Thursday, August 19, 2021. The winds of Covidian Nazism are blowing strong. Pfizer lab rats, to the right. Those who insist on maintaining their humanity, to the left.
We have a family membership at the country club for the pool and the gym. I work out there several times a week and we take our kids swimming often as well. Management knows us.
We do not carry the green Swastika. We have no “green pass”. We will not even be part of it by getting a fake one. We have never taken a single serological or PCR test. We never, ever, wear masks, we do not quarantine (unless we are actually symptomatically sick and it makes sense of course). We are not part of the Covidian National Socialist Hypochondriac Party. We do not consent, and we will not comply.
We drive to the pool. Me, my wife, and my 5 kids, ages 11 to 2. Our plan is to walk straight in, ignore any requests to present a green pass, and just go right to the pool. Before we enter, we pray to the Holy One Blessed Be He to protect us from Covidian Nazis and to give us strength to maintain our calm. I tell my kids, “As long as we are doing the right thing, Hashem (God) will protect us.” I look each of them in the eye. We walk on.
We get nearer to the door, and there it is. That revolting green Swastika. That nauseating green pass sign that says we are now less than human because we refuse to submit to a mass medical experiment. We ignore it. We enter the building, and walk past the turnstile.
“Do you have a Tav Yarok (green pass)?” asks the clerk.
“No, we do not.”
“Then you have to come here to take a corona test.”
“No, we will not.” And we keep walking.
“Wait! Stop!”
I turn back to her as I’m walking in the direction of the pool.
“Call the police if you want. We are going swimming.”
She picks up the phone to call the head manager. We head to the pool and put our stuff down on the turf. There is almost nobody there at all. Very rare for a hot August day, day one of Green Pass enforcement. We see the manager, who knows us, walking towards us. Before he even gets near us, I say loudly, “I’m not interested in talking about it at all. Call the police if you want to. We are going swimming.”
He says he is calling the police. He picks up his phone and walks away.
Thirty minutes pass by as we enjoy the pool, almost alone. We explain to our older kids what is going on and why the police might come and arrest us soon. They understand. We are shaking in the pool as the 4 year old is swimming between us. We are trying to maintain calm, wondering if the police are going to come fish us out of the pool any second. All the sudden the manager comes back out and asks politely to me, “Can I talk to you for a second?”
This sounded reasonable, so I said yes, sure.
“Look, you’re my customers, and I don’t want to call the police on you. Nobody’s coming anymore and I don’t want to lose you as customers. I know a lot of people like you and I understand. But there are laws in this country and I have to follow them.”
“I will not follow them. The Nazis had laws, too.”
“I can’t say anything to that, but I won’t bother you. Just, there are ways to go about this. You don’t just barge in like that,” he says. Fair enough.
“Look, I’m sorry about that. You know me. I’m glad that you understand, and I respect you and I thank you. I’ve been under pressure for 18 months now and I am sick of the injustice of all this. I’m sorry I barged in, but I’m just very short on patience. I don’t want to cause you any trouble at all. Just know that I am going to keep coming here, I will walk straight in, do my work out, I do not have a green pass, and I will never take a single test, ever.”
“Then that’s at your own risk,” he says.
“Of course, 100%. It’s my responsibility, not yours. Thank you very much, and I’m glad we’re on the same page.”
My wife and I hug, he turns back and sees us, he smiles. We have a very nice swim with our children. I ask my 7-year-old son how he’s feeling. He says to me, “I knew the police weren’t going to come.” He seemed very confident, without a worry in the world.
“I wasn’t so sure, but I guess you were right. I should be more brave like you,” I tell him. Pride swells and I have a lump in my throat. He is a good man.
Anyone can do this. Anywhere. You must do this. Just walk in, and call their bluff. Tell them to call the police. The worst that will happen, if you are calm and stand your ground, is that you will get a ticket, that you can then appeal in court, and the ticket will be cancelled, because they do not want anything going to court, lest they lose, there’s precedent, and the whole totalitarian system crumbles.
Call. Their. Bluff. This is all just fear. There is nothing to be afraid of. Pool conquered. Gym conquered. Supermarket conquered. The counterattack progresses.
Thank you God for giving us the strength to do Your will and to fight back.
VAERS data released Friday by the CDC showed a total of 595,622 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 13,068 deaths and 81,050 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 13, 2021.
Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 13, 2021, a total of 595,622 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 13,068 deaths — an increase of 702 over the previous week.
There were 81,050 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 10,945 compared with the previous week.
In the U.S., 354.5 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Aug. 13. This includes: 141 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 199 million doses of Pfizer and 14 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.
The data come directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.
Booster shots coming for most Americans 8 months after second dose
The Biden administration decided most Americans should get a COVID vaccine booster dose eight months after they received their second shot, despite consensus among U.S. health experts last month there wasn’t enough data to recommend boosters for the general population.
“Based on our latest assessment, the current protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death could diminish in the months ahead,” the officials, led by Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, and Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, said Wednesday.
The plan is still subject to approval from the FDA and the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, but officials say they are prepared to begin the rollout of booster shots starting the week of Sept. 20.
However, the CDC has pushed back by one week a meeting by a group of outside advisers who were set to review COVID booster shots as debate heats up over the need for a third dose, according to Bloomberg.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, was scheduled to meet and possibly make a recommendation about the need for boosters on Aug. 24, but is now set to convene over two days starting Aug. 30.
The first boosters are likely to go to nursing home residents, healthcare workers and emergency workers, followed by older people who were near the front of the line when vaccinations began late last year and then the general population.
Federal health officials are waiting for more data before offering guidance for J&J vaccine recipients. However, officials expect a booster will also be needed.
CDC studies show vaccine protection wanes over time
Three studies released Wednesday by the CDC confirm COVID vaccine effectiveness against infection has decreased over time, and is less effective in combating the Delta variant.
One study assessed Pfizer and Moderna’s effectiveness over time against infections among nursing home residents, and found it dropped from 75% pre-Delta to 53% when Delta became dominant. The study didn’t differentiate between asymptomatic, symptomatic and severe infections.
Another study used data from 21 hospitals to estimate the effectiveness of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines against hospitalization over time. Among 1,129 patients who received two doses of a mRNA vaccine, vaccine effectiveness was 86% 2 to12 weeks after vaccination and 84% at 13 to 24 weeks.
The third study, using New York state data, found all three vaccines’ effectiveness against infection dropped from 92% in early May to 80% at the end of July, but the effectiveness against hospitalization remained relatively stable.
Data from the three reports in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, helped convince the Biden administration to recommend booster shots to people eight months after receiving their second dose, despite no completed late-stage clinical trials assessing the safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of a third dose.
Oxford study shows vaccinated just as contagious as unvaxxed
As The Defender reported Thursday, a British public health study released Aug. 16, indicates vaccinated people with “breakthrough” infections could pose a significant infection risk to those who have not been vaccinated.
A study by University of Oxford scientists found people who contract the Delta variant after being fully vaccinated carry a similar amount of the virus as those who catch the disease and have not been vaccinated.
The study also found protection was greatest in those vaccinated who already had natural immunity through previous infection.
Based on more than 3 million nose and throat swabs, Oxford University researchers found that 90 days after a second shot of the Pfizer or Astrazeneca vaccine, efficacy in preventing infections had slipped to 75% and 61% respectively.
Those results were down from 85% and 68%, respectively, seen two weeks after a second dose, with the decline in efficacy more pronounced among those 35 years and older.
The study also showed that after two doses of the Pfizer vaccine, effectiveness was at least as great as protection afforded by natural infection — with greater initial effectiveness against new PCR-positives but faster declines in protection against high viral burden and symptomatic infection.
Researchers said there was no evidence effectiveness varied by dosing interval, but protection was higher among those vaccinated who already had natural immunity.
The survey, which has yet to be peer-reviewed before publication in a scientific journal, underscores concerns by scientists that the Delta variant can infect fully vaccinated people at a greater rate than previous variants, and that the vaccinated could more easily transmit it.
CHD sues Rutgers over COVID vaccine mandate
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) along with 18 students on Monday filed a lawsuit in federal court against Rutgers University, its board of governors, Rutgers President Jonathan Holloway and others over the university’s decision to mandate COVID vaccines for students attending school in the fall.
The lawsuit states that in a free society, “all people have the right to decide their own medical treatment — especially to decide what to inject into their bodies. And every person has the right to make that decision voluntarily, free from coercion by anyone, and to be fully informed of the benefits and especially the risks of that decision.”
The lawsuit alleges Rutgers’ policy is a violation of the right to informed consent and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatments.
The complaint also alleges the policy is a breach of contract because in January 2021, the university assured students COVID vaccines would not be required in order to attend school. Just two months later, Rutgers flip-flopped and issued new requirements for taking the shot prior to attending classes.
According to the plaintiffs, Rutgers is working with all three manufacturers — Pfizer, Moderna and J&J — to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots which, until fully licensed by the FDA, are defined by the FDA as experimental.
The Rutgers requirement also constitutes a denial of equal protection, as administration, faculty and staff are not required to take the vaccine. It also conflicts with federal and state law, as neither has enacted legislation requiring COVID vaccines for citizens.
165 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender’s inquiries
According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”
On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We have made repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions.
Despite multiple phone and email communications with many people at the CDC, and despite being told that our request was in the system and that someone would respond, we have not yet received answers to any of the questions we submitted. It has been 165 days since we sent our first email to the CDC requesting information.
[TCTL Editor’s note: Rough translation from French to English was done using online translator.]
The “shock” figure of the day: in Lombardy, 10,000 caregivers refuse the vaccine, in Veneto 5,000. The authorities are faced with the risk of losing clinics and hospitals.
According to reports published this week in the Italian press, the real number of Italian caregivers refusing so-called “anti-Covid” injections, following the entry into force of Decree No. 44 intended to impose injections on them, is extremely impressive.
If in Lombardy and Veneto, the refusal of injections is massive, it is real in all regions of Italy. In Sardinia, 700 caregivers refuse it, of which 57 have been suspended from their work. Of the 10,000 objectors in Lombardy , the suspension procedure has been launched against 2,500 of them.
The National Federation of Medical Orders, all to its pro-injection fervor, nevertheless recognizes that the decree is poorly drafted while there is a proven risk of emptying entire services by suspending caregivers or creating medical deserts. In Cervarese Santa Croce near Padua, the one and only general practitioner in charge of treating 1,300 patients stopped practicing overnight so as not to have to submit.
The same is happening in many “medical deserts”. Moreover, since employment contracts do not provide for any vaccination obligation, its legal basis is very fragile. However, each caregiver is entitled to challenge the suspension before the administrative courts.
Thus, professor of constitutional law and lawyer Daniele Granara represents 10,000 caregivers before fifteen provincial courts, as well as around 2,000 teachers from schools and universities. Another specialist in class actions, lawyer Mauro Sandri has launched actions against the “Green Pass”, against the European Medicines Agency and represents many employees injured by the vaccination obligation.
Vaxxed II: In 2016, a media firestorm erupted when Tribeca Film Festival abruptly censored its documentary selection, VAXXED: From Coverup to Catastrophe, amid pressure from pro-pharmaceutical interests.
In response to media silence on CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, who admitted to fraud on a pivotal vaccine safety study, VAXXED catapulted to notoriety and became a worldwide trending topic, opening to sold out theater audiences nationwide. Stunned by the immense volume of parents lining up outside the theaters with vaccine injury stories to share, VAXXED producer Polly Tommey began to livestream worldwide reaching millions, and a community that had once been silenced were empowered to rise up. In VAXXED II: The People’s Truth, Polly and the team travel over 50,000 miles in the USA and around the world. Interviews of parents and doctors with nothing to gain and everything to lose exposed the vaccine injury epidemic and asked the question on every parent’s mind, “Are vaccines really as safe and effective as we’ve been told?”
Children’s Health Defense has posted over 65 studies on vaccinate/unvaccinated studies. All of them show dramatically better health in unvaccinated children. We have found no studies that show superior health outcomes in vaccinated children.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Canada-wide, the favoured approach among universities is to let students, staff, faculty and campus visitors make their own health decisions without threats to their liberties. As of August 17, 65% of Canadian universities (40/61 universities) do not have any mandatory vaccination policies in place.
Universities situated in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, and the Yukon have not instituted any campus-wide mandatory vaccination policies.
However, at least one university situated in each of the provinces of Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Nova Scotia does have a mandatory vaccination policy.
Universities in Ontario and Saskatchewan are the worst offenders: 17/20 or 85% of Ontario universities have instituted a mandatory vaccine policy, although at some schools, students can opt for onerous twice-weekly testing regimes in lieu of the jab. Both of Saskatchewan’s universities have mandatory vaccine policies in place.
Since 2011, the Justice Centre has published the annual Campus Freedom Index report to measure the state of free speech at Canada’s publicly-funded universities. However, due to government-mandated lockdown measures, there was insufficient campus data to analyze for the 2020–2021 academic year. This year’s Campus Vaccine Index is therefore a special edition of our annual report.
The Justice Centre’s position is that mandating vaccination for Canadians under most circumstances violates their right to bodily autonomy, and other Charter protected rights to freedom of conscience and religion, mobility rights, and the right to liberty, and security of the person. The Justice Centre is considering the commencement of a Charter application against a college in Ontario which, if successful, may result in a change in policy on universities as well.
Getting a Covid vaccination should not be a prerequisite to accessing postsecondary education in Canada.
At least one university situated in each of the provinces of Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Nova Scotia does have a mandatory vaccination policy.
Universities in Saskatchewan and Ontario are the worst offenders: 17/20 or 85% of Ontario universities have instituted a mandatory vaccine policy, although at some schools, students can opt for onerous twice-weekly testing regimes in lieu of the jab. Both of Saskatchewan’s universities have mandatory vaccine policies in place.
In Nova Scotia, one of the province’s seven universities requires the vaccine of some students.
Canada-wide, the favoured approach among universities is to let students, staff, faculty and campus visitors make their own health decisions without threats to their liberties. 65% of Canadian universities (40/61 universities) do not have any mandatory vaccination policy in place.
Monday, August 16, 2021, prompted by a Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) lawsuit, Governor Ducey of Arizona issued an Executive Order barring any city, county, state, or state entity from mandating COVID-19 vaccines thereby protecting the rights of Arizonans to direct their own healthcare choices. HFDF thanks Governor Ducey for defending the most basic of human rights, that of bodily autonomy.
The Governor’s order capped off a day of twists and turns in HFDF’s lawsuit, filed August 2, 2021 on behalf of Phoenix High School teacher Douglas Hester. The lawsuit sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Phoenix Union High School District’s mask mandate because it violates a new Arizona law prohibiting mask and vaccine mandates.
“The legislature is the legislative branch of government, charged with making law, yet the school district, defiantly pledged to follow CDC’s non-binding recommendations even though they contradict state law. CDC does not have the power or authority to make health laws, merely to issue recommendations,” said HFDF president Leslie Manookian
Friday August 13th, HFDF attorney Alex Kolodin appeared in court and argued for a TRO barring Phoenix Union High School District from implementing its mask mandate, while counsel for the school district argued a motion to dismiss the case.
Monday August 16th the judge delivered his ruling denying both our TRO and the school district’s motion to dismiss in which he noted that Phoenix Union High School District cited “no legal authority that this statute [the new AZ law prohibiting mask and vaccine mandates] beyond the Legislature’s power. Indeed, Arizona law expressly limits school districts’ authority to policies that “are not inconsistent with law.”” The judge determine our TRO was premature because the anti-mandate law will not be effective until September 29th, 2021.
Later Monday, after the ruling, in a provocative move, an AZ school board announced an emergency meeting to consider mandating the experimental COVID-19 injections for all teachers by September 29th so the Governor stepped in with an executive order barring the school district and all other state entities from mandating the shots.
Kolodin said, “Our client was going for a TRO against masks and got an EO against vaccine mandates! While we wish the EO extended to masks, we’re delighted Governor Ducey stepped in and protected teachers and students from this attempted power grab.”
This is a big win for HFDF, a big win for the rule of law, and a big win for freedom.
University of Washington Medical Center in US & Beaumont Hospital In Dublin, Ireland Are Now Denying Organ Transplants to Those Who Refuse Experimental Anti-Covid Injections
University of Washington Medical Center in US & Beaumont Hospital In Dublin, Ireland Are Now Denying Organ Transplants to Those Who Refuse Experimental Anti-Covid Injections
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Link to TD letter, Beaumont Letter and TD contact details spreadsheet:
A new report from Jason Rantz, a talk-show host on 770 KTTH in the Pacific Northwest, reveals that officials at the University of Washington Medical Center have dropped a heart-transplant patient from their wait list – because he declined the experimental COVID vaccines.
And now, Rantz reported, the hospital isn’t talking about its policy – and won’t even admit it has one.
Rantz said he learned this week UW Medicine has removed a 64-year-old patient who had been on the list for two and a half years from the list entirely.
That would mean that should a transplant organ become available, it would go to someone who likely had waited less time, and the 64-year-old’s life would be in higher danger.
The report explained, “The hospital made the decision after they learned the patient refused to be vaccinated against COVID. They said they would consider adding him back to the waitlist should he satisfy their ‘compliance concerns.'”
Another “vaccine-hesitant” patient also reported, Rantz said, “he was told the vaccine was mandatory before he could get a necessary liver transplant.”
“The hospital does not deny any of the allegations,” he reported.
Rantz explained the practice apparently dates back to June, when “Sam Allen of Monroe learned that his heart transplant surgery was on the line over his refusal to get the COVID vaccine.”
“The list of medical conditions Allen says he’s facing is long: mitral valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation, aortic valve regurgitation, aneurism of thoracic aorta, and dilated cardiomyopathy,” the report explained.
All that makes it difficult to breathe, which is why he wouldn’t mask up, after which his doctor called.
“The cardiologist called me and we had a discussion, and he informed me that, ‘well, you’re going to have to get a vaccination to get a transplant.’ And I said, ‘well that’s news to me. And nobody’s ever told me that before.’ And he says, ‘yeah, that’s our policy,'” Allen said.
NEW Zealand’s two leading pro-freedom activists Billy Te Kahika and Vinny Eastwood, have been arrested and were being held in custody on Wednesday night following an anti-lockdown protest in Auckland. A third person, Debbie Bartlett, was also arrested.
The charges allege offences against the Covid 19 Response Act which bans gatherings under level 4 restrictions, announced because of seven “cases” of Covid linked to an Auckland man who allegedly has “the Delta variant”, which Australian health authorities cannot distinguish from the phoney SARS-Cov-2 “novel corona virus”.
The protest was held outside the outside building of the Ardern tyranny cheer squad, TVNZ. New Zealand’s mainstream media cheers on everything done by the “charming” Kiwi COVID dictator Ardern, who is a personal friend of Bill and Melinda Gates and funneled tens of millions of taxpayer funds to their foundation and the Clinton Foundation.
Auckland has been plunged into the lockdown over three co-called cases. The lockdown also mandates mask wearing and locks people in their homes. On Tuesday night after the lockdown announcement thousands of cars were seen heading south from Auckland to country locations.
The exodus was recorded by Eastwood and Te Kahika in a livestream as they drove north into the city. The mass exit from Auckland prompted locals in one small town on the Coromandel Peninsula to block the road. But police took advantage of the situation to turn the motorists back.
Shortly before his arrest at the protest Te Kahika said he had been issued with a warning that he did not understand or stand under. “I do not stand under the jurisdiction of a corrupt government,” he told the crowd. “Now I accept that the police have a job to do, but what they are doing is wrong – there is no doubt about it. And I know if I get a $4000 fine you’ll pay it for me.” Protesters cheered in response.
[TCTL Editor’s note: In the video below, listen to powerful, empowered, passionate people of all ages and backgrounds as they expose the lies, challenge the covid mandates and stand up firmly against the unfolding global tyranny. ]
The German vaccination machine is beginning to falter. In quite a few general practitioners’ offices, vaccinations are no longer being administered.
More and more doctors are withdrawing from the corona “vaccination” campaign according to figures from the Robert Koch Institut, accessed by the newspaper Welt am Sonntag.
In the week from August 2 to 8, only 29,300 practices still “vaccinated people against the coronavirus”, meaning many dropped out. At the time the vaccines were rolled out in Germany, a total of 52,600 practices were participating in the genocide campaign. This means that 23,300 (44%) practices have stopped giving the shot.
Eleven of the 16 states are closing jab centers
The number of vaccine orders is also declining. As of July 27, a whopping 1.3 million doses had been ordered. At the beginning of the campaign, the figure was still 1.5 million doses.
In addition, many German states are preparing to close their vaccination centers. Eleven of the 16 federal states are closing most or all of their vaccination centers by September 30, Welt am Sonntag writes. Bavaria and Schleswig-Holstein are leaving their centers open. There they are running at limited capacity or are in standby mode.
Unvaccinated put under pressure
In Germany, only over half (56.82%) of the population has been fully vaccinated against corona. Less than two-thirds (62.76%) of Germans have received at least one shot.
Meanwhile, unvaccinated people in Germany are being put under further pressure. Coronatests will no longer be free as of October 11. Without a vaccine, recovery certificate or negative test, you will no longer be allowed to enter the hospitality industry or hairdressers and other contact professions. Sports or events will also become taboo. The rule will also apply to visitors to hospitals and retirement and nursing homes. (ER: This is copying the French playbook.)
“We’ve reached the point where state actors can penetrate rectums and vaginas, where judges can order forced catheterizations, and where police and medical personnel can perform scans, enemas and colonoscopies without the suspect’s consent. And these procedures aren’t to nab kingpins or cartels, but people who at worst are hiding an amount of drugs that can fit into a body cavity. In most of these cases, they were suspected only of possession or ingestion. Many of them were innocent… But these tactics aren’t about getting drugs off the street… These tactics are instead about degrading and humiliating a class of people that politicians and law enforcement have deemed the enemy.”—Radley Balko, The Washington Post
Freedom is never free.
There is always a price—always a sacrifice—that must be made in order to safeguard one’s freedoms.
Where that transaction becomes more complicated is when one has to balance the rights of the individual with the needs of the community.
Philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau envisioned the social contract between the individual and a nation’s rulers as a means of finding that balance. Invariably, however, those in power grow greedy, and what was intended to be a symbiotic relationship with both sides benefitting inevitably turns into a parasitic one, with a clear winner and a clear loser.
We have seen this vicious cycle play out over and over again throughout the nation’s history.
Just look at this COVID-19 pandemic: the whole sorry mess has been so overtly politicized, propagandized, and used to expand the government’s powers (and Corporate America’s bank balance) that it’s difficult at times to distinguish between what may be legitimate health concerns and government power grabs.
After all, the government has a history of shamelessly exploiting national emergencies for its own nefarious purposes. Terrorist attacks, mass shootings, civil unrest, economic instability, pandemics, natural disasters: the government has been taking advantage of such crises for years now in order to gain greater power over an unsuspecting and largely gullible populace.
This COVID-19 pandemic is no different.
Yet be warned: we will all lose if this pandemic becomes a showdown between COVID-19 vaccine mandates and the right to bodily integrity.
It doesn’t matter what your trigger issue is—whether it’s vaccines, abortion, crime, religion, immigration, terrorism or some other overtly politicized touchstone used by politicians as a rallying cry for votes—we should all be concerned when governments and businesses (i.e., the Corporate State) join forces to compel individuals to sacrifice their right to bodily integrity (which goes hand in hand with the right to conscience and religious freedom) on the altar of so-called safety and national security.
That’s exactly what’s unfolding right now, with public and private employers using the threat of termination to force employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19.
Unfortunately, legal protections in this area are limited.
While the Americans with Disabilities Act protects those who can prove they have medical conditions that make receiving a vaccination dangerous, employees must be able to prove they have a sensitivity to vaccines.
