Swiss Olympic Sprinter Gets Pericarditis After Pfizer Booster, 22,193 Deaths After COVID Shots Reported to CDC

Swiss Olympic Sprinter Gets Pericarditis After Pfizer Booster, 22,193 Deaths After COVID Shots Reported to CDC
VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,053,830 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 22,193 deaths and 174,864 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 14, 2022. 

by Megan Redshaw, The Defender
January 21, 2022

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,053,830 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 14, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 22,193 reports of deaths — an increase of 448 over the previous week — and 174,864 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,418 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 732,883 adverse events, including 10,162 deaths and 66,059 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Jan. 14, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 10,162 U.S. deaths reported as of Jan. 14, 19% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 24% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 525.2 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Jan. 14, including 307 million doses of Pfizer, 200 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Jan. 14, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

The most recent death involves a 7-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1975356) from Minnesota who died 11 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when she was found unresponsive by her mother. An autopsy is pending.

  • 14 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).
  • 22 reports of blood clotting disorders.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Jan. 14, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
  • 27,205 adverse events, including 1,559 rated as serious and 35 reported deaths.The most recent death involves a 15-year-old girl from Minnesota (VAERS I.D. 1974744), who died 177 days after receiving her second dose of Pfizer from a pulmonary embolus. An autopsy is pending.
  • 65 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of casesattributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 594 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 583 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 152 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Jan. 14, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:
40% rise nationwide in excess deaths among 18- to 49-year-olds, CDC Data Show

Death certificate data from the CDC show excess deaths increased by more than 40% among Americans 18 to 49 years old during a 12-month period ending in October 2021, compared to the same time period in 2018-2019 before the pandemic. COVID caused only about 42% of those deaths.

Excess deaths are defined as the difference between the observed number of deaths during a specific time frame and the expected number of deaths during that same period.

State-level data for the same 12-month period also show increases. For example, in Nevada, excess deaths were as high as 65%, with COVID accounting for only 36%. The District of Columbia saw an increase of 72% — with COVID not being a factor in any of the deaths.

Increases in excess deaths were most noticeable in the Midwest and western and southern states, while states seeing the lowest increases were primarily from the Northeast.

Swiss Olympic sprinter gets pericarditis after Pfizer’s COVID booster

In a Jan. 17 social media post, swiss Olympic sprinter Sarah Atcho said she is experiencing pericarditis after receiving a Pfizer booster shot.

On Dec. 22, Atcho received a booster because she “didn’t want to struggle with this when the season started” and was told it was safer to get Pfizer — even though she had Moderna the first time — to avoid cardiac side effects.

On Dec. 27, Atcho said she started experiencing tightness in her chest and felt dizzy while walking. A cardiologist diagnosed Atcho with pericarditis — inflammation of the thin membrane that surrounds the heart.

Atcho is not allowed to get her heart rate up for several weeks to allow her heart to rest and heal from the inflammation. Said she is upset nobody talks about the “heavy side-effects” young and healthy people are experiencing after receiving COVID vaccines.

Experts call on UK regulators to reassess COVID vaccines for 12- to 15-year-olds

In a letter to the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation, more than 30 politicians, doctors and medical experts in immunology asked UK regulators to overhaul the country’s COVID vaccine rollout for 12- to 15-year-olds based on new data showing a high risk of myocarditis in that age group.

The experts said data proved “for males under 40, risk of myocarditis was up to 14 times higher after vaccination than after infection” and the risk of myocarditis in young men and boys increased “significantly after a second dose of the vaccine.

They also argued vaccines are less effective “at stemming the transmission of Omicron compared to Delta” and therefore there may be few advantages to exposing young people to the potential increased risks and long-term harm.

Prior COVID infection more protective than vaccination during Delta wave

People with a history of previous COVID infection were better protected against infection and related hospitalization during periods of predominantly Alpha and Delta variant transmission, suggesting natural immunity was more protective against the variants than vaccines, according to the CDC.

New data released Wednesday by the CDC showed people who survived a previous infection had lower rates of COVID than people who were vaccinated alone.

Hospitalization rates were also lower among people who had recovered from COVID than among those who had been vaccinated.

For the study, health officials in California and New York gathered data from May through November 2021, which included the period when the Delta variant was dominant. The agency said there were limitations to the study and results were not applicable to the new Omicron variant.

However, the agency concluded vaccination “remains the safest and primary strategy to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections, associated complications and onward transmission,” due to the risks associated with COVID infection.

The agency did not compare the risks of infection in those with and without underlying medical conditions and did not analyze the risks associated with vaccinating those with a history of previous COVID infection.

Major businesses, attorneys general, respond to Supreme Court ruling

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last week striking down the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test mandate for private businesses has left many companies scrambling to decide whether they should abandon the mandate or force their employees to be vaccinated anyway while the case plays out in the lower courts.

As The Defender reported today, Starbucks was the first major business to announce it would not enforce its COVID vaccine mandate against employees in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, while Carhartt CEO Mark Valade announced in an email to staff the company’s vaccine mandate for its 3,000 U.S. employees would remain in place.

Both decisions sparked backlash on social media with calls to boycott both companies.

Meanwhile, a coalition of attorneys general from 27 states is calling on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to rescind its Emergency Temporary Standard for private businesses with more than 100 employees because it lacks the authority to issue a broad vaccine mandate.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

 

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




Texas Judge Blocks Biden’s Vaccine Mandate for Federal Employees Nationwide

Texas Judge Blocks Biden’s Vaccine Mandate for Federal Employees Nationwide

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
September 21, 2022

 

While President Biden was occupied Friday trying to take credit for a new factory for the production of semiconductors (and all the jobs – construction-related and otherwise – that he said it would create), a federal judge in Texas was issuing an injunction to put the second major piece of Biden’s vaccine mandate on ice.

After SCOTUS last week rejected the administration’s attempt to force corporations to abide by the mandate via OSHAa federal court in Texas has issued an injunction against Biden’s jab mandate for federal workers, the other part of his administration’s attempts to force vaccines on reluctant Americans –  a strategy that Biden has already abandoned in favor of providing at-home COVID tests to all Americans.

Biden issued both mandates by executive order back in September.

Trump-appointed Judge Jeffrey Brown of the US Court for the Southern District of Texas said the case was not about whether individuals should be vaccinated or even about federal power more broadly. Instead, he said it’s about “whether the president can, with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment,” Brown wrote.

“That, under the current state of the law as just recently expressed by the Supreme Court, is a bridge too far.”

The order that SCOTUS struck down last week would have mandated all private sector employers with more than 100 workers, as well as the US Postal Service, to test or vaccinated their employees.

The case against the mandate for federal workers was brought by Feds for Medical Freedom, which has filed three different lawsuits against the mandate, according to a report from Government Executive.

Most federal agencies have already started implementing the mandate requiring vaccination or testing, and some had already started ordering suspensions for workers who failed to meet the requirements.

This latest ruling will forestall (at least temporarily) those suspensions from moving forward. Although there’s still a possibility that the injunction granted could be overturned, given SCOTUS’s conservative majority and its previous ruling on the other federal vaccine mandate, any workers who were facing suspension can probably breath a sigh of relief.

 

Connect with ZeroHedge

cover image credit:  pixabay




La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide in Covid Vaccines, Self-Assemblies and MAC Addresses

La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide in Covid Vaccines, Self-Assemblies and MAC Addresses

 

Graphene oxide, self-assemblies, and MAC addresses

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 21, 2022

 

In an interview that La Quinta Columna gave for the Paraguayan channel La Bitácora, biostatistician Ricardo Delgado gave a brief but accurate explanation of the relationship between the self-assembling structures that he and his team have found in vaccination vials with graphene oxide and the generation of MAC addresses.

This explanation is especially good for those who have not yet caught up with the most recent discoveries the Spanish team has made to date.

Below, Orwell City brings the key excerpt.

Ricardo Delgado:

Self-assembly as a key player for materials nano-architectonics.” A 2019 article.

“The development of science and technology of advanced materials…” Such as graphene. “…using nano- and micro-scale units can be conducted by a novel concept involving the combination of nanotechnology methodology with various research disciplines, especially supramolecular chemistry.

The novel concept is called ‘nano-architectonics’ where self-assembly processes are crucial in many cases involving a wide range of component materials.”

That is… Let’s say, that the materials that go into the vaccine have some kind of “orders” of some chemical prevalence so that they have to self-assemble in a certain way. And then form these other more complex structures. But also, throughout the evolution of the days.

Do you understand now why they kept the samples in an apparently extremely cold environment and so on? It was precisely so that the hydrogel wouldn’t evaporate prematurely, and these certain formations would appear. It wasn’t to preserve the vaccine at -5 to -10 ºC. Everybody said “What a strange thing, isn’t it?” Now we understand everything.

Let’s take a look at the next publication. This is, well, yet another one that tells us about “MAC protocols for wireless nano-sensor networks: Performance analysis and design guidelines.” This goes in the same line. “Graphene nano-antennas supporting the terahertz frequency band make bit rates on the order of terabytes.”

Okay. Everything we’ve been advancing before. And the most worrisome thing. We have said that graphene is there precisely so that all that can work.

But of course, is that the side effect of introducing graphene inside the body is to multiply signals, as we already know. And when we study the toxicity that graphene has from the chemical point of view, we realize that it’s a blood clotting factor. It generates thrombi, thrombocytopenia…

Graphene is a superconductor, so it’ll go to places with the highest electrical conductivity in the body. The spinal cord is, practically, the central nervous system. It consists of the spinal cord and neurons in the brain. But also the heart, when its electrical activity increases. That’s to say, athletes make a special effort because they work with their tool, which is the heart. When there’s a greater amount of electricity or conductivity, graphene reaches the heart due to greater cardiac activity. Graphene will go there as a conductor to impregnate it. As it’s toxic it generates inflammations all over the parts where it occurs. Systemic or multi-organ inflammations, as those seen in COVID-19.

Then, precisely once it impregnates the heart, it generates, in the case of the myocardium, myocarditis. If it’s the pericardium, pericarditis. But in addition, graphene absorbs radiation and multiplies it, so it generates discharges. And a discharge in the heart generates an arrhythmia. And arrhythmias will have consequences such as fainting, syncope, collapses… Usually with cardiac arrest or sudden death, especially in athletes.

That’s what we’re seeing more and more. They’re arrhythmias camouflaged as infarction. Because infarction has a prodrome. There’s a forewarning. It doesn’t happen to an athlete. It hardly ever happens to an athlete. And yet we’re seeing, well, what we’re seeing absolutely all over the world. Weekends when a soccer player, a cyclist, etc., doesn’t die or collapse are rare.

But, as we have said, as far as the toxicity of graphene is concerned, it generates neurodegeneration. It’s a carcinogen. It triggers mutagenesis, chromosomal alteration… In other words, causes the cancer to skyrocket. This is something that we’re also seeing especially in vaccinated people. Keep in mind that we are talking about a toxic. And not declared in vaccines.

This is an aberration. It’s the side effect of introducing that technology, for which graphene had to be introduced as well. Graphene inside the body is attacked by the immune system as if it were a pathogen. Graphene oxide is the simile of the famous SARS-CoV-2 of the official version. Or non-existent SARS-CoV-2.

This means that when eliminated by the lung, graphene will irradiate them and trigger bilateral inflammations. These are the famous bilateral types of pneumonia.

And now, one very important thing, which is the last article I want to share before opening the Q&A. This one we have here. Precisely what it tells us is that graphene oxide —which is what we have found in the samples— is radiomodulable. Okay? Radiomodulable. Let’s take it out.

What does it mean that it’s radiomodulable? It means that the toxicity of the material depends on the amount of radiation dose it absorbs. Therefore, there may be a person who has been vaccinated and has no bad symptoms, or nothing has apparently happened to them. Except for the damage the chemical does. Even if the body can degrade it. However, another person in the same conditions, but who absorbs the radiation dose because he lives, for example, near a telephone antenna, absorbs that radiation, and begins to shoot the number of free radicals inside the body.

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna

Connect with Orwell City


Click here to see related articles featuring the work of La Quinta Columna

See related:

La Quinta Columna: Pfizer Vaccine Under a Microscope | Strange Structures & Their Movements




Get on the Bus: Join “Defeat the Mandates” March & Rally in Washington, DC –Roundtrip Buses Available From Multiple States

Get on the Bus: Join “Defeat the Mandates” March & Rally in Washington, DC –Roundtrip Buses Available From Multiple States

 

by Children’s Health Defense
January 21, 2022

 

Dear Friend,

It’s not too late to join us this Sunday in Washington, DC for the “Defeat the Mandates: An American Homecoming” march and rally to peacefully protest government mandates, vaccine passports and the loss of our fundamental rights.

Buses are available for same-day, roundtrip transportation to DC from multiple states – get on the bus and join us in DC!

Tens of thousands have already registered to be there for what is sure to be a historic event. Participants from all walks of life will be attending, regardless of political affiliation, race, ideology or vaccination status. We will gather to peacefully protest and march together in unity to restore democracy, reclaim our civil liberties and say NO to mandates.

Defeat the Mandates – Overview of Schedule

We will meet at the Washington Monument at 10:30 a.m. At 11:30 a.m., attendees will march peacefully from the Washington Monument to the Lincoln Memorial, approximately one mile, where the program will start around 12:30pm.

Speakers & Guests

Speaker highlights include Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Del Bigtree, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, Steve Kirsch, Dr. Christina Parks, Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Richard Urso, Attorney Tricia Lindsay, Kevin Jenkins, Rev. Aaron Lewis, Rabbi Epstein, Tramell Johnson, Jo Rose (Jo Speaks Truth), Lara Logan, Angela Stanton King, Chris Martenson, Kwame Brown, Trahern Crews, Operation Freedom of Choice, American Frontline Nurses, Airline Employees for Health Freedom and Feds for Medical Freedom.

JP Sears will emcee the event!

Musical performances will also be a part of the event with performances by Jimmy Levy and Hi-Rez the rapper, Five Times August, and Matt Brevner.

Organizers and sponsors of the event are Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, along with us at Children’s Health Defense, Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, Global Covid Summit, World Council for Health and JP Sears.

Helpful Reminders to Prepare for the March and Rally
  • It’s not too late to jump on the bus! Buses are available from a number of stops in New York and New Jersey for same-day, roundtrip transportation to Washington, D.C.
  • Dress for cold weather! Temperatures are expected to be in the 30s and the entire event is outdoors. Wear layers, warm clothing/socks/shoes and be sure to bring hats, gloves and scarfs!
  • As of January 15, 2022, Mayor Bowser enacted order 2021-148 for the District of Columbia that requires citywide vaccination proof to enter most indoor facilities including restaurants, coffee shops and hotels. And, the event permit only allows for two food trucks on premise and the crowd size will far exceed their capacity. We recommend you bring a thermos of tea or coffee, water bottles, a bagged lunch and snacks for the day or be prepared to travel 15-20 minutes into Virginia for food and lodging.
  • Mayor Bowser also enacted orders that require masks if outdoors in large group settings throughout the metro DC area. Please understand we are not suggesting you wear a mask but be prepared to be asked by local authorities and plan accordingly. A scarf around your face to protect you from the blustery cold may be helpful for many reasons.
  • The number in attendance is expected to be massive! If you’re further from the stage, you’ll have the opportunity to tune in to hear the speakers on your phone if service permits, or you may want to consider bringing a battery-powered radio to also tune in over a local radio station to hear the speakers.
  • If you see something, say something. This is a peaceful event. There will be no tolerance for anything other than peaceful participation. If you see anything concerning, please remain calm. Report any issues or suspicious activity immediately to the local law enforcement on hand, private security or event volunteers. A private security firm has been hired and is working hand-in-hand with the local DC Metro police to ensure this is a peaceful and successful event.
  • Mobile restrooms will be provided but with large crowds there could be long waits.
  • If traveling out that same afternoon, please be mindful of the large crowds and congestion and give yourself plenty of time to catch your bus or flight.
Can’t Join us in person? Tune in at CHD.TV

If you can’t join in person, tune in for live coverage of two key events on CHD.TV on Sunday. First, catch live coverage of “A Call to Europe” press conference (from 4-6am EST) followed by a rally (8:00-11:30 a.m. EST) in Belgium, Brussels. Live coverage of “Defeat the Mandates” in Washington, DC will begin at 12:30 p.m. EST.

Get Ready, Get Set: Tweet!

For those of you watching from home, be ready to make your voice heard in the twittersphere! All day Sunday, January 23, Tweet your elected representatives, public health institutions, SCOTUS Justices and all related groups who are enforcing mandates. Let them know you #DoNotComply and you want to #DefeatTheMandates

We are on the front lines of the most important battle in history. This is a battle to save our democracy, freedom and civil liberties from the totalitarian cartel that is trying to rob us of our inalienable rights.

This will be a historic event uniting everyone who wants to reclaim individual liberties, reinstate democratic principles and refuse to comply with un-American mandates. Please join us for “Defeat the Mandates: An American Homecoming” this Sunday  in Washington, D.C.

Thank you,
The Children’s Health Defense Team

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.




Bill Gates, Indian Government Targeted in Lawsuit Alleging AstraZeneca Vaccine Killed 23-Year-Old

Bill Gates, Indian Government Targeted in Lawsuit Alleging AstraZeneca Vaccine Killed 23-Year-Old
A lawsuit against Bill Gates, the Indian government and others, citing extensive case law, is attracting renewed scrutiny of Gates and his long-term, controversial involvement in India’s vaccine program.

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., The Defender
January 20, 2022

 

In what may be the first legal case of its kind globally, a petitioner in India is seeking to prosecute Bill Gates, Indian vaccine czar Adar Poonawalla, and Indian government and public health officials over the death of a 23-year-old man who died after receiving AstraZeneca’s Covishield vaccine.

Kiran Yadav late last year filed a criminal writ petition for murder, Smt. Kiran Yadav v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. (herein referred to as Yadav v. Maharashtra), with the Bombay High Court of Judicature, on behalf of her deceased son, Shri Hitesh Kadve.

Her son was vaccinated on Sept. 29, 2021. According to the complaint, he died that same day due to side effects brought on by the vaccine.

The complaint alleges Kadve died “due to [an] act of willful commission and omission attributable to some public servants who are misusing their position to bring policies to help the pharma mafia and thereby [are] responsible [for] mass murders.”

The complaint further states Yadav’s son was “unwillingly” compelled to get vaccinated based on the “false narrative” that the vaccine was entirely safe, and because the State of Maharashtra prohibited the non-vaccinated from riding on railroads or entering retail spaces such as shopping malls.

The complaint alleges Maharashtra’s restrictions “are against the Central Government’s policy that, there cannot be any discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated people.”

Other defendants in the case include the commissioner and director-general of the Maharashtra State Police, the Indian Central Bureau of Investigation and the principal secretary of the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

The complaint also brings charges against Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, CEO of the Serum Institute of India, the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer by number of doses produced and sold.

The Serum Institute produces the Covishield vaccine, as well as over half of the world’s vaccines that are administered to babies.

In all, Yadav is requesting 1,000 crores (10 billion rupees, or $134 million USD) in compensation, including 100 crores ($13.4 million USD) in interim compensation.

She is seeking lie detector and narcoanalysis tests from Gates, Poonawalla and others.

According to the complaint, the Indian government admitted the Covishield vaccine may have harmful, and potentially fatal, side effects, but the vaccine was administered despite this knowledge.

The complaint in Yadav v. Maharashtra was filed by attorneys Shivam Mehra and Siddhi Dhamnaskar of Mumbai, and appears to have first been publicized in English by the Indian Bar Association, an informal group of Indian lawyers (the Bar Council of India is the country’s official bar association).

Judges of the Supreme Court of India have generally adopted a pro-vaccine stance. Nevertheless, Yadav’s 265-page complaint stands out for the extensive legal precedent it draws upon, from Indian and common law, calling into question the legality of mandatory vaccination and other compelled medical acts.

The complaint also stands out for the specific allegations made against figures such as Poonawala and Gates, a figure of extensive controversy in India.

Extensive legal precedent casts doubt on legality of India’s mandatory vaccination policy

One of the main court rulings referenced in the Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint is that of Registrar General, High Court of Meghalaya v. State of Meghalaya (herein referred to as Meghalaya). The central finding of the ruling, issued June 23, 2021, held that vaccination by force or deception, or through the introduction of restrictions on the non-vaccinated, is a violation of fundamental human rights and a civil and criminal wrong.

This judgment overturned an order in the state of Meghalaya that required vendors, taxi drivers, shopkeepers and other individuals to get vaccinated before resuming or reopening their businesses.

In reference to this, the court held that while vaccination was “the need of the hour,” the vaccination policy of a welfare state “can never affect a major fundamental right, i.e. the right to life, personal liberty and livelihood.”

Referring to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the court in Meghalaya addressed the right to health, arguing that when such healthcare is provided through coercive means, it encroaches upon the fundamental right to privacy.

The court also drew from another Indian court ruling, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2018), which held the fundamental right to health is violated when individuals are deprived of their right to personal choice, bodily autonomy and integrity, and the overarching right to privacy.

The court in Meghalaya added:

“[V]accination by force or being made mandatory by adopting coercive methods, vitiates the very fundamental purpose of the welfare attached to it. It impinges on the fundamental right(s) as such, especially when it affects the right to means of livelihood which makes it possible for a person to live.

“Compulsory administration of a vaccine without hampering one’s right to life and liberty based on informed choice and informed consent is one thing. However, if any compulsory vaccination drive is coercive by its very nature and spirit, it assumes a different proportion and character.”

The court in Meghalaya also referenced English common law, specifically, the case of Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland (1993), a decision which held that if an unwilling adult is compelled to receive a flu vaccination through force, this action would amount to a crime and to a civil wrong.

Remarking on this, the Indian court found:

“[T]hus, coercive element of vaccination has, since the early phases of the initiation of vaccination as a preventive measure against several diseases, have been time and again not only discouraged but also consistently ruled against by the Courts for over more than a century.”

The court in Meghalaya also referred to Article 19 of the Indian Constitution regarding the “freedom to practice any profession or carry on any occupation, trade or business,” and that vaccine-related restrictions were “palpably excessive.”

The court added:

“In this case, there is a clear lack of legitimacy in prohibiting freedom of carrying on any occupation, trade or business amongst a certain category or class of citizens who are otherwise entitled to do so, making the notification/order ill-conceived, arbitrary and/or a colourable exercise of power.”

From an administrative point of view, the court in Meghalaya also found not only had the central Indian government not mandated vaccinations, instead holding that vaccination must remain voluntary, but there was no regulation or directive that allowed state governments to impose vaccination requirements within their own territory.

Yadav case draws upon extensive Indian legal precedent, scientific studies

The criminal complaint in Yadav v. Maharashtra also drew upon several other Indian court rulings, including recent COVID vaccines-related decisions such as Dinthar Incident v. State of Mizoram and Others (2021) and Madan Mili v. Union of India (2021).

These rulings found vaccinated individuals can also get infected with COVID and can spread infection, just as those who are unvaccinated, and accordingly, there cannot be any discrimination between those who are vaccinated or unvaccinated. Such discrimination would contravene Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Yadav v. Maharashtra also references the following cases and English common law:

“[A]ll adults with capacity to consent have the right of self-determination and autonomy. The said rights pave the way for the right to refuse medical treatment … [a] competent person who has come of age has the right to refuse specific treatment or all treatment or opt for an alternative treatment …

“The best interest of the patient shall override the State interest.”

“Restraining people who are yet to get vaccinated from opening institutions, organizations, factories, shops, etc., or denying them their livelihood by linking their employment … to their getting vaccinated would be illegal on the part of the State, if not unconstitutional.

“Such a measure would also trample upon the freedom of the individual to get vaccinated or choose not to do so.”

“An adult person of sound mind is entitled to decide which, if any, of the available forms of treatment to undergo, and her consent must be obtained before treatment interfering with her bodily integrity is undertaken.”

Yadav v. Maharashtra also references an Oct. 8, 2021, directive from Satyendra Singh, the undersecretary of the Indian Health Ministry, reaffirming that vaccination remains voluntary, that the Indian government “has not formulated or suggested any policies for discrimination between citizens of India on the basis of their vaccination status,” and that no citizen can be forced to be vaccinated.

The complaint also draws upon Indian legislation, specifically the Disaster Management Act of 2005, which holds that state governments cannot formulate any rules that contravene the guidelines of the national government. Nor can such prohibitions be circumvented indirectly, according to the Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint, referring to another Indian court case, Noida Entrepreneurs Association v. Noida (2011).

The complaint also refers to several clauses from UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights (2005), including:

  • Article 3 on human dignity and human rights, which holds that “[t]he interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
  • Article 6, which holds that “any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with… prior, free and informed consent.”
  • Article 8 on respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity.
  • Article 11, which states that “[n]o individual or group should be discriminated against or stigmatized on any grounds, in violation of human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

The complaint then goes on to name specific individuals, such as Venugopal G. Somani, the Drug Controller General of India, and Randeep Guleria of the All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), as individuals who participated in a “dishonesty and cheating campaign” and the “furtherance of [a] conspiracy,” by making the “false and misleading statement” that the COVID vaccines were completely safe.

The complaint accuses Somani and Guleria of following a “one-line agenda to give wrongful profit to the vaccine companies” and goes on to cite Indian case law holding that because “conspiracies are hatched on secrecy … no direct evidence is required to prove it. The offense can be proved from circumstantial evidences.”

A total of 81 research papers were also referenced in the complaint, addressing, among other issues, the higher protection those with natural immunity have against COVID, as opposed to those who are vaccinated, as well as the lower efficacy of the vaccines against variants such as Delta.

The vaccine-related death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat

The Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint references the case of Dr. Snehal Lunawat, an Indian doctor from Maharashtra who died March 1, 2021, from complications stemming from the Covishield vaccine he received on Jan. 28, 2021.

This incident gained visibility in India due to the efforts of Lunawat’s family to get an investigation launched regarding her death.

Lunawat, who was 33 years old, experienced a “rare blood-clotting event” after taking the Covishield vaccine.

Subsequently, her family wrote to the Indian government and the Serum Institute, requesting that Lunawat’s death be investigated, as it had not been registered as an adverse event in the country’s “Adverse Event Following Immunisation” (AEFI) database.

However, a satisfactory response was not provided, prompting the family to reach out to the World Health Organization (WHO), which then investigated the incident.

Ultimately, due to the family’s pressure and the intervention of the WHO and the All India Drugs Network, the AEFI committee accepted on Sept. 25, 2021, after nearly seven months, that Lunawat’s death was vaccine-related.

Specifically, the rare blood clotting complication resulted in her blood platelet count decreasing because of increased bleeding in her brain.

This was only the third vaccine-induced death recognized by AEFI. The process of reporting vaccine-related deaths to the AEFI database is reportedly “not easy.”

The Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint refers to Lunawat’s death, and its subsequent classification as vaccine-related, as “ex facie” evidence of the “falsity of claims by the … accused officials and doctors” regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines

#ArrestBillGates: Controversy, legal battles in India surrounding Gates and his foundation

The Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint makes extensive references to Bill Gates, who is described as a “habitual offender of mass murder by vaccination in conspiracy with Government officials.”

Gates is also referred to as a “mastermind … who is manufacturing ‘Covishield’ in partnership with [the] Serum Institute.”

The complaint seeks lie detector, brain mapping and narcoanalysis tests of Gates, Poonawalla and others to “unearth the complete conspiracy,” and demands the registration of a “first information report” (FIR) against individuals who marketed the vaccines as completely safe.

The request for Gates and others to undergo narcoanalysis tests is considered perplexing by some analysts, as such tests are not legally admissible in Indian courts, as the person being interrogated is in a state of semi-consciousness.

The complaint argues Gates and Poonawalla should be considered “co-conspirators to mass murder” who were “working for the welfare of the vaccine companies only,” charges which would result in them facing the death penalty and confiscation of their assets in India.

The complaint notes that under Indian law, one can be found guilty for false marketing of a product via “commission and omission.”

The complaint also references the activity of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) in India, including its alleged encouragement of a partnership between AstraZeneca and Oxford University to develop the Covishield vaccine, which was then delivered to countries such as India.

The BMGF is also noted to have previously committed, in June 2020, $750 million towards the development of the AstraZeneca vaccine at Oxford University, and conditional funding of $150 million to the Serum Institute.

In a posting on his official blog in December 2020, Gates wrote that his foundation “took on some of the financial risk” for the vaccine, so that if the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was not approved, the Serum Institute “won’t have to take a full loss.”

The Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint references prior court rulings against Gates and the BMGF in India. One such example is an Indian Supreme Court ruling in Kalpana Mehta v. Union of India (2018) regarding the death of eight female children who took part in an unauthorized trial of two Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: Gardasil, manufactured by Merck, and Cervarix, produced by GlaxoSmithKine (GSK).

The trial, which began in 2009, took place in two Indian states, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat. It was carried out by an American NGO, the Seattle-based Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), which is connected to the BMGF’s Children’s Vaccine Program.

In reference to these deaths, the Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint refers to a report by an Indian parliamentary committee that found government officials were “involved in the conspiracy,” along with a recommendation that the BMGF and other NGOs associated with Gates be investigated.

According to the complaint, “the evidentiary value” of the report was upheld in the Kalpana Mehta v. Union of India case.

The controversy over the deaths that resulted from the HPV vaccine trial led to a grassroots campaign in India in May 2021, calling for Gates and his foundation to be charged for these deaths, as they had funded the vaccination program.

The #ArrestBillGates hashtag trended on Indian Twitter that month as a result of this campaign, accusing Gates and his organization of using the girls as “guinea pigs.”

Parental consent was in many cases not obtained for the participation of the girls in the trial, which involved 14,000 tribal girls between the ages of 10 and 14, many of whom lived not with their parents but in government-run hostels.

In some instances, parental ‘consent’ consisted of a thumbprint impression from the girls’ poor and illiterate parents, while for many girls, no consent forms whatsoever could be located.

Symptoms the girls experienced included epileptic seizures, early onset of menstruation, heavy bleeding, severe menstrual cramps, severe stomach aches, headaches and mood swings.

An Indian government investigation concluded the girls’ deaths were unconnected to the vaccination, but ethical and regulatory failings in the vaccine trial were discovered, which resulted in the BMGF being restricted from the country’s vaccination program in 2013.

Despite this, the foundation continued to work with the Indian Health Ministry via the latter’s Immunization Technical Support Unit (ITSU).

Nevertheless, the investigative committee’s conclusion that the deaths were not vaccine-related, but instead due to such causes as suicide, accidental drowning, malaria, viral infections and subarachnoid hemorrhage, did not go unquestioned.

Representatives of the Sama Women’s Health NGO visited one of the affected regions, Khammam, in March 2010, on a fact-finding mission. As reported by India’s Economic Times, the Sama report found “HPV vaccine as a possible, if not probable, cause of suicidal ideation cannot be ruled out” for the girls’ deaths.

The Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint also calls out the activities of Gates and the BMGF with regard to the administration of polio vaccines in India, funded by the BMGF to the tune of $450 million.

The program foresaw the administration of 50 doses of the vaccine to children below the age of five, via overlapping vaccination programs.

This campaign was blamed for “a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children [in India] beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017.”

In 2017, Gates’ involvement in the polio vaccine campaign was “dialed back.” Following this, “NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.”

As detailed in a scientific study published in 2012:

“Nationally, the non-polio AFP rate is now 12 times higher than expected. In the states of Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Bihar, which have pulse polio rounds nearly every month, the non-polio AFP rate is 25- and 35-fold higher than the international norms … children who were identified with non-polio AFP were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.

“The international incidence of non-polio AFP is said to be 1 to 2/100,000 in the populations under 15 … In 2011, an additional 47,500 children were newly paralyzed in the year, over and above the standard 2/100,000 non-polio AFP that is generally accepted as the norm … [t]his large excess in the incidence of paralysis was not investigated as a possible signal, nor was any effort made to try and study the mechanism for this spurt in non-polio AFP.

“From India’s perspective the exercise has been extremely costly both in terms of human suffering and in monetary terms. It is tempting to speculate what could have been achieved if the $2.5 billion spent on attempting to eradicate polio were spent on water and sanitation and routine immunization.”

The specific vaccine administered to Indian children was the oral polio vaccine. As of Jan. 1, 2000, the CDC withdrew this vaccine from immunization schedules except in “special circumstances,” as the oral vaccine was itself found to be causing polio.

Nevertheless, Gates had reportedly hired a well-known Indian actor, Amitabh Bachchan, to promote the oral polio vaccine via a series of television advertisements.

Gates, Poonawalla at the center of vaccine controversy in India

India has stood out among most of the world’s countries by not offering blanket immunity to manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines.

In 2021, the Indian government’s negotiations with Pfizer fell through when Indian regulators refused to provide it legal protection via indemnity.

Such protection was not provided to the three COVID-19 vaccines that received an emergency use authorization in India: Covishield, Covaxin and Sputnik V.

This did not occur without dissent, however. Poonawalla, as head of the India-based Serum Institute, had called for protection from lawsuits for COVID vaccine injuries.

The Yadav v. Maharashtra complaint describes Poonawalla and other personnel of the Serum Institute, which manufactures the Covishield vaccine, as “complicit” in Kadve’s death, and as “habitual offenders of earning profits by selling vaccines with death-causing side effects,” placing them “in the category of mass murderers.”

However, the controversy over Gates’ and Poonawalla’s vaccine-related work in India spans beyond the Yadav v. Maharashtra case.

In April 2021, for instance, Gates and the BMGF received criticism for their refusal to share COVID-19 vaccine technologies with India and other developing countries.

This criticism prompted the CEO of the BMGF, Mark Suzman, to reverse course and support a temporary waiver on vaccine-related intellectual property.

In 2006, the BMGF co-founded, with the Indian government, the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) as a public-private partnership. The PHFI is funded, in part, by pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer and Merck.

The PHFI has also been active in producing research related to COVID-19, with at least one such study, titled “Impact of Crop Diversity on Dietary Diversity among Farmers in India during the COVID-19,” also crossing over into the agricultural realm.

In Gates’ aforementioned Nov. 2019 visit to India, he heaped praise on three Indian vaccine manufacturers, including the Serum Institute.

But Gates’ connection to the Serum Institute goes beyond verbal praise. Since November 2012, the Serum Institute has been the recipient of BMGF grants — in that initial instance for the development of an HPV vaccine. Gates toured the Serum Institute earlier that year.

The Serum Institute received a $4 million grant from the BMGF in October 2020 to support research and development as part of the COVID-19 response, while in August 2020, the Serum Institute, in partnership with the BMGF and GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance, agreed to produce up to 100 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines for low- and middle-income countries.

Also known as the “Vaccine Alliance,” GAVI proclaims a mission to “save lives and protect people’s health,” and states it “helps vaccinate almost half the world’s children against deadly and debilitating infectious diseases.”

