Dr. Andrew Kaufman, as guest host on the Alex Jones show, interviews Karen Kingston.
Karen, who recently came forward as a whistleblower, currently works as an analyst for pharmaceutical and medical device industries — analyzing intellectual property and legal landscape for both pharma and consumers — and is also a science writer and clinical analyst.
Together Dr. Kaufman and Karen Kingston break down the ingredients in the so-called vaccines and take a look at the science documents detailing the intended functions of these toxic injections.
The interview above is courtesy of Kristall BrandNewTube channel, who kindly made the effort to clip this excerpt from a 3-hour segment at Alex Jones channel. All credit for the video goes to the Alex Jones show. Thanks to Kristall for providing the clip of the full Kaufman/Kingston interview.
This conversation between journalists Jon Rappoport (US) and James Delingpole (UK) covers a lot of territory, including:
The state of journalism and the gaslighting of the public through propaganda
Donald Trump’s flip flop on vaccines and his “Operation Warp Speed” where he pushed the deadly covid “vaccines” on the US public
Global protests outside of US
Vaccine injuries and deaths
At about the 34-minute mark in the video Jon Rappoport answers this question:
James Delingpole:
Where do you get the idea that far fewer people have taken the vaccine than is being claimed in public?
Jon Rappoport:
… Public Health officials are admitting on the record that in the US stock of vaccines in the 50 states are going unused. Not just a little, but vastly unused, and they’re about to expire, many of them — which makes them completely useless.
And what these public health officials are confessing to is not ‘oh, they gave us too many vials to begin with…’. No. They’re talking about these stocks of vaccines going unused because of declining demand, across the board as they say, in the 50 states. Which to me is a massive clue that many, many people are refusing the vaccine …
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 545,338 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 12,366 deaths and 70,105 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 30, 2021.
Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed the total number of reports (including foreign and U.S.) of deaths following COVID vaccination, across all age groups, surpassed 12,000.
The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Data released today show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 30, 2021, a total of 545,338 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,366 deaths — an increase of 426 over the previous week. There were 70,105 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 7,003 compared with the previous week.
In the U.S., 344.9 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of July 30. This includes: 139 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 193 million doses of Pfizer and 13 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.
Of the 5,739 U.S. deaths reported as of July 30, 13% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 19% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 34% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.
FDA eyes full approval of Pfizer vaccine by early next month
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accelerated its timeline to fully approve Pfizer’s COVID vaccine — planning to complete the process by the beginning of September, people familiar with the effort told The New York Times.
President Biden said last week he expected a fully approved vaccine in early fall. But the FDA’s unofficial deadline is Labor Day or sooner, according to The Times.
The agency said in a statement its leaders recognized approval might inspire more public confidence and had “taken an all-hands-on-deck approach” to the work.
Federal regulators have been under growing public pressure to fully approve Pfizer’s vaccine ever since the company filed its application on May 7.
Vaccinated may play key role in aiding evolution of more dangerous COVID variants
According to research published last week in Scientific Reports, vaccinated people may play a key role in helping SARS-CoV-2 variants evolve into those that evade existing COVID vaccines.
Researchers identified three specific risk factors that favor the emergence and establishment of a vaccine-resistant strain. They are: a high probability of initial emergence of the resistant strain; a high number of infected individuals; and a low rate of vaccination.
However, the analysis also showed the highest risk for establishing a vaccine-resistant strain occurs when a large fraction of the population has already been vaccinated but the transmission is not controlled.
“When most people are vaccinated, the vaccine-resistant strain has an advantage over the original strain,” Simon Rella of the Institute of Science and Technology Austria, told CNN. “This means the vaccine-resistant strain spreads through the population faster at a time when most people are vaccinated.”
The data is consistent with a study released last week by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention which showed vaccinated people may transmit the Delta variant — now responsible for 80% of COVID cases in the U.S. — just as easily as the unvaccinated.
Delta variant more transmissible, not more deadly
As The Defender reported Aug. 3, World Health Organization (WHO) officials said they are still trying to understand why the Delta variant is more transmissible than the original COVID virus strain.
As COVID—especially Delta variant—surges among fully vaccinated, Brian Hooker, Ph.D., said the more variant deviates from original sequence used for vaccine, the less effective vaccine will be on variant.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) August 4, 2021
“There are certain mutations in the Delta variant that, for example, allow the virus to adhere to a cell more easily,” said Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’S technical lead on COVID, at a press briefing July 30. “There are some laboratory studies that suggest that there’s increased replication in some of the modeled human airway systems.”
The CDC warned lawmakers July 29 of new research indicating the Delta strain is more contagious than chickenpox. The variant also appears to have a longer transmission window than the original COVID strain, and may make older people sicker, even if they’ve been fully vaccinated, CNBC reported.
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer and professor of biology at Simpson University, said while the Delta variant is likely more transmissible, it’s also likely less pathogenic.
“What we’re seeing is virus evolution 101,” Hooker said.
He explained:
“Viruses like to survive, so killing the host (i.e. the human who is infected) defeats the purpose because killing the host kills the virus, too.
“For this reason, new variants of viruses that circulate widely through the population tend to become more transmissive but less pathogenic. In other words, they will spread more easily from person to person, but they will cause less damage to the host.”
Hooker said the more the variant deviates from the original sequence used for the vaccine, the less effective the vaccine will be on that variant, which could explain why fully vaccinated people are getting infected with the Delta variant.
But this isn’t the case for natural immunity, Hooker explained:
“The vaccine focuses on the spike protein, whereas natural immunity focuses on the entire virus. Natural immunity — with a more diverse array of antibodies and T-cell receptors — will provide better protection overall as it has more targets in which to attack the virus, whereas vaccine-derived immunity only focuses on one portion of the virus, in this case, the spike protein. Once that portion of the virus has mutated sufficiently, the vaccine no longer is effective.”
Offspring band boots drummer for refusing to get vaccinated
Pete Parada, drummer for the Californian rock band Offspring, said he was ousted from the band because he refused to get a COVID vaccine, despite having already had COVID and acquiring natural immunity.
“Since I am unable to comply with what is increasingly becoming an industry mandate, it has recently been decided that I am unsafe to be around, in the studio and on tour. I mention this because you won’t be seeing me at these upcoming shows. I also want to share my story so that anyone else experiencing the agony and isolation of getting left behind right now knows they’re not entirely alone.”
Parada, who had COVID more than a year ago, said he was medically advised not to take the vaccine due to his “personal medical history and the side-effect profile” of COVID vaccines.
Parada said he was confident he could handle the virus again, but he could not handle another round of post-vaccination GBS, which dates back to his childhood and has become progressively worse over his lifetime.
In a series of tweets, Parada said he unequivocally supports informed consent — “which necessitates choice unburdened by coercion” — and does not find it “ethical or wise” to allow those with the most power, including government, corporations, organizations or employers to “dictate medical procedures to those with the least power.”
Tyson Foods this week told its 120,000 workers in offices, slaughterhouses and poultry plants across the country they would need to be vaccinated by Nov. 1, as a “condition of employment.”
Microsoft, which employs roughly 100,000 people in the U.S., said it would require proof of vaccination for all employees, vendors and guests to gain access to its offices.
Last week, Google said it would require employees who returned to the company’s offices to be vaccinated, while Disney announced a mandate for all salaried and non-union hourly workers who work on site.
Walmart, the largest private employer in the U.S, Lyft and Uber mandated vaccines for white-collar workers but not for millions of frontline workers.
The moves brought praise from the White House.
“I want to thank Walmart, Google, Netflix, Disney, Tyson Foods for their recent actions requiring vaccination for employees,” President Biden said in a press briefing on Tuesday. “Look, I know this isn’t easy — but I will have their backs.”
“Others have declined to step up,” Biden said. “I find it disappointing.”
151 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender’s inquiries
According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”
On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We have made repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions.
Despite multiple phone and email communications with many people at the CDC, and despite being told that our request was in the system and that someone would respond, we have not yet received answers to any of the questions we submitted. It has been 144 days since we sent our first email to the CDC requesting information.
Earth’s life preserving ozone layer is deteriorating at blinding speed, covert climate engineering operations are the single greatest causal factor. If this destruction is allowed to continue unabated, the total collapse of the ozone layer will soon determine our collective fate. UVC radiation is now reaching the surface of the planet, this DNA damaging spectrum of solar radiation is the last spectrum of UV before x-rays. Geoengineering Watch has monitored the ever increasing UVC radiation for many years while trying simultaneously to sound the alarm. In this video report a former NASA contract engineer sends a dire warning.
Dr. Feinstein, leader of IPC (Israeli People Committee) speaks about the negative roles of fear and how it is being exploited to attack people and then about the role of love in changing this reality into a much more winnable state.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Brief Excerpts:
I believe we’re reaching a situation where more physicians will wake up and start talking.
…
What’s happening is that many people in Israel and around the world are overtaken by fear. They are allowing people to scare them.
People who were supposed to be calm, keep things in proportion, guide, lead, heal. Instead they turned into agents of fear.
We’re not dealing with the corona virus. Right now, we’re dealing with a virus of fear.
…
Are we afraid to die or are we actually afraid to live? Because shutting ourselves in our home, putting on masks, stop breathing, running from one shot to the other, stop thinking, this means we stop living.
Maybe we’re actually absorbing some kind of pattern that’s designed to stop us from living. Because living truly means to take risks. You don’t take risks, you don’t have freedom, you don’t have hope…
…
Do we know that fear and love cannot exist together?
I believe that we have arrived to what I call “the corona junction”.
The corona junction helps people to decide for themselves where they’re going —
Since 1988, I’ve been pointing out that relabeling and repackaging disease is standard operating procedure in the field of “pandemic medicine.”
And now we have this, from FOX News (7/25/21): “But while cases of COVID-19 soared nationwide, hospitalizations and deaths caused by influenza dropped.”
“According to data released by the CDC earlier this month, influenza mortality rates were significantly lower throughout 2020 than previous years.”
“There were 646 deaths relating to the flu among adults reported in 2020, whereas in 2019 the CDC estimated that between 24,000 and 62,000 people died from influenza-related illnesses.”
You might want to read those numbers again. The drop in flu deaths was miraculous. Perhaps the Vatican has a clue.
Rochester Regional Health has issued a flu report covering the same time periods: “As of the most recent updates from the CDC, the 2021 flu season impacted a much lower number of people than usual in all major regions of the United States.”
“Here are a few numbers to sum up the 2020/2021 flu season, running from October 1, 2020 to April 1, 2021…646 deaths were attributed to the flu.”
“The final data on [the prior] flu season 2019/2020 was released by the CDC in April as COVID-19 continued to spread throughout the United States. Between October 1, 2019 and April 4, 2020, the flu resulted in: 24,000 to 62,000 deaths.”
“Hey Bob, could you do me a favor? I need a whole lot of COVID death numbers. Can you shove some of your flu-death numbers over here?”
“Sure. No problem, Bill. We work for the same agency. We’re all in this together. But if I give you thousands of flu-death numbers, I want something back. A piece of your COVID research funding. Our flu money these days would barely bankroll a junket for a dozen of us to the Bahamas.”
“My poor cousin. Transferring research funds is tricky. Too many eyeballs involved. Tell you what. How about a steak and lobster dinner, two nights at a local hotel, and one of the hookers who sits at the bar?”
“Three nights, all expenses paid.”
“Done.”
Here are two previous articles I’ve written on the disease- relabeling/repackaging shell game:
—The disease switcheroo; they don’t teach this in medical school—
I’ve mentioned this shell game hundreds of times in articles and lectures over the years. Here I want to boil it down to a protocol that has earned the medical cartel trillions of dollars.
We begin the story with an “outbreak.” Somewhere on Earth, we are told there is a cluster of unusual cases of illness.
The key word is “unusual.” Otherwise, who would care? People would instead say, “Forty people in Wuhan have lung congestion.” And that would spark no interest.
In Wuhan, it was “unusual pneumonia.” How so? No convincing answer. Some people have cited a “ground glass” appearance in pictures of patients’ lungs. Meaning gray areas, or opacity. Another claim: patients had extreme shortness of breath.
But opacity and shortness of breath were mentioned and described in medical literature long before COVID.
Something else must be offered, to justify the term “unusual cases.” And we get it almost immediately, while we’re still trying to figure out what makes these patients’ illness new and different:
It’s a virus. A never-before-seen virus.
Already a switcheroo is in progress. There is actually nothing unusual in the Wuhan cluster of cases. And just as we’re about to realize that, we’re hit with “new virus.” And then we forget there was no reason to look for a new virus in the first place.
Deadly air pollution has been hanging over Wuhan for a long time. It explains all sorts of lung infections, including pneumonia, a cardinal COVID symptom. And by the way, roughly 300,000 people in China die every year from pneumonia.
The “new virus” is trumpeted. But of course, as I’ve demonstrated many times, it hasn’t actually been found. No one isolated it. The so-called genetic sequencing of it was a fictional castle in the air based on supposition. How could it be otherwise? No one has an isolated and purified specimen of the virus that can be analyzed.
Accepting “new virus” as fact produces this situation: a list of very familiar clinical symptoms can now be called unique, because the cause is unique.
Suddenly, cough, chills, fever, fatigue, congestion, shortness of breath—which have been called flu, or just infection, or other names—are COVID. That’s the big switcheroo.
Taking it even further—as I’ve reported in several articles—the three major clinical trials of RNA COVID vaccines were designed to prove nothing more than this: the vaccine could protect against cough, chills, and fever. You could call it a mild-flu vaccine.
Next step: provide a diagnostic test for “the virus” that would automatically spit out false-positives like water from a firehouse. That’s the PCR. I’ve taken the PCR apart six ways from Sunday and exposed it as a fraud.
With the PCR in hand, the switcheroo is deepened. That list of familiar illness symptoms—taken together with the test—paints the picture of millions of cases of a “new plague.”
All this fabrication is on the order of—“Hey, Jim, sales of our widget number 6 are in the toilet. What can we do? Unless…let’s call it widget number 7, put it in a new box…”
People say, “But there ARE mysterious COVID cases that can’t explained away as repackaged lung infections…”
Of course there are. When you make the net big enough, it will sweep in groups of cases that seem to defy explanation. But when you move in close enough, you discover, for example, new poisonous vaccination campaigns and toxic pesticides and lagoons of feces in giant pig factory-farms. These and other such causes of illness and death emerge.
I first caught on to the switcheroo in 1987, when I was doing research for my first book, AIDS INC. Scientists in Africa were investigating a “new” outbreak among people who, “incidentally,” were suffering from protein-calorie malnutrition, hunger, and starvation.
The scientists, cheap con artists that they were, called this “wasting syndrome,” then “Slim disease,” and finally “AIDS.” They announced the cause was HIV—a virus no one had isolated.
And lurking in the background, if you needed another cause of illness and death, there was the infamous World Health Organization mass smallpox-vaccination campaign in Africa, one of the most dangerous mass medical experiments ever carried out on a population. That campaign had wrapped up injecting millions of people several years before “the discovery of AIDS.”
The campaign was so dangerous that, at a secret WHO meeting in Geneva, a decision was made never to use that vaccine again, because it had caused smallpox (or something that looked like it).
In 1987, I combed through volumes of medical journals at the UCLA bio-med library, and discovered that the single most prevalent cause of T-cell depletion (“AIDS”) in the world is MALNUTRITION.
Malnutrition, hunger, starvation, toxic vaccines, grinding poverty, war, fertile farm land stolen from the people by major agricultural corporations, toxic medical drugs…all repackaged as a new disease caused by a new virus, HIV.
I then went on to study every so-called high-risk group for AIDS. I found that in each group, all the “AIDS symptoms” could be explained by non-viral causes.
At that point, I realized I was looking at a classic intelligence-agency-type covert operation, applied within the medical universe. The virus was the cover story. It was being use to hide ongoing government and corporate crimes. For example—forced starvation.
A con is a con.
Only the disease-names are changed, to protect the guilty.
Here is the second article on the scam:
—Massive number of flu cases are re-labeled COVID cases—
The number of COVID cases has been faked in various ways.
By far, the most extensive strategy is re-labeling. Flu is called COVID.
We don’t need charts and graphs to see this. It’s right in front of our eyes.
The definition of a COVID case allows flu in the door. There is nothing unique about that definition. For example, a cough, or chills and fever, would constitute “a mild case of COVID.”
A positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 would also be required, but as I’ve shown in my recent series on the test, obtaining a false positive is as easy as pie.
All you have to do is run the test at more than 35 cycles. Most labs run the test at 40 cycles. A cycle is a quantum leap in magnification of the swab sample taken from the patient. When you run the test at more than 35 cycles, false-positives come pouring out like water from a fire hose.
So…with ordinary flu symptoms plus a false-positive PCR test…voila, you have a COVID case.
Keep in mind that, overwhelmingly, most “COVID cases” are mild. In other words, they’re indistinguishable from ordinary flu.
But there is a rabbit hole here, and we can go down that hole much farther. The next question is: what is a flu case? What is it really?
Researcher Peter Doshi did much to answer that question. In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published his shocking report, which created tremors through the halls of the CDC, where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.
Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”
Boom.
You see, the CDC created one overall category that combined both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why? Because they disingenuously assumed the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could only say, with assurance, that 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.
This death toll is far lower than the old parroted 36,000 figure.
However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of annual flu deaths plummet even further.
In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.
But we’re not finished yet. Because…what test were researchers using to decide there were 18 cases of honest flu, in which a virus was found and identified? Answer: unknown.
It’s quite probable the test didn’t really isolate a flu virus at all. It only identified some marker that was ASSUMED, without proof, to be unique to a flu virus.
If so—ZERO cases of actual flu were found in the population.
Instead, what we had was “flu-like illness.” Chills, cough, congestion, fever, fatigue; the ubiquitous symptoms that describe about a billion cases of illness, every year, worldwide.
The cause of those billion cases? There is no single cause. Instead, there are many factors, ranging from sudden weather changes to air pollution, to malnutrition, to sub-standard sanitation…on and on.
That being the case, we can now say: Many, many cases of FAKE FLU are being relabeled FAKE COVID.
Now we’re getting real.
The medical cartel “discovers” (markets) huge numbers of so-called unique diseases—each disease with a purported specific cause: virus A, virus B, virus C…
For each virus, there must be at least several highly profitable drugs that supposedly kill the germ. And for each germ, there must be a vaccine that prevents the disease.
Billions and trillions in rewards follow.
And so does CONTROL. Control of minds.
Because the population is tuned up by ceaseless propaganda to believe in the rigid one-disease one-germ notion.
And when the time is right, the medical cartel can even claim a new germ is decimating the world, and they must “destroy the village in order to save it.”
Which is the psychotic fiction we are in the middle of, right now.
The Holy Church of Biological Mysticism needs your support. Give them your time, your money, your livelihood, your future, your loyalty, your faith, your health, your life.
Our legal team has reviewed the video circulating entitled: “Freedom Fighter Court VICTORY! Ends Masking, Shots, Quarantine in Alberta!” that aired on a Stew Peters broadcast, August 3, 2021, announcing: “Patrick King is a proud father of 2, Freedom Fighter and Patriot who took on the powerful government in Alberta, and WON!”
The Justice Centre has also reviewed some of the associated legal documents regarding Court File Number 12110 00751 Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, arising out of a ticket given to Patrick James King, a resident of Penhold, Alberta, issued to Mr. King for allegedly contravening an Order under S.73(1) of the Public Health Act, Provincial Court action number A87988036R. Excerpts can be found below.
The video appears to contain several inaccuracies. It is unclear whether Mr. King fully understands the legal process he is involved in. It appears that Mr. King was unsuccessful in his attempt to subpoena Alberta’s Chief Medical Health Officer. In the government’s filed Originating Application, July 16, 2021, the government notes Mr. King obtained a subpoena for the CMOH Dr. Deena Hinshaw to give evidence in the Provincial Court proceeding (the ticket case). The subpoena was issued by a Justice of the Peace under the Criminal Code, requesting the CMOH bring “all white papers describing the isolation of the COIVD-19 aka SARS-CoV-2 virus in human beings, directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient”, because “these white papers would have been integral in the crafting of the statutes made under the “Public Health Act” here in Alberta.”
The Government argued the subpoena was technically deficient and the Justice of the Peace had no jurisdiction to issue it. The Government further stated, Mr. King has “no evidence” showing that “the evidence sought from the CMOH is likely to be material” [legal term for meaning relevant and related] to the provincial court ticket received. “It is clear that Mr. King seeks evidence relating to the rationale for orders issued by the CMOH under the Act: he seeks evidence about the ‘Crafting of the statutes’,” stated the Government’s Affidavit. There do not appear to be any critical admissions by Dr. Hinshaw about the SARS-CoV-2 virus and this document has been prepared by the government’s legal team, not Dr. Hinshaw.
“The Provincial Court proceeding is about the December 5, 2020 enforcement of the law (when Mr. King was issued the ticket), not the rational for the law. The CMOH does not have, and Mr. King does not seek from the CMOH, any evidence about the ticket issued to Mr. King,” states the Government Affidavit. The Judge hearing the case informed the Accused, Mr. Patrick King, that he had not properly filed a Charter challenge against the law as required to fight the law itself, and thus could only address the ticket issued to him.
There is no indication that Mr. King’s case is connected to the relaxing of Covid restrictions in Alberta which fully opened on July 1, 2021. The government of Alberta states they have opened the province due to achieving the government’s stated goal of 70% of Albertans receiving their first vaccine.
JUDGE: So Mr. King, that is the Crown’s case against you. They are done calling evidence. So now, this is your opportunity to decide whether you want to call any evidence yourself, whether that is yourself or other witnesses.
THE ACCUSED: I don’t have any evidence per se, other than the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
JUDGE: All right. I am going to stop you right there…. if you were going to make any arguments that your rights under the Charter have been breached, there is a requirement that you provide notice of that —
THE ACCUSED: Oh.
JUDGE: –and that you do it in advance of the trial —
THE ACCUSED: Oh.
JUDGE: –provided copies tot he Crown, provided copies to the Court. So that has not been done, so that is not something that can be argued at this point… But, there has not been a Charter notice filed in this case, and so there is not an opportunity at this point for a Charter argument.
THE ACCUSED: There is not an opportunity for a Charter argument?
JUDGE: Not if you have not filed a Charter notice and given the Crown notice, and served them properly with notice that you intend to make an argument under the Charter.
THE ACCUSED: The — then the only evidence I do have then is the evidence on the front of a Canadian passport. And that is the issuance of the passport speaking of the Minister of Foreign Affairs: (as read)
Allowing the bearer of this passport to travel freely without hindrance or without delay or hindrance to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary.
JUDGE: All right. Again, sir, that particular clause, I don’t know how that relates to this particular case because this isn’t a case about your travel rights. And again, you have not raised any Charter argument or provided Charter notice…
The editor-in-chief of Germany’s top newspaper Bild has apologized for the news outlet’s fear-driven coverage of COVID, specifically to children who were told “that they were going to murder their grandma.”
In a speech delivered to camera, Julian Reichelt said sorry for Bild’s coverage which was “like poison” and “made you feel like you were a mortal danger to society.”
Reichelt directed his main sentiment towards children who have been terrorized by fearmongering media coverage which has caused child depression and suicides to soar across the world.
“To the millions of children in this country for whom our society is responsible, I want to express here what neither our government nor our Chancellor dares to tell you. We ask you to forgive us,” he said.
“Forgive us for this policy which, for a year and a half, has made you victims of violence, neglect, isolation, and loneliness.”
“We persuaded our children that they were going to murder their grandma if they dared to be what they are, children. Or if they met their friends. None of this has been scientifically proven.”
Julian Reichelt, the editor-in-chief of @BILD – one of the largest newspapers in Germany, apologized to the children of Germany for the COVID-19 coverage in his newspaper that made them “victims of neglect, isolation and loneliness.”
“When a state steals the rights of a child, it must prove that by doing so it protects him against concrete and imminent danger. This proof has never been provided. It has been replaced by propaganda presenting the child as a vector of the pandemic.”
Reichelt noted how moderate voices who attempted to offer calmer perspectives on the pandemic “were never invited to the expert table” and urged viewers “don’t believe this lie,” when encountering alarmist proclamations from the government.
The journalist called on authorities to open schools and sports halls instead of polling stations, warning that those who imposed brutal lockdown measures, “will have on their conscience and will leave in the history books, a multitude of innocent souls.”
Bild has a daily circulation of 1.24 million copies and is the best-selling newspaper in Europe, adding even more weight to this story.
As we highlighted yesterday, Germans protesting against plans to impose domestic vaccine passports were brutalized by police during demonstrations that took place in Berlin.
The ugly scenes prompted the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer to put in a request for eyewitnesses ahead of a potential investigation.
Germans were protesting against plans to ban unvaccinated people from a plethora of different venues, including restaurants, cinemas and stadiums.
As we previously highlighted, Germany’s domestic spy agency is monitoring anti-lockdown protesters, claiming they are potentially involved in a plot to subvert the country.
When airplanes routinely dump megatons of toxic garbage into our atmosphere as they have been doing for twenty years plus now, the most obvious question is: What are the biological impacts? What are the environmental implications of very small coal fly ash particles entering our bodies and fouling our biosphere? As one might guess, the implications are grave. Although the geoengineers will undoubtedly tell us that everything is fine, the best available evidence shows that the general population’s health is being negatively impacted, at least hundreds of thousands of people are dying, and our environment is being summarily wrecked as well. These are the biological impacts of the New Manhattan Project.
Particulate matter
The inhalation of aerosolized particulate matter has generally harmful human health impacts. This is not a matter of debate. Common sense and many studies show this. A slew of studies referenced at the end of this chapter shows that inhalation of fine particulate matter is associated with: Alzheimer’s disease, risk for stroke, risk for cardiovascular disease, lung inflammation and diabetes, reduced renal (kidney) function in older males, morbidity and premature mortality, decreased male fertility, low birth weight, onset of asthma, and increased hospital admissions.
Coal fly ash
As far back as October of 1979, a study was performed about the health effects of aerosolized coal fly ash. Unsurprisingly, the authors of the study found that exposure to aerosolized coal fly ash through the lungs causes harm. In other news, the geniuses at the World Health Organization found that bullets fired from guns can kill people.
We should be thankful that the good Dr. Marvin Herndon has recently produced a series of peer-reviewed, published journal articles detailing the health effects of exposure to that specific material being routinely pumped out of jet aircraft. His first paper in this area titled “Coal Fly Ash Aerosol: Risk Factor for Lung Cancer,” published in February of 2018, was co-authored by Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, MPH, the Medical Director of the Monroe County, Florida Department of Health. Herndon and Whiteside found that coal fly ash has lots of nasty, cancer-causing stuff in it. The authors write:
“CFA [coal fly ash] contains a variety of potentially carcinogenic substances including aluminosilicates, an iron oxide-containing magnetic fraction, several toxic trace elements, nanoparticles, and alpha-particle-emitting radionuclides. Silica, arsenic, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium are found in CFA and all have been associated with increased lung cancer risk.”
Further, the authors write, “Chronic exposure to aerosolized CFA, emplaced in the atmosphere for climate intervention, may be an important, yet unrecognized, environmental risk factor for development of lung cancer.”
Doctors Herndon and Whiteside
As we can see from the passage above and as many have feared, Dr.s Herndon and Whiteside have found that at least some of these atmospheric coal fly ash particles are nano-sized. This is a concern because when nano-sized particles are inhaled, they are so small that they go directly into the blood stream and right into the brain, often causing a host of neurological disorders. Nano-sized particles are so small that one ingests them through one’s skin.
Herndon and Whiteside teamed up again for the March 2018 publication of their paper “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for Neurodegenerative Disease.” The authors write:
“The recent finding of spherical exogenous magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in the brain tissue of persons with dementia suggests an origin in air pollution produced by coal fly ash. The primary components of coal fly ash, iron oxides and aluminosilicates, are all found in the abnormal proteins that characterize Alzheimer’s dementia. The presence of these substances in brain tissue leads to oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Energy absorbed by magnetite from external electromagnetic fields may contribute to this neuropathology.”
Later, in May of 2018, Herndon and Whiteside were published once again. This time, their paper titled “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for COPD and Respiratory Disease” found that:
“Aerosolized CFA [coal fly ash] is a particularly hazardous form of deliberate air pollution. Ultrafine particles and nanoparticles found in coal fly ash can be inhaled into the lungs and produce many toxic effects including decreased host defenses, tissue inflammation, altered cellular redox balance toward oxidation, and genotoxicity. Oxidative stress and chronic inflammation can predispose to chronic lung disease. Recognition and public disclosure of the adverse health effects of geoengineering projects taking place in our skies, and their concomitant cessation will be necessary to prevent an ever-widening epidemic of COPD and other respiratory illnesses.”
Rounding out this duo’s series of papers on the Human health impacts of chemtrails, Herndon and Whiteside wrote a November 2019 paper titled “Geoengineering, Coal Fly Ash and the New Heart-Iron Connection: Universal Exposure to Iron Oxide Nanoparticulates.” The authors write:
“Coal fly ash is a rich source of nano-sized metal, iron oxide, and carbonaceous particles. Previous findings revealed that coal fly ash is widely utilized in undisclosed tropospheric aerosol geoengineering. Proper iron balance is central to human health and disease, and the harmful effects of iron are normally prevented by tightly controlled processes of systemic and cellular iron homeostasis. Altered iron balance is linked to the traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The iron-heart hypothesis is supported by epidemiological, clinical, and experimental studies. Biogenic magnetite (Fe3O4) serves essential life functions, but iron oxide nanoparticles from anthropogenic sources cause disease. The recent finding of countless combustion-type magnetic nanoparticles in damaged hearts of persons from highly polluted areas is definitive evidence of the connection between the iron oxide fraction of air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Spherical magnetic iron oxide particles found in coal fly ash and certain vehicle emissions match the exogenous iron pollution particles found in the human heart. Iron oxide nanoparticles cross the placenta and may act as seed material for future cardiovascular disease. The pandemic of non-communicable diseases like cardiovascular disease and also rapid global warming can be alleviated by drastically reducing nanoparticulate air pollution. It is crucial to halt tropospheric aerosol geoengineering, and to curb fine particulate emissions from industrial and traffic sources to avoid further gross contamination of the human race by iron oxide-type nanoparticles.”
Now that we have seen the Human health impacts of aerosolized coal fly ash, we will now take a look at the Human health impacts of some known constituents of coal fly ash.
Aluminum
As evidenced by voluminous rainwater sample lab reports (ch 1), chemtrails have been shown to consist significantly of aluminum oxide. Aluminum is a common component of coal fly ash. As we have learned from Dr.s Herndon and Whiteside, these particles can be nano-sized.
Aluminum nanoparticles are nasty stuff. A material safety data sheet (MSDS) produced by US Research Nanomaterials, Inc. says that they can cause: respiratory problems, skin irritation, eye irritation, tumors, Alzheimer’s, pulmonary disease, neoplasms, and gastric or intestinal disorders. This MSDS also states that people coming in contact with aluminum nanoparticles should wear a respirator and a fully protective, impervious suit.
A 2016 paper titled “Assessing the Direct Occupational and Public Health Impacts of Solar Radiation Management with Stratospheric Aerosols” says that Aluminum aerosols will target these bodily systems: respiratory, cardiovascular, hematologic (blood), musculoskeletal (muscles & bones), endocrine (glands), immunologic, and neurologic (brain). They also say exposure to small atmospheric aluminum particles can cause cancer and death.