Beyond that, employees with a religious objection to the vaccine mandate can try to request an exemption, but even those who succeed in gaining an exemption to a vaccine mandate may have to submit to routine COVID testing and mask requirements, especially if their job involves contact with other individuals.
Under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, individuals have a right of conscience and/or religious freedom to ask that their sincere religious beliefs against receiving vaccinations be accommodated. To this end, The Rutherford Institute has issued guidance and an in-depth fact sheet and model letter for those seeking a religious exemption to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate in the workplace. The Rutherford Institute’s policy paper, “Know Your Rights: How To Request a Religious Accommodation for COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace,” goes into the details of how and why and in which forums one can request such accommodation, but there is no win-win scenario.
As with all power plays of this kind, the ramifications of empowering the government and its corporate partners to force individuals to choose between individual liberty and economic survival during a so-called state of “emergency” can lead to terrifying results.
At a minimum, it’s a slippery slope that justifies all manner of violations in the name of national security, the interest of the state and the so-called greater good.
If the government—be it the President, Congress, the courts or any federal, state or local agent or agency—can willfully disregard the rights of any particular person or group of persons, then that person becomes less than a citizen, less than human, less than deserving of respect, dignity, civility and bodily integrity. He or she becomes an “it,” a faceless number that can be tallied and tracked, a quantifiable mass of cells that can be discarded without conscience, an expendable cost that can be written off without a second thought, or an animal that can be bought, sold, branded, chained, caged, bred, neutered and euthanized at will.
That’s exactly where we find ourselves now: caught in the crosshairs of a showdown between the rights of the individual and the so-called “emergency” state.
All of those freedoms we cherish—the ones enshrined in the Constitution, the ones that affirm our right to free speech and assembly, due process, privacy, bodily integrity, the right to not have police seize our property without a warrant, or search and detain us without probable cause—amount to nothing when the government and its agents are allowed to disregard those prohibitions on government overreach at will.
This is the grim reality of life in the American police state.
Our so-called rights have been reduced to technicalities in the face of the government’s ongoing power grabs.
Yet those who founded this country believed that what we conceive of as our rights were given to us by God—we are created equal, according to the nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence—and that government cannot create nor can it extinguish our God-given rights. To do so would be to anoint the government with god-like powers and elevate it above the citizenry.
And that, in a nutshell, is what happens when government officials are allowed to determine who is deserving of constitutional rights and who should be stripped of those rights for whatever reason may be justified by the courts and the legislatures.
In this way, concerns about COVID-19 mandates and bodily integrity are part of a much larger debate over the ongoing power struggle between the citizenry and the government over our property “interest” in our bodies. For instance, who should get to decide how “we the people” care for our bodies? Are we masters over our most private of domains, our bodies? Or are we merely serfs who must answer to an overlord that gets the final say over whether and how we live or die?
This debate over bodily integrity covers broad territory, ranging from abortion and euthanasia to forced blood draws, biometric surveillance and basic healthcare.
Forced vaccinations are just the tip of the iceberg.
Forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials.
To sanction this forced blood draw, the cops and the courts hitched their wagon to state “implied consent” laws (all of the states have them), which suggest that merely driving on a state-owned road implies that a person has consented to police sobriety tests, breathalyzers and blood draws.
Read the writing on the wall, and you’ll see how little remains of our right to bodily integrity in the face of the government’s steady assaults on the Fourth Amendment.
Our freedoms—especially the Fourth Amendment—continue to be strangulated by a prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.
Worse, on a daily basis, Americans are being made to relinquish the most intimate details of who we are—our biological makeup, our genetic blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure, fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to clear the nearly insurmountable hurdle that increasingly defines life in the United States: we are now guilty until proven innocent.
Such is life in America today that individuals are being threatened with arrest and carted off to jail for the least hint of noncompliance, homes are being raided by militarized SWAT teams under the slightest pretext, property is being seized on the slightest hint of suspicious activity, and roadside police stops have devolved into government-sanctioned exercises in humiliation and degradation with a complete disregard for privacy and human dignity.
While forced searches—of one’s person and property—may span a broad spectrum of methods and scenarios, the common denominator remains the same: a complete disregard for the dignity and rights of the citizenry.
Unfortunately, the indignities being heaped upon us by the architects and agents of the American police state—whether or not we’ve done anything wrong—are just a foretaste of what is to come.
The government doesn’t need to tie you to a gurney and forcibly take your blood or strip you naked by the side of the road in order to render you helpless. As this showdown over COVID-19 vaccine mandates makes clear, the government has other methods—less subtle perhaps but equally devastating—of stripping you of your independence, robbing you of your dignity, and undermining your rights.
With every court ruling that allows the government to operate above the rule of law, every piece of legislation that limits our freedoms, and every act of government wrongdoing that goes unpunished, we’re slowly being conditioned to a society in which we have little real control over our bodies or our lives.
You may not realize it yet, but you are not free.
If you believe otherwise, it is only because you have made no real attempt to exercise your freedoms.
Had you attempted to exercise your freedoms before now by questioning a police officer’s authority, challenging an unjust tax or fine, protesting the government’s endless wars, defending your right to privacy against the intrusion of surveillance cameras, or any other effort that challenges the government’s power grabs and the generally lopsided status quo, you would have already learned the hard way that the American Police State has no appetite for freedom and it does not tolerate resistance.
This is called authoritarianism, a.k.a. totalitarianism, a.k.a. oppression.
Oppression is designed to compel obedience and submission to authority. Those who voluntarily put themselves in that state – by believing that their institutions of authority are just and good and should be followed rather than subverted – render oppression redundant, unnecessary. Of course people who think and behave this way encounter no oppression. That’s their reward for good, submissive behavior. They are left alone by institutions of power because they comport with the desired behavior of complacency and obedience without further compulsion. But the fact that good, obedient citizens do not themselves perceive oppression does not mean that oppression does not exist.
Get ready to stand your ground or run for your life.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, our government “of the people, by the people and for the people” has been transformed into a greedy pack of wolves that is on the hunt.
Christine Massey Interviewed by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: On FOIA Requests & Responses to the Question — Has SARS-CoV-2 Ever Been Isolated? Does the “Virus” Exist?
The Chinese authorities announced on January 7, 2020 that they had isolated and identified “a new type of virus”. Then on the 28th of January 2020, the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that the novela corona virus had been isolated.
Christine Massey, M.Sc conducted an extensive report over a period of more than a year. The central question raised in her study is the following:
“is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?
Christine Massey submitted Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to some 90 Health /Science institutions.
Does the Virus Exist? The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation / purification of SARS-CoV-2 “having been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.”
Original video is available at Centre for Research on Globalization BitChute channel.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that Rutgers is working with Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots.
by Children’s Health Defense Team, The Defender
August 17, 2021
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) along with 18 students on Monday filed a lawsuit in federal court against Rutgers University, its board of governors, Rutgers President Jonathan Holloway and others over the university’s decision to mandate COVID vaccines for students attending school in the fall.
According to the complaint, the Rutgers vaccine requirement “is an affront to human dignity and personal freedom because it violates our basic right to control our bodies.”
The lawsuit states that in a free society, “all people have the right to decide their own medical treatment — especially to decide what to inject into their bodies. And every person has the right to make that decision voluntarily, free from coercion by anyone, and to be fully informed of the benefits and especially the risks of that decision.”
The lawsuit alleges Rutgers’ policy is a violation of the right to informed consent and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatments.
The complaint also alleges the policy is a breach of contract because in January 2021, the university assured students COVID vaccines would not be required in order to attend school. Just two months later, Rutgers flip-flopped and issued new requirements for taking the shot prior to attending classes.
According to the plaintiffs, Rutgers is working with all three manufacturers — Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson — to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots which, until fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are defined by the FDA as experimental.
The Rutgers requirement also constitutes a denial of equal protection, as administration, faculty and staff are not required to take the vaccine. It also conflicts with federal and state law, as neither has enacted legislation requiring COVID vaccines for citizens.
“This mandate undermines our Constitution and Bill of Rights by denying students the freedom to make their own medical decisions,” said CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland.
“No one should be forced or coerced into accepting any medical procedure against her wishes,” Holland said. “When the low risk to young adults from COVID and the known and unknown risks from the vaccines are taken into account, Rutgers’ actions recklessly endanger its students.”
As confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, young people are at minimal risk of long-term effects or death from COVID and have a 99.985% survival rate if infected with the virus.
In comparison, after approximately 50 total deaths following swine flu vaccination in 1976, that vaccine campaign was immediately aborted.
“The Rutgers mandate stems from the financial relationship the university has with the vaccine makers which is clearly a conflict of interest,” said New Jersey Attorney Julio Gomez, who represents the students.
“Unjustified fear and insatiable greed drive the vaccine industry, especially now, during the pandemic,” Gomez said. “This has created an opportunity for manufacturers to bring to market expensive, novel and patentable drugs, vaccines, biologics, treatments and medical devices that will reap huge profits.”
Rutgers student Peter Cordi, a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said it is “ incredibly unnerving” that his own school would play Russian Roulette with the lives of the students it claims to protect, “with greed and ties to Big Pharma being prioritized over our safety and free will.”
In addition to Gomez, plaintiffs are represented by New Jersey Attorney Susan Judge of Scotch Plains, with support from attorneys Mary Holland and Ray Flores, special counsel to CHD.
ONE: A bombshell. Alex Berenson, former New York Times reporter, August 6: “Covid vaccine maker Moderna received 300,000 reports of side effects after vaccinations over a three-month period following the launch of its shot, according to an internal report from a company that helps Moderna manage the reports.”
“That figure is far higher than the number of side effect reports about Moderna’s vaccine publicly available in the federal system that tracks such adverse events.”
BOOM. 300,000 vaccine adverse effects NOT reported to VAERS, the federal database.
Berenson: “The 300,000 figure comes from an internal update provided to employees by IQVIA, a little-known but enormous company that helps drugmakers manage clinical trials. Headquartered in North Carolina, IQVIA has 74,000 employees worldwide and had $11 billion in sales last year.”
“Earlier this week, Richard Staub, the president of IQVIA’s Research & Development Solutions division, sent a ‘Q2 2021 update’ which was labeled ‘Confidential – For internal distribution only’.”
“A person with access to the presentation provided screenshots of the relevant slide, which clearly explains the 300,000 side effect reports were received over ‘a three-month span’ – not since the introduction of the vaccine in December…”
TWO: Independent researcher Virginia Stoner has issued a stunning new report on the VAERS numbers, and the effort by mainstream scientists to minimize the destructive effects of the COVID vaccines. Here are key quotes from her report:
“More deaths have been reported to VAERS from the covid shots than from all other vaccines combined for the last 30 years.”
“There’s a code of silence shielding the massive increase in deaths (and other serious injuries) reported to VAERS from the covid shots. Not only do CDC web pages and press releases omit that inconvenient fact—vaccine research studies omit it as well.”
“The number of covid shots [in the US] administered so far in 2021 (309 million) is roughly the same as all other vaccines administered in 2020 (316 million). But a shocking 36-times more deaths were reported this year from the covid shots than were reported last year from all other vaccines.”
“Someone died from a vaccine they [a medical provider] administered…could it potentially call their professional judgment into question, or result in a malpractice lawsuit? If you were a doctor, or supervisor at a drive-thru covid vaccination clinic, and you were given a choice between spending the evening filing a VAERS report, or having dinner with friends, which would you choose?”
“There are reasons to think death may be one of the most underreported vaccine injuries of all—mainly because the victim is dead, and can’t file a VAERS report. Nor can they prod their doctor into filing a VAERS report. Unless they’re fortunate enough to have a relative or doctor who knows they got the vaccine, knows about VAERS, understands the potential for vaccine injury, and is willing to go through the onerous process of filing a VAERS report, it won’t happen.”
THREE: Open letter from Doctors for COVID Ethics accusing governments and media of lying to the people:
“Official sources, namely EudraVigilance (EU, EEA, Switzerland), MHRA (UK) and VAERS (USA), have now recorded more Injuries and Deaths from the ‘Covid’ vaccine roll-out than from all previous vaccines combined since records began.”
“TOTAL for EU/UK/USA – 34,052 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 5.46 million injuries reported as at 1 August 2021.”
“It is important to be aware that the official figures above (reported to the health authorities) are but a small percentage of the actual figures. Furthermore, people continue to die (and suffer injury) from the injections with every day which passes.”
“This catastrophic situation has not been reported by the mainstream media, despite the official figures above being publicly available.”
“The Signal of Harm is now indisputably overwhelming, and, in line with universally accepted ethical standards for clinical trials, Doctors for Covid Ethics demands that the ‘Covid’ vaccine programme be halted immediately.”
“Continuation of the programme in the full knowledge of ongoing serious Harm and Death to both adults and children constitutes a Crime Against Humanity/Genocide for which those found to be responsible or complicit will ultimately be held personally liable.”
“Governments worldwide are lying to you the people, to the populations they purportedly serve.”
“The figures above demonstrate that the mRNA vaccines are deadly.”
FOUR: The well-known 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study of VAERS bluntly stated: “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public.”
Following the finding of that study, you would multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a proper figure.
FIVE: In view of the massive number of vaccine injuries and deaths, how would we expect the public to react? Here is a major clue. Stat News, July 21: “Millions of unused Covid-19 vaccines are set to go to waste as demand dwindles across the United States and doses likely expire this summer, according to public health officials…”
“Currently, states have administered 52.36 million fewer doses than have been distributed to them, according to federal data.”
“A significant tranche of Pfizer doses is expected to expire in August… Given waning domestic vaccine demand, those doses are unlikely to be fully used before they must be tossed.”
“’We’re seeing demand [for the vaccine] falling off across all the states,’ said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.”
SIX: Understanding this, government, media, and corporate criminals are ramping up vaccine mandates wherever and however they can, to force the needle into your arm.
“You’re aware that our product is highly dangerous and destructive? We’ll make you take it.”
Anecdotal evidence detailed by former Google software engineer Mike Hearn strongly suggests that most restaurants, cafes and other businesses in France are not enforcing the country’s controversial vaccine passport system.
As we highlighted last week, on the first day the new program was in place, police were visibly patrolling bars and cafes demanding customers show proof they’ve had the jab.
However, this seems to have largely been a bluff as just days later, businesses and venues have become very lax at checking people’s papers despite the threat of large fines.
“I decided to do a simple experiment to find out: always present an expired test even though I had a valid negative one, and see what happens,” writes Hearn.
“Over a four day stay I was required to show a valid pass exactly zero times; that includes at the airports in both directions. Compliance is absolutely min viable and often lower.”
“At small businesses enforcement was non-existent: sometimes the pass requirement was ignored entirely, other times we were asked “do you have a pass” and our answer wasn’t checked. One restaurant had come up with a clever way to detect police stings without requiring customers to actually present a pass. As expected, enforcement was stricter by larger firms, however even there we saw the following:
– Test certificates being checked once and then swapped for a token that doesn’t expire.
– Expired tests being accepted.
– People accepting paper test certificates without scanning them.
– Scanning tests and then not looking at the screen to see the results.
– Accepting QR codes that failed to scan.”
Hearn also reveals how mask mandates in theme parks and other venues are also not being followed, despite signs everywhere ordering people to cover their faces, while social distancing is also a “forgotten memory.”
Images showing empty cafes and bars on the first day the system was introduced may have spooked venues into taking a hands off approach.
In passing the law but failing to ensure that it is enforced, France is following the same model as Israel, where the point of introducing the system wasn’t really to enforce it, but merely as a means of bullying young people into getting the vaccine.
As we highlighted last week, despite the odious and draconian nature of the vaccine passport system, President Macron asserted that the it was actually introduced to protect people’s “freedom,” which is like saying putting you in prison is for your own safety.
VAERS data released Friday by the CDC showed a total of 571,831 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 12,791 deaths and 77,490 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 6, 2021.
Data released Aug. 13 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 6, 2021, a total of 571,831 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,791 deaths — an increase of 425 over the previous week. There were 77,490 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 7,385 compared with the previous week.
In the U.S., 349.8 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Aug. 6. This includes: 140 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 196 million doses of Pfizer and 13 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.
The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.
As The Defender reported Aug. 13, neither vaccine has yet received full FDA approval, and neither has completed late-stage clinical trials proving a third dose will boost immunity or work against COVID variants.
The FDA’s amended Emergency Use Authorization allows people who have had an organ transplant, or those with a similar level of weakened immune system, to get an extra COVID vaccine dose. The J&J vaccine was not included because there was not sufficient data on boosters, according to the agency.
The FDA’s decision “allows doctors to boost immunity in certain immunocompromised individuals who need extra protection from COVID19,” Dr. Janet Woodcock, FDA acting commissioner, tweeted Aug. 12.
“Others who are fully vaccinated are adequately protected & do not need an additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine at this time,” Woodcock tweeted.
The vulnerable group of patients make up less than 3% of U.S. adults, according to CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky.
Heart inflammation after COVID vaccines more common than CDC claims, new research shows U.S. public health officials claim cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID vaccination are rare — but new research published online in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) shows they may happen more often than reported.
Post-vaccine myocarditis and pericarditis also appear to represent two “distinct syndromes,” Dr. George Diaz, with the Providence Regional Medical Center Everett, told Medscape Cardiology.
Diaz and colleagues reviewed 2,000,287 electronic medical records (EMR) of people who received at least one COVID vaccination. The records, obtained from 40 hospitals in Washington, Oregon, Montana and California, showed 20 people had vaccine-related myocarditis (1.0 per 100,000) and 37 had pericarditis (1.8 per 100,000).
The new JAMA study showed a “similar pattern [to the CDC study], although at higher incidence [of myocarditis and pericarditis] after vaccination, suggesting vaccine adverse event under-reporting.”
The JAMA report also stated: “Additionally, pericarditis may be more common than myocarditis among older patients.”
“Our study resulted in higher numbers of cases probably because we searched the EMR, and [also because] VAERS requires doctors to report suspected cases voluntarily,” Diaz told Medscape.
The researchers calculated the average monthly number of cases of myocarditis or pericarditis during the pre-vaccine period of January 2019 through January 2021 was 16.9 compared with 27.3 during the vaccine period of February through May 2021. The mean numbers of pericarditis cases during the same periods were 49.1 and 78.8.
The authors said limitations of their analysis include potential missed cases outside care settings and missed diagnoses of myocarditis or pericarditis, which would underestimate the incidence, as well as inaccurate EMR vaccination information.
Mom of 14-year-old who developed myocarditis after Pfizer vaccine no longer trusts public health officials
In an exclusive interview last week with The Defender, Emily Jo said before her son, Aiden, got his first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine, she was led to believe his chance of suffering an adverse reaction was “one in a million.”
Aiden, a 14-year-old from Georgia, had no history of COVID or pre-existing conditions, except for asthma. On June 10, several days after his second Pfizer shot, Aiden woke his mother up at 4:30 a.m. because his chest hurt and he couldn’t breathe.
Jo said she was aware of the potential side effect of heart inflammation, but she believed the CDC, which said the reaction was very rare and mild. “What they didn’t explain is that mild means hospital care and follow-up care indefinitely,” Jo said.
“The biggest problem is they [CDC] are not explaining what mild myocarditis means,” Jo said. “Aiden’s cardiologist told us no case of myocarditis is ‘mild.’ That’s like saying a heart attack is mild,” she said the cardiologist told her.
Jo said her son tires easily and his recovery will be a long process. She said all her kids are fully vaccinated and she was one of the most trusting advocates of the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics — until her son experienced his vaccine injury.
Another sad story! Mom so proud that her 14-year-old son could get the COVID vaccine… but now doctors confirm her son meets the criteria for having post-vaccine myocarditis.
25-year-old develops myocarditis after Moderna vaccine
In another exclusive interview last week with The Defender, Deborah Brenner said her son, a healthy 25-year-old from Ohio, experienced myocarditis five days after his first dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine, administered on July 22.
Christopher Brenner developed a fever after the vaccine, and within five days, he was experiencing chest pain so intense he was unable to sleep, so he went to the Defiance Mercy Clinic.
When Christopher was in the ER, tests showed his troponin levels were high. “I was alarmed at that point,” Brenner said.
“One of the ER nurses mentioned it could be myocarditis from the vaccine, but everyone else played it down like it was serious — but wasn’t a big deal,” Brenner said. “When his numbers jumped higher, that’s when it became more serious.”
When nurses took Christopher’s troponin level a second time it was higher, so they kept him overnight.
“When he was still in Defiance, we saw the internist who diagnosed my son with myocarditis and said it was a reaction to the vaccine,” Brenner said. “The internist explained that one type of inflammation is around the heart and one is inside the heart — and Christopher’s was the type that caused inflammation inside the heart.”
Christopher’s troponin level continued to rise, so he was transferred by ambulance to St. Vincent Hospital in Toledo. Benner said the cardiologists in Toledo were totally against connecting the reaction to the vaccine. “They didn’t want to go there, didn’t want to talk about it and just said his numbers would come back down,” she said. “I was getting really frustrated because I was wondering what was going on in his heart that we couldn’t see.”
After four days of being hospitalized and treated with blood thinners and beta blockers, Christopher was discharged. The discharge doctor told Brenner he didn’t know why the other physicians didn’t want to admit her son’s reaction was caused by the vaccine.
“Everybody has allergic reactions and your son just had an allergic reaction to the vaccine,” he said. “I can’t sit here and tell you 100% that the vaccine is the cause but the fact that he got the vaccine and days later started having issues — something was going on.”
EU looking into new possible side-effects of mRNA COVID Vaccines
European drug regulators on Aug. 11 said they are studying three new conditions reported by a small number of people after they took the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
The European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) safety committee is studying erythema multiforme, a form of allergic skin reaction; glomerulonephritis, or kidney inflammation; and nephrotic syndrome, a renal disorder characterized by heavy urinary protein losses, Reuters reported.
The EMA did not give details on how many cases of the new conditions were recorded, but said it had requested more data from the vaccine makers.
The regulator, which disclosed the new assessments as part of routine updates to the safety section of authorized vaccines’ database, did not recommend changes to the labels of mRNA vaccines at this time.
Pfizer’s efficacy plummets to 42% as Delta variant takes hold
As The Defender reported Aug. 11, a new preprint study showed mRNA vaccines’ effectiveness plummeted in July when Delta variant was dominant — with Moderna only 76% effective and Pfizer only 42% effective against infection.
A new preprint study showed mRNA vaccines’ effectiveness plummeted in July when Delta variant was dominant — with Moderna only 76% effective and Pfizer only 42% effective against infection.
The study, which raised concerns about the effectiveness of mRNA COVID vaccines — particularly Pfizer’s — against the Delta variant, caught the attention of top Biden administration officials, Axios reported.
“If that’s not a wake up call, I don’t know what is,” a senior Biden official told Axios.
The study, which has yet to be peer-reviewed, compared the effectiveness of Moderna and Pfizer COVID vaccines in the Mayo Clinic Health System from January to July 2021, during which time either the Alpha or Delta variant were highly prevalent.
Overall, researchers found Moderna’s vaccine was 86% effective against infection over the study period, and Pfizer’s was 76% effective. Moderna’s vaccine was 92% effective against hospitalization and Pfizer’s was 85% effective. There were no deaths in either cohort.
But vaccine efficacy dropped sharply in July, when the Delta variant was more prevalent. Moderna was only 76% effective against infection and Pfizer was only 42% effective.
“We observed a pronounced reduction in the effectiveness of BNT162b2 [Pfizer] coinciding with the surging prevalence of the Delta variant in the United States, but this temporal association does not imply causality,” Venky Soundararajan and his co-authors wrote.
The authors concluded “further evaluation of mechanisms underlying differences in their effectiveness such as dosing regimens and vaccine composition are warranted.”