GAVI was established in 1999, with the BMGF as one of its co-founders and one of its four permanent board members.

GAVI then goes on to describe its core partnership with various international organizations, including the WHO, UNICEF, the World Bank and the BMGF.

As previously reported by The Defender, GAVI, through its INFUSE initiative, has called for “innovations that leverage new technologies to modernize the process of identifying and registering the children who are most in need of life-saving vaccines.”

GAVI also closely collaborates with the ID2020 Alliance, founded in 2016, which claims to advocate in favor of “ethical, privacy-protecting approaches to digital ID,” adding that “doing digital ID right means protecting civil liberties.

Microsoft is a founding member of the ID2020 alliance (in 2018) and appears to partner with it, while Kim Gagné, ID2020’s board chairman, is a former Microsoft executive.

Controversy has surrounded GAVI’s activity in India. GAVI, along with the PHFI and the BMGF, have promoted the Pentavalent vaccine, which combines five vaccines – diphtheria, hepatitis B, tetanus, whooping cough, and haemophilus influenza type B (which causes pneumonia and meningitis) – into one.

The Indian Health Ministry found the deaths of three infants in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu to have had “a consistent causal association to immunization” — that is, to the Pentavalent vaccine, while in total, 54 infant deaths were classified with the AEFI as adverse reaction deaths.

GAVI provided a $165 million grant in August 2009 for the phased introduction of Pentavalent in India, in addition to subsidizing each injection for five years thereafter.

Regulatory capture and a “revolving door” between the Indian government and GAVI also appears to exist, as in the example of Anuradha Gupta, formerly an official with the Indian Health Ministry and director of the National Health Mission. Gupta in 2014 was named deputy CEO of GAVI, and remains in the position to this day.

Gates involved in controversial digital ID schemes in India

In 2009, the Indian government launched a national digital identification card system known as Aadhaar, now the world’s largest biometric identification system.

The Aadhaar Card contains biometric and demographic data and provides individuals with a unique 12-digit identity number, though it is in and of itself not considered proof of Indian citizenship, just of Indian residence.

The Aadhaar identification number was linked with numerous public and private services, including the opening of bank accounts, verification of electoral identity, filing income tax returns, making digital payments, receiving government pensions, subsidies and welfare payments and registration of mobile SIM cards.

Aadhaar has generated controversy in India, such as over the government’s plans to link it to the national voter database.

And in 2017, it was reported that HIV patients in India were being coerced into submitting their Aadhaar number, leading them to drop out of treatment programs due to privacy concerns.

Chinese hackers also reportedly targeted the Aadhaar database.

Aadhaar also was at the center of legal controversy. A 2013 ruling by the Indian Supreme Court found no person should be denied government services, benefits or subsidies for not possessing the Aadhaar card.

A subsequent Supreme Court ruling in 2018 upheld the constitutionality of the Aadhaar system, but found it cannot be made mandatory for use by private organizations, such as banks or mobile providers.

Civil society groups in India, such as the Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties, expressed opposition to Aadhaar on the basis of privacy concerns. The National Advisory Council and the Central Employment Guarantee Council of India opposed Aadhaar “on the grounds of civil liberties.”

Nevertheless, Gates, on his personal blog, praised Aadhaar — describing it as “a valuable platform for delivering social welfare programs and other government services” — and Nandan Nilekani, who developed the Aadhaar system and who now works with the World Bank Group to help other countries develop similar schemes.

Gates also dismissed privacy concerns surrounding Aadhaar, stating that “Aadhaar in itself doesn’t pose any privacy issue because it’s just a bio ID verification scheme,” adding that “We [the BMGF] have funded the World Bank to take this Aadhaar approach to other countries.”

In 2020, the Indian government announced the launch of the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission, a system that would complement Aadhaar by providing a unique digital health ID to all citizens and that would be linked to their personal health records.

The program was initially trialed in six Indian regions and was launched nationally on Sept. 27, 2021. As of Nov. 2021, 96% of Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission users were linked with Aadhaar.

The launch earned Gates’ praise. He tweeted congratulations to Indian President Modi, stating the program “will help ensure equitable, accessible healthcare delivery and accelerate progress on India’s health goals.”

Notably, in October 2021, the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission received a $350,690 grant from the BMGF to support its “rollout and strengthening,” raising concerns have been raised regarding privacy, informed consent and data leakage.

Freedom of information requests revealed that Indian authorities generated health IDs for individuals who provided their Aadhaar number when receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, enrolling them in the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission without informed consent.

 

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., is an independent journalist and researcher based in Athens, Greece.

 

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

 


See related:

Yohan Tengra Exposes the Public Health Mafia in India




British Medical Journal: ‘Pharma Must Release of All Vaccine and Treatment Data Immediately’

British Medical Journal: ‘Pharma Must Release of All Vaccine and Treatment Data Immediately’

by 21st Century News
January 20, 2022

 

The British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the world’s oldest and most prestigious medical journals, has now called for the full and immediate release of all data relating to the COVID-19 experimental vaccines and treatments. According to the BMJ, ‘Data should be fully and immediately available for public scrutiny.’

Will the pharmaceutical cartel members Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and others, along with their allies in government regulatory bodies like the FDA comply with this crucial request? 

BMJ reports…

In the pages of The BMJ a decade ago, in the middle of a different pandemic, it came to light that governments around the world had spent billions stockpiling antivirals for influenza that had not been shown to reduce the risk of complications, hospital admissions, or death. The majority of trials that underpinned regulatory approval and government stockpiling of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) were sponsored by the manufacturer; most were unpublished, those that were published were ghostwritten by writers paid by the manufacturer, the people listed as principal authors lacked access to the raw data, and academics who requested access to the data for independent analysis were denied.1234

The Tamiflu saga heralded a decade of unprecedented attention to the importance of sharing clinical trial data.56 Public battles for drug company data,78 transparency campaigns with thousands of signatures,910 strengthened journal data sharing requirements,1112 explicit commitments from companies to share data,13 new data access website portals,8 and landmark transparency policies from medicines regulators1415 all promised a new era in data transparency.

Progress was made, but clearly not enough. The errors of the last pandemic are being repeated. Memories are short. Today, despite the global rollout of covid-19 vaccines and treatments, the anonymised participant level data underlying the trials for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors, researchers, and the public—and are likely to remain that way for years to come.16 This is morally indefensible for all trials, but especially for those involving major public health interventions.

Unacceptable delay

Pfizer’s pivotal covid vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.17 And Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, 24 months after the primary study completion date, which is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as 15 May 2023 (NCT04368728).

The lack of access to data is consistent across vaccine manufacturers.16 Moderna says data “may be available … with publication of the final study results in 2022.”18 Datasets will be available “upon request and subject to review once the trial is complete,” which has an estimated primary completion date of 27 October 2022 (NCT04470427).

As of 31 December 2021, AstraZeneca may be ready to entertain requests for data from several of its large phase III trials.19 But actually obtaining data could be slow going. As its website explains, “timelines vary per request and can take up to a year upon full submission of the request.”20

Underlying data for covid-19 therapeutics are similarly hard to find. Published reports of Regeneron’s phase III trial of its monoclonal antibody therapy REGEN-COV flatly state that participant level data will not be made available to others.21 Should the drug be approved (and not just emergency authorised), sharing “will be considered.” For remdesivir, the US National Institutes of Health, which funded the trial, created a new portal to share data (https://accessclinicaldata.niaid.nih.gov/), but the dataset on offer is limited. An accompanying document explains: “The longitudinal data set only contains a small subset of the protocol and statistical analysis plan objectives.”

We are left with publications but no access to the underlying data on reasonable request. This is worrying for trial participants, researchers, clinicians, journal editors, policy makers, and the public. The journals that have published these primary studies may argue that they faced an awkward dilemma, caught between making the summary findings available quickly and upholding the best ethical values that support timely access to underlying data. In our view, there is no dilemma; the anonymised individual participant data from clinical trials must be made available for independent scrutiny.

Journal editors, systematic reviewers, and the writers of clinical practice guideline generally obtain little beyond a journal publication, but regulatory agencies receive far more granular data as part of the regulatory review process. In the words of the European Medicine Agency’s former executive director and senior medical officer, “relying solely on the publications of clinical trials in scientific journals as the basis of healthcare decisions is not a good idea … Drug regulators have been aware of this limitation for a long time and routinely obtain and assess the full documentation (rather than just publications).”22

Among regulators, the US Food and Drug Administration is believed to receive the most raw data but does not proactively release them. After a freedom of information request to the agency for Pfizer’s vaccine data, the FDA offered to release 500 pages a month, a process that would take decades to complete, arguing in court that publicly releasing data was slow owing to the need to first redact sensitive information.23 This month, however, a judge rejected the FDA’s offer and ordered the data be released at a rate of 55 000 pages a month. The data are to be made available on the requesting organisation’s website (phmpt.org).

In releasing thousands of pages of clinical trial documents, Health Canada and the EMA have also provided a degree of transparency that deserves acknowledgment.2425 Until recently, however, the data remained of limited utility, with copious redactions aimed at protecting trial blinding. But study reports with fewer redactions have been available since September 2021,2425 and missing appendices may be accessible through freedom of information requests.

Even so, anyone looking for participant level datasets may be disappointed because Health Canada and the EMA do not receive or analyse these data, and it remains to be seen how the FDA responds to the court order. Moreover, the FDA is producing data only for Pfizer’s vaccine; other manufacturers’ data cannot be requested until the vaccines are approved, which the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are not. Industry, which holds the raw data, is not legally required to honour requests for access from independent researchers.

Like the FDA, and unlike its Canadian and European counterparts, the UK’s regulator—the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency—does not proactively release clinical trial documents, and it has also stopped posting information released in response to freedom of information requests on its website.26

Transparency and trust

As well as access to the underlying data, transparent decision making is essential. Regulators and public health bodies could release details 27 such as why vaccine trials were not designed to test efficacy against infection and spread of SARS-CoV-2.28  Had regulators insisted on this outcome, countries would have learnt sooner about the effect of vaccines on transmission and been able to plan accordingly.29

Big pharma is the least trusted industry.30 At least three of the many companies making covid-19 vaccines have past criminal and civil settlements costing them billions of dollars.31 One pleaded guilty to fraud.31 Other companies have no pre-covid track record. Now the covid pandemic has minted many new pharma billionaires 32, and vaccine manufacturers have reported tens of billions in revenue…

Continue this article at the BMJ

 

Connect with 21st Century Wire




Christine Massey: An Open Letter to Dr. Mercola in Response to His Claim That SARS-CoV-2 Has Been Isolated

Christine Massey: An Open Letter to Dr. Mercola in Response to His Claim That SARS-CoV-2 Has Been Isolated

 

[Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: On January 17 when this article was first published, a live link to Dr. Mercola’s article could still be found at his site. Due to attacks from mainstream media, his articles only remain open for public view for 48 hours. It is now available behind a paywall at his archived site. However, you can find a copy here or at many other websites and blogs that reposted the original. ]

 

This image is a screenshot from Dr. Mercola’s article which is now found in his archives and at many other websites and blogs.

 

Open Letter to Dr. Mercola January 17, 2022

by Christine Massey, M.Sc., Flouride Free Peel
January 17, 2022

 

Hi Dr. Mercola,

You’ve published an blog titled “Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is a Real Virus“.

One of the sources you relied most heavily on for this claim is a recent blog by Steve Kirsch, which is really interesting because in that blog Steve admitted right off the top that he actually has no idea whether or not the alleged virus has even been isolated and that he relies on other people’s opinions.

I wrote an educational Open Letter to Steve Kirsch in response to that blog and strongly suggest you and your readers review it.

Now in your blog you state that: “SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, photographed, genetically sequenced, and exists as a pathogenic entity.

I hope we can agree that a specific thing must be known to exist in order to know that “it” is pathogenic. Not believed, imagined, assumed, or wanted to exist, but known. Because otherwise it’s impossible to establish even a correlation, let alone prove causation of anything.

Yet nowhere in your blog did you present or cite any proof that that the alleged RNA genome of 30,000 base pairs surrounded by a spikey protein shell actually exists.

I’ll briefly review some of the sources you’ve cited to explain why I say this.

You start out with a video that features Jeremy Hammond insisting that “the virus” is real, has been isolated, and is a necessary factor in “COVID-19”.

(For the record, I had an extensive email exchange with Jeremy on this topic, between October 25 and November 14, 2020. I encourage you and your readers to review it.)

In this video, Jeremy made bold claims indeed. But despite stating that the “virus” existence issue is “probably” his “biggest pet peeve“, he came to this interview armed with zero sources showing that the alleged virus does exist. In fact Jeremy cited no studies of any kind. Just unsubstantiated claims, and reliance on the beliefs of others. They could do this, they could do that. They can’t do this, they can’t do that. So-and-so says this, so-and-so says that.

Instead, Jeremy insisted that the following is the “gold standard” for “isolation” of a disease spreading “virus”: irrational and unscientific interpretation of cytopathic effects in a cell culture – typically malnourished monkey kidney cells to which toxic drugs have been added, and further contamination in the form of fetal bovine serum is added as food for the cells, along with a patient sample (not a purified sample of anything).

This, in Jeremy’s mind, establishes the existence and presence of a virus. Which is why he’d make a great virologist. Jeremy doesn’t think like a scientist, and as I always point out, “virology is not a science“.

And Jeremy lied through his teeth when he went along with the naïve (I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt) comment from his interviewer that virologists then pull “the virus” from the cell culture. “It really is that simple.” (I challenge Jeremy or you, Dr. Mercola, to cite any study where a specific thing was “pulled”, even from a monkey/cow/human mixture aka cell culture, and shown scientifically to be a disease-spreading “virus”.)

And according to Jeremy, we just “know” what “coronaviruses” look like, despite the fact that no specific thing alleged to be a “coronavirus” has ever been purified from any patient sample (or even from a cell culture) so that it could be studied logically and scientifically. Who needs science? We just know these things.

Jeremy insists that the CDC has isolated “SARS-COV-2”. Well, yes they have according to the meaningless, antiscientific approach to “isolation” used by Jeremy and virologists.

But did the CDC researchers apply even a modicum of logic or scientific method and actually establish the existence of the alleged virus? That’s an entirely different matter and the answer is a resounding “No”.

The CDC’s “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study is just another example of the typical fraudulent monkey business (literally) that plagues our world. I have addressed the CDC’s study previously, and will address this same issue of virology’s blatantly bogus “isolation” methods below.

Jeremy carried on with more bizarre claims: that scientists never isolate/purify anything, and don’t have the technology to purify things like alleged viruses.

Jeremy also strangely implied that people (such as myself) who say that proof of a disease-spreading “virus” requires purification actually demand that the alleged virus be floating in a vacuum.

Dr. Mercola, I’ve been involved in this issue for almost 2 years now and don’t know a single man or woman who defines isolation/purification as “floating in a vacuum“.

And I make explicitly clear in my Freedom of Information requests that this is not how I define isolation/purification. Below is a screenshot from a recent FOIA request to the CDC. They have no records, like all 164 other institutions in roughly 30 countries, that have been asked by people around the world. No one on the planet has purified a sample of the alleged “virus” from a disease human, or knows of anyone who has, even though supposedly millions and millions of people are infected and spewing this “virus” every time they breath.

And no, contrary to Jeremy’s claim, it is not people such as Dr. Andrew Kaufman, or Jon Rappoport, or Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey, who bizarrely redefined the word “isolation”. It’s virologists who redefined it, to mean mixing various complicated substances together and drawing wild conclusions – quite the opposite of its historical meaning.

It’s funny how everyone knows that “isolate” means “separate” when it comes to isolating humans and the “confusion” only arises when it comes to theoretical “viruses”. And how a virologist’s use of the word “isolate” gives the impression of legitimate science when nothing could be further from the truth.

Dr. Mercola, I couldn’t help but notice the unicorn in the background over the shoulder of Jeremy’s interviewer. Was this video inserted into your blog as someone’s idea of a joke? I mean, these people proved a virus no more than a unicorn, and unicorns are a popular analogy for imaginary viruses these days, thanks to Dr. Tom Cowan, and I can’t for the life of me imagine why you would have purposely included this video when it’s completely useless to anyone looking for proof of a virus.

 

And no Dr. Mercola, we are not confused. We’re quite familiar with what virologists have been getting away with.

As distressing as it is to do so, since you have chosen to rehash Steve Kirsch’s summary of the curious “science” of Sabine Hazan, I will briefly address it once again, here, as I did in my educational Open Letter to Steve.

To put it bluntly, Sabine Hazan’s study is 100% useless and fraudulent. The RNA used in her “sequencing” was a genetic soup from various sources, including patients, and not shown to involve any alleged “virus”.

She fabricated meaningless codes on a computer that have never been shown to correspond to anything in the physical realm and falsely passed these off a “viral genomes”.

Sabine compared her meaningless “sequencing” results to the results of her utterly meaningless and fraudulent PCR tests (that she is quite secretive about, at least with me) that also have never been shown to have anything to do with a “virus”.

Sabine comes unhinged when directly challenged on the validity of her so-called “science”. I encourage your readers to try this themselves and see what happens (and send me the results at cmssyc@gmail.com).

Dr. Mercola, I also already addressed ATCC’s very expensive and fraudulent “virus” product that you are now promoting as well, in my educational Open Letter to Steve Kirsch. Please be sure to review that section. It includes a  Buyer Beware! from Dr. Saeed A. Qureshi, PhD, who spent 30+ years as a scientist (as opposed to a virologist) with Health Canada.

Dr. Mercola, I challenge you to track down the origin and contents of any ATCC “SARS-COV-2” product, as I did last year for the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” that is referred to as “MUC-IMB1” aka “BavPat1” and sold by companies like EVA for 2 000,00 € per vial, and report back to your readers what you learn. Report the detailed methods that were used to allegedly verify that the product contains any disease-causing “virus” whatsoever.

Regarding your claim that “Germ Theory and Terrain Theory Both Have Merit”, can you prove with science that virology has any merit whatsoever?

Please prove the existence of a specific physical thing alleged to be a disease-spreading “COVID-19 virus/variant” aka “SARS-COV-2” and prove that that specific thing spreads disease from host to host via natural modes of exposure in animals or humans.

I challenge you to publish a study proving that such a thing exists. Show with science that only subjects that are exposed to that specific thing get “COVID-19” respiratory disease, as claimed by Jeremy, whose wild unsubstantiated claims you are now disseminating.

Dr. Mercola, as evidence that “the virus” has been isolated and sequenced, you are citing studies that rely in part on PCR “tests”. Without bothering to go into all the well documented fatal flaws with these so-called tests, a little logic is in order.

  1. It is impossible to validate any “test” without a gold standard.
  2. It is impossible to validate any “test” claimed to “confirm” the presence of a “virus” (or a “viral infection”) before the alleged “virus” has been proven to exist.
  3. It is impossible to validate any “test” claimed to “confirm” a “viral disease” before the alleged “virus” has been a) proven to exist and b) proven to cause the disease.

Obviously an indirect test for a “virus” cannot logically be used to prove the existence of the alleged “virus”. The test is what it is. In the case of PCR, in the very best case scenario, it is evidence of the presence of the very tiny target genetic sequence. Nothing more. Not a virus, not a genome, just a tiny little sequence.

And cytopathic effects on a cell culture, any cell culture, are just that – effectsAn effect is not the cause of the effect. And wild assumptions about the cause of the effect are just that – wild assumptions, not science. This is especially true when the cells in question have been malnourished by lowering the level of food for the cells (typically fetal bovine serum) and poisoning the cells with toxic drugs.

Dr. Mercola, I am shocked that you actually published this quote from the sketchy, brief Letter from Italy that you cited, as evidence that a “virus” has been sequenced:

“[Vero E6 aka monkey kidney] Cell culture supernatants from passage 1 (P1) of four isolates were collected, and RNA was extracted…”

First of all, as you seem to understand and as should be clear by now, “isolates” do not mean purified, isolated specimens in virology. Quite the opposite. In the case of “SARS-COV-2” studies, they are monkey/cow/human mixtures. And the authors are telling you in plain language that they extracted the RNA from the cell culture supernatants. Not from a purified specimen of an alleged virus.

These authors are telling the world that they have a soup of genetic material, and are going to concoct on their computer a so-called “viral genome” out of the zillions of sequences that they (kinda, maybe, sorta) detect therein. Because this is virology, not science.

Do we really need to discuss this any further?

Dr. Mercola, fabricated “genomes”, meaningless, impossible-to-validate PCR “tests”, wild assumptions about the cause of effects on a malnourished/poisoned cell line, and arrows added to EM images and pointing at particles that were never purified, never sequenced, never characterized, never studied with controlled experiments does not add up to science.

Virology is not a science.

Dr. Mercola, it is very distressing to see you promoting blatant pseudoscience that has been used for decades to fool and coerce people around the world in myriad ways, not limited to the utterly useless and harmful injections that have fraudulently been passed off as “immunizations”.

Every time you (or someone like Peter McCullough) do this, people such as myself have to spend hours clearing up all the confusion you have caused with the public.

You need to do your due diligence, find and share the “missing” scientific proof of viruses, or retract your blog, apologize to your readers, and get on the right side of history. You’ve had 2 years already to figure this out.

Hopefully the public will soon tire of relying on “experts” and simply read the ridiculous “virus isolation” studies for themselves. When that happens, this pseudoscience (which is really too generous a word) is finished forever.

 

Best wishes,
Christine Massey, M.Sc.
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Pdf of my Jan. 18, 2022 email to Dr. Mercola:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Open-Letter-to-Dr.-Mercola-January-17-2022.pdf

 

Connect with Christine Massey, M.Sc.


See related:

156 Responses From 25 Countries: FOI Requests Affirm That No Record of SARS-Cov-2 Isolation Exists Anywhere

Virus Isolation…Is It Real? Andrew Kaufman, MD Responds to Jeremy Hammond

The Non-Existent Virus; an Explosive Interview With Christine Massey

Christine Massey Interviewed by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: On FOIA Requests & Responses to the Question — Has SARS-CoV-2 Ever Been Isolated? Does the “Virus” Exist?




How Anthony Fauci Controls Science Globally

How Anthony Fauci Controls Science Globally

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
January 20, 2022

 



STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. succinctly summarizes how Dr. Anthony Fauci wields his power to control and manipulate science across the globe
  • It’s Fauci’s job to conduct research on chronic diseases to figure out their etiology and environmental causes to protect public health, but instead he turned the NIAID into an incubator for pharmaceuticals
  • Fauci has a $7.6 billion annual budget that he uses to develop new drugs, which he then farms out to universities
  • Fauci’s control — in collusion with that of Bill Gates — has rendered the majority of global scientific research nothing more than pharmaceutical propaganda
  • Fauci shares drug patents with universities, sells them to drug companies, splits the patents with them, and walks those drugs through the FDA approval process, which he also controls; once approved, Fauci himself often profits

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. succinctly summarizes how Dr. Anthony Fauci wields his power to control and manipulate science in this riveting episode of The Jimmy Dore Show.1 Fauci has been painted as a hero throughout the pandemic, an image that is not only misleading but wildly inaccurate, as detailed in Kennedy’s best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.”

“I wrote the book because so many Americans were looking at Tony Fauci as this kind of savior,” Kennedy said. “… [T]he man on the white horse, or in the white lab coat, that would ride us out of this coronavirus crises but I knew from the beginning … that he does not do public health and has not done public health since the 1980s.” 2 , 3

Rather than looking out for public health, Fauci and his agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), prioritize pharmaceutical promotion. Kennedy refers to Fauci as the “leader of the pack” when it comes to those promoting pharmaceutical products, profiteering from Big Pharma and promoting their own personal power.

Public Health Plummeted During Fauci’s Reign

In 1984, when Fauci was appointed director of NIAID, 11.8% of Americans had chronic disease, but this has risen sharply since.4 Fauci doesn’t talk about this public health failure — at least not publicly — but as Kennedy noted, it was Fauci’s job to figure out why cases of autism, food allergies, ADHD, sleep disorders, juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and many other chronic and infectious diseases have skyrocketed.

It was Fauci’s job to conduct research on these diseases to figure out their etiology and environmental causes to protect public health, but instead he turned the NIAID into an incubator for pharmaceuticals. According to Kennedy:5

“When Tony Fauci came in, 6% of American children had chronic disease. By 2006, 54% had it. We went from being the healthiest country in the world with the healthiest children to the sickest. Literally, we do not even qualify as a developed nation. We are 79th in the world, behind Nicaragua and Costa Rica in terms of our health outcomes.

And why did that happen? Well, the one figure who is more responsible for that than anybody else in the world is Tony Fauci. He is the reason we take more pharmaceutical drugs than any other nation in the world. Three times the average among western countries. We pay the highest prices and have the worst outcomes.”

Fauci’s Multibillion-Dollar Budget Gives Him Immense Power

Fauci has a $7.6 billion annual budget, which in total during his entire tenure is more than half a trillion dollars that he’s been in control of. Instead of using that to reveal the environmental issues leading to outbreaks of chronic disease, he uses the money to develop new drugs, Kennedy explains, which he then farms out to universities:6

“He shares the patents with them, and then he sells them to the drug companies, splits the patents with them, and he walks those drugs through the FDA approval process, which he completely controls from the bottom up. And then he gets them approved and in many cases he himself profits. People within his agency can collect $150,000 a year from royalties off each of these products.”

The NIH owns half the patent for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection, which means that it stands to make billions of dollars as a result. Four of Fauci’s top deputies will also collect $150,000 a year for life as a result — from a product they’re responsible for regulating, an obvious massive conflict of interests.

“The mercantile and commercial interests have overwhelmed the regulatory function at that agency and it no longer does public health — it does pharmaceutical promotion,” Kennedy said.7 As an example, between 2009 and 2016 there were 240 new drugs approved by the FDA, all of which came out of Fauci’s “shop,” he added. “He is the incubator for the whole pharmaceutical industry.”8

How Fauci Controls Science Globally

Fauci has spread the notion that he is untouchable, going so far as to tell MSNBC that an attack on him is an attack on science:9

“It’s very dangerous … because a lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science.”

Throughout the pandemic, “trusting the science” has become a cultural statement and propaganda tool, but one that’s far from what true science is all about. Far from being a source of independent science, in essence Fauci’s control — in collusion with that of Bill Gates — has rendered the majority of global scientific research nothing more than pharmaceutical propaganda. Kennedy explains:10

“Every virologist in the world knew that the coronavirus was engineered. All you have to do is look at the genome. Everybody knew that and they kept silent for a year, and here’s how. He gives away $7.6 billion a year. That’s two to three times what [Bill] Gates gives away. Him and Gates work tandemly. They partner up on everything. They talk together a couple times a week.

They are business partners … in 2000, in Gates’ library, the two of them got together and they formally formed a partnership. You take those two and one other guy — Jeremey Farrar — who is their other de facto partner who is the head of the Wellcome Trust, which is the U.K. version of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Between those three men, they control 61% of the biomedical research funding on Earth.

So if you want to get your study funded, you’ve got to go to those guys. Not only can they give you the money, but they also can kill a study because they control all of the other funding sources. They can kill a study, they can ruin a career, they can bankrupt colleges who do science that they don’t want done. So they are able to really dictate virtually all the science on the globe.”

Drug Companies and Universities All Benefit

Kennedy gives a theoretical example of how Fauci yields his immense power to influence science: In his lab, Fauci develops a molecule that kills a virus. This is done by scientists dropping molecules onto one of countless viruses — influenza, Ebola, coronaviruses, zika and others — in petri dishes and test tubes to see if it kills them. If the molecule works to kill the virus in a petri dish, they move on to testing it on rats infected with the virus.

“If the rats don’t die, now he’s got a drug,” he says. “It’s an antiviral and it’s usable in mammals because it will kill the virus but it won’t kill the mammal. Then he farms it out to the university.”11 There, a PI, or principal investigator, who is usually a person of power, such as the dean of a department, does a phase I trial, experimenting on animals and around 100 humans. Kennedy explains:12

“For each of the humans that he recruits — he’s a medical doctor, he brings in patients, persuades them to take part in the study — Tony Fauci’s agency gives him $15,000 for every one of those patients. The university keeps 50% of that so now they’re also part of this process. And then if the drug gets through that phase I, then they move on to phase 2 and phase 3. So now they have to bring in 20,000 or 30,000 people.

They bring in a drug company as a partner, and they go through the phase 2 and phase 3 [trials], and then at the end of it, they all split up the patents. So the drug company owns half, Tony Fauci’s agency may get part of it and he and his cronies take little slivers of it so they get paid for life. The university gets a part of it, so now you have all the medical schools in the country … dependent on this income stream.”

‘Independent Panels’ Aren’t Independent

At this point, the new drug still has to get regulatory approval, which brings it before a supposedly independent panel of experts. But this panel isn’t made up of independent scientists looking for the truth about whether or not the drug is safe and effective; it’s made up of Fauci’s and Gates’ PIs, who often have drugs of their own in development. Kennedy continues:13

“When this drug goes to FDA to get approved, it goes to a panel. Tony Fauci’s always saying it’s an independent panel who decides, based upon real science, whether or not this drug is worthy of approval. It’s not an independent science. They’re virtually all his PIs or Gates’ PIs.

Those guys go sit on that panel for a year, and they know that they’ve got their own drugs back at Baylor University they’re working on, or Berkeley or Columbia, that they know are going to be in front of that same panel next year. And they’re all scratching each other’s backs. And they approve that drug and then they go off the panel, finish their drug, and then that drug goes in front of a panel that’s similarly constituted and populated.”

These principal scientists act as gatekeepers to the public, spreading the official narrative under the guise of independent science, often pushing questionable COVID-19 policies. “These PIs control the journals, they control the public debate, they’re on TV all over the world, and these are the people that form the narrative, that protect the orthodoxy,” Kennedy says.14

“If you look at Tony Fauci as the pope, the PIs are the cardinals, the bishops and the archbishops. And they’re the ones that protect the orthodoxy, that make sure that the heretics burn, that doctors who disagree are … delicensed, that they get discredited, that they get gaslighted and vilified and marginalized. They’re the army that controls the narrative.”15

Waking up to Fauci’s façade is necessary to understand the orchestrated planned use of pandemics to clamp down totalitarian control. You can find even more details about the coalition of sinister forces — intelligence agencies, pharmaceutical companies, social media titans, medical bureaucracies, mainstream media and the military — that are intent on obliterating constitutional rights globally in “The Real Anthony Fauci.”

Kennedy’s book has been a best seller for two months now and if you haven’t already picked up a copy I would encourage you to do so now.

Entertaining Content

Dore not only does interviews with important guests as the one above, but he also is a comedian. It can be very depressing when we keep sharing all the devastation that has resulted from COVID. Dore’s mission is to take the news and share the obvious in an entreating way as can be evidenced below how he interprets CNN giving the CEO of Pfizer the CEO of the year award.

 

1 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021

2 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 3:00

3 Children’s Health Defense December 22, 2021

4 The Corbett Report, The Real Anthony Fauci November 19, 2021, 10:00

5 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 4:32

6 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 5:58

7 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 7:28

8 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 7:48

9 The Hill June 9, 2021

10 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 8:24

11 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 10:30

12 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 11:00

13, 14, 15 Rumble, The Jimmy Dore Show, RFK: How Fauci Wields Power to Serve Big Pharma’s Interests December 19, 2021, 12:53

 

Connect with Dr. Joseph Mercola

cover image based on work of  RandomUserGuy1738 / Wikimedia Commons




Truckers for Freedom Organize Huge Protest Against Vaccine Mandates & Supply Chain Shortages to Come

Truckers for Freedom Organize Huge Protest Against Vaccine Mandates & Supply Chain Shortages to Come

by Dan Dicks, Press for Truth
January 19, 2022

 

The Canadian government is planning to ban any unvaccinated U.S. truckers from crossing the border this weekend, a decision that will further tighten an already bottle necked supply chain which will lead to massive food shortages in Canada in the very near future! Canadian truckers will also be expected to be vaxxed to re enter their homeland otherwise they’ll have to isolate for 14 days upon arrival.

This has infuriated the trucking community enough that a group of Canadian truck drivers recently responded by blocking the highway near the US/Manitoba border and they’re also planning a convoy trip all the way to Ottawa to protest mandatory vaccines!

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth covers the latest supply chain issues that will come as a direct result of this mandate while also most importantly explaining what you should be actively working on right now as a way to protect yourself and your family from the massive government orchestrated food shortages that are to come. 



Video available at Press for Truth Odysee, BitChute, & Rumble channels.

 

Connect with Press for Truth




Pfizer Trials: All Injected Mothers Lost Their Unborn Babies

Pfizer Trials: All Injected Mothers Lost Their Unborn Babies
Pfizer trial documents reveal attempts to cover up the death of 100% of unborn babies in outcomes actually reported

by Dr. Mark Trozzi
sourced from Global Research
January 19, 2022

 

Please recall our November 23, 2021 post titled “The FDA and Pfizer are a Match Made in Hell”.

There we described how the FDA took only 108 days to approve Pfizer’s injection, but wanted 55 years to produce the documents!

Thankfully Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency filed a lawsuit after the FDA denied their request to expedite the release of the records, and the records are being released, albeit still too slowly.

Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a ‘Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports’ describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021. You can download this entire report here.

Look at table 6 from this Pfizer report. It is titled “Missing Information”. Its first heading under the topic “Missing Information” is “Use in pregnancy and lactation”. It includes this paragraph:

“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23),outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).”

On the surface this states that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, 5 “outcomes pending”, 2 premature birth with neonatal death, 2 spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and 1 normal outcome. But note also “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies”.

So really we have no idea what happened with 243 (5 + 238) of the pregnancies of these injected women; they have just not been included in the report. What we do know is that of 27 reported pregnancies (270 subtract 243), there are 28 dead babies! This appears to mean that someone was pregnant with twins and that 100% of the unborn babies died.

Here is an excellent article by LifeSite News which goes into greater depth about these shocking revelations. LifeSite News cuts Pfizer some slack on the 5 “outcomes pending” which creates  the possible impression that 87.5% of the babies of the injected women died. With all respect to LifeSite, I feel correct in not counting the 5 “outcomes pending” and hence arrive at the conclusion that 100% of the unborn babies died in the injected women for whom results are presented.

The LifeSite News article also reveals deceptive number games in another article titled “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine”, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine on December 31, 2020. These deceptive practices attempted to cover up the fact that in first trimester pregnancies, the Pfizer injection produced 82% miscarriages.

On January 12th we shared the excellent analysis by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance of this same “Safety and Efficacy” article from the New England Journal of Medicine. This Pfizer-friendly study is a complete sham; it is replete with misrepresentation and deceptive methods. The deception and truth is revealed in detail in this video and article by the CCCA.

Dr Trozzi’s brief and Dr Nagase’s excellent interview discussing this sham article is here.

They’re killing babies; what can we do?