It appears coincidental that Wright-Patterson Air Force Base has studied the biological impacts of aerosolized aluminum. In March 2001, the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson published a study titled “In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages.” Scientists exposed rats to airborne, nano-sized aluminum oxide particles. The authors concluded:
“Aluminum oxide nanoparticles displayed significant toxicity after 96 and 144 hours post exposure at high doses (100 and 250 µg/ml). Aluminum nanoparticles also showed slight toxicity after 24 hours at high doses (100 and 250 μg/ml). When these cells were dosed at lower non toxic levels (25 μg/ml) Al 50, 80, 120 nm caused a significant reduction in phagocytosis. Even at a dose as low as 5 μg/ml Al 50 nm still caused a significant reduction. None of these nanoparticles caused the induction of nitric oxide, TNF-alpha, or MIP-2, important components in inflammatory responses. In summary, based on viability aluminum nanoparticles appear to be slightly toxic to rat alveolar macrophages. However, there was a significant reduction in phagocytic function of macrophages.”
In other words, they found that even at low doses, forcing rats to breathe in tiny aluminum particles screwed up their lungs. The induced lack of phagocytes means that the rats’ immune systems (especially in the lungs) became unable to fight off invading harmful organisms.
“In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages” was but one of a series of studies produced by Wright-Patterson pertaining to aluminum nanoparticle exposure. Wright-Patterson also produced a 2010 study titled “Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function” in which they found that inhaled aluminum nanoparticles impair human immune systems. The authors again noted that nanoparticles have more deleterious health effects than do larger sized particles. Curiously, “Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function” also states that we are prone to inhale aluminum nanoparticles because they are used in jet fuels. This information, makes yet another case for aluminum-spiked jet fuels. All this is extremely interesting when one considers Wright-Patterson’s involvement in the New Manhattan Project such as that which was documented in chapter 5.
A 2009 paper titled “Manufactured Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles Decrease Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Brain Vasculature” found that, due to brain cell death, aluminum exposure can cause: Alzheimer’s, stroke, reperfusion, hypoxia, mitochondrial disease, and general vascular dysfunction.
In a 2012 paper written by one of the world’s top neurosurgeons (now retired), many neurological diseases are linked to aluminum exposure. Russell Blaylock’s “Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders” found a link between aluminum exposure and: Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, Pick’s, HIV dementia, multiple sclerosis, viral encephalopathies, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS / Lou Gehrig’s disease). In this paper, Dr. Blaylock also found that aluminum exposure is linked to: impaired cognition, poor memory, impaired learning, poor attention, social withdrawal, irritability, reduced food and water intake and depression. Not only that, but Dr. Blaylock cites another paper here showing how extremely small aluminum particles like the ones used in today’s New Manhattan Project can intensify adverse health reactions.
Dr. Blaylock has provided us with some impressive evidence for a causal relationship between chemtrails and Alzheimer’s here. He tells us that the aluminum nanoparticles we constantly inhale are carried directly to the part of the brain that is first affected by Alzheimer’s disease AND most severely affected by Alzheimer’s disease. On March 28, 2013 Dr. Blaylock went on the Linderman Unleashed radio program. The host asked him how he became chemtrail aware and Dr. Blaylock said this:
Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD
“Well, you know, the connection has been the aluminum in the vaccines. I wrote several articles about the effects of the adjuvants in vaccines including the mercury and the aluminum effect.
“Then I found some articles about the chemtrails and there was a lot being said about it and I wasn’t too sure whether it was true or not because in my state we rarely saw them. But as I started looking on the Internet and I would see these states in which there were these criss-cross patterns and they were very tight patterns and geometrical shapes where it was obvious that it was a purposeful covering of the atmosphere with these patterns and the trails were so long. Well now, you know, we’re starting to see them in my state and as I look at them, they go from to horizon to horizon. Well, you know, I’ve been alive long enough to know that jets never did that in the past and I see the same patterning effect now where they’re criss-crossing; it’s an obvious pattern.
“And so I look into the literature and some of the reports and YouTube videos and they were saying that they were dropping as one of the ingredients, aluminum. Well, I had done a fair amount of writing and research on the effect of aerosolized chemicals in the nose when you breathe them. And what we knew was that these particles tend to travel along the olfactory nerves which are the smell nerves in the nose. And it travels directly to the part of the brain that has to do with memory and emotions; the hippocampus, the interlinal area, and the prefrontal cortex. And that you can trace these chemicals traveling along that nerve and depositing in this area of the brain.
“The other thing that was known is that if you aerosolize aluminum, it’s one of the metals that passes very easily along this track and directly into the brain. So it bypasses the blood-brain barrier and goes directly into the brain and accumulates. Well, if you do it in animals, it produces lesions, or damage in that area of the brain and the animal will begin to show changes of memory and learning and emotional changes.
“When we look at people who have Alzheimer’s disease, ironically, the highest concentration of aluminum in the brain is that same entry point; what’s called the interlinal cortex. And the levels continue to accumulate. So we have compelling evidence that aerosolized aluminum alone will enter the brain and produce damage to that critical area of the brain.
“The worst of all is the nano-sized. Nano-size means you make it such a small particle that it easily penetrates skin. It penetrates barriers in the body that normally metals cannot pass through. When you nano-size and produce these incredibly small particulate matter, it passes very easily. So when you nano-size aluminum and you use it in these aerosols through the nasal passages, it enters the brain in very high concentration and they find that the nano-sized aluminum in the brain is infinitely more toxic.
“Now one of the toxic reactions to aluminum is intense inflammation and activation of cells in the brain that are the immune cells called microglia. Aluminum is a very potent activator of these immune cells and that triggers the release of a powerful substance called glutamate which is an excitotoxin that causes cells to die from an excitatory mechanism. Kinda complex mechanism, but it is a combination of inflammation and excitotoxicity. And I coined the term in the medical literature called immunoexcitotoxicity to describe that process. So, we know that occurs. We know it occurs very easily.
“Now, the reports are coming out now that what they’re spraying is nano-sized aluminum and the idea is the old concept of preventing global warming. And they nano-size the aluminum so it will stay in the upper atmosphere longer; supposedly as a reflective compound metal. The problem with that, even from a climatological description is that if you make it into cirrus-like clouds rather than reflecting it upward and out of the atmosphere, it reflects the heat downward and actually causes global warming. So, you know, you could envision that they’re doing this on purpose to make the atmosphere heat up so they can say, ‘See, the atmosphere is warming up.’
“But what I’m concerned about mainly is the medical effect and that’s because of these very strong connections between aluminum passing through this pathway into the brain [which] is so strongly connected with Alzheimer’s disease and other diseases of memory.
“If you’re aerosolizing this and spraying literally tons of it over the world, people are constantly breathing that aerosolized, nano-sized aluminum which will easily penetrate filters in your air-conditioning system [and] enter your home. So you’re breathing it 24 hours a day; producing high levels of aluminum in this part of the brain. And the consequences could be absolutely devastating. It could cause a huge increase in Alzheimer’s disease and inflammatory neurological disorders.
“I watched a YouTube which was a geoengineering conference that the government had put on. And in the conference, one of the questions somebody in the audience asked was: What is the medical effect of spraying aluminum in the atmosphere? And the speaker said, ‘Well, uh, we don’t really know. But we’re in the process of researching that.’ Well, of course that was an absolute lie. We do know what it does. But the fact that they were admitting that in fact they were going to spray, they gave it in the future tense that they were going to spray aluminum, the evidence now from the examination by biologists and scientists around the world is that the aluminum level in the lakes and streams and trees is increasing enormously. Some areas have incredible elevations of aluminum in the groundwater and in the vegetation. So if this indeed is happening, we’re looking at a medical catastrophe that’s worldwide.”
There is lots of other highly credible evidence available linking aluminum exposure to the diseases mentioned here. If you want more information, please search the term ‘aluminum toxicity.’ Expediency demands that we move on.
Barium
Rainwater sample test results from around the world consistently show barium as well, and barium can also be a component of coal fly ash. Barium is highly toxic. Barium material safety data sheets (MSDS) readily available online will inform you that barium is extremely hazardous in case of inhalation. Severe exposure to barium can cause lung damage, choking, unconsciousness and death. Many other barium oxide MSDSs go on and on in a similar fashion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that barium oxide reacts violently with water while the atmosphere has lots of water in it and our bodies consist mostly of water. My science advisor says that barium titanate and barium sulfate have been used in atmospheric dispersions as well.
The aforementioned paper “Assessing the Direct Occupational and Public Health Impacts of Solar Radiation Management with Stratospheric Aerosols” says that barium compounds used as atmospheric sprays target these Human bodily systems: respiratory, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, renal, metabolic, and neurologic. They also say barium compounds dispersed by aircraft as part of geoengineering programs can cause death.
Strontium
Rainwater sample test results as well as others such as ambient air sample test results collected by Dr. Herndon have also been showing a presence of strontium. Strontium can be a component of coal fly ash. It is not surprising, but, like aluminum and barium, strontium is highly toxic as well.
A strontium MSDS from Sigma-Aldrich states that it is corrosive. It causes burns when it comes in contact with the skin and can be absorbed through the skin. If one inhales it, the MSDS states that it is, “…extremely destructive to the tissue of the mucous membranes and upper respiratory tract.” The MSDS continues:
“Inhalation may result in spasm, inflammation and edema of the larynx and bronchi, chemical pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema. Material is extremely destructive to tissue of the mucous membranes and upper respiratory tract, eyes, and skin.”
The Sigma-Aldrich MSDS finishes up by noting that the chemical, physical, and toxicological properties of strontium have not been thoroughly investigated.
Strontium hydroxide is even worse. Being that there is lots of water in the atmosphere, the atmospheric strontium produced as part of the New Manhattan Project may react with it and form the extremely caustic strontium hydroxide. Not only that, but don’t forget that our bodies are comprised of mostly H2O. Strontium in the atmosphere and inside of us has lots of opportunities to become strontium hydroxide. The Sigma-Aldrich MSDS cautions potential users to never expose strontium oxide to water because it reacts violently.
Because strontium can be a component of coal fly ash, it is interesting to note that studies have been done concerning exposure to the strontium found in ‘fly ash.’ The CDC writes:
“Rats were exposed to aerosols of 85Sr [strontium] carbonate, phosphate, fluoride, oxide, or titanate (particle sizes and doses not specified) (Willard and Snyder 1966). Greater than 99% of the initial lung burden of 85Sr was cleared from the lung 5 days after inhalation of the carbonate, phosphate, fluoride, or oxide, whereas 60% of the 85Sr remained in the lung after inhalation of the more insoluble strontium titanate.
“In rats exposed to airborne fly ash (sieved to have a particle diameter of distribution of 90% less than 20 μm) for 6 hours, strontium was eliminated from the lung with a half-time of 23 days (observations were made for 30 days) (Srivastava et al. 1984b). One day after the exposure, the tissue: plasma strontium concentration ratios were 0.3–0.5 in the liver, kidney, small intestine, and heart. The report of this study does not indicate whether whole-body or nose-only exposures were utilized in the study; therefore, it is not possible to know for certain how much of the absorption may have resulted from ingestion of fly ash deposited on the animals. Furthermore, given the relatively large particle size of the fly ash, it is likely that deposition in the respiratory tract was largely in the tracheobronchial and nasopharyngeal region, from which the strontium may have been cleared mechanically to the esophagus and swallowed. Nevertheless, studies in which 89Sr-enriched fly ash was instilled into the trachea of rats indicate that strontium in this form was partly absorbed and appeared in plasma and other tissues within days of the exposure (Srivastava et al. 1984a).”
The CDC goes on to note that the fly ash strontium administered to the lab rats ended up mostly in the bones. After that, it appeared in (in order of prevalence): muscle, skin, liver, and kidneys. Those heady days of just dumping dry ice into clouds are long gone.
Mercury
Dr. J. Marvin Herndon produced a December 2017 paper co-authored by Mark Whiteside, MD in which the authors write specifically of the Human health impacts of mercury. It has been well known for a long time now that mercury is one of the most toxic substances on the planet and we now know that mercury is a common constituent of the coal fly ash currently being sprayed by the megaton. The authors write:
“Despite strengthened mercury emission regulations, mercury measured in rainwater is increasing. Since it is known that the upper troposphere contains oxidized, particle-bound mercury, it is likely that covert aerosolized coal fly ash sprayed into this region is a major source of mercury pollution. Mercury affects multiple systems in the body, potentially causing neurological, cardiovascular, genitourinary, reproductive, immunological, and even genetic disease.”
CDC rates of associated diseases
As this chapter has explained, chemtrails are associated with many diseases. As we have been assaulted by this New Manhattan Project for over twenty years now, it is no surprise that the best available data shows rates of the associated diseases going up significantly. Historical rates of every disease associated with chemtrail spray are not presented here due to a lack of CDC data. Every associated disease with available CDC data is presented.
Let’s start with the most strongly correlated disease: Alzheimer’s. According to the latest data from the CDC, from 1999 to 2014, age-adjusted rates of death from Alzheimer’s increased 54.5% with the 2014 number of total deaths at 93,541. That means that in 2014 alone we saw tens of thousands of additional American deaths from Alzheimer’s. If one adds up all the additional deaths from Alzheimer’s between 1999 and 2014, we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of additional deaths. Let us recall that large-scale domestic spraying operations began in 1996.
Age adjusted rates of Alzheimer’s disease 1999-2014
In a 2013 report, the CDC found that while deaths from other diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and stroke decreased significantly, Alzheimer’s deaths increased 39%. They write, “Mortality from Alzheimer’s disease has steadily increased during the last 30 years.” Knowing what we now know, it is reasonable to assume that chemtrails have contributed greatly to this.
Not only have the rates of adult Alzheimer’s disease been increasing, but a disease that used to be relegated to the elderly is now showing up in children. Reports have been pouring in from around the world documenting research into Niemann Pick Type C disease, also known as ‘childhood Alzheimer’s.’ As previously mentioned, Dr. Blaylock has seen this phenomenon as well.
~ ~ ~
Dr. Blaylock says that there is also a correlation between aluminum exposure and Parkinson’s. The latest data from the CDC shows that between 1999 and 2017, the age-adjusted rate of Parkinson’s disease in people aged 65 or older went from 41.7 per 100,000 to 65.3 per 100,000.
CDC rates of Parkinson’s disease 1999-2017
Despite what the tobacco companies said in the 1950s, routinely breathing in particulate matter is bad for your lungs. It is for this reason that we now take a look at the CDC data pertaining to diseases associated with the routine inhalation of particulate matter such as COPD, asthma, and lung cancer. Although the CDC found that the rate of chronic pulmonary disease (COPD) was stable between 1998 and 2009, they also found that the prevalence of asthma rose during a similar period (between 2001 and 2010). The CDC also reports that between 1995 and 2011, smoking went from 35% among students and 25% among adults to 18% and 19% respectively. Concurrently, the CDC reports significant drops in the rate of lung cancer between 2002 and 2011.
Rate of smoking from 1965-2011
With these big drops in the rate of smoking, one might assume that the rate of COPD and asthma would go down as well, instead of remaining stable. Chemtrails probably kept the rate of COPD stable while contributing to the prevalence of asthma. Lung cancer probably decreased because chemtrail exposure has not been as carcinogenic for your lungs as smoking. It’s good to know that there are more carcinogenic things for your lungs than routine chemtrail exposure. Smoking cigarettes apparently fits that category. Moderate chemtrail exposure is probably better for you than inhaling burning plutonium too, but that doesn’t mean it’s ok.
Overall life expectancy
Very recently, we here in America have seen a slight reduction in our life expectancies. According to CDC data, for the first time in many decades, between 2016 and 2017 overall life expectancy at birth fell by .1 years.
CDC life expectancy 1970-2017
One might think, with all the much-touted breakthroughs in medicine, a growing health care industry, expanded access to better nutrition such as organic foods and supplements, and the like, that we would be experiencing longer average life expectancies, not shorter. Might chemtrails have something to do with it?
Early exposures
Although it appears that our bodies have been finding ways to better cope with this daily onslaught of aerosolized toxic waste, around the times when people were first exposed, emergency rooms filled up. William Thomas’ aforementioned 2004 book Chemtrails Confirmed chronicles many of these examples. Thomas recounts the words of a registered nurse:
“Approximately December 16th or the 17th, while traveling north, I could see ‘stripes’ in the sky. It appeared as if someone took white paint on their fingers and from north to south ran their fingers through the sky. These contrails were evenly spaced and covered the whole sky! They covered it completely! When I was finished with the next visit, approximately 45 minutes, I came out of the house and found the whole sky was white. There was no definition in cloud pattern.
“Within the 24 hours I became very weak, feverish, and my asthma began to act up. I didn’t think too much about it, until my boyfriend told me that many in his family started coming down with the same complaints. I also started noticing a lot of my patients and their family members were coming down with these symptoms at the same time. In our area we have one main hospital which I was the Supervisor of for four years. I worked there a total of six years. I stay in close contact with the nurses and physicians and am planning on investigating into this more. At that time, they complained of being extremely busy with respiratory diagnoses.”
Another passage from Chemtrails Confirmed recounts the experiences of a restaurant owner from Oklahoma. The passage reads:
“On January 24, 1999 [Pat] Edgar reported that on, ‘Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday and Thursday of last week, we were really hit hard with the contrails. I mean real bad. Everybody in this town is sick right now; sicker than a damn dog. It’s all in their head and their sinuses, and it hangs in the throat, (sore necks), ears ringing.’
“Edgar added: ‘Some customers that frequent our business have stated that they have been to the doctor and the offices have been full of sick people. Same thing at the Indian clinic.’
“‘People have to wait for hours because the waiting room is full. Some people have reported being on their third and fourth round of antibiotics and they are still ill. We noticed excessive contrails Thursday, Feb. 11th.’
“Edgar became ill the following day, and visited a doctor. From a friend he learned that Sparks regional hospital had over 500 people seeking medical attention at the emergency room for flu, or flu-like symptoms.”
Others appearing in Thomas’ book tell similar stories.
Bodily contamination testing
When we ingest aluminum, some of it eventually comes out in our hair and fingernails. There are many reports online of people finding high levels of chemtrail toxins in their hair and fingernails. Certain laboratories can analyze hair and fingernail samples for aluminum and other substances. If you are curious about your bodily contamination, one may get their hair tested by the Great Plains Laboratory or Analytical Research Labs. One can find their websites online.
Biospheric implications
There is evidence that chemtrails are changing soil pH. This could be very bad for our biosphere. As mentioned in the first chapter, anti-geoengineering activist Francis Mangels has a Bachelor of Science in forestry from the International School of Forestry at Missoula, spent 35 years with the U.S. Forest Service as a wildlife biologist and worked several years with the USDA Soil Conservation Service as a soil conservationist. In order to document the effect of chemtrail spray upon soil pH, Mr. Mangels wrote on Oct. 30, 2009:
“The soil scientists from the USDA Soil Conservation Department visited private property east of Shasta Lake, California, on Oct. 27, 2009. Mr. Bailey, Komar, and Owens tested the pH with standard federal meters. All agreed the pH should be 5.5.
“Under Douglas fir, the ph was 7.4, astoundingly basic for that habitat.
“Under Poderosa pine, at the precise soil-needle interface, I would expect a pH of 5. At that point, Bailey’s meter showed 6.5. This is high for a microhabitat that should be very acid. Old soil surveys indicate this soil should be very acid, around pH of 5.5.
“I bought a house in Mt. Shasta old black oak/pine pasture in 2002, tested the pH at below 6, good for vegetable gardening. It was a major reason for purchase, and proceeded with highly acid composting of leaves and grass to drive the pH down or at least keep it low, as every master gardener knows. I added a touch of sulphur and avoided wood ash to insure acidity, and proceeded to teach organic gardening courses out of my yard through COS. The pH tests were an embarrassment because now my garden is pH 7, sometimes higher. This is the opposite of what should happen.
“The pH meter of Jon McClellan proceeded to show pH in McCloud gardens also running close to 7 or 8, which is too high for heavy organic mulch with no ashes. General lawns were also running over pH 7 under oaks and pines and fir trees. This is contrary to everything I learned in college and the Soil Conservation Service for 35 years. The old data sheets say these soils should be running at a pH of 5-6.”
Francis Mangels
In the movie What In the World Are They Spraying?, Mr. Mangels says that when soil pH changes, soil arthropods (a vital link in our ecosystem) start to go away. This type of disruption could have negative effects up and down the food chain.
Reports of massive plant and animal die-offs potentially due to chemtrails are widespread. Spraying vast regions of the Earth with tens of thousands of megatons of toxic waste is probably contributing to the alarming rate of animal species extinction as well. Although many other factors are in play here, the chemtrails surely don’t help. The Center for Biological Diversity reports that:
“Scientists estimate we’re now losing species at 1,000 to 10,000 times the background rate, with literally dozens going extinct every day. It could be a scary future indeed, with as many as 30 to 50 percent of all species possibly heading toward extinction by mid-century.”
Once again, our Spartacus with the dragon energy, Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD has been on the case. Dr. Herndon has again teamed up with the Medical Director of the Monroe County, Florida Department of Health, Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, MPH to publish a series of peer-reviewed, published journal articles addressing the biospheric implications of the ongoing and uncontrolled geoengineering experimentation and we will go over them here.
Let’s start at the bottom of the food chain. In June of 2019 Herndon and Whiteside published a paper titled “Role of Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash in the Global Plankton Imbalance: Case of Florida’s Toxic Algae Crisis.” In this paper, the authors provide evidence for the assertion that the coal fly ash sprayed by the megaton into our biosphere is causing, among other things, an overabundance of harmful plankton blooms which, in turn, has more harmful effects. The authors write:
“Our objective is to review the effects the multifold components of aerosolized coal fly ash as they relate to the increasing occurrences of HABs [harmful algal blooms]. Aerosolized coal fly ash (CFA) pollutants from non-sequestered coal-fired power plant emissions and from undisclosed, although ‘hidden in plain sight,’ tropospheric particulate geoengineering operations are inflicting irreparable damage to the world’s surface water-bodies and causing great harm to human health (including lung cancer, respiratory and neurodegenerative diseases) and environmental health (including major die-offs of insects, birds and trees). Florida’s ever-growing toxic nightmare of red tides and blue-green algae is a microcosm of similar activity globally. Atmospheric deposition of aerosol particulates, most importantly bioavailable iron, has drastically shifted the global plankton community balance in the direction of harmful algae and cyanobacterial blooms in fresh and salt water.”
A little further up the food chain we find insects. Herndon and Whiteside have been working in this area as well. In August of 2018 their paper titled “Previously Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bee and Insect Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” was published. In this paper, the authors substantiate a multitude of harmful, observed effects upon insects from chemtrail spray. We can stop wondering why bee populations are being decimated. The authors write:
“The primary components of CFA [coal fly ash], silicon, aluminum, and iron, consisting in part of magnetite (Fe3O4), all have important potential toxicities to insects. Many of the trace elements in CFA are injurious to insects; several of them (e.g., arsenic, mercury, and cadmium) are used as insecticides. Toxic particulates and heavy metals in CFA contaminate air, water, and soil and thus impact the entire biosphere. Components of CFA, including aluminum extractable in a chemically-mobile form, have been shown to adversely affect insects in terrestrial, aquatic, and aerial environments. Both the primary and trace elements in CFA have been found on, in, and around insects and the plants they feed on in polluted regions around the world. Magnetite from CFA may potentially disrupt insect magnetoreception. Chlorine and certain other constituents of aerosolized CFA potentially destroy atmospheric ozone thus exposing insects to elevated mutagenicity and lethality levels of UV-B and UV-C solar radiation.”
This information goes a long way towards explaining the tremendous drops in global insect populations lately. It’s almost too scary to look into, but an Internet search of the term ‘insect populations’ will bring pages and pages of relevant results. Of course, many are blaming it on the dreaded global warming/climate change, but insect populations have done just fine throughout previous fluctuations in Earth’s average temperature. In fact, insect populations have most probably done better in warmer climates, so maybe we should look instead at the gigantic aircraft routinely dumping megatons of toxic waste into our biosphere.
As noted, Francis Mangels has been observing a lack of insects as well. He logically attributes it to geoengineering. On July 19, 2017, Francis emailed to the author the following:
“Several streams were sampled for aquatic insects, and I likewise fished them hard to get stomach samples of trout. Total sample over 1000, lately around 400 stomach samples. Methods used were fairly casual, using typical nets for streams in gravel substrates that appeared similar. Standard data was orders of aquatics per square foot, accuracy about 80% due to equipment. It was very easy to see which streams would have the most trout.
“The bottom fell out of the sampling from 2000 to 2008, and it continues today. All major orders of bugs took severe hits from an unknown source. Then I was contacted by Dane [Wigington], and logic said only sky pollution could hit all the streams at once in the same way.
“Likewise, the trout I caught before then always were loaded with bugs and etc. food both terra and aquatic. Ever since about 2006, the trout stomachs were almost empty, and I quit taking data because there was no data to take, for the most part. A bug here and there, mostly terrestrials, very small amounts and the trout got skinny over the years (except for those freshly planted, that soon lost the fat and got skinny too, as we say, poor condition factors). Very clear streams went almost barren, no bugs or trout either.
“Net sweeps in lots showed plenty of earwigs, pill bugs, ants, aphids, box elder bugs, any SUCKING types. However, the caterpillar types for the most part became very scarce, as did moths and butterflies as you would expect (leaf eaters eat the aluminum). I turned in a huge collection to the American butterfly association of CA, but damned if I could do it now….Lepidoptera are around, but rare now except for the cabbage butterfly and a few swallowtails. Point is, this distribution showed in the trout stomachs, which caused me to do the sweeps.”
Further up the food chain we find birds. Dr.s Herndon and Whiteside published a paper in November of 2018 titled “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: A Previously Unrecognized Primary Factor in the Catastrophic Global Demise of Bird Populations and Species.” In this paper, the authors find that coal fly ash is causing unprecedented bird die-offs.
The authors write, “Bird populations and species world-wide are experiencing die-offs on an unprecedented scale.” A little later, the authors continue, “Aerosolized CFA [coal fly ash], a particularly toxic form of air pollution, contains multiple metals and elements well-known to adversely affect all portions of the avian life cycle, in aerial, terrestrial, and marine environments. Studies from around the globe reveal systemic contamination of birds by these elements.” The authors conclude that, “Coal fly ash, including its use in ongoing atmospheric geoengineering operations, is a major factor in global bird die-off. The accelerating decline of birds parallels the catastrophic decline of insects, due in part to the same type of aerial pollution.”
Doctors Herndon and Whiteside have also looked at the biological impacts of chemtrails upon bat populations. In January of this year (2020), they published a paper titled “Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bat Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering.” In this paper, the authors find that bat populations worldwide are suffering a precipitous decline. The authors write:
“Bats are excellent mammalian bioindicators of environmental contaminants and it is known that their tissue contains high levels of metals and persistent organic pollutants. From a review of the literature, we show that the pollutant element ratios in bat tissue and bat guano are consistent with an origin in CFA-type air pollution. These findings suggest that CFA [coal fly ash], including its use in covert climate engineering operations, is an unacknowledged factor in the morbidity and mortality of bats. Bats, therefore, are an important ‘canary in the coal mine’ pointing to the urgency of halting covert climate engineering and greatly reducing ultrafine particulate air pollution.”
~ ~ ~
As we saw at the beginning of this section, with all the professionally observed soil pH anomalies, plants are not doing very well under this New Manhattan Project either. Doctors Herndon, Whiteside and other co-authors have been doing work in these areas as well. In a series of published, peer-reviewed journal articles, they have found that a combination of factors, all caused by the spraying of coal fly ash, are causing mass die-offs of global vegetation. They found that trees, in particular, are weakened by increased UV radiation, desiccation, and toxicity – all caused by chemtrails. Once a tree is weakened by this trifecta, it becomes susceptible to insect infestations, fungal infections, and other biotic factors such as bacteria and viruses.
The result of all this is dry, dead and dying vegetation. An abundance of dry, dead and dying vegetation makes forest fires occur more often and burn more furiously. Herndon et al. find that this is most probably why we have seen such tremendously large forest fires lately. The increased levels of UV radiation noted by Herndon et al. as being harmful to vegetation, are also harmful to Humans as well as phytoplankton, coral, and insects.
Silver iodide
The conventional weather modification industry has been openly spraying vast areas of the United States with silver iodide since 1947. The super-secret New Manhattan Project only started spraying us with coal fly ash in 1996. Hence, the vast majority of the weather modification and atmospheric sciences literature is geared towards the dispersion of silver iodide. Although silver iodide is not what is used in today’s New Manhattan Project, as a side issue, let’s take a look at the scientific evidence (or lack thereof) concerning the biological impacts of silver iodide. Past is prelude.
Considering that this issue is the most obvious question and of grave importance, the lack of publicly available research pertaining to the biological impacts of silver iodide dispersion is quite shocking. You may read the 746 page, 1978 Congressional Research Service report on weather modification. You may read all 21 of the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences reports or all of the National Science Foundation annual weather modification reports. You may read scores of weather modification reports, book after book, and myriad reports and papers about weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. But nowhere in any of these documents may you find an adequate examination of biological impacts and specifically human health impacts caused by exposure to atmospheric silver iodide. Only after reading a stack of documents about a yard high, did your author finally find a report containing an adequate discussion of this topic.
A popular silver iodide material safety data sheet describes silver iodide as, “Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, [and] of inhalation.” Unbelievably, the authors of this data sheet write that much of the toxicology information is NOT AVAILABLE. They’ve been spraying us with this stuff since 1947 and the toxicology information is not available?! Equally as unbelievable, to date, no publicly available, long-term studies have been done.
It is widely suggested that exposure to silver iodide causes argyria – characterized by a blue-grey discoloration of the eyes, skin, mucous membranes, and internal organs. Does that sound healthy? Another MSDS produced by Fisher Scientific reads:
“Chronic ingestion of iodides during pregnancy has resulted in fetal death, severe goiter, and cretinoid appearance of the newborn. Prolonged exposure to iodides may produce iodism in sensitive individuals. Symptoms could include skin rash, running nose and headache.”
In spite of this information, the historical weather modification literature notes a lack of data. A 1966 National Science Foundation report stated, “The present state of knowledge places uncomfortable limits on the prediction of the biological consequences of modifying the weather.” A 1969 Bureau of Reclamation report noted, “There has so far not been a single biological field study completed and reported in the literature specifically designed to identify any aspect of the ecological effects of weather modification.” A 1972 study conducted by the Council on Environmental Quality stated, “Projects may have significant adverse environmental effects, ranging from immediate hazards to life and property to long-term alterations in land use patterns and threats to ecological systems.”
Weather modifiers have exhibited a pattern of dismissing the potentially harmful effects of substances used in weather modification activities. In 1967 weather modifier Archie Kahan, writing for the Bureau of Reclamation, dismissed concerns about the use of silver iodide as he conflated the biological impacts of silver iodide with its efficacy as a nucleant and any possible hazardous weather that might arise from its use.
In 1972, decades after silver iodide was first used as a nucleant, Bernard Vonnegut and another atmospheric scientist by the name of Ronald Standler wrote a biology paper published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology that mollified concerns about their activities. Although the biological impacts of prolonged silver iodide dispersion has implications not only for Human health, but also for the health of the entire biosphere, the paper concerns itself almost exclusively with impacts upon Human health. The questionable biological impacts of their activities pertaining to plant and animal life is glossed over only briefly. They note that prolonged exposure to silver iodide has been known to cause Humans to exhibit an ashen appearance, but they claim that this is not of particular concern. They also dismiss concerns about silver iodide’s ability to cause a yellowing of the skin when exposure is topical. They even dismiss two examples of individuals having been significantly harmed by exposure to silver iodide. Their paper is full of phrases like ’seem to be’ and ‘we do not expect’ because much of what is presented in the paper is assumptions and extrapolations based on other people’s work rather than any scientific findings of their own.