158 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender’s inquiries
According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”
On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We have made repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions.
Despite multiple phone and email communications with many people at the CDC, and despite being told that our request was in the system and that someone would respond, we have not yet received answers to any of the questions we submitted. It has been 144 days since we sent our first email to the CDC requesting information.
Hell is Empty and the Devils are All Here
~ William Shakespeare, The Tempest, 1610- 1611
Introduction
There is a sequence of outright lies and fabrications used to justify far-reaching policy decisions which in the course of the last 18 months are literally destroying people’s lives Worldwide.
“Fake science” is used to justify confinement, social distancing, the face mask, the prohibition of social gatherings, cultural and sports events, the closure of economic activity, all of which are upheld as a means to repealing the “killer virus”.
Who is this “Killer Virus” which has been personified by both the media and our governments, held responsible for triggering economic and social chaos Worldwide?
You might recall that at the height of the February 2020 financial collapse, “V the Virus” was held responsible for the largest stock market crash since 1929.
Has the “Killer Virus” been Identified. Has SARS-CoV-2 been Isolated?
This article will review this contentious issue starting at the outset of the crisis in January 2020. Part of this analysis is based on research conducted in early 2020.
The central question raised in this review is the following: is there reliable evidence provided by the WHO and national health authorities that the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated/purified from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?
And because details concerning isolation / purification were not available, the WHO decided to “customize” The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Test using the alleged “similar” 2003 SARS virus (subsequently renamed SARS-1) as “a point of reference” for detecting genetic fragments of the novel 2019-nCoV.
What this decision entails is that novel 2019-CoV-2 is NOT a novel virus. It was categorized by the Chinese authorities and the WHO as “similar” to the 2003 SARS-CoV as well as to MERS.
2003 SARS-CoV was subsequently renamed SARS-CoV-1.
History: Isolation of the Virus
Chinese Health Authorities
The Chinese authorities announced on January 7, 2020 that “a new type of virus” had been identified “similar to the one associated with SARS and MERS” (related report , not original Chinese government source). The underlying method is described below:
We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing.
Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. (emphasis added)
…[We] collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and performed deep meta-transcriptomic sequencing. The clinical specimen was handled in a biosafety level 3 laboratory at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. Total RNA was extracted from 200 μl of BALF and a meta-transcriptomic library was constructed for pair-end (150-bp reads) sequencing using an Illumina MiniSeq as previously described 4,6,7,8.
In total, we generated 56,565,928 sequence reads that were de novo-assembled and screened for potential aetiological agents.
…
The genome sequence of this virus, as well as its termini, were determined and confirmed by reverse-transcription PCR (RT–PCR)10 and 5′/3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), respectively. This virus strain was designated as WH-Human 1 coronavirus (WHCV) (and has also been referred to as ‘2019-nCoV’) and its whole genome sequence (29,903 nt) has been assigned GenBank accession number MN908947.
The viral genome organization of WHCV was determined by sequence alignment to two representative members of the genus Betacoronavirus: a coronavirus associated with humans (SARS-CoV Tor2, GenBank accession number AY274119) [2003] and a coronavirus associated with bats (bat SL-CoVZC45, GenBank accession number MG772933) . (Nature, February 3, 2020)
It is unclear from the above quotations as well as from the documents consulted, whether the Chinese health authorities undertook an isolation / purification of a patient’s specimen.
US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Following the Chinese announcement on the 28th of January 2020, the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that the novela corona virus had been isolated.The CDC statement dated January 28th, 2020 (updated December 2020) is unequivocal:
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.
Timeline:
On January 20, 2020, CDC received a clinical specimen collected from the first reported U.S. patient infected with SARS-CoV-2. CDC immediately placed the specimen into cell culture to grow a sufficient amount of virus for study.
On February 2, 2020, CDC generated enough SARS-CoV-2 grown in cell culture to distribute to medical and scientific researchers.
On February 4, 2020, CDC shipped SARS-CoV-2 to the BEI Resources Repository.
An article discussing the isolation and characterization of this virus specimen is available in Emerging Infectious Diseases.
One important way that CDC has supported global efforts to study and learn about SARS-CoV-2 in the laboratory was by growing the virus in cell culture and ensuring that it was widely available. Researchers in the scientific and medical community can use virus obtained from this work in their studies.
SARS-CoV-2 strains supplied by CDC and other researchers can be requested, free, from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research (BEI) Resources Repository external icon by established institutions that meet BEI requirements. These requirements include maintaining appropriate facilities and safety programs, as well as having the appropriate expertise. BEI supplies organisms and reagents to the broader community of microbiology and infectious disease researchers. (Emphasis added).
See also related study which was posted on the CDC website.
The CDC Acknowledges that SARS-CoV-2 has not been Isolated.
The official CDC document, (dated July 21, 2021) entitled “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel reads as follows:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed [January 2020] and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. (emphasis added, page 40)
Compare the above statement to the CDC January 28th, 2020 advisory confirming the isolation of SARS-CoV-2:
On January 20, 2020, CDC received a clinical specimen collected from the first reported U.S. patient infected with SARS-CoV-2. CDC immediately placed the specimen into cell culture to grow a sufficient amount of virus for study.
See the analysis of CDC responses in the section below on Freedom of Information Requests.
The World Health Organization (WHO) Did Not Undertake The Isolation / Purification of a Specimen
From the documents quoted below, the Chinese authorities did not provide the WHO with a specimen of isolated / purified SARS-CoV-2.
And because details concerning isolation were not available, the WHO decided to “customize” its Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test using a so-called isolate of the “similar” 2003 SARS corona virus (subsequently renamed SARS-CoV-1) as “a point of reference” (or proxy) for detecting genetic fragments of the 2019 SARS-CoV-2.
While Corman, Drosten et al’s study confirmed that “several viral genome sequences had been released”, in the case of 2019-nCoV, “virus isolates or samples from infected patients were not available … ”
The recommendations to the WHO were as follows:
“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV,a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].
We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).
What this bold statement suggests is that the isolation / purification of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “validation” would be enabled by “the close genetic relatedness to the 2003-SARS-CoV.”
The investigative report provides detailed documentation based on Freedom of Information (FOI) requests addressed to ninety Health /Science institutions in a large number of countries.
The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation / purification of SARS-CoV-2 “having been performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.”
“The 90 Health /Science institutions that have responded thus far have provided and/or cited, in total, zero such records:
Our requests [under “freedom of information”] have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.”
The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
The CDC was contacted by the author of this report in the form of four separate requests: November 2, 2020, March 1, 2021, March 3, 2021, which are reviewed below:
The CDC again made clear that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation/purification of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible. (The request had nothing to do with replication.)
CDC again failed to provide/cite any records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification by anyone anywhere ever… but would no longer simply say so (as they did on November 2nd); instead they gave song and dance citing the study by Harcourt et al. which is the same one posted on CDC’s website:
CDC admitted they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
Here are 5 compilation pdfs containing FOI responses from 79 institutions in 22 countries/jurisdictions, re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”, as well as emails from authors of studies that claimed to have “isolated the virus” and an email from the Head of the Consultant Laboratory for Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Infectious Pathogens at Germany’s Robert Koch Institut, last updated July 13, 2021
Screenshot of a selected responses are provided below : New Zealand, Canada, UK.
Consult the full archive of letters and responses. This work was undertaken over a period of more than 12 months.
Response Public Health England
It follows from the above detailed study that there is no evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated/purified from a patient’s sample, as evidenced by the responses “under freedom of information” (FOI) from some 90 health / science institutions Worldwide.
Gemma O’Doherty is an Investigative Journalist in Ireland.
“This Irish Investigation into Covid shows that The Department of Health refuses to confirm the existence of a “virus” in writing. Confirmation that the virus was never isolated.”
VIDEO:
“As part of our legal action we had been demanding the evidence that this virus actually exists [as well as] evidence that lock downs actually have any impact on the spread of viruses; that face-masks are safe, and do deter the spread of viruses – They don’t. No such studies exist; that social distancing is based in science – It isn’t. it’s made up; that contact tracing has any bearing on the spread of a virus – of course it doesn’t. This organization here – is making it up as they go along.” – Gemma O’Doherty
Isolation of the Virus. The Legal Battle in Alberta. Patrick King
Patrick King. The Virus Has Not Been Isolated! “No I Did Not Win The Court Case”. “They Do Not Have the Evidence”.
The following video features Patrick King in his legal Battle against the Alberta Government.
There are a lot of people in Alberta and around the World who are Fighting against the Big Lie. Video: Patrick King embodies the Truth.
Concluding Remarks: “Biggest Medical Fraud in World History”
SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated. Does the virus Exist?
Neither the Chinese authorities nor the CDC, the WHO, national governments, scientific / health authorities have provided evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated /purified.
Based on the investigative research of Christine Massey we have access to the responses of numerous governments and health authorities, including that provided by the Republic of Ireland to journalist Gemma O’Doherty.
What this means is that the entire covid narrative falls flat.
We have been systematically misled.
Everything you have been told by your governments is a lie, a complexity of lies and falsehoods.
There is no pandemic. The isolation / purification of the virus has not been undertaken.
All the policies adopted by governments worldwide allegedly to “save lives” are illegal, socially destructive and in violation of fundamental human rights.
These policies have been instrumental in “destroying people’s lives”.
Dr. Stephen Frost refers to the alleged “Covid pandemic” as “The Biggest Medical Fraud in World History”.
From the outset in January 2020, the flawed and invalid RT-PCR test was used to “detect” the alleged 2019 SARS-CoV-2 virus, despite the fact that details regarding the isolation/purification of the original virus were not available.
Curbing the alleged SARS-CoV-2 pandemic through the imposition of face masks, social distancing, closing down of national economies has absolutely no validity,
The original strain of SARS-CoV-2 has not be isolated /purified: How does that affect the process of so-called “detection” of the “deadly variants” of the original virus?
Mortality and Morbidity: While there is “No Killer Virus”, there is a “Killer Vaccine”.
While the SARS-CoV-2 virus is presented by the media and the governments as a “killer virus” (when in fact the WHO and CDC describe it as “similar to seasonal influenza”), a totally invalid and dysfunctional Covid -19 vaccine is currently being imposed on the entire population of Planet Earth: 7.9 billion people.
It’s a multibillion dollar endeavour with Pfizer in the lead, establishing a near Worldwide monopoly for the sale and distribution of the mRNA killer vaccine.
Important Question:
How did Big Pharma manage to develop a vaccine (sponsored by the WHO, GAVI, the Gates Foundation, et al) with a mandate “to protect people” against a virus which has not been isolated/ purified from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?
Vaccine in relation to What? The virus has not been identified.
Moreover, 2019 SARS-CoV-2 has been categorized as similar to the 2003 SARS-CoV which means that the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 is not a novel virus.
The legitimacy of the Covid vaccine project hinges upon the validity of hundreds of thousands of RT-PCR fake positive cases Worldwide combined with fake Covid related mortality data.
Big Pharma’s mRNA vaccine has resulted in countless deaths and injuries Worldwide which are barely reported by the mainstream media.
While we do not have figures for the entire Planet, the latest official figures for the European Union and the U.S are revealing. Bear in mind they vastly underestimate the real trends in vaccin related mortality and morbidity:
EU/EEA/Switzerland to 31 July 2021 – 20,595 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 1.94 million injuries, per EudraVigilance Database.
UK to 21 July 2021 – 1,517 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 1.1 million injuries, per MHRA Yellow Card Scheme.
USA to 23 July 2021 – 11,940 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 2.4 million injuries, per VAERS database.
TOTAL for EU/UK/USA – 34,052 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 5.46 million injuries reported as at 1 August 2021
Nota Bene: It is important to be aware that the official figures above (reported to the health authorities) are but a small percentage of the actual figures. Furthermore, people continue to die (and suffer injury) from the injections with every day which passes. (D4CE)
So why are governments pressuring people to get vaccinated?
Heads of State and heads of government Worldwide are being pressured, bribed, coopted and/or threatened by powerful financial interests into accepting the Covid vaccine consensus. The vaccine passport is the endgame, which constitutes a transition towards digital tyranny.
The study and reports analyzed in this article should be used to confront politicians as well as inform and sensitize people in towns and villages, across the land, nationally and internationally.
At this stage in our history, solidarity is absolutely fundamental.
Does the Virus Exist?
The governments and the WHO do not have a Leg to Stand On. And neither does Bill Gates.
What we must seek is to confront a very fragile covid-19 consensus, which is based on fraud and deceit.
Author’s Note. I remain indebted to Christine Massey for her extensive research and investigation on the issue of isolation /purification.
See also Michel Chossudovsky’s E-book (10 chapters) entitled:
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research.
He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written extensively on the economies of developing countries with a focus on poverty and social inequality. He has also undertaken research in Health Economics (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNFPA, CIDA, WHO, Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal of Health Services (1979, 1983)
He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia.
Action: join as intervenor in the legal action to annul EU license of Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine for children aged 12 years and over
Conditions for Application: parent of a child in the European Union
Costs: no fees to apply
Details of case and form for application: see at the end of this article
In Italy starting from 6 August the ‘Green Pass’ or Covid certificate will be required for children over 12 years to access restaurants, indoor sports and cultural venues and also school.
The request for annulment rises from the fact that in practice this introduces a de facto vaccine obligation for children and constitutes an imminent danger to their health. The action is filed against the European Commission since it has released a centralised conditional marketing authorisation for the vaccine that does not require further decision from European member state (here the Italian government).
Healthy children have ZERO risk of infection with Sars-Cov-2 . Therefore there CANNOT be a positive risk-benefit ratio for children especially when injecting a substance that is based on experimental gene therapy.
Scientific evidence referenced in the complaint also shows that:
Covid can be treated
Asymptomatic transmission is not real
The Covid vaccine has no efficacy
There is no specific dosing of the vaccine for children they will have a more potent injection
Coagulation/blood clotting linked to the use of the spike protein has been observed as an important adverse event
Contrary to the claims of Pfizer the injected material does not stay in the arm but spreads all over the body and builds up in fragile areas such as the brain, the heart, the kidneys and the genitals.
Renate Holzeisen has filed this case on behalf of Italian families who are fighting the marketing authorisations that have been issued in the EU for the Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech)vaccines. Whilethe plaintiffs in this case are Italian , any European with children may participate in this legal action as an intervenor. In legal terms, an intervenor is someone who is not a party to the existing lawsuit but who makes themself a party by either joining with the plaintiff or uniting with the defendant in resistance of the plaintiff’s claims.
There is no charge to participate in this legal action, and participants are at no risk of being held financially liable should the case be lost.
People who wish to become an intervenor must provide copies of their ID cards to the coordinating lawyer in their country who will complete the paperwork provided by Attorney Holzeisen and register their participation.
For more information, please read the article below. The application forms are available in several languages below the article. If you need the documents in a language not listed, please contact us.
The deadline for participation is 15September 2021.
You can read the full text of the legal action here and watch an interview with Attorney Renate Holzeisen here.
If the application is successful, the General Court will admit the applicant as an intervenor, which will allow them to support the action and attend any oral hearing.
They must lodge the application in German—the language of the action—within 6 weeks of the action’s publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Attorney Holzeisen has prepared a draft application in German but all documents are also available in several languages. Would-be intervenors should complete the form and enclose proof of their professional capacity with a national lawyer who will review the documents and then apply on their behalf at the EU court. Lawyers can ask for a temporary registration at the European bar in which case they will have 48h access to file the documents.
Background on previous actions: Four actions, one for each authorised vaccine, have already been brought by Italian Attorney Renate Holzeisen to defend the rights of health workers in northern Italy who are growing into a pan-European push-back against the genetic engineering of the population by Big Pharma.
AVAILABLE for DOWNLOAD (click on the chosen language to download the PDF):
Action of Annulments for the Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech) Vaccine: ENGLISH / GERMAN / FRENCH / ITALIAN / SPANISH / PORTUGUESE / CZECH / DUTCH / GREEK / POLISH / SWEDISH
In Belgium the organisation Notre Bon Droit is supporting a case filed on behalf of a dozen families who appeal the decision to open vaccination for minors aged 16-17. According to them this authorisation is illegal and the requirements for informed consent cannot be met.
Several testimonies of outraged parents reveal that minors have been vaccinated in vaccination centers without having first seen a doctor.
In most cases, minors « invited » to get vaccinated and their parents have never received any medical advice prior the injection and have never been objectively informed on the potential side effects and risks. Risk benefit ratio is different according to age as the number of Covid-19 death cases in minors is extremely rare and the middle and long term effects of the experimental vaccine are of course still unknown. Informed consent can therefore never be given as required by the Belgian law of 2002 on patient’s rights.
Parents are also contesting the concept of ‘medical majority’ invoked by the government to authorise this violation of parental authority.
Parents have authority over their children and are responsible for them until the age of 18, as long as they are “minors” according to article 372 of the Civil Code.
Article 12 of the law of 2 August 2002 provides an exception stating that:
“If the patient is a minor, the rights established by this law are exercised by the parents exercising authority over the minor or by his guardian.§ 2. Depending on his age and maturity, the patient is involved in the exercise of his rights. The rights enumerated in this law may be exercised autonomously by the minor patient who can be deemed capable of reasonably assessing his or her interests.”
However this does not mean that minors can be vaccinated without parental authority permission!
According to the above-mentioned articles, and more particularly to art.12§2 al.2 of the law of 2002, the professional practitioner can give the minor patient the right to make decisions concerning his health on the basis of an individual assessment.
Thus, for example, a minor can meet with a doctor and be prescribed a treatment without the parents’ consent.
However, before doing this, the practitioner will make sure to assess the young patient’s ability to understand what is being explained and to make decisions.
The practitioner also needs to ensure that the patient is fully informed, especially about the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment in terms of side effects.
He must also present to the patient the different treatments available to remedy his medical situation.
However, this does not seem to be the case for these minors that the authorities intend to consider as being “medically adult” in the framework of the vaccination campaign.
Finally, the specific legal requirements for the vaccination of minors participating in clinical trials, which apply for Covid-19 Vaccines, are also not met.
by Richard Hugus, End Massachusetts Medical Mandates
August 11, 2021
WHEN: Saturday August 28, 2021, 12 noon to 2 PM, rain or shine
WHERE: Hyannis, MA, 300 block of Main Street near village green and statue of Iyanough (parking on North St. behind Main St. stores).
It is time to recognize that mandates for quarantine, “social distancing”, face covering, and the engineered gene injections being called “vaccines” are not about protecting public health. Public health is actually being harmed by these measures. So what is really going on? One view is that our government has been so corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry that government itself is pushing people to take pharmaceutical products even when these products have proven to be unsafe. There are precedents for this with the MMR, DPT, HPV, flu and other vaccines. Overall, vaccines have harmed, not helped, the human immune system. They have degraded the health of our society to such an extent that almost half of the children in the US today have some form of chronic illness — all for the sake of pharmaceutical company profits.
But a wider agenda is also apparent. That agenda is totalitarian social control implemented through the invention of a worldwide pandemic “emergency” which would inspire enough fear in people to make them give up their rights, separate them from others, separate them from their own instincts, and even from their spirituality. This war of the globalists against all of humanity has been cynically named “the great reset.”
Wars are fought for economic, not moral, reasons. This war is no different. Huge amounts of money have been transferred to the wealthy as a result of attacks on small business and the middle class and the further impoverishment of the poor. The wealthy want money and control of resources, as always. They don’t care if people are dying. In fact, for eugenicists like Bill Gates and other globalists who think they know best what is good for the world, depopulation is a desired goal. This may be why the authorities don’t seem to care about long-term effects of the covid injections, or about harm to reproductive organs and miscarriages that are already happening. Against all reason, pregnant women are being encouraged to get the shot. So are children. In the face of such criminality, there is nothing left for us to do but protect ourselves from our government. Whether it is working for big pharma or the globalists, we know for sure government isn’t working for us.
According to the latest data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), “between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 30, 2021, a total of 545,338 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,366 deaths. There were 70,105 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period.” VAERS is known to capture only a small percentage of adverse events, as they are greatly under-reported. And the CDC, representing the pharmaceutical industry (not us), has no interest in finding out or publicizing accurate numbers, or in following up on reports. So we can assume there have been many more deaths and injuries than cited above. There is already enough evidence that the CDC is committing a crime just allowing covid injections to continue, much less promoting them.
The purpose of standing out August 28 will be to do what we can to save more people from being harmed. The mass injection program needs to be stopped now. We must also stand up for children who may be forced to wear masks in the upcoming school year. Masks don’t protect anyone; their purpose is to condition us to accept medical tyranny and perhaps an eventual social credit score system, starting with “vaccine passports.” Using children as pawns to achieve this goal is frankly evil. We need to expose the perpetrators of this crime against humanity and see to it that they are prosecuted. If we don’t, the oppression will only continue.
This call is for a peaceful, non-partisan protest following up on our many previous demonstrations. Bring large-letter signs or banners with your message.
We stand for:
— the right to remain human — i.e., not to be genetically modified or made “transhuman.” The openly declared transhumanist agenda of the Great Reset and its plan for “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity” is absolutely insane.
— the right to live. These injections are killing people. We obviously have the right to reject them for ourselves and our children
— the right to the pursuit of happiness. Happiness will not be achievable if we have lost our health to medically induced chronic disease.
— our right to refuse medical interventions. No to the de facto vaccine mandate by which the state of Massachusetts and the federal government encourages employers, colleges, and businesses to require vaccination. certificates (or torture us with testing). No to explicit vaccine mandates likely to follow the corrupt FDA’s approval of the spike protein clot shots.
— ending mask requirements on public transportation, in healthcare facilities, and especially in schools. Forcing children to wear masks is child abuse.
— the right to bodily autonomy. No one should be forced to take a vaccine, wear a mask, be swabbed, tested, or scanned
— the Nuremberg code and the right to informed consent. No substance should be injected into anyone’s body without their full understanding of all possible harmful effects (which are as yet unknown with experimental mRNA injections). There should be no negative consequences should we refuse a medical intervention.
— parental rights. The state has no right to bypass parents’ authority on whether their minor child should wear a mask, be tested, or be given any pharmaceutical product.
— the right to education. Education at K-12 schools, universities, and colleges should not be withheld as leverage to enforce government medical decrees.
— the right to freedom of movement. This right is violated when any kind of travel requires masking, testing, or proof of vaccination.
— “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” (4th Amendment). This is our right to privacy . Our vaccine status and medical history is no one’s business.
— the right to due process: Open meeting laws continue to be illegally suspended in Massachusetts “due to coronavirus” and our elected officials seem to like it that way. Virtual meetings undermine democracy. Government-sponsored medical procedures without informed consent, and government edicts bypassing the legislative process are also a violation of the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments.
— the 1st Amendment freedom of speech and press. End the blatant Soviet-style government-media censorship of people with dissenting views about the covid narrative
— the right to equal protection of our civil and Constitutional rights. Refusal of service by any transport company, public venue, ticket vendor, grocery store, or other business on the basis of arbitrary “vaccine passports” is a form of discrimination which we should be protected from under the law. Loss of this right amounts to coercion through medical tyranny and will lay the groundwork for a “social credit score” system in which all citizens do not have equal rights.
Today, August 11, 2021. I went to the gym this morning. I live in Israel. I do not have a green pass. Technically, I am not allowed in to the gym. As I walk there, I’m thinking what to do if police prevent me from going. Do I go in anyway or back out, jump the fence and work out?
It turned out not to be an issue. Nobody was at the front desk so I just walked in, did my work out, and left.
I walk home, and when I turn the corner to my street, I’m reading The Tower of Basel so I’m not looking up. I hear my wife scream my name and immediately my blood pressure shoots up. She’s unloading groceries with my two oldest daughters, 11 and 9.
