenplay: Reality or Psyop?

by Gary D. Barnett
June 29, 2024

“In effect, the human being should be considered the priority in a political war. And conceived as the military target … the human being has his most critical point in his mind. Once the mind has been reached, the ‘political animal’ has been defeated without necessarily receiving bullets.”

~ U.S. Central Intelligence Agency training manual

I believe it imperative to question absolutely everything, especially anything coming from questionable (all) ‘news’ sources, governments, politicians, most ‘alternative’ media, and all mainstream reporting services. Nothing is to be believed unless it can be critically vetted, and proven to be accurate. In this day and age, nothing can be considered certain on its face, as lies and propaganda rule the airwaves, and inundate the minds of the indoctrinated masses. In fact, in the sense of reality, psychological warfare against individuals en masse, is a constant, and therefore a soft conscience and preferred sympathies should be initially discarded, unless and until the actual truth is found, and shown to be without doubt. This seemingly cold-hearted response can be a difficult pill to swallow, but swallow it one must if actual truth is sought.

Considering the Julian Assange saga, there is much controversy, and questions abound from every angle. I will admit before I go any further, that I was also fooled by the Assange psychological operation for a brief period, and even penned a short piece about it five years ago. I knew all along his arrest and all the attention was misleading and a scam, but wrongfully assumed that he was likely just a ‘victim’ of the State’s efforts to silence whistleblowers and dissent. That desired outcome was certainly achieved, but was Assange just an innocent victim and hero of the ‘alternative’ media, or was he complicit in this CIA psyop plot meant to squelch honest reporting exposing real criminal behavior?

Usually, when one is targeted as a risk to the phony-baloney ‘national security’ narrative, he and/or his organization is heavily censored, his content severely restricted or eliminated, and in some cases, he might be disappeared or succumb to some suspicious death, but just the opposite was the case with Assange. His so-called crime centered on the release (leak? Who leaked it and why did Assange get it?) of video showing the brutal murder of innocent people, including journalists in Iraq at the hands of the U.S. military. But the U.S. military has been brutally murdering civilians worldwide since the so-called beginning of the country. The U.S. has been responsible for slaughtering civilians for decade after decade, and in many cases, showing this evil on television to the applause of its braindead population. What about the fact that Madeline Albright, then Secretary of State, admitted that murdering 500,000 children under the age of five years, was worth it? Was that not a more heinous crime that was ignored? That is only one example of U.S terror against innocents.

Consider U.S. crimes against humanity in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Africa, Iran, Russia through the U.S. proxy war in Ukraine, Palestine, and of course in other areas and here at home. Tens of millions of civilians have died just since WWII at the hands of the U.S. directly, or by proxy, but no arrests of the murderers and their mercenaries were ever forthcoming. So why Assange, and what was the real agenda? Dan Dicks does an excellent job of explaining much of this, as can be viewed in this short video he released just recently.

Wikileaks, Assange’s organization, was suspect as a CIA operation long ago, and continued to receive press coverage from ‘alternative’ and mainstream sources, and CIA controlled mainstream sources, before, during, and after the Assange ordeal. Coverage of Assange was not hidden, it was continuously reported by every news source. Now, it is still all-consuming in the mainstream and ‘alternative’ circles, blanketing news cycles.

What began with Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy, and his very public arrest, and dragging out of that embassy, leading to his imprisonment at Belmarsh prison in the U.K., seemed brutal, and his haggard and gaunt physical appearance gave the impression of harsh mistreatment or torture. He was said to be subject to horrible conditions, heavy drugging meant to destroy his brain and body functions, and many eluded to the possibility that he would soon die in prison; a physically broken and braindead soul. But time continued, and so did constant reporting and pleas by ‘alternative’ sources to free him.

The trials, so-called extradition efforts, and constant threats against him were never-ending it seems, and all the reporting continued freely and openly throughout this decade-long plus incarceration. Now, all the drama has ended, as Assange willingly pled guilty to what were called crimes against the State, when in fact, crimes by the State have by extreme magnitudes, been far and above, beyond imagination actually, anything that Assange was accused of exposing. After all the supposed torture and drugging of Assange, he just walked out of prison, looking well-fed, fat, happy, and younger, and was given free passage back to his home country, as if nothing had ever happened. How could this be?

By pleading guilty, Assange effectively has gained his freedom, and many damning documents and emails against the U.S., its criminal politicians, and its war crimes will likely be destroyed. In addition, the precedent set is extremely dangerous considering anyone willing to expose crimes of the State. I would say that ‘journalism’ has been greatly harmed, but that happened a long time ago, as real and honest ‘journalism’ is basically non-existent today. This plea deal will go a long way to eliminating future whistle blowers, hackers, and truth tellers speaking out and exposing this heinous criminal government, and its crimes against humanity.

So is Assange a CIA asset, is he a hero, or has this entire ordeal been a staged screenplay meant to achieve a plotted outcome beneficial only to the deep state ruling cabal, its pawns in government, its enforcement gangs, and its controlled media? After all, much of Assange and his family’s past is suspect.

At this stage, it is my studied opinion, and therefore, I believe a foregone conclusion, that Wikileaks is and has been all along, a CIA operation. While my views on this matter will be a controversial stance, until I can be proven wrong, I rest on the assertion that all this has been a planned psychological operation from the start. I cannot come to any other determination based on irrefutable fact.

What I know without doubt, is that all this stinks to high heaven, and raises many more questions that have not been answered. This alone requires the utmost skepticism, and much more critical investigation is necessary if the real truth is actually sought. This is just too convoluted and too pat a hand to accept without maximum scrutiny. Get upset at my conclusions if you choose, but always look much deeper than the assumed narrative purposely given to you by your handlers.

“Capture their minds and their hearts and soul will follow.”

~ Author unknown

Connect with Gary D. Barnett website | substack

Cover image credit: dlsdkcgl

CIA as Day-to-Day Manager of Poisoning Our Skies

“CHEMTRAILS Brought to You by the CIA?”

by Peter A. Kirby, Activist Post
June 30, 2024

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) appears to be the overall, day-to-day manager of all aspects of today’s chemtrail spraying operations. To detail every documented connection between the CIA and what is referred to here as the New Manhattan Project (NMP) would be truly tedious. It suffices to say that their presence is pervasive – more so than any other organization. Their history is steeped in associated people and organizations such as the Nazis, the Council on Foreign Relations and William Francis Raborn. The CIA has been involved in many associated technologies and activities such as the operation of fleets of clandestine aircraft, the promotion of the theory of man-made global warming and the promotion of SRM geoengineering (chemtrails) itself. For the whole story of the New Manhattan Project please refer to my book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.

The CIA officially came into being in 1947 and its formation had everything to do with the Rockefellers and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR): two groups with intertwined histories and abundant connections to the New Manhattan Project. We covered the Rockefellers last week where we only touched upon the CFR, but we will cover the CFR in-depth next week.

The CIA’s most significant predecessor organization was the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS). In June of 1941, six months before America declared war on Germany, the OSS was set up in Rockefeller Center. The wife of the first Director of the OSS was a director of the Rockefeller Foundation. Similar to some of the first CIA agents, the first agents of the OSS were bankers, lawyers, businessmen, and accountants deeply embedded with the CFR and the international money cartel. The OSS was the dominant U.S. intelligence agency during WWII.

Shortly after the conclusion of the war, President Truman abolished the OSS and placed its operations under something called the Strategic Services Unit (SSU). Within months, the SSU officially morphed into another organization, then yet another. General Hoyt Vandenberg (1899-1954) then recruited Allen Dulles (1893-1969) to draft a proposal for the organization that would become the CIA. It was all financed by Rockefeller and Carnegie. In their epic book Killing the Planet Williams and Howard-Browne write:

“In 1946, General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, as director of Central Intelligence (DCI), recruited Allen Dulles, a lawyer for the House of Morgan and the president of the CFR, ‘to draft proposals for the shape and organization of what was to become the Central Intelligence Agency in 1947.’ The meeting took place within offices within Rockefeller Center. By the time the CIA was officially established by President Truman in 1947, David Rockefeller assumed control of the inner core of the CFR and the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations allocated $34 million for the new Agency to engage in covert activities.”

Williams and Howard-Browne continue, “As soon as Dulles took charge of the CIA, the Rockefellers became the private bankers for the new intelligence empire, and David became an important source for off-the-books cash to the spy agency.” Once established, the CIA’s ranks were filled with white shoe boys. New CIA recruits included John D. Rockefeller, Jr.

Throughout all of this, this group that had morphed from the wartime OSS into the post-war CIA was secretly bringing hundreds of former Nazi scientists and their families into America. Many of these scientists went to work on projects associated with the New Manhattan Project. There is a chapter in my book titled ‘The Nazis and the CIA’ which covers this in-depth and we will be covering this story in a future episode of The Abstract as well.

~ ~ ~

Running a large, clandestine fleet of jumbo jet aircraft, such as that which routinely dumps tens of thousands of megatons of toxic waste over humanity and the earth today annually, would not be a stretch for the CIA. In fact, there is a grand history of just such a thing. The evolution of today’s proprietary chemtrail spraying fleet will be yet another topic for a future article and video, but let’s just dip our toe in the water here, shall we?

As touched upon last week, the beginnings of today’s proprietary fleet of chemtrail spraying aircraft are apparently found in something you may have heard of called the Flying Tigers – which was an American paramilitary, private air force that operated in China in the early 1940s. Also as noted last week, there was an ad hoc political lobby supporting the Flying Tigers which operated out of Rockefeller Center in Manhattan.

In 1942, the Flying Tigers were disbanded and integrated into the U.S. Army Air Force when the United States armed forces officially entered the ongoing China/Japan conflict in support of Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalist Chinese. Then, after the dropping of the atomic bombs and the subsequent Japanese surrender in 1945, U.S. troops were pulled out of the theatre. The aforementioned ad hoc political lobby that had previously supported the Flying Tigers, along with some new players from both America and China, then formed something called Civil Air Transport (CAT). CAT was a fleet of commercial aircraft initially tasked with flying relief supplies into China’s interior. They were also flying the opium out.

In 1950 the CIA purchased CAT and the CIA proprietary airlines collectively known as ‘Air America’ were born. CIA airlines such as Air America, Intermountain Aviation, Air Asia, Southern Air Transport, CAT and others were all organized under something called the Pacific Corporation and were all often referred to as ‘Air America.’ The Pacific Corporation was run by a longtime CIA employee named George Doole (1909-1985). The Pacific Corporation ran airlines that collectively were larger than any other single airline in the world at the time. In the 1960s and 70s, the operation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars. By 1973, near the end of their reign, Air America had contracts with the defense department worth 41.4 million dollars.

Pilots of these airlines organized under the Pacific Corporation smuggled everything from currency to drugs to precious metals to human beings. Air America’s slogan was ‘Anything, anywhere, anytime.’ Of these different contrabands, opium was the most prevalent. Southern Air Transport was later involved in the Iran-Contra scandal.

In 1973, the secret war in Laos ended and a major portion of Air America’s business operations vanished with it. In 1974, all the airlines of the Pacific Corporation were finally disbanded due to federal legislation passed as a result of congressional hearings conducted by Idaho Senator Frank Church. Shortly before it was broken up, the Agency’s Pacific Corporation and all its proprietary airlines employed about 20,000 people, more people than the CIA itself. The Church Committee Hearings also uncovered that the Pacific Corporation was majority-owned and controlled by Chinese interests.

As previously noted, one of the airlines formerly under the Pacific Corporation was Intermountain Aviation. In 1975, after the Pacific Corporation had been broken up, Evergreen International bought Intermountain Aviation. Evergreen’s specialty was spraying substances from aircraft. They called it ‘application’ work. Evergreen is so heavily implicated in the New Manhattan Project that we’re just going to have to stop right here. Please look forward to the upcoming article and video where we go further into the formation of today’s dedicated chemtrail fleet. But, for now, please know that the CIA has an extensive history in the ownership and operation of large, covertly operating fleets of aircraft.

~ ~ ~

A former head of the CIA named William Francis Raborn, Jr. (1905-1990) is extensively implicated in the New Manhattan Project. There is an entire chapter about William Raborn in my book.

On April 22, 1965 retired Vice Admiral Raborn became the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). In November of 1965, during Raborn’s CIA directorship, LBJ’s Environmental Pollution Panel of the President’s Science Advisory Committee issued the landmark document titled “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment.” “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment” was the first top-level U.S. Government document to state the catastrophic theory of man-made climate change. Not only did the authors of “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment” provide us with the problem, they also provided us with the solution. They wrote that small particles in the atmosphere could reflect sunlight back into space, thus cooling the Earth and saving us from the problem of climate change. Way back in 1965, the authors of “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment” advocated for SRM geoengineering, also known as chemtrails. Although the CIA does not take credit for “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment,” they have produced lots of similar material and they (in theory at least) serve at the pleasure of the President. Doesn’t it make sense then that the CIA was involved in the production of “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment?” One of the document’s co-authors, the infamous Gordon J.F. ’How to Wreck the Environment’ MacDonald, was CIA.

Prior to Raborn’s CIA directorship, he had written an article titled “New Horizons of Naval Research and Development” in which he advocated for a second generation, global weather modification project involving the use of electromagnetic energy and manipulations of the ionosphere. Does that sound familiar? He was also directly involved in the production of machines which can do just that.

The United States Navy, of which Mr. Raborn was a vice admiral, was one of the managers of the gigantic HAARP ionospheric heater facility in Alaska and Raborn was directly involved in its production. Ionospheric heaters such as HAARP are used to carry out the electromagnetic aspects of today’s New Manhattan Project. In 1970 Raborn became a member of the board of directors of a company called LTV Electrosystems to which he also served as a consultant. In 1972 LTV Electrosystems’ parent corporation Ling-Temco-Vought sold the company and it became E-Systems. Admiral Raborn stayed on the board of directors throughout. In the 1990s, E-Systems built the first version of HAARP. E-Systems was also the buyer of the aforementioned CIA proprietary Air Asia.

William Raborn has other potential connections to the New Manhattan Project involving: an ELF transmitter at Clam Lake, the Polaris missile system, an administrative technique known as PERT, and a company called Aerojet General. Details are in my book.

~ ~ ~

The CIA has extensively promoted the theory of man made global warming, which is the given excuse for today’s chemtrail spraying operations. Through their Operation Mockingbird, the CIA has been running the American mainstream media news for a long time and we have all seen the MSM’s pervasive and enduring promotion of global warming. It’s exemplified by all the hot air blowing out of their mouths.

The CIA has also produced reports fear mongering about all the catastrophes that might result from a minor fluctuation in the earth’s average global temperature. To top it off, we have at least one documented example of the CIA funding the promotion of SRM geoengineering (chemtrails).

The CIA funded a study resulting in the 2015 National Academy of Sciences report titled “Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth.” This study was also supported by some of the usual suspects: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Department of Energy. In “Climate Intervention” the authors cite the faulty and discredited Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) data to assert that global warming is occurring. Then they write that, because global warming is a such a problem, the potential solution of SRM geoengineering needs more research.

~ ~ ~

There’s too much to cover here. The connections between the CIA and the New Manhattan Project simply go on and on. But let’s give it a shot. John von Neumann (1903-1957) was one of the most important scientists in the development of the NMP and he was CIA. I have already produced an episode of The Abstract detailing the connections between former head of the CIA John Deutch and the NMP. Rear Admiral Luis de Florez (1889-1962) chaired a special science advisory board of the CIA and he advocated for a second generation global weather modification system many times. From there the connections go into something called the MEDEA Committee, the JASON Group, Enron, black budgets, the global narcotics racket, a second, secret CIA and more. As noted last week, former CIA director John Brennan spoke in favor of chemtrails at the CFR.

A most probable place for the New Manhattan Project to reside inside of the CIA is in their Directorate of Science and Technology (DS&T). This Directorate has historically been at the cutting edge of two areas of technology relevant to the New Manhattan Project: satellite reconnaissance and over-the-horizon radar. Satellites can monitor atmospheric conditions and track atmospheric particles while over-the-horizon radar is the direct predecessor of today’s ionospheric heaters which can modify the weather in the fashion of the New Manhattan Project.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Find his books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco available at Amazon. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com

Connect with Activist Post

Cover image credit: amber_avalona

Voting Is Evil: Your Country Needs YOU… Not to Vote.

Voting Is Evil

Your country needs YOU… not to vote.

by Nemo Jones, Reporting for Beauty
originally published April 28, 2024
sourced from Winter Oak

“You’ve got to vote, vote, vote, vote. That’s it; that’s the way we move forward.” ~Michelle Obama

“We can all agree on the importance of voting.” ~Jenna Bush

“Voting is the expression of our commitment to ourselves, one another, this country, and this world.” ~Sharon Salzberg

“You cannot complain if you didn’t vote.” ~Barack Obama

“The right to vote is the basic right without which all others are meaningless.” ~Lyndon B Johnson

“Voting is not just a right, it’s a responsibility.” ~Don Santo

“Voting is a civic sacrament.” ~Theodore Hesburgh

Election day. Inhale deep of the blessed and rarified air. Your moment has come. Your time to shine. Today – at long last – your voice matters. Your voice will be heard. Your dream of a just and sane world is damn near palpable.

The diligent and painstaking attention you’ve paid to the rational, informed and balanced debates of the day, the carefully honed and nuanced arguments you’ve formulated all come to bear – today of all days. Your choice will resonate onwards, shaping our future world. Proudly aligned in thought, feeling and action – a responsible, informed representative of humanity – you step out, relishing the unique significance of the moment.

As you approach the sacred polling station, the drudgery of mundane existence recedes, the endless grinding trauma of life’s grotesque inequity is momently adjourned and a better world beckons, as the magical portal of possibility opens. The liminal dream space of infinite potential unfurls, as you… stroll past, shaking your head in wonder at the brainwashed humanoid automatons filing inside to righteously scrawl a cross into a box.

Democracy: a dismal charade. A transparent scam devised by the same elitist con artists that sold humanity the ‘divine right’ of kings, emperors, sultans and caesars to steal, rape, enslave, starve, torture, subjugate, deceive and massacre: the ‘divine’ wrong. In the modern age, such inhuman parasites hide their power-and-bloodlust behind ‘the will of the people’, who dutifully fall for it, election cycle after cycle. It’s maddening, heart-wrenching and world destroying.

Voting is not a ‘right’, but a profound wrong, bestowing the same fake and calamitous ‘legitimacy’ on unscrupulous parasites as the so-called ‘divine right’ of kings. Voting violates Natural Law and everything humane. It is an act of evil.

Election rejection is not the sole remedy to the world’s ills (for that, see here), but it’s a start; a simple, satisfying and eminently attainable goal on our journey toward an enlightened age.

Government is the current manifestation of humanity’s greatest failing: the feigned abdication of individual response ability; the pathetic claim of victim status as immutable identity. Government convinces Sovereign beings that they possess no inherent self-authority, or authorship of their own reality: a lethal pretence. One always remains completely ‘response able’. A lifetime spent in denial of this fact is simply an abject failure to respond appropriately to circumstances – a failure with devastating consequences.

The election pantomime is indeed the civic sacrament; the humiliation ritual that formalises and sanctifies the tragic wasted opportunity of a Sovereign being’s submission to false external authority. It’s heavy stuff. Willingly giving up our natural-born freedom to charlatans – to anyone – is the ultimate self-debasement and insult to nature – or God, if you prefer.

It’s clearer than ever that the political class is self-serving, vain, deceitful and beyond corrupt. But to blame morally bankrupt husks for their ruinous treachery is to miss the point: they play their role perfectly: corrupt cogs of a corrupt machine. And all the while, you remain ‘response able’, whether or not you like or admit it.

The purpose of a system is what it does. What does government do? Serve hidden interests. Destroy beauty and everything else that supports well-being. Normalise the violation of Natural Law to the point of banality. Devour priceless time and energy. Distract and demoralise while its cogs moralise, posture and pontificate. Endlessly steal, lie, bully and cheat. Reward evil and punish conscientiousness. Promise justice while delivering industrial-scale injustice and horrors without end. Serve demented elitist agendas perversely clothed and paraded as the greater good.

Government mocks you relentlessly. It’s long past time to stop embracing the narcissist.

Government was never intended to serve you and it cannot. Government has not become corrupted. It is the very pinnacle of corruption. A finely crafted tool of mind control, distraction, manipulation and subjugation; a weapon of mass destruction; a hideous, bent game in which we lose everything of value.

Government is a deadly, yet ridiculous, weapon. If it didn’t exist, it would be laughable. No one would believe it. And no one should. It’s a crazed despot’s sadistic fantasy; people excitedly lining up to select their torturer of choice, then sitting ‘round the goggle box revelling in the agony and ecstasy of the spectacle, as the knife is twisted right, then left, then right again.

A vote is a signal to the universe that you are a willing slave. One who truly understands what government is will never engage. Why attempt the impossible feat of making government serve you when we can so easily make it disappear instead? All it takes is ‘right inaction’ – the simple reclamation of your attention and natural born authority. Enough of this horror. Enough of this monster.

You have no right to dominate or impose your will on others. You have no right to concoct arbitrary rules that do not accord with Natural Law and enforce them upon others. Yet a vote is a (fruitless) attempt to appoint someone to conduct these immoral acts on your behalf: to steal from, threaten, coerce and wield force against others to impose your will – in direct, flagrant and absolute violation of Natural Law. A vote is both an attempted abnegation of natural born self-Sovereignty and an attempt to violate the natural born self-Sovereign rights of others. The consequences of these violations for our shared reality are evident. One can only speculate on the personal consequences.

A spoiled vote is still participation in the sacrament. Why attempt to ‘send a message’ to those with no interest in us? An inhuman system deserves only contempt and disavowal, not engagement or endorsement of any kind. There may be humane but misguided beings caught up in this enslavement system who, it could be argued, ‘deserve’ your vote – the system does not.

‘But if I don’t vote, [insert terrifying outcome]’. The monster will lumber on to its inevitable demise whether we feed it or not. The question that should concern us – and deeply – is what ultimately replaces it. True freedom or overt subjugation? A humane or inhuman future? Giving one’s power away as if it were worthless is a clear declaration of one’s valuelessness and a direct cause leading inexorably toward the latter. The monster feeds on fear. True freedom can only result from right, principled, courageous action.

Votes are an accurate measure of one thing: how well the con of democracy is working. The ideal result is zero votes. This may seem an unlikely outcome – but that is no justification for compromise. Compromise with evil is evil. Every vote cast is a vote for an evil system with no right to exist.

Voting is evil because:

It is a denial of immutable Sovereign self response ability.
It is an endorsement of a system which inherently violates Natural Law.
It is an attempt to impose your will on others, in violation of Natural Law.

Please don’t miss out on a golden opportunity to take right inaction.

Our beautiful and humane future begins in the hearts, minds and actions (or conscientious inactions) of the bold.

For the avoidance of doubt, the above does indeed approach its limited subject from an anarchistic – a morally and rationally consistent – perspective. I heartily en-courage you to delve ever deeper into Natural Law (of which I will continue to write). I am convinced that our doing so is the sole and certain path out of the madness, badness and sadness of our deluded age and toward an enlightened one.

Connect with Nemo Jones

Cover image credit: Elsemargriet

Katherine Watt: Parsing “Yay, We Did It!” Informational Misdirection Campaigns.

by Katherine Watt, Bailiwick News
originally published June 13, 2024

I’m on some email mailing lists for some of the more prominent ‘medical freedom movement’ organizations.

Without naming the organizations or the individual leaders, below is my analysis of recent messages from movement leaders that can be paraphased as “Yay, we did it!,” especially regarding campaigns directed at the World Health Organization, and “Next target!,” especially regarding gain-of-function research on so-called pathogens with pandemic potential.

The things they don’t talk about matter more than what they do talk about.

“Yay, we did it!” focused on WHO campaigns, is a method to induce readers, listeners and viewers to misunderstand and ignore legal authorities already centralized by domestic communicable disease control law, vaccine production and supply contracts (domestic and international), and international Mutual Recognition Agreements, already invoked and enforced during Covid, and to a lesser extent, during previous alleged pandemics.

Currently there’s also a focus on “gain-of-function” laboratory activity as a source of pandemic-potential pathogens, as contrasted with naturally-evolving or zoonotic pathogens.

These fake targets for public distress — imminent (rather than accomplished) centralization of global public-health-predicated governing authority, deadly global pandemic-potential pathogens and gain of function research — are offered for several reasons:

To reinforce the fear- and compliance-sustaining lie that pathogens can be, or can be manipulated to become, existential threats to society: sustainably and simultaneously very deadly and very transmissible communicable disease vectors.
To funnel public attention and effort into wasteful, irrelevant campaigns to legally influence supralegal (operating outside the law with global legal immunity) organizations (i.e. UN, WHO, WEF), and to de-fund or prohibit gain of function research.
To leave unrecognized and unchallenged the intrinsic heterogeneity, instability and toxicity of biological products, including vaccines, better understood as legalized poisons designed, intended and used for more than a century to mutilate, sterilize and kill recipients.
To leave unrecognized and unchallenged the real threat of global deception and coercion programs already established and led by the US government and central banks, already operative through US state and county governments, international organizations (UN, WHO, WEF) and other national governments and their political subdivisions.

Misleaders want people to believe these falsehoods:

Deadly global pandemic pathogens transmitting communicable diseases have occurred in the past and will occur again, especially through development and circulation of “gain of function” pathogens of pandemic potential.
Past, current, emerging, novel, and/or future pandemic pathogens legally and morally justify centralized US-government and central-bank-controlled (UN-WHO-fronted) military and financial control of global pandemic and public health emergency preparedness and response programs.
US-government- and central bank-controlled (UN-WHO-fronted) governments don’t yet have operative legal, military and financial authority to surveil, test, quarantine, isolate and compel submission to treatment for alleged infection with alleged pandemic pathogens.
US-FDA is a regulatory agency legally obligated, and historically functioning, to regulate the manufacture of drugs, devices, biological products (including vaccines), for safety, efficacy and purity, and therefore people should have confidence in US-FDA’s reviews, decisions and pronouncements.
Vaccines and other biological products are non-toxic, non-weapon, medicinal product class, and therefore people should have confidence in and consume these products.
EUA countermeasures (drugs, devices, biological products, vaccines) are intended, designed, effective, manufactured, and regulated for treating and/or preventing infection with deadly pandemic pathogens.

Misleaders want people to misunderstand or ignore these truths:

1. Deadly global pandemic pathogens are not possible, by natural evolution or by “gain-of-function” lab-development. Whatever their initial virulence (severity or harmfulness), as communicable disease outbreaks spread among living organisms, they weaken and burn out as populations’ individual and aggregate immune systems respond.

Note: I think globalist killers expedited their vaccine-mediated worldwide poisoning program starting in the 1950s with national polio vaccination campaigns partly because, in combination with better water and sewage treatment systems, faster international travel — especially air travel — had rapidly moved the world’s people toward much higher individual and aggregate immunity to many previously regionally-transmitted communicable disease vectors.

2. There is no moral or legal justification for centralized US-government and central-bank-controlled (UN-WHO-fronted) military and financial control of global pandemic/public health emergency preparedness and response programs.

3. Deadly chemical weapons, fraudulent mass testing, and fraudulent mass media campaigns can and have been developed and deployed to simulate outbreaks of deadly communicable disease and drive public credulity in the core lies listed above.

4. USA-FDA does not regulate manufacture of vaccines and other biological product. US-FDA simulates regulation, and has never established or enforced measurable, validated standards for vaccine or biological product identity, safety, efficacy or purity.1

5. UN-WHO, International Health Regulations (2005), require member states to “adjust domestic legislative and administrative arrangements” to comply with IHR regulations.

6. Centralized military and financial control of pandemic preparedness and response provisions are embedded in US domestic law (federal statutes, regulations, executive orders, commercial contracts and treaties; state laws and contracts, county emergency management plans and contracts), in compliance with UN-WHO IHR, 2005, and UN-WHO IHR, 2022 amendments, and have been built in and developed for several decades including provisions authorizing military, law enforcement and public health officers to engage in warrantless surveillance, inspection, testing, apprehension, detention, quarantine, isolation, compulsory treatment; provisions authorizing exemptions/waivers/exclusions from cGMP and related requirements for routine vaccination products and for EUA countermeasures; and provisions authorizing vaccine manufacturer and administrator (nurse, pharmacist, doctor) civil and criminal liability indemnification since 1986 for routine vaccination-poisoning and since the 2005 PREP Act for emergency countermeasure vaccination-poisoning and other EUA drugs, devices and biological products.

Repealable US domestic federal public health emergency, communicable disease control, pandemic preparedness and response laws.

7. Vaccine and other countermeasure production contracts between the US military and pharmaceutical companies condition manufacturing, distribution and use on intact PREP Act statutes and active PREP Act declarations.

2020.04.16 DoD Moderna Contract PREP Act Sec B.4.4

2020.07.21 DoD ATI Pfizer Contract PREP Act Sec 11.1

8. International sales contracts condition supply of products manufactured by US military contractors, to non-US governments, on purchasing government adoption and maintenance of indemnification laws.

2021 Pfizer-Albania Contract Indemnity Sec 8

2021 Pfizer Albania Contract Conditions Precedent to Supply Normative Act Sec 9.5

9. International Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) absolve federal drug regulators of non-US countries of legal responsibility for cGMP manufacturing regulation, transferring regulatory functions to US-FDA: global drug non-regulator under US laws exempting biological products, vaccines and EUA countermeasures from cGMP compliance.

1998 US-EU Mutual Recognition Agreement, Article 9, no batch testing, cGMP enforcement

1 FDA history of non-regulation of vaccines and other biological products, series:

Dec. 19, 2023 – Legalized FDA non-regulation of biological products effective May 2, 2019, by Federal Register Final Rule, signed by then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb.
March 8, 2024 – Part 1: Mutual Recognition Agreements. First in series on legal links connecting domestic and international non-regulation of non-medicines
March 12, 2024 – Part 2: Statutory and regulatory definitions for drugs, biological products, and biosimilars
March 15, 2024 – Part 3: Deregulation of biological product manufacturing, mid-1990s to present
March 20, 2024 – Part 4: Vaccines have always been heterogeneous mixtures of toxins used to intentionally sicken people and animals
March 21, 2024 – Part 5: Vaccine and related biological product manufacturing as US government-licensed poison manufacturing Evidence from November 1986 ‘mandate for safer childhood vaccines’ codified at 42 USC 300aa-27, and July 2018 stipulation by HHS.
April 3, 2024 – Part 6: On why FDA revised written non-rules for non-regulation of biological products to make them more unintelligible, inapplicable and unenforceable since the 1990s.
April 25, 2024 – Part 7: Terms, phrases and organizations involved in worldwide regulatory and manufacturing deception surrounding vaccines and other biological products.
May 21, 2024 – Part 8: There is no legal limit to the amount of so-called contamination that can legally be included in vaccines or any other biological products.
May 25, 2024 – Part 9: On FDA buildings as virtual mailboxes to project the public illusion of biological product manufacturing regulation.
June 4, 2024 – Part 10: Sen. Rand Paul, FDA Modernization Act 2.0, and animal testing of new drugs.

Connect with Katherine Watt

Cover image based on creative commons work of:creozavr

‘Raw Milk Conspiracy’ Band: “Miss Information Whore”

‘Raw Milk Conspiracy’ Band: “Miss Information Whore” Launch on Defiance Records

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

I was contacted by Raw Milk Conspiracy, letting us know about the release of their EP (Extended Play) recording of “Miss Information Whore”. Raw Milk Conspiracy is an “awake punk rock band” based out of London.

Below you will find two videos (available at Resistance GB YouTube & Odysee channels). The first is a music video of their newly-released “Miss Information Whore”. The second is an interview with Resistance GB that reveals more about their vision and backgrounds. A third video of a live launch event can be found here.

On first listen, I was impressed by the strength and intelligence of their music. In listening to their interview with Resistance GB, I was touched by their personal story of standing up against the evil lies that are attempting to bulldoze all of humanity into compliance with self-harm.

Resistance GB on the new EP release:

“The EP [Miss Information Whore] covers the true journey of the band, from an engineer, a pot-washer and a music teacher to ‘extremists’ and convicted ‘criminals’, who find themselves enemies of the state.

“In a perfectly reflected world of mass formation psychosis driven by state propaganda, ‘trusted news initiatives’, mass censorship, police brutality, social hypocrisy and government corruption, one man’s actions calling a BBC employee a traitor and throwing a half-empty humus-pot in self-defence can lead him down a darker path.

“The following melodies describe the climate or fear, an act of protest, an arrest, a particularly trisyllabic interview, and a descent down a dangerous road of extremism, to the extent that one begins to question whether an emotion can truly be a crime.”

In whatever way you can, please share their work and support them. Download the EP from Amazon or Apple. If you live in the UK, consider attending live events or purchasing their CD at Defiance Records. (Donations for Defiance Records’ work can be made at the same link.)

Raw Milk Conspiracy gigs are listed at Defiance Records website:

June 27th to 30th 2024 – Sounds Beautiful Festival, Wimborne, Dorset – Raw Milk Conspiracy (Buy Tickets Here)

July 25th – Underground Sounds – Raw Milk Conspiracy (at The Night Owl – N4 2DH)

August 3rd 2024 – Bush Hall, London – Raw Milk Conspiracy (Supporting The Blockheads)

Join me in letting them know you appreciate their courage, humor and creative work by sharing links to their videos, showing up at live events or passing this article on to others.

~ Kathleen

Raw Milk Conspiracy — Miss Information Whore

Video available at Odysee & YouTube

Lyrics:

Miss Information whore
Evil to the core
We’re stuck in 1984
Ghastly corporate bore

Lies, on top of Lies, on top of lies
Cant believe my ears, my eyes
And now sadly
Now sadly it comes as no surprise

Ghastly corporate bore
Were stuck in 1984
Evil to the core
Miss Information whore
Evil, evil to the core

The Resistance Podcast Episode #1: Raw Milk Conspiracy

Video available at Odysee & YouTube

Willsy interviews Raw Milk Conspiracy, creators of “Miss Information Whore”. Find more information about the band and their launch at: defiancerecordings.com.

Rockefellers Covering the Earth with Chemtrails?: Spraying Megatons of Toxic Waste From Aircraft to Solve the Global Problems

The Abstract episode 35 “Rockefellers Covering the Earth with CHEMTRAILS?”

by Peter Kirby, Activist Post
June 23, 2024

In large part, the history of the Rockefeller family is the history of today’s chemtrail spraying operations referred to here as the New Manhattan Project. The two are so intertwined and have been so for so long that it is impossible to separate them. Specific evidence of this is found in: secret societies, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Flying Tigers, the Nazis, the United Nations, the CIA, Rockefeller Bros. Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories and much more. This article gives an overview, but much more detail can be found in my book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.

As with everything the Rockefeller establishment does, it all starts with secret societies. The mysterious Committee of 300 as well as the infamous Skull & Bones have most probably been involved here too, but there’s a certain group called The Round Table known to control the resources necessary to coordinate and guide the New Manhattan Project (NMP) throughout the decades.

As a way to advance the goals of The Round Table in America, J.P. Morgan (1837-1913) established the American chapter of the Pilgrim Society at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Manhattan. A London headquarters of the Pilgrim Society had been previously established. Members of Morgan’s new Manhattan chapter of the Pilgrim Society included Percy Rockefeller. Later, members of the Pilgrim Society of more specific note to the New Manhattan Project would come to include: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, Henry Luce, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush. In 1912 the Pilgrim Society spawned an American Round Table. The financial cartel consisting mainly of the houses of: Rockefeller, Carnegie, Morgan, Schiff, and Rothschild has been the driving force behind the Pilgrim Societies and The Round Table.

The American Federal Reserve Bank System (a source of unlimited funding) was hatched by members of the Pilgrim Society. A partial 1914 listing of U.S. Federal Reserve Bank shareholders includes: National City Bank, William Rockefeller and Percy Rockefeller. The Rockefeller-controlled National City Bank was the largest shareholder with 30,000 shares.

The Rockefeller Foundation was founded in 1913 (the same year as their private U.S. Federal Reserve Bank) to promote nothing less than the welfare of all mankind. The Rockefellers intended to use science to solve the global problems of: sickness, poverty, underdevelopment, and ignorance. Spraying megatons of toxic waste from aircraft is apparently their idea of how to achieve these goals.

Chicago University was founded with funds from John D. Rockefeller, Sr. This is significant because lots of weather modification (the primary purpose of the NMP) work has been done at Chicago University. Also, it was at the University of Chicago where the the first known self-sustaining nuclear reaction was created – an important development in the history of the original Manhattan Project.

Rockefellers have traditionally dominated a powerful offshoot of The Round Table: the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) – and the CFR has been geoengineering’s top public relations firm. The Rockefeller Foundation along with the Carnegie Foundation provided the original funding for the CFR’s headquarters. David Rockefeller (1916-2017) was the longest serving director of the CFR from 1949-1985 (36 years) and chairman from 1970 to 1985. During the 1920s, J.D. Rockefeller, Jr. became a fixture at Pratt House (CFR headquarters). Other CFR members have included: J.D. Rockefeller IV, David Rockefeller, Jr., Nicholas Rockefeller, and Steven Rockefeller. The Rockefellers’ JP Morgan Chase is a corporate member of the CFR. The CFR is controlled by the Rockefellers, so it is no surprise that policies prepared at the CFR for implementation by the State Department have been designed to further the Rockefellers’ interests.

Under Rockefeller domination, CFR members and the CFR itself have published many high profile papers and reports written in support of SRM geoengineering (chemtrails). As detailed in my book, many individuals heavily implicated in the New Manhattan Project have been CFR members and many corporations implicated in the production of the NMP are (or have been) corporate members of the CFR. In 2016, the former director of the CIA John ‘Stratospheric Aerosol Injection’ Brennan famously advocated for chemtrails at CFR headquarters in Manhattan.

The Rockefellers really got busy with the NMP during and after WWII. This was when fundamental technologies needed for this global weather modification program started getting massive funding. The Rockefellers funded the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s wartime Radiation Laboratory which produced early technologies succinctly applicable to the New Manhattan Project such as aircraft control systems and over-the-horizon radar.

Meanwhile, in early 1940s China, in blatant violation of the Neutrality Act, the Rockefellers supported the beginnings of today’s proprietary fleet of chemtrail spraying jumbo jets: the Flying Tigers. The ad hoc political lobby that supported the Flying Tigers operated out of Manhattan’s Rockefeller Center. Nelson Rockefeller, along with the same people that brought us the Flying Tigers, formed the Sydney Ross Company which supplied the Flying Tigers and China with pharmaceutical drugs throughout the war.

As usual, the Rockefellers were playing all sides. They did tremendous business helping build and support the WWII Nazi war machine, often to the exclusion of American interests. This is significant to our discussion because, after the war, many former Nazi scientists were secreted into America and went to work on many areas applicable to the New Manhattan Project. Throughout WWII, the head of the Rockefeller family was John D. Rockefeller, Jr. (1874-1960).

One of John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s sons, Laurance Rockefeller (1910-2004) became firmly embedded in the American military aerospace industry – an area germane to the New Manhattan Project. In the years leading up to America’s entry into the war, he had helped finance the beginnings of McDonnell Douglas and had saved Eddie Rickenbacker’s Eastern Airlines from bankruptcy. In 1940 Laurance Rockefeller (L.R.) was persuaded by Assistant Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal (1892-1949) to assist the Navy in managing and financing certain aviation companies, and the seeds of Laurance Rockefeller’s post-war venture capital activities were planted. During WWII, L.R. was a naval lieutenant overseeing Bureau of Aeronautics aircraft production.

After the war, in 1946 Laurance Rockefeller founded Rockefeller Brothers, Inc., a venture capital firm invested in companies producing jets, helicopters, rockets, aviation electronics, and nuclear research. Among many other firms, Rockefeller Brothers helped fund the Glenn L. Martin corporation which eventually became today’s Lockheed Martin – developer of the Polaris missile and producer of the C-141 supertanker aircraft: two projects with profound implications for the NMP. Today Rockefeller Brothers, Inc. is known as Venrock.

The United Nations (UN) is another of the Rockefellers’ post war efforts and, again, this is significant because the UN is heavily implicated in the NMP. The UN started in a Rockefeller-funded study group at the CFR. In their epic book Killing the Planet, Williams and Howard-Browne write:

“The United Nations, as conceived by the Council on Foreign Relations and funded by the House of Rockefeller, was never meant to be an academic debating society. It was conceived to become an international regime that would control the world’s weapons, wars, courts, tax collectors, and economy. The orders to create this new international organization came from the Rockefellers. The plans were drawn up in 1943 by a ‘secret steering committee’ under Secretary of State Cordell Hull. The members of this committee – Leo Pasvolsky, Isaiah Bowman, Sumner Welles, Norman Davis, and Myron Taylor – were all prominent CFR members. The draft for the massive international agency, after passing Nelson Rockefeller’s inspection, was presented on June 15, 1944, to President Roosevelt, who promptly gave it his approval.”

For the UN’s headquarters, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. offered $8.5M to buy a piece of real estate situated alongside the East River in central Manhattan previously known as Turtle Bay. The United Nations headquarters were mainly designed by the same architect who designed Rockefeller Center.

For information about the UN’s extensive connections to the NMP, please refer to my book. I’m struggling to keep this article relatively short. My problem has always been one of too much evidence, not too little. Please bear with.

The Rockefellers have funded John von Neumann and Edward Teller – two monolithic figures in the development of the NMP. The Rockefellers have readily available connections to the MITRE Corporation – which has carried forth the nucleus of the NMP over the decades. The Rockefellers have been prodigious supporters of the theory of man made global warming – which provides ideological support for the NMP. The Rockefellers have always been fully invested in the CIA – an organization with only the most profound implications for the NMP. The CIA’s involvement in the NMP will be detailed on The Abstract next week. The Rockefellers have strong connections to the Travelers Insurance Company and their Weather Research Center – financial fraud anyone? Among many other major holdings of companies heavily implicated in the NMP, by 1976 the Rockefellers held a controlling interest in Atlantic Richfield whose subsidiary APTI was the assignee of all of the original HAARP patents.

Lastly, one particular historical episode involving the Rockefellers and the NMP deserves a little more attention here. It appears that the Rockefellers and their Standard Oil Company are the original founders of Lawrence Livermore National Lab. This is particularly significant because, due to an overabundance of connections to the NMP, Lawrence Livermore National Lab is my best educated guess as to where a NMP command base might be. Ernest Lawrence’s biographer Herbert Childs writes:

“As the AEC [Atomic Energy Commission] was interested in developing private industrial cooperation on the West Coast, the California Research and Development Company was organized to undertake development of the project by the California Research Corporation, a subsidiary of Standard Oil Company of California. This was accomplished after Regent Neylan brought Ernest [Lawrence] and Standard Oil Chairman R. Gwin Follis, and his predecessor, Harry Collier, together. It was an ambitious project for a new company, far larger than any ever undertaken by its parent, the California Research Corporation. The pilot plant would be constructed at a onetime naval air station near Livermore, just across the hills from Berkeley, near the edge of the San Joaquin Valley. A full-scale production plant was contemplated for Weldon Spring, Missouri. The project was announced on March 31, 1950, as an AEC classified research program.”

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. His books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco are available at Amazon. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com

Connect with Activist Post

The Untold History of the GWEN Towers Military Psyop: Cell Towers. Cellphones. Google Maps. Nukes. Poisons Dumped From Our Skies. Underground Bases & Tunnels.

“To tie it all together, we first must go back in time to 1941, when The Five Eyes alliance was formed. The Five Eyes consisted of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, agreeing to joint cooperation in intelligence, which means surveillance, which means spying.”

[…]

“They converted the GWEN Towers into radiation weapons, also known as nukes but, before they can nuke us using their radiation towers, they needed to map us. They used the maps to determine where more towers needed to go to ensure full coverage of the United States…”

~ Agent131711, What if They’re NOT 5G Towers? Untold History of GWEN Towers: a Deep Dive into an 80-Year PSYOP

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Below you will find key excerpts from Agent131711’s substack article “What if They’re NOT 5G Towers? Untold History of GWEN Towers: a Deep Dive into an 80-Year PSYOP“. I recommend reading the entire article as it includes much greater detail, many images, videos and reference links. Those familiar with Agent131711’s work will recognize his intelligent research and unique dot-connecting skills, presented in his (often-humorous) easy-to-read style. ~ Kathleen

What if They’re NOT 5G Towers? Untold History of GWEN Towers: a Deep Dive into an 80-Year PSYOP

by Agent131711
June 23, 2024

[…]

In the early 1980s, nukes were such a threat that television stations, like Channel 4, did its part to warn people by broadcasting shows like QED Nuclear War; A Guide To Armageddon which basically told the public, when the nuke hits, you and your family are going to burn to death. Then there was CBS news, who aired A Day Called X which explained what could happen to Portland, Oregon when it is attacked. Meanwhile, Bombs Will Make the Rainbow Break, had children explain to adult viewers how terrified they were of being nuked. Reliability and Risk: Computers and Nuclear War outlined how a simple computer malfunction could escalate into a national crisis, and let’s not forget about Protect and Survive Nuclear Explosions, produced by the UK government to explain all of the aforementioned. Time Life published a show called Nuclear Strategy for Beginners, informing the public that there were currently over 50,000 nuclear weapons in the world, and that is just to name a few. Based on the media’s involvement, clearly, citizens needed to recognize that nuclear weapon attacks were a grave concern for them. Although it was a time of peace, because of the fear of nukes, it was imperative that the US and its allies take proactive measures. Enter: The GWEN Towers.

GWEN stands for Ground Wave Emergency Network. The towers were a network of radio transmitters and receivers installed in the United States in the 1980s as a backup communication system in the event of a nuclear attack. These towers were designed to transmit low-frequency radio signals which would allow for communications to continue in the event of a nuclear explosion disrupting traditional radio systems (keep playing along here). So, the nuke hits us and decimates traditional communication methods, but it’s totally fine because the GWEN towers utilize a network of underground cables that work with 240 radio transceivers distributed across the continental USA (which also work on the same low frequency) therefore military and government co . Praise Jesus! – That’s the official story, just roll with it for a moment.

The Bizarre History of the GWEN Towers

In his 1985 inaugural address, President Ronald Reagan said, “A nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.”… but then, that exact same year, literally the same f*cking year, the Air Force began constructing the GWEN towers, which the Reagan administration said were a key component of its strategy for “supporting controlled nuclear counter-attacks over a protracted period.”. These towers were verbally sold to the public as protection against the Soviets who were planning to nuke us, hence the urgent need to get them installed pronto, even though a nuclear war must never be fought…

As part of the Pentagon’s Ground Wave Emergency Network, each tower was 299 feet tall (91 meters) and featured guy wires with a steel trusswork structure. Yes, 299 feet, not 300, and each tower cost $1.4 million. The entire system was planned to cost a billion dollars (thank God we cut it off at 299 feet. Imagine the cost with the added foot). Here’s a little diagram for you, so you can see what your hard-earned tax money bought you:

The truth was, citizens across the nation were pointing out that it doesn’t make sense, “Wouldn’t the Soviets aim for the GWEN towers? Wouldn’t this make my neighborhood a massive target if one is in it?”, they asked.

Because it didn’t make a damn bit of sense and government wasn’t providing adequate answers, citizens began becoming highly suspicious of what was actually going on here. To get the public to STFU, the Department of Defense and other military agencies sent representatives to hold public hearings in some of the areas of the installs. The purpose of these hearings was to assure the citizens that the towers were just for Soviet nukes, communications and counter attack stuffs (for their safety, of course) and everything else was conspiracy theory (technically, the word at the time was misinformation)…

[…]

The peoples outrage was ignored, hazard studies were hastily performed and marginal at best, and the towers were rush-installed across the USA because the safety of the people must come before the safety of the people because nuclear war was at our doorstep! Makes sense to me! Oh, and they were also put up all over Canada…

[…]

What the general populous didn’t know was that behind the scenes, in 1996, Presidential Decision Directive NSTC-6 was penned. This directive designated the Department of Transportation (DOT) as the “lead agency for all Federal civil GPS matters”. In addition, the President directed the DOT to “develop and implement U.S. Government augmentations to the basic GPS for transportation applications.”. In normal people speak, he was like, “I command you to expand the GPS system!” (then he ate a handful of grapes, brought to him by a squire, on a plate made of solid gold).

Less than a year later, in January of 1997, the DOT formed an interagency DGPS Executive Steering Group to investigate the development of a nationwide GPS system. The four-letter group was like, “You know, it would be really nice of us if we saved the taxpayers money for once. What could we do to save them a few bucks? AH HA! What if we could save them money by building this newfangled GPS system upon existing infrastructure?!”. (You totally see where this is going, right?…)

Then, someone within that 1997 DGPS group was like, “Yo! We got those GWEN Towers that the military just blew hundreds-of-millions-or-maybe-a-billion of the peoples money to build and they don’t work. It would be a shame to waste them, so you just wanna use those?”. The group was like, “And those all nukes suddenly aren’t a problem, so we totally should!”.

So, in 1998, with the fear of nukes forgotten, the US Department of Transportation in conjunction with the US Coast Guard and Department of Homeland Security proposed repurposing 29 of the existing GWEN towers. Those 299-foot GWENs were now officially suggested to be used to construct a Nationwide Global Positioning System. The proposal document is now scrubbed from the US Coast Guard / DHS site…

[…]

Then they started converting the gosh-darn-don’t-work GWENs into GPS’s…

[…]

So, we deployed the towers for the second (known) time in 1996, then randomly decided they didn’t work. Instead of fixing them, less than a year later a make-a-massive-GPS-system team was assembled and less than a year after that (which was under 24 months after the second known deployment) we already had a plan to use the towers for a totally different purpose than the nukes which they were rush-installed for… and this is where sh*t starts to get crazy…

**The Mindf*ck, Part 1:**

In 1998, (yes Sweetheart, it was indeed the exact same year the military and DOT officially proposed reusing those 299-foot-failure-towers that the DOD fought so hard to get installed against the people’s wishes cuz nukes), two men, Larry Page and Sergey Brin did something history-changing… they launched Google.

During the same timeframe, the CIA had launched its own business called In-Q-Tel. In-Q-Tel was a Silicon Valley venture capital fund whose mission was to invest in tax dollars in start-up companies because why the hell not?

In 1999 and 2000, Saddam Hussein was still whipping up Weapons of Mass Destruction even though he had been told to stop (don’t worry babe, he would later throw them all away and destroy all evidence of them existing, but that is later in the timeline. At this point, we are very afraid of what this mad man will do with his WMDs). It was a cryin’ shame those towers didn’t work to protect us but at least the good government found a new use for ‘em.

This brings us to 2001, a year when something nobody would have ever expected to happen, happened. It was not a Soviet nuke that attacked the USA. It wasn’t a Saddam WMD, no ma’am, it sure wasn’t. It was actually a dude, living in a hole in a desert far, far away, who sent his men, the terrorists, to the USA to hijack airplanes and fly them into steel towers so the US Military could retaliate by obliviating his country.

And, I’m sure it’s completely nonrelated, but did you know that shortly after the terrorists airplanes cut through those steel skyscrapers like a hot knife in butter, 3G became operational in the USA? Well technically, it would later be realized that we have no idea when exactly 3G became operational, but we can infer it was 2002 because this is when the people learned of it…

[…]

March 20th, 2003: The US invades Iraq. For you youngsters that don’t remember why exactly we invaded this country, there was a laundry list of reasons, which meant everyone could choose the reason, or reasons, they liked best…

[…]

97 days post-invasion: Call it irony, call it fate, perhaps it was destiny or just good luck, it just-so-happened that In-Q-Tel (the CIA), while scouting for investments, found a company desperately in need of the people’s tax money. This company was called Keyhole. The story is that Keyhole was somehow developing cutting-edge mapping technology… just like their investors, the CIA, did back in the 1960s. Do you know what the CIAs 1960s cutting edge mapping and spying program was called? Go ahead and guess…

ANSWER: KEYHOLE! IT WAS F*CKING CALLED KEYHOLE! You can’t make this sh*t up…

[…]

The following year, while the War in Iraq was raging and the military was trying so damn hard to locate Osama Bin Laden’s hole and Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, despite Keyhole being funded by tax dollars and used by the CIA, Pentagon and CNN, someone popped up out of the blue and bought it. That someone was Google.

[…]

Then, within months, Google Maps was released…

[…]

And shortly after, Google Earth Viewer was released using the identical technology used to map and spy on Iraq combined with the (GWEN Tower) GPS system. Yes, the technology was now sold to the American people as being helpful tools, not a tax-funded military spy system. Isn’t it to cool that we can zoom in on your house?…

[…]

Google launched Google Federal, which is exactly what it sounds like. Google Federal hired managers and staff from the Army, Air Force, CIA, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. They landed a bunch of intelligence-related contracts, including with the NSA.

Researchers on Team Truth began looking into these GWEN Towers, now being called 3G Towers, and what they discovered was shocking…

[Here Agent131711 shares a clip from this video, uploaded to YouTube in 2013]

**Mindf*ck Part 2: The Satellite Photos**

And if that wasn’t odd enough, as we looked at “Satellite photos”, we began realizing there were no airplanes in any photo…

[…]

How is this possible? If the satellite is in space, surely airplanes would be between the cartoon satellite and Earth, right?…

[…]

In fact, there are a sh*t ton of planes in the sky…

[…]

You’d think, if the satellite is at this height, or higher, some would get in the photo, right?…

…yet none are in any satellite photo…

[…]

Not even a flock of seagulls…

[…]

After discovering satellites are actually airplanes and balloons, I assumed they must be flying under the normal level of planes, because how else would planes not get in the photos? Yet that can’t be true because when have you ever been on a plane and flown over a giant balloon? Never…

[…]

But the icing on the cake of strangeness was there were no airplanes in airports either!…

[…]

No planes in between the satellite and the airport and no planes in the airport itself…

[…]

And every satellite photo I could find was like this!