These injections are criminal; period. Help us serve the Cease and Desist Declaration of the World Council for Health, to any and all governments, clinics, hospitals, medical regulatory bodies, doctors, nurses, politicians, or anyone participating in any way in the manufacture, shipping, distribution, promotion, or administration of these injections. The message to anyone involved in these injection campaigns is “Stop now. This is a crime. You will be criminally and civilly responsible. The cat is out of the bag. Justice is coming.”

The Declaration can also be found here along with information and instructions for serving it.

Please keep photos and notes of to whom, when and where the declaration and notice is served. We are finalizing more resources on the World Council for Health web site to upload these photos and details. These resources will be fine tuned and found here very soon.

There are at least five million Canadians, and billions of global citizens who have resisted the injections. We, as well as many coerced injection victims who are waking up with buyer’s remorse, must be the army that stops this, and return human rights and real health care to our society.

Do not submit; unite!

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Trozzi

cover image credit: marjorie_schochow / pixabay




UK Ends Vaccine Passports, Mask Mandates, as Prime Minister Faces Calls for Resignation

UK Ends Vaccine Passports, Mask Mandates, as Prime Minister Faces Calls for Resignation
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson today ended pandemic restrictions he instituted just last month, citing a drop in COVID cases. Some suggested the move was politically motivated as calls for his resignation increased in the wake of a scandal over alleged parties in Number 10 Downing Street during the pandemic.

by David Charbonneau, Ph.D., The Defender
January 19, 2022

 

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson today ended all Plan B pandemic restrictions in the UK, including working from home, vaccine passports and mask mandates for public spaces, including schools.

In announcing the change, Johnson said:

“The Cabinet concluded that because of the extraordinary booster campaign, together with the way the public has responded to the Plan B measures, we can return to Plan A in England, and allow Plan B regulations to expire.”

Johnson first announced the Plan B measures on Dec. 8, 2021. The measures took effect Dec. 15, 2021, after passing a parliament vote.

The ending of the restrictions means workers are due back in the office Thursday. The Department for Education also will end requirements tomorrow for facemasks in classrooms.

Mandates for vaccine passports to access businesses or public places will expire next Wednesday without renewal, the prime minister announced, as will public mask mandates.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid called the relaxation of measures a “major milestone,” adding: “But it’s not the end of the road and we shouldn’t see this as the finish line because we cannot eradicate this virus and its future variants.”

Javid added:

“Instead we must learn to live with COVID in the same way we have to live with flu. We will be setting out our long-term plan for living with COVID-19 this spring.”

The unexpected announcements came in the wake of signs the Omicron wave has peaked in the UK.

Dr. Susan Hopkins, chief medical adviser to the UK Health Security Agency, told a Downing Street news conference the latest seven-day average of COVID cases was 93,200 compared with almost 225,000 on Dec. 29, 2021.

She said hospital cases were back down to below 20,000 while there were only 703 on mechanical ventilators — levels not seen since last July.

Omicron is “not the same disease we were seeing a year ago” and high COVID death rates in the UK are “now history,” Sir John Bell, professor of medicine at Oxford University and leading immunologist said.

Mary Holland, president of Children’s Health Defense, commented:

“While we welcome the prime minister’s statement to lift draconian COVID restrictions in the UK, we believe this ‘victory through COVID defeat’ narrative raises more questions than it answers. Why now? Has the science really changed? Who is calling the shots?

“Children’s Health Defense will continue to seek truthful answers and real accountability for the harmful lockdown policies of the COVID pandemic era.”

Some suggested the timing of Johnson’s announcement is politically motivated as calls for his resignation increased Tuesday in the wake of “partygate,” the scandal over numerous, alleged parties in Number 10 Downing Street during the pandemic in breach of government lockdowns.

The announcement also came after the prime minister received a petition on Monday, signed by more than 200,000 people, demanding an end to vaccine passports.

Despite also receiving a petition signed by 160,000 healthcare workers, Johnson said vaccination requirements for healthcare workers and the mandatory testing of travelers to the UK will remain in place.

 

David Charbonneau, Ph.D. is a fellow for The Defender.

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




Yohan Tengra Exposes the Public Health Mafia in India

Yohan Tengra Exposes the Public Health Mafia in India

by James Corbett, The Corbett Report
January 19, 2022

 

How does the global public health mafia direct the health policy of nations around the world? In today’s conversation, James talks to Yohan Tengra of the Awaken Indian Movement to discuss Tengra’s article breaking down the Indian Covid-19 Task Force and how its members’ conflicts of interest relate to the decades-long takeover of India’s public health system.



Watch on Archive / BitChute / Minds / Odysee or Download the mp4

SHOW NOTES:

Yohan Tengra: AnarchyForFreedom.in / AwakenIndiaMovement / Telegram channel

Who Is Bill Gates?

India’s Covid-19 Task Force & “Experts” Exposed : Conflicts of Interest in Our Public Health System

HPV vaccine deaths: Parliament panel indicts PATH, health officials

Govt cancels FCRA licence of top public health NGO

NITI Aayog Launches Behaviour Change Campaign

A State of Fear: How the UK Weaponized Fear by Laura Dodsworth

Swedish company showcases microchip that can download COVID-19 passport status

Fact Check: Polio Vaccines, Tetanus Vaccines, and the Gates Foundation

Demonetization and You

 

Connect with James Corbett




Join Children’s Health Defense in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 23, 2022 to Defeat the Mandates

Join Children’s Health Defense in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 23, 2022 to Defeat the Mandates

by Children’s Health Defense
January 19, 2022

 



Video available at childrenshealthdefense Rumble channel.

Join Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and many other speakers at the Defeat the Mandates rally in Washington, D.C. on Sunday, January 23, 2022.

For more information, visit https://defeatthemandatesdc.com.

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense




Dr. Michelle Perro to Fellow Pediatricians: ‘Rise Up, Take a Stance’ Against COVID Vaccines for Kids

Dr. Michelle Perro to Fellow Pediatricians: ‘Rise Up, Take a Stance’ Against COVID Vaccines for Kids

In The Defender’s “Leading the Charge for Change” interview series, Dr. Michelle Perro explains why she advises parents not to give their kids the COVID vaccine and encourages other physicians to speak out against the vaccines. 

by David Marks, The Defender
January 19, 2022

 

 

Dr. Michelle Perro, a pediatric emergency doctor, has some COVID-19 vaccine advice for parents: “Don’t do it.”

She also has some strong words for fellow physicians: Have the courage to speak out on behalf of the vulnerable.

In an interview with The Defender, Perro said in her experience treating children with COVID, the disease has been mild.

She said:

“In a practice where I work, out of six practitioners, not one of us has seen an extremely sick kid with COVID. Some children have had fevers and body aches, although most have super mild symptoms. We have seen asymptomatic kids and others having mild flu-like illness — at the worst.”

She said the disease is not dangerous in children, often lasting only one or two days.

“It’s in the literature that this is a mild illness in young people,” Perro said. “And the rate of morbidity and mortality is next to zero — a more benign course than the flu.”

For children she has treated with COVID, Perro said she supports their “naturally vigorous immune system,” emphasizing the importance of eating nutrient-dense organic foods along with supplements including vitamins C and D, zinc and quercetin.

“Depending on how sick they are, I also use a range of nutraceutical and homeopathic remedies to also help clear the virus from the mouth and the nasopharynx,” she said.

When COVID vaccines were made available for children, Perro initially gave cautious advice, but she’s since become more adamant in discouraging parents.

“It’s experimental and the potential effects may be irreversible,” Perro said. “We have no idea what it does to your kids’ DNA. Don’t do it — I just said that to some parents this week.”

When her practice, which offers the vaccine, asked her to create a protocol for parents who want to vaccinate their kids, she was reluctant “because they just shouldn’t do it.”

Perro has heard from parents who regret having their children vaccinated.

“I get emails every day with parents having vaccine remorse,” Perro said. “These are not just about kids who are having side effects, but parents who don’t feel right about what they’ve done. And it’s a challenging and new territory when trying to help them — how do I reverse the effects of an mRNA jab?”

For children she sees who are suffering from COVID vaccine injuries, her observations are striking.

“Clinically, we’re seeing mild to severe reactions from this inoculation, but what is mindblowing for me are the cases with adverse outcomes reported in the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] data — it’s horrific,” she said. “If you pair that with the injured kids in the clinic, with adverse reactions to the inoculation, that should be enough to say stop, reevaluate, reverse direction.”

Perro said she is particularly concerned about the severe vaccine injuries children are experiencing.

“When I looked at the initial Moderna study, 72% of their vaccine recipients had a reaction that they had graded as mild, moderate or severe,” Perro said. “The most damaging were cardiac and neurological. Now, fast forward to what’s happening to children. What am I mostly seeing? Cardiac and neurological symptoms, just like in the study,” she said.

The increase in myocarditis is a historical anomaly, Perro said.

“As an ER doctor, a pediatric emergency physician, it was so rare pre-COVID inoculations to ever see a kid with myocarditis. In my career of 40 years with acute care medicine — working in big centers in East Harlem, Bellevue and Oakland Children’s Hospital — maybe I’ve seen one or two cases of pediatric myocarditis. That’s two children in more than four decades — and their condition was the result of an infection.”

With increasing cases of vaccine-induced heart problems in children, emergency defibrillators are being placed in schools. “They’re preparing for a wave of myocarditis symptoms and the potential for cardiac complications,” Perro told The Defender.

When asked about those risks, she described how inflammation of the outer envelope of the heart, the pericardium, and heart cells generally can cause anything from chest pain to arrhythmias and tachycardia. She has seen children just after COVID vaccination with increased heart rate and chest pain.

“These myocardial cells, once they’ve been injured, can’t regenerate, the scars remain,” she said. “And these scars in their heart tissue can precipitate arrhythmias in the future since the electrical impulses have reduced conductivity — it’s a devastating disease.”

Neurological effects of the COVID vaccine on children present further risks of an unknown outcome.

“We have no idea of the long-term effects of the spike protein in small children,” Perro said. “What is concerning is increasing the burden of neurologic disease on an already neurologically compromised population.”

Pointing out that 1 in 33 kids are now diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, Perro said one of the features of this disorder is brain inflammation with activation of their microglia — a critical component of immune response in the central nervous system.

“The spike protein acts like a bioweapon — a toxic material that can cross the blood-brain barrier,” Perro said. “There’s no way we can tell parents what’s going to develop in their kids’ brains when that happens.”

Pediatricians must ‘rise up’ to the oath they’ve taken

With data showing children have an extremely low risk of complications from the COVID virus, and her own clinical experience, Perro openly discusses what pediatricians see, but rarely speak about.

“Young children are at no great risk and do not give COVID to adults,” she said. “So the idea that we inoculate children to stop spreading the disease in adults is wrong and immoral. And it’s well-known these inoculations do nothing to stop transmission.”

Perro is not afraid to speak out about the failure of the vaccines. She said:

“We have people getting their third and fourth boosters, and variants are still ripping through communities. Mostly, those who are transmitting the virus are the vaccinated. Although this is verifiable and quite shocking, most doctors are rolling along with it. There is pressure from all areas, including medical boards to conform. Here in California, doctors are living in a climate of fear from retribution if they voice their concerns.

“It is not just a moral obligation. It’s about our oath as physicians. More pediatricians need to speak out.”

She is very clear on why her colleagues should be more vocal. “I feel that if I know something and I don’t speak out, I am complicit and part of the problem,” Perro said. “How could I look at myself in the mirror? How could I live with myself — why am I a pediatrician?”

Perro told The Defender it’s okay for physicians to be fearful — that fear can accompany altruism.

“Yes, you can be fearful, but still show the courage to speak out on behalf of the vulnerable — those who we’ve been entrusted to care for,” Perro explained. “I say to those who know but are silent, rise up to the oath that you’ve taken, allow your fear to march on with your courage — and take a stance.”

In addition to advocating on behalf of children, Perro said the time has come to fully embrace a holistic system.

“This present medical paradigm can’t be fixed,” she said. “We need to create a new specialty of regenerative healthcare, an eco-medicine, where food sustains or reinvigorates our innate vitality.”

However, she warned, “If we keep taking these jabs, we will create a population that is only more dependent on a broken medical system.”

Perro, co-author of “What’s Making Our Children Sick?” and co-founder of GMOscience.org, has long been an advocate for integrative holistic treatment.

She also believes in empowering parents by providing them with the simple tools to help the body heal itself.

“We need to turn away from a pharma-driven narrative to a food-based narrative, supplemented with healing herbs and spices,” Perro said. “The driving principle of good healthcare is simple — the best medicine is food as medicine.”

Asked about her hope for the future, Perro said:

“A paradigm shift is happening. We must continue to re-establish natural priorities and good health, with supportive communities, where physicians, farmers, scientists and activists work together with a common focus on holistic health principles.”

 

David Marks is a fellow for The Defender. He is an investigative reporter and documentary producer. His new book, “The Way,” is an interpretation of the Chinese classic, the Tao Te Ching, available at LaoTzu-TheWay.org.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense

cover image credit: Raphaelny / pixabay




Prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde: “I Assure You That These Vaccines Are Destined to Kill Us”

Prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde: “I Assure You That These Vaccines Are Destined to Kill Us”

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 18, 2022

 

Carlos Insaurralde, the prosecutor behind the case of the man who died after being inoculated talks about graphene oxide and other unknown substances, and urges people to file lawsuits to stop the poisoning of the population.

Orwell City brings the key excerpt La Quinta Columna commented on in a recent program.



Ricardo Delgado:

Let’s see the following, which is… Yes, it’s news. It’s also news from Argentina, and it talks about what we have already seen before. Vallarta’s Newspaper. (El diario de Vallarta).

Prosecutor urges to file complaints against sanitary tyranny, but the police refuse to receive them.”

OK. There’s a very striking point, and it’s that this happened before we knew the result we have started with, with the one we saw after the intro video.

It says, “He knows that there are obstacles for the institutions to accept the complaints, but he calls to seek spiritual strength. He warns that the injections contain graphene and substances that not even scientists know about.”

And he’s speaking about scientists. Just figure the doctors who have ordered or recommended all this…

“The time for passing us the information to find out and be shocked is over. We already know that vaccines have graphene —it’s official—, that there are more dead vaccinated than unvaccinated —it’s official— that people are being poisoned,” says the prosecutor. “More important than looking for information is to go out and denounce that they’re experimenting with people…” On the resistance capacity they may have to a material. “…that they’re inoculating without a doctor’s prescription, they have to file complaints. I assure you that these vaccines are destined to kill us, stresses the lawyer. And he details how people should behave before the justice agencies so that their denunciation is attended to.”

This is very clear, gentlemen. Very, very, very clear.

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna

Connect with Orwell City

cover image credit: altoff / pixabay




Arrest People Who Don’t Follow Doctors’ Orders; Put Them in Prison or Camps

Arrest People Who Don’t Follow Doctors’ Orders; Put Them in Prison or Camps
CC: Joe Rogan, Aaron Rodgers, Novak Djokovic, Rand Paul, Scott Atlas, The Donald of Warp Speed, Joe Biden…

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 18, 2022

 

I mean, it’s terrible. A person won’t take a vaccine or drug after a doctor tells him to? Arrest the non-compliant resisting son of a bitch. Lock him up. The doctor knows best. People make things so complicated. I just don’t get it.

We have experts. They’re called experts for a reason.

Your car breaks down. Who are you going to take it to? A florist?

A professor at a medical school says the COVID vaccines are safe and effective. Are you going to ask a podcaster whether he agrees?

You want to know medical truth? Do you read a fishing magazine? You read a medical journal. What’s happened to education in this country?

Oh…

Hold on.

Wait.

I just came across something.

July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; “Is US health really the best in the world?”

Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths.

Here’s something else:

Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.”

The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:

Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.

Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.

The authors write: “…Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and administered.”

This study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed or maimed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn’t begin to tally the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, at home.

Here’s something else:

BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”

The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”

The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”

Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be incorrect. And the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all medical drugs (and vaccines) before they can be released for public use.

Here’s something else:

“The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the 2013 recipient of ASA’s [American Sociological Association’s] Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University.

Donald Light: “Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.” (ASA publication, “Footnotes,” November 2014)

None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.

Given the reports on medically caused death and maiming I’ve just cited and described, it’s obvious that…

Leading medical journals around the world, which routinely publish glowing accounts of clinical trials of medical drugs…

Are spilling over with rank fraud, on page after page.

Indeed, here is a stunning quote from an editor who has quite probably read and analyzed more medical-drug studies than any other doctor in the world:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”)

Compare that quote with one from Anthony Fauci. In an interview with the National Geographic, Fauci stated: “Anybody can claim to be an expert even when they have no idea what they’re talking about…If something is published in places like New England Journal of Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or JAMA—you know, generally that is quite well peer-reviewed because the editors and the editorial staff of those journals really take things very seriously.”

Uh-huh. Of course. Right.

Given these mainstream reports of what amounts to a holocaust I’ve cited and described in this piece…

…You would think the federal government must have launched a major operation, many years ago…

…To reconstruct, from the ground up, the US medical system, so that it’s no longer killing and maiming SO MANY people, on and on and on.

But you would be wrong.

Of course, you MUST believe what the impeccable doctors are telling you about COVID; and you must follow the politicians’ orders, because the politicians are taking their cues from the doctors.

Right?

Right?

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Lukel. / pixabay




The Last Days of the Covidian Cult

The Last Days of the Covidian Cult

by C.J. Hopkins, The Consent Factory
January 18, 2022

 

This isn’t going to be pretty, folks. The downfall of a death cult rarely is. There is going to be wailing and gnashing of teeth, incoherent fanatical jabbering, mass deleting of embarrassing tweets. There’s going to be a veritable tsunami of desperate rationalizing, strenuous denying, shameless blame-shifting, and other forms of ass-covering, as suddenly former Covidian Cult members make a last-minute break for the jungle before the fully-vaxxed-and-boosted “Safe and Effective Kool-Aid” servers get to them.

Yes, that’s right, as I’m sure you’ve noticed, the official Covid narrative is finally falling apart, or is being hastily disassembled, or historically revised, right before our eyes. The “experts” and “authorities” are finally acknowledging that the “Covid deaths” and “hospitalization” statistics are artificially inflated and totally unreliable (which they have been from the very beginning), and they are admitting that their miracle “vaccines” don’t work (unless you change the definition of the word “vaccine”), and that they have killed a few peopleor maybe more than a few people, and that lockdowns were probably “a serious mistake.”

I am not going to bother with further citations. You can surf the Internet as well as I can. The point is, the “Apocalyptic Pandemic” PSYOP has reached its expiration date. After almost two years of mass hysteria over a virus that causes mild-to-moderate common-cold or flu-like symptoms (or absolutely no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, people’s nerves are shot. We are all exhausted. Even the Covidian cultists are exhausted. And they are starting to abandon the cult en masse.

It was always mostly just a matter of time. As Klaus Schwab said, “the pandemic represent[ed] a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.”

It isn’t over, but that window is closing, and our world has not been “reimagined” and “reset,” not irrevocably, not just yet. Clearly, GloboCap underestimated the potential resistance to the Great Reset, and the time it would take to crush that resistance. And now the clock is running down, and the resistance isn’t crushed … on the contrary, it is growing. And there is nothing GloboCap can do to stop it, other than go openly totalitarian, which it can’t, as that would be suicidal. As I noted in a recent column:

“New Normal totalitarianism — and any global-capitalist form of totalitarianism — cannot display itself as totalitarianism, or even authoritarianism. It cannot acknowledge its political nature. In order to exist, it must not exist. Above all, it must erase its violence (the violence that all politics ultimately comes down to) and appear to us as an essentially beneficent response to a legitimate ‘global health crisis’ …”

The simulated “global health crisis” is, for all intents and purposes, over. Which means that GloboCap has screwed the pooch. The thing is, if you intend to keep the masses whipped up into a mindless frenzy of anus-puckering paranoia over an “apocalyptic global pandemic,” at some point, you have to produce an actual apocalyptic global pandemic. Faked statistics and propaganda will carry you for a while, but eventually people are going to need to experience something at least resembling an actual devastating worldwide plague, in reality, not just on their phones and TVs.

Also, GloboCap seriously overplayed their hand with the miracle “vaccines.” Covidian cultists really believed that the “vaccines” would protect them from infection. Epidemiology experts like Rachel Maddow assured them that they would:

“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person,” Maddow said on her show the evening of March 29, 2021. “A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else,” she added with a shrug. “It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.”

And now they are all sick with … well, a cold, basically, or are “asymptomatically infected,” or whatever. And they are looking at a future in which they will have to submit to “vaccinations” and “boosters” every three or four months to keep their “compliance certificates” current, in order to be allowed to hold a job, attend a school, or eat at a restaurant, which, OK, hardcore cultists are fine with, but there are millions of people who have been complying, not because they are delusional fanatics who would wrap their children’s heads in cellophane if Anthony Fauci ordered them to, but purely out of “solidarity,” or convenience, or herd instinct, or … you know, cowardice.

Many of these people (i.e., the non-fanatics) are starting to suspect that maybe what we “tin-foil-hat-wearing, Covid-denying, anti-vax, conspiracy-theorist extremists” have been telling them for the past 22 months might not be as crazy as they originally thought. They are back-pedaling, rationalizing, revising history, and just making up all kinds of self-serving bullshit, like how we are now in “a post-vaccine world,” or how “the Science has changed,” or how “Omicron is different,” in order to avoid being forced to admit that they’re the victims of a GloboCap PSYOP and the worldwide mass hysteria it has generated.

Which … fine, let them tell themselves whatever they need to for the sake of their vanity, or their reputations as investigative journalists, celebrity leftists, or Twitter revolutionaries. If you think these “recovering” Covidian Cult members are ever going to publicly acknowledge all the damage they have done to society, and to people and their families, since March 2020, much less apologize for all the abuse they heaped onto those of us who have been reporting the facts … well, they’re not. They are going to spin, equivocate, rationalize, and lie through their teeth, whatever it takes to convince themselves and their audience that, when the shit hit the fan, they didn’t click heels and go full “Good German.”

Give these people hell if you need to. I feel just as angry and betrayed as you do. But let’s not lose sight of the ultimate stakes here. Yes, the official narrative is finally crumbling, and the Covidian Cult is starting to implode, but that does not mean that this fight is over. GloboCap and their puppets in government are not going to cancel the whole “New Normal” program, pretend the last two years never happened, and gracefully retreat to their lavish bunkers in New Zealand and their mega-yachts.

Totalitarian movements and death cults do not typically go down gracefully. They usually go down in a gratuitous orgy of wanton, nihilistic violence as the cult or movement desperately attempts to maintain its hold over its wavering members and defend itself from encroaching reality. And that is where we are at the moment … or where we are going to be very shortly.

Cities, states, and countries around the world are pushing ahead with implementing the New Normal biosecurity society, despite the fact that there is no longer any plausible justification for it. Austria is going ahead with forced “vaccination.” Germany is preparing to do the sameFrance is rolling out a national segregation system to punish “the Unvaccinated.” Greece is fining “unvaccinated” pensionersAustralia is operating “quarantine camps.” Scotland. Italy. Spain. The Netherlands. New York City. San Francisco. Toronto. The list goes on, and on, and on.

I don’t know what is going to happen. I’m not an oracle. I’m just a satirist. But we are getting dangerously close to the point where GloboCap will need to go full-blown fascist if they want to finish what they started. If that happens, things are going to get very ugly. I know, things are already ugly, but I’m talking a whole different kind of ugly. Think Jonestown, or Hitler’s final days in the bunker, or the last few months of the Manson Family.

That is what happens to totalitarian movements and death cults once the spell is broken and their official narratives fall apart. When they go down, they try to take the whole world with them. I don’t know about you, but I’m hoping we can avoid that. From what I have heard and read, it isn’t much fun.

 

Connect with C.J. Hopkins

cover image credit: PauloWolf / pixabay




Argentine Government Agency Admits Covid Vaccines Contain Graphene Oxide

Argentine Government Agency Admits Covid Vaccines Contain Graphene Oxide

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 16, 2022

 

At last, an official body has acknowledged that the vaccines against COVID-19 contain graphene oxide as part of their composition. This event took place after a request was made to investigate the death of a person post-vaccination.

The toxicity of the nanomaterial that goes into the vaccines is described in the scientific literature, with at least 67 articles on the subject, the same ones that La Quinta Columna compiled a few months ago to attach to the final report by Dr. Pablo Campra.

Orwell City brings the details of this important news in English below.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

 

Ricardo Delgado:

Argentina: A.N.M.A.T recognizes that vaccines contain graphene.

In today’s news, January 16.

“Dr. Patricia Aprea, Director of Evaluation and Control, had to admit it in a court case that took place as a result of a post-inoculation death and which is being prosecuted by Prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde.”

Thanks to the work of this prosecutor and his insistence, he finally had to admit and recognize —because they knew it— that the COVID vaccine —or what they call vaccine… They call it a vaccine—, in fact, contains graphene.

This is particularly serious. Why? Because we’re talking about a material that’s not declared in the transparency policy of pharmaceutical corporations. And, moreover, it’s a toxic material. It’s so toxic that its toxicity is also radiomodulable. Therefore, it almost doesn’t depend on the quantity but on the dose of radiation absorbed by the graphene.

What’s more, we have said that graphene uses the GigaHertz signal of telephone antennasand multiplies them to the order of TeraHertz. Graphene has its maximum transistor field-effect precisely at 26 GigaHertz. So this… Eh… Precisely —look, what a coincidence!—, our government and that of other parts of the world that are in the 2030 Agenda itself, will tender the 26 GHz frequency in mid 2022.

That graphene which increases frequencies from Giga to TeraHertz, once it’s at TeraHertz, makes possible that all the other microtechnology that we have found inside the vaccine could work. Micro-routers, micro-rectennas, codecs with communications encryption, logic gates… For all of these to work, they must necessarily operate in the Terahertz band.

Do you understand now why they wanted to introduce that graphene?

Do you understand now why the vaccinated people,in Bluetooth wireless technology,emit a MAC address that can be checked by anybody with their cell phone? Even with a Samsung or an iPhone. Because they had initially blocked them. Coming soon, we’re going to try… Eh… …to interview a person who is an expert in this regard. Here, in La Quinta Columna.

“Have they become ‘conspiracists’ at A.N.M.A.T.?” David Rey, who is the writer, wonders. I needed some water. “Well, no. It happens that this time, pressured by the prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde, they had to admit the inadmissible. Strictly speaking, the National Administration of Medicines, Food and Medical Devices had to answer in this way in a court case following a complaint about a post-inoculation death.

Those in charge of breaking the news, through social networks, were the lawyer Miguel Iannolfi and the medical geneticist Marcelo Martínez…” From here a big hug. “Both of them are well known for their work in warning the population about the singular consequences of the alleged vaccines on people’s health, as well as the novel compound they contain, i.e. graphene, which was discovered months ago by the Spanish scientist Pablo Campra.”

Okay.

“In a brief video shared in networks, Iannolfi explained that something that we had been studying, investigating and that we knew would come to light. Thanks to the efforts of the prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde, the only thing he did was to fulfill his function at the time of receiving a complaint about a person who died after having been inoculated. He made the investigation and the corresponding requests for reports, put pressure and, in the end, the A.N.M.A.T. —government agency— ended up answering in a court case that the inoculum they are applying to the entire population contains graphene.”

Okay?

“Martínez, for his part, in another video where he first expressed his solidarity with the recently arrested and already released Dr. Eduardo Ángel Yahbes…” I coincided with him in a direct. From here we send her a big hug. And, as it can not be otherwise, we’re very happy for his release. “…responds to requests and questions carried out by the prosecutor, that graphene is one of the constituent elements of these compounds.”

Well, if it’s one of the elements that appear here, moreover, in this writing that I’m going to share next. If it’s one of these elements, why isn’t it declared?

“Next, Dr. Luis Marcelo Martínez remarked that there’s a minimum —there are more— of 67 scientific publications…” In fact, they were the ones shared by La Quinta Columna. “…where the toxicity of graphene for biological organisms and for human beings, in particular, is described. Therefore, what’s the reason for the presence of this element in the inoculums? The certificate issued by Dr. Yahbes, like many of the issued by us, contains absolutely genuine information supported by numerous scientific research articles. I have just referred to an official answer, which means that they’re aware of the presence of toxic elements in these compounds.”

Alright. I mean, this is already an open secret. The work that La Quinta Columna and many of you have is just to inform the population. I’m going to copy this news first of all. Here it goes. It’s important. Because they’re acknowledging it. In other words, they’re acknowledging the poisoning of the entire population. It’s just like that. Just like that.

This is the official document issued by the ANMAT.

d. Regarding the composition of the vaccine in question, according to what has been declared, graphene is among its components. It’s suggested to accompany authorized labels or leaflets in which the components of the vaccine can be noticed.

It can also be found on its official website (click here) by entering the following information: GEDO number: IF – 2021 – 120912800 – APN-DECBR#ANMAT

https://www.docdroid.net/lqjD2LT/if-2021-120912800-apn-decbranmat-pdf

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna

Connect with Orwell City




Why Nobody Can Find a Virus

Why Nobody Can Find a Virus

by Dr. Sam Bailey & Dr. Mark Bailey
January 5, 2022

 

Perhaps prior to 2020 the issue of virus isolation was of minimal interest to the vast majority earth’s inhabitants.  Most people blindly accept the medical establishment’s claims that viruses exist and can cause disease. They otherwise don’t give it a second thought.  Sometimes you get unwell, and a doctor informs you, “it’s probably a viral illness” – but almost every time, you get better again.

However, the increasingly negative impacts from government instigated policies in the name of the “corona” crisis has resulted in some healthy new interest in the subject.  Social cohesion in households and communities is being strained, businesses are being run into the ground, and suspicions about the requirement to be injected every four months to maintain protection against an invisible enemy are on the rise.  If no virus has been isolated then its very existence is pure speculation. A phantom menace that has no confirmed physical presence, merely a ruinous psychological construct manifesting as a living nightmare.  And those who ignore the pivotal issue of virus isolation are blindly accepting a premise on which all manner of lies can be built.

But there are scientific papers that prove isolation?…

The confusion surrounding virus isolation stems from the fact that many published scientific papers state in their titles or claim in their abstracts that they successfully “isolated” a virus.  In 2020 and 2021, we lost track of the number of times we were sent such papers as apparent proof of the “SARS-CoV-2” virus.  Similarly, industry-funded “fact-checking” sites have a propensity to link to such papers to reassure their spoon-fed readers that the “virus” has been isolated.  Unfortunately, such disinformation sites fail to inform their audience that the virologists are not referring to actual physical isolation of any virus and have instead substituted the meaning of the word isolation for something that means almost the opposite.

Researchers such as Christine Massey have tirelessly collated Freedom of Information requests from governments around the world to clearly expose the fact that the alleged causal agent of COVID-19 has never once been physically isolated.  While at least one government supported microbiologist has claimed this is disingenuous as the requests are worded in such a way that they are not consistent with the methodology of modern virology, this misses the whole point: the modern virologists are not isolating viruses in the way that the public and probably most of the medical profession are led to believe.  Instead, they moved the goalposts.



The excuses for this sleight of hand should be rejected and the isolation of a virus should mean the same as it does with any other entity on the planet – that is, in its pure form, separated out from other material.  It is done with things that are smaller than alleged viruses, such as proteins, and things that are bigger such as bacteria.  It is not a technological limitation or because of some special property that precludes this process from being essential to the process of real isolation.

The most definitive evidence of a virus would be finding it directly in a host such as a human.

However, despite the fact we are told that a single sneeze could contain 200 million SARS-CoV-2 particles, when we take a mucous or blood sample from a patient not one virus particle can be found.  And what about taking samples from hundreds or even thousands of people said to be infected and have a disease such as COVID-19 and then combining them altogether?  I’m not sure if this has ever been tried but apparently even then if we purified such a sample, the excuse is apparently the same: we wouldn’t find any viruses in there!  So, we are expected to believe that a patient is overwhelmed with trillions of viral particles but we can’t find any on or inside them.

Magic Tricks and the Electron Microscope

The virologists of old were convinced that with the advent of the electron micrograph and more efficient purification techniques they would be able to find all sorts of viruses in sick individuals.  However, it became apparent they would have to abandon this process around the middle of the 20th Century as the attempts were fruitless – no viruses were found.  These days when most virologists talk about isolating viruses, one of the techniques they cite is tissue culture experiments in test tubes.  It has been outlined why these are not only unsuitable proxies, but the stress of the test tube conditions alone on abnormal cells can produce the effects, no virus required.  Similarly, detecting genetic sequences in these culture experiments is also unsatisfactory as there is no proof that such sequences come from inside any of the particles they are calling “SARS-CoV-2” and even if they did, that this is enough to qualify them as viruses.  A virus is said to be a particle with a proteinaceous coat surrounding a genome that can infect and parasitise a host and then infect other hosts.

Therefore, anyone asserting that they have isolated a virus needs to show that what they have is actually a virus and not just test-tube observations and various biological molecules that can be detected without any viruses required.

How to Isolate a Virus

STEP 1: Identify a number of individuals with specific symptoms and signs that are thought to be caused by a virus.

This can’t be done with COVID-19 as it is an ethereal clinical disease that is “diagnosed” with a PCR result. There are no specific symptoms, signs or confirmatory investigations.  However, for the purposes of this essay we will assume that we are talking about a well-defined clinical disease.  We know that the virologists will not be able to find any viruses directly in a patient as outlined above, which doesn’t look good, but we’ll let them have another shot.

STEP 2: Perform a tissue culture experiment with a patient sample.

Briefly, this involves adding a crude sample (e.g. sputum) to some cells in a test tube and seeing if it produces any viruses. In early 2020 it was declared that a “virus” called SARS-CoV-2 had been “isolated” with this method.  In reality Na Zhu, et al, had both failed to physically isolate any particles or show any of these particles to be viruses.

So, what should have been done?  Na Zhu, et al should have repeated their experiment multiple times and then purified the particles they called “2019-nCoV” (later “SARS-CoV-2”) by means of a technique such as density gradient ultracentrifugation.  This technique was already well established in the 20th Century and as illustrated below in Figure 1 could be used satisfactorily to obtain much more purified samples that could be confirmed by electron microscopy.

At this point we could more confidently claim that we had physically isolated viral-like particles and could analyse their composition, including their genetic structure.  All very interesting (and beyond what has been done) but the proof that theses particles are viruses, that is infectious and disease-causing, still needs to be established.

STEP 3: Infect a live animal, eg a monkey with the purified particles.

Mind you, we are not talking about bogus experiments as described in Sam’s SARS-1 video.



Pouring large volumes of mixed tissue culture fluid directly into an animal’s lungs to see if it will cough or develop some lung tissue changes does not constitute evidence of a virus. Pouring any biological muck into an animal’s lungs will cause these reactions.  That’s why control experiments are suspiciously absent in such experiments.  The purified particles, said to be viruses (which we are told are airborne and highly infectious) alone could be simply sprayed into the animals’ cages and they should get sick.  Following that, any monkey introduced into the cage subsequently should also get sick if there is a contagious pathogen.

