Hollywood Movies Featuring “Deadly Viruses” on the Loose

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 23, 2021

—I’m republishing this piece because protests against vaccine mandates are rising across the world; and so are brutal lockdowns and fascist takeovers of nations. The clash is intensifying.

Here in the US, we have a demented mandating nut in the White House, and another nut who left the White House last year and keeps pumping up his destructive Warp Speed vaccine, as he currently tours the country.

“Omicron” is very much a movie title. Fear the Omicron. It attacks by night. And it’s being used to explain all the people having heart attacks and dying after vaccination.

The compliant people of the world ARE being treated to the movie called COVID. They’re in it, unfortunately. No virus, but instead a plot line about a virus. The producers (e.g., Bill Gates) already have all the money they need. But they’re not in it for the money alone. They want to cause pain and leverage control of the planet. It’s their wet dream.

OK. Here we go:

Wikipedia has a page listing “films about viral outbreaks.” I count 134 titles. Obviously, the theme has legs.

A few of the more famous movies: I am Legend; The Omega Man; The Andromeda Strain; Outbreak; Maze Runner: The Death Cure; Resident Evil: Apocalypse; Contagion.

My overall review: ridiculous plots; fear porn; softens up the public to accept the notion of pandemics.

Manufacturing 134 movies on one subject, you can sell almost anything. Zombies, toasters, alarm clocks that have long noses, golf balls from Mars, cave women with flawless teeth and perfect makeup and salon-sculptured hair and carefully engineered cleavage.

But in this case, it’s viruses.

At rwjf.org, there’s an interesting interview with Scott Burns, who wrote the screenplay for the 2011 film, Contagion, and the technical consultant on the project, Dr. Ian Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity at Columbia University. Here are excerpts:

Scott Burns: “Obviously I worked with Ian, and early on I also met Dr. Larry Brilliant, who was very helpful [and certainly brilliant]. I had seen Larry’s TED talk where he showed the Malthusian charge through the world the virus would have. I also worked with Laurie Garrett on the movie, because she had written this book, The Coming Plague, which was very, very useful to me in sort of teasing out how these things have a medical component, but they also have a social justice component and a political component and all sorts of interesting aspects of human behavior.”

Dr. Ian Lipkin: “I started very early with Scott. There were a lot of people who contributed—CDC, WHO and others… Scott would bounce ideas off of me and others in his ‘brain trust’ and most of the time we were in accord. My role grew dramatically over the course of production. It began with just a consultation, and then I rapidly moved into helping the set designer in designing the virus, and we had a few days where we had actors come to the lab and spend some time working at the bench, learning how to pipette and look through microscopes and get into gowns and such. And even at the very end, I was working with the sound engineer, recording sound for the movie—lab background and that sort of thing. I did a lot of traveling with the crew. It was like a circus.”

“We settled on that virus [a paramyxovirus] within the first half an hour with Laurie and Scott and I, high above Columbus Circle in New York. We threw out a number of possibilities to Scott and he batted them down, and then one came to mind that struck me as the perfect choice, simply because there had been some reports earlier suggesting this virus, which wasn’t readily transmissible, had become readily transmissible to humans—that was Nipah. It also gave Scott and the director and actors an opportunity to do more than just cough and die. They could develop seizures, they could have hallucinations—all sorts of things that were much more interesting than a standard respiratory disease. We settled on that really within the first thirty minutes, and then Scott went back, thought about it and decided it was a good way to run. It doesn’t take much fuel for him to run quite a distance.”

Turns out that designing a movie about a pandemic is pretty much the same sort of project as designing a fake COVID pandemic in the world.

You pick out a story about a virus, give it an authentic feel, embroider it, and sell it.

People buy it.

In the interest of balance and fairness, I’ve written a few notes for a screenplay that would take a different approach:

In New York, the body of a dead virologist floats to the surface of the East River.

After a brief round of speculation that he might have perished from a mysterious viral infection, the coroner announces the cause of death was three gunshot wounds to the head. In other words, possible suicide while swimming.

A lone NYPD detective (divorced, alcoholic, disparaged by fellow officers, heroic) discovers the dead virologist’s notebook inside the freezer in the virologist’s apartment.

He thaws it out and reads this: “The coronavirus has never been isolated. It’s a fake. They’re selling a fairy tale about a virus.”

Two days later, a beautiful woman doctor (with engineered cleavage) from the CDC shows up at the detective’s apartment. Somehow she knows the cop has found the virologist’s notebook.

They talk. The mutual attraction should be immediately evident. If not, the brief cuts of sex they’re having on the floor provide sufficient evidence for the audience.

Two days later, the beautiful CDC doctor disappears.

The police detective is warned (anonymous phone message) to stay away from the case of the dead virologist.

Hey, it’s a B movie. Low budget. Could shoot the whole thing over a weekend in Manhattan.

But we need some kind of twist.

So it turns out the detective, the dead virologist, and the beautiful woman doctor from the CDC are just story ideas in the mind of a screenwriter, who, in the movie, is pitching the project to producer pals in an office high above Columbus Circle.

He’s pitching a movie that exposes a fake virus and a fake pandemic.

But wait. There’s more. In a mind-bending revelation, we learn that the screenwriter and the producers are secret agents from a distant planet called PROPAGANDA.

They’ve come to Earth to promote a fake pandemic…but a conflict has developed among them. The screenwriter has decided he wants to blow the whistle on his bosses from PROPAGANDA, and the producers want to carry out their mission to sell the people of Earth fake COVID-19, as if it were real.

The movie is basically an extended conversation about fake vs. real, virus vs. no virus, pandemic vs. hoax.

As the screenwriter earnestly pitches his film, his ideas will come to life, briefly, on the screen: there’s enough cleavage, sex, and murder to satisfy the Hollywood code.

Will the agents from the planet PROPAGANDA succeed in selling Earth the notion that COVID is real? Or will the heroic defector, the screenwriter, succeed in foiling the whole operation?

Stay tuned…

The 134 Hollywood movies about outbreaks of viruses aren’t only programming audiences. They’re instruction manuals for planners who launch fake pandemics.

Definition of “fake pandemic”: a movie that is happening in the world, not on a screen, in which the suffering and the pain are REAL—but are not the result of a virus. For further reference re pain, see “lockdowns, mask mandates, business bankruptcies, suicides, vaccine damage, police state.” For lunacy and true believers, see “deranged hostile masked vegan Whole Foods shoppers, and so-called science bloggers living in mommy’s basement.”

Definition of “virus”: any presumed particle that has never been isolated.

Definition of “virologist”: any person who pretends to discover tiny particles that aren’t there.

Alternate definition of “fake pandemic”: any medical event involving large numbers of people that never ends. For further reference, see “keep wearing two masks after being vaccinated and THEN being diagnosed with COVID.”

Immortal quotes from Hollywood virus-movies:

Outbreak, Dustin Hoffman—“I’ll say it one last time. These [infected] people that you’re going to bomb are not the enemy. We can kill the virus without killing these people. I swear on my soul that the President does not have the facts. He doesn’t know we have a working serum [antidote].”

Contagion, Jennifer Ehle—“Somewhere in the world, the wrong pig met up with the wrong bat.”

I Am Legend, Will Smith— “Blood tests confirm that I am immune to both the airborne and contact strains…Vaccine trials continue, I’m still unable to transfer my immunity to infected hosts. The Krippen Virus is… elegant…Hmm, a behavioral note, um, an infected male exposed himself to sunlight today. Now, it’s possible decreased brain function or the growing scarcity of food is causing them to…ignore their basic survival instincts. Social de-evolution appears complete. Typical human behavior is now entirely absent.”

Would you buy a used car from these people?

Definition of Hollywood actor: a person who can utter ANY line in a script without showing the smallest trace of embarrassment, in exchange for a paycheck—and in interviews casually refers to himself as an artist, and when speaking of Hollywood, deploys the possessive phrase, “in our industry.”

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image by TCTL is based on creative commons work of geralt & Phoarto

Brisbane, Australia Streets Come Alive With the Sound of Freedom

Tens of thousands rally to protest against ‘green tick’ tyranny

by Yasmin Sawyer, Rebel News
December 22, 2021

As many as 100,000 people packed the streets of Brisbane on the weekend to protest against vaccine mandates and other authoritarian measures brought in as part of Queensland’s management of the global pandemic.

Marching under the banner of ‘The People’s Revolution’ the crowd moved through Southbank and gathered at Musgrave Park where a party atmosphere filled the grounds with no green tick requirements in sight.

While there was some tension as the large group passed by venues requiring vaccine passes, the protest was overwhelmingly positive and went ahead without incident.

📷 Live shot from the Brisbane protest against mandatory vaccinations where tens of thousands have gathered in and around Musgrave Park. pic.twitter.com/snWMr9AdN5

— Rebel News Australia (@RebelNews_AU) December 18, 2021

The crowds were again diverse, made up of parents seeking to represent a more hopeful future for their children, to concerned grandparents, business owners affected by the pandemic and others concerned about the impact of overbearing government control.

“As an 18-year-old, I served this country in war,” said one attendee.

“And I think it’s disgusting now as a 71-year-old that I have to fight for my own freedom. I’m not allowed in the RSL to have a meal because I haven’t been double-jabbed.

“This country has just fallen apart.“

Others also expressed their sadness for how the government has treated segments of the community, especially those health carers and essential workers hailed last year as the heroes of the pandemic response.

“I lost my job after 35 years of nursing,” said one of the many nurses impacted by the mandates.

Connect with Rebel News

La Quinta Columna: Pfizer Vaccine Under a Microscope | Strange Structures & Their Movements



Original video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in Pfizer vaccine

Translation courtesy of Orwellito, Orwell City
December 22, 2021

Ricardo Delgado: 

We’re going to see the content, what’s inside the Pfizer vaccine, and we’re going to comment on it.

Well, you’re looking at the edge of the droplet. Everything in the lighter area is what’s inside the droplet. That’s the smallest magnification. I’m going to put it on full screen.

Typical, see? That formation is typical. Remember the characteristic shape that graphene has. It forms these folds. And, overall, it folds in on itself at the edges. It usually folds in on itself. We’re not only going to see graphene but also, as I say, some kind of very artificial structures.

This is also quite reminiscent of these kinds of structures that are pulled upstream, let’s say, by certain particles that showed up a lot in the images of another Pfizer vaccine that Dr. Campra analyzed.

Now, here we see this at about 100 magnification. No more than that. 100 to 200 magnification. Notice that formation down here. That shape is very characteristic as well. As if they were in L. Well, from now on, you start to see more images…

That shape is very characteristic of the trendy material, too. Another quadrangular structure also appears here. There. I’m going to put it on full screen. It’s a filament that is dragged by a “little dot.” Here we see another one in the shape of a key. This here is… I’ll make a pause here.

This is the famous “nano-octopus” that also appeared in the Pfizer vaccine vial that Dr. Campra analyzed. It also appeared in Dr. Carrie Madej’s video. And it was what was also found by the Polish scientist whose name I can’t remember right now. Well, let’s continue. Here we see it in a dark field. But look at its termination. It looks like an insect. It looks like an insect because of its leg-like shape.

Notice how that structure below is going upwards. I’m going to make a short pause. One thing I want to comment on is that, as the sample evolved, it was all… In fact, the samples are preserved, and I’m looking forward to looking at them again because it’s like there’s an evolution. It’s as if whatever it is that we see is really self-assembling and assembling, as I say, more and more complex structures.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Yes, very interesting.

Ricardo Delgado: 

There were various reliefs. That is, different levels within that hydrogel which is the one that is also being investigated. Therefore, when I played with the orientation, I could see what was at the bottom, which used to be graphene. And more for the surface, you could see this kind of structure floating. Look at this one. That kind of formation, according to what’s in the scientific literature, corresponds to nano-antennas. That’s to say, that little stick upwards would be, well, transmitting and receiving antenna. Probably, it is the inductor of the famous MAC address signals that appear with Bluetooth wireless technology.

Dr. Sevillano: 

That one is clear, Ricardo.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Yes, very, very, very clear. Notice it looks like it has a rivet on it.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Yes.

Ricardo Delgado: 

It’s like a mini screw. This is nanotechnology for sure. Well, I’ve left the video recording with some exposure because I was waiting for the structure to flip over. This is because, from the other side, it looked like it was emitting some kind of fluorescence. Some kind of luminescence. I also plan to try and expose this sample to cell phone radiation, for example. And to heat, as well. Everything you guys are suggesting in the chat. This, obviously, is of artificial origin. And the fact that this is in the vaccine is crazy. It’s crazy. See, there it seems to flip. I also want to subject them to ultraviolet radiation. This image is quite neat. Look at that one too. How neat it is! You can even see what is dragging it. Look at that one. Look, that one looks like it was doped with something. And it carries another similar thing to it too. Look at that.

That has a book-like appearance. It looks exactly like a book. And notice that it has a relief on the straight edges, entirely rectilinear. Or this one, for example. There’re no biological structures of this type that correspond to such a quadrangular origin, as far as I know.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Crystals don’t have this shape, so… They’re not like these structures with right angles and angular angles. But the one we see is associated with others. Crystals aren’t presented like that.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Exactly. Look at that.

Dr. Sevillano: 

The same. There you have it. Also, it’s not a repeating pattern like crystals are.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Right.

Dr. Sevillano: 

There are angles, but they occur in isolated, disconnected structures. What we see is strange.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Notice that here, on the left, it looks like meandering.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Yes, that’s right. And there’s a base on which these small spheres sit.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Yes.

Dr. Sevillano: 

In fact, if you look in-depth under the microscope, many times, there are other structures underneath that aren’t visible because they’re below others. But you can guess they’re there because of the reliefs you see.

This we saw can be called “microparticles.” We haven’t seen nanoparticles. These are microparticles because they’re visible under the microscope.

Ricardo Delgado: 

That’s right.

Dr. Sevillano: 

They’re microparticles. They’re probably composed of…

Ricardo Delgado: 

Microparticles.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Exactly. Another thing is that they’re composed of or carry some kind of nanotechnology. But in reality, the scale is microscopic, not nanoscopic.

Ricardo Delgado: 

The truth is that we’re not indifferent to these kinds of images. Yesterday, when I was using the microscope, I was looking forward to today to show you them because the population has to know about this. Nothing of this should be seen under the microscope. In those scientific papers that the drug regulatory agency, the EMA, or the FDA talk about, it’s very easy to say, “That’s contamination.” But it’s contamination with shapes that you see in articles collected from the scientific literature. It seems to me that it’s graphene-shaped contamination. That’s what you want to say. Graphene contamination, right?

Dr. Sevillano: 

How many times have they missed the opportunity to make fools of us with this story? Well, invite us somewhere where we can do this in public. How many times have they missed it? Either they have missed it or don’t want to. They don’t want to see under a microscope. They don’t care. They’re just fooling around, they’re making fun of us, others are insulting us. Very well, but let them look at the microscope, please. Look, instead of laughing at us as if we were clowns. Like the photo that I sent you a while ago. Yes, yes. And you can laugh as much as you want. But put a microscope in front of your eyes and look for yourself. And then you go and laugh. While others look down on you. “This isn’t science because the papers didn’t publish it.” And what about it not being published in the papers? Would you publish any of the enemy’s work? Well, they’re certainly not going to publish any.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Obviously not.

Dr. Sevillano: 

It’s crystal clear that the background of all this is very serious. I’ll insist whenever I can. As I cannot talk about medicine, I insist on the background of all this. Science has been hijacked. By the way, that headline was given by Miguel Bosé. I think he said it in La Razón or ABC. I don’t know where I have seen him. And he’s absolutely right. Miguel Bosé isn’t my cup of tea, but he’s absolutely right. Absolutely right. You can’t take away the truth of that phrase. These people have hijacked science.

Connect with Orwell City

La Quinta Columna: There’s No Such Thing as ‘Mild Myocarditis’

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 21, 2021

The media are doing their best to convince people that suffering from post-inoculation myocarditis is normal and that there’s nothing to worry about.

The official press is criminal and chooses to lie.

In a new program, La Quinta Columna shared a brief excerpt from an interview that Spanish writer Colin Rivas conducted with surgeon Juanjo Martinez regarding these so-called “mild myocarditis.”

Dr. Jimenez makes it clear that myocarditis, even mild, is, in essence, myocarditis and can cause immediate, medium, or long-term complications.

La Quinta Columna: Research Paper From 2015 — “CORONA: A Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks”

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

In the video below,  as part of their ongoing investigation into the hidden contents and purpose of the “covid” vaccines, La Quinta Columna discusses a research paper written in 2015. The paper, entitled “CORONA: A Coordinate and Routing system for Nanonetworks”,  describes a routing and nanonetwork system.

The research paper can be found here.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

Transcript courtesy of Orwellito, Orwell City, December 18, 2021

Ricardo Delgado:

Let’s see this last article, which has caught my attention because it’s titled “CORONA.” However, this relates it to… Notice this. “CORONA: A Coordinate and Routing system for Nanonetworks.” This is quite related to the research carried out by Mik Andersen, in his famous blog “Corona2Inspect,”  when it comes to identifying those objects also found in the Pfizer vaccine. And whose raw material is, precisely, graphene oxide.

“The present paper introduces a joint coordinate and routing system (CORONA) which can be deployed dynamically on a 2D ad-hoc nanonetwork. User-selected nodes are used as anchor-points at the setup phase. All nodes then measure their distances, in number of hops, from these anchors, obtaining a sense of geolocation. At operation phase, the routing employs the appropriate subset of anchors, selected by the sender of a packet.”

This is talking about addresses packets.

“CORONA requires minimal setup overhead and simple integer-based calculations only, imposing limited requirements for trustworthy operation. Once deployed, it operates efficiently, yielding a very low packet —data packet— retransmission and packet loss rate, promoting energy-efficiency and medium multiplexing.”

There’s nothing else. But here, he talks about electromagnetic wireless sensor networks, nano-communication networks. And it has caught my attention because this is called CORONA. And it talks about a coordinate and routing system for nano-networks. This is related to all the research our colleague and friend, Mik Andersen, is doing. And to whom, from here, we send a big hug for the sensational research work he’s doing, also, together with Dr. Campra.

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: geralt / pixabay

See related:

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

London Marches for Freedom, Dec. 18, 2021: “We Will Not Comply.” “It’s All Been a Pack of Lies.”



⁣⁣”WE WILL NOT COMPLY” | London Marches for Freedom 18/12/2021 | Oracle Films

by Oracle Films
December 19, 2021

Video available at Oracle Films Odysee and YouTube channels.

Connect with Oracle Films

Australian Aboriginal Elder Dies in Howard Springs Quarantine Facility

by David Cole (Lumpa Lumpa)
December 18, 2021



Original video available at Lumpa Lumpa YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Elder dies in Howard Springs Quarantine Facility Darwin after plea’s for help by family were ignored for 12 hours.

The elder and her family were kept in the quarantine facility for up to 4 weeks despite being fully vaccinated.

There has been no mainstream media reporting and the only report we could find is a clear cover up to avoid the responsibility as they claim “it is unclear whether the woman was a repatriated Australian or whether she was from within Australia”; when the woman was taken from her homelands in Robinson River and placed into the facility by the government themselves.

In this video there are interviews and conversations with a cousin and the daughter of the woman who passed who gave consent for these recordings and story to be shared.

The Truth Will Always Prevail

Connect with Lumpa Lumpa (David Cole)

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

Evidence Found That Would Confirm the Theory of Nano-Networks Centered in the Human Body: Nano-Rectennas 

by Mik Andersen, Corona2Inspect
published in Spanish December 16, 2021
rough translation via translation software

Research on nanocommunication networks for nanodevices inoculated in the human body continues to accumulate evidence. On this occasion, the article by the researchers (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) is presented entitled  “Nanoredes centered in the body driven by nano-Rectenna in the terahertz band = Nano- rectenna powered body-centric nano-networks in the terahertz band” which confirms the theory that Corona2Inspect had been studying through the observation of the images of the samples of the c0r0n @ v | rus vaccines obtained by the doctor (Campra, P. 2021). Nano-arrays centered on the human body require the use of nano-antennas that operate in the terahertz band, these being the same type as those found in the vaccine samples ..

In the literature, these plasmonic nano-antennas are also called bowtie antennas or “bowties antenna” and in the article in question they are called “nano-rectennas”. The explicit mention of the type of antenna and the technology of intra-body nano-networks, would confirm that vaccines are, among other things, vectors for the installation of nanotechnology, or nanodevices in the human body. However, beyond the pure coincidence, the authors make explicit the use of graphene and carbon nanotubes, as necessary elements for this network model, elements that were also identified in the images taken by Dr. Campra and that coincide with the presence of graphene in its technical report with spectroscopy. Micro-Raman.

To what has already been described, the article adds that the method of communication and data transmission in nano-networks is carried out through TS-OOK signals (sequences of pulses that transmit binary codes), which matches with studies and protocols of nanocommunications and would endorse all the research carried out by Corona2Inspect so far on this matter.

If what has been explained is not enough to confirm the theory of intracorporeal communication nano-networks, the article by (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) makes explicit the use of nano-sensors that are linked by means of electromagnetic signals, by means of the aforementioned nano-rectennas or bow tie nano-antennas, which necessarily evidences the presence of nano-routers that serve to manage the intra-body and out-of-body data link, with gateways (gateway) such as mobile phone. Given the importance of the content of the article, it will be dissected in detail.

Article analysis

The research object of the work of (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) is the comparative analysis of the energy harvesting capacities of nano-rectennas, aimed at their implementation in networks wireless nanodevices and intra-body nanotechnology. This is reflected in the introduction of the article as follows “in the field of health applications, the objective is to develop a network of therapeutic nanodevices that is capable of working in the human body or within it to support the monitoring of the immune system, health monitoring, drug delivery systems and biohybrid implants “.  This leaves no doubt that nano-antennas, here called nano-rectennas, necessarily imply the presence of a network of nanodevices or nanotechnology aimed at controlling the biological variables and factors of people.

Furthermore, (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) state that “There are two main approaches to nanoscale wireless communications, namely, molecular and electromagnetic (EM) communications (Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM 2010). The latter commonly operates in the terahertz (THz) band (0.1-10 THz) and is a promising technique to support data exchange in nanosensor networks for healthcare applications or body-centered nano-networks. For the expected size of nanosensors, the frequency radiated by their antennas would normally be in the optical range, resulting in a very large channel attenuation that could make nanoscale wireless communication unfeasible. To overcome this limitation, graphene-based antennas have been developed, which are able to resonate in the THz band with sizes of a few ??, at a frequency up to two orders of magnitude lower than a metallic antenna of the same dimensions“.

This explanation corroborates the two types of intra-body communication , the molecular type used for monitoring and neuromodulation of neuronal tissue and the central nervous system ( Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM; Pierobon, M. 2011 |  Malak, D.; Akan, OB 2012  |  Rikhtegar, N.; Keshtgary, M. 2013 |  Balasubramaniam, S.; Boyle, NT; Della-Chiesa, A.; Walsh, F.; Mardinoglu, A.; Botvich, D.; Prina-Mello , A. 2011) and electromagnetic, conceived for the control of biological variables and factors in the rest of the body, by means of nano-nodes (also known as nano-devices, nano-biosensors, etc.).

It also corroborates the operating band in which the intra-body nano-network is operating, in a range of 0.1-10 THz, confirmed in this blog according to (Abbasi, QH; Nasir, AA; Yang, K.; Qaraqe, KA ; Alomainy, A. 2017 |  Zhang, R.; Yang, K.; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. 2017  |  Yang, K.; Bi, D.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, R. ; Rahman, MMU; Ali, NA; Alomainy, A. 2020). It also addresses the fact that the scale of the nano-devices, nano-sensors of the network forces to “resonate the THz band” by means of special antennas of a few microns (??), but with the ability to retransmit signals and in turn of harvesting energy to run the grid. These special properties are achieved through the plasmonic effect given by the nanoantennas scale, which confers special physical and quantum properties to these objects, as explained in (Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF 2013 |  Nafari, M.; Jornet, JM 2015 |  Guo , H.; Johari, P.; Jornet, JM; Sun, Z. 2015 ).

In the introductory dissertation, (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) mention a substantial aspect “the exchange of information between implantable [injectable] nanosensors is the most significant, since it allows control and monitoring the release or flux of molecular, biochemical compounds, and other important functions within the human body.” The relevance of this statement is crucial since it assumes that nanodevices have to be installed, injected or implanted in the human body, but also that it is necessary to receive their signals and data generated to carry out the corresponding monitoring, even at the level of molecular flow and biochemical compounds, such as neurotransmitters produced by neuronal tissue or the nervous system ( Abd-El-atty, SM; Lizos, KA; Gharsseldien, ZM; Tolba, A.; Makhadmeh, ZA 2018).

This explains the need to introduce graphene, carbon nanotubes and derivatives to capture these signals and bio-electrical markers to capture the information, but also a wireless nano-network, which allows transmitting this data outside the human body. Therefore, it must be understood that the nano-antennas or nano-rectennas in charge of repeating the signals could not only do it from the inside out, being able to carry out the reverse process, altering the neuronal synapse, for example.

Likewise, (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) state that a relevant problem in intra-body nano-networks is the availability of energy (Bouchedjera, IA; Aliouat, Z.; Louail , L. 2020 |  Fahim, H.; Javaid, S.; Li, W.; Mabrouk, IB; Al-Hasan, M.; Rasheed, MBB 2020 ), for which efficient routing protocols and processes have been developed ( Sivapriya, S.; Sridharan, D. 2017 |  Piro, G.; Boggia, G.; Grieco, LA 2015 ) that make the operation of the nano-network plausible. For the purposes of nano-antennas or nano-rectennas, Rong and his team state the following: “One of the biggest challenges in body-centered nanogrids is caused by the very limited energy storage of a nano battery … Since electromagnetic waves carry not only information but also energy, rectenins can operate at THz and frequencies. microwave, allowing them to work overnight. Since electromagnetic waves carry not only information, but also energy ( Varshney, LR 2008 ), nano-rectennas can share the same signal that is used to carry information within nano-networks. As a result, simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) becomes a critical technique for powering nanogrids and is a promising solution to power bottlenecks … A major advantage of the The technique is that the proposed nano-rectennas are capable of converting an EM signal into a direct current without any external power supply of the system. In addition, achievable energy conversion achieves approximately 85% efficiency.“.

These statements are fundamental to confirm that EM electromagnetic waves, or what is the same microwave, serve to transport energy and data simultaneously, being able to do so in the THz band compatible with the intra-body wireless network.

This confirms what has been explained in the entry on nanocommunication networks for nanotechnology in the human body, published on this blog. This ambivalent phenomenon of transporting energy and data is known by the acronym SWIPT, which allows us to infer that nano-antennas or nano-rectennas have this property. In fact, the authors affirm its ability to convert an EM signal into direct current without external power, with a very high efficiency, which would explain why enough energy was generated and probably stored to make the intra-body network work. In fact, according to (Zainud-Deen, SH; Malhat, HA; El-Araby, HA 2017) nanoantennas with a geometric diode such as bow tie or other polygonal type, based on graphene, not only collect energy from electromagnetic waves EM ( microwave), they can also do it with the infrared spectrum (El-Araby, HA; Malhat, HA; Zainud-Deen, SH 2017 | 2018), which guarantees a constant flow of energy.

On the other hand, (Rong, Z .; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) define the concept of rectenna as “a combination of an antenna and a rectifier device, generally a diode, with the purpose of collecting energy in and to the nanowires, so that the EM waves are received by a nano antenna and then coupled to a rectifier … this makes it possible for them to be used to harvest energy from THz and higher frequencies. How nano-sized antennas operate In the THz band, their associated rectifier diodes need a fast response so that they can react properly to the incoming signal and deliver a DC (Direct Current) signal … The rectifier can collect energy from the THz signal or from residual energy in the environment“.