Apparently, as I was working out at the gym, my wife was having a workout of the mind and soul at the supermarket.
“Rafi, they called the police on me!”
“What, is everything OK? Does this have a happy ending?”
I immediately want to know if this is a good or bad story. I have been constantly on edge for about 18 months now, and I am in no condition to handle any sort of suspense at all.
“Everything’s fine,” says my wife. I breathe a sigh of relief.
“So what happened?!”
A bit of background. My wife and I made a pact a while back. We would not put on masks anymore for any reason. Not to keep a job, not to placate the police, nothing. (The last time I put one on was for an interview to get a weapons license 3 months ago, and I had to annul vows for that.) Why are we so adamant? Because it is time to set an example, and so we are. Neither I nor my wife have ever gotten a ticket for not wearing a mask. I’ve been threatened, even booked and detained by police, but never ticketed.
She begins the story. She’s heading into the grocery store with our two oldest daughters. The guard stops her at the entrance and tells her she can’t come in without a mask. She says yes, she can, and that she does not have to wear a mask. She simply walks past the guard. The guard follows her inside and continues to harass her. She just continues shopping, with an asinine back-and-forth about what the “law is”.
“Show me your exemption,” says the guard.
“I don’t have to show you anything,” she insists. And keeps shopping. My daughters are witnessing all of this, also unmasked.
As this is going on, the manager of the store comes out and takes my wife’s side, which was nice. “If she says she doesn’t have to wear a mask, then she doesn’t have to wear a mask! Enough already!”
The guard slinks off. Meanwhile, random masked grocery shoppers continue to harass my wife in front of my kids. She ignores them all and keeps shopping.
Then, she gets to the self-checkout counter and starts scanning her stuff. She swipes her credit card, the machine says there’s a problem (what a coincidence) and to call a clerk to help. A clerk comes, and she says, “Sorry, this checkout isn’t working. You’ll have to start over. And the police are coming. You have to put on a mask.”
“No, I don’t,” says my wife.
Then the store intercom starts blaring. “The police are on their way. Everyone must make sure their mask covers both nose and mouth.”
My wife just stands there, with my daughters. She can’t leave, because payment hasn’t gone through. She suspects someone shut down the machine to pin her there as the police were coming. Plus, my oldest just happened to have a bee sting on her foot from the day before that was swelling up again and needed to be iced, but my wife did not want to use that excuse to leave, because it would look cowardly. It is time to stand up. So she just stood there calmly, unmasked.
Police arrive outside the supermarket, taking pictures. They do not come in.
Still waiting, she’s the only person unmasked in the entire store. The checkout machine comes back to life. A new screen pops up on for a manager to swipe a card again. My wife calls the manager over, she swipes the card. The machine now says to swipe the credit card again. She does. Receipt comes out this time, finished.
She’s now walking out of the store, my oldest’s foot in a lot of pain. She gets past the guard again, and she simply walks past three policemen standing there. As she passes them, the guard says, “That’s her that’s her!” to the cops. But my wife just keeps walking to the car, two daughters in tow. They help her load the car, and she drives off home.
That’s it. That’s the whole story. This is all one big bluff. Our enemies are empty shells. Evil is emptiness.
Show no fear. Stare the bastards down. Keep your calm. They’re nothing.
I would bet that nobody in my entire city has the sheer courage of my wife. I am blessed with the most amazing woman in the world.
We are pleased to report that through our efforts, vaccination with the experimental COVID-19 shots, issued under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), is no longer mandatory at the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). On July 27, 2021, the case against LAUSD was dismissed without prejudice, as the judge concluded the district had indeed abandoned the mandatory C-19 vaccination policy, communicated through various channels to the public, teachers, and staff before the lawsuit was filed.
This is a BIG win – because of the lawsuit, LAUSD represented to the court on the record that it does not have a policy requiring vaccination with EUA products. Since the court has now confirmed the absence of any policy requiring vaccination at LAUSD, all teachers and staff are safe to return to work without vaccination or furnishing proof of vaccination in the fall.
We consider this an important victory for individual freedom for LAUSD personnel because it accomplished precisely what we sought in filing the lawsuit.
Importantly, the dismissal was without prejudice, meaning the complaint can be re-filed if LAUSD changes its policy and begins to require vaccination with an EUA product yet again. The dismissal was due to the fact that LAUSD had changed its previous policy and represented to the court it did not have a policy mandating EUA products. The Judge’s own words confirm this in the last line of the Order granting the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss:
“That Defendants were contemplating requiring the vaccine, and then later reversed course and explicitly said they would not be, does not create a ripe case or controversy.”
Our lawsuit was filed in March because LAUSD mandated vaccination against COVID for all personnel. The following day after we filed our lawsuit, LAUSD attempted to reverse course by issuing a new policy stating the EUA vaccines were voluntary in direct contradiction to what had been communicated in emails, meetings, and the media.
At that point, when asked to specifically state to the court that they did not have a vaccination policy, LAUSD refused, thus confirming that they did have such a policy in place as a condition of employment.
Upon filing of our amended complaint, LAUSD filed a Motion to Dismiss on the basis that there was no policy of mandatory vaccination. In its Reply to our Opposition to their motion, they were forced to confirm – on the court record – no less than 8 times, that LAUSD does not require COVID-19 vaccination and that vaccination is purely voluntary. In other words, LAUSD did exactly what we had asked it to do from the start, and therefore the case was dismissed without prejudice.
Should a LAUSD official try to force an employee to take an EUA injection under penalty of termination, they should show them the LAUSD Reply Brief and the highlighted language showing their public position that there is no mandate for vaccination.
Although we wish the judge had decided the case on its merits and had expressly stated what we believe to be self-evident: that we have unalienable rights endowed by our Creator, and that among these is the right to determine what goes into our bodies, we are still delighted that our legal action prevented LAUSD’s illegal vaccine mandate and protected the rights of countless educators and staff.
We must all continue our fight and indeed Health Freedom Defense Fund will do so and appreciates you helping to spread the word and supporting our work.
In a petition filed Tuesday in the California Supreme Court, the Orange County Board of Education and Children’s Health Defense asked the court to declare an immediate end to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s state of emergency, arguing Newsom himself last week said the emergency was over.
Orange County Board of Education and Children’s Health Defense (CHD) on Tuesday filed a petition for writ of mandate in the California Supreme Court asking the court to declare an immediate end to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s declared state of emergency.
A writ of mandate is a court order to a government agency, including another court, to follow the law by correcting its prior actions or ceasing illegal acts.
“This petition is not about masks, vaccines or any other specific policy issue,” said Scott J. Street, attorney for the Orange County Board of Education.
“This concerns fundamental issues of governance that are the foundation of American self-government and which cannot exist in an indefinite state of emergency,” said Street, who last year successfully litigated a similar case against the state, after state health officials arbitrarily closed gyms.
The Emergency Services Act states that an emergency can be declared when there exists “extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state.”
The act also states the governor must terminate a state of emergency “at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant.”
“ … the state no longer faces a threat that the state’s healthcare system will be overwhelmed. To the contrary, all available evidence suggests a resurgence of cases, hospitalizations and deaths to the level that last August prompted the Blueprint [for a Safer Economy] and the other now-rescinded public health directives at issue is unlikely to occur in light of the percentage of eligible Californians who are fully vaccinated.”
“The governor can’t have it both ways,” said Robert Tyler, counsel for Orange County Board of Education. “He can’t claim victory over the emergency of COVID-19 in one court, and immediately claim an emergency exists in another just so he can keep the people of California in a headlock.”
CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., said the aim of the lawsuit is to restore democracy in California after a 17-month suspension.
Kennedy, who lives in California, said:
“Californians are tired of being governed by unelected technocrats ruling us by arbitrary dictates with no scientific basis in violation of our constitutional rights to transparency, public participation and due process.”
Kennedy said “government best serves public health” when citizens participate in the regulatory process to craft policies “annealed in the cauldron of debate as the regulatory system provides.”
According to Denise Young, executive director of CHD’s California chapter, the state’s “never-ending ‘state of emergency’ and lack of transparency of science and data on which these policies have been based” have resulted in the “massive disruption” to children’s education.
“It is difficult to quantify the damage perpetrated on our children by the state and its schools as a result of online learning, mask wearing, testing and living in a continuous state of fear,” Young said.
Have you been vaccinated against COVID but afraid of vaccine failure? Do you wear a mask, or two, for added protection? Do you fear being around others? Feeling pressured to get the jab to keep your job? Have you tested positive for COVID post-vaccination? Do you fear the virus is mutating into a Totalitarian dictatorship?
Everyday there is a new story, “news-story,” designed to cause confusion and fear. Confusion equals control. FEAR equals ‘false information appearing real.’
The rule is now simple: get vaccinated or wear a mask until you do. – President Biden
The answer? Know bad advice campaigns when you see them.
Bad Advice Campaigns
The bad advice campaigns began in early March of 2020, when “the experts” advised you to wear a mask to “flatter the curve.”
However, mask mandates did not flatten any curves. They only turned curves upside down.
Then, one day in January 2021, after nine months of gestating fear, you were told by “the experts” to get vaccinated to stop viral transmission, avoid death, that life would return to normal and the masks could come off.
However, masks did not come off, reports said COVID cases increased, and variants resulted.
…even if you’ve been fully vaccinated and protected from severe illness from COVID-19, you could have the Delta variant in your system and spread it to someone who isn’t vaccinated. –President Biden
Yes, some fully vaccinated people will still test positive, and some will show some symptoms of COVID-19. That’s expected with almost every vaccine there is for other diseases. – President Biden
One major hurdle for COVID variants remains: there is no approved test to identify a COVID variant. If there is no delta variant test, then how exactly are people being diagnosed with a “delta variant’ or other variants?”
The problem is that the tests in question for detecting variants have not been approved as a diagnostic tool either by the Food and Drug Administration or under federal rules governing university labs ― PBS News, February 26, 2021
The media is deliberately seeding misinformation to the masses. Expect more confusion to come.
After December 31, 2021, the CDC will withdraw its request to use the PCR Diagnostic Panel for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Without PCR testing, blood tests will be the only available tests, which require weeks for a result. Will there be a new distraction, a new variant? A new vaccine? An alien landing?
Don’t be duped. With no real proof of a true source of infection, it is fear and growing vaccine reactions that are responsible for pandemic cases and deaths. If the reports prove anything, they prove that we are all casualties of an informational war that will result in potentially millions of deaths, due to collective human ignorance. The goals of misinformation can be found in the 10 messages of The Georgia Guidestones.
Spike In Vax Reactions
The blatant contradiction is that injectable products, sold as “safe and effective,” come with no proof of safety or effectiveness. The experimental mRNA vaccines produce a spike protein in your body, a known toxin, which spikes a cytokine storm with unpredictable results. The CDC reports a Russian Roulette of symptoms, ranging from anaphylaxis, to heart palpitations, blood clots, and death.
o Heart failure, heart injury, heart attack, myocarditis (Chen et al., 2020; Sawalha et al., 2021)
o Pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary thromboembolism and thrombosis, lung tissue damage, possible pulmonary fibrosis (McDonald, 2020; Mishra et al., 2020; Pasqualetto et al., 2020; Potus et al., 2020; Dhawan et al., 2021)
o Increased venous and arterial thromboembolic events (Ali and Spinler, 2021)
o Diabetes (Yang et al., 2010; Lima-Martinez et al., 2021)
o Neurological complications, including encephalopathy, seizures, headaches, and neuromuscular diseases. Also, hypercoagulability and stroke (AboTaleb, 2020; Bobker and Robbins, 2020; Hassett et al., 2020; Hess et al., 2020)
o Gut dysbiosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and leaky gut (Perisetti et al., 2020; Zeppa et al., 2020; Hunt et al., 2021)
o Kidney damage (Han and Ye, 2021)
o Impaired male reproductive capacity (Seymen, 2021)
o Skin lesions and other cutaneous manifestations (Galli et al., 2020)
o General autoimmune diseases, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (Jacobs and Eichbaum, 2021; Liu et al., 2021)
o Liver injury (Roth et al., 2021)
State governments ended previous illegal mandates due to a criminal complaint filed by Randall Kelton in Texas court against Governor Abbott. See the Governor Criminal Complaint. However, the role of magistrate then passed to corporations and employers who claimed they could mandate you, as an employee, to get the Emergency Authorized Use (EAU) medical product (vaccine) that did not have FDA-approval.
Do you trust experts who began a pandemic with bogus cases? New “surges” are spreading in vaccinated populations. Did the vaccines fail? Have they failed before?
‘Primary Vaccine Failure’ in Highly Vaccinated Populations
Disease outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations are nothing new. As expected, disease is spreading among vaccinated people in highly vaccinated populations, expressing the disease as what experts call ‘breakthrough infections’, or covariants.
Fast forward to July 2021, when the CDC again shifted 180-degrees in its message to recommend that fully vaccinated people should continue to wear a mask because the unvaccinated could put the vaccinated at risk of infection. This logic is the same as requiring you to wear a raincoat to keep someone else dry, or exercise for others so they can lose weight. Vaccine failure is no longer mentioned.
The “experts” will always advise everyone to get vaccinated voluntarily, even as there is a global die-off of recipients being test animals to experimental vaccines. “Get the booster. Get all the boosters!”
Insurance Companies Off The Hook
Because of the uncertainties from unauthorized tests and experimental vaccines, insurance companies in India and Korea are limiting what they will cover if someone becomes sick from the COVID injections. They write:
Contrary to popular perception, existing health insurance policies are unlikely to cover the cost of vaccination and adverse reactions, if any. Only policies designed purely for the COVID vaccination process — there is none at the moment — will cover the costs.
Wuhan scientists conducted a major study in Wuhan China, where the problem began, involving almost 10 million people, and found zero cases of asymptomatic transmission. See the Study, not reported to the public. What U.S. insurance companies will do remains to be seen as news breaks out, along with new variant surges.
Treatments Vs. Healing
These are historical times. It’s the time to dissolve the pandemic of fear and liberate yourself.
First, it is important to know there is a difference between treatment (vaccination) and healing (immunization). The former is synthetic with no guarantees. The latter is natural and proven by the you, the healer as you heal yourself. Just as each healer heals him/her self, each liberator, liberates her/himself.
Since April 2021, the FDA has only approved one treatment, an antiviral drug called Veklury, widely known as remdesivir, a toxic treatment for a wide array of COVID symptoms. Studies conclusively show this drug to be ineffective. Other medical treatments include the drugs invermectin, which is used in Africa for parasitic infections, and hydroxychloroquine. In combination with the mineral zinc, hydroxychloroquine is reported by some doctors to offer relief of COVID symptoms.
As a group, synthetic drugs and vaccines dismantle the body’s immune system. Without an immune system, you are susceptible to be invaded by technology that is proven to be fatal. Instead of synthetic solutions, there are natural solutions. Zinc, alone, or quercitin, a zinc ionophor, can offer relief to flu-like symptoms. This is because people with infections are deficient in zinc and other minerals. Their immune systems are out of balance to prevent infection and to push out toxins that lead to illness. When replenished with the right minerals, the body swings back into balance.
With many adverse effects of these vaccines now widely reported, such as AstraZeneca confirming a link between its shot and blood clots, and 18 countries suspending its vaccine, while other paused the use of the J&J experimental shot, no one has a clear indication or information about the safety or effectiveness of the shots to make an informed choice. To inject or not to inject?
Dissolving Fear
Is your head exploding trying to make sense of the contradictions and inconsistencies from the experts in the media?
Fear not! When you know you are a spiritual being, you can dissolve all fear. You can awaken to truth.
Mandates are not laws. Unless a legislature passes a law requiring mass injections (which cannot happen due to problems with the solution), there is no requirement, and there never could be. Not participating in a medical experiment is a legal and lawful right because people have the right to refuse medical interventions.
People are discovering that they need only trust their own judgment when it comes to unproven medical products and politicians who practice medicine without a license. Especially since vaccine makers are not liable for any damages from their products. You cannot sue vaccine makers for side effects or direct effects from their products. Neither will the government compensate you for any damages. Who is responsible for damages?
You are.
You came here with everything you need. Simply know who you are. Two Greek words carved on a temple in Greece are γνωρίστε τον εαυτό σας, meaning Know Thyself. Are you a body or a spirit with a body?
The strength and integrity of your spirit is matched only by your internal defense system, known as your innate immune system. Your immune system is the key to thwarting infections and invaders of all kinds. If you already survived the symptoms of ‘COVID,’ then you have already produced a stronger immune system. There is no point in vaccination, as the Cleveland Clinic suggests.
No injections are necessary because infections come and go naturally, as they have done throughout human history for centuries, long before vaccines were known or viruses were patented as ‘real.’
There is no need to fear an infection in your body if you understand that your body heals itself if given the right tools, which are the tools of Nature. Once healed, your body becomes stronger because it has created antibodies that now guard your immune system against future invasions so that you never experience that particular natural invader again. You have created innate immunity that lasts a lifetime. A synthetic vaccine cannot do that.
Your body shows you symptoms as its sign language, to show you how to heal yourself because you are your own healer. Your symptoms are nothing to fear. Infections reflect mineral deficiencies, which cascade into other deficiencies.
Natural options to strengthen the immune system include adding minerals such as zinc, magnesium, iodine, boron, and selenium; herbs such as nettle, and goldenseal, and Elderberries; vitamins such as vitamin D, which your skin makes from the sun; and vitamin C from green onions made into soup, and Sumac berries, or White pine needles made into tea.
Natural healing options come from Nature, which is noninvasive and not patentable. Nature is freely offered right outside your door. You simply have to open the door and step outside to find a natural, free farmacy at your feet.
The Power of Choice
Whenever there are uncertainties for your health, there must always be many choices in how you respond. Choice is the solution, along with ensuring that your immune system is nourished and strong. That is why there is never a one-size-fits all approach to health or freedom issues. All individuals are unique, so all solutions must be unique.
That is the essence of Health Freedom. Each person is endowed, by birth, with natural, Universal rights that are reflected in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration reflects personal responsibility for your health, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Your health and life is reflected in your own innate immune system. By building your immune system to reverse the symptomatic language of your body, you connect to your higher powers, to your spirit.
It’s been YOU all along. Others do not set themselves on fire to keep you warm or wear a raincoat to keep you dry. Others are not responsible for how you heal yourself.
The right and responsibility to decline any product or treatment is a birthright, especially when it comes to your body. Connect with who you are and let that be contagious.
A mandate to accept a medical product to keep your job is illegal. Mandates are merely offers that you can decline or refuse. No government, governor, employer or church can force or coerce or dictate any mandate since there is no law to follow or enforce, no legislation to point to. But there is guidance to protect your right to choose.
Five Solutions
One medical professional, known as Agent J, who continues to be employed as a nurse in a hospital, unvaccinated, after being mandated to get the shot, has created a Right To Decline form to protect her freedom. She offers it freely for others. See her Declination Statement.
2. The RighttoRefuse.org is a health freedom organization and website tracking legislation in 45 states that protect rights of individuals to make their own health decisions, including workplace coercion and banning vaccine passports. To date, 15 states have passed at least one Right to Refuse bill.
4. Stop listening to the media. Validate the information you receive to get to a clean view of things, untainted by fear.
5. Don’t play their war games!
In any war, it is incumbent that you make a plan. Whatever choices you make, there is no reason to be afraid of other people, since you decide what’s best for you. It’s your body, so it’s your choice. Your body belongs only to you, and only you are responsible for what you put into it. You are not responsible for what others decide for their own bodies. Trust yourself!
“It is incredible that this must be said, but the obvious seems to escape politicized academics, so we must state the obvious: Genocide is deliberate; it is premeditated. There is no genocide without premeditation. The murders are not unfortunate coincidences. This is why it is called “mass MURDER” and not “mass MANSLAUGHTER.”~ A.E. Samaan
R.J. Rummel, a researcher and political scientist, defined the term “democide” as “the murder of any person or people by their government, including genocide, politicide and mass murder.” According to Rummel, democide passed war as the leading cause of non-natural death in the 20th Century, and moving into the 21st Century, it not only shows no signs of stopping, it seems to be the desired and planned manner of death of hundreds of millions or even billions of innocent people around the world. In the U.S today, democide has only just begun, as this ‘Covid’ plot orchestrated by the ruling master class and this government continues in its efforts to cull the American population so as to advance the agendas of disease, eugenics, and death. This is being done simply to achieve total control over the masses.
This would seem to be no easy task, but so far, there has been almost no resistance to the government’s efforts to propagandize, threaten, and then subdue the bulk of people that make up what should now be referred to as the American herd. Because of this apathetic response to tyranny by the people of this country, this economy has been devastated, jobs and the ability to provide sustenance have been greatly reduced, restrictions of life and freedom have massively increased, price inflation is rampant, the controlling political and medical protocols have already proven to be deadly beyond the scope of the imagination of any sane person, and this is only a preview of what is to come.
Although many people have been sick and have died, some with unique but unexplained symptoms, the total numbers of deaths throughout 2020 remained normal. There are many factors involved of course, although logic was disappeared long ago, but no such thing described as SARS-CoV-2 or ‘Covid-19’ has ever once been properly isolated or shown to actually exist. This should be very troubling to all, and reason enough to immediately put down this fake pandemic and expose the staged government coup that was intentionally launched early last year.
This staged ‘pandemic’ has been planned for at least two decades or more. It has been simulated and acted out, almost exactly as has happened, on multiple occasions over this timeframe, and previous attempts with very similar plots have taken place for decades with flu, SARS, Swine Flu, Ebola, MERS, and other falsely claimed viral scares. But this time is different in that the people are ripe for control and takeover, and modern technology can now spread propaganda to every household in seconds, giving the government and mainstream media the tools to create instant fear, panic, and mass obedience to illegal draconian mandates.
But let us in this conversation discuss the aspect of the existing and coming premeditated murder of innocents by this governing system; the possible planned democide of millions of citizens, especially those that are considered to be a drain on the system such as the old and infirmed, those with limited mental capacity, those with disabilities, those of certain ethnic backgrounds, and all those that question, dissent, disobey, and expose the truth about what is really happening in this plotted takeover. In addition, efforts to destroy fertility, to depopulate the earth, and to inject every single child from infancy to adult with deadly poison is underway as well. Make no mistake, this is war against the people by government.
Consider the fact that remdesivir, an experimental drug, was fast-tracked as the “standard of care” for ‘Covid’ early on by Anthony Fauci, and was originally the only approved ‘Covid” treatment for American hospitals, even though this drug does not work against anything, and causes many adverse reactions, body organ failure, and a high incidence of death. “Remdesivir was one of four drugs in a clinical trial for Ebola in 2018, and was dropped from the study before it was over, after a safety review revealed that it had the highest death rate of the drugs being tested.” One of only two studies cited by Fauci for the recommended use of this toxic drug was the Ebola Trial in 2018, and in that trial, the manufacturer, Gilead Sciences, only tested 53 patients for just 28 days. Gilead had close ties, monetary interests, and partnership with the CDC and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed up by Fauci.
In Gilead’s cohort study, they reported “that of 61 patients treated with the drug, eight were excluded for missing information, 32 (60%) of 53 remaining patients reported adverse events including increased liver enzymes, diarrhea, rash, and kidney function impairment. Twelve patients (23%) had “serious” adverse events including multiple-organ-dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and hypotension (low blood pressure).”
In the second Ebola study, after results from the first 499 participants had been reviewed, the trial’s safety monitors recommended that two drugs—ZMapp and remdesivir—be dropped from the remainder of the trial. These two drugs were much less effective at preventing death.
Overall, about 50% of people who received either Zmapp or remdesivir died during the trial. In contrast, only about 35% of people who received either Mab114 or REGN-EB3 died. Three participants died of side effects thought to be related to treatment—two in the ZMapp group and one in the remdesivir group.