The Case for Human Experiments with “Viruses”

In fact, given that the world has been subjected to draconian restrictions, ruinous lockdowns, and population-wide experiments with “vaccines” in the name of an alleged virus, the case can be made for human experiments involving the “virus”.  In the tradition of Max von Pettenkofer (who swallowed cholera bacillus in 1892 to show that it could not cause cholera by itself), we would be happy to inhale any purified particles said to be the SARS-CoV-2 “virus”, like many (we’re sure) who have investigated virology.  It’s not particularly bold when one is aware that not once in history have any particles alleged to be viruses by themselves been shown to cause disease in any animal.  Of course, such experiments would not be considered ethical today because the “deadly virus” was declared to exist, cause disease, and transmit via aerosol even though no such evidence was produced.  However, one would suspect that these experiments are avoided due to the long history of the failure to demonstrate human to human transmission of any alleged viral illness.

Perhaps the complete lack of clinical evidence that influenza passes between humans as talked about below is the most embarrassing chapter for the “highly infectious virus” claimants. 



The virus model was suspect long ago but it’s a model that will continue to be peddled as it pays dividends for industry participants – indeed, the development of their playbook over the decades is outlined in Virus Mania.

The End of Virology

Forget hypothetical computer generated “genomes” from non-purified samples and PCR tests that are calibrated to these simulations: none of these require the existence of a virus.  Forget electron micrographs of cell “culture” experiments purporting to show viruses: these are simply vesicles of unknown significance until shown otherwise.  What we need to see is purification of these particles and then a demonstration that they can parasitise a host and are the causal agent of a disease.  The reality is that nobody is isolating viruses because carrying out the correct experiments would reveal that the particles are not viruses at all and virology would be finished.

 

Connect with Dr. Sam Bailey & Dr. Mark Bailey

cover image credit: based on creative commons work of mauriciodonascimento




Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger: On the Bio-Hacking of Humanity via Graphene Oxide in Vaccines & 5G/WiFi

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger: On the Bio-Hacking of Humanity via Graphene Oxide in Vaccines & 5G/WiFi

 

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is an interdisciplinary scientist at University of Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. She is an invited professor in European universities, an author and international public speaker.

Below the video and transcript provided by Orwell City, you will find links to the two videos mentioned by Dr. Stuckelberger. The first is a presentation at a US military conference on the topic of Psycho-Neurobiology and War, The second is Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (Corona Investigative Committee) in conversation with Dr. David Martin.

 

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on Bio-hacking

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 15, 2022



In the same interview that CONUVIVE Mundial conducted with Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger two days ago, the scientist commented on the relationship between graphene, 5G, and Neuro-rights.

One mindblowing point is that the technology that’s being injected into the population would make it possible to intervene in human beings to send them virus imprints and make them sick, among other possibilities.

Dr. Stuckelberger emphasizes the need to become aware of this and start a detox from the graphene present in the body since it’s thanks to this nanomaterial that the bio-hacking of the human being is possible.

More details in the new excerpt that Orwell City has prepared.

Jorge Osorio: 

Doctor, I’d like to ask you… Because I was just going to ask you about Dr. Pablo Campra’s report. And you already brought it up. In this same line, what do you think about graphene —which is a nano-conductor—, electromagnetic waves, and 5G?

5G is already being implemented all over the world. Especially here, in South America. And if we add to that, as part of this cocktail, the Neuro-rights that, at least here in Chile, are groundbreaking. Groundbreaking. This is the only country in the world where Neuro-rights have already been implemented. And now they want to implement them in Spain as well.

What could we be talking about, in your opinion? Graphene, 5G, and Neuro-rights.

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger:

What are Neuro-rights? Can you just explain?

Jorge Osorio:

The Neuro-rights Law establishes —the Chilean President of the Republic said it here— that your thoughts could be intervened. He regularized it as a law.

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger: 

OK. Yeah, that’s… We’re coming to a very interesting topic. So, Dr. Charles Morgan… And I invite you to go and see it on YouTube. Bio-Psycho-Neurology. He made a YouTube video of 58 minutes. And it’s fantastic.

He’s teaching the military about this new DARPA technology in 2018. And in this… And it’s an eye-opening video, really. And in there, he says —about graphene oxide in nanoparticles—, that they were doing experiments —with monkeys, first— of the transmission of thought patterns. They can read or transmit thought patterns.

And they were taking the example of a surgeon. Of course, they want to make it look like it’s good, but you can also use it badly. So, they took the example and said that, if a neurosurgeon wants to make an operation in the Philippines and wants to take control of a person’s hand by his thinking, they can analyze his pattern lighting… We’re electric beings. We’re bioelectronic, so it’s easy to see the pattern. And then they transmit… The person has graphene, and they can transfer the pattern by WiFi. And the person in the Philippines gets the hands going into a pattern of a surgeon. And the person even says, “Oh, it’s very strange. I don’t even do anything, and I’m directed by this program.”

So can you see where I’m going? I’m going to this zombie pandemic because what they’re doing now is that… Yes. Professor Campra came to the conclusion that, in fact, this bioelectric graphene is able to receive information and change the body because it’s everywhere. It’s everywhere, and it even goes in the brain. So, of course, it can have a toxicity. So… The endpoint of this is that they’re going to… What they want to do is bio-hack the brain and bio-hack people. And yeah, that’s what I wanted to say.

I want to make the link with David Martin. Dr. David Martin is a patent expert in the USA who spoke to Reiner Fuellmich, in his debate (program). And he said something very important. I invite you to go and see his video with Dr. David Martin. He gives a clue. He says that he was responsible to give the patents of coronavirus and of the vaccine. And he was doing a mea culpa. He said, “I’m very sorry because I should have never accepted those patents because they aren’t biological. They are synthetic modélisations of the virus.”

And when you go and see into some of the documents of Bill Gates, you see in the back the… I have put this in the report. I can give it to you so you can translate it into Spanish. They have put the number of the patent of the synthetic modélisation of many diseases. Marburg, also.

So what they’re doing is: they have modelized a synthetic message to send through Wi-Fi, through 5G. Because the band is so potent, it’s going up to terahertz. Because of the ionization that increases 1000 times. That’s what La Quinta Columna says. It goes up to terahertz, so it can get the information very quickly.

So, the first thing is that people have to stop this receptor. The graphene. Because they’re going to get the information and will be sick. It’s not a biological virus. It’s a synthetic nanoparticle. Biotech through WiFi. And you can already, you know, transmit through your computer. Information.

And they know this because Luc Montagnier, the Nobel prize, was doing this with water. He was doing the composition of water. And he said that he can give the composition through the computer into a database at the time.

This is crazy. But now, I see that it has been used for the collection of data with the PCR —in the nose—, the mask, the antigenic test. They’re getting it through WiFi to the databank because there’s a hydrogel, and there’s everything to make this transmission.

OK, so this is what I’m saying. We’re in a world where they have kept us ignorant in medicine and science. And they have gone very far into what we’re doing now. We’re electric beings, and we can get the imprint of a virus. hat’s why we have to protect ourselves from 5G. From our phone. Even the phone. You hold it like this, and the graphene comes up. So we have to stop using the phone like this. We have to use it like that. Not having it in our pockets, not sleeping with WiFi, etc. And to detox with zinc, glutathione, and N-acetylcysteine, for example.

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna: Website & Telegram

Connect with Orwell City


Dr. Charles Morgan on Psycho-Neurobiology and War



 

Dr. David Martin with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich



 

Click here to see related articles featuring the work of La Quinta Columna

 

See related documents by Mik Andersen:

Identification of Patterns in Coronavirus Vaccines: Evidence of DNA-Origami Self-Assembly

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections




La Quinta Columna Issues Report on Microtechnology Found in Pfizer Vials

La Quinta Columna Issues Report on Microtechnology Found in Pfizer Vials

 

 

Download PDF 
Identificación De Posible Micro-Tecnología
Y Patrones Artificialesen Vacuna Pfizer Con Miscroscopía Óptica

English version will be provided as soon as it is available

 

Video available at Orwellito Rumble.



by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 16, 2022

 

As announced at the time, La Quinta Columna has shared a report on their finding of graphene-like objects, self-assemblies, and microtechnology in 3 Pfizer vaccination vials.

Biostatistician Ricardo Delgado has announced that his team will soon have the report available in several languages for subsequent dissemination in different countries.

Below, Orwell City brings to English the important information given by the Spanish researchers.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Good evening, everyone. La Quinta Columna has issued a report entitled “Identification of possible micro-technology and artificial patterns in Pfizer vaccines with optical microscopy,” which you can download just below this video. And in which we collect the results of the optical microscopy analysis and photographic report of what was recently observed in the Pfizer vials.The report is supported by links to the scientific literature related to the research and object of study. It’s further divided into three parts:

    1. Observed objects with graphene-like appearance.
    2. Self-assembly of objects observed during the conducted research. And
    3. Identification of artificial patterns and micro-technology.

In this report, we draw a series of final conclusions. And we also encourage the scientific and independent community to make similar observations, following the guidelines set out in this study.The file is in PDF format and is digitally signed. We consider the images to be particularly neat and clear. And we demand an explanation from the health and medical community that has been, and still, administering this target product to our civil society. As well as from the European Medicines Agency itself and other regulatory bodies.The report will be per the previous complaints presented with the preliminary report by Dr. Campra, dated June 2021, and the final technical report, also by Dr. Campra, dated November of the same year. La Quinta Columna asks our subscribers to spread the word.Soon, the report will be translated into other languages so that it becomes known and studied in other countries. Thank you all for your attention.

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna at Telegram

Connect with Orwell City




Who Will Save You From This Insane Tyranny? Only You Have the Power to Save Yourself

Who Will Save You From This Insane Tyranny? Only You Have the Power to Save Yourself

by Gary D. Barnett
January 14, 2022

 

“In the last analysis, the essential thing is the life of the individual. This alone makes history, here alone do the great transformations take place, and the whole future, the whole history of the world, ultimately springs as a gigantic summation from this hidden source in individuals.” 
Carl Gustav Jung

Here we are in an age of fear and excuses; an age of collective madness that strives for the death of the individual. Little do the masses know, as the end of individuality is the end of man. The crowd can destroy us, but the individual can save us. The idea of self then is the savior of humanity, for all efforts that rely on the masses as a whole to awaken to the idea of freedom will fail, as the mass will never act to free itself until it is too late.

While this thinking may seem defeatist, it is not, it is simply the way of human nature to hide from the truth. The few can change the world, but the common man who simply exists in life instead of living beyond life, cannot even save himself. In order for any true awakening of mind and spirit to take place, a rebirth brought about by a deep understanding of the inner psyche is necessary; requiring a personal and visceral activation of individual consciousness. This is not a learned behavior, and it is does not come from any perceived physical or personal experience, it is innate. Rarely is this awareness of the subconscious self, experienced by the common man, as it is reserved for those who have the strength and courage to look deep inside and not only face themselves, but also to accept what they find. Once this occurs, truth becomes evident, and fear disappears.

Considering our current circumstances, the more who separate from the crowd in order to find self, the more who are likely to disobey and dissent. It does not take huge numbers for the fight for freedom to survive and prosper, it takes only a minority of very courageous individuals to turn this tide of tyranny. The masses collectively will not win this battle, and in fact will hamper all efforts due to their indifference, but the few awakened can move mountains. If the few become greater in number, the evil can be defeated.

The state’s answer to the strong and awake is to corrupt the minds and bodies of as many people as possible. By gaining the cooperation of the masses, the ruling monsters can pit them against the very individuals with the power to save them. Many tools are being used to accomplish this destruction of the individual psyche, not the least of which is this deadly, poisonous, and body and gene-altering bioweapon called the ‘Covid vaccine.’ Psychological torture is rampant, and has been extremely effective in gaining the acquiescence of the herd, due mostly to unfounded fear. Because of this, most have complied with very totalitarian orders and mandates meant to subdue that bulk of society too weak to fight against this obvious fraud.

Extreme propaganda, false flags, emergency declarations, lockdowns, social distancing, mandated mask wearing, threats, fearmongering, job loss, forced business closures, massive inflation, limitless intimidation, staged and allowed violence, sickness, and much death have been the result of the state’s efforts to repress and control this society. When stress due to fear reaches these levels, the people’s ability to fight back is not enhanced as might be expected, but is vastly weakened. This is known by those evil enough to pursue this agenda of gaining more power in order to subdue and control the majority. When this happens, the real enemy that is the state, pretends to become the savior, and all those attempting to refute the lies become the enemy of the people. This is a true inversion of reality, and controlled perception becomes a real-world media phenomenon, based only on the mass hypnosis of the crowd. As sad as it is, this has been a successful effort by the controlling element of society, and one that threatens the very essence of man.

Considering all that has happened, it is obvious that the deadly fake injection is the most sought-after control method being used by the evil ‘master’ class today. This is why in light of the fact that they are worthless in any effort to control any so-called sickness or disease, and that they are so gravely dangerous, that they are being forced on this and other populations with such vigor. The technology available to those making, administering, and demanding acceptance of these toxic concoctions, is at this point fantastical, and what is being told to the ‘public’ is only a minor snippet of the actual technology available. These are bioweapons meant to change the body, mind, and genetic structure of its victims, including injecting substances that allow for mind control, and can maim and kill as well.

Depopulation is a large part of the state’s agenda, but the submission of the rest is necessary as well in order for long term control of large populations. The proposed injection attack planned for all children is vitally important to the ruling class, because if the injection of these bioweapons into the majority of children from the very young through adolescence can be accomplished, the future belongs to the state. The push to inject the children will not go away on its own, because that is the most important aspect of the plan for future control of humanity. Innocent children and the old and weak are the most vulnerable among us. Should this conspiratorial plot continue to gain success, many of the old will be killed or will die due to the shots, and the young can be fully restrained, supervised, and dominated through artificial methods for many years to come. This is what we face, and why it is so imperative that we stand against the tyranny as aware individuals, never allowing this takeover of mankind to see the light of day.

“No price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself”
~ Friedrich Nietzsche

 

Reference links:

Trauma-based mind control

The ‘Covid’ silent weapon injection

Herd Stupidity and the controlling gene-based “Covid’ injections

The m-RNA-Experiment Gene-altering Poisonous Jabs

“Covid’ Bioweapon shot designed for control and depopulation

Eugenics Is Alive and Well, and the ‘Covid-19’ Scam is the Engine for Accomplishing Depopulation and Mind control

 

Connect with Gary D. Barnett

cover image credit: Peggy_Marco / pixabay




Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on Graphene Oxide, Parasites, and Transistors Found in Vaccines

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on Graphene Oxide, Parasites, and Transistors Found in Vaccines

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 14, 2022

 

In an exclusive interview for CONUVIVE Mundial (United Nations World Council for Life and Truth), Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger talked about the findings made by her and several scientists around the world about the content of vaccines, mentioning from graphene oxide to parasites and biotechnology.

Orwell City brings one of the key excerpts from the interview.



Video available at Rumble.

Dr. Astrid Stucklberger:

Now. So when you know that the graphene oxide is an accelerator and it can go very quickly in the tissue, and then you know that, scientifically, in the autopsy, after death… They have a forbidden autopsy for a long time because they knew that we wouldn’t find the virus. But now the scientists are looking at the… You know, they’re doing autopsies. So what they found is that the Spike protein is not just in one place (where you’re jabbed). They’re everywhere in the body. In the organs, in the tissues, and in all the liquids and the “plumbery.” And this isn’t normal.

And how can it go and be transported? My hypothesis is that it’s graphene oxide. So this means that if the Spike protein is really toxic, graphene oxide is what transports it everywhere. And we don’t know whether the graphene oxide or the Spike protein is the “killer.” Because actually, in the autopsy of sportspeople, even in their brains, what you find is a coagulation of the blood. And it’s so thick that the Spike protein couldn’t do that. So this is very strange. You can measure this micro-coagulation with the D-dimer test. D-dimer test.

OK, so that’s the first point. We can look at Spike protein and graphene oxide as a combination that goes in the whole body and the brain. But I’m not sure that the Spike protein is really the “killer.” But what Professor Bhakti says is that Spike protein triggers an auto-immune reaction. But we have no proof of this because there is no Spike… There’s no virus isolation. So I still have a doubt about this, and that’s just graphene oxide. But now… I’ll talk more about graphene oxide afterward.

But what I want to say is that another group of scientists in Germany, a pathologist, Professor Arne Burckhardt, and Professor Langer have made, together with Reiner Fuellmich —the lawyer— a press conference with an Electronic Microscope. They have taken the vaccine liquid, showed it on the screen, and confirmed the presence of graphene oxide in high doses. They have confirmed the presence of metals that have nothing to do with an experimental vaccine. It’s chrome and nickel. And they have found some type of parasites and, also, a transistor. And they said, “We have to investigate what’s this transistor.”

But when they made this “stage” on what’s in the vaccine, they said in the press conference that anybody… “Now that we have told them what’s in the vaccine… Anybody who’s doing this experimental vaccine and forcing it onto people will be accused on the international trial. Because they’re committing a crime since all those components are toxic for people.”

Working in a research group is like doing detective work. So now, the next group that did the same is Dr. Carrie Madej and Dr. Zalewski, who are… You know, one is an archaeologist. One was working in the laboratory of Pfizer. And then, Dr. Ariana Love. They have also looked into this in a different way. They put the parasite under the microscope at body temperature. And the eggs, because they found nano-eggs, nano… You know, more stuff in there. And they found that this egg at body temperature would become a parasite that would go out. And it’s Hydra Vulgaris.

And this is very, very strange. Very worrying. We have never seen this in any book of medicine. It was said by those experts. So this is another mystery. Then, there’s more in this vaccine than we know. And they have different lots with different… You know, batches with different risks of dying or not. That’s one thing.

Now, I have to come to the last part… The latest danger that we find now… And this is thanks to Professor Campra Madrid. His latest and final report is coming to a really, really interesting point. And it corresponds to what we call in the WHO, a chemical hazard. Because if you have a chemical intoxication or poisoning, it creates an infection. Or creates a heart attack. Or it creates this and that.

So what they found is that, in fact, this graphene has a potential, a power that makes (radiation) a thousand times higher because graphene is an ionizer. There’s an ionization. I’m not an expert, but I remember the concept. There’s an ionization that multiplies radiation 1000 times, which means that they have potentialized graphene. And it’s very sensitive to radiation. And according to the group in Spain, La Quinta Columna and Professor Campra, in fact, people are dying of acute radiation and not about anything else. Acute radiation. And radiation coagulates the blood, and it cannot be transported. And this is why footballers or sportspeople should stop sport if they got the vaccine. Because when they do sport, they accelerate their bodies, and the whole acceleration of radiation becomes so acute that the heart stops and they fall.

And I tell my friends, “You’re infectologists, you’re always talking more about the infectious diseases.” I tell them, “Do you really think that a footballer who drops dead on the football field… Did you think this is a virus? That it’s infectious? It’s not a virus. It’s impossible. You cannot just die from a heart attack because of an infectious disease. It’s a highly intoxicating chemical.”

And we don’t know more, but I’m sure we’re going to find more. So the fact is that we shouldn’t give blood to anybody if we’re vaccinated because there are nanoparticles. And that those nanoparticles are transmitted. They’re “contagious.” It’s the vaccine and the nanoparticles that “fly.” We don’t know yet. But what they’re saying is that, in fact, those nanoparticles can be transmitted like a poison. Because that’s how they want everybody to mix up. We have to be very careful with the vaccinated people because once they have been experimentally vaccinated, they’re transmitting much more (nanoparticles) at the beginning.

So it’s very… We don’t know everything, but we know that the people who are vaccinated are at high risk of having a disease. And also of transmitting it to their partner if they’re sleeping with them. If they even hold hands. I have talked with doctors who told me that even couples that just hold hands. And one is vaccinated, and the other isn’t. The second comes and has a high level of D-dimer and graphene.

So graphene nanoparticles transmit from person to person in a very, very quick way. And it’s very important that people understand that they have to detoxify their blood. We’re going to talk about this now. Detoxify and take away the potentiality of graphene nanoparticles.

 

Connect with Conuvive Mundial at Telegram

Connect with Orwell City

 


Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is an interdisciplinary scientist at University of Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. She is an invited professor in European universities, an author and international public speaker

See related articles:

Corona Investigative Committee: PhD Scientist, Working for Decades with WHO, Exposes Deep Corruption of Bill Gates, GAVI, WHO, the UN & Global Governments

Whistleblower Astrid Stuckelberger w/ Del Bigtree: Who’s Pulling the Strings at the W.H.O.?




Zen Koan for the Virus

Zen Koan for the Virus

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 14, 2022

 

Question: How do you prevent a disease that has no cause?

Get back to me after contemplating this for 10 years.

The so-called disease, COVID, is touted as the result of a virus, but the virus doesn’t exist.

Nevertheless, a vaccine aimed at beefing up the immune system against the virus that doesn’t exist is heralded as a miracle.

There is also a test for the virus that doesn’t exist.

People fear the virus that doesn’t exist.

Whole countries are locked down to stop the spread of the virus that doesn’t exist.

People wear masks to stop the transmission of the virus that doesn’t exist.

People with no symptoms are called cases of the disease caused by the virus that doesn’t exist.

The vaccine can’t stop the transmission of the virus that doesn’t exist.

The federal database lists over a million injuries reported after the vaccination which was designed to prevent the disease caused by the virus that doesn’t exist.

People who refuse the vaccination designed to prevent the disease caused by the virus that doesn’t exist are called criminals or even terrorists.

The virus that doesn’t exist will spread at a small party in a person’s home, but the virus that doesn’t exist will detour around waves of immigrants coming into the country.

The virus that doesn’t exist was created in a lab.

The overwhelming percentage of people who die from infection by the virus that doesn’t exist are the elderly, who already have several long-standing serious health problems and have been treated for decades with toxic drugs, and are then given more toxic drugs to kill the virus that doesn’t exist and are sedated with powerful drugs and put on breathing ventilators—a lethal treatment.

There are at least two variants of the virus that doesn’t exist.

There are doctors who heavily criticize the current vaccines, but claim that a safe and successful vaccine can be developed to prevent the disease caused by the virus that doesn’t exist.

Other than all of the above, the global public COVID policy is quite sane.


For reference, read:

COVID: If there is no virus, why are people dying?

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/01/06/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying-why/

COVID: the virus was never proven to exist; a statement from Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/26/covid-the-virus-was-never-proven-to-exist-a-statement/

Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists

blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/21/isolation-of-sars-cov-2-refuted-in-step-by-step-analysis-of-claim/

 

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Miriams-Fotos / pixabay




Europeans United for Freedom: Join the Protest for Freedom and Democracy in Brussels on January 23

Europeans United for Freedom: Join the Protest for Freedom and Democracy in Brussels on January 23

 

 

European Parliament Members call on you: Join Protest for Freedom and Democracy in Brussels on January 23

by Children’s Health Defense Europe
January 14, 2022

 

We are living in excecptional times. Whilst hundreds of thousands of people have been harmed after taking experimental medical products, governments and regulators are not even just looking the other way; they are forcing people to continue taking those harmful products or have basic human rights taken from them. Even more: peaceful demonstrators against thos totalitarian measures are being attacked by security forces and riot police in many countries, involuntary exposing government hypocrisy and double-standards: Parliamentarians, who are elected to represent the people, are keeping quiet about it when it happens at home where they usually erupt in televised condemnations of such atrocities happening in rogue-states or dictatorships abroad. But there is hope: a small group of Members of the European Parliament are calling spades a spade!



In a press conference on January 13 in Brussels, MEPs Antoniella Donato, Cristian Terhes and Ivan Sincic not only called out governments and the European Commission for failing in their pandemic response policies. They also called upon the people of Europe, especially in Germany, Netherlands, Luxemburg, Belgium and France to come to Brussels an Sunday, January 23rd for the Protest for Freedom and Democracy.

MEP FRANCESCA DONATO reported about her native Italy

  • The collapse of the health care system in Italy is a reality
  • Italian MEP Francesca Donato warned of civil war in Italy which could spread to other EU member states
  • She reported of how the unvaccinated minority is persecuted
  • She demanded the EU Council must intervene immediately
  • She reported how population in Italy feels that president Mario Draghi seems to be “untouchable”
  • Why are so many people hospitalized and dying despite 90% of Italians being fully vaccinated?
  • Why has the Italian health institute not published monthly reports since September 2021?
  • Why do People injured by vaccines not receive any assistance from public health services?
  • Why is no compensation paid to people who lost relatives because of vaccine adverse events?
  • Why is there no transparency guaranteed to people?
  • Why is there no investigation about the ingredients of these injections despite of reports from Japan and elsewhere about contaminations and high numbers of injuries?

ROMANIAN MEP CRISTIAN TERHES

  • observed how the EU, under the leadership of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, stays silent when peaceful European citizens are beaten up by police forces
  • stated how he watched in disbelief what happened in Amsterdam on January 2nd
  • observed how the EU is transitioning from democracy to tyranny
  • People’s fundamental rights were stripped from them by their governments
  • questioned what is the direction that European citizens allow the EU to take
  • asked: “Do we live in Europe as an area of freedom as the treaty says, or do we accept this EU under the leadership of Ursula von der Leyen to become a prison camp?”

 

©January 2022, Children’s Health Defense Europe, A.S.B.L.. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, A.S.B.L.. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense Europe? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Senta Depuydt and the Children’s Health Defense Europe team. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 

Connect with Children’s Health Defense Europe

Connect with Europeans United for Freedom

Join Europeans United for Freedom on Telegram




Justice Centre Will Take Legal Action Against Quebec Tax on Unvaccinated

Justice Centre Will Take Legal Action Against Quebec Tax on Unvaccinated

by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
January 13, 2022

 

The Justice Centre today announced it will launch legal action against the provincial government of Quebec, following the announcement by Premier Francois Legault of a “planned health tax” on Quebec residents who do not receive the requisite number of Covid injections, currently at three.

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022, Quebec Premier Francois Legault told news media a “substantial” amount would be implemented as a tax for those not getting a Covid vaccine. Despite having a double vaccination rate of 78.3%, Quebec has implemented some of the strictest lockdown measures in North America. The province imposed a curfew from 10:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. banning even the solitary act of dog walking, and has implemented “vaccine passports” for places of worship and for businesses deemed “non-essential” by politicians. The province has also banned the vaccine-free from liquor and cannabis stores.

Premier Legault did not give details on when the tax would be implemented, or how much the cost would be.

Quebec follows other European nations such as Greece and Italy implementing a financial burden on unvaccinated citizens. In Greece, individuals over 60 year olds will be fined 100 euros ($144 CDN) after January 15 for not taking the shot, while in Austria, individuals over 14 will be charged the Canadian equivalent of $5,147 every three months.

“The proposed Quebec ‘health tax’ is an egregious violation of the Charter rights of Quebecers and an affront to equality which Canada was, in times past, known for,” states Justice Centre President, John Carpay.

“This is a blatant attack on a minority of society. Historically, persecution of a minority through taxation has paved the way for further and worse measures. We will fight this discriminatory and unscientific tax in court and defend the right to bodily autonomy of Quebecers and all Canadians. This injustice has no place in Canada,” adds Mr. Carpay.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly states that every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination.  And Canadian courts have repeatedly affirmed the Charter right to bodily autonomy.

“The announcement of a tax on those who decline the Covid injections, like the ‘vaccine passport,’ is discrimination and wrong. Vaccines do not stop people from contracting or spreading Covid, so there is no medical or scientific justification for the financial persecution and discrimination against vaccine-free citizens,” concludes Mr. Carpay.

 

Connect with Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

cover image credit: DEZALB / pixabay




The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly on the Supreme Court Vaccine Mandate Opinion

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly on the Supreme Court Vaccine Mandate Opinion

by Michael Boldin, Tenth Amendment Center
January 13, 2022

 

GOOD: Supreme Court holds vaccine mandate for businesses is illegal. (We absolutely gotta take a win when we get it!)

“Although Congress has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly. Requiring the vaccination of 84 million Americans, selected simply because they work for employers with more than 100 employees, certainly falls in the latter category,” the unsigned opinion says.

BAD: The opinion absolutely leaves room for another mandate, tailored differently.

UGLY: The Court believes the feds had the power to pass the OSH Act in the first place – and get deeply involved in healthcare today.

It’s important to understand that the Supreme Court opinion today is largely based on the argument that Congress didn’t expressly authorize a vaccine mandate in the OSH Act of 1970.

So, if Congress does just that, we can count on SCOTUS to back up their power as they usually do.

But, under the Constitution, the OSH Act of 1970 was unconstitutional from day one.

Whether Congress gets around to expanding their own power this year, or in 50 years, we shouldn’t be surprised about it – unless the people reject the foundation of it all.

That includes – no longer waiting for the federal government to limit its own power.

It’s up to the people to preserve their own Constitution.

 

Connect with Tenth Amendment Center

cover image credit: Conmongt / pixabay




Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s OSHA Vaxx Mandate

Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s OSHA Vaxx Mandate

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
January 13, 2022

 

Despite the misinformation spewed forth by Justice Sotomayor, The US Supreme Court has blocked the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test rule for US businessesbut allows vaccine mandate for most health care workers.

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) argue against the Department of Labor, in the Court’s first hearing, that:

“OSHA’s sweeping regulatory dictate,” will “irreparably injure the very businesses that Americans have counted on to widely distribute COVID-19 vaccines and protective equipment to save lives—and to keep them fed, clothed, and sustained during this now two-year-long pandemic.”

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rule would have required 80 million workers to get shots or periodic tests.

The OSHA ruling vote was 6-3 with Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan in dissent.

“Permitting OSHA to regulate the hazards of daily life – simply because most Americans have jobs and face those same risks while on the clock – would significantly expand OSHA’s regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said during arguments that he thinks it’s hard to argue that the 1970 law governing OSHA “gives free reign to the agencies to enact such broad regulation.”

The court allowed a separate rule to take effect requiring shots for workers in nursing homes, hospitals and other facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid payments from the federal government (which will be interesting given that California just allowed COVID positive healthcare workers to go back to work).

The vaccine mandate for healthcare workers vote was 5-4 with Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett in dissent, which means Roberts and Kavanaugh joined liberal justices in allowing the HHS mandate on healthcare workers to stand.

So with over 1 million COVID cases per day and now his vaxx mandate in tatters, this seems to sum things up rather well…

How long before the cries of “Pack The Court” echo around The Capitol once more?

*  *  *

Read the full opinions [Download PDF HERE]

 

Connect with ZeroHedge

cover image credit: OhBillyBoy / pixabay




Reiner Fuellmich Update on International Lawsuits & Continued Exposure of Globalist Agenda: “The Vaccines Are Designed to Kill and Depopulate the Planet.”

Reiner Fuellmich Update on International Lawsuits & Continued Exposure of Globalist Agenda: “The Vaccines Are Designed to Kill and Depopulate the Planet.”

 

“…Everyone who is involved in this is going to be held liable — the politicians, the media people, everyone.
The most important thing, as you’re alluding to the European Union, is that this is only possible to happen because it was done from far away. Because people are trying to make us do what they want us to do — people who we have nothing to do with, people who we never elected. This is a totally undemocratic process that we’re looking at, the result of which is killing us.
If we in all regions– in Sweden, in our regions in Germany, in our separate little regions in Denmark. all of these places — if we had been in charge, this would never have happened.
That is why we have to disconnect from all of these global corporations which are nothing but predators. They don’t produce anything. They just steal…
We have to set up our own our own supply chains, agricultural supply chains, health supply chains, energy supply chains, and we have the means to do it.
We — those who will not get the shot — we are the ones who have all the good people with us, the smart people. All the others who are following orders, they know nothing. They don’t understand anything. In the end, they’re going to need us to save them, if there is a way to save them.
But we have to keep in mind that it is the regions. We have to connect with each other, to exchange the best ideas. But only we in our communities, in our separate regions, only we know what is best for us.
And we will not ever let any of these bastards tell us what to do, ever again. This is not going to happen. We’re exposing them and this is going to be the end of the line for them.”
~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

 

Reiner Füllmich & 50 lawyers: ”The vaccines are designed to kill and depopulate the planet” 

by Jesper Johansson, Perspektiv
with Ulf Bittner, citizen journalist & blogger
January 10, 2022



Original video available at Perspektiv Rumble channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

 

After hearing the witness statements to the German Corona Investigative Committee by former vice president of Pfizer dr Mike Yeadon who has been a scientist for 36 years, lawyers with Reiner Füllmich draw the same conclusion: The injections normally called Corona vaccines are designed to experiment on the human race and to find out what dosage of a yet unknown toxin is needed in order to kill people.

The mortality rate linked to the vaccines, according to Yeadon, is traceable in terms of lot numbers of the different batches, as some batches appear to be more lethal than others. When taking a look at the evidence available, the main goal with the injections all over the world is global depopulation, according to the lawyers involved.

Dr Füllmich told Perspektiv that the lawyers preparing an international law suit were no longer in doubt: Poisoning and mass murder through so called Corona vaccines is intentionally being perpetrated on the peoples of the world.

Citizen Journalist Ulf Bittner from EU/EES Healthcare blog and Sverige Granskas stated in the interview that the situation with traceable lot numbers and injuries and death related to lot numbers is similar in the different health care regions of Sweden. Bittner is in contact with a vaccine coordinator who has provided documents to keep track of how many people have been injured and lost their lives related to the different batches of the so-called vaccines.

01:00 Different numbers on the barcodes on the bottom of the vaccine doses are placebo which has been given to politicians according to a Slovenian chief nurse. Is it the same in other countries?

1:54 Mike Yeadon and the LOT numbers of some shots of the brands Moderna, Johnson& Johnson and Pfizer/Biontech are related to much higher mortality than for the other manufacturers.

3:52 The producers of the so-called vaccines are experimenting with the correct dosages to kill people according to Dr Füllmich. This according to the Corona Investigative Committee, constitute compelling evidence for punitive damages and attempted mass murder. They are intentionally killing people.

08:30 Lawyers from India have filed complaints for premeditative murder.

09:55 Mike Yeadon as a witness for the coming legal action against the perpetrators.

10:44 Everyone who critizises the wrongdoings of the governments of the world is being called a ‘right wing extremist’. This has also happened to the internationally renowned scientist Mike Yeadon.

13:05 CDC withdrew the recommendation for the PCR-tests diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 from 31/12-2021. PCR- tests are the foundation of the pandemic. Why is Anthony Fauci now doing a 180-degree turn?

17:25 At least a million dollars per person will be claimed in punitive damages if the lawsuit is successful.

18:33 Previously only ten percent of all adverse effects were reported. In the situation the world is right now, the team estimated that in fact only one percent of all adverse effects were being reported.

