Accused of Embezzlement While Robbed – the Peculiar Case Against Reiner Fuellmich

by Djamila le Pair, Pinch of Soot
November 9, 2024

The accusation that the German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich embezzled money from his own foundation, the Corona Investigative Committee (CIC), has slowly but steadily been exposed as an inversion of reality, since court proceedings started in January 2024. It is not CIC, but Fuellmich himself who has been robbed.

Fuellmich is said to have embezzled €700,000 from CIC’s donations. The money, however (plus an additional €450,000) is sitting right under everybody’s noses in a German bank account, as Edgar Siemund, one of Fuellmich’s five lawyers, exclaimed in frustration at the end of the 36^th court hearing, on Friday, 1 November.

The State Prosecution of Göttingen (where the hearings take place), however, ignores this fact. Neither does she seem interested in prosecuting the holder of the account, Marcel Templin, for illegally obtaining the funds, which consist of the majority (€1,158,000) of the €1.3 million that Fuellmich’s house sold for in 2022.

 

Politically Motivated

The political motive behind the criminal case against Fuellmich, who co-founded the CIC with three other lawyers (Dr. Justus Hoffman, Antonia Fischer and Viviane Fischer) has been getting more evident, with every court hearing.

In fact, Fuellmich had been more than an eyesore for large enterprises and the German state for decades, as he legally battled (mostly successfully) the financial giant Deutsche Bank (mortgage cases), Kühne & Nagel (bribes), and Volkswagen (emissions scandal).

Since CIC’s was founded in July 2020, however, the German government has invested (and is still investing) a considerable amount of time, money, and resources with the sole aim to silence and destroy Fuellmich financially, professionally and psychologically for once and for all.

The corona crisis transformed Fuellmich into a potential three-tiered threat to the official corona narrative and the longer term implementation of the Great Reset. Not only did Fuellmich provide, with CIC, an online platform for scientists and experts critical of the government’s corona narrative voiced their views and scientific findings, he made several attempts to get a class action suit going abroad (in New York, New Zealand, South Africa and twice in Canada) to fight governments’ abuse of human rights, the damage caused by corona measures and more specifically, the use of the PCR-test as a diagnostic tool. His third offensive was political, as the national electoral candidate for the newly established political party, Die Basis, in the run up to the German 2022 elections.

A dossier, authored by one of Germany’s intelligence services and leaked to Fuellmich’s lawyer Dr. Christof Miseré, contains an order given in 2021 to find, or alternatively “create” grounds to criminally prosecute the lawyer to make sure he would never be able hold a political position.

Not Embezzlement but Loans

The €700,000 – made up of two loans of €200,000 and €500,000 – were part of three loans for which Viviane Fischer, Reiner Fuellmich and the CIC bookkeeper signed lending contracts. Viviane Fischer borrowed €100,000. In addition, €1,000,000 was invested in Gold.

The loans and gold purchase were meant to safeguard a large part of the incoming donations against confiscation or blocking of accounts by the German government – a measure that authorities had already used against several critics of the corona narrative in 2020.

Betrayal

Viviane Fischer turned on Fuellmich publicly, on 2 September 2022, and expelled him from CIC, without informing him. On the 21^st of September she announced – again publicly, through the CIC platform – that he had embezzled €700,000, not mentioning her own loan.

Since early 2021, Justus Hoffman and Antonia Fischer had no longer been part of CIC, but were informed of Fuellmich’s alleged malfeasance by Viviane Fischer, in May or June 2022. Together, and joined by former member of parliament, Wolfgang Wodarg, they publicly discussed Fuellmich’s alleged crime during a couple of CIC broadcasts, without offering Fuellmich the opportunity to address the allegations.

Defamation Campaign

Because Fuellmich was only arrested and imprisoned in October 2023 (after being kidnapped from Mexico) and the court proceedings started as late as January 2024, both main and alternative media had ample time to publish the false accusations of embezzlement and make a big impact on public opinion.

Only during the course of the court hearings, did a different picture start to emerge. As main stream media is not, or no longer present during the hearings, this ‘other picture’ is ignored by main stream press.

Ever Changing Charges

A brief overview of the (adjusted) charge may be help to understand this intertwined and multi-player case:

• Accusation: Whitewashing

An initial attempt to prosecute Fuellmich for whitewashing donations had failed in the period June–August 2022. Two (chief) state prosecutors (one in Göttingen, one in Berlin) both found that the money had been used according to the activities and goals the CIC listed on their website: providing free (Covid-19 critical) information through online broadcasts.

• Accusation: Embezzlement

State prosecutor Simon Phillip John was subsequently transferred from Hannover to Göttingen and accepted the case. The accusations (18 in total) were submitted to him by CIC co-founders Dr. Justus Hoffman and Antonia Fischer and their law practice partner, Marcel Templin.

Templin had nothing to do with CIC, but he had initially helped Fuellmich to collect funds and register clients to start the class action suit. The partnership stopped after Templin sent out an email in which all class action suit signees had been copied in openly, instead of blind copied.

During the trial it has become clear that state prosecutor John was in high-frequent email and other contact with Hoffman, Templin and Antonia Fischer, as well as with Viviane Fischer. No written records exist of their telephone conversations which, in the case of Antonia Fischer alone, amount to at least 30. What’s more, Fuellmich’s lawyers claim the language used in the charges pressed by the three lawyers, contains phrases and terms typical for State Prosecutors. In short, the charges seem to have been formulated in close cooperation with Niedersachsen’s Prosecution Services.

• Accusation: Sham loan contracts

The five judges handling the case dismissed 16 of the 18 charges, but accepted the embezzlement charge for the €200,000 and €500,000 loans – listed as two separate charges.

After the defence team produced the signed contracts for the loans – of which State Prosecutor John said that he had ‘forgotten’ to include them, – the embezzlement claim became difficult to sustain. Chairing judge Schindler then decided that the loan contracts had no official status and should be considered as sham contracts.

This new view crumbled, too, once it transpired that CIC’s registration as a foundation had never been completed. What’s more, with the amount of time that had elapsed since pre-registration, it was no longer possible to ever get it registered. Since CIC would have to be considered a civil law partnership in which each of the partners were eligible to spend the organisation’s money as they saw fit, there was no obligation to make contracts. Therefore, the contracts could be not be considered to be sham contracts.

• Accusation: No intention to pay back the loan

Parallel to the sham contract accusation ran the assumption that Fuellmich never intended to pay back the €700,000. After hearing the testimonies of three witnesses, spontaneously invited by the defence team in July and August 2024, which stated the opposite, this assumption, too, had to be retracted.

• Accusation: Loan was not kept available for spending

The latest interpretation of the charge against Fuellmich was that he should have kept the money available at all times. Fuellmich had invested the money in upgrading his house in Göttingen, since he and his wife intended to sell the house. They were planning to move to their ranch in California, from where he would run both his German and Californian practice. The house was paid off and investing the money in his property would keep it safe from the overreaching arm of the German government, it was assumed. After the sale of the house, the money would be returned to CIC.

The fact that the €100,000 borrowed by Viviane Fischer had also not been available for instant pay-outs, and had not been backed by real estate or other assets did not pose a problem to the court. It sufficed that her husband is known to be wealthy, even thought she used the loan in part to pay off a debt to her husband.

A Million Dollar Robbery

When the house was indeed sold, the solicitor transferred only about €140,000 of the €1,300,000 sale’s price to Fuellmich’s account. The other €1,158,000 was – unbeknown to Fuellmich – transferred to the account of Marcel Templin, making it impossible for Fuellmich to pay back the loan.

During the testimony of A.B., it transpired that Marcel Templin and Dr. Justus Hoffman had pressured both the solicitor and the buyer into facilitating this transaction. So far, neither the State Prosecutor, nor Antonia Fischer and Dr. Justus Hoffman have made any attempt to retrieve the money from Templin. Fuellmich’s own attempt is still being processed.

Not having a loan available at the drop of a hat, is hardly a crime that justifies kidnapping a suspect for. It is not grave enough to keep a man in jail while his trial is ongoing, let alone to shackle him and keep him in solitary confinement for five months.

The State Prosecution Services must have known the case had become untenable and that something had to change, as indeed something did during the 37^th court hearing – which will be the topic of the next and upcoming article on this platform.

Petition for Reiner Fuellmich:  https://www.freereinerfuellmich.org/

Write to Reiner Fuellmich:

JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf Germany

• Letters, cards and postcards are allowed
• No glitter on the envelope
• No stamps or money in the envelope
• Do not send books or any other objects, they will be refused
• Do not write about the criminal proceedings against Reiner Fuellmich, although scanning on his incoming post seems to have eased up.
• Put your name on each page of your letter and number the pages. If they do check the mail, at least Reiner will know the order of your writing and can see if pages are missing.

Connect with Djamila le Pair

Cover image source: Pinch of Soot

German Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s Persecution in Prison

Today, Germany Has Become Neo-Nazi on Steroids

by Reiner Fuellmich and Peter Koenig, Global Research
October 14, 2024

Introduction by Peter Koenig

13 October 2024 will be the first anniversary of Reiner Fuellmich’s pre-trial prison custody. His conditions, especially for someone who has not committed and is not suspected of a criminal act of violence are, to say it benignly, horrendous, bordering on torture.

Let me remind you, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich in 2020 founded the Corona Investigative Committee (CIC) in Germany, investigating the worldwide corona fraud. In a CIC internal strife, probably instigated from outside forces and secret services, he was unjustly accused of embezzlement. The CIC collapsed. Dr. Fuellmich attempted to return to California, where he had a license to practice law and where he also owned a house.

For some “bureaucratic” formalities (cooperation secret services Germany-US), he was “temporarily” refused entry to the US. He then settled with his wife in Mexico, where he created the International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC), and continued investigating crimes committed by the covid scam, as well as related social and economic misconducts by those who dictated the “rules-based order”, overriding all international, national and local laws.

In March 2023, the German Government issued an arrest warrant for Dr. Fuellmich. Since he had not committed a violent crime, an extradition order has no value outside of the EU / Schengen countries. 

Therefore, the German Government – through their secret agents – lured him to a German representation in Mexico, where they kidnapped him on 12 October 2023, took him immediately – as is, without a change of clothes, or even a toothbrush – to the airport, and flew him between two German guards to Frankfurt, where he was immediately arrested on 13 October 2023. Ever since, Reiner has been in pre-trial custody, under the most inhumane conditions, in the Göttingen high-security prison in Rosdorf.

Pretrial custody is on average six months in Germany, at most 11 months. He is detained in solitary confinement, cannot see and talk to anyone, not to his fellow prisoners, must walk alone for his daily hour of exercise in the prison yard, and can have contact by phone or visits by his family for no more than three hours a month.

For every court appearance, Reiner is body-searched, then handcuffed, tightly foot-shackled, and accompanied by two fully machine-gun armed prison guards with bulletproof vests – as if he was a mass murderer.

He is shackled and body-searched, naked, every time the court interrupts, and he is led to an isolated basement room of the court to wait.

This deeply dehumanizing humiliation reminds of German concentration camps during Hitler’s Third Reich regime over 80 years back. 

One would think that humanity has learned from the horrors of WWII, but nada, zilch, nothing.

Humanity is led by the same inhumane monsters; except much worse today. 

Then, the Third Reich was confined to Europe and North Africa; today, the New World Order or One World Order –  one that wants to become One World Government, for which Germany is again playing a leading role, spans the entire globe, all 193 UN member countries.