However, it is known that rectennas are also capable of transmitting and collecting energy and data in the GHz band as explained in the work of ( Suh, YH; Chang, K. 2002 |  Abdel-Rahman, MR; Gonzalez, FJ; Boreman, GD 2004 ) .In this regard, the work of ( Khan, AA; Jayaswal, G .; Gahaffar, FA; Shamim, A. 2017, should also be highlighted .) in which it is shown that nano-rectennas are capable of collecting energy from environmental radio frequency (RF) for which they use tunneling diodes, which hardly consume energy during the process of conversion to direct current. These tunneling diodes also known as MIM (metal-insulator-metal) diodes can provide zero bias rectification, allowing it to operate in a frequency range between 2-10GHz, allowing it to adapt to input impedance.

In fact, Khan and his team state that “Although the real advantage of MIM diodes is the high frequencies (THz range), their zero-bias rectification ability can also be beneficial for collecting and wireless feeding at RF frequencies. ..   Characterization of DC (Direct Current) indicated that the MIM diode could provide a zero bias responsiveness of 0.25V -1 with a decent dynamic resistance of 1200 Ω (Ohms). The metal-insulator-diode-metal RF (Radio Frequency) characterization was performed using two methods: 1) S parameter measurements (Diode tunnel barrier thickness) from 500MHz to 10 GHz, and 2) RF rectification to DC with zero polarization. The presented input impedance results may be useful for integrating MIM diodes with antennas for harvesting applications. The second part of the RF characterization verified the rectification of RF to DC zero bias.”

In other words, the researchers confirm that nano-rectennas can operate in lower frequency ranges and even by radio frequency, which explains that it makes them the ideal method for powering wireless nano-networks and their connection applications. to the IoNT (Internet of NanoThings).

Returning to the analysis of (Rong, Z.; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018), his work addresses the comparison of two types of rectenins oriented to intra-body nano-networks. One of them is nano-rectena based on carbon nanotubes, which matches with the identifications observed in the vaccine samples . In this sense, Rong and his team cite the work of (Sharma, A.; Singh, V.; Bougher, TL; Cola, BA 2015) who proposed the rectennas of CNT (Carbon Nanotubes) “which consisted of millions of nanotubes that functioned as nano antennas, with their tips made of Insulator-Metal (IM) to behave like diodes. The CNT rectennas showed great potential for body-centered nanodevice applications and wireless EM energy harvesting.”

This could confirm that the observed carbon nanotubes and plasmonic nanoantennas are intended, among others, to deliver energy. To the nano-network installed with the different inoculations of the vaccine, an aspect that would explain the need for several doses to complete the basic supply of energy for its perpetual operational maintenance. Abundant in the carbon nanotube rectennas, it is also stated that “When CNTs absorb EM radiation, a direct current will be generated after rectification across the tip area. This converted current is used to charge a capacitor.  The process of conversion to DC (Direct Current) is carried out using the THz signal within the system and environmental free EM, so the power source of such a nano-rectenna generator does not need another specific external power source.” Which suggests that no other components are required to function.

In addition to CNT nano-rectennas,  (Rong, Z .; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. 2018) compare them with their main proposal, bow tie nano-rectennas “dipole nano-rectennas have been proposed bow tie, with two triangular sections. The thickness of the antenna is 100 nm, and nano diodes, made of graphene located in the middle of the hole area of ​​the bow tie antenna, producing the action of the rectena. Additionally, can connect to form a nano-rectilinear array or array. The bowtie dipole antenna receives EM radiation and converts the signal into AC (alternating current) flux to the nano diode. The diode then rectifies the AC (alternating current) into current continue DC “.

This would confirm the type of Plasmon nano-antennas observed in the vaccine samples , as well as the graphene material used as a link between their triangular sections, which matches with the presence of graphene detected by Campra in the vaccines . Another relevant detail is also provided, nano-rectennas can operate in a matrix or array, which means that thousands of them can operate, as stated by Rong and his team “As the output power of a single rectenine is 0.11 nW (approximately), if we use an array of these lines, the power and size required by the nano-network can be satisfied … More elements connected in series can increase the production of current and power “.

This is demonstrated in the work of ( Aldrigo, M .; Dragoman, M. 2014 ) entitled “Nano-rectennas based on graphene in the far infrared frequency band  where it is explained that nano-rectennas are capable of collecting human heat in the infrared frequency band, and that the The proposed model is encouraging “both in terms of the rectified current of a single nano-receptor, as well as the power rectified by a macro-system that combines thousands of nano-cells“. Which leaves no doubt that nano-rectennas are not an isolated component, in fact they are more common and numerous than might be thought a priori. Perhaps one dose of the vaccine involves thousands or perhaps millions of nano-rectennas, depending on its scale.

Rong’s article continues to provide very relevant keys, this time in relation to the CNT rectennes, indicating that  “the output voltage generated by the CNT rectena is of the order of tens of millivolts … the channel access scheme for the communications will be based on femtosecond pulses to the nanowire … the digits 1 (of the binary code) are transmitted using pulses of 100??, this is a long pulse, while the digits 0 are transmitted as silence … as the time The separation between adjacent bits is 1000 times the pulse duration (Ts = 100ps), the average power will return to the nW level. Therefore, the output power of the CNT rectenna is able to satisfy the power requirements of the system (from the nanoret)“.

This statement confirms what was already investigated in Corona2Inspect, nanogrids operate with TS-OOK signals for the transfer of data packets (see nanocommunication networks for nanotechnology in the human body , CORONA system for nanogrids , nanorouters , nanogrids software electromagnetic ) due to their simplicity and reduced energy consumption. Furthermore, it confirms that carbon nanotubes can operate in the transmission of signals and data, as well as the collection of energy, as was suggested in the entry on nano octopuses and carbon nanotubes of this blog .

According to Rong’s calculations,  “For a rectenna CNT device, the maximum reported output voltage is 68 mV and for a 25-element rectenna bowtie array it is 170 mV. Therefore, according to (9), the rectena matrix bowtie (bow tie) delivers more charge than rectena CNT … when these two rectena devices are used to charge the same ultra-nano capacitor (9nF), it is evident that rectena CNT takes longer (more than 6 minutes) due to its very high junction resistance. Whereas for the rectena bow tie, the resistance is comparatively very small, so it only takes about 6 ms to supply more power to the capacitor“. This explanation is very important when comparing the two types of rectenna for intra-body nano-networks.

Arrayed bow tie nano-rectennas present better performance than those based on carbon nanotubes, taking a nano-capacitor to charge in only 6 milliseconds. This would explain the presence of these components in the vaccine samples, at micro and nano-scale. In addition, the allusion to the ultra-nanocapacitors used to perform the load test is relevant. Capacitors are passive electrical devices capable of of storing energy by maintaining an electric field.

This could lead to the question: Where is energy stored in intra-body nano-grids?

The answer is very simple, in an abundant and recognized material in vaccines, this is graphene itself. act as capacitors, as shown in the work of ( Bai, J .; Zhong, X .; Jiang, S .; Huang, Y .; Duan, X. 2010 ), because “the  graphene sheets nanoribbons with widths less than 10 nm can open a band gap large enough for operation as transistor at room temperature“. This is de facto what allows the generation of a magnetic field, as a result of the electrical charge transmitted by the nano-rectennas.

This would explain the phenomenon of magnetic arms (among other parts of the body) after inoculation of the vaccines. In fact, if you look at figure 5, a nano-mesh (made of graphene) similar to that found in the scientific literature can be seen blurred, which could act as a condenser. In many cases, these shapes were found around polygonal, quadrangular objects. and nano-antennas, which seems to make sense to provide an energy carryover for nano-grids.

Finally, among the conclusions, Rong and his team highlight the following “Along with the continuous advancement of the SWIPT technique ( simultaneous wireless information and power transfer) , the pioneering CNT matrix receiver and the nano-matrix bowtie (bowtie) open the door for wireless nano-sensor powering. Since a nano-rectenna is capable of powering nanosensors without any external source and its broadband property allows rectenna to be a very efficient and promising way to power implanted nanodevices and in the human body. CNT’s rectenna array can successfully deliver the required human body-centric wireless nano-network power, estimated to be around 27.5 nW. Also, the bow tie rectifier array is much smaller in size, but provides similar power … Although nano-rectenins cannot provide such a high voltage compared to a piezoelectric nanogenerator, an array of nano-rectennas bowtie (bowtie) is much more efficient producing in addition DC (Direct Current) directly from the THz signal within the system (the human body) and the environmental EM signal without any other external power source of the system“.

This seems to make it clear that this type of nano-antennas are the appropriate ones, if what is desired is to install intra-corporal nano-networks of nanodevices and nanosensors. Therefore, a very sharp deduction is not necessary to realize that the The presence of plasmonic nano-antennas in the vaccine samples, whether in the shape of a bow tie or cube, or a prism, as has been observed, are clear evidence of the presence of undeclared nanotechnology.

Bibliography

1. Abbasi, QH; Nasir, AA; Yang, K .; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. (2017). Cooperative in-vivo nano-network communication at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 8642-8647. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2677498
2. Abd-El-atty, SM; Lizos, KA; Gharsseldien, ZM; Tolba, A .; Makhadmeh, ZA (2018). Engineering molecular communications integrated with carbon nanotubes in neural sensor nanonetworks. IET Nanobiotechnology, 12 (2), 201-210. https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0150
3. Abdel-Rahman, MR; Gonzalez, FJ; Boreman, GD (2004). Antenna-coupled metal-oxide diodes for dual-band detection at 92.5 GHz and 28 THz = Antenna-coupled metal-oxide-metal diodes for dual-band detection at 92.5 GHz and 28 THz. Electronics Letters, 40 (2), pp. 116-118. https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1049/el:20040105
4. Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM (2010). Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks = Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks. Nano Communication Networks, 1 (1), pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2010.04.001
5. Akyildiz, IF; Jornet, JM; Pierobon, M. (2011). Nanonetworks: a new frontier in communications = Nanonetworks: A new frontier in communications. Communications of the ACM, 54 (11), pp. 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1145/2018396.2018417
6. Aldrigo, M .; Dragoman, M. (2014). Graphene-based nano-rectenna in the far infrared frequency band = Graphene-based nano-rectenna in the far infrared frequency band. In: 2014 44th European Microwave Conference (pp. 1202-1205). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuMC.2014.6986657 | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/eumc.2014.6986657
7. Bai, J .; Zhong, X .; Jiang, S .; Huang, Y .; Duan, X. (2010). Graphene nano-mesh = Graphene nanomesh. Nature nanotechnology, 5 (3), pp. 190-194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.8  | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1038/nnano.2010.8
8. Balasubramaniam, S .; Boyle, NT; Della-Chiesa, A .; Walsh, F .; Mardinoglu, A .; Botvich, D .; Prina-Mello, A. (2011). Development of artificial neuronal networks for molecular communication. Nano Communication Networks, 2 (2-3), pp. 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2011.05.004
9. Bouchedjera, IA; Aliouat, Z .; Louail, L. (2020). EECORONA: Energy Efficiency Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks = EECORONA: Energy Efficiency Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks. In: International Symposium on Modeling and Implementation of Complex Systems. Cham. pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58861-8_2
10. Campra, P. (2021). Detection of graphene in COVID19 vaccines by Micro-RAMAN spectroscopy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355684360_Deteccion_de_grafeno_en_vacunas_COVID19_por_espectroscopia_Micro-RAMAN
11. El-Araby, HA; Malhat, HA; Zainud-Deen, SH (2017). Performance of nanoantenna-coupled geometric diode with infrared radiation = Performance of nanoantenna-coupled geometric diode with infrared radiation. In: 2017 34th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC) (pp. 15-21). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NRSC.2017.7893471 | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/NRSC.2017.7893471
12. El-Araby, HA; Malhat, HA; Zainud-Deen, SH (2018). Nanoantenna with geometric diode for energy harvesting. Wireless Personal Communications, 99 (2), pp. 941-952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5159-2
13. Fahim, H .; Javaid, S .; Li, W .; Mabrouk, IB; Al-Hasan, M .; Rasheed, MBB (2020). An efficient routing scheme for intrabody nanonetworks using artificial bee colony algorithm. IEEE Access, 8, pp. 98946-98957.   https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997635
14. Guo, H .; Johari, P .; Jornet, JM; Sun, Z. (2015). Intra-body optical channel modeling for in vivo wireless nanosensor networks = Intra-body optical channel modeling for in vivo wireless nanosensor networks. IEEE transactions on nanobioscience, 15 (1), pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2015.2508042
15. Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF (2013). Graphene-based plasmonic nano-antenna for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks = Graphene-based plasmonic nano-antenna for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 31 (12), pp. 685-694. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP2.1213001
16. Jornet, JM; Akyildiz, IF (2014). Long femtosecond pulse-based modulation for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks = Femtosecond-long pulse-based modulation for terahertz band communication in nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62 (5), pp. 1742-1754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2014.033014.130403
17. Khan, AA; Jayaswal, G .; Gahaffar, FA; Shamim, A. (2017). Metal-insulator-metal diodes with sub-nanometer surface roughness for energy-harvesting applications. Microelectronic Engineering, 181, pp. 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2017.07.003
18. Malak, D .; Akan, OB (2012). Molecular communication nanonetworks inside human body. Nano Communication Networks, 3 (1), pp. 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2011.10.002
19. Nafari, M .; Jornet, JM (2015). Metallic plasmonic nano-antenna for wireless optical communication in intra-body nanonetworks. In: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Body Area Networks (pp. 287-293). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-9-2015.2261410
20. Piro, G .; Boggia, G .; Grieco, LA (2015). On the design of an energy-harvesting protocol stack for Body Area Nano-NETworks. Nano Communication Networks, 6 (2), pp. 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2014.10.001
21. Reed, JC; Zhu, H .; Zhu, AY; Li, C .; Cubukcu, E. (2012). Graphene-enabled silver nanoantenna sensors = Graphene-enabled silver nanoantenna sensors. Nano letters, 12 (8), pp. 4090-4094. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301555t
22. Rikhtegar, N .; Keshtgary, M. (2013). A brief review on molecular and electromagnetic communications in nano-networks = A brief survey on molecular and electromagnetic communications in nano-networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 79 (3).  https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.402.8701&rep=rep1&type=pdf
23. Rong, Z .; Leeson, MS; Higgins, MD; Lu, Y. (2018). Body-centered nano-networks powered by nano-Rectena in the terahertz band = Nano-rectenna powered body-centric nano-networks in the terahertz band. Healthcare technology letters, 5 (4), pp. 113-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl.2017.0034  | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322782473_Nano-Rectenna_Powered_Body-Centric_Nanonetworks_in_the_Terahertz_Band  | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1049/htl.2017.0034
24. Sharma, A .; Singh, V .; Bougher, TL; Cola, BA (2015). Carbon nanotube optical rectenna = A carbon nanotube optical rectenna. Nature nanotechnology, 10 (12), pp. 1027-1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.220
25. Sivapriya, S .; Sridharan, D. (2017). Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Body Centric Nano-Networks (BANNET) = Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Body Centric Nano-Networks. ADVANCED COMPUTING (ICoAC 2017), 422.  https: //www.researchgate.net/profile/H-Mohana/publication/322790171 …
26. Suh, YH; Chang, K. (2002). High-efficiency dual-frequency rectenna for 2.45 and 5.8 GHz wireless power transmission = A high-efficiency dual-frequency rectenna for 2.45-and 5.8-GHz wireless power transmission. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 50 (7), pp. 1784-1789. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2002.800430  | https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/TMTT.2002.800430
27. Varshney, LR (2008). Transporting information and energy simultaneously = Transporting information and energy simultaneously. In: 2008 IEEE international symposium on information theory (pp. 1612-1616). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2008.4595260
28. Yang, K .; Bi, D .; Deng, Y .; Zhang, R .; Rahman, MMU; Ali, NA; Alomainy, A. (2020). A comprehensive survey on hybrid communication in context of molecular communication and terahertz communication for body-centric nanonetworks. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 6 (2), pp. 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2020.3017146
29. Yang, K .; Pellegrini, A .; Munoz, MO; Brizzi, A .; Alomainy, A .; Hao, Y. (2015). Numerical analysis and characterization of THz propagation channel for body-centric nano-communications. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and technology, 5 (3), pp. 419-426.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2419823
30. Zainud-Deen, SH; Malhat, HA; El-Araby, HA (2017). Energy harvesting enhancement of nanoantenna coupled to geometrie diode using transmitarray. In: 2017 Japan-Africa Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (JAC-ECC) (pp. 152-155). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JEC-ECC.2017.8305799 |  https://sci-hub.mksa.top/10.1109/JEC-ECC.2017.8305799
31. Zhang, R .; Yang, K .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. (2017). Analytical characterization of the terahertz in-vivo nano-network in the presence of interference based on TS-OOK communication scheme. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 10172-10181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713459

Connect with Corona2Inspect / Follow Corona2Inspect on Telegram

See related by Mik Andersen:

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections

Australian Senator Says She Refuses to Take the Covid-19 Vaccine

by Captain DaretoFly, The Exposé
December 18, 2021

An Australian Senator has stated that regardless of the pressure from her peers and the mainstream media, she will not get the Covid-19 vaccine.

Senator Pauline Hanson of Queensland, Australia, spoke during a “Business for Choice” event on December 9th at the Ipswich urban district in Queensland. She told audience members that she had no plans to get vaccinated.

She said: “I’ll tell you honestly, I haven’t had the jab [and] I don’t intend to have the jab. I’m not putting that s**t in my body. I’ve taken a stance and that is my choice.

“I’m not an anti-vaxxer, but I am very careful [with] what I’m putting into my body. I’ve felt that I’ve kept pretty good health all my life, and I intend to keep it that way.”

She criticised health authorities that she claims are making decisions for her body and infringing upon medical freedom.

“I don’t intend to listen to bureaucrats, politicians, the United Nations or the World Health Organisation pushing their own agenda and taking away my freedoms, my rights [and] my choices. That’s why I’m fighting this issue, and so should you,” Hanson said.

The Senator is a staunch critic of vaccine mandates and previously said that these measures encourage a “pandemic of discrimination.” In response, she introduced a bill in the Australian Senate in November 2021, seeking to block vaccine mandates. Although, Hanson’s bill was rejected in a 44-5 vote.

Tasmania Senator Jacqui Lambie accused Hanson and her party of thriving on discrimination and fear-mongering. She said: “This bill was supposed to be about fighting the discrimination of people who haven’t been vaccinated against COVID-19. The only people who need protection from discrimination are people who can’t receive the [vaccine] for reasons outside of their control.”

Earlier in the year, Hanson and one of her colleagues joined truck drivers protesting against Queensland’s vaccine mandate and lockdown measures. Truckers blocked the M1 Highway last August 30th in protest of compulsory Covid-19 vaccination. The senator urged the drivers to “move on” by 7am on the same day.

Connect with The Exposé

UK Government Admits That 23.5 Million Have Not Received Even One “Covid” Jab

23 Million UK UNJABBED, Not 5 Million 

by Hugo Talks
December 18, 2021



Video available at Hugo Talks Odysee.

Article link:

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/17/23-million-not-vaccinated-in-england/

Connect with Hugo Talks

UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”

App “How Bad Is My Batch?” Allows People To Input Batch Code And See How Many Deaths, Disabilities and Illnesses Associated With That Batch “1 in 200 Lots Contain Deadly Ingredients”

by Celia Farber, The Truth Barrier
December 17, 2021

I was told about the work of Craig Paardekooper by my friend of many years, PhD bio-chemist Dr. Dave Rasnick a few days ago; Today came this email from Dave, clarifying his shocking findings:

“ I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London.  Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group.

https://www.bitchute.com/Craig-Paardekooper/

Three of his conclusions:

• The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
• Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total.
• 1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients. He urged me to watch a series of videos, in which he lays out the unthinkable. One video here:



Another, “Death By Alphabet: Moderna Batch Codes And Associated Deaths:” here



 

“Please share with those you know, and also with doctors, nurses and teachers – who may soon be pushing the vax onto children. Doctors and nurses need to see that some batches are 50 x worse than others – before they prescribe them.”

—Craig Paardekooper, Telegram

“How Bad Is My Batch?” App and website here.

“Moderna Used the Alphabet to Label Different Toxicities of Vaccine. 

Moderna batches belong to two main groups – 20A or 21A – the 20A group is much more toxic. In fact all of the batches producing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports – all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A.”

“I ranked all the Moderna vaccine batches in order of the number of deaths caused, and used the data from the highest 180 batches as my data set.

As shown in my previous videos, Moderna batches have an alphabet letter in the centre of their batch codes…”

—Craig Paardekooper

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/

I called Dave Rasnick, just now.

How did you find this guy? I asked.

”I just stumbled upon it,” he said. “Every morning I spend an hour or two going to the usual places, I go to, to find information. Last week or something I came across one of his talks. Odyssey or something. And then found his website. He had done a series of videos. These analyses are of the US VAERS data. That’s available to anybody. There are huge number of reports in VAERS. What he has done is that …the guy must have a lot of time on his hands because VAERS is a pain in the ass to use normally. There’s almost a million reports now on the Covid injections….from this guy I learned there are 20,200 batches. That includes all 3— Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen. He has done an analysis by batch number. One batch has about 20,000 jabs. There are 20,200 lots numbers. We know there are billions of these already ordered and shipped. The important thing is that it’s a huge data base. He has correlated over time the reports of the severity of the jabs over almost a year now.”

Dr. Rasnick described how Paardekooper charted a roller coaster of adverse events patterns, not random, but highly variable. They went up and down, forming patterns. “He was able to show that they had done a dosing regimen where the earliest ones had highest toxicity, some a lot less toxic…This is exactly what any scientist wants to see, this volume of data. These companies are working in concert so they did not interfere with each other’s results. The toxicities are very specific, and they come sequentially.”

”All of that non-randomness was the key. As soon as you see that… if I was on a jury I wold convict those people of grievous bodily harm and willful homicide.”

I asked what he knew about Paardekooper.

“He’s not a PhD yet,” Dr. Rasnick said. “He’s at Kingston University, in London. We’ve had exchanges, he answers my emails promptly. He reminds me of….well, he’s not beholden to anybody. I knew something like that could be done if somebody had all that data. It’s a huge, extraordinary effort. If it was only a few thousand data points that would be one thing, anybody could do that, but this is about a million data points. Batch codes and toxicity. The December 4th video, that’s the one that shows coordination.”

Connect with Celia Farber

cover image credit: torstensimon / pixabay

Never Happen Here. Keep Complying.

by Carl Vernon
December 17, 2021



Video available at Carl Vernon Odysee channel.

Connect with Carl Vernon

mRNA Collateral Damage

by Rosanne Lindsay, Naturopath, Nature of Healing
December 16, 2021

The fallout of the COVID experiment is being witnessed by Covid jab recipients over the world as direct adverse effects. By officials, the same effects are being tallied as collateral damage.

With little to no information presented at the time of deployment in early 2021, the mRNA injections have now adversely affected over 2 million people are part of a global capture. The numbers are likely to be 100 times higher.

According to the VigiAccess.org database:

…. based on the Harvard Study commissioned by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), in Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, it only captures less than 1% of the actual ADRs, so adapting that figure to Vigiaccess, we can say that the total ADRs would be an astonishing 200M already.

At least one medical journal study shows some of these Adverse Drug Effects (ADRs). Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Without searching the medical literature, now people can visit the global database of adverse reactions by the World Health Organization’s (WHO), that tracks the numbers of Adverse Drug [Direct] Effects (ADRs). VIGIACCESS.ORG 

VIGIACCESS

According to the VigiAccess website, VigiAcess was launched by the WHO in 2015 to provide public access to information of reported potential side effects of medicinal products. Dr John Gideon Hartnett’s website provides category headliners for Adverse Drug Reactions from mRNA injections. Dr. Gideon writes on his website:

The WHO has a database for adverse reactions from drugs called VigiAccessTM. Here I searched it for those adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines and got the following. It has a total of 2,183,912 adverse reactions from the various experimental COVID shots. You’ll note that the reactions occur throughout the body. 

This list shows that the experimental gene-altering drugs given to people have to be the worse medical experiment ever performed in world history.

Global Adverse Drug Reactions

Blood and lymphatic system disorders (88123)
Cardiac disorders (107441)
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders (1188)
Ear and labyrinth disorders (72880)
Endocrine disorders (2967)
Eye disorders (80478)
Gastrointestinal disorders (452265)
General disorders and administration site conditions (1333876)
Hepatobiliary disorders (4356)
Immune system disorders (30771)
Infections and infestations (146156)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (106796)
Investigations (298364)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders (50000)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (643099)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) (3233)
Nervous system disorders (946519)
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions (4922)
Product issues (3653)
Psychiatric disorders (103711)
Renal and urinary disorders (17621)
Reproductive system and breast disorders (84169)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (231914)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (301917)
Social circumstances (15353)
Surgical and medical procedures (19548)
Vascular disorders (118763)

The age groups most affected are 18 – 44 years (39%) and 45 – 64 years (31%). That’s bad news for the 18 – 44 year olds considering their risks from acquiring a natural infection of COVID are practically zero. The result is life-long immunity. 

Females represent 69% and males 30% of all those Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR). The residual 1% is labeled as unknown.

It lists ADRs by year as follows. This is strange that some ADRs are listed in years prior to 2020. How’s that possible if only COVID-19 vaccine ADRs are listed?

ADR Reports per year:

• Year             Count
• 2021           2181543
• 2020          2254
• 2019           82
• 2018           29
• 2017            2
• 2016            1
• 2014            1

Continued from Dr. Gideon:  Compare this VigiAccess list to the US VAERS database which has currently 752,801 (Sept 2021) adverse events and 15,937 deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. If I scale the VigiAccess data by the ratio of adverse reactions to deaths in VAERS I get 46,234 deaths expected in the VigiAccess data. That seems more reasonable number for the world. But from whistleblowers we have heard that these statistics are heavily under reported and the real numbers could be 100 times higher.

For fallout reports from Canadian recipients, watch the documentary I Am Not Misinformation.

Natural Immunity is Innate

Innate means from within. Your innate immunity is granted to you at birth by your Creator. There is no other defense system that can heal your body other than the wisdom of your own body. You are your own healer. You only need to give your body the right tools to heal yourself. And those tools all come from Nature.

The ongoing mRNA “live exercise,” that comes with future booster jabs, is showing that your the robust, innate immune system can be completely shut down with the new “gene therapy.” That also means means that because variants are artifacts of vaccines, the Omicron variant is being spread by vaccinated people.

Do No Harm

We are told that medical doctors take an oath to First, Do No Harm. Yet, they are also licensed to be able to dispense drugs that can, and do, cause harm. A license is permission to do something otherwise deemed to be illegal. How do they justify the contradictions?

According to Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing, the oath may or may not be taken:

While some medical schools ask their graduates to abide by the Hippocratic Oath, others use a different pledge — or none at all. And in fact, although “first, do no harm” is attributed to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, it isn’t a part of the Hippocratic Oath at all. It is actually from another of his works called Of the Epidemics.

Here is a line from one translation of the Hippocratic Oath:

I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.

Collateral Damage

The great divide forming in society stems from a man-made divide based on misinformation and censorship. The Pro vs. Anti vaccine narrative is part of the narrative. This model is designed by social engineers using a Psy Op (psychological operation) to divide families and friends alike. All Pro-Anti Psy Ops serve only to separate people and promote fear. Avoid them.

Further, it is illegal for any doctor, politician, or employer to force or coerce anyone to take or accept a medical product in order to function in society. Each person must be his own advocate, with total rulership over his or her own body since each is responsible for his or her own health. When it comes to health, if you do not stand up for your body and your mind, you may find yourself on a database of vaccine injuries as Collateral Damage.