Fauci knew of the deadly nature of the poisonous remdesivir at least as early as 2018, but chose to use this dangerous drug with fast-track FDA approval in October of 2020 as the “standard of care,” and the primary treatment in all U.S. hospitals for all “Covid” patients. That means that American patients across this country were not treated, but murdered.
The secondary drug being used as a stand-alone and in combination with remdesivir is another deadly experimental corticosteroid called dexamethasone. According to eHealthMe,“Death is found among people who take Dexamethasone, especially for people who are male, 60+ old, have been taking the drug for < 1 month.”
According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), “in recovery, treatment with dexamethasone conferred a “survival benefit” among participants who required supplemental oxygen at enrollment. In the dexamethasone group, 23.3% of participants died within 28 days of enrollment.”
In addition, I have written about another toxin called graphene oxide, that has been said to be in some masks, PCR testing, and shown to be in heavy concentrations in certain injections falsely called “Covid vaccines.’ This is a deadly substance purposely being used in order to harm those that have been subject to its exposure from any of these methods. Again, this is the purposeful use of a poison that has the ability to greatly harm the public, and also cause death.
Then of course there are these very poisonous ‘Covid vaccines’ that are not vaccines at all, but simply bioweapons being used by the state and the pharmaceutical monsters to cause extreme sickness, to inject toxic material into the masses, to cause body and immune system harm and destruction, and death to many. It is also a way for the state thugs to gain control over much of the population through processes of gene-altering RNA/DNA manipulation, nano-particle insertion, and to gain bio-technological mastery over the minds and bodies of much of the American public.
Sickness, mayhem, medical martial law, economic destruction, censorship, extreme wealth transfer to the richest among us, and death have been the result of all the state’s orders, mandates, restrictions, regulations, and ‘Covid’ rules. This is no pandemic, it is a long-planned coup meant as war against all of society. It is the plot of eugenicists and murderers whose intent is to depopulate the earth, while building a society made up of slaves controlled by a technocratic master class.
This absurd phenomenon is only possible because of the collective madness of the masses, and their inability to grasp the truth and then act accordingly to stop this onslaught of murder by the state. In other words, the people are their own worst enemy.
The truth is much more powerful and compelling than fiction, so find and accept truth, ridicule the rulers, accept no assault on freedom, disobey every state mandate, and avoid all dangerous attempts of division and isolation sought by the totalitarians bent on gaining total control of society.
“Isolation and the patient repetition of stimuli are required to tame wild animals … The totalitarians have followed this rule. They know that they can condition their political victims most quickly if they are kept in isolation.” ~ Joost A. M. Meerloo—“The Rape of the Mind” (1956)
Board-certified pathologist, Dr. Ryan N. Cole MD spoke at the White Coat Summit about the catastrophic damage COVID vaccines are doing on humans and the toxic spike protein, potential long-term effects of vaccines.
“You want to give a 2, 5 or 12 year old a shot? And we see a 200% increase of myocarditis. That’s a good idea. Let’s give a kid a toxine that ruins his health for life. (…/…) We need to stop insanity immediately”
“This is not science. This is poison attack on our population.”
“In the Pfizer paperworks and applications, it clearly states that in the rats, there is a 16% decrease in fertility, one of the most fertile mammals on the planet. (…/…) So what they’re doing on humanity? The answer is: We don’t know. Guess what? We don’t have long term safety data yet. That’s the tragedy and the crime in all of this. It’s an experiment. It’s an emergency authorisation, not approved. Humanity is the phase 3 trial.”
“What is the risk for cancer after the shot? We don’t know. What is the risk of autoimmune disease after the shot? We don’t know.”
“What is the risk of impairing fertility for a life time? We don’t know.”
“So why in the world are we really pushing forward at the path rate we’re going without knowing these thing? Complete attack on science and a complete attack on us.”
“No more mandatory forcing of employees. (…/…) ‘How in the world these hospitals and these employers saying: ‘You can not work for me if you don’t sign up to be a subject for an experiment on humanity’ ”
“Where are the billions to do the autopsies? Where are the billions to prove the science?”
Here are some protest compilations from around France on Saturday, August 7, 2021. Word via independent media sources is that the government is VERY worried, indeed. August should be shut-down month in France; instead, people are massing at these marches.
Consciousness among these people is that the entire system is a corrupt mess, that if you exchange one hideous politician or party for another, you’ll end up with just the same. It’s way beyond a mandatory vaccination or a health pass. (Although marchers are very aware that the vaccinations are now making people sick, especially through the example of Israel.)
The French truly get it.
Today, the health passes kick in, so this writer will not be able to visit a restaurant or similar. The call among demonstrators is to simple boycott the entire system, to step outside it and avoid those places and businesses affected wherever possible.
A march we participated in at the weekend revealed a whole new set of people out protesting, including friends and neighbours.
Both videos below give us an idea of the scope and scale around the country this past Saturday.
One banner we saw someone carry said, in French of course, ‘thanks Covid-19, for the Great Awakening.’
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
Transcript
So, children over the age of 16 won’t need parental permission to accept the experimental jab for covid-19. The British Government wants to give it to children over the age of 12. And they are now testing it on pre-school and primary school children.
Listen carefully to what I’ve got to tell you.
If you’re a human and not a zombie this will fill you with rage. If the squaddies in the 77th Brigade listen properly even they are going to think twice about pressing the thumbs down button.
On the 15th July 2021, the UK Government’s advisors the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation said: `until more data become available JCVI does not currently advise routine universal vaccination of children and young people less than 18 years of age.’ They added that the `the health benefits in this population is small and do not outweigh the potential risks.
Splendid, I thought. Send up a rocket.
And then a few weeks later, on 4th August, the committee changed its mind after the UK’s Chief Medical Officers requested that JCVI accelerated its review of advice for jabbing children.
Changed their minds.
They admitted that covid-19 disease in children is typically mild or asymptomatic. But they changed their minds and said that all 16 and 17-year-olds be jabbed. And that many children aged 12 and over be jabbed.
One odd thing was that they said that `in recent weeks, reports have been submitted about myocarditis.
Recent weeks.
Take a look at my video dated 8th December 2020 entitled `Covid 19 vaccine – possible vaccine side effects’ and you will find that I listed myocarditis.
So how come I knew about this risk half a year before the Government’s advisory committee? Not boasting but I’ve been half a year ahead since early 2020.
I can’t find any new evidence that would have changed their minds.
But the minds changed.
The membership of the JCVI’s subcommittee on covid changed and one prominent critic of covid jabs for children coincidentally left. Three other members changed too. Gosh. However, committee members said that they had not felt any political pressure to change their views on giving the jab to teenagers. How reassuring.
Just out of idle curiosity I wonder if any members of the committee have any links with drug companies or have ever accepted drug company money. Or are there any who have no links with drug company money. Just wondering. I’ll perhaps look into that in detail another day.
Politicians, advisers and doctors should know that the experimental jab will kill children – almost certainly kill or injure far more than would be killed or injured by this year’s flu: covid-19.
And there won’t be one in a million of these jabbed children who will understand that they’re taking part in a massive, unethical, immoral and illegal experiment. The Joint Committee says `in all instances, the offer of vaccination to children and young people must be accompanied by appropriate information to enable children and young people…to be adequately appraised of the potential harms and benefits of vaccination as part of informed consent prior to vaccination.
That’s called covering your back.
The queen, Dolly Parton and a bunch of influencers on social media will say it’s OK. The kids will be bribed. And not one in a thousand doctors or nurses will explain the risks in detail.
What am I saying: I bet not one in a thousand doctors or nurses have any idea of the risks.
And the idea that 16-year-olds will understand these complicated vaccines would be laughable if it were not obscene. Most kids think the jab will stop them getting covid. And stop them spreading it to granny.
Not that this matters much because the Government killed granny last year.
And all this is illegal.
Back in February, six months ago, I pointed out in a video entitled, ‘Doctors and Nurses giving the covid-19 vaccine will be tried as war criminals’ that the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation, which was written in 1947, stated that explicit voluntary consent from patients is required for human experimentation.
That means, of course, that patients must be told that they are taking part in a trial. And they must be warned of the dozens of possible adverse events – which were known before Christmas. I made a video listing the FDA’s draft working list of adverse events in December 2020. Those being jabbed must be warned that they could die. And they must be warned that the vaccine they’re being given won’t necessarily stop them catching covid or passing it on if they do catch it.
That’s informed consent.
And as I said, I doubt if one in a million adults was properly advised.
How many 16-year-olds will understand what an mRNA vaccine does? How many will understand the principles of pathogenic priming?
Once again, as I said back in February, any doctor or nurse giving one of these experimental jabs without making sure that their victim has been given all the necessary information, and understands it, is breaking international law and will go to prison.
The fact is that the whole vaccination programme is built on lies and deceit. Governments and the media wouldn’t need to lie, harass and suppress the truth if there really were a plague and if the experimental injection really worked. People would be fighting to get jabbed.
Of course, if there really were a plague there wouldn’t be a vaccine. The vaccine’s promoters are mostly on record as saying that they want a smaller global population. So if there were a killer plague they wouldn’t want a vaccine, would they?
Accepting this experimental and unnecessary jab is the most important decision any citizen will ever make. The so-called vaccine is for ever. It isn’t like a drug that you can stop and get over. The covid-19 jab stays. You can’t get it out. And no one, repeat no one, knows what the effect will be in six months or six years or sixteen years. It’s an experiment and the preliminary part of the experiment won’t be over until 2023. The vaccine has already killed thousands of people and injured millions more. Just look at the updated figures on my website where I quote the official death and injury figures published by the British and American governments.
Will the vaccinated be more susceptible to new variations? Will they die when they contract winter viruses? No one knows the answers.
The risks are so great that I believe that anyone who has been jabbed – particular the young who seem to be particularly liable to heart damage – should avoid all strenuous exercise and stress.
Forever.
Meanwhile, the promotional campaign to sell the jab to kids is moving fast. Free money. Free kebabs. The chance to reclaim a little of the life that was taken from them.
The BBC has reported that 60,000 lives have been saved by the covid jab. There’s isn’t one shred of evidence to prove that claim. They might as well claim that 60 billion lives have been saved.
The disgusting BBC and the rest of the mainstream media become indecently orgasmic with excitement when they find someone who hasn’t been vaccinated and who has died of or with covid-19 (aka the rebranded flu) or, probably, anything else. They ignore the fact that every year, in the six month flu season, up to 650,000 people of all ages die of the flu worldwide. Often ordinary healthy people.
But the deception and the lies about the rebranded flu just keep getting bigger.
Unvaccinated man with flu run over by bus. Unvaccinated woman eaten by lion.
The truth is that these experimental jabs have not been sufficiently tested, do not do what most people think they do and are so dangerous that their distribution should be halted immediately.
Doctors who object, who point out the dangers, and who explain why the risk benefit ratio shows that the people producing, and promoting these damned things should be locked up, are monstered and silenced and lied about and offered mental health care – just as if we were in Russia in Stalin’s time. Objections are dismissed without debate. There is no debate. Never before in my knowledge has a drug been introduced and used so widely with no discussion. For 18 months I’ve been asking government advisors to debate with me on live television.
Nothing. Silence.
We pay them. They ignore us.
All this proves, of course, that the promotion of this experimental product is a heinous fraud.
Meanwhile, the majority of doctors will accept the lies, promote the jab and take the big money they’re being paid.
When these disgusting women and men are arrested – as they will be – I hope they are shown no mercy. They are, man and woman, guilty of some of the most awful crimes in history.
Please go to vernoncoleman.org and email this video – together with the transcript – to every school and doctor’s surgery in your area.
I’ll leave you with this.
The UK Government admits that the longer term health effects from the myocarditis events reported are not yet well understood.
But they’re planning to give the damned stuff to pre-school children and primary school children as well as teenagers.
They’ve killed the grandparents. Now they want to kill the kids.
You are not alone! As of 28 July 2021, 29% of Canadians have not received a COVID-19 vaccine, and an additional 14% have received one shot. In the US and in the European Union, less than half the population is fully vaccinated, and even in Israel, the “world’s lab” according to Pfizer, one third of people remain completely unvaccinated. Politicians and the media have taken a uniform view, scapegoating the unvaccinated for the troubles that have ensued after eighteen months of fearmongering and lockdowns. It’s time to set the record straight.
It is entirely reasonable and legitimate to say ‘no’ to insufficiently tested vaccines for which there is no reliable science. You have a right to assert guardianship of your body and to refuse medical treatments if you see fit. You are right to say ‘no’ to a violation of your dignity, your integrity and your bodily autonomy. It is your body, and you have the right to choose. You are right to fight for your children against their mass vaccination in school.
You are right to question whether free and informed consent is at all possible under present circumstances. Long-term effects are unknown. Transgenerational effects are unknown. Vaccine-induced deregulation of natural immunity is unknown. Potential harm is unknown as the adverse event reporting is delayed, incomplete and inconsistent between jurisdictions.
You are being targeted by mainstream media, government social engineering campaigns, unjust rules and policies, collaborating employers, and the social-media mob. You are being told that you are now the problem and that the world cannot get back to normal unless you get vaccinated. You are being viciously scapegoated by propaganda and pressured by others around you. Remember; there is nothing wrong with you.
You are inaccurately accused of being a factory for new SARS-CoV-2 variants, when in fact, according to leading scientists, your natural immune system generates immunity to multiple components of the virus. This will promote your protection against a vast range of viral variants and abrogates further spread to anyone else.
You are justified in demanding independent peer-reviewed studies, not funded by multinational pharmaceutical companies. All the peer-reviewed studies of short-term safety and short-term efficacy have been funded, organized, coordinated, and supported by these for-profit corporations; and none of the study data have been made public or available to researchers who don’t work for these companies.
You are right to question the preliminary vaccine trial results. The claimed high values of relative efficacy rely on small numbers of tenuously determined “infections.” The studies were also not blind, where people giving the injections admittedly knew or could deduce whether they were injecting the experimental vaccine or the placebo. This is not acceptable scientific methodology for vaccine trials.
You are correct in your calls for a diversity of scientific opinions. Like in nature, we need a polyculture of information and its interpretations. And we don’t have that right now. Choosing not to take the vaccine is holding space for reason, transparency and accountability to emerge. You are right to ask, ‘What comes next when we give away authority over our own bodies?’
Do not be intimidated. You are showing resilience, integrity and grit. You are coming together in your communities, making plans to help one another and standing for scientific accountability and free speech, which are required for society to thrive. We are among many who stand with you.
Angela Durante, PhD
Denis Rancourt, PhD
Claus Rinner, PhD
Laurent Leduc, PhD
Donald Welsh, PhD
John Zwaagstra, PhD
Jan Vrbik, PhD
Valentina Capurri, PhD
Update: The letter has been shared widely on the Internet, and translated into several languages, including Czech, Norwegian and Spanish.
When it comes to the safety and efficacy of the so-called COVID-19 vaccinations the public has been thoroughly divided and conquered. On one side of the carefully crafted argument, governments can’t get enough shots in enough arms to ward off a “pandemic” of unvaccinated people. The other side has as many excuses for avoiding these injections as it has members. So when a controversial study comes along showing that these injections may contain a toxic substance called graphene oxide the allowed spectrum of debate is quickly alight and the bigger picture is missed by all but a few.
The story of vaccines containing graphene oxide broke in late June when Ricardo Delgado Martin, Founder and Director of Quinta Columna, which calls itself a “free thinking movement,” published the the results of an analysis conducted by a Spanish research team at the University of Almeria. The analysis claims to have discovered graphene oxide in a vial of a Pfizer vaccine via electron microscopy and spectroscopy. The analysis can be read in English here.
It took a few weeks for this story to find it’s way into the English speaking world it would seem. Once it did, the mainstream media’s fact checkers were all over this story. Reuters, Full Fact, and Forbes among other establishment outlets have tried to debunk the study by assuring their readers that only an anti-vax QAnon conspiracy theorist would believe such nonsense. On the other side of the aisle, the analysis has been uncritically circulated which only adds to the problem.
As usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The analysis conducted by the team at the University of Almeria has it’s flaws but concerns over the presence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer vaccines, and elsewhere in our environment, should be given serious consideration.
But first, let’s address some of the issues with the analysis:
The analysis is an interim report needing further study.
The analysis was commissioned.
The origin of Pfizer vial used in this analysis is unknown.
Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide are, at times, used interchangeably.
Comparative images of graphene oxide are of different magnification levels.
For an in-depth look at these concerns and others that arise from this analysis we recommend watching world class researcher, Whitney Webb’s recent appearance over at The Last American Vagabond where they dive into this analysis.
Just because this study currently stands on scientifically shaky grounds does not mean that the theory that graphene oxide is in fact in these injections should be dismissed. The substance has also already been discovered in face masks in Canada and Spain while patents in China (1, 2) that explore the possibility of using graphene oxide in COVID19 vaccines are pending.
It is also curious graphene oxide can be made to have magnetic properties which would explain the countless videos circulating online of magnets sticking to those who’ve been injected with these so-called vaccines. More research on this phenomenon is certainly needed but a recent “statistical and sociological” survey conducted by the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance in Luxemburg found that 29 of the 30 “vaccinated” individuals interviewed showed attraction to the magnet at the site of injection.
Additionally, it has been shown that graphene oxide can cause blood clots and damage lungs. Does this explain why blood clots are such an often reported adverse effect from these shots? Is there a connection to this lung damage and surge in supposed surge in COVID-19 cases in areas of high injection rates?
These questions and many others surrounding graphene oxide, injections, masks, and the so-called pandemic need answering but if we just focus on these elements of the conversation we risk missing the bigger picture. Graphene oxide, its applications, and its impact on humanity are not limited to the so-called pandemic. The applications of graphene and it’s related materials are almost limitless and as they are introduced into the ecosystem, inside and out of the human body, they have the potential to reshape our relationship with the natural world by making it impossible to escape the digital realm.
On the future applications of graphene, Alan S. Brown writes:
Silicon electronics dominate the world, but engineers frequently turn to other types of semiconductors to do things that silicon cannot. These materials—ranging from silicon carbide to indium gallium arsenide—emit and interact with light, enable high-frequency microwave communications in smartphones, run at higher speeds, and handle massive amounts of power.
Yet, what if a single material could do all that—if it could interact with electrons, light, and even magnetism. What if it could transmit electricity like a metal and also behave as a semiconductor. Just for good measure, suppose it might make a good building block for quantum computers? And—most impressively—what if it could do all these things just by changing its shape?
That material is graphene.
By introducing graphene and other related nanoparticles into the human system, our bodies become cybernetic systems where light, microwaves and other frequencies, or magnets could be used to control bodily and neurological functions. If some predictions are correct then graphene oxide will one day be as prevalent in our world as plastic is now. It is already raining down on us from above, polluting our soil, being laser printed onto food, and, in turn, is likely already in all of us. If so, it seems reasonable to conclude that, based on all that we know about previous medical experimentation carried out on humans, something similar is happening today.
But why introduce a material like this into the human body? Catherine Austin Fitts ventures a guess:
So let me go through where I think he’s going. I think where they’re going—and they’re they’re prototyping tons of technology, so I don’t think they have it yet—but where they want to go is they want to download a Microsoft Office system into your body, into your brain, and hook it up to the Jedi cloud contract and the Amazon Cloud contract at the CIA. And if they can get seven people seven billion people hooked up directly to their cloud contracts and use viruses—I mean, it’s very clever—use viruses to keep those updates coming. You know, just keep those updates coming.
So you saw my most recent article, “The Injection Fraud.” I think it’s a fraud to call these vaccines they’re not vaccines, they’re not medicine. But I think it’s the exact same model you used in the computers and the ideas. Just like Bill Gates made it possible for the intelligence agencies to get a backdoor into our—you know, our data—and our computers. They want a backdoor into our mind and it’s very hard if you haven’t if you haven’t looked into the creepy technology, the Charles Lieber kind of technology, it’s hard to fathom but we’re beginning to fathom it.
Experimental injections. Magnetic nanoparticles. A human operating system. Sadly, these are not the fever dreams of a lone, crazed scientist but technologies which have already arrived. The COVID-19 panic has accelerated the introduction of these and many more frightening technologies into the public sphere as trojan horses for even more terrifying technologies yet to be revealed. The work from researchers like Whitney Webb, Alison McDowell, Catherine Austin Fitts, Rosa Koire, James Corbett, Patrick Wood, and everyone else which shines light on the this transhumanist agenda is becoming more important than ever.
For too long we’ve narrowed in on all things COVID-19 just like the powers-that-shouldn’t-be hope for. There is no pandemic, only a psychological operation afoot. That operation needs as much resistance as possible but if we fail to see beyond this then their dream of can be reached without a fight. Beyond saying no to experimental injections and nanoparticle-laden masks we must starting saying no to everything that is being used to create the graphene oxide prison being built around us.
France saw its largest protests yet against the country’s health pass, as thousands swept across major Italian town demanding an end to the infamous green pass.
On Saturday, Protesters took to the streets in France and Italy in opposition to COVID rules that they say infringe on their civil liberties but which officials argue are needed to curb the coronavirus pandemic. The protests come as European countries double down on efforts to get wide portions of their populations vaccinated in the face of the spreading delta variant — and in a bid to avoid further lockdowns.
Demonstrations against France’s health pass and mandatory vaccines for health care workers entered their fourth weekend, with Saturday seeing the largest rally yet, Deutsche Welle reported. An estimated 237,000 people turned out nationwide, according to the Interior Ministry. The figure exceeds the attendance a week ago, which saw 204,000 protesters.
While 17,000 people turned out in Paris, much of the focus was in southern France — where between 10,000 and 20,000 people marched in Nice alone. In contrast to prior weekends, the demonstrations were largely peaceful. The more major scuffles broke out between protesters and police in Lyon, France’s third-largest city.
The protests come on the heels of a Constructional Council ruling on Thursday. The court approved the government’s plan for the health pass and vaccine requirements for workers in hospitals in nursing homes. France is currently in the grips of a fourth wave of coronavirus infections. The county has seen a boost in vaccinations since French President Emmanuel Macron announced the health pass in July. Some two-thirds of the French population eligible for the jab have received one dose, while 55% are fully vaccinated.
Meanwhile, protests also took place in several Italian cities over the weekend against against the implementation of the country’s Green Pass, which is now required for teachers and for people to attend indoor events.
Thousands gathered in Piazza del Popolo in central Rome shouting “No Green Pass!” and “Freedom!”.
Thousands more marched in Milan, with some comparing themselves to holocaust victims by wearing Star of David badges with the words “not vaccinated”, news agency ANSA reported.
In Turin, angry citizens marched in front of the editorial offices of Italy’s biggest dailies “La Repubblica” and “La Stampa” shouting “You are shit! Sold out!”
Protesters from the “No Vax” movement also gathered in Naples, objecting in particular to vaccinations for children, shouting “Hands off the children” and “Shame! Shame!”.
The health pass in France and the Green Pass in Italy are both digital certificates that provide proof of a person’s coronavirus status. They contain data on whether the person is vaccinated against COVID-19, has recently tested negative, or has recovered from the virus.
The pass is already required in France for those who want to go to the movie theater or attend other major events. Starting on Monday, it will also be required for those who want to visit bars and restaurants, or for those traveling on long-distance trains or on airplanes.
In Italy, the Green Pass became compulsory in Italy on Friday and is required to enter museums, sports venues, cinemas and for indoor dining. School teachers, university staff and university students are also required to show the pass.
It’s just two weeks. It’s just staying three feet apart. It’s just staying six feet apart. It’s just not going outside. It’s just not giving handshakes. It’s just working from home. It is just non-essential businesses that are closed.
It’s just bars. It’s just restaurants. It’s just theaters. It’s just concerts. It’s just dancing. It’s just intramural sports. It’s just choir.