This photo was taken by the International Space Station and still no planes!…

[…]

It didn’t make any sense… until today, when it hit me…

THESE AREN’T PHOTOS, THEY ARE A.I. CGI! THAT IS WHY THERE ARE NO PLANES ANYWHERE! This is why birds do not get in the photos. This is why there’s never a hot air balloon tour blocking the satellite photo over the Grand Canyon. There’s no clouds, no rain, no little Cessna airplanes Cloud Seeding. This is why nothing gets between the satellite and the ground! These images are not coming from something orbiting in outer space while the earth spins at 1,000 mph. These images are not even from balloons or planes. These are nothing more than 3D graphics coming from cutting-edge GPS mapping! My mind is officially blown.

Need more proof? Yes you do, because you are on Team Truth and you refuse to settle for someone saying something so outlandish without evidence, so bear with me here: I am not a technology person, but you don’t need to be a techie to understand what I am about to show you. I located this video, uploaded in 2016, which appears to show the back-end inner-workings of Apple’s map system, which is the same as Googles (although I would guess Googles is far more advanced). Whoever the person is who uploaded this video also uploaded another of the same nature. It appears they are part of the development team for the map system, because in their other video they appear to be programming locations on the back-end of Apple maps. But what they are doing doesn’t matter, just watch and you will see, it is all CGI with photos taken from the ground added in: (2:34 video)

[Here he shares a video clip found at Internet Archives]

[…]

**Mindf*ck Part 3: Piecing the Puzzle Together = Major Revelations**

To tie it all together, we first must go back in time to 1941, when The Five Eyes alliance was formed. The Five Eyes consisted of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, agreeing to joint cooperation in intelligence, which means surveillance, which means spying.

Only a few years after the formation of the worldwide spying collaboration, The Federation of American Scientists and Philip Ragan Associates began publishing Atomic Bomb content which warned of the threat of nuclear war coming to American and our allies, and Oh Thank God the Five ~~Spies~~ Eyes was just established because now they could save the people through mass surveillance! (This is the first video they released in the 1940s. It’s 9 minutes long and worth your time to watch the extreme propaganda.)

[Here he shares the One World or None video, which can be found at Archive.org.]

Only four years later, on October 24, 1945, the United Nations was established.

Only a matter of years after that, the CIA was Keyholing and Operation LAC was taking place.

Operation LAC

Operation Large Area Coverage (LAC) took place in the 1950s and involved the United States military, Canada and Britain dousing select cities within their countries with Zinc Cadmium Sulfide, a toxic glowing compound. The alleged purpose, as we have been told, was to simulate what would happen during a chemical or biological attack, specifically, they wanted to know how far the chemicals would disperse. So, to simulate an attack, the nations sprayed toxic chemicals all over their countries. That actually happened…

[…]

Operation LAC never made sense to me, but neither does the majority of the military experiments so I didn’t put much thought into it… until today.

Let’s switch gears for a moment.

How Mapping Works

Quote, “Radar, sonar and lidar can determine an object’s distance, or range. For that measurement, time plays an important role. Lidar, radar and sonar systems all include timing devices. Their clocks record the length of time needed for a wave to travel to an object and back. The farther the distance, the longer it takes for an echo to return.

Radar, sonar and lidar also can reveal information about an object’s shape, size, material and direction…. lidar helps read the lay of the land or features on Earth’s surface. Lidar’s laser pulses can penetrate forest cover to record the shape of the ground below. That makes this technology especially valuable for mapping.”

[…]

The Revelation

I’m pretty damn sure Operation LACs Zinc Cadmium Sulfide was not used to simulate a biological attack and was instead used for mapping purposes for the military and CIA Keyhole spying program as part of The Five Eyes. The metals in Zinc Cadmium Sulfate, dumped over major cities, allowed for the sonar / lidar signals to reflect evenly.

[…]

Occam’s Razor: My theory is, the reason they wanted the materials they dispersed to glow was to ensure the ground was fully covered for the mapping… which makes a helluva lot more sense than dousing your countries major cities in chemicals to see what a biological attack would look like when you have no idea which biological materials a hostile nation would have chosen to release let alone where the enemy would have chosen to release them or even what method they would use to disperse them. They selected main cities to be coated in chemicals because that was where they wanted to test out mapping. FFS, the name of the operation was Operation LARGE AREA COVERAGE.

Google / CIA / Pentagon / DHS / NSA / Dot Mapping & Bombshell Revelations

We know graphene oxide, along with Smart Dust, is coming down in rain water and snow….

[…]

Smart Dust Graphene is nanotechnology, “no bigger than a grain of sand”…

[…]

It can be deployed into the sky by aircraft. In fact, they are now researching having unmanned aerial vehicles deploy it…

[…]

What is released into the sky will eventually come down in the rain and snow. But why release it in the first place? It turns out that Smart Dust has a variety of uses including numerous military applications. The military uses include reconnaissance and surveillance…

[…]

But that’s not all. Smart Dust is also used by the military for …

…

… (pause for suspense)…

…

MAPPING!: IT IS USED FOR MAPPING!

[…]

Now watch how fast this timeline goes:

1940s through 1994: “Ze Noookz are coming!”

1995: Second known GWEN Deployment

1996: “It doesn’t work. Let’s use it for something else” and “How ‘bout a nationwide high-tech ~~spy system~~ GPS?”

1997: Converted 29 of the GWEN Towers into part of the nationwide GPS system

ALSO IN 1997: Smart Dust was funded by DARPA

2002: 3G network goes live to the public and most of the tower panel ownership information is hidden from the public.

2003: The CIA’s In-Q-Tel inked the deal with Keyhole for their mapping program

2004: Google quickly bought the tax-funded Keyhole

Also in 2004, the same year Google bought Keyhole, a document was published relating to the creation of “smart clouds” using Nanotechnology…

[…]

2005, Google Maps and Navigation were released, CGI programd developed using cutting-edge mapping.

2007, reports of clouds falling to the ground began appearing, but were quickly labeled tinfoil hat nonsense and “edited videos”:

[Here Agent131711 shares seven short YouTube videos 1 2 3 4 5 6 7.]

2008, Google fully integrated Street View into Google Earth (combined the cutting-edge mapping with real photos and videos taken from the ground)

[…]

In 2009, with strange clouds still unexplainably falling to the ground, Google Earth 5.0 was released which featured Google Ocean, followed by Google Great Lakes.

[…]

How’d they do it? I would have to assume the tax-funded GPS system on the GWEN Towers was used with DARPA-funded Smart Dust to map the country just like OPERATION LAC that took place during the same time the CIA was running Keyhole for spying and mapping. I expect that these towers may not be able to stretch across oceans, therefore, to map over large bodies of water, Smart Clouds were developed. …but it gets crazier…

**Mindf*ck Part 4: The Final Piece Is Inserted Into the Puzzle**

[…]

Because of the fear of nukes, the militaries of the world built Deep Underground Military Bases (D.U.M.Bs) and were heavily planning utilization of the tunnel system in the United States, including utility tunnels:

(1967 document)

[…]

Was the military truly planning to save the people from a nuclear attack? Or just themselves? Or was everything just an illusion? Or is it deeper than that?

We know these evil doers we are dealing with play the long game. While you and I plan what we will have for dinner a day in advance or we might plan a vacation a year in advance or even set a 10-year-goal, these villains have plans spanning literal centuries.

Operation LAC and the CIAs Keyhole spying and mapping took began in 1950.

45 years later, the GWEN towers were deployed for the second known time

55 years later, Google released the ultimate spying and mapping technology upon the American populous

What is 100 years after 1950? Agenda 2050, which is slotted to be, essentially, the end of the world as we know it.

To understand these evil doers, you must understand that they believe in the Revelation of Method (RoM), also known as The Law of Karma, or, as I call it, “they have to show us”. They believe that if they tell us what they are going to do before they do it they are relieved of all bad karma, regardless of terrible their actions are. The specific method they use to show us varies. It can be symbolism, phrases repeated in the media, news headlines, the method is flexible, as long as the citizens are shown what will happen…

[…]

Folks, they have spent 80 years telling us a nuke is coming which will create a massive flash followed by a radiation nightmare.

[…]

They then built the GWEN Towers. The GWENS are the machines assembled by saboteurs

[…]

They converted the GWEN Towers into radiation weapons, also known as nukes but, before they can nuke us using their radiation towers, they needed to map us. They used the maps to determine where more towers needed to go to ensure full coverage of the United States

[…]

They had to release the Google / Military mapping system to us so we can unknowingly help build it using the GPS on our cell phones and vehicles. Each time we travel somewhere with our GPS turned on we are perfecting the system.

[…]

They have already told us that when the nuke comes the government will be in their specialized underground bunkers…

[…]

Meanwhile, We the People, should Duck and Cover..

Connect with & support the work of Agent131711 at substack

Cover images credits:
Tom.jennings — Photo of the differential GPS gear added to
the Essex, CA GWEN site; California, USA. (Trimble gear).
US government public domain — Diagram of a US military Ground
Wave Emergency Network automated radio relay station

Exploding the Spanish Flu Myth

by Health Freedom Defense Team
June 20, 2024

Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.

George Orwell, “1984”

Type “Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918” into any search engine or head to your local library to research historical references on the topic and you’ll inevitably and universally get a story that goes something like this:

The Spanish flu pandemic of 1918-1919 was the deadliest pandemic in world history, infecting some 500 million people across the globe—roughly one-third of the population—and causing up to 50 million deaths, including some 650,000 deaths in the United States alone. The disease, caused by a new variant of the influenza virus, was spread in part by troop movements during World War I. With no vaccines or effective treatments, the pandemic caused massive social disruption: Schools, theaters, churches and businesses were forced to close, citizens were ordered to wear masks and bodies piled up in makeshift morgues before the virus ended its deadly worldwide march in early 1920.

Conventional explanations found in the standard literature are perfunctory, uniform and lacking in forensic analysis of causal factors for this cataclysmic historical event.

The immortalized history of the improperly named “Spanish Flu” is regularly used like a sword of Damocles as justification for all manner of government health policy responses – “If we don’t do X we may see the horrors of the Spanish Flu again.”

The story of an alleged pathogen sweeping across the globe and causing a mass death event has been ingrained in the public psyche through generational repetition and is now uncritically accepted despite numerous inexplicable anomalies in the official narrative.

When looked at without pre-established sentiments the entire story of this cataclysmic health catastrophe being caused by some microscopic superbug seems rather unreasonable.

When looked at in the context of the devastation produced by World War 1, with the backdrop of a nascent Pharmaceutical/Chemical Industry in search of its raison d’etre, this seminal human catastrophe develops a logical coherence that defies the standard assumptions of infectious disease.

This rapidly expanding scientific and medical industry, being assembled by the wealthiest men in the world, stood in direct opposition to research that investigated the relationship of social factors to health and disease. Instead, resources would be focused only on chemistry, pathology, bacteriology, physiology and pharmacology, ignoring the impact of the mental, emotional, social, economic, and physical environment on disease and health.

The Conditions of World War 1

The trench was a horrible sight. The dead were stretched out on one side, one on top of each other six feet high. I thought at the time I should never get the peculiar disgusting smell of the vapour of warm human blood heated by the sun out of my nostrils. I would rather have smelt gas a hundred times. I can never describe that faint sickening, horrible smell which several times nearly knocked me up altogether.

British Captain Leeham

Fighting in World War I went from July 1914 – November 1918 and took place throughout Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Pacific, and parts of Asia, resulting in one of the deadliest wars in history.

Multiple distinguishing and brutal features of World War 1 turned the conditions of everyday life into an environment where death, destruction and rampant illness became normal features of life for millions of people, particularly for the young men involved in the violent battles.

A distinctive characteristic of WW 1 was the extensive use of animals such as horses, mules and camels. Getting such a large number of animals to the battlefield entailed a colossal project of logistics and mass transport.

The US alone transported around 1 million animals across the Atlantic Ocean in boats with horrible ventilation. These animals were traveling long distances in a high humidity environment and were malnourished- many perished from the rigors and deprivations of this long-distance maritime journey. The death of the animals during transport would become known as “the shipping flu.”

Troops that were being transported on the same ships were suffering from the same stressful and unsanitary conditions.

Another distinguishing and severe feature of WW1 was trench warfare in which soldiers lived their lives in a world of mud, death and despair. Soldiers in the trenches lived in a constantly cold and damp environment, eating canned food and drinking dirty water to survive. The trenches themselves were unsanitary trash dumps of ammunition boxes, empty cartridges, soiled bandages, shrapnel balls, bone fragments and the assorted detritus of war.

Soldiers fighting in close proximity in these unsanitary conditions were commonly subject to diseases such as dysentery, cholera and typhoid fever. Soldiers in the trenches were plagued by sore throats, colds, flu, lice infested clothing which caused ‘trench fever’ and typhus and suffered from exhaustion and sores as regular aspects of their lives.

Effectively trapped in the trenches for long periods of time, under nearly constant bombardment, many soldiers suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The soldier’s physical and mental health were severely impacted by these conditions while medical facilities were far from the front lines and mental health support was nonexistent. The devastating effects of the war on the human psyche and body would create conditions which would foster immediate and lasting breakdown of all facets of the human condition.

The trenches on the Western Front would become poisonous pits as soldiers fell victim to gas attacks as early as 1915.

Chemical/Gas Warfare

When the gas attack was over and the all clear was sounded I decided to go out for a breath of fresh air and see what was happening. But I could hardly believe my eyes when I looked along the bank. The bank was absolutely covered with bodies of gassed men. Must have been over 1,000 of them. And down in the stream, a little bit further along the canal bank, the stream there was also full of bodies as well.

British sapper, Lendon Payne

Perhaps sitting at the top of the list of overwhelming assaults on biological and environmental systems pertaining to WW1 was the radical new chemical and gas warfare that was used extensively by all forces in the European war theater.

The following excerpts come from the Leavenworth Papers, “Chemical Warfare in World War 1: The American Experience, 1917-1918.” This lengthy paper gives insights into the widespread usage of chemical warfare and vivid accounts of its devastating impacts:

The war gases [sic] and chemicals were grouped according to their effects on the human body. The most widely used by both sides, the one that had the most harmful and deadly effects, was mustard gas. It was said to be responsible for 1,205,655 non-fatal injuries and 91,198 deaths.

Strictly speaking, mustard gas is not a gas, but a liquid, which slowly evaporates at normal ambient temperatures.

“The person felt no discomfort when exposed to the gas but hours later, would experience choking, severe burning, and mucosal blistering. Mustard gas penetrated all types of ‘protective’ clothing and was remarkably persistent over time in the environment – soil, leaves, and grasses.” [Bold Added.]

“With the use of heavy artillery, soldiers didn’t have to rely on the direction of the wind to deliver the payload correctly or rely on ‘direct hits’ to be effective. For example, in May 1916 they began to use shells filled with diphosgene, a strong lung irritant.” [Bold Added]

“By July 1917, both sides were using three different mixtures of phosgene, diphosgene, and diphenylchlorosine, a chlorine powder laced with arsenic dust. In field trials, arsenic powder proved extremely effective because it penetrated all types of filters used in the rudimentary masks. But it was the “Yellow Cross” (mustard gas) that gave the Germans a distinct advantage in chemical warfare. When mustard gas was coupled with explosives, it spread over wide areas and remained airborne for an extended time.” [Bold Added]

As noted in the Leavenworth Papers attempts at personal protection were nominal and ineffectual resulting in large numbers of casualties and mass poisonings:

On 6 April 1917, when the U.S. declared war on Germany, the Army not only lacked defensive equipment for chemical warfare, but also had no concrete plans to develop or manufacture gas masks or any other defensive equipment.

While impossible to accurately assess the total amount of poison gasses and toxic chemicals that were used in WW1, much of the European continent was bombarded and saturated for three years with heavy doses of these toxic and persistent compounds.

A Strange Blue Flu

One of the oft-cited symptoms of the Spanish Flu, different from all other flus before and since, was a strange bluish-gray discoloration of the skin. It was noted that as victims lungs would fill with fluid their skin would turn grayish-blue.

When cadavers were examined and the cause of death registered, victims who died suddenly and had a bluish-purple discoloration to their lips or skin were automatically registered as having died from the Spanish Flu.

Another unique feature of this flu’s clinical profile was how the victims could die within hours or days of developing symptoms, their lungs filling with fluid causing them to suffocate.

While these extraordinary symptoms don’t fit the classical clinical profile of the flu, they do fit descriptions of chemical warfare during WW1.

Witness accounts of chemical attacks describe French soldiers, “stumbling off the battlefield blinded, coughing, chests heaving, faces an ugly purple color, lips speechless with agony.”

Another report by a British soldier described survivors of a poison gas attack: “Complexion here was an ashed blueish grey, the expression most anxious and distressed with the eye-balls staring, and the lids half closed. Respiration was extremely laboured and noisy with frequent efforts to expel copious amounts of tenacious yellowish green frothy fluid which threatened to drown them, and through which they inhaled and exhaled air into and out of their lungs with a gurgling noise.”

An Unusual Flu That Kills the Young and Strong and Spares the Old

The illness traditionally designated as ‘the flu’ has historically been noted to place certain groups at higher risk of developing serious complications if afflicted. At the top of this list, as it is with most illnesses, are older adults. Oddly, this was not the case with the Spanish Flu.

Unique to all of epidemiological history the Spanish Flu was said to have an “unprecedented age-specific mortality pattern, in which young adults were at extraordinarily high risk of dying, a feature not observed in influenza outbreaks before or since.” [Emphasis added]

The mortality profile of the 1918 epidemic was exceptional in many ways.The age-specific mortality pattern for this flu was radically different from the traditional U-shaped patterns, meaning high mortality in the very young and the very old, and low mortality in the in-between age groups, as seen in all previous influenza outbreaks.

In contrast with past influenza mortality patterns the Spanish Flu produced a peculiar W-shaped mortality age profile, meaning that the age groups 15–24, 25–34, and 35–44, experienced the highest rates of mortality.

Also of note is that the male death rates for influenza in 1918 far exceeded the female death rates among adults.

This depicted an unprecedented age-specific mortality pattern, in which young adult males were at extraordinarily high risk of dying, a feature not observed in influenza outbreaks before or since.

The young males who were most severely impacted by this ostensible illness were by and large precisely those who were involved in WW1 combat, “The first of three waves hit soldiers in France early in 1918. But the flu soon spread from there, in two subsequent and far more virulent waves, to sicken soldiers and civilians almost everywhere.”

Explanations for these uncanny deviations from all known medical history were perfunctory, insufficiently explained and usually came with qualifiers, “Elders may have acquired immunity from exposure to a previous flu outbreak” or “The less than predicted mortality in the elderly conceivably could be attributed to 19th century exposure either to then-prevalent influenza A viruses containing H1 or N1 surface proteins.”

Another stab at explaining away this mortality mystery suggested, “the disproportionate increase in frequency of secondary bacterial pneumonias in healthy young adults might be an additional manifestation of viral virulence associated with differential host immune responses.”

With no definitive explanations ever offered some experts would admit, “The extreme virulence of the fall wave has never been explained”, while obliquely suggesting, “Both the nature of the virus itself and accompanying bacterial pneumonias may be involved.”

In 2008 researchers at the National Institute of Health (NIH) concluded that bacterial pneumonia was the killer in 92% of the autopsies of those who died of so-called “Spanish flu” between 1918 and 1919. Their research looked at 8,398 autopsies from 15 countries. Virtually all of the lung tissue examinations showed, “compelling histologic evidence of severe acute bacterial pneumonia, either as the predominant pathology or in conjunction with underlying pathologic features now believed to be associated with influenza virus infection,” including damage to the bronchial epithelium.

Ignored in this profusion of conjecture, research and speculation were the concrete realities of the mass amounts of toxins, stressors and non-stop biological assaults being confronted on a daily basis by the group most heavily afflicted by this mysterious flu.

No matter how obvious it was that the victims of this alleged disease were under the most violent of assaults in multiple ways, officialdom only allowed for ‘the pathogen’ to be considered as the explanation for these illnesses and deaths.

The Military Vaccine Campaign

As everyone knows, the world has never witnessed such an orgy of vaccination and inoculation of every description as was inflicted by army-camp doctors upon the soldiers of the [First] World War.

Annie Riley Hale, “The Medical Voodoo”

Between Jan. 21 and June 4 of 1918, Dr. Frederick L. Gates reported an experiment in which soldiers at Camp Funston located at Fort Riley in Kansas. were given three doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine.

Fort Riley was a massive complex which housed 26,000 men, a place where soldiers complained of “bone-chilling winters, sweltering summers and blinding dust storms.”

Living alongside the soldiers were thousands of horses and mules that produced nine tons of manure each month. The method of manure disposal was to burn it, sending the burning manure into the driving wind.

While up for debate, Fort Riley is considered by “official” sources as the most likely site of the origin of the historic ‘influenza pandemic’ of 1918, later called the Spanish Flu.

The experimental vaccines given to the soldiers were dosages of a vaccine serum derived from horses. The vaccine used was made in the laboratory of The Rockefeller Institute.

Soon thereafter, the vaccine would be offered by the Division Surgeon to the camp at large.

On the morning of March 4 Private Albert Gitchell of the U.S. Army reported to the hospital at Fort Riley, Kansas, “complaining of the cold-like symptoms of sore throat, fever and headache.”

Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.

By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady.

The Gates’ report chronicled near immediate illnesses suffered by the injected troops:

“Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time of injection.”

“Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night. Next in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few injections were followed by diarrhea. “

“The reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.”

The Rockefeller Institute triumphantly stated that they had formulated three different kinds of what they called “curative serums” and that these serums, antimeningococci, antipneumococcic Type I, and antidysenteric (polyvalent)”, were manufactured in large quantities.

Use of these experimental injections was not unique to the United States as noted by The Rockefeller Institute, which boasted that before the United States entered the war they had, “resumed the preparation of antimeningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests from England, France, Belgium, Italy, and other countries.”

Of Electromagnetic Poisoning and the Rosenau Experiments

In Arthur Firstenberg’s groundbreaking book, “The Invisible Rainbow꞉ A History Of Electricity And Life”, he examines the impacts of electricity and its interaction with living organisms.

Firstenberg’s seminal work suggests a wide range of illnesses and metabolic disorders can be attributed to exposures to pulsed and alternating electromagnetic fields in the environment which interfere with electric currents used by our biological systems.

A distinct feature of the late 19th century and early 20th century was the mass electrification of urban areas. This period saw the emergence of the first stray currents to which living beings were exposed and saw the initial appearance of diseases such as neurasthenia.

Some have suggested that this mass electrification program, accelerated during WW1 as governments installed antennas which created strong radio signals, was yet another contributing factor to the innumerable maladies that impacted soldiers during this time.

In 1918 researchers for the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy conducted human experiments in order to determine the cause of the Spanish flu and the reason for what was thought to be its extraordinary contagious qualities.

Milton J. Roseneau supervised this landmark study, “Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza,” which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1919.

The experiments were conducted at Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor.

Quoting directly from the study:

“The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.

His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer’s bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients.

Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each.

Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face.

None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza. Rosenau was clearly puzzled, and he cautioned against drawing conclusions from negative results.” [Bold added.]

In the JAMA article Roseneau concluded:

As a matter of fact, we entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease. [Emphasis added]

A companion study done at the same time at Angel Island in San Francisco produced similar negative results. Both studies concluded that what was considered to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases in history could not be transferred under experimental conditions.

As well as challenging the contagion orthodoxy the results of the Roseneau experiments repudiate yet another pillar of the Spanish Flu mythos.

Conclusion

The Spanish Flu horror story has been planted in the collective consciousness and few have taken the time to inspect its veracity. When brought to our attention the story is always broadcast as an apocalyptic health disaster caused by an otherworldly and fatal microbe and this is accepted as an incontrovertible truth.

While debates around the margins are allowed, those come with an unspoken contract that there must remain an intractable belief in the fundamental “truths” of the prevailing narrative.

How many did ‘It’ actually kill? Was it 20 million? Was it 50 million?

Where did ‘It’ originate? From a US military base? From France? From China?

How exactly did ‘It’ spread so widely and quickly? Did ‘It’ move through the population through train travel? Was it due to massive military movements?

What was so unique and deadly about this pathogen? Was ‘It’ enhanced with novel deadly features? Was the antigenic composition particularly virulent?

These types of questions are allowed and, circa 2024, all too familiar.

What’s not allowed is to question the core assumptions of this earth shaking historical event- even if those assumptions defy all logic.

What’s emphatically not to be questioned is that ‘It’ actually existed. What’s demanded by the established order is that all other plausible explanations are dismissed from the outset.

What’s not to be considered is the possibility that this tragedy has been completely mischaracterized.

So if not a unique pathogen that spread like wildfire across the globe, what did kill all these people?

A look at history books and statistics shows that epidemics always developed where human biological systems had been weakened, primarily due to lack of food and water, poor sanitary conditions, toxic overload and immense social stressors. This description defines the world of 1918 and the social conditions of “The Great War.”

Deconstructing these social conditions leads to a fistful of profound questions surrounding the established history of the Spanish Flu.

How was it that this flu and only this flu ambushed young healthy adults and not young children and older adults with weaker systems?

How was it that this flu and only this flu turned people’s faces blue, their lips purple and caused people to collapse within a matter of hours, and even dying the same day?

Is it such a stretch to believe that thousands of tons of war chemicals including chlorine gas, phosgene, mustard gas and thirty-odd other chemicals released into the environment during three years of daily explosions would create the conditions that would lead to biological breakdown and mass fatalities in both the short and long-term?

What about the training for chemical warfare and exposure to these chemicals and the harm these men incurred as a result of this exposure even before landing on the battlefield?

Is it really a controversial belief that thousands of tons of explosives used to send millions of pounds of toxic liquids and poisonous gasses into the air across an entire continent would create an environment that would create mass casualties?

Is it revisionist history to ask basic questions about how often the soldiers were able to bathe and change clothes in order to get the toxic residues off of their bodies?

Is it preposterous to point out that chemical residues remain in the lungs and in the environment for prolonged periods and will inevitably cause lethal outcomes?

Wouldn’t it be logical to consider maritime transportation issues for soldiers, animals and goods during WW1, where soldiers were crammed together on ships with lots of horses and mules in very humid conditions, horrendous sanitary conditions, onerous nutritional deficiencies, limited hygienic repositories for human and animal waste? Wouldn’t these conditions be a guaranteed recipe for disease, including respiratory problems?

Is it really far-fetched to suggest that using millions of soldiers in crude experimental mass injection campaigns might have had detrimental, even deadly, outcomes for the subjects?

Is it really so fantastical to mention that socially and economically devastated towns and cities in physically devastated areas throughout Europe would create the perfect conditions for disease?

Is it forbidden to ask how it was that the ‘global pandemic’ ended and the alleged illness “mysteriously” disappeared at the same time WW1 ended?

Is it really unreasonable to suggest that the primary cause of deaths attributable to the Spanish Flu was all things related to WW1 and not a pathogen?

Now more than ever it’s important to pursue these questions, to have knowledge of this history, and to get that history right in order to understand the verifiable origins of the event and who the false narrative serves.

Connect with Health Freedom Defense

Cover images are in the public domain:
1) Headlines from newspapers in Chicago, Illinois, U.S. at the time of the 1918 Spanish flu.
2) Emergency hospital during 1918 influenza epidemic, Camp Funston, Kansas.

The Great Reset of 1776: The Missing Adults & the Orphan Trains

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Those who have explored the many questions about our hidden history will likely find this interview of interest. In this and other recent interviews, Richard Vobes ties together some key questions and theories about our global and national histories, personal family histories and so much more.

Interview Highlights:

Evidence of the Tartarian Empire (with complex architecture and free energy & advanced technologies) is found throughout the world, including North America, before 1776.

“…And in America, it wasn’t really the Tartarians. They were actually a group of people called the Moors, which were black nobility. So in America, we would be talking about the Tartarian-influenced Moors…”

Earthquakes, fires, floods, the Great Comet of 1811 (that perhaps wasn’t a comet).

The hidden families, “bloodlines”, that continue to enslave the world.

“…It is the the bloodline of the most powerful people in the world. You know the Council of Thirteen, the Club of Rome, it’s people who call them the Illuminati. It’s the Rothschilds and company… You have 13 families that run and own everything…”

“…A lot of people don’t believe we’re going through one now but it does say it on the World Economic Forum’s website, ‘Welcome to New World Order and the Great Reset’. This is something that’s planned over vast periods of time. I think it probably goes back hundreds if not thousands of years and they follow a very specific plan. And it appears to be every 250 years…”

The orphans and the missing parents. Thousands of orphans being gathered up and sold. The Lunacy Act as a way to “commit” women and take way their children.

“So all of a sudden there are no adults around and the ones that are left are committed to prison if they won’t comply, they won’t change to the new way of doing things after the reset. And the Lunacy Act meant that even being a single female parent, a mum on her own whose lost her husband in a civil war, would instantly have her children taken away because you were considered insane if you were a single parent. You were considered insane if you read too much, if you had ‘women’s problems’…”

Strange “cabbage patch” postcards depicting children growing out of cabbages and being offered for sale. “Orphan trains”, lost connections to ancestry and family names. Destruction of family dynasties, bloodlines and family histories.

“And this is where the Freemasons come into play. So when the children were moved around and shipped around en masse it was normally the standard practice to have them assembled outside of a Masonic lodge. And that is where the bidding would start.”

Magnificent buildings repurposed as prisons, orphanages, and asylums.

Pandemics, plagues and other cullings.

Plans of the planet’s hidden manipulators, possible coming events and the importance of preserving our history offline in non-digital formats.

What happened to all the adults?

by Richard Vobes with Guy Anderson
June 20, 2024

Guy Anderson joins me for a second time to reveal more about the end of the Tartarian empire, the cabbage patch kids, and what they did to rid the planet of adults.

Video available at Richard Vobes Odysee & YouTube channels.

See the previous interview “History That Has Been Hidden?”, between Richard Vobes and Guy Anderson, at Odysee or YouTube.

As mentioned by Richard Vobes, the Stew Peters video “Old World Order” can be found at Stew Peters website or mirrored at Rumble, Bitchute and Odysee.

Connect with Richard Vobes at Odysee & YouTube,

Cover image credit: Columbia Metropolitan Library
View of the St. Vincent’s Orphan Asylum & St. Vincent’s Church surrounded by lush trees. The orphanage was founded in 1875.

How Slavery Radicalized Lysander Spooner

by Liam McCollum, Mises Institute
June 19, 2024

How does a radical libertarian abolitionist attorney from the North go from passionately defending the United States Constitution–arguing that the document prohibited slavery from its ratification–to declaring the United States Constitution “unfit to exist” two decades later?

Lysander Spooner wrote The Unconstitutionality of Slavery in 1845 as a response to William Lloyd Garrison, who opposed the Constitution due to its apparent preservation of slavery. Garrison was a Northern disunionist who advocated separation from the South after the Dred Scott decision.

Conversely, Spooner argued that, according to a textualist interpretation, the United States Constitution outlawed slavery. He argued that the original meaning of the document’s text at the founding, and not the founders’ original intent at the Constitutional Convention, is determinative of the law. Spooner’s argument famously won over former slave and abolitionist Frederick Douglass, who was previously a Garrisonian disunionist.

In an 1864 letter to Charles Sumner, Spooner criticized the South for its pro-slavery stance but blamed the senator for the Civil War and for preventing the “peaceful abolition of slavery” by continuing to propagate the belief that the Constitution was pro-slavery while being one of the most prominent voices of the antislavery North.

In 1867, however, just two years after Northern troops ordered the people of Texas to free all slaves on June 19th, 1865, or “Juneteenth,” in accordance with the Emancipation Proclamation, Spooner wrote No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. In these essays, Lysander Spooner argued that the abolition of slavery was not the primary goal of the Civil War but simply “a war measure” to preserve the national government and enslave the entire population by other means:

“The pretence that the “abolition of slavery” was either a motive or justification for the war, is a fraud of the same character with that of “maintaining the national honor.” Who, but such usurpers, robbers, and murderers as they, ever established slavery? Or what government, except one resting upon the sword, like the one we now have, was ever capable of maintaining slavery? And why did these men abolish slavery? Not from any love of liberty in general—not as an act of justice to the black man himself, but only “as a war measure,” and because they wanted his assistance, and that of his friends, in carrying on the war they had undertaken for maintaining and intensifying that political, commercial, and industrial slavery, to which they have subjected the great body of the people, both white and black. And yet these impostors now cry out that they have abolished the chattel slavery of the black man—although that was not the motive of the war—as if they thought they could thereby conceal, atone for, or justify that other slavery which they were fighting to perpetuate, and to render more rigorous and inexorable than it ever was before. There was no difference of principle—but only of degree—between the slavery they boast they have abolished, and the slavery they were fighting to preserve; for all restraints upon men’s natural liberty, not necessary for the simple maintenance of justice, are of the nature of slavery, and differ from each other only in degree.”

Notably, Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, commonly understood to have freed all slaves during the Civil War, only applied to the Confederacy and did not apply to Missouri, Delaware, Kentucky, and Maryland. Abraham Lincoln believed these border states would have joined the Confederacy if it applied to them. Therefore, “Juneteenth” did not mark the end of slavery in the US; instead, it signaled victory in war and the defeat of the South, while Northern states continued to permit slavery after the Civil War ended until December 6, 1865, when the 13th Amendment was ratified.

These facts and the totality of the Civil War radicalized Spooner. He was still ferociously anti-slavery—he had once advocated plotting with slaves to violently overthrow plantation owners and compensate the freedmen with the plantation property—but the Civil War also made him an anarchist, concluding that the federal government was worse than a highwayman robber, and had enslaved all of its subjects:

“A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years. Neither are a people any the less slaves because permitted periodically to choose new masters. What makes them slaves is the fact that they now are, and are always hereafter to be, in the hands of men whose power over them is, and always is to be, absolute and irresponsible.”

Spooner was alarmed by the growth of the federal government during the Civil War. Jim Powell, in The Triumph of Liberty, writes:

“In the North, there was military conscription; paper money inflation (”Greenbacks”); tariffs as high as 100%; excise, sales, inheritance and income taxes; censorship of mail, telegraphs and newspapers; jailing people without filing formal charges. The Lincoln administration imprisoned some 14,000 civilians. Many of these measures were taken without Congressional approval. Most fighting took place in the South which was devastated. The overall death toll exceeded 625,000. After the war, the federal government maintained a standing army 50% higher than before the war began. Federal spending as a proportion of the national economy was twice as high after the war than before. The national debt, which was about $65 million when the Civil War began, largely a consequence of the Mexican War, skyrocketed to $2.8 billion, and interest on it accounted for about 40% of the federal budget through the mid-1870s.”

After observing these perceived abuses, Spooner suggested that, despite abolishing chattel slavery, “there is not a single natural, human right, that the government of the United States recognizes as invoiolable; that there is not a single natureal, human right, that it hesitates to trample under foot, whenever it thinks it can promote its own interests by doing so.”

He particularly took issue with the North’s use of conscription, which he viewed simply as a different form of slavery:

“The government does not even recognize a man’s natural right to his own life. If it have need of him, for the maintenance of its power, it takes him, against his will (conscripts him), and puts him before the cannon’s mouth, to be blown in pieces, as if he were a mere senseless thing, having no more rights than if he were a shell, a canister, or a torpedo. It considers him simply as so much senseless war material, to be consumed, expended, and destroyed for the maintenance of its power. It no more recognizes his right to have anything to say in the matter, than if he were but so much weight of powder or ball. It does not recognize him at all as a human being, having any rights whatever of his own, but only as an instrument, a weapon, or a machine, to be used in killing other men.”

His comments on conscription are increasingly important, especially with recent efforts in Congress to automatically register males for Selective Service and ongoing efforts to include women in the draft.

Once a staunch defender of the Constitution before the Civil War, after the observed abuses by the federal government, Spooner declared: “[W]hether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.”

Others have since argued that Americans should not blame the Constitution itself for the loss of liberty and an ever-growing federal government. Instead, as Thomas Jefferson said, “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.”

But, as a strong opponent of slavery who lived through the Civil War and influenced historical figures like Frederick Douglass, Spooner’s radical transformation should make us ponder the very nature of slavery and whether it truly has been eradicated in the United States, or if it has continued to be employed by other means.

Connect with Mises Institute

Cover image is in the public domain
1780 caricature of a press gang — a group of men employed by the British Royal Navy to forcibly recruit (enslave) sailors into naval service during the 18th century

Adam Eisenberg on There Being No Plane at the Pentagon on 9/11

by Jeremy Nell, Jerm Warfare
originally published for Jerm Warfare members April 15, 2024
updated June 18, 2024

While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11.

In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash.

Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues.

Why is there absolutely no plane debris?

In fact, there are no bodies either. Surely, there would be something.

Yet, so many people blindly believe the official story and refuse to ask the most basic questions.

In our conversation, Adam explains why he waited so long to speak up, but in my opinion it doesn’t matter, because his claim—about there being no plane—is corroborated by earlier conversations I’ve had.

Conversation

For further context, I recommend listening to my podcasts with Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, and James Fetzer.

Summary

Using slides, he presents evidence that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.

He includes his personal experiences on site, including the lack of plane parts and the strange condition of the boardroom where people were still in their chairs despite fire damage.

Adam believes that a plane was indeed used in some capacity, but not in the way it is portrayed in the official story. And, to be fair, anyone who thinks that a large aircraft could fly that low—literally just above the grass—by an inexperienced pilot, is a fool.

“There is overwhelming evidence that no planes hit the World Trade Centre or the Pentagon on 9/11.”

Judy Wood

Connect with Jerm Warfare

Cover image credit: United States Air Force (public domain ID 010911-F-ZZ999-019)

Chemtrails: A Bush Family Business?

by Peter A. Kirby, The Abstract
June 17, 2024

Just like the devil himself, the Bush family has been busily building an empire of death. Their kingdom is typified by the aircraft flying overhead which routinely dump tens of thousands of megatons of toxic waste over humanity and the earth. Let’s take a look at abundant evidence which indicates that the Bush family has been up to their eyeballs in the New Manhattan Project, shall we?

GoeengineeringWatch.org
ClimateViewer.com
NoGeoingegneria.com
StopSprayingCalifornia.com

NuclearPlanet.com
GlobalSkyWatch.com
ChemtrailsProject.com
ChemtrailsProjectUK.com

Peter A. Kirby’s books ‘Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project’ and ‘The Fall of San Francisco’ are available at Amazon.com as paperbacks, ebooks and audiobooks.

Connect with Peter A. Kirby

Fire Chief Full Interview | Lahaina Fire Anomalies Revealed & Confirmed Suspicious

Fire Chief FULL Interview | Lahaina Fire Anomalies Revealed & Confirmed Suspicious

by Maui Community Investigation
June 16, 2024

Video is mirrored from original Hawaii Real Estate YouTube channel.

Connect with Maui Community Investigation

All images, including cover, are screenshots from the video found above.

Message From Reiner Fuellmich, June 12, 2024: “…Do Not Forget That We’re Fighting Against Psychopaths”

by Reiner Fuellmich, ICIC
sourced from Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel

A new statement by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the latest events in the court proceedings before the Göttingen Regional Court and on current world events.

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Dear friends,

I think I have a really interesting story to tell you.

The synchronicity of events all over the world is, in a somewhat eerie way, astonishing. Everywhere, things are coming to a head. The fog of propaganda and manipulation is clearing so fast now that our happy ending is clearly visible.

But there’s a rough road ahead of us, at least of me. Despite all the efforts of the usual suspects in the mainstream media and politicians, this past Sunday’s EU elections resulted in the war mongers and economic destroyers losing heavily, and those who criticized them for it winning massively.

The Belgian Prime Minister stepped down and the French puppet of the World Economic Forum was forced to dissolve parliament.

The German Chancellor is reduced to the status of a largely incapacitated lame duck.

Sure, mainstream media and politicians immediately scramble to ramp up their propaganda and manipulation machine as soon as they heard the results. But it is too late. They’ve lost control.

Those who have woken up, among them now many young people, will not go back to sleep.

In fact, it is the young generation that, with their worldwide student protests, made sure that the monsters’ attempts at concealing the horrific massacres in Gaza failed. Not so much in Germany, but in the rest of the world, it failed.

One day before the EU elections, another military raid in Gaza with tanks and fighter jets killed 274 Palestinians and injured more than 700. Even though four hostages were freed, three others, according to TRT, the Turkish broadcaster that has journalists on the ground there, three others were killed.

Since October of last year, more than 37,000 Palestinians were killed, 70% of whom are women and children and more than 85,000 Palestinians were injured; 15,000 children are dead and 1,000 children lost a limb, that is, an arm and or a leg.

Anyone who has seen these images — and TRT does have journalists on the ground there that have witnesses and they capture the images — anyone who has seen these images will never be able to unsee them.

If only half of what the journalists who were there tell us with their pictures and their witnesses, if only half of this is true, then no one, none of those who are responsible, will ever get out of prison again.

The Turkish president Erdogan called Netanyahu (and I’m sure he chose his words carefully and deliberately) a psychopath and a bloodthirsty vampire.

But in protest of the indiscriminate and chaotic horror at Gaza, an important member of Netanyahu’s war cabinet resigned.

And here’s something else, two brave Israeli journalists uncovered through their research that the former chief prosecutor of the ICC, the International Criminal Court, at the behest of Netanyahu, was followed and threatened by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad.

The two journalists were not able to publish their story in Israel, but managed to get it published in the UK through the Guardian and in Germany through [Süddeutsche Zeitung ?].

And the successor of that chief prosecutor was not intimidated and he asked for arrest warrants, as we all know, not just against Hamas leaders, but also against Netanyahu and the Secretary of Defense.

Sure, as a response, US puppets are now threatening to sanction officials of the ICC if they go any further. However, they’re now forced to do this in broad daylight and before the eyes of the world, thus demonstrating that the puppets (the puppet masters actually) are not just standing with their backs against the wall, but already halfway through the wall.

It seems odd that what is happening in my criminal case is almost simultaneously mirroring these events. But I am, after everything I’ve learned over the past four years, sure that this is not a coincidence.

After it became clear that the charges against me lack any substance whatsoever as the indictment was based on a criminal complaint filed by deeply-disturbed criminal liars, the presiding judge’s last resort was to exchange the facts and invent new ones out of thin air.

To match this bizarre behavior with more of the usual intimidation and dehumanization tactics, they simply ramped them up. In addition to me being transported from the prison to the court in handcuffs that are chained to a belt around my waist, they now put chains around my ankles as well. Plus, they had two busloads of heavily-armed police officers accompany the transport. And the two heavily-guarded officers who drove me to the court building wore bulletproof vests and asked me if I wanted one too. I wonder why they didn’t ask me if I wanted my Winchester.

When I declined, they asked me to sign a waiver and declare that wearing a bulletproof vest is a good idea as accidents may happen. Hmmm. I wonder what that was supposed to mean.

In court, my attorney, Katja Wörmer asked the presiding judge if he knew what this was all about. He said he didn’t. But he lied, of course.

Back in prison, the deputy chief officer in charge of the prisoners who were only in preliminary detention (as opposed to those who were here to serve a prison term after having been found guilty in a final judgment) told me that the presiding judge had received anonymous threats, including death threats.

Now instead of investigating this and inevitably coming to the conclusion that this is a false flag operation instigated by those same people who are trying to get my money and put me behind bars, it seems to have been easier for these people to act as usual — shoot first and then ask questions.

To top this, the deputy chief officer looked at me, explained that I’m very athletic and that one other inmate may feel threatened by me. This was enough of a justification for him to transfer me once more to the maximum security ward in this maximum security prison, where there’s no communication with my friends, with all the other inmates, and no opportunity for sport. I suppose they think they defused me.

This whole charade is now beginning to feel like our defense team is kind of landing on Omaha Beach, except we do not intend to become victorious cannon fodder. Rather, we prefer the image of John Wayne in ‘True Grit’ when he, reins between his teeth, gun in one hand, rifle in the other, charges and wins against the bad guys.

However, let us not forget two things. First, what is going on in the world has nothing to do with black against white, Russians against Americans, Muslims against Jews, et cetera. Rather, the reality is this is about good against evil.

Everything else is an illusion created by the monsters who are playing the only game they know, the divide and conquer game.

Second, I think a word of caution is in order for our own protection on this final leg of this war.

We’re all of us — black people, white people, Muslims, Christians, Americans, Russians, Chinese, et cetera — fighting for peace and for a human world with love.

But do not forget that we’re fighting against psychopaths, that is people who lack any empathy and any capacity for love. They, in fact, they practice human emotions in front of the mirror in order to make us believe that they’re humans. But they only do it to fool us and to get what they want.

Remember the video I made a year ago about the psychology behind all the panic mongering and the psychopaths who are the puppet masters behind all of this, who use idiots and psychopaths as their most important puppets?

Well, in that video, I explained that a famous brilliant Polish psychologist by the name of Dr. Lobaczewski and his group of psychologists had found out already in the 1960s, psychopaths lack any human qualities. And they’re born that way.

Unlike sociopaths who lose their human qualities as a result, for example, of early childhood abuse, of early childhood trauma, psychopaths cannot be cured and will, under any and all circumstances, continue to do what they want.

In this case, the goal is, of course, population reduction and population control.

That’s why another psychologist described these psychopaths as aliens who are very good actors pretending to have the human qualities that in reality they lack. And that’s why you will not reach them when you preach empathy and love to them.

Never forget how three years ago they forced old people in nursing homes to die in complete isolation. Don’t forget this.

And this is why some of us need to be in armor and carry the sword of justice to make sure that we will not be stopped by the monsters when we finish this final lap on our way to a happy ending as real humans.

Let me close by expressing my heartfelt thanks for your truly invaluable, just life-saving support. This is indeed what keeps me going. And this is how we will cross the finishing line. All of us, being connected as humans through a band that the others do not even know it exists.

I’m not sure if I told you about these songs already.

Van Halen: ‘Jump’ and ‘Dance the Night Away’. [? from Italy]. Amy Winehouse: ‘Valerie’. Eddie Money ‘Take Me Home Tonight’.

And then there’s a movie ‘Out of Africa’. I think it’s great. Robert Redford and Meryl Streep.

See you all soon.

We will not give in. We will not give up.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich website | telegram

The Future of Food: “We Are Witnessing a Controlled Demolition of the Food Supply Chain.”

by James Corbett & Broc West, The Corbett Report
June 11, 2024

We all know the problems of the modern factory farming system. But, as bad as things are, they’re about to get even worse. New technologies are coming online that threaten to upend our understanding of food altogether. Technologies that could, ultimately, begin altering the human species itself. This is The Future of Food on The Corbett Report.

Video available at Odysee, Rumble, BitChute

Transcript:

If it is true that “you are what you eat,” as the old adage has it, then what does that make us?

As consumers of heavily processed, chemically treated, GMO-infested gunk, we in the modern, developed world have solved the problem of hunger that plagued our forebears since time immemorial by handing our food sovereignty over to a handful of corporate conglomerates.

The result of this handover has been the creation of a factory farming system in which genetically engineered crops are doused in glyphosate and livestock are herded into tiny pens where they live their entire lives in fetid squalor, pumped up with antibiotics and growth hormones until they are slaughtered and shipped off to the supermarkets and fast food chains.

There are plenty of documentaries and exposés detailing the dangers of this industrial farming system that we find ourselves beholden to. Any number of activists ringing the alarm about these problems. Numerous campaigns and marches organized to raise awareness about these issues.

Yet still, nation after nation gets fatter and sicker as traditional diets based on fresh produce sourced from local farmers are displaced by the fast food pink slime sourced from the industrial farms of the Big Food oligopoly.

But, as bad as things may be, they’re about to get even worse. As crisis after crisis disrupts the food supply, the “solution” to these problems has already been prepared.

New technologies are coming online that threaten to upend our understanding of food altogether. Technologies that could, ultimately, begin altering the human species itself.

This is your guide to The Future of Food. You are watching The Corbett Report.

Food As A Weapon

So what is food, anyway?

To a normal human being whose head is screwed on straight, that sounds like a dumb question. Food is fuel for the body, obviously.

Oh, sure, we could get fancy about it. Scientists might talk about the caloric content of different foods, or measure their macronutrient levels. Sociologists might point to food as the basis of human community, drawing people together into families, tribes and communities to break bread and engage in social relations. Theologians may even discuss the transubstantiation of bread and wine and the communion with God that such sacred acts of consumption make possible. . . .

. . . But then there are the psychopathic would-be world controllers. These Machiavellian schemers would define food in a very different manner. To them, food is a very different thing altogether.

To those seeking to rule over nations, food is a weapon.

For millennia, attacking armies have known that a city can be conquered by blockading it. Eventually, the besieged city’s inhabitants will run out of food and will either starve to death or surrender.

The English knew that food was a powerful tool of control. They created the conditions that led to the Irish Potato Famine and then stood idly by as millions died or were displaced, because—in the memorable words of Charles Trevelyan, who was in charge of the British government’s response—”the judgement of God sent the calamity to teach the Irish a lesson, that calamity must not be too much mitigated.” But the Irish were neither the first nor the last to feel the brunt of the British Empire’s indifference to their hunger; just ask the Bengals about their own famine.

The 20th-century example of this “food as a weapon” mindset that immediately springs to mind is the Holodomor, a brazen act of genocide perpetrated by Josef Stalin’s Soviets against the Ukrainians in order to force through his campaign to collectivize agriculture in the USSR and to silence the agrarian peasants who were rebelling against that policy. The ensuing famine killed millions of Ukrainians.

But the Holodomor is certainly not the only time that food was weaponized in the previous century. Who can forget arch-globalist Henry Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests? This now-infamous document—drafted by Kissinger in December of 1974 and adopted as official policy by President Ford in 1975—argues that since “[g]rowing populations will have a serious impact on the need for food,” food aid to the developing world may need to be tied to mandatory sterilization programs or population reduction quotas. Even the coolly calculating Kissinger was forced to concede that such a scheme would turn food into “an instrument of national power.”

But that was then. This is now! Surely this “food as a weapon” idea has been retired, hasn’t it?

Lest there be any doubt that food is still being weaponized against us in the 21st century, we only have to turn to the latest news headlines to see that this idea is far from a relic of the past.

From the disruptions to the global food supply caused by the COVID lockdowns and restrictions to the decimation of the Ukrainian wheat harvest caused by the Russian invasion in 2022, the shocks to the global food supply chain have contributed to a doubling in the number of people facing acute food insecurity in the last four years.

Given this vivid demonstration of just how fragile the global food supply is and just how much economic and societal chaos can result from any shock to this system, it would be unthinkable that governments would now be deliberately attempting to undermine that supply chain further, wouldn’t it?

Well, think again. From the Netherlands to Ireland to Poland to Italy to Canada to Argentina to Sri Lanka, governments are cracking down on farmers, forcing them to cull herds, lower production, dump milk and comply with onerous new operating restrictions in the name of reducing pollution.

These governments are not stupid. Like the British, the Soviets, the Americans and other repressive regimes throughout history, they know that these measures, if played out to their conclusion, will result in widespread hunger and unrest. In fact, we’ve already seen massive protests against these restrictions in numerous countries, from Germany to Italy to Poland to Spain to Panama to Argentina to Canada. And that’s to say nothing of the mass Dutch farmer protests in recent years and Sri Lankans running their president out of the country when it became obvious that the government’s green policies and farming restrictions had contributed to the collapse of that nation’s economy.

And now, we find that the food supply itself is under attack.

ANCHOR: 40,000 pounds of food meant to feed people in a food desert near Maricopa, south of the valley, is completely gone.
And tonight, investigators are still trying to figure out what caused the fire.

SOURCE: Fire at Maricopa Food Pantry destroys 40,000 pounds of food

ANCHOR: Breaking news out of Pasco County: crews battling a huge fire at a chicken farm. It’s all happening on Cal Main Foods along Simpson Farm Lane in Dade City.

SOURCE: Dade City poultry farm fire likely killed 250,000 chickens

ANCHOR: Firefighters trying to figure out what sparked a fire at a food processing plant on the west side. It happened around 9.30 last night on Merida Street near South Zarzamora.

SOURCE: West Side food processing plant left with smoke damage after fire, SAFD says

ANCHOR: Breaking news in eastern Oregon, where crews are battling a major fire at a potato chip processing plant. Air 12 flew over the scene at Shearer’s foods on highway 207 in Hermiston.

SOURCE: At least two people injured in explosion at Hermiston food plant

ANCHOR: Crews were on the scene of a massive fire at an egg farm earlier this afternoon. The fire broke out at the Hillendale Farms location on Schwarz Road. The Salvation Army says around 100,000 chickens may have died in that fire.

SOURCE: VIDEO: 100,000 chickens die in Bozrah egg farm fire

A series of mysterious fires, explosions, incidents of arson and even cyberattacks on food processing facilities across the United States in recent years has prompted law enforcement agencies to warn of a coordinated attack on the food supply.

In April 2022, the FBI even issued an official notice to private industry warning that “ransomware attacks against the entire farm-to-table spectrum of the FA [Food and Agriculture] sector occur on a regular basis” and noting that such attacks are “disrupting operations, causing financial loss, and negatively impacting the food supply chain.”

This mysterious attack has taken place at the same time as a massive disruption of the global food supply has left the world one crisis away from disaster. With nitrogen fertilizer shortages fueling food inflation even as governments around the world crack down on their farmers’ use of fertilizers and farming inputs, and with war, drought and trade disruptions also playing havoc on food production, the global farm-to-fork system’s ability to feed the world’s population is coming into question.

Organic farmers and local agriculture advocates have been warning about the precarious nature of the global just-in-time supply chain and its lack of resilience for decades. But one group didn’t just warn about the current crisis, they predicted it in surprising detail.

In November of 2015—as you can learn from an official press release on the Cargill website—”65 international policymakers, academics, business and thought leaders gathered at the World Wildlife Fund’s headquarters in Washington DC to game out how the world would respond to a future food crisis.” Over the course of two days, the participants in this “Food Chain Reaction” crisis simulation role-played a response to a number of converging and overlapping catastrophes in the 2020s, including “two major food crises, with prices approaching 400 percent of the long term average; a raft of climate-related extreme weather events; governments toppling in Pakistan and Ukraine; and famine and refugee crises in Bangladesh, Myanmar, Chad and Sudan.” The game—which, we are assured, “was built over the course of months, with maximal realism in mind”—went on to envision some very specific scenarios that bare an eery resemblance to current-day reality, including “a steep price spike with looming global food shortages in 2022” that prompted the EU players to impose a tax on meat.