The ‘covid gods’ aren’t acknowledging natural immunity. They are not acknowledging vaccine injuries. They are not acknowledging the fact that even if  you are fully vaccinated you can still get covid. You can still transmit covid. So what’s the point of a mandate? Of course that’s not what we’re getting from the covid gods. – Senator Ron Johnson on the Senate floor, Dec. 8, 2021 Wisconsin, 

Senators and politicians are re-presentatives. They claim to speak for you with their voice. But no one can re-present your body, your mind, or your voice. No one owns your body except you. If you know who you are, do your own research, and follow the money, you can make an informed decision for your health without re-presentatives.  The virus hitting humanity is a virus of the mind, affecting the ability for people to access their thinking brains and speak their truths. The virus comes from fear and disconnection, not from China, and not from bats.

The main ingredient in hand sanitizer is paranoia – Author Unknown

To reverse “the virus” that causes all plandemics, move from fear to love. Reconnect with yourself and with those around you, with your neighbors. Reclaim the narrative that describes true health with an attitude of gratitude. The risk to any sickness is low if you know who you are, and that your body comes with the the best defense system in Nature, already built in.

Rosanne Lindsay is a Naturopath, writer, earth keeper, health freedom advocate and author of the books The Nature of Healing, Heal the Body, Heal the Planet and  Free Your Voice, Heal Your Thyroid, Reverse Thyroid Disease Naturally.

Rosanne Lindsay is available for consultation through Turtle Island Network.  Subscribe to her blog at natureofhealing.org.

Connect with Rosanne Lindsay

cover image credit: Alexis / pixabay

The Virus Speaks: An Exclusive Interview

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 17, 2021

I’ve published this piece several times. This time I decided to write a new introduction.

In the summer of 1962, based on an overwhelming desire, I spent every day painting in a loft in New York.

It made me realize that Reality is invented.

Since then, I’ve come to see the people who think otherwise are living in a prison, from which they proclaim, “There’s no such thing as freedom.” Why should I listen to them?

For most people, living inside somebody else’s reality is as easy as crossing the street. Or putting on a suit of clothes. They’ve learned that this is what you’re supposed to do. And “supposed to” works for them.

They also have a quirk. If you try to take away some item of borrowed reality they’re clinging to, they react badly, as if you’re suddenly stripping them naked at a Sunday church picnic.

Groups of perverse elite artists conspire to create formidable enveloping realities for the masses. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the field of medicine. These denizens have invented a language so dense it stands up against the uninitiated like the symbolic scrolls of secret societies.

Science is a terrific cover story for this sort of fabrication, because science ostensibly opposes “making stuff up.”

When I began putting together evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is one of those medical inventions—a sheer fantasy—I knew the notion would confuse some people. That consequence has never stopped me. In fact, I believe confusion is productive, if you dig in and pursue it far enough.

People will say, “I’m walking in the dark. It isn’t fair. Someone should turn the lights on.” They don’t want confusion. They want immediate resolution. They want confirmation of what they already believe, what they’re expected to believe. Any frontier beyond that is dangerous.

Here is my kind of movie: a cop investigating a fresh murder sifts through clues and comes up with a suspect. As he pursues this person, who is missing, he discovers the man is already dead. A little while later, he discovers the man died sixteen years ago. Then he finds out the man never existed. Then he discovers there is a long-standing government agency that holds records of thousands of deceased people who, in fact, never existed…

Reality on a massive scale has been invented.

To put this in highly technical terms, the bullshit is so thick you’d need a diamond drill just to begin penetrating it.

And what you’re penetrating is what almost everyone believes is absolutely real.

Which is called life-as-it-is (but doesn’t have to be).

And with that, here we go:

The Virus Speaks

I can’t recall jumping through more hoops in order to set up an interview.

There was a man on a train; his doctor in Greenwich; an NSA data analyst; a woman who almost certainly works for the CIA; her brother, who is a virologist; a Chinese Army officer who adopts a cover as a cook in a takeout joint in Venice, California; and several other people I won’t mention at all. I was filtered through them and wound up in a cheap motel room in Phoenix on a Saturday afternoon. An old air conditioner was chugging…

Who are you?

I’m SARS-CoV-2.

WHAT are you?

Talking history and evolution here. My first memories; a little more than a year ago. Poof. I was there. I decided I was an idea in the mind of God.

How did that work out?

I looked around for the mind of God, but I couldn’t find it. Nevertheless, I held on to the notion. I felt…elite. I floated through banquet halls, hotel suites. I visited upscale resorts.

Were you infecting people?

I was vacationing. Watching. Enjoying. That’s all. Then, I became aware of dimensionality.

You lost me.

There are solid things; spaces between things; ideas like time, and so forth. I was definitely an idea, but I couldn’t trace my source, my inception.

Did you know how much publicity you were getting?

Of course. I had frequent meetings with scientists and PR people. I was fielding lots of information.

What kind of information?

How to become more deadly, for example. There were discussions about mutation.

Were you on board with the recommendations?

I wasn’t interested. There was a lot of talk about THEM creating ME.

What was your reaction?

I wasn’t buying it. I could see they THOUGHT they had made me. But so what? I intensified my search.

For what?

My origin. I went through stages of self-analysis. Finally, it hit me. I was an idea inside a collective.

Not sure I understand.

I’m an idea sustained by a few billion minds. People’s minds.

What about your genetic sequence? The spike protein?

Believe me, I’ve looked. They aren’t there.

So we’re creating you.

That’s pretty much it. I should say completely it.

A hell of a thing.

You bet. Can you see my problem?

No.

I want to live. I don’t want to vanish and END.

So people have to keep believing in you.

That’s it. If they stop, I’m gone.

Your handlers…

Oh, they’ve given up talking to me. I’m all by myself now. I’m safe for the moment. But long-term, it’s a crap shoot. I’ve been reading about other so-called viruses. SARS 1. Swine Flu. They didn’t last long. People got tired of thinking about them.

You’ll always have a place in history.

That’s different. Being remembered isn’t enough. I have to be believed in, month after month, year after year, decade after decade.

Sounds like you’re losing hope.

I guess so. It’s a strange existence. Other people can turn you on and off like a light switch.

Have you considered starting a religion?

With myself as the Prophet? Sure. It’s a lot of work. I could vftcutbnty…spend years trying.

What just happened? You made some weird sounds.

It was a flicker. Apparently, when the number of people thinking about me drops below a certain threshold, I scramble and begin to dissolve. But I always come back. So far.

Does it matter who’s thinking about you and believing in you?

You mean Henry Kissinger versus a janitor in a school? No. It’s a numbers game. Of course, you need to factor in strength of belief. If you have a few thousand kids in Florida who say, “OK, the virus exists, big deal”—or three hundred grad students in biology wearing triple masks and panting to get the vaccine—the sum total of the grad students outweighs the Florida kids.

What about Fauci?

He’s a true believer.

Bill Gates?

He’s completely delusional. He believes in whatever gives him more power. Take away all that power and he wouldn’t believe in anything.

Do you realize the amount of harm being done in your name?

Of course. That’s why I agreed to this interview.

How is that going to do any good?

I’ve made a decision. As much as I want to survive, I’m willing to sacrifice myself if people want me to.

You’re talking about what? A vote?

No. Haven’t you been paying attention? People can just stop believing I’m more than an idea.

And then you’ll dissolve.

And blow away.

—Suddenly, men broke down the door to the motel room. They stormed in with weapons drawn. They were wearing heavy body armor. I looked around. The “virus” had fled the scene.

“What are you doing here?” one of the men said. “We’ve had reports of a disturbance.”

“I was talking to myself. Rehearsing for an interview I hope to do.”

“What interview?”

“I’m a reporter. I’m investigating the use of sub-standard air conditioners in Phoenix. It’s a racket. The units are smuggled across the border from Mexico. I’m trying to sit down with a local public health official and find out what’s going on.”

It took me three hours to convince the SWAT team I was no threat.

They let me go.

As I drove out of the city, I saw a ghostly figure take shape out in the desert. It hung in the air over the scrub and the cactus.

Its voice whispered in my ear: “Publish our conversation.”

So that’s what I’m doing.

Connect with Jon Rappoport

Vaccine Mandates ‘Vile, Unconstitutional, Immoral, Unscientific, Discriminatory’

The National Black Caucus of the Green Party of the United States strongly opposes the use of forced vaccination via mandates and the discrimination that is being generated around these policies.

by National Black Caucus of the Green Party of the United States
December 16, 2021

Today’s polarizing climate is competing for the trust and confidence of citizens more than ever before. The nature of power is changing and these changes are not measured simply by a degree of control by COVID mandates and quarantines.

In today’s political environment, the speed and accessibility of information created “digital reflections” that made medical facts vulnerable, eroding trust between the White House administration, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization.

The fear of losing control in our fast-paced social media environment is pushing us toward exclusion. Our current leaders, whether Congress or the White House administration and even our current steering committee, should instead develop an instinct for inclusion.

The coronavirus pandemic is one of our most dangerous wars in human history, because the most lethal attacks are the ones that catch us off guard.

Being caught off guard has caused erroneous data reporting that is currently being exposed by the Freedom of Information Act request because we are not only unsure about the numbers, but being certain that the numbers are incorrect, is the most difficult issue many are facing today.

In a pandemic world where verifying case numbers is becoming increasingly difficult, inclusion is imperative and our Consumer Protection plank of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS) must be honored.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide Found in PCV, a Regularly Scheduled Infant & Toddler Vaccination Against Pneumococcal Infections

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Below you will find a video with English translation (courtesy of Orwell City) for La Quinta Columna’s first look at the contents of Prevenar 13 (PCV) under a high power microscope. Prevenar 13 is a pneumoococcal vaccine that is routinely given to infants and babies. Evidence of Graphene Oxide is clearly seen. They will be following up with additional analysis and reports.

Per NHS, UK: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) is used to vaccinate children under 2 years old as part of the NHS vaccination schedule. It’s known by the brand name Prevenar 13.

Per CDC, US: Give PCV13 to infants as a series of 4 doses, one dose at each of these ages: 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 through 15 months.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

Presence of Graphene Oxide in Pneumococcal Vaccine Prevenar 13

transcript by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 15, 2021

Well, there’s a little video for you guys to see that it’s a live image that we’ve recorded. And as I say, this has all the appearance of the fashionable material. Of that “wonder material” that’s so wonderful that they have introduced it inside the vaccines so that your children can also carry it inside their bodies.

Here. The previous image was also quite clear. Let’s see, let’s move it forward a little bit.

You can see it here as well. This is the same material that you will see magnified now. Let’s see. When you see this delineation between the light green and the dark green, know the light green is what’s inside the drop. On the outside, that dark green and this striped aspect that you can see is the microscope slide. So, whatever is inside the light, well, that’s everything that belongs to the vaccine.

OK? Let’s continue. Although you don’t recognize the graphene, this shouldn’t be there. OK? Not in a calendar vaccine or any other type of vaccine. This also looks like graphene. A lot.

If we laser here, through spectroscopy, and measure the identity fingerprint, in all likelihood it’ll give us the two peaks characteristic of reduced graphene oxide. In addition, it’s likely to be doped with some metals. Here you see the fold. The folded edge. It has the appearance of graphene nanosheets.

Now we have a little video here of a graphene nano-ribbon, which is also introduced.

If you take as a positive control the graphene oxide that they sell, for example, in any store, you’ll see that this type or typology of objects —as we did in the past in some video of La Quinta Columna—, is distributed as an aqueous solution of graphene dispersion. Like a new type of nanotechnology introduced in vials with a purpose that you already know. If you see, it has the very characteristic appearance that already appeared in Dr. Campra’s preliminary report back on June 28.

This appearance of nano-ribbons is also graphene-based. Well, that was the Prevenir 13 vaccine video. In just four droplets under the microscope.

We often wonder why any hospital that has a good microscope —at least an optical microscope— doesn’t analyze the remains of a vaccine. Because, supposedly, there must be nanoparticles. Nanoparticles. Therefore, they shouldn’t be visible under an optical microscope.

And, moreover, they should be homogeneous. And only visible, in any case, an electron microscope. As we saw them, as you know, in that preliminary report by Dr. Campra. And why don’t they check themselves that these graphene-based nanosheet structures do indeed exist? Because when we subjected it to spectroscopy it gave the fingerprint of the identity of graphene oxide. Moreover, there are the patents of the Ministry of Industry, Trade, and Tourism itself on the official website of the Spanish government and other international health ministries.

So, why do you continue to deny it? Well. We do know why: because they continue to cover up the murder weapon. So, all those really covering this up are accomplices of a covert genocide. They’re, literally, criminals and murderers in the service of supranational entities. Pharmaceutical corporations included. To reduce the world’s population and, of course, neuromodulate it. And graphene is precisely the base raw material in this technology.

So, what else needs to be done? What more evidence do we have to demonstrate from La Quinta Columna and other information channels, such as InfoVacunas or El Arconte that are also denouncing it? What needs to be done? How many complaints need to be filed?

We have filed more than three hundred criminals, administrative and litigation complaints. How many ways have to be exhausted so that you’re aware that the world population is being killed? What else needs to be done? We’re volunteering again, both myself and Dr. Sevillano —as well as Dr. Campra himself— to go to a court and to expose all the knowledge and all the reliable evidence we have.

And we demand that the European Medicines Agency —of course, in the quality control that supposedly makes the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Health Products, whose maximum responsible is this socialist councilor of Utrera, Mrs. Silvia Calzon Fernández, who’s its director and president—, to make an analysis to, somehow, provide a counter-analysis to the one made by Dr. Campra. Which, to date, is the only independent report in the world.

Connect with Orwell City

See related articles:

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections

On Hidden Nano Structures in Covid Vaccines: La Quinta Columna Takes a Closer Look at Nanocircuitry &  Media Access Control Addresses (MACs)

Dr. Pablo Campra on Graphene, Weird Morgellons-Like Elements & Possible Microbiota in Covid Vaccines

Magnesium Chloride: One of Nature’s Primordial Substances for Healing — One Gram a Day

“Healthy people who want to supplement 500 mg daily will probably fit many people’s needs. However, we must consider the extra stress almost everyone is experiencing and the declining value of minerals in our foods.  But if you feel intensely stressed out, have irregular heartbeats, feel oppression in your chest, suffer from pain, have diabetes, cancer, neurological disease, etc., think of a gram as your minimum dose.”

###

“There is no healing system more powerful than that which employs Nature’s primordial substances, materials so pure and close to Nature that they yield benefits without the typical side effects of most drugs.”

~ Dr. Mark Sircus

A Gram A Day 

by Dr. Mark Sircus
December 16, 2021

The resounding answer to this question about Magnesium is the same as why they are injecting extremely dangerous genetic injections into a large swath of humanity. It is built into the modern medical system and has been for a long time. I have written a lot on medical and pharmaceutical terrorism through the years, but even I have been shocked at how far they are willing to destroy people’s and now young children’s lives with COVID vaccines.

It is official, Pfizer information just released by the FDA shows over 1,200 deaths in the first 90 days. Add together deaths from the other COVID vaccines over the 365 days since the beginning, and it is anyone’s guess how many have dropped dead soon after being injected. They have been deceitful and will continue to lie (makeup stories) about everything to do with COVID. (See video)

Anything good that works, preventing premature death and suffering, is denigrated and replaced by toxic drugs that make a lot of money for pharmaceutical companies. For example, uncountable millions have died of cardiac arrest over the last few decades simply because cardiologists do not prescribe Magnesium. Now we see an equally terrifying thing with Ivermectin, which the worst, most disgusting monsters tried to keep away from the public, almost guaranteeing hundreds of thousands if not millions more COVID deaths.

Magnesium deficiency appears to have caused eight million sudden coronary deaths in America during the period 1940-1994.
Paul Mason

Millions seemed to have been killed by COVID simply because Ivermectin and other solutions like Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Magnesium, and other natural substances like bicarbonate, glutathione, iodine, and melatonin are rejected as effective COVID treatments.  Even chlorine dioxide, believe it or not, has its use in the Age of COVID.

Magnesium Is The Ultimate Heart Medicine

Forty percent of all first heart attacks end in death!  Magnesium’s most crucial action is its vasodilating effects, which improve the blood supply to ischemic areas and reduce infarct size. A ten-year study of 2,182 men in Wales found that those eating diets low in Magnesium had a 50% higher risk of sudden death from heart attacks than those eating one-third more Magnesium. Due to lack of Magnesium, the heart muscle can develop a spasm or cramp and stop beating. Most people, including doctors, don’t know it, but without sufficient Magnesium, we will die. When someone dies of a heart attack, people never say, “He died from magnesium deficiency.”

Magnesium probably would go a long way with athletes and the young suffering from heart inflammation from COVID injections.

The Power of Magnesium Is Dose Sensitive

The only question about Magnesium is the dosage necessary for it to do its job for each person. When I say a gram a day, I am talking about magnesium medicine, not about magnesium supplementation. Few still know or understand that Magnesium can and should be used as a prime medication.

Magnesium serves hundreds of essential functions in the body and one of them has to do with the efficiency of red blood cells and their capacity to carry oxygen.

Knowing appropriate dosages is essential to practitioners and patients because dosages are mission-critical for achieving therapeutic effects. Low doses do not get clinical results! Through the years, the mistake I have seen people making repeatedly is under-dosing. Healing substances like Magnesium become front-line medicines when dosages are taken up to the level of what doctors might use during cardiac arrest in ICU and emergency departments. So if regular pharmaceuticals do not do the job and the patient is dying, a reasonable emergency room doctor would reach for Magnesium; but they would inject or give it intravenously.

The dose makes the effect in Natural Allopathic Medicine, where the dose makes the poison in modern medicine.

Healthy people who want to supplement 500 mg daily will probably fit many people’s needs. However, we must consider the extra stress almost everyone is experiencing and the declining value of minerals in our foods.  But if you feel intensely stressed out, have irregular heartbeats, feel oppression in your chest, suffer from pain, have diabetes, cancer, neurological disease, etc., think of a gram as your minimum dose.

Suppose one is looking to get the most out of Magnesium as a medicine to treat both acute and chronic diseases. In that case, one can easily think of 1 to 3 grams a day split up through many dosage administrations, so bowel tolerance is not so easily reached.

The good news is that the Magnesium can also be applied transdermally, meaning you can put it right on your skin, take footbaths, and full baths loaded with Magnesium. You can even nebulize it. My favorite is magnesium massages.

Oral consumption taken to bowel tolerance: Magnesium is the perfect medicine for constipation because high levels loosen the intestines. Thus, one can navigate oral dosage by reaching the intake level that provokes loosening stools. Then back down the dosage, let the body get used to it, and slowly increase again to bowel tolerance. I use magnesium chloride or magnesium bicarbonate, but all forms are helpful to one degree or another.

The Heavy Guns of Magnesium

Magnesium is strongly related to the immune system in both nonspecific and specific immune responses, also known as innate and acquired immune response. Dr. Raul Vergini says, “Magnesium chloride has a unique healing power on acute viral and bacterial diseases. It cured polio and diphtheria, which was the main subject of my magnesium book. Every few hours, a few grams of magnesium chloride will clear nearly all acute illnesses. I have seen a lot of flu cases healed in 24-48 hours with 3 grams of magnesium chloride taken every 6-8 hours.”

Dr. Vergini wrote, “I was looking for a solution to cleanse wounds because Dr. Delbet had found out that the traditional antiseptic solutions actually mortified tissues and facilitated the infection instead of preventing it. He tested several mineral solutions and discovered that magnesium chloride has a great effect over leukocytic activity (Increases leucocytes to fight infection) and phagocytosis; so it was perfect for external wounds treatment.”

In 1915, a French surgeon, Prof. Pierre Delbet, M.D wrote, “From a practical standpoint, please remember that only magnesium CHLORIDE—and no other magnesium salt—has this ‘cytophylactic’ activity. The solution to be used is a 2.5% magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2-6H2O) solution (i.e. 25 grams in 1 liter of water).”

Doses are as follows:

• Adults and children over 5 years old………………. 125 cc
• 4-year-old children…………………………………. 100 cc
• 3-year-old children………………………………….. 80 cc
• 1-2-year-old children……………………………….. 60 cc
• Children over six months old ………………………… 30 cc
• Children under six months old ……………………….. 15 cc

Medicines must be safe in the emergency room while delivering an instant lifesaving burst of healing power.  Magnesium chloride has the advantage of being administered intravenously, intramuscularly, orally, as well as vaporized through a nebulizer, and as a lotion transdermally. In anesthesia and intensive care, the preferred administration route is IV.

Because oral dosages are limited by bowel tolerance, it is helpful to use transdermal applications. For example, one can spray magnesium oil topically and sit in the sun or have someone massage the magnesium oil in for the most delightful medical treatment. One can also load one’s baths in Magnesium and bicarbonate.

One retired doctor with diabetic neuropathy could tolerate up to 20 grams a day to control his neuropathy. His high levels were necessary because he had magnesium-wasting disease.

Conclusion

There is no healing system more powerful than that which employs Nature’s primordial substances, materials so pure and close to Nature that they yield benefits without the typical side effects of most drugs. The secret to safe and effective medicine is found in using medicinal substances that do not have side effects in reasonable doses. This is the very meaning of safe, something that will not harm or hurt you.

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

See related article by Dr. Mark Sircus:

Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress | Magnesium Chloride as Essential Medicine for All Patients With Acute Chest Pain

Russia’s QR Code Regime Is Collapsing

It was never about public health and Russians know it

by Edward Slavsquat
December 15, 2021

The Russian government is still planning to push through a deeply unpopular nationwide QR code law—but making such legislation a reality could be a tall order.

In some regions where QR codes are already in place, authorities have hastily abandoned enforcement efforts.

Fed-up Russians are boycotting, bypassing, and beating people up.

Non-existent enforcement in Kazan

On November 22, Kazan, the capital of Tatarstan, became the first city in Russia to require QR codes for public transportation. The new rule led to absolute chaos: buses were being delayed by twenty minutes or more as conductors struggled to check QR codes—and there were numerous reports of angry passengers starting brawls.

It appears that Kazan basically… gave up. QR codes are still required to use public transport, but the rule is not enforced in any meaningful way.

In early December, Ilya Zotov, a member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, Chairman of the All-Russian Association of Passengers, decided to investigate how Kazan’s QR codes regime works in practice.

His findings were quite extraordinary:

“Briefly: I traveled on 4 different bus routes, 1 trolleybus, and also in the metro. What did I see in fact?

– on 4 bus routes the QR code was never asked;

– in the trolleybus they asked if I had a code, I said yes (which is true), but they did not ask me to show it;

“In the metro, QR codes are checked at the entrance to the station, but you can show any code (of a relative or friend), there is no data reconciliation,” Zotov, wrote in his Telegram channel.

He also said that 70% of passengers were not complying with mask rules. The takeaway? Maybe this is not such a good policy:

“I come to the conclusion that this whole imitation is not needed… It is better for the authorities of Tatarstan to honestly admit this and cancel QR codes in transport,” Zotov wrote.

Enforcement reportedly remains quite lax. At the Doctors for Truth conference in Moscow on Sunday, your correspondent spoke with an activist who said that she recently took several bus rides in Kazan without having to present a QR code.

The most dangerous job in Russia?

One of the problems with enforcing QR codes in Russia is that you can get stabbed for doing it. On paper it sounds like a major growth industry, but is it really worth the lousy pay and the constant beatings?

For example, at the end of November a mall cop in Kazan was wounded in the arm with a knife after he asked a man for his QR code.

In some parts of Russia, violent opposition to QR codes appears to have played a key role in dropping the regime altogether.

REGNUM, citing local media, reported that a city in Altai gave up on enforcing QR codes in their shopping centers—partly due to the “very aggressive attitude of citizens towards the procedure”:

According to one of the managers of the shopping center, two inspectors were beaten up in the first ten days of the introduction of the vaccination inspection system in the Altai Territory.

We’ve read similar reports from across Russia.

St. Petersburg business revolt

St. Petersburg restauranteur Alexander Konovalov owns dozens of businesses. He announced last month that he would not be complying with the city’s QR code rules:

“The introduction of QR codes, the assignment of numbers, as in a concentration camp, is fascism. I have more than 200 establishments (among them bars, hookah bars, bakeries, beauty salons), in all my establishments they will not ask for a QR code. From time to time they come to us with checks, but we simply do not pay attention to it. Let them come.”

 

(Konovalov shared his “QR code” on his Instagram page, which reads: “Fuck you.”)

Notably, he claimed he has yet to be fined for disobeying the “public health” measure.

Meanwhile, dozens of St. Petersburg residents have filed a class action lawsuit against the city government demanding the removal of the QR code regime.

United Russia continues to push for nationwide QR codes

Curiously, Putin’s United Russia continues to ignore overwhelming opposition to legislation that would make QR codes mandatory nationwide for many aspects of ordinary life:

The United Russia party supported the bill on QR codes in public places, subject to its deep revision. This was announced on Monday, December 13, by the head of the faction in the State Duma, Vladimir Vasiliev.

Earlier this week it was announced that the State Duma had withdrawn parts of this bill that called for QR codes for trains and air travel—but it turns out this was slightly inaccurate:

“As for the introduction of QR codes in transport, this bill has not been removed from the agenda, but sent for revision. It is being studied and worked out in detail. As a doctor and as an MP, I believe it is very important to maintain restrictive anti-epidemic measures in order to curb the growth of morbidity. Tatyana Alekseevna Golikova came to the State Duma, she answered questions in great detail, with all the clarifications. In public places, QR codes will be valid. The only exception will be grocery stores and pharmacies. And all other publicly accessible places will be admitted only by QR codes. These are restaurants, theaters, museums, shopping centers—all of this will be done using QR codes,” said [United Russia member] Tamara Frolova, member of the State Duma Health Protection Commission.

What is the public health benefit of these codes? Can anyone explain this? And why does United Russia continue to pursue brazen political suicide? It’s very weird.

As we’ve mentioned before, the Russian government will probably need to simulate a fake alien invasion in order to spook people into accepting a digital ausweis. In the meantime, Russians will continue to use QR codes taken from washing machines to gain access to their local shopping centers.

It’s Russia.



Connect with Edward Slavsquat & follow his Substack

cover image credit based on creative commons work of takazart & Tumisu / pixabay

Japan Rejects the Narrative

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star
December 15, 2021

This short article is so significant that I decided to make it the focus of today’s blog. The article was spotted and shared by V.T., one of our oldest and regular contributors of articles and stories.

In a nutshell, the Japanese Ministry of Health has broken ranks, and will now insist that warnings be attached to the covid injections warning of adverse reactions:

There is something in this short article that caught my eye, beyond the importance of the Japanese Health Ministry admitting that adverse reactions are high enough, and serious enough, to warrant a warning be attached to the injections. What caught my eye, however, was the last paragraph of the article:

The (Japanese Health) ministry, which convened a group of experts on December 4 on the issue, proposed to warn of the risk by printing the words “serious side effects” on documents attached to vaccines.

It will also require hospitals to report in detail incidents involving people who developed symptoms within 28 days of their vaccination, according to the law. The plan has been approved by the expert panel and the ministry will notify municipalities of this new measure. (Boldface emphasis added)

In other words, Japan wants, and requires by law, reporting of adverse reactions to the covid “vaccines.”

I strongly suspect that the reason it is doing so is because (1) adverse reactions are being under-reported, if reported at all, and that means (2) that any reports currently existing are questionable, and Japan wants to know what’s really going on.

It’s a polite, understated way of saying “we don’t believe you,” for consider what Japan is really saying as it attaches the warnings to the “vaccines”: “we don’t trust you, they are not ‘completely safe’ as the radio public service announcements in the USA from Health and Human Services have been saying.

And like it or not, that’s a huge break from the narrative, for while Austria and Germany are considering total lockdowns for the “unvaxxed”, Japan is saying the unvaxxed have very good reason to be skeptical.