There is seemingly no way to escape. 

But as history has shown time and time again, any system of excesses, be it injustice no end, war atrocities, abhorrent dehumanization with torture, corruption and genocide no limits, will fall. There is no doubt that the diabolical Cult that allows Germany to hold an honest citizen in such atrocious prison conditions, wants to scare and shut up any others that may speak up against the crimes committed, and are still being committed, by the German Government, and by association, other western governments. 

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a western world political prisoner.

Reiner’s description, illustrations and photos speak for themselves.

*

Reiner Fuellmich – A Political Prisoner in the Federal Republic of Germany

A report by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on his conditions of detention in the Göttingen high-security prison in Rosdorf, in response to the author Kerstin Heusinger, Germany correspondent for the French-language online publication BAM! With exclusive photos from the courtroom and sketches.

7:00 a.m., court date for the civil rights activist and lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“Heavily armed officers with pistols and submachine guns equipped with bulletproof vests are there to greet me. They try to persuade me to put on a bulletproof vest, which I consistently refuse. They then make me sign a waiver releasing them from liability if I am injured or killed by gunfire.

One of the officers searches my body and then, as always, forces me to kneel on a stool while he puts ankle cuffs on me.

He ties a wide leather belt around my waist and then puts handcuffs on me, which are attached to the belt with chains that are in turn secured with a large padlock.

The ankle cuffs force me to take very small steps, making it difficult to get in and out of the transport vehicle. If I were to trip while cuffed like this, I would not be able to stop or soften my fall and would likely break my wrists.

Prison officials told me that they had never seen a defendant held in pre-trial custody for more than 11 months for a simple offense (and not for a serious crime or an act of terrorism), kept in solitary confinement, and, above all, brought to court hearings handcuffed at the hands and feet.

In court, I was taken to the basement, to a tiled cell with a simple wooden bench. Another strip-search. Then I had to wait to be handcuffed and led into the courtroom. Each time the proceedings were interrupted, I was handcuffed again and taken back to the “basement”.

Each time I returned from court, I was stripped naked in a transit room to undergo a thorough body search.

Harassment, humiliation, punishment

Mr. D., the deputy director responsible for pre-trial detention, ordered my complete isolation on the grounds that my legal advice to other detainees could incite them to revolt.

The Rosdorf prison is divided into two sections: the penal section (400 detainees) and the pre-trial detention section (80 detainees), where I have been detained since October 13, 2023.

The pre-trial detainees are spread over 4 levels. Those considered to be particularly dangerous or vulnerable are isolated on level A0, where security is increased and additional restrictions are imposed. I was placed there.

Like the other inmates on level A0, I am strictly forbidden to talk to any other inmate.

For 11 months I have had no internet access, no computer, and no cell phone. I am only allowed to watch TV. My only contact with the outside world is my lawyer and the 3 hours per month for visits or phone calls with my family. Yes, a total of 3 hours per month.

My isolation goes so far that even my daily walk in the courtyard must be done alone. This one-hour walk is suspended if I am caught communicating with another inmate, even if it is only a hand signal. Yes, if I exchange a greeting with a fellow inmate through the bars of a window, even if I just nod my head – he and I will be punished immediately.

All disciplinary measures are imposed without stating reasons and without the possibility of appeal.

Everyone is guilty!

The treatment of pre-trial detainees is particularly poor and borders on torture. Mr. D., who administers pre-trial detention, and also works as a social worker, makes no secret of his convictions: he believes that if you are in pre-trial detention, you are guilty.

His disregard for the presumption of innocence is the main reason why I was placed in solitary confinement.

He has committed serious and intentional breaches of duty, which I have witnessed. These violations were covered up by the prison management. With two exceptions, the security officers carry out the orders they receive without compunction, like robots.

On August 8, 2024, I asked to speak to the deputy director of the penal institution. I informed her that personal belongings and documents had disappeared from my cell during my absence for court hearings. The cells are normally searched regularly according to strict rules. These thefts occurred outside of the official inspections, which are recorded.

Persecution: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich refers to the case of Redzep [another, former case of unjustly incarcerating a man for murder which he did not commit, and the court knew it]

“The seriousness of the situation is demonstrated by the attacks on a pre-trial detainee, Kevin Redzep, who was seriously injured. He has allowed me to publish his name and story. He comes from Montenegro and although he is intelligent and speaks several languages, he cannot write or read German fluently. He was placed in a department where there were several violent inmates or those accused of premeditated murder. He was called a “gypsy” by his fellow inmates, threatened, and asked for help from Mr. D., who refused to take him to the high-risk inmates. The next day, Kevin Redzep was attacked by three fellow inmates during a walk. He was hit over the head with a glass bottle so severely that the zygomatic bone above his left eye was crushed and his vision was at risk.

On July 9, 2024, Kevin Redzep had to undergo surgery before returning to Rosdorf Prison, even before he had recovered. He was involved in another physical altercation with five or six prison officers who threw him to the ground and injured him again in the head. Mr. D. then ordered the isolation of Kevin Redzep, who was already severely traumatized.

Kevin Redzep, who wanted to sue Mr. D, the penal institution, and the state of Lower Saxony for assault, asked me for help. When Mr. D. learned that I had advised this inmate and provided him with a lawyer, Kevin Redzep disappeared. It is assumed that he was transferred to another prison. Since then, Ms. Wörmer, my lawyer, has been trying in vain to find him, hoping that he is still alive.

A glimmer of hope.

Despite the disciplinary punishments they face, the pre-trial detainees show solidarity with me. They encourage me. They shout to me, for example, “Don’t give up, keep going.”

Some prison officials have seen through the pandemic scam and know that my trial is a sham staged by the secret services. They let me know and wish me well.

What helps me most is the enormous support from the international public.

I receive a large number of letters that are no longer read by the prison administration. I read all the letters and I am deeply touched by the affection they show. I try to respond as best I can.

Sometimes I see the pickets and the people who greet me, while I’m sitting in the transport vehicle to court.

I feel the remarkably strong connection to all those who support me. It is this connection that allows us to overcome adversity together.

I have to go to the medical service twice a week to be examined because I refused to give blood. I argued that any medical act, especially any invasive medical act, constitutes a violation of physical integrity if the patient does not voluntarily give consent. I am therefore regularly examined because a prisoner suffering from tuberculosis could potentially have infected people with whom he has been in contact.

One of the prison doctors expressed sympathy for my work. He also told me that the medical staff believe that the health of many detainees is incompatible with detention. However, the prison management prefers to ignore this fact.

After having personally witnessed what happens in pre-trial detention – the suspension of the fundamental rights of the accused, their difficulties in accessing a defense that really cares about their fate – I am convinced that prisons only benefit those who profit from them, with pre-trial detention being more lucrative than post-sentencing detention.

I have not met a defendant who I would describe as “evil”. I have met many, many remand prisoners who appear innocent to me, or who, above all, need therapeutic treatment, as a prison doctor admitted.

If we did not need a few prisons for a few sociopaths, for example those responsible for the pandemic, the wars, the massacres like in Gaza and for the corrupt of the system, I would be in favor of abolishing prisons.”

This statement was recorded by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the phone of his lawyer, Katja Wörmer.

It was translated into French by Kerstin Heusinger; and translated into English by Peter Koenig via Deepl.com

Photos and sketches: Kerstin Heusinger

Plan of his cell: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Concept and design of the original article: Michel Caulea and Karo

Click here to read the original German version.

This report first appeared (in French) on BAM! NEWS.

All illustrations can be seen in the original German article.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.

Featured image is by Kerstin Heusinger

Connect with Global Research

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich at ICIC

Brief Message From Reiner Fuellmich — July 14, 2024

Sourced from Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel.

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Dear friends,

This is just a short weekend message from me to you. There will be a longer one next week.

Some of you worry about me and tell me not to give up. You do not need to worry about my giving up. I do not crack under pressure, and that is to a large degree due to my grandmother’s constant encouragement, and of course due to your massive support.

I’ll tell you all about my grandmother next week. For now, allow me to tell you that I personally believe that Joe Biden’s coming apart at the seams before everyone’s eyes is, to me at least, emblematic of the entire systems coming apart at the seams. He is quite obviously kind of writing things on the wall for us.

This is now our time. Let us get ready to take responsibility for ourselves and to take the helm. We are many and we are ready.

And by the way, I do like classical music, opera, operettas as well, especially Italian operas and operettas. That’s one of the reasons I love that movie Moonstruck so much. And one of my favorite areas is Caruso, sung by Luciano Pavarotti.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich at telegram

Message From Reiner Fuellmich, June 12, 2024: “…Do Not Forget That We’re Fighting Against Psychopaths”

by Reiner Fuellmich, ICIC
sourced from Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel

A new statement by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the latest events in the court proceedings before the Göttingen Regional Court and on current world events.

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Dear friends,

I think I have a really interesting story to tell you.

The synchronicity of events all over the world is, in a somewhat eerie way, astonishing. Everywhere, things are coming to a head. The fog of propaganda and manipulation is clearing so fast now that our happy ending is clearly visible.

But there’s a rough road ahead of us, at least of me. Despite all the efforts of the usual suspects in the mainstream media and politicians, this past Sunday’s EU elections resulted in the war mongers and economic destroyers losing heavily, and those who criticized them for it winning massively.

The Belgian Prime Minister stepped down and the French puppet of the World Economic Forum was forced to dissolve parliament.

The German Chancellor is reduced to the status of a largely incapacitated lame duck.

Sure, mainstream media and politicians immediately scramble to ramp up their propaganda and manipulation machine as soon as they heard the results. But it is too late. They’ve lost control.

Those who have woken up, among them now many young people, will not go back to sleep.

In fact, it is the young generation that, with their worldwide student protests, made sure that the monsters’ attempts at concealing the horrific massacres in Gaza failed. Not so much in Germany, but in the rest of the world, it failed.

One day before the EU elections, another military raid in Gaza with tanks and fighter jets killed 274 Palestinians and injured more than 700. Even though four hostages were freed, three others, according to TRT, the Turkish broadcaster that has journalists on the ground there, three others were killed.

Since October of last year, more than 37,000 Palestinians were killed, 70% of whom are women and children and more than 85,000 Palestinians were injured; 15,000 children are dead and 1,000 children lost a limb, that is, an arm and or a leg.

Anyone who has seen these images — and TRT does have journalists on the ground there that have witnesses and they capture the images — anyone who has seen these images will never be able to unsee them.

If only half of what the journalists who were there tell us with their pictures and their witnesses, if only half of this is true, then no one, none of those who are responsible, will ever get out of prison again.

The Turkish president Erdogan called Netanyahu (and I’m sure he chose his words carefully and deliberately) a psychopath and a bloodthirsty vampire.

But in protest of the indiscriminate and chaotic horror at Gaza, an important member of Netanyahu’s war cabinet resigned.

And here’s something else, two brave Israeli journalists uncovered through their research that the former chief prosecutor of the ICC, the International Criminal Court, at the behest of Netanyahu, was followed and threatened by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad.

The two journalists were not able to publish their story in Israel, but managed to get it published in the UK through the Guardian and in Germany through [Süddeutsche Zeitung ?].

And the successor of that chief prosecutor was not intimidated and he asked for arrest warrants, as we all know, not just against Hamas leaders, but also against Netanyahu and the Secretary of Defense.