Lest the meaning of this exercise be lost on the general public, the World Wildlife Fund went on to spell it out in their after-action report on the simulation: “Only by stopping agricultural expansion, augmenting agricultural production, increasing resource-use efficiency, and reducing food waste, can we provide the food and nourishment we need, while ensuring we are conserving nature for future generations.” Accordingly, this “game” ended with the imposition of a global carbon tax.

In February 2024, the European Union ran its own food crisis simulation. The exercise—which brought 60 EU and government officials together for a 2-day conference in Brussels—envisioned a cascading series of food emergencies unfolding over the next two years, from harvest failures and fertilizer shortages to popular uprisings and unrest. The war game ended, predictably enough, with the government bureaucrats calling for more centralization of food reserves and stockpiles in the name of biosecurity and concluding that “diets need to shift toward healthier options and away from meat.”

This EU crisis simulation and the “Food Chain Reaction” exercise, combined with a series of government and NGO-sponsored awareness campaigns related to food security—including the Rockefeller Foundation’s “Reset The Table” report calling for further consolidation of the global food supply and the Chinese government’s “Clean Your Plate Campaign,” which aims to bring technocratic management of the economy into every citizens’ dining room—throw the current round of mysterious and unexplained attacks on food processors and farmers into stark relief. Together, these campaigns and exercises suggest that the current food crisis is not a naturally occurring event, but a deliberately engineered phenomenon.

But if this food crisis is being knowingly engineered, the question is why? What could governments gain by creating food shortages for their own people?

The answer is simple. We are witnessing a controlled demolition of the food supply chain, one that is intended to result in the destruction of the current industrial farming system as we know it. But this changeover is not intended to return us to truly sustainable farming practices, with local, organic farmers producing crops in accordance with age-old agricultural wisdom. Far from it.

As it turns out, the “solution” to this food crisis, the one being proffered by the billionaires of the corporate-pharmaceutical-medical-industrial-philanthrocapital-military complex, is being engineered in laboratories and sold to the public via a bought-and-paid-for mainstream media.

One thing is for certain: the future of food will look very different from anything that we have seen in human history.

The Future of (Weaponized) Food

Now, anyone who has been paying attention in recent years will already know the direction that the food industry is heading.

Yes, by now we all know the “Eat Ze Bugs” agenda being pushed by Klaus Schwaub and his Davos minions. I guarantee that wherever you are, in whatever corner of the world you are reading this editorial, you will have seen (or could easily find) a local news story about high school students “spontaneously requesting” cricket powder dumplings in their school lunch or a puff piece about how valiant scientists are working to save the world with worm burgers.

And we all know about the GMO problem: genetically modified organisms making their way into our food supply. We know about the multiple health studies that have proven time and time again the deleterious health effects of GMO consumption. We know about the insane lengths that the GMO giants have gone to to suppress bad news about their products and the insane lengths that the press has gone to to assist them in this cover-up. And we know about the additional harms that this technology causes, ruining farmer’s lives, contaminating the genome of the planet and causing associated products like glyphosate to further contaminate the food supply and further endanger our health.

But do we know about the next evolution in culinary technology? Now that scientists are playing around with the fundamental building blocks of life, reengineering organisms at the cellular level, an entire field of biotechnology is opening up that is threatening to fundamentally transform what we think of as food itself.

Moving beyond the simple insertion of foreign genes into an organism, scientists are now working on creating foodstuffs from designer microbes, engineering organisms into “bioreactors” that can be used to grow proteins and other materials for food production, growing meat-like products from cells in the laboratory and dozens of other zany ideas.

NARRATOR: The meat of the future will likely be lab-grown. Compared to our conventional methods of putting meat on the table, lab-grown meat—which debuted in 2013—doesn’t involve slaughtering of animals, nor does it require as many environmental resources.

SOURCE: The Meat of the Future: How Lab-Grown Meat Is Made

HOST: I’m about to be one of the first people on Earth to eat real chicken grown entirely in a lab. That’s right, we’re talking the most futuristic nuggets ever.

SOURCE: Lab-Grown Meat is Here… and I Taste-Tested It!

AMNA NAWAZ: Nearly 90 percent of Americans eat meat as a part of their diet. But earlier this year the Agriculture Department approved the production of what’s known as cultivated meat. That is, chicken grown in a lab.

SOURCE: How ‘lab-grown’ meat is made and will people accept it?

NARRATOR: This machine is 3D printing steak. The goal is to create a piece of meat without killing a cow. And this Israeli startup is one of the dozens of companies racing to perfect the process.

SIMON FRIED: It turns out that cows aren’t necessarily the most efficient way of making beef.

SOURCE: Can Lab-Grown Steak be the Future of Meat? | Big Business | Business Insider

After a near-decade-long PR campaign, you’ve probably heard of Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, companies that employ the latest techniques in chemical engineering to create plant-based meat substitutes. But there are many more technologies around the corner that threaten to transform our food supply in even more bewildering ways.

Scientists are bioengineering spores that can be inserted into crops and livestock, allowing companies to identify and track food products all the way through the food system, from farm to factory to fork.

VISHAAL BUYAN: We use microbes as tracking devices. So what we do is we convert data digital data into strands of DNA. We insert that little bit of DNA into a microorganism. A probiotic microorganism, to be honest. And then we can sort of apply that organism and sort of “hitch a ride” on any food or agricultural product or really anything through the supply chain. And the reason we use a microbe to do it is because we engineer it to go into a spore, so that dormant state allows it to be impervious to high temperatures and UV light sort of protect that DNA barcode through transit.

SOURCE: Eating Bioengineered Spores

DARPA is doling out multi-million-dollar contracts for researchers to find ways “to turn military plastic waste into protein powder” for human consumption.

STEVE TECHTMAN: What we’re trying to do is to use microbes to take plastic and other inedible plant material and turn that into something that’s nutritious.

REPORTER: The idea is to turn components of plastic into protein and other nutrients like fats and sugars. If that sounds kind of gross to you, well . . .

TECHTMAN: I don’t want to eat plastic either. What we’re trying to do is to take that plastic and turn it into something completely different.

SOURCE: Turning Plastic Into Protein?

A company called Amai Proteins is using genetically engineered microbes to create peptides that taste like sugar but are digested like proteins, a process that, the company brags, allow their product to be legally sold as non-GMO even though, as they openly admit, these microbes are technically genetically engineered.

ILAN SAMISH: Then, we grow the protein. We biomanufacture it using yeast, just like you do in a brewery. We harvest the protein to get 100% pure protein. And last, our ProTaste food technology incorporates the protein to replace up to 70% of the sugar without compromising taste.

SOURCE: Sweet Protein | BBC StoryWorks

And then there are companies like Indigo Ag, a Boston-based agricultural technology company, and tech companies like EY Global and Microsoft, who are ushering in The New Normal Of Agriculture by—as their thinly-disguised corporate PR masquerading as “investment news” likes to boast—”utilizing advanced AI and machine learning techniques to create a revolutionary agronomics platform that boosts farmland sustainability and productivity through next-gen microbiome treatments, digital regenerative content, time-series satellite imagery, advanced crop monitoring and data analysis, and grain quality testing.”

NARRATOR: What if you could predict the best crops to grow using the power of data, recognize crop disease or pests faster, connect with vendors seamlessly, doing all this knowing you control your own data? With data captured from each field and connected to predictive analysis, farmers have an unprecedented view of their crops.

SOURCE: Innovating for Agribusiness – EY and Microsoft

Of course, these technologies will be sold to the public as a way to remarkably improve upon the boring old “food” that humanity has relied on for untold millennia. This isn’t food after all, this is Food 2.0!

Molecular gastronomy will allow for the creation of all sorts of zany and unimaginable dishes, from spherified juices to deep-fried hollandaise to lollipopified octopus!

In the nutrigenomical kitchen of the future, the AI systems that plan our meals and assemble our food will be able to precisely tailor our diet to our individual genome, calculating the exact portions of foodstuffs (or lab-grown food substitutes) we need to consume to meet our desired health goals!

And who needs a chef? In the future, we’ll bring the Star Trekkian idea of the replicator into reality by 3D printing all our food right in our own kitchen!

NARRATOR: You’re hungry. But instead of whipping up a meal, all you have to do is enter your menu choices into a computer and your dinner appears before you. So magical!

It may seem like science fiction, but it isn’t. Well, not completely. The future is now, my friends!

Is 3D printed food in your future?

SOURCE: Is 3D Printed Food the Future?

The propaganda that is being rolled out to sell the public on this transformation of our food supply sounds like the sales pitch of a used car salesman. This should not be surprising. For those who know the players who are pushing this “Food 2.0” agenda and their real intentions, it is obvious that the enormous and unbelievably hubristic effort to replace natural food with laboratory-made food substitutes is not about helping the poor and starving to achieve food security, but rather to deprive them of the earth’s natural abundance.

The end result will be a population dependent on the laboratory-produced food substitutes produced by a handful of corporations and a population at the mercy of the scientists these corporations employ. These molecular magicians will, after all, be able to insert all manner of exotic agents into the food supply at any time.

But to really understand where this agenda is heading and how quickly we are likely to get there if it is not opposed, we need look no further than the story of Future Fields. This company and its product has managed to combine the Unholy Trinity of fake food: GMOs, bugs and biotech.

MATT ANDERSON-BARON: So, today I’m here to talk about the humble fruit fly and how one day it could save your life—and perhaps all of humanity! So, science has given us countless medical miracles. You know: pandemic-stopping vaccines, life-saving therapies. But one of the most impactful things that it’s given us and given modern medicine is genetic engineering of biological systems.

SOURCE: How can a fruit fly save your life? Future Fields at Collision 2023

Future Fields, a Canadian biotech company, has notified the Canadian government of its intention to commercialize “EntoEngine,” a type of fruit fly that “has been genetically engineered to express a growth factor isolated from cows.” This growth factor, it turns out, is an important component of the lab-grown meat recipe, which has so far required the use of “fetal bovine serum” (FBS)—a substance extracted from unborn cattle—to grow the meat cells. But now that the “EntoEngine” has been created, Future Fields is excited to use these flying “bioreactors” to produce the growth factor faster and more cheaply than before.

Yes, from cricket powder dumplings and bug burgers to GMOs and glyphosate to bioreactors and designer microbes to nutrigenomics and 3D printed material, this is the future of food if the mad scientists get their way.

But who is funding these mad scientists? Where do they get their support? And what drives these shadowy billionaires and their non-profit organizations in their quest to reengineer the world’s food supply?

The Rockefeller Foundation

The Rockefeller family and their namesake foundation are in many ways the progenitors and the architects of the Great Food Reset. From the beginning of the so-called “Green Revolution” to the so-called “Gene Revolution,” the Rockefellers have been there, helping to move things along with their “philanthropic” donations.

In the 1940s, they founded the Mexican Agricultural Program in Mexico and the International Basic Economy Corporation in Brazil, both of which have been criticized for hooking farmers on expensive machinery and Rockefeller-supplied petroleum products. This formed the basis of the “agribusiness” concept that emerged, predictably enough, from the Harvard Business School out of research conducted by Wassily Leontief under a Rockefeller Foundation grant.

The Rockefeller’s agribusiness model arguably did more to change the course of human civilization in the 20th century than anything other than war. It transformed farming and traditional agriculture into the business-led, input-intensive industrial enterprise that it is today, and led to the creation of the global food supply chain.

But the Rockefellers’ influence did not end in the 21st century.

In 2006, The Rockefeller Foundation co-founded the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, whose stated goal of “elevat[ing] the single African voice” on the world stage is belied by the fact that over 200 organizations have come together to denounce the alliance and its activities, claiming that the group has not only “unequivocally failed in its mission” but has actuall y “harmed broader efforts to support African farmers.”

And in 2020 the Rockefeller Foundation released a report entitled “Reset the Table: Meeting the Moment to Transform the U.S. Food System” calling for a further centralization of control over the food supply, including “a new, integrated nutrition security system.”

Bill Gates

Having explicitly cited The Rockefeller Foundation as one of its main inspirations, it’s no surprise that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has emerged to become one of the most important players in the Great Food Reset in recent years.

Gates was an important early backer of “Impossible Burger” and its lab-grown synthetic biology food substitute. He also provided capital to Impossible rival Beyond Meat . . . until Beyond’s stock began to crumble. Miraculously, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust was able to divest itself of its Beyond Meat stock right before the shares tanked in 2019.

And, as PleaseStopTheRide.com has pointed out, Gates is also investing millions into “hacking your microbiome” to reengineer humans’ gut bacteria.

Ominously, Bill Gates has also recently become the biggest owner of US farmland, a move that allows him unprecedented control over the future of farming in America.

USAID

Created in 1961 by executive order, USAID is a US government agency that has participated in subterfuge and counterinsurgency operations in Venezuela, Cuba, Ukraine and numerous other countries under the guise of providing humanitarian assistance and, of course, food aid.

Last year, USAID, in conjunction with “Feed the Future” (the U.S. government’s global hunger and food security initiative), released a working paper titled “Systemic Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation.” The paper argues that:

. . . a perfect storm of circumstances in which supply chain issues, regional agricultural and nutrition challenges, the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and regional conflict have combined to form a looming food security crisis.

Their proposal for addressing this (generated) crisis includes:

linking “carbon markets” to “regenerative agriculture” in a move that continues the financialization of nature;
using ESG scores as a way to pressure companies into acquiescing to the nebulous and ever-changing demands of the Food Reset agenda;
and, of course, “the promotion of insects as sustainable sources of proteins.”

Throughout the document, USAID’s “leverage” over developing countries is referenced no less than 125 times. Given the Kissingerian food-as-a-weapon mentality that is the very basis of USAID and its mission, the document perfectly represents the kind of Rockefeller-inspired, Gates-funded, USAID-promoted, agribusiness-based neocolonialism that people in Africa and elsewhere have been warning about for decades.

This list of Great Food Reset culprits is of course incomplete. I haven’t even mentioned the participants in the “Food Chain Reaction Game” or the “nitrogen reduction” schemes being pushed by national governments around the world or the Global Crop Diversity Trust and its ominous Svalbard seed vault or any of a million other relevant players and factors in this grand transformation.

But from this (admittedly incomplete) exploration we can begin to make a list of the types of players that are behind this push to “transform the global food supply” and better understand their methods and motivation. And, armed with that knowledge, we can start formulating our own plans for counteracting this agenda.

THE PUSHBACK

Now, if there is any good news to be had in the sad saga of future (fake) food, it’s that the people are waking up to the Great Food Reset agenda and they are not happy about it.

For a trivial example of the pushback against the fake food agenda and the oligarchs stewarding over it, witness Bill Gates’ recent “AMA” (ask me anything) thread on reddit, where one heavily upvoted question put the issue to America’s largest farmland owner directly:

Why are you buying up so much farmland, do you think this is a problem with billionaire wealth and how much you can disproportionally acquire? [sic]

Gates’ answer—employing the fact checkers’ ACKSHUALLY! by pointing out that he “own[s] less than 1/4000 of the farmland in the US [sic]” and that his only interest in farms is “to make them more productive and create more jobs”—is to be expected from a man who has spent billions on PR and propaganda in recent decades to transform his public image from that a reviled tech monopolist to that of a revered billionaire philanthropist.

The response to that answer, however—observing that 1/4,000th of US farmland is still an incredibly large amount of land and that Gates did not explain how consolidation of farmland in fewer hands will transform the agricultural sector—shows that the public is not buying Gates’ PR wholesale anymore.

A less trivial example of the pushback against Gates and his ilk is to be found in the “Open Letter to Bill Gates on Food, Farming, and Africa” published last November and signed by no less than 50 organizations dedicated to food sovereignty, including the Community Alliance for Global Justice/AGRA Watch and the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa. The letter derides Gates’ role in “creating the very problem” of global food shortages that he is ostensibly “fixing,” accusing him of pushing ineffective (but profitable) technocratic solutions instead of simpler, less expensive agricultural solutions:

There are already many tangible, ongoing proposals and projects that work to boost productivity and food security—from biofertilizer and biopesticide manufacturing facilities, to agroecological farmer training programs, to experimentation with new water and soil management techniques, low-input farming systems, and pest-deterring plant species. What you are doing here is gaslighting—presenting practical, ongoing, farmer-led solutions as somehow fanciful or ridiculous, while presenting your own preferred approaches as pragmatic. Yet it is your preferred high-tech solutions, including genetic engineering, new breeding technologies, and now digital agriculture, that have in fact consistently failed to reduce hunger or increase food access as promised.

The pushback against the transformation of the food supply is not limited to Gates and his eponymous foundation’s efforts, however.

Resistance against GMO foods, for instance, is massive. In fact, the more the biotech billionaires try to shove their genetically modified monstrosities on vast swaths of the human population, the more the public is rising up to reject them. In recent months alone we have seen people rebelling against GMOs in Turkey, Kenya, Nigeria, Mexico, Pakistan and Indonesia.

All of these protests against the Great Food Reset are hopeful signs. They show that the public are not simply going to swallow anything that is put on their plate.

But even more important than these examples of protest and pushback are the things that we can do to take the Future of Food away from the agribusiness conspirators and their bought-and-paid-for politicians and put it back in the hands of the people.

It involves getting our hands dirty and getting to work . . . but that’s the way it’s always been. And the alternative to this, this working of the land, is, as we have seen, no alternative at all.

And in the end, the future of food is ours to decide. Happy planting!

Connect with The Corbett Report

Evil Beyond Words

by Paul Cudenec, Winter Oak
June 13, 2024

In a previous phase of my existence I used to pen regular film reviews for the local paper at which I worked.

I got into the habit of writing these as soon as possible after I had seen the film in question, so that I would still be in touch with the impression that it had made on me and remember the salient details.

So it’s somewhat surprising for me to realise that I have taken several weeks to write about the film I am going to describe.

What has happened, I think, is that it made a very deep impression on me that I have needed time to fully process.

Les Survivantes (‘the female survivors’, literally, or perhaps better rendered as ‘the women who survived’) is a new French documentary from director Pierre Barnérias, known for his 2020 exposé of the Covid scam, Hold-Up.

Given the vitriol and censorship aimed at that film, and given the even more controversial subject matter of Les Survivantes, I would have expected only to have been able to view it via some rebellious non-corporate website.

So it was a little surreal to find myself sitting down to watch it at a massive multiplex cinema in an out-of-town commercial zone in Nîmes.

The subject of the film is the abuse of children: not just sexual abuse, including violent rape, but also the torture of children, the dismembering and murdering of children and the forcing of children to watch and participate in the abuse, torture, dismembering and murdering of other children.

It has taken me a month to be able even to write that sentence, so it is hard to imagine how difficult it must have been for the survivors of such activity to talk in public about what they experienced.

Indeed, as one of them explained, part of the purpose of the activity – in particular the forced participation – was to traumatise and shame them into a lifelong silence that these women have now broken.

An important aspect of the film is that these crimes were not carried out by random individuals but by a network – when they met up, some of the eight women realised they had been abused by the same individuals in different locations across France, Belgium and Switzerland.

As the survivors told their stories, the nature of this network became increasingly apparent – there was talk of powerful people, politicians, heads of state and billionaires.

A former employee of Crédit Suisse (which cropped up in my recent article on the Rothschilds’ Chatham House operation) described how he had walked out of a party hosted by his banker boss when it started to involve a simulated satanic child sacrifice involving the banker’s daughter.

Just in case there was any lingering doubt, the caption at the end of the film refers to the network being run by “global financial power”.

We have, of course, all heard about Jeffrey Epstein or Jimmy Savile, with dark rumours about activities even less acceptable than sex with underage girls and boys.

But I for one never wanted to think about this too much, didn’t really want to emotionally embrace its reality, even though I accepted it intellectually.

Les Survivantes forced me to think about it, to feel it through the words of little girls who had suffered, survived and somehow found the courage, as women, to tell the world what had happened.

I know I was not the only person who walked out of the cinema desperately suppressing the desire to burst into angry tears.

In the subsequent weeks, the shock of what was described in the film has percolated into my thinking.

I thought I was being pretty hard-line in the language I use to describe the circles involved in all this, using labels like “criminocrats” or “mafia” and adjectives like “corrupt”, “odious” or “vile”.

However, I now realise I have been letting them off the hook. They’re worse than any of that.

It is already difficult to understand how anyone could deliberately cause the deaths of millions of people in wars, deliberately poison them with toxic drugs, deliberately destroy the natural world, polluting land, air and water, deliberately wreck communities and cultures, cynically enslave and exploit people across the world.

But how can we digest the fact that members of this same global financial power also enjoy raping, torturing, dismembering and murdering little children?

What words can we use to describe what they are? Even “Satanist”, which is presumably how they regard themselves, seems too weak.

I’ve always thought that mere human beings can no more be entirely evil than they can be entirely good.

Now I’m not so sure.

The three pieces of art illustrating this article are all by the film director David Lynch.

Connect with Paul Cudenec website | substack

Chemtrails = DEATH

The Abstract episode 33 “Chemtrails = DEATH”

by Peter A. Kirby, Activist Post
June 9, 2023

Highly credible evidence shows that what is constantly sprayed from jumbo jet aircraft is devastating us and our environment. From the last two installments of The Abstract we have learned that we are being sprayed with coal fly ash. Now the question becomes: What does that do? The answer to that question is already well established: Chemtrails cause DEATH. For the full story of chemtrails and geoengineering, please buy and read the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.

We already know what coal fly ash does to humans and the environment. This has been well established long ago. Before the widespread use of electrostatic precipitators which purify the emissions from hydrocarbon-fired power plants, the smoke that rises from burning coal simply billowed out into the free atmosphere. At the time, extensive environmental studies were conducted in order to gauge the impact of these effluents. The findings were not good. Billowing clouds of coal fly ash were found to cause: lung cancer, neurodegenerative disease, chronic inflammation, respiratory disease and cardiovascular disease.

Bringing these findings to light and putting them into the context of today’s geoengineering operations is, once again, our friend Dr. Marvin Herndon, PhD. In a series of peer-reviewed, published journal articles, Dr. Herndon and his colleague Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD (a sitting director of Monroe County, Florida’s Department of Health) have updated and expanded upon this voluminous body of historical scientific work.

Forget about coal fly ash for a moment though. Simply breathing in any kind of particulate matter is very bad for humans. This is not a matter of debate. Common sense and many studies show this. Inhalation of fine particulate matter is associated with: Alzheimer’s disease, risk for stroke, risk for cardiovascular disease, lung inflammation and diabetes, reduced renal (kidney) function in older males, morbidity and premature mortality, decreased male fertility, low birth weight, onset of asthma, and increased hospital admissions.

Due to its extreme toxicity, coal fly ash is much worse. Herndon and Whiteside write, “CFA [coal fly ash] contains a variety of potentially carcinogenic substances including aluminosilicates, an iron oxide-containing magnetic fraction, several toxic trace elements, nanoparticles, and alpha-particle-emitting radionuclides. Silica, arsenic, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium are found in CFA and all have been associated with increased lung cancer risk.”

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data has confirmed a recent, concurrent rise in neurological diseases.

Biospheric implications

In June of 2019 Herndon and Whiteside published a paper titled “Role of Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash in the Global Plankton Imbalance: Case of Florida’s Toxic Algae Crisis.” In this paper, the authors provide evidence for the assertion that the coal fly ash sprayed by the megaton into our biosphere is causing, among other things, an overabundance of harmful plankton blooms which, in turn, has more harmful effects.

A little further up the food chain we find insects. Herndon and Whiteside have been working in this area as well. In August of 2018 their paper titled “Previously Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bee and Insect Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” was published. In this paper, the authors substantiate a multitude of harmful, observed effects upon insects from chemtrail spray. We can stop wondering why bee populations are being decimated and we have seen a concurrent, precipitous drop in overall global insect populations as well. The authors write:

“The primary components of CFA [coal fly ash], silicon, aluminum, and iron, consisting in part of magnetite (Fe3O4), all have important potential toxicities to insects. Many of the trace elements in CFA are injurious to insects; several of them (e.g., arsenic, mercury, and cadmium) are used as insecticides. Toxic particulates and heavy metals in CFA contaminate air, water, and soil and thus impact the entire biosphere. Components of CFA, including aluminum extractable in a chemically-mobile form, have been shown to adversely affect insects in terrestrial, aquatic, and aerial environments. Both the primary and trace elements in CFA have been found on, in, and around insects and the plants they feed on in polluted regions around the world. Magnetite from CFA may potentially disrupt insect magnetoreception. Chlorine and certain other constituents of aerosolized CFA potentially destroy atmospheric ozone thus exposing insects to elevated mutagenicity and lethal levels of UV-B and UV-C solar radiation.”

Further up the food chain we find birds. Drs. Herndon and Whiteside published a paper in November of 2018 titled “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: A Previously Unrecognized Primary Factor in the Catastrophic Global Demise of Bird Populations and Species.” In this paper, the authors find that coal fly ash is causing unprecedented bird die-offs. The authors write, “Bird populations and species world-wide are experiencing die-offs on an unprecedented scale.” A little later, the authors continue, “Aerosolized CFA [coal fly ash], a particularly toxic form of air pollution, contains multiple metals and elements well-known to adversely affect all portions of the avian life cycle, in aerial, terrestrial, and marine environments. Studies from around the globe reveal systemic contamination of birds by these elements.” The authors conclude that, “Coal fly ash, including its use in ongoing atmospheric geoengineering operations, is a major factor in global bird die-off. The accelerating decline of birds parallels the catastrophic decline of insects, due in part to the same type of aerial pollution.”

Doctors Herndon and Whiteside have also looked at the biological impacts of chemtrails upon bat populations. In January of 2020 they published a paper titled “Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bat Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering.” In this paper, the authors find that bat populations worldwide are suffering a precipitous decline. The authors write:

“Bats are excellent mammalian bioindicators of environmental contaminants and it is known that their tissue contains high levels of metals and persistent organic pollutants. From a review of the literature, we show that the pollutant element ratios in bat tissue and bat guano are consistent with an origin in CFA-type air pollution. These findings suggest that CFA [coal fly ash], including its use in covert climate engineering operations, is an unacknowledged factor in the morbidity and mortality of bats. Bats, therefore, are an important ‘canary in the coal mine’ pointing to the urgency of halting covert climate engineering and greatly reducing ultrafine particulate air pollution.”

Plants have been decimated under this New Manhattan Project too. Doctors Herndon, Whiteside and other co-authors have been doing work in this area as well. In a series of published, peer-reviewed journal articles, they have found that a combination of factors, all caused by the spraying of coal fly ash, are causing mass die-offs of global vegetation. They found that trees, in particular, are weakened by increased UV radiation, desiccation, and toxicity – all caused by chemtrails. Once a tree is weakened by this trifecta, it becomes susceptible to insect infestations, fungal infections, and other biotic factors such as bacteria and viruses. The result of all this is dry, dead and dying vegetation. An abundance of dry, dead and dying vegetation makes forest fires occur more often and burn more furiously. Herndon et al conclude that this is most probably why we have seen such tremendously large forest fires lately.

For all of what Drs. Herndon and Whiteside have to offer here, please buy and read their book Chemtrails are not Contrails: The Face of Evil.

Silver Iodide

The conventional cloud seeding industry has set the precedent. They’ve been spraying us with a toxic substance since just after the end of WWII. They’ve been routinely spraying us with silver iodide. Although today’s Weather Modification Association claims it is completely safe, they have a conflict of interest and they do not have enough data to sufficiently back up their claims.

A popular silver iodide material safety data sheet describes silver iodide as, “Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, [and] of inhalation.” Unbelievably, the authors of this data sheet write that much of the toxicology information is NOT AVAILABLE. They’ve been spraying us with this stuff since 1947 and the toxicology information is not available?! Equally as unbelievable, to date, no publicly available, long-term studies of silver iodide’s ecological impacts have been done.

It is widely suggested that exposure to silver iodide causes argyria – characterized by a blue-grey discoloration of the eyes, skin, mucous membranes, and internal organs. Does that sound healthy?

Another MSDS produced by Fisher Scientific reads, ”Chronic ingestion of iodides during pregnancy has resulted in fetal death, severe goiter, and cretinoid appearance of the newborn. Prolonged exposure to iodides may produce iodism in sensitive individuals. Symptoms could include skin rash, running nose and headache.”

Despite this information, the historical weather modification literature notes a lack of data. A 1966 National Science Foundation report stated, “The present state of knowledge places uncomfortable limits on the prediction of the biological consequences of modifying the weather.” A 1969 Bureau of Reclamation report noted, “There has so far not been a single biological field study completed and reported in the literature specifically designed to identify any aspect of the ecological effects of weather modification.” While a 1972 study conducted by the Council on Environmental Quality stated, “Projects may have significant adverse environmental effects, ranging from immediate hazards to life and property to long-term alterations in land use patterns and threats to ecological systems.”

Weather modifiers have exhibited a pattern of dismissing the potentially harmful effects of substances used in weather modification activities. In 1967 weather modifier Archie Kahan, writing for the Bureau of Reclamation, dismissed concerns about the use of silver iodide as he conflated the biological impacts of silver iodide with its efficacy as a nucleant and any possible hazardous weather that might arise from its use. This has been a common tactic used to avoid answering the most obvious question.

The vast majority of research done in this area does not even concern itself with Human health impacts or biospheric contamination. Rather, it focuses on the ancillary issue of how plants and animals may be affected by either more or less rainfall. The work that is publicly available is mostly cursory. In the vast majority of cases where the subject is even so much as broached, the literature quickly follows with assurances that there are probably no adverse effects and that further study is not necessary.

Thankfully, some research indicating silver iodide’s negative biological impacts has surfaced. It is not good news, but we need to hear it. Evidence suggests that it is exceptionally bad for organisms further down the food chain. The aforementioned 1969 Bureau of Reclamation report also noted:

“Silver compounds are much more toxic to fish than to terrestrial vertebrates. Some of the higher concentrations of Ag recorded in precipitation from seeded storms are comparable to the lowest concentrations lethal to fish in the short run. In one set of experiments, sticklebacks were able to withstand no more than 0.003 ppm Ag in water at 15-18° C. The fish survived one week at 0.004 ppm, four days at 0.01 ppm, and but one day at 0.1 ppm.”

This 1969 report also found silver to be, “…highly toxic to microorganisms….” The report continues:

“Many investigators have placed Ag at or near the top of the list among heavy metals in toxicity to fungi, slime molds, and bacteria. Water containing 0.015 ppm Ag from contact with specially prepared metal has exhibited bacteriocidal activity. 0.006 ppm Ag has killed E. coli in 2 to 24 hours, depending on numbers of bacteria. Bacteriocidal activity in this context usually implies death of 9.99% or so of the cells present.”

Killing fungi, E. coli, and slime molds may sound like a good thing. But in the context of our complex and interdependent biosphere, it is not. Our overall ecosystem needs slime molds and the like. These things are vital links in the food chain.

The bottom line is that there is compelling evidence showing that silver iodide has seriously negative biological impacts. We cannot know for sure that spraying this stuff is safe if no reputable, public, long-term studies have been done, but they have been going ahead and doing it anyway – just like today’s geoengineers.

Connect with Activist Post

Cover image credit: SAXSTL

The Connection Between Toxic Mold, Parasites & EMFs

by Rosanne Lindsay, Traditional Naturopath, Nature of Healing
June 7, 2024
Updated from February 2022

Living in the material world means an attachment to wireless technology. When does an attachment become an addiction?

Can you do without a cellphone? Watching TV? Scrolling social media? How much time in a day does wireless occupy? What do you consider excessive use? Do you experience withdrawal symptoms (moodiness, irritability, depression) by going without? Would you consent to the imposition of technology at the risk of harming your health and potentially all biological life?

Unfortunately, the emotional and physical effects of invisible electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) are not listed on the package. If you have two or more of the following devices; cell phones, computers, GPS, Smart appliances, electric cars, wearables, and Smart™ TVs, or electric cars, then there are symptoms you may never hear about.

The manufacturer does not disclose that EMFs activate the hidden world of yeast, fungus, mold, mycoplasma, Lyme spirochetes, and protozoan parasites to unhealthy levels in the human body.

The consequence of WiFi is a rise in chronic infections that can be misdiagnosed.

The industries responsible for creating this silent connection between EMFs and infection fail to take responsibility. The line between what will protect you, and what will not, has never been less clearly defined.

As 5G towers become compatible with 6G, 7G and beyond, who is responsible for the consequences?

Symptoms from exposure to mold toxins include:

Fatigue
Weakness
Muscle cramps
Headache and pain
Light sensitivity
Sinus problems
Abdominal pain
Diarrhea
Joint pain and stiffness
Cognitive issues
Mood dysregulation
Temperature regulation or dysregulation problems
Excessive thirst
Increased urination
Nervous system issues

The user is responsible.

Naturopath Dr. Klinghardt, of the Sophia Health Institute, shared an in vitro mold experiment comparing a mold plate shielded from electromagnetic fields to an unprotected mold plate exposed to ambient electromagnetic fields. The unprotected mold, mycoplasma, and spirochete (Lyme) reacts defensively by releasing more potent biotoxins, and by multiplying more than 600 times. This biological response can be observed anywhere in Nature; it is the desire to survive and thrive. In 2011, the amount of cell phone radiation in a cubic inch of air was several million times higher than it had been a decade before that.

Billions of people worldwide harbor tropical worms and don’t know it. They don’t know that cell phones and cell towers trigger their activity. They don’t know that mold, parasites, and other microbes respond by becoming chronic infections. Medical doctors do not automatically rule out parasites, even though there are over one million worm species, alone, classified as helminths.

Helminths take many forms, but all of them harm their host in some way. In humans, they can live in the intestinal tract, urinary tract, bladder, or bloodstream, causing a variety of illness from malnutrition to organ failure” —Dr. Monica Botelho of Portugal’s National Institute of Health.

In endemic regions — predominantly sub-saharan Africa and Southeast Asia — flukes are responsible for the majority of all bladder and liver cancer cases. – Dr. Joachim Richter, Associate Professor at Charité Berlin and co-editor with Botelho.

Symptoms of Parasites:

Parasites Among Us

Worms R us! When in balance, worms live with us in harmony Out of balance, they can invade and overpower any part of the body, including the eyes.

There are hundreds of large parasites that can enter the body by various modes, take up residence, and cause a variety of life-threatening diseases, including cancer. For worms to make a home in the body, the body must be conducive to their existence. The body is best suited for worms if it is depleted of essential minerals and nutrients, thus acidic.

Scientists have known for decades that helminths can turn healthy cells into diseased cells. The same is true of protozoan parasites. For instance, Chagas disease is caused by infection with the protozoan parasite T. cruzi.

It has long been established by study of Ascaris lumbricoides (phylum and species) in man as well as in laboratory hosts, that the larvae, on hatching in the small intestine, migrate through the liver to the lungs. On the eighth to ninth day after infestation, they move farther into the bronchii and then, via the trachea and esophagus, return to the intestine. It has also been shown that the larvae in their migration and development often cause extreme eosinophilia, symptoms such as shortness of breath and cough. —Naval Captain David P. Osborne, chief of surgery, Bethesda Naval Hospital

A search of Pubmed will net hundreds of published, peer-reviewed studies describing Dirofilaria in humans, a mere drop in the worm

bucket. Dirofilaria immitis is a canine parasite that can infect humans, specifically it is a roundworm, otherwise known as a nematode. For instance, whereas Dirofilaria immitis infects the heart and lungs, Dirofiaria repens infects the eye.

Patented Transgenic Insects

Dirofilaria, or heartworm, is transmitted by mosquitoes. An egg gets deposited through the proboscis, which is the long, flexible tube mosquitoes use to pierce the skin. There is plenty of evidence showing that mosquitoes are genetically engineered and patented.

Despite a kill-switch gene, these transgenic mosquitoes breed in the wild. The dire consequence is the contamination of the native mosquito population. Evidence from field trials show that GMO mosquitoes have been bred for disease resistance for decades.

So, why not expect the same for GMO tics and biting flies infected with agents known to transmit Lyme disease? The CDC acknowledges that Lyme disease from multiple vectors is on the rise in the US., but offers no explanation and no solutions.

Parasites & Cancer

Tumors analyzed for pathology often come back showing worms and parasites. Parasitic invasion by a nematode worm is often mistaken for “cancer” in women presenting with breast lumps.

Filarial infection of the breast is not rare, explain the authors. “The larvae enter the lymphatic vessels of the mammary gland, causing lymphangitis, fibrosis, and disruption of lymphatic drainage.” In late, inactive phases, the larvae appear on mammography as serpiginous calcifications. —Medwire News, 2005

Slowly, the information worming its way out into the public is that parasitic infestations represent the internal conditions called “cancer.” All cancers are, in fact, parasitic infections (with high Candida levels) even if not all parasitic infections present as cancer. Worms cause cancer. based on an acidic tissue environment.

It is no secret that the American Cancer Society knows that parasites can lead to cancer. Even the CDC publishes the fact on their website that cases or parasitic infections are misdiagnosed as cancer.

Scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have discovered cancer cells originating in a common tapeworm may take root in people with weakened immune systems, causing cancer-like tumors. It is the first known case of a person becoming ill from cancer cells that arose in a parasite – in this case, Hymenolepis nana, the dwarf tapeworm.

The report, in the Nov. 5 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, raises concern that other similar cases, if they occur, may be misdiagnosed as human cancer – especially in less developed countries where this tapeworm and immune-system-suppressing illnesses like HIV are widespread.

“We were amazed when we found this new type of disease – tapeworms growing inside a person essentially getting cancer that spreads to the person, causing tumors,” said Atis Muehlenbachs, M.D., Ph.D., staff pathologist in CDC’s Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch (IDPB) and lead author of the study. “We think this type of event is rare. However, this tapeworm is found worldwide and millions of people globally suffer from conditions like HIV that weaken their immune system. So there may be more cases that are unrecognized. It’s definitely an area that deserves more study. – CDC, November 4, 2015

So why are we always the last to know?

Anti-Parasitic Protocol

In the Age of Information, ignorance is a choice.

Today, more people diagnosed with cancer have taken matters into their own hands and begun sharing information to heal. Their choice of medicine? An inexpensive pet dewormers/antihelminths called Fenbendazole found at the local pet store. Why don’t doctors tell patients that Fenbendazole is being studied as an anti-cancer drug?

According to sources promoting this anti-worm protocol, Fenbendazole is a triple-threat to cancer: it kills cancer cells in three ways which are significant:

It destroys microtubules that sustain the structure of the cancer cell and its ability to divide and multiply rapidly.It interrupts the cancer cells’ ability to process sugar, and cancer cells must metabolize sugar to survive.
It boosts the production of a cancer-killing gene called p53, a gene cancer patients may lack. When p53 becomes mutated or can’t keep cancer cells in check, cancer cells can proliferate.
The de-wormer also works against parasites, which might be the origin of some cancers.

Before you decide to blame all cancers on worms, realize that helminths are also being used as Immunotherapy (Helminthic Therapy) for Crohn’s disease and for malignancies. In a strange twist of fate, the earthworm’s immune system has shown an ability to kill cancer cells (in vitro). Could it be that a worm’s metabolism depends on a balance of oxygen supply and demand like their human hosts? Yes, indeed.

Is that why oxygen deprivation from EMF fields harm both host and worm?

Add Pulsed EMFs And Mix

The forces in EMFs are caused by EMF radiation, broken down into two categories:

High frequency EMF include: x-rays, gamma rays, or ionizing radiation, and
Low to mid frequencies include: electric power lines, radio waves, cell phones, wireless networks, smart meters, TVs, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, or non-ionizing radiation. These are the most dangerous emission, known to cause direct damage to DNA or cells.

Wireless communication (cell towers, phones, etc) is more dangerous because it produces pulsed EMFs. Pulsed EMFs are much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs. When introducing pulsed electric and magnetic fields into a population infested with parasites and yeast, you have a recipe for dis-ease disaster.

Today, the answers are available to anyone who has a curiosity to search the electronic database of scientific studies. Science has well established that EMF fields incite the growth of fungus, yeasts, molds, mycoplasmas, and parasites.

Just as the chemicals and metal constituents of synthetic medications serve as a food source for these pathogens, so does radioactivity, which serves as an energy source for making food and spurring the growth of fungus.

Those fungi able to “eat” radiation must possess melanin, the pigment found in many if not most fungal species. But up until now, melanin’s biological role in fungi—if any–has been a mystery. —Albert Einstein College of Medicine, May 23, 2007

Since May of 2011, the IARC classification for cell phone radiation internationally had been officially documented as a Class 2B Carcinogen. See the Cell Phone Radiation Emissions Chart from Least to Greatest head SAR level.

BioToxins

Humans are 1:10 human cells to microbes. What affects our smallest inhabitants also affects us. When our microbes perceive an attack from man-made frequencies, they release biotoxins in defense of their lives, even if it damages their host. Sit down before you watch this freakishly large worm (parasitic nematode) slither out of a dead spider host.

Biotoxins are released from microbial metabolism and die-off. This process drives inflammation in humans. As our microbes struggle to survive, they congest the host’s liver and impair digestion. The liver is unable to produce bile to digest fats which leads to a deficiency of fatty acids and eventually fatty liver disease, unrelated to alcohol.

Our microbes cause stress on the whole body, which leads to “Leaky Gut,” now an accepted term. Leaky Gut gave rise to the previously unknown field of neurogastroenterology, and the disorders of IBD, IBS, and Crohn’s disease. When the gut is “leaky,” microbes and their biotoxins leak into the bloodstream to infect other organs, including the brain, also known as “leaky brain.” In the brain, symptoms resemble depression, anxiety, and other neurological conditions.

Magnetic Fields

Sleep is critical for cell repair and regeneration. When electrical and magnetic fields barrage the body, day and night, the stress hormone, cortisol, is stimulated, which prevents normal elimination (constipation) and detoxification. As cortisol rises, melatonin falls. Sleep is elusive. Magnetic fields also alter the movement of minerals and metals the body. A loss of iron leads to anemia.

In 2005, Extremely low frequencies (ELF) have been documented as a possible carcinogen in children diagnosed with leukemia. More than a decade later, ELF exposures have only increased.

I personally suspect that the exposure to electromagnetic fields in the home and the microwaves from cell phone radiation are driving the virulence of many of the microbes that are naturally in us, and makes them aggressive and illness producing. Shielding patients from EMFs has been a more successful strategy to treating Lyme disease and to get people neurologically well than any of the antibiotics or any of the antimicrobial compounds. —Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD, 2018

Solutions

1. EMF Shielding Tools

With the rise of EMF fields a new EMF shielding industry was born. Now you can use the benefits of wireless technology and shield yourself from is health depleting effects using the following tools:

purchase or make faraday cages for cell phones.
hardwire your computers with an Ethernet cable.
Shield smart meters with meter guards.
Wear Shungite, a mineraloid, or place shungite pyramids around the house. Since they become saturated. you will need to cleanse these stones often.
Paint bedrooms with EMF shielding paint.
Use EMF shielding material. Do not use aluminum foil which can shield and also reflect back EMFs.
Hardwire a cell phone, and computer.
Blue light blockers:
Use a blue light blocker covering for all your computer/laptop/tablet screens including cell phones.
Use blue blocking glasses when you are working on the computer (this does not protect skin.). Some people will use a blue light blocker (a thin film that covers the screen) and then also a 100% blue blocker of hard thick plastic at night. However be aware that many of the thinner unnoticable blue light coverings on the market do not protect 100% blue light.
Download a program (e.g.., Iris) onto your device that will automatically reduce blue light at night.

2. Cellphone-Free Communities:

If you can live without electronic devices, there are cellphone-free communities forming. The Intentional Sanctuary Lifestyle Alternative (ISLA), it is located on 40 acres on the Pacific coast of Nicaragua:

Cell phones, WiFi, wireless mice and keyboards, AirPods, smart watches, wireless printers, and all other wireless devices will be prohibited in public and private spaces throughout the property. Interest is growing, and prospective home-buyers have already invested 1/4 of the amount needed to break ground and begin building. There is space for up to 200 homes in the future.

3. Natural Mold and Parasite Detox

If you will continue using electronic devices, know the symptoms of mold poisoning and parasitic infections. Secondly, prevent infections of mold, yeast, and parasites, by keeping your immune system strong and allowing it to work for you by acquiring natural infections.

Eat clean, organic foods. Drink clean water, and avoid drinking public tap water, especially if the water tower has 5G technology on top. Seek out natural spring water.

Avoid factory-farmed foods—sugar and processed grains, coffee, chicken, fish, and red meat—which generate an acidic pH in the body. Choose natural medicines vs. synthetic medicines. Seek out natural healers to assist. And be aware of parasitic relationships among your peers. As within So without.

If you have a parasitic infection, try adding food grade diatomaceous earth. There are two strong herbs that can kill nematodes. One popular anti-parasitic herb is Thyme. Thyme is a culinary herb, but it also kills hook-worms, roundworms, threadworms, skin parasites and several types of harmful bacteria.

Other natural antifungal/antiparasitic herbs include: Black walnut hulls, high in iodine; wormwood, clove oil, oregano oil, and consider a cleanse diet. For other remedies, consult a natural health care practitioner.

When the worm population in the human body overwhelms the immune system, it is called a hyperinfection. At this stage, it may be difficult to kill the worms with herbs unless you eat clean. Using frequencies to target parasites through a Rife machine or homeopathic (energy) preparations can directly target parasites in the body, gently and safely. However, the Rife machine does not always solve the problem since parasites can shift their frequency and hide in the body to evade death. A diet and lifestyle change will be necessary by changing your habits to prevent the problems of living with EMFs.

Disclaimer: The author encourages you to consult a doctor before making any health changes, especially any changes related to a specific diagnosis or condition. No information in this article should be relied upon to determine diet, make a medical diagnosis, or to determine or prescribe a treatment for a medical condition. This information is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice.

Related Articles:

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay

Cover ai-generated image credit: bluemoont

Rising Severe Weather Disasters

by Joseph P. Farrell, The Giza Death Star
June 5, 2024

If you’re a member of this website [The Giza Death Star] or a regular follower on its forums, you will know that over the past couple of years there has been an increasing inability for me to schedule regular events such as vidchats. The reason for this is very simple: weather, and, to be more precise, the possibility of severe weather. I live in an area where, quite literally, severe weather can “spin up” very quickly and with little warning, leaving me but few precious seconds to scoop up my dog and my radio, and scramble to the storm shelter in the back yard. As this procedure is alone somewhat risky, if there is a probability of severe weather – massive hail or winds or tornadoes – I will cancel events to allow me to monitor weather radars and to take shelter long before the sirens are blown. Indeed, if you’re hearing the sirens and are not in your shelter when they blow, it’s probably too late. And over the years, as the storms seem to become more intense, I’ve adopted the “better safe than sorry” philosophy.

But this year has been the absolute worst. During last month (May, 2024), the cycle of storms seemed to hit with weekly regularity, and virtually every time they did, there were warnings of severe weather and tornadoes. We were in our storm shelter no less than five times in four weeks, for a total of about 15 hours spent in it. From Texas to Ohio the country has been pummeled with storms, and as I’ve remarked, we seem to be incapable of having a simple rain with a rumble of thunder every now and then. Every storm now becomes severe. Other people, when I talk about the weird weather, are perceiving the same thing. But before we get to today’s high octane speculation, we must take notice of the following article kindly shared by E.G., because there is a telltale financial and economic indicator that this perception is not merely some sort of “group subjective phenomenon”; it is very real:

The Rise In America’s Billion-Dollar Extreme Weather Disasters

This article says it all, and it’s best to begin at the beginning:

Since 1980, there have been 383 extreme weather or climate disasters where the damages reached at least $1 billion. In total, these disasters have cost more than $2.7 trillion.

Created in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, this chart, via Visual Capitalist’s Jenna Ross, shows how these disasters have been increasing with each passing decade.(Emphasis added)

But note carefully the following important points: adjusting for inflation, the costs of weather disasters has been steadily rising (and note also that benchmark cate of 1980; we’ll get back to that):

The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tracks each disaster and estimates the cost based on factors like physical damages and time losses such as business interruption. They adjust all costs by the Consumer Price Index to account for inflation.

Both the number and cost of extreme weather disasters has grown over time. In fact, not even halfway through the 2020s the number of disasters is over 70% of those seen during the entire 2010s.

Note that according to the above table, we are not even halfway through the 2020s, but are well over halfway to the previous inflation-adjusted cost of weather disasters in the 2010s, and notice the steady increase of the costs.

In other words, measured by the monetary costs, the weather is, indeed, getting worse, much worse. It is not merely a “group subjective impression.”

And that brings me to today’s high octane speculation: the question is why? Of course, we know that the “climate change” nitwits will trot out their usual sauce of whining claptrap and nonsense: cow farts, methane, greenhouse gases, farmers, too many people. But nary a peep will ever cross their ideologically blinded eyes and mute lips about weather modification technologies, from the simple procedures of cloud seeding, to Baal Gates’ (and others’) kooky and insane idea about blotting out the sun with chemical spraying, to the use of ionospheric heaters to actually alter and engineer the ionosphere and magnetosphere, and hence, to be able to manipulate the weather.

Remember, the original patents for HAARP included weather modification and missile defense as one of the uses of the technology, and that was in the late 1980s! Let us add to this the chemical spraying that began with the Reagan Administration to increase the electrical conductivity of the atmosphere as a component of its Star Wars program (and of course, that would make those ionospheric heaters more efficient). In other words, that 1980s date is important, because it is an indicator, a symbol, that mankind is indeed causing the climate change, but for none of the “reasons” offered by the climate change advocates. Their version of it is merely a cloak for the military-industrial manipulation of the weather, and all the blowback happening as a result of that interference and manipulation.

In the very apt words of Elana Freeland, and to put it country simple, there is no longer any such thing as purely natural weather; the use and deployment of these technologies has made that impossible. But that does not mean they have total or complete control either. They can “steer” systems (look at the HAARP patents again, and think of them in connection with the strange behavior taken by Hurricane Katrina before its landfall at New Orleans), and perhaps even increase or attenuate the strength of weather systems, and perhaps even create them.

But they have not mastered 100% control; part of what we’re experiencing is, I maintain, the blowback from a complex of interlocked systems they have yet to master. However, that same increase of severity over the years also means that they must continue to experiment with these technologies of the apocalypse in order to learn the basic laws of their functioning and systemic blowback, much like they did with the first nuclear bombs, and the inability to calculate yields without considering wider systemic energy transduction into the reaction.

Why do this at all? Well, to return to our speculation in last Monday’s blog about the saturnian moon Pan and the Norman Bergrun scenario of The Ringmakers of Saturn, if one wants to deter a potentially hostile extraterrestrial intervention, especially from what looks to be Saturn-sized technology, a Kardashev Class One civilization type technology literally right next door in our own celestial neighborhood, then one must demonstrate a similar ability to engineer systems of a planetary scale: enter ionospheric heaters and the types of weather and geophysical systems manipulation they entail.

In other words, the experimentations are also exercises in deterrence; they are the planetary demonstrations of an ability for “others” to observe, just as nuclear tests were to demonstrate to the Soviets (or the Americans, or the British, or the French, or the Chinese, or the Pakistanis &c) that “we can do this; don’t mess with us.”

And along the way, they can literally destroy property, throw people out of their homes, and pick up land and assets for pennies on the dollar. It’s called disaster capitalism, or as I like to call it, disaster crapitalism. Or to put this point differently in case it is being missed or overlooked: the pattern of increasing disaster is also a pattern similar to the escalation of a war, a weather war being waged on its own people. And while we’re talking about weather war, the technologies are known to more than just the USA, and thus the very real possibility arises that one party might be using this technology to modify an adversary’s weather, and that adversary is attempting to defend against that, and to retaliate, thus inducing even more factors into the equation which may result in unintended blowback.

The end result of all of this is that Mr. Globaloony wants you to blame your local cattle rancher or farmer, or fossil fuels, or what have you, when in reality the types of systems they are playing with are way beyond the ability of methane gas emissions to manipulate. There’s an old adage whose truthfulness in this context goes way beyond the humorous circumstances in which it was offered: “the smeller is the feller.” In this case, the people raising the most noise about climate change are the only people with enough power to access the technologies that can actually do it.

That’s why, when I’m huddling with my dog in our storm shelter and hoping and praying I have a home to return to when we emerge, I’m not thinking of my local farmer or cattle rancher. I’m thinking of John “Ketchup” Kerry, of Baal Gates, of der Hochklaus, of Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev discussing mutual planetary defense in case of an ET invasion, and of the whole miserable and rotten political class, of the whole bloviating mass of the Davos, Bilderburgers, and the Bohemian Grove set.

See you on the flip side…

Connect with Joseph P. Farrell

Cover image credit: KELLEPICS

Dr. Mark Bailey: “HIV Inserts”, Lies & “Lab Leaks”

“The claim that ‘SARS-CoV-2’ contains “HIV inserts” is emblematic of the propagation of decades of virological pseudoscience. Peng Zhou’s team could not engineer a virus as there was no evidence
of a virus to begin with, just as there is no evidence of ‘HIV’. The debate over the origin of the 38 39 COVID-19 “pandemic” has been presented as a false dichotomy where the uninitiated are asked to pick between: (1) ‘zoonotic spillover’ (wet market/bat cave, etc) or (2) ’lab leak’ (accident vs deliberate). The overall story is not disrupted by those throwing ‘HIV’ into option 2, in fact, it helps maintain the virus model on multiple fronts.”

~ Excerpt from “HIV Inserts”, Lies & “Lab Leaks” by Dr. Mark Bailey

“HIV Inserts”, Lies & “Lab Leaks”

by Dr. Mark Bailey
June 2, 2024

More people than ever are becoming aware of the COVID-19 Fraud, not just with regard to the purported tests, “responses” and vaccines but with the foundational claim that a pathogenic virus ‘SARS-CoV-2’ exists. However, the notion that there are “bio-weapons” and “gain of function” activities taking place keeps many people believing that the virus model may have some validity.