19:25 CEO of Life insurance company from Indiana USA with 100 billions of dollars in assets said: ”Over the span of this past year there has been an excess mortality of 40 percent”. This is believed to be due to the injections.

21:05 What substance in the vials makes them so lethal? Is it Graphene Oxide/graphene hydroxide?

22:37 Any vaccin is a poison, it is the dosage which makes the difference. This is not a vaccine, as a vaccine provides immunity, while these products demand incessant injections. Either a vaccine works or it does not.

24:40 This is not gene therapy either, since a gene therapy means exchanging a broken gene with a fixed one. This is more like experimenting on people, and trying to kill us.

25.15 The doses are not tested by governments, while governments will be keeping the contracts hidden from the public for at least 55 years. How is this affecting the possibility of getting people punished? Dr Füllmich goes through all the lies paving the way for the tyrannical situation the world is now in.

28:25 The vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The producers are experimenting on lethal doses of poison. Everyone now taking part in intentional malicious infliction of harm will be punished.

30:05 How sure are legal experts about the conclusion that Mike Yeadon has drawn from this, that it is all about depopulation and intentionally killing people through injections? If close to 50 lawyers are of the same opinion, it is regarded as “irrefutable proof”.

32:08 Batches of injections in Sweden can be traced by an application.

32:45 Füllmich is in cooperation with people working within the secret service of Germany who do not wish to take the injections.

34:15 Dr Lee Merritt on combat pilots in the USA refusing to get the shots. According to Dr Füllmich, Dr Merrit explained: ”They understood that if they were forced to [get vaccinated] they were going to get killed.”

35:15 Information is being collected on batches in Sweden from every region, the Swedish health authorities (Folkhälsomyndigheten) and medical board (Läkemedelsverket). Every batch is traceable through an application. There is economic reward for the Swedish regions which manage to get more people injected. One of the expert lawyers involved in the upcoming court hearings is a specialist on Nuremberg Trials.

38:45 How will the trials be performed, and through what legal structure? A common design, the same structure as for the Nuremberg trials.

39:40 Free choice should reign for members of the European Union. Consumers of health care have consumer rights. Fraud means misleading the people and consumers of health care.

42:00 The so called vaccines are an adulterated product put on to the market. According to Mike Yeadon there is a law in the US that will make everyone liable for the harms created by the adulterated product. Toxins are being put into the vials other than the known lipids etc, which the people who took the vaccines never consented to.

43:40 The importance of decentralization of power and national independence rather than global organizations such as the European Union telling the people what to do. Disconnecting from the banking system, NGO:s and creating independent and strong agricultural supply chains, energy supply chains etc.

46:15 When are the trials going to take place? How will the indicements happen and how will the trials be held? One of the goals is to inform people and expose the wrongdoings by involving the alternative media so that the mainstream media won’t be able to ignore the trials. The crew is working on a new system of law in the USA, Africa and Germany.

50:48 Dr Füllmich believes the world is close to a tipping point and the whole narrative will fall apart very very soon, maybe in a couple of weeks or months.

54:13 Robert Malone, Robert F Kennedy and Mike Yeadon and others involved in exposing the agenda are in contact with each other, and a tour is planned with these whistleblowers in the USA in March

 

Connect with Jesper Johansson & Perspektiv at Rumble




Vaccinated People Who Then Test Positive for COVID; the Wave Is Building

Vaccinated People Who Then Test Positive for COVID; the Wave Is Building

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 11, 2022

 

An alert reader pointed me to a key statement in a document published by OraSure Technologies, a manufacturer of a rapid COVID test. The document is posted on an FDA web page.

It is titled, “IntellSwab COVID-19 Rapid Test—Healthcare Provider Instructions for Use.”

The key quote occurs in a section headlined, Limitations of the Test:

“Potential cross reactivity of the InteliSwab™ COVID-19 Rapid Test with COVID-19 vaccines or therapeutics has not been evaluated.”

In the medical community, the term “cross reactivity” is universally understood. It means: a test designed to detect whether X is present in a person’s body is, in fact, detecting Y, an entirely irrelevant item, BUT is mistakenly calling it X.

For example, a person had three drinks the night before his test, and the test then came up positive for the presence of a germ, when actually the test was reacting to the alcohol in the drinks.

And in this document I just quoted, the manufacturer readily admits it hasn’t looked into the possibility that the COVID test is reacting to the COVID VACCINE and then mistakenly stating the vaccinated person has THE VIRUS in his body.

So the question is: why hasn’t the manufacturer looked into this cross reactivity issue? The document shows tests for all sorts of other possible cross reactivity.

And the next question is: how can the FDA grant emergency use authorization for this rapid test, when cross reactivity with the vaccine hasn’t been explored?

The manufacturer clearly understands that cross reactivity with the vaccine is a possibility; otherwise they wouldn’t have mentioned it.

Consider this scenario: a person takes the COVID vaccine. He can now go back to work at his office. But his boss wants all employees to keep getting tested. Three weeks later, the vaccinated person takes the test—and because the test DOES cross react with the vaccine, he’s told he’s positive. He has to go home. If he has a cough or a sniffle, he might end up at the doctor, who might direct him to the hospital. At that point, all bets are off. Who knows what highly dangerous and life-threatening treatments (e.g., a breathing ventilator) the hospital might impose—especially since the hospital is receiving federal money for both the diagnosis and treatment of every COVID patient.

In this article, I’m not trying to explain why the test could cross react with the vaccine. All sorts of educated speculations are possible. I’m simply pointing out the existence of rapid COVID tests that have never been examined, thoroughly, for cross-reactivity with the vaccine.

And this is an entirely separate issue from the huge number of deaths and severe injuries directly caused by the vaccine.

Except…it isn’t a separate issue, because, if very large numbers of vaccinated people are then testing positive for COVID, and the positive tests are occurring because of cross-reactivity, this is contributing to the lunatic medical assertion that people must take TOXIC boosters, to ward off the possibility of “catching COVID” after just one or two vaccine injections.

Bottom line: It’s inexcusable and criminal for a public health agency to approve a test that hasn’t been vetted for cross reactivity with a vaccine, when the vaccine has been taken by millions of people.

I’ll give you one educated speculation about cross reactivity. The COVID test is looking for a piece of RNA ASSUMED to be part of “the virus.” The vaccine contains some part of that RNA-piece. Therefore, when the test is run—depending on the sensitivity of the test—many previously vaccinated people are going to be “positive” for “the virus.”

It’s all fun and games—if you consider destruction of lives fun and games.

People who have taken the vaccine, and then are told to get tested, could say, “I want you to guarantee that the test has been thoroughly vetted for cross reactivity with the vaccine. Prove it.”

I’m not saying this argument would fly, legally speaking, because appearing in courts before judges is a roll of the dice; but the employer who ordered the test might back off.

This, however, is definitely NOT a recommendation that anyone should take the vaccine in the first place.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: chenspec / pixabay




The Real Anthony Fauci – Catherine Austin Fitts talks with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The Real Anthony Fauci – Catherine Austin Fitts talks with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

by Children’s Health Defense Europe
January 11, 2022

 



Transcript:

0:00:00.0 Catherine Austin Fitts:
Ladies and gentleman, it’s my pleasure to welcome to The COVID-19 Symposium for the Doctors For COVID Ethics, a man who needs no introduction here, Robert F. Kennedy Junior, who is the chair of Children’s Health Defense, a seasoned attorney litigator. Well, you were a best-selling author before this, but now, this is the one I wanna hold up, this is The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, already a global best-seller. The last time I saw you, I had not read it. I have read it, and I have to tell you, I started it on a Saturday morning and I said I was just gonna read a few chapters. There went the day. I spent the whole… [chuckle] I could not put it down. And for a book with this many footnotes to be this well-written and fascinating, and spell-binding is a great achievement. I have no idea how you did it, but I just wanna congratulate you.

0:00:56.0 Robert F. Kennedy,Jr.:
Thank you so much. Catherine. [laughter] I think that’s the best praise I’ve had coming from you.

0:01:06.6 CAF:
Well, I keep telling people, this book has more footnotes than the Encyclopedia Britannica. [laughter]

0:01:13.3 RFK,Jr.:
We need to be careful.

0:01:15.4 CAF:
Yeah, no, it’s clearly, brilliantly documented. Okay, so I wanna dive in in this way. The session that you’ll be part of tonight on Doctors For COVID Ethics is called “Global Coup d’état”, and I think no one does a better job of explaining how Fauci and his role fits into the global coup. The book does a marvelous job of doing it, but I wanna kinda dive into the middle. Because the thing I like the most about this book, is that people all over the heartland are feeding back to me and saying, “Oh my God, it’s really this bad, and how did I not know that it was this bad?” So, it’s a remarkable achievement, and it’s sort of piercing through and breaking through the fog of war and making people realize: this really is a global coup. So, I want you to step back and tell us why you wrote this book, and how you managed to connect the dots to… really, the change of control that is being attempted across the planet.

0:02:20.8 RFK,Jr.:
Yeah, so I felt I was in a unique position because I’d been litigating… And I apologize, my voice is really bad today. I hope it will get better as we talk. But I felt like I was in a unique position, because I had been litigating for many years against powerful corporations on environmental issues, and I had seen firsthand and really understood the dynamics of agency capture. How regulatory agencies, through a variety and abundance of very well-documented forces, are, inevitably, captured and transformed into sock puppets of the industry that they’re supposed to regulate. And the public health,… so probably about 20% of my lawsuits… I’ve had over 500 lawsuits against polluters, and probably 20% of those were against the EPA, and the other state regulatory agencies that are supposed to function to protect Americans from pollution. But instead had become promoters and spokespeople for and defenders of the industry. And I also, because for 17 of those years, I’ve been working on public health issue, specifically, with vaccines, trying to get some vaccine safety, robust science, independent regulators who are free from these corrupt entanglements with pharmaceutical companies. I also recognized that what happened in the public health arena was really unique.

0:04:09.2 RFK,Jr.:
That there’s a level… Because of these financial relationships with pharma, it’s regulatory capture on steroids.

0:04:23.4 CAF:
I would say it’s regulatory ownership.

0:04:25.4 RFK,Jr.:
The relationship between pharmaceutical companies and the three big agencies, HHS-health agencies, FDA, CDC and NIH, is a seamless subsidiary relationship. In other words, even within those agencies, the individual regulators, the highest level people, regard their job as a partnership with pharma. Pharma is consulted on everything, pharma can overrule policies, you get advance. In those agencies, you get your bonuses, you get your salary increase by promoting the pharmaceutical agenda and by promoting the mercantile and commercial interests of pharmaceutical companies, and particularly vaccines. The vaccines have become the fulcrum of that whole relationship. One, because they’re enormously profitable, and the reason they’re profitable is because they’re exempt on liability. So, the biggest margin in every other medicine is downstream payments to people injured. Every medicine injures some subgroup. And pharma’s immune. No matter how egregious their behavior, no matter how terrible your injury, no matter how reckless or negligent their conduct, you cannot sue them. That alone, Pharma has made vaccines immensely profitable and that act was passed in 1986.

0:06:15.1 RFK,Jr.:
And you had this gold rush, which when they added up all these new vaccines etc…. We went from the three vaccines that I had as a kid to 17, essentially mandated – they’re technically recommended. But in many states, you cannot enjoy your freedom without complying. Your kids can’t go to school, etcetera. And up to 72 doses of 16 vaccines are mandated now for kids from birth to when they’re 18 years old. And accompanying that change, beginning around 1989, when a lot of these new vaccines were suddenly “recommended”, you had an explosion in chronic disease, which really enriched the pharmaceutical industry. So, you had autism go from one in 10,000 in my generation to one in 34 today. We had the food allergies suddenly becoming an epidemic, peanut allergies, and Pharma was selling the $600 EpiPens. And you had rheumatoid… All the auto-immune diseases, rheumatoid Arthritis, juvenile Diabetes, Lupus, Graves Disease, Crohn’s Disease, MS.

0:07:32.2 RFK,Jr.:
All these other diseases that are… By the way, they’re all listed as side effects on the manufacturer’s inserts of these 72 vaccines. They suddenly became epidemic, and vaccines went from being a $187 million a year industry, when Tony Fauci took control, to a $60 billion industry. But the big payments to the pharmaceutical companies are the… Selling the remedies of the chronic diseases that are associated with the vaccines that they’re selling children. So, treating the seizures, treating all these 170 auto-immune diseases that suddenly came out, which we hadn’t even heard about. Neurodevelopmental diseases, ADD/ADHD. speech delay, sleeping disorders, tics, Tourette’s Syndrome, Narcolepsy. All these things that my generation never heard of that suddenly appeared in 1989.

0:08:34.6 CAF:
So, one of the things I love about this book is you do… As you’re documenting Fauci’s agency basically controlling and running over three-quarters of the trillion dollars from the time he takes over, you are documenting the slide in the health of Americans, their life expectancy, the chronic diseases in children, which are epidemic, and the one that really takes your breath away is from 2000 on the IQ of American children have dropped by seven points. Is that correct?

0:09:06.1 RFK,Jr.:
Yeah.

0:09:06.8 CAF:
And so you’re showing how the disease is growing and the American people are sliding into failure.

0:09:15.4 RFK,Jr.:
We went from being the healthiest nation in the world, to being the sickest. We’re number 79 in terms of all indicia… of the cumulative indicia of health metrics. All the things that public health regulators use to judge whether a nation is healthy or not are in decline longevity, life expectancy, the rises in infant mortality and first-year-mortality, second-year-mortality and the medical claims. Ironically, again and Fauci had a lot to do with this, we are consuming more pharmaceutical drugs than any other nation. So, we consume three times the pharmaceutical drugs as the other Western nations. We pay higher prices for them. We have the most expensive healthcare system in the world and we’re 79th in terms of public health outcomes. I show how most of these problems are not… You can’t blame them all on Doctor Fauci but he alone could have prevented all of them. And what he’s done is, he’s turned NIH from a public health agency, which is a Gold Standard public health agency, where it was when he found it, to an incubator for pharmaceutical products.

0:10:54.1 CAF:
Right, but you also draw the circle out into the intelligence agencies and a broader coalition of syndicate, who’s engineering central control. If you look at the rise of inequality, it’s very much a part of this because poor health is part of what’s causing this rise in inequality.

0:11:14.6 RFK,Jr.:
Exactly, and if you look at the way he… They drilled it again and again, this pandemic response Tony Fauci was intimately and intricately involved in figuring out, well in advance of Covid-19, Here’s what we do when there’s a pandemic. And he worked, and I think one of the revelation of my book shows how closely he worked with the CIA in developing a response that had nothing to do with public health. It was a militarized and monetized response to a public health crisis. In each of these pandemic simulations that they took for 20 years, they were training frontline workers, public officials in Europe, Canada, the United States and Australia how to use pandemics as not to heal people, but as a pretense for imposing totalitarian controls, for the controlled demolition of constitutional rights in all the liberal democracies across the world. They called this pandemic… a secret pandemic simulation program that they had, “Operation Lockstep.” Because it was a way of training all these governments to pivot in lockstep and impose totalitarian… As we talk about to execute a coup d’etat against democracy globally.

0:12:51.5 CAF:
So, one of the things that I first heard from you, and it was a very powerful, really powerful insight, because I keep trying to warn people, we have to stop the vaccine passports. You pointed out, they’re being run by the financial ministries.

0:13:05.4 RFK,Jr.:
Yeah, that’s right. The real danger of vaccine passports that people have to understand, is we live in a country, and the Europeans have lived in countries where you could pretty much do what you wanted. Now, these governments are not perfect. Our constitutional rights are not perfect. There’s always cases of abuse. Government and industry had more power than we should give them, but it was pretty good anyway. You could go out, see a sports game. You could get on an airplane and fly anywhere you want without being tracked or traced, or any of these things. And you had a lot of freedom in your lives. But once you get that passport, those freedoms are no longer freedoms, they’re privileges. And they’re privileges that are contingent upon your obedience to a ultimately limitless inventory of diktats.

0:14:15.1 RFK,Jr.:
Many of them from unelected authorities. If you’re a bureaucrat like Tony Fauci, who without any public hearing can say, “Everybody put on masks. Everybody social distance.” And the significance is that these are not being administered by public health agencies. One, is there is no public health classification on these passports. We know that vaccines do not prevent transmission. They cannot end the pandemic, therefore… And so there’s really not a public health rationale. It’s a control device, and it’s a control device that is going to be linked to currency and to your checkbook, your savings account, your capacity to…

0:15:00.8 CAF:
Yeah, I believe they’re going to use it to take all of our assets. I really do.

0:15:06.8 RFK,JR.:
That’s possible. I try not to predict what’s gonna happen, that don’t I know about… But here’s what you can predict: we know they now have programmable currency. What that means is that, when we move to digitalized currency, which you’ve been warning about for years, they’re gonna be a government… It makes every transaction that you make visible to government and recordable and makes every transactions visible to these financial houses, so the government can tax them… The financial houses can figure out ways to make money on transaction so, you buy a porn magazine, a bottle of beer or whatever it is that you’re buying, they’re gonna know about it.

0:15:55.4 RFK,Jr.:
But it also allows them to stop you from spending money on things they don’t want you to spend money on. They can program your currency. For example, let’s say you violate the social distancing rule, and they know that because they know your location 24 hours a day from your cellphone, etcetera, and from facial recognition. You violate that rule or you refuse the vaccine or whatever, now they can say, until you comply or in punishment, you are under house arrest and you could only leave your house to buy at local grocery stores. They can make it so your money does not work any place, other than grocery stores within a mile of your house. They can make it so that you can’t travel from Brentwood to Burbank. You can’t get gasoline, you can’t… So they can control you with no due process, they can simply control you.

0:16:55.7 RFK,Jr.:
And all of these rights that we assume we have have now become privileges that are contingent upon your obedience with their diktats, and with your social credit scores, and all of things that they can now look at, that are gonna be slowly added. So, here is the thing that I would say, the ultimate punchline is that, we were told this was only going to be two weeks. We know it’s gonna last forever. There is no rule, there is no power in history that governments have taken away and given back freely. There has to be a demand. And they will keep those powers forever. They will never relinquish them ever too. Each one of the powers they have gotten, and this is the rule tah is as reliable law of gravity: They will abuse it to the ultimate extent possible, so you have to assume that any power that you give them, they are going to abuse.

0:18:01.2 CAF:
Okay, so how do we fix that?

0:18:02.5 RFK,Jr.:
And the last rule I would say is, nobody ever complied their way out of totalitarianism.

0:18:10.2 CAF:
Absolutely. Bravo.

0:18:11.7 RFK,Jr.:
The more you behave, the worse it’s gonna get.

0:18:16.3 CAF:
Yes. Absolutely.

0:18:17.3 RFK,Jr.:
And this today is really the hill you are going to die on. If you don’t defend hill this tomorrow.

0:18:29.8 Catherine:
So, two things before we close. I have to tell you, one of the most inspiring things about this book is I realized as you read it, what you have managed to do over many decades is pull together, I call it a Zulu Army of the 21th century, a group of doctors and scientists and attorneys and journalists, and it is a remarkable demonstration of what happens when that many smart people come together to serve freedom. And it’s remarkable, it’s really… Because you’ve managed to put together a network, which is very mighty and very inspiring and makes you feel when you read it, I’m not alone. There’s a lot of people who are fearless and fighting for freedom. So, one…

0:19:21.9 RFK,Jr.:
I had better run now Catherine, We are in an arms race. The question is, can we build the resistance quick enough to stop the escalating control that they’ve planned now with their turn-key-totalitarianism ? Or are we gonna get to the point where they just have so much power, that even if 100% of us are opposing them, is there gonna be an exit?

0:19:45.1 CAF:
So one thing I’m gonna suggest, one thing everybody can do is buy this book, read this book, give it to your friends for Christmas, pass it on. I’ve been passing it out like candy at Halloween. No, but it’s remarkable because I pass it out and people read it. And when they read it, it changes their mind, and they see the urgency of doing something and resisting now. So as you say, resist, resist, resist. And I can’t thank you enough for joining us, the Doctors For COVID Ethics, all of us are very appreciative of everything you do. If there’s anything we can ever do to help, let us know we’re there.

0:20:21.4 RFK,Jr.:
Thank you Catherine.

0:20:23.3 CAF:
Have a great day.

0:20:23.8 RFK,Jr.:
You too.

 

©January 2022, Children’s Health Defense Europe, A.S.B.L.. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, A.S.B.L.. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense Europe? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Senta Depuydt and the Children’s Health Defense Europe team. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with Children’s Health Defense Europe 




Evidence of Self Assembling Nano Circuitry in the Pfizer Vaccine

Evidence of Self Assembling Nano Circuitry in the Pfizer Vaccine

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
January 6, 2022

 



Video available at Rumble.

 

Connect with The Reese Report




Vax Nation: Show Me Your Papers

Vax Nation: Show Me Your Papers

by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
January 8, 2022

 

Governments around the world have implemented various coercive measures to introduce mandatory “immunity passports”, vaccine passes, certificates of vaccination, and QR codes to prove being injected with a Covid-19 vaccine to go about daily life.

Meanwhile, a biological divide has been created, between the vaccinated and the vaccine free. Those with passports have access to options and rights, including the right to work, go to school, and engage in leisure and social activities.

Canadians without passports are being treated as second-class citizens and denied their fundamental Charter rights.



Video available at Rumble.

 

Connect with Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

cover image credit: diegoparra / pixabay




Covid: If There Is No Virus, Why Are People Dying?

Covid: If There Is No Virus, Why Are People Dying?

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 6, 2022

 

Yesterday, I published one of my articles explaining how the existence of SARS-CoV-2 was fabricated—when, actually, the virus doesn’t exist at all.

Naturally, people who haven’t been reading the 450 or so articles I’ve written about the pandemic fraud then ask, “So why are all these people getting sick and dying?”

Today, I’m republishing one of my articles that answers that question:


Since the beginning of this false pandemic, I’ve been offering compelling evidence that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.

Then people ask, “So why are all these people dying?”

I have explained that, many times, and in this article I’ll explain it again.

First of all, the whole notion that COVID-19 is one health condition is a lie. COVID IS NOT ONE THING.

This is both the hardest and simplest point to accept and understand.

Don’t reject the existence of the virus and then say, “So what is THE cause of people dying?” There is no ONE CAUSE. There is no one illness. There is no “it.”

By far, the biggest sources of illness we are dealing with are lung conditions: called pneumonia, flu, flu-like disease, TB, other unnamed lung/respiratory problems.

THESE ARE BEING RELABELED “COVID.” It’s a repackaging scheme. People are dying for those traditional reasons, and their deaths are being called “COVID.”

Thus, the old is artificially made new. It’s still old.

In this wide-ranging group of people who have traditional lung conditions, by far the largest population is the elderly and frail.

They are dying in nursing homes, in hospitals, in their houses and apartments. In addition to their lung problems, they have been suffering from a whole host of other conditions, for a long time, and they’ve been treated with toxic drugs for years.

They’re terrified that they might receive a diagnosis of “COVID,” and then they ARE given that diagnosis. THEN they’re isolated, cut off from friends and family. They give up and die.

This is forced premature death.

Some of these elderly and frail people are heavily sedated and put on breathing ventilators—which is a killing treatment. In a large New York study, it was discovered that “COVID” patients over the age of 64, who were put on ventilators, died 97.2 % of the time. Staggering.

Many of these elderly and frail people are put on antiviral drugs—e.g., remdesivir—which are highly toxic.

Some of these elderly and frail patients are now dying from reactions to the COVID vaccine—and of course, their deaths are listed as “COVID.”

Why else are people dying? In many cases, it’s a simple matter of bookkeeping. They die in hospitals for a variety of reasons, and staff write “COVID death” on their files. In the US, states receive federal money based on these statistics.

Let’s say that, in certain places around the world, there are clusters of deaths (being called COVID) that can’t be explained in the ways I’ve just described.

In those situations, you would have to examine EACH situation closely. For example, just prior to an outbreak in Northern Italy, was there a vaccination campaign? What was in the vaccine? A breed of toxic substances?

You have to consider each cluster independently.

Getting the picture?

None of the “COVID deaths” anywhere in the world requires the existence of a new virus.

For instance, in Wuhan, where the whole business began, the first “COVID” cases of pneumonia occurred in a city whose air is HEAVILY polluted. In China, every year, roughly 300,000 people die from pneumonia. That means millions of cases. None of those deaths need to be explained by invoking a new virus.

Now, add to all this the fact that the PCR test for the (non-existent) virus is rigged so it spits out positive results like a fire hose. Thus, the high case numbers.

The “pandemic” is invented.

The fraud is promoted.

During these fake epidemics (there have been many), someone will say: “But my neighbor’s son, who was very healthy, died suddenly. It must be the virus.”

No. People who appear to be healthy do die. Not just today, but going back in history as far as you want to go. No one has an explanation. They might have an explanation if they looked very closely, but they don’t look closely.

Favoring the “virus explanation” is a bias, a knee-jerk reaction, a response to propaganda.

If you think there must be other major reasons to explain “why all these people are dying,” keep in mind that “lung conditions” is a category that expands all over the globe. For instance, there are about one BILLION cases of flu-like illness EVERY YEAR on planet Earth.

Repackaging/relabeling just a small percentage of those cases alone would account for all official COVID death numbers.

What’s new about COVID is the COVID STORY. That’s what’s being sold: a STORY about a COVID virus.


I’m aware that authors have been presenting other reasons for people who have been getting sick and dying since early 2020. I’m not necessarily rejecting those reasons. But if some of them are true, they only represent part of the picture. Again, it’s not one thing that’s killing people.

There is a programmed impulse to say, “If it isn’t X, then it must be Y. If X isn’t the cause of people dying, then Y must be the cause.” That’s the basic lie. It’s the basic lie of all so-called pandemics.

It’s also a con. At the highest levels of planning, propagandists (inventers of reality) know that people are willing to buy one explanation for one phenomenon.

But “COVID” isn’t one phenomenon. There is no “it.”

And there is no single cause.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: ElasticComputeFarm / pixabay




Federal Judge Blocks DOD From Disciplining Navy SEALS Who Sued Over Vaccine Mandate

Federal Judge Blocks DOD From Disciplining Navy SEALS Who Sued Over Vaccine Mandate
In another defeat of Biden’s military vaccine mandates, a federal judge barred the U.S. Department of Defense from disciplining military service members who object to COVID-19 vaccination on religious grounds.

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., The Defender
January 5, 2022

 

In another defeat for the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate for members of the armed services, a federal judge on Jan. 3 issued a preliminary injunction barring the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) from disciplining military service members who object to COVID-19 vaccination on religious grounds.

The injunction was issued by The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division.

The case in question concerns a group of 35 NAVY SEALs and other special forces members. They sued the Biden administration and the DOD, which denied the service members’ requests for a religious exemption.

The 35 service members, whose identities were not made public and who serve at a variety of locations which remain classified and confidential, collectively possess more than 350 years of military service and have completed more than 100 combat deployments.

Each of the members reportedly inquired about being granted a religious exemption to the vaccine mandate. The Navy responded in most cases that the service members would be subject to possible court-martial or involuntary separation from the forces.

They were also threatened with confiscation of their Special Warfare devices, including the famous SEAL “trident” worn on their uniforms.

Each of the written denials the service members received were identical, suggesting their requests were not given individualized consideration by the Navy, The Associated Press reported.

Following the denials, the 35 individuals filed a federal lawsuit and subsequent motion for preliminary injunction via the First Liberty Institute, a non-profit public interest law firm specializing in cases pertaining to religious freedom.

In his preliminary order, Federal Judge Reed O’Connor wrote:

“The Navy service members in this case seek to vindicate the very freedoms they have sacrificed so much to protect. The COVID-19 pandemic provides the government no license to abrogate those freedoms.

“There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment. There is no military exclusion from our Constitution.”

Responding to the issuance of the preliminary injunction, Mike Berry, general counsel for First Liberty Institute, said:

“Forcing a service member to choose between their faith and serving their country is abhorrent to the Constitution and America’s values.

“Punishing SEALs for simply asking for a religious accommodation is purely vindictive and punitive. We’re pleased that the court has acted to protect our brave warriors before more damage is done to our national security.”

The Pentagon is considering lodging an appeal against the preliminary injunction. Such an appeal would reportedly send the case up to a federal appeals court, which could choose to uphold the injunction pending a full hearing, or overturn it.

Notably, The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently also ruled against the implementation of a mask and vaccine mandate for participants in federal Head Start programs.

Religious exemptions recognized only on paper in armed forces

As reported by military.com, no branch of the military has yet approved a religious exemption for the COVID-19 vaccine. Indeed, no religious exemption of any kind has been granted by the Navy and Marine Corps in at least seven years.

Several branches of the military instead moved in recent weeks to discharge service members whose applications for a religious exemption were denied.

The Marine Corps, for instance, recently discharged 206 Marines, claiming it has denied 3,115 of the 3,247 requests that it had received.

The Air Force reported 4,652 pending religious exemption requests, while the Navy reported 2,844 such requests are in progress.

The Air Force has, until now, announced the discharge of only 27 service members for non-vaccination, while the Navy has not announced any discharges of non-vaccinated members as of yet.

In the meantime, myriad other legal challenges against military-related vaccine mandates continue to work their way through U.S. courts.

On Jan. 4, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced his administration will sue the Pentagon in an effort to block its vaccine mandate for the Texas National Guard.

In December 2021, a federal judge ruled against Oklahoma’s attempt to block the mandate for that state’s National Guard.

And, as reported by The Defender, 18 military service members on Dec. 10, 2021, filed an amended complaint, seeking an injunction against the implementation of the vaccine mandate.

In the latter instance, the service members are drawing upon an earlier determination made by a judge in the case, that the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, which was fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration but is apparently unavailable in the U.S., and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine licensed under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) are not interchangeable.

This distinction now forms the basis of one of the arguments put forth by the service members in their amended complaint.

 

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., is an independent journalist and researcher based in Athens, Greece.

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Connect with The Defender




Diamond Mine of Data? Insurance Companies Report 40% Increase in Premature Non-COVID Deaths

Diamond Mine of Data? Insurance Companies Report 40% Increase in Premature Non-COVID Deaths
Insurers in Indiana and India report similar rates of non-COVID-related premature deaths. “I’m sure I’m one of many who wonder what kind of diamond mine of data the insurance companies are sitting on,” said educator and statistician Michael Crawford.

by The Defender Staff
January 5, 2022

 

An Indiana insurance executive dropped a bombshell statistic during an end-of-year virtual news conference, reporting a “stunning” 40% increase in the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old adults compared to pre-pandemic levels.

During the same call, OneAmerica’s CEO Scott Davison also described a major uptick in both short- and long-term disability claims.

The insurance executive rated the extraordinarily high death rate as “the highest … we have seen in the history of this business,” adding the trend is “consistent across every player in that business.”

To further underscore the import of his statements, Davison said, “Just to give you an idea of how bad [40%] is, a … one-in-200 catastrophe would be a 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So 40% is just unheard of.”

Contrary to what the public might assume — given the media’s unremitting coverage of COVID-19 — Davison reported most of the death claims listed causes of death other than COVID.

Commenting on the news, Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundationwrote, “It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big.”

Moreover, Kirsch said, the culprit would have to be something first introduced in 2021 — “something new … that a huge number of people would be exposed to” — such as COVID shots

Vaccine scientist Dr. Robert Malone and statistician Jessica Rose, Ph.D., agreed that experimental COVID injections should be considered prime suspects.

Surging non-COVID-related hospital admissions

Around the country, hospitals are reporting increased admissions for serious non-COVID-related illnesses that just happen to match up to the types of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccination.

In fact, at a different Indiana news conference in December, the state’s chief medical officer reported Indiana is experiencing its highest hospitalization rate in five years.

While claiming not to have a breakdown of causes, an Indiana hospital association official noted that the majority of intensive care patients are in the hospital for illnesses and conditions having nothing to do with COVID.

In a September study described as “narrative-shattering,” Harvard, Tufts and Veterans Affairs researchers reported that approximately half of hospitalized patients “showing up on COVID-data dashboards in 2021” had likely been admitted “for another reason entirely.”

In Ventura County, California, which is witnessing a startling spike in non-COVID-related hospitalizations, nurse whistleblowers argue the vaccines should be one of the first explanations considered. Why else, they ask, would otherwise healthy adults be showing up in droves with brain bleeds, heart attacks, autoimmune issues and lung abnormalities?

Autopsies of individuals who died following COVID vaccination reveal shocking pathological alterations most frequently affecting the heart and lungs but also the brain and other organs.

A profitable industry that intends to remain profitable

By revenue, the U.S. has the largest insurance industry in the world, valued in 2020 at $1.28 trillion. Financial analysts deem life insurance — which represents 49% of total premiums paid — to be “one of the most profitable industries in the world.”

More than half (52%) of American adults have life insurance, including group coverage of the type underwritten by OneAmerica. The face value of life insurance policy purchases in the U.S. is $3.29 trillion.

One of the key determinants of life insurance profitability is the accurate assessment of mortality risk by actuaries, and notably, proper accounting of premature death risks.

Reports for 2020 indicate life insurers took an unexpected hit from claims associated with “COVID-19” — with an $18 billion drop in “net gains from operations” in 2020 as compared to 2019.

While no one, as of yet, is commenting on 2021 or discussing whether the life insurance industry may have underestimated the lethality of COVID vaccines, OneAmerica’s Davison did go so far as to admit that payouts related to the unprecedented 40% increase in working-age deaths will be in excess of $100 million.

To claw back those outlays, the costs “will be passed on to employers purchasing group life insurance policies, who will have to pay higher premiums,” Davison said.

Far from being willing to contemplate the elephant in the room, the Indiana insurance executive indicated he plans to require all OneAmerica employees to get vaccinated.

Somewhat counterintuitively, the industry’s ability to pass along costs for elevated claims activity by raising premiums now has analysts rosily predicting the insurance industry is “buckled up to accelerate growth in 2022.”

Insurers also anticipate rising demand due to “businesses and consumers becom[ing] more risk-conscious coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic,” and “new levels of awareness” about the importance of disability insurance.

On the consumer side of the fence, the picture is far less rosy — for both the unvaccinated and vaccinated.

For example, New York State Assemblyman Patrick Burke (D-Buffalo) proposed punitive legislation that would permit insurers to deny COVID-related treatment coverage for individuals who choose not to get vaccinated.

Adding insult to injury, there are also reports of insurance companies imposing premium increases on employers in counties with low vaccination rates.

Meanwhile, many of those injured by COVID vaccines report denials of health and disability insurance coverage.

In December 2020, on the cusp of the vaccine rollout, a spokesman for the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) pledged to beef up claims-handling capacity for the government’s Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) in anticipation of a “potential influx of COVID-19 claims.”