Sure, as a response, US puppets are now threatening to sanction officials of the ICC if they go any further. However, they’re now forced to do this in broad daylight and before the eyes of the world, thus demonstrating that the puppets (the puppet masters actually) are not just standing with their backs against the wall, but already halfway through the wall.

It seems odd that what is happening in my criminal case is almost simultaneously mirroring these events. But I am, after everything I’ve learned over the past four years, sure that this is not a coincidence.

After it became clear that the charges against me lack any substance whatsoever as the indictment was based on a criminal complaint filed by deeply-disturbed criminal liars, the presiding judge’s last resort was to exchange the facts and invent new ones out of thin air.

To match this bizarre behavior with more of the usual intimidation and dehumanization tactics, they simply ramped them up. In addition to me being transported from the prison to the court in handcuffs that are chained to a belt around my waist, they now put chains around my ankles as well. Plus, they had two busloads of heavily-armed police officers accompany the transport. And the two heavily-guarded officers who drove me to the court building wore bulletproof vests and asked me if I wanted one too. I wonder why they didn’t ask me if I wanted my Winchester.

When I declined, they asked me to sign a waiver and declare that wearing a bulletproof vest is a good idea as accidents may happen. Hmmm. I wonder what that was supposed to mean.

In court, my attorney, Katja Wörmer asked the presiding judge if he knew what this was all about. He said he didn’t. But he lied, of course.

Back in prison, the deputy chief officer in charge of the prisoners who were only in preliminary detention (as opposed to those who were here to serve a prison term after having been found guilty in a final judgment) told me that the presiding judge had received anonymous threats, including death threats.

Now instead of investigating this and inevitably coming to the conclusion that this is a false flag operation instigated by those same people who are trying to get my money and put me behind bars, it seems to have been easier for these people to act as usual — shoot first and then ask questions.

To top this, the deputy chief officer looked at me, explained that I’m very athletic and that one other inmate may feel threatened by me. This was enough of a justification for him to transfer me once more to the maximum security ward in this maximum security prison, where there’s no communication with my friends, with all the other inmates, and no opportunity for sport. I suppose they think they defused me.

This whole charade is now beginning to feel like our defense team is kind of landing on Omaha Beach, except we do not intend to become victorious cannon fodder. Rather, we prefer the image of John Wayne in ‘True Grit’ when he, reins between his teeth, gun in one hand, rifle in the other, charges and wins against the bad guys.

However, let us not forget two things. First, what is going on in the world has nothing to do with black against white, Russians against Americans, Muslims against Jews, et cetera. Rather, the reality is this is about good against evil.

Everything else is an illusion created by the monsters who are playing the only game they know, the divide and conquer game.

Second, I think a word of caution is in order for our own protection on this final leg of this war.

We’re all of us — black people, white people, Muslims, Christians, Americans, Russians, Chinese, et cetera — fighting for peace and for a human world with love.

But do not forget that we’re fighting against psychopaths, that is people who lack any empathy and any capacity for love. They, in fact, they practice human emotions in front of the mirror in order to make us believe that they’re humans. But they only do it to fool us and to get what they want.

Remember the video I made a year ago about the psychology behind all the panic mongering and the psychopaths who are the puppet masters behind all of this, who use idiots and psychopaths as their most important puppets?

Well, in that video, I explained that a famous brilliant Polish psychologist by the name of Dr. Lobaczewski and his group of psychologists had found out already in the 1960s, psychopaths lack any human qualities. And they’re born that way.

Unlike sociopaths who lose their human qualities as a result, for example, of early childhood abuse, of early childhood trauma, psychopaths cannot be cured and will, under any and all circumstances, continue to do what they want.

In this case, the goal is, of course, population reduction and population control.

That’s why another psychologist described these psychopaths as aliens who are very good actors pretending to have the human qualities that in reality they lack. And that’s why you will not reach them when you preach empathy and love to them.

Never forget how three years ago they forced old people in nursing homes to die in complete isolation. Don’t forget this.

And this is why some of us need to be in armor and carry the sword of justice to make sure that we will not be stopped by the monsters when we finish this final lap on our way to a happy ending as real humans.

Let me close by expressing my heartfelt thanks for your truly invaluable, just life-saving support. This is indeed what keeps me going. And this is how we will cross the finishing line. All of us, being connected as humans through a band that the others do not even know it exists.

I’m not sure if I told you about these songs already.

Van Halen: ‘Jump’ and ‘Dance the Night Away’. [? from Italy]. Amy Winehouse: ‘Valerie’. Eddie Money ‘Take Me Home Tonight’.

And then there’s a movie ‘Out of Africa’. I think it’s great. Robert Redford and Meryl Streep.

See you all soon.

We will not give in. We will not give up.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich website | telegram

Message From Reiner Fuellmich — May 28, 2024

sourced from Reiner Fuellmich English telegram channel

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Dear friends,

If there was, after hearing the hateful and lying testimony of my accusers, any remaining doubt that this criminal proceeding against me is nothing but a very thinly-veiled show trial staged to put me behind bars and shut all of us up because I took a deep dive into the plandemic and found many people who also wanted to get to the bottom of this, this scintilla of doubt evaporated into thin air on May 17th.

On that day, the presiding judge in my case issued something that he calls a procedural guideline. With this guideline, he attempts in a completely unprecedented manner, at least in recent German times, to keep our defense team from arguing our case. He grotesquely claims that it is perfectly okay for the DA’s office and one judge to actively deny me my constitutionally-guaranteed right to a fair hearing, and it is equally okay for the DA to refuse to investigate at all. In fact, as we now know, the DA did indeed not even attempt to investigate. Rather, he exclusively relied on the criminal complaint filed by, as we now know, lying and criminal accusers, depite the fact that he knew or should have known (or rather might have known) from their own submissions that the criminal complaint was just one big lie, one false accusation.

But the presiding judge didn’t stop there. He added a couple of insults to his illegal and unconstitutional attempt to intimidate us by calling some of the arguments the defense had made rubbish and condescendingly reminding us that we all should have learned something in law school.

This outrageous behavior makes perfect sense in light of the fact that one of my attorneys received whistleblower information from different sources informing him that the same intelligence service that wrote the now infamous dossier about me approached two of the panel of five judges in my case, one of them being the presiding judge.

Our team of lawyers will of course file an adequate, an adequate response to this and I will issue three or four short statements in writing explaining both the facts and the law to the presiding judge — like you know Law 101 can’t hurt. Some extra class in Law 101.

But before I do that allow me a play on words that highlights what my right to a fair hearing requires from both the court at this stage and, of course, from the DA. But he’s beyond the law anyway — unless, of course, the presiding judge and those members of the court who share his untenable opinions recuse themselves.

I won’t tell you about four weddings and a funeral but I will tell you about four losers and one very bright and strong ray of hope. Here’s what I mean.

As you know, I truly enjoy all your letters and postcards and I do read each and every one. My mail is not being scanned anymore so that you don’t have to worry about anything.

I want to share with you one of these letters, a letter that was written at the end of March by someone who not only knows what she’s talking about (she’s been closely following my trial and the testimony of my accusers) — who has the professional qualification to be an expert witness in this criminal proceeding. Maybe others do too, I’m pretty sure they do. She took a close look at the four people on whom the DA based his entire case, the four people who readily made themselves available as puppets to destroy the Corona Investigative Committee and its international standing.

I’m sure glad I founded ICIC as a successor after they were through with the destruction.

The expert, with the help of other experts, analyzed, in a highly interesting manner, what the court and the public have been able to hear and see from, and about, the witnesses through their testimony and their behavior in court.

Since the DA based his arrest warrant and his indictment solely, that is without even attempting to investigate anything, on Justus Hoffmann’s criminal complaint, and since the presiding judge’s only foundation for his switching from ‘Reiner Fuellmich was prohibited by corporate law from taking out a loan’ to ‘Reiner Fuellmich didn’t take out a loan at all. Rather, he violated an obscure agreement to keep a liquidity reserve’ — is Viviane Fischer’s false testimony — everything now depends on the credibility and integrity of these witnesses.

We will, with the help of experts such as the ones who wrote to us, take a very close look at these sorry figures.

But in order to not ruin our day, I will refrain from going into the details of this right now and will instead stay on the surface of what is to come.

Bottom line is, of course, forget about them. They’re already on a, what… Chris Rea has a song, it’s called ‘Road to Hell’. They’re directly on a road, on their own road to hell, on a one-way ticket.

Now let’s take a look at a brighter side of this.

Juxtapose this with an interview I just saw on an English language Turkish TV station, TRT World, a man by the name of Alex Mitchell from Scotland talked about what happened to him after he took the AstraZeneca so-called vaccine. He developed a very typical and, as we now know from dozens and dozens of interviews with doctors, scientists and victims, not-at-all rare but common side effect, that is blood clots or thrombosis. Because of this his left leg had to be amputated. But he didn’t just sit there and suffer silently. Rather he joined a group of other plaintiffs in a class action case in England and thus far was awarded damages in the amount of some $150,000.

And he keeps going and wants to continue to give those a voice that cannot speak for themselves or have even lost their lives because of the so-called vaccines. He says that to take the vaccine, because he believed dishonest politicians and media who knew about the adverse effects of the vaccine but lied about it, was the worst mistake of his entire life.

Besides losing a leg and dealing with other health issues as a result of that, he is of course deeply traumatized. And yet he is still standing and fighting. He says in that interview that this is not about money. No amount of money is going to give him his health and his leg back. He continues ‘This is much bigger than me. This is about proper justice. It is about doing the decent thing, doing the right thing.’

I’m pretty sure that Eric Clapton who has also spoken out would agree with him.

Here are a couple of my favorite movies: ‘True Grit’ with John Wayne, of course, and ‘Moonstruck’ with Cher and Nicholas Cage. And here are a few more of my favorite songs Marvin Gaye ‘What’s Going On?’, Otis Redding ‘Sitting on the Dock of the Bay’, Sam Cook ‘Stand by Me’, Eddie Money ‘Take Me Home Tonight’ and Toto ‘Hold the Line’.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich website | telegram

May 20th, 2024 — Message RE Reiner Fuellmich Court Case From Lawyer Dr. Cristof Miseré

translated from German via telegram translate
sourced from Official ICIC Law News telegram channel

Dam break!!

A personal comment from lawyer Dr. Cristof Miseré:

Incredible attack on the defense in the LG Göttingen proceedings (Dr. Füllmich).

Apparently, all barriers to the illegal imprisonment of the defendant Dr. Füllmich for politically motivated reasons seem to have been broken.

The Göttingen Regional Court has now, following the documented objective of a politically intended conviction of the accused, which has been correctly referred to here and in the exercise of fundamental rights of defence, from which, as stated, the final objective of the ineligibility of the accused Dr Füllmich should arise, by means of a so-called procedural order, attempted to “threaten” the defence of the accused or to restrict and thus prevent a further proper defence.

This is objectively and subjectively a blatant attack on the defense and, correspondingly, on the defendant himself, the likes of which I have never seen before. It is quite obvious that the presiding judge, Schindler, is no longer able or willing to conduct the proceedings fairly and lawfully, or he no longer wants to participate in the proceedings and the politically intended verdict and is hoping that, as a person who is clearly no longer impartial, he can save himself by assuming bias and thus excluding himself from the proceedings.

I will use this and other incidents as an opportunity to contact Amnesty International etc. with regard to the defendant’s detention, which I consider to be unlawful, and the court’s actions, which we believe to be unlawful, so that this trial can be monitored from a legal history perspective.