My latest essay focusses on the origins of the COVID-19 “lab leak” and ‘HIV insert’ narratives and why they continue to serve multiple pandemic industries. At the heart of it, an examination of gp120, a protein first described in 1984 and attributed to ‘HIV’, unravels the propagation of virological fraud into the present era…

Read & Download PDF

Connect with Drs. Mark & Samantha Bailey

Cover images credit: PublicDomainPictures

Our Geoengineered Skies: Why Coal Fly Ash?

The Abstract episode 32 “Why coal fly ash?”

by Peter A. Kirby, Activist Post
June 3, 2024

Once we understand that we are being sprayed, the most obvious question becomes: What are they spraying? The answer is: coal fly ash. We know that we are being sprayed with coal fly ash due to the work of Marvin Herndon, PhD and his peer-reviewers. But beyond that, there is a seemingly endless amount of circumstantial evidence supporting Dr. Herndon’s findings as well. Here we go over all of the evidence as to why it is asserted that we are being sprayed with coal fly ash. For the full story of everything chemtrails and geoengineering, please buy and read the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.

Coal fly ash is the smoke that rises from burning coal. It is a toxic waste byproduct of coal-fired power plants, which are a staple of global energy production. It is continuously produced by the megaton. In America and the rest of the Western world, coal fly ash is intercepted before it can billow out into our atmosphere by large machines known as ‘electrostatic precipitators.’ Once collected, the question becomes one of what to do with all of this coal fly ash: a toxic slew comprised of, among many other things, mercury, arsenic and radioactive elements. The best evidence indicates that, rather than being disposed of properly, coal fly ash has been utilized as the most common chemtrail spray.

Scientific evidence

Dr. Herndon’s peer-reviewed papers identifying coal fly ash as common chemtrail spray first began to be published in 2017. All four of these 2017 articles were published in the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International. Herndon also co-authored three 2018 peer-reviewed papers which further substantiated the evidence for common chemtrail spray as being coal fly ash.

Dr. J. Marvin Herndon is an American interdisciplinary scientist. He earned his BA in physics in 1970 from the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) and his PhD in nuclear chemistry in 1974 from Texas A&M University. He has worked extensively with famous scientists such as geochemist Hans Suess (1909-1993) and Manhattan Project physical chemist Harold Urey (1893-1981), who themselves were trained by master scientists, including Nobel Laureate Niels Bohr (1885-1962). Dr. Herndon’s scientific papers have been published in world-class journals such as the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. He has also been profiled in the popular press worldwide including a Discover Magazine cover story. Dr. Herndon is a well-known and respected, civically active citizen.

As detailed in Herndon’s book Chemtrails are not Contrails: The Face of Evil, using mass spectroscopy (a process that determines the elemental composition of substances), Herndon compared coal fly ash to environmental samples of snow, rainwater and ambient air. What he found was a match. He found that the chemical signature of coal fly ash was present in all of the environmental samples tested. This is irrefutable proof that we are being sprayed with coal fly ash (CFA) and Herndon’s peer-reviewers have confirmed his findings.

The fact that CFA was found ubiquitously in all of the environmental samples Herndon analyzed means that this substance is being sprayed from aircraft. That is the only way that this substance could be present in every sample tested.

This is not to say that CFA is the only substance with which we are being sprayed. CFA may be used as a substrate for other dispersed substances and we have seen plenty of strange, as yet unidentified substances sprayed from aircraft such as the black goo credibly mentioned in William Thomas’ book Chemtrails Confirmed. But it makes sense that CFA would be utilized for this purpose for many reasons, not the least of which is the fact that there is an inexpensive, readily available and seemingly inexhaustible supply of the stuff.

Circumstantial evidence

As we understand that the New Manhattan Project (NMP) is mainly about weather modification, it is interesting to note that there is quite a historical precedent for the use of coal fly ash in weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. Many military men have claimed that the smoke from exploded bombs causes precipitation. The early American meteorologist James Pollard ‘The Storm King’ Espy (1785-1860) claimed that the smoke from forest fires causes rain to fall. The Nobel Prize-winning weather modifier Irving Langmuir (1881-1957) and NMP pioneer Bernard Vonnegut (1914-1997) were working with fine particle oil smokes way back during WWII. The nucleant discovered by Vonnegut and used through to the conventional weather modification industry of today is the smoke of burning silver iodide. In all of these instances, as with coal fly ash, smoke from some type of fire is either said to cause or is known to cause weather modification.

Congruently, the geoengineers of today often talk about how stratospheric masses of volcanic ash spewing from a fiery volcano can reflect sunlight back into space and therefore cool the planet, saving us from the dreaded global warming – in other words, the SRM geoengineering thesis. In 1963, weather modifier Narayan R. Gokhale of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences of the State University of New York was experimenting with volcanic ash as a nucleant. Many of the things geoengineers say they want to spray us with are in coal fly ash like silica, sulphates, and aluminum.

It is entirely possible to produce coal fly ash particles of the proper size for optimum nucleation. Particles optimally sized for nucleation would be the most useful for the New Manhattan Project as those particles attract the most amount of atmospheric water. The proper size is in the neighborhood of one tenth of a micron (.1μ). Therefore it is safe to assume that the coal fly ash particles to be used as part of the New Manhattan Project are in the neighborhood of .1μ in diameter. .1μ is extremely small, but, to attain this particle size, before combustion, the coal simply needs to be finely pulverized, which is a standard industry practice.

The different molecules which comprise the coal fly ash of the New Manhattan Project may serve different purposes. Aluminum oxide has been used extensively as a nucleant. Silicon (which presents abundantly in coal fly ash) has too. The barium, strontium and other radioactive elements found in CFA probably serve as atmospheric tracers. Geoengineers are on record using tiny radioactive particles, monitored by satellites and computers, to track atmospheric movements.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) sells CFA as one of their standard reference materials (SRMs) and has done so for decades. It would be advantageous to the technological development and ongoing operations of the New Manhattan Project to standardize the substance being sprayed.

The circumstantial evidence for coal fly ash as common chemtrail spray just goes on and on. The First International Coal Fly Ash Utilization Symposium (yes, there is a entire field of ‘coal fly ash utilization’) and Dr. Marvin Herndon both mention how the iron oxide in the fly ash makes the ash a brownish color. Your author has observed that chemtrail spray has a brownish tint.

The use of coal fly ash in chemtrails has precedent in that it is analogous to water fluoridation. What our local water district calls ‘fluoride’ is not what most people think it is. What is put in the water is an industrial waste by-product called hydrofluosilicic acid which, if the population was not forced to ingest it, would be expensive to get rid of. Instead, corrupt governments pay for it to be consumed by the unsuspecting public and a giant disinformation apparatus constantly tells us that anyone opposed to water fluoridation is a crazy conspiracy theorist. Does that sound familiar?

Another analogue is how the functioning of an electrostatic precipitator is germane to the New Manhattan Project itself. When today’s coal fly ash is sequestered with an electrostatic precipitator, a mini New Manhattan Project occurs. Electrostatic precipitators collect fly ash by first electrically charging the airborne ash particles then attracting them to oppositely charged plates where the ash is then whisked away. This is analogous to how, in the course of today’s New Manhattan Project, atmospheric particles are ionized (charged) and then manipulated. In fact, today’s electrostatic precipitators are the product of decades of study concerning the electrical manipulation of atmospheric particles.

Although it is naturally a powder, the NMP’s coal fly ash would probably need to be reconstituted into some type of liquid. A liquid would work well within the context of the New Manhattan Project as a liquid could be more easily and efficiently transported and stored. When dispersed, a liquid would be preferable to a powder because liquids would tend to clog-up the necessary tubing much less. A final blast of heat from a jet engine might turn a dense liquid into tiny, finely dispersed particles.

Dresser Industries and the Bush family

It is interesting to note that the Bush political crime family, through their family bank Brown Brothers Harriman, owns the world’s largest manufacturer of electrostatic precipitators. It’s called Dresser Industries. Dresser’s company history goes back to the late 1800s and, as detailed in the author’s book, they have historically worked with many organizations heavily associated with the New Manhattan Project such as the Nazis.

As far as the Bush family goes, only their bosses, the Rockefellers are more implicated in the New Manhattan Project. The Bush family is connected to the New Manhattan Project through their close associations with: Nazis, the original Manhattan Project, the CIA, the Council on Foreign Relations, The Carlyle Group, Enron and more. Again, all of this is detailed in my book.

Is Dresser Industries providing the coal fly ash needed for today’s New Manhattan Project? Just askin’

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Find his books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco available exclusively at Amazon. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.

Connect with Activist Post

Cover image credit: Library of Congress, Public Domain
The Champion No. 1 coal cleaning plant near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. November 1942.

The History of Slavery Around the World

by Thomas SowellTV
June 2, 2024

Video is available at Thomas SowellTV Odysee & YouTube channels.

This video is a reading of an excerpt from “Black Rednecks and White Liberals” by Thomas Sowell.

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light with the aid of transcription software:

It takes no more research than a trip to almost any public library or college library to show the incredibly lopsided coverage of slavery in the United States or in the Western Hemisphere, as compared to the meager writings on the even larger number of Africans enslaved in the Islamic countries of the Middle East and North Africa, not to mention the vast numbers of Europeans also enslaved in centuries past in the Islamic world and within Europe itself.

At least a million Europeans were enslaved by North African pirates alone from 1500 to 1800, and some European slaves were still being sold on the auction block in Egypt, years after the Emancipation Proclamation freed blacks in the United States. Indeed, an Anglo-Egyptian treaty of August 4, 1877 prohibited the continued sale of white slaves after August 3, 1885, as well as prohibiting the import and export of Sudanese and Abyssinian slaves.

During the Middle Ages, Slavs were so widely used as slaves in both Europe and the Islamic world that the very word “slave” derived from the word for Slav, not only in English, but also in other European languages, as well as in Arabic. Nor have Asians or Polynesians been exempt from either being enslaved or enslaving others. China, in centuries past, has been described as “one of the largest and most comprehensive markets for the exchange of human beings in the world”. Slavery was also common in India, where it has been estimated that there were more slaves than in the entire Western Hemisphere, and where the original thugs kidnapped children for the purpose of enslavement.

In some of the cities of Southeast Asia, slaves were a majority of the population. Slavery was also an established institution in the Western Hemisphere before Columbus’ ships ever appeared on the horizon. The Ottoman Empire regularly enslaved a percentage of the young boys from the Balkans, converted them to Islam, and assigned them to various duties in the civil or military establishment.

The instrumental use of the history of slavery today also underlies the claim that slavery grew out of racism. For most of its long history, which includes most of the history of the human race, slavery was largely not the enslavement of racially different people, for the simple reason that only in recent centuries has either the technology or the wealth existed to go to another continent to get slaves and transport them en masse across an ocean.

People were enslaved because they were vulnerable, not because of how they looked.

The peoples of the Balkans were enslaved by fellow Europeans, as well as by the peoples of the Middle East, for at least six centuries before the first African was brought to the Western Hemisphere.

Before the modern era, by and large, Europeans enslaved other Europeans, Asians enslaved other Asians, Africans enslaved other Africans, and the indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere enslaved other indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

History was not based on race, much less on theories about race.

Only relatively late in history did enslavement across racial lines occur on such a scale as to promote an ideology of racism that outlasted the institution of slavery itself. Wherever a separate people were enslaved, they were disdained or despised, whether they were different by country, religion, caste, race, or tribe.

The Europeans who were enslaved in North Africa were despised and abused because they were Christians in a Muslim region of the world, where they were called Christian dogs. Race became the most visible difference between slaves and slave owners in the Western Hemisphere.

As distinguished historian Daniel J. Boorstin put it, now for the first time in Western history, the status of slave coincided with a difference of race.

Connect with Thomas SowellTV

Cover image credit: Joseph Sold Into Slavery By His Brothers by Damiano Mascagani ca. 1602 – Image Courtesy of Sotheby’s
Image is in the Public Domain

Andrew Kaufman With Paul Saladino: Stepping Away From Dietary Dogma

by Andrew Kaufman, MD
sourced from Andrew Kaufman MD newsletter
May 31, 2024

When it comes to diet and nutrition, the last place you want to go for advice is the medical establishment. Their definition of a “healthy” diet will likely put you on the stretcher…

That means that you’re going to have to do your own homework, and that’s no small feat considering all the conflicting views on what a “healthy” human diet actually is, especially when it comes to men’s health…

Knowing full-well that grocery shelves are filled with synthetic, hormone-disrupting garbage—slowly turning strong, defiant men into docile yellow-bellies—the ability to recognize which foods will optimally strengthen you both physically and mentally becomes critical in these times…

I’ve been tumbling down this neverending nutritional rabbit hole for a long time now, and I’ve encountered many invaluable voices. But there’s one individual who stood out like nobody else… the illustrious Dr. Paul Saladino.

Paul has been at the forefront of the carnivore community for a long time, so much so that he has even worn the title of “Carnivore MD”…. And he’s an archnemesis of Big Pharma and its evil twin-brother, Big Food…

Occasionally dropping by places like McDonald’s and Chipotle to reveal the harmful ingredients contained in their infamous “Happy” meals and Mexican burritos made him extremely popular on Youtube…

(It’s useful to know when your son’s Chicken McNuggets are fried in seed oils and contain a whopping 30 ingredients you couldn’t pronounce if you tried.)

After 2 years of doing the carnivore diet, Paul eventually decided to add organic fruit and honey into his diet. And since those foods don’t exactly typify a carnivorous diet, he morphed it into the rubric of ‘animal-based,’ with the addition of various organ meats and raw dairy products.

Being a broad-minded thinker, and no stranger to controversy, like myself; Paul was bound to be a guest on my Healthy Living Interviews series, and today we finally made it happen!

During our remarkable discussion, Paul reflects on his long-distance journey of becoming a psychiatrist, and how he eventually parted ways with the allopathic priesthood and adopted a natural approach to healing…

“On the first day of medical school, they told me: ’50% of what you’ll learn is going to be wrong.’ I found it very ironic when a physician questions anything dogmatic in medicine and then gets thrown out of the kingdom.”

We also touched on the difference between beneficial and unhealthy carbohydrates, the xenoestrogen deluge and its effects on men’s hormones, and the perils of seed oil consumption.

I have much appreciation for Paul and his inspiring work. It’s rare to find avid contrarians like himself who continue to point our collective understanding of health in the right direction.

Connect with Andrew Kaufman

The Zionist NAZI Connection and the Creation of Israel

By way of deception thou shalt do war

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
May 30, 2024

Adolf Hitler’s father was Alois Schicklgruber, the bastard child of Maria Schicklgruber, who changed his name to Hitler to hide the fact that he was an illegitimate child. Many historians have claimed that Maria was impregnated by Baron Rothschild when she worked for him. The Rothschilds have been known to breed thousands of illegitimate children under different names to serve the family’s agenda. And their name isn’t really Rothschild. In the late eighteenth century, Mayer Amschel Bauer was the private banker for the Black Nobility through the House of Hesse, and changed the family name just before expanding the family business.

Rothschild means, “Red Shield,” which was their company logo. A six-pointed star which has become known as the Star of David. This was not a Jewish symbol, it was introduced by the Rothschilds who later funded the Zionists. And in 1948, Rothschild influence compelled the state of Israel to adopt the hexagram as their national symbol.

In the late 1800s, Cecil Rhodes set up a secret society to preserve the expansion of the British Empire. Known as the Milner group, their main focus from 1920 to 1938 was to maintain the balance of power in Europe by building up Germany and pitting them against France and Russia. They discussed creating a situation that would compel Germany to start a second World War.

During this time, the reparations from the Treaty of Versailles led to hyper-inflation in Germany. And in 1930, as the international banking system was collapsing, the Young Plan was enacted which required Germany to pay about two billion Reichsmarks annually payable through 1988. This scheme was funded by JP Morgan, led by the founder of RCA, and directed by members of the Milner group. It broke the German economy.

In 1933, Hitler secured funding from the Bank of England, which was run by the Rothschild banking dynasty. This deal was brokered by John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, who later headed the CIA.

With initial funding from the Rothschild bank of England, Germany invaded Poland and received additional funding from the Bush family’s Brown Brothers Harriman. The Germans were fueled by Standard Oil and supported by Ford, General Electric, DuPont, and IBM, all of which profited greatly from the war.

World War Two accomplished the stated goals of the Milner Group, it made the banks and their cronies even richer, and it directly led to the creation of the United Nations, and Israel.

Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement, was not a religious Jew. Officially he was an atheist, but more likely he was an occultist agent of the Rothschilds. He was no fan of the Jews. In his own words he sympathized with anti Jewish sentiment. His original plan was to have them all convert to Catholicism. And when that failed, he decided they should be expelled from Europe.

In 1933, the Haavara Agreement, or “transfer agreement,” was made between Nazi Germany and the Zionists wherein German Jews would be sent to Palestine. Non-Zionist Jews did not want to leave, and so the NAZIs encouraged them through persecution.

In 1917, the British Government announced its support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, known as the Balfour Declaration, and seized control of the land. After the second world war, with Holocaust propaganda used as the catalyst, this land was gifted to the Zionists from the British, and the state of Israel was officially created.

Between 1947 and 1949, the Zionists murdered the locals, destroyed hundreds of villages, and expelled more than seven-hundred-thousand Palestinians. A savage invasion celebrated every May 15^th known as, Nakba Day.

Before Zionism created the state of Israel, Jews did not have a common language or nationality, and they were not considered to be a race.

The historical record tells us that the Khazars were known for starting wars through deception. And about seven hundred years ago, they all converted to Judaism. These are the Ashkenazi Jews who later became Zionists, and persecuted the Sephardic Jews of Palestine. They do not follow the teachings of the Torah, they follow the Talmud, ancient teachings that can be described as anti-christian or satanic. The motto of Israeli Mossad “By way of deception thou shalt do war,” really sums up the nature of Zionism, which includes Evangelical Christians and certain sects of Islam. With eighty percent of the world being religious, religion is the easiest way to ignite war. Which is what the central banks always want.

Connect with Greg Reese

Vera Sharav on the Debasement of Human Life Today and Obedience Leading to Slavery

by Vera Sharav, Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)

sourced from AHRP Newsletter
May 30, 2024

Greetings fellow lovers of freedom,

Over the Memorial Day weekend here in NYC, I attended and spoke at a protest regarding the World Health Organization. Not enough of us showed up, but wow, what a fierce group of freedom fighters. Citizens around the world must open their eyes to the damage that WHO continues to do. They must be stopped!

Here is a short excerpt from my speech:

The declared, but fake pandemic was a ruse – an excuse to issue draconian lockdown directives that caused irreparable harm. Forbidding doctors to prescribe life-saving medicines was an intentional medical crime

The debasement of human life today – and the evisceration of moral values and standards—bears a chilling similarity to the culture that facilitated the genocidal operations of the Holocaust.

Once again, systematic indoctrination and incessant media propaganda has gained  the support of the medical profession, and prestigious medical-scientific institutions to participate in crimes against humanity.

The 1947 UN Charter bestows legal immunity from all legal liability for the UN and for each of its agencies. Neither the UN nor any of its agencies can be taken to court over any subject matter – in any country.

Obedience is the gateway to slavery. We must never ignore government infringements on our freedom and our constitutionally protected rights— or to ignore the infringement of our neighbors’ rights.

Failure to speak up is to facilitate a Totalitarian dictatorship.

I also recently had a dynamic conversation with Canadian investigative journalist Dan Fournier. We spoke about science vs. scientism, and more! Link below. Again, I think it’s important that we all keep having conversations, whether in person or virtual, whether we agree or disagree, let’s keep talking and figuring out ways to move forward together.

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12-the-holocaust-is-now-global-w-vera-sharav–60031521

In June, I plan to announce a new documentary film that my team and I have been working on. I’m very excited about it. More on that very soon…

Wherever you are in the world reading this, I’m grateful for your contribution whether as an information seeker, an activist, a dreamer, whether you are injured or your loved ones are injured, whether you are out there in the trenches, whether you’re a whistleblower or a donor (yes, we need your help for those who can.) Thank you all. We will win these collective battles together. We must.

Never Give In, Never Give Up

Vera

Vera Sharav is founder and president of The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP), a national network of lay people and professionals who are committed to upholding the humanitarian values and ethical standards of medicine enshrined in the Hippocratic Oath: “First, do no harm”; the Nuremberg Code (1947): “The Voluntary informed consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”; and the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005): “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.” Read Vera’s bio here.

Connect with Vera Sharav at AHRP

Message From Reiner Fuellmich — May 28, 2024

sourced from Reiner Fuellmich English telegram channel

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Dear friends,

If there was, after hearing the hateful and lying testimony of my accusers, any remaining doubt that this criminal proceeding against me is nothing but a very thinly-veiled show trial staged to put me behind bars and shut all of us up because I took a deep dive into the plandemic and found many people who also wanted to get to the bottom of this, this scintilla of doubt evaporated into thin air on May 17th.

On that day, the presiding judge in my case issued something that he calls a procedural guideline. With this guideline, he attempts in a completely unprecedented manner, at least in recent German times, to keep our defense team from arguing our case. He grotesquely claims that it is perfectly okay for the DA’s office and one judge to actively deny me my constitutionally-guaranteed right to a fair hearing, and it is equally okay for the DA to refuse to investigate at all. In fact, as we now know, the DA did indeed not even attempt to investigate. Rather, he exclusively relied on the criminal complaint filed by, as we now know, lying and criminal accusers, depite the fact that he knew or should have known (or rather might have known) from their own submissions that the criminal complaint was just one big lie, one false accusation.

But the presiding judge didn’t stop there. He added a couple of insults to his illegal and unconstitutional attempt to intimidate us by calling some of the arguments the defense had made rubbish and condescendingly reminding us that we all should have learned something in law school.

This outrageous behavior makes perfect sense in light of the fact that one of my attorneys received whistleblower information from different sources informing him that the same intelligence service that wrote the now infamous dossier about me approached two of the panel of five judges in my case, one of them being the presiding judge.

Our team of lawyers will of course file an adequate, an adequate response to this and I will issue three or four short statements in writing explaining both the facts and the law to the presiding judge — like you know Law 101 can’t hurt. Some extra class in Law 101.

But before I do that allow me a play on words that highlights what my right to a fair hearing requires from both the court at this stage and, of course, from the DA. But he’s beyond the law anyway — unless, of course, the presiding judge and those members of the court who share his untenable opinions recuse themselves.

I won’t tell you about four weddings and a funeral but I will tell you about four losers and one very bright and strong ray of hope. Here’s what I mean.

As you know, I truly enjoy all your letters and postcards and I do read each and every one. My mail is not being scanned anymore so that you don’t have to worry about anything.

I want to share with you one of these letters, a letter that was written at the end of March by someone who not only knows what she’s talking about (she’s been closely following my trial and the testimony of my accusers) — who has the professional qualification to be an expert witness in this criminal proceeding. Maybe others do too, I’m pretty sure they do. She took a close look at the four people on whom the DA based his entire case, the four people who readily made themselves available as puppets to destroy the Corona Investigative Committee and its international standing.

I’m sure glad I founded ICIC as a successor after they were through with the destruction.

The expert, with the help of other experts, analyzed, in a highly interesting manner, what the court and the public have been able to hear and see from, and about, the witnesses through their testimony and their behavior in court.

Since the DA based his arrest warrant and his indictment solely, that is without even attempting to investigate anything, on Justus Hoffmann’s criminal complaint, and since the presiding judge’s only foundation for his switching from ‘Reiner Fuellmich was prohibited by corporate law from taking out a loan’ to ‘Reiner Fuellmich didn’t take out a loan at all. Rather, he violated an obscure agreement to keep a liquidity reserve’ — is Viviane Fischer’s false testimony — everything now depends on the credibility and integrity of these witnesses.

We will, with the help of experts such as the ones who wrote to us, take a very close look at these sorry figures.

But in order to not ruin our day, I will refrain from going into the details of this right now and will instead stay on the surface of what is to come.

Bottom line is, of course, forget about them. They’re already on a, what… Chris Rea has a song, it’s called ‘Road to Hell’. They’re directly on a road, on their own road to hell, on a one-way ticket.

Now let’s take a look at a brighter side of this.

Juxtapose this with an interview I just saw on an English language Turkish TV station, TRT World, a man by the name of Alex Mitchell from Scotland talked about what happened to him after he took the AstraZeneca so-called vaccine. He developed a very typical and, as we now know from dozens and dozens of interviews with doctors, scientists and victims, not-at-all rare but common side effect, that is blood clots or thrombosis. Because of this his left leg had to be amputated. But he didn’t just sit there and suffer silently. Rather he joined a group of other plaintiffs in a class action case in England and thus far was awarded damages in the amount of some $150,000.

And he keeps going and wants to continue to give those a voice that cannot speak for themselves or have even lost their lives because of the so-called vaccines. He says that to take the vaccine, because he believed dishonest politicians and media who knew about the adverse effects of the vaccine but lied about it, was the worst mistake of his entire life.

Besides losing a leg and dealing with other health issues as a result of that, he is of course deeply traumatized. And yet he is still standing and fighting. He says in that interview that this is not about money. No amount of money is going to give him his health and his leg back. He continues ‘This is much bigger than me. This is about proper justice. It is about doing the decent thing, doing the right thing.’

I’m pretty sure that Eric Clapton who has also spoken out would agree with him.

Here are a couple of my favorite movies: ‘True Grit’ with John Wayne, of course, and ‘Moonstruck’ with Cher and Nicholas Cage. And here are a few more of my favorite songs Marvin Gaye ‘What’s Going On?’, Otis Redding ‘Sitting on the Dock of the Bay’, Sam Cook ‘Stand by Me’, Eddie Money ‘Take Me Home Tonight’ and Toto ‘Hold the Line’.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich website | telegram

Hailstones by Acme?

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star
originally published May 15, 2024

Every now and then I receive a story – or in the very rare instance, a video – that is so bizarre and “out there” that I just have to blog about it, even if it means violating my own “no videos” rule. That’s the case with today’s blog about a video that was shared by V.T., because this is so out there that I simply have to add my two cents’ worth of extremely high octane speculation.

Indeed, today’s speculation is a sprint to the end of the twig of the speculation tree and altogether off the twig into a Wile E. Coyote nosedive into a very deep canyon. In this case, the “Anvil by Acme” is the hailstone itself.

As most of you are aware, much of this country has been having what seems like wave after wave of unstable atmospheric conditions, with accompanying wave after wave of severe storms. I can remember a time when the weather forecasts distinguished between thunder showers and thunderstorms, and even a time when not every thunderstorm was more often than not going to be a severe weather event. Not so any more: if there’s a thunderstorm headed your way, the likelihood is that – these days – it will be severe. And as for thunder showers, they just don’t seem to happen any more. In the past two weeks, for example, Shiloh and I have had to take shelter in our storm shelter five times, and each time for more than three hours. This is, decidedly, not fun. In Oklahoma and Tennessee whole towns have been wiped off the map and in other states, like today’s example from North Carolina, we’ve seen bombardments by hail…

… hail it seems that has been made and manufactured and distributed by Acme:

[source:] https://www.facebook.com/1022328449/videos/2341084309420265/

Now there’s just plain odd behavior here. Clearly, for a moment, the hail appears to melt, but, as one can see from the video, there are scorch marks on the hail, and this implies that there is a chemical composition to this hailstone that goes beyond mere water. In fact, to my eyes, it looks like the hailstone is, at least to some extent, plastic.

So I have two very high octane speculations to advance here: am I the only one, or do others genuinely have the same impression that the thundershowers that I recall from my youth and its weather predictions on the news, are all but vanished? When was the last time you remember a weather prediction for thunder showers? Did the category disappear? Or is something else going on? Are “they”, for example, out of an abundance of caution, deciding to treat every thunder shower as it if is a thunderstorm and capable of becoming a severe weather event? or is the weather, in fact, becoming more severe? I suspect the latter, but it’s a question I genuinely have. I cannot think of any rationale for changing categories and definitions of those categories out of an abundance of caution, for such an effort would seem to be self-defeating in the long run; we all know the scenario: the more the boy cried wolf, the less seriously he was taken, and then the wolf really showed up, but the help did not; no one wished to be taken in any more.

So now we have (apparently) a hailstone in North Carolina that does not appear to want to melt in an ordinary fashion, and after a little dripping under a flame, appears to take on scorching marks. As I noted above, this suggests some sort of chemical composition to me, beyond mere water, and I am bold to suggest that perhaps we are looking at the weather equivalent of the nanotechnology alleged to have been covertly placed in some of the cofib planscamdemic clot shots: a nano-plastic that can be activated and agglutinated under certain conditions of electrical stress, such as within the human body, or such as within the plasma conditions of a thunderstorm and its electrical events.

Now if that wild and woolly idea has any traction at all, then it leads us to yet another implication, one even more disturbing: is the purpose or motivation in creating such things quite literally to create mimicry of biblical plagues of hailstones? is the purpose, literally, to create a means of kinetic bombardment by making “hailstones” that will fall from the sky and damage or destroy crops, or homes, or livestock, or people? Spray enough crud into the atmosphere, and by itself it is merely a bunch of particulate crud, that, with the right recipe, might fall to earth and be absorbed into the food supply and thence into the body for whatever nefarious purpose one has cooked up. But turn on the electricity, let it congeal into big hailstones, and commencer le bombardement.

I don’t know, but what I do know is that under the doctrine of mens rea, the globaloneyists have made their murderous intentions quite clear, so bombardments of hailstones? I put nothing past them…

…See you on the flip side…

Connect with Joseph P. Farrell

Cover image credit: DerTobiSturmjagd

See Related:

More Evidence That All Of Life Is Contaminated With Plastic Polymers: “UNM Researchers Find Microplastics in Canine and Human Testicular Tissue” — And Associated Lower Sperm Count

Smart Dust Biosensors and Chemtrail Dispersal

Our Geoengineered Skies: Evidence Points to the MITRE Corporation & New Manhattan Project

The Polymerization (Clotting) of Blood : A Model

Polymer Rain, 90 Second Alert

How the WHO Plans to Take Over the World

by Health Freedom Defense Fund Team
March 20, 2024

The World Health Organization (WHO) is set to convene the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting for May 27 – June 1, 2024 at the plush InterContinental Hotel in Geneva, Switzerland.

This in-person meeting of the WHA, the decision-making body of WHO, will bring together senior representatives from governments, multilateral organizations, and the private sector to discuss two international legal instruments intended to increase WHO’s authority in identifying and managing health emergencies.

The two documents, (1) Amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), and (2) A Pandemic Treaty, termed ‘ÇA+’ by the WHO, when viewed together in the context of the globalist pandemic preparedness agenda represent an ambitious attempt towards monopoly power in global health governance.

These two instruments, the Pandemic Treaty and the IHR Amendments, are designed to operate in concert and consolidate the influence of the WHO as the world’s “global health authority.” If adopted and approved by member states these proposals would bring about significant changes in how the WHO operates.

The draft IHR amendments would lay out new powers for the WHO during health emergencies, and broaden the context within which they can be used. The draft CA+ (‘treaty’) if implemented would support the bureaucracy, financing and governance that underpins the expanded IHR amendments.

Under the guise of a “One Health” approach these proposals and amendments would grant the WHO sweeping powers, under its Director General, in the arena of health management and broaden the WHO’s reach into areas of governance on food economies, the environment and issues surrounding allocation of national resources.

If implemented, the IHR Amendments and the Pandemic Treaty working in tandem would grant administrative authority to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats at the WHO.

These unilateral, wide-ranging decisions would assuredly benefit those who work for the various public-private partnerships that control the financial and political machinery of the WHO.

While there are countless reasons this latest hijacking of power by the WHO must be opposed, the list below highlights some of the primary concerns and consequences entailed in the IHR amendments and Pandemic Treaty:

Changes the existing IHR provisions from non-binding “advice” to legally binding regulations;

Allows the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) which can oblige national governments to “undertake” border closures, lockdown of individuals, mandated medical examinations and vaccination;

Expands the WHO Director General’s (DG) authority to unilaterally declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC);

Empowers Regional Directors to declare regional public health emergencies;

Expands the definitions of what constitutes pandemics and health emergencies;

Maintain a perpetually operative pandemic preparedness bureaucracy through the development of a “framework convention” that would establish a new $30 billion per year international health authority. This new global health bureaucracy would choreograph the WHO’s role in developing global “allocation plans for health products” (including vaccines);

Require member States to support censorship and suppression of information that diverges or dissents from WHO opinions and directives;

Sets up wide-ranging health surveillance systems in all member States, which WHO will monitor regularly through administrative mechanisms;

Gives WHO control over some measure of country resources, including requirements for financial contributions to fund “capacity building and “technical assistance” structures by requiring a percentage of national health budgets be devoted to health emergencies as defined by the WHO;

Removal of a clause that required regulations must be in accordance “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons”, and replacing it with a new clause that reads regulations shall be “based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development”;

Expands WHO’s scope by emphasizing a ‘One Health’ agenda which includes a broad range of health, economic, social and political life which impact health, and therefore fall under the dictates of a declared international health emergency.

In addition to creating a multi-billion dollar self-perpetuating pandemic-preparedness industry, which will fund itself by looting the world’s taxpayers, this latest power grab by the WHO and its globalist sponsors represents a fundamental threat to national, medical and bodily autonomy and is a clear and present danger to the citizens of the world.

This entire process under which unelected delegates negotiate terms and conditions which would place people at the mercy of medical officers, public health bureaucrats and health enforcement gendarmes, who will be immune to any penalty for any acts carried out in the name of “public good,” stands in direct opposition to, and are in direct violation of informed consent and stands in direct opposition to multiple long-standing national and international principles of medical ethics such as:

The Nuremberg Code of 1947: ′′The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation, in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment.”

The Geneva statement for doctors from 1948: “I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient’s health as my first concern.”

The Declaration of Geneva of the World Medical Association that binds the physician with the words, “The health of my patient will be my first consideration,” and the International Code of Medical Ethics declares that, “A physician shall act only in the patient’s interest when providing medical care which might have the effect of weakening the physical and mental condition of the patient.”

The Belmont Report on voluntariness which asserts, “[the] element of informed consent requires conditions free of coercion and undue influence. Coercion occurs when an overt threat of harm is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance. Undue influence, by contrast, occurs through an offer of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance.

Unjustifiable pressures usually occur when persons in positions of authority or commanding influence — especially where possible sanctions are involved — urge a course of action for a subject.”

UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights in 2005: “to provide a universal framework of principles and procedures to guide States in the formulation of their legislation, policies or other instruments in the field of bioethics [and to] promote respect for human dignity and protect human rights, by ensuring respect for the life of human beings, and fundamental freedoms, consistent with international human rights law.”

The World Health Organization, a UN agency with no national legal oversight and no legal accountability at all, seeks to establish itself as global health dictator by demanding member States respond to perceived threats through autocratic decrees formulated and given by the WHO which are certain to accrue profits and power to its corporate sponsors.

Make no mistake, whatever bylines and selling points the WHO offers, be it called “treaty,” “agreement” or “accord,”the practical intent and desired effect of this latest autocratic assault on our rights is to create the legal and financial basis for an internationally coordinated bio-surveillance regime that will significantly strengthen the authority of the World Health Organisation.

The historical precedence of coercive and oppressive actions seen throughout the Covid-19 crisis provides a clear warning to all and demonstrates that the WHO will assuredly attempt to leverage the Pandemic Treaty and IHR Amendments to gain monopoly power through a global health governance pact that will inevitably result in global health despotism.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty which creates a world of “declared pandemics” and rolling “perpetual lockdowns” that will take away people’s inalienable human rights and bodily autonomy must be rebuked by all citizens of the world and formally rejected by all local, state, regional and national governments of the world.

Connect with Health Freedom Defense Fund

Cover image based on creative commons work of: Wikingo_Design

ADHD: Ritalin, Cocaine, and the Fraudulent Pharmaceutical Physical and ‘Psychological’ Torture of Children

by Gary D. Barnett
May 24, 2024

“The degree to which the psychiatric community is complicit with abusive parents in drugging non-compliant children is a war crime across the generations, and there will be a Nuremberg at some point in the future”

~ Stefan Molyneux

I will step away from my normal correspondence in order to address a purposely-generated problem that has reached heights of abuse so extreme as to have grossly compromised one in nine children in this country. This intentionally manufactured problem is insanely egregious, and has caused irreparable harm due to the administration of psycho-stimulation drugs prescribed to mostly children, and in many (most) cases, has destroyed their ability to think, function normally, live active and fulfilling lives, and to exist without devastation of their health, mind, body, and soul. I am speaking of what is dishonestly labeled as ‘ADHD,’ or Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity ‘Disorder,’ a bogus scam meant only to achieve wealth, power, and control of a large segment of the young in society, without any physiological evidence whatsoever.

I was first introduced to this State-supported atrocity 25 years ago, when the government (‘public) school system attempted to erroneously ‘diagnose’ and drug my granddaughter with what is the equivalent of cocaine on steroids for a non-existent ‘disorder.’ She was only 6 years old at the time, but I was able to get her out of the heinous ‘public’ school system and into a private school that did not promote (force) the drugging of children. This began my research efforts into this collaborative and criminal government’s fascist partnership with pharmaceutical companies targeting kids.

This was (and is) in essence, a domestic false flag operation targeting the young, with a multi-dimensional agenda that could at the same time disturb the mental capabilities of a large swath of the youngest generations. This of course, would lead to a compounding effect over time, breeding a more obedient and a less intellectual population. It could cause additional health-related problems for life, serve as a control mechanism based on the compromising of brain and motor functions of the young through central nervous system damage, and could easily lead to a much more compliant society so as to enhance the ability to manage and regulate large numbers. This is all based on the greatly enhanced wealth of the few, gaining governing power, and a higher level of control over the collective herd of the dumbed-down masses.

There is no such thing as ADHD! Period. No brain condition, no brain damage, ‘mental’ or physical, no physiological evidence whatsoever exists, or has ever been demonstrated to prove that any cause dishonestly referred to as ADHD is valid. None.

What has been proven and is obvious, is the horrible damage done due to the administration of harmful drugs, especially to the bodies and minds of the not fully developed, and immature young. The so-called (illegitimate) ‘treatment’ for the fake ‘disorder’ called ADHD is Ritalin, a most devastating and mind-altering drug to be certain. The properties of Ritalin as opposed to cocaine are staggeringly similar, and in fact, are two sides of the same coin, except that Ritalin has longer lasting adverse effects. Cocaine is said to be plant based, while Ritalin is said to be chemically based. In simple terms, and from a comparative analysis, the differences are few. Ritalin is the immediate-release form of methylphenidate, and is classified as a central nervous system stimulant or psychostimulant. in fact, it has been classified as a Schedule II drug, which is in the same class as cocaine, Vicodin, methamphetamine, methadone, hydromorphone, Demerol, OxyContin, fentanyl, Dexedrine, Adderall, and Ritalin.

Ritalin’s side effects, and many are not even listed here, are astounding. They include allergies, hives, swelling, extreme heart problems, psychosis, circulation problems, increased blood pressure, mood changes, anxiety, nervousness, irritability, inability to sleep, fast heart rate, heart arrhythmia, no appetite, extreme weight loss, nausea, vomiting, pain, headache, dizziness, disorientation, aggression, hostility, paranoia, and loss of coordination. This is in addition to possible permanent brain damage. All of these side effects can also be enhanced to even more dangerous levels when other drugs, anti-depressants, and even over-the-counter ‘medications.’ are co-mingled. Given the massive prescribing and administration of drugs for everything and everybody today, the risks are astronomical. Also, the risk of dependency (addiction) is great as well.

The incidence of diagnosis of this bogus ‘disorder’ has increased steadily year after year. Since 1997, and just up to 2017, the increase in stated cases rose by approximately 145%. The rate of diagnosed cases by that time were over 11% of children under 12 years of age. In addition, more cases are said to be dramatically increasing in older children and adults, opening up much larger markets for higher profits for the murderous pharmaceutical companies.

This is an abomination, as it is the literal destruction of a large percentage of children. Much of this criminal medical scam is based on fear of one’s child being ‘different,’ which should be applauded, instead of suppressed. Today’s parents are much at fault (or most) for allowing the State and its partners in crime, to dictate how their children should be raised and drugged to suit the perverted mores of the ruling class’s idea of societal collective mediocrity. There is another degrading aspect to this dilemma, as parents today, many who have been ‘forced,’ (due to voluntary support of the State) both married couples and single parents, to work outside the home, leaving their children to be raised by the evil governing and schooling systems. This in my mind is the abandonment of family for the sake of material survival, which would never have been prevalent if government instead of family had been abandoned.

Every child, every human in fact, is different from every other. We are unique as individuals, and that uniqueness should be cherished. Wants, needs, intelligence, interests, personality, desire, energy levels, talents, hopes, and dreams, are destroyed when all attempt to stifle individual excellence in favor of conformity. When the individual is sacrificed for the so-called ‘good’ of the collective crowd, an inferior society will be the result, and independence, strength, self-ownership, and self-responsibility, will be discarded in favor of sameness, universal attitudes of victimization, boredom, and depression.

This is why the drugging of society, especially the current and future generations of the impressionable young, are targeted by this fascist and criminal State. The older generations still exist in large numbers, but their lives are not long for this world. In two generations only, all will dramatically change. If the young are fully controlled due to indoctrination, AI, technocratic design, drugs, and propagandized from birth, the controlling element of this world will have an easy time eliminating all dissent, while creating an entire society of drone-like mannequins accepting of their own dependency and enslavement.

There is a reason that the young are being dumbed down and targeted from every angle, manipulated to never question false ‘authority,’ to forget and eliminate tradition, to abandon family, and to hate everything and everybody. The State and its criminal partners fully understand the path they are taking in order to achieve its goal of creating a kept and indifferent society of slaves. The medical fraud, including the toxic and fatal poisoning by lethal injection of bioweapons called ‘vaccines,’, and the extreme drugging of youth, including the ADHD and Ritalin crime, is just one aspect of this terror being inflicted on society.

To stop this deadly assault, parents have to once again become parents, instead of worthless, pathetic, dolts worried more about their phone, games, and constant personal desires that run completely counter to the well-being of their own children.

“Why fit in when you were born to stand out?”

~ Dr. Sues

Connect with Gary D. Barnett substack | website

Cover image credit: hulkiokantabak

In Hindsight: Pandemic or Global Reset?

by Rosanne Lindsay, Traditional Naturopath, Nature of Healing
May 24, 2024

People say hindsight is 20/20. So what happened in 2020?

The following is an update of an April 2020 blog. Sometimes it is easier to look back to see a pattern, rather than connecting the dots as they are coalescing.

Recapitulation to a Reset

What if 100-year pandemics occurred in 1720 (Plague), 1820,(Cholera), 1920 (Spanish Flu), and 2020 (SARS-Covid), as backdrops to resets of world government, economy, currency, electronic communications, religion, and social interactions? Would you be able to see a transition from freedom to slavery as it played out?

What if the loss of freedoms happened under a narrative of “safety” or “unity?”

I would love to be able to bring back our country into a great form of unity. Without a major event where people pull together, that’s hard to do. But I would like to do it without that major event because usually that major event is not a good thing. – President Trump, 2018 State of the Union Address

During COVID, leaders of every nation in the world ended their political divisions to unanimously agree on new draconian dictates against its people by going to war against an invisible “cold virus,” patented as a chimera with SARS (SARS-Cov-2).

In a show of unprecedented uniformity, state leaders agreed to mandate lockdowns, “social distancing” and “masking,” under threat of coronaviruses (COVID-19), expressed as a cold. As of May 2022, there was still no origin for SARS-CoV-2 in the literature.

The coordinated response of mandated closures of small businesses in the U.S. for the once-in-a-hundred “novel” Coronavirus- that never was followed a federal 100-year plan.

Had the people been duped into allowing their leaders to reset the world to usher in a Global Oligarchy as a digital reality made up of an Internet of Bodies?

The Boiling Frog Principle is a metaphor for the inability of people to react to significant changes that occur gradually.

In the future, countries will continue to work together under the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. Yes, these countries have been working together since 1957 for the next phase of the program of the New World. See the Committee on the Peaceful Use of Outer Space, and Goals for 2030.

Predictive Programming

The Pandemic may have been revealed to millions of people, decades before under Predictive Programming.

The faked “novel virus” may have had its debut in the 1981 Dean Koontz’ “novel,” The Eyes of Darkness, which strangely predicted an outbreak of a “Wuhan-400 virus” from a bioweapons lab outside the city of Wuhan, China. The toilet paper panic, social distancing, and the coming bio-chip ID implant were first predicted in the 1993 movie, Demolition Man, with Sylvester Stallone and Sandra Bullock.

In the U.S., state governors acted in unison when they “locked down” citizens to accept insurance money under the 2018 Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF). The PEF kicked into action under the event of a Flu (New or novel influenza A virus, or an influenza A virus, including viruses belonging to the family Coronaviridae).
All stay-at-home orders were purely voluntary. NY Governor Andrew Cuomo disclosed this message in this April 27, 2020 public announcement:

Everything we are doing is basically voluntary, on behalf of people… The state government, local government, federal government can’t really… DOESN’T HAVE THE POWER TO ENFORCE STAY-AT-HOME ORDERS. If 19 million people said I’m going out today, they would go out.

The Governors appeared to be in lock-step with the Rockefeller National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan, which directs how states can reopen under new testing measures.

The lockdown of the states was first test marketed during the United Nations Event 201 Simulation, with modeled predictions of infections and deaths, control of information via a centralized source, and a major economic downturn. See the Highlights Reel. And the Epilogue of the simulation exercise (at the 32:55 minute mark) where the outcome is summarized:

Sixty-five million people died in the first 18 months. The outbreak was small at first…. but then it started spreading in densely crowded and impoverished neighborhoods of megacities. From that point on, the spread of the disease was explosive….

Going forward, new CDC guidelines are already in place for grade schools, including more frequent and thorough sanitation, temperature checks, mask wearing, social distancing, fewer students per classroom, lunch at the desk, and so forth. While students did eventually return to the classroom, the future is digital. School will consist of online learning.

Just as U.S. Governors did not have authority to mandate anything in 2020, they also have no authority to order online learning. Just as the COVID pandemic began in China, so, too, does digital online learning.

Silence Is Acquiescence

As the pandemic advanced, people agreed to give up the freedom to assemble and “earn a living.”

Fear has a way of shutting down critical thinking. With contradictory information, people are easily confused and duped. They submit and self-sensor. They fail to question authority or do their own research.

Digital IDs are here, in the cell phone and wearables. Going forward, they will be embedded under the skin for increased security (and increased surveillance)?

It has already happened in the food system. America’s farmers submitted to lawmakers who ordered the mass culling of cattle, chickens, and hogs to force food shortages that lead to rationing.

We were informed yesterday that all our sold hog loads were cancelled for no less than a week. Then a few hours later we got a call that the United States government was buying one million hogs and they were just going to kill them. They are intentionally causing a panic. They killed one million chickens a few days ago. I’ve already been sent a message that the beef industry was also informed that the cows will be killed also. This is not a joke. They’re causing a food shortage purposely.

You have very few days to get meat before the price goes through the roof. If our Farms are chosen for the intentional cull we can’t even have them butchered to not have to waste the meat. This is not good! – Eddie H. Illinois farmer. — April 29, 2020

Digital Cattle

Today, May 2024, politicians are preparing to force independent ranchers to digitize/chip their cattle and bison for interstate transport. Governments want to make electronic ID official.

How is digital meat different from real meat?

Is the digital twin (human) the same as digital cattle?

Is the digital system the core of a global reset, to poll data for a social credit system?

Will social credit use digital Universal Basic Income (UBI), via a central-bank, programmable currency, in a digital economy? Is data being “harvested” from cattle for compliance with a digital Gulag system?

These are questions being bypassed by the “experts.” From digital meat to digital people, the world is transitioning from a pandemic to a virtual reality, by silent consent.

Will people allow drones to enter their airspace to monitor and track them? How many have already agreed to be monitored by Smart™ technology wired into their homes, TVs, via TeleHealth, wearables, and cell phones?

Built On A Theory

The 100-year pandemic cycle is built on a theory.

Without proof, people readily accepted The Germ Theory as the cause of all disease, and of COVID. They failed to ask the questions:

Is a theory, fact?

Does an invisible germ cause disease, as Louis Pasteur once claimed, or?
Is the germ the effect of disease, based on the decline of the immune system?

Is rotting garbage created by flies? Or are flies attracted to rotting garbage?

Why hasn’t the director of NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, reminded people that Pasteur recanted the Germ Theory when he understood that true immunity came from a healthy terrain, not a germ?

The Terrain Theory describes the germ as part of your innate immune system that works with you; not against you. Within the Terrain model, viruses do not exist. Thus, they cannot cause damage unless they are engineered in a lab, dubbed a “virus,” patented, and injected into the body. This means that “viruses” do not cross the species barrier, from bats, to pigs, to humans, as advertised; not unless they break the skin barrier, through a needle.

Within the Terrain, viruses are really exosomes secreted by damaged cells for repair. Thus, a virus is not alive and cannot be transmitted through the air. A flu or cold is the body’s cleansing reaction, a purging of toxins from cells, directed by the body’s innate immune system. A cold or flu is the body “getting well,” not getting sick.

What Is Freedom?

Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature. — Benjamin Franklin

A global reset is taking place under illegal government dictates. True freedom is being redefined as new freedom.

However, freedom is not granted by governments and rights are not gifts from government. Just like the immune system is innate, rights and freedoms are inborn. Participating in marches or rallies against government is a form of begging government for rights that already exist. Put another way: a rally is a virus (external), while Freedom is an exosome (internal).

Freedom is expressed through each individual as choice.

Freedom is declining to do something that is morally objectionable.

Freedom is listening to your inner truth barometer when it may not be popular, then acting on it.

Freedom is expression and movement without restriction.

Freedom is claiming responsibility for your body as your property.

The question each of us must ask is, am I responsible for my health, or do I give up responsibility to an authority? Am I a slave to a master, or am I master of my choices?

Do I remain silent or do I question a global authority?

Related Articles:

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay

Cover image credit: FerRuffino14 & RichardsDrawings

More Evidence That All Of Life Is Contaminated With Plastic Polymers: “UNM Researchers Find Microplastics in Canine and Human Testicular Tissue” — And Associated Lower Sperm Count

by Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD

I have discussed extensively that the scientific community is gaslighting everyone by claiming that microplastics are from environmental pollution from degraded plastics. The polymers found are the same seen in the blood polyethlene and polyvinyl alcohol.

But remember, these same microplastics were found in the placenta, but also in the Moderna patent and the chemical signatures in C19 injected and uninjected blood:

Damning New Research Study Finds Self Assembly Plastic Polymer Nanoparticles In Every Placenta

These same polymers are mentioned in geoengineering patents:

Smart Dust, Biosensors, Polymers For Geoengineering And The Multinational Corporations That Manufacture Them

If have previously shown that there are correlations between the chemicals found from geoengineering operations and the C19 shots:

Chemical Analysis Comparison of Hydrogel Filaments from C19 Shots and Environmental Geoengineering Sources – Project What Happened to Humanities Blood?

Microplastics – aka Nanotechnological Self Assembly Polymers – Are Everywhere – Poisoning Our Biosphere, Food Supply And Humans

We also know there is increased risk of vascular diseases:

New England Journal Of Medicine Microplastics Article Shows Higher Risk Of Heart Attacks, Stroke And Death

These polymers are also associated with turbo cancers and all diseases of aging:

Self Assembly Nanotechnology Microplastic Polymers Contributing To Turbo Cancers, Accelerated Aging And All Diseases

I have previously explained how phthalates are the breakdown products of these polymers:

C19 Vax Analysis Shows Dozens Of Toxic Phthalates That Have Been Associated With Endocrine Disruption And Death From Heart Disease

And how come the entire biosphere is being contaminated with these microplastics? Because it is sprayed via chemtrails, otherwise there is no way you would find the same polymers in snow on the highest mountains on earth and even in the Arctic. GEOENGINEERING OPERATIONS ENDANGER ALL LIFE ON EARTH.

As I have said so many times before, you cannot ensure the survival of the human species by just working to ban the C19 biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. The same poison that self assembles in the blood and they call microplastics is being inhaled by every living thing on earth, flora and fauna, animals and humans alike. Everything is contaminated and dying because of covert military aerial spraying. Chemtrails are GENOCIDE for our entire planet.

White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic

Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous, and considerable quantities prevail even in the Arctic; however, there are large knowledge gaps regarding pathways to the North. To assess whether atmospheric transport plays a role, we analyzed snow samples from ice floes in Fram Strait. For comparison, we investigated snow samples from remote (Swiss Alps) and populated (Bremen, Bavaria) European sites. MPs were identified by Fourier transform infrared imaging in 20 of 21 samples. The MP concentration of Arctic snow was significantly lower (0 to 14.4 × 10³ N liter⁻¹) than European snow (0.19 × 10³ to 154 × 10³ N liter⁻¹) but still substantial. Polymer composition varied strongly, but varnish, rubber, polyethylene, and polyamide dominated overall. Most particles were in the smallest size range indicating large numbers of particles below the detection limit of 11 μm. Our data highlight that atmospheric transport and deposition can be notable pathways for MPs meriting more research.

Here is the original publication and abstract that shows fertility once again impacted in humans and dogs:

Microplastic presence in dog and human testis and its potential association with sperm count and weights of testis and epididymis

The ubiquitous existence of microplastics and nanoplastics raises concerns about their potential impact on the human reproductive system. Limited data exists on microplastics within the human reproductive system and their potential consequences on sperm quality. Our objectives were to quantify and characterize the prevalence and composition of microplastics within both canine and human testes and investigate potential associations with the sperm count, and weights of testis and epididymis. Using advanced sensitive Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), we quantified 12 types of microplastics within 47 canine and 23 human testes. Data on reproductive organ weights, and sperm count in dogs were collected. Statistical analyses, including descriptive analysis, correlational analysis, and multivariate linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the association of microplastics with reproductive functions. Our study revealed the presence of microplastics in all canine and human testes, with significant inter-individual variability. Mean total microplastic levels were 122.63 µg/g in dogs and 328.44 µg/g in humans. Both humans and canines exhibit relatively similar proportions of the major polymer types, with PE being dominant. Furthermore, a negative correlation between specific polymers such as PVC and PET and the normalized weight of the testis was observed. These findings highlight the pervasive presence of microplastics in the male reproductive system in both canine and human testes, with potential consequences on male fertility.