The vast majority of research done in this area does not even concern itself with Human health impacts or biospheric contamination. Rather, it focuses on the ancillary issue of how plants and animals may be affected by either more or less rainfall. The work that is publicly available is mostly cursory. In the vast majority of cases where the subject is even so much as broached, the literature quickly follows with assurances that there are probably no adverse effects and that further study is not necessary.
Thankfully, some research indicating silver iodide’s negative biological impacts has surfaced. It is not good news, but we need to hear it. Evidence suggests that it is exceptionally bad for organisms further down the food chain. The aforementioned 1969 Bureau of Reclamation report also noted:
“Silver compounds are much more toxic to fish than to terrestrial vertebrates. Some of the higher concentrations of Ag recorded in precipitation from seeded storms are comparable to the lowest concentrations lethal to fish in the short run. In one set of experiments, sticklebacks were able to withstand no more than 0.003 ppm Ag in water at 15-18° C. The fish survived one week at 0.004 ppm, four days at 0.01 ppm, and but one day at 0.1 ppm.”
This 1969 report also found silver to be, “…highly toxic to microorganisms….” The report continues:
“Many investigators have placed Ag at or near the top of the list among heavy metals in toxicity to fungi, slime molds, and bacteria. Water containing 0.015 ppm Ag from contact with specially prepared metal has exhibited bacteriocidal activity. 0.006 ppm Ag has killed E. coli in 2 to 24 hours, depending on numbers of bacteria. Bacteriocidal activity in this context usually implies death of 9.99% or so of the cells present.”
Killing fungi, E. coli, and slime molds may sound like a good thing. But in the context of our complex and interdependent biosphere, it is not. Our overall ecosystem needs slime molds and the like. These things are vital links in the food chain.
Why does the conventional weather modification and atmospheric sciences literature not sufficiently address the issue of silver iodide’s biological impacts? They wouldn’t have anything to hide, would they? That which is not disclosed is often more incriminating than that which is. Although today’s Weather Modification Association claims it is completely safe, they have a conflict of interest and they do not have enough data to sufficiently back up their claims.
The bottom line is that there is evidence showing that silver iodide has negative biological impacts. We cannot know for sure that spraying this stuff is safe if no public long term studies have been done. But they have been going ahead and doing it anyway – just like today’s geoengineers.
Conclusions
Although it is currently not feasible to completely assess the damage to Earth’s biosphere caused by this New Manhattan Project, the available evidence does not paint a pretty picture. This is an area of study and body of work which should be vastly expanded and updated in the coming years and decades. We already know that massive quantities of atmospheric coal fly ash are bad for Humans, animals, insects, plants, and the overall environment. In Humans, the rates of diseases linked to exposure are on the rise. Many people became very sick when first exposed. The historical precedent set by the conventional weather modification industry mandates irresponsibility. When geoengineers say that their activities are harmless, we have plenty of good reasons to not believe them.
References
“An Open Letter to Members of AGU, EGU, and IPCC Alleging Promotion of Fake Science at the Expense of Human and Environmental Health and Comments on AGU Draft Geoengineering Position Statement” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, published by New Concepts in Global Tectonics Journal, September 2017
Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human health effects of air pollution Environmental Pollution 2008, 151, 362-367.
Calderon-Garciduenas, L.; Franko-Lira, M.; Mora-Tiscareno, A.; Medina-Cortina, H.; Torres-Jardon, R.; et al. Early alzheimer’s and parkinson’s diese pathology in urban children: Friend verses foe response – it’s time to face the evidence. BioMed Research International 2013, 32, 650-658.
Moulton, P.V.; Yang, W. Air pollution, oxidative stress, and alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2012, 109, 1004-1011.
Beeson, W.L.; Abbey, D.E.; Knutsen, S.F. Long-term concentrations of ambient air pollutants and incident lung cancer in california adults: Results from the ahsmog study. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106, 813-822.
Hong, Y.C.; Lee, J.T.; Kim, H.; Kwon, H.J. Air pollution: A new risk factor in ischemic stroke mortality. Stroke 2002, 33, 2165-2169.
Haberzetti, P.; Lee, J.; Duggineni, D.; McCracken, J.; Bolanowski, D.; O’Toole, T.E.; Bhatnagar, A.; Conklin, D., J. Exposure to ambient air fine particulate matter prevents vegf-induced mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells from bone matter. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 848-856.
Potera, C. Toxicity beyond the lung: Connecting pm2.5, inflammation, and diabetes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, A29
Mehta, A.J.; Zanobetti, A.; Bind, M.-A., C.; Kloog, I.; Koutrakis, P.; Sparrow, D.; Vokonas, P.S.; Schwartz, J.D. Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and renal function in older men: The va normative aging study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124(9), 1353-1360.
Dai, L.; Zanobetti, A.; Koutrakis, P.; Schwartz, J.D. Associations of fine particulate matter species with mortality in the united states: A multicity time-series analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122,
Dockery, D.W.; Pope, C.A.I.; Xu, X.P.; Spengler, J.D.; Ware, J.H.; et al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U. S. Cities. N. Eng. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1753-1759.
Pope, C.A.I.; Ezzati, M.; Dockery, D.W. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the united states. N. Eng. J. Med. 2009, 360, 376-386.
Pires, A.; de Melo, E.N.; Mauad, T.; Saldiva, P.H.N.; Bueno, H.M.d.S. Pre- and postnatal exposure to ambient levels of urban particulate matter (pm2.5) affects mice spermatogenesis. Inhalation Toxicology: International Forum for Respiratory Research: DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2011.563508 2011, 23.
Ebisu, K.; Bell, M.L. Airborne pm2.5 chemical components and low birth weight in the northeastern and midatlantic regions of the united states. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1746-1752.
Tetreault, L.-F.; Doucet, M.; Gamache, P.; Fournier, M.; Brand, A.; Kosatsky, T.; Smargiassi, A. Childhood exposure to ambient air pollutants and the onset of asthma: An administrative cohort study in quebec. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124(8), 1276.
Bell, M.L.; Ebisu, K.; Leaderer, B.P.; Gent, J.F.; Lee, H.J.; Koutrakis, P.; Wang, Y.; Dominici, F.; Peng, R.D. Associations of pm2.5 constituents and sources with hospital admissions: Analysis of four counties in connecticut and massachusetts (USA). Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 138-144.
“The Effect of Reaerosolized Fly Ash from an Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustor on Murine Alveolar Macrophages” a paper by Patricia C. Brennan, Frederick R. Kirchner, and William P. Norris, published by Argonne National Laboratory, 1979
“Coal Fly Ash Aerosol: Risk Factor for Lung Cancer” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, February 2018
“Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for Neurodegenerative Disease” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, March 2018
“Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for COPD and Respiratory Disease” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, May 2018
“Geoengineering, Coal Fly Ash and the New Heart-Iron Connection: Universal Exposure to Iron Oxide Nanoparticulates” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, November 2019
“Weather and Climate Modification: Report of the Special Commission on Weather Modification” by the National Science Foundation, 1965
Aluminum oxide material safety data sheet by US Research Nanomaterials, Inc., 2013
“Assessing the Direct Occupational and Public Health Impacts of Solar Radiation Management with Stratospheric Aerosols” a paper by Utibe Effiong and Richard L. Neitzel, published in Environmental Health, 2016
“In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages” a report by Andrew Wagner, Charles Bleckmann, and E. England of the Air Force Institute of Technology, Krista Hess of Geo-Centers, Inc., Dayton, Ohio, and Saber Hussain and John J. Schlager of the Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Applied Biotechnology Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB, published by the Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Applied Biotechnology Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB, 2001
“Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function” a paper by Laura K. Braydich-Stolle, Janice L. Speshock, Alicia Castle, Marcus Smith, Richard C. Murdock, and Saber M. Hussain, published by the American Chemical Society, 2010
“Manufactured Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles Decrease Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Brain Vasculature” a paper by Lei Chen, Robert A. Yokel, Bernhard Henning, and Michal Toborek, published by the Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, December, 2008
“Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders” a paper by Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, as published in Current Inorganic Chemistry, 2012
“Gila Activation Induced by Peripheral Administration of Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles in Rat Brains” a paper by X. Li, H. Zheng, Z. Zhang, M. Li, Z. Huang, H.J. Schluesener, Y. Li, and S. Xu, published in Nanomed, 2009, 5, (4), 473-479
Strontium oxide material safety data sheet by Sigma- Aldrich, 2007
“Aluminum Poisoning of Humanity and Earth’s Biota by Clandestine Geoengineering Activity: Implications for India” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by Current Science, 2015
“Strontium” a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
“Contamination of the Biosphere with Mercury: Another Potential Consequence of On-going Climate Manipulation Using Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, December 2017
Inhaled Particles and Vapours a book edited by C.N. Davies, published by Pergamon Press, 1961
“Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality in 20 U.S. Cities, 1987-1994” a report by Jonathan M. Samet, MD, Francesca Dominici, PhD, Frank C. Curriero, PhD, Ivan Coursac, MS, and Scott L. Zeger, PhD, published by the New England Journal of Medicine, volume 343, number 24, 2000
Pulmonary Deposition and Retention of Inhaled Aerosols a book by Theodore F. Hatch, Paul Gross, the American Industrial Hygiene Association, and the United States Atomic Energy Commission, published by Academic Press, 1964
“Mortality from Alzheimer’s Disease in the United States: Data for 2000 and 2010” a report by Betzaida Tejada-Vera, M.S., published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013
“Deaths from Alzheimer’s Disease – United States, 1999-2014” an article by Christopher A. Taylor, PhD, Sujay F. Greenlund, Lisa C. McGuire, PhD, Hua Lu, MS, and Janet B. Croft, PhD, published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May 26, 2017
“Age-Adjusted Death Rates for Parkinson’s Disease Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years – National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1999-2017” an article by Nancy Han, MS and Barnali Das, PhD, published by the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sept. 6, 2019
“Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Adults Aged 18 and Over in the United States, 1998–2009” a report by Lara J. Akinbami, MD; and Xiang Liu, MSc, published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011
“United States Life Tables, 2017” an article by Elizabeth Arias, PhD and Jiaquan Xu, MD, published by National Vital Statistics Reports, June 24, 2019
“National Surveillance of Asthma: United States, 2001-2010” a report by the Centers for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, November, 2012
Chemtrails Confirmed a book by William Thomas, published by Bridger House Publishers, 2004
What In the World Are They Spraying? a documentary film by Michael Murphy, Paul Wittenberger, and Edward G. Griffin, produced by Truth Media Productions, 2010
“Role of Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash in the Global Plankton Imbalance: Case of Florida’s Toxic Algae Crisis” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, June 2019
“Previously Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bee and Insect Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, August 2018
“Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: A Previously Unrecognized Primary Factor in the Catastrophic Global Demise of Bird Populations and Species” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, November 2018
“Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bat Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, January 2020
“Previously Unrecognized Primary Factors in the Demise of Endangered Torrey Pines: A Microcosm of Global Forest Die-offs” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, Dale D. Williams, and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, August 2018
“California Wildfires: Role of Undisclosed Atmospheric Manipulation and Geoengineering” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, October 2018
“Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth’s Surface: Human and Environmental Health Implications” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, Raymond D. Hoisington and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, March 2018
Silver iodide material safety data sheet produced by ScienceLab.com, 2010
Silver iodide material safety data sheet produced by Fisher Scientific, 2009
National Science Foundation Report No. 66-3 as it appeared in a hearing before the Subcommittee on Oceans and Atmosphere of the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, Feb. 17, 1976
“Ecological Effects of Weather Modification: A Problem Analysis” a report by Charles F. Cooper and William C. Jolly, produced by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Atmospheric Water Resources, published by the University of Michigan, 1969
“Some Comments About Weather Modification Affects on Man’s Environment” by Archie M. Kahan, Office of Atmospheric Water Resources, Office of Chief Engineer, Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, published by the Department of the Interior, 1967
“Federal Regulation of Weather Modification” a report by the Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, D.C., 1972 as it appeared in a hearing before the Subcommittee on Oceans and Atmosphere of the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, Feb. 17, 1976
Environmental Impacts of Artificial Ice Nucleating Agents a book edited and co-written by Donald A. Klein, published by Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1978
“Weather Modification Association Position Statement on the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodide as a Cloud Seeding Agent” a paper by the Weather Modification Association, published by the Weather Modification Association, 2009
“Estimated Possible Effects of AgI Cloud Seeding on Human Health” a paper by Ronald B. Standler and Bernard Vonnegut, published by the Journal of Applied Meteorology, Volume 11, August 11, 1972
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. The greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project is now available. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.
All life adapts to its environment. All life adapts to survive. Humans adapt to variations in space, time, temperature, pressure, fear, and intimidation. We are variants.
So, too, are our microbes. Humans are more microbe than human, 10:1.
This fact was shown with Bordetella pertussis, a bacterium blamed for whooping cough, which adapted itself to survive the vaccine. According to the February 7, 2013 New England Journal of Medicine study, the authors concluded that adaptation of B. pertussis was “in response to vaccine selection pressure.”
The one thing the experts know is that 21 COVID variants are coming down the pipeline. Here is one list showing their Greek names and birthdates/release dates between June 2021 (Delta) and February 2023 (Omega).
Variant
Name
Birthdate
A
Delta
Jun 2021
E
Epsilon
Jul 2021
Z
Zeta
Aug 2021
H
Eta
Sept 2021
θ
Theta
Oct 2021
I
Iota
Nov 2021
K
Kappa
Dec 2021
λ
Lambda
Jan 2022
M
Mu
Feb 2022
N
Nu
Mar 2022
Ξ
Ksi
April 2022
O
Omicron
May 2022
Π
Pi
June 2022
P
Rho
July 2022
Σ
Sigma
Aug 2022
T
Tao
Sept 2022
Y
Upsilon
Oct 2022
Φ
Phi
Nov 2022
X
Chi
Dec 2022
Ψ
Psi
Jan 2023
Ω
Omega
Feb 2023
Yet still, no one knows the true costs to health from injected spike proteins and nanotechnology inherent in COVID vaccines. No time for research. And no clinical trial vaccine data is available for people to analyze for themselves before making a choice whether to inject, or not to inject, because clinical trials continue, live, in the population. And experimental vaccines are being deployed by chosen vaccine makers who have never produced this type of medical product before.
No responsible party for negative consequences. Vaccine makers are not liable for damages from their experimental products. Doctors are not responsible for reporting any adverse reactions from the COVID vaccines to authorities, even though the CDC-authority has a reporting system called The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS collects less than 1% of adverse events reports from medical doctors who fail to report them. See the latest results for COVID vaccine reactions here.
The PCR Ruse
Meanwhile, the PCR test that drives the numbers of reported cases up, along with deaths, surges, and fear, has been deemed invalid by the CDC. The CDC has quietly withdrawn its request to use the PCR test to identify COVID vs. Flu This means that no valid tracking test exists for the virus, that was never isolated, and that shut down the world, eliminated jobs, and caused suicide, hardship and regret for neglecting elderly family members who died alone.
If no valid test exists to track the coronavirus [one word], then what does that say about coronavirus itself? Is it real? Is it corona virus? Or is it just a word masquerading as a virus? Is it a bacterium? A figment of someone’s imagination? What does it say about the power of “the experts” and their mandates who attempt to track a figment?
What does it say that 120 patents for a number of bacterial and viral pathogens were filed from NIH, NIAID, US armed services infectious disease program, and the international agencies that collaborated with them?
A pandemic of fear has morphed into a pandemic of illness. Yet still, there are over 500,000 adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines since injections began. See the updated COVID adverse reactions reported to VAERS.
Transmuting The Transhumanist Agenda
There are no consequences for the those who take part in modifying the genetics of the whole population. Under conditioning through the media, social engineers are taking advantage of human ignorance, by modifying human behavior right along with the genome. As long as the population consents to the biologic invasion, humanity becomes a farm of genetic material, ripe for DNA harvesting.
Yet, each human has free will and the power to say NO.
You have the power to not consent to biologic invasion and takeover of your humanity. Simply do not consent to anything that comes from fear. Declare out loud. “I Do Not Consent to manipulation of my biologic identity.” I Do Not Consent to harvesting of my property. I Do Not Consent. Say it out loud and know it because no one has the right to violate your property, your body, your DNA, your mind, or your free will.
Under mind manipulation, whether through the media, through government dictates, through frequencies emitted from towers or devices, or through intimidation by others, it is important to maintain a strong mind and your willpower. Mind over matter has never been more critical. The Corona-agenda was never about a runaway virus or Greek covariants. The agenda is about creating a Transhuman variant out of humanity via conditioning to be controlled. Know your mind.
Do you consent?
These are history-making times and you are part of it, here to do your part to liberate yourself and humanity from synthetic slavery. No one else saves humanity, just as no one else can heal you. We each save ourselves. We each heal ourselves.
Once more, dear reader, I put on my hazmat suit and enter the fake world where SARS-Cov2 exists, the Delta Variant exists, the test is meaningful, the case numbers are real, and the vaccine makes sense. These are all lies, as I’ve been proving for the past year, but even within the fake world of those lies, the experts can’t keep their stories straight; they contradict themselves, they expose their own fabrications, and they try to cover up those exposures with new pathetic fabrications. Here we go:
RT, July 30 [1]: “The CDC has released a study backing up its decision to recommend indoor masking for both vaccinated and unvaccinated Americans. The study examined one outbreak and found three-quarters of people testing positive were vaccinated.”
“The CDC released that evidence on Friday. In a study of 469 cases of Covid-19 that broke out in the resort town of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, earlier this month, 74% occurred in ‘fully vaccinated persons.’ Four out of five patients hospitalized were fully vaccinated, and on average the inoculated had completed their two rounds of doses only 86 days before infection.”
Oops.
“Lab testing revealed that 90% of all the Cape Cod infections involved the Delta variant of the coronavirus.”
Oops again. So fully vaccinated people are infected with the Delta Variant.
“The study appears to negate the argument by top health officials that unvaccinated Americans are responsible for the fourfold rise in Covid-19 cases in the US since June. ‘This is an issue predominantly among the unvaccinated, which is the reason why we’re out there, practically pleading with the unvaccinated people to go out and get vaccinated,’ White House coronavirus adviser [and psychopathic liar] Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNN on Sunday, adding that the US is currently moving ‘in the wrong direction’ with regard to stamping out Covid-19.”
Yet another oops.
“The [CDC] report lends weight to the argument that the current crop of vaccines aren’t as effective against the Delta variant, although the CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) both insist that vaccination is effective against ‘severe disease and death’ from the virus, to quote WHO technical lead Maria Van Kerkhove in a briefing earlier on Friday.”
More nonsense. As I’ve been reporting for months, the 3 clinical trials of the major COVID vaccines were DESIGNED to only prove the vaccine could protect against mild disease; e.g., a cough, or chills and fever. Not severe disease. [2]
The CDC new Cape Cod study of vaccinated people has caused a firestorm among “the experts.” A member of the White House coronavirus coffee klatch, Ben Wakana, is claiming only a very small percentage of vaccinated people (who are infected with the virus) can transmit it to others.
RT: “[However] the CDC study noted that similarly high viral loads were found in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Walensky [head of the CDC] stated on Friday that ‘high viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission’ and raised concern that ‘vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus’.”
RT: [But] “The study itself is less alarmist, stating that ‘microbiological studies are required to confirm these findings’ [that vaccinated people who are infected can spread the virus.]”
Well, if the vaccinated and unvaccinated both have high loads of the virus, why wouldn’t vaccinated people spread the virus easily to others? Is there some magic set of walls in the vaccine that keeps the virus locked up inside the body?
And there you have it, the latest revelations about the vaccine, the virus, the Delta Variant, viral transmission, and the attempt to cover up the whole business up after it’s gone public.
The next time someone tells you it’s the duty of all Americans to take the shot in the arm, say, “Of course you’ve heard about the new Cape Cod study, right?”
“What? What’s that? Codfish are filled with toxic mercury? They’re dying because of global warming?”
“No. Lots of vaccinated people still have the killer virus in their bodies. And it’s alive. And it spreads from person to person.”
“That can’t be true. Dr. Fauci didn’t say that.”
“Well, he was on vacation when the study came out. Inside sources say he’s dumbfounded. Fully vaccinated people have loads and loads of the virus still in their bodies. They’re walking time bombs. That’s why we have to wear masks, even after we get the shot.”
“Do we have to wear masks while we’re in the bathroom? While we’re having sex?”
“Absolutely. Two masks while you’re having sex. And no kissing, even through the masks. No talking, either. Talking can spread the virus.”
“I didn’t know that.”
“Hey, I’m risking my life right now talking to you. But I’m willing to take the risk, for all of humanity.”
“I appreciate that. But what do we do? Do we get vaccinated again?”
“That won’t help. Just wear the mask. Shut up. Stay indoors. In another few years, the doctors might have an answer.”
And that concludes today’s episode of The Wild and Wacky World of COVID, where the fake virus is real, there is a Delta Variant, and the vaccine makes sense. These lies are brought to you by Force the Vaccine into Every Arm Everywhere, a non-profit organization funded by Lunatics on the March, a subsidiary of Corporate Cowards Folding Up under Pressure from the White House.
August 5, 2021 Update — TCTL editor’s note: Please see Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms’ important challenges to statements made in this interview, which we have now posted here: Canadian Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms Challenges Statements Made in “Freedom Fighter Court Victory” Video. As always, things posted on this site are done in the spirit of conversation, as we research many avenues and listen to many voices in our support of truth and freedom.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
The Mexican President Andres Manuel López Obrador has said that he won’t let Big Pharma dictate Mexico after he refused to purchase Covid vaccines for children, vowing that Mexico wouldn’t bow to pressure from drugs firms.
In remarks made earlier this week, the Mexican leader said his government was still waiting for the scientific community to demonstrate the benefits of vaccinating minors.
Until conclusive evidence was provided, Mexico would refuse to purchase jabs for children, Obrador announced, adding that pharmaceutical firms seemed to be focused more on making profits than on ensuring medical necessity as they rake in record sales from Covid-19 vaccines.
He was similarly critical of plans by drugs companies to introduce third – or even fourth-dose booster shots, opining that the jabs could be “superfluous.”
Recently, a Johns Hopkins study has found that there were zero COVID-19 deaths among healthy kids. Rather than acknowledge science, Dr. Makary says the CDC continues to use ‘flimsy evidence’ to push the COVID vaccine upon children.
Speaking on the same topic, Undersecretary for Health Hugo López-Gatell claimed there was “no scientific evidence” showing the jab was “essential” for minors, given the high rate of inoculation among the adult population, Excélsior, Mexico City’s second-oldest daily, reported.
Largely ignored by international media, Obrador’s provocative remarks went viral after an English-subtitled video of his speech was shared across social media.
Several comments hailed the Mexican president’s “cajones” for calling out Big Pharma greed. Pfizer, for example, has boasted record profits and recently raised full-year sales estimates for its vaccine to $45 billion.
The Mexican President’s concerns regarding Big Pharma are very relevant seen through the recent assassinations of heads of state who rejected to implement their policies.
Right until July this year, Haiti was the only country in the western hemisphere without COVID-19 vaccines. Then, the US trained Columbian hit squad assassinated the Haitian President Jovenel Moïse and soon within days Haiti received delivery of its first vaccine doses and now vaccination is in full swing in the country.
GreatGameIndia has prepared a COVID-19 Assassination List – a list of people engaged in coronavirus research and critics of plandemic dropping dead in mysterious circumstances.
I don’t believe governments are telling the truth about how many people have taken the COVID shot. I think they’re lying. Inflating the numbers because they’re desperate; far more people than advertised are refusing the vaxx.
In every war, spies and other hired hands try to demoralize the enemy. This is standard operating procedure. Inflating key numbers is one strategy.
In this vaccine war, the ace in the hole is obvious: if enough people say NO to the shot, it’s over. A tidal wave will engulf the governments and their corporate allies.
If people believed, say, that only 30% of Americans have taken the shot, and that number is holding steady, despite all the new mandates, morale would shoot up to a new high.
It always feels better to be on a winning side.
If most Americans knew that massive anti-vaxx protests are taking place in France and Germany and other countries, their attitude would shift. If most Americans knew that in Australia, the most fascist pro-vaxx government in the world is sweating bullets, because despite horrendous lockdowns and vaccine mandates, despite cops and soldiers on the streets, Aussies are still going to the beach…that knowledge would bolster spirits.
If people opposed to the vaccine and/or the mandates could get an accurate count on how many posts and how many videos and how many accounts have been censored by social media, worldwide, because those posts express opposition to the vaxx…people would see how large the resistance really is.
Here’s a report from statista.com: “As of August 1, 2021, China had administered about 1.67 billion doses of coronavirus COVID-19 vaccine, whereas about 4.18 billion doses of the vaccine had been applied worldwide.”
I don’t believe it. I don’t think the global organization and the logistics are that good. People who’ve traveled extensively know how diverse and spread-out the global landscape is. They know how inefficient many, many governments are.
The world isn’t one huge well-lit modern pharmacy with people lined up and techs administering the jabs.
As several people have pointed out, the unvaccinated are a control group in this vast COVID vaccine experiment. If a year from now, millions and millions of us who didn’t take the shot are obviously still healthy, that’s not going to sit well with the vaccinators-in-charge or the pro-vaccine crowd. They don’t want a vibrant control group. They want compliant robots.
Then there is this, from Stat News, July 21: “Millions of unused Covid-19 vaccines are set to go to waste as demand dwindles across the United States and doses likely expire this summer, according to public health officials…”
“Currently, states have administered 52.36 million fewer doses than have been distributed to them, according to federal data.”
“A significant tranche of Pfizer doses is expected to expire in August… Given waning domestic vaccine demand, those doses are unlikely to be fully used before they must be tossed.”
“’We’re seeing demand [for the vaccine] falling off across all the states,’ said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.”
So which sets of statistics should we believe? Those that pump up the numbers of people who’ve taken the shots, or those that show millions of vials going to waste? I think the latter stats are the true indicators. Officials are less likely to confess to them, unless they’re accurate.
Out in front, the movie called COVID VACCINE is being hailed as a brilliant blockbuster, but at the back end, ticket sales are dropping off a cliff.
There are reasons for that. One is: People are having very serious and severe injuries from the shot; they’re dying; and their families and friends know about it.
Here are the latest CDC figures I have, as compiled by Children’s Health Defense. The statistics are taken from VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. “VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 463,457 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021.”
Keep in mind there is vast underreporting of injuries, because most Americans don’t know what VAERS is or are hesitant to make a report.
Some analysts have suggested that, to get a reasonably accurate count, you should multiply reported numbers by 10.
The well-known 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study of VAERS bluntly stated: “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public.”
Following the finding of that study, you would multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a proper figure.
The numbers of vaccine injuries and deaths are huge. In any situation other than the current fake pandemic, the vaccination program would have been stopped. Cancelled.
No matter what governments and news parrots say about the vaccine (“safe and effective”), vast numbers of injured people, their families, and the families of those who’ve died from the shot are messengers for the truth.
The truth spreads.
In a war, when combatants and civilians end up in hospitals, and when many of them lie in coffins lowered into the ground, and when the people can no longer hold a coherent story in their minds about why the war is being fought, the whole mood of a country changes.
This is no time for surrendering or joining those who claim doom is the only outcome.
COVID-19 vaccine is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Product. Mandating it violates Federal Law and the Nuremberg Code. The Children’s Health Defense Legal Section has extensive legal resources to make individuals aware about their legally protected rights. Use these resources to educate and preserve fundamental human rights on critical issues related to health freedom.
If you are an employee and are being told that you will be mandated to take the COVID vaccination(s) or will be fired, and are not being provided an alternative accommodation, you are not alone. Send us examples of groups fighting back.
United Healthcare Workers. Michigan Healthcare System. “It’s time healthcare workers across the state band together and say, enough is enough.”
Houston healthcare workers push back and are appealing their case
Endogenous Crowning and Protein Spiking of the Red Blood Cells After Vaccination
Programmable magnetic nanobots injected into the vascular and interstitial fluids of a human or animal body are found to be deposited into the connective and fatty tissues and then into the organs and glands potentially causing biological transformation of the cell membrane (crowning and protein spiking), genetic mutation, and the death of the cell.[1]
Programmable Magnetic Nanobots
Nanobots can be injected using an ordinary hypodermic syringe. The nanobots are microscopic functioning robots with the ability to walk and withstand harsh environments. Each robot is 70-mm in length as seen above and can also be as small as 1-nm in length, which is the width of one atom, up to a billion can be produced from a single 4-inch silicon composite wafer as seen above. The original nanofabrication techniques were developed by Marc Miskin and colleagues at Cornell University. The research was presented at the American Physical Society in March of 2017. According to a release from EurekAlert, the team spent years developing a nanofabrication process that can produce a million nanobots from a specialized 4-inch silicon wafer in the span of weeks.
These micro-robots shown above feature four legs and are composed of hexagonal graphene oxide which are highly magnetic, flexible and super strong.[1]
The following is the link for a video showing their activation triggered by electromagnetic (EMF) pulsating microwave frequencies: [https://rumble.com/vkm84h-is-nanobot-technology-or-artificial-intelligence-viable-inside-the-human-bo.html] [2]
Nanoparticulates of Graphene Oxide – https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-david-martin-just-ended-covid-fauci-doj-politicians-in-one-interview/
This enables the nanobots to carry a body weighing about 8,000 times more than each leg. As well, each leg measures only 100 atoms and even down to 1 atom thick, and they can carry bodies 1,000 to 100,000 times thicker.
Researchers have now developed ‘smart’ versions of these graphene nanobots. These versions feature controllers, sensors, transmitters and clocks.
The graphene oxide nanobots are powered by using magnetic fields (EMF) or ultrasound, making it possible for them to travel deeply into the human body tissues, organs and glands (such as the reproductive organs,[3] bone marrow, across the blood-brain barrier and the air-blood barrier of the lungs via the interstitial fluids – the largest organ of the human and animal body called the Interstitium[4]
The following flow-chart below is an example how nanobots and EMF technology can affect YOUR physical and mental health once you have been inoculated with the graphene oxide nanobot programmable technology or so-called ‘vaccine’ for protection frin a phantom virus!
Something quite remarkable is happening in France, as we pointed out a couple of weeks ago.
Since then, opposition to the vaccine passports being imposed for everyday life has swollen to a phenomenal extent.
On Saturday July 31 massive numbers took to the streets in some 200 towns and cities across the country. There were also big protests in Italy and Switzerland.
The mainstream media are desperately trying to minimise the numbers, write off the protesters as minority “conspiracy theorists” and pretend nothing important is happening.
But their lies are just making the situation even worse for the system, as the ordinary men and women who have taken to the streets outraged at the draconian vaccine passports wake up to the fact that they have been duped in an even bigger way…
The visible presence of nurses and firefighters on the protests also gives this new movement a powerful edge.
Saturday of course saw a gigantic protest in Paris (which also included some comic relief), but that was just the tip of the iceberg.
Here are some photos from Annecy in the French Alps, where thousands joined a protest headed by nurses and which was greeted by applause from their colleagues as it completely blocked the main road and passed in front of the town’s hospital.
“Macron, we don’t want your vaccine passport! Liberté! Macron in jail! Hands off our children!” shouted the crowds, which were diverse and full of energy.
Will Macron be forced to back down in the face of this popular uprising? Or is he bound to push through the dictatorial global Great Reset at any cost?
Crucial days lie ahead, not just for France but for the whole of humankind.
“No to conditional freedom”
“No to the authoritarian paSSport”
“Imagine a ‘vaccine’ so reliable that you have to be threatened into taking it and a sickness so ‘lethal’ that you have to be tested to know if you’ve got it. No to mandatory vaccination!’