In particular, the current legal opinion of the trial court remains completely untenable and, in our opinion, blatantly disregards dogmatic principles of current German criminal law. To put it clearly: de lege lata, it would be rather unlikely that one would pass a university exam with the court’s new construction (if it were not new, there would have been no need for a legal reference, so that the court’s protective claims in this regard contradict themselves).

Among other things, the Regional Court asserts, without any evidence, that a dossier submitted by the German federal services or a German federal service does not exist.

This is completely unfounded. If we knew under what specific circumstances this dossier and other information was given to me, it would be immediately clear that this is of course nonsense.

However, the BKA itself did not make this inaccurate claim, although it was asked by the public prosecutor. That says it all for any insider!

Crucial parts of the dossier are said to have come from people or from a person who, as an informant, is supposed to be directly responsible for Mr. Templin, and whose function and name are also available to the defense, so that we assume that this person (Templin, and with him the port attorneys and thus the complainants themselves) is directly involved in the content of the dossier through an exchange of information or other communication, especially since Mr. Templin is politically connected to this person in several associations and also worked for them as a lawyer until recently. This informant works for the BKA and another service, but according to my information is himself monitored by another of the services.

There are also different opinions within the service regarding how to deal with the “coronavirus injustice”.

This also corresponds to the fact that the court is now opposed to the questioning of the witness, lawyer Templin, who was originally intended as a witness. You already know what you have to do and what is expected of you.

The dossier was, moreover, assigned to the undersigned by circles of the “services” or the judiciary in a broader sense that are particularly committed to the rule of law, with the clear indication that this is a process that is politically motivated. I have now been able to form my own impression of the latter assessment: it is quite obviously so, without any justifiable doubt.

So you can see that there is resistance to this procedure even from internal circles and that is a good thing.

Since, as we all know, the law does not have to give way to injustice, I will not allow myself to be influenced in any way by this threat from the court. We will also not allow Chairman Schindler to “play tricks” on our valued client. He can “take poison” on that, although I do not want this to be misunderstood as incitement to suicide.

And my opinion is that the action in Mexico, which only took place under malicious deception of the accused and in collusion with the public prosecutor’s office, precisely that politically active BKA mentioned above and the so-called port lawyers, represents a kidnapping in the broader sense (the GDR also used this method, of course with the same formal security, and around 700 kidnappings were known).

We continue to fight for the rights even on a holiday like today.

The first holiday is when the lawyer Dr. Füllmich, who we believe is a political prisoner, is released again.

Dr. Miseré

You can find the opportunity to support Reiner here: https://icic.law/

Connect with ICIC Law at telegram

Judicial Scandal in Germany: The Fuellmich Case

by Laufpass
May 12, 2024

The political trial against civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich reveals the motives and behaviour of a compromised constitutional state. Open violation of the law and legal trickery are intended to secure the conviction of Dr Füllmich. The misconduct of the public prosecutor’s office and judges is documented. So is the involvement of malicious third parties. They are part of the conspiracy against the investigator, who has already been illegally deprived of his freedom for over six months.

by Wolfgang Jeschke

The history of the proceedings against civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich is impressive evidence of the erosion of the rule of law in the Federal Republic of Germany. From the preparations for Füllmich’s arrest to the final statement by the Göttingen district court presided over by judge Carsten Schindler at the end of April, a common thread runs through the trial. At every turn, the proceedings ooze the intention to bring about a conviction of the persecuted man at all costs. Right from the start.

While the conspiracy against the civil rights activist initially appeared to be the work of the public prosecutor’s office, the Federal Criminal Police Office and Füllmich’s former co-partners, it is now clear that the court also wants – or needs – to ensure the persecuted man’s unconditional conviction.

During the trial, some observers still hoped that the court was actually interested in establishing the facts and would soon realise that it had been deliberately misled by the prosecution and the complainants. However, the court’s statement of 26 April 2024 destroyed the last hope of a constitutional trial, even for the greatest optimists. Once again, Schindler and his accomplices fabricated new accusations against the civil rights activist. The contrived trial is now turning into a legal farce.

The Füllmich thriller: In the beginning was the lie.

Even the beginning of Füllmich’s persecution could be the subject of a cheap Hollywood-thriller. The story went like this: the young public prosecutor Simon Philipp John sets up a persecution scenario with former co-partners of the victim. Their holey story: Reiner Füllmich had illegally appropriated money and gold from the Corona Committee and wanted to make off with it. The fact that neither money nor gold were in his possession was irrelevant. For the story to be relevant at all, the complainants (the renegade lawyers Justus Hoffmann, Antonia Fischer and Marcel Templin) and the public prosecutor had to deceive the prosecuting authorities (BKA) and the courts – or co-operate with them.

The grotesque play was initialised by Viviane Fischer, Füllmich’s assessor on the Corona Committee, who in turn is primarily responsible for the prosecution of Füllmich. She had insidiously thrown the head of the Corona Committee out of the committee on 2 September 2022. While she led Füllmich to believe that no committee meeting was taking place, she used the actual meeting to publicly execute Füllmich. Since that day, Fischer has been waging a private war against her mentor and doing everything she can to put him behind bars. As a partner of the people who filed the charges, she plays the most inglorious role in this conspiracy.

Conditions for prosecution

In order for Dr Füllmich to be prosecuted at all, the public prosecutor’s office had to make up a number of lies. In the end, they had to apply for an arrest warrant. This is where prosecutor John and the renegade lawyers showed their creativity. In order to demonstrate the illegality of Füllmich’s behaviour, they simply claimed, by omitting important information, that Füllmich should never have had access to the committee’s funds. In doing so, they maliciously concealed the fact that all managing directors were exempted from the restrictions of § 181 BGB by a shareholders‘ resolution. Füllmich therefore acted lawfully at all times within the scope of the powers conferred on him when securing the committee’s funds.

The illegal deal: public prosecutor and co-prosecutors working together

Public prosecutor Simon Philipp John and the renegade lawyers constructed the Füllmich case in close coordination with each other. The very nature of the cooperation between the prosecution and those involved in a civil dispute is remarkable. Antonia Fischer forwarded all negotiation correspondence between the shareholders of the Corona Committee to public prosecutor John and maintained a personal relationship with him in this exchange.

Not only that: they discussed the possibilities of prosecuting and imprisoning Füllmich. This happened while the negotiations between Füllmich and the other committee members about the loan repayment were still ongoing. During the trial, Antonia Fischer admitted that she had never been interested in a negotiated outcome. She only ever wanted to get Füllmich into prison. The other main accomplice in the Füllmich conspiracy, Justus P. Hoffman, made a similar statement. The renegade lawyers, in coordination with the public prosecutor’s office, prevented an agreement in order to maintain the claim that Füllmich had committed misconduct.

Füllmich had already taken the first steps to return secured funds in accordance with the agreement. However, it would have been a disaster for the desired imprisonment and elimination of the civil rights activist if an agreement had been implemented. The lawyer and doctoral supervisor of Justus P. Hoffmann, Professor Martin Schwab, was to receive a power of attorney to make the secured gold – with the joint signature of Viviane Fischer – available to the committee. However, Schwab refused. One can only speculate about the reasons.

Acts planned jointly by the public prosecutor’s office and the committee traitors

Not all details of these agreements between public prosecutor John and his accomplices are documented. The construction of the prosecution of Dr Füllmich was largely secret and therefore also formally illegal. John failed to keep a record of the agreements and telephone calls or to make recordings. This is further unlawful behaviour on the part of the public prosecutor. However, the available evidence is sufficient to prove that a case was constructed here and that the illegal abduction of Dr Füllmich from Mexico was jointly prepared.

The Federal Criminal Police Office abducts Dr Reiner Füllmich

In the course of the abduction of the civil rights activist, the complicity of the Federal Criminal Police Office in the illegal action was also revealed. The public prosecutor’s office and the renegade lawyers set a trap for Reiner Füllmich. He was to be lured to the German consulate in Tijuana under the pretence that a signature was still missing from a document. The subsequent arrest by the Mexican authorities was coordinated by the BKA field office. This is evident from the communication of the service.

Under the pretext of a visa offence, Füllmich was arrested by his Mexican “colleagues”, put on a plane to Germany and arrested there as planned. As agreed, Reiner Füllmich was denied the opportunity to appeal against his deportation. The fact that the “visa offence” was also part of the plan and an illegal favour is shown by the fact that Dr Füllmich’s wife was not expelled from the country in the same situation as her husband. It was only ever about illegally deporting Füllmich to the FRG in order to bring him to trial there.

The Federal Criminal Police Office and a ridiculous “denial”

The involvement of the BKA in the abduction of the civil rights activist has been proven. It is clear from the communication between the BKA and the public prosecutor’s office. However, the BKA also appears elsewhere in this bizarre piece: Dr Füllmich’s co-counsel, the Cologne criminal defence lawyer Christof Miseré, was leaked information (see here: The Füllmich Conspiracy) which could describe the activities of the services (BKA, BND and/or Verfassungsschutz). It describes Füllmich’s work and defines the aim of preventing him from continuing to be publicly effective or even holding public office.

In order to verify the “truthfulness” of the dossier, the public prosecutor’s office questioned the Federal Criminal Police Office. Of course, no one seriously expects an authority to confirm that it is involved in the illegal persecution of political dissidents and is being instrumentalised against the investigation. On the contrary, one would expect a clear denial. In the sense of: This paper and its contents do not originate from our authority, either in whole or in part. That would be a denial. However, the office’s answer is different: “It is therefore very unlikely that this is a document written by the BKA.”

Dr Christof Miseré: “As a public prosecutor, I ask an authority whether they keep a body in the cellar and receive the answer that this is rather unlikely because bodies are usually buried in the attic of history.“

Regardless of the degree of involvement of the Federal Criminal Police Office in the persecution of the civil rights activist, its involvement in the abduction of Füllmich is proven by the available communication. In doing so, the Federal Criminal Police Office has foregone a constitutional way of detaining Dr Füllmich within the framework of internationally valid extradition procedures. This would have involved applying for an international arrest warrant and co-operating with Interpol. The procedure is well known to the BKA. However, the fabricated allegations would never have been sufficient for an international prosecution. So the only remaining option was the illegal route of abduction coordinated with the Mexican authorities.

The metamorphosis of the accusations – conviction at any price

Once it was clear that Reiner Füllmich was exempt from the restrictions of Section 181 of the German Civil Code (BGB), it could have been established that the original accusation was unfounded and that there were no unlawful dispositions. The proceedings could have been discontinued and the shareholders could have continued their negotiations, which had been interrupted by the kidnapping, to determine when and how the loan amounts protected from state access should be transferred back to one of the Corona Committee companies. Due to this deliberate deception by the public prosecutor’s office and its accomplices, the court wrongly assumed from September 2022 to November 2023 that Füllmich could already be accused of criminal behaviour solely because of the lack of exemption from Section 181 BGB.

In court, Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer submitted the following as part of a motion: “At the time, the first shareholder resolution confirming the exemption from Section 181 BGB and the sole management of all shareholders was not submitted – most likely intentionally, in order to deliberately incriminate the defendant more severely and ensure that a criminal investigation was opened.“

Der Richter auf dem Holzweg

For the court chaired by Carsten Schindler, the tricks and deceptions that constructed the case play no role. Although the public prosecutor and her accomplices had deceived the court in several ways, although the senior public prosecutor Dr Kutzner was not even able to read the email correspondence between Dr Füllmich and Viviane Fischer correctly and gave the impression in her statement that she had either not read the file or was mentally deranged, the judge seemingly went on his way without any irritation at these fatal errors. He enjoys playing the keyboard of arbitrariness and ignores all motions and evidence, as if he had been instructed to ensure a conviction of the civil rights activist at all costs.