Here is the write up

UNM Researchers Find Microplastics in Canine and Human Testicular Tissue

“Our study revealed the presence of microplastics in all human and canine testes,” Yu said. The team was also able to quantify the amount of microplastics in the tissue samples using a novel analytical method that revealed correlations between certain types of plastic and reduced sperm count in the canine samples.

Yu, who studies the impact of various environmental factors on the human reproductive system, said heavy metals, pesticides and endocrine-disrupting chemicals have all been implicated in a global decline in sperm count and quality in recent years. A conversation with his colleague Matthew Campen, PhD, a professor in the UNM College of Pharmacy who has documented the presence of microplastics in human placentas, led him to wonder whether something else might be at work.

“He said, ‘Have you considered why there is this decline (in reproductive potential) more recently? There must be something new,’” Yu said. That led Yu to design a study using the same experimental method Campen’s lab had used in the placenta research.

His team obtained anonymized human tissue from the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator, which collects tissue during autopsies and stores it for seven years before disposing of it. The canine tissue came from City of Albuquerque animal shelters and private veterinary clinics that perform spay-neutering operations.

The team chemically treated the samples to dissolve the fat and proteins and spun each sample in an ultracentrifuge, leaving a nugget of plastic at the bottom of a tube. Then, heated the plastic pellet in a metal cup to 600 degrees Celsius. They used a mass spectrometer to analyze gas emissions as different types of plastic burned at specific temperatures.

In dogs, the average concentration of microplastics in testicular tissue was 122.63 micrograms per gram of tissue (a microgram is a millionth of a gram). In human tissue the average concentration was 329.44 micrograms per gram – nearly three times higher than in dogs and significantly higher than the average concentration Campen found in placental tissue.

“At the beginning, I doubted whether microplastics could penetrate the reproductive system,” Yu said. “When I first received the results for dogs I was surprised. I was even more surprised when I received the results for humans.”

The researchers found the most prevalent polymer in both human and canine tissue was polyethylene (PE), which is used to make plastic bags and bottles. In dogs that was followed by PVC, which is used in industrial, municipal and household plumbing and in many other applications.

The team was able to count the sperm in the canine samples (but not in the human ones, which had been chemically preserved) and found that higher levels of PVC in the tissue correlated with a lower sperm count, Yu said. There was no correlation with tissue concentration of PE, however.

“The plastic makes a difference – what type of plastic might be correlated with potential function,” he said. “PVC can release a lot of chemicals that interfere with spermatogenesis and it contains chemicals that cause endocrine disruption.”

The study compared human and canine tissue for a couple of reasons, one being that dogs live alongside people and share their environment. They also share some biological characteristics.

“Compared to rats and other animals, dogs are closer to humans,” he said. “Physically, their spermatogenesis is closer to humans and the concentration has more similarity to humans.” Canine sperm counts also seem to be dropping, he added. “We believe dogs and humans share common environmental factors that contribute to their decline.”

Microplastics result when plastic is exposed to ultraviolet radiation in sunlight and degrades in landfills. It can be blown about by the wind or carried into nearby waterways, and some bits are so small they are measured in nanometers (a billionth of a meter). They’re now ubiquitous in the environment – even as global use of plastics continues to grow. Yu noted that the average age of the men in the OMI autopsy samples was 35, meaning their plastics exposure began decades ago, when there was less plastic in circulation. “The impact on the younger generation might be more concerning,” now that there is more plastic than ever in the environment, he said.

The findings point the way for additional research to understand how microplastics might affect sperm production in the testes, he said. “We have a lot of unknowns. We need to really look at what the potential long-term effect. Are microplastics one of the factors contributing to this decline?”

In disseminating his findings, Yu doesn’t want anyone to panic. “We don’t want to scare people,” he said. “We want to scientifically provide the data and make people aware there are a lot of microplastics. We can make our own choices to better avoid exposures, change our lifestyle and change our behavior.”

Summary:

Don’t panic? Our planet is being poisoned to death. Modify lifestyle? What are people and animals going to stop breathing the poisoned air?

People need to revolt against the covert military operations of destroying our earth for the sake of climate change and military operations.

Connect with Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD

Cover image credit: Joshua_seajw92

Smart Dust Biosensors and Chemtrail Dispersal

A means of monitoring and controlling the entire human population

by Greg Reese
May 23, 2024

For decades, those with eyes to see have been aware of Chemtrails in our skies. And for decades we were called conspiracy theorists. But in 2016, while serving as Director of the CIA, John Brennan admitted that Chemtrails are real at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“Another example is the array of technologies, often referred to collectively as geo-engineering, that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection. Or SAI. A method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures, and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.”

~ John Brennan

In 2007, it was announced that nanosized particles, known as Smart Dust, can be dispersed over the battlefield via aerial spraying.

The military has contracted several multinational corporations to develop “wearable” biosensors. Biosensors and smart dust can become something known as body dust that can spread inside the human body as an active network capable to provide telemetry from inside the body for the use of monitoring humans.

There is a patent for using polyethylene glycol derivatives as a way to modify the weather, the same substances used in the COVID19 lipid nanoparticles. These polymers can be integrated with biosensors and soft robotics for smart materials, materials that can be modified by external stimuli. Soft robotics is a subfield of robotics that utilizes compliant materials rather than rigid ones. Such as the hydrogels found in the experimental COVID shots.

DuPont is manufacturing Elastomers for fast moving soft robots. And have developed the fastest DEA-driven soft robots ever reported. Designed for bio-sensing, interacting with biological entities, and actuating on a cellular level.

In her recent article, Smart Dust, Biosensors, Polymers For Geoengineering And The Multinational Corporations That Manufacture Them, Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea points out that these are the transhumanist technologies that will be giving A.I. enormous amounts of data, as Bill Gates said, “to understand 100 trillion organisms.“

She also points out the important fact that the elastomers being fabricated by DuPont for this soft robot technology are made of the exact same chemicals found when analyzing the mesogens, a compound that displays liquid crystal properties, found in targeted individuals. And they appear to be the same compounds she found in the blood of the vaxxed, as well as the blood of the unvaxxed. Which appear to be the same structures used as part of electronic circuitry in self assembly nanotechnology.

Smartdust is a system of tiny microelectromechanical systems that can detect light, temperature, vibration, magnetism, or chemicals. They are operated wirelessly on a computer network, can be used for medical or military surveillance purposes, and can be dispersed through the air via Chemtrails. Which would greatly go unnoticed by the sleeping masses who have come to accept them. When combined with the mesogen soft robot technology, which has already been found in several blood samples of unwitting victims, they could create a means of monitoring and controlling the entire human population.

Connect with Greg Reese

Cover image credit: sharathsu

The Health Benefits of Fermented Kombucha Beverage

by Sally Fallon Morell, Weston A. Price Foundation
May 21, 2024

This recipe is from the “Beverages” section of Nourishing Traditions and can be found on page 496. It reflects the fifth of our 11 Wise Traditions Dietary Principles: enjoy lacto-fermented condiments and beverages.

It seems surprising, even ironic, to conclude a health food cookbook, in which we have warned against sugar, yeasted foods and tea, with a tonic made from sugar, yeast and tea! But the kombucha “mushroom” (which is actually a symbiotic colony of yeast and bacteria) acts on sugar and tea to produce not only acetic and lactic acid but also small amounts of a potent detoxifying substance, glucuronic acid. Normally this organic acid is produced by the liver in sufficient quantities to neutralize toxins in the body— whether these are naturally produced toxins or poisons ingested in food and water. However, when liver function becomes overloaded, and when the body must deal with a superabundance of toxins from the environment—certainly the case with most of us today—additional glucuronic acid taken in the form of kombucha is said to be a powerful aid to the body’s natural cleansing process, a boost to the immune system and a proven prophylactic against cancer and other degenerative diseases.

More importantly, kombucha is the cure for a hot day—it tastes delicious and refreshing. A fizzy, dark colored, energizing beverage, at the same time acidic and slightly sweet, this gift to the world from the Ural mountain region of Russia qualifies as the soft drink of the twenty-first century, the answer to the scourge of cola drinks that now wreaks havoc with the health of Western populations.

Read the article: In a world full of soda, be a kombucha. for more background!

The following recipe makes 2 quarts:

INGREDIENTS

3 quarts filtered water
1 cup sugar [organic cane sugar]
4 tea bags of organic black tea
½ cup kombucha from a previous culture
1 kombucha mushroom

INSTRUCTIONS

Bring 3 quarts filtered water to boil.
Add sugar and simmer until dissolved.
Remove from heat, add the tea bags and allow the tea to steep until water has completely cooled.
Remove tea bags. Pour cooled liquid into a 4-quart pyrex bowl and add ½ cup kombucha from previous batch.
Place the mushroom on top of the liquid.
Make a crisscross over the bowl with masking tape, cover loosely with a cloth or towel and transfer to a warm, dark place, away from contaminants and insects. [Alternatively, put a loose cloth over the container and tie it in place so it dosen’t fall in!]
In about 7 to 10 days the kombucha will be ready, depending on the temperature.
It should be rather sour and possibly fizzy, with no taste of tea remaining.
Transfer to covered glass containers and store in the refrigerator. (Note: Do not wash kombucha bowls in the dishwasher.)
When the kombucha is ready, your mushroom will have grown a second spongy pancake. This can be used to make other batches or given away to friends.
Store fresh mushrooms in the refrigerator in a glass container—never plastic. A kombucha mushroom can be used dozens of times. If it begins to turn black, or if the resulting kombucha doesn’t sour properly, it’s a sign that the culture has become contaminated. When this happens, it’s best to throw away all your mushrooms and order a new clean one.
Note: White sugar, rather than honey or Rapadura, and black tea, rather than flavored teas, give the highest amounts of glucuronic acid. Non-organic tea is high in fluoride so always use organic tea.
A word of caution: Some individuals may have an allergic reaction to kombucha. If you have allergies, start with a small taste to observe any adverse effects. If you react badly, use beet kvass several weeks to detoxify and then try again.

Connect with Weston A. Price Foundation

Cover image credit: Nennieinszweidrei

Error of Science? The Truth About Proteins and Antibodies

by Next Level
translated from German via telegram translate
May 21, 2024

It is a fact that to date no three-dimensional resolution and biochemical characterization of an isolated protein is possible, and thus its unequivocal existence as an independent molecule and effect is still pending. In current science, proteins are not defined as solid structures, but are constantly changing their three-dimensional shape. This continuous “wobbling” means that assumed proteins never remain stable long enough to serve as constant target structures for antibodies.

Even the smallest changes in the tissue environment can lead to completely different forms of an assumed protein. We are talking about intrinsic randomness here!

So how can antibodies be specific when their target is constantly changing shape?
How can the specificity of a protein be asserted if it can neither be isolated nor clearly characterized in three dimensions?
How is it possible to distinguish a not clearly characterized and constantly changing protein from other proteins and assign it to a specific, never isolated virus?

Tests and diagnoses based on the assumption that antibodies can specifically recognize a constantly changing protein are therefore scientifically untenable.

In a laboratory test tube, where environmental variables are meticulously controlled, specific reactions can be forced under certain circumstances – but the smallest deviations or disturbances in the conditions lead to different results! In a natural organism or in natural environments, these laboratory conditions are impossible simply because of the constant interaction and reciprocity with nature.

Connect with Next Level at telegram

Cover image credit: geralt

The Truth Shall Set You Free: Quitting the US Corporation & Breaking the Matrix

by Luke Storey
May 21, 2024

I’m incredibly stoked to have Brotha Truth, the visionary founder of I Self Law Am Master National Assembly, with us today to share liberating insights on our history, law, and how we can reclaim our personal power in a system that can feel like it’s working against us. Brotha Truth has spent years exploring alternative histories, sovereignty, and the cultural threads that shape our worldviews. His journey from discovering the roots of his identity to teaching others how to navigate modern law is inspiring.

Today’s conversation dives deep into the historical and legal frameworks that shape our lives. Brotha Truth sheds light on the implications of Anglo-Saxon law, the importance of the Magna Carta, and the jurisdiction of American Indian reservations. We also tackle questions about birth certificates and social security numbers in The System and how these archival data define us.

As we explore these themes, Brotha Truth offers actionable advice for asserting your rights and understanding financial and legal literacy. Whether it’s navigating credit systems or investing in assets like gold and silver, expect insights into how long-standing laws influence today’s societal norms and personal rights. By recognizing our rights and learning to navigate these systems effectively, we’re not just participants; we’re informed, empowered citizens making enlightened choices.

Chapters:

00:00:00 — 1: Opening
00:00:00 — 2: Unveiling Roots & Truths About Our History, Culture & Heritage
00:25:03 — 3: Navigating Law & Legacy: Understanding Our Legal & Cultural Foundations
00:51:50 — 4: Finding Empowerment: Unraveling Identity & Consent in the State System
01:10:18 — 5: Mastering the Financial Matrix: Credit, Contracts & Consumer Rights
01:36:08 — 6: Securing Freedom: Asset Wisdom & Self-Respect in a Controlled System

Transcript:

VIEW WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT
[00:00:00] Luke: So Brotha Truth.

[00:00:02] Brotha: Yes, indeed. How you doing, brother?

[00:00:03] Luke: I heard your name when I started listening to a bunch of podcasts by Brandon Joe Williams. I found him, and he’s a young guy. He’s putting all this complex law information into, I don’t know, digestible, actionable model, and he was talking about some of the people that have influenced him, and you’re one of the people that he named. So I started to follow you on Instagram, and I was like, all right, had Brandon on the show. Now I got to get Brotha Truth on the show.

[00:00:32] Brotha: Yeah, yeah, I’d like to meet the brother one day too, man.

[00:00:33] Luke: He’s cool. He was just out here for a couple of weeks. I introduced him to a bunch of podcasters. He did a bunch of shows, but it’s really interesting to me because the leaders in this space all have a very unique perspective and use different procedures and focus on different parts of it.

[00:00:50] So when I look at your stuff, I’m like, I’ve never heard of half the shit you’re talking about. And I’ve been studying pretty hard for the past few months, so I’m super excited to chat with you about it.

[00:01:01] Brotha: Appreciate you.

[00:01:02] Luke: In an overview kind of way, the thing about this system that many people call the matrix that spiritually is problematic to me is that somehow humanity’s been duped into being the only creature that pays to merely exist on the planet. You just start right there, and it’s like, well, what’s behind that? My shirt says–

[00:01:31] Brotha: Yeah. I was keeping that earlier. Yeah.

[00:01:33] Luke: Just because we’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not after us. There’s a they, and it’s like, how did they dupe us all into sacrificing our energy, our resources, man? It’s like a parasitic system, and it turns out, from my perspective, and I’m a newbie at this, that how they did it was by manipulating the law.

[00:01:56] Brotha: Absolutely.

[00:01:57] Luke: And creating layers upon layers upon layers of law and not telling us about the original laws underneath the biblical laws, the trust law, the equity law. So it’s like, we’re just all following the rules and giving them our energy, and we don’t even know there’s a whole other system underneath it. So I’m excited to talk with you, but first let’s like get into your origin a little bit. So you grew up in Houston, and you were raised a Christian.

[00:02:23] Brotha: Yeah, man, I grew up in Houston, Texas, born and raised. I always grew up in a church. My father, my grandfather, my uncles, all of them owned churches when we were younger. And my father now he’s a pastor, a youth pastor at a church. So I’ve always grown up just being around that.

[00:02:40] He also plays the piano at church, so I’ve always been musically inclined too. I’ve always been about music and just speaking. But as I grew older, I felt like I had a different message than some of my uncles and grandfathers and parents. And both of my grandfathers actually marched with Martin Luther King.

[00:02:56] They were both preachers, and they were very, very prominent in the community. When I went to school in Mississippi, went to Jackson State University in Jackson, Mississippi, just transformed my whole world, my whole life, and that’s what brought me a little bit closer to the culture and things of that nature.

[00:03:15] And once I graduated from Jackson state, man, and just dealing with everyday life, I remember, like I said, getting pulled over for a traffic stop and just being harassed by the police officers and things like that. And it was opportunities like that that shook my soul.

[00:03:34] It was like, you know what? Maybe I need to learn this information. And I remember there was a guy on Instagram, well, no, on YouTube, his name was Jonah Bey, a guy that I follow. He’s a teacher that’s been around for years in this same market. And I remember seeing the videos where cops would pull them over. They let them go.

[00:03:51] And I’m like, oh, what’s going on here? What am I missing that this brother and his organization, his group, is doing and I’m not doing. And that’s what I learned. It was just all about the language, the legalese and understanding. Like you said, we’re in two different legal systems here.

[00:04:08] It’s almost a dual legal system. And that’s funny you brought up religion because that plays enormous role in all of this, man. So just being that I grew up in religion, coming from Houston, pastors all in my family, I wanted to be a preacher, so to say, but I wanted to preach a different message, and it’s what led me on my path to become a brother true today, man.

[00:04:29] Luke: Wow. Cool, cool. I’ll probably fast forward in here because I really do want to talk about the law, but in a lot of your content, you’re talking about Moorish people and Hebrew science, all of this worldly philosophy. What led you to start exploring some of the alternative history and different cultural approaches to sovereignty and so on?

[00:04:52] Brotha: Oh man, that’s a wonderful question, because I feel like, well, here in America, to not go back too far, when we were conquered by Britain, so to say, the very first thing that they took was the women, the children, and they changed the education systems. And with being here in America, especially as what we would call “African Americans”, we were highly reeducated, and they started off with the religion, the most important part.

[00:05:19] They took everything from you, but they made sure they let you keep the religion. But then they didn’t really teach you the equitable side of religion. They didn’t teach you the trust law side of the Bible, which is really the Helios bibliotech, a science book. They didn’t teach us none of the science in the Bible. They just taught us the oppressive verses of it.

[00:05:41] Because the Bible has been remodified over 2,000 times by Rome and their people. And they only taught us the parts to keep us in slavery. And that’s when I learned, well, okay, well, there is Christianity, but then that’s when I started researching, well, then what’s the Hebrew side of this? Because they call themselves Christians, or Hebrews.

[00:06:00] But yet they still separate themselves from the regular Christian movement, the Baptist movement here in America. So I just started questioning, and that’s what really led me on my journey. I had to go through the Hebrews. I had to go through the Hebrew science and information first, the laws, the tribes, all that good stuff.

[00:06:16] And then that’s what led me to more science. And then from more science, that led me into my American Indian tribal heritage. And then from there, the last final step that I’ve made it to is the English law, English common law. And at the end, we’re operating in a British English system.

[00:06:32] And it was like, if we’re going to be here, we’re going to exist, and we’re going to live in this system. We better learn the rules and how to navigate. And that’s when I learned it doesn’t matter if you’re Hebrew or Moor. It doesn’t matter what you claim. Really, that’s irrelevant.

[00:06:47] What matters is, do you know how to play the game? Do you understand the constitution? Do you know equitable law, and do you know how to assert it? What color you are, what race you are, your belief system, none of that matters. So I had to go through that journey of just learning all the different sides and aspects of my heritage from a religious perspective.

[00:07:10] And that’s where the Hebrew side came in. But then I had to learn the science perspective, and that’s where the more side came in. And then when I learned the American Indian part to it, that’s when I learned the heritage, my actual culture and what tribe I come from, even here in America. Because a lot of people in my family, grandfather, all of them have the long, silky hair. My great grandfather has the ponytail all the way down his back.

[00:07:35] Luke: Really?

[00:07:36] Brotha: Yeah. Dark dude. Long, silky hair. So we’ve always had that in our family. And growing up in our culture and our heritage, they always had that saying, oh, well, you got a little Indian in your family. But we never really knew what that meant.

[00:07:51] We just always went with that, but nobody in my family ever took it deeper. So I was the one that just questioned all of that, man. And sure enough, I just started with my family. And once I started shaking up things to my family, they were like, you know what, Brotha? You might be on to something, Brotha Truth.

[00:08:05] I was like, you know what? I’m going to take this over to the world. I’m going to take this to everybody, man, because we can operate totally different. But like you said, it’s so many different aspects. The culture and the heritage side was just something that was big for me and what brought me into this.

[00:08:20] But once you start getting into the taxes, the discharging, the war, there’s so many different aspects to sovereignty. But what I’ve learned is, a lot of it being in this English system, it starts with religion. That’s where their whole form of law stems from, religion. And it goes back to a case in 1799.

[00:08:40] It was the Runkel versus Winehouse, something like that. No, it was the Runkel case. It was in 1799, but basically, that’s when they actually made a judgment in that court case that the United States is a Christian country. And Christianity and all denominations of Christianity are protected by the constitution.

[00:09:02] So knowing that, that’s when I learned like, huh, in the constitution, you have religious rights that they protect, but were they talking about for the Islamic men or the Buddhists or the [Inaudible]. They specifically said it was for Christianity, and this is a Christian country. So once I understood that, that’s when I realized it wasn’t even so much about my personal beliefs and what I wanted to identify as, but it was about playing the game.

[00:09:29] And that’s what I really learned and realized about the religious aspect. It was more so about knowing to play the game and how to identify to get the most benefits from this system. And once I took it from that angle, man, I never took anything personal.

[00:09:43] If you have your religious belief, that’s cool. You can have your religious beliefs. But when we all come together, we got to play this game, and we got to play it a certain way because we were birthed into this system with certain rules and regulations, and you will have to get out with certain rules and regulations.

[00:09:59] So the United States is a pure corporation, and it’s like, we’ve worked at jobs our whole life. And we always know there’s a process to get in the job, and there has to be a process, like a two weeks notice, some type of notice, something to get out. You know what I’m saying?

[00:10:16] Luke: Right.

[00:10:16] Brotha: So it’s the same thing. But the cool thing about just my path, and being from Houston, and being into religion, I always wanted to help the people. That was always just something that I was real big on, my father was big on. So even when I did make it out, I feel like you have a lot of brothers and sisters in this movement who get out and just be like, you know what? I’m going to go live in the woods.

[00:10:36] And that’s going to be it. But it was like, what good is learning this information if you’re just going to hoard it and stay to yourself somewhere in the corner, in a quiet corner. So like I said, that’s what led to Brotha Truth and my movement, ISelfLawAmMaster.com.

[00:10:49] Because I was like, yo, if I saw how this has dramatically changed my life, I could just wonder how many other people this could transform them to. So yeah, man, that’s when we just started doing tours, just started going all over the world, man, just to speak my message.

[00:11:06] Luke: It’s like that thing in war where part of your battalion gets captured behind enemy lines and you escape, right?

[00:11:15] Brotha: Yeah.

[00:11:16] Luke: There’s a certain type of character, a person that just is motivated to go back in and rescue some of the people that are left behind. I noticed that too. And I have a history in addiction recovery.

[00:11:29] Brotha: Really?

[00:11:30] Luke: Yeah, so I’ve been sober a long time, and something that happens when the grace of God releases you from that bondage, not to everyone, but for me, I had to commit my life to helping pull other people out of that. Because when you’ve been there, in whatever bondage, whatever enslavement, whether it’s in your own mind or from the outside, and you find the key to get out, it takes a very selfish person just be like, I’m good now. You guys, good luck. You know what I mean?

[00:12:00] Brotha: Right.

[00:12:01] Luke: No judgment.

[00:12:02] Brotha: It just the heart of soul of the person. You can really tell a person’s character, man. Yeah, absolutely.

[00:12:08] Luke: Touching on the two pieces, the heritage and the religious context for this work, I think is really key because that has so much to do with how the game is set up, and so many of our rights are embedded within either heritage and culture, or in religion, as you said, with Christianity being the template for what’s allowed and what’s not allowed.

[00:12:34] And something that’s always tripped me out, and you probably have a lot of insight into this more than I do, is how on Native American reservations, they have their own law enforcement. There’s different rules for gambling, the Indian casinos and all this, and I’ve always tripped on that, like why do they have a whole different setup there? And maybe it has something to do with jurisdiction or something. Can you speak to that?

[00:13:00] Brotha: Oh, man, wonderful questions. Well, being that we’re American Indians and Native Americans to some of those with the reservations and things of that nature, they’re considered separate nations from the United States, almost working with, correlating with the United States, but they’re not a part of. So with that being stated, that’s why they are actually operating.

[00:13:24] Because there’s a difference between American Indians and Native Americans. Let me just say that. Because natives is actually a subject of Britain. You’re still a British subject by being a Native American. Now, American Indian is actually protected by the treaties. That’s getting into 1871 when the Naturalization Act came in.

[00:13:46] Luke: That’s on my list, trust me.

[00:13:47] Brotha: Yeah, they naturalized so many of us into this. But anyway, just getting back to the question, it’s just a different jurisdiction. And basically, we have the ability to do things that the normal US citizen can’t do, because we don’t operate, so to say, under their codes or statutes. We still have constitutional rights.

[00:14:10] And just us having our tribes and having our nations, we have our own governments. We have our own, like you say, police force. We have our own, all of that. So at the end of the day, it’s more so about it’s business. And that’s really all the casinos that you see and all that, because they know, in certain jurisdictions, in certain states, they probably can’t have casinos.

[00:14:32] But if we go through this tribal nation then we can operate outside of the state jurisdiction and what they allow. So yeah, man, just being a tribal nation. And that’s what I always try to tell people. We are a nation. It’s an actual nation, and we have treaties, and government signed treaties with other nations.

[00:14:53] So a lot of times people try to say, oh, well, the Indians aren’t respected. I’m like, no, we have treaties. We just aren’t asserting them anymore. Just because instead of identifying as the Choctaw, Cherokees or Blackfoot, we might say we’re blacks, or that we’re whites, or that we’re Latinos or something, but really all of y’all come from Aztecs, or Mayans, and it’s such a mixing pot here in America.

[00:15:19] Cultures have mixed in for so long. You could have Cherokee in you and same in me, and there could be no difference. Because you might have a great great grandmother somewhere down the line. This goes back seven generations. Just when you start moving under the nation, you have a totally different jurisdiction, a whole totally different set of laws and rules that you can operate under.

[00:15:47] And that’s what I was touching base with you earlier about when we had just the guns and things like that. As American Indians, we can buy guns for hunting, and we have treaty rights, and we don’t have to have a license for that. But a regular US citizen does. You see what I’m saying?

[00:16:02] Luke: US citizens have very few rights.

[00:16:05] Brotha: Very few rights.

[00:16:06] Luke: Which we’ll talk about.

[00:16:07] Brotha: Yeah. It’s crazy.

[00:16:10] Luke: So much of what has subjugated us, just speaking in this country, but it’s true in many countries around the world, is that we’ve been given fallacious history on where everyone came from and how this was all established.

[00:16:25] Brotha: That’s how they keep us so confused.

[00:16:27] Luke: And I’ve heard some melanated folks talk about this, and I want to see if you felt into this, that one of the things we’ve been lied to about is that all dark skin people, what we call African Americans came from Africa. But then some brothers are like no, we were already here.

[00:16:44] Brotha: Yeah. Absolutely.

[00:16:45] Luke: What’s your perspective on that?

[00:16:47] Brotha: My perspective on that is that we’re aboriginal to the entire planet. And back in the day, millions of years ago, because I believe we’ve been here for millions of years, you can look up the Turkana boy. They got his body in museum now, 1. 3 million years old, a real body. They had, what was this? Well, all the land masses were all together as one. And basically, when humanity was existing, even back then, according to the Dogons and things of that nature, they say, we didn’t come from this planet.

[00:17:20] We came here. All the star system. That’s another conversation. But at the end of the day, it’s just more so of, how can I say this? We walked the entire planet. We didn’t just all go to one navigational center there in Africa and just say, all right, well, we’re going to wait till all the continents and the plate tectonic shifts and everything like that. Then once the continents have broken up, now we’re going to all get on boats and start exploring the other lands.

[00:17:46] No, when the world was one piece, called the Pangaea, that’s what they refer to it as, the Pangaea, we walked the entire planet. We didn’t just hover and stay in one spot and say, well, we’re not going to go see what the rest of the world here has to offer.

[00:18:02] So yeah, we’re indigenous to the entire planet, and that’s what my beliefs is and always will be. And to think that we only came from one part– when we get into the Dogons and stuff later, like I said, we weren’t even originally from this planet, and that’s what a lot of the African tribes and things to that nature will actually even tell you.

[00:18:24] So to even claim one continent in this commercial game has all been the mind trick within itself. Because as long as you have all of your Americans here claiming that they’re Africans, then now you have the British who can sit here and control our lands because we don’t want them.

[00:18:41] We think we all come from over the sea. So it’s all a mental game. It’s like as long as we can teach you in school, make you believe you come from Africa, this Africa, Africa, Africa, Africa, then you’ll want to do away with everything here in America and resort your lands and go back to Africa. That’s the mind trick.

[00:18:59] Because as long as we have that, no, well, we don’t want this land here. It wasn’t ours anyway. We were slaves. When really, this belonged to your great grandmothers in there. I always tell people when you actually even go and look in the 1800s, you’ll even see some of the old dollar bills, and you’ll see people on there farming, people of all colors, and especially a lot of melanated people on the dollar bills farming. I’m like, no, I don’t think those were slaves.

[00:19:22] Those were sharecroppers. Many of your ancestors were sharecroppers, and we were farmers and traders. I know in my family, that’s what we got, the 50 plus acres of land from my great grandparents used to actually grow food and produce for the actual community. And that’s how they used to make a living.

[00:19:40] So it was like a lot of us need to understand that we didn’t just come from Africa. We didn’t just come over here on slave boats. And our ancestors, many of us have been here for hundreds and thousands of years, even millions, but that’s another conversation. But yeah, man.

[00:19:57] So that’s just my belief system on what I’ve learned just from studying different cultures, and different tribes, and just different information. They got artifacts and things that have been here from thousands of years ago, because the whole slave story is only about what, 200, 300 years? We came from Africa 200, 300 years ago. And I’m like, yo, are you really trying to tell us that we didn’t have an existence here at all till we were brought on some boats? It’s crazy.

[00:20:23] Luke: Well, when you look at the land masses, how you’re saying before the tectonic plates shifted like that, if you think about the Inuits, the Alaskan Eskimos, you could line them up against a bunch of Mongolians from over in like China, Russia. You can’t even tell the difference other than cultural.

[00:20:41] But in terms of just looking at two people, they’re pretty damn close. So it’s like, how do you explain that there’s people that are that close in the way that they look and their physical features that are supposedly from different countries or continents to trip?

[00:20:55] Brotha: And what I’ve always heard about the Inuits, because a lot of them migrated a long time ago from the Mongol culture and some of that stuff, but even from Asia, and came over here and set up shop and started living and operating, that’s what I was always told about the Inuits, because they’re a little bit different than some of the American Indians.

[00:21:14] And they ended up blending in with the cultures over time. But of course, that’s why a lot of them look like Mongols. And that’s why I said America’s a huge mix and pot, and especially with the Natives and American Indians here, because you have so many different influences. You have a Mongol influence that came through. You have an African influence that came through. Then you have the French men who came in.

[00:21:38] You go to Louisiana– I have a lot of families. My family’s from Louisiana. You have a lot of Creoles, who are French, and Indians, American Indians here. But yeah, we call them Creoles, and that’s a certain tribe that almost broke off. They were fixed mulattoes, shall we say. They were tribal American women and men who had babies with some of these Frenchmen. They ended up creating Creoles, and they branched off and created their own ways, their own language. They spoke French. Everything was totally different.

[00:22:11] But that in itself, that became a tribe. So it’s just all these different ways and influences, man. And it’s so many different influences from so many different cultures of the world. That’s why I was like, you could easily have American Indian in your family bloodline or whatever, just because if your ancestors came here and just happened to breed with some of the Natives or American Indians here, you would have it in your heritage too.

[00:22:36] So that’s why I was like, we focus so much on what makes us different. We should really focus more on what makes us alike, and how we can unify around those things and actually use that to overpower the system that we’re in. We’re so distracted and worried about all the nonsense that doesn’t matter when it comes to commerce and handling your affairs.

[00:22:58] Luke: And it’s not just the human propensity toward tribalism and creating others out of others. It’s also that the system is designed to create that division, because disunity makes a population super easy to control. Dude, I more and more, even just racial stuff aside, look at the left-right chasm, and it’s like, most people don’t even realize it’s not even left versus right. It’s humanity versus the State. That’s the problem.

[00:23:32] The State is the problem. That’s not the conservatives, the liberals, black, white. It’s like all that is all just a distraction. It’s all a mind game to keep us all running around in circles fighting while they’re like, cool, Patriot Act. They roll it out, and it’s just like David Ike says, the totalitarian tiptoe. It’s like, we’re all down here bickering, and meanwhile, they’re rolling the tanks in, taking away more rights. So yeah.

[00:23:56] Brotha: Wasting time and wasting energy with all the distractions while they’re passing things and doing things, like you say. And I just even speak on that. That’s crazy because I just came back from Jamaica, of course, which is a British colony from back in the day.

[00:24:09] And it was crazy because I heard they’re voting and things happening on the radio. They were talking about their new election season, but just like here, they have two parties, and these two parties have been in war with themselves, going all the way back to barley’s. Bob Marley.

[00:24:27] Luke: I was watching the Bob Marley documentary the other night.

[00:24:31] Brotha: He brought them together, but I was like, think about that, though. You have some of the country who’s fighting for this side, some of the country who’s fighting. They’re going to war and killing each other. And I’m like, man, all behind politics, the politicians are in the back like, yeah, we’re getting what we want. We just got to let you guys self-destruct while we control everything else.

[00:24:50] Luke: Yeah.

[00:24:51] Brotha: I was like, man, we got to stop existing and actually start controlling.

[00:24:55] Luke: Yeah, two masks on the same face.

[00:24:58] Brotha: Yeah, two masks. It doesn’t matter really what country you’re in.

[00:25:01] Luke: It’s like a spinning head. You’re like I want that guy, not that guy. It’s like, it’s the same guy. That’s a great segue into– maybe for people not familiar with any of this law stuff, I’ve only done one show dedicated to this. Maybe another one would have come out by the time yours comes out. But as I was talking about earlier, we have this original system of law that’s essentially just based on the golden rule.

[00:25:28] It’s like, don’t defraud people. Don’t hurt people’s property. Don’t hurt other people. Basically, three rules. I’m down with that. Your average person, I think, is a good person and is willing to uphold that, and has no problem that there are consequences for those that don’t uphold that.

[00:25:46] It’s like Brandon Joe talks about, you can think about common laws, the Old West. You have a town sheriff. Everyone’s following the rules. You have some shady fucker comes into town and steal something or hurt somebody and the sheriff goes and throws them in the clink, and then the town, a group of their peers comes together and says, yeah, we think he should be kicked out of the town, or he should be hung, or he should be locked in the little town jail for six months. Right?

[00:26:10] Brotha: Absolutely.

[00:26:10] Luke: It’s like there’s a simplicity in that that gives humanity the benefit of the doubt, that the majority of us are fair and equitable. And you don’t need the state to enforce that. That’s just the common good.

[00:26:27] Brotha: That’s the common law. That’s the laws that we all share in common. That’s exactly what common law means.

[00:26:33] Luke: Maybe you could break down the different layers of law from that through the Admiralty Maritime Commerce and show us where we’re stuck at the point now, because we’re all in these commercial laws and we don’t know it. Maybe just break that down for us because I think that’s the crux of unlocking the jail cell, really, is understanding, oh, there’s a whole other thing that exists here. It’s just buried.

[00:26:59] Brotha: Yeah. It’s just buried. Well, I’ll just say first it started in England with the English common law, and a lot of this happened after the Frenchman, the Norman King took over the Anglo-Saxons there. And that’s when they started in 1099, actually. That’s when the Battle of Hastings happened, and that’s when the Frenchmen invaded.

[00:27:15] Luke: I wonder if they call it Form 1099, because–

[00:27:18] Brotha: Wow, wow. I never thought of– man, damn. That’s a good question.

[00:27:23] Luke: Just a guess. Just a guess.

[00:27:24] Brotha: Yeah, so the French Norman King, he ended up coming there, and he took the Anglo-Saxon law, which was more so the indigenous ways that they were doing things. And he combined it with the French Norman law, and they created a new law called English common law, where the Frenchmen and the English barons and the French barons, they could all come together and agree and say, hey, let’s operate, and let’s do this.

[00:27:49] So they ended up taking that law, and they ended up taking that all across the world to their different colonies and places that they ended up conquering over time. And these were just English common laws. And again, these were just laws that we all shared together as common people. And basically, what this was not even– not to get into the constitution yet.

[00:28:07] It goes back to the Magna Carta when, again, you have these Frenchmen who came and took over the English throne there and the Anglo-Saxons, and he was taxing the people, taxing the people, sending them to war, taxing the people. And that’s when the English barons had got upset, and they were like, hey, man, you have to chill out with this, or else we’re going to have your head for this.

[00:28:27] And that’s when they sat him down, sat down King John. The whole Robin Hood, that whole story comes from this story here. And they sat down King John, all the English barons, and they were like, listen, man, you’re going to sign this contract, and it’s going to act as a constitution.

[00:28:43] And it’s going to be a new constitutional monarch, and you’re going to have to let the– we, the people, respect our God given rights. It just goes down to this. We don’t need all this extra stuff, code, statutes like Rome. All we want you to do is respect our God given rights. You can’t tax us. You can’t do any of this without our consent and without our permission.

[00:29:02] And this is really the roots of all constitutions across the world. And later on, they ended up creating the English Bill of Rights, which got added to the Magna Carta. And that’s what I ended up taking this blueprint across the world to Jamaica, to the United States, to Canada, and they all set up these English common laws. And it was all based upon a constitution that all actually stemmed from the Magna Carta.

[00:29:27] So the Magna Carta is the highest of all constitutions of any English country across the world. If it’s ever been an English colony, an English common law has been set up. The Magna Carta is actually the highest of the high there, but then you have the United States, and every single country itself has a constitution.

[00:29:46] That’s actually there to protect its people. But again, over the constitution is the Magna Carta. So what I always tell people, we can study our constitutions too, but also know the Magna Carta because that supersedes everything in their English system. But anyway, moving along, every single state has a constitution, which is all backed and protects your English common law rights, which are really just your rights that are protected by God, your God given rights.

[00:30:14] And again, you have equity, which is a little bit different. That’s a branch of English common law, but that’s more built upon fairness and equality. So getting a constitutional remedy sometime, you can go back more so to monetary damages and charges, but then you can also have equity law, and you can get equitable relief in a courtroom, which is a totally different relief.

[00:30:39] And equity is purely about fairness. And it’s like, let’s say you took something from me, and it was like, I’m not here to sue you for money. I just want what’s mine returned back to me. So I could go into a courtroom and have the judge rule on and give me an equitable relief for fairness and be like, yo, Mr. Luke, I need you to go ahead and give Brotha Truth back his book, whatever. And that’s what they can rule on– fairness. That’s English common law. So I’ll just say that. I know that was long-winded, but that’s English common law.

[00:31:11] Luke: No, it’s great. It needs to be long-winded because it’s complex.

[00:31:16] Brotha: It is. And what happened was in 1300s, I believe it was 1306, I can’t remember, 1307 specifically. But you had someone by the name of Pope Boniface VIII. And what he actually did was he came up with something called the Unam Sanctam.

[00:31:35] And basically, this was Rome, and he made a declaring that, we are going to make every single human being on this planet a subject of the Roman pontiff. We want to make them all servants, because how Rome saw it at the time, in the 1300s, if you weren’t a Christian, you were a savage.

[00:31:57] So that was like, yo, we got to go out here and civilize the world. That’s what the whole movement was about. It was 1312. That’s what it was. And 1312, Pope Boniface VIII did the Unam Sanctam papers, and he made that declaration. And what a lot of people don’t realize is that a lot of the countries and the kings during these times, they were all influenced religiously by the Pope.

[00:32:18] There was no country back then that really operate that didn’t have someone from the Pope that was there, from the Vatican, to oversee that whole movement. So once you had the Pope, who’s from the Roman Catholic church that comes from Roman civil laws and things of that nature, that’s when they said, well, you know what? I’m going to declare all of my European powers, France, Germany, Britain.

[00:32:47] We’re basically going to declare war on the world. I want you all to go out and civilize the world. Spain sent people over there. Portugal went over here to Brazil. You have Frenchmen who went to Haiti and South, and then you had the British who went there. Once they got the calling from the church, go out and take over, that’s exactly what they did. And that’s another little story part, but eventually England, they were like, yo, we’re not getting down with this whole Roman movie.

[00:33:17] We don’t want to be a part of this. Like, no, it ain’t got nothing to do with us. And that’s when in 1707, unfortunately, the sovereign kingdom of England came down. Because in 1707, you actually had the queen at the time. She actually gave over the power because she didn’t have an heir. She didn’t have any child.

[00:33:37] Her one child had died, so she was just going to be the last one on the throne. So they were like, yo, before you die, let’s go ahead and get the next person coming in in line after you. And that’s when the Pope came in and got to influence in her. He was like, yo, I want you to give the power to this German King. And we want you to pass over the throne to this German King.

[00:33:57] And the German King, at the time, was heavily controlled by the Pope and influenced by them. So after 1707, she signed the act. And basically, from there, that’s when the sovereign kingdom of England fell, all of that. And then that’s when they say, you know what? We’re going to bring Scotland. We’re going to bring Ireland. We’re going to unite all of y’all together, and we’re just going to call it the United Kingdom now.

[00:34:19] So no longer is this a sovereign kingdom of Scotland or England, because it’s crazy. You’ll watch the soccer games in the World Cup, and they’ll play as England. But when you actually go to the country, it’s only UK flags everywhere and all of those. England, just like the United States, you have the United States of America, the sovereign Republic, and then you have the United States Corporation. Two different governments.

[00:34:42] Luke: Yeah.

[00:34:42] Brotha: So that’s how they ended up conquering England. So they were like, you know what? The Pope was like, no, I don’t want the world to be operating on their free God-given rights. I want the world to operate through me, which is why the Catholic church has this confession booth where the Pope is supposed to be the middleman between you and God to hear your confessions. And he’s supposed to take your message up to God and deliver them for you.

[00:35:06] That goes all the way back to 1312 and Pope Boniface. He was like, yo, I want to make all of them savage. I want to make all of them civilized, and they basically got to answer to us. So the Roman laws, they said, well, you know what? Since we’ve taken over England and the UK now, all of the colonies that are a part of all of these English common law countries that y’all have set up now, I want you to convert those into civil law now.

[00:35:34] I want you to operate under maritime law. And that’s when they said, all right, well, that means we’ll have to do a lot of conversion, because all of these countries got common law already set up. They’ve been here for years. And that’s when they were like, well, we don’t care.

[00:35:46] We’re going to come in with a whole new set of laws. We’re going to reincorporate everything, and we’re going to bring people into our new jurisdiction that we’re going to create. And that’s what led to the 1871 and the naturalization, because they created a new corporation.

[00:36:02] You had all these European bankers. You had the Pope, all of them who came over here after the civil war. They were like, yo, your country’s in turmoil, man. You need money. Come on. I got you. And that’s what ended up– they gave us a big loan, and like I said, in order to get that loan, we had to reincorporate as a whole new country.

[00:36:18] And that’s what the Naturalization Act did too. They created the United States Corporation in. And then that’s when they started naturalizing us into their corporation as US citizens. And that’s when we lost our heritage.

[00:36:33] Luke: So the way I understand this, and please correct me if I get any of it wrong, but I’m always trying to track these different punctuation marks where things have gone awry. So 1871, at the end of the civil war, you have the ratification of the 14th Amendment, which turns out actually wasn’t ratified, of course. That’s another thing. Then you have the Federal Reserve Act, 1913. Then in 1933, you got the– I wrote it down.

[00:37:04] Brotha: Not the Great Depression, but when they did the–

[00:37:06] Luke: Oh, the Emergency Banking Act.

[00:37:08] Brotha: Emergency Banking Act.

[00:37:09] Luke: And shortly after that, the Social Security Act. So you have every few years, every few decades, there’s like a boom, a big power grab.

[00:37:17] Brotha: They were taking powers away, slowly but surely.

[00:37:19] Luke: Yeah, yeah. But the thing that is really nefarious as far as my understanding is, at the end of the Civil War, you had a faction of people, probably outside of the country too, the controllers from overseas, but within this country, you got a faction of people that are like, we got to free the slaves. This is fucked up.

[00:37:35] Brotha: Yeah.

[00:37:35] Luke: And you have people for whom it was advantageous, and for whatever reason, they didn’t want to stop that system because they’re all getting rich off the labor of the slaves, right?

[00:37:43] Brotha: Mm-hmm.

[00:37:44] Luke: So there was a compromise where they said, okay, well, we’re going to free the slaves, but we’re going to make them essentially a second-class citizen. So rather than being a citizen of the state of the Southwest territory, we call Tennessee, or the Republic of Texas, or whatever, the 35 or so nation states at that time, they pulled a huge, fast one.

[00:38:04] And so they’re like, oh, everyone, you’re free, you guys. Do whatever you want, but you’re no longer a state citizen or a sovereign. Now you’re a federal citizen, AKA a US citizen, which is essentially a sub corporation of the corporation called the United States, which is super messed up. But then it seems like they figured out this is working so well for us. They did it to everyone. They started naturalizing everyone, not just the freed slaves. Is that how it went down?

[00:38:30] Brotha: That’s exactly how it went. And it’s funny you say that because, again, after 1871 and the Naturalization Act, they created this new corporation, this new United States. And they were bringing in new members and naturalizing new people. And this new United States operated under codes and statutes.

[00:38:47] It no longer operated under the original United States of America, the Republic, which was constitutional, which was just, don’t infringe on me. I won’t infringe on you, like we were speaking about earlier. But the new United States came with taxation. It came with different codes, different statutes, and the reason for it– and it goes all the way back to the 1700s, we owe British and Europeans so much money from just war debts and things of that over the years.

[00:39:15] And in 1871, they loaned us money again. So we took on more loans that we couldn’t pay off. And that gets into the 1933 and the whole crash and stuff like that. But anyway, when they created this new corporation in 1871, that’s what it was all about. It’s a whole new corporation of rules, laws, regulations, and now we can tax you.

[00:39:35] See, the power about the Magna Carta was, and why it was so powerful, you had kings like King Charles back in the day. When the Magna Carta was out in England, he was like, yo, I don’t care about these citizens. I don’t care about a Magna Carta. I’m going to do what I want to do. And he just totally disregarded it. And the people, the barons, they ended up swooping him up, threw him in court, and then they had him executed.

[00:39:59] And this was the king, first king to ever be executed by the people. And they chopped his head off because it was like, yo, you went against the Magna Carta. You can’t do that. You swore to uphold this Magna Carta. Now this is basically– what is that when you go against the countrymen?

[00:40:16] Luke: Treason.

[00:40:16] Brotha: Treason. So they were like, nah, man, chop his head off. And they killed him. And that was in the mid-1600s. That’s why in 1707, before the Rome had put in his plan and took over England and turned it into the UK, he was like, yo, we got to get them out of the sovereign kingdom of England, because England is tied into the Magna Carta. And any king that we bring in, he has to abide by the Magna Carta if we’re going to be operating from England.

[00:40:44] That’s where they said, uh-uh, we’re going to just put this all together, all these countries, and we’re just going to call y’all the United Kingdom, and we’re going to create a new corporation, just like how they did there in the States, just like how they did here. We were a sovereign country first, United States of America, and then they turned us into the United States, and they started naturalizing the sin.

[00:41:01] Same thing happened in the UK. They were England. They were Scotland. They were Ireland. And they said, uh-uh. Let’s call it the UK. Now let’s start naturalizing and bringing them in and making them citizens of the UK. And that’s how they started snatching their rights too.

[00:41:14] It was all the same thing, but it all goes back to Rome starting there in 1707. And then after 1707, that’s when Rome really had his foot in the game. He was like, all right. Now, everywhere that the English men went, I got to come back and put codes and statutes now. So that’s why they’d be like, that’s man’s law. You have God’s law, which is trust law, which is, don’t infringe on me, just the trust law of things.

[00:41:41] And then you have man’s law, which are different codes and statutes, and those damn near change every day. They vote and whatever. I always try to tell people, when it comes to law, if you ever want to know if something is lawful, because there’s a difference between lawful and legal, lawful is constitution. That’s God’s right. Then you have legal. That’s codes. That’s statutes. That’s man’s law. Those are consumer codes and statutes.

[00:42:07] If you ever have to ask if something is lawful or legal, you should go and always ask, well, is it in the organic state constitution? Because here in Texas, we have the 1876 organic state constitution. If it doesn’t say that I need a license to drive, a license to do this, or a license to do that, then that means that’s a code or a statute which was passed by man, and that really doesn’t apply to me.

[00:42:31] Because I’m operating under the constitutional law and what’s lawful, and that’s what the whole status correction thing is about, just changing your mindset of how and what laws you want to operate under. That’s what the great awakening is about. It’s like, okay, now I’m up. I’m awake. I’m reborn again.

[00:42:50] I can go biblically with all of this, but I’m reborn again, and it’s like, okay, well, now that I have a new, fresh mind, do I still want to operate under codes and statutes for slaves, or do I want to go back to God’s law and operate under the constitution and just don’t infringe on me, and I won’t infringe on you? It’s just life is so much simpler.

[00:43:10] When you can worry about God’s law. So once you can totally understand the two, just the basis for it– that’s why I always start with history. Because once you can understand the basis and how we got here to where we are today, you’ll know how we need to go moving forward and how we get there.

[00:43:27] But it starts with knowing that there is English common law in play and there is Roman military law in play. Now, the one that applies to you all depends on your status of knowing who and what you are. If you believe you’re a US citizen, then yes, you’re supposed to pay taxes.

[00:43:45] You’re supposed to get pulled out the car. You’re supposed to be treated as a saddle slave. That’s what police policy enforcers are here to do. They are here to control property of the state, but they work, and they serve we, the people. There’s a difference. They’re servants of the state.

[00:44:05] And the best constitution that shows that is, I believe, this 1876. It’s the one in Georgia. They have their actual constitution. It says it the best. It’s police enforcers or policy enforced. No, it says agents of the States are servants, and they work for us. It literally says that in the constitution.

[00:44:28] But again, when we’re operating as US citizens, as corporate entities, it’s their job to control corporate property. They work for the real man, we, the people, but they control. So that’s when I started to learn, well, hold on. I got pulled over by this police officer, and it’s crazy.

[00:44:44] I see him walking up to the car, and it’s like, all right, Brotha Truth, you’ve been doing all this studying. It’s game time. Now you know what you’re supposed to say. And as soon as he pulled up, license and registration. And that’s why I was like, let’s just go ahead and get it started. Let’s see what happens.

[00:45:00] I was like, oh, well, I’m not driving. I’m traveling freely under my constitutional bill of rights. And when I said that, he looked at me. He was like, that’s interesting. Well, here. And then that’s when he tested me again. Because it’s the legalese. It’s all a conversation.

[00:45:15] He was like, well, here in the state of Texas, you’re supposed to be driving with a seatbelt on. I was like, oh, well, luckily, I don’t live in the state of Texas. I live in the Texas territory of the Republic. And once I said that, he looked at me and said, all right, sir. You have a good day.

[00:45:32] Luke: Are you serious?

[00:45:32] Brotha: You enjoy that. Yeah. And he let me go. I didn’t have to pull out any tribal ID. I didn’t have to do any of that. It was literally just a conversation. But again, that all comes with knowing and understanding the different forms of law. Because before I even have to pull out my tribal card or before I had to do the Cherokee, I could simply– that’s why I was like, I can go to Canada. I can go to Jamaica. I can go to all these places, and I’m good just because I know English common law, and that’s the law there.

[00:46:03] That’s what every policy enforcer swore to uphold. Now, they play the codes in the statutes for the 95% of the masses who don’t know what the hell is going on, but for that 5% that does and that’s in the know, they respect us. And no reason for them to get thrown in a jail or get their heads chopped off, because they swore to uphold that constitution.

[00:46:24] And if you try to persecute me with Roman laws, you can’t uphold an American constitution, but then persecute me with Roman laws. These are two different– that’s treason. So once you get the calling out, well, hold on. Didn’t you swear to uphold the constitution, but yet you’re trying to hit me for a Roman code and statute? Once they know you know, all right, sir, you have a good day. Because, again, you’re literally one out of 100.

[00:46:50] I got 99 other people to beat up on who have no clue what’s going on. Why would I care about the one person who could actually get me thrown in jail as a policy enforcer? So once I understood that, I was like, yo, this is a game. And once I proved myself to myself, that one police stop that I had, and the police officer looked at me, he had this smirk, and he was like, you enjoy yourself. You have a good day, sir.

[00:47:14] And just living my whole life in fear of police officers and then having that victory, that little small victory, it transformed my mind forever. And then that’s when I realized like now, every time I talk to a police officer, every time I talk to a judge, every time I talk to a lawyer, I speak with law and speak with authority, and they respect it.

[00:47:34] They don’t look at me as the normal, typical “black man”. They’re like, no. He’s a little different, the constitution. He’s speaking at equity because it’s like, no. That’s why I was like, I don’t even have to play with all of the heritage and culture stuff. I’m going to play the English game.

[00:47:50] I speak English. I have an English last name. I have English heritage too. That’s my surname heritage, just like I have an American heritage from my mother here. We’re American, but at the end of the day, my father’s last name is White, and that stems from England.

[00:48:07] So it’s important to know that while we have American heritage, we also have European heritage. And since this is a European operation that’s running over here, we got to go back to our European heritage too and use that back against them. That’s why it’s like, yeah, I don’t care where I go. I can go to Canada. I can go to wherever, because if Britain or England had ever went there and set up shop, I’m good, because I can always stand on English common law.

[00:48:32] Luke: Period. Now, on that note, specifically dealing with the policy enforcers for the corporation known as the United States located in the District of Columbia–

[00:48:42] Brotha: Yeah. There you go.