It’s just non-essential medical services that you have to give up. It is just non-essential items that you are not allowed to buy. It’s just not being able to exercise. It’s just gyms. It is just the closure of your business for a while. It is just not making money for a while. It is just not being able to pay your bills for a little while.
It’s just a minor inconvenience. It’s just not being allowed to carpool. It’s just not socializing for a while. It’s just a mask. It’s just not traveling for a while. It’s just not hugging people for a while. It’s just missionary sex that is risky.
It is just not seeing your family and friends for a while. It’s just not visiting your grandparents temporarily. It’s just your grandparents not having visitors for their safety. It’s just one birthday you have to sacrifice. It’s just one Thanksgiving alone. It’s just one Christmas without your family. It’s just two birthdays you had to sacrifice. It is just not celebrating any milestones for a year and a half.
It’s just temporary. It’s just a safety measure. It is just your ability to pay cash. It is just contact tracing. It is just a health screening. It is just a temperature check. It is just a scan of your face. It’s just a minor loss of privacy.
It is just one semester. It is just two semesters. It is just one year out of your child’s life. It is just one more semester. It is just a high school graduation.
It’s just the birth of your grandchild that you missed. It is just not being able to be there for your relatives when they are ill or dying. It is just not having a funeral. It is just in person that you cannot grieve with your loved ones. It is just not getting to attend religious service. It is just not getting to practice some parts of your religion.
It is just misinformation that is being censored. It is just conservatives that are being censored. It is just some of the science that is being censored. It is just the people who have the opposing opinions that are banned online. It is just the opposition that the White House is targeting for censorship. It is just bad opinions that are being censored.
It’s just the economy. It is just small business owners who are suffering financially. It is just poor people who are suffering financially. It is just people of color who are suffering financially. It is just financial suffering. It is just a few small businesses that had to close permanently. It is just a few big businesses that closed.
It is just not going farther than a few kilometers from your house. It is just a curfew. It is just a permission slip. It is just being alone for two weeks. It is just being socially isolated for one year.
It is just one vaccine. It is just one set of booster shots. It is just regular booster shots every six months. It is just another two weeks. It is just one more lock-down. It is just once a week—twice tops—that you will have to prove that you are fit to participate in society. It is just the unvaccinated that will be segregated from society. It is just a medical test.
Pretty simple, no?
Just fucking do it.
But when you add up all the “justs,” it amounts to our entire lives.
For over a year and a half and counting, we have been robbed of the ability to live our lives fully, to make meaningful choices for ourselves, and to express our values the way we see fit.
It is “just” the inability to express our humanity and the total negation of our very selves. All of these measures have served as a prohibition of expressing outwardly one’s valid and complex internal reality. This kind of suppression of self does violence to one’s very soul.
All of these supposedly little and supposedly short-lived “justs” have transformed us into totalitarian states from which there appears to be no endpoint.
In New York City, California, Australia, etc., the people have permitted government such control over our daily lives that we have to ask it for permission to control our bodies, to move freely, to practice religion, to educate our children ourselves, to protest, etc.
Soon Biden, Trudeau, and other world leaders are going to clamp down on our ability to express ourselves and to associate with each other online so that we can no longer question, object to, or organize against government action. It is the destruction of democracy.
It astounds me that my Progressive friends — the same ones who claim to support “social justice” — are welcoming a fascist society in which government crushes any opposition and individuals cannot make choices about their own lives.
I will not comply because I do not want to live in the society that is being created by extraordinary submissiveness to government. I do not want to be complicit in this era’s atrocities.
What is the point of living if one merely exists to obey the elite to one’s own detriment? Is it even living if one lacks the agency to direct one’s life? I’ve already submitted in contradiction of my values to a shameful extent. One might say, “Well, what’s one more compromise,” but it won’t be just one more compromise. It will be just the next cut in a slow death by a thousand cuts.
Submitting only validates tyrannical displays of power and ensures that there will be more such displays in the future.
And what does one get for compromising? Merely your continued membership in a society that will only have you if you immolate yourself and become nothing more than a reflection of the desires of the ruling class.
If you cannot be truly yourself in a society, is that society worth clinging to? I think not. As much as leaving the stability of my comfort zone terrifies me, staying in it means continuing to silence and shrink myself for a disingenuous feeling of acceptance. In that way, it is more of a discomfort zone.
Each time I expressed my fears about the future direction of society, my friends said “it won’t happen.” Each time it did happen, they shrugged their shoulders and reminded me that compliance was an option.
At this point, if the government were to cart me away to an internment camp (which is not a completely far-fetched notion and which has happened in the past) for being a dangerous dissident I am certain that my friends and family would watch it happen and say it was my fault for not complying.
They are no longer capable of recognizing the humanity of the opposition or of questioning government.
I will not submit because I don’t want to live in a world in which my supposed allies would happily see me persecuted by the government.
I will not comply because the political climate has become so censorial, authoritarian, and generally toxic that my viewpoints will never be represented in the political process here. Without representation, my values and beliefs will be violated again and again by a polity that sees any deviation from itself as invalid. Thus, my compliance will provide zero assurance of any better treatment in the future.
I will not bend because I am not a conformist.
I will not give in because I do not want to reward government manipulation and coercion.
I will not surrender because I could die at any moment, and I do not want my final memories to be ones of craven submission to tyranny and the resultant misery and self-loathing.
I will not comply because it is not the government’s first intrusion on my body, mind, and spirit; and if we comply, it will definitely not be the last. All I will accomplish by my compliance is validating the government’s claim on my body and life.
I am not submitting because this is war, and I am not handing the enemy its victories.
I will not comply because the reward for compliance will still be being treated as a second class-citizen by society.
I won’t acquiesce because I am a conscientious objector.
I will not cede because the measures are unnecessary and the only practical effect will be to increase government power.
I don’t comply because I do not want to be a mere slave in the future version of the world they are creating, doing only what I am told to do and having to beg for access to the necessities of life that I am entitled to as a living being on this earth.
I will not yield because their religion is not my religion, and I refuse to worship a false idol.
I will not capitulate because I do not want to betray my ancestors and predecessors who fought for me to be free.
I will not surrender because freedom is more important than convenience and ease.
I will not comply because if I did I would be filled with rage against society, resentment towards my friends and family, and self-loathing that would eat me alive. I would become bitter and closed-hearted, and I don’t want that for myself.
All of this is why I won’t “just fucking do it.”.
Addison Reeves is a lawyer, political scientist, philosopher, and civil rights and civil liberties advocate based in New York. Addison critiques modern culture from a radical, leftist perspective at ModernHeretic.com or you can follow him on Telegram or Twitter.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, as guest host on the Alex Jones show, interviews Karen Kingston.
Karen, who recently came forward as a whistleblower, currently works as an analyst for pharmaceutical and medical device industries — analyzing intellectual property and legal landscape for both pharma and consumers — and is also a science writer and clinical analyst.
Together Dr. Kaufman and Karen Kingston break down the ingredients in the so-called vaccines and take a look at the science documents detailing the intended functions of these toxic injections.
The interview above is courtesy of Kristall BrandNewTube channel, who kindly made the effort to clip this excerpt from a 3-hour segment at Alex Jones channel. All credit for the video goes to the Alex Jones show. Thanks to Kristall for providing the clip of the full Kaufman/Kingston interview.
This conversation between journalists Jon Rappoport (US) and James Delingpole (UK) covers a lot of territory, including:
The state of journalism and the gaslighting of the public through propaganda
Donald Trump’s flip flop on vaccines and his “Operation Warp Speed” where he pushed the deadly covid “vaccines” on the US public
Global protests outside of US
Vaccine injuries and deaths
At about the 34-minute mark in the video Jon Rappoport answers this question:
James Delingpole:
Where do you get the idea that far fewer people have taken the vaccine than is being claimed in public?
Jon Rappoport:
… Public Health officials are admitting on the record that in the US stock of vaccines in the 50 states are going unused. Not just a little, but vastly unused, and they’re about to expire, many of them — which makes them completely useless.
And what these public health officials are confessing to is not ‘oh, they gave us too many vials to begin with…’. No. They’re talking about these stocks of vaccines going unused because of declining demand, across the board as they say, in the 50 states. Which to me is a massive clue that many, many people are refusing the vaccine …
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 545,338 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 12,366 deaths and 70,105 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 30, 2021.
Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed the total number of reports (including foreign and U.S.) of deaths following COVID vaccination, across all age groups, surpassed 12,000.
The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Data released today show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 30, 2021, a total of 545,338 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,366 deaths — an increase of 426 over the previous week. There were 70,105 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 7,003 compared with the previous week.
In the U.S., 344.9 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of July 30. This includes: 139 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 193 million doses of Pfizer and 13 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.
Of the 5,739 U.S. deaths reported as of July 30, 13% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 19% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 34% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.
FDA eyes full approval of Pfizer vaccine by early next month
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accelerated its timeline to fully approve Pfizer’s COVID vaccine — planning to complete the process by the beginning of September, people familiar with the effort told The New York Times.
President Biden said last week he expected a fully approved vaccine in early fall. But the FDA’s unofficial deadline is Labor Day or sooner, according to The Times.
The agency said in a statement its leaders recognized approval might inspire more public confidence and had “taken an all-hands-on-deck approach” to the work.
Federal regulators have been under growing public pressure to fully approve Pfizer’s vaccine ever since the company filed its application on May 7.
Vaccinated may play key role in aiding evolution of more dangerous COVID variants
According to research published last week in Scientific Reports, vaccinated people may play a key role in helping SARS-CoV-2 variants evolve into those that evade existing COVID vaccines.
Researchers identified three specific risk factors that favor the emergence and establishment of a vaccine-resistant strain. They are: a high probability of initial emergence of the resistant strain; a high number of infected individuals; and a low rate of vaccination.
However, the analysis also showed the highest risk for establishing a vaccine-resistant strain occurs when a large fraction of the population has already been vaccinated but the transmission is not controlled.
“When most people are vaccinated, the vaccine-resistant strain has an advantage over the original strain,” Simon Rella of the Institute of Science and Technology Austria, told CNN. “This means the vaccine-resistant strain spreads through the population faster at a time when most people are vaccinated.”
The data is consistent with a study released last week by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention which showed vaccinated people may transmit the Delta variant — now responsible for 80% of COVID cases in the U.S. — just as easily as the unvaccinated.
Delta variant more transmissible, not more deadly
As The Defender reported Aug. 3, World Health Organization (WHO) officials said they are still trying to understand why the Delta variant is more transmissible than the original COVID virus strain.
As COVID—especially Delta variant—surges among fully vaccinated, Brian Hooker, Ph.D., said the more variant deviates from original sequence used for vaccine, the less effective vaccine will be on variant.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) August 4, 2021
“There are certain mutations in the Delta variant that, for example, allow the virus to adhere to a cell more easily,” said Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’S technical lead on COVID, at a press briefing July 30. “There are some laboratory studies that suggest that there’s increased replication in some of the modeled human airway systems.”
The CDC warned lawmakers July 29 of new research indicating the Delta strain is more contagious than chickenpox. The variant also appears to have a longer transmission window than the original COVID strain, and may make older people sicker, even if they’ve been fully vaccinated, CNBC reported.
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer and professor of biology at Simpson University, said while the Delta variant is likely more transmissible, it’s also likely less pathogenic.
“What we’re seeing is virus evolution 101,” Hooker said.
He explained:
“Viruses like to survive, so killing the host (i.e. the human who is infected) defeats the purpose because killing the host kills the virus, too.
“For this reason, new variants of viruses that circulate widely through the population tend to become more transmissive but less pathogenic. In other words, they will spread more easily from person to person, but they will cause less damage to the host.”
Hooker said the more the variant deviates from the original sequence used for the vaccine, the less effective the vaccine will be on that variant, which could explain why fully vaccinated people are getting infected with the Delta variant.
But this isn’t the case for natural immunity, Hooker explained:
“The vaccine focuses on the spike protein, whereas natural immunity focuses on the entire virus. Natural immunity — with a more diverse array of antibodies and T-cell receptors — will provide better protection overall as it has more targets in which to attack the virus, whereas vaccine-derived immunity only focuses on one portion of the virus, in this case, the spike protein. Once that portion of the virus has mutated sufficiently, the vaccine no longer is effective.”
Offspring band boots drummer for refusing to get vaccinated
Pete Parada, drummer for the Californian rock band Offspring, said he was ousted from the band because he refused to get a COVID vaccine, despite having already had COVID and acquiring natural immunity.
“Since I am unable to comply with what is increasingly becoming an industry mandate, it has recently been decided that I am unsafe to be around, in the studio and on tour. I mention this because you won’t be seeing me at these upcoming shows. I also want to share my story so that anyone else experiencing the agony and isolation of getting left behind right now knows they’re not entirely alone.”
Parada, who had COVID more than a year ago, said he was medically advised not to take the vaccine due to his “personal medical history and the side-effect profile” of COVID vaccines.
Parada said he was confident he could handle the virus again, but he could not handle another round of post-vaccination GBS, which dates back to his childhood and has become progressively worse over his lifetime.
In a series of tweets, Parada said he unequivocally supports informed consent — “which necessitates choice unburdened by coercion” — and does not find it “ethical or wise” to allow those with the most power, including government, corporations, organizations or employers to “dictate medical procedures to those with the least power.”
Tyson Foods this week told its 120,000 workers in offices, slaughterhouses and poultry plants across the country they would need to be vaccinated by Nov. 1, as a “condition of employment.”
Microsoft, which employs roughly 100,000 people in the U.S., said it would require proof of vaccination for all employees, vendors and guests to gain access to its offices.
Last week, Google said it would require employees who returned to the company’s offices to be vaccinated, while Disney announced a mandate for all salaried and non-union hourly workers who work on site.
Walmart, the largest private employer in the U.S, Lyft and Uber mandated vaccines for white-collar workers but not for millions of frontline workers.
The moves brought praise from the White House.
“I want to thank Walmart, Google, Netflix, Disney, Tyson Foods for their recent actions requiring vaccination for employees,” President Biden said in a press briefing on Tuesday. “Look, I know this isn’t easy — but I will have their backs.”
“Others have declined to step up,” Biden said. “I find it disappointing.”
151 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender’s inquiries
According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”
On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We have made repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions.
Despite multiple phone and email communications with many people at the CDC, and despite being told that our request was in the system and that someone would respond, we have not yet received answers to any of the questions we submitted. It has been 144 days since we sent our first email to the CDC requesting information.
Our legal team has reviewed the video circulating entitled: “Freedom Fighter Court VICTORY! Ends Masking, Shots, Quarantine in Alberta!” that aired on a Stew Peters broadcast, August 3, 2021, announcing: “Patrick King is a proud father of 2, Freedom Fighter and Patriot who took on the powerful government in Alberta, and WON!”
The Justice Centre has also reviewed some of the associated legal documents regarding Court File Number 12110 00751 Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, arising out of a ticket given to Patrick James King, a resident of Penhold, Alberta, issued to Mr. King for allegedly contravening an Order under S.73(1) of the Public Health Act, Provincial Court action number A87988036R. Excerpts can be found below.
The video appears to contain several inaccuracies. It is unclear whether Mr. King fully understands the legal process he is involved in. It appears that Mr. King was unsuccessful in his attempt to subpoena Alberta’s Chief Medical Health Officer. In the government’s filed Originating Application, July 16, 2021, the government notes Mr. King obtained a subpoena for the CMOH Dr. Deena Hinshaw to give evidence in the Provincial Court proceeding (the ticket case). The subpoena was issued by a Justice of the Peace under the Criminal Code, requesting the CMOH bring “all white papers describing the isolation of the COIVD-19 aka SARS-CoV-2 virus in human beings, directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient”, because “these white papers would have been integral in the crafting of the statutes made under the “Public Health Act” here in Alberta.”
The Government argued the subpoena was technically deficient and the Justice of the Peace had no jurisdiction to issue it. The Government further stated, Mr. King has “no evidence” showing that “the evidence sought from the CMOH is likely to be material” [legal term for meaning relevant and related] to the provincial court ticket received. “It is clear that Mr. King seeks evidence relating to the rationale for orders issued by the CMOH under the Act: he seeks evidence about the ‘Crafting of the statutes’,” stated the Government’s Affidavit. There do not appear to be any critical admissions by Dr. Hinshaw about the SARS-CoV-2 virus and this document has been prepared by the government’s legal team, not Dr. Hinshaw.
“The Provincial Court proceeding is about the December 5, 2020 enforcement of the law (when Mr. King was issued the ticket), not the rational for the law. The CMOH does not have, and Mr. King does not seek from the CMOH, any evidence about the ticket issued to Mr. King,” states the Government Affidavit. The Judge hearing the case informed the Accused, Mr. Patrick King, that he had not properly filed a Charter challenge against the law as required to fight the law itself, and thus could only address the ticket issued to him.
There is no indication that Mr. King’s case is connected to the relaxing of Covid restrictions in Alberta which fully opened on July 1, 2021. The government of Alberta states they have opened the province due to achieving the government’s stated goal of 70% of Albertans receiving their first vaccine.
JUDGE: So Mr. King, that is the Crown’s case against you. They are done calling evidence. So now, this is your opportunity to decide whether you want to call any evidence yourself, whether that is yourself or other witnesses.
THE ACCUSED: I don’t have any evidence per se, other than the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
JUDGE: All right. I am going to stop you right there…. if you were going to make any arguments that your rights under the Charter have been breached, there is a requirement that you provide notice of that —
THE ACCUSED: Oh.
JUDGE: –and that you do it in advance of the trial —
THE ACCUSED: Oh.
JUDGE: –provided copies tot he Crown, provided copies to the Court. So that has not been done, so that is not something that can be argued at this point… But, there has not been a Charter notice filed in this case, and so there is not an opportunity at this point for a Charter argument.
THE ACCUSED: There is not an opportunity for a Charter argument?
JUDGE: Not if you have not filed a Charter notice and given the Crown notice, and served them properly with notice that you intend to make an argument under the Charter.
THE ACCUSED: The — then the only evidence I do have then is the evidence on the front of a Canadian passport. And that is the issuance of the passport speaking of the Minister of Foreign Affairs: (as read)
Allowing the bearer of this passport to travel freely without hindrance or without delay or hindrance to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary.
JUDGE: All right. Again, sir, that particular clause, I don’t know how that relates to this particular case because this isn’t a case about your travel rights. And again, you have not raised any Charter argument or provided Charter notice…
The editor-in-chief of Germany’s top newspaper Bild has apologized for the news outlet’s fear-driven coverage of COVID, specifically to children who were told “that they were going to murder their grandma.”
In a speech delivered to camera, Julian Reichelt said sorry for Bild’s coverage which was “like poison” and “made you feel like you were a mortal danger to society.”
Reichelt directed his main sentiment towards children who have been terrorized by fearmongering media coverage which has caused child depression and suicides to soar across the world.
“To the millions of children in this country for whom our society is responsible, I want to express here what neither our government nor our Chancellor dares to tell you. We ask you to forgive us,” he said.
“Forgive us for this policy which, for a year and a half, has made you victims of violence, neglect, isolation, and loneliness.”
“We persuaded our children that they were going to murder their grandma if they dared to be what they are, children. Or if they met their friends. None of this has been scientifically proven.”
Julian Reichelt, the editor-in-chief of @BILD – one of the largest newspapers in Germany, apologized to the children of Germany for the COVID-19 coverage in his newspaper that made them “victims of neglect, isolation and loneliness.”
“When a state steals the rights of a child, it must prove that by doing so it protects him against concrete and imminent danger. This proof has never been provided. It has been replaced by propaganda presenting the child as a vector of the pandemic.”
Reichelt noted how moderate voices who attempted to offer calmer perspectives on the pandemic “were never invited to the expert table” and urged viewers “don’t believe this lie,” when encountering alarmist proclamations from the government.
The journalist called on authorities to open schools and sports halls instead of polling stations, warning that those who imposed brutal lockdown measures, “will have on their conscience and will leave in the history books, a multitude of innocent souls.”
Bild has a daily circulation of 1.24 million copies and is the best-selling newspaper in Europe, adding even more weight to this story.
As we highlighted yesterday, Germans protesting against plans to impose domestic vaccine passports were brutalized by police during demonstrations that took place in Berlin.
The ugly scenes prompted the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer to put in a request for eyewitnesses ahead of a potential investigation.
Germans were protesting against plans to ban unvaccinated people from a plethora of different venues, including restaurants, cinemas and stadiums.
As we previously highlighted, Germany’s domestic spy agency is monitoring anti-lockdown protesters, claiming they are potentially involved in a plot to subvert the country.
All life adapts to its environment. All life adapts to survive. Humans adapt to variations in space, time, temperature, pressure, fear, and intimidation. We are variants.
So, too, are our microbes. Humans are more microbe than human, 10:1.
This fact was shown with Bordetella pertussis, a bacterium blamed for whooping cough, which adapted itself to survive the vaccine. According to the February 7, 2013 New England Journal of Medicine study, the authors concluded that adaptation of B. pertussis was “in response to vaccine selection pressure.”
The one thing the experts know is that 21 COVID variants are coming down the pipeline. Here is one list showing their Greek names and birthdates/release dates between June 2021 (Delta) and February 2023 (Omega).
Variant
Name
Birthdate
A
Delta
Jun 2021
E
Epsilon
Jul 2021
Z
Zeta
Aug 2021
H
Eta
Sept 2021
θ
Theta
Oct 2021
I
Iota
Nov 2021
K
Kappa
Dec 2021
λ
Lambda
Jan 2022
M
Mu
Feb 2022
N
Nu
Mar 2022
Ξ
Ksi
April 2022
O
Omicron
May 2022
Π
Pi
June 2022
P
Rho
July 2022
Σ
Sigma
Aug 2022
T
Tao
Sept 2022
Y
Upsilon
Oct 2022
Φ
Phi
Nov 2022
X
Chi
Dec 2022
Ψ
Psi
Jan 2023
Ω
Omega
Feb 2023
Yet still, no one knows the true costs to health from injected spike proteins and nanotechnology inherent in COVID vaccines. No time for research. And no clinical trial vaccine data is available for people to analyze for themselves before making a choice whether to inject, or not to inject, because clinical trials continue, live, in the population. And experimental vaccines are being deployed by chosen vaccine makers who have never produced this type of medical product before.
No responsible party for negative consequences. Vaccine makers are not liable for damages from their experimental products. Doctors are not responsible for reporting any adverse reactions from the COVID vaccines to authorities, even though the CDC-authority has a reporting system called The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS collects less than 1% of adverse events reports from medical doctors who fail to report them. See the latest results for COVID vaccine reactions here.
The PCR Ruse
Meanwhile, the PCR test that drives the numbers of reported cases up, along with deaths, surges, and fear, has been deemed invalid by the CDC. The CDC has quietly withdrawn its request to use the PCR test to identify COVID vs. Flu This means that no valid tracking test exists for the virus, that was never isolated, and that shut down the world, eliminated jobs, and caused suicide, hardship and regret for neglecting elderly family members who died alone.
If no valid test exists to track the coronavirus [one word], then what does that say about coronavirus itself? Is it real? Is it corona virus? Or is it just a word masquerading as a virus? Is it a bacterium? A figment of someone’s imagination? What does it say about the power of “the experts” and their mandates who attempt to track a figment?
What does it say that 120 patents for a number of bacterial and viral pathogens were filed from NIH, NIAID, US armed services infectious disease program, and the international agencies that collaborated with them?
A pandemic of fear has morphed into a pandemic of illness. Yet still, there are over 500,000 adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines since injections began. See the updated COVID adverse reactions reported to VAERS.