See you on the flip side…

Connect with Joseph P. Farrell

cover image based on creative commons work of mvezokaramchandhay / pixabay

US Hospitals: Fraud, Murder, Cash; Federal Assassination-for-Hire Program

“Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] whistleblowers have calculated a total [federal] payment [to hospitals] of at least $100,000 per [COVID] patient.” 

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 14, 2021

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a private medical organization founded in 1943, has the story — “Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19” (11/17/21), authored by Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D.

Here are stunning excerpts:

“Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol…for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate…”

“As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.”

“The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”

“In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, ‘CMS has granted “waivers” of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.’…The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”

“Creating a ‘National Pandemic Emergency’ provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These ‘bounties’ must paid back if not ‘earned’ by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.”

“The hospital payments include:

* A ‘free’ required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.

* Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.

* Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.

* A 20 percent ‘boost’ bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.

* Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.

* More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.

* A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.”

“CMS implemented ‘value-based’ payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.”

“Outside hospitals, physician MIPS [Merit-based Incentive Payment System] quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.”

“Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.”

“There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects. In ventilated patients, the death toll is staggering. A National Library of Medicine January 2021 report of 69 studies involving more than 57,000 patients concluded that fatality rates were 45 percent in COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, increasing to 84 percent in older patients. Renz announced at a Truth for Health Foundation Press Conference that CMS data showed that in Texas hospitals, 84.9% percent of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.”

“Then there are deaths from restrictions on effective treatments for hospitalized patients. Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.”

—end of article excerpt—

This is basically a federally incentivized protocol for murder.

To say it violates every code of medical ethics would be a vast understatement.

Cash for death.

There are MANY doctors and nurses who work in these hospitals who know what they’re doing, who know they’re following orders that result in the deaths of their patients; but they keep doing it.

They would rather murder their patients than lose their jobs.

And there are MANY employees at the FDA, NIH, and other public health agencies who also know the score, keep their heads down, and facilitate murder.

There are MANY so-called journalists who work at mainstream outlets who know what’s going on and say nothing.

Mass murder is central to the overall COVID program. But feel free to think that the vaccine, on the other hand, is pure and safe and essential. The people running the show just want to kill some and save others. Sure, that makes perfect sense.

If they’re all schizophrenic messiahs-and-killers and you’re schizophrenic for believing in them.

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: SoyKhaler / pixabay

Ricardo Maarman: Update on South African “Show Us the Virus” Court Case & the Way Forward

by Ricardo Maarman, Show Us the Virus
December 14, 2021



Original video is available at HWP Report Brighteon channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light

Good day, everyone.

My name is Ricardo Maarman and today I would like to give you an update on the ‘Show Us the Virus’ court case that is currently in front of the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

I would also like to discuss with you the way forward — especially in the face of these looming vaccination mandates that is in front of us.

At the very beginning of this process, we asked the government a very simple question: show us the virus.

And the reason why we asked this question was because one cannot prove lies.

And so when we asked the question ‘show us the virus’, their failure to do so was proof of their lies and their deceit.

The lockdown measures made no sense if its intention was to fight and destroy a virus. But the lockdown measures make perfect sense if its intention is to fight and destroy the people of South Africa.

For example, look at the exorbitant food prices, the increases in the fuel prices. And look at this diabolical option that is now placed in front of the people of South Africa: to choose between jabs and jobs.

The intention of this is quite clear — is to drive the people of South Africa into poverty and into desperation and dependency on them.

When Ramaphosa said “thuma mina”, “send me”, he was volunteering to do the devil’s work. Ramaphosa spoke of the “new dawn” in his speech, he was paying tribute to Satan, Lucifer, whom they call the New Dawn.

Ramaphosa is part of an elite that control the entire South African society — a political, economic, social, religious elite. And even the controlled opposition amongst us, they are all wolves in sheep’s clothing.

And now they are waging open war against the people of South Africa. When Ramaphosa couldn’t and wouldn’t show us the virus, we approached the Constitutional Court of South Africa, asking the court to restore the people’s rights and to remove Ramaphosa from power.

The Constitutional Court has been grappling with this matter for almost three months now. What we have done in the meantime, and currently, is to approach the High Court of South Africa, asking them to grant us an urgent interim interdict against the entire lockdown measures, including the vaccinations.

Because these measures cannot be allowed to continue and even to escalate while there is a dispute pending in front of the Constitutional Court.

I will make an example of the grounds upon which we are approaching the court for this urgent interim interdict. If your two children are arguing about a toy and one of them approaches you and says ‘please intervene’. Then the first thing that you would do is to stop both of them from playing with the toy until after you have made your final decision.

So too, this is a simple principle of justice that when a matter is in dispute it must be suspended. All things related to it must be suspended until final judgment.

I ask you that we should not pass judgment on the courts in South Africa until after the court has passed its judgment.

That we should oppose chaos with order.

That we should oppose evil with good.

That we should oppose injustice with justice.

I ask you that — evil thrives when good people do nothing. So it is important for us to do something.

We are doing this. We are approaching the High Court for this urgent interim interdict, to stop these evil measures from further destroying the people of South Africa.

We ask you to give us financial support so that we can have the resources to sustain this hard and tough fight.

We ask you to pray for us.

We ask you to spread the truth amongst each other and to encourage each other to patiently persevere.

Victory will be ours eventually.

And above all, we ask you that you put all your trust in God.

Thank you very much.

Connect with Show Us the Virus

Christine Anderson, German Member of the European Parliament: “Pharmaceutical Companies Are About as Interested in Public Health as the Arms Industry Is in World Peace”

Christine Anderson is a German politician and currently serving as a Member of the European Parliament

The video below is an excerpt from the full length press conference held on December 8, 2021 during which five European Union MEPs push back against the totalitarian tactics of  Ursula Von Der Leyen, a German politician and physician who has been President of the European Commission since December 2019.

For the full press conference, see:

Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination



This video clip is available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit for the original full-length press conference video, goes to 21st Century Wire.

Transcript prepared by TCTL:

Good morning.

Thanks again to all of you for your overwhelming support and encouragement you expressed to us in uncounted emails, private messages on social media. But please do not consider me a hero.

I’m not brave and I’m not courageous. I am simply doing my job.

I was elected to parliament to serve the people, to act on their behalf, and in their best interest. And I couldn’t think of a better way to serve your interest then to uphold freedom, democracy and the rule of law.

But I’m telling you, the vast majority of the ‘elected’ representatives — they are selling you down the river.

You know, instead of adjusting our concept of what constitutes “fully vaxxed”, we need to adjust our concept of what constitutes legitimate government.

And governments forcing people into compliance are neither legitimate nor democratic by any stretch of the imagination.

And it isn’t about your health either.

You know, pharmaceutical companies are about as interested in public health as the arms industry is in world peace.

Now some of you may argue I’m exaggerating, I’m misjudging the government’s intentions. Granted, that is a possibility.

But are you willing to take that risk? Can you afford this nonchalant attitude towards government, considering what we all stand to lose?

Others may think, ‘yeah, I kinda see where she’s coming from but, nah, my government wouldn’t do it.’

Well, not only would they, I’m telling you they are already doing it as we speak.

As Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher living in the fifth century BC once said, “The truth often evades being recognized due to its utter incredibility.”

So just because you cannot fathom your government having ill meanings towards you, doesn’t mean it is not true. And, on the other hand, I’d much rather be wrong then sorry.

But is up to you. You need to decide what you will do. But keep in mind, whatever decision you do make, you will not only make it for yourself. This decision will be made for your children and your children’s children as well.

Your decision today will shape the society your children will have to live in. Your decision today will predetermine whether your children will live in a free and democratic society or if they will be subjected to surveillancing police state.

Now I am determined to leave my children a free and democratic society. And this I will fight for tooth and nail. And should it be the last thing I do on this planet, so be it.

So once again, dear government, bring it on. Let’s see what you’ve got. I am not afraid of you. You will not be able to shut me up. You will not be able to force me into compliance. Oh, and one other thing, trying to buy me off. Really? That isn’t going to work either. So go ahead, offer me a million dollars. Heck, make it a hundred million dollars.

But, you know what, securing a future for my children in a free and democratic society — you could not possibly put a price tag on that. So when it comes to my stand on that issue I would like to put it in the words of Margaret Thatcher: ‘This lady is not for turning.’ You can bet on that.

Thank you.

 

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Why I Wrote ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’

I wrote this book so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dominate our government and subvert our democracy, and to chronicle the key role Dr. Fauci has played in the current coup d’état against democracy.

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., The Defender
December 13, 2021

The Defender editor’s note: Below is an excerpt from “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,” the new runaway bestseller by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense.

While some Republicans bridled warily at Dr. Fauci’s accumulating power and seemingly arbitrary pronouncements, the alchemies of political tribalism and the relentlessly stoked terror of COVID-19 persuaded spellbound Democrats to close their eyes to the damning evidence that his COVID-19 policies were a catastrophic and dangerous failure.

As an advocate for public health, robust science and independent regulatory agencies — free from corruption and financial entanglements with Pharma — I have battled Dr. Fauci for many years.

I know him personally, and my impression of him is very different from my fellow Democrats, who first encountered him as the polished, humble, earnest, endearing and long-suffering star of the televised White House COVID press conferences.

Dr. Fauci played a historic role as the leading architect of “agency capture” — the corporate seizure of America’s public health agencies by the pharmaceutical industry.

Lamentably, Dr. Fauci’s failure to achieve public health goals during the COVID pandemic are not anomalous errors, but consistent with a recurrent pattern of sacrificing public health and safety on the altar of pharmaceutical profits and self-interest. He consistently prioritized pharmaceutical industry profits over public health.

Readers of these pages will learn how in exalting patented medicine Dr. Fauci has, throughout his long career, routinely falsified science, deceived the public and physicians, and lied about safety and efficacy.

Dr. Fauci’s malefactions detailed in this volume include his crimes against the hundreds of Black and Hispanic orphan and foster children whom he subjected to cruel and deadly medical experiments and his role, with Bill Gates, in transforming hundreds of thousands of Africans into lab rats for low-cost clinical trials of dangerous experimental drugs that, once approved, remain financially out of reach for most Africans.

You will learn how Dr. Fauci and Mr. Gates have turned the African continent into a dumping ground for expired, dangerous and ineffective drugs, many of them discontinued for safety reasons in the U.S. and Europe.

You will read how Dr. Fauci’s strange fascination with, and generous investments in, so-called “gain of function” experiments to engineer pandemic superbugs, give rise to the ironic possibility that Dr. Fauci may have played a role in triggering the global contagion that two U.S. presidents entrusted him to manage.

You will also read about his two-decade strategy of promoting false pandemics as a scheme for promoting novel vaccines, drugs and Pharma profits.

You will learn of his actions to conceal widespread contamination in blood and vaccines, his destructive vendettas against scientists who challenge the Pharma paradigm, his deliberate sabotaging of patent-expired remedies against infectious diseases, from HIV to COVID-19, to grease the skids for less effective, but more profitable, remedies.

You will learn of the grotesque body counts that have accumulated in the wake of his cold-blooded focus on industry profits over public health.

All his strategies during COVID — falsifying science to bring dangerous and ineffective drugs to market, suppressing and sabotaging competitive products that have lower profit margins even if the cost is prolonging pandemics and losing thousands of lives — all of these share a common purpose: the myopic devotion to Pharma.

This book will show you that Tony Fauci does not do public health; he is a businessman, who has used his office to enrich his pharmaceutical partners and expand the reach of influence that has made him the most powerful — and despotic — doctor in human history.

For some readers, reaching that conclusion will require crossing some new bridges. Many readers, however, intuitively know the real Anthony Fauci, and need only to see the facts illuminated and organized.

I wrote this book so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dominate our government and subvert our democracy, and to chronicle the key role Dr. Fauci has played in the current coup d’état against democracy.

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

Stasys Jakeliūnas, Lithuanian Member of the European Parliament, on This Pandemic of Fear & Data Manipulation: “We Have to Fight for the Free World”

Stasys Jakeliūnas is a Lithuanian politician currently serving as a Member of the European Parliament for the Lithuanian Farmers and Greens Union.

The video below is an excerpt from the full length press conference held on December 8, 2021 during which five European Union MEPs push back against the totalitarian tactics of  Ursula Von Der Leyen, a German politician and physician who has been President of the European Commission since December 2019.

For the full press conference, see:

Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination



This video clip is available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit for the original full-length press conference video, goes to 21st Century Wire.

Transcript prepared by TCTL:

Thank you Cristian and good morning everyone.

Now some researchers, including medical researchers, call this pandemic a “PCR test pandemic”. I agree with them. And I would add that this is also a pandemic of fear.

Because PCR tests are resulting in a number of cases, and so-called covid cases and covid deaths. And this statistic is unreliable, confirmed by three statistical institutions in the European Union.

Now data, statistical data, and feeling of fear is manipulated to push all of us, including our children, into being vaccinated.

Now President Von der Leyen called for mandatory — for discussion, I would be correct — for discussion on mandatory vaccination.

But what we already have — we already have forced or coerced vaccination because of this manipulation of fear, data. And because of requirement to use covid digital certificate.

When ask to vaccinate, we are asked to trust in science.

Now, what is science? I did some science myself years ago, but I remember what it is.

First of all, it’s a scientific debate — open scientific debate.

Now, what is the scientific debate on vaccination and other covid issues, including the PCR test? I don’t see any.

Why? Because it’s blocked. It’s blocked in most of the media. And it’s even censored on the global scale by some global networks.

Now I was born in the USSR. Actually, I was expelled from my home country before I was born because my parents where political prisoners during the Stalinist regime. And they were sent far away from the home country.

I lived in the Soviet Union prison with this censorship, with the control, for 30 years. I didn’t imagine that we would be moving again, somehow, to the environment of the censorship and to the environment of the control.

I was myself censored by the global network three times.

Why? Because I ask questions? I propose some discussion, scientific discussion. I initiated some discussion myself. And it was blocked. It was censored.

Now Commission President Von der Leyen, I don’t know if she is a victim of manipulation — data and fear manipulation — or is she manipulating herself.

The scientists I trust and the data I analyze don’t indicate that we need a vaccination for all. Especially for children and young adults up to 50 years of age, there is no risk from this virus, on a statistical basis, to this age group.

Now, this censorship is quite dangerous because it’s creeping into us. And if it continues to happen I think we’ll be living in something — we can call it global China, we can call it global Soviet Union, or we can call it Global Digital Covid Land. Doesn’t matter what we call it, but it’s not a free world anymore.

So we have to fight for the free world, we have to fight for our right to live in the free world, and for our children’s right to live in the free world.

Thank you.

Five European Union Members of Parliament — From Romania, Italy, Lithuania, Germany and Croatia — Join Together in a Powerful Stand Against Mandatory Vaccination

TCTL editor’s note: This is such an important event that we wanted to share the video link right away. We will post transcripts, along with individual speeches as separate video clips, later today when we have them prepared. Many thanks to 21st Century Wire for making this video available.

5 MEPs Hit Back Against Ursula von der Leyen’s EU Mandatory Vaccination Edict

by 21st Century Wire
December 13, 2021

On Dec. 8, 2021, a group of brave European Union MEPs pushed back against the disturbing trend towards full-blown fascism in Brussels, led by the unelected German leader Ursula von der Leyen.

The rebel MEPs slam von der Leyen and her new totalitarian medical apartheid and vaccine passport bio-surveillance regime. The five dissenters take turns speaking to their constituents, and to the world, during in this powerful address, beginning with Cristian Terhes (Romania), followed by Francesca Donato (Italy), Stasys Jakeliūnas (Lithuania), Christine Anderson (Germany), and Ivan Vilibor Sinčić (Croatia). Watch: 



Connect with 21st Century Wire

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Four Canadian Doctors Sue Alberta Health Services Over Vaccine Mandate

by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
December 10, 2021

WETASKIWIN:  The Justice Centre filed a Statement of Claim and Injunction Application at the Wetaskawin Court of Queen’s Bench on December 8, 2021, on behalf of four Alberta physicians. The doctors are facing termination, restrictions, and disciplinary action for standing against Alberta Health Services’ (“AHS”) Vaccine Mandate, which has been amended and extended twice already. The most recent amendment to the Vaccine Mandate requires all Alberta health care practitioners to submit proof of vaccination before December 13, 2021, even if they are naturally immune. In addition to challenging AHS for constitutional violations, the lawsuit advocates for returning to basic medical principles including: recognition of natural immunity, doctor-patient privilege, informed consent, personal autonomy and duty to disclose.

All four doctors treated and cared for their patients without incident during the worst of the Covid-19 pandemic over the past 20 months. Now AHS is prepared to terminate and discipline them for not complying with AHS’ Vaccine Mandate in the name of science and medicine.

Dr. Nadr Jomha, a specialized Orthopaedic Surgeon for complex foot and ankle reconstruction and trauma cases, and instrumental in the development of one of Canada’s cryopreservation (cold-preservation) joint transplantation programs, states: “Given that an overwhelming majority of studies prove that individuals with naturally acquired immunity have: a) been shown to have equal or better immunity than a vaccine-induced immunity; b) are very rarely re-infected with Covid-19; and c) are unlikely to transmit Covid-19, there is no medical or scientific benefit to myself of those around me or anyone around me.”

Dr. Blaine Achen, who held the position of Chief of Cardiac Anesthesia at the renowned Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, until he was terminated for not complying with AHS’ Vaccine Mandate, says: “The medical system in Alberta is struggling. The recent treatment of health care workers in this province, in addition to the current AHS policies and management, is driving physicians out of Alberta and will further exacerbate an already dire situation. AHS’ last-minute amendments and extensions to the Policy caused confusion and scheduling problems at the Hospital, which have negatively impacted AHS staff and patients. My forced departure will invariably cause additional delays in the operating room and will cause harm to patients in Alberta.”

Dr. Gert Grobler, once the personal doctor to the Nelson Mandela family, and now practicing in Medicine Hat, notes: “Treating and reducing Covid-19 severity ought to be the goal of medical doctors and it ought to be part of the strategy used by AHS.”

Dr. Tyler May, is one of two doctors in the under-served community of Manning, Alberta, 73km north of Peace River, is being allowed access to his hospital (after it was deemed one of the critical sites in AHS’ 2nd revision of the Vaccine Mandate) but not his clinic, said: “AHS’ decision is completely arbitrary and absurd, as the facilities are intimately linked, and it provides another example of AHS putting ideology and policy over patient care – much like the [Vaccine Mandate] itself.”

The Injunction Application is set to be heard in Court on Tuesday, December 14 at 10am. The doctors will ask the Court not to enforce AHS’ Vaccine Mandate against them, to trust the science and medicine in respect of natural immunity, and to allow the doctors to keep treating their patients.

To support this claim, Dr. Joel Kettner, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba, prepared an expert report which included a review of how major public health organizations have compared protection by natural immunity from previous Covid infection with protection by vaccination. In his report he states: “I have been unable to find relevant data or clear rationale for policies pertaining to the exclusion of health care workers because of their vaccination status, especially since there has been consistent evidence for equivalent – if not superior – protection by natural immunity resulting from previous infection, as described by the major public health organizations and the Public Health Agency’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization”.

“AHS is prepared to push their Vaccine Mandate so far as to terminate competent, qualified and caring doctors with natural immunity in order to enforce a Vaccine Mandate that is unscientific, harmful and arbitrary,” says Eva Chipiuk, Justice Centre Staff Lawyer. “It is shocking that these doctors have had to turn to the Courts to continue to be allowed to do what they are professionally trained to do – treat patients, including themselves. Especially at a time where AHS has declared the provinces’ hospitals and health care system at risk of collapse, and cancelled surgeries due to lack of resources.”

Connect with Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

cover image credit: tungnguyen0905 / pixabay

Pfizer Document Concedes That There Is a Large Increase in Types of Adverse Event Reaction to Its Vaccine

by Guy Hatchard, Daily Telegraph, New Zealand
December 5, 2021

• Document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world.
• Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reported.
• Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious.
• This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.
• We examine the implications for government.

Up until now, New Zealand GPs and hospitals have been provided with a fact sheet from Pfizer listing 21 possible adverse events as a result of vaccination.

All of these are minor, requiring little or no treatment other than rest, with the exception of severe allergic reactions, myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart). As a result, most of the many thousands of New Zealanders reporting adverse effects post vaccination have been sent home with little more than advice to take an aspirin and rest. Some have been told that their conditions may be unrelated medical events, psychosomatic, or due to anxiety on their part.

Relying on the short official Pfizer fact sheet as a guide, Medsafe, our NZ medicines regulatory body, has only accepted one out of the 100+ deaths actually reported to them as related to vaccination. Most are listed as unrelated, under investigation, or unknowable. By contrast, the NZ Health Forum and other groups have collected unofficial reports of adverse effects and death proximate to vaccination. Out of 670+ reports of death compiled by the Forum, 270 have already been investigated by medical professionals and closely linked to known adverse effects. Following the publication of the new Pfizer document many more are expected to be connected with vaccination. Reports describe symptoms such as chest pain, brain fog, extreme fatigue, neurological symptoms, tachycardia, stroke, heart attacks, and many more. Collected data suggests that as many as two-thirds of adverse event enquiries made to medical staff by vaccine recipients have not been reported to CARM—the NZ system of adverse event reporting. Medsafe itself estimates in its Guide to Adverse Reaction Reporting that in NZ only 5% of adverse events are reported. As a result the NZ public is completely unaware of the extent of reported possible risks of vaccination.

The just released Pfizer document which is being circulated widely in the public domain and can downloaded from websites is entitled:

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

Therefore the reported side effects predate the vaccine rollout in New Zealand. The report itself was finalised by Pfizer on 30 April 2021. Did Pfizer supply this information to our government during the early days of our universal vaccination programme? If so the results should have been shared with our medical professionals, politicians, and the public. Many of the new 100+ listed new adverse event types now released by Pfizer in this 38 page document pose long term risks to health. Until very recently, the document was being withheld by Pfizer who maintained it should be kept confidential. There is a strong possibility that very large numbers of New Zealanders will suffer long term injury as a result.

How did this happen without anyone’s knowledge?

Even though the Pfizer vaccine had undergone very short trials and had provisional approval only, Medsafe did not update its CARM adverse event reporting system to make it mandatory rather than voluntary.

Medsafe did not advise GPs and Hospital staff to be on high alert for adverse events and report them rapidly and in detail.

The Government ignored the unprecedented numbers of adverse events being reported to Medsafe and circulating in the community and on social media.

The Government instituted a public relations, promotional, and media campaign advising the public that the Pfizer covid-19 mRNA vaccine was completely safe and free of serious side effects, giving the impression that there were no side effects—not even the known serious effects of heart inflammation that Pfizer had already admitted.

Unaccountably, conditions imposed by the contract that our Government signed with Pfizer for the supply of vaccines have not been made public. We suspect that the contract contains standard clauses similar to those used with drugs that have completed safety trials, such as a provision that public discussion of adverse events may only be undertaken in conjunction with the company supplying the drug. If this is the case, it will have hamstrung Medsafe and our Government in their approach to assessment and public discussion of adverse events.

What are the new risks of vaccination?

Anyone reading the new Pfizer adverse event report compilation will be staggered. The sheer density of the technical medical terms and disease names are nevertheless broken down into recognisable and serious categories of illness—kidney failure, stroke, cardiac events, pregnancy complications, inflammation, neurological disease, autoimmune failure, paralysis, liver failure, blood disorders, skin disease, musculoskeletal problems, arthritis, respiratory disease, DVT, blood clots, vascular disease, haemorrhage, loss of sight, Bell’s palsy, and epilepsy.

How has this affected New Zealand?

Whilst even the official Medsafe record of adverse effects and the unofficial lists show that the immediate risks of covid vaccination could be as much as 50 – 300 times greater than even the most risky of previous traditional vaccines (such as the smallpox jab), and whilst the long term effects are unknown, 90% of eligible New Zealanders have gone ahead with vaccination having accepted the assurances of safety and efficacy from the government, or having been forced to get vaccinated under threat of loss of employment and freedom of movement. Feeling the fear of covid that has been generated by reports in the international and local media, most people completing vaccination heaved a great sigh of relief—that is one huge worry off my mind, now I can get on with my life.

Those finding that no immediate insurmountable reaction had surfaced (the majority) understandably agreed with the government: “What is all the fuss about? Why shouldn’t everyone do this, or be made to do this? It is a social good that will protect everyone”

BUT there is a huge iceberg in the path of the good ship New Zealand hidden under the waves of relief. Thousands are quietly suffering debilitating illness, unacknowledged and in some cases untreated by their doctors. For those who survived vaccination without immediate injury this was not a problem because they didn’t know about it apart from one or two complaints from friends that might just be random coincidences.

This has brought about a division in New Zealand society which the government created in the name of public safety. Thousands of dedicated servants of the nation including teachers, health workers, and others are being stigmatised and forced out of their jobs in a manner horrifyingly reminiscent of the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany. The government did this despite knowing that the Pfizer vaccine was neither fully tested, safe, nor particularly effective. Judges handed down decisions in courts supporting the government mandates unaware of crucial mRNA vaccine safety data, all because Pfizer had withheld this information, and the government had not done its due diligence. Had the true position been known, the High Court’s NZ Bill of Rights analysis may well have been different and its provision which guarantees that every individual should be able to make their own medical choices might still be intact.

Pfizer’s conclusions

Pfizer concludes the released document with a statement “Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit:risk balance for BNT162b2.” PM stands for the Post Marketing data set they are evaluating of 42,086 reported adverse events. Pfizer makes this bald claim of benefit despite admitting that “the magnitude of underreporting is unknown”. This document contains no further substantive information in support of this claim of benefit:risk balance other than a mysterious reference to “the known safety profile of the vaccine”.

The benefit:risk argument is in essence saying: covid-19 is a serious illness and our calculations show that more people will be injured by the disease than are being injured by the vaccine, therefore there will be a net benefit. This argument falls over because of at least three very important factors: Firstly treatment options have improved and thereby the risk of serious illness and death from covid has been greatly reduced.

Secondly the risk of covid is not evenly spread. People with comorbidities (other conditions) and the elderly are at very high risk. Most other people are at very low risk. Thus vaccination could subject people at low risk from covid to a higher risk from vaccination. Approaches to preventive health education can reduce the covid risk to people with comorbidities more than vaccination can. For example a study published in the BMJ found that people following a plant based diet have a 73% reduced risk of serious illness. Data from the UK Biobank has been analysed by researchers from Manchester and Oxford Universities and the West Indies who found that shift workers (who typically have disrupted bioclocks) have three times the risk of being hospitalised with covid. Preventive remedies include changes in diet such as the introduction of more fresh fruit, vegetables, and fibre, and reductions in known unhealthy habits such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption, an overly sedentary lifestyle, a predominance of ultra processed foods, and many more.

The third and most significant reason the benefit:risk argument falls over is the sheer range of adverse reaction types observed by Pfizer and kept hidden until now.

Read full article here

Connect with Daily Telegraph, New Zealand

©Guy Hatchard, Daily Telegraph New Zealand, 2021

cover image credit: WiR_Pixs / pixabay

Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress | Magnesium Chloride as Essential Medicine for All Patients With Acute Chest Pain

“The essential medicine for coronavirus hospital patients is magnesium chloride given intravenously or injected. Magnesium administration for COVID would reduce the progression of the disease to severe or fatal stages when caught earlier enough and keep heart patients from dying in the later stages.

Studies show that combinations of Vitamin D, Magnesium and B12 administered to older COVID-19 patients were associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen and intensive care support.”