[00:48:46] Luke: It’s so mind blowing, dude. When you start to learn this stuff, it really is the matrix. We’ve been living in this facsimile world. But to your point of understanding the language and understanding your God-given rights, constitutional rights, etc., I’ve seen, because there’s a few videos floating around of these sovereign citizens, which is an oxymoron, where they’re very aggressive toward the policy enforcers, very combative, and they know a little of the language, and then their ass gets pulled out of the car and arrested, and that’s the end of it. Right?

[00:49:22] Brotha: Yeah.

[00:49:23] Luke: It seems to me that one of the fundamental parts of just that, just that piece, just dealing with courts, dealing with policy enforcers, is first being diplomatic and being respectful, and understanding that person was just indoctrinated into that system of law. And they don’t even know this shit, most of them, right?

[00:49:39] Brotha: Absolutely.

[00:49:40] Luke: But it seems that it would be important to change your citizenship status, maybe get the DOT plates, have your diplomatic passport, have your status correction in the can so that you’re not just speaking the language, but when they actually run your ID, run your passport card, they see that you don’t only know the lingo–

[00:50:06] Brotha: Your actual status.

[00:50:07] Luke: Yeah. But that you’ve actually reverted yourself back to being an American or a state national. So what do you think some of the downsides of half assing it are for people that just learn the language and end up getting themselves in more trouble than they would have been in the first place?

[00:50:24] Brotha: Man, that’s a good question because I feel like you have so many people. And I know earlier you were talking about some people want to come in just to learn a discharge just to get little certain bits and pieces instead of learning, taking the time to learn the whole bigger picture and understand why everything is happening.

[00:50:40] So you have a lot of students who’ll halfway do things and won’t really– like I said, you have some who would just take the program to learn how to discharge. But then when you get pulled over by police, or whatever it may be, you don’t know how to stand on your square. You don’t even know the language. You don’t know anything about the constitution. You just know one specific thing on filling out an affidavit on how to discharge my school loan.

[00:51:01] Luke: And because they know the legalese so well, they’ll trick your ass into jurisdiction–

[00:51:07] Brotha: Just like that.

[00:51:08] Luke: Every two seconds. That’s the thing.

[00:51:11] Brotha: That’s how legalese works.

[00:51:12] Luke: You start answering any questions. Well, do you have a driver’s license? Yeah, but it’s not with me. Boom.

[00:51:17] Brotha: Boom. That’s it.

[00:51:19] Luke: Look up your VIN. Oh, your car is registered. So the state of Texas actually owns your car, and you’re basically leasing it from the state. It’s like it gets so deep that I think if you don’t have that level of confidence from educating yourself, you’re going to slip up or chicken out. And then there you go. And it’s like you might as well just paid the ticket and not even tried to retain your rights.

[00:51:41] Brotha: The fear. Yeah.

[00:51:41] Luke: Yeah. It’s really interesting. Let’s go into what I think is one of the most fascinating parts about this. So we’ve discussed how there’s layers of law. So you have this original landmass that we call the United States of America, and we have these original laws, as you described, that are just based on common law and just golden rule type stuff.

[00:52:02] And they superimpose this fictitious law of commerce, this Roman military law that you described. There’s a duality there, and most of us don’t know the sub floor there. We’re just up on the upper level, getting shafted. We’re not dramatically getting shafted, especially in the last four years.

[00:52:21] But the other duality that is mind blowing is the birth certificate, the Social Security Act, where when you’re born in this country in a hospital, unless you’re home birthed and your parents are woke to all this shit, what’s going to happen is they’re going to say, hey, we’ve got a birth certificate here. Sign here.

[00:52:38] Brotha: That’s where it starts.

[00:52:38] Luke: And then that birth certificate gets issued to your parents with an all capitals name. And they just created a ens legis, a sub corporation that is essentially an employee of the corporation known as the United States. So it’s like, we’re all running around with two countries, and we’re all running around as two people.

[00:53:00] Brotha: Absolutely.

[00:53:01] Luke: There’s the living, breathing man or woman that, to me, has all the rights that a bear or a deer has. We should just be able to do whatever we want and not have to pay to be here. Who signed us up for this shit? How do we get signed up is that birth certificate. So could you break down how that all works?

[00:53:19] Brotha: I’ll just say, that was beautifully broken down even by you already. That was good how you segued that in.

[00:53:24] Luke: I’m studying, dude. I’m trying to learn this stuff as fast as I can.

[00:53:29] Brotha: No, that was beautiful though, man, because that’s exactly it on the private side. Again, this all goes back to public, and private, and things of that nature, constitutional, and codes, and statutes. That’s really the meat and bones of all of that. But the only way that Rome was able to pull you into their jurisdiction, they had to berth, B-E-R-T-H, not B-I-R-T-H. Birthing, B-I-R-T-H is for coming out the canal, the womb, coming out the womb of a woman.

[00:54:00] Berth, B-E-R-T-H, is actually mooring through the waters, and you’re actually berthing, and you land at a dock. So when you have a birth certificate, we are basically swimming through the waters of your mother’s wombs, and then you land at a dock. In your berth, B-E-R-T-H, and that dock is the doctor, and that’s the one that actually takes you, and he unloads the cargo off of the ship, which is the baby.

[00:54:26] You unload the cargo out of the mother, which is the mother’s vessel, unload the cargo, and they turn around, and they register that cargo with the state registrar. And that’s why the registrar signs your birth certificate too, as well, because now you’ve actually been conveyed into their system as actual goods. And now, like you say, you’re given that social.

[00:54:46] We have the whole trust set up, everything. Now they’ve literally brought you in, and they’ve created a vessel now for their maritime commercial world of law just for you now, and your parents sign off on it. So everything all comes down to the consent of your mother. Truly father, not so much. And some states don’t even really need the father’s signature, because they know, truly, everything starts with the mother.

[00:55:11] So they attack the mothers, and they get the baby that way, and the state acts as the father, ushering in to this new corporation. So yeah, that’s how that whole situation works, man. It starts there. And unfortunately, it’s about even on your birth certificate, they know– I don’t want to say that– that you’re not considered a US citizen. This is still something you have to choose to be. Nowhere on your birth certificate does it say you’re a US citizen.

[00:55:43] Luke: And then you get a job when you’re 16 at Pizza Hut or whatever, and you sign that I-9, and it says, are you a US citizen? And you’re like, hell yeah, I am.

[00:55:52] Brotha: Yeah, I’m here.

[00:55:52] Luke: Boom, you just contracted. There you go.

[00:55:55] Brotha: And now you just took away your sovereign constitutional rights to play their Roman game. Even with that driver’s license, half of the time, most of these people only get tickets because they’re pulled in according to their driver’s license, which is connected to that social. So that’s how the whole charging game works, because that social is an account.

[00:56:19] It’s almost like an account to benefit you to pay for your bills, or whatever it may be. It’s almost like insurance, shall I say you. You get into an accident, or you get into something commercially out here you were speeding in their commercial world, where for that violation, I have to charge your insurance accounts to recompensate us for your violation, that’s how the whole social security number works.

[00:56:48] But that’s why it’s all connected to damn near every public document that you have, because they always need that account to charge. And that’s connected to credits because there is no more money. They took all the gold and silver. Once I figured that out and just learned that this all stems back to them birthing us into this system and making us a part of their corporation, they created it, but it still doesn’t apply until we consent to it. We have to say we are that avatar.

[00:57:23] Luke: This piece of it to me is really empowering on a lot of levels because ever since I was a little kid, I just hated authority. If there’s a rule, I’m going to break it, even if I don’t want to break it, just because I have to break it, because you told me there’s a rule. What gives you the right? Got me in a lot of trouble. I’m not going to say it’s a good way to live, but it’s just how I’m wired.

[00:57:47] Brotha: Yeah, same.

[00:57:49] Luke: So my whole life, especially when the plandemic stuff happened, I’m just seething with anger against the state for what they’ve done to me, feeling like a victim, feeling very disempowered, and also very afraid of them. It’s like, even when I moved to Texas, I’m like, I feel safer than in California, but what if the fucking mRNA police come and knock on my door, and they’re like, hey, we see here that you haven’t taken the shot. It could go there.

[00:58:14] It has in history. It’s been worse in history than that even. They just come take you and put you on a train. So I’m living in all this fear and this a resentment. And as I started to learn about the stuff we’re talking about here today, it’s so empowering because I can take responsibility that I have, however unknowingly and however I might have been deceived. And there were a lot of lies of omission.

[00:58:39] There was a lot of things that I wasn’t told, sign here, sign this, sign that, my mom signing the birth certificate. There wasn’t full disclosure. So there was some shadiness for sure, but ultimately it’s on me because I’m the one that signed my passport application. I’m the one that signed W-9s and did my driver’s license.

[00:58:58] So it’s like I unknowingly opted into this system. And now I’m over here. Well, I don’t like the system. It’s like, well, they’re not going to tell you how to get out of it because they didn’t even tell you you were getting into it. So a guy like you comes along and is like, hey, here’s how you got into it. Take responsibility, and here’s how you get out of it.

[00:59:18] That, to me, is so empowering. All this stuff to me is very– I’m not like a religious person, but I’m definitely a very spiritual person. And it’s like, this is a spiritual game. You start learning about this stuff, and it becomes an act of self-love.

[00:59:41] Brotha: Man, you’re hitting it on the nail.

[00:59:44] Luke: That’s I feel my body light up when we talk about this stuff, and I feel I actually have much less anger toward the parasitic system. If you’re feeling sick and you get a gut test and you have a bunch of parasites, you don’t hate the parasites. They’re just trying to survive.

[01:00:03] You get a tick on you, you’re not like, oh, this tick. I hate this tick. You’re just like, oh, I’m going to just get some tweezers, pull the tick off, have a nice life. And so we have this parasitic banking cartels, all this maritime law, and all this stuff, and it’s like, these are just people that seem to lack creativity.

[01:00:20] They can’t produce, so they create this parasitic system to siphon the energy and resources from those of us who are creative and connected to our creator that do produce. So you see like, oh, they’re just fighting for their survival, and that’s why they create these intricate webs of all these fallacious laws and all this shit. You don’t have to hate them. You don’t have to fight them. You can love yourself enough to educate yourself and free yourself.

[01:00:47] Brotha: That’s it. That’s it.

[01:00:49] Luke: That’s beautiful. It makes me hate the whole thing much less because I’m just like, oh, this is actually interesting.

[01:00:56] Brotha: Man, you just hit it on the head. And that’s a big part that I try to bring to even the urban community the “African American”, because we’ve been taught and so miseducated to hate a certain type of people, or hate a certain type of this. And it’s like, well, you really just need to learn and educate yourself, because really, truly, that’s not how that story quite went.

[01:01:18] And once you understand too that it was a lot of us, King James, and all these were brothers anyway. This was about nationality. This was never about race. These were melanated men who were like, yo, I want that land over there. I’m going to go get that shit. It had nothing to do with race.

[01:01:38] They just they all came together as British and Englishmen and came over here and took some shit. So yeah, man, that’s the part you were saying about self-love. Because again, once I tested myself and that police officer pulled me over and I stood on my square, once he was like, you have a good day, sir, it was like, boom, I had this burst of energy. Whoa, you just evolved. You just reached a whole new level.

[01:02:04] Luke: Jedi shit.

[01:02:04] Brotha: Yeah, you just broke through level one. And that’s when I was like, yo, well, what else can I do? Can I do the cars now? Can I do the whoop? And I was like, whoa, I can remove all my school dates. That didn’t even happen. I can discharge cars. I could– then you start figuring out different levels of the matrix. And then that’s when you start realizing like, damn I have God power. You know what I’m saying?

[01:02:27] Luke: God mode.

[01:02:27] Brotha: Yeah, God mode, man. And like I always said, man, the Bible is a science book, and it’s a history book. And Psalms 82:6 and John 10 verse 34 always tell you, you are gods. But are you taking the power to take control over your life? Because again, that’s what it also says in Genesis 1:26. It says God was supposed to be passing down the ability for us to control our own dominions, control all the birds, and control all the things of the earth, because this was all about trust law.

[01:03:05] And he passed down the trust because that’s what the Bible is. It’s his will and Testament. For our benefit, the beneficiaries of this trust. To control the birds in the world.

[01:03:20] Luke: Wow. Hold up. Say that again.

[01:03:22] Brotha: Yeah. Again, in trust law, you have three positions. You have the creator who executed, created the trust, and then you also have trustees, and then you have the beneficiaries. So basically, you have this God who created the original trust force, and then you had Jesus who was the trustee at one time.

[01:03:43] And he left his will and testament for us to be the trustees now to come here and control over the birds, and the flocks, and the animals, the world, which is basically saying that now we were the beneficiaries, and we have the control through trust to control all of this world.

[01:04:03] This benefit is for us as the beneficiaries. We just have to know who we are. Even dabbling in, you get into the Cestui Que Vie trust, all of that. We’re the beneficiaries of that trust. And they always say God gave you everything that you needed, but he did. He gave you that social in this commercial system that really is here to insure you and cover all of your charges.

[01:04:25] That’s why you have unlimited credit. There is no money. So it’s like you have everything in life. God gave you everything that you need, but did you know your position? Did you understand the karma side of it, the trust law? Or were you caught up in the dogmatic part of religion running around the church, hallelujah, hallelujah, whatever? That’s cool. But did you get the trust part of it? Did you become the beneficiary so that you could take control over your situation?

[01:04:50] So that’s when I started getting into equity law, and I started realizing, as the beneficiaries, we have to start taking surety ship. We have to take subrogation, which is almost like, you see these NFL players. They all have the agent who speaks for them. They don’t really ever do the speaking. They have agents. It’s the same way we’re in the game, and we’re a player in the game. That name, all caps, that’s the avatar.

[01:05:14] He’s a player in the game, but we have to take subrogation as the real living man to come over here and say, yo, I’m his agent for this straw man. I’m not the name, all caps. I am the agent speaking for the name, all caps. I’m the secured party. I’m the party securing the debtor here that’s playing in the game.

[01:05:34] So it’s like, once I understood that, it was like, yo, because subrogation, when you look at the definition of it, that’s just one person stepping in the position of another to claim a benefit on behalf of an insurance claim. So it’s like, well, hold on. That’s when I learned that we have the power.

[01:05:51] It was like, wait a minute, this cop charged me and stopped me for driving. Wait a minute. That’s unconstitutional. That’s when I said, hold on. The private man has to put on my subrogation boots. And I go up in these courtrooms, and it’s like, whoa, whoa, wait a minute. According to the law, this was unlawful, because you said that you swore to uphold the constitution and my right to travel, but yet here you have a ticket where you charged me under Roman law.

[01:06:19] Uh, uh, uh, there’s a problem here. And when I come in there speaking as a man, speaking on behalf, but I have the power of attorney over my own estate, that’s when they’re like, all right, sir. Hey, let’s put him at the end of the docket, and if he comes back in here again, put him at the end and let everybody else go out, then we just bring them up here and dismiss his case.

[01:06:38] Luke: There’s that language again, docket.

[01:06:40] Brotha: Yeah. That docket. The more you got to cross the– what is that?

[01:06:45] Luke: The bar.

[01:06:45] Brotha: The bar, all of this stuff, and actually load the boat to get on their vessel to do business with them. That’s what all of that’s about. So it’s like, once I understood the maritime part of this, the business part of this, everything changes. But when we can take our personal feelings out of this and not be so caught up in the perceptions and the worldly images that they show in the media and just understand the business, ah, man, you have a whole totally different perspective.

[01:07:13] Because I’m a business entrepreneurship major. I went to college for business. So that’s why it was a lot easier for me to catch it compared to a lot of my brothers and sisters, because they were so deep into it. They had feelings, emotion. Oh, forget Trump, Biden, this. Whoop, whoop. Everything was so emotional to them, but I’m like, yo, it’s just business. They don’t really care about you.

[01:07:35] Luke: Well, that must have been helpful going to business school because you understand the nature of corporate liability protection, why we get S corps and LLCs, and why we get trust, and wills, and all this stuff. So you definitely would have had an advantage there, because I don’t know anything about all that shit.

[01:07:53] And so I just figured it out as I go, try to minimize the dang of the taxes. But I want to go back to the birth certificate. To me, I don’t know why I’m so always so hung up on this. It’s so fascinating. I was looking at a couple of mine today because we have a meeting of a few guys, as you know, coming over today, where we talk about this stuff and help support one another.

[01:08:15] A while ago, I noticed that my birth certificate is on bond paper. It looks like a financial instrument.

[01:08:22] Brotha: Just like the dollar bill.

[01:08:24] Luke: Yeah, exactly. And I never noticed this, but my old one that I had since I was a kid, on the bottom–

[01:08:30] Brotha: Has the numbers.

[01:08:31] Luke: It has the numbers, but it says this is a bank note, straight up. I was like, my whole life, I’ve had to show that to get ID or whatever. And I’m like, how did I never see that my birth certificate is a bank note?

[01:08:46] Another trippy thing about my particular situation is I just want to get all my documents in order. I don’t know how deep I’m going to go into all this. I’m just educating at this point for the most part. But I found that it’s important to get your long-form birth certificate, which is your certificate of live birth, where your name is not in capital letters. So I tried to order mine from the state of Colorado where I was born.

[01:09:08] Brotha: They don’t even give you that now.

[01:09:09] Luke: Yeah. And they were like, we don’t do that. Sorry. Ain’t going to happen. I was like, whoa. Okay. But they did send me a couple of different versions of it that are different than my original one, but they’re all on bond paper. They all have these CUSIP numbers and all this shit on there, and then I started to learn, and maybe you could speak to this, that if you do research on your birth certificate, that it’s been, I think–

[01:09:34] Brotha: Traded on multiple times.

[01:09:36] Luke: It’s like, what is up with that part of it?

[01:09:40] Brotha: Well, again, all of this is attached to your social. This is attached to your Cestui Que Vie. So the times that you’ve given your social for different applications and they’ve sold your note or whatever it is to another person, or whatever this is, your shit is on the stock market.

[01:09:56] You went and filled out an application for a car, and then that car dealership turned around and sold that application to the bank. Then the bank’s taking that, and they’re flipping it times 10. So they’re putting this note– they’re flipping securities even more. They’re selling it to other people. So your private information is out there. Your social’s on these contracts.

[01:10:17] Luke: Dude, a friend of mine looked up his car loan, and the value of it had gone up to $680,000. I won’t say his name. I don’t want to out him, but he’s coming here today. He’s texted it to me. I was like, wait, what? Shit is crazy. What’s Cestui Que Vie trust?

[01:10:35] Brotha: Cestui Que Vie.

[01:10:36] Luke: Is that the same thing as your TreasuryDirect account?

[01:10:39] Brotha: Something like that. It’s all connected back to the Cestui Que Vie. The TreasuryDirect is more so like a service to the Cestui Que Vie. When you start discharging and certain things, they have any interest bonds or things to send to you, they can do that through the TreasuryDirect.

[01:10:58] Let me just even speak on the Cestui Que Vie and what exactly it is. And again, a lot of people that have it get the birth certificate authenticated, but they don’t really know the depths of why. And again, this goes back to our English heritage, goes all the way back to King Henry VIII in 1540.

[01:11:19] He had actually passed the first Cestui Que Vie Act. He created the first Cestui Que Vie trust for the Englishman at that time. And at that time, in England, you have many people who had the religious wars that were going on, Christianity, and just had a lot of people who were leaving the country and things like that.

[01:11:40] And at this time, when you had so many people who were leaving the country and just abandoning their estates you had King Henry, who was like, yo, man, y’all are slowing up the whole commercial flow around here. Y’all are just leaving your estates and just abandoning everything.

[01:11:56] So you know what, we’re going to create this Cestui Que Vie trust. And after a certain amount of years, if you don’t come back and claim your stuff, we’re just going to assume control over. But if you ever do come back, you can come back and claim damages. You can come back and take control over this estate that we created for you.

[01:12:16] But we just assumed control over it because you just left it. We thought you were gone. And I don’t know if you’ve ever seen the Robin Hood movie with Jamie Foxx, the latest one in there. Because that part’s in the 1600s. Anyway, when they ended up going off to war, some of the soldiers who were fighting for England, they went off to war, and the sheriff assumed some of them were dead so therefore that’s when they ended up just taking their estates over, and they ended up controlling it.

[01:12:47] That was the earliest concepts of the Cestui Que Vie trust, because since they were dead, they were assumed dead at sea. Because they went off across to go fight across the waters. And if they didn’t come back in a certain time, they assumed they were dead at sea, and the state took control over their estate if they didn’t have anybody there to control it.

[01:13:05] So that’s when they ended up setting up these Cestui Que Vie trusts. And it was like, all right, well, the state is saying that we’re going to control your property unless you come back and take it as the beneficiary, because it’s yours. You have the benefit to it. But if you don’t ever come back and you don’t know who you are, then we assume control over all your property.

[01:13:26] That was the earliest parts of the Cestui Que Vie. And then in 1666, that’s when they had the other Cestui Que Vie Act that was signed, and that’s when they really brought in, really establishing, as far as birthing it in with the birth certificates and giving you the trust from there.

[01:13:44] And then in 1707, and we were talking about when the UK came, when they finally took over all the sovereign England, Scotland, all of that, and they finally turned into the UK, that’s when they said, well, you know what? We’re going to use the Cestui Que Vie account for corporate business. That’s when the Pope Roman, and they were like, yo, I think we can do business off of this. I think there’s a business opportunity here.

[01:14:07] And then that’s when Rome was like, you know what? I think we can go across the entire world and we could take all the gold and silver from all the indigenous nations. And then we can turn around, and we can give them a central banking system that’s really built off credit and fake ass money.

[01:14:26] And this is exactly what he did. And from there, they used all the countries that were under the Roman empire, and they used them to go and take over all these countries, take all the gold, and then replace them with central banking systems. Here in America they had the Federal Reserve Bank that was in 1913, but the real one, they started way back in the 1700s.

[01:14:49] There was two others– a lot of people don’t know that. They had two other central banks that were here in America before the Federal Reserve. And that was all just because the Rothschilds had been here since the 1700s, trying to set up this bank.

[01:15:01] And then you had people like– what’s his name? President Jackson that were going to war with him, like, no, man, you can’t take this shit over. And they kept passing laws to go against the Rothschilds. Then that’s why after the civil war happened, they were like, yo, Abe, we’re going to get down or not? And Abe was like, no, we’re going to– Abe was going against the Rothschilds.

[01:15:22] We know what happened in that story. And from there, that’s when the Rothschilds and the bankers and everybody all came together and said, all right, now let’s do this shit. Let’s take it over, and let’s come up with this new corporation. And from there, and then in 1913, that’s when all the bankers got together and said, yo, let’s finally go ahead and create this last little Central Bank, and let’s turn everybody in this moment into a corporation.

[01:15:45] And let’s take all the gold, all the silver, and let’s just give them a central banking system built on fake ass dollars. And that’s when in 1933, like you were talking about, they had the emergency banking gap, and everybody was told to bring in their gold in return for money. And all that money was fake. It was all fake ass money. They knew that. All built on credit that was–

[01:16:09] Luke: Federal Reserve notes. Even if you look at a dollar right now, it’s not money. That’s a crazy thing I learned from Brandon. And I was like, hey, define money. He said, well, if you look up the legal definition, it’s gold and silver coins. Anything other than that is not money.

[01:16:23] Brotha: Yeah.

[01:16:24] Luke: Which is true because therefore you can’t owe money. You literally can’t be in debt. You can’t have a student loan debt. You can’t have mortgage debt. You can’t have tax debt. Because there’s no money to owe.

[01:16:38] Brotha: If people understood just that simple part right there, how was there anything to owe? Because I use my social in that consumer credit transaction anyway. And according to 15 USC 1602 (l) it’ll actually tell you when any consumer credits transaction, the actual natural person is the one extending the credit. And we know businesses aren’t natural people, because they know that everything was given to us from God.

[01:17:04] Again, this is trust law. So they gave us this trust, this social, to actually pay for everything. Because you pay for everything when you give them your social. Now, how slavery works is, well, let’s not tell them that everything is paid off, but let them go work a 9-5 job, slave, and still going double dip and pay us again a second time around for something that was paid off the moment you gave me your social. But that’s how they keep everyone trapped in the matrix.

[01:17:32] Because if everyone in the matrix knew that everything was already paid, the whole world would be different. Who would be working a job? For what? Why? Everything’s already paid for. That would mean that we, the people, have more time for ourselves, for our family, to think, to operate. And that’s exactly what this system doesn’t want you to do.

[01:17:53] Luke: Right. Because we would have the time, energy, and resources to build a new parallel system.

[01:17:59] Brotha: Bro, we build our own whole worlds. All of us would if we knew everything was paid for already, but that’s why the elites are the elite, and the lower class is the lower class. And the only thing that’s different between all of us is education that nobody should be told. Some of us might have more assets than others, but when it comes to money, we’re all unlimited. We all have credit.

[01:18:21] And when you went to go pay for your bills, or your lights, or your water, we all gave them the social. Hell, your water, your lights is always paid for, always. Just because you extended the credit to pay for it. So it’s like, once I started learning the consumer laws and I started learning the laws that even backed up that said that I was the creditor, that’s when I really got the tripping.

[01:18:46] I really started tripping. I was like, yo, hold on. You’re telling me that everything is already paid for in commerce. Because you hear that. Oh, yeah, whatever. Yeah, whatever. But then when you start seeing the laws, like 15 USC 1602, that explains. Wait a minute.

[01:19:06] Now you go into 15 USC 1692, which is actually talking about how we can charge these people thousands of dollars, every single violation. That’s when I was like, whoa. So you mean to tell me when they send me a bill, this is full of all kinds of violations where they violated my rights and I can send them a bill back to charge them for that?

[01:19:25] And they’re like, yeah. And once I stepped into that power, that’s when I started learning how to discharge. That’s what the whole discharge game is. It’s about basically stating and standing on your power already knowing that, yo, I extended the credit to you, and you tried to loan it back to me with interest, and now you’re saying that I owe you, but the debt’s already been paid. You know what I’m saying?

[01:19:46] Luke: This piece right here is so hard for me to understand, probably equally for many people listening. The programming is so deep from the time you’re 16, 18, whatever, and you start getting credit. You really want your good credit score and all this stuff. And then it’s so trippy when you start looking at bills that you get, say a credit card statement, your utility bill, the balance is always positive.

[01:20:13] There’s never a minus sign. They’re saying you owe. It’s already paid. It’s so crazy that when you get a bill, it’s a negotiable instrument, it’s like a blank check. But we think because, we’ve been conditioned to think, that we owe that money. It’s crazy, dude.

[01:20:31] Brotha: Yeah. And for me, that was one of the first mind blowing ones with endorsing the bills and different things like that, and just security instruments. That blew my mind when I first came in that. And just knowing that this has been in front of me my whole life, I’m like, yo, it’s always been in positive. And it’ll even tell you, cut off the coupon at the bottom.

[01:20:52] The instructions have always been there, but we’ve been so programmed, we’ve never even paid attention, and it was crazy. My little nephew was playing a little Spider Man game the other day, and he was like– I forgot what part it was with him being Peter Parker or something, but he ended up going into a store. He signed up for something for his little apartment.

[01:21:10] They play like the whole game, but it’s crazy because he got a bill in the game. And they sent him a bill in the game, and even in the game it had the little bottom coupon part where you could cut it off and endorse it. I’m like, yo. I’m like, yo, Peter Parker is going to get them bills paid today. Peter Parker’s about to endorse those bills, man.

[01:21:26] But it’s just funny because they even put it in games and put it in your face, because they know we have no clue what’s going on. But it’s like, those of us– that’s why I was like, man, when you come into the know, you truly are reborn again. Because your whole mind frame is different. That’s what the status correction is.

[01:21:45] How you handle business is different now. How you handle your bills is different now. How you handle the police is different now. How you handle your courtroom situations is different now. That’s what correcting my status is. It’s not so much about a certain piece of paper that someone might have you send in.

[01:22:02] Like I say, all the paperwork part probably accounts for 5%. I would just say, like having a passport and the different things like that in their system where they can run your passport, I can look and see, damn, even with the information from our system that we gave him, it even says that do not search, do not detain.

[01:22:23] So he’s not just talking shit. He’s actually done something in the system where the system’s telling me he’s different. So whatever it is, let me wrap this shit up. You’re good. You go. Have a good day. Because they know we can’t– that’s what they have the computers for and every single cop for.

[01:22:39] So it’s just like, man, once I’ve learned all of this, being different, operating different, you’re handling your bills different, it’s a total mind boggling life transfer. It’s a whole shift. Everything changed. The bills part is at the upper echelon, but I always tell people to handle the trust first, get your basics out the way, get your estate set up.

[01:23:03] Because you have some people who are just so hungry to start getting into the discharge game that they’ll just totally forget all of the basics and go straight to that. Then you discharge, or let’s say a car or a house, but then yet you still got taxes because you don’t know how to handle that.

[01:23:16] You’re still paying this. So it’s like, you’re still stuck in the game, and they can still just take your property from a tax lien or something because you didn’t know the game. You didn’t know the laws. So that’s why I was like, learn the basics first, because if you know the basics first, and when it’s time to discharge and stand on that square, boom, you’re bulldozing it.

[01:23:33] And at that point, it’s like, oh, I got the law. I got different bullets, but you want consumer law. You want equity law. You want constitutional law. You want tribal law. So it’s like, when you get to that point, then that’s when they know, okay, he’s actually one of the ones who actually does know. It’s a game. Go ahead and discharge him.

[01:23:53] He’s one out of 100, but the other ones, I’m going to play with them for a while. I’m going to send him a few letters back. We’re going to respond, go back, because of how you respond as a consumer is going to let me know if you really know the law or not. Because if you really know the law, you’re not going to sit there and keep arguing all day back and forth through those letters.

[01:24:10] Once I got you an administrative default, I’m about to go take you to court, and I’m going to get my remedy, period. And I’m going to win because I got the evidence. Once they know you know the game, and let’s say you even take it that far to even petition it and opening up a courtroom and they get served with something, that’s when you go ahead and get that call. And prr.

[01:24:27] So yes, Mr. White, we were trying to see if we can go ahead and settle this outside of court. We’ll go ahead and remove the account. And that’s why I was like, bro, but y’all could have did that from Jump Street. Now I’m mad, and now I want to charge you for that. But since I’m feeling good, it’s a, whatever, Sunday, fun day, we cool.

[01:24:45] We’re going to let y’all go. I want it totally removed off my credit report, and I want it as if it never even existed. Sure enough, they’re going to remove that whole account like it never existed.

[01:24:54] Luke: And you’ve done this stuff yourself?

[01:24:56] Brotha: I got a Maserati Ghibli. I got a BMW. I ate Tesla model X, Tesla model three. I got my dad a Mercedes C350. Yeah, man, five cars, and I’m about to go get that Tesla truck, bro. But at the end of the day, it’s all the– me, once I go into that dealership and I give you that social security, and I fill out that consumer application, and I give you the down payment, which I don’t even have to give you that, that’s voluntary, on the actual contract, it says that.

[01:25:29] But as soon as I leave the parking lot, all right, no, it’s a wrap. You’ll never see this car again. And that’s all I pay, is my down payment. And really, I don’t have to do that, but I do that as a courtesy because I know that the salesman, he gets a piece of that. So I’m like, oh, thank you for giving me some of your time today. If I have to pay $1,000 or $2,000 down for this $60,000, $80,000 car, that’s cool, because that’s all they’re going to get from me.

[01:25:51] Luke: So when you’re filling out your loan application, you’re doing a special endorsement. Is that how that’s happening, not a blank endorsement or just like a dumb ass, we just sign our name. And then now they take that negotiable instrument. It has value. They take it to the federal reserve window, or the bank, or whatever. They get paid. Then they start sending you fake bills, and they get paid twice.

[01:26:12] Brotha: Always reserve your rights when you sign. I would say that.

[01:26:15] Luke: Is that without recourse?

[01:26:16] Brotha: Yeah. At least put that under your signature, UCC 1308, reserve your rights. Because again, when a matter does come up in court, you can always say, well, hold on, check out that original contract. I signed it, but I reserved my rights. So I have the ability to come back and get my remedy if you did something wrong in the contract.

[01:26:39] And reserving the rights and all that stuff is cool, but with stuff like cars and things like that, the real way how that really works, and I guess I’ll just go ahead and give you all the sauce in this one, is because they fraud you. Again, when you go into these car dealerships, and a lot of people don’t really know this, usually when you leave that car dealership, they don’t want you to bring that car back because you’ve already signed the note.

[01:27:07] And as soon as you leave, they’re sending that to the bank to cash out, because they know as soon as that bank gets that note that you signed there, all right, the bank goes and cashes out, gives them some bread for that. And then the bank takes it and flips it 10 times.

[01:27:23] So they already know that. So that’s why when you leave that dealership, what they’re supposed to inform you about is your right of rescissions. Everybody has 72 hours to rescind any auto contract. Oh, I drove it for a couple of days. I didn’t like it. I’m bringing it back. Maybe I want something else. Maybe I just want my money back.

[01:27:44] But the dealer would never tell you that. But that’s federal law and it’s state law that they have to give you your right of rescission. And it’s supposed to come in a whole total separate package and mailing sent to your house. This is in the law.

[01:27:57] But none of us, when we bought a car, they never send you a separate mailing to your house informing you of your rights of rescissions, ever. And that’s because we don’t really want you to bring the car back, because we’re already flipping your note. How would we look if two days go by, then you bring the car back, and we’ve already sent your note to the bank to be flipped, and we got paid already?

[01:28:17] And now you’re telling me, and we’ve already paid out the little car dealer, now we done paid out everybody who played their role in it. And now you’re telling me now that you brought the car back after two days, I’m supposed to go back and get all that from those people? No. Hell no. The car dealer don’t want to do that.

[01:28:31] So that’s why he doesn’t tell you about your rights of recission, because we don’t want you to bring it back. And that’s why he’s like, yo, make sure this is the final car you want. As soon as you drive off the lot, the car loses value, and all this. That’s all bullshit. But they just really don’t want you to bring the car back.

[01:28:46] Because after those 72 hours, that car’s stuck on. And it’s hitting your credit report being you’ve paid for it. And the only way to get rid of it then is like, I got to sell it, or I got to, whatever, file bankrupt, whatever. Man, that’s why I was like, yeah, once I understood the car contract for us, I was like, oh, I can get as many cars as I want to now, just because of the simple fact that I already know y’all are going to fraud me.

[01:29:09] I’m going to buy this car. After three days go by, I’ll be waiting by the mail on the third day. Did anything come today? No, sir. I know it didn’t, because as soon as that mail didn’t come through and those 72 hours went by, and you didn’t give me my notice of rescission, oh yeah, I’m going to start filling out my paperwork.

[01:29:28] Because they benefit off your social. They benefited. They got money off the promissory note. So according to the law, it says you can keep the property, because they got benefit already. And then, basically, you can even make them return your actual title, because you buy a car, they hold possession of it till you finish paying it off.

[01:29:49] No, that title belongs to you now too, because that’s your property now. They frauded you. So you get to keep the property and the titles that come along with it, and they get to keep the benefit that they made from it, which was the money that they made off your social. It’s really all business.

[01:30:03] Luke: That’s crazy.

[01:30:04] Brotha: It’s banking.

[01:30:05] Luke: Is part of the fraud too, that they’re not disclosing that you’re using a blank endorsement?

[01:30:11] Brotha: Absolutely. All of that. Because they know that.

[01:30:15] Luke: Because you’re basically signing a blank check on that application.

[01:30:18] Brotha: And that’s with a house, all of that. Same thing. But it’s like, it’s not their right to disclose the law to you. It’s your right to be informed on your rights. Again, just knowing those simple things in the laws to say about your right of rescissions, or even knowing that it’s a promissory note, any of that, it’s not their job to educate you.

[01:30:40] But if you are educated and you go in there, you can pretty much get what you want, especially if you’ve got a good credit score. I’ll just tell you that. Now that’s all that is. Credit score doesn’t mean nothing. Whether you really have an 800 or a 500, y’all could both afford the same things. The reason I say it’s no difference is because credit is credit. They’re going to pull it.

[01:31:00] It’s all about they know that if you have that high credit score, this is somebody who pays his bills. This is somebody who’s always on time. You know what? It’s safe to go ahead and give him a loan, because he’s going to pay us back. But that person with the 500 credit score is like, ah, we give him a loan, he might not be a good slave and bring us back that money.

[01:31:18] No, let’s not fund his loan, even though the credit is all the same. They can pull it from the treasury and get it the exact same way, but it’s all about slavery. I need you to work and pay me off. So that’s why once you do the status correction, get your estate together, you get your credit straight, all of that good things.

[01:31:35] Now, once you get to that 700, you ain’t never got to go back, ever. Because any credit account that gets added on there, when you understand credit, most of the time they frauded you. Because again, like you said, you gave them a promissory note. They didn’t disclose all of the things and some other shit that comes along with it.

[01:31:51] So it doesn’t matter if it’s school loan, cars, houses. They’re always frauding you, because they’re saying that you were the debtor, but it’s like, no, according to 15 USC 1602 (l), consumer credit contract, I extended the credit. So how the hell am I paying y’all every month?

[01:32:08] Matter of fact, send me back every single dollar I sent you all, and you can actually do that. You can make them pay you back every dollar that you paid into this trust account. I’m going off now. All this always goes to trust. And any single time you ever gave someone your social security number, you trusted them.

[01:32:29] You created a trust. I bet when you go and look at your water bill, your school loan bill, whatever, there’s always an account number there. And that account number represents a trust that has been created.

[01:32:41] Luke: Oh, wow.

[01:32:41] Brotha: On behalf of your social, which means something was already paid off, and now they owe you a service or a product on an exchange. Now, if it’s a service, you had an open-ended credit contract. That means they have open-end access to always getting your credits. And really, they could pay your bills every month off of that. That’s when I was like, yo, it’s one thing to be status correction. It’s another one when we start thinking and moving like bankers.

[01:33:09] We have to move like bankers. And that’s when you start getting into the security instruments. Because again, this is all trust. You’ve set up trust with all of these companies on behalf of your social, and you are in benefit of this. You’re the beneficiary. This all goes back to God’s law.

[01:33:24] You’re the beneficiaries, and these people are trustees for you, and they have fiduciary duties according to the law. And if they don’t perform these fiduciary duties, then they violated the Trust Indenture Act. And this goes back to the early 1900s.

[01:33:40] If you violate that act, the whole SEC can come run up in your shit in that company. So it’s like, once you know the law and the people to report them to and get on their ass, oh, they move totally different. Because again, it becomes a game. Oh, well, sir. Because you’re like, damn, I just got this new Tesla truck.

[01:34:00] Well, I know it’s 100,000. They ain’t going to want to let this one go. I’m prepared for war. They’re going to want to fight me. But when they see you unload on them and they see you know, oh, no, you’re good. So you have a good day. Because you’re literally one out of 100 who knows the game.

[01:34:14] If anything, I just want to say thank you and have a good day because I really don’t want you to go out here and expose the game. And what I’ve always heard, they give black cards. I don’t know too many people who have them, but from the teachers that have actually taught me and what they’ve told me, if you’re going to get a black card, all that is unlimited access to your social.

[01:34:32] That’s it. We already have that now. We’re on the consumer side, on the public side, and they know most of us don’t know law. So they’re going to keep playing with us. But when they know the game and you’re private, you got things, but you’re willing to contract, you got a contract with them, they’re like, all right, we’ll give you that black card, but you’re not allowed to speak on this. You can’t speak why you got it, how you got it.

[01:34:53] And then that’s when you got to play that role. I got to go be that quiet man in the corner while I just watched the rest of the world go to shits. And for me, that was never really an option that I wanted to take. Because it was like, I could still get those same benefits by just knowing the law and teaching my people that way without having to sign a contract just to be on hush. Because one thing you’re not going to do, you’re not going to renege on those contracts.

[01:35:18] You renege on those contracts. We know what happens. They come for your head. So it’s business. It’s always been business. And I just always think about some of the greats like the Malcolm X’s, and the Martin Luther Kings, and some of the ones that even had those movements.

[01:35:32] But again, it was like, brother, you can’t be on the plantation of the United States corporation and think you can talk shit and not have your affairs together. This is what the status correction is about. You got to hop your ass off the plantation, then you can talk your shit. But you can’t talk it if you’re still a 14th Amendment slave registered to their system.

[01:35:53] But unfortunately, that was the ’50s and the ’60s. We’ve improved their game so much even since then. They weren’t talking about says the Cestui Que Vie trust back then, trust law. They were just like power. Power to the people. Let’s March. It was like, no, brother. This is about banking.

[01:36:10] That’s what that whole bond was, that bond instrument, that birth certificate. We got to take time to understand the banking side of things now. All that emotional shit, quieted. It’s time to be businessmen now. Because again, I went to school for business. So when my friends were so emotional about all of this, I was like, it made so much sense to me on a business side. [Inaudible].

[01:36:34] They got a president? They got a Treasury? I have a company. I’m the president of my company. I have a treasury. So I was like, damn, they’re just running this shit like a business, and we’re the employee. And I’m like, oh. That’s when I started getting into tax exemptions.

[01:36:49] That’s when I was like, well, damn, they got a W-4r for the slaves. And then they have a W-4V, where you can voluntarily choose not to pay your damn taxes using their form. And I’m like, damn. It’s like, they’ve always given us an out, but they never educated us about it. If you want to pay taxes, if you think you’re a US citizen, if you think you’re taxable, you’re damn right. You’re going to be.

[01:37:10] But if you know the law and you know how to assert yourself, trust me, they always had the back door waiting for you. And that’s why I was like, whoa, they got a whole W-4V form? And this is a real IRS form saying that when I get my paycheck from my job, you got to pay me everything and don’t take out the taxes?

[01:37:28] It’s like, all right, well, cool. Once I learned that, my businessman hat went on. I was like, okay, so if I’m getting my check in full, then, oh, well, I’m just going to turn around and create a foundation or a church, and I’m going to donate my funds in Jesus’s name. And I’m going to go work for my church as a volunteer, and I’m going to just filter my funds through the church and pay myself out as a volunteer.

[01:37:49] It’s really just business and filtering, but when you think about it, all these NFL players, their agents always have them do one thing. They’re going to set up a foundation. And that’s really not just because they care for the people. It’s because they filter in their money through their tax-free, through their foundations. That’s exactly why every damn near sports player always has a foundation.

[01:38:11] Luke: And politicians.

[01:38:12] Brotha: And politicians.

[01:38:13] Luke: You look at Bill Gates and the Clinton Foundation.

[01:38:16] Brotha: The Trumps.

[01:38:16] Luke: All that. That’s wild.

[01:38:17] Brotha: Oh yeah. They always have these foundations. Because it’s really fulfilled them, but you never really know what the foundation does where all these funds really go, because they’re private foundations.

[01:38:27] Luke: Right.

[01:38:28] Brotha: I don’t have to exploit that information to you. So it’s just like, man, once you just start getting into knowing the status, understanding the tax exemptions, everything, they got so many forms just from the IRS, and I had just dropped one on my page last week. I’m talking about being a religious minister. Anybody has the right. Like right now, we’re having church by fellowshipping. The Life Stylist Church, we have a church right here.

[01:38:54] Luke: It pretty much is, actually.

[01:38:56] Brotha: And you are a minister of this church right now. So it’s like just even doing that and running it that way and running this as a church, even your whole house, this is a temple. Every time my feet hit the ground here, it’s a temple.

[01:39:12] If you just start to operate your affairs in that way, those tax exemptions come right off because there’s one thing. If they don’t respect anything here in America, they respect religion. That’s why I said, bro, once I understood that I don’t have time to be Bloods, Crips, this, that, whoop, whoop.

[01:39:29] I’m like, no, I’m about to play the game. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Muslim. Play the game. And once I understood that, I’m like, yo, life just became easy, man. Taxes. What are those? And then once you really get good at it, that’s when you start building your portfolio.

[01:39:50] Because in the beginning, I just wanted to get cars. I was just testing things out like, bro, this really works. Let me get whatever car I want. But after a while, you get humble, and you’re like, bro, what am I really doing this for? Am I really doing this just because I wanted to shine? I want to get all these great things for me.

[01:40:04] Or is it like, yo, I want to actually build something to actually benefit not only myself, but my family and my community? So once I set it up like that, man, that’s when I created the whole ISelfLawAmMaster.com, a whole online university to educate the people. And that’s when I felt like I really found my purpose.

[01:40:22] Because it was like, I’m educating the world, and I could charge a very decent good price for it, not even high. I know you’ll never get this in college. I could charge a 10th of what they charge you in college for inferior knowledge, and I can give you the game that’s going to change your life forever.

[01:40:37] And it was like, man, I was good first time in my life. I had no worries, no bills, no woo woo. And then it was like, once you knew the law, you didn’t have bills anyway. Then it was like, all the money that is coming in from your business ventures, that’s just extra shit that you just get to go convert in the silver and gold and turn into real assets.

[01:40:55] I got all the credit that I need to operate in their commercial world. Now, just from the business ventures and things that I create, I can get earnings and turn that into real asset and real substance. Instead of having a whole bank account full of fake numbers and digital numbers in a bank, that means nothing.

[01:41:14] No, smart people, wise, wealthy men, they go and get their gold and their silver. So it’s like you use credit to operate in their world, to build your businesses. You use loans. You use credit. But then you turn around, and it’s like, with the earnings that you make from your businesses, that’s when you get the silver and the gold.

[01:41:34] So even when their economy crashes and goes to hell tomorrow and that dollar crashes, everybody who had money in the bank accounts, all of those dollar bills, all that money sitting up under your bed, those dollar bills are worthless now. But those people who have that gold and that silver, it’s going to skyrocket.

[01:41:51] You can go to Chinatown. You can go to any place, and they’re still going to accept their silver and gold anywhere. And matter of fact, I always tell people, if you’re going to get either silver or gold, get the silver just because in times of war, and we’re about to go back into times of war now, silver’s used for collodion.

[01:42:08] Silver is used for bullets. It’s used for armory. It’s used for all of this. So the demand for silver has been skyrocketing, just like it did back in the past. It went literally from $15 an ounce to like $500 an ounce in times of war.

[01:42:22] Luke: It’s also easier to parse out, right?

[01:42:26] Brotha: Yeah.

[01:42:26] Luke: I play around with buying a little gold and silver here and there, and it’s like, if you got a gold bar that’s worth five grand, how are you going to take that down to the local farmer and be like, hey, can I get a few pounds of beef?

[01:42:39] Brotha: Yeah. I have to give you a whole–

[01:42:40] Luke: Yeah, exactly. It’s harder to get it in incremental denominations, whereas silver, it can be worth a dollar. It can be worth 100 bucks, or whatever. So it seems to be more spendable in a situation like that to me.

[01:42:54] Brotha: Absolutely. That’s exactly why I do silver. I prefer silver over the gold. But both of them are valuable, but like you said, the gold, it’s much harder to break down in an economical way. And when you’re talking about sovereignty, and when it really gets down to it, you’re going to want to be able to do business and trade with people as much as possible.

[01:43:14] And unless you’re starting to write promissory notes off of points that you have in your bank or something, I don’t know, that’s a whole other conversation, but me personally, just going back to the times in the ancient ways, and that’s what we’re about to go back to. Even before the gold and silver here, just on our tribal ways, we used to have beads. We had heishi beads and things of that nature.

[01:43:37] And this one bead right here, I would pass this whole necklace down to my son. Let’s say I own those 20 acres over there. And every single acre was represented by a stone. And it’s like, oh, well, if I’m trading with another tribe and I’m doing business, I’ll be like, all right, well, here.

[01:43:52] So I’m going to give you two stones, which is those two acres over there in return for this and that. That’s how we used to do business back in the day, our jewelry arts, heishi beads. That was our form of money. So until Britain and all of them came over here, that’s when they changed the game, and we’re like, no, get off this.

[01:44:14] And that’s why they call it the black market, because it was a market with the heishi beads and things that we did, but they called it the black market. That’s illegal. We don’t want you doing that. That’s the black market. We want y’all to use these dollar bills. We want y’all to use this federal reserve system.

[01:44:29] So we have to get the indigenous people off of their way of operating, but now we’re about to go back to that with the crypto and all of those other kinds of things, man. Man, it’s so many different aspects to the status correction.

[01:44:44] Luke: This shit is mind blowing, bro.

[01:44:46] Brotha: I feel like I’m talking a lot.

[01:44:49] Luke: No. I’m eating it up, man. You’re doing such a great job. You have such a skill for breaking down complexity into something that I think is, I won’t say it’s easy to understand, but there’s been cats teaching this stuff for a long time.

[01:45:05] Brotha: It’s so complex to grasp.

[01:45:08] Luke: Dude, yeah. You feel the truth in it. It’s like you feel your nervous system go, ooh, there’s something there. There’s a pull toward it because you’re hearing reality, but it’s like you watch a few videos, read a bunch of shit on some website, and you’re like, eh, what am I going to do?You’re not really left with actionable steps.

[01:45:25] Brotha: Yeah. Instructional steps.

[01:45:27] Luke: Yeah.

[01:45:28] Brotha: That’s crazy. That’s exactly why I created ISelfLaw blog. It’s just like, our people need step by step instructions just like school.

[01:45:37] Luke: So we’re going to put the show notes for this one at lukestorey.com/brothatruth. B-R-O-T-H-A, Brotha Truth. And we’re going to link out to all your courses, your tour dates, all the stuff that you’re doing, man. You’re like a musician. You go on tour. I was looking on your site, and I’m like, oh, he’s in this city, that city. And I was like, I hope I can get him before he goes on tour.

[01:45:58] Man, but I love that you’re putting the power back in people’s hands. And there’s only a certain percentage of people that are going to be willing to educate themselves and to take these steps. Maybe it’s probably better that there’s only a select group of people that really gets the fire under their ass because they’re probably the ones that are going to do it right and be good stewards of this power that you’re learning how to harness.

[01:46:21] But, man, hearing you talk helps me lean more into the idea that we’re at the beginning stages of a great awakening, more so than we are at the collapse of Western civilization. It’s probably both. It’s probably both to some degree, but I’m like, no man, this is real.

[01:46:41] This isn’t running through the streets, lighting shit on fire with picket signs. F the man, all that low vibe way that we think we can change things. This is like, cool. To me, it’s very diplomatic because you go, okay, you have the US corporation, and you have these federal citizens. You have all these limited rights, and they have this whole fake banking system, fiat currency. There’s no way you’re going to tear that down. It’s just too established.

[01:47:10] Brotha: It’s been around for too long.

[01:47:11] Luke: It’s like going up my era, trying to pull over an oak tree. It ain’t going to happen. But what you can do is you can plant a bunch of other trees around it. And it’s going to take a little time for those trees to grow up and equal the integrity of that oak tree.

[01:47:25] But man, to me, it’s all about parallel systems and self-responsibility, as I said earlier, self-love. And there’s a certain number of us that feel called to this work, and are willing to do it.

[01:47:37] Brotha: Yeah. And I’m so glad you keep touching on that self-love because, again, for me, that’s what really sparked the light. Like I said, when I beat that traffic stop and the police officer walked up, it was like it was a whole new burst of love, a whole new burst of like, man, I am somebody. I am valuable. And especially, for myself, it was like, yo, I’m more than just a black or someone that they see in the streets, they can just shoot down.

[01:48:06] I’m not a gang. I’m an educated enlightened man now. Just the whole light, everything about how I walk started changing. I walk with a different little stature now, and it was just because I’m confident. It gives you confidence.

[01:48:20] Luke: Well, dude, that’s the thing when you describe that interaction with the policy enforcer, what I heard was you exercised self-respect, and it ingratiated respect from him to you, right?

[01:48:32] Brotha: Absolutely.

[01:48:32] Luke: It’s like, how many of us in our lives have been, man, you better respect me. You better respect me. It’s like, we don’t actually have ownership of that within ourselves yet, so it falls on deaf ears, and we don’t get the reciprocation of that respect because we actually don’t have it yet. We’re not embodying it yet. So I hear that policy officer gives you that smirk. He’s like, right on. Because you didn’t yell out the window, you need to respect me.

[01:48:57] Brotha: Yeah. No cursing, none of that.

[01:48:59] Luke: You just exercise your own self-respect, and he mirrored that back to you, which is really how that works on an energetic level.

[01:49:05] Brotha: Just treat people how you want to be treated.

[01:49:07] Luke: Yeah. 100%.

[01:49:07] Brotha: And also, if you don’t come in that energy, they don’t really come back. That’s why I always tell people, man, but it’s very rare that a cop just comes to your car, hey, mother, get on the floor. No, it’s like you have to become combative. No, I’m not going to do that. No, you can’t tell me what to do. Then that’s when they start. Let me get you to touch on this side. That’s when things start getting a little funny, man.

[01:49:28] Luke: Because if you don’t show them respect, there is no way on hell they’re going to issue you respect.

[01:49:33] Brotha: Absolutely not. And even if they know your status or not, if they haven’t had the chance to check your status. That’s why I always say, like, even when we’re smart, even when we’re in our correct status, still keep a calm, cool head, because he doesn’t know who you are until maybe he scans that passport, or sees your tribal ID, or whatever it may be, your private ID, until he sees that, he’s still assuming that you’re a regular US citizen like anybody else.

[01:49:57] But once he hears that conversation, you speak with intelligence, you speak constitutionally and direct to the things that he swore an oath to, the whole energy is different. They’re like, huh. It’s actually pleasing. They actually get a kick out of it. Some of them would be like, yo, can we talk about this with me? Even police officers would be like, yo, man, I want to learn some of that stuff you’re talking about.

[01:50:21] Luke: Yeah. I’ve seen some videos where they have that interaction, and then they got to get a superior and another superior. Next thing you know, you’ve got three or four policy officers there asking questions.

[01:50:32] Oftentimes it’s the superiors that come in and they’re like, tell me more about this. What’s up with that? It’s like when everyone calms down, then it’s like you’ll see a couple of policy enforcers being like, yeah, what is this thing? Yeah, it’s cool. And then you can see the wheels turning. They’re like, man, I’m going to go look this up for myself. Right?