Freedom! No to the vacine passport. Macron, Castex and Véran OUT. Resign!
“My grandfather, who was in the French Resistance, must be turning in his grave!”
“I refuse fear. I am a free citizen. No to the passport”
“Dictatorship is ‘en marche’ [from the name of Macron’s party, La République En Marche]. Wake up!”
Liberty, Equality and Fraternity replaced by Submission, Inequality and Enmity.
all images including cover image credit: Winter Oak
Canada’s Constitutional Rights Centre & Children’s Health Defense Send Legal Notice to Colleges and Universities Across Ontario With Regards to “COVID 19 Vaccination”
CRC on behalf of the Children’s Health Defence Canada has now sent a legal notice to Colleges & Universities across the province of Ontario inclusively.
Colleges and Universities are not above the law, especially the Constitution.
If the policies persist, legal action will ensue.
Below is the letter already sent out to Universities & Colleges, including a corresponding Appendix page.
Please click links below to read full Children’s Health Defence Canada Letters
In the 1973 film, Soylent Green, a NY police detective discovers that the vastly overcrowded, poverty–stricken population of the city—who are being sustained on processed government food, called Soylent—are now unknowingly eating humans who have died. That’s what Soylent Green is made of. That’s the terrible secret. What’s the secret now? It’s all there in the open-source literature…
The people who have died have died for multiple reasons, none of which has anything to do with SARS-CoV-2.
I have spent the past year writing over 300 articles, providing compelling evidence for the above assertions.
There are “people who have died who are LABELED COVID deaths.” AKA “official reality.” AKA “official lies.”
Who are these people? By and large, who are they?
Here are two statements. The people DID die, but not because of SARS-CoV-2:
The Kaiser Family Foundation, July 24, 2020: “Adults 65 and older account for 16% of the US population but 80% of COVID-19 deaths in the US…”
AARP, April 1, 2021: “95 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. have occurred among people who were 50 or older.”
A member of Biden’s coronavirus task force, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, once stated there is no reason people should want to live beyond the age of 75. Just go gently into that good night.
Well, what is called COVID is old people.
My first clue about the elderly came from a report published by Italy’s National Institute of Health during the early days of the “pandemic.” It stated that the average age of people dying from COVID in the country was 79.5. That clue was the size of an aircraft carrier parked outside your house.
Soon after the Italian report, the Institute of Health went dark. No more research was released. No updates. They’d spoken out of school, and someone slapped them in the head.
Open-source press reports revealed the “excess mortality” of 2020 was largely the result of elderly people dying in nursing homes.
This has nothing to do with a virus.
It has to do with patients who are ALREADY on a long downward health slide. They ALREADY have multiple health conditions. For years, even decades, they’ve been pounded with toxic medical drugs, weakening their bodies and shredding their immune systems—
And THEN they’re hit with the TERROR of an arbitrary and fake COVID-19 diagnosis—
And THEN they’re isolated and shut off from family and friends—in facilities where gross neglect and indifference are all too often the “standard of care.”
Death is the direct result.
Forced premature death.
These patients just fold up and die.
The managers of pandemic information tell the big lie. They spin tales about “the virus” having a greater impact on the elderly.
No, the STORY about a virus has the impact. The terror has the deadly impact. The isolation has the deadly impact. The terror and the isolation deliver the final blow.
To an astounding extent, COVID-19 is a NURSING HOME DISASTER.
Mass murder by cruelty.
Memo to financial investigators: Calculate how much money government and private insurers are saving, because they don’t have to keep paying for the long-term care of all the old people who are dying premature deaths in nursing homes. The money number will be staggering.
Tony Fauci knows the con. He knows COVID-19 is old people. People are dying from the fear he promotes. Fauci has no shred of shame. He’s a mouthpiece turned out by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller.
Evil permeates the COVID operation. The elderly in nursing homes are the primary target. Getting them to die earlier is the tactic, in order to pump up the fake COVID mortality numbers.
Without those phony numbers, the whole “pandemic” would be exposed in an hour.
I’ve said there were two key events in the foisting of the whole vicious COVID fiction—the Chinese regime locking down 50 million citizens overnight for no good medical reason, giving the green light to the World Health Organization and the CDC to “follow the new model”; and the Bill Gates-financed computer projection of deaths, put together by Neil Ferguson, who lied through his teeth when he claimed half a million people could die in the UK and two million in the US by the summer of 2020—thus supplying the final “rationale” for the lockdowns.
The third key event was and is the sustained attack on the elderly.
Kill these people with terror and isolation, and make the death numbers escalate.
As of May 22, 2020, Forbes reported that, “…in the 43 states that currently report such figures, an astounding 42% of all COVID-19 deaths have taken place in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.”
Washington Post, May 18, 2020: “The World Health Organization said half of Europe’s covid-19 deaths occurred in such facilities.”
Headline of same Post article: “Canada’s nursing home crisis: 81 percent of coronavirus deaths [in the country] are in long-term care facilities.”
The Guardian, May 16, 2020: “About 90% of the 3,700 people who have died from coronavirus in Sweden were over 70, and half were living in care homes, according to a study from Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare at the end of April.”
“The country [Spain] was shocked at the end of March when the defence minister revealed that soldiers drafted in to disinfect residential homes had found some elderly people abandoned and dead in their beds.”
“…the regional governments of Madrid and Catalonia have been publishing their own figures on people who have died in care homes…”
“In Madrid, the total for Covid, or suspected Covid, deaths since 8 March stood at 5,886 on Thursday. In Catalonia, it was 3,375. Between them, care home deaths in the two regions account for more than a third of all the coronavirus deaths in the country.”
And there was a great deal of early warning on the subject, if anyone from public health agencies wanted to pay attention—The Guardian, 13 April, 2020: “About half of all Covid-19 deaths appear to be happening in care homes in some European countries…Snapshot data from varying official sources shows that in Italy, Spain, France, Ireland and Belgium between 42% and 57% of deaths from the virus have been happening in homes, according to the report by academics based at the London School of Economics (LSE).”
These nursing home figures only give a partial picture. Consider the HUGE NUMBER of elderly, already-ill people who are basically in the same situation AT HOME—terrified by COVID propaganda, locked down, isolated; and then die—and also those who manage to make it to a hospital, where they are put on breathing ventilators, heavily sedated, and killed.
The Hill, undated (late April 2020), reported on “data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examines 5,700 patients hospitalized with coronavirus infections in the New York City region, with final outcomes recorded for 2,634 patients. The average patient age was 63 years old… For the next oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.”
And yet the ventilator death-treatment continues. As does treatment with remdesivir, a highly toxic drug.
The New York Times (June 27, 2020) reported that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths were occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly. In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths were occurring in these facilities. The Times failed to mention deaths of the elderly at hospitals or, at home, cut off from family and friends. The situation is far worse than the Times made it out to be.
COVID is old people. Pushed into death.
It’s mass murder.
Behind politicians’ and public health officials’ oh so caring directives and demands and declarations and pronouncements, it’s mass murder.
Imagine YOU were 80 years old. For years you’ve been suffering from multiple serious health conditions. For years, doctors have been giving you many toxic drugs, carving up your immune system, weakening your body, affecting your judgement. Along comes a false story about a deadly virus. Every time you turn on the television set, there it is, that fearful story. You’re terrified. Maybe the virus will visit you. And then one day, your doctor gives you a test, or simply eyeballs your clinical symptoms, and says yes, you have it. The virus. You’re infected. Your terror escalates. Your worst nightmare has come true. And suddenly, you’re isolated in your home, alone, or you’re locked up in your room in a nursing home, cut off from family and friends. Day after day, week after week. What would you do?
Chances are, you would see no point in living. You would give up and die.
The operation called COVID is old people. Killing old people.
This week, the vaccine contracts with Albania and Brazil signed with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for the supply of “vaccines” were leaked.
The agreements confirm our suspicion that governments worldwide, in the delusion and illusion of a “pandemic”, have agreed to the most insane deadly terms for-and-in-behalf for the whole of humanity!
In addition, Big Pharma decides, that the citizens of their respective countries with pay for these ‘death shots’!
A huge gamble is being taken with the public health, especially that of our children at the hands of ‘Luciferians’ who want to reduce the surplus human population and redistribute wealth to themselves without accountability!
So What Are the Agreements in these Vaccine Contracts?
[1] Pfizer does not accept any responsibility for any side effects, injury, including death related to the CoV – 19 inoculation.
[2] The buyer (each government) pays any claims for damages due to side effects, including death.
[3] The purchaser (each government) must acknowledge to Pfizer that the long-term effects of the “vaccine” are unknown!
[4] The purchaser (each government) must acknowledge to Pfizer that the effectiveness of the “vaccine” is unknown!
[5] The purchaser (each government) must acknowledge to Pfizer that unknown side effects, including death may occur after administration of the “vaccine”.
[6] An unknown device (Artificial Intelligence – AI) and/or other technology (adjuvants of graphene oxide – GO) falls within the definition of the Pfizer “vaccine”.
[7] Cheaper and more effective medication that comes on the market or appears to be on the market, such as ivermectin or hydroxychlorquine (HCQ), for example, should not be a reason to cancel the contract. In other words, the Pfizer ‘death shot’ must be marketed anyway, even if there are much better alternatives.
The ‘Vaccine’ Contract
Albania’s and Brazil’s contracts with Pfizer are virtually identical!
Are the Vaccine Contract the Same Around the World?
The People Want to Know What They Have Signed Up For!
It is highly likely that the United States of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands have signed to the same terms of agreement just like Albania and Brazil! This is ALL the more important considering that Carlos Murillo, Pfizer’s CEO of Latin America, has stated under oath that, “Pfizer has set the same terms in the supply contract for each country”.
Thierry Henri Philippe Baudet – Leader for the Forum for Democracy
On behalf of the ‘Forum for Democracy’ (Dutch political party), Pepijn van Houwelingen puts parliamentary questions to Minister Hugo de Jonge of the Worlds Health Organization (WHO) Concerning the ‘Vaccine Contract’:
Here are the Questions that Need to Be Asked by the Citizens of Every Country and Answered by Their Respective Governments, Especially the USA Congress and Senate.
This Must Be DONE NOW!
[1] Are you aware of the agreements Albania(1) and Brazil(2) have entered into with Pfizer for the supply of “vaccinations” to fight COVID – 19, whose contracts have recently been leaked?
[2] Are you aware that Carlos Murillo, Pfizer CEO of Latin America (3), has stated under oath to the parliamentary COVID-19 Inquiry Committee of the Brazilian Federal Senate that Pfizer has the same conditions for every country has stated in the supply contract (4)?
Carlos Murillo, Country Manager, Pfizer Brazil, Latin America
[3] Do you acknowledge that Pfizer’s two leaked contracts with Albania and Brazil, respectively, do indeed contain the same terms and conditions, as Carlos Murillo has stated, “despite being two completely different countries on two different continents?”
[4] Has The Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) signed a supply contract with Pfizer with the same or similar terms as stated in Pfizer’s leaked supply contracts with Albania and Brazil?
[5] Why did you agree to confidentiality of the supply agreement with Pfizer?
[6] Why did you agree to secrecy of the supply agreement with other pharmaceutical companies?
[7] For how long has confidentiality been agreed with Pfizer?
[8] For how long has the confidentiality been agreed with Moderna?
[9] For how long has confidentiality been agreed with AstraZeneca?
[10] For how long has confidentiality been agreed with Janssen? For how long has the confidentiality been agreed with Curevac?
[11] What purpose does the secrecy of supply contracts with pharmaceuticals serve, based on the interests of the Dutch population?
[12] Are you prepared to make the contracts public after all? Are you prepared to request this permission on behalf of the Dutch government, if permission is required from the relevant pharmaceutical company?
[13] Do you see the social importance of making the Dutch and European contracts with Pfizer public soon, now that after Pfizer’s leaked contracts with Albania and Brazil there is a lot of speculation about the content of the contracts, and the Dutch are worried about either their health after taking the Pfizer “vaccine”, or about the possible financial consequences of possible damages claims for Dutch taxpayers?
Director for the Brazilian Ministry of Health Roberto Ferreira Dias Resigned and Arrested for Bribery for the Procurement of the Pfizer CoV – 19 Vaccine
[14] Are you aware of the resignation and arrest of Roberto Ferrera Dias, a former director in charge of logistics for the Brazilian Ministry of Health and also a signatory on behalf of the Brazilian government of the supply agreement with Pfizer, for allegedly being bribed in the procurement of a vaccine and lied to the Brazilian Federal Senate’s parliamentary COVID-19 Commission of Inquiry (5)?
[15] Who is authorized to sign contracts with pharmaceutical companies on behalf of the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Japan, etc.) for the supply of “vaccines”?
[16] Which persons were directly involved on behalf of the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) in the negotiations with Pfizer and other suppliers of “corona vaccines”?
[17] Can you rule out the possibility that bribery has taken place in the purchase of “vaccinations” in the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, etc.,), as may be the case in Brazil? If so, how? If not, why not?
[18] What is meant by “any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine”, as the Pfizer vaccine (in part) is defined in the contract with Albania under Article 1.54 and in the contract with Brazil under article 1.57?
[19] Which technology and/or which devices are part of the “vaccine” delivery to the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil and other countries inoculating their citizens with the CoV – 19 ‘vaccine’?
[20] Do other “vaccines” also use technology or devices? If so, which “vaccines”? And what kind of technology is it?
[21] How would you rate the clause under Article 2.1(b), which both Albania and Brazil have accepted, which states that even if cheaper and more effective drugs against COVID-19 come on the market or already appear to be, such as ivermectin, for example, this should not constitute grounds for terminating the contract with Pfizer?
[22] Has the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) agreed to an identical or similar clause?
[23] Have other pharmaceutical companies included an identical or similar clause in the supply contract with the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.,)?
[24] Does Pfizer advise or has it in the past advised the Dutch government (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) about which drugs that could constitute a cheap and effective alternative to its “vaccine” should necessarily be discouraged, in order to break the multi-billion dollar contract between Let the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) and Pfizer hold out politically?
[25] How do you reconcile your firm statement “I can be clear about long-term effects, there are none” (6), with the acknowledgment demanded by Pfizer of Albania and Brazil that the long-term effects are unknown, as is made clear in both contracts under Article 5.5 ?
[26] How can you convince Dutch (EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.,) people, especially Dutch (EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.,) children, that the “vaccine” is safe in the long term, if even the manufacturer of the injection, at least in some countries in the world, does not bear any responsibility dare to take?
[27] Have you yourself acknowledged in the supply contract between the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) and Pfizer that the long-term effects of the Pfizer injection are unclear?
[28] Have you (also) had to acknowledge to the suppliers of other “corona vaccinations” that the long-term effects of the relevant “vaccine” are unknown? If so, which “vaccines” are involved?
[29] Has the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., on behalf of the Netherlands) reserved money for any claims for damages resulting from large-scale and drastic side effects of the Pfizer injection? If so, why and how much? If not, why not? Is this different from other “corona vaccines”?
[30] Can you indicate for each “corona vaccine” to what extent the Dutch state, the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., is liable for damage and/or injury as a result of its administration?
[31] Can you send an overview of the concrete standards that the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., uses to control the (production) quality of a specific batch of mRNA injections, such as that of Pfizer?
[32] Which so-called Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs) apply in the Netherlands/the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., with regard to mRNA injections?
[33] Are these CGMPs up to date at the time of the first shipments of the Pfizer “vaccine”? If so, how does this prove? If not, why not?
[34] Can you indicate under what conditions the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., can return a delivery/batch of Pfizer vaccines in case of doubts about the quality? In which cases will a refund be made?
[35] What price has the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., paid per dose of the Pfizer “vaccine”?
Additional Questions from Dr. Robert O. Young
Dr. Robert O. Young — www.drrobertyoung.com
[36] WHO ultimately SHOULD have RESPONSIBILITY for the potential and anticipated injury and death to NOT MILLIONS but to BILLIONS of innocent souls around the World![9][10]
[ 37] Why cannot each citizen choose for themselves their own doctor and their own treatment protocol for CoV – 19 since the so-called ‘vaccine’ is experimental and unproven.[7]
[38] Why are the ingredients of the so-called ‘vaccines’ left off the inserts in the boxes containing the CoV – 19 vaccine? [8]
[39] How is mandating or forcing any human against their free-will to be inoculated with an experimental ‘vaccine’ not a violation of human rights under the Nuremberg Laws?[8]
[40] Once again, ‘Who’ should be held accountable for ‘crimes against humanity’ for injury and the loss of life directly related to the CoV – 19 inoculation? [8]
Please send these article with questions to your Major, your, Governor, your State representatives, your Congressman, your Senator, your President, and especially your loved ones. Time is of essence in order to STOP the mass injury and deaths to billions of souls around the world.
STOP the ‘killing fields’ of the ‘4th Wave’ of pulsating microwave radiation that will activate the graphene oxide contained ALL the so-called fake ‘vaccines’, coming this fall.
Watch, listen and learn and then care enough to share to everyone to love and care about NOW![9][10]:
The incipient “Great Reset” is a multi-faceted beast. We talk a lot about vaccine passports and lockdowns and the Covid-realated aspects – and we should – but there’s more to it than that.
Remember, they want you to “own nothing and be happy”. And right at the top of the list of things you definitely shouldn’t own, is your own home.
The headlines about this have been steady for the last few years, but it has picked up pace in the wake of the “pandemic” (as has so much else). An agenda hidden on back pages, behind by Covid’s meaningless big red numbers, but perhaps no less sinister.
You can find articles all over the net talking up renting over owning.
Last month, for example, Bloomberg ran an article headlined:
America Should Become a Nation of Renters
Which praises what they call “the liquefaction of the housing market” and gleefully expounds on the idea that “The very features that made home buying an affordable and stable investment are coming to an end.”
Other publications go more personal with it, with anecdotal columns about ignoring financial advice and refusing to buy your home. Vox, never one to sell their agenda with any kind of subtlety, have a piece titled:
Homeownership can bring out the worst in you
Which literally argues that buying a house can make you a bad person:
It’s the biggest thing you might ever buy. And it could be turning you into a bad person.
So what exactly is the narrative here? What’s the story behind the story?
The short answer is fairly simple: It’s about greed, and it’s about control.
It almost always is, in the end.
The longer answer is rather more complicated. Major investment firms such as Vanguard and Blackrock, along with rental companies such as American Homes 4 Rent, are buying up single-family homes in record numbers – sometimes entire neighbourhoods at a time.
They pay well over market value, pricing families who want to own those homes out of the market, which forces the housing market up whilst the Lockdown-created recession is lowering wages and creating millions of newly unemployed.
Of course, this is motivating people to sell the houses they already own.
People all across America have been saddled with houses worth less than they bought them for since the 2008 economic crash, and are eager to take the cash from private investment firms paying 10-20% over market value. Combine an economic recession with a created housing boom and you have a huge population of motivated sellers.
Of course, many of these sellers don’t realise, until it’s too late, that even if they attempt to downsize or move to a cheaper area, they may be priced out of the market completely, and forced to rent.
As such, in the last year, the private investment share of single-family home purchases is estimated to have increased ten-fold, going from 2% in 2018 to over 20% this year.
As more and more people are forced to rent, of course, rental properties will be in higher and higher demand. This in turn will drive the cost of renting up.
Which means, this weekend, while Senators adjourn to the summer homes they probably don’t rent, the ban will officially end and a lot of people are likely to have their houses foreclosed or their landlords kick them out.
The newly empty buildings will be a feeding frenzy for the massive corporate landlords. Who will descend on the banks like starving hyenas to snap up the foreclosed properties for pennies on the dollar. Just like they did in 2008.
Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, competing with ordinary Americans and driving up prices
However, since then, something has clearly changed. The propaganda machine has kicked into gear to defend Wall Street from any backlash.
No better example of this shift can be found than The Atlantic, which ran this story in 2019:
WHEN WALL STREET IS YOUR LANDLORD
With help from the federal government, institutional investors became major players in the rental market. They promised to return profits to their investors and convenience to their tenants. Investors are happy. Tenants are not.
BLACKROCK IS NOT RUINING THE US HOUSING MARKET
The real villain isn’t a faceless Wall Street Goliath; it’s your neighbors and local governments stopping the construction of new units.
Wall Street isn’t to blame for the chaotic housing market
Which ran just a few days after the Atlantic article, and is practically identical.
Both these (oddly similar) articles argue that Wall Street and private equity firms can’t be blamed for buying up houses, and that the real problem is the lack of supply to meet demand.
You see, all the “selfish” people who already own homes (they did say it makes you a bad person) are blocking the construction of new houses, and thus driving up the cost of property through scarcity.
This has been a logically flawed argument around the housing market for decades.
That there aren’t enough houses for people to buy is patently absurd when the US census data says that there are over 15 million houses currently standing empty. That’s enough to house all of America’s roughly 500,000 homeless people 30x over.
There’s plenty of houses, there’s just not enough money to buy them.
For decades now, wage increases have lagged behind increases in the cost of living. In the 1960s one full-time job could afford a decent standard of living for a family of four or more. These days both parents work, sometimes multiple jobs each.
It was huge amounts of financial de-regulation which created this situation. So, whether you believe Vox’s BlackRock apologia or not, one way or another Wall Street very definitely is to blame.
But this isn’t just about money. It never is. Just as the war on cash isn’t just about efficiency, and the environmental push isn’t just about climate change. Ditto veganism. It’s about control. Just like vaccines, lockdowns and masks.
It always comes down to control.
It’s an oft-used cliche, but no less true for that, that homeowning “gives people a stake in society”. A family-owned house is a source of security for the future and something to leave your children. It is also sovereignty and privacy. Your own space that no one else can control or take away.
In short: A homeowner is independent. A renter is not. A renter can be controlled. A homeowner can not.
It’s the same reasoning behind the way working people were encouraged to take out loans and become debt slaves. If you limit people’s options, if you make them rely on you for a roof over their heads, you have control over them.
Under Feudalism, land wasn’t owned by the working class, but provided to them by landed barons, hence the term “Land Lord”. If you disrespected your Lord, or broke his rules, or he perceived another peasant/farm animal/crop would be a better use of the land, he could take it back.
Essentially, the behaviour of serfs was kept in check by their reliance on the nobility for a place to live. That’s very much the dynamic they’re going for here.
Rental agreements can be full of any terms and conditions the landlord wants, and the more desperate people get the more of their consumer rights they will sign over.
Maybe you’ll agree to smart meters which monitor your internet or power-usage habits, and then sell the data to behavioural modellers and viral marketers.
Maybe you’ll have to agree to certain power limitations or water shortages in order to “fight climate change”.
Maybe it will get worse than that.
Maybe they’ll go full Black Mirror style corporate dystopia. Maybe, through affiliation programs, the mega-equity firm which owns your rental house has ties to McDonald’s, and as such will require you to not eat at any competing fast-food franchises, or demand you observe at least ninety seconds of Disney advertisements per day.
Maybe it will be as simple as including vaccine status in the tenancy agreement, making it impossible for the unvaxxed to find a home.
Maybe they just want to make poor people miserable.
After all, the super-wealthy have got all the money they could ever need, and all the luxury they could ever use. Their living standards are as high as physically possible. So maybe the only way they can keep “winning”, is to start driving the living standards of us proles down.
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality. [This miserable mode Maintain the melancholy souls of those Who lived withouten infamy or praise.]” ~ Dante Alighieri
Mankind is a fickle creature at best, and is normally content to not rock the boat. This is the collective philosophy held by the many, as it is mistakenly thought to be the easiest way to avoid any danger and strife. Reality is another matter, as weakness is forever present in the minds of men, and therefore tyranny and control are easily accomplished by those who understand that the common masses will always obey the dominate master class at the expense of their own liberty, so long as they are promised safety in return. This grotesque phenomenon will be the ruination of humanity.
All that is happening today is based on this premise, and the ruling ‘authority’ has taken control of the entire population of the planet by simply introducing the idea that a great crisis that does not even exist is present, and is an imminent and ongoing menace to society. In doing so, they claim to be a prophet, false of course, promising to defend the people, when just the opposite is intended. Instead of reacting in some sort of logical or sane manner, the general population en masse has acquiesced to the controlling power, and in doing so has taken the neutral position explained so well by Alighieri, all at the great expense of their own lives and freedom. This attitude is one of not only great harm, but exposes the worst side of humanity, as most hide and wallow in unnecessary fear while their very existence is threatened. Other than the children, those that take this position deserve no empathy.
By hiding from the truth, the herd does not seek to understand what is actually happening around them, but concentrates only on their local, immediate, and present circumstances, while ignoring all the signs of impending doom that are brutally obvious to any thinking individual. In doing so, the spectre of tyranny grows ever faster, and without enough resistance to stop the premeditated onslaught against the common people.
The people of this country falsely called the “united states” has one great advantage over most others on earth, but fails to see their favored position due to ignorance and brainwashing over time. That advantage is that the people of this country still have many guns to defend themselves against the terror that is the ‘State;’ that ‘State’ that is continuously at war against its own people. It is not the active use of guns and bullets that is so important, but the threat, capability, and willingness to do so is certainly enough to halt the advancing totalitarian policies of the ruling class. They are all cowards after all. They are the few, while the people are the many, and being armed is the best protection against tyrannical behavior by evil and corrupt governments. The people in most countries around the world have been forcibly (or more likely, voluntarily) disarmed, and are at much greater risk than Americans today. That is why the most restrictive, regulated, and heinous policies are being advanced faster in other parts of the world, but it will all be here very soon if this society allows it. If U.S. citizens did not have guns, it would be no different now here than in Canada, Australia, China, the United Kingdom and much of Europe, and many other places around the globe. This is why it is imperative for Americans to understand that everything going on in these captured societies is coming here soon, so watching the world around you is of great importance. It is also necessary to listen to the controlling political class in this country that is constantly attempting to capture and control arms and ammunition, with the future aim of eliminating all gun ownership here just as has already happened across the globe. The only reason we are not already living in a total dictatorial society is because we have the armed capability to stop this government’s attempts to create a totalitarian master/slave nation.
The more restrictive and brutal activity that is levied against the people in the countries mentioned above, among others, the more likely it will be accepted by the drones of this country. If that occurs, the takeover of America will be successful in short order in my opinion. That would be the end of this country, as a new system of technocratic dictatorship would be put into place. The illegitimate and poisonous gene-altering injections called ‘vaccines’ are meant to help this along by changing the mental and physical makeup of the masses, accelerating submissive behavior, and allowing for more control in order to create a compliant populace that will accept their new status as dependent wards of the state.
Much of Australia is locked down, and travel for Australian citizens and tourists is virtually impossible in much of that country. Restrictions and mandates are ever increasing, including ‘vaccine passports.
The evil Macron in France has “announced that from next month anyone wanting to go out to eat or drink, take a long-distance train or visit a shopping centre will need to show either proof of vaccination or a negative test. The so-called “health pass” will also be needed to attend a festival, a theatre show or a cinema screening as part of the government’s strategy to tackle the surging number of new cases linked to the Delta Variant. You will have understood that vaccination is not obligatory straight away, but we are going to extend the health pass to its maximum to encourage as many of you as possible to get yourselves vaccinated,” Macron said.
In Canada, besides all the massive tyranny that has already occurred, now in Vancouver, all arrivals into that country are separated into vaccinated/unvaccinated lines, not unlike the heinous racial segregation in the past.
Contact tracing, forced ‘Covid’ testing, mandated ‘vaccination’ in order to survive and gain necessities of life, draconian travel restrictions, forced colored arm bands to distinguish those injected and not, immunity passports, college admission requirements to take the jab in order to attend, job loss without ‘vaccination, mandated food restrictions, extreme government marketing campaigns for poisonous ‘vaccination, more lockdowns and quarantine, more mask mandates, and much more tyrannical authoritarian orders are coming. This is happening all around the world, including the U.S., as the depopulation agenda by the bio-weapon ‘vaccine is gaining much ground as this plot to harm and destabilize this population continues without end.
Everything happening concerning this non-existent ‘virus pandemic’ in every part of the world will also happen here soon, if in fact, it is not already happening or planned. Do not ignore the signs right in front of you, and do not trust any claims coming from this government, the controlled mainstream media, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, tax-free foundations, or any government partner whatsoever. Understand that the people still have the power to stop this by banding together against the state. Disobey, do not comply, dissent, take no orders, and let these evil murderous monsters know that you have the absolute power to stop them!
The first draft of this form was written by Corey Lynn of Corey Digs but has subsequently been updated by the Solari Team for future events.
[NOTE TO EMPLOYEE: Be sure to document the date and time you submit the form to your employer; also document the date and time and their response if they refuse to sign it.Note that three other Solari Report forms1,2,3 are also available as downloadable PDFs: the “Family Financial Disclosure Form for Covid-19 Injections”; “Notice and Declaration of Parental Authority Requirement of Disclosure and Safety of Medical Treatment/s”; and “Form for Students Attending Colleges or Universities Requiring Covid-19 Injections under Emergency Use Authorization.”]
Introduction
The situation with Covid-19 injections is fluid and evolving rapidly. As of July 2021, three vaccines were being administered in the U.S. under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA): the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA injections and the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson adenovirus-vectored injection.
The injections’ regulatory status could soon change. On July 16, the FDA granted priority review to Pfizer’s application for full approval (licensure) of its Covid-19 vaccine for those age 16 and up. Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are also preparing to seek full approval. FDA officials have pledged to issue a decision with respect to the Pfizer application within two months. And though “not intervening in the decision of government scientists,” President Biden predicts full approval by September or October.4
Approval would have significant workplace ramifications. Assuming one or more shots receives full approval, public health experts expect “a wave of Covid-19 vaccine mandates,” confidently anticipating that licensure will “remove a significant legal and public relations barrier for businesses…that want to”—or are being pressured to—require vaccinations for their employees.5 Even under EUA, one federal agency (the Department of Veterans Affairs) has already mandated (on July 26) the experimental injections for its health care personnel, setting a federal precedent for employee mandates that others may soon follow. That same day, the Department of Justice published an opinion stating that it is legal for “public and private entities” to mandate Covid vaccines despite the injections only being approved for emergency use.
American workers who do not wish to accept Covid-19 injections are thus in a difficult position. The genesis of this form was to provide a tool for employees to use within the context of emergency use authorization with employers who attempt to mandate still-investigational Covid-19 injections (Scenario 1). With the possibility of full FDA approval in fall 2021 (Scenario 2), the legal context for U.S. mandates will likely shift in significant ways. In the event of licensure, we will provide an updated form that reflects the altered regulatory circumstances.
Under both scenarios, we anticipate that a form of this type will remain a critically important tool for employees determined to educate employers about the full set of physical and financial risks they are asking workers to incur. Employees should strongly consider reviewing the form with employers and also sharing it with co-workers. This could result in a positive outcome for employees and, if used widely, could be a game-changer.
Scenario 1: Emergency Use Authorization
Many employers are trying to deny employees’ right to choose and their right to bodily integrity by requiring EUA Covid-19 vaccines as a condition of employment. Under EUA, however, such requirements are a violation of the law. (We anticipate that the Department of Justice opinion on the legality of EUA mandates should and will be challenged.) Mandates are also a violation of fundamental human and religious rights.
The provisions of the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act and a February 2020 declaration by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary mean that pharmaceutical companies cannot be held liable for injuries or deaths caused by EUA Covid-19 injections.6 However, other companies, institutions, and individuals can be held liable.