Carsten Schindler is leading the proceedings against civil rights activist Dr Reiner Füllmich. While the lawyer initially gave the impression that he was interested in a constitutional trial, his latest ‘sleight of hand’ (quote from lawyer Dr C. Miseré) shocked trial observers, international human rights activists and lawyers alike. Schindler’s name will be remembered in the future with one of the most curious cases in German legal history: When the FRG illegally abducted a civil rights activist from Mexico in order to put him on a contrived trial.

When it could be proven on the basis of the shareholders‘ resolutions that Füllmich had effective sole power of representation, the court looked for new ways to incriminate the persecuted man. Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer commented: “When this argument was no longer possible, the district court simply reinterpreted the justification for the criminal offence as an abuse of power of representation.“

This means nothing other than: First, the court claimed that the persecuted person was not authorised to make his orders. When it then turned out that he was, the court changed its view and said that he was authorised but had abused his power of representation.

The second trick also fails

However, the questioning of the witnesses by lawyer Katja Wörmer and the persecuted man himself quickly showed that there had been no misuse of the power of representation. Even his former partners on the Corona Committee confirmed Dr Füllmich’s statements. Füllmich and Viviane Fischer wanted to protect the committee’s funds from possible access by the state or make this access more difficult. The donations had to disappear from the current accounts. The state had already frozen the funds of critics too often.

Viviane Fischer and Reiner Füllmich took two steps: firstly, they bought gold, which could retain its value even in the event of an economic crisis. Secondly, Fischer and Füllmich shifted the committee’s funds into their private sphere by granting loans. The loans were recognised in the accounting records and contractually agreed. The parties involved agreed that the loan amounts should be repaid to the committee.

Things went wrong? No problem.

So the second prosecution trick, supported by Judge Carsten Schindler, was also dashed by reality. It was proven that the funds were transferred by way of loan agreements and were to be repaid. The persons involved were authorised to do so on the basis of the existing agreements and had documented the procedure. They adopted the regulations and their legal content as their own. The loan agreements were therefore validly agreed. Everyone agreed on this – which is why the dispute between the shareholders centred on the question of when and how the loans were to be repaid. In Dr Füllmich’s case, this was to take place after the sale of his private property. He had never stated otherwise.

The fact that Dr Füllmich’s loan amounts were not repaid was due to an equally illegal arrangement. In collaboration with the notary who notarised the sale of the Füllmich family’s property, one of the complainants, Marcel Templin, in coordination with the other accomplices (Justus P. Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer), appropriated further parts of the proceeds from the sale of the property without sufficient legal grounds. Piquantly, the public prosecutor’s office blocked the Füllmichs‘ accounts – but did not seize the illegally collected share of the sales proceeds from Templin. No investigations were initiated against Marcel Templin either. He is now suspected of being an employee of the authorities and of ensuring the persecution of the civil rights activist Füllmich on their behalf and making it impossible for him to repay the agreed loan.

The arsenal of obstruction of justice is vast.

After the public prosecutor’s office had failed to substantiate the allegations against Dr Füllmich despite all the illegal machinations and objective misrepresentations, the court now came to the prosecutor’s aid. This was a surprise for the defence and the prosecution: the agreed loan agreements, which had been intended, described and assessed as such by all parties involved, were suddenly – after several weeks of trial – simply reinterpreted by the court.

The court is now constructing a “fiduciary relationship” in order to ensure that Dr Füllmich is convicted. In the court’s instructions read out by presiding judge Carsten Schindler, the court now prefers to assume that a “fiduciary safekeeping of the funds was agreed in such a way that these funds were to be available at all times in bank accounts on behalf of the pre-company”. The court relied solely on the statements made by Viviane Fischer, who also placed herself at the service of the prosecution.

Schindler achieves two things with this creative volte face. Firstly, Viviane Fischer is released from the previously assumed complicity in the joint offence with Reiner Füllmich. This means that a participant in the persecution of the civil rights activist has been removed from the focus of the prosecution. At the same time, the court will now attempt to construct a claim based on the breach of a duty to look after assets. Remember: up to now, the question was whether the agreed loans could have been repaid by Füllmich and whether he had intended to do so. Since both questions can be answered in the affirmative based on the investigation of the facts and the questioning of witnesses, no damage can be assumed either for the companies of the committee or the co-shareholders.

In the “opinion” of the court, the arbitrary assumption of a fiduciary relationship should make it possible to construct a criminal offence. Schindler commented: “The defendant was already in breach of his duty to look after his assets by transferring sums of money from the previous company to his private account in the way he did.”

Under this ludicrous construction, it would therefore no longer matter that Füllmich wanted to repay the loan and had done so – the damage would now already lie in the constructed breach of fiduciary duty that Schindler and his comrades and/or clients had devised here. Despite the dramatic change it brings to the trial, the court’s statement causes bitter amusement among lawyers and human rights activists. The presiding judge Carsten Schindler explained: “The defendant’s argument that he had ‘parked’ the money in his property and that this was in the interests of the previous company because the bank account could be more easily seized by arbitrary state measures than property assets is misguided in several respects. Firstly, legal protection against unlawful measures is always possible in court and, within the scope of the German Basic Law, it is not the defendant or Mrs Viviane Fischer, but the competent courts alone that decide what is unlawful and what is not.”

In recent years, the hijacked legal system of the FRG has stripped itself to the bone. Right up to the politically appointed head of the Federal Constitutional Court with its chairman, CDU grandee and Merkel friend Stefan Harbarth, who enabled all illegal measures and unconstitutional restrictions of fundamental rights as well as the abolition of parliamentarianism in the FRG, judgements have been handed down that are in every respect not of a constitutional nature. To this day, the unjust system punishes people who stand up for human rights, freedom and health.

And now a judge in a political trial based on illegal machinations of the state apparatus (kidnapping from abroad, falsification or misappropriation of evidence, illegal undocumented agreements between the public prosecutor’s office and accomplices, etc.) points out that “only the competent courts should decide what is unlawful”. The committee’s reserves were also to be kept safe from judges like Schindler. And the scope of the Basic Law could also be discussed.

Lawyer Dr Christof Miseré has clear words to say about the court’s instructions in his application to the court:

“This new, almost absurd construction also documents the fact that in the present case, at our discretion, we are dealing with a trial that is not oriented towards the objectively prescribed standards of law, but towards the final objective of convicting the defendant Dr Füllmich as a political opponent at all costs, and thus with a politicised trial influenced by political guidelines and constructs by various actors. Although I was already aware when I took over the mandate that this was more or less a political trial, including the incomparable empowerment of the accused in Mexico, I could not have imagined the legally untenable constructs that are now being used to try to realise this final objective.”

Dr Miseré: “The game is not over yet!”

Defence lawyer Dr Miseré remains optimistic. For him, the court’s behaviour is an arrogant violation of the law.

“It is not for the court to make legally binding – retrospective – findings on a contract subject to private autonomy – in this case a validly concluded and intended loan agreement – and, what is more, to replace it with a different construction determined by the court. This could at best be possible if something is declared as a loan, but no repayment of the loan amount was intended. In this case, there is no loan at all, as the gift of the loan amount and the repayment of this loan amount are constitutive elements of a loan.

“A fortiori, the court may not interpret the defendant Dr Füllmich’s consistently expressed view that this was a loan that he had to repay and that he would also use it for private purposes to mean that he had in fact wanted to agree a fiduciary agreement. That is precisely not what he wanted!

“To then subsequently disregard the defendant’s personal idea and replace his intention to be bound by a contract with a construct that was not agreed – namely a fiduciary agreement – and then to convict him based on the reinterpretation of his clearly expressed idea, is an arbitrary violation of the law par excellence and blatantly contradicts a fair trial.”

Lawyer Katja Wörmer: “The defendant should be sentenced to prison in any case.”

Füllmich’s lawyer Katja Wörmer also finds clear words in her application for a stay of proceedings presented in court: “It is more than clear that the chamber intends to sentence the accused for better or worse at any cost. The legal references almost give the impression that the accused has already been convicted in the eyes of the Chamber and that the intended judgement is already as good as written in the desk drawer.“

“This is because the chamber expressly assumes that the hearing of evidence can be concluded and that no further witnesses need to be heard. However, on 24 and 25 April 2014, the undersigned was urgently requested by the presiding judge to report possible conflicts of dates for the months of May and June, as further hearing dates were to be scheduled. Just one day later, on 26.04.24, the chamber suddenly sends the legal information, which was only read out on 03.05.24, via beA outside the main hearing, which is actually an anticipated assessment of the evidence, which is also expected to be included in the grounds for the judgement in the same form. The judgement is therefore apparently already written.”

“The defendant will be sentenced to prison in any case.”

Republished under Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International)

Connect with Laufpass

Cover image credit: Swen Pfortner/dpa

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: Update on His Ongoing Trial & Current Events — April 29, 2024

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, ICIC Law
April 29, 2024

Statement Dr. Reiner Fuellmich April 29, 2024

Dear friends, with this statement, I want to tell you that there are more and more reasons for us to be optimistic, at least outside this prison cell where I’ve been held in captivity for more than six and a half months now. It is now not only palpable that the tide has turned, but it is both clearly visible and clearly audible.

At the same time, this worldwide development in the right direction is mirrored by what is happening in my case, except that last week an alarming twist in this never-ending story shows how now pressure is being put on the court by the intelligence services and that one of my attorneys is receiving anonymous threats, which quite obviously come from that very same source.

But let me first tell you about the positive developments that we can now clearly see and hear happening worldwide. As I already mentioned, it looks like my work, first at the Corona Investigative Committee and then at ICIC, has been vindicated by the publication of the, albeit heavily redacted, RKI papers. RKI is the equivalent of the American CDC.

These papers clearly show that Corona was not a pandemic, but a staged plandemic set in motion by the mainstream media, politicians and others, who got paid to induce panic among the population so that they could be controlled and made to destroy their own economy and their own health. On top of these now infamous RKI papers, the highly regarded former president of Germany’s highest court, the constitutional court, Professor Papier, for months has now been asking for a judicial investigation of what happened during Corona, stating that the judiciary and above all Germany’s highest court, the constitutional court, failed to
protect the rights and values enshrined in the constitution during Corona.

Well, we can certainly help with this judicial investigation as we have all the evidence readily available. Anyone can easily download all the interviews I have conducted with, for example, Dr. Mike Yeadon, the former vice president of Pfizer, Professor Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV virus
and then changed his mind and, like Dr. Judy Mikovits said, that it wasn’t a virus that caused AIDS. I conducted interviews with presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Archbishop Viganò, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Peter Breggin, former premier of Newfoundland, Labrador, Brian Peckford, ritual abuse survivor Cathy O’Brien, and many, many others. It’s all there.

But there is, in fact, even more reason for optimism as outside of Germany, the wake-up process has picked up so much speed that it is now unstoppable. Those on the other side of the fence, in particular, those who are in the business of panic and warmongering, have now every reason to panic themselves.

At Columbia University in New York, reminiscent of what happened 55 years ago, that’s during the Vietnam War, student protests against the Vietnam War have now spread in its variation of protests against what’s happening in Gaza, have now spread across the entire country and then worldwide. Once again, it is students and faculty members of Columbia University who are protesting against a war, this time the war in Gaza.