[01:50:49] Brotha: Absolutely.

[01:50:50] Luke: Because they’re also in the system too. Even though they’re the policy enforcers, they’re still under the jurisdiction of that policy unless they change it. So they’re getting victimized through taxation and all this other shit too.

[01:51:01] Brotha: And that’s what they don’t want us to know– the people. They don’t want us to act as the people, and they just want us to play a position, play a role. Because once we wake up, we, the people, that means that the police got to wake up. That means the military has to wake up. That means all these people are going to wake up. Then those few elites that you have at the top, who’s going to protect them?

[01:51:21] Luke: Right. Then you got mutiny on the bounty.

[01:51:25] Brotha: Yes. That’s why we have to keep ignorance at an all time high, always. Because if you ever have time to sit down and think, then you’re going to start realizing that this is all the shit. What’s going on? You got to start asking questions, and that’s when you’re going to walk yourself right out the matrix. Then when you’re out, then it’s like, oh, I got all the power. And I always watch movies with the two actors, man, Keanu Reeves and Will Smith.

[01:51:53] Both of them will always tell you about what’s to come in these movies, The Matrix and John Wick, both movies are about sovereignty. Even at the end where they said John Wick was dead when he really wasn’t, they showed his tombstone with his name on all caps. They were trying to say he was dead, but really, we all knew John Wick was still alive in his living spirit.

[01:52:13] He was alive, but they just had a tombstone that said he was dead. But that goes with how karmas works. When you’re first born into this system, with your name all caps, you’re literally dead. Truly, that estate is dead.

[01:52:27] So it’s funny because your name, you’ve been converted to all caps, but John Wick was telling you, no, they do everything sovereign. They don’t even use regular money in that movie. They use gold. They use this. They did certain things because they were moving under, really, common law, I would like to say.

[01:52:43] But everybody else that was operating outside of their little private system was all operating as regular slaves of the system. So it was the same thing. And movies like Will Smith, the I, Robot, things like this. So it’s crazy. I went into the Tesla store the other day. They have those robots on sale for 20,000. The home robots.

[01:53:03] Luke: Are you serious?

[01:53:04] Brotha: Yeah. They will be your home helper. Absolutely. They have the robots. You can start pre-sale ordering now. So what we saw in that movie with I, Robot– and Will Smith, he’s had other movies too. I ain’t going to get into the men in black and things of that nature, but these two actors are always telling you something subliminally in a lot of their movies.

[01:53:25] Keanu Reeves, especially, with The Matrix, yeah, it’s very real, and it’s so dope. Even in The Matrix, it’s so real that they showed you the Frenchmen always had the power. In order to get back and forth through the matrix, you have to go through the Frenchmen. And even in the last John Wick 4, you had the Frenchmen who had all the powers, always the Frenchmen.

[01:53:45] It’s because everything started with the Frenchmen going all the way back to England in 1066. It’s 1066 when the Frenchmen had came and conquered them with the Battle of Hastings. So ever since then, Frenchmen had ruled the English throne and had ruled it for many, many generations.

[01:54:03] So everybody always knows when you’re talking about English common law now, that all really starts with the Frenchmen who came in and took over the Anglo-Saxons, and they came together and created a whole new English law system. And they said, well, you know what? The Frenchman’s in control now.

[01:54:19] But that’s why in the movies like The Matrix and John Wick, he always played that important role where the Frenchman was always like the big man, the bad guy, with all the money. Because, yeah, he was the king that took over England back in the day.

[01:54:31] And France is still very much in power. But that’s why you have France, who also is the DC, and what is it? The Vatican that have these big obelisks. One is the military capital of the world. France is like the financial capital of the world. And I forgot which one was–

[01:54:50] Luke: They have one in DC too.

[01:54:51] Brotha: Yeah. So it’s like all of these are the pendulums, just different things showing the markings of just showing how they’re all connected. But at the end of the day, every single country played a major role in this. And France is one of the most powerful ones of the whole Roman Empire.

[01:55:12] Luke: I had no idea.

[01:55:13] Brotha: Yeah, yeah. Hell, yeah. So yeah, that’s why a lot of them over there in Rome, man, speak France. They speak Spanish. Most popes speak multiple languages because they need to know those languages in order to control all those different countries You know what I’m saying?

[01:55:30] Luke: Right.

[01:55:31] Brotha: Yeah, and that’s why I always tell people they conquered the world. More than, damn near 50% of Catholics in the world are from South Americas. And why do they think that is? It’s because the Roman Empire sent out Germany, France, Portugal, Spain, all of them, out there to the Americas.

[01:55:49] And that’s what they conquered, and they converted them. You can go down there now and see all these Catholic churches. And that starts all the way back with Rome. And once we got you in the church, yeah, we’re going to go ahead and pull you into the commercial system too in Jesus’s name.

[01:56:05] That’s exactly how they do it. But they didn’t teach you the trust law side. They just taught you the codes and statute side for the slave. Never the free man’s part. So just once you know the basics, it all boils down to public, private, military law, English common law.

[01:56:25] That’s literally it. A secure party creditor, debtor. So it always has a public and a private aspect to all of it, constitutional, codes and statutes, public, private rule. If y’all don’t take anything from this podcast, you take knowing the difference between public and private, constitutional, codes and statutes, knowing your English common law rights compared to knowing these fake ass codes and statutes that they try to oppress you with. I’m telling you, if you can just know that basic right there, your whole life will be changed, man.

[01:57:03] Luke: I love you, bro. You’re the best, man.

[01:57:05] Brotha: Oh, thank you.

[01:57:05] Luke: This has been so fun. Thank you so much.

[01:57:07] Brotha: Yeah, it was. We definitely have to do this again.

[01:57:09] Luke: Yeah, there’s so much more to cover. There was a couple of other things I wanted to get into, and we have a whole squad that just arrived here. I’m like, it’ll be another hour if I do that. So we’ll do a part two. You’re only over in Houston. I appreciate you coming out here. Luckily, you have a love interest in this area, which looked out great for me. And again, you guys–

[01:57:30] Brotha: I’m down here all the time.

[01:57:31] Luke: Yeah, I love it. The show notes are lukestorey.com/brothatruth. And we’re going to link out again to your tour, all online training programs, a real wealth of information that we didn’t even tap into a lot of the stuff you teach. So yeah, man, I look forward to seeing you again.

[01:57:46] Brotha: Well, I thank you, man, and I appreciate you for having me on. It’s very rare that I have outlets that I can even talk and express this information too, man. So I thank you. I thank your followers, your listeners, for even giving me the opportunity to come in here and express myself, man. Thank you, and I appreciate you, brother.

[01:58:05] Luke: Likewise.

Connect with Luke Storey website | YouTube

Connect with Brotha Truth

Cover image based on creative commons work of deeznutz1

See Related:

The United States Is Running Parallel Governments

The U.S. Is Running Parallel Governments. All U.S. Citizens Have Dual Citizenship & Are “Volunteered” as Property. How to Unvolunteer: “U.S. National / State Citizen Comprehensive Guide (Non Citizen National)”

2024 & the Inevitable Rise of Biometrics

by Kit Knightly, OffGuardian
May 21, 2024

Have you noticed a lot of two-factor authentication prompts lately? Are you getting emailed verification codes that take forever to arrive, so you have to request another?

Perhaps you are asked to do captchas to “prove you’re human” and they seem to be getting more complex all the time or simply not working at all?

Why do you think that might be?

We’ll come back to that.

Did you know we’re in a “breakthrough year” for biometric payment systems?

According to this story from CNBC, JPMorgan and Mastercard are on board with the technology and intend a wide rollout in the near future, following successful trials.

In March this year, JPMorgan signed a deal with PopID to begin a broad release of biometric payment systems in 2025.

A Mastercard spokesman told CNBC:

Our focus on biometrics as a secure way to verify identity, replacing the password with the person, is at the heart of our efforts in this area,”

Apple Pay already lets you pay with a face scan, while Amazon have introduced pay-by-palm in many of their real-world stores.

VISA showcased their latest palm biometric payment set-up at an event in Singapore earlier this year.

As we covered in a recent This Week, PayPal is pushing out its own biometric payment systems in the name of “preventing fraud”.

As always, this is not just an issue in “the West”.

Chinese companies have been leading this race for a while, with AliPay having biometric payment options since 2015.

Moscow’s Metro system has been using facial recognition cameras for biometric payments for over a year.

And it’s not just payments, “replacing the password with the person” has already spread to other areas.

Hoping to corral support for biometrics from the right, national governments are collecting biometrics to “curb illegal immigration”. You can expect that to spread.

The European Union will be implementing a new Biometric Entry-Exit System (EES) as soon as October of this year.

Biometric signing is on the rise too.

Laptops tablets and smartphones already come with face-reading and fingerprint scanning technology to confirm your identity.

Social media companies have been collecting biometric data “for security and identification purposes” for years.

Google Play launched a new biometric accessibility feature only a couple of weeks ago.

It’s all just so convenient, isn’t it? So much faster than e-mailing security codes and solving increasingly impossible captchas (both of which have unaccountably got harder and more complicated recently, and will doubtless continue to do so).

That’s how they get you: Convenience.

They won’t ever remove the “old-fashioned” ways of accessing your accounts, but it will get increasingly slow and difficult to use while biometrics get faster and easier.

Meanwhile, the propaganda will begin to flow.

Influencers will be paid to use “cool” “futuristic” biometric payment options that “feel like having superpowers” in contrived “viral” videos. Biometrics will save the day in a trendy movie or TV show. Some old fuddy-duddy will go on Question Time and rant about the new technology…just before saying something racist or denying climate change.

Maybe a major hack or cyber-attack will only affect those who haven’t switched to biometric authentication yet.

You get the idea.

And all the while supra-national corporate megaliths will be creating a massive database of voice recordings, finger and palm prints, facial and retinal scans.

It’s a good thing we’re ruled by a morally upright elite. Imagine the damage they could do with all of that.

Connect with OffGuardian

Cover image credit: geralt

May 20th, 2024 — Message RE Reiner Fuellmich Court Case From Lawyer Dr. Cristof Miseré

translated from German via telegram translate
sourced from Official ICIC Law News telegram channel

Dam break!!

A personal comment from lawyer Dr. Cristof Miseré:

Incredible attack on the defense in the LG Göttingen proceedings (Dr. Füllmich).

Apparently, all barriers to the illegal imprisonment of the defendant Dr. Füllmich for politically motivated reasons seem to have been broken.

The Göttingen Regional Court has now, following the documented objective of a politically intended conviction of the accused, which has been correctly referred to here and in the exercise of fundamental rights of defence, from which, as stated, the final objective of the ineligibility of the accused Dr Füllmich should arise, by means of a so-called procedural order, attempted to “threaten” the defence of the accused or to restrict and thus prevent a further proper defence.

This is objectively and subjectively a blatant attack on the defense and, correspondingly, on the defendant himself, the likes of which I have never seen before. It is quite obvious that the presiding judge, Schindler, is no longer able or willing to conduct the proceedings fairly and lawfully, or he no longer wants to participate in the proceedings and the politically intended verdict and is hoping that, as a person who is clearly no longer impartial, he can save himself by assuming bias and thus excluding himself from the proceedings.

I will use this and other incidents as an opportunity to contact Amnesty International etc. with regard to the defendant’s detention, which I consider to be unlawful, and the court’s actions, which we believe to be unlawful, so that this trial can be monitored from a legal history perspective.

In particular, the current legal opinion of the trial court remains completely untenable and, in our opinion, blatantly disregards dogmatic principles of current German criminal law. To put it clearly: de lege lata, it would be rather unlikely that one would pass a university exam with the court’s new construction (if it were not new, there would have been no need for a legal reference, so that the court’s protective claims in this regard contradict themselves).

Among other things, the Regional Court asserts, without any evidence, that a dossier submitted by the German federal services or a German federal service does not exist.

This is completely unfounded. If we knew under what specific circumstances this dossier and other information was given to me, it would be immediately clear that this is of course nonsense.

However, the BKA itself did not make this inaccurate claim, although it was asked by the public prosecutor. That says it all for any insider!

Crucial parts of the dossier are said to have come from people or from a person who, as an informant, is supposed to be directly responsible for Mr. Templin, and whose function and name are also available to the defense, so that we assume that this person (Templin, and with him the port attorneys and thus the complainants themselves) is directly involved in the content of the dossier through an exchange of information or other communication, especially since Mr. Templin is politically connected to this person in several associations and also worked for them as a lawyer until recently. This informant works for the BKA and another service, but according to my information is himself monitored by another of the services.

There are also different opinions within the service regarding how to deal with the “coronavirus injustice”.

This also corresponds to the fact that the court is now opposed to the questioning of the witness, lawyer Templin, who was originally intended as a witness. You already know what you have to do and what is expected of you.

The dossier was, moreover, assigned to the undersigned by circles of the “services” or the judiciary in a broader sense that are particularly committed to the rule of law, with the clear indication that this is a process that is politically motivated. I have now been able to form my own impression of the latter assessment: it is quite obviously so, without any justifiable doubt.

So you can see that there is resistance to this procedure even from internal circles and that is a good thing.

Since, as we all know, the law does not have to give way to injustice, I will not allow myself to be influenced in any way by this threat from the court. We will also not allow Chairman Schindler to “play tricks” on our valued client. He can “take poison” on that, although I do not want this to be misunderstood as incitement to suicide.

And my opinion is that the action in Mexico, which only took place under malicious deception of the accused and in collusion with the public prosecutor’s office, precisely that politically active BKA mentioned above and the so-called port lawyers, represents a kidnapping in the broader sense (the GDR also used this method, of course with the same formal security, and around 700 kidnappings were known).

We continue to fight for the rights even on a holiday like today.

The first holiday is when the lawyer Dr. Füllmich, who we believe is a political prisoner, is released again.

Dr. Miseré

You can find the opportunity to support Reiner here: https://icic.law/

Connect with ICIC Law at telegram

The United States Is Running Parallel Governments

The United States is Running Parallel Governments

by Roger Sayles, sovereigntoserf.com
originally published March 25, 2015

The United States is running parallel governments. For 23.5 years I have been studying the basics of law and the methods and techniques that the New World Order has so skillfully used to enslave the once freest people on the face of the earth. Few people really understand the uniqueness of the form of government our Forefathers founded and left us. Obviously, it has been totally corrupted and changed. ‘How’ the exact method that has been used was laid out exactly in my book, From Sovereign to Serf, Government by the Treachery and Deception of Words. However, some people, even truly wanting to understand still have a problem understanding the really relative simple trick that has been played.

The explanation was greatly simplified, demonstrated and shown in actual application for a U.S. Passport in the video posted at A U.S. Passport for Ed Snowden. In the middle of that video is what must be the greatest open hidden secret in the history of the world, The Holy Grail, the ‘the pyramid w/the all seeing eye’, a Babylonian conceptual trap! Viewing the video plainly shows you the two distinct types of ‘political status’, or ‘citizenship’ (if you want to use a term where their double definition dialectal word trick can potentially confuse and trick your mind). One can easily look into The Declaration of Independence and see the words that are capitalized, “Citizen” being one of them along with “Rights” and “Duties.” I’ve tried to establish the phrase ‘political status’ as opposed to ‘citizenship’ for clarification purposes. The object of ‘all’ of this specificity is to assist people in “fine tuning” their thinking. “Muddy thinking”, not being specific, allows them to play opposite-definition word tricks. They get us thinking in ‘generalities’ and then come back and zap us with ‘specificity’. This is the technique that has been used so effectively by the Satanists that has brought the world so very close to the literal brink of destruction where we now find ourselves no matter where we are located on the globe.

For all the years I’ve come to understand these complex concepts I have continually attempted to apply my growing familiarity in methods to show or explain what has been done in simpler ways so that more people can quickly ‘uptake’ their understanding. The reason is because when people find out they’ve been living in a world of opposite definitions they have to go back and ‘think through’ each situation where they have established a “reality theory” view of their personal and worldview situations. Untying all of these “double minded” knots in one’s life takes time, concentration and effort.

Lately I have come to understand something I had actually noticed and identified numerous years ago. But, in this ‘untie the knots’ approach to understanding our jilted world now spinning out of control one can ‘see’ something, even ‘know’ some fact and still not know how it fits into the puzzle. What they have done is definitely complex and meant to deceive, trick and induce you into giving them the “Consent of the Governed” all the while not understanding what you are doing or agreeing to.

Oh, you didn’t know they have ‘the “Consent of the Governed”? Oh yes, you’ve given that to them many times over your lifetime! When you have been asked “are you a resident?” or “are you a citizen of the United States?” maybe even “are you a U.S. Person?” they were, in complex legally coded language asking you “are you a voluntary serf under the scope and purview of the 14th Amendment?”. You answered ‘yes’ and signed some type of legal document! As the legal cannon goes, “Ignorance of the law is ‘no’ excuse!” Hell, you ‘should’ know ‘what you ARE’, shouldn’t you? YOU should know whether you’re ‘slave or free’, ‘free or bond’ now, ‘shouldn’t you’? To get Biblical here, “my people die from lack of knowledge.”

Let’s go back to a ‘basic’ premise, back in time over 2,000 years. One of the truly greatest true statesman in the history of the world was Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C. Note the dates that he lived. Try to comprehend the importance of this quote written before the birth and death of Jesus Christ.

Power and law are not synonymous. In truth, they are frequently in opposition and irreconcilable. There is God‘s Law from which all equitable laws of man emerge and by which men must live if they are not to die in oppression, chaos and despair. Divorced from God‘s eternal and immutable Law, established before the founding of the suns, man‘s power is evil no matter the noble words with which it is employed or the motives urged when enforcing it. Men of good will, mindful therefore of the Law laid down by God, will oppose governments whose rule is by men, and if they wish to survive as a nation they will destroy the government which attempts to adjudicate by the whim of venal judges.

~ Marcus Tullius Cicero 106-43 B.C.

There are ‘two’ and “ONLY TWO” places men get their ‘Rights’ or ‘rights’. The capital “R” Rights are the Natural God-Given Rights (with correlative Duties) as spelled out in The Declaration of Independence. The lower case “r” rights we today call ‘civil rights’ as installed and dictated by the 14th Amendment. Small ‘r’ rights are nothing more than ‘privileges’, privileges can be ‘given’ as well as ‘taken away’ and, even more importantly they can be, here’s the key word, “regulated”! Hence the growth of “Administrative” or “Regulatory” Agencies, to “administrate” or “regulate” the new ‘voluntary serfs’ put into that condition with the Bankruptcy of the United States on March 9, 1933. From the Congressional Record. Congressman Louis T. McFadden, one of America‘s greatest Representatives. Thursday, May 4, 1933. (From Sovereign to Serf Government by the Treachery and Deception of Words)

Mr. McFadden. Mr. Chairman, the United States is bankrupt. It has been bankrupted by the corrupt and dishonest Federal Reserve banks. It has repudiated its debt to its own citizens. Its chief foreign creditor is Great Britain, and a British bailiff has been at the White House and British agents are in the United States Treasury making inventories and arranging terms of liquidation. In close cooperation with the British bailiff a French bailiff has been standing by with a staff of experts and 25 of the leading French journalists. The ?united front‘ has arrived at Washington.

Put into bondage that day in this banker manipulated ‘bankruptcy’ were ‘all’ the people in America at the time. This was done under the legal concepts of the 13th and 14th Amendment. Let’s examine and dissect these two Constitutional Amendments.

It amazes me that the answers have been right there in front of all of our faces for ‘all’ these years. However, until you understand the basic premise of what is/has happening/happened you simply cannot fathom the depth of the trickery, treachery and deceit. Let’s dissect the 13th Amendment.

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Note the first highlighted phrase “involuntary servitude”. Note that the term also is equally qualified with the preceding key word, ‘slavery’. In law there is another concept termed ‘legal by omission’. What the 13th does NOT make ‘illegal’ is “Voluntary Servitude” because it is ‘not’ expressly prohibited! Put in the dialectical form, “Voluntary Servitude” was made ‘legal’ by the 13th Amendment.

Now, secondly and equally if not ‘more’ important is the next key, highlighted, word. That word is “their”! “Their” is obviously referring to “PLURAL” or, the original states jurisdiction! So, these ‘illegalities’ and ‘legalities’ of the 13th Amendment apply to the states of the Union at the time of the Amendment’s passing. This, again, capitalized here for emphasis, “PLURAL” denotation is highly important to not only ‘note’ but also ‘understand’.

Now that we know “Voluntary Servitude” is ‘legal by omission’ in the existing ‘states’ let’s move to the 14th Amendment’s 1st sentence or clause.

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

I am already planning on writing another, follow up article on SIX ‘legal landmines’ in the above sentence. For this article and our analysis here we’ll concentrate on the highlighted text, the middle ‘guts’ of this dastardly addition to our National Constitution. You see, it has become vividly apparent to me, especially as of late, the more I understand the true dialectical nature of our traditional enemy, their plans and more importantly their methods of advancing their slavery agenda. It takes planning, stealth and years of scheming and conditioning of the people’s minds to accomplish their goals! These amendments as well as a horrible ‘Civil War’ or, as, being a Southern boy I prefer to call it, “The War of Northern Aggression,” were ALL part of the more than 150 year old plan we live in now, unfolding to its predicted and intended results now in our collective lifetimes.

I don’t think it takes much of an English language scholar to see the above center part of the 14th Amendment is framed in the ‘singular’. “the jurisdiction thereof” is solo, one as diametrically opposed to the previous “their”, plural jurisdiction. Here you see the stark reality, right there in the U.S. Constitution the plain evidence that we have ‘parallel governments’! The first the original composite of the original and added ‘states’, each considered a separate country. The second the post “War of Northern Aggression” singular ‘federal government’ now all powerful!

Now, let’s reexamine the “Oath” on the current Application for U.S. Passport as examined in depth in From Sovereign to Serf Government by the Treachery and Deception of Words as well as the “A U.S. Passport for Ed Snowden” video on this website. Here you will see the two separate and distinct political statuses set forth plainly in the 13th & 14th Amendments to the Constitution discussed at length above.”

“I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a United States citizen (or non- citizen national) and have not, since acquiring United States citizenship (or U.S. nationality), performed any of the acts listed under “Acts or Conditions” on the reverse of this application form (unless explanatory statement is attached). I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements made on this application are true and correct.”

They are ‘to this day’ running ‘parallel governments’! The ‘original’ government, with God-Given Rights and Constitutional protections is still there, it still is operable and it still operates! The second, the federal government, with its ‘regulatory/administrative agencies’ to ‘regulate/administrate’ the post March 9, 1933 ‘voluntary serfs’ or, even more correctly, ‘federal property’ has become predominant. It controls the entire country, it’s business and it’s ‘property’. That, of course, would be YOU!

Changing this is, at least in action, a very simple and easy exercise. File, according to the U.S. Passport application, a ‘declaration, including Affidavits’ with the United States Secretary of State. That office is the highest office in the federal government with ‘all’ final authority on ALL matters concerning ‘citizenship’, therefore ‘political status’.

To learn more details you can listen to our weekday radio program aired 12-2 CDT: http://peoplespatriotnetwork.com/

Connect with Roger Sayles here, here & here

Cover image based on creative commons work of: Clker-Free-Vector-Images

TCTL editor’s note:

For related information see nationalstatus.info

See related article:

The U.S. Is Running Parallel Governments. All U.S. Citizens Have Dual Citizenship & Are “Volunteered” as Property. How to Unvolunteer: “U.S. National / State Citizen Comprehensive Guide (Non Citizen National)”

Our Geoengineered Skies: Evidence Points to the MITRE Corporation & New Manhattan Project

The Abstract episode 30 “Why is nobody else talking about the MITRE Corporation?”

by Peter A. Kirby, Activist Post
May 19, 2024

Many participants in our noble anti-geoengineering movement appear to be confused as to exactly who is spraying us while answers to this question are extensively detailed in my book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project. Among many other heavily implicated organizations, one stands out as the lowest of the low-hanging fruit: the MITRE Corporation. The evidence for their building and maintaining the many technical aspects of today’s ongoing SRM geoengineering operations is simply legion.

Evidence suggests that the MITRE Corporation has been in charge of the New Manhattan Project’s systems architecture. Systems architecture refers to the organization and harmonization of all the different scientific New Manhattan Project sub-operations such as: operation of the ionospheric heaters, control of the aircraft, collection of atmospheric data, satellite communications, etc. MITRE can make all these things work together and create an elegant end-user experience to boot.

Along with designing and building technical systems architecture, the MITRE Corporation of Bedford, Massachusetts designs and helps build military aerospace command and control centers. In fact, they have designed and helped build every major aerospace command and control center in America. From the National Military Command Center under the Pentagon to Strategic Air Command (SAC) in Nebraska to the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) facility in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado, MITRE has built them all. MITRE also worked with NASA to develop the Apollo Mission Control Center in Houston (now the Johnson Space Flight Center).

The MITRE Corporation has extensive involvement in just about every sub-operation of the New Manhattan Project. From satellite communications to atmospheric monitoring to remotely controlling fleets of airplanes to supercomputing to operating ionospheric heaters, MITRE can do it all. The New Manhattan Project is operationally right up their alley – so much so that it makes one wonder if the MITRE Corporation was created specifically to be the New Manhattan Project’s development coordinator and technical manager. As far as the author can tell, the MITRE Corporation is the only American corporation with the right skill set to build the systems architecture of the New Manhattan Project – probably the only one in the world.

Much of the information recounted here is contained within the pages of a 1979 book titled MITRE: The First Twenty Years. It was written and published by the MITRE Corporation. There may not be a single book more important to the history of the New Manhattan Project.

MITRE was founded in 1958 with about 500 employees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Lincoln Laboratory to resolve a technical mess made by the previous administrators of a system called the SAGE Air Defense System. The RAND Corporation, the Ford Foundation, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology were disproportionally represented on MITRE’s first board of trustees. Connections to the original Manhattan Project, Edward Teller, Rockefellers, and Rothschilds are readily found. Although they themselves do not specify exactly what their name means, the author speculates that MITRE is an acronym for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Radiation Experiment.

The SAGE system was another tremendously huge, covert effort involving radar, computers, command and control centers, and fleets of unmanned, remotely controlled missile-like jet aircraft designed by Boeing to hit enemy bomber aircraft before they could reach American cities. Originally named Project Whirlwind, it was a direct spin-off of the nascent automated missile battery systems developed at the MIT Radiation Laboratory during WWII. This was all, of course, to keep us safe from the Russian nuclear threat. This effort involved the first use of centralized computers for air traffic control. MIT and the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories then founded the SAGE project which dates back to a 1950 committee called Project Charles headed by an MIT professor named George E. Valley (1913-1999). John von Neumann (1903-1957) was a consultant to Project Charles. The chief architect of the SAGE system was an MIT scientist by the name of Jay Forrester (1918-2016). The project was known originally as Project Lincoln and it was launched in 1951 at MIT’s former Rad Lab in Kendall Square.

The earliest official mention of something like the SAGE system is found with Theodore Von Kármán and the other authors of a report titled “Where We Stand” who wrote of, “large numbers of long-range ground-to-ground pilotless aircraft” controlled by a central location. Nikola Tesla and Vannevar Bush theorized about such things as well. For more information about all of this, please see the author’s book.

Information gathered in the field from radar and other sensors was to be fed into a central computer which was designed to streamline and automate the process of launching the missiles. The central computer of the SAGE system was known as Whirlwind and later as the IBM AN/FSQ-7. Work on the SAGE system was originally conducted at MIT’s Lincoln Laboratory, which was created for the purpose. Like the MITRE Corporation, Lincoln Laboratory’s headquarters were and are in Bedford, Massachusetts.

The SAGE system never fully attained its planned capabilities. There were many delays and cost increases during the course of SAGE’s development. On top of this, in the meantime, the enemy’s offensive capabilities changed from bombers to intercontinental ballistic missiles which created a situation of moving goalposts. Due to these factors, in the late 1950s the Department of Defense recognized the realities of the situation and cut their losses by beginning to scuttle the project before it was completed.

Nevertheless, it is this SAGE system from which large portions of today’s New Manhattan Project evolved. In fact, it is this SAGE system that has served as the nucleus of the New Manhattan Project – passed on throughout the decades. Most notably, the air traffic control systems of today’s NMP evolved from SAGE.

Over the years, MITRE has consistently developed many different air traffic control systems capable of remotely controlling large numbers of aircraft. In 1959, MITRE partnered with the Federal Aviation Agency to develop something called SAGE Air Traffic Integration (SATIN). MITRE had been developing this system since their founding. According to a book commemorating their 50th anniversary, SATIN, “…was aimed at developing a single, unified system for managing all aircraft in the nation’s airspace.”

Later, something called Position Location, Reporting, and Control of Tactical Aircraft (PLRACTA) took shape. Let us reference a passage from MITRE: The First Twenty Years:

“In the late 1960s, the activities being pursued separately under CNI [Communications, Navigation, and Identification] and CASOFF [Control and Surveillance of Friendly Forces] were combined into a single advanced development program called PLRACTA, standing for Position Location, Reporting, and Control of Tactical Aircraft, headed by C. Eric Ellingson. PLRACTA’s goal was to provide information exchange among a maximum of one thousand aircraft and other, ground elements of the control system.”

PLRACTA later became known as Seek Bus, then later still as the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS). JTIDS is in use today. There is a JTIDS Wikipedia page. The New Manhattan Project probably utilizes an enhanced and customized version of the JTIDS system.

The NMP’s air traffic control is most probably operated out of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado. This location is the most dominant North American air traffic controller and the site of intense MITRE activity over the years. NORAD is a joint U.S. and Canadian operation. Word is that NORAD’s command center has actually been moved recently to underneath Denver International Airport, but at this time, this story cannot be substantiated.

Separately, MITRE did the big study that provided a scientific basis for the Environmental Protection Agency’s 1976 Toxic Controlled Substances Act. Before they produced that study, MITRE worked with the Department of the Interior’s Office of Coal Research to produce a study about possible cleaner uses of coal. For the Interior Department, MITRE investigated methods for doubling or tripling coal production as well. These facts are interesting because chemtrails usually consist of coal fly ash. Maybe MITRE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) worked together to make sure that plenty of toxic coal fly ash was removed by government mandated coal fly ash scrubbers and therefore available as New Manhattan Project chemtrail spray.

Since their founding and throughout the production of the New Manhattan Project, MITRE Corporation’s world headquarters has been in Bedford, Massachusetts. This is interesting because Bedford is in the Boston metropolitan area. As noted in the author’s book, the Boston metropolitan area has an abnormally high concentration of organizations involved in the development of the New Manhattan Project such as: the American Meteorological Society, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and many more. In order to produce history’s largest scientific endeavor, it would be advantageous to have a community of some of the world’s top academic, research, and development institutions located within a 15 mile radius; all answering to MITRE the coordinator. The Boston area was the New Manhattan Project’s developmental epicenter and MITRE was most probably the NMP’s late-stage development coordinator.

Once this Project became operational, it would be advantageous to retain the maintenance and support services of the people that designed and built it. It’s like buying a brand new car from the dealer and getting premium factory service. Doing it this way makes things as easy as possible. As they are an ongoing concern, the MITRE Corporation probably continues to manage the systems of the New Manhattan Project to this day. They’ve been sucking up our taxpayer dollars this whole time. Now, where is our congressional investigation?

Believe it or not, there is actually much more evidence implicating the MITRE Corporation in the pages of my book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project. Let us wander in confusion no longer. The who, what, why, where, when and how of the New Manhattan Project has already been discovered and made available to the public in an easily accessible and concise fashion. If you have not done so already, please educate yourself and read my book. If we are to engage the enemy, it is helpful to know their ways. Thank you.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. His books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco available now exclusively at Amazon. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.

Connect with Peter Kirby website | Activist Post website

Cover image is a screenshot from embedded video

The Financial Incentive to Murder and Poison American Children

There are more deaths from vaccines than from the diseases they are said to prevent.

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
May 16, 2024

In an April 16^th interview with Polly Tommey, Dr. Paul Thomas, explained how the American medical establishment incentivizes pediatricians to fully vaccinate their young patients, and fines them if they don’t. Vaccinations that have been proven to cause more death and harm than the diseases they are said to be preventing.

“Well, as other practices started kicking people out of their practices if they weren’t following the CDC schedule, I was getting more and more families who didn’t want to do any vaccines. Which was fine with me. So we took an entire month of every single billing sheet. And on every visit, on the back of that, our providers would mark off what vaccines we recommend according to the CDC schedule. Families could decline them. And then our billing department, insurance company by insurance company, vaccine by vaccine, we looked at how much money was being lost for vaccines that were refused, just the admin fee.

So there’s three main ways you make money off of vaccines in pediatrics. The number one is the admin fee. And you get about, it depends on the insurance company, every contract’s different, but I would average it out to say about $40 for the first antigen and $20 for each subsequent antigen. So let’s just say a two month well baby visit. There’s a DPT. That’s three shots, three antigens. Hib, Prevnar, HepB, Polio, Rotavirus, six shots, eight antigens, about $240. Thank you for giving those shots. Multiply that by the fact that I was getting 30 to 40 newborns per month. They’re coming in repeatedly at two months, four months, six months, nine months, twelve months, fifteen, eighteen months, and age two. So we looked at the admin fee loss and from my practice that was billing at that time, about 3 million gross, we were losing a million dollars, over a million dollars, in vaccines that were refused. So you cannot stay in business if you’re not giving, pretty close to the CDC schedule. It just doesn’t pencil out economically at all.

But let me tell you about the other two ways we make money from vaccines. One is the markup. That’s,that’s small. They don’t allow a lot of profit on vaccines as far as markups. But they do this thing called incentives or bonuses. And it’s called a “Quality Bonus.” Well in pediatrics, one of the main quality measures is how well you vaccinate. Isn’t that interesting? It has nothing to do with how healthy your kids are. Like when I studied my vaxed vs unvaxed patients, the unvaxed were so incredibly healthy. They rarely got sick. They rarely would end up in an emergency room or in a hospital or with any chronic condition. So being unvaxed results in very healthy kids who don’t use a lot of medical dollars. Every health system should want that. But it’s reversed, it’s all flipped, It’s bizarre.

You’re supposed to have had your kids up to date about 80% of them by age two. Guess what percentage of my population was at fully vaccinated at age two? 1%. The goal is 80%. So Doctor Paul gets an F minus. Basically what that means is not only do I not get paid the normal amount for everything else we do in the office, I get dinged maybe 10 or 15% off of those RVUs, relative value units, that are ascribed. To everything you do in medicine is given a value. If you do very well on your quality measures, you’re a really good vaccinator, you may get an additional 10% on everything you do in your office. That’s huge.

SIDs is sudden infant death syndrome. When you hear the word syndrome, it means we don’t know what it is. We don’t know what causes it. Well, we actually have a pretty good clue because there are six data sets. Studies that looked at SIDs when that infant died, relative to when they got a vaccine. In one data set, 97% were in the first ten days after the vaccine. For the six other studies, a couple of them showed that 50% of the deaths happened in the first week. But 75 to about 90% of those deaths are happening in the first week after vaccines in all these studies. We’ve known this for decades. The countries that have the most infant vaccines have the highest infant mortality. Guess where the US stands? We are number one in infant vaccines. We are number one in industrial countries for infant mortality.

There’s a document, 450 page legal document, that has tables showing for every single disease for which we have a vaccine, there are more deaths from the vaccine
than there are from the disease for which we have that vaccine.”

~ Dr. Paul Thomas

Connect with Greg Reese

Cover image credit: Alexas_Fotos

If I Were a Parent I Wouldn’t Vaccinate My Child…

by Jon Rappoport
May 15, 2024

If I Were a Parent I Wouldn’t Vaccinate My Child…

…According to the CDC schedule…

With a gun pointed at my head.

I wouldn’t vaccinate him at all.

I’ve been told the CDC expects every child to receive 70 shots in the arm between birth and 18 years of age.

I recently took a look at the CDC childhood vaccine schedule. I found the tables confusing.

But I did note the two lists of vaccines they want kids to take between birth and 15 months, and then between 18 months and 18 years old.

This isn’t the number of injections; it’s the number of vaccines.

Between birth and 15 months: 20 vaccines.

Between 18 months and 18 years old: 20 vaccines.

40 vaccines. FORTY.

20 during the most vulnerable period possible—birth to 15 months. And that doesn’t include vaccines the mother took during pregnancy.

So the CDC is Murder Incorporated.

Show me the hundred well done studies that prove 20 plus 20 vaccines are safe.

Also—show me one well done study against another large study of children who were never vaccinated. Compare overall health in the 2 groups.

No? You can’t?

There is no science going on.

Imagine this. A sales person approaches a parent. He says, “I have a very low-cost offer. Here are dozens and dozens of chemicals and random biological materials I can inject into your child between birth and 18 years of age. How about it? It’s a great deal.”

That’s what’s going on.

Psychopathic motherfuckers are going on.

Connect with Jon Rappoport

Cover image credit: skalekar1992

See Related:

Vaccine Woman

Eight States in the U.S. Take Action Against Geo-Engineering & “Chemtrails”

Eight States in the U.S. Take Action Against Geo-Engineering

The Abstract episode 29 “8 States BANNING CHEMTRAILS”

by Peter Kirby, Activist Post
May 13, 2024

It appears that the issue of chemtrails and geoengineering is finally starting to go mainstream. This is largely due to the fact that Tennessee has recently signed a bill into law which effectively bans weather modification activities and there are 7 other states with similar bills in the works. For a thorough understanding of chemtrails and geoengineering, please buy and read the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project.

Tennessee

On April 11, 2024 Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed SB 2691 (formerly HB 2063) into law. The new law goes into effect on July 1. SB 2691 was introduced by Representative Monty Fritts (R) and had 14 co-sponsors.

The law is very brief. It amends an already existing law. It simply states that, “The intentional injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus within the borders of this state into the atmosphere with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight is prohibited.” Violators face charges of a class C misdemeanor with fines of up to $10K per day, per violation.

Representative Fritts notes that SB 2691 has been promoted in response to a 2023 Biden White House report which asserts the need for spraying the Earth with tens of thousands of megatons of toxic chemicals.

Illinois

The legal movement resulting in Tennessee’s successful bill started in Illinois over a year ago. In January of 2023 Illinois Senator Neil Anderson (R) introduced SB 0134. This bill was definitely a trial run. It’s very bare bones. It simply outlaws ‘cloud seeding,’ but is not specific and provides no investigatory process or penalties for violators. The bill was shuffled around in committees and never received a vote. It is now stalled.

New Hampshire

Late last year, New Hampshire Representative Jason Gerhard (R) introduced HB 1700-FN also known as The Clean Atmosphere Preservation Act. The bill prohibits the intentional release of pollutants associated with weather and climate modification. It also bans excessive electromagnetic energy (EM) pollution and provides penalties for violators.

The bill explicitly asserts states’ rights under the 10th amendment to the Constitution ‘where federal programs and restrictions have become oppressive or destructive.’ The bill specifically outlaws federally approved and/or funded activities that violate the provisions of HB 1700. HB 1700 also stipulates that foreign state-sponsored programs and programs sponsored by international bodies that violate the provisions of this bill can be banned in perpetuity from engaging or applying to engage in activities that violate the law.

Reports of violations are to be made to the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Enforcement is performed by county sheriffs and the N.H. Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division of Compliance. Under this proposed law the state of N.H. is required to actively solicit for evidence of violations from the general public.

Violators of HB 1700-FN will have committed a felony and shall pay at least $500K or be imprisoned for at least 2 years or both. Every day that offending conduct is carried out is treated as a separate offense. Perpetrators are also subject to other applicable New Hampshire environmental laws.

HB 1700-FN is to take effect upon passage. Now is this what we have been waiting for or what? As we will see, subsequent proposed legislation in other states has apparently been modeled on HB 1700-FN.

South Dakota

On January 31 of this year, South Dakota Senator Tom Pischke (R) introduced SB 215. SB 215 has 3 co-sponsors and it has already passed the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources committee 7-0. Like the New Hampshire bill, SB 215 outlaws both polluting emissions and excessive EM in the course of weather/climate modification activities. SB 215 appears to have been modeled on New Hampshire’s bill. Like New Hampshire’s bill, SB 215 says that federally and/or internationally authorized weather/climate modifying activities violating SB 215 are not legal in South Dakota under the 10th amendment.

SB 215 mandates that the state of South Dakota encourages the general public to collect and report information pertaining to potential violations. Such evidence is to be reported to county sheriffs and the Governor. Anti-geoengineering activists been collecting evidence like this for many years: rainwater samples, video evidence, etc.

The parameters for polluting EM violations are very specific. Reports of violations are to be made to the local county sheriff’s office. The bill provides that local sheriffs are to be assisted by scientific experts at state colleges and universities when necessary. If the sheriff corroborates any violations, the violations are to be reported to the Governor’s office. Local sheriffs as well as the Governor can issue cease-and-desist orders with the weight of a court order.

The Governor can call upon the adjutant general of the South Dakota National Guard in order to notify any aircraft of their violations and command them to ground the aircraft at the nearest available airport so that they may be further investigated. The Governor can also call upon State agencies such as the State police and the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources to assist in the investigation. Owners and operators of offending facilities are required to produce operational records pertinent to the investigation. If warranted, entire facilities can be completely shut down. Further legal penalties for violations of SB 215 are not yet specified, but sheriffs finding violations are required to report those violations to the state’s attorney for prosecution.

Kentucky

On February 9 of this year Kentucky Representative Steve Rawlings (R) introduced HB 506. The bill has 5 co-sponsors so far, but has not had any committee votes yet. In many ways it is similar to the N.H. and S.D. bills.

Kentucky HB 506 bans the intentional release of all polluting emissions used in weather and climate modification. The bill gets a little more esoteric than others though. There are mentions of masers and artificial intelligence.

HB 506 provides for citizen input pertaining to possible violations. This input is to be solicited through notices in media publications as well as on the Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection (DEP) website. The bill requires all local and state officials to report any evidence of violations within 24 hours. Investigations of possible violations are to be made by the commissioner of the Kentucky DEP and HB 506 imbues the DEP with power to stop any offending activities and level penalties against those found to be in violation of the law. HB 506 challenges the federal government’s authority in these matters by saying that the DEP will issue notice to the feds if they authorize spraying activities over Kentucky. The DEP is also authorized to put other countries on notice.

Violators of the anti-geoengineering provisions of HB 506 (there are some things in the bill that do not pertain to geoengineering) face a minimum of a $500K fine as well as the penalties of a class D felony. Each day a violation is committed, it is treated as a separate offense.

Rhode Island

On March 1 of this year Rhode Island Senator Elaine Morgan (R) introduced SB 2540, also known as “The Rhode Island Clean Air Preservation Act.” There are no co-sponsors of the bill yet and it has not yet been put to a committee vote.

SB 2540 bans all types of atmospheric pollutants associated with climate and weather modification activities and provides penalties for violators. Like other proposed legislation, SB 2540 asserts states’ rights under the 10th amendment. It notes that violative activities authorized by the feds are not legal in R.I.

SB 2540 differs from the others in that it notes that the ‘combustable agents’ in weather engineering aerosols combined with EM radiation, “causes the desiccation of all biological life and contributes to draught and the hazard of catastrophic forest fires.” Like the Kentucky bill, SB 2540 mentions that AI might be responsible for running climate and/or weather modification activities.

Under SB 2540 the R.I. government is to encourage the public to monitor for and report violations. What constitutes evidence that the state can use is outlined in detail. This type of evidence collection is stuff that our anti-geoengineering community has been doing for many years. The bill stipulates that local universities and colleges are to assist the state police in investigating EM violations.

Potential violations of SB 2540 are to be reported to the R.I. state police. The R.I. state police may then report violations to the Air National Guard. The state police are concurrently empowered to issue a cease-and-desist order with the weight of a court order to violators. They are also empowered to seize violators’ records.

Violation of SB 2540 would result in a felony charge and at least a $500K fine or imprisonment for at least 5 years, or both a fine and imprisonment. Each day of violation is treated as a separate offense. There may be further penalties from associated laws.

Minnesota

On March 7 of this year Minnesota Representatives Jeff Dotseth (R), Eric Lucero (R) and Justin Eichorn (R) introduced HB 4687. HB 4687 bans the dispersion of all climate and/or weather modifying substances as well as the ‘excessive’ use of EM. There have been no committee votes yet.

County Sheriffs are required to encourage people to report potential violations. County sheriffs are also responsible for investigating reported violations and are required to report violations to the Minnesota attorney general. In the discovery of evidence, the cooperation of state universities and colleges is required. In investigations, the bill also allows for the assistance of the Minnesota National Guard. HB 4687 allows for sheriffs and county commissioners to immediately shut down offending activities, then refer perpetrators to the attorney general for prosecution. Violators are subject to being charged with a felony and a fine of $500K.

Like other proposed laws, the bill challenges the authority of the feds, foreign nations and international bodies that may have authorized or otherwise supported violations of HB 4687.

Pennsylvania

Lastly, Pennsylvania’s anti-geoengineering bill is in the formative stages. The prominent senator Doug Mastriano, who ran for Pennsylvania governor on the Republican ticket in 2022, has stated his intention to introduce the legislation. Mastriano has made repeated references to the chemtrail phenomenon on social media.

The passage of the law in Tennessee and associated activity has suddenly spurred the mainstream media into life. After years of near total silence, there’s been a flurry of activity lately the likes of which I’ve never seen. There’s suddenly 30-40 new slavestream media articles published online on the subject of ‘chemtrails.’ Of course they’re all hit pieces, but there’s no such thing as bad press. It couldn’t get much worse.

My take is that these bills are game changers. By the way the mainstream media is reacting, this looks like the tipping point in the chemtrail information war. Not only that, but almost all of these bills have teeth. Almost all of these bills set the stage for a real confrontation between the people and the chemtrail sprayers and, given a fair fight, the people will never lose.

These bills are straightforward and elegant in their simplicity. The votes taken thus far indicate overwhelming support and momentum. Everything I’m seeing here indicates a successful effort. It will be interesting to see how all this plays out. I intend to keep covering this story. Please stay tuned. I’m already figuring on my next report.

For more information, please see the ‘legal action’ tab at GeoEngineeringWatch.org.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Buy his books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco available now exclusively at Amazon. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.

Connect with Activist Post

Judicial Scandal in Germany: The Fuellmich Case

by Laufpass
May 12, 2024

The political trial against civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich reveals the motives and behaviour of a compromised constitutional state. Open violation of the law and legal trickery are intended to secure the conviction of Dr Füllmich. The misconduct of the public prosecutor’s office and judges is documented. So is the involvement of malicious third parties. They are part of the conspiracy against the investigator, who has already been illegally deprived of his freedom for over six months.

by Wolfgang Jeschke

The history of the proceedings against civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich is impressive evidence of the erosion of the rule of law in the Federal Republic of Germany. From the preparations for Füllmich’s arrest to the final statement by the Göttingen district court presided over by judge Carsten Schindler at the end of April, a common thread runs through the trial. At every turn, the proceedings ooze the intention to bring about a conviction of the persecuted man at all costs. Right from the start.

While the conspiracy against the civil rights activist initially appeared to be the work of the public prosecutor’s office, the Federal Criminal Police Office and Füllmich’s former co-partners, it is now clear that the court also wants – or needs – to ensure the persecuted man’s unconditional conviction.

During the trial, some observers still hoped that the court was actually interested in establishing the facts and would soon realise that it had been deliberately misled by the prosecution and the complainants. However, the court’s statement of 26 April 2024 destroyed the last hope of a constitutional trial, even for the greatest optimists. Once again, Schindler and his accomplices fabricated new accusations against the civil rights activist. The contrived trial is now turning into a legal farce.

The Füllmich thriller: In the beginning was the lie.

Even the beginning of Füllmich’s persecution could be the subject of a cheap Hollywood-thriller. The story went like this: the young public prosecutor Simon Philipp John sets up a persecution scenario with former co-partners of the victim. Their holey story: Reiner Füllmich had illegally appropriated money and gold from the Corona Committee and wanted to make off with it. The fact that neither money nor gold were in his possession was irrelevant. For the story to be relevant at all, the complainants (the renegade lawyers Justus Hoffmann, Antonia Fischer and Marcel Templin) and the public prosecutor had to deceive the prosecuting authorities (BKA) and the courts – or co-operate with them.

The grotesque play was initialised by Viviane Fischer, Füllmich’s assessor on the Corona Committee, who in turn is primarily responsible for the prosecution of Füllmich. She had insidiously thrown the head of the Corona Committee out of the committee on 2 September 2022. While she led Füllmich to believe that no committee meeting was taking place, she used the actual meeting to publicly execute Füllmich. Since that day, Fischer has been waging a private war against her mentor and doing everything she can to put him behind bars. As a partner of the people who filed the charges, she plays the most inglorious role in this conspiracy.

Conditions for prosecution

In order for Dr Füllmich to be prosecuted at all, the public prosecutor’s office had to make up a number of lies. In the end, they had to apply for an arrest warrant. This is where prosecutor John and the renegade lawyers showed their creativity. In order to demonstrate the illegality of Füllmich’s behaviour, they simply claimed, by omitting important information, that Füllmich should never have had access to the committee’s funds. In doing so, they maliciously concealed the fact that all managing directors were exempted from the restrictions of § 181 BGB by a shareholders‘ resolution. Füllmich therefore acted lawfully at all times within the scope of the powers conferred on him when securing the committee’s funds.

More than 6 months in prison: the internationally renowned civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich. Photo: Swen Pfortner/dpa

The illegal deal: public prosecutor and co-prosecutors working together

Public prosecutor Simon Philipp John and the renegade lawyers constructed the Füllmich case in close coordination with each other. The very nature of the cooperation between the prosecution and those involved in a civil dispute is remarkable. Antonia Fischer forwarded all negotiation correspondence between the shareholders of the Corona Committee to public prosecutor John and maintained a personal relationship with him in this exchange.

Not only that: they discussed the possibilities of prosecuting and imprisoning Füllmich. This happened while the negotiations between Füllmich and the other committee members about the loan repayment were still ongoing. During the trial, Antonia Fischer admitted that she had never been interested in a negotiated outcome. She only ever wanted to get Füllmich into prison. The other main accomplice in the Füllmich conspiracy, Justus P. Hoffman, made a similar statement. The renegade lawyers, in coordination with the public prosecutor’s office, prevented an agreement in order to maintain the claim that Füllmich had committed misconduct.

Füllmich had already taken the first steps to return secured funds in accordance with the agreement. However, it would have been a disaster for the desired imprisonment and elimination of the civil rights activist if an agreement had been implemented. The lawyer and doctoral supervisor of Justus P. Hoffmann, Professor Martin Schwab, was to receive a power of attorney to make the secured gold – with the joint signature of Viviane Fischer – available to the committee. However, Schwab refused. One can only speculate about the reasons.

Acts planned jointly by the public prosecutor’s office and the committee traitors

Not all details of these agreements between public prosecutor John and his accomplices are documented. The construction of the prosecution of Dr Füllmich was largely secret and therefore also formally illegal. John failed to keep a record of the agreements and telephone calls or to make recordings. This is further unlawful behaviour on the part of the public prosecutor. However, the available evidence is sufficient to prove that a case was constructed here and that the illegal abduction of Dr Füllmich from Mexico was jointly prepared.

The Federal Criminal Police Office abducts Dr Reiner Füllmich

In the course of the abduction of the civil rights activist, the complicity of the Federal Criminal Police Office in the illegal action was also revealed. The public prosecutor’s office and the renegade lawyers set a trap for Reiner Füllmich. He was to be lured to the German consulate in Tijuana under the pretence that a signature was still missing from a document. The subsequent arrest by the Mexican authorities was coordinated by the BKA field office. This is evident from the communication of the service.

Under the pretext of a visa offence, Füllmich was arrested by his Mexican “colleagues”, put on a plane to Germany and arrested there as planned. As agreed, Reiner Füllmich was denied the opportunity to appeal against his deportation. The fact that the “visa offence” was also part of the plan and an illegal favour is shown by the fact that Dr Füllmich’s wife was not expelled from the country in the same situation as her husband. It was only ever about illegally deporting Füllmich to the FRG in order to bring him to trial there.

The Federal Criminal Police Office and a ridiculous “denial”

The involvement of the BKA in the abduction of the civil rights activist has been proven. It is clear from the communication between the BKA and the public prosecutor’s office. However, the BKA also appears elsewhere in this bizarre piece: Dr Füllmich’s co-counsel, the Cologne criminal defence lawyer Christof Miseré, was leaked information (see here: The Füllmich Conspiracy) which could describe the activities of the services (BKA, BND and/or Verfassungsschutz). It describes Füllmich’s work and defines the aim of preventing him from continuing to be publicly effective or even holding public office.

In order to verify the “truthfulness” of the dossier, the public prosecutor’s office questioned the Federal Criminal Police Office. Of course, no one seriously expects an authority to confirm that it is involved in the illegal persecution of political dissidents and is being instrumentalised against the investigation. On the contrary, one would expect a clear denial. In the sense of: This paper and its contents do not originate from our authority, either in whole or in part. That would be a denial. However, the office’s answer is different: “It is therefore very unlikely that this is a document written by the BKA.”

Credit: Jonas Guttler/dpa/Alamy Live News

Dr Christof Miseré: “As a public prosecutor, I ask an authority whether they keep a body in the cellar and receive the answer that this is rather unlikely because bodies are usually buried in the attic of history.“

Regardless of the degree of involvement of the Federal Criminal Police Office in the persecution of the civil rights activist, its involvement in the abduction of Füllmich is proven by the available communication. In doing so, the Federal Criminal Police Office has foregone a constitutional way of detaining Dr Füllmich within the framework of internationally valid extradition procedures. This would have involved applying for an international arrest warrant and co-operating with Interpol. The procedure is well known to the BKA. However, the fabricated allegations would never have been sufficient for an international prosecution. So the only remaining option was the illegal route of abduction coordinated with the Mexican authorities.