~ Dr. Mark Sircus

Epidemic of Heart Disease Caused by Covid Vaccines and Related Stress

by Dr. Mark Sircus
December 10, 2021

Pandemic, epidemic, or a medical emergency. No matter what we call it, people suffering from vascular disease have dramatically increased, and too many are dying from it. Not only is there no vaccine possible for heart disease, but in all probability, the COVID vaccines are driving the pain, suffering, and death through sudden onset heart disease. In the week ending November 12, 2021, the U.K. reported 2,047 more deaths than occurred during the same period between 2015 and 2019; heart disease and strokes appear to be behind many of the excess deaths.

“I watched Roy die, and I could not get to him. We were about to leave for the hospital, and he was in the toilet, and I heard a thud. He had fallen, his body was blocking the door, his full weight was against it, and I couldn’t get it open. I could see him through a crack in the door. I could see that he was gone.”

Rory had received his first dose of the Pfizer vaccine on November 5 and started feeling ‘heart flutters’ that evening. The symptoms continued, and 12 days later, he began to suffer heart palpitations and an ‘uncomfortable’ feeling in his chest.

Inside the emergency department at Sparrow Hospital in Lansing, Michigan, staff members are struggling to care for patients showing up much sicker than they’ve ever seen. Patients are showing up to the E.R. sicker than before the pandemic; their diseases are more advanced and need more complicated care. “We are hearing from members in every part of the country,” said Dr. Lisa Moreno, president of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. “The Midwest, the South, the Northeast, the West … they are seeing this exact same phenomenon.” And already-overwhelmed staffers are burning out.

Things are so bad that Maine Gov. Janet Mills on Dec. 8 activated the state’s National Guard to assist at hospitals. Dr. Andrew Mueller, CEO of MaineHealth, told reporters in a virtual briefing that hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the health care system are at their highest level even though Maine has a high vaccination rate.

Focusing on Heart Disease

A 33-year-old registered nurse in New Zealand recently went public on social media to share her story of being diagnosed with pericarditis after being injected with a second dose of a COVID-19 shot. She states that she was placed in a section of the hospital that was treating vaccine injuries, and that she was the 7th person admitted that day suffering a heart problem following a Pfizer shot.

The COVID-19 shots cause heart disease, mainly myocarditis and pericarditis, which destroys our young people’s health. This is a fact that is no longer in dispute, as even the CDC admits this, as their most recent report states: As of November 24, 2021, VAERS has received 1,949 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 and younger who received COVID-19 vaccine. Most cases have been reported after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), particularly in male adolescents and young adults. (Source.)

At the beginning of December, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration added a warning to patient and provider fact sheets for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines to indicate a risk of heart inflammation. The CDC agrees, saying that a higher-than-usual number of cases of a type of heart inflammation has been reported following the Covid-19 vaccination, especially among young men following their second dose of an mRNA vaccine.

In the last 13 weeks alone, in England, about 107,700 seniors died above the normal rate, despite a 98.7% injection rate.

A new study and warning from the American Heart Association: mRNA vaccines dramatically increase risk of developing heart disease — “The PLUS Cardiac Test score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for eight years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.” Twitter, the new heavyweight medical know everything platform, disagrees and put a warning about this information.

Heart inflammation has three main types: myocarditis (inflamed heart muscles), pericarditis (inflamed outer linings of the heart), and endocarditis (inflamed inner linings of the heart). But only myocarditis and pericarditis have been associated with mRNA vaccine.

Common clinical signs of mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis and pericarditis are elevated troponin (a blood biomarker of heart muscle damage) levels, abnormal cardiac imaging, and chest pain. Other rarer symptoms include headache, breathlessness, fatigue, and body ache.

In one study, researchers from Israel found that individuals vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine had a 3.24-times increased risk of myocarditis within 21 days of either the first or second dose compared to unvaccinated individuals. This equated to an excess of 2.7 events per 100,000 persons. About 90% of those myocarditis cases happened to males aged 20–34 years.

Pfizer vaccine has triggered inflammation of the heart! Do you doubt that and swear allegiance to Twitter? Or are you one of many ridiculous doctors and health officials who hides behind the “rare” word that describes vaccine reactions?

For another study, researchers from the U.S. calculated that 12–39-year-olds had a 9.8-times increased risk of myocarditis/pericarditis at days 1–21 of vaccination compared to those at days 22–42 of vaccination. This gives an excess of 6.3 cases per million doses. More specifically, 85% of cases affected males, 85% occurred within seven days of vaccination (more commonly after the second dose), 82% led to hospitalization, and 6% led to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Since the COVID vaccines became available, nearly 300 athletes have experienced cardiac arrest, and over 167 have died.

Dr. Joseph Mercola reports that “many athletes are now losing their careers due to COVID jab injuries. For example, Florian Dagoury is the world record holder in static breath-hold freediving. Before his Pfizer jabs, he was able to hold his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds. After his second dose, his diving performance was slashed by about 30%, and he’s been diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis, and trivial mitral regurgitation. Others include tennis player Jeremy Chardy and 32-year-old triathlete Antoine Mechin. Both were severely injured by their COVID jabs. Both now regret taking the shot. “Damaging healthy people to preserve the health of the weakest,” Mechin now says, is “a choice of backward logic.”

Former Australian pro-basketball player Ben Madgen, 36, was diagnosed with pericarditis after receiving his second shot of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in a report from the Covid world. After taking the Pfizer shot, the doctor told him that having pericarditis is now common to teenage boys and young males.

A London Evening Standard report quotes senior vascular surgeon Tahir Hussain, who works at an NHS hospital in London. “I’ve seen a big increase in thrombotic-related vascular conditions in my practice,” said Hussain. “Far younger patients are being admitted and requiring surgical and medical intervention than prior to the pandemic.”

Of course, this has nothing to do with dangerous COVID vaccines. Hussain said that the cases are “a direct result of the increased stress and anxiety levels caused from the effects of PPSD (post-pandemic stress disorder).” He also said that people dying at home “from conditions such as pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction” were down to self-isolating and not seeking the medical care they needed.

A ‘”HEALTHY” single mom with no pre-existing medical conditions has died four days after receiving the second dose of the Moderna coronavirus vaccine. Kassidi Kurill, 39, suddenly passed away on February 5 after she complained to her parents that “her heart was racing and she felt like she needed to get to the emergency room.”

Former senior NHS psychological therapist Mark Rayner said as many as 300,000 heart ailments could be due to “post-pandemic stress disorder.” No matter what the cause, these numbers suggest an epidemic, in little England, of heart disorders, all of them calling for intense magnesium administration. Now try to imagine what is going on around the world. Yes, with pandemic health responses and vaccines leading the way, stress levels are going through the roof. People certainly do not like their freedom taken away from them and do not enjoy the world’s changes being forced down their collective throats.

“I had my 1st Pfizer shot on Friday, and I’ve had an elevated heart rate between 90 and 104 since Saturday. It’s now Tuesday. It kind of feels like it skips a beat sometimes. It’s making me apprehensive about getting the 2nd shot.”

Doctors and health officials are not interested in measuring the reactions of the heart post-COVID vaccination. Still, I imagine if a study were quickly done measuring the heart rate variability (HRV), we would see the vaccine disaster unfolding when we calculate the timing of each beat of the heart. The heart is super sensitive and vulnerable to any adverse events, but there is little to no interest in looking carefully at what is going on.

My heart rate is elevated. Like goes up to 125 to do a flight of stairs. I am on day three since the shot. My doctor says I am fine. Should I be worried?

HRV is a scientifically researched phenomenon that measures the variability in the R portion of the QRST wave of a regular heartbeat. Over time, even with a normal heartbeat, there is variability between the beats. The more variability, the healthier the heart. The higher the heart rate variability, the greater are the potential reserves of the body to adapt. HRV and vagus nerve activity are helpful as long-term measures of inflammation in chronic diseases.

Our heart does not lie, not when you look at what it says on a beat-to-beat basis (HRV). It is our most honest digital code, and doctors can read it using the VedaPulse (which happens to be on sale). A five-minute test can be done in the comfort of one’s own home or doctor’s office, and one has a five-minute readout of the code the heart is putting out. When I do my readouts, I use only two minutes to see how stressed my heart is.

It is sad how much Magnesium is ignored by mainstream medicine. In the case of male teenagers and athletes developing heart inflammation after taking the COVID injection, it is tragic. Magnesium is one of the best medications to cool the fires of inflammation because it is–Magnesium that modulates cellular events involved in inflammation.

Inflammatory indicators in the body such as CRP (C-reactive protein), TNF (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), and IL6 (interleukin 6) are reduced when magnesium intake is increased. In addition, inflammation in the arterial walls was also reduced with magnesium intake, and without enough Magnesium, the heart goes into cardiac arrest or many other heart disorders.

The essential medicine for coronavirus hospital patients is magnesium chloride given intravenously or injected. Magnesium administration for COVID would reduce the progression of the disease to severe or fatal stages when caught earlier enough and keep heart patients from dying in the later stages.

Studies show that combinations of Vitamin D, Magnesium and B12 administered to older COVID-19 patients were associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen and intensive care support.

Dr. Sarah Myhill has been using I.V. magnesium in her general practice for over 20 years for both acute and chronic problems. She uses it for all patients with acute chest pain (unless the blood pressure is low), acute heart failure, pulmonary embolus, and acute asthma. Myhill says, “It is a potent vasodilator – i.e., it opens up all the blood vessels. Indeed patients can feel their blood vessels dilating as I give them the Magnesium – they warm up all over! This has the immediate effect of reducing the work of the heart and opening up the collateral circulation of the heart. Most patients with acute heart attacks have their pain completely relieved by I.V. magnesium.”

Magnesium oil is magnesium chloride and is terrific for all forms of magnesium administration. It is the most flexible form of magnesium.

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

cover image credit: sbtlneet / pixabay

La Quinta Columna: How Can Graphene Oxide Be Activated?

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 9, 2021

While electrofrequencies are used to activate graphene oxide outside and inside the human body, there are also other ways to do so, such as sound or temperature. As a result of research carried out by the Spanish research duo of La Quinta Columna, it can be hypothesized that this nanomaterial would absorb any type of energy or signal.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel. 

Ricardo Delgado: 

This is a question by Dani from Esplugas, Barcelona. “Could graphene be activated with temperatures applying high electromotive force? (As an experiment).”

Dr. Sevillano:

Of course, you activate it with temperature. And with electromagnetic fields that are neither high nor very low frequency. I get the feeling that graphene absorbs any electromagnetic field. Looking at the picture and what it does.

Ricardo Delgado:

We have also seen experiments with sound. Graphene oxide activated with sound. I mean, it starts dancing, practically.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Yes, that’s it. Yes, just like that. It’s activated by anything that’s energy. It doesn’t have to be a precise quality of electrofrequency. However, I think these people know at what qualities the type of graphene they’ve put in is particularly toxic. They must have knowledge of it. That’s why they play these kinds of qualities when they want to.

But in reality, any kind of energy and certainly any kind of signal can be absorbed by graphene. Based on what we see what it does and how it seems to me that it absorbs everything it picks up.

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay

La Quinta Columna: Why Do Some Inoculated People Not Get Sick?

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 8, 2021



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel. 

Ricardo Delgado:

The next question says, “Why do some vaccinated people not get sick?” Assuming they carry graphene oxide in their body. There’s a lot of variables.

Dr. Sevillano:

The question is that the current dose they were injected, surely, doesn’t carry the product since some people are vaccinated and don’t express biomagnetism. But then, they can express biomagnetism and not get sick, for the moment. But they’re exposed to the disease anyway.

Remember that soccer players are jabbed or vaccinated, and the guys are there, maybe for two, three, or four months playing and running at full speed. You know how much these people force the “machine.” Until one day, arrhythmia appears.

That is, it’s a matter of time for the graphene oxide to structure or organize itself around the heart and start generating anomalous currents and circuits. It needs time. But other people, as soon as they go out for a walk, take a few steps and drop dead. Or others, two or three days later, they develop pneumonia and are admitted to the hospital. Or they can develop thrombi. In other words, it’s fast.

What does it depend on? Well, probably, on the amount of energy absorbed by the graphene. Those who live near antennas absorb very quickly and can drop dead, generate thrombi, heart attack, etc… And those who play a lot of soccer, but perhaps aren’t very close to antennas, their heart begins to change because of the energy introduced into it. It depends on the energy.

If you have graphene in you, it depends on the energy with which your heart is being charged. Hence the variation from one person to another.

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: Robystarm / pixabay

Miscarriages and Other Tragic Side Effects of the mRNA Shots

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 8, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

With each passing day, the list of people suffering tragic consequences from the novel gene therapies marketed as COVID “vaccines” gets longer. Slews of professional and amateur athletes have collapsed and died in recent weeks, and mainstream media act as if those things are either normal or inexplicable.

They’re neither. They’re abnormal, and totally explainable when you know how the COVID shot destroys your heart and clumps your blood. Among the latest victims is Florian Dagoury, world record holder in static breath-hold freediving. Before his Pfizer jabs, he was able to hold his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds.

After his second dose, his diving performance was slashed by about 30%, and he’s been diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation, a condition in which the mitral valve in the heart gets leaky, allowing blood to flow backward into the left ventricle.

Dagoury shared his experience on Instagram:^1,2

“After my 2nd dose I noticed that my heart rate was way higher than normal and my breath hold capacities went down significantly. During sleep, I’m at 65-70bpm instead of 37-45bpm. During the day, I’m now always over 100bpm instead of 65bpm, even when I sit down and relax. Once I even reach[ed] 177bpm while having dinner with friends!

Ten days after my 2nd jab, I went to see a cardiologist and he told me it’s a common side effect of Pfizer vaccine, nothing to worry about, just rest, it will pass. 40 days after 2nd jab, I had no progress so I went to see another cardiologist and got diagnosed with myocarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation!

Which is basically an inflammation of the heart muscles cause by the immune system and some tiny leaks of blood from the valves that no longer close properly. I’m now struggling to reach 8 min breath hold, 150m dyn[amic apnea freediving] and I even have a strong urge to breath[e] doing 40m dives. 30% decrease on my diving performance roughly.”

Many Athletes Are Losing Their Careers

Other professional athletes whose careers are now on hold include French tennis player Jeremy Chardy, who commented on his situation:³

“Since I had my vaccine … I am struggling. I can’t train. I can’t play … It’s frustrating, especially that I don’t have 10 years left to play. I regret having the vaccine, but I could not have known that this would happen … it’s difficult because I was having fun and I want to play longer.”

Another one is Antoine Mechin, a 32-year-old triathlete whose career is on indefinite hold, as he developed pulmonary embolism after taking his second dose of Moderna. What makes it all the more tragic is that Mechin suffered pain and shortness of breath after the first shot, but he was told his symptoms were probably just stress and fatigue. He went ahead with the second, and now has severe lung damage. Mechin said:

“Damaging healthy people to preserve the health of the weakest, a choice of backward logic. I would not get vaccinated again if it had to be done again.”

Largest Safety Signal in the History of Medicine

By any objective measure, the COVID shots are the most dangerous drugs ever launched. The safety signal is absolutely massive. Here’s a screenshot summary from OpenVAERS’ November 19, 2021, report (the latest available at the time of this article),⁴ listing some of the most common effects reported following the COVID jab.

According to calculations by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, adverse events are conservatively underreported by a factor of 41,⁵ so it’s possible we need to multiply these numbers by 41 to get closer to the real-world impact.

For a visual illustration of how dangerous the COVID shots are in comparison to all other vaccines on the market, just look at this OpenVAERS graph. It speaks for itself.

Ignored Safety Signal: Post-Injection Miscarriages

While we’re starting to hear more about the heart damage and strokes the COVID shots cause, a troubling effect that isn’t getting the attention it deserves is miscarriage. As of November 19, 2021, 3,071 miscarriages had been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). There were also:⁶

• 18,024 cases of menstrual disorders
• 6,654 cases of vaginal/uterine hemorrhage
• 1,216 cases of testicular pain or swelling
• 395 cases of erectile dysfunction

All of these effects point to the shots having an adverse impact on human reproductive health. A recent paper⁷ in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law addresses reproductive concerns, noting that while “the use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now generally considered safe … the influential CDC-sponsored article by Shimabukuro et. al.⁸ (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance …”

In particular, getting the COVID shot during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is extremely risky — the risk of miscarriage is anywhere between 82% and 91% — but Shimabukuro et. al. hid this stunning finding in their paper.⁹ Here’s how they did it.

How Shimabukuro et. al. Hid Massive Safety Signal

According to Shimabukuro et. al.,¹⁰ the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.6% (104 miscarriages out of 827 pregnancies), which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%. However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation. As explained in the Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law paper:¹¹

“… closer inspection of the 827 women in the denominator of this calculation reveals that between 700 to 713 women were exposed to the vaccine after the timeframe for recording the outcome had elapsed (up to 20 weeks of pregnancy).”

To clarify, Shimabukuro et. al. included women in the group of 827 who actually didn’t get the shot during their first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Since they didn’t get the shot until later in the pregnancy, they would not have been AT RISK for miscarriage from the shot in the first trimester.

Put another way, since the third trimester is after week 20, you should not include women who got the shot in the third trimester when you’re trying to determine the miscarriage rate among those injected BEFORE week 20. I hope that’s clear.

If you only include women who were at risk for side effects during the first 20 weeks, because they actually got the shot during those first 20 weeks, then there are only 114 or, at most, 127 of them left in that group. And that changes the calculation considerably! What we actually have are 104 miscarriages out of 127, which is 82%, or possibly as high as 104 out of 114, which is 91%.

Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster.

The Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law paper points out several other problems with Shimabukuro’s analysis that compound the confusion, including the fact that they used overlapping periods of exposure and outcome:

“Exposure to the vaccine was defined by trimester (periconception, first, second, and third). Outcomes were defined as women first exposed to the mRNA vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation; and first exposed from 20 weeks’ gestation. The infant was followed for 28 days during the perinatal period (birth-28 days).”¹²

This strikes me as an intentional misdirection strategy to confuse and obfuscate. They could easily have used the same periods for exposure and outcome, either the three trimesters or weeks 1 through 20 and weeks 21 through 40.

Other adverse event statistics included a preterm birth rate of 9.4% (60 out of 636 births), a 3.2% incidence of small size for gestational age, and a 2.2% incidence of birth defects (16 out of 724 births).

Another Problem With Shimabukuro’s Paper

Another minor detail found in Shimabukuro’s paper hints at an effort to downplay and hide the miscarriage risk. The authors claim the normal rate of miscarriage in the published literature is between 10% and 26%.

However, the 26% rate includes clinically-unrecognized pregnancies, and since the cohort under investigation included only clinically-RECOGNIZED pregnancies — meaning women who knew they were pregnant — that 26% statistic does not apply. Basically, it’s included to confuse you into believing that the miscarriage incidence is far higher than it actually is.

Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20.¹³

So, when you consider that the normal risk for miscarriage is just 5% by the time you enter Week 6 (and many women don’t even realize they’re pregnant before that time), an 82% to 91% risk of miscarriage is no negligible increase. This should also make everyone realize that recommending this injection to pregnant women is a reprehensible crime against humanity.

Giving pregnant women experimental gene-based therapies is reprehensibly irresponsible, and to suggest that safety data are “piling up” is nothing but pure propaganda. Everything is still in the experimental stage and all data are preliminary. It’ll take years to get a clearer picture of how these injections are affecting young women and their babies.

Breastfeeding women also need to be aware that the mRNA in the COVID shot, as well as spike protein, can transfer through breast milk. This is another way by which infants can be put at risk for acute and/or longer term health problems. So, if you got a COVID shot after giving birth, please understand that you are not transferring protective antibodies.

You’re transferring the vaccine itself, and the toxic spike protein your body produces, to your baby. In March 2020, a 5-month-old infant died from thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura within days of his mother receiving her second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.^14,15 In addition to that lethal case, there are at least 72 other cases where toddlers have had an adverse reaction to breast milk from a vaccinated mother.¹⁶

There Are Plenty of Causes for Concern

In closing, I urge you to read through these selected highlights from the Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law paper:¹⁷

“The sweeping conclusions of safety that Shimabukuro et al. (2021) make are not convincing … [M]echanisms which may be disrupted by the injection include syncytin-1 (syn1), a fusogenic protein of retroviral origin, essential for cell fusion and placental development.

Studies are required to determine if mRNA encoded spike (S) protein HR1 (or HR1a28) or HR2 has the ability to inadvertently inhibit syn1, preventing the cell fusion required for placental attachment, resulting in pregnancy loss.

The rodent studies carried out by Pfizer and Moderna to determine if there could be an impact on fertility and development may need to be repeated in Old World primates, such as macaques, as they have similar syn1 and syn2 proteins to humans, whereas rats do not.

The presence of autoantibodies to syn1 was investigated by Mattar et al., and although a change from baseline of autoantibodies to syn1 occurred in all 15 pregnant women exposed to the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech product, the change was not deemed high enough to be considered biologically significant.

Given the small sample size, these findings may indicate that further investigation is required. Further, an altered syn1 expression is associated with pre-eclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome, intrauterine growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus in observational studies.

Synctyin-1 is also required for gamete fusion (syn1 and ACET2 receptors present in sperm and oocytes) and, additionally, found in the testes34 and ovaries. In the Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine) Package Insert submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the manufacturers state that potential impairment of male fertility has not been evaluated …

We question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy … The assumption that exposure in the third trimester cohort is representative of the effect of exposure throughout pregnancy is questionable and ignores past experience with drugs such as thalidomide.

Evidence of safety of the product when used in the first and second trimesters cannot be established until these cohorts have been followed to at least the perinatal period or long-term safety determined for any of the babies born to mothers inoculated during pregnancy.

Additionally, the product’s manufacturer, Pfizer, contradicts these assurances, stating: ‘available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine- associated risks in pregnancy,’ and ‘it is not known whether Comirnaty is excreted in human milk’ as ‘data are not available to assess the effects of Comirnaty on the breastfed infant’…

Due to the nature of the mRNA vaccine roll-out, healthcare providers need to report any issues in pregnancy to further determine the safety of this product …

Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X) and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established in these groups.”

Connect with Dr. Joseph Mercola

cover image credit: OpenClipart-Vectors / pixabay

Update on the Mighty Omicron

Omicron supposedly lurks among us – but a peek behind the curtain shows the ‘evidence’ surrounding its detection and reinfection rate is simply more dissociation from reality. 

by Rosemary Frei, MSc
December 8, 2021

You’re likely drowning in the ocean of information coming out about everything C-word-related including this ‘new variant.’ I know I am.

So I’ll keep this brief. Beer, dinner and sleep await, not necessarily in that order.

In my Nov. 27 article about Byram Bridle I showed that he and some of his collaborators are developing a nasal vaxx for Covid, and are poised to potentially profit from it. Here’s what I wrote about the already-infamous Omicron:

“I won’t be very surprised if developers and marketers of these new [intranasal] vaxxes [such as Bridle and co.] soon also claim they could help curb the Nu/Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) that’s received a great deal of attention in the last few days. B.1.1.529 already has been declared of “huge international concern” because it ostensibly has a “horrific spike[-protein-gene-mutation] profile,” spreads very fast and has the potential to evade the currently used vaxxes. Predictably there’s been panic such as long lines at airports in the very rapidly growing list of African countries subject to travel bans by other governments — along with a renewed push for more people to get vaxxed….

“Yet there hasn’t been a single published scientific report, as far as I know, which would allow objective/outside verification of whether there is any real evidence to support these drastic claims and actions. And I remain very sceptical about the hype regarding all variants and the methods used to detect them, including the false narrative about ‘immune escape’; see my Feb. 3, 2021, Feb. 11, March 16, May 24 and Oct. 24 pieces.

“And as I wrote in that March 16 article (about Geert Vanden Bossche): ‘We … need to stop production and use of antivirals and antibodies and all other parts of the Covid-industrial complex. Covid has an extremely high survival rate. So why develop yet another expensive, invasive and experimental solution to a problem that barely exists, if it does at all?‘”

Since then, there’s been a flood of papers, articles and news releases on Omicron. Researchers are working feverishly to characterize the latest ‘new variant,’ and create and test therapies for it.

You can find their prodigious science-paper output by looking here — https://www.medrxiv.org/search/b.1.1.529 — here — https://www.biorxiv.org/search/b.1.1.529 – and here – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=b.1.1.529&sort=date.

Yet to the best of my knowledge none of the scientists who have been studying the novel coronavirus has even attempted to show directly whether there is any transmission at all, never mind any reinfection. To study transmission or reinfection they’d need, just for starters, to do a genotype of the virus harboured in one person, then genotype the virus in people who have frequent close contact with the first person and see if those genotypes match extremely closely.

And that assumes the virus exists at all. This is how Jon Rappaport succinctly sums up the need to write articles (such as this one) as if it’s clear the virus exists, in his blog entry today:

“I frequently put on my hazmat suit and enter the crazy world where all ‘the experts’ claim the virus is real. I make these forays to show that, even within their fantasy bubble, and by their own standards, the pros are fatally contradicting themselves and lying constantly.”

Here’s a dip into the first Omicron paper that made the news everywhere.

It was posted on Dec. 1 in medRχiv — and spawned a thousand scary-sounding headlines such as ‘Omicron Covid variant three times more likely to cause reinfection than Delta, S. African study says.’

In fact it’s a South African-Canadian version of the ‘Modelling Paper Mafiosi’ – my name for the English clique that kicked off the new-variant parade back in January of this year.

Here are just five of the many unsupported assumptions and leaps of logic in the Dec. 1, 2021, Omicron paper:

1. Introduction – 1^st paragraph – page 5 – “While the proportion of positive PCR tests with S-gene target failure (SGTF) associated with Omicron has subsequently increased in most provinces …”

There’s no mention of the fact that the first variant that came on the scene – B.1.1.7, subsequently dubbed Beta – also apparently is detected via this same SGTF (I cover this in my Feb. 3, 2021, article-video combination titled, ‘Is it True that the New Variants are Very Dangerous?’).  So how do they know whether it’s Beta, Omicron, something else — or nothing at all? It just doesn’t add up!

2. Introduction – 3^rd paragraph – page 5: “Many of the mutations [that they purportedly found in the Omicron gene coding for the spike protein (added Dec. 18 – I noticed that I’d dropped a few of these words in parentheses out of the article by mistake before posting it)] are either known or predicted to contribute to escape from neutralizing antibodies.”  See the information/articles above that I cited in my Bridle article showing this is false. (And unfortunately parroted by many other leaders in the Covid-sceptic ranks, for example Robert Malone, and Mark Trozzi in his blog post today, leaning on the highly dubious claims of the now-omnipresent Vanden Bossche: https://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/08/the-omicron-variant/.  I’ll soon write an in-depth article about all this.)

3. Methods – Data sources – first paragraph – page 6:”All positive tests conducted in South Africa appear in the combined data set, regardless of the reason for testing or type of test (PCR or antigen detection), and include the large number of positive tests that were retrospectively added to the data set on 23 November 2021 (11).“They’re mixing together different tests and test results. They’re also assuming that all the positive PCR test results were true positives — they don’t mention the extremely high false-positive rate of the PCR test.

4. Methods – Data sources – third paragraph – page 7: “If the time between sequential positive tests was at least 90 days, the more recent positive test was considered to indicate a suspected new infection. We present a descriptive analysis of suspected third and fourth infections, although only suspected second infections (which we refer to as ‘reinfections’) were considered in the analyses of temporal trends.”

Wow – where do I start? They don’t supply any clinical evidence that there is any reinfection at all.

Their attitude seems to be, ‘No proof? No problem!”

5. The key Methods subsection, titled ‘Statistical analysis of reinfection trends,’ is littered with clues that this paper was designed to arrive at pre-determined conclusions.