More than 34,000 people were killed over the last six months, 70 percent of whom are women and children, and now two mass graves, graveyards, were found with more than 300 bodies of patients and medical staff of hospitals, many of whom showing signs of torture and execution-style murder. Neither the US administration nor the EU is able to ignore this.

Both have asked for an independent investigation into the massacres. Student protests have already spread to other countries, like for example Australia, and students and faculty members are now coordinating their efforts and connecting with each other. Sounds like real grassroots, bottom-up democracy, standing up against globalistic, top-down totalitarianism to me.

The protesters demand not just that the killing stops immediately, but they also ask, cui bono? Who profits from all this? In what ways?

This means that just like during Vietnam, the protesters are breaking through the official wall of propaganda and want to get to the bottom of what’s going on. Only this time, for real it seems. Because I believe it is no accident that the call for an investigation of these crimes against humanity coincide with the call for an investigation into the corona crimes against humanity.

The people on the other side of the fence are only one step short of the realization that the same puppets in the mainstream media, politics and pseudoscience who got paid to lie to us about corona are now lying to us about Gaza. And from that realization will come follow-up questions, such as, for example, what is really going on in Ukraine and what exactly is it with man-made global warming? And why are they trying to keep us in permanent panic mode? Good questions, don’t you think?

The positive developments are mirrored or reflected by what’s happening in the criminal proceeding against me, except that here their panic is so great that they’re now pushing themselves and the rule of law into very, very dangerous territory. On the one hand, their official narrative has collapsed.

Both the hearing and the, albeit incomplete, that is illegally redacted contents of my file have shown beyond a reasonable doubt my taking a loan in order to protect some of the donations temporarily from imminent attachment of our bank account was perfectly okay, as I had both the authority to do this under the business judgment rule and I was willing and capable of repaying the loan.

The allegations in the criminal complaint, to the contrary, were simply freely invented lies which the DA would have immediately uncovered had he conducted a real investigation and not just a fake one. The senior district attorney who refused to even start a criminal investigation when she looked at the very same facts less than a half a year ago or a half a year earlier was correct when she came to the conclusion that there was absolutely no evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.

But behind this travesty of justice, we can now see the real criminals. The three attorneys from Berlin and the assistant district attorney who operated very closely when they first had me kidnapped in Mexico and then got their hands on my money and the Corona Investigative Committee’s money by way of fraud and extortion. Even my illegally redacted file shows that the assistant DA knew right from the start of his non-investigation that I was in the process of repaying the loan with the proceeds from the sale of my house and that there was way more than enough money available for this.

The file also shows that he knew full well that the three accusers had absolutely no right whatsoever to get their hands on that purchase price. And the file shows that he knew that the three authors of the criminal complaint would nevertheless engage in fraud and extortion in order to get their hands on that money. In fact, the criminals themselves kept him informed about their criminal activities.

He not only allowed them to commit these crimes, rather there’s now reasonable cause for a criminal proceeding against him for aiding and abetting their crimes or at the very least for obstruction of justice. And those are real crimes, not just misdemeanors.

But the matter gets worse. In full knowledge of the fact that the three criminals only interest in the Corona Committee’s activities focused on the donations it received for my work mostly. And knowing also, of course, that they had already stolen 1.15 million euros of my purchase price. He now attached my attorney’s pension plan, collecting everything up to another 700,000 euros for these three criminals.

But what is the reason for all this? Well, the secret dossier on me written by the German intelligence services proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the three Berlin attorneys and the assistant DA were instructed to do a kind of a hit job, to do the dirty work, so to speak, for those who are pulling the strings from behind the scenes.

Ultimately, of course, this will backfire. And this will turn out to be a hit job on themselves and before the eyes of the world, a hit job on the rule of law in Germany.

Why am I saying this? Well, last week, the intelligence services approached the presiding judge and his number two judge on the panel, in my case, and put them under pressure to, or at least he manipulated or they manipulated them. As a result of this presiding judge just informed us that despite all the evidence to the contrary, he will definitely find me guilty of whatever crimes.

If any further proof was required to show that this is a fake trial that undeniably started with my kidnapping in Mexico, here it is: My attorney, Dr. Miseré, who defends me in this trial alongside my colleague Katja Woermer, just received an anonymous letter with a photo of his daughter, clearly a threat that something will happen to her if he continues to defend me.

I will publish the details of all of this still unfolding crime story in my next statement.

For now, let me conclude not with another list of my favorite songs, but by telling you that my favorite book is Harper Lee’s novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird”. And my favorite movie is the movie by the same name, starring Gregory Peck.

There will be justice. And if the system is too corrupt to deliver it, it’ll come another way. Call it karma or poetic justice, but it will come.

See you soon.

Connect with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich telegram | ICIC website

Leaked Dossier Shows German Government Conspired to Silence Reiner Fuëllmich

Accuser connected to German Intelligence and pedophile cover-up

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
April 11, 2024



Transcript:

An alleged leaked dossier shows that German intelligence agencies conspired to create a false construct in order to silence Reiner Fuëllmich, disqualify him from being able to run for public office, and seize control of the Corona committee and its finances.

“It actually shows through a dossier that has just been leaked to me, that Mr. Fuellmich has been under surveillance for a very long time, and attempts have been made to prevent him from being eligible for election in the Federal Republic of Germany through various constructs. They attempted to enlist individuals from his surroundings, acquire information, and ultimately press charges against him, and secure his conviction. It was instigated by one of the organizations, like the Federal Criminal Police Office or something similar, in cooperation with the Public Prosecutor’s office. That was planned. That was already planned through a note that was already in 2021, so it was practically already intended.

“And also, that in 2021, it is already been said that we have to somehow get rid of it. And almost got rid of him. Also, that he is no longer politically eligible. In the end, this means a high conviction which excludes the possibility of being elected in the Federal Republic of Germany.”

~ Dr. Christof Miseré

“So you can say this is a staged plan that has been in place for a long time?”

~ Reporter

“Yes, but during implementation it had to be ensured no prosecutor took part. Then you had to adjust it a bit. And then there was this house sale, and it was handled in this manner, and of course this has the scent of the money being gone now. You’ve killed two birds with one stone. The money, one has Dr. Fuellmich through it. Because it’s said that the money hasn’t been returned. And the Corona committee, which one probably didn’t like so much, as this paper also says, or as one can see in public, also doesn’t receive any money. But Templin and others have the money. And Templin is situated in an environment where there are actually individuals who either work for the BKA or with the BND intelligence agency.”

~Dr. Christof Miseré

“I would now suggest that the file can also be read?”

~ Reporter

“So this is just a part of it now.

” ‘An analysis should be carried out to assess the possibilities of a declaration of incompatibility that purely prohibits holding political offices due to proven anti-democratic tendencies.’

“Then comes the wonderful point, wonderfully in quotation marks.

” ‘Criminal procedural measures. Preparation must be made for the initiation of criminal proceedings based on the evidence collected against Reiner Fuellmich. This entails collaborating with prosecutors and preparing charges for established legal violations and offenses.’

“And now comes the probably decisive sentence.

” ‘If necessary, constructions are to be weighed and suitable third parties are to be recruited.’

“As a note at the end,

” ‘The activities of Reiner Fuellmich pose a complex challenge for the security authorities. The man is absolutely harmless, requiring a coordinated and multi-layered response. The implementation of the recommended measures is intended to prevent its political viability, and to safeguard the security and democratic values of the Federal Republic of Germany.’ ”

~Dr. Christof Miseré

While some are claiming the dossier is fake, the evidence already on record overwhelmingly shows that Fuëllmich was targeted by the German government for his far reaching voice exposing the crimes of the COVID lockdowns and mandated experimental shots.

Corona Committee members, Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer, claimed that Füellmich embezzled 700,000 euros, despite this being an official documented loan for the committees legal investigation.

With the help of the notary, they illegally deposited the proceeds of Fuëllmich’s own real-estate sale into the personal account of Marcel Templin. 1.58 million euros.

In court, Fuëllmich has been able to question his accusers and got them to admit they currently have access to this money.

In a 2022 video, Justus Hoffmann claims that there was nothing personal about the charges against Füellmich. But in court they admitted that they wanted to put him in jail, and that it would be the most beautiful day of their life.

Years ago, a father was accused of raping his four year old child. Hospital records and audio recordings of the four year old confirm this, but the father was found not guilty and German intelligence services covered it up and sealed the file until the year 2060.

Marcel Templin worked with Carsten Stahl to try and block the boy’s mother from speaking publicly about the case. Marcel Luthe, who is running for the European elections along with Carsten Stahl, was also involved in this coverup.

This places Templin, Stahl, and Luthe within the circle of German intelligence services. And it is rumored that they may have created the dossier to later discredit the trial. Which would make sense seeing as how Reiner Fuëllmich has gained the upper hand in the courts. They will be desperate.

For more background on this case, see my report, the Illegal Kidnapping and Persecution of Reiner Fuëllmich.

Connect with Greg Reese

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: April 5, 2024 – RE His Court Case, Incarceration & Recently-Revealed Dossier Detailing Secret Actions of His Accusers

sourced from Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel (English)

video is mirrored at TCTL BitChute, Odysee & Brighteon channels

Transcript edited by TCTL:

Dear friends,

This is an, in more than one way, hopeful message. It consists of three parts.

There’s another statement which I gave in court a few days ago, and of which we have an English translation that’s available for those of you who are interested.

Together, with the already now infamous secret dossier written by the intelligence services and its English translation, it provides both the official evidence and further supporting facts that now prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the criminal proceeding against me is nothing but a, I quote from the dossier, “construct” to shut me up and put me behind bars without any legal substance whatsoever.

So here’s the deal.

Part One.

As I already told you a few times, I have always been very, very happy to receive your letters and postcards as they kept me going and my head above water in this very frustrating situation.

But what is happening now goes far beyond this lifeboat effect.

I am absolutely convinced that the incredible yet palpable, enormous push of positive energy that is all of a sudden reaching me is coming to me through your letters and postcards, but also through the vigils outside the prison, and the many of you who are supporting me by coming to the courtroom for the hearings,
plus your many other actions in my support.

Up until a few years ago though, I, as a rational attorney, would have probably thought that maybe I’m just imagining things. But I don’t think that this is possible anymore.

Never in my entire life have I been under such enormous pressure.

Six months of preliminary detention in a maximum security prison whose claim to fame, according to other more experienced inmates, is that here they do everything to break you, make you feel utterly powerless and helpless.

As an intended consequence of this detention, my capacity to defend myself is reduced to maybe five percent.

I have no access to my files, no access to my computer, and I cannot talk to the witnesses whom we want to hear.

However, as you already know, some crack under pressure, but we don’t. And I say “we” for a reason.

Despite this predicament I am always fully awake and focused when they take me to the courtroom. And believe it or not, it feels as though I am protected and clad in an impenetrable armor of energy and as though I carry an indestructible and invincible sword of energy.

There’s no doubt in my mind that it is your positive energy that does this. And I don’t think it’s fake.

No money in the world could buy me this, just like no money in the world can buy me the love of my wife, of whom I’m immensely proud.

Enough of these strange, emotional, spiritual ramblings of an otherwise rational attorney.

But I hope that through my sharing these feelings with you, I am giving you reason for hope and optimism too. In fact, I’m sure I do because I know who I’m talking to.

Part Two.