The metamorphosis of the accusations – conviction at any price

Once it was clear that Reiner Füllmich was exempt from the restrictions of Section 181 of the German Civil Code (BGB), it could have been established that the original accusation was unfounded and that there were no unlawful dispositions. The proceedings could have been discontinued and the shareholders could have continued their negotiations, which had been interrupted by the kidnapping, to determine when and how the loan amounts protected from state access should be transferred back to one of the Corona Committee companies. Due to this deliberate deception by the public prosecutor’s office and its accomplices, the court wrongly assumed from September 2022 to November 2023 that Füllmich could already be accused of criminal behaviour solely because of the lack of exemption from Section 181 BGB.

In court, Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer submitted the following as part of a motion: “At the time, the first shareholder resolution confirming the exemption from Section 181 BGB and the sole management of all shareholders was not submitted – most likely intentionally, in order to deliberately incriminate the defendant more severely and ensure that a criminal investigation was opened.“

Der Richter auf dem Holzweg

For the court chaired by Carsten Schindler, the tricks and deceptions that constructed the case play no role. Although the public prosecutor and her accomplices had deceived the court in several ways, although the senior public prosecutor Dr Kutzner was not even able to read the email correspondence between Dr Füllmich and Viviane Fischer correctly and gave the impression in her statement that she had either not read the file or was mentally deranged, the judge seemingly went on his way without any irritation at these fatal errors. He enjoys playing the keyboard of arbitrariness and ignores all motions and evidence, as if he had been instructed to ensure a conviction of the civil rights activist at all costs.

Carsten Schindler is leading the proceedings against civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich. While the lawyer initially gave the impression that he was interested in a constitutional trial, his latest ‘sleight of hand’ (quote from lawyer Dr C. Miseré) shocked trial observers, international human rights activists and lawyers alike. Schindler’s name will be remembered in the future with one of the most curious cases in German legal history: When the FRG illegally abducted a civil rights activist from Mexico in order to put him on a contrived trial.

When it could be proven on the basis of the shareholders‘ resolutions that Füllmich had effective sole power of representation, the court looked for new ways to incriminate the persecuted man. Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer commented: “When this argument was no longer possible, the district court simply reinterpreted the justification for the criminal offence as an abuse of power of representation.“

This means nothing other than: First, the court claimed that the persecuted person was not authorised to make his orders. When it then turned out that he was, the court changed its view and said that he was authorised but had abused his power of representation.

The second trick also fails

However, the questioning of the witnesses by lawyer Katja Wörmer and the persecuted man himself quickly showed that there had been no misuse of the power of representation. Even his former partners on the Corona Committee confirmed Dr Füllmich’s statements. Füllmich and Viviane Fischer wanted to protect the committee’s funds from possible access by the state or make this access more difficult. The donations had to disappear from the current accounts. The state had already frozen the funds of critics too often.

Viviane Fischer and Reiner Füllmich took two steps: firstly, they bought gold, which could retain its value even in the event of an economic crisis. Secondly, Fischer and Füllmich shifted the committee’s funds into their private sphere by granting loans. The loans were recognised in the accounting records and contractually agreed. The parties involved agreed that the loan amounts should be repaid to the committee.

Lawyer Katja Wörmer and Dr. Reiner Füllmich. Photo: Swen Pfortner/dpa

Things went wrong? No problem.

So the second prosecution trick, supported by Judge Carsten Schindler, was also dashed by reality. It was proven that the funds were transferred by way of loan agreements and were to be repaid. The persons involved were authorised to do so on the basis of the existing agreements and had documented the procedure. They adopted the regulations and their legal content as their own. The loan agreements were therefore validly agreed. Everyone agreed on this – which is why the dispute between the shareholders centred on the question of when and how the loans were to be repaid. In Dr Füllmich’s case, this was to take place after the sale of his private property. He had never stated otherwise.

The fact that Dr Füllmich’s loan amounts were not repaid was due to an equally illegal arrangement. In collaboration with the notary who notarised the sale of the Füllmich family’s property, one of the complainants, Marcel Templin, in coordination with the other accomplices (Justus P. Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer), appropriated further parts of the proceeds from the sale of the property without sufficient legal grounds. Piquantly, the public prosecutor’s office blocked the Füllmichs‘ accounts – but did not seize the illegally collected share of the sales proceeds from Templin. No investigations were initiated against Marcel Templin either. He is now suspected of being an employee of the authorities and of ensuring the persecution of the civil rights activist Füllmich on their behalf and making it impossible for him to repay the agreed loan.

The arsenal of obstruction of justice is vast.

After the public prosecutor’s office had failed to substantiate the allegations against Dr Füllmich despite all the illegal machinations and objective misrepresentations, the court now came to the prosecutor’s aid. This was a surprise for the defence and the prosecution: the agreed loan agreements, which had been intended, described and assessed as such by all parties involved, were suddenly – after several weeks of trial – simply reinterpreted by the court.

The court is now constructing a “fiduciary relationship” in order to ensure that Dr Füllmich is convicted. In the court’s instructions read out by presiding judge Carsten Schindler, the court now prefers to assume that a “fiduciary safekeeping of the funds was agreed in such a way that these funds were to be available at all times in bank accounts on behalf of the pre-company”. The court relied solely on the statements made by Viviane Fischer, who also placed herself at the service of the prosecution.

Schindler achieves two things with this creative volte face. Firstly, Viviane Fischer is released from the previously assumed complicity in the joint offence with Reiner Füllmich. This means that a participant in the persecution of the civil rights activist has been removed from the focus of the prosecution. At the same time, the court will now attempt to construct a claim based on the breach of a duty to look after assets. Remember: up to now, the question was whether the agreed loans could have been repaid by Füllmich and whether he had intended to do so. Since both questions can be answered in the affirmative based on the investigation of the facts and the questioning of witnesses, no damage can be assumed either for the companies of the committee or the co-shareholders.

In the “opinion” of the court, the arbitrary assumption of a fiduciary relationship should make it possible to construct a criminal offence. Schindler commented: “The defendant was already in breach of his duty to look after his assets by transferring sums of money from the previous company to his private account in the way he did.”

Under this ludicrous construction, it would therefore no longer matter that Füllmich wanted to repay the loan and had done so – the damage would now already lie in the constructed breach of fiduciary duty that Schindler and his comrades and/or clients had devised here. Despite the dramatic change it brings to the trial, the court’s statement causes bitter amusement among lawyers and human rights activists. The presiding judge Carsten Schindler explained: “The defendant’s argument that he had ‘parked’ the money in his property and that this was in the interests of the previous company because the bank account could be more easily seized by arbitrary state measures than property assets is misguided in several respects. Firstly, legal protection against unlawful measures is always possible in court and, within the scope of the German Basic Law, it is not the defendant or Mrs Viviane Fischer, but the competent courts alone that decide what is unlawful and what is not.”

In recent years, the hijacked legal system of the FRG has stripped itself to the bone. Right up to the politically appointed head of the Federal Constitutional Court with its chairman, CDU grandee and Merkel friend Stefan Harbarth, who enabled all illegal measures and unconstitutional restrictions of fundamental rights as well as the abolition of parliamentarianism in the FRG, judgements have been handed down that are in every respect not of a constitutional nature. To this day, the unjust system punishes people who stand up for human rights, freedom and health.

And now a judge in a political trial based on illegal machinations of the state apparatus (kidnapping from abroad, falsification or misappropriation of evidence, illegal undocumented agreements between the public prosecutor’s office and accomplices, etc.) points out that “only the competent courts should decide what is unlawful”. The committee’s reserves were also to be kept safe from judges like Schindler. And the scope of the Basic Law could also be discussed.

Lawyer Dr Christof Miseré has clear words to say about the court’s instructions in his application to the court:

“This new, almost absurd construction also documents the fact that in the present case, at our discretion, we are dealing with a trial that is not oriented towards the objectively prescribed standards of law, but towards the final objective of convicting the defendant Dr Füllmich as a political opponent at all costs, and thus with a politicised trial influenced by political guidelines and constructs by various actors. Although I was already aware when I took over the mandate that this was more or less a political trial, including the incomparable empowerment of the accused in Mexico, I could not have imagined the legally untenable constructs that are now being used to try to realise this final objective.”

Dr Miseré: “The game is not over yet!”

Defence lawyer Dr Miseré remains optimistic. For him, the court’s behaviour is an arrogant violation of the law.

“It is not for the court to make legally binding – retrospective – findings on a contract subject to private autonomy – in this case a validly concluded and intended loan agreement – and, what is more, to replace it with a different construction determined by the court. This could at best be possible if something is declared as a loan, but no repayment of the loan amount was intended. In this case, there is no loan at all, as the gift of the loan amount and the repayment of this loan amount are constitutive elements of a loan.

“A fortiori, the court may not interpret the defendant Dr Füllmich’s consistently expressed view that this was a loan that he had to repay and that he would also use it for private purposes to mean that he had in fact wanted to agree a fiduciary agreement. That is precisely not what he wanted!

“To then subsequently disregard the defendant’s personal idea and replace his intention to be bound by a contract with a construct that was not agreed – namely a fiduciary agreement – and then to convict him based on the reinterpretation of his clearly expressed idea, is an arbitrary violation of the law par excellence and blatantly contradicts a fair trial.”

Lawyer Katja Wörmer: “The defendant should be sentenced to prison in any case.”

Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer also finds clear words in her application for a stay of proceedings presented in court: “It is more than clear that the chamber intends to sentence the accused for better or worse at any cost. The legal references almost give the impression that the accused has already been convicted in the eyes of the Chamber and that the intended judgement is already as good as written in the desk drawer.“

“This is because the chamber expressly assumes that the hearing of evidence can be concluded and that no further witnesses need to be heard. However, on 24 and 25 April 2014, the undersigned was urgently requested by the presiding judge to report possible conflicts of dates for the months of May and June, as further hearing dates were to be scheduled. Just one day later, on 26.04.24, the chamber suddenly sends the legal information, which was only read out on 03.05.24, via beA outside the main hearing, which is actually an anticipated assessment of the evidence, which is also expected to be included in the grounds for the judgement in the same form. The judgement is therefore apparently already written.”

“The defendant will be sentenced to prison in any case.”

Republished under Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International)

Connect with Laufpass

Cover image credit: Swen Pfortner/dpa

What Is in the Jabs?

by Library of Atlantis
sourced from Library of Atlantis at telegram
May 4, 2024

There does not seem to be much of a consensus about this. Lots pf people still saying that the mRNA is altering our DNA. DNA is irrelevant but the processes which alter DNA can cause permanent and inheritable damage.

Damage seems to be done sometimes months after the shots and the body itself is building spike protein or white clots or something bad elsewhere

Stefan Lanka is saying that the RNA does no damage as it breaks down quickly in the body and it cannot be an inorganic toxin as it would either get expelled or have an immediate toxic effect. So he doesn’t seem to think that toxins are stored for a later detox and he is going for biological-conflict.

The technology used to produce particularly the RNA vaccines is very similar to that used to produce GMO. Toxins are introduced into biological material and this results in effects (usually bad) that can span several generations.

Injecting the blood of black chickens into white chickens gave offspring that had inherited a tendency to produce black feathers: https://library-of-atlantis.com/2023/06/10/telegony/

So ‘genetic’ information can be permanently transmitted by injection into the bloodstream but it has little to do with DNA. The active ‘ingredient’ is a piece of bio-field containing morphological information harmful to human health. This consists of a scalar-wave complex that is invisible and unmeasurable. Whatever its origins it is modified by the manufacturing process in a wholly unpredictable manner.

This information becomes integrated into the body bio-field and may cause trouble at any time, thereby explaining the delay between jab and effects. No lab test will be able to detect or characterise this information.

We don’t really know anything and there is no way of telling if the antipathetic field will or could ever be expelled or neutralised. We cannot therefore say if things will get better or worse for the jabbed or their children.

Telegony

Healing frequencies

Connect with Library of Atlantis

Cover image credit: geralt

See Related:

What Is the Brain?

Dr. Tom Cowan: Do COVID “mRNA Shots” Actually Contain mRNA? Let’s Look at the Science

Is DNA Targeting Really Happening? Or Are They Faking “High Level” Science & Bedazzling Us With Fancy Words?

Evidence of MASSIVE Microwave Pulses via NEXRAD Satellite Imagery

by Brett Houston, Brett Houston Tube
uploaded to YouTube on April 20, 2024

If YouTube video disappears, you’ll find it mirrored at Odysee & BitChute

If you want to know what is causing the heat waves, and dis ease, here’s a clue. We are being microwaved.

On the 16th they microwaved most of the country with MASSIVE synchronized pulses for 12 hours straight, while we slept from 9:11 at night until 9:11 in the morning.

https://www.pauljhurtado.com/US_Composite_Radar/2024-4-16/

The 17th they started at 8:11 and went until 9:11 increasing it to 13 hours.

https://www.pauljhurtado.com/US_Composite_Radar/2024-4-17/

The 18th they started at 7:11 and went until 9:11 increasing it to 14 hours.

https://www.pauljhurtado.com/US_Composite_Radar/2024-4-18/

They are ramping it up exponentially each day. Like the formula for boiling frogs, increasing by one incremental degree at a time so as not to trigger their reflexes of self-preservation. This is using the same frequency as the microwave oven. This has the same cause/effect relationship. This causes damage to DNA, which will result in many issues from cancer to brain/neurological damage.

A scientific study from the official Govern Mental sources that shows microwave radiation causes the misfolding of peptides/proteins.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309322/

The misfolded proteins associated with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, and Creutzfeldt–Jakob diseases as well as certain cancer types such as amyloidosis can be caused by microwave radiation… The same frequencies used in Wifi/Bluetooth, SMART meters, Radar, microwave ovens and such.

And there is evidence that NEXRAD towers were being synchronized and pulsing these frequencies across the country… CJD is similar to “Mad Cow”. A brain wasting disorder. Zombie. The cows are innocent.

So many people are suffering now without even realizing it.

Meanwhile… I found it. Share it with the people you love. We’re all in this outdoor microwave oven together. Turn it off!

http://bretthouston.com/creations/microwave-radiation-can-cause-zombies-prions/ [TCTL editor’s note: website is not secure & might not be available.]

Here is an interactive map of 159 NEXRAD installations.

There are also 150 Doppler stations and scores of the 5th Generation network towers that can be synced as well.

You can see the location of the towers in relation to the radiation pulse points on the Sat feeds to verify for yourself.

Widescale overview https://www.roc.noaa.gov/wsr88d/windfarm/lineofsightmap.aspx NEXRAD doppler.

This will pull up and allow you to zoom in on the sites https://climateviewer.org/history-and-science/atmospheric-sensors-and-emf-sites/maps/nexrad-doppler-radar-stations/

Connect with Brett Houston

Cover image is a screenshot from video
Thanks to Sharon James for the heads up about the NEXRAD microwave events.

International Dark Sky Association vs. FCC and SpaceX

by Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force
May 1, 2024

On December 29, 2022, the International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) sued the U.S. Federal Communications Commission over its decision to approve SpaceX’s application for up to 30,000 more low-orbit satellites, in addition to the 12,000 already approved and in process of filling our skies. This is Case No. 22-1337 before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and has not yet been decided by the court.

Long-exposure photographs of the sky by astronomers already look like this:

The above photo was taken by an amateur astronomer in a suburban location in Western Australia. The circular tracks are stars. The much brighter straight tracks are all satellites, except for one track which is a meteor.

Below is a 77-minute exposure taken by astronomer Dave Thanatos in Salisbury, England. In this darker location, the circular tracks of the stars are brighter than the straight tracks of the meteors and satellites which, however, fill the entire frame of the photograph. There are only 10 meteors in this picture. All the other straight tracks are satellites. And as Scottish astronomer Andy Lawrence, lead author of “The Case for Space Environmentalism,” said, “Good luck telling the difference!”

American plasma physicist Sierra Solter implored the FCC to “please save our night sky… Please, please, don’t take away my stars. To feel that my place of comfort and calm — a starry sky — is being taken away and given to billionaires is suffocating.”

On December 18, 2023, Ms. Solter published a scientific article detailing her fear for our planet. Each of the 42,000 planned Starlink satellites, she wrote, has a design lifespan of only 5 years, after which it will be de-orbited, burned up in the atmosphere, and replaced. She calculated that this will require 23 satellites per day — each the size of an SUV or truck — to be burned up in the atmosphere forever into the future, leaving an enormous amount of toxic chemicals and metallic dust to accumulate in the air we breathe and in the ionosphere.

This is already happening, she wrote, and should be stopped if we value our lives. “Since the beginning of the space industry, approximately 20,000 tons of material have been demolished during reentry… This amount is over 100 billion times greater than [the mass of] the Van Allen Belts.” She estimated that if 42,000 Starlink satellites are deployed and regularly demolished — let alone the 1,000,000 satellites planned by other companies and governments — “every second the space industry is adding approximately 2,000 times more conductive material than mass of the Van Allen Belts into the ionosphere.”

“Unlike meteorites, which are small and only contain trace amounts of aluminum, these wrecked spacecraft are huge and consist entirely of aluminum and other exotic, highly conductive materials,” she explained in an April 16, 2024 article in The Guardian.

Much of the metallic dust will settle into the ionosphere where, she says, it could act as a magnetic shield, reducing the magnitude of the Earth’s magnetic field in space. If that happens, the atmosphere itself could eventually be destroyed, because the Earth’s magnetic field — the magnetosphere — is what deflects the solar wind and prevents it from stripping away Earth’s atmosphere, as she told Teresa Pulterova in an interview on Space.com.

Other astronomers involved in the litigation before the FCC and now the Court of Appeals include Meredith Rawls with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory in Chile; Gary Hunt with Action Against Satellite Light Pollution in the UK; Samantha Lawler at the University of Regina in Canada; Graeme Cuffy of Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago; Mark Phillips, President of the Astronomical Society of Edinburgh; Roberto Trotta of the Imperial Centre for Inference and Cosmology in London; Carrie Nugent, Associate Professor of Computational Physics and Planetary Science at the Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts; and Cameron Nelson of Tenzing Startup Consultants in Virginia.

Other issues are also mentioned in the appeal. For example, the burned up aluminum produces aluminum oxide, which destroys ozone and contributes to climate change. So does the water vapor, soot, and nitrogen oxides in rocket exhaust.

Cameron Nelson told the FCC that “Humans, not to mention all other animal and plant life, have not given our consent for SpaceX to send the signals it is proposing into our bodies and irrevocably alter us.”

The BroadBand International Legal Action Network (BBILAN) mentioned “RF/EMF radiation from linked base and earth stations” in comments sent to the FCC. Starlink earth stations, also called Gateways, are far more powerful than the Starlink dishes that people are putting on their homes. The (as of March 2024) 2.6 million Starlink dishes each send one signal up to the moving network of satellites above them. All of this traffic is coordinated in space by thousands of lasers linking the satellites to one another, and on the ground by Gateways, which relay the thousands of signals in a large geographic area to and from the satellites. This is what a Gateway with 5 antennas (“radomes”) looks like:

Some Gateways have up to 40 radomes. Each of those domes weighs 1750 kilograms. Each aims a narrow beam at moving satellites. According to FCC filings by SpaceX, each beam can have an effective radiated power of more than 1,000,000 watts, which it can aim as low as 25 degrees above the horizon. If you are a bird you do not want to fly anywhere near a Starlink Gateway. And if you are a human you do not want to live near one either. When a satellite aims its beam containing thousands of signals at a Gateway, that beam is about 10 miles in diameter by the time it reaches the Earth.

Robin is a subscriber who lives in a remote area of Idaho less than 3 miles from the Starlink Gateway in Colburn. She writes about effects on her family and her animals — effects that disappear when they are at their other home in Montana where they are surrounded by National Forest. The effects on her guinea hens are similar to the effects I wrote about in my last newsletter:

“Our guinea hens make a strange noise while moving in a circle. This only happens in Idaho where we live within 3 miles from a SpaceX ground station. We never see this phenomenon in Montana.

“We also had 2 separate litters of Chihuahua puppies born. Both litters had defects, and both lost a puppy and were smaller in size. The very same thing happened with our cat, small litter, birth defects and the loss of one kitten. There was a fire last year and we were forced back to Idaho and are making EVERY EFFORT to move away from the gateway and our neighbors’ Starlink dishes as quickly as possible. My health is a concern here, but when I go home to Montana I am fully recovered as are my husband and son. We live off grid both places. No electricity, no running water, and it’s a crying shame what is happening to the world with all these manmade devices.”

When in Idaho, Robin suffers from extreme vertigo and nausea, burning migraines, severe pain in her spine and all her joints, tingling in her fingers and toes, memory problems, “extreme gut pain, and at times stabbing pain in gall bladder and liver,” bradycardia, tooth pain and sinus infections, and “severe heart palpitations to the point where I’m gasping for breath while my heart pounds.” Her husband has joint pains, frequent urination during the night, and headaches. Her son has heart arrhythmias, stabbing pains in the gut, and brain fog. She and her husband hear the radiation. “We’re hearing a sort of sped-up Morse code,” she says. “When I go home to Montana I am fully recovered as is my husband and son.”

Robin knows many people in her area who are similarly affected. She adds that “when we first moved here in 2019 we had A LOT of birds. We now have a silent spring, it’s like a dead zone. I’ve heard/seen one Robin and just a handful of birds. We used to put out 11 hummingbird feeders and as of last year we only need one. There were quite a few black bears and a couple of grizzlies but now only one grizzly is around.”

At last count there were 277 Starlink Gateways in operation or under construction in the world: 181 in North America and the Caribbean, 26 in South America, 2 in Africa, 26 in Europe, and 42 in Asia and the Pacific.

The FCC maintains a webpage listing thousands of licenses that it has handed out to hundreds of companies to operate both fixed and mobile satellite earth stations in the United States. Some of these stations are far more powerful than the Starlink Gateways. SES’s earth station at Bristol, Virginia emits up to 1,900,000,000 watts of effective radiated power, and it is allowed to aim it as low as 5 degrees above the horizon. SES’s earth station at Brewster, Washington is allowed to emit almost 1,000,000 watts in the actual direction of the horizon! SES owns O3b mPOWER, which is the satellite system that had its first radomes on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, the ship that had the famous outbreak of disease blamed on COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic.

Arthur Firstenberg
President, Cellular Phone Task Force
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA

Connect with Arthur Firstenberg website | substack

Cover image credit: Charles Boyer, SpaceX Falcon 9 Launching Starlink Group 4-34 Satellites, 09-18-2022

Vaccines From Womb to Tomb

Why Do We Have an Adult Immunization Schedule?

by Health Freedom Institute
May 2, 2024

Did you know that the CDC has an adult vaccination schedule?¹ It’s been around for 22 years, growing and changing.² Promotion of routine adult immunization started around 1990 but wasn’t formalized into a schedule until 2002.

The federal government has embraced vaccination as “a lifespan approach, covering vaccination from before birth into old age,”³ basically, from womb to tomb. This is laid out in its National Vaccination Plans, which were mandated by U.S. Congress in 1987.

The Adult Immunization Schedule has been a bit of a sleeper, but in recent years, when listening to the CDC’s Advisory Council on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings, we hear about it more and more. What changed? Let’s start at the beginning.

What Is the Adult Schedule?

In 1991, the CDC acknowledged in its weekly public health report that vaccination in adults wasn’t typical.⁴

The very first time the CDC pulled all their immunization recommendations into one place was in their weekly publication “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report” (MMWR) in 1969.⁵ Those recommendations laid the foundation for what we now recognize as the “schedule.” This first publication included dosage recommendations for adults, but those dosages generally were for shots missed in childhood or special circumstances like travel. It was not until many years later that the idea of an adult schedule was independently promoted. Other than influenza, the shots were targeted toward common childhood illnesses, and there wasn’t much to promote for adults.

The face of public health, and thus immunization, changed in 1979 when the federal Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (the predecessor to Health and Human Services) released a report titled “Healthy People: The Surgeon General’s Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.”⁶ That publication marked the beginning of a new era of emphasis on population health. It was unique in its structured, data-driven approach to setting and surveilling health policy goals for our nation.⁷ This approach gave it longevity and flexibility and created the foundation for a new, decades-long infrastructure of setting health policy goals through identification of specific objectives with measurable targets, starting with “Healthy People 1990,” (launched in 1980) that continues to the latest “Healthy People 2030.”

The 1980s were tumultuous for vaccine policy. The expose “Vaccine Roulette” aired in 1982, helping parents across the country (and the globe) connect the dots on symptoms their children suddenly acquired after routine vaccination with DPT. The awareness congealed into a movement of parents who ignited a fire under U.S. Congress about the injustice of following the federally recommended childhood schedule only to find it was not safe for their babies. This outcry culminated in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, known by many as the “1986 Act,” which removed liability from manufacturers. (You can do a deep dive on DPT in our article, “Shining a light on Pertussis & DPT: the vaccine that shut the courthouse doors.”)

While the 1986 Act was being debated, 1985 saw two measles outbreaks on college campuses.⁸ With vaccines in mind, a joint resolution was adopted by Congress that was signed by Ronald Reagan into law, acknowledging the last week in October as “National Adult Immunization Awareness Week.”⁹ The intent behind the resolution was to prevent deaths from influenza and pneumonia in older adults, but the college measles outbreaks were mentioned as justification for needing to raise awareness of vaccination among adults.¹⁰ Baked into federal adult immunization policy was the intent that the awareness week was “only the beginning.”

Source: Congressional Record, Aug. 13, 1986; remarks by Sen. Orrin Hatch, sponsor of the joint resolution.

A National Coalition for Adult Immunization (NCAI) was formed shortly after, in 1988, to align “public and private resources to achieve Healthy People national goals.”

Source: Resource Guide for Adult and Adolescent Immunization, 3rd ed. : National Coalition for Adult Immunization : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

The 1979 report that inspired “Healthy People” only mentioned adult immunization in passing.

And the follow up report in 1980, “Promoting Health, Preventing Disease,” which came to be known as “Healthy People 1990,” provided 226 health policy goals with targets to be reached by 1990, but did not dive into adult vaccination.¹¹

Regardless, the CDC fell in line with NCAI and started calling on doctors to include adult immunization as “a routine part of their practice.” In the 1991 publication where the CDC changed its tune on adult immunization, they reasoned that we couldn’t eliminate all illnesses because some adults were still “at risk” of getting sick from diseases on the childhood schedule if they were never vaccinated or weren’t sick in childhood. That said, there weren’t many action items because there weren’t many vaccines licensed to be marketed to adults.

After the 1986 Act, many vaccines were added to the childhood schedule. When the pneumococcal vaccine was added in 2001, it was licensed both for adolescents and adults. The promotion of adult vaccines picked up again for that moment in time. In 2002, the CDC unveiled its first official adult schedule. In short, healthy adults who had already been following the CDC’s childhood schedule were recommended annual flu shots, tetanus boosters every 10 years (generally at the time given in tandem with diphtheria as a TD shot), and the newly added pneumococcal recommendation for people who were 65 and over.

Source: https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2002/1215/p2329.html

Note that right now COVID is recommended as “one or more doses,” which basically means there’s a blank check for how many shots will be recommended. The FDA and the CDC, along with their advisory committees (ACIP and VRBPAC respectively), have contemplated annual doses, but there’s also discussion of targeting strains. In other words, what will be recommended is yet to be seen.

One thing we can say for certain is that back in 2002 when the adult schedule table was first unveiled, the dose counts recommended were a lot lower.

Barriers to Success for the Adult Schedule

Simplification: The American Family Physician group says of the adult schedule, “The success of the childhood immunization program is partly because of the annual publication of the Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule that summarizes the current recommendations and that it can be posted in the office for quick reference. We suggest that physicians post the Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule in the office as a quick reference tool and that it be used as part of a larger office-based program to improve adult immunization rates.”

Access: A study published on February 4, 2014, in the Annals of Internal Medicinerecommended that physicians refer patients to get the vaccines they did not stock to a pharmacy or public health department to get vaccinated.¹² The reason for referring patients outside their clinic was either “lack of insurance coverage for the vaccine (55% for general internists and 62% for family physicians) or inadequate reimbursement (36% for general internists and 41% for family physicians).” Dr. Laura Hurley, one of the authors of the paper,¹³ that improving the delivery of recommended vaccines to adults will require a concerted effort to resolve financial barriers, especially for smaller practices and for general internists who see more patients with Medicare Part D.

In short, access comes down to whether a doctor is going to be paid enough to go to the trouble of stocking a shot.

The current White House has been promoting increased uptake of immunizing agents in adults. And the CDC, the agency in charge of getting “shots in arms,” has increased both propaganda and financial incentives. The 2023 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), for example, was¹⁴

Conveniently, any American with Medicare or Medicaid can get any shot on the schedule at no cost to them. But some states did not require payment through their Medicaid for certain vaccines, and this federal law overrode their autonomy to decide how to spend taxpayer money. The new policy addresses that.

Biden’s policy follows the footsteps laid by Obama’s Affordable Care Act in 2010, which expanded access to vaccines with cost-sharing. The Healthy People plan was mentioned in the Affordable Care Act four times.¹⁵

The IRA law also highlights the importance of the schedule itself — insurance payments hinge on whether the vaccine is on the schedule, not simply whether it has been recommended. Not surprisingly, for the first time in history, the ACIP chose to update its annual schedule to a rolling schedule to keep up with all the anticipated changes and additional recommendations. For the first time in the history of the schedule, the ACIP left the last page blank so new recommendations could be quickly added through the year, rather than waiting for the annual update. This was done in the name of access.

You may have also been hearing of calls for financing called Vaccines for Adults. This will have to be legislated through the budget.

Why the Sudden Push for Vaccines for Adults?

A review of 100 vaccines in development by “Vaccines Today,” found a staggering 80% percent are aimed at adults.¹⁶ A survey of the vaccines and immunizing agents approved for use by the FDA over the past five years shows 11 of 15 can be marketed to adults, nine of which are only approved for those over 18 years of age.¹⁷ This is a shift from around the 1960s where we saw an explosion in new vaccines aimed at children, especially after the 1986 Act removed liability for injury from manufacturers and providers for shots on the childhood schedule.

The National Adult Immunization Plan

“Global Immunization Vision and Strategy.” World Health Organization, 64th World Health Assembly (2011).

One of the goals of the plan is to simply increase demand. In other words, the federal government wants you to want these products. The plan was launched in 2015, a year after the CDC announced it was collaborating with Pfizer and a company called CECity to increase adult immunization rates.¹⁹ We know Pfizer makes vaccines (and “immunizing agents”); CECity is a company that specializes in electronic health records and was brought on board to implement a cloud-based “Adult Immunization Registry.” The initiative was released during the World Health Organization’s “Decade of Vaccines,” where their “Global Immunization Vision and Strategy 2006-2015” expanded the target group for routine immunizations to include adults.

The plan integrates health data transfer goals with calls for “interoperability” and “bidirectional exchange” of personal data between electronic health records (EHRs) and Immunization Information Systems (IIS’s).

Can adults injured by vaccines sue the manufacturer? It depends.

The 1986 Act and subsequent court cases removed liability from manufacturers and providers of vaccines if a person is injured or killed from vaccines. Does that apply to all vaccines? No, it only applies to shots that are on the childhood schedule. So if an adult takes a vaccine that is on the childhood schedule, like HPV or tetanus, they are bound by law to lose their right to a day in court and instead go through an administrative process many call “Vaccine Court,” which removes the right to a trial by jury. But if an adult takes the vaccine for shingles, which is not on the childhood schedule and therefore not under the umbrella of the VICP, an injured person can sue in court. It makes one wonder if those legal rights could be taken away and swept up into an amendment to the 1986 Act with a normalized Adult Immunization Schedule.

References:

“Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule.” CDC. February 28, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf.
“Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule–United States, 2002-2003.” MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., (2003): 52(15):345. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12418546/.
“2020 National Vaccine Plan Development: Recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee.” Public Health Reports, 135(2):181–188. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12418546/.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., (1991): 40(RR-12). v “ACIP Recommendations 1969: Collected Recommendations of the Public Health Service Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.” National Communicable Disease Center 18, no. 43. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/818.
“Healthy People: The Surgeon General’s Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.” Public Health Service 79-55071, U.S. Department of Health and Welfare (1979). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED186357.pdf.
“The Evolution of the Healthy People Initiative: A Look Through the Decades.” J Public Health Manag Pract, (2021): 27(6):S225–S234. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478310/. ↩︎
“Current Trends Measles on College Campuses.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, (1985): 34(29);445-9. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000581.htm.
“Public Law 99-528.” Congressional Record, 99th Congress 132, (1986). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-100/pdf/STATUTE-100-Pg3009.pdf.
Congressional Record, 99th Congress 132, part 15 (1986): 21399. https://www.congress.gov/bound-congressional-record/1986/08/13/senate-section?p=1.
“Healthy People: The Surgeon General’s Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.” Public Health Service 79-55071, U.S. Department of Health and Welfare (1979). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED186357.pdf.
“Healthy People: The Surgeon General’s Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.” Public Health Service 79-55071, U.S. Department of Health and Welfare (1979). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED186357.pdf.
”US Physicians’ Perspective of Adult Vaccine Delivery. Annals of Internal Medicine. Volume 160. No. 3. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M13-2332?articleid=1819120
“National Adult Immunization Plan.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo/national-adult-immunization-plan/naip.pdf.
“Several Changes to Adult Vaccine Access Enacted Through IRA.” Avalere, (2022). https://avalere.com/insights/several-changes-to-adult-vaccine-access-enacted-through-ira.
“Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” U.S. House of Representatives, (2010). https://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf.
Future of Immunisation: 100 Vaccines in the Pipeline.” Vaccines Today, Gary Finnegan (2023). https://www.vaccinestoday.eu/stories/future-of-immunisation-100-vaccines-in-the-pipeline/.
“Biological Approvals by Year.” The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S.FDA (2024). https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/biological-approvals-year.
“Adult Immunization Plans.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (2019). https://www.hhs.gov/vaccines/national-adult-immunization-plan/index.html.
“American College of Physicians, CECity, and Pfizer Collaborate to Increase Adult Immunization Rates.” Pfizer, (2014). https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/american_college_of_physicians_cecity_and_pfizer_collaborate_to_increase_adult_immunization_rates

Connect with Health Freedom Institute

Cover image credit: TCTL with creative commons images by larspromotion & OpenClipart-Vectors

The Zionist Death Grip on the United States Government

From JFK to 9/11 the Zionist agenda comes first

by Greg Reese, Reese Report
April 30, 2024

Transcript:

When Netanyahu demanded that the protests against Israel be stopped, the US government complied because our members of Congress have all been bought and paid for with tax dollars given to the American Israeli Political Action Committee, known as AIPAC. AIPAC openly brags about this on their official website, because they don’t have to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires agents of foreign principals to register and provide transparency.

Beginning in 1962 they were known as the American Zionist Council, and President John F. Kennedy was ordering them to register as a foreign agent. Along with members of the US government, the Zionists fought against this. In October of 1963, forms were prepared for them to register. But the next month, JFK was assassinated. And Israel has never been asked to register since.

Four years later, Israel attacked the USS Liberty, murdering dozens of Americans and injuring over a hundred. The US government helped them cover it up as an accident.

On the day of 9/11, five Israelis who were seen photographing the collapse of the twin towers and celebrating were arrested and detained for several weeks. In documents later released by FOIA requests, the FBI redacted their faces in pictures where they were posing in front of the burning towers. And described them as being happy and jovial. One of them stated that, “Israel now has hope that the world will understand us.” The end of the declassified document asks if they had foreknowledge of the event and were there to film it, and the answer was redacted. As soon as they were released, they returned to Israel and went on television where they confirmed that the answer was yes.

The dancing Israelis had fake student IDs. And several accounts of suspicious Israeli art students were reported to be infiltrating government buildings. Over a hundred of these Israeli art students were arrested. Fox NEWS reported that these art students served in military intelligence and explosive ordinance units.

In March of 2000, several of these Mossad art students were living in the World Trade Center as part of the World Views Artist-in-Residence program. They occupied floors 90 and 91 where walls were unfinished and structural beams were exposed. A member of this group of artists, Hanan Serfaty, was arrested by the DEA as part of the Israeli spy ring. But the identities of an additional 14 Israelis who were with him have never been released to the public. These Israeli artists were sharing the space with a group of Austrian artists known as Gelatin who were working on a project called “The B thing” that involved removing windows on the 91st floor of the North Tower. A small balcony was constructed for people to stand on while photographs were taken by a helicopter. Another group called, E-team, managed the helicopter with the designation number, N666LH. This helicopter was to be in an art exhibit memorializing this project scheduled for September 11th 2001.

In March of 2001, E Team had an art project called “127 windows.” Officially, they were going to write their name on the exterior of the tower. They had an artist’s rendering of what the project was supposed to look like, but it never appears to have happened. And on 9/11, American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the exact spot where they were supposedly preparing to do this.

In 2001, Gelatin published a book on the project and described it as conspiratorial work. It includes a drawing of someone falling headfirst from the 91st floor with the words, 300 meters of pure pleasure.

Gelatin was originally spelled the same as the explosive, but was officially changed in 2005.

And the 9/11 Commission report does not mention Gelatin, E-Team, or any of the Israeli Mossad art students.

Connect with Greg Reese

Cover image credit: screenshot from video

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: Update on His Ongoing Trial & Current Events — April 29, 2024

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, ICIC Law
April 29, 2024

Statement Dr. Reiner Fuellmich April 29, 2024

Dear friends, with this statement, I want to tell you that there are more and more reasons for us to be optimistic, at least outside this prison cell where I’ve been held in captivity for more than six and a half months now. It is now not only palpable that the tide has turned, but it is both clearly visible and clearly audible.

At the same time, this worldwide development in the right direction is mirrored by what is happening in my case, except that last week an alarming twist in this never-ending story shows how now pressure is being put on the court by the intelligence services and that one of my attorneys is receiving anonymous threats, which quite obviously come from that very same source.

But let me first tell you about the positive developments that we can now clearly see and hear happening worldwide. As I already mentioned, it looks like my work, first at the Corona Investigative Committee and then at ICIC, has been vindicated by the publication of the, albeit heavily redacted, RKI papers. RKI is the equivalent of the American CDC.

These papers clearly show that Corona was not a pandemic, but a staged plandemic set in motion by the mainstream media, politicians and others, who got paid to induce panic among the population so that they could be controlled and made to destroy their own economy and their own health. On top of these now infamous RKI papers, the highly regarded former president of Germany’s highest court, the constitutional court, Professor Papier, for months has now been asking for a judicial investigation of what happened during Corona, stating that the judiciary and above all Germany’s highest court, the constitutional court, failed to
protect the rights and values enshrined in the constitution during Corona.

Well, we can certainly help with this judicial investigation as we have all the evidence readily available. Anyone can easily download all the interviews I have conducted with, for example, Dr. Mike Yeadon, the former vice president of Pfizer, Professor Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV virus
and then changed his mind and, like Dr. Judy Mikovits said, that it wasn’t a virus that caused AIDS. I conducted interviews with presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Archbishop Viganò, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Peter Breggin, former premier of Newfoundland, Labrador, Brian Peckford, ritual abuse survivor Cathy O’Brien, and many, many others. It’s all there.

But there is, in fact, even more reason for optimism as outside of Germany, the wake-up process has picked up so much speed that it is now unstoppable. Those on the other side of the fence, in particular, those who are in the business of panic and warmongering, have now every reason to panic themselves.

At Columbia University in New York, reminiscent of what happened 55 years ago, that’s during the Vietnam War, student protests against the Vietnam War have now spread in its variation of protests against what’s happening in Gaza, have now spread across the entire country and then worldwide. Once again, it is students and faculty members of Columbia University who are protesting against a war, this time the war in Gaza.

More than 34,000 people were killed over the last six months, 70 percent of whom are women and children, and now two mass graves, graveyards, were found with more than 300 bodies of patients and medical staff of hospitals, many of whom showing signs of torture and execution-style murder. Neither the US administration nor the EU is able to ignore this.

Both have asked for an independent investigation into the massacres. Student protests have already spread to other countries, like for example Australia, and students and faculty members are now coordinating their efforts and connecting with each other. Sounds like real grassroots, bottom-up democracy, standing up against globalistic, top-down totalitarianism to me.

The protesters demand not just that the killing stops immediately, but they also ask, cui bono? Who profits from all this? In what ways?

This means that just like during Vietnam, the protesters are breaking through the official wall of propaganda and want to get to the bottom of what’s going on. Only this time, for real it seems. Because I believe it is no accident that the call for an investigation of these crimes against humanity coincide with the call for an investigation into the corona crimes against humanity.

The people on the other side of the fence are only one step short of the realization that the same puppets in the mainstream media, politics and pseudoscience who got paid to lie to us about corona are now lying to us about Gaza. And from that realization will come follow-up questions, such as, for example, what is really going on in Ukraine and what exactly is it with man-made global warming? And why are they trying to keep us in permanent panic mode? Good questions, don’t you think?

The positive developments are mirrored or reflected by what’s happening in the criminal proceeding against me, except that here their panic is so great that they’re now pushing themselves and the rule of law into very, very dangerous territory. On the one hand, their official narrative has collapsed.

Both the hearing and the, albeit incomplete, that is illegally redacted contents of my file have shown beyond a reasonable doubt my taking a loan in order to protect some of the donations temporarily from imminent attachment of our bank account was perfectly okay, as I had both the authority to do this under the business judgment rule and I was willing and capable of repaying the loan.

The allegations in the criminal complaint, to the contrary, were simply freely invented lies which the DA would have immediately uncovered had he conducted a real investigation and not just a fake one. The senior district attorney who refused to even start a criminal investigation when she looked at the very same facts less than a half a year ago or a half a year earlier was correct when she came to the conclusion that there was absolutely no evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.

But behind this travesty of justice, we can now see the real criminals. The three attorneys from Berlin and the assistant district attorney who operated very closely when they first had me kidnapped in Mexico and then got their hands on my money and the Corona Investigative Committee’s money by way of fraud and extortion. Even my illegally redacted file shows that the assistant DA knew right from the start of his non-investigation that I was in the process of repaying the loan with the proceeds from the sale of my house and that there was way more than enough money available for this.

The file also shows that he knew full well that the three accusers had absolutely no right whatsoever to get their hands on that purchase price. And the file shows that he knew that the three authors of the criminal complaint would nevertheless engage in fraud and extortion in order to get their hands on that money. In fact, the criminals themselves kept him informed about their criminal activities.

He not only allowed them to commit these crimes, rather there’s now reasonable cause for a criminal proceeding against him for aiding and abetting their crimes or at the very least for obstruction of justice. And those are real crimes, not just misdemeanors.

But the matter gets worse. In full knowledge of the fact that the three criminals only interest in the Corona Committee’s activities focused on the donations it received for my work mostly. And knowing also, of course, that they had already stolen 1.15 million euros of my purchase price. He now attached my attorney’s pension plan, collecting everything up to another 700,000 euros for these three criminals.

But what is the reason for all this? Well, the secret dossier on me written by the German intelligence services proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the three Berlin attorneys and the assistant DA were instructed to do a kind of a hit job, to do the dirty work, so to speak, for those who are pulling the strings from behind the scenes.

Ultimately, of course, this will backfire. And this will turn out to be a hit job on themselves and before the eyes of the world, a hit job on the rule of law in Germany.

Why am I saying this? Well, last week, the intelligence services approached the presiding judge and his number two judge on the panel, in my case, and put them under pressure to, or at least he manipulated or they manipulated them. As a result of this presiding judge just informed us that despite all the evidence to the contrary, he will definitely find me guilty of whatever crimes.

If any further proof was required to show that this is a fake trial that undeniably started with my kidnapping in Mexico, here it is: My attorney, Dr. Miseré, who defends me in this trial alongside my colleague Katja Woermer, just received an anonymous letter with a photo of his daughter, clearly a threat that something will happen to her if he continues to defend me.

I will publish the details of all of this still unfolding crime story in my next statement.

For now, let me conclude not with another list of my favorite songs, but by telling you that my favorite book is Harper Lee’s novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird”. And my favorite movie is the movie by the same name, starring Gregory Peck.

There will be justice. And if the system is too corrupt to deliver it, it’ll come another way. Call it karma or poetic justice, but it will come.

See you soon.

Connect with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich telegram | ICIC website

GM Golden Rice in the Philippines Stopped: The Deception of Development and the Politics of Progress

by Colin Todhunter, Asia-Pacific Research
April 29, 2024

On 19 April 2024, the Philippines Supreme Court issued a cease-and-desist order on the commercial propagation of genetically modified (GM) Golden Rice and GM eggplant in the country.

The Stop Golden Rice Network says that the court decision is a victory for farmers and consumers everywhere as the decision goes beyond Golden Rice and insecticidal eggplant and covers “any application for contained use, field testing, direct use as food or feed or processing, commercial propagation, and importation of GMOs.”

The court recognised that government agencies and other proponents of GM Golden Rice and GM eggplant “failed to submit proof of safety and compliance with all legal requirements.” The order remains indefinite until GMO proponents can fulfil all the mandated steps and provide concrete evidence that these GMOs are indeed safe.

A network of farmers, consumers and civil society organisations, Stop Golden Rice emphasises the need to address hunger and malnutrition through securing small farmers’ control over resources such as seed, appropriate technologies, water and land.

The campaign group says:

“We believe that GM crops are primarily pushed by global monopoly capitalists in food and agriculture… there is already irrevocable evidence of the failure of GM crops and how it has contributed to further indebtedness, crop failures, hunger and loss of biodiversity.”

It states that the court’s decision shows that ordinary people can prevail in the face of corporate power.

The Story of Golden Rice

Vitamin A deficiency is a problem in many poor countries in the Global South and leaves millions at high risk of infection, diseases and other maladies, such as blindness.

The agritech industry has long argued that Golden Rice is a practical way to provide poor farmers in remote areas with a subsistence crop capable of adding much-needed vitamin A to local diets. Lobbyists say that Golden Rice, developed with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, could help save the lives of around 670,000 children who die each year from Vitamin A deficiency and another 350,000 who go blind.

Such claims, however, are based more on spin than reality, and, over the years, the interests behind Golden Rice have wasted no time in attacking anyone who questioned it.

As Britain’s Environment Secretary in 2013, the now disgraced Owen Paterson claimed that opponents of GM were “casting a dark shadow over attempts to feed the world”. He called for the rapid roll-out of vitamin A-enhanced rice to help prevent the cause of up to a third of the world’s child deaths. He claimed:

“It’s just disgusting that little children are allowed to go blind and die because of a hang-up by a small number of people about this technology. I feel really strongly about it. I think what they do is absolutely wicked.”

On Twitter, The Observer’s Nick Cohen chimed in with his support by tweeting:

“There is no greater example of ignorant Western privilege causing needless misery than the campaign against genetically modified golden rice.”

The rhetoric took the well-worn cynically devised PR line that anti-GM activists and environmentalists are little more than privileged, affluent people residing in rich countries and are denying the poor the supposed benefits of GM crops.

Despite these smears and emotional blackmail, in a 2016 article in the journal Agriculture & Human Values Glenn Stone and Dominic Glover found little evidence that activists were to blame for Golden Rice’s unfulfilled promises.

Researchers still had problems developing beta carotene-enriched strains that yield as well as non-GM strains already being grown by farmers. It was questionable whether the beta carotene in Golden Rice could even be converted to vitamin A in the bodies of badly undernourished children. There had also been little research on how well the beta carotene in Golden Rice would hold up when stored for long periods between harvest seasons or when cooked using traditional methods common in remote rural locations.

In the meantime, Glenn Stone noted that that, as the development of Golden Rice crept along, the Philippines had managed to slash the incidence of Vitamin A deficiency by non-GM methods.

So, whose interests were really being served in the push for Golden Rice?

In 2011, Marcia Ishii-Eiteman, a senior scientist with a background in insect ecology and pest management, answered this question:

“An elite, so-called Humanitarian Board where Syngenta sits – along with the inventors of Golden Rice, Rockefeller Foundation, USAID and public relations and marketing experts, among a handful of others. Not a single farmer, indigenous person or even an ecologist or sociologist to assess the huge political, social and ecological implications of this massive experiment. And the leader of IRRI’s Golden Rice project is none other than Gerald Barry, previously Director of Research at Monsanto.”

Sarojeni V Rengam, executive director of Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific, called on the donors and scientists involved to wake up and do the right thing:

“Golden Rice is really a ‘Trojan horse’; a public relations stunt pulled by the agribusiness corporations to garner acceptance of genetically engineered (GE) crops and food… money and efforts would be better spent on restoring natural and agricultural biodiversity rather than destroying it by promoting monoculture plantations and GE food crops.”

To tackle disease, malnutrition and poverty, you have to first understand the underlying causes – or indeed want to understand them.

Renowned academic Walden Bello notes that the complex of policies that pushed the Philippines into an economic quagmire over the past few decades is due to ‘structural adjustment’ that included the restructuring of agriculture and export-oriented production.

And that restructuring of the agrarian economy is something touched on by Claire Robinson of GMWatch who notes that leafy green vegetables used to be grown in backyards as well as in rice (paddy) fields on the banks between the flooded ditches in which the rice grew.

Ditches also contained fish, which ate pests. People thus had access to rice, green leafy veg and fish – a balanced diet that gave them a healthy mix of nutrients, including plenty of beta-carotene.

But indigenous crops and farming systems have been replaced by monocultures dependent on chemical inputs. Green leafy veg were killed off with pesticides, artificial fertilisers were introduced, and the fish could not live in the resulting chemically contaminated water. Moreover, decreased access to land meant that many people no longer had backyards containing leafy green veg.

Blindness in developing countries could have been eradicated years ago if only the money, research and publicity put into Golden Rice over the last 20 years had gone into proven ways of addressing Vitamin A deficiency. However, instead of pursuing genuine solutions, what we have seen is pro-GM spin in an attempt to close down debate.

Technology and Development

If the discussion so far tells us anything, it is that technology is not neutral. It is developed and promoted by people who want to cement their control over a sector and stand to financially gain from its rollout.

All too often, politicians, corporations and the media equate new technology with ‘progress’. And those who question it, as we see with GMOs, are called Luddites or anti-science in order to prevent proper debate over the social, economic and ethical concerns of rolling out a given technology.

Take the Green Revolution, for instance. There was nothing progressive, inevitable or neutral about its seed, chemical and related infrastructure technology.

Despite it being rolled out under the banner of ‘progress’, it underperformed, was exploitative and has had devastating social, ecological and environmental impacts (see the writings of Prof. Glenn Stone, Vandana Shiva and Bhaskar Save). It served US geopolitical, financial and agribusiness interests and prioritised urban-industrial expansion at the expense of rural communities and a more diverse, healthy and nutrient-sufficient agriculture.

But the Green Revolution became integral to the ‘development’ agenda.

In a recent article on the Winter Oak website, Paul Cudenec says that ‘development’:

“… is the destruction of nature, now seen as a mere resource to be used for development or as an empty undeveloped space in which development could, should and, ultimately, must take place. It is the destruction of natural human communities, whose self-sufficiency gets in the way of the advance of development, and of authentic human culture and traditional values, which are incompatible with the dogma and domination of development.”

Cudenec argues that those behind ‘development’ have been destroying everything of real value in our natural world and our human societies in the pursuit of personal wealth and power. Moreover, they have concealed this crime behind all the positive-sounding rhetoric associated with development on every level.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in India.

The World Bank, the World Trade Organization, global agribusiness and financial capital are working to corporatise India’s agriculture sector. This ‘structural adjustment’ policy and process involves displacing the current food production system with contract farming and an industrial model of agriculture and food retail that serves the above interests.

The plan is to displace the peasantry, create a land market and amalgamate landholdings to form larger farms that are more suited to international land investors and export-oriented industrial farming.

The demand is that India sacrifice its farmers and its own food security for the benefit of a handful of billionaires. This is all passed off as ‘development’.

It involves the state facilitating the enrichment of a wealthy elite and privileging a certain model of social and economic development based on urban sprawl, centralised power and dependency on global finance, corporations, markets and supply chains. All legitimised under the banners of innovation, technological progress and ‘development’.

There are other pathways that humanity can take. Anthropologist Felix Padel and researcher Malvika Gupta offer some insights (based on their work with India’s Adivasi communities) into what the solutions or alternatives to ‘development’ might look like:

“Democracy as consensus politics rather than the Western model of liberal democracy that perpetuates division and corruption behind the scenes; exchange labour rather than the ruthless, anti-life logic of ‘the market’; law as reconciliation rather than judgements that depend on exorbitant legal fees and divide people into winners and losers… and learning as something to be shared, not competed over.”

However, we see more ‘development’ being proposed: more rural population displacement and human dislocation, more mining, port and other big infrastructure developments and the further entrenchment of corporate interests and their projects.

While many have a different vision for the future, self-interest and consumerism underpinned by economic neoliberal dogma continue to seduce the masses into accepting the prevailing ‘development’ agenda.

Corporate industrial agriculture is integral to that agenda. A model that took hold half a century ago in the Western nations and which has resulted in nutrient-deficient food, narrower diets, the massive use of agrochemicals, food contaminated by hormones, steroids, antibiotics and a wide range of chemical additives, the eradication of many smallholder farmers, spiralling rates of ill health, degraded soil and contaminated and depleted water supplies.

That’s ‘progress’? Well, agribusiness interests aside, perhaps so for the many private health clinics that have sprung up in India in recent years.

The introduction of GMOs represents a further entrenchment of the prevailing ‘development’ agenda.

The decision by the Philippines Supreme Court called out government agencies and those behind the Golden Rice agenda for key failures. This is important for India, whose Supreme Court is about to decide on whether to sanction the commercial cultivation of GM mustard. It would be India’s first GM food crop (of which there are many more in the pipeline).

Will India’s Supreme Court come down on the side of reason and stop GM mustard on the basis of there being no need for GMOs in Indian agriculture and the well-documented fraud and regulatory delinquency that has surrounded this issue for many years?

That remains to be seen.

Many of the issues presented above are discussed in the author’s free e-book Food, Dispossession and Dependency. Resisting the New World Order.

Renowned author Colin Todhunter specialises in development, food and agriculture. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

Connect with Colin Todhunter

Cover image credit: consolesafari