Transmuting The Transhumanist Agenda
There are no consequences for the those who take part in modifying the genetics of the whole population. Under conditioning through the media, social engineers are taking advantage of human ignorance, by modifying human behavior right along with the genome. As long as the population consents to the biologic invasion, humanity becomes a farm of genetic material, ripe for DNA harvesting.
Yet, each human has free will and the power to say NO.
You have the power to not consent to biologic invasion and takeover of your humanity. Simply do not consent to anything that comes from fear. Declare out loud. “I Do Not Consent to manipulation of my biologic identity.” I Do Not Consent to harvesting of my property. I Do Not Consent. Say it out loud and know it because no one has the right to violate your property, your body, your DNA, your mind, or your free will.
Under mind manipulation, whether through the media, through government dictates, through frequencies emitted from towers or devices, or through intimidation by others, it is important to maintain a strong mind and your willpower. Mind over matter has never been more critical. The Corona-agenda was never about a runaway virus or Greek covariants. The agenda is about creating a Transhuman variant out of humanity via conditioning to be controlled. Know your mind.
Do you consent?
These are history-making times and you are part of it, here to do your part to liberate yourself and humanity from synthetic slavery. No one else saves humanity, just as no one else can heal you. We each save ourselves. We each heal ourselves.
Once more, dear reader, I put on my hazmat suit and enter the fake world where SARS-Cov2 exists, the Delta Variant exists, the test is meaningful, the case numbers are real, and the vaccine makes sense. These are all lies, as I’ve been proving for the past year, but even within the fake world of those lies, the experts can’t keep their stories straight; they contradict themselves, they expose their own fabrications, and they try to cover up those exposures with new pathetic fabrications. Here we go:
RT, July 30 [1]: “The CDC has released a study backing up its decision to recommend indoor masking for both vaccinated and unvaccinated Americans. The study examined one outbreak and found three-quarters of people testing positive were vaccinated.”
“The CDC released that evidence on Friday. In a study of 469 cases of Covid-19 that broke out in the resort town of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, earlier this month, 74% occurred in ‘fully vaccinated persons.’ Four out of five patients hospitalized were fully vaccinated, and on average the inoculated had completed their two rounds of doses only 86 days before infection.”
Oops.
“Lab testing revealed that 90% of all the Cape Cod infections involved the Delta variant of the coronavirus.”
Oops again. So fully vaccinated people are infected with the Delta Variant.
“The study appears to negate the argument by top health officials that unvaccinated Americans are responsible for the fourfold rise in Covid-19 cases in the US since June. ‘This is an issue predominantly among the unvaccinated, which is the reason why we’re out there, practically pleading with the unvaccinated people to go out and get vaccinated,’ White House coronavirus adviser [and psychopathic liar] Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNN on Sunday, adding that the US is currently moving ‘in the wrong direction’ with regard to stamping out Covid-19.”
Yet another oops.
“The [CDC] report lends weight to the argument that the current crop of vaccines aren’t as effective against the Delta variant, although the CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) both insist that vaccination is effective against ‘severe disease and death’ from the virus, to quote WHO technical lead Maria Van Kerkhove in a briefing earlier on Friday.”
More nonsense. As I’ve been reporting for months, the 3 clinical trials of the major COVID vaccines were DESIGNED to only prove the vaccine could protect against mild disease; e.g., a cough, or chills and fever. Not severe disease. [2]
The CDC new Cape Cod study of vaccinated people has caused a firestorm among “the experts.” A member of the White House coronavirus coffee klatch, Ben Wakana, is claiming only a very small percentage of vaccinated people (who are infected with the virus) can transmit it to others.
RT: “[However] the CDC study noted that similarly high viral loads were found in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Walensky [head of the CDC] stated on Friday that ‘high viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission’ and raised concern that ‘vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus’.”
RT: [But] “The study itself is less alarmist, stating that ‘microbiological studies are required to confirm these findings’ [that vaccinated people who are infected can spread the virus.]”
Well, if the vaccinated and unvaccinated both have high loads of the virus, why wouldn’t vaccinated people spread the virus easily to others? Is there some magic set of walls in the vaccine that keeps the virus locked up inside the body?
And there you have it, the latest revelations about the vaccine, the virus, the Delta Variant, viral transmission, and the attempt to cover up the whole business up after it’s gone public.
The next time someone tells you it’s the duty of all Americans to take the shot in the arm, say, “Of course you’ve heard about the new Cape Cod study, right?”
“What? What’s that? Codfish are filled with toxic mercury? They’re dying because of global warming?”
“No. Lots of vaccinated people still have the killer virus in their bodies. And it’s alive. And it spreads from person to person.”
“That can’t be true. Dr. Fauci didn’t say that.”
“Well, he was on vacation when the study came out. Inside sources say he’s dumbfounded. Fully vaccinated people have loads and loads of the virus still in their bodies. They’re walking time bombs. That’s why we have to wear masks, even after we get the shot.”
“Do we have to wear masks while we’re in the bathroom? While we’re having sex?”
“Absolutely. Two masks while you’re having sex. And no kissing, even through the masks. No talking, either. Talking can spread the virus.”
“I didn’t know that.”
“Hey, I’m risking my life right now talking to you. But I’m willing to take the risk, for all of humanity.”
“I appreciate that. But what do we do? Do we get vaccinated again?”
“That won’t help. Just wear the mask. Shut up. Stay indoors. In another few years, the doctors might have an answer.”
And that concludes today’s episode of The Wild and Wacky World of COVID, where the fake virus is real, there is a Delta Variant, and the vaccine makes sense. These lies are brought to you by Force the Vaccine into Every Arm Everywhere, a non-profit organization funded by Lunatics on the March, a subsidiary of Corporate Cowards Folding Up under Pressure from the White House.
August 5, 2021 Update — TCTL editor’s note: Please see Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms’ important challenges to statements made in this interview, which we have now posted here: Canadian Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms Challenges Statements Made in “Freedom Fighter Court Victory” Video. As always, things posted on this site are done in the spirit of conversation, as we research many avenues and listen to many voices in our support of truth and freedom.
[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]
The Mexican President Andres Manuel López Obrador has said that he won’t let Big Pharma dictate Mexico after he refused to purchase Covid vaccines for children, vowing that Mexico wouldn’t bow to pressure from drugs firms.
In remarks made earlier this week, the Mexican leader said his government was still waiting for the scientific community to demonstrate the benefits of vaccinating minors.
Until conclusive evidence was provided, Mexico would refuse to purchase jabs for children, Obrador announced, adding that pharmaceutical firms seemed to be focused more on making profits than on ensuring medical necessity as they rake in record sales from Covid-19 vaccines.
He was similarly critical of plans by drugs companies to introduce third – or even fourth-dose booster shots, opining that the jabs could be “superfluous.”
Recently, a Johns Hopkins study has found that there were zero COVID-19 deaths among healthy kids. Rather than acknowledge science, Dr. Makary says the CDC continues to use ‘flimsy evidence’ to push the COVID vaccine upon children.
Speaking on the same topic, Undersecretary for Health Hugo López-Gatell claimed there was “no scientific evidence” showing the jab was “essential” for minors, given the high rate of inoculation among the adult population, Excélsior, Mexico City’s second-oldest daily, reported.
Largely ignored by international media, Obrador’s provocative remarks went viral after an English-subtitled video of his speech was shared across social media.
Several comments hailed the Mexican president’s “cajones” for calling out Big Pharma greed. Pfizer, for example, has boasted record profits and recently raised full-year sales estimates for its vaccine to $45 billion.
The Mexican President’s concerns regarding Big Pharma are very relevant seen through the recent assassinations of heads of state who rejected to implement their policies.
Right until July this year, Haiti was the only country in the western hemisphere without COVID-19 vaccines. Then, the US trained Columbian hit squad assassinated the Haitian President Jovenel Moïse and soon within days Haiti received delivery of its first vaccine doses and now vaccination is in full swing in the country.
GreatGameIndia has prepared a COVID-19 Assassination List – a list of people engaged in coronavirus research and critics of plandemic dropping dead in mysterious circumstances.
I don’t believe governments are telling the truth about how many people have taken the COVID shot. I think they’re lying. Inflating the numbers because they’re desperate; far more people than advertised are refusing the vaxx.
In every war, spies and other hired hands try to demoralize the enemy. This is standard operating procedure. Inflating key numbers is one strategy.
In this vaccine war, the ace in the hole is obvious: if enough people say NO to the shot, it’s over. A tidal wave will engulf the governments and their corporate allies.
If people believed, say, that only 30% of Americans have taken the shot, and that number is holding steady, despite all the new mandates, morale would shoot up to a new high.
It always feels better to be on a winning side.
If most Americans knew that massive anti-vaxx protests are taking place in France and Germany and other countries, their attitude would shift. If most Americans knew that in Australia, the most fascist pro-vaxx government in the world is sweating bullets, because despite horrendous lockdowns and vaccine mandates, despite cops and soldiers on the streets, Aussies are still going to the beach…that knowledge would bolster spirits.
If people opposed to the vaccine and/or the mandates could get an accurate count on how many posts and how many videos and how many accounts have been censored by social media, worldwide, because those posts express opposition to the vaxx…people would see how large the resistance really is.
Here’s a report from statista.com: “As of August 1, 2021, China had administered about 1.67 billion doses of coronavirus COVID-19 vaccine, whereas about 4.18 billion doses of the vaccine had been applied worldwide.”
I don’t believe it. I don’t think the global organization and the logistics are that good. People who’ve traveled extensively know how diverse and spread-out the global landscape is. They know how inefficient many, many governments are.
The world isn’t one huge well-lit modern pharmacy with people lined up and techs administering the jabs.
As several people have pointed out, the unvaccinated are a control group in this vast COVID vaccine experiment. If a year from now, millions and millions of us who didn’t take the shot are obviously still healthy, that’s not going to sit well with the vaccinators-in-charge or the pro-vaccine crowd. They don’t want a vibrant control group. They want compliant robots.
Then there is this, from Stat News, July 21: “Millions of unused Covid-19 vaccines are set to go to waste as demand dwindles across the United States and doses likely expire this summer, according to public health officials…”
“Currently, states have administered 52.36 million fewer doses than have been distributed to them, according to federal data.”
“A significant tranche of Pfizer doses is expected to expire in August… Given waning domestic vaccine demand, those doses are unlikely to be fully used before they must be tossed.”
“’We’re seeing demand [for the vaccine] falling off across all the states,’ said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.”
So which sets of statistics should we believe? Those that pump up the numbers of people who’ve taken the shots, or those that show millions of vials going to waste? I think the latter stats are the true indicators. Officials are less likely to confess to them, unless they’re accurate.
Out in front, the movie called COVID VACCINE is being hailed as a brilliant blockbuster, but at the back end, ticket sales are dropping off a cliff.
There are reasons for that. One is: People are having very serious and severe injuries from the shot; they’re dying; and their families and friends know about it.
Here are the latest CDC figures I have, as compiled by Children’s Health Defense. The statistics are taken from VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. “VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 463,457 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021.”
Keep in mind there is vast underreporting of injuries, because most Americans don’t know what VAERS is or are hesitant to make a report.
Some analysts have suggested that, to get a reasonably accurate count, you should multiply reported numbers by 10.
The well-known 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study of VAERS bluntly stated: “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public.”
Following the finding of that study, you would multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a proper figure.
The numbers of vaccine injuries and deaths are huge. In any situation other than the current fake pandemic, the vaccination program would have been stopped. Cancelled.
No matter what governments and news parrots say about the vaccine (“safe and effective”), vast numbers of injured people, their families, and the families of those who’ve died from the shot are messengers for the truth.
The truth spreads.
In a war, when combatants and civilians end up in hospitals, and when many of them lie in coffins lowered into the ground, and when the people can no longer hold a coherent story in their minds about why the war is being fought, the whole mood of a country changes.
This is no time for surrendering or joining those who claim doom is the only outcome.
COVID-19 vaccine is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Product. Mandating it violates Federal Law and the Nuremberg Code. The Children’s Health Defense Legal Section has extensive legal resources to make individuals aware about their legally protected rights. Use these resources to educate and preserve fundamental human rights on critical issues related to health freedom.
If you are an employee and are being told that you will be mandated to take the COVID vaccination(s) or will be fired, and are not being provided an alternative accommodation, you are not alone. Send us examples of groups fighting back.
United Healthcare Workers. Michigan Healthcare System. “It’s time healthcare workers across the state band together and say, enough is enough.”
Houston healthcare workers push back and are appealing their case
Programmable magnetic nanobots injected into the vascular and interstitial fluids of a human or animal body are found to be deposited into the connective and fatty tissues and then into the organs and glands potentially causing biological transformation of the cell membrane (crowning and protein spiking), genetic mutation, and the death of the cell.[1]
Nanobots can be injected using an ordinary hypodermic syringe. The nanobots are microscopic functioning robots with the ability to walk and withstand harsh environments. Each robot is 70-mm in length as seen above and can also be as small as 1-nm in length, which is the width of one atom, up to a billion can be produced from a single 4-inch silicon composite wafer as seen above. The original nanofabrication techniques were developed by Marc Miskin and colleagues at Cornell University. The research was presented at the American Physical Society in March of 2017. According to a release from EurekAlert, the team spent years developing a nanofabrication process that can produce a million nanobots from a specialized 4-inch silicon wafer in the span of weeks.
These micro-robots shown above feature four legs and are composed of hexagonal graphene oxide which are highly magnetic, flexible and super strong.[1]
The following is the link for a video showing their activation triggered by electromagnetic (EMF) pulsating microwave frequencies: [https://rumble.com/vkm84h-is-nanobot-technology-or-artificial-intelligence-viable-inside-the-human-bo.html] [2]
This enables the nanobots to carry a body weighing about 8,000 times more than each leg. As well, each leg measures only 100 atoms and even down to 1 atom thick, and they can carry bodies 1,000 to 100,000 times thicker.
Researchers have now developed ‘smart’ versions of these graphene nanobots. These versions feature controllers, sensors, transmitters and clocks.
The graphene oxide nanobots are powered by using magnetic fields (EMF) or ultrasound, making it possible for them to travel deeply into the human body tissues, organs and glands (such as the reproductive organs,[3] bone marrow, across the blood-brain barrier and the air-blood barrier of the lungs via the interstitial fluids – the largest organ of the human and animal body called the Interstitium[4]
The following flow-chart below is an example how nanobots and EMF technology can affect YOUR physical and mental health once you have been inoculated with the graphene oxide nanobot programmable technology or so-called ‘vaccine’ for protection frin a phantom virus!
Canada’s Constitutional Rights Centre & Children’s Health Defense Send Legal Notice to Colleges and Universities Across Ontario With Regards to “COVID 19 Vaccination”
CRC on behalf of the Children’s Health Defence Canada has now sent a legal notice to Colleges & Universities across the province of Ontario inclusively.
Colleges and Universities are not above the law, especially the Constitution.
If the policies persist, legal action will ensue.
Below is the letter already sent out to Universities & Colleges, including a corresponding Appendix page.
Please click links below to read full Children’s Health Defence Canada Letters
This week, the vaccine contracts with Albania and Brazil signed with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for the supply of “vaccines” were leaked.
The agreements confirm our suspicion that governments worldwide, in the delusion and illusion of a “pandemic”, have agreed to the most insane deadly terms for-and-in-behalf for the whole of humanity!
In addition, Big Pharma decides, that the citizens of their respective countries with pay for these ‘death shots’!
A huge gamble is being taken with the public health, especially that of our children at the hands of ‘Luciferians’ who want to reduce the surplus human population and redistribute wealth to themselves without accountability!
So What Are the Agreements in these Vaccine Contracts?
[1] Pfizer does not accept any responsibility for any side effects, injury, including death related to the CoV – 19 inoculation.
[2] The buyer (each government) pays any claims for damages due to side effects, including death.
[3] The purchaser (each government) must acknowledge to Pfizer that the long-term effects of the “vaccine” are unknown!
[4] The purchaser (each government) must acknowledge to Pfizer that the effectiveness of the “vaccine” is unknown!
[5] The purchaser (each government) must acknowledge to Pfizer that unknown side effects, including death may occur after administration of the “vaccine”.
[6] An unknown device (Artificial Intelligence – AI) and/or other technology (adjuvants of graphene oxide – GO) falls within the definition of the Pfizer “vaccine”.
[7] Cheaper and more effective medication that comes on the market or appears to be on the market, such as ivermectin or hydroxychlorquine (HCQ), for example, should not be a reason to cancel the contract. In other words, the Pfizer ‘death shot’ must be marketed anyway, even if there are much better alternatives.
The ‘Vaccine’ Contract
Albania’s and Brazil’s contracts with Pfizer are virtually identical!
Are the Vaccine Contract the Same Around the World?
The People Want to Know What They Have Signed Up For!
It is highly likely that the United States of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands have signed to the same terms of agreement just like Albania and Brazil! This is ALL the more important considering that Carlos Murillo, Pfizer’s CEO of Latin America, has stated under oath that, “Pfizer has set the same terms in the supply contract for each country”.
On behalf of the ‘Forum for Democracy’ (Dutch political party), Pepijn van Houwelingen puts parliamentary questions to Minister Hugo de Jonge of the Worlds Health Organization (WHO) Concerning the ‘Vaccine Contract’:
Here are the Questions that Need to Be Asked by the Citizens of Every Country and Answered by Their Respective Governments, Especially the USA Congress and Senate.
This Must Be DONE NOW!
[1] Are you aware of the agreements Albania(1) and Brazil(2) have entered into with Pfizer for the supply of “vaccinations” to fight COVID – 19, whose contracts have recently been leaked?
[2] Are you aware that Carlos Murillo, Pfizer CEO of Latin America (3), has stated under oath to the parliamentary COVID-19 Inquiry Committee of the Brazilian Federal Senate that Pfizer has the same conditions for every country has stated in the supply contract (4)?
[3] Do you acknowledge that Pfizer’s two leaked contracts with Albania and Brazil, respectively, do indeed contain the same terms and conditions, as Carlos Murillo has stated, “despite being two completely different countries on two different continents?”
[4] Has The Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) signed a supply contract with Pfizer with the same or similar terms as stated in Pfizer’s leaked supply contracts with Albania and Brazil?
[5] Why did you agree to confidentiality of the supply agreement with Pfizer?
[6] Why did you agree to secrecy of the supply agreement with other pharmaceutical companies?
[7] For how long has confidentiality been agreed with Pfizer?
[8] For how long has the confidentiality been agreed with Moderna?
[9] For how long has confidentiality been agreed with AstraZeneca?
[10] For how long has confidentiality been agreed with Janssen? For how long has the confidentiality been agreed with Curevac?
[11] What purpose does the secrecy of supply contracts with pharmaceuticals serve, based on the interests of the Dutch population?
[12] Are you prepared to make the contracts public after all? Are you prepared to request this permission on behalf of the Dutch government, if permission is required from the relevant pharmaceutical company?
[13] Do you see the social importance of making the Dutch and European contracts with Pfizer public soon, now that after Pfizer’s leaked contracts with Albania and Brazil there is a lot of speculation about the content of the contracts, and the Dutch are worried about either their health after taking the Pfizer “vaccine”, or about the possible financial consequences of possible damages claims for Dutch taxpayers?
[14] Are you aware of the resignation and arrest of Roberto Ferrera Dias, a former director in charge of logistics for the Brazilian Ministry of Health and also a signatory on behalf of the Brazilian government of the supply agreement with Pfizer, for allegedly being bribed in the procurement of a vaccine and lied to the Brazilian Federal Senate’s parliamentary COVID-19 Commission of Inquiry (5)?
[15] Who is authorized to sign contracts with pharmaceutical companies on behalf of the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Japan, etc.) for the supply of “vaccines”?
[16] Which persons were directly involved on behalf of the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) in the negotiations with Pfizer and other suppliers of “corona vaccines”?
[17] Can you rule out the possibility that bribery has taken place in the purchase of “vaccinations” in the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, etc.,), as may be the case in Brazil? If so, how? If not, why not?
[18] What is meant by “any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine”, as the Pfizer vaccine (in part) is defined in the contract with Albania under Article 1.54 and in the contract with Brazil under article 1.57?
[19] Which technology and/or which devices are part of the “vaccine” delivery to the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil and other countries inoculating their citizens with the CoV – 19 ‘vaccine’?
[20] Do other “vaccines” also use technology or devices? If so, which “vaccines”? And what kind of technology is it?
[21] How would you rate the clause under Article 2.1(b), which both Albania and Brazil have accepted, which states that even if cheaper and more effective drugs against COVID-19 come on the market or already appear to be, such as ivermectin, for example, this should not constitute grounds for terminating the contract with Pfizer?
[22] Has the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) agreed to an identical or similar clause?
[23] Have other pharmaceutical companies included an identical or similar clause in the supply contract with the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.,)?
[24] Does Pfizer advise or has it in the past advised the Dutch government (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) about which drugs that could constitute a cheap and effective alternative to its “vaccine” should necessarily be discouraged, in order to break the multi-billion dollar contract between Let the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) and Pfizer hold out politically?
[25] How do you reconcile your firm statement “I can be clear about long-term effects, there are none” (6), with the acknowledgment demanded by Pfizer of Albania and Brazil that the long-term effects are unknown, as is made clear in both contracts under Article 5.5 ?
[26] How can you convince Dutch (EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.,) people, especially Dutch (EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.,) children, that the “vaccine” is safe in the long term, if even the manufacturer of the injection, at least in some countries in the world, does not bear any responsibility dare to take?
[27] Have you yourself acknowledged in the supply contract between the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc.) and Pfizer that the long-term effects of the Pfizer injection are unclear?
[28] Have you (also) had to acknowledge to the suppliers of other “corona vaccinations” that the long-term effects of the relevant “vaccine” are unknown? If so, which “vaccines” are involved?
[29] Has the Netherlands (and/or the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., on behalf of the Netherlands) reserved money for any claims for damages resulting from large-scale and drastic side effects of the Pfizer injection? If so, why and how much? If not, why not? Is this different from other “corona vaccines”?
[30] Can you indicate for each “corona vaccine” to what extent the Dutch state, the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., is liable for damage and/or injury as a result of its administration?
[31] Can you send an overview of the concrete standards that the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., uses to control the (production) quality of a specific batch of mRNA injections, such as that of Pfizer?
[32] Which so-called Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs) apply in the Netherlands/the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., with regard to mRNA injections?
[33] Are these CGMPs up to date at the time of the first shipments of the Pfizer “vaccine”? If so, how does this prove? If not, why not?
[34] Can you indicate under what conditions the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., can return a delivery/batch of Pfizer vaccines in case of doubts about the quality? In which cases will a refund be made?
[35] What price has the Netherlands, EU, USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, etc., paid per dose of the Pfizer “vaccine”?
Additional Questions from Dr. Robert O. Young
[36] WHO ultimately SHOULD have RESPONSIBILITY for the potential and anticipated injury and death to NOT MILLIONS but to BILLIONS of innocent souls around the World![9][10]
[ 37] Why cannot each citizen choose for themselves their own doctor and their own treatment protocol for CoV – 19 since the so-called ‘vaccine’ is experimental and unproven.[7]
[38] Why are the ingredients of the so-called ‘vaccines’ left off the inserts in the boxes containing the CoV – 19 vaccine? [8]
[39] How is mandating or forcing any human against their free-will to be inoculated with an experimental ‘vaccine’ not a violation of human rights under the Nuremberg Laws?[8]
[40] Once again, ‘Who’ should be held accountable for ‘crimes against humanity’ for injury and the loss of life directly related to the CoV – 19 inoculation? [8]
Please send these article with questions to your Major, your, Governor, your State representatives, your Congressman, your Senator, your President, and especially your loved ones. Time is of essence in order to STOP the mass injury and deaths to billions of souls around the world.