Last week, I told you that the excellent German journalist Paul Schreyer won a huge victory in court under the German version of the Freedom of Information Act. His court victory forced the German equivalent of the CDC to make secret documents available, which proved that the so-called pandemic was in reality a plandemic.

In light of the fact that the same thing happened simultaneously all over the world, it is very likely that — I mean, it was a lockstep thing — that this victory will have massive implications and ramifications worldwide.

What’s even more important is this, however. This very, very important piece of news, this victory did not get stuck in the alternative media alone. Rather, it was impossible for the mainstream media to ignore it because now many people,
many of them personally affected by the so-called measures, want to know the truth about Corona. And there will be more that they want to know.

And now there will be an official investigation here in Germany. Well, that is exactly what I did for three years. First with the Corona Committee and then with ICIC.

Part Three.

This development is especially helpful for my defense in this staged criminal proceeding against me. And that’s because now, all of a sudden and out of the blue, a secret dossier written out by the German intelligence services, headed by the German version of the FBI, whose current leader, ironically, was trained by my father, landed in our laps.

This dossier explains everything and shows that the criminal case against me is a staged construct. In fact, a very famous, and of course highly esteemed German law professor, who for the time being wants to remain anonymous, looked at the facts of my case and the charges and provided us with a short legal analysis.

He comes to the conclusion that it is, of course, no violation of a fiduciary duty if we took out the loans in order to temporarily protect part of that money from imminent attachment by the authorities. The very same authorities, by the way, who are responsible for the dossier.

As long as we were both willing and capable of repaying the loan, no problem, he says. And all the textbooks and all the case books say the very same thing.

As an aside, and I don’t want to blow my own horn here, I might add that without my work there probably would not have been any donations.

An additional, very crucial piece of information, I think I gave it to you before, makes the whole dossier and everyone involved in its execution look even more like a criminal conspiracy. Indeed, it makes the whole thing look like food for a RICO case.

The famous Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [RICO] designed to go after mafia crimes.

And here’s the thing. Less than two years ago, all the facts that are now relevant, including the loans, were brought to the attention of the senior DA, an experienced senior DA, district attorney in Goettingen.

She looked at the evidence and decided that there’s no basis for criminal investigation, let alone for a indictment and ordered the non-case to be closed.

So how can it be that less than two years later, based on a criminal complaint which real lawyers regard as obviously querulous and preposterous?

Another prosecutor, this time a very young, inexperienced assistant DA, had me kidnapped in Mexico so that I could be arrested at the Frankfurt Airport.

How can it be that this assistant DA never even tried to check the obviously insane charges in that criminal complaint?

For example, that I threatened the authors of the complaint with a Winchester rifle.

How can it be that that assistant DA refused to hear my side of the story while constantly communicating with my accusers? And why did he keep these many conversations with my accusers secret — a grave violation of his prosecutorial duty to include all the evidence, including such phone conversations in the files, and make all of this available to the defense?

Does this man have any what a fair trial means? Well, the dossier gives us all the answers.

It starts explaining about — actually in a very positive way — it starts explaining about how I had made a name for myself as an international attorney who fought both in court, through public interviews and speeches and through many publications for democracy, the rule of law and free speech and the protection of these values against attacks or overreach by private corporations and organizations. And it emphasizes that my international connections and friends made it possible for me to connect with an international community.

Despite of all this, they conclude that I present a danger to democracy because some people didn’t like what I was doing.

There’s no explanation as to who these some people are and on what basis they think that I presented danger for democracy.

So in order to stop me, and in particular to make it impossible for me to run for public office, the dossier advises that my immediate circle of people, those who I work with, should be infiltrated by an informant.

We know that this is a former politician who befriended the three Berlin attorneys, two of whom I had made the mistake of allowing them to work with us in the Corona Committee.

The idea behind this infiltration was to collect as much info about me as possible, and to then hire another agent, a prosecutor, to start a criminal proceeding against me.

The undercover informer who befriended the three attorneys manipulated them with false information about me into writing the above-mentioned, obviously idiotic, and as we know now, totally false complaint.

But the fact that the legal quality of the complaint was beyond the pale didn’t matter, as according to the dossier, another undercover agent, this time the assistant DA, would spring into action and make sure that none of the real experienced DAs in Goettingen would once again quash the case like the experienced senior DA had done based on the very same facts less than two years ago.

For this purpose, he was transferred from Hanover to Goettingen, intercepted the idiotic criminal complaint, and took charge of the matter. He proceeded with an illegal and unconstitutional secret investigation, which was actually limited to taking everything in the complaint as factually true without even trying to check either the allegations or the credibility of the three attorneys who filed it.

After more than a year of this so-called investigation, he made sure that none of his continuous telephone conversations with my accusers would show up in the file, and have me kidnapped in Mexico.

He then proceeded to write an indictment that matches the ineptitude of the three Berlin buffoons. Had he conducted an actual investigation, informed me about the charges, and given me an opportunity to respond, his case would have collapsed then and there like a house of cards.

Even if he had at least questioned the now totally destroyed credibility of my accusers, he would have immediately known that there was no case, only false accusations.

Why do I say this? Because on April 2nd and 3rd when the court, my attorneys, and I did what the assistant DA, who by the way never asked a single question, had failed to do — that is when we interrogated one of the three attorneys who filed the complaint, she admitted that the two central pillars of this totally false indictment on which it rests do not exist.

The first pillar is, in contrast to the indictment’s false central assumption, I as the director of the corporation that ran the Corona Committee, had the power to act completely independent of the others and did not need their approval for anything. This is of course of special importance in cases of emergency situations which we were facing back then.

It is especially important when two of the four directors do not participate in anything, and as the files show now, and my former co-host has actually confirmed, do not respond to anything.

Asked why they have falsely informed the assistant DA, the witness shrugged and said, “Oh well, looks like we made a mistake.”

The second pillar on which the indictment rests was its false assumption that I never intended to repay the loan, even though it was transparently listed in the corporation’s books and even though I had been the international face of the Corona Committee and relied on the Corona Committee’s financial security to continue with its work and then use its evidence to produce in international legal proceedings.

Even the courts now admit that this is not the case. That means that I was both willing and able to repay the loan.

Asked if the accusers had any evidence for this false allegation, she admitted that she had none, except for my former co-host’s equally false assumptions that were based on nothing but thin air.

In light of the dossier, we now believe she too was just another one of the dossier’s puppets.

Now that the two cornerstones of the indictment have come crashing down, it’s clear that the famous law professor’s legal analysis is correct, of course.

Under the circumstances, the loan was not a violation of a fiduciary duty to protect the donations. Au contraire, as my French friends would say, on the contrary.

Through this dossier, it has also become clear why the assistant DA acted so utterly incompetent and brazenly illegal, and why, despite the fact that there’s clear and convincing evidence that the three buffoons stole my money, my client’s money, he did nothing, didn’t even attach the bank account where the money is in order to secure whatever’s left of it, if there is anything left.

The female attorney whom we interrogated over the last couple of days literally admitted that the three attorneys had threatened the buyer of my house and forced him to divert much more than one million euros of my purchase price into their account.

After all this, it is next to impossible to escape the conclusion that the deal between the three buffoons and the assistant DA is that they helped him kidnap me and put me behind bars, and in return he would allow them to keep the stolen money and help them get all the other assets of the Corona Committee, namely the gold.

And it is equally hard to escape the conclusion that the assistant DA, whose ineptitude would have kept him from having a real career in real life, was promised exactly that, a real career based on the heroic ingenuity that led to my incarceration.

There are many more instances of outright displays of insanity by the actors in this evolving crime and spy show, but I’ll save this for another day. One thing is certain though, the evil side that is the not-so-very-intelligent intelligence services that set me up with the help of their undercover buffoons, never expected that my work in the Corona Committee and then in ICIC would be vindicated by the above-mentioned recent developments.

There will be an official investigation of the plandemic.

I’ll close by harkening back to the Winchester allegations.

Some of you may remember the TV show “The Rifleman” with Chuck Connors. Well, when I was a child and my father showed me the police academy’s rifle range, this was my favorite show. Watch the opening credits on YouTube and you’ll see Chuck Connors fire his rifle to bring justice. Well, that’s how I saw my father as a little boy.

Now, of course, I’m a grown man and I’m an attorney and that’s how I’ll make sure that justice will be done, as an attorney. But I still love that show, and my father of course.

See you later.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich telegram | ICIC website

Reiner Fuëllmich Update: February 23, 2024

Video sourced from Reiner Fuëllmich Telegram channel.
Mirrored at Truth Comes to Light BitChute & Odysee channels.

Transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

Dear friends, let me give you a quick update of what is happening.

Due to illness, my criminal trial was delayed by two weeks, but on Tuesday, February 27th, it will continue.

Two witnesses that will be heard on that day are, one, the person who filed the criminal charges against me and who was in the process, in the self-destructive process, of losing every last bit of credibility he might have ever had. The other witness is my former co-host Viviane Fischer, whom the above-mentioned person threatened to sue for a million dollars in December of 23.

Currently, the criminal charges of having violated a fiduciary duty to take care of another person’s monetary interests (which is, of course, the donors of the Corona Investigative Committee) seem to be evaporating into thin air. This is all depending, of course, on how important and how pervasive the political pressure is that’s coming from behind.

The only fiduciary duty we owed was the one spelled out in the bylaws of the Corona Committee and communicated to our donors when we asked them for donations. That is, to use that money solely for the purpose of investigating the Corona scandal. We would not get paid for our work, in particular, not for conducting the interviews, and we would not receive any payments upon leaving the corporation, as the donations would continue to serve that purpose on a permanent basis.

That is what we promised our donors and viewers. The crucial question is, therefore, if this fiduciary duty towards our donors and viewers was violated when we took some of the donations out of the bank account of the Corona Committee, or if this action was covered by the business judgment rule, which allows directors of a corporation much discretion, that is, gives us a lot of leeway, especially when there is a threat to the very existence of the corporation.

We believe that it is clear for three reasons that our decision was covered by the business judgment rule. One, we didn’t take the money secretly and not to increase our personal wealth at the expense of the Corona Committee. Rather, we did it openly through clear loan contracts, which means we were obligated to repay the loan to the Corona Committee, and these loans were transparently listed in the Corona Committee’s books. Two, there was an imminent danger of our bank account getting attached by the authorities, that’s by the district attorney’s office, as we were informed by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi’s group that their bank account had just been attached.

At the same time, the directors and shareholders of the Corona Committee were already under investigation as our bank accounts were being cancelled by the banks who had informed the authorities of possible money laundering. I had, in fact, as shown in the DA’s files, informed all shareholders and the inner circle of the Corona Committee of this threat by email without, however, getting any response from the two inactive substitute shareholders/directors who filed the criminal charges against us.

The third reason why our loans were not a violation of the fiduciary duty to take care of our donors’ financial assets, is that we were both willing and able to repay the loans. The district attorney decided this with respect to Viviane Fischer when he stopped investigating her in April of ’23 after hearing her side of the story. And the court decided this with respect to me after they had finally heard my side of the story in a ruling dated January 9th, 2024.

The court understands that I, as the international face of the Corona Committee, was in the process of using all the evidence we had collected through our interviews in international legal proceedings, which our group of international attorneys and I were working on, and that I was doing everything in my power to make the findings of the Corona Committee public on an international level. So that there was absolutely no reason for me to destroy these activities and, of course, my reputation by not repaying the loan.