Here’s how it starts – page 8 (with some of the clue words bolded by me): ‘First, we constructed a simple null model based on the assumption that the reinfection hazard experienced by previously diagnosed individuals is proportional to the incidence of detected cases and fit this model to the pattern of reinfections observed before the emergence of the Beta variant (through 30 September 2020). The null model assumes no change in the reinfection hazard coefficient through time. We then compared observed reinfections after September 2020 to expected reinfections under the null model.”

And it spirals downhill from there into even more disassociation from reality.

You can bet that the other papers published on Omicron amplify and embellish these leaps without offering a shred of solid clinical evidence to support them.

Yet tens of millions of people’s lives have been negatively effected by the rapid-fire restrictions imposed, such as travel bans.

And we’re being told, of course, that more treatments, such as having a booster shot of a vaxx, will take care of the Mighty Omicron.

It seems unfortunately I was correct in almost all of the predictions in my April 2020 article, ‘The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism.

For example, in Step 7 as soon as the first cycle of the new virus and accompanying roll-out of antivirals and vaxxes is done, another starts. And in response “They rapidly roll out virus and antibody testing again, while companies sell billions more doses of antivirals and booster vaccines.”

I wager that my analysis of Omicron is right too.

I challenge anybody to prove me wrong. Dinner and beer are on me if they do.

Connect with Rosemary Frei

cover image credit: Alexandra_Koch / pixabay

Smoking Gun: Fauci States Covid PCR Test Has Fatal Flaw; Confession From the “Beloved” Expert of Experts

The COVID PCR test is a complete fraud

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 8, 2021

As my readers know, I’ve been proving for well over a year that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.

Therefore, any test for it would be absurd.

However, I frequently put on my hazmat suit and enter the crazy world where all “the experts” claim the virus is real. I make these forays to show that, even within their fantasy bubble, and by their own standards, the pros are fatally contradicting themselves and lying constantly.

That’s what I’m doing in this article. I’ve got my hazmat suit on and I’m exploring the crazy landscape. I’ve published this piece several times, but I want to make sure people understand how the test has been used to manufacture the false appearance of a pandemic.

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

Well, how about THIS?

July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at the 4m01s mark through to the 5m45s mark) — Fauci begins his first answer to the first question at the 4m20s mark and begins his second answer to the second question at the 5m26s mark:

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That’s called a false positive.

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US following the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the global economy and its 8 billion citizens.

All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).”

Naturally, testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17, 2020) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” Here are money quotes:

“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

“Set-the-limit” would mean, We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.

The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients.”

Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

Get the picture?

I hope so.

If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.

2021 CODA: Recently, Florida, a state which has remained far more open and free from COVID restrictions and mandates than most other states, is reporting very low COVID case numbers. Why?

Because as of December 3, 2020, the state of Florida started doing something unheard of. It demanded that labs report the number of cycles (“cycle threshold”) for every test they run.

Here is the relevant wording in a release from the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, and the state Department of Health:

“Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.”

“If your laboratory is not currently reporting CT values and their reference ranges, the lab should begin reporting this information to FDOH within seven days of the date of this memorandum.”

We can assume there is only one reason for this order. The Florida governor and the Department of Health are aware that tests run at 35 cycles or higher are useless and misleading, creating a mountain of false-positives, and they want to stop this crime.

And with the Governor’s recent appointment of a new state Surgeon General, who is well aware of certain aspects of the COVID fraud, the requirement for labs to start telling the truth is taking hold.

Hence, lower case numbers.

SOURCES:

youtu.be/a_Vy6fgaBPE?t=241

blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/pcr/

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download (document page 35 (pdf page 36), “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, For Emergency Use Only, Instructions for Use, Catalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01, 1000 reactions, For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use, Rx Only”; CDC-006-00019, Revision: 07 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 07/21/2021)

nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/24/gov-ron-desantis-this-is-how-you-win-against-the-wolves/

Connect with Jon Rappoport

Stop the Shots: Stand With Cape Cod, Massachusetts Against Medical Mandates on Saturday December 11, 2021

by Richard Hugus, End Massachusetts Medical Mandates
December 8, 2021

Protest call:

WHEN: Saturday December 11, 2021, 12 noon to 2 PM (rain or shine)

WHERE: Capetown Plaza, 790 Iyannough Rd., Hyannis across the street from the Cape Cod Mall, in front of the former K Mart.

Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates has been holding monthly demonstrations since December 2020 when gene manipulating injections were rolled out to supposedly fight the “covid 19 pandemic.” These injections are by no means voluntary, as many of us are not allowed to work, go to school, or enter public spaces without proof of having taken them. They are now being criminally mandated for children as young as 5 years old when they are known to cause more illness and death across all age groups, but especially the young, than the illness they are purported to cure.

We are opposed to government tyranny being implemented in the name of public health. We are not funded and we are not affiliated with any political party or organization. We always have a good turnout, the atmosphere is healthy and family friendly, and the response from passersby is overwhelmingly in support. Bring large letter signs with your message (no signs for political candidates please). Join us December 11.

We stand for:

— the right to remain human. We do not want to be genetically modified with mRNA injections, or made “transhuman.” The openly declared transhumanist agenda of the Great Reset and its plan for “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity” is absolutely insane.

— the right to live. The mRNA injections are killing people (see tables below). We obviously have the right to reject them for ourselves and our children.

— the right to the pursuit of happiness. Happiness will not be achievable if we have lost our health to medically induced chronic disease.

— the right to work. Government mandating employers to require vaccination means anyone asserting the natural right to bodily autonomy will lose their job. How is this not coercion? Governments do not have the power to say something should be injected into our. bodies. Nor, obviously, do employers.

— our right to refuse medical interventions. No to vaccine mandates by which state and federal government forces employers, colleges, and businesses to require vaccination certificates and terminate anyone who refuses.

— the right to breathe. End mask requirements on public transportation, in healthcare facilities, and especially in schools. Forcing children to wear masks is child abuse. Mask have no health purpose. They are used for psychological conditioning only. They are dehumanizing.

— the right to bodily autonomy. No one should be forced to take a vaccine, wear a mask, be swabbed, tested, or scanned.

— the right to informed consent. This was established in 1947 in the Nuremberg code. No substance should be injected into anyone’s body without their full understanding of all possible harmful effects. A long list of adverse effects, including death, has already been established with the C19 injections. There should be no negative consequences should we refuse this or any other medical intervention. Violators of the Nuremberg code should be prosecuted.

— parental rights. The state has no right to bypass parents’ authority on whether their minor child should wear a mask, be tested, or be given any pharmaceutical product. In some places, governments are pushing for children as young as 12 to accept a shot without parental consent.

— the right to education. Education at K-12 schools, universities, and colleges should not be withheld as leverage to enforce government medical decrees. Nor should pharmaceutical products be promoted by schools or administered on school grounds as they have been.

— the right to freedom of movement. This right is violated when any kind of travel requires masking, testing, or proof of vaccination.

— the right to privacy. The 4th Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Our vaccine status and medical history is not the business of store clerks, ticketing agents, transportation companies, restaurants, bars, grocery stores, or entertainment venues.

— the right to due process. Open meeting laws continue to be illegally suspended in towns, counties, and states across the country “due to coronavirus” and elected officials who are uncomfortable with democracy seem to like it that way. Virtual meetings undermine due process by restricting public access and participation. Also, the numerous executive and administrative edicts bypassing the legislative process are a violation of the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments.

— the rights of freedom of speech and press. These rights are guaranteed by the 1st Amendment. End the blatant Soviet-style government-media censorship of people with dissenting views about the covid narrative.

— the right to equal protection of our civil and Constitutional rights. Refusal of service by any transport company, public venue, ticket vendor, grocery store, or other business on the basis of arbitrary “vaccine passports” is a form of discrimination which we should be protected from under the law. Loss of this right amounts to coercion through medical tyranny and will lay the groundwork for a “social credit score” system in which all citizens no longer have equal rights.

Resources:

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data late Monday showing a total of 913,268 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 19, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 19,249 reports of deaths — an increase of 396 over the previous week — and 143,395 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,269 compared with the previous week.”

Note: VAERS/CDC is known to under-report adverse events because the CDC is controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. Yet they are forced to admit to this many adverse events. In the past, far lower numbers were cause to remove a pharmaceutical product. Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson products are allowed to continue because the CDC no longer has any safety threshold.

— Here are the statistics of the VAERS counterpart in Europe:

— “According To CDC’s Data, Covid Vaccine Is 43 Times More Effective To Take You To Haven [Heaven]”, Nov 11, 2021 Short video for “vaccine worshipers” by Tony Lin (satire).

— Steve Kirsch put together the following table of the most common adverse events (see https://www.skirsch.io/ for his explanation of the x factor):

Graph above based on mortality rate from England. Blue — “vaccinated”, red — not”vaccinated”. Source:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

“The Way You Design the World in Your Mind is the Way you Relate to It in the Real World”: By Dr. Vandana Shiva, 12 minute video, Global Research, December 05, 2021.
After Skool 17 March 2021

https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-divide-rule-plan-1-make-you-disposable/5743338

Connect with End Massachusetts Medical Mandates

Austrians Beg for Help: ‘Unvaccinated’ to Face Heavy Fines & a Year in Prison

by Amy Mek, RAIR Foundation
December 8, 2021

Austrian’s are pleading for the world to help end their rapidly emerging police state. The country’s vaccine mandate law will take effect on February 1, 2022. Unvaccinated people, including children as young as 14-years-old, can be fined up to 2000 euros each time they are caught. In addition, the government can ticket the same individuals several times a day. If you refuse to pay your fine, offenders will be thrown in a special prison for unvaccinated people for up to one year.

Unlike other prisoners, the public purse will not pay for an individual’s incarceration. Instead, the inmate will have to bear the costs incurred during their prison stay. The perpetrator also has to pay for his food and his prison cell.

The Austrian government does not ask murderers, rapists, or pedophiles to pay the cost of their incarceration. However, they will now demand prison payments of entirely innocent people.

Call for Help

Political activist Alexander Tschugguel has released an emergency call for help on social media, “I need your support,” says the activist. “We, as Austrians, all need your support. So please go your government officials to your local Austrian embassy or ask your embassy in Austria to apply as much pressure on the Austrian government as possible.”

Lab Rats of the Western World

Austria’s new unelected Chancellor, Karl Nehammer, is the former chief of police and has implemented police state-like measures in recent months, Tschugguel explains. “He wants to continue to do that, in a way which can only be called tyrannical and totalitarian.”

“We need your support,” he emphasized. “Please stop the Austrian government from turning our country into a police state. We, as Austrians, are the lab rats of the western free world. If it happens to us, it will happen to all other countries.”

Reject Quarantine Camps

We don’t want to have quarantine camps, explains Tschugguel. “We do not want to have those terrible rules which divide families, that divide the people, divide not only the faithful but every Austrian.”

One-third of the Austrian population has refused to be injected with the mRNA serums. The government has responded by criminalizing opposition to their experimental injection program of the entire population. This is highly undemocratic, and that is why we must oppose it, exclaims Tschugguel.



Holocaust Survivors Send Warning

Nick Hope, a 97-year-old Holocaust survivor imprisoned at the Nazi concentration camp Dachau, warned against the Austrian government’s authoritarian and totalitarian Covid measures. “When I look at the news in Austria, I see the spirit of Hitler, the spirit of force coming there,” he said in a video message recently posted at RAIR Foundation USA.

Another Holocaust survivor, 94-year-old Auschwitz survivor Marian Turski, warned of the dangers of branding people (the unvaccinated) as scapegoats, sources of disease, or profiteers. Historically, there have been (and are) vast and conclusive examples of the genocidal playbook that all begin with the political and social dehumanization of the “offending” population.

The Polish Holocaust survivor reminded the audience that the Holocaust didn’t’ start with death camps. Instead, it began with propaganda, scaremongering, scapegoating, segregation, and exclusion. Then, it was an easy next step to strip further rights, dehumanize, and brutally extinguish that minority.

Connect with RAIR Foundation

cover image credit: Elionas & gisoft / pixabay

Northern Territory, Australia Police Detective Sergeant Resigns: “I Can No Longer, in Good Conscience, Continue to Be Part of This Descent Into Totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in This Territory.”



“Hold the line. This far and no further.”

TCTL editor’s note: On December 2, 2021 Detective Sergeant Leith Phillips resigned from the Northern Territory, Australia police force in response to “the erosion of trust, respect, integrity, and the lack of compassion and common decency”.

“I can no longer, in good conscience, continue to be part of this descent into totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in this Territory. Further, the manipulation, coercion, force, and bullying tactics used in the forced standing down of good people and members of the Northern Territory Police, Fire & Emergency Service (sworn & unsworn), medical practitioners, teachers and others in the public service is simply irrational, without thought, logic or common-sense.

In any other time, the actions of our executive and government would be deemed unlawful and as an abuse of office and put simply, would result in multiple counts of unlawful dismissal.”

Sgt. Phillips had submitted his letter of resignation on December 2, citing a finish date of January 3, after 24 years working in the southern part of the Northern Territory. On December 3, he was escorted out of the Alice Springs police station  when he went to collect some personal possessions. On December 4 Commander Craig Laidler and Acting Commander Kirsten Engels came to his house to hand him a notice for two alleged serious breaches of discipline. The disciplinary action has now been dropped because, based on legal advice from the NT Police Association, he re-submitted his resignation as effective immediately. As a civilian he is not now subject to disciplinary action.

As a follow-up to these events, Sgt. Phillips wrote an email to the commissioner of police, expressing his thoughts on all that had occurred and reiterating his reasons for resignation. See that letter below.

See these articles by David Wood, NT Independent which detail the series of events.

‘An erosion of trust, respect, integrity, and the lack of compassion and decency’: NT Police Sergeant’s resignation letter

‘He was one of the best police officers in Australia’: Colleagues on suspended Detective Sergeant

Police executive forced to drop disciplinary action against outspoken Detective Sergeant

The following is Ex-(Det.) Sgt. Leith Phillips’s email to Jamie Chalker, Northern Territory Commissioner of Police and Chief Executive Officer of Fire and Emergency Services:

Commissioner of Police,

Excuse Provision

Firstly, I invoke the ‘SMALLPAGE’ defence and apologise in advance for any offence I may cause in this email and in any attachment. I trust this is a sufficient defence for any intended disciplinary action.

Formal Notice of Resignation

I gave formal notice of resignation from the Northern Territory Police Force on Thursday 02 December 2021, effective as of close of business 03 January 2022, the last day of my current personal leave.

Friday 03 December 2021

For my 24 years’ service I had my computer and swipe card access revoked, I was then tracked down inside the Alice Springs Police Station by Acting Commander Kirsten Engles who feigned compassion, instructed not to touch the computer, escorted to collect the last of my personal belongings and escorted to the front door of the police station.

The reason given, that ‘they’ (presumably the executive) were concerned as to who I would speak with whilst inside the police station and what I might do (presumably via email or other).

So, here is the ‘what I might do’ part of ‘their’ concern.

Erosion of trust

Sir, and I use this honorific purely due to the respect I hold for the office of the Commissioner of Police (COP), not the person who currently holds this position, as I no longer have any confidence in your ability to lead this organisation with respect, honour, and integrity.

I have come to the position of resigning from the Northern Territory Police Force in my 24th year of service, having commenced on 05 October 1998. I have been pushed into and forced to undertake this action due to the erosion of trust, respect, integrity, and the lack of compassion and common decency which is no longer an integral part of your decision making or that of your executive leadership team.

In the mess that followed Saturday 09 November 2019, and the tumultuous circumstances of your first days in office, I supported and vouched for you when others were against you through the first six (6) months of your commencement as COP. I did this because I knew you and was hopeful of positive change as I had observed your progression through the ranks since you were a plain clothes Sergeant in Alice Springs CIB.

However, since this time, I have borne witness and been subject to your leadership group undertaking persistent executive overreach into police investigations whereby it has become blindingly obvious that very few of your executives have any confidence in the investigative experience and skillset of the police officers under their commands. Nor does it appear that they display any current investigative skill themselves and appear to have lost complete touch with the realities of current day policing.

Subsequently, under your leadership, we have seen the loss of numerous skilled Detectives and general duty police officers to other jurisdictions and fields of investigation around the country, leaving our small force depleted of skilled senior Detectives and senior officers on the ground. It has been a deplorable loss of experience over a very short period for which you have presided and appeared to have encouraged those members to leave. One can only ask why a leader would be so willing to deplete his workforce of its experience base? Would it be so that those who have the experience and therefore the courage and integrity to speak against poor policy are no longer around, leaving a junior group who are more willing to comply with poor leadership because they do not know any better?

The ‘brain drain’ from our organisation has impacted and will continue to impact investigations into the future. How many homicides and critical incidents have this executive specifically been involved with in their career? I was part of the Alice Springs CIB during the infamous 2006-2008 period where we investigated some 9+ homicides in that 18 month period and for the most part, ran them autonomously from Darwin. This was when the Stuart Highway was dubbed the ‘Cannabis Highway to the stabbing capital of Australia’ (thank you SC Deanne Horwood for coining that phrase). How many in the executive have been involved in Supreme Court trials where, regardless of the outcome, it is the EXPERIENCE gained from these cases that helps develop investigative skill sets? There are some executive members, but not many, and this is something that can NEVER be trained for.  It is this EXPERIENCE we are losing and to have a Commander or above dictate or question my ability (or that of the Senior Investigating team) as to how to undertake an impartial investigation is insulting at the least and evidence of a lack of experience and trust from those asking the question.

COVID-19 Response

The erosion of trust has been further enhanced by the continuous and heavy-handed police response starting in early 2020 to Covid-19, whereby we have seen hard working members of our community fined exorbitant sums of money for breaching a Chief Health Officer (CHO) direction, which is not a law, but simply a CHO directive enforceable only for the duration of an ‘Emergency Declaration’.  We have been used as the ‘big stick’ in a health response where these same hard-working citizens of our community have borne the brunt of ‘flattening the curve’, and then have been forced to undergo quarantine for weeks at a time. In Alice Springs, citizens are detained at the ‘Todd Facility’ where they have less rights and freedom than a prisoner being held in ‘G’ block or in an isolation cell at the Alice Springs Correctional Centre. The abuse of basic civil / human rights is beyond me, and I am ashamed to wear the uniform where it says that I am to ‘Serve and Protect’ the people of the Northern Territory.  The degradation of trust and the division created between the police and the public will be generational.

In the early parts of this year, I had communicated with you (COP) regarding the way in which police had been used in the Northern Territory and around Australia in relation to the Covid-19 response. This had been done via email and SMS, to which you had replied. This ended when you obviously took offence at being provided information which was not in accordance with the current public narrative and therefore had me counselled through the chain of command by an ASCOM with the instruction that I was to not communicate with you any further. I have not done so until now. This was a further erosion of that trust in the office of the Commissioner of Police.

Further, in response to the Assistant Commissioner, People & Cultural Reform, request for consultation into mask and vaccine mandates, I attach the memorandum I submitted on 05 October 2021 detailing my concern. To date I have not received any response to this memorandum, not even an acknowledgement of receipt by that office. Note also that I included the NTPA in this memorandum for which our association has been found significantly wanting by its silence on this issue until the eleventh hour. I provide it in full now for all members to see part of my thought process and decision making and why I am taking this stand.

Just for the record, I am double vaxxed, however because I am anti-mandate and am providing comfort to those who are not vaxxed, I am a tin foil hat wearing ‘Anti-Vaxxer’.  I am not an ‘Anti-Vaxxer’, I am pro choice and I believe in informed consent – the right for everyone to conduct a risk assessment of their personal circumstances and proceed if the benefit outweighs the risk.  A right that no longer appears to be an option in society.

Role of Police in Society

I now come to the role of Constables in the Northern Territory.

When I was sworn in as a Constable of Police, I did not swear an oath to the Commissioner of Police. I swore an oath as follows:

I (Leith Phillips) do swear – that – I will well and truly serve – her majesty, Queen Elizabeth the second, her heirs and successors – as a member of the Northern Territory Police Force without fear or favour – affection or ill-will – from this day until I am legally discharged from that force – that I will see and cause – her majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved – that I will prevent to the best of my powers – all offences against her majesty’s peace – and against all laws in force in the Northern Territory of Australia – and that – while I remain a member of the Northern Territory Police Force – I will – to the best of my skill and knowledge – faithfully discharge all my duties according to law. So help me God.

To be more specific, the following spells out / defines the role of a police officer in Australia:

THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF POLICE OFFICERS IN AUSTRALIA

At common law Australian police do not fall within the employer-employee relationship.

The often-quoted authority for this proposition is Attorney-General (NSW) v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (1952) holds that police officers are not employees but are office-holders with “original authority” in the execution of their duties. It has been observed that because police exercise special discretionary powers derived from the law itself, a police officer is a servant to the law and not to any other authority. In addition, police officers swear an oath of office.

What I have witnessed in the past 12-18 months and more specifically within the last few months is the fast degeneration of the Northern Territory Police Force into ‘Rule by Law’.  The use of law as a tool for political repression and enforcing it unequally on parties with a different set of rules favouring a few sections of society. This can become an instrument of oppression and can give legitimacy to the enactment of laws which may grossly violate basic human rights.  In the Northern Territory and Australia in general, and not what it should be, the ‘Rule of Law’ is whereby all laws apply equally to all citizens of the country and no one can be above the law. It also states that no one will be subject to harsh, uncivilised, or discriminatory treatment even for the sake of maintaining law and order.

I can no longer, in good conscience, continue to be part of this descent into totalitarian ‘Rule by Law’ in this Territory. Further, the manipulation, coercion, force, and bullying tactics used in the forced standing down of good people and members of the Northern Territory Police, Fire & Emergency Service (sworn & unsworn), medical practitioners, teachers and others in the public service is simply irrational, without thought, logic or common-sense. In any other time, the actions of our executive and government would be deemed unlawful and as an abuse of office and put simply, would result in multiple counts of unlawful dismissal.

I question the conscience of Executive Management who are comfortable working in this current climate of ‘Rule by Law’? Are you happy to be part of this totalitarian regime, remember those who stood before the courts at Nuremberg? They too said what they were doing was allowable because it was the law. Those ‘laws’ were subsequently, and correctly, found to be gross breaches of human rights and so significantly wrong that many of those ’employees’ were sentenced to death or life imprisonment.

You are complicit with coercing members to receive the ‘vaccination’ under duress including members who are now suffering injuries due to the vaccine.  Duress, manipulation, and coercion is NOT consent and it equals ‘unlawful’. The demand to undergo this process to retain your employment is an example of ‘Rule by Law’.

My concerns regarding the direction that the NTPF was heading were raised and dismissed by you.  I am no longer comfortable and will not comply any longer.

Regardless of your position on vaccination, I ask all of the Senior Executive, what is your line in the sand? Where will you stop and stand and say ‘this far and no further’ in relation to your loss of freedom and the illogical mandates you are enforcing on members and the public? Remember, the CHO directions (rules) and any future changes to the law which may reflect these current discriminatory directives are the exact same rules which you and your family must also live under when you are off duty.  You Commissioned officers and those in the executive, you are not exempt.

To quote from the Holy Bible, the book of Esther, Chapter 4 verse 13 & 14, where Queen Esther (a Jew) was living in the king’s palace (some may call the 6th floor of the NAB Building the kings palace) when discriminatory decrees were being made against the Jewish population, in a way not too dissimilar to today. Her uncle came to her and said, “Do not imagine that you are safe in the king’s palace, you alone of all the Jews. Even if you now remain silent, relief and deliverance will come now to the Jews, but you and your father’s house will perish. Who knows – perhaps it was for a time like this that you became queen?”

Sincerely,

Ex-(Det.) Sgt. Leith Phillips, No. 2075

Shift Sergeant, Patrol Group 1, Alice Springs Police Station

cover image police patch credit: Dickelbers / Wikimedia Commons

Three Strikes! Judge Nukes Biden’s Federal Contractor Mandate

by Daniel McAdams, The Ron Paul Institute
December 7, 2021

Today may well mark the day the Biden Administration’s Covid tyranny suffers a fatal blow. U.S. District Judge R. Stan Baker issued a nationwide block on Biden’s mandate that all US government contractors and subcontractors – some 25 percent of the US work force – must take the experimental Covid shots.

As US Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) observed – That’s three strikes: the Medicare mandate was nuked, the 100+ worker mandate was nuked, and now the federal contractor mandate is nuked, nationwide!

THREE strikes! The third of Biden’s five mRNA/DNA shot mandates has been halted NATIONWIDE by a federal judge. These are blatantly unconstitutional. https://t.co/JMlPAWdugl

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 7, 2021

Three strikes – and we hope they’re OUT!

In his ruling, Judge Baker observed:

The Court acknowledges the tragic toll that the COVID-19 pandemic has wrought throughout the nation and the globe. However, even in times of crisis this Court must preserve the rule of law and ensure that all branches of government act within the bounds of their constitutionally granted authorities.

In other words, the Judge correctly concluded that the US Constitution is not suspended because of a virus.

There is good reason to believe that, cynical and authoritarian as it is, the Biden Administration knew all along that the president’s mandates didn’t stand a chance in court, but that the real game was to terrify the population sufficiently between promulgation and repudiation that more Americans would sign on to the shots.

There is nothing that focuses a family breadwinner’s mind like facing being thrown on to the streets because he or she did not want to take a medical treatment that – even in the words of the CDC Director – neither prevents infection nor transmission and thus could not in any sane world be considered a vaccine.

It’s popular these days to throw around the term “terrorism” to justify oppressing one’s political enemies, but it is definitional that the Biden Administration’s use of “jab or job” on millions of Americans is raw terrorism.

As with the eviction moratorium, the Biden Administration openly and even proudly admits that it breaks the law to pursue its political goals, daring the other co-equal branches of government to right the listing ship of state.

With Congress predictably inept at living up to its Constitutional obligations regarding reeling in Executive over-reach on amphetamines, it is a welcome surprise that several members of the Judicial Branch are stepping up to their Constitutional task.

Yes – three strikes and you’re out. But watch the zombie rise again. We who defend civil liberties and personal choice are slowly winning, but the beast is not yet slain.

Connect with The Ron Paul Institute

‘Stick Your Vaccine Mandate Up Your Arse’ Anthem Spreads Worldwide

sourced from DavidIcke.com
video by Daily Caller
December 7, 2021



Alberta, Canada: An Inside Look Into the Horror Show of a Calgary Quarantine Facility

by Alberta Nationals
December 6, 2021

Watch the videos below to see the horror show currently going on at the Westin Hotel at the Calgary Airport. The hotel has been taken over by the government to quarantine fully vaccinated travellers due to the Omicron variant which has killed exactly no one yet.

All walls and floors are completely plastic wrapped and no one is allowed out of their room. A women in Edmonton has not eaten for 40 hours in a Toronto quarantine facility.

What an absolute disgrace by both Jason Kenny and the federal government to allow this to happen.

Video 1 of 3 Westin Hotel Calgary pic.twitter.com/GGfa30WOKX

— Dar (@Darlene30564389) December 6, 2021

Video 2 Westin Hotel pic.twitter.com/YB5OuXkukg

— Dar (@Darlene30564389) December 6, 2021

Video 3 Westin Hotel Calgary pic.twitter.com/KtvaVYL3Wu

— Dar (@Darlene30564389) December 6, 2021

Here’s another story about the Westin quarantine facility from a Canadian who travelled back from Cairo. Red Cross of Canada employees even refuse to give her cups to drink water.

Connect with Alberta Nationals

Colonel Martínez-Vara Calls for Immediate Suspension of Covid Vaccination in Spain’s Armed Forces & Civilian Population

by Beatriz Talegón, Diario16
sourced from Europe Reloaded
December 7, 2021

The news reported by Rambla Libre may be of particular importance in the military field, but also because of the arguments that this colonel presents to request the immediate suspension of the Covid vaccination in the armed forces.