On the grounds that the injections are under EUA and are not formally licensed, many health care providers are refusing service to individuals injured by the Covid-19 injections, and health and life insurance companies are declining coverage for vaccine-related injuries and deaths.7 This denial of care and coverage poses a serious threat to the physical and financial well-being of employees presented with a requirement to get a Covid injection—perhaps even more so than the possibility of losing their job for not being vaccinated. Medical bills for vaccinated individuals with serious injuries have already exceeded $1 million in some cases.8 Under the PREP act, the vaccine-injured may submit a claim to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), but the CICP historically has rejected 92% of claims and has not yet compensated a single Covid injection claim.9
Reviewing this form with employers may open their eyes to the regulations in place and the liability they may face (that they may otherwise not be aware of). If an employee should decide to accept the required experimental Covid-19 injection, the form also provides a mechanism to insist on a signature from the employer’s representative that holds the company liable. If the employer’s representative refuses to sign the form, that may be an indicator of the company’s concerns about potential liability and should prompt an immediate discussion about how the employee can continue working for the company without being injected.
Scenario 2: Full Approval
Before Covid-19, workplace vaccine mandates for adults were on a state-by-state basis and primarily focused on hepatitis B and influenza vaccination in health care settings, often allowing some accommodation for disability or religious beliefs.10 Under a scenario of full FDA approval for Covid-19 injections, a broader cross-section of employers well beyond the health care arena will likely feel emboldened or pressured to impose workplace mandates.11, Evoking the specter of “potentially severe” Covid illness, some commentators are suggesting that the process for granting medical or religious exemptions “may look a little different” (i.e., be more restrictive).12
If Covid-19 injections lose their EUA status and receive full FDA approval, they would no longer enjoy the liability protection conferred by the PREP Act. However, if the FDA extends full approval to children under age 18—as is widely anticipated13—and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends Covid-19 injections for “routine administration” to children (or pregnant women),14 manufacturers and health care providers will be protected from liability for Covid-vaccine-related injuries and deaths under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).15 From that point on, the only avenue available for compensation would be the notoriously stingy and difficult-to-navigate National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).16
If you find yourself in a predicament with a company that refuses to hear you out, does not provide you with required information, or threatens termination of your employment, here are a few potential resources for attorneys:
Health Freedom Defense Fund: This nonprofit is working to address unethical and unlawful mask, testing, and vaccine mandates through focused legal actions. Resources for employees include a Notice to Employers (“Vaccine Notice”) that compulsory Covid-19 vaccination imposed by employers on employees violates federal law.
Comprehensive, high-integrity medical and scientific information, including briefs and reports summarizing what is known about the risks of Covid-19 injections and adverse events, is available (and routinely updated) at the following websites:
America’s Frontline Doctors: In addition to its legal resources (see above), AFLDS’ website includes information about Covid-19 treatments, “issue briefs” on post-vaccination complications and other topics, and numerous other resources. https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/about-us/mission-statement/
Children’s Health Defense (CHD): In addition to reporting on vaccine safety topics via its flagship online news outlet The Defender, CHD offers a “Fighting COVID Mandates” toolkit and related resources, a series of eBooks (including eBooks on vaccine mandates and protection of individual rights), a research library, and a “Community Corner.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
Doctors for COVID Ethics (D4CE): Among the excellent resources provided by this group of doctors and scientists from 30 countries are “Letter to physicians: Four new scientific discoveries regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines,” which warns that “all physicians must reconsider the ethical issues surrounding COVID-19 vaccination,” and a 23-page Expert Statement outlining the serious risks of the Pfizer injection (European brand name Comirnaty) in children. https://doctors4covidethics.org/
Form for Employers Requiring Covid-19 Injections under Emergency Use Authorization
NOTE TO EMPLOYER: As your employee, I request that you review this document, provide the requisite information, and sign the form, in regards to your requirement that employees get a Covid-19 emergency use authorization (EUA) investigational vaccine.
1) If I agree to receive an EUA Covid-19 injection, does my employee health insurance plan provide complete coverage should I experience an adverse event, or even death?
3) As an employee, will you be providing Workers’ Compensation, disability insurance, or other resources if I have an adverse event to an EUA Covid-19 injection and am unable to come to work for days, weeks, or months, or if I am disabled for life?
4) The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that EUA vaccine recipients be provided with certain vaccine-specific information to help them make an informed decision about vaccination.1 The EUA fact sheets that must be provided are specific to each authorized Covid-19 injection and are developed by the manufacturers (Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson). The fact sheets must provide up-to-date information on the injections and their ingredients; vaccine recipients must also receive information about adverse events. Have you read, understood, and provided me (and all other employees) with these fact sheets and current information on adverse events—and can you furnish a list of vaccine ingredients guaranteed to be complete—so that I/we can make an educated decision?
5) Have you reviewed the material adverse events experienced to date by people who have received EUA Covid-19 injections, reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)?2 Reported adverse events include death, anaphylaxis, blood clots and related complications, heart problems (myocarditis and pericarditis), neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders, other chronic and inflammatory conditions, blindness and deafness, infertility, fetal damage, miscarriage, and stillbirth.
6) The FDA’s guidance3 on emergency use authorization of medical products requires the FDA to “ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances…[t]hat they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product…” Are you aware of this statement? Have you informed all employees that they have the option to refuse?
___________________________________________________________________________________
7) With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Title 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) reiterates that individuals be informed of “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”4 In the event that the FDA decided to grant full approval to Covid-19 vaccines, state legislation would be required to allow companies to mandate the Covid-19 injections. Are you aware of these facts?
8) EUA products are unapproved, unlicensed, and experimental. Under the Nuremberg Code—the foundation of ethical medicine—no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. The individual’s consent is absolutely essential. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine. In Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003),5 a federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines for soldiers: “[T]he United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs” (Id. at 135). Are you aware of this?
___________________________________________________________________________________ 9) The United States Code of Federal Regulations6 and the FDA require the informed consent of human subjects for medical research. The EUA Covid-19 injections are unapproved, unlicensed, investigational vaccines that are still in their experimental stage. It is unlawful to conduct medical research on a human being, even in the event of an emergency, unless steps are taken to secure the full informed consent of all participants. Are you aware of this?
10) According to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Guidelines7 and the FTC’s “Truth In Advertising,”8 promotional materials—and especially materials involving health-related products—cannot mislead consumers, omit important information, or express claims. All of this falls under the rubric of “deceptive advertising” (whereby a company is providing or endorsing a product), whether presented in the form of an ad, on a website, through email, on a poster, or in the mail. For example, statements such as “all employees are required to get the Covid-19 vaccine to make the workspace safe” or “it’s safe and effective” leave out critical information. Critical information includes the facts that Covid-19 injections are unapproved EUA vaccines that “may” or “may not” prevent Covid, won’t necessarily make the workplace safer, and could in fact cause harm. Not providing links or attachments of the manufacturers’ fact sheets and current information on adverse events is omitting safety information. Are you aware of this?
11) Since the Covid lockdowns began over one year ago, there have been over 178 reported breaches of unsecured protected health information (PHI), incidents investigated by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). These breaches exposed millions of people’s personal health information. Although many of these incidents were attributed to hacking, some of the breaches to PHI fell directly under the 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), such as sharing a patient’s or person’s information with an unauthorized individual or incorrectly handling PHI.9 Can you please explain your obligations to me, under HIPAA law, with respect to your requirement that I receive this injection?
12) Whereas pharmaceutical companies that manufacture EUA vaccines have been protected from liability related to injuries or deaths caused by experimental agents since the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act10 was enacted in 2005, companies and all other institutions or individuals who mandate experimental vaccines on any human being are not protected from liability. Are you aware that you do not enjoy such liability protection?
13) Are you aware that employees could file a civil suit against you should they suffer an adverse event, death, or termination from their place of employment?
As the legally authorized officer of the employer/company, I have read all of the above information, have provided my employees with all of the information that the FDA requires be provided to recipients of the Covid-19 injections, and do hereby agree to assume 100% financial responsibility for covering any and all expenses from adverse events, including death, through insurance coverage or directly. In addition, I affirm that the employee will not be subjected to the loss of their job should they decline to receive a Covid-19 injection.
2. In the United States, see Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, https://vaers.hhs.gov; CDC WONDER, “About the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),”” https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html; National Vaccine Information Center, “Search the U.S. Government’s VAERS Data,” https://www.medalerts.org/.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities: Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders. January 2017. https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download.
People can tell themselves that they didn’t see where things have been heading for the last 17 months, but they did. They saw all the signs along the way. The signs were all written in big, bold letters, some of them in scary-looking Germanic script. They read …
“THIS IS THE ROAD TO TOTALITARIANISM.”
I’m not going to show you all those signs out again. People like me have been pointing them out, and reading them out loud, for 17 months now. Anyone who knows anything about the history of totalitarianism, how it incrementally transforms society into a monstrous mirror image of itself, has known since the beginning what the “New Normal” is, and we have been shouting from the rooftops about it.
We have watched as the New Normal transformed our societies into paranoid, pathologized, authoritarian dystopias where people now have to show their “papers” to see a movie or get a cup of coffee and publicly display their ideological conformity to enter a supermarket and buy their groceries.
We have watched as the New Normal transformed the majority of the masses into hate-drunk, hysterical mobs that are openly persecuting “the Unvaccinated,” the official “Untermenschen” of the New Normal ideology.
We have watched as the New Normal has done precisely what every totalitarian movement in history has done before it, right by the numbers. We pointed all this out, each step of the way. I’m not going to reiterate all that again.
I am, however, going to document where we are at the moment, and how we got here … for the record, so that the people who will tell you later that they “had no clue where the trains were going” will understand why we no longer trust them, and why we regard them as cowards and collaborators, or worse.
Yes, that’s harsh, but this is not a game. It isn’t a difference of opinion. The global-capitalist ruling establishment is implementing a new, more openly totalitarian structure of society and method of rule. They are revoking our constitutional and human rights, transferring power out of sovereign governments and democratic institutions into unaccountable global entities that have no allegiance to any nation or its people.
That is what is happening … right now. It isn’t a TV show. It’s actually happening.
The time for people to “wake up” is over. At this point, you either join the fight to preserve what is left of those rights, and that sovereignty, or you surrender to the “New Normal,” to global-capitalist totalitarianism. I couldn’t care less what you believe about the virus, or its mutant variants, or the experimental “vaccines.” This isn’t an abstract argument over “the science.” It is a fight … a political, ideological fight. On one side is democracy, on the other is totalitarianism. Pick a fucking side, and live with it.
Anyway, here’s where we are at the moment, and how we got here, just the broad strokes.
It’s August 2021, and Germany has officially banned demonstrations against the “New Normal” official ideology. Other public assemblies, like the Christopher Street Day demo (pictured below), one week ago, are still allowed. The outlawing of political opposition is a classic hallmark of totalitarian systems. It’s also a classic move by the German authorities, which will give them the pretext they need to unleash the New Normal goon squads on the demonstrators tomorrow.
Christopher Street Day demo: RBB
In Australia, the military has been deployed to enforce total compliance with government decrees … lockdowns, mandatory public obedience rituals, etc. In other words, it is de facto martial law. This is another classic hallmark of totalitarian systems.
In France, restaurant and other business owners who serve “the Unvaccinated” will now be imprisoned, as will, of course, “the Unvaccinated.” The scapegoating, demonizing, and segregating of “the Unvaccinated” is happening in countries all over the world. France is just an extreme example. The scapegoating, dehumanizing, and segregating of minorities — particularly the regime’s political opponents — is another classic hallmark of totalitarian systems.
We didn’t get here overnight. Here are just a few of the unmistakable signs along the road to totalitarianism that I have pointed out over the last 17 months.
And now, here we are, where we have been heading all along, clearly, unmistakably heading … directly into The Approaching Storm, or possibly global civil war. This isn’t the end of the road to totalitarianism, but I’m pretty sure we are in the home stretch. It feels like things are about to get ugly. Very ugly. Extremely ugly. Those of us who are fighting to preserve our rights, and some basic semblance of democracy, are outnumbered, but we haven’t had our final say yet … and there are millions of us, and we are wide awake.
So pick a side, if you haven’t already. But, before you do, maybe look back at the history of totalitarian systems, which, for some reason, never seem to work out for the totalitarians, at least not in the long run. I’m not a professional philosopher or anything, but I suspect that might have something to do with some people’s inextinguishable desire for freedom, and our willingness to fight for it, sometimes to the death.
This kind of feels like one of those times.
Sorry for going all “Braveheart” on you, but I’m psyching myself up to go get the snot beat out of me by the New Normal goon squads tomorrow, so I’m a little … you know, overly emotional.
Seriously, though, pick a side … now … or a side will be picked for you.
What city is this
Whose moments tremble
Azure sky and lime lights
Walking in the intersections
Through the squares of paradise
People are solidly addicted to story line. Beginning, middle, end. They want to have it, over and over, in different guises.
The ultimate payoff of that addiction? There is none. Except the need for more.
Propaganda, media, announced government policy, education, religious messages, hundreds of medical treatments—the underlying theme is polished story line. Wrapped up and sold. When the wrong ending looms like a thundercloud, an order to goes out to hide it or lie about it.
When a relentlessly creative individual disrupts story lines, an unlimited number of universes opens up. And every one of them causes tremors in the addict.
“Don’t do that. I don’t understand what you’re doing. Stop. It makes no sense. You’re crazy. Where is the ending? Civilization is going to fall into the sea. What is your message? I can’t find it. Boil down what you’re saying. God will punish you.”
The addict feels his mind is cracking. He runs screaming in the night looking for his next fix.
For example, the open and basically endless poetry of Pablo Neruda, Walt Whitman, William Carlos Williams, and Arthur Rimbaud can have that effect.
So many new worlds moving through the old one.
Why does a story have to have a recognizable plot and a tuned-up climax? Same question: Why does a person need to inject heroin?
Look at Piero della Francesca’s 1464 fresco, Legend of the True Cross—perhaps the greatest painting of the Renaissance. In a series of episodic panels, it traces the mythical history of the wooden cross on which Jesus was crucified. However, there are a number of puzzling “non-linear” representations in Piero’s work, the most famous of which is the panel titled, King Solomon Receiving the Queen of Sheba. What does that meeting have to do with the purported journey of the timber on which Jesus hung?
The Roman Church would claim it is symbolic of an archetypal super-event called The Arrival, and refers to the birth of the Messiah or his later entrance into public life as a teacher; or Sheba had precognitive knowledge of the tree whose wood would be used to make the cross. That’s an extraordinary stretch, to say the least. But it’s typical of a strategy down through the ages: when a promoted story line breaks down, invent a way of claiming it’s still coherent.
Buttress conventional story at all costs.
Mechanical minds will always reduce events, data, history, science, etc., to manageable stories.
Oceanic artists go the other way: they proliferate their work beyond any mechanical limit or summarized interpretation.
Why does that matter? Because, for these artists and their committed audiences, routine day-to-day experience is cracked open like an egg, out of which emerge vital energies of concealed dimensions. Life becomes LIFE.
When I was 21, a friend showed me photos of the architectural productions of the Spanish genius, Antoni Gaudi, scattered throughout Barcelona. My first reaction was, these buildings came from another planet. My second reaction: how was he allowed to build these structures?
Gaudi was a technical innovator of the first order. He developed forms and methods of construction that surpassed the engineering rationale of the great cathedrals of Europe. At the same time, he confounded old ideas of space. The experience of seeing or standing in one of his buildings yielded up the sensation of living in a DIFFERENT KIND OF CONTINUUM.
That new continuum disrupts the story line of consciousness by proliferating a new narrative that has no convenient ending. The old way of seeing has been given a bath in some mysterious dynamo and is vitalized.
Habitual categories and compartments of perception have dissolved.
Who would have known this was possible, unless Gaudi (1852-1926) had lived?
Our world, contrary to all consensus, is meant to be revolutionized by art, by imagination, right down to its core.
That this has not happened is no sign that the process is irrelevant. It is only a testament to the collective resistance.
Who knows how many such revolutions have been shunted aside and rejected, in favor of the consensus-shape we now think of as central and eternal?
We are living in a default structure, the one that has been left over after all the prior revolutions have been put to sleep.
Occasionally, an artist will take on the role of actor and performer, in order to deal with the denizens and mental dwarves of ministries of truth. Over the past hundred years, it would be hard to find an artist who carried out such a program with more skill and verve than Salvador Dali.
Let’s start here. To absorb a work of imagination, one has to use his own imagination.
Since this is considered unlikely, pundits earnestly help us with step-down contexts, so we can understand the work in pedestrian terms. In other words, so we can reduce it to nothing.
Salvador Dali was not content to allow this to happen.
The critics would have declared Dali a minor lunatic if he hadn’t possessed such formidable classical painting skills.
He placed his repeating images (the notorious melting watch, the face and body of his wife, the ornate and fierce skeletal structures of unknown creatures) on the canvas as if they had as much right to be there as any familiar object.
This was quite troubling to many people. If an immense jawbone that was also a rib or a forked femur could rival a perfectly rendered lamp or couch or book (on the same canvas), where were all the accoutrements and assurances of modern comfortable living?
Where was the pleasantly mesmerizing effect of a predictable existence?
Where was a protective class structure that depended on nothing more than money and cultural slogans?
Dali invented vast comedies on canvas. But the overall joke turned, as the viewer’s eye moved, into a nightmare, into an entrancing interlude of music, a memory of something that had never happened, a gang of genies coming out of corked bottles. A bewildering mix of attitudes sprang out from the paintings.
What was the man doing? Was he mocking the audience? Was he simply showing off? Was he inventing waking dreams? Was he, God forbid, actually imagining something entirely new that resisted classification?
Words failed viewers and critics and colleagues and enemies.
But they didn’t fail Dali. He took every occasion to explain his work. However, his explications were handed out in a way that made it plain he was telling tall tales—interesting, hilarious, and preposterous tall tales.
Every interview and press conference he gave, gave birth to more attacks on him. Was he inviting scorn? Was he really above it all? Was he toying with the press like some perverse Olympian?
Critics flocked to make him persona non grata, but what was the persona they were exiling? They had no idea then, and they have no idea now.
It comes back to this: when you invent something truly novel, you know that you are going to stir the forces trapped within others that aspire to do the very same thing. You know that others are going to begin by denying that anything truly NEW even exists. That DOES make the situation a comedy (among other things), whether you want to admit it or not.
It is possible that every statement ever uttered in public by Dali was a lie. A fabrication. An invention dedicated to constructing a massive (and contradictory) persona.
Commentators who try to take on Dali’s life usually center on the early death of his young brother as the core explanation for Dali’s “basic confusion”—which resulted in his bizarre approach to his own fame.
However, these days, with good reason, we might more correctly say Dali was playing the media on his own terms, after realizing that no reporter wanted the real Dali (whatever that might mean)—some fiction was being asked for, and the artist was merely being accommodating.
He was creating a self (or selves) that matched his paintings.
It is generally acknowledged that no artist of the 20th century was superior to Dali in the ability to render realistic detail.
But of course Dali’s work was not about realism.
The most complex paintings—see, for example, Christopher Columbus Discovering America and The Hallucinogenic Toreador—brilliantly orchestrated the interpenetration of various solidities/realities, more or less occupying the same space.
At some point in his career, Dali saw (decided) there was no limit to what he could assemble in the same space—and there was no limit to the number of spaces he could corral into the same canvas. A painting could become a science-fiction novel reaching into several pasts and futures. The protagonist (the viewer) could find himself in such a simultaneity.
Critics have attacked the paintings relentlessly. They are offended at Dali’s skill, which matches the best work of the meticulous Dutch Renaissance masters.
They hate the dissonance. They resent Dali’s mordant wit and rankle at the idea that Dali could carry out monstrous jokes in such fierce extended detail.
But above all, the sheer imagination harpoons the critics. How dare a painter turn reality upside down so blatantly, while rubbing their faces in it.
The cherry on the cake was: for every attack the critics launched at Dali the man (they really had no idea who he was), Dali would come back at them with yet another elaborate piece of fiction about himself. It was unfair. The scholars were “devoted to the truth.” The painter was free to invent himself over and over as many times as he fancied.
Dali was holding up a mirror. He was saying, “You people are like me. We’re all doing fiction. I’m much better at it. In the process, I get at a much deeper truth.”
Dali was the hallucinogenic toreador. He was holding off and skirting the bull (shit) rushes of the critics and the historians. They charged at him. He moved with his cape—and stepped out of the way.
The principles of organized society dictate that a person must be who he is, even if that is a cartoon of a cartoon. A person must be one recognizable caricature forever, must be IDed, must have one basic function. Must—as a civilization goes down the trail of decline—be watched and recorded and profiled.
When a person shows up who is many different things, who can invent himself at the drop of hat, who seems to stand in 14 different places at the same time, the Order trembles.
(Fake) reality declares: what you said yesterday must synchronize absolutely with what you say today.
This rule (“being the only thing you are”) guarantees that human beings will resonate with the premise that we all live and think and work in one continuum of space and time. One. Only one. Forever. The biggest joke of all. The big lie.
Whatever he was, however despicable he may have been in certain respects, Dali broke that egg. Broke the cardinal rule.
He reveled in doing it. He made people wait for an answer about himself, and the answer never came. Instead, he gave them a hundred answers, improvised like odd-shaped and meticulous reveries.
He threw people back on their own resources, and those resources proved to be severely limited.
How harsh for conventional critics to discover that nothing in Dali’s education produced an explanation for his ability to render an object so perfectly on the canvas. It was almost as if, deciding that he would present competing circumstances inside one painting, he perversely ENABLED himself to do the job with exacting skill, “making subversive photographs come to life.”
That was too much.
But there the paintings are.
Imagination realized.
Like it or not, Dali paved the way for many others. He opened doors and windows.
And the pressure has been building. The growing failure of major institutions (organized religion, psychology, education, government) to keep the cork in the bottle signals a prison break in progress.
The pot is boiling. People want out. Even if they don’t know where out is.
Somewhere along the line we have to give the green light to our own creative force. That is the first great day. That’s the dawn of no coerced boundaries. Everything we’ve been taught tells us that a life lived entirely from creative power is impossible. We don’t have it within us. We should maintain silence and propriety in the face of greater official power and wisdom. We must abide by the rules. We must, at best, “surrender to the universe.”
But what if, when we come around the far turn, we see that the universe is us? Is simply one part of imagination? Is a twinkling rendition we installed to keep us titillated with dreams that would forever drift out of reach? What if it turns out that we are the perverse ones and a Dali is quite normal?
What if we pop out of the fences of this culture and this continuum and this tired movie called Planet Earth?
Shocking revelations posted to social media this week revealed that Pfizer engineered a contract, which governments had to sign when purchasing the experimental Covid-19 vaccine. Excerpts appear to show that there is no way for the pharmaceutical company to lose, even if the vaccine is dangerous, causes injury, or is ineffective.
PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT.
(thread)
Background: Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements.
— Ehden (#PfizerLeak/#MonkeyBusiness/#COptiGate) 🌟 (@eh_den) July 26, 2021
The details of the contract were posted by a Twitter user named Ehden, who begins a thread of tweets (many of which have since been deleted) by stating: “Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements.
“These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well enough, so I managed to get a hold of a copy. As you are about to see, there is a good reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts.”
Here are some of the key points taken from the contract:
The contract appears to state that the agreement covers the manufacturing of vaccines for Covid-19 and its mutations, but also for “any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine.”
The reason why governments around the world were suppressing the use of alternative treatments for Covid-19 – including Ivermectin – is because the contract does not allow them to pull out even if a more effective treatment than Pfizer is discovered.
Pfizer cannot be held liable for any delivery delays or missed deliveries: “Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates… nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product.”
To emphasise this, the contract states: “Purchaser hereby waives all rights and remedies that it may have at Law, in equity or otherwise, arising from or relating to:…any failure by Pfizer to deliver the Contracted Doses in accordance with the Delivery Schedule.”
Additionally, once governments have purchased vaccines, they cannot be returned: “Pfizer will not, in any circumstances, accept any returns of Product (or any dose)…no Product returns may take place under any circumstances.”
To add to this, Pfizer assured that it is guaranteed its money and that governments cannot withhold or try to credit funds for the vaccines.
It seems as though that it doesn’t matter to Pfizer whether the vaccines are effective in the short or long term, either. The contract states that the “Purchaser acknowledges…the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.”
Through the contract, Pfizer has guaranteed that all sales are basically final, as is the exception of the contract. Ehden writes: “There are clauses about termination possibility, but in fact, as you saw so far, the buyer has almost nothing that can be considered a material breach, while Pfizer can easily do so if they don’t get their money or if they deem so.”
And, of course, no one can hold Pfizer liable for anything related to its Covid-19 vaccine, as the contract states: “Purchaser must provide Pfizer protection from liability for claims and all Losses, must implement it via statutory or regulatory requirements, and the sufficiency of such efforts shall be in Pfizer’s sole discretion.”
Whilst to many of us a contract like this isn’t really surprising, it just emphasises that these pharmaceutical companies are only interested in money and power. It shows that the Covid vaccine has never been about protecting the population, but that it’s just a worldwide experiment that guarantees Pfizer and big pharma will get rich whilst those who receive a dose suffer adverse reactions.
Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh my! – Dorothy, The Wizard of Oz
The Blame Game is underway in a test of global proportions.
Humans are participants in a Global Reset, with global control by one official voice, where all sovereign nations must work together in unison. Only if all heads-of-state play from the same page in the same Playbook can they achieve their end goal of uniformity. They do so by first dividing people by their identity, and then eliminating it altogether by making humans one amorphous blob.
First, governments must create a “compelling interest:”
Compelling interest – Legal Definition. n. In constitutional law, a method for determining the constitutionality of a statute that restricts the practice of a fundamental right or distinguishes between people due to a suspect classification.
Blaming the Unvaccinated
The classification and separation of a species is nothing new. Subclassifications are essential for an elite power structure to dissect and maintain control. In humans it happens because people allow it to happen.
Suspect classifications in humans include: racial status (BLM), gender status (male vs. female), non-gender status, religious status, educational status (degrees), social status (Caste system in India), marital status, political status, disease status (lepers, patients), vaccinated status, and now, health status. All dictated by a sole authority, such as the United Nations U.N., whose sole purpose is to unite nations.
Using new logic, a disease-free, asymptomatic person is a threat to everyone. Healthy people are weapons.
New Logic: A vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against, because someone else is not vaccinated.
As world governments build a case for a global reset using an unapproved global vaccine, and a bogus PCR test, they utilize the media, by design, as a means to an end.
This dynamic process comes directly from the Playbook of the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. First, create the problem – a health threat to divide people. Second, foment a reaction – fear and frenzy through media. And finally, roll out the solution – uniformity via a global vaccine program with the elimination of rights and freedoms.
New Logic: Unvaccinated equals unclean.
Warnings Not Reported
Not reported in The News are the real threats to human health, once they are connected to each other.
1) The CDC Quietly Withdraws PCR Test to Identify COVID.
PEG is an excipient found in the Pfizer and Moderna shots, known to cause anaphylaxis in some cases. Both the U.S. CDC and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advise that:
A 2016 study published in Analytical Chemistry found that about 7% of people who have been exposed to PEG from various products have a level of antibodies to the compound that is high enough to cause an anaphylactic reaction.
Polysorbate 80, also known to cause allergies, and other adverse effects should never be injected. Though it is not well tested, it is found in the following approved vaccines: DTaP (Infanrix);DTaP—IPV (Kinrix);DTap-HepB-IPV (Pediarix);DTaP-IPV-Hib (Pentacel);Influenza (Agriflu);Influenza (Fluarix);Meningococcal (MenB-Trumenba);Pneumococcal (PCV13—Prevnar13);Rotavirus (RotaTeq);Tdap (Boostrix).
Nanoparticles are the game changer as suspicions grow that they, too, cause allergies, blood clots, heart problems, and unknown effects.
In an interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media, Dr. Montagnier said he believed that the mass vaccination programs for COVID may actually be causing SARS-CoV-2 mutations like the Delta variant and, thus, prolonging the pandemic.
You may wish to stay ahead of the variant curve by knowing which variants will be announced at what time. A short list of “variants of concern” are published by state health departments. But the full list of variants thru 2023 is already known, though not televised in The News.
Here is one list showing their Greek names and birthdates/release dates between June 2021 (Delta) and February 2023 (Omega).
Variant
Name
Birthdate
A
Delta
Jun 2021
E
Epsilon
Jul 2021
Z
Zeta
Aug 2021
H
Eta
Sept 2021
θ
Theta
Oct 2021
I
Iota
Nov 2021
K
Kappa
Dec 2021
λ
Lambda
Jan 2022
M
Mu
Feb 2022
N
Nu
Mar 2022
Ξ
Ksi
April 2022
O
Omicron
May 2022
Π
Pi
June 2022
P
Rho
July 2022
Σ
Sigma
Aug 2022
T
Tao
Sept 2022
Y
Upsilon
Oct 2022
Φ
Phi
Nov 2022
X
Chi
Dec 2022
Ψ
Psi
Jan 2023
Ω
Omega
Feb 2023
4) Delta Tower
Is it a coincidence that Delta towers are announced to support 3G, 4G, and 5G frequency deployment during the reign of the Delta variant? New Delta tower antenna poles allow “multiple Operators” for roof top “monitoring solutions.” The new 5G towers and their frequencies are microwaves known to affect human health.
Nanotechnology through injections suggests a whole new level of unknowns when it comes to microwave frequencies. One study titled, “5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells” suggests that 5G frequencies are absorbed through the skin to produce the symptoms of COVID.
Further, Patent #: US5800481 published on Sep 1, 1998 and filed on Dec 28, 1995, confirms the skin – microwave frequency connection:
In man, autonomic and cortical resonances of the nervous system can be excited by inducing subliminal heat pulses in the skin by means of a resistive heat patch, laser, heat lamp, or microwave radiation, or through a slow air jet that carries a small periodic fluctuation in temperature. Deeply subliminal skin temperature oscillations of frequency near 1/2 Hz induced in a subject by any of these means cause sleepiness, drowsiness, relaxation, a tonic smile, ptosis of the eyelids, a tense feeling, sudden loose stool, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise pulse frequency used. For certain higher frequencies, the induced subliminal skin temperature oscillations cause fractured thought and a slowing of certain cortical processes. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of tremors, seizures, and emotional disorders. There is further application in the form of nonlethal weapons, involving a pulsed infrared laser or a pulsed microwave beam, tuned to a sensory resonance pulse frequency
Moderna is careful to call its mRNA injection an “operating system.”
Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer… In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
At the same time, Moderna admits that healthy human immune responses can destroy the mRNA sequences before they get into the person’s cells. According to Bloomberg, Moderna wants to transform the human body into a vaccine making machine, though the company began making chemotherapy agents for cancer, not as a vaccine manufacturer for SARS-COV2. Are these devices injecting people with prophylactic chemotherapy for cancer that has not been diagnosed by a medical professional?
Even if a healthy immune system can disable injected nanotechnology early on, nanobots can jeopardize normal enzyme reactions, molecular bonds, and hormone balance. In other words, the body can turn on its own cells in an autoimmune (self attack) response as it does with approved vaccines. In medical circles, this is called called A.S.I.A. or Autoimmune Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants.
If someone does come to your door to encourage you to get the COVID-19 vaccine, you have no obligation to tell them whether you have been vaccinated, said Kayte Spector-Bagdady, lawyer and associate director for the Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School.
HIPAA does not apply to public health outreach volunteers, and it doesn’t apply to information you offer to tell,” Spector-Bagdady said in an email to the AP. “If you are uncomfortable, just don’t open the door – or do and just get some information without giving any in return!”
7) Question The News
To question The News is to make journalists accountable for their information or misinformation. Some rhetorical questions to pose:
Since when have all sovereign nations agreed on anything as a unified group?