The “black hole” program, ostensibly available to dispense compensation for COVID vaccine injuries, is notoriously stingy and has a one-year statute of limitations. Thus far, CICP has only compensated one of the thousands of COVID-vaccine-related claims submitted.

40% — India, too, not just Indiana

For the time being, at least, other U.S. insurers do not appear to be sharing data or observations about increased non-COVID hospitalization and death claims.

But the press in India is openly discussing the same unprecedented trends as Indiana.

The Times of India reported in late October that health insurers are seeing a “huge surge in non-COVID claims.” Again citing the magic number of 40%, the head of interventional cardiology at a Mumbai hospital noted a 40% increase in heart problems — acute coronary syndrome, sudden heart attacks and cardiac arrest — over the previous six to eight months

The cardiologist also observed that “even patients who have been stable for years are coming in with acute heart emergencies.”

That same month, the New Indian Express reported on widespread concern about the growing prevalence of heart attacks in those under age 45. although these young adults — including a number of celebrities — typically have “no conventional risk factors,” Indian heart doctors are blaming the mysterious rise in heart attacks on “lifestyle choices.”

Around the same time in late December that OneAmerica’s Davison shared his remarks, Fortune India reported on data from the nation’s Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority showing a 41% increase (there’s that number again) in death claims in fiscal year 2021. In comparison, death claims rose by 11% in fiscal year 2020.

Describing the increase in non-COVID-19 deaths, a life insurance executive suggested the industry might end up posting “a 200% – 300% increase in claims” for 2021. For now, however, 18 of the 24 life insurance companies operating in India in 2020-21 are reporting profits.

India launched the “world’s biggest” COVID vaccination drive in January 2021, primarily administering AstraZeneca’s vaccine (manufactured by India’s Serum Institute under the brand name Covishield) and Covaxin, an India-developed vaccine perceived as having garnered a “hasty” approval and which resulted in one acknowledged death during clinical trials.

And, to get 2022 off to an ambitious start, India just administered Covaxin to more than 3.8 million teenagers (ages 15-18) in the span of a single day. With 120 million youngsters between ages 15 and 19, India has the largest adolescent population in the world, which will remain the target of COVID vaccination efforts.

Meanwhile, with no long-term safety data and VAERS reports of COVID vaccine injuries passing the one million mark, including tens of thousands of adverse events reported for 5- to 17-year-olds, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just okayed Pfizer booster shots for American teens ages 12 and up.

Ethical doctors have been issuing urgent warnings about the dangers of COVID vaccines for children and adolescents for months — but the FDA’s and CDC’s paid stooges continue to ignore them.

Hidden treasure trove of data?

Academic researchers have long acknowledged the utility of insurance claims data for predicting trends. Describing India’s 24 life insurance companies, one writer noted the “millions of rows of data” generated by 310 million policies, stating “you can imagine the humongous amount of data generated by insurance companies in India and [the] world over.”

Likewise, Substack writer and mathematician Matthew Crawford pondered the implications of Davison’s admissions, commenting, “I’m sure I’m one of many who wonder what kind of diamond mine of data the insurance companies are sitting on.”

Recent reports indicate U.S. life expectancy declined in 2020 by an unprecedented 1.8 years, and Davison’s remarks suggest we could see even worse when 2021 is tallied up.

At a 2017 symposium of actuaries, a presenter noted that understanding shifts in the structure of mortality requires going beyond variables such as life expectancy to look at the main drivers of the change and the age ranges affected.

In a study published a few months ago, researchers tackled that type of analysis, finding the dramatic decline in U.S. life expectancy was not only due to “direct” effects of COVID but also “indirect” effects (for example, from restrictive policies).

The researchers emphasized the 15 to 44 age group was most strongly impacted by indirect effects.

Clearly, numerous factors could be contributing to premature deaths in working-age adults — including suicide, overdoses and deferred care related to lockdowns.

However, the pressing question raised by life insurer Davison’s disclosures is whether insurance companies will reveal the extent to which the COVID injections are also having a fatal impact.

 

©January 2022 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.</

Connect with The Defender

 




COVID: Everybody Will Be Infected; No Exceptions; Stop Pretending Otherwise

COVID: Everybody Will Be Infected; No Exceptions; Stop Pretending Otherwise

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 4, 2022

 

I’ve spent the past two years proving SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. It’s a total fiction.

Nevertheless, since most people believe in the virus with every fiber of their being, I enter their world and point out glaring inconsistencies and preposterous strategies for “containing the spread.”

Once again, in this article, I’ll visit the bizarre world of the virus. I’ll take the viewpoint of a person who earnestly believes in the existence of SARS-Cov-2. And I’ll show you a few of the walls such a person must ram into. Ready, get set, go:

First of all, here is the main reason why health authorities don’t just throw up their hands and say, “Everybody is going to get infected”:

It’s bad for business. The business of profits and control over populations.

If everybody is infected, there is no way, no treatment, no vaccine, no lockdown, no mask, no quarantine that will solve the issue. You would be trying to solve a boat with a million holes floating in the middle of a tidal wave.

And reports of the initial spread of SARS-CoV-2 in early 2020 confirm the futility of blocking it. Overnight, the virus was found in a dozen countries and 10,000 people. Those 10,000 rapidly and inevitably became 100,000—and so on, multiplying in every direction.

Likewise with Omicron. It’s here and there; a day later it’s everywhere.

Another problem with “everybody will be infected”: the only answer is the development of natural immunity. That is not a medical intervention. That is not money. That is not State-imposed.

Once you let this cat out of the bag—natural immunity—people grasp the concept. They understand. “Oh, we’re just going to have to live through it. We’ll have to tough it out. And we can, because we always have.”

That’s VERY bad for business and control.

Therefore, against all common sense, health authorities have to keep promoting the myth that some people will be infected and some won’t be. And in order to increase the number that won’t be, we need a vaccine and antiviral drugs and masks and lockdowns and business bankruptcies and suicides and desolated cities and towns and medical dictatorship and the Great Reset.

Once you accept the spread of SARS-CoV-2, you accept universal infection. There’s no way around it. And then you’re stuck with non-medical natural immunity.

The next piece of balderdash: the test for the virus. I’ve analyzed the test a dozen different ways and shown it’s useless and deceptive. But why is it being done? What’s the real reason?

Here’s the big kicker, the bonus, and the true bottom-line reason for the test: it serves to reinforce the necessary myth that “some people will be cases (infected) and some people won’t.”

Whereas, again, once you accept the spread of the virus, you accept that everyone will eventually be infected. There is no “some people infected” and “some people not.”

The powers-that-be will do and say anything to pretend the virus won’t infect everyone. The test gives them that justification.

Here is yet another reason to accept universal infection: locales and states and countries with very high vaccination rates are also reporting high levels of “COVID-19 disease.” The virus keeps spreading, regardless of what humans do to stop it.

If the development of natural immunity is the only answer…what IS natural immunity?

The medical research community has no compelling description. They’re wedded to a military model of antibodies (army scouts) that go out and ID invaders (viruses), so killer cells (backup troops) can destroy these enemies. And that’s the simple explanation. In the medical literature, it gets far more complicated than that.

On the other hand, I would say natural immunity is something called HEALTH. And you could write reams about what contributes to health, on a number of levels. But of course, the medical cartel doesn’t do health. It doesn’t study it in any comprehensive way.

Because it would be bad for business. The business of money and control.

Finally, for now, there is the related issue of “early intervention treatment.” I’m talking about ivermectin, HCQ, etc. If these drugs were widely used, would they stop the spread of the virus? I wouldn’t bet on it. For example, there is the possibility that one or more of these drugs help some people get better who are simply sick with common flu-like illness. Not COVID. And a belief in the power of the drugs (placebo effect) could play a significant role in recovery, for a limited number of people. (I would strongly advise people to look into adverse effects of any drug.)

Because taking a drug helps a person get better, that doesn’t mean the medicine is “wiping out a virus,” or preventing it from taking hold in the first place, or stopping it from spreading.

And that concludes today’s episode of Let’s Enter the Wacky Wonderful World of SARS-CoV-2, where people exercise their right to worship fairy tales highlighting non-existent viruses, and thus earn a gold star on the blackboard from the Reality Manufacturing Company.

I return you now to regular COVID mind-control programming on channels 1 through 5000.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: CDD20 / pixabay




La Quinta Columna: Complex Microtechnology in Pfizer Vaccine

La Quinta Columna: Complex Microtechnology in Pfizer Vaccine

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 3, 2022

 

If you thought the video about microtechnology detected in a Pfizer vial by La Quinta Columna was shocking enough, the team of Spanish researchers has shared today another one even more impressive.

In a single drop that has been left to dry, it has been possible to observe microstructures that would explain the phenomenon behind the generation of MAC addresses.

Orwell City brings to English this new visual material that La Quinta Columna has shared with the world.



Video available at Orwellito Rumble.

[Transcript]

Ricardo Delgado:

As we suspected —and as we had been informed by certain people who have worked in the preparation of technical reports, and so on—, as the sample evaporates, this hydrogel solidifies. This substance somehow forms with heat. And we can also understand the fact that these samples were initially frozen. Practically, at an ideal temperature. Now we can understand many things.

I have subjected the sample to certain experimentation, such as exposing it to electromagnetic fields, magnetic fields from a magnet, and ultraviolet radiation. This is very important because as the days go by, the sample evolves. And that’s what you’re going to see today.

Well, I don’t know how you’re going to assimilate it mentally because the images are extremely shocking. And I believe that this is not news. We’d like to give the good news that all this is over and that it all was just a nightmare. But what we’re going to see is very important.

So we were waiting, José Luis, for you to come in so that you could also see it live. And so that we could all comment on what can be inferred or can be concluded from all this.

Dr. Sevillano: 

Very good.

Ricardo Delgado: 

Well, without further ado, let’s play this video. I’m going to ask you all to share it. Share this broadcast. Then I’m going to post it on La Quinta Columna’s Telegram channel so that you can download it. We’ll also upload it to Odysee, particularly. Download it and upload it to your Facebook profiles. It’s seven and a half minutes long, but they’re very intense minutes. So here we go. Ready?

The video is titled “Complex Microtechnology in Pfizer Vaccine.” Of course, aside from graphene, which is also there. In fact, it’s the raw material used, precisely, for all of this. Let’s watch it.

Video:

Micro-technology in Pfizer vaccine Haxon Aquiles II Microscope.

Ricardo Delgado:

Well, if you guys are freaking out about this, this is nothing.

It’s still nothing. Now you’re going to see some more evaporated samples. And the components are easier to see. Look at the rectilinear structures. And what’s in the center? A CPU? What a shock!

And here’s another “CPU,” so to speak. This is another one. I mean, they have the same formation in the center.

Look how easily it can be seen there. Well, that’s nothing. Can you see… Here… Gimme a second. Here. Can you see that some rectangles at the bottom? Well, these types of formations are self-assembling. In fact, we have seen it live, that more and more complex structures are being formed.

Let’s keep watching. Look at this. Unbelievable. It’s just unbelievable!

Ricardo Delgado:

Okay. I’m gonna make a little stop here. Here. José Luis, what impression does this give you? Do you think this is a crystal that forms naturally?

Dr. Sevillano:

Obviously not. These are microchips. They’re microscopic electronic circuits. And they would explain why we have received so many signals (MAC) from vaccinated people.

We already said at the time that graphene by itself, unstructured as raw material, wasn’t capable of emitting more signals than an “OFF/ON.” It couldn’t emit numbers, nor codes, nor… let’s say, nor could it interact intelligently with the environment, more than as a simple signal that’s simply received or sent as such. Raw.

That’s what graphene is for. That’s what graphene sheets are for. They impregnate to biological tissue and, from there, do what we saw in the image that Ricardo can show whenever he wants of the myocytes being excited by a light discharge. That’s what raw graphene is for. It permeates the tissue, the cell. And from there, it excites or inhibits it depending on the type of cell it’s adhered to.

But of course, that’s just an “ON/OFF.” It’s either excited or inhibited. And there’s no signal there. There’s no information other than excitation or inhibition.

On the other hand, when you have to send codes, in addition to several multi-digit codes, you need a circuit. I’m not an expert, but you need a circuitry that allows you to send signals with certain codes. Depending on the signal you receive, you’ll send them. That is, you need technology: microtechnology – nanotechnology.

What we’re wondering here, apart from the fact that this could be in a “health product” (to give it a name), is that the competent people in this topic haven’t already started to look at what’s being introduced surreptitiously into the population.

I don’t understand why the responsible people who have seen these videos that have been circulating for so many months and in which raw or elaborated material, where nanotechnology or microtechnology is seen, aren’t responding to this.

Ricardo Delgado:

Look, two identical ones.

Video:

The images were obtained from a single drop of a Pfizer vial. The structures evolve when stimulated with ultraviolet light and over time.

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna

Connect with Orwell City


Click here to see related articles featuring the work of La Quinta Columna

See related:

Identification of Patterns in Coronavirus Vaccines: Evidence of DNA-Origami Self-Assembly

 




Identification of Patterns in Coronavirus Vaccines: Evidence of DNA-Origami Self-Assembly

Identification of Patterns in Coronavirus Vaccines: Evidence of DNA-Origami Self-Assembly

by Mik Andersen, C0r0n@2Inspect
published in Spanish January 3, 2022
rough translation via translation software

 

One of the most difficult aspects to determine in the identification of patterns of c0r0n@v|rus vaccines is the method or procedure, by which the objects that are being observed ( micro / nano-routersmicro / nano-rectenas . ..), have been able to conform. In the scientific literature, a multitude of works have been found that pointed to various production techniques, such as electron lithography, focused ion beam FIB (Focused Ion Beam) and even synthetic DNA templates, with which QCA circuits would be defined. of the nanorouters

However, no clear evidence of self-assembly was found in the vaccine samples. However, the suspicions, more than founded on this process, were confirmed with the observation of the video produced by Ricardo Delgado on December 27, 2021 , in which the movement of thousands of particles in a sample of the Pfizer vaccine was witnessed. These particles seemed to come together to form more complex structures, defining simple geometric patterns, see excerpt in the following video 1.


Video 1. Self-assembly observed in a Pfizer vaccine sample. Original source:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1245191848?t=00h34m56s (Delgado, R. 2021)

 

In the scientific literature, this quasi-directed behavior or movement of the particles, in the context of the construction of micro / nano electronic objects and devices in an intracorporeal communications nano-network, had a high probability of corresponding to a self-assembly process based on DNA, epitaxial growth and origami. This deduction resulted in the location of the scientific article that, with high probability, could confirm the self-assembly of complex objects, including circuits, boards, routers, sensors and other micro / nano electronic components and devices.

This discovery explains how the components responsible for the bluetooth MAC address emission phenomenon would self-assemble (Sarlangue, G.; Devilleger, J.; Trillaud, P.; Fouchet, S.; Taillasson, L.; Catteau, G. 2021) .It would also explain the assembly of nano-devices,nano-sensors, nano-nodes, micro / nano-interfaces,micro / nano-routers ,  micro / nano-antennas , micro / nano-rectenas , with which configures the network hardware intra-body of nano-communications .

Figure 1 shows the signs of self-assembly observed in the scientific literature and its correspondence with the analyzed samples of the Pfizer vaccine. From a morphological point of view, there are important coincidences that allow us to infer and almost assume that self-assembly is a verifiable reality.

Fig. 1. Evidence of DNA-Origami Self-Assembly in Pfizer Vaccine

 

Due to the complexity of the self-assembly issue, as well as the relevance of the evidence discovered, a detailed analysis will be carried out, around three fundamental headings: a) directed self-assembly; b) self-assembly by smooth epitaxial growth; c) origami self-assembly.

Directed self-assembly

The article by (Kumar, P. 2010) presents the first clear indication of “directed self-assembly” that can be observed in the vaccine sample, see figure 2 and video 1. The observed nanoparticles seem to unite in clusters of larger size and with it, more complex structures that move in the sample drop.

Fig. 2. The vaccine sample presents particles with apparent self-assembly movement, which raises the suspicion that the hybridized DNA technique for directed self-assembly is being used. (Kumar, P. 2010)

 

According  to (Kumar, P. 2010), the self – assembly directed is key to the development of electronic devices, magnetic and optical miniaturized, which fits with materials derived from graphene found in samples of the vaccine, in fact states that the Nanoparticles have attracted a great deal of attention as such components due to their unique size-dependent properties, including super-paramagnetism, chemiluminescence, and catalysis. To take full advantage of the potential capabilities of nanoparticles, we need to develop new methods to assemble them into useful patterns or structures. These self-assembling structures promise new opportunities to develop miniaturized optical, electronic, optoelectronic and magnetic devices .”

On the other hand, Kumar reveals that the “directed self-assembly” method is suitable for generating nano- and micro-scale devices due to its ability to use quantum dots or nanopoints. He explains it in the following way ” as the size or functions of the device get smaller and smaller, conventional lithographic processes turn out to be limited for their production. It is necessary to develop alternative methods to overcome this difficulty. As they are developed Conventional manufacturing technologies, such as optical lithography, are also beginning to encounter fundamental limits … In addition, new manufacturing techniques are required to help extend both the life and range of application of existing techniques … Directed self-assembly technique can be used appropriately to produce functional nanostructures, for example nanowires and an organized array of nano-dots (understand quantum dots) . “In other words,” directed self-assembly “allows quantum dots to of a certain material (for example the graphene GQD Graphene Quantum Dots), they self-assemble according to a predefined pattern.

Among the possible types of directed or guided self-assembly, Kumar recognizes the “assembly guided by templates where they use atomic surface patterns; the assembly guided by electromagnetic field or electric field, by electron beam, light and laser, among others“.

Furthermore, it recognizes that “directed self-assembly is a robust and reproducible technique with future prospects for use on an industrial scale …  which means building well-ordered, often intriguing structures, which has received a lot of attention for its ease of organizing materials. at the nanoscale in ordered structures and produce complex structures on a large scale.” This seems to be fundamental in the context of the intra-corporal network of nanocommunications and nano / micro devices, since thousands of devices must be created for their operation ( Zhang, R.; Yang, K.; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. 2017 |  Galal, A.; Hesselbach, X. 2018 |  Galal, A.; Hesselbach, X. 2020)

Among all the forms of self-assembly, the most probable and the one with the greatest coincidences at the morphological level is self-assembly guided by biological DNA templates. Among its advantages, Kumar highlights “the manufacture of nanowires since they solve integration problems (eliminating the need to manipulate individual nanowires). They also solve problems related to contacts for electrical and magnetic transport.” This fits with the type of nanodevices observed, for example micro / nano rectenas and graphene-derived materials, GQD graphene quantum dots.

In fact, Kumar states that “the use of physical DNA templates, results in the growth of nanomaterials in a predefined position, eliminating the need for post-growth manipulation and providing the ease of electrical connections for additional characterizations“, which helps to understand how the structures are constructed and defined. Quadrangular shapes observed in the vaccine samples, which bear a great resemblance to PCBs, microchips, sensors and integrated circuits. He also adds that ” such templates give rise to the growth of nanopoints (quantum dots), vertical nanowires, which can be used in a controllable way to manufacture FET devices (Field Effect Transistors), magnetic tunnel junction devices and devices for optical applications” which confirms that with directed self-assembly it is possible to create miniaturized nanotechnology of any known electronic device.

In other words, self-assembly guided by biological DNA templates can be used to make all the devices required for an intracorporeal nano-network , being feasible that this is the technique used in vaccines, according to the observed images and the statements in the scientific literature (Catania, V .; Mineo, A .; Monteleone, S .; Patti, D. 2014 | Keren, K .; Berman, RS; Buchstab, E .; Sivan, U .; Braun, E. 2003).

Fig. 3. DNA template carbon nanotube FET field effect transistor. (Keren, K .; Berman, RS; Buchstab, E .; Sivan, U .; Braun, E. 2003)

 

To be exact, Kumar indicates that “as directed strategies biomolecules (biological DNA templates) have shown great promise in the nanoparticle assembly in a wide variety of architectures, because of its high efficiency, high specificity and genetic programmability McMillan , RA; Paavola, CD; Howard, J .; Chan, SL; Zaluzec, NJ; Trent, JD 2002 )These nanoassembled materials have been shown to have potential applications in new detection systems, such as biosensors Taton, TA; Mirkin , CA; Letsinger, RL 2000 ) and chemical sensors Liu, J .; Lu, Y. 2003 | Liu, J .; Lu, Y. 2006 ), and in the construction of nanoelectronic devices ( Keren, K .; Berman, RS; Buchstab, E .; Sivan, U .; Braun, E. 2003 ) [paradoxically configured with carbon nanotubes] ” Which again confirms that it is a convenient technique / method in the implementation of nanotechnology in the human body.

Self-assembly through smooth epitaxial growth

If evidence of directed self-assembly can be considered a well-founded hypothesis, “self-assembly by smooth epitaxial growth” presents even more compelling evidence. Figure 4 shows an exact equivalence between the scientific literature and the Pfizer vaccine samples analyzed by the doctor (Campra, P. 2021). Some of the most numerous objects, with a quadrangular and pyramidal shape, would actually be the result of an epitaxial self-assembly technique, which is in fact, “one of the manufacturing processes of integrated circuits” (Shen, J .; Sun, W .; Liu, D .; Schaus, T .; Yin, P. 2021 | Burns, MA; Mastrangelo, CH; Sammarco, TS; Man, FP; Webster, JR; Johnsons, BN; Burke, DT 1996 | Esener, SC; Hartmann, DM; Heller, MJ; Cable, JM 1998 | Krahne, R .; Yacoby, A .; Shtrikman, H .; Bar-Joseph, I .; Dadosh, T. ; Sperling, J. 2002 |  Chen, Y .; Pepin, A. 2001 ) Epitaxy refers to the deposition of a layer of material (for example quantum dots of graphene, graphene oxide, hydrogel, etc.) on a Primary nucleation substrate. However, unlike traditional growth processes, in this case it is achieved through DNA hybridization. It is at this point, where  (Liu, J .; Wei, J .; Yang, Z. 2021 ) develops one of the objects of his research.

Fig. 4. An exact match is observed between objects self-assembled by smooth epitaxial growth from the scientific literature (Liu, J .; Wei, J .; Yang, Z. 2021) and objects observed in the Pfizer vaccine (Campra, P. 2021).

 

According to  (Liu, J.; Wei, J.; Yang, Z. 2021) the self-assembly of  “inorganic nanoparticles into mesoscopic or macroscopic nanoparticle assemblies is an efficient strategy to manufacture advanced devices with emerging nanoscale functionalities. In addition, the assembly of Nanoparticles on substrates can allow the fabrication of substrate-integrated devices, similar to the growth of atomic crystals on a substrate. Recent progress in nanoparticle assembly suggests that ordered nanoparticle assemblies could well be produced on a selected substrate, which known as smooth epitaxial growth.

This definition confirms that the manufacture of micro / nano electronic devices (integrated circuits) can be carried out by guided crystal growth on a DNA substrate or template. This is evident in the following explanation “DNA hybridization It has been applied to assemble nanoparticles into superlattices with crystalline structures that are surprisingly rich. The three-dimensional double helix structure of DNA (fixed pitch, fixed diameter) was found to have more advantages than other materials in guiding nanoparticles toward an ordered three-dimensional assembly (Nykypanchuk, D.; Maye, MM; Van-Der-Lelie , D .; Gang, O. 2008). Specific recognition between base pairs and the ability to control DNA strand length and base sequence make it a powerful weapon for nanoscale assembly. The programming capacity of DNA makes it an extremely attractive structure-oriented ligand .” This confirms that self-assembly by means of DNA not only allows the construction of 2D structures, since 3D structures can be generated thanks to the bonds of the double helix of the DNA, which allows it to be used to configure all kinds of shapes , including cubic and prismatic shapes seen in figure 4.

Among the experiences cited by  (Liu, J .; Wei, J .; Yang, Z. 2021) it is worth highlighting the following paragraph on epitexial self-assembly, in which a wide experience in the experimentation of DNA- based crystalline constructions is revealed, with a tolerance to error (mismatch) of only 1%.

According ( Lewis, DJ; Zornberg, LZ; Carter, DJ; Macfarlane, RJ 2020 ) and colleagues used this technique and a combination of nanoparticles functionalized with DNA and a substrate functionalized DNA strand to design a process of epitaxial assembly They found that monocrystalline Winterbottom forms of nanoparticle crystals are formed by controlling the interfacial energies between crystals and fluid, substrate and crystal, and substrate and fluid Other examples show that grafted DNA nanoparticles self-assemble into two-dimensional colloidal films can be applied as a substrate for smooth epitaxial assembly For example, according to  ( Wang, MX; Seo, SE; Gabrys, PA; Fleischman, D .; Lee, B .; Kim, Y .; Mirkin, CA 2017  used DNA-coated nanoparticles as more elastic and malleable building elements to better adapt to network mismatch .  Later studies ( Gabrys, PA; Seo, SE; Wang, MX; Oh, E.; Macfarlane, RJ; Mirkin, CA 2018)  showed that superlattice thin films assembled by DNA functionalized nanoparticles can store elastic strains by deforming and reorganizing, with lattice mismatches of up to ± 7.7%, significantly overcoming the ± 1% lattice mismatches allowed by atomic thin films.It is important to highlight that these DNA-coated nanoparticles experience a progressive and coherent relaxation, dissipating the tension in an elastic and irrecoverable way through the formation of dislocations or vacancies. Therefore, it is possible to grow heteroepitaxial colloidal films by controlling programmable -soft- atomic equivalents of nanometers and microstructures using rigid nanocrystals coated with soft compressible polymeric materials.”  (Liu, J.; Wei, J.; Yang, Z. 2021)

Self-assembly origami

Finally, among the most original forms of self-assembly is the “origami method“, also linked to the use of DNA templates. In this case, the evidence is found in the work of ( Wang, J.; Yue, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tian, ​​H.; Willner, I. 2019 ) entitled “Active generation of nano -holes in DNA origami scaffolds for programmed catalysis in nanocavities“. The pattern of a point or hole within a quadrangular structure is striking and characterizing from the morphological point of view. This detail was found in the images obtained by Dr. Campra, which together with the self-assembly study object, allowed infer that it was another piece of the puzzle and that in reality, there must be larger objects self-assembled with the origami method. The similarities are clear and evident, see figure 5, since the quadrangular structure of the objects coincides, the position of the nano -holes inscribed within the surface, as well as the number or quantity of them observed in the Pfizer vaccine samples.

Fig. 5. It is observed that the objects observed in the Pfizer vaccine samples have direct correspondence with the scientific literature related to origami self-assembly, where nano-holes are unmistakable characteristic elements. (Wang, J .; Yue, L .; Li, Z .; Zhang, J .; Tian, ​​H .; Willner, I. 2019)

 

But, before proceeding to analyze the issue of holes in quadrangular objects, it is worth reviewing the introduction and state of the art provided by the authors in their work, as it helps to locate the capabilities of the technique and demonstrate its link to nanotechnology used in vaccines. In fact, surprising claims are made, since origami self-assembly is a “programmed assembly of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) DNA nanostructures, representing a major advance in DNA nanotechnology” (Hong, F .; Zhang , F .; Liu, Y .; Yan, H. 2017 |  Rothemund, PW 2006 |  Endo, M .; Sugiyama, H. 2014), which confirms not only the possible dimensions or axes of self-assembly, but also that the origami method is compatible with self-assembly with smooth epitexial growth and therefore with directed or guided self-assembly. In all cases, the use of suitably configured synthetic DNA structures are the necessary precursors for the development of the structures and objects observed in the vaccine samples.

In addition, (Wang, J .; Yue, L .; Li, Z .; Zhang, J .; Tian, ​​H .; Willner, I. 2019) confirm that the origami self-assembly method using DNA allows the anchoring of components for configure, among other devices, plasmonic antennas , previously identified in the vaccine samples as part of the nano-network centered on the human body . This is stated in the following literal quote: “In addition to creating ingenious forms of origami structures generated by the programmed folding of DNA, origami structures were functionalized with protruding nucleic acid strands, or strands of oligonucleotides with modified edges. The protruding strands were used as anchor sites for the organization of the polymers, proteins and nanoparticles in the scaffolds of each origami. Unique functions of assembled nanostructures in origami scaffolds were demonstrated, such as the operation of enzyme cascades, the design of plasmonic antennas, and the assembly of chiroplasmonic structures.

This explanation is essential to understand the process of formation of superstructures, guided by DNA patterns, since they are linked through the strands that protrude from the building pieces, functionalized with nanoparticles (for example graphene quantum dots), which together with the scale factor and superconductor of the material, provide plasmonic characteristics, and quantum hall, which implies the self-assembly of transistors, and micro / nano chips of the complexity that is required.

In their introduction,  (Wang, J.; Yue, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tian, ​​H.; Willner, I. 2019) also provide interesting annotations and quotes about the possibilities of the origami technique and the design of DNA walkers with motor capacity to start movement, turn and stop, according to molecular interaction patterns. In fact, according to ( Lund, K.; Manzo, AJ; Dabby, N.; Michelotti, N.; Johnson-Buck, A.; Nangreave, J.; Yan, H. 2010 ) these DNA walkers are essentially Molecular robots guided by substrate molecules (precursors) in a set of origami DNA structures (templates). This is confirmed in the following full-text quote from Lund, also corroborated by (Omabegho, T.; Sha, R.; Seeman, NC 2009 |  Gu, H.; Chao, J.; Xiao, SJ;Seeman, NC 2010):

Moving robotics to the level of a single molecule is possible a priori, but it requires facing the limited capacity of individual molecules to store information and complex programs. One strategy to overcome this problem is to use systems that can obtain complex behaviors from the interaction of simple robots with their environment. A first step in this direction was the development of DNA walkers, which have gone from being non-autonomous, to being able to perform brief but directed movements on one-dimensional tracks. In this work we show that random walkers, also called molecular spiders that comprise a streptavidin molecule as an inert -body- and three deoxyribozymes as catalytic -paws-, they exhibit elementary robotic behavior when interacting with a precisely defined environment. Single-molecule microscopy observations confirm that these walkers achieve directional motion by detecting and modifying the tracks of substrate molecules arranged in a two-dimensional DNA origami landscape.” (Lund, K .; Manzo, AJ; Dabby, N .; Michelotti, N .; Johnson-Buck, A .; Nangreave, J .; Yan, H. 2010 )

This can confirm the presence of molecules and pieces with the capacity for self-assembly, their movement, orientation and self-organization, to configure complex electronic devices, according to the patterns and templates of synthetic DNA, that are closer in a solution such as of the vaccine, as suggested by the observation in video 1.

Fig. 6. Schemes of operation of the origami DNA walkers that would explain the movement of components, particles and clusters of GQD graphene quantum dots in the analyzed samples of the Pfizer vaccine. This movement can be observed in video 1 and completely in the reference (Delgado, R. 2021).

 

Continuing with the analysis of  (Wang, J.; Yue, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tian, ​​H.; Willner, I. 2019), it is added that “The functionalization of edges of the mosaics of origami (from DNA templates), was applied to design programmed multi-component origami structures and, in particular, to develop interchangeable origami dimers .” In other words, DNA templates can be defined in such a way that they are made up of specific pieces (particles, proteins, quantum dots, etc.) according to a predetermined program or pattern.

However, technology of origami DNA may cover additional areas, as stated experiences the state of the Wang and his team “and manufactured ingenious systems of origami 3D. For example, demonstrated self – assembly of a box of origami, the staggered assembly of gigadalton -scale programmable DNA structures, and the light-driven movement of 3D origami packages to produce reversible chiroptic functions. Different applications of origami nanostructures were suggested, including programmed catalysis, controlled release of drugs, logic gate operations and detection“.  Among the applications mentioned, it is worth highlighting the logic gate and detection operations, typical of the QCA (Quantum Cell Automata) circuit design already commented on in the identification of nanorouters among the patterns observed in vaccines. This is one more proof that DNA origami methodology is valid for developing electronic devices based on quantum dots, given the ability to control the orderly construction of cables and circuits.

After completing the review of the preambles of the article by  (Wang, J.; Yue, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tian, ​​H.; Willner, I. 2019), the scientific discourse focuses on the object of the cavities or holes in the “origami rafts”, which in the shot are shown as quadrangular structures with a dot inscribed within their area. As indicated “Most of these functional origami structures involved, bottom-up modification of origami rafts, edge modification of origami tiles, or folding of the tiles into tubes. However, functionalization of origami structures with nanocavities (holes or barrels) that could act as containment or channels for guided chemical transformations can be considered. To date, such cavities have been fabricated within the passive assembly of origami tiles and these cavities have been used for site-specific coupling of antibodies, reconstitution of membrane proteins, and functionalization of solid-state pores for selective transport. What’s more, DNA structures (not origami) have been introduced into the membranes and these acted as channels for the stimulated potential transport of cargo species across the membranes. On the contrary, the present study introduces the concept of active manufacturing of nanoholes in origami tiles. We report on the active DNAzyme-guided formation of nanoholes in origami scaffolds and the molecular mechanical unlocking of nanoholes by lifting the covered window domains. By applying two different DNAzymes, the programmed and activated fabrication of nanoholes in origami structures is demonstrated. In addition, we use the cavities in the different origami scaffolds as confined nanoenvironments for selective and specific catalysis. What’s more, we highlight a design for the reversible mechanical opening and closing by light of the nanoholes, and the switchable catalysis in the nanocavities. We report on the active DNAzyme-guided formation of nanoholes in origami scaffolds and the molecular mechanical unlocking of nanoholes by lifting the covered window domains. By applying two different DNAzymes, the programmed and activated fabrication of nanoholes in origami structures is demonstrated. In addition, we use the cavities in the different origami scaffolds as confined nanoenvironments for selective and specific catalysis. What’s more, We highlight a design for the reversible mechanical opening and closing by light of the nanoholes, and the switchable catalysis in the nanocavities. We report on the active DNAzyme-guided formation of nanoholes in origami scaffolds and the molecular mechanical unlocking of nanoholes by lifting the covered window domains. By applying two different DNAzymes, the programmed and activated fabrication of nanoholes in origami structures is demonstrated. In addition, we use the cavities in the different origami scaffolds as confined nanoenvironments for selective and specific catalysis. What’s more, We highlight a design for the reversible mechanical opening and closing by light of the nanoholes, and the switchable catalysis in the nanocavities we use the cavities in the different origami scaffolds as confined nanoenvironments for selective and specific catalysis. What’s more, we highlight a design for the reversible mechanical opening and closing by light of the nanoholes, and the switchable catalysis in the nanocavities we use the cavities in the different origami scaffolds as confined nanoenvironments for selective and specific catalysis. What’s more, We highlight a design for the reversible mechanical opening and closing by light of the nanoholes, and the switchable catalysis in the nanocavities.” In this explanation, which leaves no doubt as to the intentionality of the origami technique, there is a fundamental detail that must be seriously considered. It is the ability of cavities in DNA origami structures to trap, immobilize and couple antibodies ( Ouyang, X .; De-Stefano, M.; Krissanaprasit, A.; Bank-Kodal, AL; Bech-Rosen, C.; Liu, T.; Gothelf, KV 2017), which was originally intended to be used for serological studies, but applied to the construction of intracorporeal micro / nano scale electronic devices, could achieve the objective of avoiding phagocytization and immobilization of self-shaped structures. It is also revealed that these holes play a very important role in the interaction with other origami DNA sequences, which can fit together (as if it were a Lego piece) to add new construction scaffolding, as explained ( Kurokawa, T. ; Kiyonaka, S .; Nakata, E .; Endo, M .; Koyama, S .; Mori, E .; Mori, Y. 2018 ) in figure 7.