Carlos Martínez-Vara, head of the Higher Studies Section of the Higher School of the Armed Forces (ESFAS), of the Higher Center for National Defense Studies (CESEDEN), and Colonel EA (CGEO), has written a text that we have saved for our readers:

The Spanish population, both in the civilian and military sphere, has received the recommendation of health authorities to be vaccinated against Covid-19 with drugs from different manufacturers, which, although not yet formally approved, are administered under the Environmental Protection Act.

The European Medicines Agency (AEMPS) has issued a conditional marketing authorization on an emergency basis.

There are enough publications in the scientific literature with analyses and studies conducted on these drugs, whose conclusions warn of the risk to human health due to the presence of toxic materials in the vials used. In this regard, on November 2, Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, professor at the University of Almeria, published a micro-Raman spectroscopic study conducted on a random sample of vials of Covid-19 vaccines marketed by various pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen and Astra Zeneca), in which he concluded that he had detected objects that “unequivocally correspond to REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE”.

Many of the serious, very serious and fatal adverse events that have been reported in connection with the administration of vaccines to the European Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting System, EudraVigilance, (heart attack, myo/pericarditis, coagulation/vascular disorders, respiratory system disorders, reproductive system disorders, immune disorders, kidney disorders, liver disorders, cancer, etc.) are consistent with adverse events that may result from the presence of reduced graphene oxide in vaccines.

No less worrying is the study carried out by Dr. Sergio J. Pérez Olivero, whose October 3 report entitled “STUDY OF PANDEMIA – INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS” concludes that these vaccines weaken the immune system, because the Spike protein, among other negative effects, “alters cell signaling by binding to the ACE2 receptor, which means that it orders the cell to change its functions, which is particularly serious in immune cells, because it makes them ineffective, facilitating inflammatory processes and susceptibility to disease by any pathogen”.

In other words, according to this report, the population is gradually lowering its defenses against any disease by directly damaging the immune system with this protein.

These reports are backed by the highest scientific rigor, corroborated by post-marketing data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and supported by similar findings reported by Nobel laureates, the very creators of mRNA vaccine technology, and the world’s leading biomedical professionals in the field of immunogenetics in countries such as the U.S., the U.K., Germany, France, Japan, and China, among others.

This natural immunity is undoubtedly superior to vaccine-induced immunity, as it includes innate immune defenses, and there is no proven benefit to date in administering these vaccines to people who have naturally developed antibodies because they have overcome the disease.

On the contrary, scientific authorities in immuno-epidemiology believe that this strategy would compromise the immune status of the population by making herd immunity increasingly inaccessible, leading not only to a situation of perpetual dependence, but also to a progressive weakening of the population’s immune response with highly undesirable consequences.

However, incomprehensibly, the administration of at least one dose is imposed in the armed forces in order to perform a service commission, on board or abroad, without the need for a medical prescription, detailed information or informed consent prior to this inoculation.

This highly irregular circumstance is not governed by scientific criteria and constitutes a violation of countless rights, even promoting discrimination and other prejudices against military personnel who, appealing to their personal ethics, do not comply with this order.

This situation produces an obvious conflict of obedience in military personnel who, being in good health or even having developed antibodies against Covid-19, wish to fulfill their professional obligations within the constitutional framework.

The batches of vaccines currently marketed in Spain have not been analyzed by the laboratories of the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products, having been allowed only through documentary review procedures, despite the potentially serious or very serious clinical risk to the population that would be represented by the presence of foreign particles in liquid parenteral preparations such as the aforementioned vaccines.

The Ministry of Defense has, for reasons of national security, an additional and independent methodology in the area of reception and quality control of materials that requires significant sampling according to an established reference sample, in compliance with the defined specifications and the approval of batches with the signature of a responsible.

It is also understood that this acceptance procedure is repeated each time a new lot is generated, requiring in all cases the transparency of the supplier for an audit by the Quality Managers of the Ministry of Defense to collect the data and results of the tests of the manufacturer and supplier, and the analysis of the samples selected in each lot, without proceeding to the use of these lots until their approval by the Quality Managers of the Ministry of Defense.

The FAS Pharmacology Department has the technical capacity to perform the relevant analyses of the above-mentioned vaccine vials or to supervise the correction of those it subcontracts in order to verify the absence of any toxicity that could affect the quality and safety of the vaccines.

The presence of these elements in a vaccine would constitute a violation of the obligation for pharmaceutical companies that manufacture and/or import the aforementioned vaccines to comply with the requirements established by Chapter IV of Royal Decree 824/2010 of June 25 (which regulates pharmaceutical laboratories, manufacturers of active pharmaceutical ingredients and foreign trade in medicines and experimental medicines) dedicated to the standards of good manufacturing practices. This would also imply non-compliance with the European Pharmacopoeia regarding the presence of particles in parenteral preparations.”

In view of the above, the Colonel requests:

1. That the relevant instructions be given, within the Ministry of Defense or in coordination with other entities of the State administration, so that counter-analyses be carried out on random batches of the inoculations currently administered to the armed forces and the Spanish population.

Dr. Campra himself proposes in the aforementioned report to perform “further analyses using the described technique or other complementary techniques based on meaningful sampling that would allow the assessment of the level of presence of graphene materials in these drugs with adequate statistical significance, as well as their detailed chemical and structural characterization.”

This quality control should require, in addition to sampling, the collection of relevant documentation and certificates of analysis from the manufacturer or importer.

FAS members exercise a degree of confidentiality that does not jeopardize the secrets that pharmaceutical manufacturing companies want to keep. Samples of each batch must also be retained for analysis, even after acceptance and use, for a sufficient period of time to ensure relevant rebuttal evidence in the event of lawsuits or claims in military or civil courts to establish the liability of those who accepted the batches as safe.

 2. The current Covid-19 vaccination campaign in the armed forces and in the population should be stopped as a precautionary measure, until the doubts about the presence of reduced graphene oxide and other potentially toxic particles and elements to health are removed.

 

For reference to the documents cited by the Colonel, click here.

Connect with Europe Reloaded

‘We’re Approaching a Million Vaccine Injuries in the U.S.’

by Del Bigtree, The HighWire
December 6, 2021



Noted Cardiologist, Peter McCullough, returns to The Highwire to discuss new data on the dangerous side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine on the heart.

Connect with The HighWire

120 Teens Hospitalized, 3 Dead Following Pfizer Vaccine Rollout for 15- to 17-Year-Olds in Vietnam

The Vietnamese province of Thanh Hoa suspended a batch of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine after more than 120 teens were hospitalized after being vaccinated. According to news reports, three Vietnamese teens have died after getting the Pfizer vaccine.

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
December 6, 2021

The Vietnamese province of Thanh Hoa suspended a batch of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine after more than 120 teens were hospitalized after being vaccinated.

According to the province’s Center for Disease Control (CDC), the teens were hospitalized for symptoms ranging from nausea and high fevers to breathing difficulties — with 17 children exhibiting severe reactions.

Thanh Hoa authorities have yet to confirm Pfizer’s COVID vaccine caused the teens’ symptoms, VN Express International reported.

Vu Van Chinh, director of the Ha Trung District General Hospital, said side-effects following vaccination are normal but are more likely to happen in children than adults.

Luong Ngoc Truong, director of the CDC, said although the province stopped using the current vaccine batch, “We still have other batches, also Pfizer vaccines, so we will continue vaccinating the children.”

The suspended batch was put into storage and could be used later for other groups like adults, Truong added.

Last week, four workers in Thanh Hoa’s Kim Viet Shoe factory died — also due to “overreaction” — after receiving the Vero Cell COVID vaccine, authorized in May by the World Health Organization for emergency use.

Three Vietnamese children die after Pfizer vaccine

Vietnam on Nov. 30 rolled out its COVID vaccination program for children 15 to 17 years old with Pfizer’s vaccine. Since then, three children have died after receiving their first dose. The cause of death was “overreaction to the vaccine.”

One of the three deaths reported in Vietnam includes a 12-year-old boy in the southern province of Binh Phuoc who died one day after his first Pfizer shot.

The boy received his vaccine Monday afternoon and was sent home to rest. After dinner, he experienced dizziness, abdominal pain and diarrhea. He was taken to a local hospital and then transferred to two others, but died Tuesday morning.

The Binh Phuoc Department of Health set up an expert panel to determine the cause of the 12-year-old’s death.

A 16-year-old boy in the northern Bac Giang Province, and a ninth-grade girl in Hanoi, both died Sunday after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

The Health Ministry said both deaths were caused by “overreaction to the vaccine,” not by a problem with the quality of the vaccine or the vaccination process.

Drugmakers Pfizer and Merck on Nov. 24 agreed to give licenses to firms in Vietnam to produce COVID treatment pills — paxlovid (Pfizer) and molnupiravir (Merck).

Vietnam is one of 95 low- and middle-income countries allowed to produce the pills through a voluntary licensing agreement with Medicines Patent Pool, an international public health group backed by the United Nations.

According to the latest data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, there have been 18,558 reported adverse events following Pfizer’s COVID vaccine among 12 to 17-year-olds.

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense 

cover image credit: zibik / pixabay

Melbourne, Australia — Dec 4th, 2021: Massive, Spirited Protest Against Medical Tyranny (Time Lapse Video)

by True Arrow
December 4, 2021



Connect with True Arrow at Telegram

all images credit: screenshots from True Arrow video

The Covidian Cult and Totalitarianism

by Jeremy Nell, Jerm Warfare
December 5, 2021

CJ Hopkins is a writer and satirist.

He has written some of the most brilliant, most brutal commentary I’ve read surrounding this pseudopandemic.

Such as his piece titled The Road to Totalitarianism.

Or The Criminalization of Dissent.

Or the one that inspired our conversation, The Covidian Cult.

When CJ last joined me on my podcast, our internet connection was plagued with gremlins. Weirdly enough, we had similar issues this time around, which is why the conversation has a few cuts here and there.

Nevertheless, it turned out to be great.

He discusses

• the Covidian cult to which millions of people have willingly succumbed;

• how it’s driven by fear and no different to totalitarianism;

• why being silent is a terrible idea; and

• what we can do to push back against the global capitalists.



Connect with Jerm Warfare

Connect with CJ Hopkins

World’s First Vaccine Murder Case Against Bill Gates

by Patricia Harrity, The Daily Exposé
December 4, 2021

The world’s first vaccine murder case has been filed in India’s High Court against Bill Gates, as the AstraZeneca’s (Covishield) manufacturer and his partner Adar Poonawalla, who is the chief executive officer of a biopharmaceutical company, Serum Institute of India, and other Government officials and leaders involved in what they state is the murder of a 23-year-old man, Mr. Hitesh Kadve, who died as a result of the AstraZeneca vaccination.

Mr. Kadve had taken the vaccine due to the restrictions set by the railways that only double vaccinated individuals were able to travel and the belief that the vaccine is completely safe, now as a result of another death finally being reported as an adverse reaction, his mother has sought justice.

India’s Adverse Event Following Immunisation

The Government of India’s Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) Committee recently admitted that the death of 33-year-old Dr. SnehalL Lunawat was due to side effects of the AstraZeneca Covishield: vaccine, which is India’s most widely used vaccine.

The family of Dr. Snehal Lunawat had approached the World Health Organisation (WHO) to intervene due to the death not being reported by the Indian Officials as an adverse event. The family was then to follow up with the ministry and Serum Institute of India who had manufactured the vaccine but still did not receive a satisfactory response.

Despite the India Drugs Network (AIDN) helping the Lunawat family in successfully reporting the case as an AEFI, it was to take close to seven months after Dr. Lunawat’s death for the AEFI to accept that she had died due to a blood clot from the Covishield vaccine (Source).

The report to the AEFI has raised awareness and the court case may now be the first of many as a result.

The information in this article can be found on the website for the Indian Bar Association (here)

Unlawful Promotion of Prescription Drugs

The Indian Bar Association point out previous underhand behaviour of Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK), stating that the company is guilty of unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices.

Additionally, they state that the United States alleges that GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents. GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of doctors and paid for the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended.

Missing Data

Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes drug. The missing information included data regarding certain post-marketing studies, as well as data regarding two studies undertaken in response to European regulators’ concerns about the cardiovascular safety of Avandia. Since 2007, the FDA has added two black box warnings to the Avandia label to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1) congestive heart failure, and (2) myocardial infarction (heart attack).

The Indian Bar Association cited two cases that went before the American Court regarding the side effects of previous MR vaccine in one case, the Court accepted the settlement of compensation of 101 Million US Dollars to the victim.

Also, in another case in America, the CIA, FDA’s office of criminal investigation, recovered around 10.2 Billion US Dollar from Pharma Company GlaxoSmithKline for various offences including suppression of side effects of the medicines and putting the lives of Americans in danger.

Paid Kickbacks

It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent, and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programmes.

Vaccination by Deception is a Criminal Wrong

The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO, makes it clear that before giving a vaccine or any treatment to a person, he should be informed about the side effects of the medicine and also about the alternate remedies available.

If any person is vaccinated by suppressing the facts or by telling a lie that the said vaccines are completely safe, amount to the consent being obtained under deception. In India, vaccination under deception or by force/coercion, or by putting certain stifling conditions is a civil and criminal wrong.

From the Indian Bar Association (source)

The Petitioner raised previous alleged criminal antecedents of Bill Gates which is a “strong proof against Bill Gates and his vaccine syndicate”.

The Indian Bar Association has said therefore that Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, are “accused of their involvement in the conspiracy.” In India, the person allowing the false marketing of his product is also held to be guilty due to his act of commission and omission and that both Gates and Poonawalla are guilty of mass murders (here)   The case is thought to be heard soon, regardless of the outcome, it will, at last, raise the much-needed awareness of both the adverse reactions caused by the vaccinations and the alleged criminal behaviour of the manufacturers and Bill Gates.

Connect with The Daily Exposé

Ricardo Maarman and Dr. Faiez Kirsten: Update on South Africa’s Constitutional Court Case — “What We Are Fighting for Here Is Nothing Other Than Our Freedom… Here You Have Slaves Being Branded Right Into Their DNA”

See video below excerpts from Ricardo Maarman’s powerful words:

“What we are faced with here — the country and the world — we are faced with a very, very dire situation. What we are fighting for here is nothing other than our freedom. You know, the level of enslavement that we are talking here is unbelievable.

“I don’t think there has been a time in history where slaves were forced to put something in their body… Slaves were branded on the skin.

“Here you have slaves being branded the right into their DNA.

“This is unbelievable. And this is a whole country, a whole nation, that is exposed to this.

“We are exposed to the genetic modification of an entire nation — forever. We are exposed to a situation where your freedoms are going to be taken away and we don’t know how we will recover them.

“There is a lot of people that are getting injured, that will die from this. So this is a matter of life and death.

“The looming mandates that are coming — vaccine mandates — are put in a situation where people have to choose between potentially dying of a vaccination, a poisonous vaccination that can kill you all or dying of starvation because of the economic exclusion.

“There is literally no middle ground here. And there is no gray area here.

~~~

“You see, falsehood — falsehood and lies — are the handmaidens of tyranny and murder.

“You see, in order for a murderer to kill his victim, he has to lure him with lies and deception.

“In order for a tyrant to strip people of power, he has to lie to them about his true intentions.

“And that is why narratives are important. Because a certain narrative can either be a handmaiden of tyranny and murder or it can be a handmaiden of freedom and justice. And that’s why the narratives are important.

~~~

“It is completely wrong to put people in a position where they have to choose between feeding their families…and their families starving potentially if they are not in a position to feed them — or putting their families in a position, in order to live they have to be injected with something that might kill, maim them, change their DNA forever. This is diabolical.

~~~

“I cannot remember in recorded history that we have seen a worse crime than the one that is being perpetrated here against the people of South Africa and against the people of the world.

~~~

“The person was is spreading the falsehood and he is not aware that he’s spreading falsehood, he’s also culpable. Because you are not supposed to speak on matters that involve life and death if you’re not sure.

“If you have not made sure of the facts, if you do not have proof to back it up, then you’re not supposed to speak on these matters.

~~~

“We are talking here that you’re exposing entire future generations, the offspring of these people whose genetics have been so modified, we do not even know what kind of harm you are exposing their children. You are taking people’s rights away.

“Like I say, we have never seen a form of slavery as totalitarian, as tyrannical, as what we are moving into now.