In this ‘live exercise,’ will each new variant require a new experimental injection?
Have recipients volunteered for an experimental shot under false pretenses? See premise of the TV mini Series Ascension.
Will life insurance companies insure their members if they accept any unapproved medical procedures, tests, or vaccines? Are you covered in the COVID experiment?
Is the mRNA “operating system” designed to program humans and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems or hack biological functions to create a transhuman, subhuman species? Both? What happens to the human soul and spirit?
Is it news, propaganda, fraud, or a political reality show? Are they all one and the same?
Answer: New Logic
Health Freedom and The Right to Refuse
Common Sense: In a free society each individual is responsible for determining the costs and benefits of any medical treatment — the decision to get vaccinated is no different. – Commentary by Dr. Neil Shah, MD
In a free society common sense trumps New Logic every time. How do the rights of a healthy person infringe upon the rights of others simply by not being vaccinated?
They don’t.
We, the people, must demand that the government leave us alone. A global governmental entity is only able to succeed in its agenda to remove inherent rights if the people consent to immoral dictates.
Government mandates of coerced medical treatments only hold power if people allow it.
The protection of the legal concepts of informed consent, where patients have the right to significant information about a medical intervention that would impact whether to accept or decline a product or procedure, is imperative to supporting a person’s fundamental right to make decisions about their own bodies. Incentivizing a person to make a decision one way or the other, outside of information discussed in the doctor/patient relationship, would be unethical. When government and corporations interfere with the doctor/patient relationship and health and medical decision-making by giving rewards to patients for compliance with government goals, then a dangerous abuse of power is initiated. Gimmicks and coercive policies not only undermine informed consent, but also reduce consumer confidence in public health policy. In our country, all individuals have the fundamental right to make health decisions for themselves and their families without coercion or discrimination.
In a truly free society, the freedom to choose is non-negotiable and not open to interpretation by science or by any other means. When we allow government to remove the principle of choice, it binds freedom itself to a contract and choice becomes obsolete. Natural rights are a birthright and can neither be given away nor denied by any government or court.
The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies, either municipal, state or federal, or even from the Constitution. They exist inherently in every man, by endowment of the Creator, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution, and restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government. The people’s rights are not derived from the government, but the government’s authority comes from the people. The Constitution but states again these rights already existing, and when legislative encroachment by the nation, state, or municipality invade these original and permanent rights, it is the duty of the courts to so declare, and to afford the necessary relief. The fewer restrictions that surround the individual liberties of the citizen, except those for the preservation of the public health, safety, and morals, the more contented the people and the more successful the democracy. (City of Dallas v. Mitchell, 245 S.w. 944, 945-46, Tex.Civ.App. – Dallas (1922).
The choice to keep your identity and power is yours and no one else’s, even in attempts to reset the world stage. The evolution or devolution of humanity is dependent on whether each individual chooses to be healthy or to risk disease, whether each chooses to be weaponized by a government entity, or not.
The entrenched front of the makers of corona is crumbling and dissolving. And that is because the power of US. The power of humanity is greater than the power of those on the other side, the inhumans.
Humanity with emotions will always prevail over digitalization and artificial intelligence.
I say this after the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee has, since its inception on July 10th 2020, heard testimony from more than 110 highly-respected experts from all over the world on the questions of how dangerous is the virus, how dangerous are the anti-corona measures to human life and health and to the economy, and how reliable is Drosten PCR test underlying all these measures worldwide.
Well, in the meantime, even the WHO has conceded that the virus, regardless of whether it is fully or semi-artificial or natural, is no more dangerous than the common flu — with an infection finality rate of .14 percent.
And accordingly, Singapore agrees and has removed all measures. These measures are as deadly and destructive as a third world war would be.
And the Drosten PCR test, which was declared by the WHO — under control of Bill Gates and the Chinese — as the gold standard for detecting infections is an outrageous fraud.
First, a PCR test per se cannot detect infections. And second, the Drosten PCR test, with 45 cycles of amplification, has been set to show 100 percent false positives as so-called corona cases.
Because, from 24 cycles on, the test lacks anything even remotely scientific. And at 35 cycles it produces at least 97% false positives according to Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer. Only these so-called cases, which have in reality been faked with the test — with the help of this test with the basis for the determination of ‘a public health emergency of international concern’ in February of 2020.
The acronym, by the way, for ‘public health emergency of international concern’ is PHEIC, pronounced ‘fake’.
This is the termination of a public health emergency of international concern, in turn, was needed by the global alliance of the pharmaceutical and tech industries in order to achieve the goal of so-called vaccinations, which was their true stated intention right from the beginning.
Only on the basis of this public health emergency of international concern, that is on the basis of this state of emergency, is it possible at all — according to the rules of the WHO — to use untested drugs on humans by way of this emergency approval.
All other steps — the social distancing, the lockdowns, the mask mandates, etcetera — served only to give the population: firstly, a visible reason for an otherwise illusionary panic created solely through psychological operations and, secondly, to subjugate them so that they would ultimately agree even to the so-called vaccinations.
In reality, of course, these vaccinations are experimental gene therapies without any scientific study as a basis. There is neither a reason nor even a necessity for them.
Firstly, there is no evidence for a pandemic. Only the fake Drosten PCR test with its false positives is responsible for the public health emergency of international concern, as explained above. And, secondly, there are effective alternative treatment methods. And, as a rule, a human immune system that is very well equipped to fight viruses — even man-made viruses.
Apart from that, the vaccinations lack any effectiveness, as a very recent study by Science Files has just proven concerning BioNtech Pfizer.
And, on top of all this, these shots are extremely dangerous as the latest official figures from the U.S. prove. There, according to VAERS — the official register for adverse events after vaccination — 45.000 people have died after vaccination in 180 days since the beginning of these so-called vaccinations.
However, as our colleague Tom Renz learned from a whistleblower. these numbers were kept secret and false numbers were given — namely only about 11,000 deaths after vaccination. Even worse.
In normal times, it can be assumed that, at most, between one and 10 percent of all the real vaccination adverse events are reported at all. But we do not have normal times.
The mainstream media and the politicians, which are both under control of the global corporations and the global NGOs, are doing everything in their power to make registration of vaccination adverse events as difficult as possible. So that, in truth, we are in all likelihood looking at approximately 500,000 dead after vaccination in the U.S. alone.
This puts the other side in a panic because this is not part of their plan. That is why this other empathy and emotional side now drops all masks. In France, for example, the government is threatening to make vaccination mandatory and introduce compulsory vaccination. And in the U.S.. the president wants to censor even private communications — even if it concerns completely correct statements whose only problem is that they’re not in line with the official fraudulent lie as announced by the government.
In the meantime — in India, in South Africa, in the U.S., in Canada and in France — very large legal battles have been set in motion or are now being set in motion.
In Portugal, Austria and Germany excellent court decisions have come down stating that the completely unsuitable Drosten PCR test cannot be the basis for any anti-corona measures.
The Berlin Corona Investigative Committee already now has accumulated extremely incriminating evidence which proves that this was never about health.
Rather, Mister Global — as former investment banker in U.S. Deputy Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Catherine Austin Fitts calls the global corporations, NGOs and their backers — Mister Global is exclusively pursuing these goals with their measures:
– Destruction of regional economies to make the world’s population dependent on global supply chains.
– Shifting the wealth of the world’s population from the bottom to the very top — that is to the super rich.
– Population reduction, which means genocide. And gaining total control over the remaining population.
We are obviously dealing here with megalomaniac psychopaths and sociopaths who should have been stopped a long time ago. But now the time has come for this.
That is why millions of people are demonstrating all over the world today.
One other aspect needs to be emphasized. In addition to our legal work and in addition to our efforts and shining a bright light on these dark truths there is a third level, namely the spiritual or religious or cosmic (call it what you will) level. And this level is crucial.
This is what a story shows us, which a German doctor told us last week. He wanted to withdraw money at an ATM and went to the lobby of a bank for that purpose. There stood an elderly woman wearing a mask, who fearfully backed away from him because he was not wearing a mask. She said he had to wear a mask because otherwise she was afraid of infecting herself and then her husband. The doctor told her ‘no’, she shouldn’t be afraid. And then he went up to her, took off her mask and took her in his arms. The woman began to cry and said that no one had hugged her for more than a year.
That’s what this is all about. It is humanity versus inhumanity. We are human. We can laugh, cry, sing, dance and hug. The other side can’t. Because the other side has no access to the spiritual side.
Therefore, without any doubt, the other — dark side — will lose this inhuman battle against life and creation.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Scuffles Erupt in Italian Parliament as Group of MPs Protests Coronavirus ‘Green Pass’
A session of the Italian Parliament has turned to chaos after a group of right-wing MPs protested the country’s ‘Green Pass’ Covid vaccine cert system, which is soon to become mandatory for accessing most public venues.
The protest was held by members of the Brothers of Italy (FdI) party in the parliamentary chamber on Thursday. Footage from the scene shows the MPs rushing to the center of the chamber, shouting and waving placards reading ‘No Green Pass.’
One of the MPs was promptly chased away by his opponents, however the FdI still managed to continue its demonstration, prompting the speaker to suspend the session. The protesting MPs were booed by their political opponents who support the vaccine certificate system.
The incident unfolded shortly before the legislature was set to vote on a motion, launched by the FdI, questioning whether the recent decree to expand the Green Pass was constitutional. After order was restored and the session continued, the motion was shot down, with 51 votes in favor, 288 against, and a single abstention.
Italy’s Green Pass was launched in late June. The certificate is issued for people who have been vaccinated against Covid-19, have tested negative in the previous 48 hours, or have recovered from the disease.
The Pass, however, was ultimately expanded into more of a binding document. Starting from August 6, the Green Pass will be required for indoor dining, and only its holders will be allowed into gyms, swimming pools, museums and other venues across Italy. The measure has triggered mass protests in Italy, with its opponents condemning the Green Pass initiative as discriminatory.
Welcome to New World Next Week – the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. This week:
Pfizer hiked its projections for COVID vaccine revenues, telling investors this week it expects booster shots, a vaccine targeting the Delta variant and anticipated authorization of its vaccines for children as young as 6 months will drive revenues higher
Strong sales of its COVID vaccine helped Pfizer nearly double second-quarter revenue and boost profits by 59% — beating Wall Street projections and leading the drug giant to sharply hike its 2021 sales and profit forecasts.
During a July 28 second quarter earnings call, Pfizer told investors the company has increased its revenue projection, now expected to be in the range of $78 to $80 billion.
The company projected revenue from its COVID vaccine alone will hit $33.5 billion — a 29% jump from the previously estimated $26 billion. Pfizer registered $7.8 billion in COVID vaccine sales in the second quarter, bringing total worldwide sales so far this year to $11.3 billion.
The new profit forecast doesn’t include a contract struck last week with the Biden administration to provide an additional 200 million doses to the U.S.
“The federal government is exercising an option in its contract with Pfizer to purchase 200 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine to be delivered between fall 2021 and spring 2022 to prepare for future vaccination needs, including vaccines for children under 12 and possible booster shots if studies show they are necessary.”
The pharmaceutical giant plans to deliver 2.1 billion doses this year and has the capacity to manufacture 4 billion doses next year, CEO Albert Bourla said during the conference call.
The U.S. previously paid $19.50 per dose for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but Pfizer recently raised the price for the government to $24 per dose.
“The price for this order accounts for the additional investment necessary to produce, package and deliver new formulations of the vaccine, as well as the increased cost associated with delivering the vaccine in smaller pack sizes to facilitate delivery at individual provider offices, including pediatricians.”
Pfizer based the vaccine’s original price on the need for governments to secure doses and get the virus under control, but CFO Frank D’Amelio said in March the company planned to “get more on price” once the pandemic waned and the company was no longer in a “pandemic pricing environment.”
U.S. federal health agencies and the maker of one of the most popular COVID vaccines are publicly at odds over whether fully vaccinated people will soon need a third booster shot.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) July 11, 2021
Pfizer said Wednesday it is in ongoing discussions with regulatory agencies regarding a potential third dose booster of the current vaccine and, assuming positive results, anticipates an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) submission as early as August.
Bourla said the company believes “it is likely that a third dose booster may be needed within 6 to 12 months after full vaccination to maintain the highest levels of protection, and studies are underway to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a third dose.”
Pfizer said it has new data showing a third dose of its vaccine significantly increases antibody levels against the Delta variant.
Pfizer’s two-dose schedule is already effective against COVID, including the Delta variant, said David Dowdy, an infectious disease epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins. Just because a third dose means more antibodies, doesn’t mean you need one, Dowdy said.
Pfizer reports >5x increase in antibody levels w 3rd vaccine dose (https://t.co/sV7b3L5Dyp).
BUT: – 5x more antibodies doesn't mean 5x more protection. – 2 doses are already highly effective, even against delta.
Just because 3rd dose = more antibodies doesn't mean you need one.
U.S. health agencies said earlier this month there’s no evidence to suggest a booster is needed, but it may be appropriate for special risk groups in the future, including elderly people and transplant recipients. Federal public health officials said they would continue to monitor the situation.
Officials said after the meeting that more data — and possibly several more months — would be needed before regulators could determine whether booster shots were necessary, threatening the pharmaceutical giant’s multibillion-dollar revenue stream.
During this week’s call, Pfizer also announced plans to start an immunogenicity and safety study in August to evaluate an updated version of its current vaccine. The new version is specifically designed to target the Delta variant — pending regulatory approval.
During a February earnings call, Bourla told analysts the company could make significant profits by charging higher prices and implementing routine booster doses for new variants of the virus, assuring investors the company didn’t see this as a one-time event, but “as something that’s going to continue for the foreseeable future.”
Vaccines for kids could provide additional revenue stream
Bourla said during the call this week he anticipates that by the end of September, testing in 5- through 11-year-old volunteers will produce the safety and efficacy data needed to seek EUA in that age group, and data on testing in children from 6 months to 5 years old should follow soon after.
This week, Pfizer and Moderna announced they will expand clinical trials of their mRNA vaccines, after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told the vaccine makers the size and scope of their pediatric studies, as initially envisioned, were inadequate to detect rare side effects.
The rare side effects cited by the FDA include myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining around the heart, multiple people familiar with the trials told The New York Times.
Expanding the pediatric trials means thousands more children as young as 6 months old may soon be recruited and enrolled in COVID vaccine trials.
Moderna’s shot is authorized for emergency use in people 18 and up, and Pfizer’s vaccine is authorized for children as young as 12. No COVID vaccines have yet received EUA approval for children younger than 12.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman at Worldwide Freedom Rally in London: “…In Solidarity, Arm-in-Arm, We Are a Force of Nature. We Are the Power Elite’s Worst Nightmare.”
Hello, men and women of the United Kingdom. It is an honor to be invited to speak to you on this important occasion.
In the United States we have been spared much of the tyranny that you faced but I’ve been observing from afar and do my best to tell others about your unfortunate plight. The almighty himself, Mr. Boris Johnson, recently declared Freedom Day after more than six months of bondage for the British people. Well, Boris Johnson does not have the authority to give or take away your freedom.
Freedom — the right to choose our own fate, to determine how to treat our bodies. to speak our mind, to formulate our own opinions, to raise our children according to our values — is our birthright bestowed upon us by the Creator. It’s our natural right.
No authority figure, be it head of state, scientific experts, globalist leader, banker, CEO, occultist or politician can grant us rights or take them away.
The responsibility to protect, preserve and defend our rights lies fully and completely with us and us alone.
You have committed to a major first step by coming here today. Many of you have maintained and defended your freedom by resisting the jabs, by showing your face, by refusing testing, and by leaving your home at will — based on your own decision and inclination.
Many have sacrificed toward this end — losing jobs, losing friends, causing marital disagreements and alienating family members.
It’s a difficult realization that many who have chosen to ignore reality and believe the lies of the BBC and others will end up sick, dead or become compliant zombies of the technocratic surveillance state. It will be painful to watch their defense, their demise, but we must realize that everyone has a choice and every decision has consequences.
While there is now a temporary reprieve from the state of oppression, the headlines are already sensationalizing the dangers of the made-up Delta variant and claiming, ironically, that the economy will not recover from re-opening businesses. This forecasts more lockdowns to come.
What is also coming is the vaccine pass. For those who accept the pass will no longer be free.
As a physician scientist my job is been to educate as many people as possible about the scientific misconceptions, misinterpretations and outright fraud that the scientific establishment and the government agencies, charged with monitoring public health, have bestowed upon us.
While carrying out this mission I uncovered that the proof offered to claim the very existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged virus, is scientifically invalid.
A new virus has never, not once, been taken out of a sick person and studied for its structure, composition, genetics or ability to cause disease. Not once.
Instead they offer an experimental procedure that produces the results they want, the alleged proof of a new virus, from the experimental procedure itself — without any source of virus needed. Very convenient.
They show pictures of particles claiming their new virus, but the same exact particles are seen in kidney biopsies from 1999. They developed a PCR test based on an alleged virus from 2003, that was never validated by any testing against a gold standard. And now they’re trying to make everyone in the entire United Kingdom — every single man and woman — take this test every week.
Every policy has been justified by these bogus test results. One of the most important things you can do is refuse testing.
I want to remind you about World War II. I know that your beloved country was nearly destroyed by the Nazis.
One of their central policies was to perform medical experiments on their citizens. After they were defeated an international code was developed which was later codified into an international treaty. And this was known as the Nuremberg Code.
This code is the standard which establishes the ethics of conducting scientific research on human subjects. It states that NO experimental medical procedure of any kind can be forced on the people. Participation always has to be informed and voluntary. Furthermore, vulnerable populations — like children, the mentally ill, the elderly and infirm, and prisoners — have special protections.
Now, for the first time since the Nazis, governments across the world, private businesses, schools and universities, and many others are openly, and with impunity, forcing or coercing you to accept experimental medical procedures.
That’s right, not one diagnostic test, not one genetic jab, not one mask has been approved by any government agency as safe and effective as a medical procedure. Not one.
All of these procedures are experimental and you are the intended guinea pigs.
I want to remind you that you — each and everyone of you — are powerful. What you do matters, now more than ever before in your lifetime. You have the ability to see the truth and embody that truth in every way.
We are at a critical time, a turning point in human history. The hard lessons of ‘classroom earth’ are upon us. It is our duty to look into the fire and see the source of its flames.
When we gather like we are today, in solidarity, arm-in-arm, we are a force of nature. We are the power elite’s worst nightmare.
We have taken a major step for freedom by coming here today. We need to continue our efforts.
We need to be prepared for sacrifice in the short term. But we are strong. We can endure.
Let us make a commitment, right here today, that we will continue to act as the beautiful, amazing, free beings of light that we truly are.
We will stand up to tyranny at every step. We will not comply. We will not comply.
The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:
They have a soup they make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”
To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”
Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.
During the World Wide Freedom Rally in Argentina, Dr. Luis Marcelo Martínez raised awareness of the dangers of the misnamed vaccines and the farce of PCR tests among the people gathered and passing by the meeting place.
In his powerful speech, he informed those present that this plandemic is a psychological operation carried out by the military and intelligence services with the knowledge of world governments; and that, under no circumstances, should people let their integrity and condition as human beings be violated by the measures being imposed.
Below, Orwell City offers the video in which he explains how this operation is being executed, and why we must remain strong and fearless.
We assume that using the PCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 is like playing tic-tac-toe.
So I’d very strongly suggest to anyone who listens to us outside of this group and this core not to swab. Do not get swabbed. Don’t let anyone put anything in your body. Don’t allow it. All of this is dangerous.
They’ve played for decades with us. They have had us under control, mainly with our children. They have tested all kinds of technology with us. They did whatever they wanted with us.
So, the evidence is that yes, people die. Unfortunately, a lot of people. Some within minutes of getting vaccinated, some within days, some within weeks. And there are sequelae. Many are left with neurological difficulties, etc. We already know all that.
The magnetic phenomenon has actually been verified and certified on several occasions. There are things that, for sure, we’re not able to define exactly what they are. But I am also aware that to continue diving intellectually into all this ―and scientifically as well―, is a waste of time. Because there is a single concept: we don’t need anything. Nothing at all. So, if someone comes to you and says, ‘Well, look, I’m injecting this on you because you, and you, and you, and you, and everybody needs it.’ No! Just no. No, no, no, no, gentlemen. No, no, no, no! Leave us in peace. Nothing. We don’t need anything.
So, personally, I don’t even care if I can define what the vaccine is at all. Because I have come to the full awareness that there really are things that are beyond our understanding. Some things are beyond our ability to define… what exactly? I mean, you can’t. We’re seeing things that we don’t know what they are. It’s as simple as that.
So, these phenomena aren’t uniformly observed. Some people don’t express the magnetic phenomenon, others do. There are countries where we don’t see cases of magnetism and others in which we do. So, obviously, I suspect that in different populations, different regions, and with different groups, whether ethnic groups or countries, different things are tested. Different things are tried. Let’s not expect a uniform effect. So, is magnetism seen in some people? Yes, you can see it. You can measure it with devices, with gauss meters, with metal detectors, and with other devices. You can. What’s in the vaccination vials? Well, we can hypothesize, we can ruminate according to the information we’re getting, but ultimately we cannot get into the discussion of whether it contains A, B, or C components. Nor do I care. All I can say, as a physician, is that none of it has to be introduced into the human body. Period.
So, the final stage of this whole plan, because it is a whole plan, is to break free. And it’s very simple to do that. You don’t have to participate in this reality anymore. So, once again, there is no virus. There never was. The PCR test was made for all of this. The test can be positive or negative according to our convenience. The treatments are being proposed, and people always end up being blown up at the institutional level. And all this is a great psychological operation, managed with military and intelligence services and governments’ knowledge. And it has always been like that, OK? This is the final phase.
So, don’t get swabbed because that stick inside your body, whether nasal or anal, is just another element of the psychological operation to bend you, to put you on your knees, and to burst you as a human being. To trash you. And at the same time, the process of psychological suggestion is set in motion. Because a lot of people, when they test positive ―whether they took the test because they were forced to do it at work or whatever―, they start to somatize or they start to feel bad. They start to feel sick and running a fever.
What do these people need? An immediate unreal appointment with the doctor. Because imagine the moment when you arrive at a hospital, and everyone sees you dressed as an astronaut from a distance as if you were radioactive and so on… The process of disease management is detrimental because that’s not medicine. This is not even a scenario in which we’re really dealing with a real and highly lethal pathogen.
I repeat. When I saw patients with leprosy in the past, I wasn’t standing at a distance even when I knew that I could catch it. Yes, well, taking distance and all that is part of all the plan: breaking with everything and generating new normalities. New normalities are being generated in that environment. An environment that doesn’t have much life left.
Just imagine, all the people of the Judiciary are vaccinated; all the lower echelons of politics are vaccinated; the police are vaccinated. This is self-limiting. It’s self-limiting. Don’t believe that there’s going to be persecution. Don’t believe that we’re going to be pariahs. This is self-limiting. We’re the reserve. Don’t be afraid. We’re the reserve of the human being. Of the original human being.
Postal workers union bristles at Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate | 28 July 2021 | The influential American Postal Workers Union on Wednesday said, at this point, it opposes a coronavirus vaccine mandate from the Biden administration but encouraged workers to voluntarily take the jabs. “While the APWU leadership continues to encourage postal workers to voluntarily get vaccinated, it is not the role of the federal government to mandate vaccinations for the employees we represent,” the union said in a statement obtained by Fox News. The union said in the statement that the safety of its workers is “of paramount importance” but “at this time the APWU opposes the mandating of COVID-19 vaccinations.”
New York COVID-19 vaccine mandates for government workers facing growing union backlash –One New York union says it is considering its legal options to fight the state’s decision | 28 July 2021 | Public employee unions in New York are pushing back against newly-announced dictates requiring workers to get vaccinated for COVID-19 or submit to regular testing for the virus. FDNY EMS Local 2507 President Oren Barzilay blasted the mayor’s decision following the news, saying his union — which represents the city’s 4,300 EMS workers — took them by surprise with the move. “The city and the mayor cannot simply disregard the civil liberties of the workforce,” he told The Associated Press. “The unions are really, really aggravated that the mayor sprung this on everybody,” sanitation workers’ union President Harry Nespoli told The New York Times. On Wednesday, Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced there would be a requirement for vaccination or testing for public employees at the state level, too.
A group of “citizens” of the Andromeda Galaxy, the closest to our Milky Way, but still about 2.5 million light years away from planet Earth – People of Peace – wanted to visit Mother Earth, the beautiful blue planet. They must have heard lots of good things about our planet, many light years back. The Andromeda people’s nutrition is love. When they landed on earth, they first were thrilled – the breathtaking landscape, mountains, lakes, still fresh air, forests – though rapidly diminishing. They ignored the latter, because of the beauty of the former. But gradually they started starving – they had to leave. They found no love on Earth….
***
Lost Love. The Gladiator Games are over, the soccer players went home, both in South America and in Europe, to continue celebrating without masks and without social distancing – and the Olympics in Japan will be taking place in virtual mode, arenas without live spectators. The infection case numbers are on the rise, a scaringly rapid rise, the Delta Variant and Wave Four are at the doorstep, actually they are knocking at the door – in some US States at least, and soon in Europe – to give you a last chance to get the wonder jab.
The directors of the world, the Merkels, Macrons and other compromised world leaders, plus their nameless tiny elite-bosses way above them – are calling for tightening the screws again. To use Madame Merkel’s terminology of what she decided to do with the German people a few months ago. She has hardly loosened the screws since.
The populace has had their summer fun. They have enjoyed their Gladiators.
Now reality sets in again. Preparation for the Fourth Wave. New lockdowns.
Imagine we are only in year 2021, There are another almost ten years left in the UN Agenda 2030 to accomplish the nefarious objectives of the Great Reset – if We, the People, don’t stop it.
The tyrants, first in disguise, then in semi-disguise – and now with the Fourth Wave coming, they show their true face – wide open. No scruples. They have been given their quota of vaxxing by the higher masters, and god-forbid, they may not reach their targets.
The Presidents of Tanzania and Burundi, they did not want to jab their people with poisonous mRNA inoculations. They knew about and had natural remedies to heal. While there is no firm evidence, they died mysterious deaths. Just a few months ago. And nobody dares to investigate them.
The President of Haiti, Jovenel Moïse (A right wing president who was the object of mass protests), on 7 July 2021, was assassinated in the middle of the night in his bed, by a well-organized group of 28 mercenaries, they say.
He too, said there was no need to jab Haitians. They were free of masks, and they were free to hug and socialize. No social distancing. And Haiti’s “case numbers” and deaths were very low. Proportionately much lower than the artificially blown out of proportion, fear-inducing “cases”, disease and death numbers of the obedient tyrannical West. (See Open Democracy)
Haiti was the only country in the Western Hemisphere which refused to implement the mRNA vaccine.
In a bitter irony, immediately following Jovenal Moise’s assassination, President Joe Biden sent half a million vaccine doses (and more to come) (courtesy of Uncle Sam) which were promptly delivered to Port au Prince (six days later) on July 14.
What we are living today, is the Lockstep Scenario, according to the infamous 2010 Rockefeller Report, confirmed by Klaus Schwab’s (WEF) “The Great Reset”.
These Rockefeller Report’s four scenarios (Lock Step; Clever Together; Hack Attack; and Smart Scramble), have been on the drawing board for decades. Ever so often we were told and warned about the deadly actions they had in store for us.
This is part of their cult. They have to tell people. And they did on numerous occasions.
But nobody listened. For example, by publishing the 2010 Rockefeller Report which was never a secret. Not even now. See this. (p. 34)
Have you noticed, the scenario “Hack Attack” is being tried out, in plain sight?
The highly propagated blame and breach of cyber security is on Russia and China. And hardly anybody is linking it to the openly displayed chapter “Hack Attack” of the 2010 Rockefeller report (p 34).
How come? Are we so blind or brain-brushed and brain-washed to ignore the open warnings we receive?
Then almost simultaneously, Bill Gate’s TedTalk in February 2010, in Southern California, where he says “If we are doing a real good job, we could reduce world population by 10% to 15%”; see this, called “Innovating to Zero”.
And then there is this “Luciferian” Swiss Gotthard tunnel inauguration in June 2016.
People say Switzerland is one of the cults main hubs. All of the European government “leaders” and other hot shots were sitting in the front line to watch this nefarious spectacle – that just coincidentally starts with a “lockstep scenario” – watch this 6 min very revealing youtube (below). Also see this.
Event 201
As if this is not enough, there was Event 201 that took place on 18 October 2019, in NYC, just a few weeks before the “start” of the pandemic, what turned out to be a plandemic. It was sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (funded by the Rockefeller Foundation) in partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with the participation of WHO, UNICEF, other UN agencies, and – of course, the World Bank, the IMF and many more.
The event portrayed a simulation of things to come, a corona virus à la SARS (China 2002 / 2003), thus called SARS-CoV-2, later renamed by WHO to Covid-19 (the disease), a simulation of what we are living since the beginning of 2020. The simulated virus caused 65 million deaths in 18 months, destroyed the world economy and left humanity in chaotic shambles. See this.
Surely, there were many more such introductory demonstrations on what “they” intend to do with us. Even though, they played out right in front of our eyes, we largely ignored them all.
This profoundly immoral and criminal endeavor has been on the drawing board for years. The final and formal decision to go ahead NOW, albeit planned, was taken in January 2020 at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos – behind closed doors, of course. The Gates, GAVI (an association of vaccination-promoting pharmaceuticals), Rockefellers, Rothschilds et al, they are all behind this decision – the implementation of Agenda ID2020 – see links above.
The key points and predictions of these Agenda ID2020-linked articles, were published by GR on 12 March 2020.
(i) “Force vaccination, under police and / or military surveillance. Those who refuse may be penalized (fines and / or jail – and force-vaccinated all the same);”
(ii) “People really don’t know what kind of cocktail will be put into the vaccine, maybe a slow killer, that acts-up only in a few years – or a disease that hits only the next generation – or a brain debilitating agent, or a gene that renders women infertile …. all is possible – always with the aim of full population control and population reduction. In a few years’ time, one doesn’t know, of course, where the disease comes from. That’s the level of technology our bio-war labs have reached (US, UK, Israel, Canada, Australia…);” – See this.
(iii) “Along with the vaccination – if not with the first one, then possibly with a later one, a nano-chip may be injected, unknown to the person being vaccinated. The chip may be remotely charged with all your personal data, including bank accounts – digital money. Yes, digital money that’s what “they” are aiming at, so you really have no control any more over your health, and other intimate data, but also over your earnings and spending. Your money could be blocked, or taken away – as a ‘sanction’ for misbehavior, for swimming against the stream. You may become a mere slave of the masters. Comparatively, feudalism may appear like a walk in the park.”
Lo and behold, precisely this is happening. We thought forced vaccination is anti-constitutional and could never happen. But it is just in the process of being imposed. Why is it possible? Because the constitutional democratic rights of people throughout Europe and most of the Western World, have quietly been overtaken by “Health Martial Laws” that were quickly passed through the respective Parliaments, with most people not even noticing.
This means, our Constitutional Human and Civil Rights have been suspended. The governments can do whatever they want, in the name of health. They can storm your house, arrest you, fine you, put you in jail, or even in a mental hospital. All has already happened, with the mainstream media hardly reporting on it.
Keep one thing in mind though – and that is very important keeping always before your eyes and in your mind: Tyrants don’t create tyranny; people do – by their obedience.
Keep also in mind, all the mainstream media are bought by governments and by the order-giving cult, above the governments.