Fig. 7. Assemblage of origami DNA in the holes of quadrangular plates, which are also plates made up of DNA origami structures ( Kurokawa, T .; Kiyonaka, S .; Nakata, E .; Endo, M .; Koyama, S .; Mori, E .; Mori, Y. 2018 ). This shows that DNA serves as a de facto building block that serves to guide the integration of other molecular components and materials, such as graphene quantum dots, with which electronic devices can be built.

 

Another of the applications cited by Wang and his team for holes is to serve as channels or pores that cross the plate or origami DNA structure, in order to develop biosensors, as they corroborate (Seifert, A.; Göpfrich, K.; Burns, JR; Fertig, N.; Keyser, UF; Howorka, S. 2015 | Burns, JR; Seifert, A.; Fertig, N.; Howorka, S. 2016). In fact it is stated that “Membrane-spanning nanopores from folded DNA are a recent example of artificial biomimetic nanostructures that can open applications in biosensors, drug delivery, and nanofluids … We establish that DNA pores exhibit two voltage-dependent states of conductance. Low transmembrane voltages favor a stable level of high conductance, which corresponds to an unobstructed DNA pore. The expected inner width of the open channel is confirmed by measuring the change in conductance as a function of the size of the poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), thus it is assumed that smaller PEGs enter the pore.” This not only fits with one of the declared components in the Pfizer vaccine excipient list, but also matches the conductivity required for the components of the human body-oriented nano-network ( Yang, J .; Ma, M .; Li, L .; Zhang, Y .; Huang, W .; Dong, X. 2014 |  Abbasi, QH; Yang, K .; Chopra, N .; Jornet, JM; Abuali, NA; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. 2016 |  Oukhatar, A .; Bakhouya, M .; El Ouadghiri, D. 2021 )
Bibliography
  1. Abbasi, QH; Yang, K .; Chopra, N .; Jornet, JM; Abuali, NA; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. (2016). Nano-communication for biomedical applications: A review on the state-of-the-art from physical layers to novel networking concepts. IEEE Access, 4, pp. 3920-3935. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2593582
  2. Burns, JR; Seifert, A .; Fertig, N .; Howorka, S. (2016). A biomimetic DNA-based channel for the ligand-controlled transport of charged molecular cargo across a biological membrane. Nature nanotechnology, 11 (2), pp. 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.279
  3. Burns, MA; Mastrangelo, CH; Sammarco, TS; Man, FP; Webster, JR; Johnsons, BN; Burke, DT (1996). Microfabricated structures for integrated DNA analysis = Microfabricated structures for integrated DNA analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93 (11), pp. 5556-5561. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.11.5556
  4. Campra, P. (2021a). Observations of possible microbiotics in COVID RNAm Version 1. vaccines http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13875.55840
  5. Campra, P. (2021b). Detection of graphene in COVID19 vaccines by Micro-RAMAN spectroscopy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355684360_Deteccion_de_grafeno_en_vacunas_COVID19_por_espectroscopia_Micro-RAMAN
  6. Campra, P. (2021c). MICROSTRUCTURES IN COVID VACCINES: Inorganic crystals or Wireless Nanosensors Network? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356507702_MICROSTRUCTURES_IN_COVID_VACCINES_inorganic_crystals_or_Wireless_Nanosensors_Network
  7. Catania, V .; Mineo, A .; Monteleone, S .; Patti, D. (2014). Distributed topology discovery in self-assembled nano network-on-chip. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40 (8), pp. 292-306.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.09.003
  8. Chen, Y .; Pepin, A. (2001). Nanofabrication: conventional and non-conventional methods = Nanofabrication: Conventional and nonconventional methods. Electrophoresis, 22 (2), pp. 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200101)22:2%3C187::AID-ELPS187%3E3.0.CO;2-0
  9. Delgado, R. (2021). Direct from the contents of a Pfizer vaccine under the microscope [Special program]. Fifth column. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1245191848
  10. Endo, M .; Sugiyama, H. (2014). Single-molecule imaging of dynamic motions of biomolecules in DNA origami nanostructures using high-speed atomic force microscopy. Accounts of chemical research, 47 (6), pp. 1645-1653.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400299m
  11. Esener, SC; Hartmann, DM; Heller, MJ; Cable, JM (1998). DNA-assisted microassembly: a heterogeneous integration technology for optoelectronics = DNA-assisted microassembly: a hetrogeneous integration technology for optoelectronics. In: Heterogeneous Integration: Systems on a Chip: A Critical Review (Vol. 10292, p. 1029208). International Society for Optics and Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.300616
  12. Gabrys, PA; Seo, SE; Wang, MX; Oh, E .; Macfarlane, RJ; Mirkin, CA (2018). Lattice mismatch in crystalline nanoparticle thin films = Lattice mismatch in crystalline nanoparticle thin films. Nano letters, 18 (1), pp. 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04737
  13. Galal, A .; Hesselbach, X. (2018). Nano-networks communication architecture: Modeling and functions = Nano-networks communication architecture: Modeling and functions. Nano Communication Networks, 17, pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2018.07.001
  14. Galal, A .; Hesselbach, X. (2020). Probability-based path discovery protocol for electromagnetic nano-networks. Computer Networks, 174, 107246.    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107246
  15. Gu, H .; Chao, J .; Xiao, SJ; Seeman, NC (2010). A proximity-based programmable DNA nanoscale assembly line. Nature, 465 (7295), pp. 202-205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09026
  16. Hong, F .; Zhang, F .; Liu, Y .; Yan, H. (2017). DNA origami: scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chemical reviews, 117 (20), pp. 12584-12640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00825
  17. Keren, K .; Berman, RS; Buchstab, E .; Sivan, U .; Braun, E. (2003). DNA-Templated Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistor = DNA template carbon nanotube field effect transistor. Science, 302 (5649), pp. 1380-1382. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091022  | https://sci-hub.yncjkj.com/10.1126/science.1091022
  18. Krahne, R .; Yacoby, A .; Shtrikman, H .; Bar-Joseph, I .; Dadosh, T .; Sperling, J. (2002). Fabrication of nanoscale gaps in integrated circuits = Fabrication of nanoscale gaps in integrated circuits. Applied physics letters, 81 (4), pp. 730-732. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1495080
  19. Kumar, P. (2010). Directed self-assembly: expectations and achievements. Nanoscale research letters, 5 (9), pp. 1367-1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-010-9696-9 | https://sci-hub.yncjkj.com/10.1007/s11671-010-9696-9
  20. Kurokawa, T .; Kiyonaka, S .; Nakata, E .; Endo, M .; Koyama, S .; Mori, E .; Mori, Y. (2018). DNA Origami scaffolds as templates for functional tetrameric Kir3 K + channels. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 57 (10), pp. 2586-2591. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201709982
  21. Lewis, DJ; Zornberg, LZ; Carter, DJ; Macfarlane, RJ (2020). Monocrystalline Winterbottom constructions of nanoparticle superlattices = Single-crystal Winterbottom constructions of nanoparticle superlattices. Nature materials, 19 (7), pp. 719-724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0643-6
  22. Liu, J .; Lu, Y. (2003). A colorimetric lead biosensor using DNAzyme-directed assembly of gold nanoparticles = A colorimetric lead biosensor using DNAzyme-directed assembly of gold nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125 (22), pp. 6642-6643. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja034775u
  23. Liu, J .; Lu, Y. (2006). Fast colorimetric sensing of adenosine and cocaine based on a general sensor design involving aptamers and nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie, 118 (1), pp. 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.200502589
  24. Liu, J .; Wei, J .; Yang, Z. (2021). Building ordered nanoparticle assemblies inspired by atomic epitaxy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 23 (36), pp. 20028-20037. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP02373J | https://sci-hub.yncjkj.com/10.1039/D1CP02373J
  25. Lund, K .; Manzo, AJ; Dabby, N .; Michelotti, N .; Johnson-Buck, A .; Nangreave, J .; Yan, H. (2010). Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes = Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes. Nature, 465 (7295), pp. 206-210. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09012
  26. McMillan, RA; Paavola, CD; Howard, J .; Chan, SL; Zaluzec, NJ; Trent, JD (2002). Ordered nanoparticle arrays formed on engineered chaperonin protein templates. Nature materials, 1 (4), pp. 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat775
  27. Nykypanchuk, D .; Maye, MM; Van-Der-Lelie, D .; Gang, O. (2008). DNA-guided crystallization of colloidal nanoparticles = DNA-guided crystallization of colloidal nanoparticles. Nature, 451 (7178), pp. 549-552. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06560
  28. Omabegho, T .; Sha, R .; Seeman, NC (2009). A bipedal DNA Brownian motor with coordinated legs = A bipedal DNA Brownian motor with coordinated legs. Science, 324 (5923), pp. 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170336
  29. Oukhatar, A .; Bakhouya, M .; El Ouadghiri, D. (2021). Electromagnetic-Based Wireless Nano-Sensors Network: Architectures and Applications. J. Commun., 16 (1), 8.  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Driss-El-Ouadghiri/publication/348355577…/Electromagnetic-Based-Wireless-Nano-Sensors-Network-Architectures -and-Applications.pdf
  30. Ouyang, X .; De-Stefano, M .; Krissanaprasit, A .; Bank-Kodal, AL; Bech-Rosen, C .; Liu, T .; Gothelf, KV (2017). Docking of antibodies into the cavities of DNA origami structures. Angewandte Chemie, 129 (46), pp. 14615-14619. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201706765
  31. Rothemund, PW (2006). Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature, 440 (7082), pp. 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04586
  32. Sarlangue, G .; Devilleger, J .; Trillaud, P .; Fouchet, S .; Taillasson, L .; Catteau, G. (2021). Objectification of the existence of discoverable MAC addresses in the Bluetooth frequency range after an inoculation of COVID antigen therapy and the COVID detection PCR test. https://ln5.sync.com/dl/195df4a10/5ab9apq6-q5vgawam-vgr3ktt9-7zr985rh/view/default/2451906512011
  33. Seifert, A .; Göpfrich, K .; Burns, JR; Fertig, N .; Keyser, UF; Howorka, S. (2015). Bilayer DNA nanopores with voltage-switching between open and closed state = Bilayer-spanning DNA nanopores with voltage-switching between open and closed state. ACS nano, 9 (2), pp. 1117-1126. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn5039433
  34. Shen, J .; Sun, W .; Liu, D .; Schaus, T .; Yin, P. (2021). Three-dimensional nanolithography guided by DNA modular epitaxy = Three-dimensional nanolithography guided by DNA modular epitaxy. Nature Materials, 20 (5), pp. 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00930-7
  35. Taton, TA; Mirkin, CA; Letsinger, RL (2000). Scanometric DNA array detection with nanoparticle probes = Scanometric DNA array detection with nanoparticle probes. Science, 289 (5485), pp. 1757-1760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1757
  36. Wang, J .; Yue, L .; Li, Z .; Zhang, J .; Tian, ​​H .; Willner, I. (2019). Active generation of nanoholes in DNA origami scaffolds for programmed catalysis in nanocavities = Active generation of nanoholes in DNA origami scaffolds for programmed catalysis in nanocavities. Nature communications, 10 (1), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12933-9 | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336927899_Active_generation_of_nanoholes_in_DNA_origami_scaffolds_for_programmed_catalysis_in_nanocavities
  37. Wang, MX; Seo, SE; Gabrys, PA; Fleischman, D .; Lee, B .; Kim, Y .; Mirkin, CA (2017). Epitaxy: Programmable atom equivalents versus atoms = Epitaxy: Programmable atom equivalents versus atoms. ACS nano, 11 (1), pp. 180-185.   https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b06584
  38. Yang, J .; Ma, M .; Li, L .; Zhang, Y .; Huang, W .; Dong, X. (2014). Graphene nanomesh: new versatile materials = Graphene nanomesh: new versatile materials. Nanoscale, 6 (22), pp. 13301-13313. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR04584J  | https://sci-hub.yncjkj.com/10.1039/c4nr04584j
  39. Zhang, R .; Yang, K .; Abbasi, QH; Qaraqe, KA; Alomainy, A. (2017). Analytical characterization of the terahertz in-vivo nano-network in the presence of interference based on TS-OOK communication scheme. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 10172-10181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713459

 

Connect with Mik Andersen at Corona2Inspect


Click here to see related articles featuring the work of La Quinta Columna

See related by Mik Andersen:

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections




COVID Scam Falls Apart; It’s Over

COVID Scam Falls Apart; It’s Over

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
January 3, 2022

 

Since the beginning, I’ve been producing the evidence COVID is a scam. Now, official agencies are virtually admitting it.

On December 29, the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, announced, in a White House press briefing, that the PCR test can register positive (meaning the person is “infected”) long AFTER infection is over.

Here’s Walensky’s money quote:

“…people can remain PCR positive for up to 12 weeks after infection and long after they are transmissible and infectious.”

That means MILLIONS of FALSE positive test results have been logged as REAL, in the past two years.

If you can’t trace the implications of THAT, I can’t help you.

Recall the old Zen Koan: What is the sound of one hand clapping?

The new version is: What is the sound of the White House press corps after Walensky’s admission?

And is the answer is: Nothing. Zero. Silence. And not stunned silence. No. Clueless silence. Sold-out silence.

No shouting. No furor. No questions.

“Dear Mr. Smith, We here at the CDC wish to inform to you that your positive PCR COVID test, administered in the spring of 2020, was misleading. There was no proof it meant you were infected. Therefore, your isolation, your hospitalization, during which your business closed and went into bankruptcy, your wife left home taking up residence with the children at her mother’s, your business partner committed suicide—all that was unnecessary. Thank you for your understanding.”

Of course, the blind following the blind following Fauci will say, “But…but…the CDC couldn’t have made a mistake that big…there must be some explanation…”

And yes, there is an explanation. The CDC and other public health officials have known all along they were running a scam. Committing a crime. A Nuremberg-type crime.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: rolandmey / pixabay




La Quinta Columna: Microtechnology in Pfizer’s Covid Vaxx

La Quinta Columna: Microtechnology in Pfizer’s Covid Vaxx

 



Video available at Orwellito Rumble channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

 

Microtechnology in Pfizer’s vaccine 

by Orwellito, Orwell City
January 2, 2022

 

La Quinta Columna has issued a new communiqué of special importance. This time, denouncing the presence of microtechnology in a Pfizer vial.

The observation of the objects detected in this vial to date has been carried out under optical microscopy throughout the most recent programs of the Spanish team.

Biostatistician Ricardo Delgado Martín has asked people all over the world to contact him to testify before a legal body about the content of the vaccine.

Orwell City brings the words of the founder of La Quinta Columna into English.

[Transcript]

Ricardo Delgado: 

Hello. Very good evening to everyone. First of all, I wanted to wish everybody a happy new year. However, I’d like to share with you some chilling images.

Remember throughout this time, throughout this week, we’ve even done a live stream with what’s inside the Pfizer vaccine, and we’ve said that there’s graphene and some, let’s say artificial structures. But now I want you to see what we have on the screen. Precisely what’s seen under the microscope, and that, logically, has creeped me out.

We have to denounce this en masse. Everybody has to go out immediately to the streets and expose what the entire world population had been inoculated. All your neighbors, all your relatives have been jabbed with what you’ll see now. Circuitry. Microtechnology inside the body. I’m going to share with you, on the screen, what’s on the object holder.

This is one of the droplets that were discarded from last week. When the hydrogel has dried, it formed these images that we’re going to share. As I say, right now. Let’s see if it’s possible. Well. I think you’re seeing what I’m seeing on the screen, right? Let’s zoom in so you can see it. One moment, please. That’s it. Look at the object we found in the Pfizer vaccine.

As you can see… I’m going to be moving it. Downwards. Now upwards.

There are four strange corners. Four perfectly square-angular shapes and circuitry inside. These are electronic components. This is what’s formed at the base. Here are what appear to be ceramic capacitors or some other type of electronic component or circuitry. As I say, this is part of the contents of the Pfizer vaccine. Here’s another perfectly artificial corner. Let’s adjust the image a little bit. Here and here too. This is micro-technology. This is probably a micro-router.

This is, probably, the consequence… Or this is what causes people to generate MAC addresses. In other words, micro-technology is being introduced into our family members, into people who have been totally deceived.

How is this not going to cause thrombi? How is this not supposed to cause all kinds of cardiovascular diseases and heart attacks? How is this not going to cause arrhythmias? I beg the entire medical community immediately to end this covert genocide.

This is what’s inside the Pfizer vaccine. This is visible after four or five days of waiting for the water in the sample to evaporate. We cannot allow one more second for these people to give one more injection, especially to our children. That’s what’s inside the vial. And that’s what needs to be denounced. Please share this video with all parts of the world. Share this video on all your social networks and go with these images directly to the duty court to file a complaint. Because I, Mr. Ricardo Delgado Martín, D.N.I: 79.202.099N (with “N” for Navarra), will go to testify. And I’ll take the sample with me.

I’m going to change the magnification. Let’s see it bigger.

Well, in case there were any doubts. In case there you had any doubts… This is… This isn’t a crime, but much worse. This is the most complete humiliation and aberration that has ever been done to human beings. Ever! There’s no longer any kind of doubt here. No doubts. This is an artificial spawn. Now let all the fucking controlled dissidence come and tell me what this is. That “dissident” group that doesn’t look at anything under a fucking microscope. The corners are perfectly square. This is micro-technology. There’s at least on the order of 1200 magnification right now. And you can see it clearly. So, this is a few tens of microns large. And this is what has been introduced… What has been injected into everybody’s body. This is what has been injected into everybody’s body. Oh, my goodness! Jesus Christ!

Either we just stop these genocidal people right now and put them directly in jail or hang them directly in a public square. Otherwise, they’ll end up with the whole human race. Do you understand? Let’s try this. While we’re at it, of course, recording all kinds of images. And I have stopped on this object because I had the imperative need to share it with all of you. Let’s try another magnification. Here you can see, let’s say… Please, share the live broadcast with everyone. Crystal clear, isn’t it? Clear, right? Even so, people will say you’re “conspiracy theorists.” Even so, they’ll call you “deniers.” This is what’s inside the Pfizer vaccine.

I make an appeal to all the judges and magistrates of our country. Either you do something about this immediately, or we go directly to the courts and turn them all upside down. And we go as we have to go because this can no longer be tolerated. Either you take Dr. Campra’s report that proved all this and more, or we take another type of measure because this cannot be allowed in any way. Summon me to testify. Just summon me. I repeat. I, Ricardo Delgado Martín, D.N.I: 79.202.099N (with “N” for Navarra), offer myself before any prosecutor, magistrate, judge of our country —and of any other part of the world— to show what’s inside the vaccines. To prove what’s inside the vials. This is a real genocide. A real genocide. A crime against humanity. And we cannot allow this since it’s being done taking advantage of people’s ignorance, illiteracy, and unawareness.

Please take these images to the outpatient clinics and public hospitals. Please, do me the favor. And summon me! Summon me to testify. Summon me. And please immediately remove this impostor who calls himself President of the Government from office. Immediatly!

I think it’s more than enough. It’s more than enough. I apologize for having expressed myself in this way, but like any human being, I get carried away. But not for the best exactly. Because this is an aberration. Take these images and take them directly to a court of law. I have given all my personal data, and I’ll take the sample, which I’ll keep carefully, of this Pfizer vaccine. Together with a specific batch whose traceability I have from the health worker who gave it to me at the Seville meeting. Let’s all go to denounce this authentic genocide. We cannot tolerate this atrocity for one more minute. I close here. Very good night. And as I say, happy new year to all.

Text from the video: Report the situation to your physician.

 

Connect with La Quinta Columna

Connect with Orwell City


Click here to see related articles featuring the work of La Quinta Columna

See also:

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

Graphene Oxide & Nano-Router Circuitry in Covid Vaccines: Uncovering the True Purpose of These Mandatory Toxic Injections




Extreme Authoritarian Laws Proposed in New York!

Extreme Authoritarian Laws Proposed in New York!

by JP Sears, AwakenWithJP
December 28, 2021

 



Video available at AwakenWithJP Odysee and Rumble channels.

 

Connect with JP Sears




Defeat the Mandates: An American Homecoming — “United We Stand, in Peace We March.” — January 23, 2022 in Washington, DC

Defeat the Mandates: An American Homecoming — “United We Stand, in Peace We March.” — January 23, 2022 in Washington, DC

 

About:

We want to be…free.

Americans of every class and color.

Democrats and Republicans.

Vaccinated and unvaccinated.

United we stand, in peace we march.

The Plan

We will start the march at 11:30am at the Washington Monument and we’ll walk together to the steps of the Lincoln Memorial (approximately 1 mile).

At the Lincoln Memorial, a wide range of featured guests will be waiting.

Connect with the organizers of this event and sign up to receive updates.

 

Join Us at Defeat the Mandates

cover image credit:  Роман Рябенко / Wikimedia Commons




Trump Supporters: Who Is Our Fighter?

Trump Supporters: Who Is Our Fighter?

by Alicia GreenContributing Writer at Truth Comes to Light
December 31, 2021

 

“If not us, who? If not now, when?”
― John F. Kennedy

 

The mass formation psychosis and maybe white savior mentality has caused many to follow Trump and many leaders like him (i.e., Biden, Fauci/Gates). They stir up emotions, promise to “save” you from “fill-in-the-blank” but end up doing the exact opposite of what they promised. It’s an abusive relationship with the government and they are counting on you to play the victim role.

We now know what Fauci did during the AIDS crisis when he tried to “save” us from that virus. He experimented to death orphaned Black and Hispanic children. Similarly, Gates has tried to “save” Africans from “fill-in-the-blank”, but ended up killing more children than the diseases.

Now Biden and Fauci/Gates want “to save Republicans’ lives.” They recently praised Trump for his “Operation Warp Speed”, for his promotion of the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, and for being vaccinated and boosted.

They have been waiting and hoping for Trump’s charisma to help increase vaccinations among his followers. Peter H. Schuck, Baldwin Professor of Law Emeritus at Yale Law School wrote in Real Clear Politics:

“With 2022 in mind, Trump is unlikely to aid Democrats by diminishing the impact of a wedge issue. And with 2024 in mind, he’s unlikely to drive away his own vaccine-skeptic voters by echoing Biden’s sentiments.

But imagine if he did! No doubt Trump would take a victory lap or two for the vaccine’s rapid development – probably his greatest achievement as president. Giving him credit for helping to get more of us vaccinated would be a grand bargain that we should not begrudge him.”

Trump is very proud of having orchestrated the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccinations in “warp speed” and it has been found to be unprecedented in its “firsts” as stated in the May 2021 issue of International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR), Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19:

Many aspects of Covid-19 and subsequent vaccine development are unprecedented for a vaccine deployed for use in the general population. Some of these include the following.

1. First to use PEG (polyethylene glycol) in an injection (see text)

2. First to use mRNA vaccine technology against an infectious agent

3. First time Moderna has brought any product to market

4. First to have public health officials telling those receiving the vaccination to expect an adverse reaction

5. First to be implemented publicly with nothing more than preliminary efficacy data (see text)

6. First vaccine to make no clear claims about reducing infections, transmissibility, or deaths

7. First coronavirus vaccine ever attempted in humans

8. First injection of genetically modified polynucleotides in the general population

More information regarding the manipulation of the vaccine testing, and lack of testing, has been recently exposed by The Canadian Covid Care Alliance. As you may know, Dr. Robert Malone, was just suspended from Twitter for posting their video The Pfizer Inoculations for COVID-19: More Harm than Good. Is Trump still proud of these vaccines?

Trump had said in the past that he was opposed to promoting the vaccines for fear that he would lose his base supporters. He must have changed his mind with his recent comments stating he is proud of the COVID-19 vaccines, claiming that there are no serious side effects or deaths from the vaccines.

Trump’s Surgeon General, Jerome Adams, stated Trump waited to come out as pro-vaccine until after Biden praised him for his work in getting the vaccines to the public. Jerome also believes vaccine mandates are effective for adults and children.

Even Pastor Jeffress, Trump’s famous evangelical supporter, advocates for the vaccines and sees no reason for vaccine exemptions. Pastor Jefferies’ church has even promoted the vaccines by having vaccine clinics to make the vaccines more accessible to the people in his community.

When Trump stated he received his booster, he seemed to belittle those who booed in opposition as “just a tiny group”, even though most of his supporters are considered anti-vaxxers. (Note: Not all anti-vaxxers are Trump supporters, and possibly most are not.)

In Candace Owens’ recent interview with Trump, he seemed to double and triple-down on his pro-vaccine stance. Trump said “vaccines are good, and people should get them.” Candace followed-up the interview with an Instagram video to her followers making excuses for Trump’s vaccine stance saying he is pro-vaccine because he isn’t aware of the known side effects, because he is sheltered and doesn’t keep up with the topic, and doesn’t do research on the internet. All of these excuses seem implausible since he has always been keenly aware of current news, the “fake news”, and any news that relates to “voter fraud”.

Why do people make excuses for him and continue to support him? Has he brainwashed his followers to follow him at all costs, even if he stands against something they feel so strongly against? Remember, he did state during an election rally that “he loves the poorly educated”. Does he think his followers are poorly educated?

Trump also believes “his vaccines” have saved millions of lives. New York Times’, Maggie Haberman, asked Trump’s representatives if he was going to play ball with his anti-vaxx followers, and she was handed a handwritten note with Trump’s signature in response. The note stated: “Must tell the truth — and very proud to have produced the 3 vaccines so quickly. Millions of lives saved worldwide. Best wishes, Donald.”

Is his promotion of the COVID-19 vaccines part of the con game? Erving Goffman, a Canadian-born sociologist, social psychologist, and writer, considered by some “the most influential American sociologist of the twentieth century”, is known for his classic essay On Cooling the Mark Out. Brooke Harrington of The Guardian explains:

“In 1952, the sociologist Erving Goffman analysed the art of the con in a seminal essay, On Cooling the Mark Out. To understand the phenomenon, he identified a cast of characters: first, the ‘operator’, who perpetrates the con; second, the ‘mark’, the target of the con; and third, the ‘cooler’, an ally of the con artist who attempts to console the victim once the fraud has become apparent ‘in a way that makes it easy for him to accept the inevitable and quietly go home’.”

Once the “mark” discovers he has been deceived, he needs “cooling out”:

“The most effective ‘coolers’ are figures that the ‘marks’ trust, people whose opinion they value.”

Goffman explains:

“For the mark, cooling represents a process of adjustment to an impossible situation – a situation arising from having defined himself in a way which the social facts come to contradict. The mark must therefore be supplied with a new set of apologies for himself, a new framework in which to see himself and judge himself. A process of redefining the self along defensible lines must be instigated and carried along; since the mark himself is frequently in too weakened a condition to do this, the cooler must initially do it for him.”

It appears Candace Owens and Marjorie Taylor Greene are attempting to “cool out” Trump supporters who feel they have been conned. Alex Jones, another avid Trump supporter, appears to be taking both sides, and calling for Trump supporters to “move on” from Trump, while at the same time, excusing Trump for his pro-vaccine stance. Jason Lemon of Newsweek reported Alex Jones’ statements:

“Yeah, we all wish Trump would do the right thing, but listen, I’ve got the inside baseball on Trump. He doesn’t know what’s going on, and I’m not even defending Trump, I’m just saying we’ve got to move on,” Jones told listeners to his Wednesday InfoWars show.

Jones went on to suggest that to “get Trump’s attention” he may begin to “dish all the dirt” on the former president. “You know what, you know what—I am going to dish it all on Trump…” he said. While Jones contended that Trump is “not a bad guy,” he lamented that the former president “doesn’t know what he’s doing” and is “surrounded by bad advisors.”

Alex Jones seems to shift the blame for Trump’s pro-vaccine stance to his supporters for believing in Trump and to Trump’s “bad advisors”. Similar to Candace Owens’ excuses for Trump being “unaware” of vaccine side effects. This con tactic is also pointed out by Brooke Harrington in The Atlantic:

“Goffman points out that con artists employ specialists to ‘cool’ marks down when the deception is finally revealed. A cooler, he writes, ‘has the job of handling persons caught out on a limb—persons whose expectations and self-conceptions have been built up and then shattered.’ Coolers prevent blowback from angry marks—encouraging them to blame themselves, not the con artist. They help marks rebuild their social identity, retain their self-respect, and preserve their affiliations with their reference groups.”

As Goffman says, “cooling represents a process of adjustment”, and “the disappointment of reasonable expectations, as well as misguided ones, creates a need for consolation”.

Now that we know Trump is pro-vaccine because he believes the “vaccines save lives, have no known side-effects and don’t cause death”, why would he not be pro-vaccine-mandate? Haven’t we heard this before: The vaccines are safe and effective; we won’t mandate them. Now, there are mandates.

One Trump Grill in Trump Tower enforces the vaccine mandate, so does he approve of the vaccine mandates? Will Trump’s next surprise statement be that he is pro-vaccine-mandate, and will that announcement come before or after he is elected President in 2024? Are you willing to wait and find out?

Does Alex Jones regret promoting Trump? Newsweek reported Alex Jones “wishes he never had met Trump”:

“The leaked footage was recorded by filmmaker Caolan Robertson, who told SPLC that Jones ‘doesn’t care about most of the stuff he professes to.’”

Are Jones, Owens, Greene, and Trump all in lockstep with the vaccine con game? Brooke Harrington concludes:

“From a purely pragmatic perspective, it’s good news for everyone that some influential conservative figures are beginning to act as ‘coolers’ in relation to pandemic holdouts by encouraging vaccination – even if the ‘coolers’ have often been, as in Goffman’s theory, complicit in the con. The call back to reality has to come from inside the house.”

Is there now no difference between Biden and Trump, or Democrats and Republicans, when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines? It seems there is not any difference, they all promote that COVID-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective”.

I guess Trump was right about one thing, we are all poorly educated. We are having a national security crisis because we are allowing the government to take away our freedoms. Matthew Lynch of The Edvocate states:

“When citizens understand their government, they will be more inclined to contribute and participate, strengthening our country overall. Dumbed down education proves to hinder national security by producing citizens who are poorly informed, unprepared, and unmotivated to take part.”

Trump recently said that we are in need of a “savior” for our COVID-19 situation and he said “it is not me”. His followers should take him at his word. He is not taking up our fight. He seems to pretend to be clueless. Each individual must take up their own fight.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, of Children’s’ Health Defense, is taking up the fight. He has been instrumental in battling dangerous health and safety violators such as Monsanto/Round-up. Trump had the chance to hire RFK Jr to help with the COVID-19 vaccine project, but decided to hire Fauci/Gates and Brix instead. Doesn’t that answer the question of where Trump stands on vaccines?

RFK Jr’s newest book, The Real Anthony Fauci, reveals that federal government organizations, the media, and big pharma are all working together to promote the COVID-19 “vaccines”, while they all make big profits from the business of vaccines. Much like how big pharma, the FDA, doctors, and politicians seem to have colluded together to make millions on Oxycontin despite the addiction and deaths it caused.

If you haven’t watched Dopesick, you should, and while watching replace the word “Oxycontin” with “COVID-19 vaccines”. One similarity in the marketing of Oxycontin and COVID-19 vaccines is the emphasis on taking more of the drug when you get “breakthrough” pain (Oxycontin) or “breakthrough” infection (COVID-19 booster vaccines).

Purdue was found guilty of their marketing lies of Oxycontin. Pfizer was found guilty of fraudulent marketing of Bextra:

“American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together ‘Pfizer’) have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.

Pharmacia & Upjohn Company has agreed to plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead.”

If Pfizer and Purdue can be found guilty of fraudulent marketing, why can’t Pfizer and Moderna be found guilty of fraudulent marketing of their “vaccines”? The literal definition of the word vaccine had to be changed to accommodate their drugs. Since when is that legal?

Vaccines are the gold mine for big pharma because there is zero liability involved in the vaccine business. Moreso with the COVID-19 vaccines which are covered by the PREP Act. The entire supply chain is covered by the PREP Act, including all people involved in the marketing, distribution, administration, and injection.

The COVID-19 vaccines do give 100% immunity, 100% legal immunity to any liability. The PREP Act should be rescinded. Contact your congressperson and senator and ask them to rescind the PREP Act now, before it’s too late to fight.

RFK, Jr and Children’s Health Defense are taking up the fight. They are one of the organizers for the January 5, 2022 March for Medical Freedom and promoting grassroots action at the local level. They are also calling for all to come together at a rally to fight against tyranny and government overreach. On January 23rd, 2022 “Defeat the Mandates” will march from the Washington Monument to a rally at the Lincoln Memorial:

“Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. along with many others will be addressing the crowd. We are going to come together – black, white and Hispanic; vaccinated and unvaccinated; Democrats and Republicans – to fight for freedom and to march on Washington in peace. The discrimination against the unvaccinated is an assault against the very fabric that makes us a free, democratic society. Go to www.defeatthemandatesdc.com to sign up and join us! #DoNotComply”

It is time for all to take action before we permanently lose our freedoms and our country. Trump is not the answer, as you may be starting to understand. Do not feel abandoned. Come together and support Defeat the Mandates.

In the words of former President John F Kennedy, RFK, Jr’s Uncle:

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.

Now the trumpet summons us again–not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need–not as a call to battle, though embattled we are– but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, ‘rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation’–a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease and war itself.

Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility–I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it–and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”

Will YOU take up the fight?


Alicia Green is an instinctive researcher and writer, with BA in Psychology and BS in Advertising. She gained her first experience as an investigative news reporter while working for a student-run news publication, providing breaking news and information on issues affecting the university and local community.

Alicia Green is a contributing writer at Truth Comes to Light.

Alicia welcomes your comments and feedback on her articles. If you have a topic or issue you would like her to investigate, please reach out to her here:

 

cover image credit: Pexels / pixabay




Marines “Crushed” by Vax Mandate as “Thousands” Denied Religious Exemptions in “Political Purge”

Marines “Crushed” by Vax Mandate as “Thousands” Denied Religious Exemptions in “Political Purge”

by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge
December 29, 2021

 

Days ago it was first revealed that despite the Department of Defense offering a “religious exemption” as part of the Covid-19 vaccine mandate across all military branches, not a single one has yet to be approved – at a time at least 169 Marines were already discharged for their refusal to receive the shot.