STOP the ‘killing fields’ of the ‘4th Wave’ of pulsating microwave radiation that will activate the graphene oxide contained ALL the so-called fake ‘vaccines’, coming this fall.
Watch, listen and learn and then care enough to share to everyone to love and care about NOW![9][10]:
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality. [This miserable mode Maintain the melancholy souls of those Who lived withouten infamy or praise.]” ~ Dante Alighieri
Mankind is a fickle creature at best, and is normally content to not rock the boat. This is the collective philosophy held by the many, as it is mistakenly thought to be the easiest way to avoid any danger and strife. Reality is another matter, as weakness is forever present in the minds of men, and therefore tyranny and control are easily accomplished by those who understand that the common masses will always obey the dominate master class at the expense of their own liberty, so long as they are promised safety in return. This grotesque phenomenon will be the ruination of humanity.
All that is happening today is based on this premise, and the ruling ‘authority’ has taken control of the entire population of the planet by simply introducing the idea that a great crisis that does not even exist is present, and is an imminent and ongoing menace to society. In doing so, they claim to be a prophet, false of course, promising to defend the people, when just the opposite is intended. Instead of reacting in some sort of logical or sane manner, the general population en masse has acquiesced to the controlling power, and in doing so has taken the neutral position explained so well by Alighieri, all at the great expense of their own lives and freedom. This attitude is one of not only great harm, but exposes the worst side of humanity, as most hide and wallow in unnecessary fear while their very existence is threatened. Other than the children, those that take this position deserve no empathy.
By hiding from the truth, the herd does not seek to understand what is actually happening around them, but concentrates only on their local, immediate, and present circumstances, while ignoring all the signs of impending doom that are brutally obvious to any thinking individual. In doing so, the spectre of tyranny grows ever faster, and without enough resistance to stop the premeditated onslaught against the common people.
The people of this country falsely called the “united states” has one great advantage over most others on earth, but fails to see their favored position due to ignorance and brainwashing over time. That advantage is that the people of this country still have many guns to defend themselves against the terror that is the ‘State;’ that ‘State’ that is continuously at war against its own people. It is not the active use of guns and bullets that is so important, but the threat, capability, and willingness to do so is certainly enough to halt the advancing totalitarian policies of the ruling class. They are all cowards after all. They are the few, while the people are the many, and being armed is the best protection against tyrannical behavior by evil and corrupt governments. The people in most countries around the world have been forcibly (or more likely, voluntarily) disarmed, and are at much greater risk than Americans today. That is why the most restrictive, regulated, and heinous policies are being advanced faster in other parts of the world, but it will all be here very soon if this society allows it. If U.S. citizens did not have guns, it would be no different now here than in Canada, Australia, China, the United Kingdom and much of Europe, and many other places around the globe. This is why it is imperative for Americans to understand that everything going on in these captured societies is coming here soon, so watching the world around you is of great importance. It is also necessary to listen to the controlling political class in this country that is constantly attempting to capture and control arms and ammunition, with the future aim of eliminating all gun ownership here just as has already happened across the globe. The only reason we are not already living in a total dictatorial society is because we have the armed capability to stop this government’s attempts to create a totalitarian master/slave nation.
The more restrictive and brutal activity that is levied against the people in the countries mentioned above, among others, the more likely it will be accepted by the drones of this country. If that occurs, the takeover of America will be successful in short order in my opinion. That would be the end of this country, as a new system of technocratic dictatorship would be put into place. The illegitimate and poisonous gene-altering injections called ‘vaccines’ are meant to help this along by changing the mental and physical makeup of the masses, accelerating submissive behavior, and allowing for more control in order to create a compliant populace that will accept their new status as dependent wards of the state.
Much of Australia is locked down, and travel for Australian citizens and tourists is virtually impossible in much of that country. Restrictions and mandates are ever increasing, including ‘vaccine passports.
The evil Macron in France has “announced that from next month anyone wanting to go out to eat or drink, take a long-distance train or visit a shopping centre will need to show either proof of vaccination or a negative test. The so-called “health pass” will also be needed to attend a festival, a theatre show or a cinema screening as part of the government’s strategy to tackle the surging number of new cases linked to the Delta Variant. You will have understood that vaccination is not obligatory straight away, but we are going to extend the health pass to its maximum to encourage as many of you as possible to get yourselves vaccinated,” Macron said.
In Canada, besides all the massive tyranny that has already occurred, now in Vancouver, all arrivals into that country are separated into vaccinated/unvaccinated lines, not unlike the heinous racial segregation in the past.
Contact tracing, forced ‘Covid’ testing, mandated ‘vaccination’ in order to survive and gain necessities of life, draconian travel restrictions, forced colored arm bands to distinguish those injected and not, immunity passports, college admission requirements to take the jab in order to attend, job loss without ‘vaccination, mandated food restrictions, extreme government marketing campaigns for poisonous ‘vaccination, more lockdowns and quarantine, more mask mandates, and much more tyrannical authoritarian orders are coming. This is happening all around the world, including the U.S., as the depopulation agenda by the bio-weapon ‘vaccine is gaining much ground as this plot to harm and destabilize this population continues without end.
Everything happening concerning this non-existent ‘virus pandemic’ in every part of the world will also happen here soon, if in fact, it is not already happening or planned. Do not ignore the signs right in front of you, and do not trust any claims coming from this government, the controlled mainstream media, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, tax-free foundations, or any government partner whatsoever. Understand that the people still have the power to stop this by banding together against the state. Disobey, do not comply, dissent, take no orders, and let these evil murderous monsters know that you have the absolute power to stop them!
The first draft of this form was written by Corey Lynn of Corey Digs but has subsequently been updated by the Solari Team for future events.
[NOTE TO EMPLOYEE: Be sure to document the date and time you submit the form to your employer; also document the date and time and their response if they refuse to sign it.Note that three other Solari Report forms1,2,3 are also available as downloadable PDFs: the “Family Financial Disclosure Form for Covid-19 Injections”; “Notice and Declaration of Parental Authority Requirement of Disclosure and Safety of Medical Treatment/s”; and “Form for Students Attending Colleges or Universities Requiring Covid-19 Injections under Emergency Use Authorization.”]
Introduction
The situation with Covid-19 injections is fluid and evolving rapidly. As of July 2021, three vaccines were being administered in the U.S. under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA): the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA injections and the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson adenovirus-vectored injection.
The injections’ regulatory status could soon change. On July 16, the FDA granted priority review to Pfizer’s application for full approval (licensure) of its Covid-19 vaccine for those age 16 and up. Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are also preparing to seek full approval. FDA officials have pledged to issue a decision with respect to the Pfizer application within two months. And though “not intervening in the decision of government scientists,” President Biden predicts full approval by September or October.4
Approval would have significant workplace ramifications. Assuming one or more shots receives full approval, public health experts expect “a wave of Covid-19 vaccine mandates,” confidently anticipating that licensure will “remove a significant legal and public relations barrier for businesses…that want to”—or are being pressured to—require vaccinations for their employees.5 Even under EUA, one federal agency (the Department of Veterans Affairs) has already mandated (on July 26) the experimental injections for its health care personnel, setting a federal precedent for employee mandates that others may soon follow. That same day, the Department of Justice published an opinion stating that it is legal for “public and private entities” to mandate Covid vaccines despite the injections only being approved for emergency use.
American workers who do not wish to accept Covid-19 injections are thus in a difficult position. The genesis of this form was to provide a tool for employees to use within the context of emergency use authorization with employers who attempt to mandate still-investigational Covid-19 injections (Scenario 1). With the possibility of full FDA approval in fall 2021 (Scenario 2), the legal context for U.S. mandates will likely shift in significant ways. In the event of licensure, we will provide an updated form that reflects the altered regulatory circumstances.
Under both scenarios, we anticipate that a form of this type will remain a critically important tool for employees determined to educate employers about the full set of physical and financial risks they are asking workers to incur. Employees should strongly consider reviewing the form with employers and also sharing it with co-workers. This could result in a positive outcome for employees and, if used widely, could be a game-changer.
Scenario 1: Emergency Use Authorization
Many employers are trying to deny employees’ right to choose and their right to bodily integrity by requiring EUA Covid-19 vaccines as a condition of employment. Under EUA, however, such requirements are a violation of the law. (We anticipate that the Department of Justice opinion on the legality of EUA mandates should and will be challenged.) Mandates are also a violation of fundamental human and religious rights.
The provisions of the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act and a February 2020 declaration by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary mean that pharmaceutical companies cannot be held liable for injuries or deaths caused by EUA Covid-19 injections.6 However, other companies, institutions, and individuals can be held liable.
On the grounds that the injections are under EUA and are not formally licensed, many health care providers are refusing service to individuals injured by the Covid-19 injections, and health and life insurance companies are declining coverage for vaccine-related injuries and deaths.7 This denial of care and coverage poses a serious threat to the physical and financial well-being of employees presented with a requirement to get a Covid injection—perhaps even more so than the possibility of losing their job for not being vaccinated. Medical bills for vaccinated individuals with serious injuries have already exceeded $1 million in some cases.8 Under the PREP act, the vaccine-injured may submit a claim to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), but the CICP historically has rejected 92% of claims and has not yet compensated a single Covid injection claim.9
Reviewing this form with employers may open their eyes to the regulations in place and the liability they may face (that they may otherwise not be aware of). If an employee should decide to accept the required experimental Covid-19 injection, the form also provides a mechanism to insist on a signature from the employer’s representative that holds the company liable. If the employer’s representative refuses to sign the form, that may be an indicator of the company’s concerns about potential liability and should prompt an immediate discussion about how the employee can continue working for the company without being injected.
Scenario 2: Full Approval
Before Covid-19, workplace vaccine mandates for adults were on a state-by-state basis and primarily focused on hepatitis B and influenza vaccination in health care settings, often allowing some accommodation for disability or religious beliefs.10 Under a scenario of full FDA approval for Covid-19 injections, a broader cross-section of employers well beyond the health care arena will likely feel emboldened or pressured to impose workplace mandates.11, Evoking the specter of “potentially severe” Covid illness, some commentators are suggesting that the process for granting medical or religious exemptions “may look a little different” (i.e., be more restrictive).12
If Covid-19 injections lose their EUA status and receive full FDA approval, they would no longer enjoy the liability protection conferred by the PREP Act. However, if the FDA extends full approval to children under age 18—as is widely anticipated13—and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends Covid-19 injections for “routine administration” to children (or pregnant women),14 manufacturers and health care providers will be protected from liability for Covid-vaccine-related injuries and deaths under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).15 From that point on, the only avenue available for compensation would be the notoriously stingy and difficult-to-navigate National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).16
If you find yourself in a predicament with a company that refuses to hear you out, does not provide you with required information, or threatens termination of your employment, here are a few potential resources for attorneys:
Health Freedom Defense Fund: This nonprofit is working to address unethical and unlawful mask, testing, and vaccine mandates through focused legal actions. Resources for employees include a Notice to Employers (“Vaccine Notice”) that compulsory Covid-19 vaccination imposed by employers on employees violates federal law.
Comprehensive, high-integrity medical and scientific information, including briefs and reports summarizing what is known about the risks of Covid-19 injections and adverse events, is available (and routinely updated) at the following websites:
America’s Frontline Doctors: In addition to its legal resources (see above), AFLDS’ website includes information about Covid-19 treatments, “issue briefs” on post-vaccination complications and other topics, and numerous other resources. https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/about-us/mission-statement/
Children’s Health Defense (CHD): In addition to reporting on vaccine safety topics via its flagship online news outlet The Defender, CHD offers a “Fighting COVID Mandates” toolkit and related resources, a series of eBooks (including eBooks on vaccine mandates and protection of individual rights), a research library, and a “Community Corner.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
Doctors for COVID Ethics (D4CE): Among the excellent resources provided by this group of doctors and scientists from 30 countries are “Letter to physicians: Four new scientific discoveries regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines,” which warns that “all physicians must reconsider the ethical issues surrounding COVID-19 vaccination,” and a 23-page Expert Statement outlining the serious risks of the Pfizer injection (European brand name Comirnaty) in children. https://doctors4covidethics.org/
Form for Employers Requiring Covid-19 Injections under Emergency Use Authorization
NOTE TO EMPLOYER: As your employee, I request that you review this document, provide the requisite information, and sign the form, in regards to your requirement that employees get a Covid-19 emergency use authorization (EUA) investigational vaccine.
1) If I agree to receive an EUA Covid-19 injection, does my employee health insurance plan provide complete coverage should I experience an adverse event, or even death?
3) As an employee, will you be providing Workers’ Compensation, disability insurance, or other resources if I have an adverse event to an EUA Covid-19 injection and am unable to come to work for days, weeks, or months, or if I am disabled for life?
4) The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that EUA vaccine recipients be provided with certain vaccine-specific information to help them make an informed decision about vaccination.1 The EUA fact sheets that must be provided are specific to each authorized Covid-19 injection and are developed by the manufacturers (Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson). The fact sheets must provide up-to-date information on the injections and their ingredients; vaccine recipients must also receive information about adverse events. Have you read, understood, and provided me (and all other employees) with these fact sheets and current information on adverse events—and can you furnish a list of vaccine ingredients guaranteed to be complete—so that I/we can make an educated decision?
5) Have you reviewed the material adverse events experienced to date by people who have received EUA Covid-19 injections, reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)?2 Reported adverse events include death, anaphylaxis, blood clots and related complications, heart problems (myocarditis and pericarditis), neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders, other chronic and inflammatory conditions, blindness and deafness, infertility, fetal damage, miscarriage, and stillbirth.
6) The FDA’s guidance3 on emergency use authorization of medical products requires the FDA to “ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances…[t]hat they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product…” Are you aware of this statement? Have you informed all employees that they have the option to refuse?
___________________________________________________________________________________
7) With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Title 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) reiterates that individuals be informed of “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”4 In the event that the FDA decided to grant full approval to Covid-19 vaccines, state legislation would be required to allow companies to mandate the Covid-19 injections. Are you aware of these facts?
8) EUA products are unapproved, unlicensed, and experimental. Under the Nuremberg Code—the foundation of ethical medicine—no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. The individual’s consent is absolutely essential. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine. In Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003),5 a federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines for soldiers: “[T]he United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs” (Id. at 135). Are you aware of this?
___________________________________________________________________________________ 9) The United States Code of Federal Regulations6 and the FDA require the informed consent of human subjects for medical research. The EUA Covid-19 injections are unapproved, unlicensed, investigational vaccines that are still in their experimental stage. It is unlawful to conduct medical research on a human being, even in the event of an emergency, unless steps are taken to secure the full informed consent of all participants. Are you aware of this?
10) According to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Guidelines7 and the FTC’s “Truth In Advertising,”8 promotional materials—and especially materials involving health-related products—cannot mislead consumers, omit important information, or express claims. All of this falls under the rubric of “deceptive advertising” (whereby a company is providing or endorsing a product), whether presented in the form of an ad, on a website, through email, on a poster, or in the mail. For example, statements such as “all employees are required to get the Covid-19 vaccine to make the workspace safe” or “it’s safe and effective” leave out critical information. Critical information includes the facts that Covid-19 injections are unapproved EUA vaccines that “may” or “may not” prevent Covid, won’t necessarily make the workplace safer, and could in fact cause harm. Not providing links or attachments of the manufacturers’ fact sheets and current information on adverse events is omitting safety information. Are you aware of this?
11) Since the Covid lockdowns began over one year ago, there have been over 178 reported breaches of unsecured protected health information (PHI), incidents investigated by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). These breaches exposed millions of people’s personal health information. Although many of these incidents were attributed to hacking, some of the breaches to PHI fell directly under the 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), such as sharing a patient’s or person’s information with an unauthorized individual or incorrectly handling PHI.9 Can you please explain your obligations to me, under HIPAA law, with respect to your requirement that I receive this injection?
12) Whereas pharmaceutical companies that manufacture EUA vaccines have been protected from liability related to injuries or deaths caused by experimental agents since the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act10 was enacted in 2005, companies and all other institutions or individuals who mandate experimental vaccines on any human being are not protected from liability. Are you aware that you do not enjoy such liability protection?
13) Are you aware that employees could file a civil suit against you should they suffer an adverse event, death, or termination from their place of employment?
As the legally authorized officer of the employer/company, I have read all of the above information, have provided my employees with all of the information that the FDA requires be provided to recipients of the Covid-19 injections, and do hereby agree to assume 100% financial responsibility for covering any and all expenses from adverse events, including death, through insurance coverage or directly. In addition, I affirm that the employee will not be subjected to the loss of their job should they decline to receive a Covid-19 injection.
2. In the United States, see Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, https://vaers.hhs.gov; CDC WONDER, “About the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),”” https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html; National Vaccine Information Center, “Search the U.S. Government’s VAERS Data,” https://www.medalerts.org/.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities: Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders. January 2017. https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download.
Shocking revelations posted to social media this week revealed that Pfizer engineered a contract, which governments had to sign when purchasing the experimental Covid-19 vaccine. Excerpts appear to show that there is no way for the pharmaceutical company to lose, even if the vaccine is dangerous, causes injury, or is ineffective.
PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT.
(thread)
Background: Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements.
— Ehden (#PfizerLeak/#MonkeyBusiness/#COptiGate) 🌟 (@eh_den) July 26, 2021
The details of the contract were posted by a Twitter user named Ehden, who begins a thread of tweets (many of which have since been deleted) by stating: “Pfizer has been extremely aggressive in trying to protect the details of their international COVID19 vaccine agreements.
“These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well enough, so I managed to get a hold of a copy. As you are about to see, there is a good reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts.”
Here are some of the key points taken from the contract:
The contract appears to state that the agreement covers the manufacturing of vaccines for Covid-19 and its mutations, but also for “any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine.”
The reason why governments around the world were suppressing the use of alternative treatments for Covid-19 – including Ivermectin – is because the contract does not allow them to pull out even if a more effective treatment than Pfizer is discovered.
Pfizer cannot be held liable for any delivery delays or missed deliveries: “Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates… nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product.”
To emphasise this, the contract states: “Purchaser hereby waives all rights and remedies that it may have at Law, in equity or otherwise, arising from or relating to:…any failure by Pfizer to deliver the Contracted Doses in accordance with the Delivery Schedule.”
Additionally, once governments have purchased vaccines, they cannot be returned: “Pfizer will not, in any circumstances, accept any returns of Product (or any dose)…no Product returns may take place under any circumstances.”
To add to this, Pfizer assured that it is guaranteed its money and that governments cannot withhold or try to credit funds for the vaccines.
It seems as though that it doesn’t matter to Pfizer whether the vaccines are effective in the short or long term, either. The contract states that the “Purchaser acknowledges…the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.”
Through the contract, Pfizer has guaranteed that all sales are basically final, as is the exception of the contract. Ehden writes: “There are clauses about termination possibility, but in fact, as you saw so far, the buyer has almost nothing that can be considered a material breach, while Pfizer can easily do so if they don’t get their money or if they deem so.”
And, of course, no one can hold Pfizer liable for anything related to its Covid-19 vaccine, as the contract states: “Purchaser must provide Pfizer protection from liability for claims and all Losses, must implement it via statutory or regulatory requirements, and the sufficiency of such efforts shall be in Pfizer’s sole discretion.”
Whilst to many of us a contract like this isn’t really surprising, it just emphasises that these pharmaceutical companies are only interested in money and power. It shows that the Covid vaccine has never been about protecting the population, but that it’s just a worldwide experiment that guarantees Pfizer and big pharma will get rich whilst those who receive a dose suffer adverse reactions.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman at Worldwide Freedom Rally in London: “…In Solidarity, Arm-in-Arm, We Are a Force of Nature. We Are the Power Elite’s Worst Nightmare.”
Hello, men and women of the United Kingdom. It is an honor to be invited to speak to you on this important occasion.
In the United States we have been spared much of the tyranny that you faced but I’ve been observing from afar and do my best to tell others about your unfortunate plight. The almighty himself, Mr. Boris Johnson, recently declared Freedom Day after more than six months of bondage for the British people. Well, Boris Johnson does not have the authority to give or take away your freedom.
Freedom — the right to choose our own fate, to determine how to treat our bodies. to speak our mind, to formulate our own opinions, to raise our children according to our values — is our birthright bestowed upon us by the Creator. It’s our natural right.
No authority figure, be it head of state, scientific experts, globalist leader, banker, CEO, occultist or politician can grant us rights or take them away.
The responsibility to protect, preserve and defend our rights lies fully and completely with us and us alone.
You have committed to a major first step by coming here today. Many of you have maintained and defended your freedom by resisting the jabs, by showing your face, by refusing testing, and by leaving your home at will — based on your own decision and inclination.
Many have sacrificed toward this end — losing jobs, losing friends, causing marital disagreements and alienating family members.
It’s a difficult realization that many who have chosen to ignore reality and believe the lies of the BBC and others will end up sick, dead or become compliant zombies of the technocratic surveillance state. It will be painful to watch their defense, their demise, but we must realize that everyone has a choice and every decision has consequences.
While there is now a temporary reprieve from the state of oppression, the headlines are already sensationalizing the dangers of the made-up Delta variant and claiming, ironically, that the economy will not recover from re-opening businesses. This forecasts more lockdowns to come.
What is also coming is the vaccine pass. For those who accept the pass will no longer be free.
As a physician scientist my job is been to educate as many people as possible about the scientific misconceptions, misinterpretations and outright fraud that the scientific establishment and the government agencies, charged with monitoring public health, have bestowed upon us.
While carrying out this mission I uncovered that the proof offered to claim the very existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged virus, is scientifically invalid.
A new virus has never, not once, been taken out of a sick person and studied for its structure, composition, genetics or ability to cause disease. Not once.
Instead they offer an experimental procedure that produces the results they want, the alleged proof of a new virus, from the experimental procedure itself — without any source of virus needed. Very convenient.
They show pictures of particles claiming their new virus, but the same exact particles are seen in kidney biopsies from 1999. They developed a PCR test based on an alleged virus from 2003, that was never validated by any testing against a gold standard. And now they’re trying to make everyone in the entire United Kingdom — every single man and woman — take this test every week.
Every policy has been justified by these bogus test results. One of the most important things you can do is refuse testing.
I want to remind you about World War II. I know that your beloved country was nearly destroyed by the Nazis.
One of their central policies was to perform medical experiments on their citizens. After they were defeated an international code was developed which was later codified into an international treaty. And this was known as the Nuremberg Code.
This code is the standard which establishes the ethics of conducting scientific research on human subjects. It states that NO experimental medical procedure of any kind can be forced on the people. Participation always has to be informed and voluntary. Furthermore, vulnerable populations — like children, the mentally ill, the elderly and infirm, and prisoners — have special protections.
Now, for the first time since the Nazis, governments across the world, private businesses, schools and universities, and many others are openly, and with impunity, forcing or coercing you to accept experimental medical procedures.
That’s right, not one diagnostic test, not one genetic jab, not one mask has been approved by any government agency as safe and effective as a medical procedure. Not one.
All of these procedures are experimental and you are the intended guinea pigs.
I want to remind you that you — each and everyone of you — are powerful. What you do matters, now more than ever before in your lifetime. You have the ability to see the truth and embody that truth in every way.
We are at a critical time, a turning point in human history. The hard lessons of ‘classroom earth’ are upon us. It is our duty to look into the fire and see the source of its flames.
When we gather like we are today, in solidarity, arm-in-arm, we are a force of nature. We are the power elite’s worst nightmare.
We have taken a major step for freedom by coming here today. We need to continue our efforts.
We need to be prepared for sacrifice in the short term. But we are strong. We can endure.
Let us make a commitment, right here today, that we will continue to act as the beautiful, amazing, free beings of light that we truly are.
We will stand up to tyranny at every step. We will not comply. We will not comply.