As an example, in tiny Switzerland with 8.4 million people, the Government had just a few weeks ago decided to increase the “subsidies” to the (mainstream) media by another 120 million Swiss francs (about US$ 132 million), to an annual aggregate total of close to half a billion Swiss francs, or about 550 million dollars. That sum “obliges”.
Imagine, what sums are being dished out to the media in the rest of Europe, the US and most of the all-coerced 193 UN member countries!
Forced Vaccination announced in France on Bastille Day
Now comes the BREAKING: On 13 July, a day before the French National Independence Day, the Bastille Day, the very day celebrating the French Revolution – 14 July 1789, when the French broke loose from Royal feudalism, when they gave an example for others to follow – on that very occasion, French President Macron announced forced vaccination, to begin with all health services employees; no attending of public events, taking public transportations, a ban on movie theatres, restaurants and even shops – and of course no flying – for unvaxxed people. See this.
This was foreseeable, as Germany, Greece, Canada and others have passed similar laws. Others are to follow – probably the Netherlands, Italy and Spain. Boris Johnson, UK, may join the gang later.
As of 19 July he declared the UK totally free of any covid restrictions. Maybe he has fulfilled his vaxx-quota? And gives people – or rather the economy – a little reprieve, before the cult cracks down on him and other coopted-coerced leaders (sic) again. There is a lot to be done to complete the UN Agenda 2030 – and, foremost Agenda ID2020.
On 14 of July 2021, French Bastille Day – instead of celebrating the French prowess of freeing themselves from feudalism and aristocratic oppression 232 years ago, millions took to the streets in Paris and major French cities to demonstrate against Macron and his abject dictatorship. What they will achieve remains to be seen. The mainstream media hardly covered the protests. Of course, not. They are paid not to incite people to bond in solidarity.
Apropos solidarity, a little anecdote. Swiss citizens, as a step towards a direct democracy, have, since the Constitutional Revision of 1891, the right to launch a referendum against a law. It takes 50,000 validated signatures. As somewhat a surprise, on 7 March 2021 a people’s referendum rejected a law governing a proposed electronic identity system, the so-called e-ID Act, i.e., Agenda ID2020, by more than two thirds majority. The Swiss ID2020 would have connected everything to everything on personal data.
The key reason for such a clear rejection was most likely the Swiss government’s intent to privatize the data handling and management of ID2020. Can you imagine, a bank or insurance company handling your very sensitive personal data, possibly even selling it to marketing companies or to foreign secret service agencies! Well, that didn’t pass.
In September 2020, the Swiss Parliament quietly passed a law giving the government “martial powers” over matters concerning Covid-19. This Health Martial Law would be valid until 2031. An Association of “Friends of the Constitution” was formed, launching a referendum against this law. On 13 June, the referendum was rejected by the people and the law prevailed.
However, after the law passed Parliament, a small but significant amendment was introduced into the Covid-19 law. The Friends of the Constitution launched immediately a new referendum. This time in less than 5 weeks, 187,000 signatures were collected, an all-time record for a referendum in the 130 years of the Swiss Right to Referendum. The new Referendum will be voted on in November 2021. Let’s wait and see, whether this time people will reject the Swiss Health Martial Law.
The 187,000 signatures are a clear sign of a growing anti-covid, anti-oppression movement, or awakening, in Switzerland. When “Friends of the Constitution” was created in the summer 2020, they counted a few dozen people. Now, a year later, their membership has grown to over 10,000.
In most other European countries, a covid martial law was passed by Parliament or by government decree, with no saying by the people.
The key in a situation like the one the world faces today, where a small cult of evil, but dirty rich people, attempt to take control of the world, of the population, of the financial system, of the manufacturing and infrastructure apparatus – peoples’ solidarity in spirit and in actions, is key.
We are 99.999 %, they are 0.001% or less. We shall overcome their nefarious tyrannical attempt to rule the world, attempt to do away with sovereign nation states – and convert a drastically reduced world population into a One World Order – OWO, or a New World Order. They shall not succeed. But we must remain peaceful, non-aggressive – but in solid solidarity, steadily moving forward, like a flowing stream, gathering ever more momentum and strength – towards a mankind and sovereign states with a shared future.
He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He is also a non-resident Sr. Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.
July, 29th & 30th: Emergency Summit with Highly Acclaimed International Scientists, Lawyers and Economists Calling for Immediate Interventions in the Current Crisis
July, 29th and 30th – 18.00 – 23.00 CET / 7.00 – 22.00 BST
Have you been wondering why nothing seems to make sense in the current ‘pandemic response’?
Children’s Health Defense Europe is inviting you to an exceptional meeting with top notch experts that were never heard in official circles during the pandemic.
This is likely the most important symposium to watch and share in order to understand the current crisis. True whistleblowers with the highest standards of ethics are putting the pieces of the pandemic agenda together. And their picture reveals that the implacable measures destroying our economy and our democracies are not ‘the only possible response to a health threat’, but a step in a global coup that is organised by private bankers, industrial mafia and captured agencies.
When the former vice-president and chief scientific officer of respiratory disease at Pfizer Global is warning of the life threatening dangers of the Covid Vaccines…
When a former board member of a major Wall Street investment bank and former Assistant Secretary of the housing department of the U.S. government explains where and when the ‘going direct reset’ financial plan was launched by central bankers ahead of the pandemic and in perfect synchronisation…
Session I with Prof. Martin Haditsch: The False Pandemic
17:00 Greetings and introduction Opening Statement by Sucharit Bhakdi
17:10 The SARS-CoV-2 Genome: Evidence of its Artificial Origin Opening Plenary by Michael Palmer
17:30 The Laboratory Pandemic Ulrike Kämmerer
17:50 The False Pandemic
Denis Rancourt
18:10 Planned Lockdown A dialogue with Stefan Homburg & Sucharit Bhakdi
18:30 The Power of Masks Conversation with Josef Thoma, Harald Walach & Martin Haditsch
18:50 The Powerless Doctors Debate with Sam White, Thomas Binder, Charles Hoffe & Martin Haditsch
19:20 Panel Discussion With all Session I participants led by Martin Haditsch
Session II with Catherine Austin Fitts: The Going Direct Reset
19:50 The Going Direct Reset: The Pandemic is a Monetary Event John Titus
20:10 UK Central Bankers & the Economic Drivers Discussion with Richard Werner, Catherine Austin Fitts & Taylor Hudak
20:30 How to Decentralize Control Discussion with Richard Werner, Mark Skidmore, Patrick Wood &
Catherine Austin Fitts
21:00 Panel Discussion With all session II participants & Wolfgang Wodarg, led by Taylor Hudak
21:45 First Day Wrap Up and the programme for the 2nd day With Catherine Austin Fitts, Michael Palmer & Taylor Hudak
———————
PROGRAMME DAY 2 / Friday, 30 July
Session III with Michael Palmer: First Do No Harm
17:00 The Propaganda Matrix – The complicit role of the media With Taylor Hudak, Patrick Henningsen, Michael Meyen & Catherine Austin Fitts
17:30 Vaccines: Emergency Authorization Abused Mike Yeadon
17:50 Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of mRNA vaccines With Michael Palmer and Sucharit Bhakdi
18:10 The End of the Narrative With Sucharit Bhakdi and Michael Palmer
18:40 Panel Discussion on Vaccinations With Mike Yeadon, Sucharit Bhakdi, Michael Palmer & Taylor Hudak
19:00 Debate on Vaccine Passports With Patrick Henningsen and Guests
Session IV : The Hour of Justice
19:30 Reviving the Nuremberg Codex Conversation with Vera Sharav, Sucharit Bhakdi & Catherine Austin Fitts
19:50 The Hour of Justice With Reiner Fuellmich, Vera Sharav, Mary Holland, Patrick Henningsen & Guest
20:30 Final Panel Discussion With Sucharit Bhakdi, Thomas Binder, Catherine Austin Fitts, Reiner Fuellmich & Wolfgang Wodarg, led by Michael Palmer
———————
PARTICIPANTS in alphabetical order
Catherine AUSTIN FITTS is the president of Solari, Inc., publisher of the Solari Report, and managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC. Catherine served as managing director and member of the board of directors of the Wall Street investment bank Dillon, Read & Co. Inc., as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in the Xrst Bush Administration, and was the president of Hamilton Securities Group, Inc. Catherine has designed and closed over $25 billion of transactions and investments to-date and has led portfolio and investment strategy for $300 billion of Xnancial assets and liabilities. She graduated from the University of Pennsylvania (BA), the Wharton School (MBA) and studied Mandarin Chinese at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Professsor Sucharit BHAKDI MD is Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz.
Dr. Thomas BINDER, MD is specialised in Cardiology and Internal Medicine, with a thesis in Immunology and Virology, and 32 years experience in diagnosis and treatment of Acute Respiratory Illness.
Dr. Reiner FUELLMICH is an attorney at law since 1993 in Germany and 1994 in California/USA. He has over three decades of experience as a consumer protection attorney, particularly against banks. From 1985 to 2001 Reiner was ScientiXc Assistant to Prof. Deutsch at the University of Göttingen, research center for medical and pharmaceutical law, and member of the Ethics Committees of the University Hospitals of Göttingen and Hannover. He is currently co-chair of the Extra Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry into the impact of governmental corona measures.
Professor Martin HADITSCH MD PhD is Specialist in Hygiene and Microbiology and in Microbiology, Virology, Epidemiology/Infectious Diseases, and Tropical Medicine. He is Medical Director at the TravelMedCenter, Leonding, Austria, and Medical Director at Labor Hannover, MVZ GmbH. Martin travelled around the world to make a documentary entitled “Corona in Search of the Truth”, in which scientists and experts unveil the suppressed realities of COVID-19.
Patrick HENNINGSEN is founder and managing editor of the news website 21st Century Wire, a UK Column writer and presenter, and independent foreign and political affairs analyst. He is also the host of the SUNDAY WIRE talk radio program which airs live every Sunday on the Alternate Current Radio Network.
Dr. Charles HOFFE MD has been a practicing physician in British Columbia for 28 years. He has experienced regulatory consequences after speaking and writing about vaccine dangers, including a letter to his provincial public health officer regarding vaccine-related harms he witnessed in his patients.
Mary HOLLAND is a former Research Scholar and Director of the Graduate Lawyering Program at NYU School of Law, and President of Children’s Health Defense. She has written several law review articles and blog posts on vaccine law and policy and is the co-author and co-editor of the books “Vaccine Epidemic” and “HPV Vaccine on Trial: Seeking Justice for a Generation Betrayed.” She has testiXed to retain or expand vaccination exemptions in the California, West Virginia, Maine and Vermont legislatures and has has appeared in several documentaries and programs on vaccine issues. Mary is chair of the advisory board of Health Choice and a member of the advisory boards for the Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law and Advocacy, the Otto Specht School and Actionplay. Educated at Harvard and Columbia Universities, Mary has worked in international public and private law. Prior to joining NYU, she worked at major U.S. law Xrms, with three years based in Moscow, Russia. She also worked at a U.S. human rights organization as Director of its European Program. She has taught courses at Columbia Law School and has served as a consultant to the Aspen Institute Justice and Society Program.
Professor Stefan HOMBURG is Professor of Economics. He was the director of the Institute of Public Finance at the University of Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany until 2021, and formerly Professor of Economics at University of Bonn and University of Magdeburg. Stefan’s research focuses on macroeconomics and public finance. He has co-authored a textbook in macroeconomics, and authored other publications addressing topics in monetary policy, social security, tax law, and business taxation. He served as a member of several policy committees, including the Advisory Council at the Federal Ministry of Finance, the Federal Constitutional Commission, and the 2007, he acted as Dean of Hannover’s School of Economics and Management and from 1996 until 2003 he was editor of journals of the German Economic Association.
Taylor HUDAK, MA, is an independent journalist focusing on free speech, press freedoms, whistleblowing and US foreign policy. Taylor’s work can be found on acTVism Munich YouTube channel, as well as The Last American Vagabond.
Professor Ulrike Kämmerer PhD is a Molecular Virologist and Immunologist. She is Associate Professor of Experimental Reproductive Immunology and Tumor Biology at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany.
Associate Professor Michael PALMER MD is Asociate Professor in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, and is board certiXed in Medical Microbiology with a focus on Pharmacology, metabolism and biological membranes. His experimental research focus is on bacterial toxins and antibiotics. Michael has authored a textbook on Biochemical Pharmacology.
Professor Michael MEYEN is Professor at the Institute for Communication Studies and Media Research at the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich. He is widely published in his Xeld, and has worked as a freelance journalist in newspapers, news broadcasting stations and online. His PhD concerned “The bourgeois daily press in the city of Leipzig in the Weimar Republic. Connections between social change and media change.”
Dr. Denis RANCOURT is a retired former Full Professor of Physics at the University of Ottawa. He is currently researcher at the Ontario Civil Liberties Association and a Member scientist at PANDA, Pandemics Data and Analysis. He has done industrial-application research on the technology of Xltration, with applicability to Xlters such as face masks. His scientiXc H-index impact factor is 40, and his articles have been cited more than 5,000 times in peer-reviewed scientiXc journals. He is an expert in statistical analysis methods, mathematical modelling, and measurement methods.
Vera SHARAV is a Holocaust survivor, a public advocate for human rights, and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, which serves as an information resource and public interest watchdog organization. Its goal is combat secrecy and bring accountability to biomedical research. She has served on the Children’s Workgroup of the National Human Research Protection Advisory Committee, testiXed before public policy advisory panels including, the Institute of Medicine and numerous FDA hearings. Vera has been an invited presenter at various professional and academic forums: the World Federation of Science Journalists, London, National Academy of Sciences Policy Fellow program, National Public Health Association, Consumers Institute for Medicines and Health, Stockholm and the U.S. military medical ethics forum. She has authored numerous peer-reviewed papers and a book chapter on mandatory vaccination.
Mark SKIDMORE is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research covers topics in public Xnance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times.
Dr Josef THOMA is a specialist in ear, nose and throat medicine with several decades experience. He worked in private practice from 1986 until 2018 and studied at the Technical University of Munich and the University of Regensburg from 1971 to 1977, then completed his specialist training at the University ENT Clinic in Berlin from 1979 to 1986.
John TITUS has written, produced and directed videos about the loss of the rule of law in the U.S. since 2014. His videos focus largely on Wall Street crime, and cronyism in the Xnancial system. He has a juris doctor and has litigated patents for 25 years. He also holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in electrical engineering and worked as an electrical engineer in the space industry. Since 2020 John has co-produced and co-hosted Money & Markets with Catherine Austin Fitts at Solari Inc.
Professor Harald WALACH is a researcher at the interface between medicine, psychology and consciousness studies. He holds a double Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology, and History and Theory of Science. Currently he is anliated as a professor with Poznan Medical University in Poznan, Poland, and a visiting professor with the University Witten-Herdecke’s psychology department in Germany, where he teaches philosophical foundations of psychology. He is founding director of the Change Health Science Institute in Berlin.
Professor Richard A. WERNER is a university Professor in banking and Finance. He holds a First Class Honours in Economics from the London School of Economics and a doctorate in Economics from the University of Oxford. He is a founding chair of Local First, a community interest company establishing not-for-profit community banks in the UK and in 2008 he founded and has been director of the Centre for Banking, Finance and Sustainable Development – the first research centre to focus on the link between the Financial sector and sustainability issues. He has been professor of monetary, macro and development economics at Goethe-University Frankfurt, Professor of International Banking at the University of Southampton, and assistant professor in economics and Finance at Sophia University, Tokyo. Richard has worked as Chief Economist, Senior Managing Director and Senior Consultant in private industry, including at Bear Stearns and Jardine Fleming Securities, and as visiting scholar and visiting researcher at the Japanese Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Japan. His book Princes of the Yen was a No. 1 bestseller in Japan.
Dr. Sam WHITE is a UK-based General Practitioner. In early 2021 he resigned from a partnership in a medical practice, and posted a video to social media explaining his reasoning, citing lies surrounding COVID-19. After the NHS suspended his licence to practice medicine a result, he wrote an open letter, via his lawyer, to the NHS Chief Executive. The letter appealed the grounds for this suspension and highlighted in great detail the ethical breaches of the vaccine program, including lack of informed consent.
Patrick WOOD is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton. Patrick remains a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral Commission, their policies and achievements in creating their self-proclaimed “New International Economic Order” which is the essence of Sustainable Development on a global scale. Wood is the publisher of Technocracy News and Trends and founder of Citizens for Free Speech.
Dr. Michael YEADON BSc was Formerly Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D. He holds Joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology and a PhD in Pharmacology. He is an Independent Consultant and Co-founder & CEO of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.
Numerous schools have announced that COVID-19 injections will be compulsory for student attendance. We would like to share some information on how you can potentially avoid the experimental shots by obtaining either a religious or medical exemption.
There is no time to wait! The latest Human Health Service’s reporting system data shows that 470,898 people have reported injuries and 5,467 deaths have been reported, even though it is estimated that only between 1 and 10 percent of all vaccine injuries are ever reported.
Recent data also shows many people under 30 are suffering from heart inflammation, blood clots, and low platelets post COVID-19 injections.
Interventions that interfere with bodily autonomy, especially forced vaccination, should never be stipulated as a condition of receiving an education!
If you are applying for a medical exemption you will need to obtain one from your doctor.
You may also want to contact your school and let them know why you OPPOSE COVID-19 injection mandates. If more people oppose the mandates, they may reverse their policies. Be sure to address these concerns to the schools’ Presidents and any affiliated board members.
Sample email for Action #2:
“Hi, my name is ____ and I am deeply concerned about compulsory COVID-19 injections for students.
To date there have been nearly half a million people who have reported their vaccine injury to the government’s vaccine injury data base (VAERS.) Many young people are among them; a significant number of teenagers and young adults have experienced myocarditis (heart inflammation), blood clots, stokes and more following COVID shots.
Looking just at people under the age of 30 who have reported adverse reactions to the government, over 90 people have died, over 600 people have reported life threatening reactions, and 375 people have reported permanent disabilities following a COVID injection.
Young adults are at a very low risk for COVID, and it is not appropriate to force them to take the risk of death or permanent disability in order to attend school. I urge you to reconsider your policies and support your students’ access to education.
Be sure to explain why this issue is important to you. You may wish to use a couple of the talking points below. Don’t copy all of them – just use them as ideas to help structure your own message.
TALKING POINTS for calls and emails:
COVID-19 injections were created with completely new gene-based technologies. These messenger RNA and DNA shots are experimental and have not received full regulatory approval.
COVID-19 injections were rushed to market. Standard vaccine testing takes 6-10 years, not mere months. We do not have long-term safety data on large populations.
On June 22, 2021 the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) said there is ‘likely’ a link between heart inflammation and Moderna and Pfizer’s messenger RNA injections. The committee members acknowledged 1,200 case of heart inflammation in 16-24 year olds and advised that there be a warning statement.
No published studies demonstrate that patients who have already had a prior COVID injection benefit from the injections. Why require universal COVID-19 injections?
Vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline have paid billions of dollars in criminal penalties and settlements for research fraud, faking drug safety studies, failing to report safety problems, bribery, kickbacks and false advertising.[i][ii] Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in 2009 alone to resolve criminal and civil allegations.[iii]
COVID-19 injection manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medial expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely undercompensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.
The US Supreme Court recognizes vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and to cause injury and death in some recipients. The US Government has paid out approximately $4.4 billion to the victims of vaccine injury. Hundreds of thousands have reported an adverse reaction to vaccination to VAERS. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/
Aggregated data for fiscal year 2020 show the NIH and CDC collected a combined $63.4 million in royalty revenues under a business model that allows the NIH to grant technology licenses to the private sector.
With 27 different institutes and centers housed under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) umbrella — including the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — NIH is the largest biomedical research agency in the world.
Operating under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), NIH currently wields a hefty annual budget of nearly $42 billion.
Within NIH, the Office of Technology Transfer (OTT) plays a “strategic role” in supporting patenting and licensing for inventions that emerge from laboratories at the NIH and also Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In a win-win business model, the NIH routinely grants technology licenses (both exclusive and non-exclusive) to the private sector for use or commercialization of its inventions, with those licenses then driving billions of dollars in royalties back into NIH coffers.
In fiscal year (FY) 2020 alone — October 2019 through September 2020 — aggregated data for NIH and CDC show the agencies collected a neat $63.4 million in royalty revenues.
Under federal law, a portion of licensing royalties reverts to NIH to support undefined “mission-related activities.” Another portion goes directly to the agency’s inventors, who are allowed up to $150,000 in payments per calendar year. The same holds true at CDC.
Universities, too, receive royalties when they market patented technologies. Nearly 25 years ago, a University of Michigan biologist complained that two California universities (both public and private) were using royalties as a mechanism to covertly fleece taxpayers.
Citing a technology patented and licensed by the two universities, the professor explained that “ordinary people” had already paid through their tax dollars for the basic research that gave rise to the patents. He argued taxpayers should not have to continue paying the universities “many times over the original investment through patent royalties.”
The royalty monies flowing to NIH scientists have periodically attracted comparable public ire.
In 2005, an explosive Associated Press (AP) scoop showed large numbers of agency scientists — at the NIH’s explicit instruction — were routinely failing to disclose royalty payments, either to taxpayers or to participants in taxpayer-funded clinical trials who were obligingly testing out the NIH’s royalty-generating experimental treatments.
As AP pointed out, “Such research helps bring the treatment closer to possible commercial use, which could in turn bring the researchers and NIH higher royalties.”
Among the scientists scolded by AP for “testing products for which they secretly receive[d] royalties” was NIAID’s Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Even without royalties (which are classified as “federal compensation” rather than “outside income”), the long-time NIAID director — who describes himself as a humble “government worker” with a “government salary” — is the nation’s highest paid federal employee.
During the 2005 brouhaha, professing to be “extremely sensitive about the possibility of an appearance of a conflict of interest,” Fauci told the public he was donating his payments to charity.
Judging by a late-2020 report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), there is still considerable room for improvement in terms of NIH transparency about NIH’s licensing activities.
The GAO noted NIH “does not report which of its patents are licensed or release metrics that would enable the public to evaluate how licensing affects patient access to resulting drugs.”
As one of its top two recommendations, the GAO urged NIH to provide “more information to the public” — in “an accessible and searchable format to the maximum extent possible” — to help citizens and policymakers understand licensing outcomes and impacts.
2020: Laying the groundwork for more historic highs?
“More public information” is conspicuously lacking in the OTT’s FY2020 annual report, which provides only one paragraph of specifics (and two paragraphs of boilerplate) in a short section on “Inventions and Agreements.”
In addition to noting the $63.4 million in FY2020 royalty revenues, the paragraph highlights a significant uptick in invention disclosures (up 20% over FY2019) and patent applications — 47% more applications filed compared to the previous year. (Invention disclosures are the first step in the patenting process.)
Elsewhere, technology transfer statistics show NIH executed more licenses in FY2020 (n=359) than in any prior fiscal year dating back to 1985 (when a mere 25 licenses were executed).
A few more COVID-specific details are available in the three-page portion of the GAO report focused on NIAID (pp. 22-25). There, we learn NIAID and its Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Office (TTIPO) worked “diligently” and “as quickly as possible” in 2020 to facilitate worldwide “sharing” of NIAID-developed SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and plasmids (molecules encoding the spike proteins) to spur development of COVID-19 diagnostics, treatments and vaccines.
These efforts resulted in:
Ninety-six agreements with 75 academic organizations, nonprofit entities, government agencies, international organizations and other entities to furnish NIAID spike proteins or plasmids for research projects (called “material transfer agreements”)
Twenty-one licenses negotiated with biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, mostly for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development — these licenses pertain to “most of the vaccines in advanced clinical trials and several currently in use around the world” (notably, the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine that received Emergency Use Authorization in Dec. 2020)
An additional 16 agreements to collaborate on research, including four clinical trial agreements for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
NIH royalty income reached a historic high of $147 million in FY2015. At that time, however, the agency accurately forecast declines beginning around FY2018 due to expiring patents on major products.
Given the COVID-related licensing groundwork laid in FY2020, it would not be surprising to see NIH’s royalties surge anew in FY2021.
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine collaborator, BioNTech, is already paying royalties for use of the NIH-developed spike protein technology. Moderna, which co-owns its COVID vaccine patents with NIAID, is not paying royalties.
CDC’s webpage listing technologies available for licensing (and, therefore, with the potential to generate royalties) has not been updated since May, 2020. At that time, the agency had about 60 technologies on offer, many related to diagnostics or vaccine development.
Whenever the CDC gets around to updating its list, it is likely the number of available technologies will be even higher.
The pandemic growth model
Where public health agencies are concerned, COVID-19 appears to be very good for business, with a flurry of unprecedented funding — conveniently mobilized by the pandemic — ushering in profound and likely permanent changes in a public health infrastructure once lamented as weak and fragmented.
The CDC now brags about having marshaled the largest response effort in its 74-year history. According to the agency’s chief financial officer, “More resources were entrusted to CDC for execution and management [in FY2020] than ever before” — including a more than doubling of the previous year’s funding.
Two-thirds (66%) of the grant funds committed or spent by CDC in FY2020 were COVID-19-related.
Over at NIH, prospects are even rosier for the agency — and scarier for the public. For FY2022, the Biden administration has requested a 21% NIH budget increase (to $51 billion), “accelerating a six-year trend of multi-billion-dollar annual budget increases.”
Most of this would go toward the creation of a new NIH agency that would merge national security with health security, modeled after the military’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Knowing of DARPA’s disturbing track record, investigative journalist Whitney Webb characterizes the new agency’s security mandate as “a recipe for a technocratic ‘pre-crime’ organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as ‘wrongthink.’”
Ironically, many of the COVID therapies proven effective by frontline doctors but actively suppressed by federal agencies are inexpensive — a far cry from the budget-busting experimental vaccines that have been illegitimately framed as the pandemic’s sole solution.
For the public, a major advantage of these therapies — including longtime fixtures on the World Health Organization essential medicines list — is the fact that their safety profile, side effects, dosing and drug interactions are well documented.
However, royalty-hungry scientists are not interested in “tried-and-true, classical … repurposing [of] drugs and strategies that have already been shown to work.” They prefer, in the words of Columbia University’s Dr. Ian Lipkin, novel treatments that are “sexy and new and patentable.”
In short, off-patent drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and cheap supplements like vitamin C and vitamin D — often preventive as well as therapeutic — don’t generate royalties.
Nor do they mesh with the global control agenda the NIH’s new DARPA-like agency promises to facilitate. It is up to the public to reassert, strongly, that people and freedom come first.
If you live in Washington DC, and your child comes home a bit wobbly, there is a chance the school you entrust with their care just gave them a clandestine Covid jab. Without talking to you about it first, or even warning you afterwards to keep a close watch on your child for adverse vaccine reactions.
Parents Take Aim At D.C. Law That Lets Minors Get Vaccinated Without Permission
July 19, 2021
D.C. parents are suing city officials over a new law that allows children 11 and older to acquire vaccines without permission from parents.
Four parents of students at several public schools — both traditional and charter — said giving children the autonomy to get immunized on their own violates parents’ rights and religious freedom, according to a July 12 lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington.
“All parents have a right to be directly involved in medical decision-making about their children,” said James Mason, an attorney representing the parents.
It is the second lawsuit brought in recent weeks by parents who want the federal court to strike down the law, which went into effect in March.
The D.C. Council voted 10-3 in November to allow minors to give their own consent for vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, even if a parent has filed a religious exemption.
It is unclear if or how the legal challenges will affect the city’s efforts to inoculate youth against the coronavirus before the next academic year starts.
What about my claim that the law authorises “clandestine” medical procedures? Councillor Vincent Grayattached the following amendment to the original law:
“The provider shall notify the insurer that the immunization has been provided under the authority of this section.”
Rationale: This amendment requires the provider to notify the insurer that the immunization has been provided under the authority of the “Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020”, so the insurer will know that they should not send an Explanation of Benefits (EOB) for the vaccination. Without this amendment, the insurer would not be on notice that they needed to refrain from sending the EOB.
I’m not a lawyer, but the above amendment appears to be an instruction to insurers to not send an Explanation of Benefits to the policy holders, in this case the parents. This appears to be an instruction not to inform the parents that a medical procedure has been performed on their child.
To say I am shocked is an understatement.
An 11 year old is not capable of giving informed consent. I remember what I was like at age 11 – I mostly did what the teacher told me to do. I was a kid, and that is what good kids do – they obey adult authority figures.
The idea that a school can administer a non-emergency medical treatment which could injure or in rare cases even kill a child, without talking to the parents about it, or providing any warning to watch for side effects or adverse reactions, in my opinion is a total breach of trust.
You’re the head of the Guardian Angels, the group you founded in 1979. Unarmed, you and your people made citizens’ arrests of scores of criminals in New York.
In 1992, you got into a cab in Manhattan, and two mob thugs shot you five times. You escaped. You survived.
Insufficient courage is not a problem you have.
Now you’re running for the office of Mayor of New York. You’ve got nothing more than a desperate puncher’s chance.
Unless you and most of New York wake up to what’s happening to the City, the City is doomed. It’s going to turn into a desolate hulk, a garbage dump of crime and poverty.
I was born in New York. I lived there long enough to know what a great city is all about. That was 60 years ago. Those people are gone.
Now there is a COVID war. I’m talking about the masks and distancing and lockdowns and the massive destruction of businesses and now the expanding vaccine mandate. The people of the City have gone down on their knees to De Blasio and Cuomo and the public health predators.
The bottom line is, Curtis, people either come out into the streets by the hundreds of thousands and say ENOUGH, or the whole show—the whole City—is over.
Beyond a certain point, no matter what you believe this pandemic is or isn’t, you and the rest of New York have to live your lives out in the open, come hell or high water.
NO perceived threat justifies the imprisonment that has been put on the citizens of the City.
You have to see this, Curtis, and you have to go directly to the people and challenge them. Live, or fold up and die.
You have the courage, Curtis. The question is, do you see what’s there in front of you, what’s been there in front of you for the past year?
You have to know there was a time when the people would have shaken off the COVID restrictions and the vaccine mandate like a bad dream and gone about their business. New York would never have bowed down in fear before political tyrants, with barely a whimper.
Now they have. Now many of them are proud of their self-styled sacrifice. They worship the government as if it were a god who is going to keep bailing them out. This is their delusion.
You have to be the revolutionary you once were, Curtis, when you and your people boarded subway trains late at night and defended citizens against criminals because the cops couldn’t or wouldn’t.
The stakes are much bigger this time. Basic freedom. Survival. But you have to SEE that. You can’t pretend the dragon of fascist control isn’t there.
You have to shove the truth in people’s faces. You have to get into their minds and souls and say, DO YOU WANT TO LIVE? LIVING IS COMING OUT OF YOUR HOMES AND TAKING TO THE STREET. A MILLION OF YOU WHO’VE HAD ENOUGH. ENOUGH OF THE LOCKDOWNS AND FORCED VACCINATIONS AND ENOUGH OF THE THREATS OF MORE QUARANTINES.
I don’t know, Curtis. Maybe you’re over the hill. Maybe you’ve become politically institutionalized. I hope to heaven that’s not true. It’s time to land the desperate punch. If you can. If you will.
Remember the old days, when you had half the City in your hand? You, a private citizen, with no big-time official backing? You saw who the bad guys were, you saw they were going free, and you and your friends busted them. Who the hell else in New York would have done that?
Do you still have the electricity?
Rain, snow, floods, wind, crime; people live and go on. COVID is no different, no matter what the bought-off experts say. This is what I’m telling you, Curtis. New York is under a spell. It’s under de facto martial law. It’s in prison and the threat of prison. This isn’t science, it’s tyranny.