A new investigative report by Fox News finds that multiple “thousands” of Marines are still set to be processed out over the mandate, and that the corps’ “best and brightest” are being “crushed” by the Biden vaccine order. “Marines are allowed to apply for a religious exemption, but so far not a single application regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, or any vaccine for that matter, has been approved, a Marine Corps spokesman told Fox News.”

For this reason the mandate is being likened to a “political purge” – which has seen a “blanket denial” of all formal requests for religious exemptions. In recent days official Marine Corps statements have underscored no exemptions are being given out, yet supposedly these are being considered on a case by case basis.

As of late last week, the Marine Corps confirmed that not a single religious exemption request has yet to be approved. It was further confirmed that at least a few thousand could be discharged based on the exemption denial:

Marine Corps spokesman Capt. Ryan Bruce told Fox News that as of Thursday, 3,080 of the 3,192 requests for religious accommodation concerning the COVID-19 vaccine mandate had been processed and zero had been approved, adding that “no religious accommodations have been approved for any other vaccine in the past seven years.” 

So assuming these Marines will still refuse the jab, thousands are set to be booted from the Marine Corps. In its reporting, Fox extensively quotes Marine officers, whose names are withheld. The Daily Wire, citing the most recently available public data from last week, estimated that some 9,000 could still be set for early discharge from the service:

As of Thursday, 94% of active-duty troops were fully vaccinated and another 1% were partially vaccinated, according to data from the U.S. Marine Corps.

That leaves the remaining 5% of an active-duty Marine force of about 182,500, which amounts to about 9,125 active-duty Marines who are still unvaccinated.

“There’s something fundamentally wrong at this point with our nation’s leadership,” a major with over 17 years of active service was cited as saying. “We are facing an unconstitutional edict that I think is very targeted as a political purge, taking out some of the best and brightest soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and guardians from the Space Force.”

Further, a lieutenant colonel who has served for almost two decades said the Marines are discharging service members “as fast as they can and as brutally as they can, damaging every Marine as much as they can on the way out.”

Further, Fox’s Jessica Chasmar, who interviewed several of the officers, said:

“The one message I got from the colonel above me was: ‘Tread very carefully, this is political, you will be crushed like an ant.’ And he told me that because he cares about me,” the lieutenant colonel said. “Do I want to continue serving in an institution that crushes people for bringing up reasonable points in defending their faith?”

One master sergeant said it seems that “the louder I speak the tighter the screws are turned against me.”

Additionally one Marine who ranks high on the enlisted side said, “When you’re expected to behave a certain way and to obey certain rules and follow certain processes, and then to see on the other end that that’s not a two-way street, that’s a violation of my morals that I can’t stand by and not speak out about.”

The same Marine, identified as a Master Sergeant, described one particular instance of an individual Marine’s exhaustively documented and very convincing case for a religious exemption: “I saw one package from a sergeant who had attached, like, 30 pages of material to substantiate why his belief was sincere, under no lawful obligation to do so,” the master sergeant said. “And then to have this as a response with no individual inquiry and just a generalized assertion of governmental interest is insulting.”

“On the religious side, this is absolutely a travesty what’s happening,” a separate officer described. “People are getting blanket denials, they’re not addressing the individual concerns or beliefs of Marines who are submitting for religious accommodations, and I think that’s just horribly wrong. I honestly believe that they’re not really reading the packages.”

Those interviewed also depicted an ongoing culture of intimidation which appears intended to silence any potential opposition to the mandate, further with no recourse whatsoever. Instead the Marines feel steamrolled into compliance. What’s more is that unlike many parts of Europe, prior infection and natural immunity is being completely ignored.

 

Connect with ZeroHedge

cover image credit: russmac / pixabay




Real-Time Observation of the Content of a Pfizer Vaccine Vial

Real-Time Observation of the Content of a Pfizer Vaccine Vial

by Orwellito, Orwell City
December 29, 2021

 

La Quinta Columna dedicated its most recent program to show the substance contained in a Pfizer vaccination vial under an optical microscope.

In the following excerpt that Orwell City has brought into English, some of the main structures identified by the Spanish researchers can be easily observed.



Video available at Rumble.

 

Ricardo Delgado:

Here you can see it directly. There’s the drop. You see it, don’t you? On the right, you see everything outside the drop. And on the left, you see everything inside the drop of a Pfizer vaccine. I’ll put it on full screen. I’m going to put it on full screen so you can see it. And I’m going to be talking over here.

There’s movement here already. That’s right. I’m going to see my screen. Done. There are different settings here. I have the maximum resolution and certain parameters, such as brightness, contrast, saturation, a gamma parameter, and so on. So it looks relatively good with this lens. I’m going to move the microscope towards me. Now let’s look the inside of the drop. Okay. Here we’re going to play with the relief. We’re going to look at the edges. Well, there you see some graphene-like objects. Like these right here. Those are, let’s say, on the surface. See?

I’m telling you, you shouldn’t see anything at all. When we give more relief when we play with the focus, we see other objects in the plane. Everything that we’re looking at right now is inside the drop, OK? Here at the edge, there’s something… No. It’s the relief of the drop itself. And we’re going to be doing a first probe, a first magnification (x). I’m playing with the focus. Playing with it directly through the whole sample until we find objects with certain patterns. But well, I’m going to the background. Look, here in the background, for example, you can see something. The famous nanotubes. Here in another plane, there’s another one. Look at what is in the center. Look what a strange formation, isn’t it?

Man! Juanma Moreno, what do you want to put in our bodies?

Well, let’s go on. There seems to be something here. Let’s see… Yes. They’re microbubbles, right? And there’s also a graphenic formation. In fact, there’s an evolution that can be seen over time. That is, as we continue to observe… There’s also a rare formation there. As we continue to observe, let’s say, you can see that it self-assembles. Let’s see if we’re lucky enough to see that self-assembly. Because you have to understand, guys, that right now we’re under significant radiation. You know which one. And through teslaphoresis mechanism, this prime material used in this vaccine, which is graphene, gets to act this way. Then we’re going to look at it with more magnification.

Well, here’s something. It has the shape of one of those famous Morgellons, right? Look at the shape, as it’s usually in two tips. It’s not very well focused. Let’s take a little picture of it, shall we?

 

Connect with Orwell City

 


See related:

Vaccines as Vectors for the Installation of Nanotechnology: Evidence That Nano Receiving Antennas Are Being Inoculated Into the Human Body

La Quinta Columna: Pfizer Vaccine Under a Microscope | Strange Structures & Their Movements




Russian Roulette: Unproven COVID ‘Vaccine’ Gene Transfer Technology

Russian Roulette: Unproven COVID ‘Vaccine’ Gene Transfer Technology

by 21st Century Wire
December 29, 2021

 

Since the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out began in late 2020, government, mainstream media and Silicon Valley censorship departments has been working overtime to try and obfuscate the fact that the experimental  mRNA  injections are an unproven, genetically-modified gene therapy compound.

Despite a desperate effort by Gates-funded Fact-Checkers to convince that public that the unproven mRNA technology is “not gene therapy”, the scientific literature clearly shows that mRNA is in fact gene therapy, or rather gene transfer technology.

The so-called ‘vaccines’ made by Pfizer and Moderna use oily envelopes called lipid nanoparticles to insert genetically-modified material called messenger RNA (mRNA) blueprint for a toxic spike protein into a person’s cells which then become mini-factories for the GMO toxic protein. The Johnson & Johnson works slightly different, using a double-stranded DNA inserted into an inert adenovirus. The DNA also contains the instructions for building the toxic spike protein.

Pharmaceutical firms claim this genetic cocktail protects people from COVID-19, but upon closer examination their brash claims of “90% effective” are clearly fraudulent. Rather than require drug manufacturers to use proper metrics to prove real effectiveness, government regulators have chosen instead to look the other way and allow the fraud to continue unabated.

To date, in the United States alone, there have been 1,842,457 adverse reactions and injuries reported following these experimental injections. These number continue to grow each week.

As the new pharmaceutical ‘vaccine’ products have been intentionally rushed through the normal safety and regulatory procedures before being deployed into the population under the aegis of an “emergency use authorization” – and with zero medium or long-terms clinical trials or studies – then these are by definition experimental products.

What will be the results of this mass-human experiment, and who will ultimately be held responsible for the growing list of casualties? Watch: 

 

 

Connect with 21st Century Wire




117,093 Cases? — “They’re All Nuts”

117,093 Cases? — “They’re All Nuts”

by Carl Vernon
December 28, 2021

 



 

Connect with Carl Vernon




The Tyrant Says He Means Well

The Tyrant Says He Means Well

by Adam Dick, Ron Paul Institute
December 27, 2021

 

Tyrants just about always say they mean well in imposing tyranny. Sweeping prohibitions, coupled with harsh enforcement, the tyrants say, are necessary to advance important conditions, such as health, economic wellbeing, or defense from an enemy’s menace.

So it goes as well with United States President Joe Biden who has unilaterally exercised broad tyrannical powers on matters including mask mandates and vaccine mandates in the name of protecting people’s health.

Addressing his mandates that people take experimental coronavirus “vaccine” shots, Biden, in his December 21 speech related to the US government’s actions taken in the name of countering coronavirus, acknowledged that “vaccination requirements are unpopular for many.” Then, declared Biden: “But my administration has put them in place not to control your life, but to save your life and the lives of others.”

Every freedom loving person should outright reject this go-to “I mean well” excuse used by tyrants through the ages. Even if the experimental coronavirus vaccine shots were safe and effective as propagandized nonstop by government officials and people in the big money media, the freedom to reject the shots and other medical interventions is fundamental. People are wise to fight to protect against government abuse of this freedom irrespective of politicians’ promises of safety.

Next time you hear Biden talk up one of his mandates as protecting people’s health, remember that he is repeating a common tyrants’ pitch that time and time again has led to destruction of people’s freedom. Tyranny, despite promises otherwise, has tended to lead to bad health results for the people as well.

 

Connect with Ron Paul Institute




Pandemic Grift: 35 Doctors, Scientists and Healthcare Moguls Who Became COVID Billionaires

Pandemic Grift: 35 Doctors, Scientists and Healthcare Moguls Who Became COVID Billionaires

by 21st Century Wire
December 27, 2021

 

It’s been two years since the ‘novel’ coronavirus first appeared on the global scene in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December 2019. Since then, a litter a of new billionaires have been born, all conveniently positioned to capitalise off of the world great-ever pseudo pandemic. Whether it’s cashing in on unprecedented vaccine sales made possible government mandates, new and expensive untested drug treatments, dubious medical devices, fraudulent PCR and lateral flow COVID-19 testing, masks, PPE, home delivery services, and various other forms of public-private grift, well-connected globalists have been quick to extract as much free public money as possible and then launder their takings on the stock market, and other ventures to supposedly ‘fight the global pandemic.’

By allowing Washington to declare a “national emergency,” during the first year in the USA alone, billionaires managed to rake-in upwards of $1 Trillion.
.
Of course, among the biggest winners globally in this corporativist coup d’etat are the transnational pharmaceutical drug cartels – gifted sweatheart contracts by governments, allowing cartel members to freely manufacture and distribute experimental gene-jab ‘vaccines’ which they claims protect people against COVID-19. Leading this pack in this sordid group of corporate actors are the perennially corrupt firm Pfizer, along with its German biotech partner in crime, BioNTech, along with Massachusetts-based Moderna — all of whom are pushing an experimental mRNA gene therapy injection deceptively marketed as a ‘vaccine.’

Cashing in on COVID

Because of massive guaranteed government purchases of their half-baked, unproven products, executives at these well-connected firms have seen their net worths skyrocket since January 2020.

Leading in this pseudo pandemic jackpot sweepstakes are BioNTech CEO Uğur Şahin who is now worth a cool $4.2 billion, and Moderna’s Stéphane Bancel who has managed to parlay a $4.1 billion fortune on the back of the COVID crisis. Thanks to public subsidies and funding from the US taxpayers to develop their experimental mRNA genetic injection, vaccine barons at Moderna have also produced other billionaires, including Harvard professor Timothy Springer and MIT scientist Robert Langer.

Naturally, these experimental mandated GMO gene-jab ‘vaccines’ will require billions of glass vials to transport their toxic payload, and so enter Italy’s Sergio Stevanato, another new COVID billionaire and the majority shareholder in the privately-owned Stevanato Group, which is making vaccine vials for the transnational corporate drug cartel.

Other industries cashing in on the PCR-driven ‘case-demic’ are those making antibody treatments and other drugs which they claim will “fight the virus”and have benefited from mass-hysteria we’ve seen since February 2020. Clever operators like Carl Hansen, the CEO of Canadian biotech firm AbCellera, suddenly became worth $2.9 billion after his company went public in December 2020, after a questionable fast-track approval by the Food and Drug Administration’s for its alleged ‘safe and effective’ antibody treatment developed with Big Pharma cartel member Eli Lilly.

The other big grift is the testing of the rushed experimental ‘vaccines’, drugs and medical devices. Among those topping the list is the world of spotty clinic tests and product trials is one August Troendle, the founder and CEO of Cincinnati-based research firm Medpace, who is suddenly became worth a tidy $1.3 billion after his shares jumped a whopping 70% since 2020.

Here are the 10 of the most noteworthy opportunists who have managed to leverage what has been largely a contrived crisis from the beginning – using the fear and chaos to become rich  beyond their wildest dreams. The list is based on calculations made by Forbes for the year 2020:

Uğur Şahin

Net worth: $4.2 billion

Citizenship: Germany

Source of wealth: BioNTech

The Turkish-born physician cofounded BioNTech in the German city of Mainz in 2008 with his wife, Özlem Türeci, who serves as the firm’s Chief Medical Officer. He owns about 17% of the company’s shares. BioNTech’s stock has risen 160% since January on the back of its successful Covid-19 vaccine developed in partnership with Pfizer, which was declared by the U.S. FDA to be 95% effective in preventing Covid-19. The first doses were rolled out in the U.K. on December 8th and in the U.S. on December 14th, with more doses reserved for the European Union, Japan and Canada, among others. Before starting BioNTech, Şahin and Türeci founded biopharma company Ganymed Pharmaceuticals in 2001, which they sold to Japan-based Astellas Pharma for about $460 million in 2016.

 

Stéphane Bancel

Net worth: $4.1 billion

Citizenship: France

Source of wealth: Moderna

Bancel, a French citizen, became CEO of Massachusetts-based Moderna in 2011 after leaving his previous job as CEO of French diagnostics firm BioMérieux. He owns about 6% of Moderna, down from about 9% when he first became a billionaire in March, after selling more than a million shares as the firm’s stock surged by more than 550% since the beginning of the year. On December 18, Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine – with a reported efficacy of 95% — was the second to be approved by regulators in the U.S. after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The first doses will be administered in the U.S., which ordered 200 million doses with an option for 300 million more.

 

Yuan Liping

Net worth: $4.1 billion

Citizenship: Canada

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Yuan owns 24% of one of China’s leading vaccine producers, Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products, after her divorce from the company’s chairman (and fellow billionaire) Du Weimin in June. The split instantly made the Shenzhen resident Canada’s richest woman. Kangtai’s stock is up 90% since the beginning of 2020. She worked at the company from 2012 to 2015 as a manager and director and has been a director at a Kangtai subsidiary, Beijing Minhai Biotechnology, since March 2017. Kangtai is the exclusive Chinese manufacturer for the vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford, with a deal to produce 200 million doses, but the company has a checkered history: in 2013, its hepatitis B vaccine was linked to the death of 17 infants, but a government investigation went nowhere and critics were reportedly pressured to retract negative articles. A representative for Shenzhen Kangtai did not reply to a request for comment.

 

Hu Kun

Net worth: $3.9 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Hu is the chairman of Contec Medical Systems, a manufacturer of medical devices based in the  northeastern Chinese port city of Qinhuangdao. He took the company public on the Shenzhen stock exchange in August and owns nearly half of the shares, which are up nearly 150% since the IPO. Contec draws more than 70% of its revenue from overseas and makes a range of medical products for hospitals including nebulizers, stethoscopes and blood pressure monitors.

 

Carl Hansen

Net worth: $2.9 billion

Citizenship: Canada

Source of wealth: AbCellera

Hansen is the CEO and cofounder of Vancouver-based AbCellera, a biotech firm that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to identify the most promising antibody treatments for diseases. He founded the company in 2012. Until 2019 he also worked as a professor at the University of British Columbia, but shifted to focus full-time on AbCellera. That decision seems to have paid off, and Hansen’s 23% stake earned him a spot in the billionaire club after AbCellera’s successful listing on the Nasdaq on December 11. The U.S. government has ordered 300,000 doses of bamlanivimab, an antibody AbCellera discovered in partnership with Eli Lilly that received FDA approval as a Covid-19 treatment in November.

 

Timothy Springer

Net worth: $2 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Moderna

An immunologist and professor of biological chemistry and molecular pharmacology at Harvard University, Springer was a founding investor in Moderna in 2010 when he put about $5 million into the fledgling company. A decade later, his 3.5% stake is now worth roughly $1.6 billion. Springer is an active investor in biotech, with smaller holdings in publicly traded firms Scholar Rock and Morphic Therapeutic, which grew out of his research with postdoctoral students from his lab at Harvard. He earned his first big payday in 1999 when he sold LeukoSite, a biotech outfit he founded in 1993 and took public five years later, to Millennium Therapeutics for $635 million.

 

Sergio Stevanato

Net worth: $1.8 billion

Citizenship: Italy

Source of wealth: Medical packaging

Stevanato is president of Italian medical packaging firm Stevanato Group, the world’s second-largest producer of glass vials and a prominent supplier of vials for more than forty Covid-19 vaccines. Founded on the outskirts of Venice in 1949 by Sergio’s father, Giovanni, the company is now run by Sergio’s children, Franco and Marco, who serve as CEO and vice president, respectively. The $700 million (sales) company is also the world’s largest producer of insulin pens and makes machines that craft, sterilize and package billions of vials, syringes and other glass products. In June, Stevanato signed an agreement with the Gates Foundation-backed Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations to provide 100 million vials for nine different Covid-19 vaccines — since then, the firm has penned additional deals with several more vaccine manufacturers which it cannot publicly disclose.

 

Robert Langer

Net worth: $1.5 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Moderna

Known as the “Edison of Medicine” for his pioneering work in the field of biomedical engineering, Langer is a professor of chemical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was a founding investor in Moderna — located just across the street from his office in Cambridge — in 2010 and has never sold a share; his 3% stake is now worth about $1.5 billion. He owns smaller holdings in publicly traded biotech startups SQZ Biotechnologies and Frequency Therapeutics, both founded by postdoctoral students from his lab, and he holds more than 1,400 patents which have been licensed more than 400 times to pharmaceutical and medical companies.

 

Premchand Godha

Net worth: $1.4 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Godha started out as a chartered accountant before entering the pharmaceutical sector in 1975, when he acquired Mumbai-based drugmaker Ipca Labs in partnership with the family of Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan. The firm, which manufactures generics and pharmaceutical ingredients, saw its stock price nearly double this year partly due to higher production and sales of the controversial antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, which was touted as a potential cure early in the pandemic before its use was discouraged by the World Health Organization for having little to no effect in reducing mortality from Covid-19.

 

August Troendle

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Pharmaceutical services

Troendle is the CEO and founder of Cincinnati-based Medpace, which carries out contract work and clinical trials for pharmaceutical firms developing drugs and medical devices. Before founding Medpace in 1992 and taking it public in 2016, the University of Maryland-trained doctor worked on clinical development at Swiss pharma giant Novartis and as a medical review officer at the FDA. Medpace’s labs handle the gamut of pharmaceutical services, from running swab and antibody tests for Covid-19 for external clinics to running complex clinical trials for drugmakers working on new vaccines and treatments. Forbes estimates that Troendle, who owns about 21% of Medpace shares, is now worth about $1.3 billion, making him the latest healthcare entrepreneur to join the billionaire club in 2020.

Juan López-Belmonte López & family

Net worth: $1.8 billion

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals
Citizenship: Spain

López-Belmonte López chairs Spanish pharma company Rovi, which inked a contract with Moderna in July to fill and package hundreds of millions of doses of its Covid-19 vaccine at Rovi’s factory in Madrid, Spain.

John Oyler

Net worth: $1.8 billion

Source of wealth: BioTech

Citizenship: USA

Oyler is the CEO and cofounder of Beijing-based drugmaker BeiGene, which signed an agreement with biotech outfit Singlomics Pharmaceuticals in August to develop, manufacture and sell Singlomics’ antibody treatment for Covid-19.

Other Billionaire Beneficiaries: 

Li Juanquan & family

Net worth: $7.9 billion

Citizenship: Hong Kong

Source of wealth: Surgical products

Jian Jun

Net worth: $4.4 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Biotech

Ye Xiaoping

Net worth: $4.2 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Hao Hong

Net worth: $3.4 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Jin Lei

Net worth: $3.2 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Liu Fangyi

Net worth: $3.2 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Lv Jianming

Net worth: $3.1 billion

Citizenship: Hong Kong

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Chen Xiao Ying

Net worth: $2.7 billion

Citizenship: Hong Kong

Source of wealth: Health information

Miao Yongjun

Net worth: $2.5 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Clinical diagnostics

Lin Zhixiong & family

Net worth: $2.1 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical devices

Alberto Siccardi & family

Net worth: $2.1 billion

Citizenship: Switzerland

Source of wealth: Medical devices

Noubar Afeyan

Net worth: $1.9 billion

Source of wealth: BioTech

Citizenship: USA

Li Wenmei & family

Net worth: $1.7 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Lin Jie & family

Net worth: $1.7 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Liu Xiucai & family

Net worth: $1.6 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Chemicals

Pu Zhongjie & family

Net worth: $1.6 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Medical equipment

Rao Wei & family

Net worth: $1.6 billion

Citizenship: China

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Felix Baker

Net worth: $1.4 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Biotech investing

Julian Baker

Net worth: $1.4 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Biotech investing

Rajendra Agarwal

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Banwarilal Bawri

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Girdharilal Bawri

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: India

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Benedicte Find

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: Denmark

Source of wealth: Medical devices

Alan Miller & family

Net worth: $1.3 billion

Citizenship: United States

Source of wealth: Healthcare services

 

Connect with 21st Century Wire




Cancer Patients Beware of COVID Vaccines

Cancer Patients Beware of COVID Vaccines

by Dr. Mark Sircus
December 27, 2021

 

The government-media-pharma gang is lying, and they will never stop lying to cancer patients specifically and the rest of us in general. Do a Google search on Cancer and COVID vaccines, and you will see the number of organizations all saying the same thing.

As far as the eye can see, we have pronouncements that COVID vaccines for cancer patients are safe, even though we know they are not. They are not safe for adults, children, and especially not for cancer patients who need the most healthy immune system possible. Always remember Vitamin D  is the key to immune health not genetic vaccines.

It has been shown that in up to 50% of vaccinees, COVID vaccines can induce a temporary immune suppression or immune dysregulation (lymphocytopenia) that may last about a week or possibly longer. Not good for cancer patients.

In addition, COVID mRNA vaccines have been shown to “reprogram” (i.e., influence) adaptive and innate immune responses and, in particular, to downregulate the so-called TLR4 pathway, which is known to play an essential role in the immune response to infections and cancer cells. More bad news for cancer patients but don’t mention this to your doctor, for they will play stupid and try to sell you on the idea of getting vaccinated.

Vaccine-induced immune suppression or immune dysregulation might potentially trigger sudden tumor growth and cancer in the weeks following vaccination. Notably, lymphocytopenia has also been frequently observed in cases of severe covid.

“My daughter has a close friend who got colon cancer several years ago, supposedly in remission since then. She got doubled vaxxed back in April or May, and then a booster in Sept. In October, her cancer was back with a vengeance and spreading to other places. She is currently on chemo but not doing well.”

Is it best to talk with your doctor before getting any vaccine? No, almost all doctors who want to keep their licenses to practice medicine will favor you getting your COVID shots no matter what your cancer status is.

It was always dangerous for cancer patients to go to hospitals. But now, vaccine madness leads to patients being refused without a passport in hospitals. They demand that patients be vaccinated before receiving treatment, including cancer patients.

Dr. Brett Parkinson (MD of Intermountain Healthcare’s Breast Care Centre) said, “When one receives a vaccination, there is an inflammatory response in the arm.” As a result, doctors have observed swollen lymph nodes on screening mammograms of recently vaccinated women for COVID-19. “Whenever we see these on a normal screening mammogram, we call those patients back because it can either mean metastatic breast cancer which travels to the lymph nodes or lymphoma or leukemia.”

Mayo Clinic Trained Doctor Reports Surge in Cancer

In a video produced by the Idaho state government in March, Dr. Ryan Cole, who runs the largest independent testing laboratory in Idaho, said that since the rollout of the vaccines, he had seen a staggering increase in cancers among those who have received the abortion-tainted jabs.

“Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20-times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Cole in the video clip. “I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before.’” Listen to Dr. Cole here.

Cole explained that the COVID-19 vaccines seem to impact the immune system function responsible for combatting the growth of cancer cells and other viruses, referring to the phenomenon as a “reverse HIV response.”

Cole explained that the vaccines cause suppression of a person’s “killer T-cells,” similar to how HIV suppresses a person’s “helper T-cells” and how both types of cells are integral to fighting off cancer cells and other damaging viruses.

In addition to endometrial cancer, Cole reported an “uptick” in melanomas, herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV, which he attributes to the damage done to the immune system by the experimental shots.

Of course, every doctor who has anything different to say than the public narrative that COVID vaccines are safer than mom’s apple pie is censored, and it’s no different with Dr. Cole, who is an official member of Idaho’s public health board. The government-media-pharma gang is not interested in listening to the many professionals speaking out and is ignoring the adverse drug reaction systems completely.

The Profile of Safe COVID Vaccines

Fifty percent of the more than 3 million injuries are reported to be serious. In the United States, the official number in the VAERS vaccine reporting system is 20,622 deaths. The FDA, the CDC, and the president of the United States, present and former, are potent magicians and can reduce these numbers to zero.

Lock-downs Hurt Cancer Patients

Of 1,200 patients and survivors surveyed by the American Cancer Society in the first two weeks of May, 87% said the pandemic has affected their health care. That’s compared to 51% in April.

There are many ways the over-reaction of health officials is hurting cancer patients. One of the most potent cancer-fighting weapons is exercise. Several studies have shown that physical activity is linked with decreased risk of some cancers, particularly breast and colon cancer. People who followed healthy lifestyle habits, including exercising for more than 30 minutes daily, lowered their risk of colorectal cancer, according to a study published online in October in the British Medical Journal.

Modern Medicine Has Forgotten About Light

Keeping people indoors instead of exercising and being out in the sun is not a good idea for cancer patients. I bet world health officials did not consider that a lack of sunlight can also cause cancer. Vitamin D deficiencies (lack of light) can lead to the development of prostate and breast cancer, memory loss, and an increased risk for developing dementia and schizophrenia. The surest way to die of COVID is to be vitamin D deficient. We could say the same for cancer.

“It seems clear that light is the most important environmental input, after food, in controlling bodily function,” reported Dr. Richard J. Wurtman, a nutritionist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Sometimes I get the impression my dermatologist colleagues would be happiest if we lived in caves,” continues Wurtman, who recommends daily 20-minute walks at noon to get the Sunlight we need.

“Cancer is helped by sunbathing. Those who get more sunlight have less cancer. Sunbathing heals cancer by building up the immune system and increasing the oxygen in the tissues. Sunlight does not cause skin cancer unless one suffers through chronic sunburn,” writes Dr. Zane R. Kime, author of Sunlight Could Save Your Life.

 

Connect with Dr. Mark Sircus

cover image credit: gribouille334700 / pixabay




Dr. Andrew Kaufman Exposes the ‘Omicron Variant’ Scam That Increases Covid Case Numbers

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Exposes the ‘Omicron Variant’ Scam That Increases Covid Case Numbers

sourced from G. Edward Griffin’s Need to Know
videos by Andrew Kaufman and David Icke
December 27, 2021

 

Dr. Andrew Kaufman explained that in the usual PCR test protocol, there are three primers (fragments of single stranded DNA), and if all three are positive, it is considered to be a positive test and the person is diagnosed with Covid. But now the criteria has changed and only two primers are required for a test to be deemed positive.

The change in protocol is a way to convert negative results to positive results and call it a new thing, which was named Omicron. The result is an increase the number of Covid cases.

Dr. Kaufman has shown many times that the SARS-Cov-2 virus has never been isolated, a process of separating it from everything else and viewing it under a microscope, and cannot be proven to exist.

Similarly, the new Omicron variant of the Covid virus has yet to be isolated and proven to exist. Omicron is an ‘in silico’ computer-produced genome sequence.

There is no clinical test authorized, approved, or available for purchase for any variant! There are no scientific publications studying Omicron.

David Icke summarizes Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s findings in this short video clip:



Video available at BitChute.

 

Dr. Kaufman’s full interview:

Video available at BitChute.

 

Connect with Andrew Kaufman

Connect with David Icke

Connect with G. Edward Griffin’s Need to Know

 

cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist / pixabay




The Vegas Fear Porn Awards Ceremony 2021

The Vegas Fear Porn Awards Ceremony 2021

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
December 27, 2021

 

Happy New Year!

Mostly naked pole-dancers fronting a full orchestra playing Doo-Wop tunes you love from the 50s! Drinks on the house! Liberal celebs mingling with the peasants! The Vegas Mob Brothel and Hotel Casino just off the Strip presents…

The COVID Fear Porn Awards Ceremony 2021!

Leading up to the presentation of the coveted gold-plated statuette of Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, which an as yet unnamed out of work actor will present to Fear Porn Person of the Year, several awards will be handed out to men and women in sub-categories of Halfway Compromise:

CATEGORY ONE: “Of course the virus exists. Don’t bother me with evidence to the contrary. I don’t have time to look at it. I’m busy with other issues. It’s a distraction. Anyway, people don’t understand the claim.”

TWO: “I’m definitely and absolutely pro-vaccine. I just want safer and more effective shots, and the current COVID vaccine happens to be unsafe. Vaccines have nothing to do with autism and other forms of brain damage.”

THREE: “The courts and judges will save us from the vaccine mandates. Don’t worry, be happy. The system works. Street protests are counter-productive. Cloth masks don’t work, but R283-X-A45367-BQX-23-9 masks are quite effective at stopping the spread of the dreaded virus.”

FOUR: “The Omicron Variant is quite real and spreads quickly, but it is less virulent than the Delta or the original SARS-CoV-2.”

FIVE: “The PCR test is irreparably flawed, but the case numbers based on the test are real, not meaningless. We need more testing.”

At the crest of the evening’s presentations, the Committee will reveal its choice for Fear Porn Person of the Year, from the following nominees:

Anthony Fauci
Bill Gates
Joe Biden
Gavin Newsom
Andrew Cuomo
Klaus Schwab
Anthony Fauci

Save your ticket stub. There will be a drawing. One attendee will win an all-expenses trip to Vienna, to live for three months under the government’s lockdown regime. Stay in your hotel room. Watch television. Eat canned food. Wear a mask. Experience the fear. Sweat in the dark.

Bonus! At the Awards presentation, Dr. Deborah Birx will receive the annual Hot Zone Virus From The Jungle plaque commemorating her work as a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force under President Donald Warp Speed Trump.

Dr. Birx is presently working as a waitress at the 24-hour Sam Giancana Diner on the outskirts of Las Vegas. She is seeking re-employment as a bureaucrat at any tax-gobbling government agency that remembers her. We will be taking up a collection to pay her rent. She will be signing copies of her book, I Was Never an Out and Out Grifter.

A special scroll will be presented to CNN and MSNBC for their unceasing yearlong fear porn promotion. We understand an alleged and accused CNN pedophile will be on hand to receive his half of the scroll.

In absentia, Nancy My Husband Doesn’t Really Work With The Chinese Pelosi will be awarded an Emperor Nero silver coin engraved thusly: I WEAR MY MASK IN THE BATHROOM WHILE I’M SITTING DOWN.

Breaking—Boston Mayor, Michelle Wu, has just announced a vaccine passport system for the City of the American Revolution…all persons 12 and older will have to present the passport to enter any covered indoor venue. This fear porn enforcement Queen Mayor will be granted a brass plaque with her name engraved, to be placed on a slot machine outside a bedroom in the famed Crazy Eights Brothel and Steak House in Skirts, Nevada. Keep up the good work, Michelle My Belle!

To all compliant Americans who believe in fear porn, congratulations. We would give each one of you a participation trophy if we could afford it, to signify you are the greatest enablers in human history.

You inspire us to continue our work, singling out those individuals and organizations that distribute the tonnage of fear porn at a rate which stuns the senses.

Quoting our Founder, Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda: “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.”

Friends, when you come right down to it, are you afraid of not being afraid? If fear were stripped from your minds, would you feel at sea…not knowing what to think or do? Would you be lost without your old pal fear? You’re our audience, and we serve you every day of every year. And in doing so, we put a pretty bow on the ties that bind.

Stay close. We’re planning new surprises, new variants on the central theme of Medical Emergency. We’re the Titans of Pavlovian stimulus-response, and we feel your anticipatory drool.

If you can’t attend our Awards Ceremony this year, just keep watching our minions juke and tap dance on the Network News:

Lester Holt (Lurch, from the Addams Family); David Muir (Sears underwear model); Norah O’Donnell (state baton twirling champion); Wolf Blitzer (old man in tattered bathrobe pouring a can of soup into a saucepan in his kitchen); Chuck Todd (racetrack tout and penny-stock hustler).

They’ll keep you tuned to America’s leading product: fear porn.

The New York Times: “Today, on the Southern Face of Mt. Everest, a New York Hedge Fund manager froze to death in a seething blizzard. Sitting behind a new DARPA super-telescope observing the scene from Fort Meade, Maryland, Anthony Fauci diagnosed the man with COVID as he expired. ‘Shortness of breath was the telltale sign,’ Fauci remarked…”

So yes, Tony Fauci IS our Fear Porn Person of the Year. He’s on the case and on the money every time he takes center stage. He’s a belching stage hog, and we love him.

 

Connect with Jon Rappoport

cover image credit: Alexandra_Koch / pixabay




Queensland, Australia Anti-Mandate Protestors Form a Blockade, Protecting Freedom-Loving Cafe From Police

Queensland, Australia Anti-Mandate Protestors Form a Blockade, Protecting Freedom-Loving Cafe From Police

by Cairns News
December 24, 2021

 

A northern Gold Coast cafe has shut for several weeks after anti-mandate protesters formed a blockade against police, who they say were going to fine the operator for his inclusive service policy.

This was the amazing scene in front of Cafe Noego Coffee in Queensland Australia after police targeted the establishment for not asking customers for vaccine passports.



 

Connect with Cairns News