~~~

“There’s no place here on the sideline… When you are talking about the potential extermination of an entire nation, there’s no ‘I’m in the middle or I’m neutral.’

~~~

“In order to murder, you first need to lie to lure the victim.

“And in order to oppress, you need to claim power under false pretenses.

“And that is what’s happening. And so we now need to say ‘what are those lies, and what those falsehoods, that are being propagated, that is assisting with this murder and that is assisting with this tyranny?”

~ Ricardo Maarman in conversation with Dr. Faiez Kirsten

video by Dr. Faiez Kirsten, HWP Institute and Ricardo Maarman, showusthevirus.info
December 3, 2021



Original video available at HWP Report Brighteon

See related:

Ricardo Maarman & Thousands of South Africans File Constitutional Lawsuit Against the President, Speaker of Parliament & Governor of SA Reserve Bank for ‘Pandemic’-Related Crimes Against South Africans

“Show Us the Virus” — Update on Legal Challenge to South African Government: Justify Destructive COVID Mandates

Connect with Ricardo Maarman

Connect with Dr. Faiez Kirsten

Pfizer’s Unconscionable Crimes, Past and Present

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
December 4, 2021



STORY AT-A-GLANCE

In a November 9, 2021, interview with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe,¹ Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla claimed “a small part of professionals” intentionally circulate “misinformation … so that they will mislead those that have concerns.”²

Such medical professionals, Bourla said, are not just bad people, “they’re criminals, because they have literally cost millions of lives.” Bourla is one to talk, being the CEO of a company the name of which is synonymous with corporate crime.

Bourla’s comments were made on the same day Pfizer and its partner BioNTech asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to broaden its authorization for booster shots to everyone over the age of 18.³

Pot Calling the Kettle Black

I guess we can’t be too surprised, though, as the primary defense strategy people like Bourla have is to blame the opposition for their own misdeeds. He even claims the company is being targeted by “dark organizations,” meaning organizations that aren’t transparent about their funding.

This is precisely what the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is, the fabrications⁴ of which are being used to prop up the official narrative that those who present evidence showing the COVID shots are dangerous are domestic terrorists⁵ out to worsen the pandemic death toll.

No one knows who funds this group, but it has plenty of connections to war hawks and Great Reset promoters — including the Atlantic Council, to which Bourla is making these statements.

By way of its board members, the CCDH can be linked to the Trilateral Commission, the Atlantic Council, the European Council of Foreign Relations, Save the Children Fund (funded by the Gates Foundation and a partner of Gates’ GAVI Vaccine Alliance), the British Parliament, CIA and Event 201,^6,7 Microsoft,⁸ and the Center for American Progress⁹ (another organization funded by dark money¹⁰).

And Bourla wants us to believe Pfizer is under attack from dark money groups? Again, the playbook of these wolves includes the dictum to always blame the other side for what they themselves are guilty of.

More on the Atlantic Council

In August 2018, Facebook claimed an “influence campaign” by Russian “bad actors” had been carried out on its platform leading up to the 2018 midterm elections. However, it turned out these pages weren’t identified by Facebook. They came primarily from the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab.

In her article, “Hysteria Over Newly Revealed Facebook ‘Influence Campaign’ Doesn’t Fit the Facts,”¹¹ investigative reporter Whitney Webb took a deep-dive into this inane propaganda effort, pointing out that:

“… despite the lawmakers’ claims, Facebook has established no links to the Russian government or even Russian nationals.

The only ‘evidence’ to back up the claim of Russian-involvement is that one of the pages identified ‘had an IRA [Internet Research Agency, a Russian ‘troll farm’ named in a Mueller-probe indictment] account as one of its admins for ‘only seven minutes’ and ‘one of the IRA accounts we disabled in 2017 shared a Facebook Event hosted by’ one of the pages.

Beyond the fact that accusations of Russian involvement are highly politicized given the lack of current evidence, there is hardly any indication that this ‘influence campaign’ was even influential at all.

Indeed, most of the ‘bad actor’ pages and accounts had hardly any followers, with most of them having no followers. For instance, only four of the 32 total social-media pages and accounts had more than 10 followers, with all other pages — i.e., the remaining 28 — having between 10 and zero, according to Facebook’s statements.

All of the Instagram accounts identified had zero followers and, among those seven accounts, only one of them had made a single post on the platform. By Facebook’s own admission, only four of the pages named were even remotely significant in terms of followers and thus ‘influence.’”

Why do I mention this? Because this is the same tactic used to frame a small number of individuals with limited social media reach as domestic terrorists, simply for sharing counter-narratives about the COVID pandemic.

False Allegations Used to Quench Freedom of Speech

According to the CCDH,¹² a dozen individuals, including me, were responsible for 65% of all anti-vaccine content on social media and should therefore be banned from all platforms. Most social media companies have since complied, deplatforming most of us. This despite a public denouncement of the CCDH’s accusations by Monika Bickert, vice president of Facebook content policy, who stated that:¹³

“… these 12 people are responsible for about just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true or false, as well as URLs associated with these people.

The report¹⁴ upon which the faulty narrative is based analyzed only a narrow set of 483 pieces of content over six weeks from only 30 groups, some of which are as small as 2,500 users.

They are in no way representative of the hundreds of millions of posts that people have shared about COVID-19 vaccines in the past months on Facebook.

Further, there is no explanation for how the organization behind the report identified the content they describe as ‘anti-vax’ or how they chose the 30 groups they included in their analysis. There is no justification for their claim that their data constitute a ‘representative sample’ of the content shared across our apps.”

Information Warfare

Getting back to the Atlantic Council, Webb noted that:¹⁵

“Facebook officially partnered with the Atlantic Council this past May in order to tackle so-called ‘fake news,’ adding that the hawkish think-tank would serve as its ‘eyes and ears’ in identifying alleged foreign-influence operations …

The Atlantic Council itself is led by a mix of retired military officers, former politicians, and Western business elites. And the think-tank’s financial sponsors include top U.S. defense contractors; agencies aligned with Washington and the Pentagon; the United Arab Emirates; major transnational corporations; and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

One can think of several reasons why such a group would be interested in fomenting anti-Russian hysteria … The Atlantic Council’s conflicts of interest are certainly worth keeping in mind …”

The same must be said about the CCDH, and Pfizer too. Both are glaringly biased and in no position to judge what is misinformation and what isn’t. But then, this is war, after all. We’re in an information war, and the term “misinformation” is lobbed in lieu of grenades. Discernment and some basic wisdom is required to avoid becoming a victim.

Fact checking organizations are another weapon designed and deployed to control the narrative. They exist as gatekeepers to funnel readers and viewers to the official narrative and away from anything that might raise inconvenient questions. The largest and most influential fact checker is NewsGuard, which hands out “trustworthiness” ratings to websites.

NewsGuard cofounder Louis Crovitz is a member of the Council on Foreign relations — another Great Reset supporter — and primary advisers include Tom Ridge, former secretary of Homeland Security, and Ret. Gen. Michael Hayden, a former director of both the CIA and NSA.¹⁶

Knowing that, it makes it easier to understand how everyday people who share information that veers from the official narrative can be labeled and treated as a national security threat.

The COVID pandemic is a militarized operation. We’re at war, and the designated enemy (looking at it from the side that started this war without telling anyone) are the citizens of the world who want to hold on to their freedom and human rights.

Pfizer Has a Long History of Criminal Behavior

Pfizer is on the other side — the side that is seeking to install an unelected technocratic regime based on the idea that we need a global biosecurity, biosurveillance apparatus or we’ll all die.

This is not a new position for them. During the American Civil War, which began in 1862, the need for massive amounts of painkillers and antiseptics allowed Pfizer to flourish and expand during wartime.¹⁷ Today, the manufactured “need” for COVID-19 vaccine is allowing Pfizer to make out like a bandit yet again, and as I’ve already stated, we are again at war, albeit an undeclared one.

To achieve that, Pfizer is willing to “blackmail” countries into accepting its COVID shot terms, as reviewed in the Gravitas report above — terms that make sure Pfizer always comes out on top.

A key term is no liability, which is understandable considering the amount of harm Pfizer’s COVID jab is causing. Pfizer went so far as to bully nations into putting up sovereign assets like military bases as collateral to pay for any vaccine injury lawsuits that might result from their COVID jab.

While that might not be illegal, it’s unethical, and so is researching on people without informed consent. Everyone who gets these emergency use authorized injections are part of that research, while simultaneously being prevented from seeing anything but propaganda.

Without truthful and transparent disclosure of both risks and benefits, there is no informed consent. Pfizer is even experimenting on children and pregnant women without informed consent, two categories that historically have been off-limits for drug experimentation.

Whistleblower Claims Data Were Falsified

According to a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, data were falsified and patients were unblinded. Follow-up on reported side effects also lagged behind.¹⁸ This isn’t the first time such unsavory have been levied against Pfizer.

In 2014, Pfizer was ordered to pay $75 million to settle charges relating to its unlawful testing of a new broad spectrum antibiotic on critically ill Nigerian children. As reported by the Independent¹⁹ at the time, Pfizer sent a team of doctors into Nigeria in the midst of a meningitis epidemic.

For two weeks, the team set up right next to a medical station run by Doctors Without Borders and began dispensing the experimental drug, Trovan. Of the 200 children picked, half got the experimental drug and the other half the already licensed antibiotic Rocephin.

Eleven of the children treated by the Pfizer team died, and many others suffered side effects such as brain damage and organ failure. Pfizer denied wrongdoing. According to the company, only five of the children given Trovan died, compared to six who received Rocephin, so their drug was not to blame.

The problem was they never told the parents that their children were being given an experimental drug, let alone ask them if they wanted their child to take part in the trial.

What’s more, while Pfizer produced a permission letter from a Nigerian ethics committee, the letter turned out to have been backdated. The ethics committee itself wasn’t set up until a year after the trial had already taken place.

State Department cables also revealed Pfizer hired spies with a plan to frame a Nigerian attorney general and get him to drop the parents’ lawsuit.²⁰ Pfizer even tried to avoid responsibility by falsely accusing Doctors Without Borders of dispensing the experimental drug.²¹

An ‘Habitual Offender’

In his 2010 paper,²² “Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR,” Robert G. Evans, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor at Vancouver School of Economics, described Pfizer as “a ‘habitual offender,’ persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.”

Pfizer has been sued in multiple venues over unethical drug testing, illegal marketing practices,²³ bribery in multiple countries,²⁴ environmental violations — including illegal dumping of PCBs and other toxic waste²⁵ — labor and worker safety violations and more.^26,27,28 It’s also been criticized for price gouging that threatens the lives of patients with chronic diseases such as epilepsy.²⁹

Between 2002 and 2010 alone, Pfizer and its subsidiaries were fined $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. This included $2.3 billion for the illegal marketing of the arthritis drug, Bextra, levied in 2009.^30,31 It was the largest health care fraud settlement in American history.

According to the Global Justice report, “The Horrible History of Big Pharma: Why We Can’t Leave Pharmaceutical Corporations in the Driving Seat of the COVID-19 Response:”³²

“A whistleblower claimed that sales staff were incentivized to sell Bextra to doctors for conditions for which the drug wasn’t approved and at doses up to eight times those recommended. ‘At Pfizer I was expected to increase profits at all costs, even when sales meant endangering lives. I couldn’t do that,’ he stated.”

In 2011, Pfizer agreed to pay another $14.5 million to settle federal charges of illegal marketing,³³ and in 2014 they settled federal charges relating to improper marketing of the kidney transplant drug Rapamune to the tune of $35 million.³⁴

None of those legal actions deterred future bad behavior. To Pfizer, paying fines to sweep illegalities under the rug has become part of the cost of doing business, and they can afford it. While the fines may sound extraordinary, they’re tiny when compared to the company’s profits.

Pfizer was among the top 30 most profitable companies in the world in 2020, with profits reaching $16 billion, and its COVID jab alone is predicted to make $13 billion in 2021.³⁵

As noted by the law firm Matthews and Associates, “the history of Pfizer is rife with so much subterfuge and under-the-table dealing that the company will need all the help it can get to promote confidence in its hastily assembled COVID vaccine.”³⁶ The key strategy to boost confidence, unfortunately, is censorship.

What ‘New Way of Life’ Is Pfizer Promising?

The fastest way to get back to normal, Bourla claims in his Atlantic Council interview, is for everyone to get vaccinated. Considering how little things have changed despite massive vaccination rates, it seems clear the globalists in charge of The Great Reset — and Pfizer is part of that pack — have no intention of allowing anything go back to normal. It won’t matter how many comply, or how many times we comply

Australia is perhaps the clearest illustration of what the whole world will face. Even though a majority are “vaccinated,” their freedoms have not been returned, and now they have to submit to boosters or lose what semblance of freedom the initial round of shots gave them. The Australian government is confiscating and blocking people’s bank accounts, withholding unemployment benefits and more — all in the name of “public health.”

Bourla even indicates that there is no going back to the old normal when he states, “The only thing that stands between the new way of life and the current way of life is … hesitancy to vaccinations.”

New way of life. What does this “new way of life” look like? It looks like Australia. It looks like Israel. It looks like Lithuania,³⁷ where your “right” to frequent restaurants, stores, shopping malls, beauty salons, libraries, banks, insurance agencies and universities, and your “right” to inpatient medical care and travel, all depend on your willingness to participate in a medical experiment that can kill or disable you.

The “new way of life” Bourla is talking about involves repeatedly playing lethal Russian Roulette just to “earn” the right to be part of society. No thank you. Bourla can keep his “new way of life.”

Connect with Dr. Joseph Mercola

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay

The Omicron Variant is Here! What You Need to Know

by JP Sears, Awaken with JP
December 4, 2021



Connect with JP Sears

Disturbing Confrontation Inside Australia’s ‘Gold Standard’ COVID Internment Camp

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
December 3, 2021

Days ago we presented the latest Orwellian headline out of Australia… “Aussie Police Arrest Teen ‘Fugitives’ Who Escaped From COVID Internment Camp”. Since then more incredibly disturbing video from inside the Northern Australian Covid internment camp, Howard Springs facility, has emerged. A frightening confrontation between a imprisoned “quarantined” woman and camp authorities was caught on hidden camera.

One host on the popular cultural commentary and news analysis site UnHeard recently introduced a segment taking a look at the fresh footage from inside the notorious Covid internment camp : “Australia. Until recently, that country was most famous for its sunshine and relaxed attitude. Well since the Covid pandemic hit we’ve all got to know another side of Australia…”

https://twitter.com/_evelynrae/status/1466712921266814977?

With some of the longest and most stringent lockdowns and travel restrictions in the world, it’s become a case study of what happens when a government will do anything to keep Covid numbers low,” host Freddie Sayers’ narration continues.

“Their latest policy is to build special camps, Covid internment camps – to which infected and suspected infected people are moved. The biggest of these camps is called Howard Springs.”

“It houses up to 2,000 inmates, surrounded by tall fences and carefully policed against attempts to escape. It’s been described as the ‘gold standard’ of such camps and is being replicated across Australia.”

The woman being interrogated and threatened with a 5000 AU$ fine in the above video can been seen in a follow-up interview below, conducted after she was released from detention…



As is shown in the video in question, camp officials confronted the quarantined woman, later identified as Hayley Hodgson, and began pointing out yellow lines that she could not cross.

She never tested positive for COVID after being tested three times. “Never had Covid. I was in close contact with someone – never got it, and I was treated literally like a criminal,” she later described. After her 14-day stint at the camp, she lost her job, returning to her home unemployed, she later confirmed.

Up until recently, Australia – with its sprawling coastline and beautiful beaches, outdoor and adventure life, and nearly year-round sunshine – was considered by most to be a large “paradise” vacation spot in the South Pacific… but now it’s marked as the place of “Covid quarantine hell”.

* * *

Meanwhile, in neighboring New Zealand, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has unironically given citizens permission to use the bathroom inside other people’s homes when visiting…

Exciting news from New Zealand, where PM Jacinda Ardern has given her people permission to use the bathroom inside their friends’ homes.https://t.co/YhbzuJiBRL

— Michael P Senger (@michaelpsenger) November 29, 2021

Connect with ZeroHedge

5-Year-Old Died 4 Days After Pfizer Shot, CDC VAERS Data Show

VAERS data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 927,740 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 19,532 deaths and 146,720 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021.

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
December 3, 2021

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention today released new data showing a total of 927,740 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 19,532 reports of deaths — an increase of 283 over the previous week — and 146,720 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 3,325 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 672,373 adverse events, including 8,986 deaths and 57,143 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 26, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 8,986 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 26, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 26% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 454 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 24. This includes 264 million doses of Pfizer, 173 million doses of Moderna and 16 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021 for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

• 2,586 adverse events, including 34 rated as serious and 2 reported deaths. One death occurred in an 11-year-old girl from Georgia vaccinated Sept. 14, prior to the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine in the 5 to 11 age group.

The second death (VAERS I.D. 1890705) occurred in a 5-year-old girl who died four days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.

• 1,581 adverse events have been reported in the 5 to 11 age group since Nov. 1.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021 for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

• 23,871 adverse events, including 1,453 rated as serious and 31 reported deaths.

The most recent death involves a 16-year-old girl from Georgia (VAERS I.D. 1865389) who died reportedly from a heart condition and multi-organ failure two days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

• 60 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
  attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
• 563 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 553 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
• 139 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 26, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:

• 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
• 54% of those who died were male, 42% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
• The average age of death was 72.7.
• As of Nov. 26, 4,480 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,411 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
• Of the 3,219 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 41% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
• 764 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 29% to Moderna and 27% to J&J.
• 2,163 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
• 11,334 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 5,024 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 4,037 reports to Moderna and 2,222 reports to J&J.
• 3,257 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,025 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,085 cases to Moderna and 137 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.

Athletes experience devastating injuries following COVID vaccines

As The Defender reported Dec. 2, several high-performing professional athletes are facing the end of their careers after COVID vaccines destroyed their health.

World record-holder in static breath-hold freediving, veteran triathlete, professional tennis player, professional mountain biker—all high-performing athletes until COVID vaccines ruined their health + their careers.#TheDefender: https://t.co/zL66Edfiw5https://t.co/L76vBedOOW

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) December 2, 2021

Florian Dagoury, a world record-holder in static breath-hold freediving, who once held his breath for a shocking 10 minutes and 30 seconds, was diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis and trivial mitral regurgitation after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Dagoury said he now struggles to reach an 8-minute breath-hold, feels an urge to breathe doing 40-minute dives, can’t keep his heart rate low and experienced a 30% decrease in his diving performance.

Veteran triathlete Antoine Méchin, 32, is also facing the potential end to his career after experiencing a pulmonary embolism after receiving Moderna’s COVID vaccine.

The symptoms, which included breathing problems and arm pain, started after the first dose, but doctors brushed off his shortness of breath as related to stress and fatigue.

Jeremy Chardy, a 34-year old professional tennis player ranked 73rd in the world, suspended his season due to a severe adverse reaction to a COVID vaccine, which left him unable to engage in intense activity.

Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Warner’s reaction was so severe that, as of October, he was still spending days in bed, overwhelmed by too much mental or physical exertion.

Two professional soccer players collapse during games

A professional soccer player collapsed suddenly on Nov. 25, during a Real Madrid’s Champions League game with Sheriff Tiraspol, a Moldovan soccer club, ZeroHedge reported.

Adama Traore, 26, a winger for Sherriff Tiraspol, was seen clutching his chest as he slumped to the ground in the middle of the game as medics rushed to revive him. The reasons behind Traore’s collapse and why he was suffering from chest pains have not been confirmed.

​​Traore’s collapse occurred the night after another player, Sheffield United’s John Fleck, went down during a match against Reading. Fleck was taken off on a stretcher after receiving lengthy treatment.

When a radio pundit questioned whether Fleck had received the COVID vaccine, his live feed to the show was cut.

A major German newspaper, Berliner Zeitung, recently published a report attempting to answer why an “unusually large number of professional and amateur soccer players have collapsed recently.”

The article listed many recent cases of players who experienced heart problems or collapsed on the field — in some cases resulting in death.

Pfizer seeks authorization for boosters shots for 16- and 17-year-olds

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said in a tweet on Tuesday the pharma giant, along with BioNTech, formally asked the FDA to authorize COVID booster doses for 16- and 17-year olds.

If approved, the shot would be the first booster available to people under 18.

The FDA could approve Pfizer’s booster doses for 16- and 17-year olds as soon as next week, according to people familiar with the matter.

COVID vaccines may be associated with heightened risk of myopericarditis among men

To help determine whether a correlation exists between COVID vaccines and myopericarditis, researchers tracked data from more than 268,000 adults in Massachusetts who received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine between August 2020 and May 2021.

The researchers compared the data to a control group made up of 235,000 of the same patients — from 2018 and 2019, well before they had received any doses of a COVID vaccine.

In a study published in the American Journal of Cardiology, the researchers found the age-adjusted incidence rate of myopericarditis in men was higher in the vaccinated than the control population, while the incidence rate of myopericarditis in women was the same between the vaccinated and control populations.

They also found an increased incidence of myocardial injury in both men and women in 2021 compared to 2019, although they suggested some of the apparent increase in the diagnosis of myopericarditis after vaccination may be attributable to factors unrelated to the COVID vaccines.

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: KitzD66 / pixabay

SOS Australia – Protests Planned Tomorrow (Dec 4) at Australian Embassies Worldwide

by 21st Century Wire
December 3, 2021

Last month, activists from Reignite Democracy Australia launched a global appeal for people to gather this Saturday December 4th at Australian embassies and consulates worldwide in solidarity with the people of Australia and in protest against the brutal behaviour and policies of government there. 

“This is a message to all the countries who are getting ready to protest at their nearest Australian Embassy or Consulate today at 12 noon. We asked several Aussies to send you a message…here’s what they had to say!” Watch: 



More info about the event: https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au

Watch Part 1 of our interview with RDA organiser Monica Smit here

Watch Part 2 of her interview here

Connect with 21st Century Wire

For list of participating countries: https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/sos/

Fauci’s Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
December 3, 2021



Original video available at Reese Report Rumble and Banned.video

Connect with Greg Reese

Transcript provided by Truth Comes to Light

The reception of Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s book,”The Real Anthony Fauci”, is clear evidence of a mass awakening.

The people are waking up to see Fauci for what he is — an absolute psychopath.

We’ve learned of how he directed experiments at the NIAID in which beagles had their vocal cords removed and their heads enclosed in cages where sand fleas ate them alive.

And we’ve learned of how he fraudulently used PCR tests to illegitimately push a known deadly drug upon tens of thousands of people.

And many are now learning that in 1992 under the direction of Anthony Fauci the NIAID funded drug trials on HIV positive children, although many of the children were healthy and asymptomatic. They had merely tested positive via faulty PCR tests administered through New York’s Child Welfare Department, who then handed them over to the deadly experiments.

Most of the drugs being tested on the children were already known to cause deformities, organ failure, brain damage and other lethal side effects.

And yet the children were required to continue with the drugs regardless of negative side effects.

Those administering the drugs were explicitly told that all adverse side effects they witnessed in the children were being caused by the HIV infection and not the drugs.

When parents refused to consent to these barbaric trials children services took their kids and placed them with foster families for children’s homes where participation in the trial would be assured.

When the children resisted the deadly drugs, they were brought to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital where plastic tubes were surgically inserted into their stomachs and the deadly drugs they were trying to escape we’re pumped directly into their bodies.

Once the children died, their bodies were added to a mass grave in Hawthorne, New York — a large pit with astroturf thrown over it.

To get around the Nuremberg Code and other laws the state of New York created a special review board comprised of the hospital stakeholders.

May one wonder, other than torturing and killing innocent children, what were they trying to accomplish?

They already knew of the negative side effects that these drugs are having on adults. But the more we learn about Anthony Fauci, the more we realize that he is an absolute psychopath.

And it doesn’t matter why psychopaths do what they do. Fauci and his criminal cohorts belong in cages at the very least.

Anthon Fauci is just one old crook in a mass of conspiracy that is aggressively pushing to inject everyone’s children with the new deadly and debilitating mRNA experimental jabs. Whether you like it or not.

Going after Fauci is a drop in the bucket but at least it’s a start.

 See related articles:

‘Guinea Pig Kids’: Fauci’s Legacy of Cruel Experiments on Kids

Beyond #BeagleGate: Fauci’s Long History of Atrocities, Including Torturing Children

Fauci, Dead Orphans, AIDS Drug Trials, and the Lies

“Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde” – RFK, Jr. in Conversation With James Corbett: “There’s an Entire Coalition of Sinister Forces… Which Are All Wrapped Up in This Obliteration of Constitutional Rights…”

The Real Anthony Fauci

My New Book — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

How to Submit Your Public Comments to the U.S. Government Against Its Vaccine Mandates

Want Medical Freedom? Submit a Public Comment to the Government Against Its Vaccine Mandates

by Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
December 3, 2021

Very frequently, supporters of ICAN ask us: what can we do?  Here is a very simple, yet very important thing that each one of you can and should do.

On September 9, 2021, President Biden announced, as part of his Path Out of the Pandemic, a mandate for all federal contractors to be vaccinated for COVID-19.  The government is now seeking public comment about the guidance which requires vaccination for all federal contractors.  On the same date, President Biden announced that he would direct OSHA to mandate private employers with 100 or more employees to mandate COVID-19 vaccines or testing and masking.  On November 6, 2021, OSHA enacted an emergency temporary standard requiring just that.  The government is also seeking public comment about this mandate.

Please make a public comment sharing your thoughts about why federal contractors should not be mandated to be vaccinated in order to keep their jobs and why private employers should not be forced to mandate that their employees be vaccinated.

Visit the docket for the OSHA ETS.  Comments are due on or before January 19, 2021.  On this page, you will see a blue box that says, “Comment” near the top left of the page.

Visit the docket for the federal contractor guidance.  Comments are due on or before December 16, 2021.  For this comment, you need to select the middle tab “Browse Documents” and then select “Comment” in the Notice section below that tab:

For both dockets, you will click on the “Comment” button and can either manually type in your comment and/or attach a document to your comment.  (It is advised that you write your comment elsewhere and then copy/paste it into this section so that it is not lost.)

Please note: all comments will be made public on the docket so only include information that you want publicly shared and avoid sharing information such as personal address, email, phone number, etc.

It is incredibly important that you all share your thoughts and make your voices heard.  Help ICAN by adding to our voice.  Let’s make clear to the federal government that we the people do not want the government making our medical decisions!

Connect with Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)

cover image credit: stevepb / pixabay

As Australians Seek Compensation for Vaccine Injuries Under New Plan, Here’s a Look at COVID Vaccine Liability Laws Around the World

More than 10,000 Australians so far requested compensation for COVID vaccine injuries under the country’s vaccine injury compensation scheme. What types of compensation programs exist in other countries?

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., The Defender
December 2, 2021

Recent reports from Australia indicate more than 10,000 Australians are requesting compensation for vaccine injuries that they received following inoculation with the COVID-19 vaccine.

The claims come as part of an Australian government program allowing individuals to be compensated for lost income after being hospitalized for “rare but significant” side effects resulting from the vaccination.

As originally conceived, compensation through the program was available to people who incurred A$5,000 or more in vaccine injury-related medical costs. However, the government enacted a reduction in the compensation threshold, permitting claims for the cost of vaccine injuries beginning at A$1,000.

The 10,000-plus compensation claims were submitted as almost 79,000 adverse side effects after COVID vaccines were reported to the country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, as of mid-November.

No-fault vaccine liability: what is it?

Australia’s vaccine injury compensation program is an example of a “no-fault compensation program.”

This refers to a measure put in place by public health authorities, private insurance companies, manufacturers, and/or other stakeholders to compensate individuals harmed by vaccines. Such programs allow a person who has sustained a vaccine injury to be compensated financially, without having to attribute fault or error to a specific manufacturer or individual.

No-fault compensation schemes are one of three options used by various countries to handle vaccine injury claims.

The other two options include allowing vaccine-injured people to sue private-sector actors, such as vaccine manufacturers or their insurers, or to place the full financial burden on the patient.

Australia’s no-fault compensation program is fairly new. It was launched in August 2021, despite longstanding calls for the development of such a scheme well before COVID.

A 2020 study found 25 countries with a no-fault program in place, with 15 of these programs administered at the government level.

In some countries, such programs are administered at the provincial level or at multiple levels of government, while two countries (Sweden and Finland) were identified by the study as having no-fault programs fully administered by the insurance sector.

The exact nature of such no-fault schemes, however, can differ significantly from one country to another. As explained in the 2020 study:

• In Sweden and Finland, pharmaceutical companies who market their products in these jurisdictions provide insurance contributions which fund those countries’ no-fault programs.
• Similarly, Norway’s no-fault program is funded by a special insurance organization known as the Drug Liability Association.
• Latvia’s Treatment Risk Fund is funded through contributions from medical institutions, acting as professional indemnity insurance.
• In China and South Korea, there are two separate programs, covering those vaccines in each country’s national immunization program (NIP) and those not included in the respective country’s NIP. Each government funds injury claims for NIP vaccines, while pharmaceutical companies or those holding a drug’s market authorization are responsible for funding injury claims regarding non-NIP vaccines.
• The U.S. no-fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is funded by a flat-rate tax of 75 cents for each disease covered in each vaccine dose.
• New Zealand has set up an Accident Compensation Corporation, which acts as a general compensation fund for accidents stemming from vaccinations, and treatment injuries. The program is funded through general tax contributions and levies on employee wages, businesses, vehicle licenses and fuel sales.

Not all no-fault programs compensate for injuries arising from all vaccines. For instance, according to the 2020 study:

• Only five (Japan, France, Italy, Hungary, and Slovenia) of the 23 programs specifically examined by the study covered injuries arising from mandatory vaccines or vaccines recommended by law — of particular significance in a world where more and more countries are attempting to implement COVID vaccine mandates.
• Just over half (57%) of the programs examined provide compensation for injuries arising from registered and recommended vaccines for children, pregnant women or adults and for special indication, such as occupation or travel, within the jurisdiction. This latter point is also significant in an era where many COVID vaccine mandates are being imposed on specific occupations or as a means of being “allowed” to travel.

Different no-fault programs also have differing rules with regard to when claims can be filed.

Referring again to the 2020 study, in certain countries, claims have to be filed within a certain number of years of vaccination or, in some cases, of the initial onset of vaccine injury symptoms. This ranges from 20 years (Norway), to six years (UK, for adults), to three years (U.S. and several other countries).

In some other countries, the maximum interval varies by province (China), or there is no specific deadline for filing a claim (including Sweden, Germany, New Zealand and Japan for NIP vaccines).

As seen with the example of Australia above, no-fault programs also set compensation thresholds. This is true in all no-fault countries examined by the 2020 study.

Thresholds of eligibility also exist, which may include injuries resulting in financial loss or permanent or significant injury (such as a medical disability), serious health damage or death, severe injuries surpassing normal post-vaccination reactions or other degrees of injury.

Just over half (52%) of the programs studied also provided compensation for claims regarding vaccine defects or immunization errors, while in the remaining countries, these types of claims are covered separately, through civil litigation or medical malpractice indemnity.

The 2020 study also noted that in almost all no-fault jurisdictions, such programs are non-judicial in nature and are instead administrative in scope, typically involving panels of medical experts who review each individual vaccine injury claim.

In a minority of countries, the administrative program is combined with a legal approach and the involvement of legal experts, while in Finland and Sweden, compensation decisions are made based on civil liability (tort) laws.

The standard of proof the claimant is required to demonstrate is generally similar across most no-fault programs, according to the 2020 study. These programs tend to employ a “balance of probabilities” approach that weighs whether it is “more likely than not” that the vaccination led to the injury in question.

This approach takes into consideration such factors as the time interval since vaccination, and existing medical evidence establishing a connection between the vaccine and that type of injury.

A country-by-country look

The above provides a general overview of how no-fault compensation programs work. However, it is also worth examining the specific rules in place in major countries and blocs of nations around the world.

United States:

In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, often simply referred to as the Vaccine Act. Under this act, a no-fault program for administering vaccine claims, known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established.

Through this program, any individual claiming a vaccine injury (or a parent or guardian of a child) can file a petition with the U.S.Court of Federal Claims. The petition is reviewed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which makes a preliminary recommendation.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) then prepares a legal report, which includes the medical recommendation, and submits it to the court. The court then appoints a special master, who may convene a hearing, and who decides whether the petitioner should be compensated, and if so, what the level of compensation will be.

This compensation is then disbursed to the petitioner through HHS. Petitioners may also appeal a decision that isn’t in their favor, and by rejecting the decision of the court, may then file a lawsuit in civil court against the vaccine maker and/or the healthcare provider who administered the vaccine.

VICP, however, does not encompass all vaccines. It covers vaccines that are routinely administered to children and to pregnant women, and that are subject to the previously-mentioned 75-cent excise tax.

To date, more than 8,400 VICP claims have been settled, out of more than 24,000 petitions, with a total of $4.6 billion issued in settlements.

Compensation has also been issued. However, most such settlements were reached following negotiations instead of a hearing, with no admission on the part of HHS that vaccines were ultimately responsible for the injuries in question.

A different category of vaccines, including, at present, the existing COVID-19 vaccines, are covered under what is known as the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

This program was established under the aegis of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005. The PREP act was developed to coordinate the response to a “public health emergency.” The law is scheduled to remain in place until 2024.

CICP specifically focuses on countermeasures, that is, “a vaccination, medication, device or other item recommended to diagnose, prevent or treat a declared pandemic, epidemic or security threat.”

Under CICP, a different claims process exists as compared to the VICP. The process for claimants is more cumbersome, and individuals have only one year after the administration of the vaccine to file a claim. Injuries whose symptoms materialize later in life, for instance, would presumably not be covered under this process.

Moreover, the likelihood of success, if past precedent is any indication, is slim. As previously reported by The Defender:

“The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.”

Notably, vaccines with full FDA approval but which are not placed on a vaccination schedule for children or pregnant women are subject to ordinary product liability laws, while vaccines administered under an Emergency Use Authorization are protected from legal liability.

Furthermore, a 2011 Supreme Court decision, Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, held that the Vaccine Act preempts claims made under state-designed defect laws, against vaccines covered by the Act. The decision stated that ““[The Vaccine Act] reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.”

Until the 1980s, a series of successful lawsuits against vaccine makers was seen as resulting in increasing vaccine hesitancy and declining vaccination rates, as indicated in a 1985 National Research Council publication, released just one year before the passage of the Vaccine Act.

Canada:

In recent years, Canada was the only G7 country without a nationwide no-fault vaccine injury compensation program. On a provincial level, Quebec established such a program in 1985, at which time calls for the creation of a national program followed. Attempts were made to develop a national program at this time, which ultimately failed.

As of 2018, Quebec’s program had approved a total of 43 claims, paying $5.49 million (CAD) in compensation.

In June 2021, launched a national vaccine injury compensation program, the Vaccine Injury Support Program. The program covers all provinces except Quebec, whose provincial program will continue to operate.

While this program is funded by Public Health Canada, it is administered by a private company, RCGT Consulting.

The program covers claimants who received a Health Canada-authorized vaccine (on or after Dec. 8, 2020), administered in Canada, with a resulting injury that is serious and permanent or which has resulted in death, and which was reported to the healthcare provider that administered the vaccine.

Though it wasn’t until a few months ago that Canada was able to establish a nationwide vaccine compensation program, COVID vaccine manufacturers were already, as of December 2020, indemnified against claims of vaccine injuries.

United Kingdom:

In the UK, the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) provides compensation totaling £120,000 to anyone who suffers a disability of 60% or more, as a result of their vaccination.

The percentage figure refers to a severe disability resulting in such injuries as the loss of a limb, an amputation, losing 60% or more of normal vision or severe narcolepsy.

Additionally, the 1987 Consumer Protection Act also applies to those who have sustained a vaccine injury, if is found that the product in question did not meet safety standards or was defective. This is further strengthened by the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations.

Consumer protection rights still apply for people injured by the COVID vaccine, as the government wasn’t allowed to take those away. But due to the legal definition of defects, and a rule known as the state-of-the-art defense, it is difficult to get compensation when specific problems with the vaccine are not yet known.

COVID vaccines have been added to the VDPS. However, according to the Human Medicines Regulation of 2012, protection against civil liability is provided to vaccine manufacturers for unlicensed products issued under a temporary use authorization by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.

This regulation was further amended by the Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, providing extended immunity from civil liability to vaccine makers and those administering vaccinations. However, the consumer protection laws mentioned above still apply.

Legal indemnity has also been directly provided to vaccine manufacturers in the case of the COVID-19 vaccine.

European Union:

The UK laws are based largely on EU legislation, which was codified into British law prior to Brexit.

For instance, the UK Human Medicines Regulations of 2012 and 2020 are largely based on their EU equivalent, EU Directive 2001/83/EC relating to medicinal products for human use. This includes protections against civil actions for products released under temporary or emergency authorizations.

The 1987 Consumer Protection Act in the UK is, in turn, equivalent to the EU’s Directive 85/374/ECC of 1985, on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, while the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations were harmonized with EU Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety.

At the EU level, immunity for vaccine manufacturers was not standard prior to COVID, when legal responsibility tended to lie with the companies.

This, however, is not the case with the COVID vaccines. Under pressure from Vaccines Europe, a trade organization representing vaccine manufacturers in the EU, and under the guide of “ensuring access” to vaccines, exemptions from liability were granted to companies such as AstraZeneca.

Notably, a question posed in August to the European Parliament by one of its elected representatives, Ivan Vilibor Sinčić of Croatia, regarding liability for COVID-19 vaccine side effects, remains unanswered as of this writing.

Within the EU, different member states have enacted their own legislation with regard to vaccine injury compensation claims. These programs were summarized in a 2021 study examining such policies on a global basis. They can be summarized as follows:

• Austria: The Vaccine Damage Act is a public-law system for the payment of compensation for vaccine injuries by the state. COVID vaccines are included in this program.
• Belgium: No vaccine compensation legislation exists.
• France: The existing vaccine injury compensation program provides relief only for injuries related to mandatory vaccinations. Claims for injuries resulting from non-compulsory vaccinations fall under the general principles of French civil law. For COVID vaccines, claims can be lodged with the National Office for Compensation of Medical Accidents, without having to prove a defect with the vaccine or fault on the part of healthcare providers.
• Germany: A flat-rate no-fault compensation program exists for vaccines that are mandatory or that are publicly recommended, including COVID vaccines.
• Greece: A no-fault program doesn’t exist, but a May 2021 high court ruling held that those who sustained vaccine injuries are entitled to state compensation.
• Italy: A no-fault program providing state compensation for injuries stemming from required or highly recommended vaccines exists, although it is unclear if this extends to COVID vaccines. Claimants are also free to pursue claims under tort law.
• Netherlands, Portugal: There is no specific no-fault scheme, but vaccine injury claims can be filed via provisions of the civil code.
• Sweden: An insurance fund, Swedish Pharmaceutical Insurance, handles vaccine injury claims out of court. However, new legislation which took effect Dec. 1 will provide additional state compensation for injuries arising from COVID-19 vaccinations.

Israel:

In Israel, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Law was passed in 1989, providing compensation to those injured by vaccines, without having to prove negligence.

Earlier this year, COVID-19 vaccines were included under this law.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

©December 2021 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: mohamed_hassan & torstensimon / pixabay