There’s plenty of science to show the fascist regulations have been harming and killing far more people than a supposed virus.
You’re 67 now, Curtis. You’re in the ring up against a machine fighter. Puncher’s chance. If your mind’s been twisted, and somehow you think the political bureaucracy of New York can be tuned up to do good, the machine fighter in the ring HAS the bureaucracy in his CORNER. Take a look. Can you see it?
The odds of you winning the race for Mayor are ten thousand to one against. So why not go into a crouch, pick your spot, and swing from the heels? Do it in front of the crowd, so they can see courage one more time. You never know.
Moments have ripples.
Things are never exactly what they seem to be. The book is not completely closed.
Out of the dark walks a puncher who throws caution to the winds. That’s you, Curtis. It has to be.
American opposition to cell towers near homes is NOT new. In fact, firefighter unions have opposed the use of their stations for cell towers and antennas due to radiation exposure health risks since before 5G and 4G.
U.S. opposition to 4G and 5G small cells near homes continues to increase due to concerns about reduced property value (see 1, 2, 3), public safety (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), health (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), cybersecurity (see 1, 2), privacy (see 1, 2), and environmental risks (see 1, 2, 3, 4). In fact, some have described 5G deployment as a form of “environmental racism”.
So it’s not unreasonable for a scientist to ask if companies should be allowed to install small cell towers 30 feet from residential homes without prior consent.
Should companies be allowed to site small cells 30 feet from residential homes without prior consent?
Jul 26, 2021
The following article was published in The Montgomery County Sentinel on July 26, 2021, one day before the Montgomery County Council was set to vote on a bill that would grant cell phone providers the right to put small cell antennas on light posts in front of people’s homes without community feedback and free from local jurisdictional rules.
By Paul Ben Ishai
I read with some trepidation that wireless providers will be allowed, if this proposal ZTA 19-07 passes, to site small-cell infrastructure, including antennas, within 30 ft of residential buildings. The intention is that by utilizing existing street light poles by simply added a small cell antenna, the provider would not even have to inform the siting of a new antenna.
Expected Exposure Levels and Current Safety Standards
In general, small cell antennas suitable for serving 4G/5G networks will have an output power between 6 – 10 Watts and an antenna gain for anything between 6 -15 dBi. They can be placed on poles as low as 6 meters in height. For most residential neighborhoods this means that many street-facing second story bedrooms will be in direct line of sight from the antenna. The equivalent power density[1](PD) at 9.14 meters (30 feet) is up to 0.3 W/m2, less than that allowed by the FCC (10 W/m2) at these frequencies, but far higher than those accepted by Russia, Switzerland and Italy (0.1 W/m2) [1] . This level is also far higher than what is today considered as reasonable biological safe, which is 0.1 mW/m2. More worryingly, this estimation is for a single antenna. As the structure of the cellular market is such that there will be competing companies and competing infrastructures, it is natural to assume that many antenna sites will have more than one antenna on them, working at different frequency bands. In short, the figure of 0.3 W/m2 is an under-estimate of the true exposure one would expect in bedrooms so exposed.
On the tissue level of the organism (human being), EMF exposure has been linked to degradation of the antioxidant defence system. A common argument against the relevance of this body of work is that it is mainly in – vitro and therefore not applicable to the “real world” situation of mobile phone use, although the “real world” use of cellphones shows that they consistently violate allowed exposure levels. However, recent studies of people living in proximity to mobile base stations have found evidence for ROS in their blood, which is recognized as a biochemical indicator of stress that has been associated with increased risks of cancer and other chronic diseases. Another important 2015 review of existing studies on radio frequency radiation (RFR) effects was published by the National Academy of Sciences in the Ukraine, Indiana University, and the University of Campinas in Brazil. Based on 93 out of 100 peer-reviewed studies, that paper concluded that low-intensity RFR is an oxidative agent for living cells with a high pathological potential. The oxidative stress induced by RFR exposure explains a range of RFR health impacts, both cancer and non-cancer illnesses. In addition to chronicling illnesses, this study outlines 6 different biological mechanisms that may explain these RFR effects in the body. To quote this source:
“In conclusion, our analysis demonstrates that low-intensity radio frequency radiation (RFR) is an expressive oxidative agent for living cells with a high pathogenic potential and that the oxidative stress induced by RFR exposure should be recognized as one of the primary mechanisms of the biological activity of this kind of radiation.”
Studies have also found that nonthermal cellphone radiation and laptop radiation can damage human sperm, reducing sperm quantity and quality, impair mitochondrial DNA of sperm, and appear to play a role in testicular dysgenesis and erectile dysfunction. We should note, as have other commentators, that male infertility clinics in Australia, the United States and India regularly advise men having difficulty impregnating their partners to remove all wireless devices from their bodies. This advice is consistent with studies showing that current levels of cell phone radiation can damage mitochondrial DNA of sperm, increase reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reduce sperm quantity and quality.
There exist ample proof of detrimental effects to human health in epidemiological studies. I list a few here:
Miller et al. states “recent case-control studies from Sweden and France corroborate findings of earlier studies in providing support for making a causal connection between cell phone use and brain cancer, as well as acoustic neuroma, also called Vestibular Schwannoma.Hardell and Carlberg (2013) concluded that the Bradford Hill criteria for causality have now been fulfilled. It is notable that three recent meta-analyses all confirm significant increased risk of glioma after 10 or more years of use of cell phones (Bortkiewicz et al., 2017; Prasad et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017).”
Luo et al. also noted the carcinogenicity of cellphone radiation increased the incidence of thyroid cancers when genetic susceptibility was taken into account.
The incidence of ROS in in-vivo studies was summarized byDasdag and Akdag and listed over 50 in-vivo studies demonstrating adverse ROS stress as a result of cellphone radiation.
In a meta study byBelpomme et al. it was shown that in case -controlled studies there is a consistent increased risk (40%) for glioma and acoustic neuroma associated with mobile phone use. These results are backed by results from animal studies that show co-carcinogenic and tumor promoting effects. The conclusions are further confirmed by studies by Vornoli et al. and Falcioni et al.
Significant DNA damage, caused by exposure to real life exposure to mobile phones was found by Panagopoulos.
These studies represent a small portion of the epidemiological studies and in-vivo studies documenting substantiated increases in cancer rates that can be attributed to the use of and exposure to cellphone radiation at levels similar to those expected under this Zoning Ordinance, ZTA 19-07.
Why Should Cellphone Providers Not Be Allowed to Override Zoning laws?
The basic goal of a cellphone provider is to make money for its investors, despite whatever their publicity may claim. They have no vested interest in public health. Their primary objective is to provide service to their customers for profit. As outlined above, the public level of exposure, especially inside peoples homes will dramatically increase, along with an expected detrimental effect on their health. That the residents have no say in the matter is fundamentally undemocratic and a violation of their basic right to health.
ZTA 19-07 will be voted on by the Montgomery County Council on Tuesday the 27th. Given the wealth of scientific evidence as listed above, the power to site and install antenna in the residential domain cannot be the prerogative of a commercial company only.
Dr. Paul Ben Ishai, a Senior Lecturer with the Department of Physics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel, and the Head of the Laboratory of Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy.
[1] where G is the gain in linear scale, P is the power in Watts and R is the distance from the antenna.
Citing concerns about the risk of heart inflammation associated with the vaccines, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asked Pfizer and Moderna to expand the number of children in their clinical trials.
Pfizer and Moderna will increase the number of children in their COVID vaccine clinical trials prior to seeking Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told the vaccine makers the size and scope of their pediatric studies, as initially envisioned, were inadequate to detect rare side effects.
The rare side effects cited by the FDA include myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining around the heart, multiple people familiar with the trials told The New York Times.
Moderna’s shot is authorized for emergency use in people 18 and up, and Pfizer’s vaccine is authorized for children as young as 12. No COVID vaccines have yet received EUA approval for children younger than 12.
Expanding the pediatric trials means thousands more children as young as 6 months old may soon be recruited and enrolled in COVID vaccine trials.
According to the Times, the FDA asked the companies to include 3,000 children in the 5- to 11-year-old group, the group for whom results were expected first.
One person, granted anonymity by the Times to speak freely, described that figure as double the original number of study participants.
Moderna researchers had intended to test the vaccine in about 7,000 children, with some as young as 6 months, according to ABC News, but the company told the news outlet today in an email they never decided on how many kids would be added to the trial.
Pfizer began testing its vaccine in children ages 5 to 11 on June 8, with those younger than 5 being included as of June 21. The study will involve up to 4,500 subjects from the U.S., Finland, Poland and Spain, according to the Wall Street Journal, which also reported the company declined to say whether the recent request from the FDA will change the timing of any authorization submissions.
Last month, Pfizer and Moderna said their vaccines for children 5 through 11 could be ready as early as September. Pfizer, which is on a faster timetable than Moderna, may be able to meet the FDA’s expectations on a bigger trial size and still file a request for expanded EUA by the end of September, the Times reported.
A federal official, who spoke to the Washington Post on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, predicted authorization of a COVID vaccine for children 5 through 11 might come by late October or early November.
The government is not expecting it will be a big problem to enroll more children because so many parents are eager to get their children vaccinated, the official said.
Heart inflammation in teens raises red flag
Moderna spokesman Ray Jordan told the Post the goal is “to enroll a larger safety database which increases the likelihood of detecting rarer events.”
“The FDA wants to be particularly careful about the possibility of children developing myocarditis, or heart inflammation, after receiving a coronavirus vaccine. Adolescents who receive the vaccines are more likely to develop myocarditis than adults — though the risk remains small — and officials want to increase the chances that the trials will indicate whether there is increased incidence of heart inflammation in children.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in June acknowledged 1,200 cases of heart inflammation in 16- to 24-year-olds, and said mRNA COVID vaccines should carry a warning statement. The FDA followed by adding the warning.
For all age groups during the same period, 1,848 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were reported to VAERS, with 1,176 cases attributed to Pfizer, 606 cases to Moderna and 62 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
The data reflects reports received between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 16, 2021. The FDA first authorized Pfizer’s vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds in May of this year.
Despite the known cases and the FDA warning, the CDC said the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risk.
Doctors weigh in on ill-advised rush to vaccinate kids
The authors of an op-ed published earlier this month in The BMJ argued that even if one assumes the vaccine provides protection against severe COVID, given its “very low incidence in children,” an extremely high number would need to be vaccinated in order to prevent one severe case.
Meanwhile, a large number of children with very low risk for severe disease would be exposed to vaccine risks, known and unknown, they said.
They wrote:
“In the clinical trial underlying the authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech’s mRNA vaccine in children aged 12 to 15, of the close to 1000 children who received placebo, 16 tested positive for COVID-19, compared to none in the fully vaccinated group.
“Given this low incidence, the fact that COVID-19 is generally asymptomatic or mild in children, and the high rate of adverse events in those vaccinated (e.g. in Pfizer’s trial of 12-15 year olds, 3 in 4 kids had fatigue and headaches, around half had chills and muscle pain, and around 1 in 4 to 5 had a fever and joint pain), a comparison of quality-adjusted life-years in the trial would very much favor the placebo group.”
Doctors for COVID Ethics, an EU-based international alliance of hundreds of concerned doctors and scientists, said COVID vaccines are not only “unnecessary and ineffective,” but also “dangerous for children and adolescents.”
Three of the group’s founding signatories — Dr. Michael Palmer (Canada), Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, (Germany) and Stefan Hockertz, Ph.D. (Germany) — assembled in one document powerful expert evidence that highlights the Pfizer vaccine’s “catastrophically bad” safety profile in both adults and adolescents.
In an open letter to the EU’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, more than 40 doctors, medics and scientists in the UK said children are more vulnerable to the potential long-term effects of COVID vaccines.
In an open letter to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, more than 40 doctors, medics and scientists in the UK say children are more vulnerable to the potential long-term effects of COVID vaccines. #TheDefenderhttps://t.co/kkgIp6jFsv
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 1, 2021
Vaccinating kids for COVID is “irresponsible, unethical and unnecessary,” they said.
The letter warned against vaccinating people under 18 because evidence shows the virus poses almost no risk to healthy children. The risk of death from COVID in healthy children is 1 in 1.25 million, the authors wrote.
COVID vaccines, however, are linked to strokes due to cerebral venous thromboses in people under 40 — a finding that “led to the suspension of the Oxford-AstraZeneca children’s trial,” the authors said.
The doctors wrote:
“Children have a lifetime ahead of them, and their immunological and neurological systems are still in development, making them potentially more vulnerable to adverse effects than adults.”
According to the latest available data for 12- to 17-year-olds, between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 16, 2021, VAERS received a total of 14,494 reports of adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 871 rated as serious and 17 deaths.
Indian Doctors for Truth (IDT) have written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressing the importance of an urgent need to stop the overzealous universal vaccination drive against COVID-19.
Twenty doctors have signed the letter and highlight numerous scientific data about immunity achieved by the Indian population among both adults and children in light of the latest sero-survey done by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in Delhi along with the World Health Organization.
Based on the evidence, IDT urges the PM to immediately stop the drive for vaccination of the entire population and limit it to voluntary vaccination of only those above 60 years and/or people with severe degree of comorbidity.
The letter itself runs to five pages but the signatories enclosed 21 pages of references and evidence in support of their claims. What is presented below is a summary of some of the key points made in the five-page letter. The full letter and list of signatories can be read on the Awaken India Movement website.
The doctors argue that the first principle of medicine is to do no harm and to benefit patients. They point out that the vaccination drive is doing more harm than any good for the people of India and present the PM with scientific facts about SARS-CoV-2 related immunity and vaccination.
Those who have recovered from COVID-19 develop robust and long-lasting immunity against SARS-CoV-2, even after mild or asymptomatic infections. The chances of reinfection among these people, including from the emerging variants of the same virus, are extremely rare or non-existent. The WHO in its interim guidance released on 2 July 2021 has also recognised the fact of acquired immunity in all those who have had previous infection with SARS-CoV-2.
There is no evidence to show that those who have recovered from the infection will get any additional benefit from vaccination.
The epidemiology of COVID-19 in India is very different from other countries and varies much within the country itself: there are differences between urban and rural communities and between socioeconomic strata. There is therefore a need for policies that address prevention of COVID-19, including the policy on vaccination, which account for the situation in India.
According to available reports, the percentage of the population infected in the US, UK and similar countries is at 1-23%. In India, recent sero-surveys at Delhi and Mumbai have reported a positivity of 50-70%, indicating that a significant proportion of Indians have already been infected and will therefore not need the vaccine.
A number of reports have been published stressing that India has already achieved herd immunity. Mathematical models have explained what percentage of a population is required to be infected and varies for different populations: the disease-induced herd immunity level can be as low as 43%.
The case fatality rate (CFR) is usually reported by the government: the number of deaths per 100 confirmed cases as detected by antigen or rt-PCR test. But as renowned epidemiologist Dr John Ioannidis shows, the proper way of counting death rate in diseases with a CFR less than five is infection mortality rate.
Therefore, considering the fact of high level of infections in India, near herd immunity and very low levels of infection fatality rates, vaccinating the entire population will not serve any purpose. Moreover, given the negligible risk to children from COVID-19, trial of the vaccines for them or even consideration of approval is highly unethical.
Four recent studies indicate that almost 99.9% of the population have immune system memory from previous coronavirus infections and that, whether the actual coronavirus infection or the vaccine, the immune system gets activated and vaccines in fact can be more harmful in an already immune population.
Rapid and efficient memory-type immune responses occur reliably in virtually all unvaccinated individuals who are exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of further boosting the immune response through vaccination is therefore highly doubtful. Vaccination may instead aggravate disease through antibody-dependent enhancement.
The Indian government’s own operative guidelines have mentioned that “COVID-19 vaccines have limited safety data”. Moreover, adverse effects of the vaccine are found the world over. For example, as per the EUDRA report dated June 19, more than 1.3 million people in EU countries have had vaccine adverse effects and 13,867 people have died following vaccination. Furthermore, as in many countries, in India also, the death rate from COVID-19 seems to have increased with the increase in the vaccination drive.
The number of deaths per thousand population did not increase much if at all in most countries in 2020. Even in India, deaths per thousand increased 0.5% in 2019 but 0.49% in 2020. However, they seem to have increased after the vaccine drive.
Considering all the above, IDT strongly urge that the overzealous universal vaccination drive, with widespread incidences of coercion and vaccination being made mandatory for jobs and student exams, must be stopped immediately.
The doctors also call on the government to offer people above the age of 60 and those with severe comorbidities vaccination a voluntary basis with full disclosure of warnings about side effects and the lack of safety data – as mentioned in the government’s operative guidelines for COVID-19.
They call for a stop on all trials on children for the vaccine and urge the government to institute detailed studies to analyse the observation that there has been a surge in cases and deaths due to COVID-19 in India since March-April 2021, coinciding with the roll out of the vaccination drive.
A glaring omission from the IDT letter is any focus on vaccinating pregnant women. This, too, should be addressed.
Basilico’s restaurant in Huntington Beach, CA proudly supporting small business and personal freedoms in dining culture. (Image via Twitter)
Basilico’s Pasta e Vino in Huntington Beach, CA has once again shown defiance in the face of the perpetual COVID-19 police state that has crashed local economies since ‘pandemic’ restrictions were imposed on the people and businesses of California beginning in 2020.
The Orange County eatery previously promoted a mask-free dining experience and even required diners to remove their masks before entering, according to the LA Times.
Now, Basilico’s has added a new twist, putting diners and public health officials on notice:
‘Proof of being unvaccinated is required for entry.’
The sign says it all: “We have zero tolerance for treasonous, anti-American stupidity. Thank you for pondering.” (Image source: Madeleine Hordinski/Los Angeles Times)
Basilico’s owner, Tony Roman, told the LA Times in an email that he’s fighting harmful government policies:
“With warning signs of another impending lockdown, and many business owners again emboldening those who I refer to as ‘the lockdown tiny tyrants’ — this time by imposing proof-of-vaccination policies — we chose to fire another missile of defiance to further make our point in defense of American liberty and freedom,” he said.
Huntington Beach and other California beach towns have consistently challenged Governor Gavin Newsom’s ‘overreach’ orders going as far back as May of last year.
Basilico’s trademark COVID catchphrase, “Leave the mask, take the cannoli”, has been featured on a billboard along La Cienega Boulevard in Los Angeles and is also on a t-shirt design that can be purchased on its website.
Answer: There is no Delta Variant. Because there is no original SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Question: Why are we hearing that the majority of new cases of COVID-19 are occurring in the unvaccinated?
Answer: “A case” means a positive PCR test. The test doesn’t detect a virus. There is no virus. But since people who test positive are called cases…think it through. People who have been vaccinated are far less likely to get tested than people who haven’t been vaccinated. Therefore, it’s going to look like “most new cases” are occurring in the unvaccinated.
Furthermore, the CDC instituted a change in the way vaccinated people are then tested. The sensitivity of the test has been reduced for them—which means fewer results indicating “infection with the virus.” This is outright manipulation. Unvaccinated people are still tested at higher sensitivity, meaning more of them will seem to be “infected.”
Question: Experts say the vaccine may not prevent infection with the virus, but it will greatly reduce the chance of serious illness or hospitalization. True?
Answer: False. First of all, this is a vaccine to protect against a virus that doesn’t exist. Second, the 3 major clinical trials of the vaccine were only designed to show the vaccine could protect against mild disease, such as a cough, or chills and fever.
Question: Across the world, political leaders are threatening or ordering new lockdowns, saying too many people are refusing the vaccine. Is this anything other than a pressure tactic to force people to take the shot?
Answer: It’s exactly a pressure tactic to justify mandating, forcing, shaming, quarantining.
Question: Regardless of whether the vaccine is necessary or effective, is it safe?
Answer: Here are the latest CDC figures I have, as compiled by Children’s Health Defense. The statistics are taken from VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. “VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 463,457 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021.”
There are two chronic problems with VAERS. The reports of injuries have not been studied to determine which injuries stemmed from a vaccine and which didn’t. And there is vast underreporting of injuries, because most Americans don’t know what VAERS is or are hesitant to make a report. By far, the second problem is the larger one—underreporting.
Some analysts have suggested that, to get a reasonably accurate count, you should multiply reported numbers by 10.
The well-known 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study of VAERS bluntly stated: “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public.”
Following the finding of that study, you could multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a proper figure.
The numbers of vaccine injuries and deaths are huge. In any situation other than the current fake pandemic, the vaccination program would have been stopped. Cancelled.
Question: There are reports of many new COVID cases in areas or states which didn’t apply strict COVID measures early on in 2020. Are these reports legitimate?
Answer: First of all, there are no COVID cases, because there is no virus. Second, the “number of cases” can be manipulated by changing the sensitivity of the PCR test, which in turn changes the test result. The relatively few honest politicians in the world should carefully investigate this possibility, if “case numbers” in their area suddenly rise.
FIVE: The CDC has reduced the sensitivity of the PCR test for people who are already vaccinated—which will give the impression of fewer “infections with the virus” among the vaccinated.
UK Medical Freedom Alliance has written an Open Letter to all University Vice Chancellors and Higher Education College Senior Management, appealing to them to refrain from imposing any Covid-19 health-related conditions on students accessing education at their institutions, and urging them specifically to strongly resist imposing any requirements for students to accept a Covid-19 vaccine.
We set out our concerns relating to Covid-19 vaccine safety, and the violation of laws and guidelines around informed consent that would result from imposing this condition on students’ access to education.
Researchers at Cornell University show images of their graphene-based origami biomorphs in their research article, “Graphene-based bimorphs for micron-sized, autonomous origami machines.” They have found graphene can be used to create micron sized machines “for sensing, robotics, energy harvesting, and interacting with biological systems on the cellular level.”
In their short video (at 2:36) you can see an origami graphene-based biomorph machine:
“We can design a processor like the Intel 4004 that is small enough that it can fit on a machine….that is a 5th of a hair’s diameter. That is, you could put the computational power of the spaceship Voyager on a machine that is smaller than the width of a hair.”
Graphene can provide an endless supply of continuous low frequency green energy through its Brownian motion. According to BigThink.com, it may someday power the world.
“A team of physicists from the University of Arkansas led by Paul Thibado have found it’s possible to capture energy from graphene’s ripples as an endless source of clean energy.”
Treehugger.com describes green energy as energy that “utilizes energy sources that are readily available all over the world, including in rural and remote areas that don’t otherwise have access to electricity. Advances in renewable energy technologies have lowered the cost of solar panels, wind turbines and other sources of green energy, placing the ability to produce electricity in the hands of the people rather than those of oil, gas, coal and utility companies.”
Green energy can also be harvested from graphene by movement or heat.
“The research of Paul Thibado, professor of physics at the University of Arkansas, provides strong evidence that the motion of graphene could indeed be used as a source of clean, limitless energy.”
Graphene’s electrical capabilities can be used in tattoos, biosensors, and in clothing. Techradar.com has listed 40 ways graphene is being used in our products:
“The first wave of graphene-based products are being used in the world of smartphones, wearables, batteries, virtual reality, sports equipment, super-capacitors and supercars… and that’s just the beginning.
Graphene is a material that some believe has been coerced from abandoned space ships, left on Earth by extraterrestrials years ago. While that’s a little unlikely, the power of this super-thin, strong, conductive and all-round amazing material is deserving of such a conspiracy.”
Graphene tattoos can allow us to interact electronically with our Internet of Things (IoT), home devices, and computers:
Coauthor Shideh Kabiri Ameri told Phys.org: “This area of research can have applications for the internet of things, smart houses and cities, human computer interaction, smart wheelchairs, speech assistance technology, monitoring of distracted driving, and human-robot control. Recently we have demonstrated the application of graphene tattoos for sensing human signals to wirelessly control flying objects. That demonstration will be reported in the near future.”
Graphene mixed in concrete can provide green energy for our homes. Graphene-infused cement“could lead to houses that don’t require wiring as the building material is already highly conductive on its own.”
Heidelberg Cement has created “graphene-enhanced concrete that conducts electricity and will be able to heat houses, protect the outdoor areas from ice and snow, monitor the structural integrity of buildings and deliver energy to electric vehicles in motion directly from the pavement.”
Graphene’s electrical capability to power the Internet of Things, in conjunction with antennas and hotspots, could help to power the 5G low energy small cell WiFi grid and “smart cities“.
“Mobile operators can’t send out highly trained RF engineers to set up the multitude of small cells needed to establish the kind of coverage needed with these higher frequencies. Instead, Robson and the Forum have been developing a more automated process that is no more complicated than setting up a home Wi-Fi router.”
Robson added: “With the increased number of cells required to gain the coverage needed for 5G networks, you’re going to have to rethink the way you deploy. We are working on processes that are cheaper and more scalable so that you can train armies of people to go out and do that.”
The 5G small cell network is expanding through individuals and property owners. An open source 5G network through FreedomFi is helping to expand the 5G grid. People can purchase their FreedomFi Gateway:
“FreedomFi Gateway is a radio agnostic LTE/5G network core (aka EPC). It sits between the small cell radio and the Internet.”
Property owners can also sign up to host a 5G antenna and earn income through Citizen’s Broadband:
“Low cost, extremely-high-capacity indoor and/or outdoor small cell site 5G technology will be deployed at the Citizens Broadband partner’s property location to allow end users of the service access at the highest wireless speeds possible for watching high definition video, listening to music, transmitting large data files, and placing calls over mobile devices – at no cost to the property owner.”
5G works together with satellites to integrate the communication of the IoT. You can see on this interactive map that Starlink satellites cover almost the entire world. Starlink may one day be able to offer satellite internet connectivity all over the world which could further the advancement of the worldwide 5G IoT capabilities.
OQ Technology is an example of how 5G and satellites work together to bring about “smart” everything:
“OQ Technology is the world’s first global satellite 5G IoT operator providing uninterrupted cellular coverage for your assets and machines anywhere in the planet.”
Crypto mining uses enormous amounts of electricity and can be very costly. By using green energy through the 5G IoT, crypto mining could be more efficient and less costly.
IOTforall.com explains how botnets help the Internet of Things mine crypto:
“The process involves releasing botnets on a private network of interconnected computers, smartphones, and other devices. The botnets combine the processing power of all the connected devices to generate computational power for mining cryptocurrency. The result is an increase in mining output with the use of fewer resources.”
Microsoft has a patent for the use of a crypto mining biosensor. The crypto mining will be based on body activity (see page 26) and the user will be awarded crypto currency.
With graphene being used to help electrically connect the Internet of Things, are the vaccines part of this inter-connectivity?
La Quinta Columna recently claims to have found graphene in the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The U.S. Secretary of Treasury says the vaccines are related to the global economy, “A rapid and truly global vaccination program is the strongest stimulus we can provide to the global economy.”
Are the vaccines moving the world economy to crypto currency and will our human bodies be part of the IoT green energy grid used for crypto mining?
Email me and let me know what you think.
Alicia Green is an instinctive researcher and writer, with BA in Psychology and BS in Advertising. She gained her first experience as an investigative news reporter while working for a student-run news publication, providing breaking news and information on issues affecting the university and local community.
Alicia Green welcomes your comments and feedback on her articles. If you have a topic or issue you would like her to investigate, please reach out to her here:
The staff of the hospital in Montelimar, in the French department of Drome, have gone on indefinite strike to protest the new rules demanding they take a vaccine against Covid-19 by mid-September or face losing their jobs.
The strike against “forced vaccination” was announced on Thursday by the CGT-GHPP trade union, and affects some 200 doctors and 1,500 nurses in the southeastern French city.
Hundreds of them gathered outside the hospital on Friday, denouncing lockdowns and vaccine mandates and chanting “liberté!” (freedom).
The French legislature is finalizing the proposal that would require all medical professionals in contact with the vulnerable to be fully vaccinated by September 15, or else lose their salaries and even their jobs.
“We are against mandatory vaccination and vaccine coercion,” Elsa Ruillere, local union representative, told Sputnik France. “There is no choice between tests or vaccination: vaccination is compulsory. No, we don’t agree. We want to have the choice like the rest of the world and we do not want compulsory vaccination.”
Ruillere says her union supports “free and informed consent” and is not against vaccination on principle but is against coercion. Some of the medical workers said they are waiting for the French-made Sanofi-GSK vaccine, promised for December.
“We are well aware of the evolution of the virus. We do not take it lightly,” Ruillere said. However, she and her striking colleagues point out that even with the rise in positive tests for the Delta variant of the coronavirus, there is no commensurate rise in hospitalizations.
“Yes, we turned ‘red’ but that’s in fact due to the positive tests. In terms of hospitalizations, we are fine at the moment, we did not need to reopen beds, we have far fewer hospitalized people than before and fewer people in intensive care,” she added.
Another union gripe is the lack of public debate, since France’s National Assembly seems to have simply proceeded on the advice of the High Health Authority (HAS), which called the vaccination mandate “justified.”
There have been widespread protests in France since mid-July, as the government of President Emmanuel Macron imposed the vaccination mandate on health workers and introduced a “health pass” requirement to access public venues with more than 50 people in attendance. The pass requirement will extend to cafes, restaurants and shops starting August 1.
There has been a 150% increase in coronavirus cases over the past week in France, attributed to the Delta variant. The government says 96% of those infected are unvaccinated.
Are you aware that the covid injections given for the claimed protection against the claimed virus, Sars-CoV2, are harmful and deadly?
QUESTION #2
If you are aware, why do you persist in promoting, prescribing and administering such harmful and deadly substances to people, and especially to defenseless children?
QUESTION #3
If you are not aware, why have you not researched the facts about these injections before promoting, prescribing and administering such harmful and deadly substances?
QUESTION #4
Are you aware that murder is defined as: ‘The killing of another person without justification or excuse, especially the crime of killing a person with malice aforethought or with recklessness manifesting extreme in-difference to the value of human life?’
QUESTION #5
Are you aware that these injections are still in the experimental phase and have not been officially approved for use on the public?
QUESTION #6
Are you aware that with regard to healing the sick or administering any medical treatment to anyone, healthcare workers are obliged to take care that they suffer no hurt or damage and that in certain cases it is better to do nothing rather than intervening and potentially causing more harm than good?
QUESTION #7
Are you aware of the Nuremburg Code?
QUESTION #8
Are you aware of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights?
QUESTION #9
Are you aware of the unfolding Globalist Agenda for a New World Order and its Depopulation Sub-agenda?
QUESTION #10
Are you aware that the Covid-19 Deception is a major strategic move towards the Technocratic, Transhumanist New World Order?
While you were distracted by the scamdemic, the banksters have been working on the greatest wealth transfer in the history of the world. It’s called the Going Direct Reset, and it’s going to fundamentally transform the monetary system as we know it. Today Catherine Austin Fitts of Solari.com joins us to talk about this transformation and what we can do about it.
When you walk through a storm Keep your chin up high And don’t be afraid of the dark At the end of a storm is a golden sky And the sweet silver song of a lark
Walk on through the wind Walk on through the rain Tho’ your dreams Be tossed and blown Walk on Walk on With hope in your heart And you’ll never walk alone You’ll never walk alone
When you walk through a storm Hold your head up high And don’t be afraid of the dark At the end of a storm is a golden sky And the sweet silver song of a lark
Walk on through the wind Walk on through the rain Tho’ your dreams Be tossed and blown Walk on Walk on With hope in your heart And you’ll never walk alone You’ll never walk alone
Written by: Oscar Hammerstein II, Richard Rodgers Lyrics Licensed & Provided by LyricFind
Alicia Green is an instinctive researcher and writer, with BA in Psychology and BS in Advertising. She gained her first experience as an investigative news reporter while working for a student-run news publication, providing breaking news and information on issues affecting the university and local community.