The court also understands that I would have repaid the loan as planned with the proceeds of the sale of my house. The only reason I didn’t do it is because that money was stolen by the three people who filed the criminal charges against me — stolen by way of fraud and extortion. We filed a criminal complaint against the three crooked attorneys in mid-December of ’23 and are now waiting for a response from the DA’s office. Let’s see if the district attorney scrutinizes their bank accounts as thoroughly as he did ours.

By the way, another district attorney had refused to start criminal proceedings against us already in 2022. I’ll give you the details of this.

In her ruling — and she knew everything. She had all the facts back then.

In her ruling, she decided, she wrote on June 14, 2022:

Against this backdrop there’s not enough evidence that the founders of the Corona Committee or any other of those involved in its activities intended, as it would be necessary for starting criminal proceedings, from the start to ask for donations under the guise of the Corona Committee without delivering what they promised. This is true even if such donations were collected in excess of what was necessary for their work and if such donations were used for other purposes for which there is currently no evidence, especially as other such investments may have been in the best interest of a Corona Committee, or to use them for purposes of the Corona Committee at a later time.

So that’s what she wrote in 2022.

Let me continue and finish.

I told you we filed a criminal complaint against those three crooked attorneys in mid-December. Let’s see what’s going to happen.

Apart from my personal situation, the international crises in Ukraine and in Israel/ Palestine seem to be coming to a head and the economic collapse of Europe, especially of Germany is obvious for everyone.

The question is how long the people, in particular the Germans, will continue to remain silent. Justice will come however. Both the international lawyers, myself and, of course, all of you who are supporting me with your letters and postcards in an almost magical way, stand for this. I continue to read everything.

Here’s six more of my favorite songs. One is George Gershwin’s “Rhapsody in Blue” and his wonderful “Summertime” for Porgy and Bess. Then there’s the O’Jay’s “Love Train” and “Backstabbers”. And then there’s Journey: “Don’t Stop Believin'” and “Only the Young”.

See you soon.

Connect with ICIC Law News at Telegram

Connect with Reiner Fuëllmich at Telegram

Connect with ICIC Law website

See Related:

An Overview of What Reiner Füellmich Is Facing as His Trial Starts & the Circumstances Leading Up to His Arrest

Recap: Reiner Fuellmich Explains the Circumstances Leading Up to His Arrest

ICIC Law Reports on Reiner Fuëllmich’s Trial Process — Day 1 and Day 2

ICIC Law Reports on Reiner Fuëllmich’s Trial Process — Day 1 and Day 2

Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich — The Process

by Jiota, ICIC Law News
sourced from Reiner Fuëllmich telegram

Day 1 and 2
Göttingen, 31.1. and 2.2.2024

This is an account of my personal impressions and feelings. I have reproduced what I have heard in the sessions as I personally understood it, and I do not claim to know all the connections and legal details or the whole truth. This report must not be taken out of context.

It’s very chilly on this Wednesday morning in Göttingen. The wind makes me shiver slightly on the way to the district court. The main entrance is not intended to gain access to the first day of the trial in the case of Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich. Security is high and access is a narrow, separate side entrance that everyone has to go through, including the lawyer.

It is just before 9 a.m., and the trial is scheduled to begin at 9:15 a.m. Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich has been waiting there for about two hours for the start of the trial. He was brought here at 6:30 a.m. from the Rosdorf prison, where he has been incarcerated for over a quarter of a year, as I learned from the lawyer. In the catacombs of the courthouse there are rooms that look like “real” cells, yes, they are “real” cells: barren, a bunk, bars …

Dr. Fuëllmich is always transported in handcuffs, with his arms crossed and fixed in front of his chest. In the course of the first day of the trial, he will explain exactly how this works. All complaints of the defense about this procedure, which can no longer be justified even with the hypothetical risk of flight, were rejected.

In front of me, some spectators are already waiting to be admitted. Some have brought cardboard signs on which they express their opinion in short words, such as “Legislative, judiciary and executive go hand in hand!”. They are not allowed to take such signs with them and hold them in front of the window in order to reach one or the other judicial official or representatives of the mainstream press. In vain, because suddenly there is a bit of a hectic pace and everything has to be done meticulously and quickly in order to check and search the people in detail.

It’s like at the airport, taking off my jacket, putting all my belongings in a plastic container, yes, even the dog treats I accidentally forgot in my coat pocket. ID card, accreditation certificate, press card, scarf, keys, handkerchiefs … Then the short step through the electronic airlock, where at the end a judicial officer pats me down. And with every visitor…

To my surprise, the people in the uniforms with the inscription “Justice” and “Task Force Justice” are very friendly, courteous and helpful. No trace of “askance” or even hostility. On the contrary, they show me the separate entrance for the press and answer all questions in a friendly and patient manner.

I see a TV crew, an editor, photographers and a cameraman with a sound engineer. They look a bit uncertain, as it quickly becomes apparent that the majority of those present are supporters of Dr. Fuëllmich. And so they stand a little off to the side. Too bad, I think.

As a result, the division is visible and they don’t particularly try to mingle with the visitors or even approach each other innocently. However, despite the energetically perceptible wall that does not allow even this, the unspoken opinion of the viewers about the leading media is abundantly clear.

In the courtroom, which is currently the largest available and holds 36 seats for listeners, I hear two young men behind me talking about the spelling of Dr. Fuëllmich’s name. “Is it spelled with ü or with ue? At the law firm it said ue, I took a look at it,” says one. The other shrugs. I lean over to the questioner and tell him that I think the spelling with ue is necessary for his work in America, because there are no umlauts and since Dr. Fuëllmich is also admitted to the bar in California and has also studied and worked there, he probably spells it himself with ue there. But since we are here in Germany, I would write the name with umlaut. He looks at me astonished but interested and nods.

Later I see that of course he did not follow my advice. Maybe also because I answered the question about who I would write for, with:

“I’m a freelance journalist and I choose who I write for.”

My counter-question to him: “Which newspaper do you write for?” must have stuck in his memory, because he looks at me slightly indignantly and answers: “I’m from NDR!”. I have to smile, breathe a nonchalant “Ah” at him and smile my actual answer to myself, remembering that the NDR has received a filming permit and has committed itself by accreditation to pass on the photographs, recordings and information to other media houses. So they are important.

What that will probably turn out to be is my not unfounded mistrust of the mainstream media. Through my own experiences as a salaried editor and later as a freelance journalist and publisher, I know enough about how “press” and “news and opinion-making” work. During the Corona plandemic, I suddenly became aware of this clever manipulation of human brains, a knowledge that swirled inside me for years, like so many things that I felt were “strange” or inconsistent in many everyday areas, but to which I never paid deeper attention. After all, you’re busy organizing your life …

But now, here in the courtroom and four years after the proclamation of what I consider to be the greatest crime against humanity because it is worldwide and taking place at the same time, the so-called “Corona pandemic”, I know that nothing is as important as freedom.

I guess you have to take freedom away from someone before you really become aware of its importance. In my desperation, because of the numerous people who fell victim to this narrative four years ago (and still are), I struggled to bring the truth, or at least other opinions, to the public. Bloody noses, quarrels, ended friendships (if there were any), attacks on my economic existence and character assassination were the result. It was a bad time for so many of us who quickly saw through this perfidious game, wanted to help our fellow human beings and simply spoke our minds.

In this truly dark time of loneliness, I heard reports from Prof. Dr. Bhakdi, Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Schiffmann, saw what Michael Ballweg did with “lateral thinking”, and it was my personal therapy to go to the demos to realize: We are many! It was balm and I realized that the community is the most important thing to free oneself from the thicket of cloudy thoughts that make you feel powerless and energy-less.

In July 2020, the great moment of hope came for me and since then I have been personally convinced that there will be real justice at some point. The press conference of the so-called “Corona Committee” was broadcast in the alternative media and four lawyers explained that they had come together to debunk the narrative of this strange pandemic through educational work and the gathering of expert opinions. This gave courage and strengthened the belief in a legal reappraisal of all the injustice, at the beginning of which we were still standing at that time. We didn’t know what to expect and what would be done to us…

And now I’m sitting here, in the courtroom in Göttingen, the city where the law firm of the renowned lawyer (one of the four mentioned above) and consumer advocate Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich was located. Sadly, I look at the empty space that will soon fill up.

There are name tags on the tables: Attorney Katja Wörmer, Prof. Dr. Weiler, Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich. On the tables opposite are the name tags of Public Prosecutor John, Attorney Dr. Justus Hoffmann and Attorney Antonia Fischer. The seats of the latter two remain empty, on both days: they have called in sick at the same time…

I remember the initial meetings of the Corona Committee, the presence and the strength and eloquence of Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich, and how he asked the right questions, talked to the experts, scientists and guests and brought so much important information to light.

I don’t remember any of the four who were present at the time as intensely as I remember him. Despite all the adversities and reprisals, he did not give up. After the betrayal and the perfidious exclusion from his own (!) Committee, he seamlessly continued his work and founded ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee) and went even deeper down the rabbit hole, producing many more insights into world affairs.

I am abruptly brought back from my short journey into the past and my memories of the beginnings of the Corona Committee, the strength and hope I felt after the press conference.

The door opens and the chamber, consisting of three professional judges and two lay judges, enters. The audience also rises, and the presiding judge, Schindler, asks us to take our seats. Dr. Fuëllmich enters from the side door which opens, handcuffed and with his file folders, which he carries awkwardly due to the restraint. He is pale and yet he walks upright and confident. His lawyer greets him and after he sits down, the handcuffs are removed.

I will see these pictures in the evening in the NDR “report”, in close-up of course. They need sensations in order to program the viewer negatively, even before a single word is reported. This was clear to me from the beginning and does not surprise me, especially not after the past four years of the worst propaganda against dissenters.

Even before the prosecutor can read out the indictment at the request of the presiding judge, the defense attorney files a motion for the indictment not to be read and for the proceedings to be discontinued due to several deficiencies. This procedure is possible and lawyer Katja Wörmer is allowed to justify her applications and reads them aloud.

After this has been done, the sitting is adjourned and the board retires to discuss the request. This lasts about an hour and during this time Dr. Fuëllmich is again handcuffed and taken to the catacombs of the courthouse, not allowed to remain in the courtroom with others.

The tension is rising. Will the defense’s motion be accepted? We are not very optimistic. But it was good to hear about the errors and shortcomings in the indictment. Many of them, in fact…

The Chamber returns after its deliberations. We eagerly await what she has to say. Of course, the defense’s request is rejected, and it would have been too nice to discontinue the proceedings now, after all the fanfare due to deficiencies in the indictment. Chairman Schindler does not seem to be aware of this procedure, which allows a motion to be made before the indictment is read. Be that as it may, the prosecutor is now allowed to read the indictment, stands up and does so in a loud voice.

When he has finished, the chairman asks for Dr. Fuëllmich’s data and asks if he wants to comment on the matter. In a firm voice, he answers: Yes!

And he begins to report on how he is now getting the opportunity to be heard for the first time here and now after more than three months of pre-trial detention. He complains that he is being handcuffed and that all requests by the defense to prevent this, because there is no sufficient justification for it, have been rejected. Then he describes how, every time he is transported to the courthouse, his arms are crossed in front of his chest, his elbows are bent upwards, he demonstrates it, and fixes him and his crossed arms with abdominal cuffs and puts the handcuffs on, so that under no circumstances could he make even a tiny movement with his arms, and he explains that every time he thinks: I hope I don’t stumble…

He then addresses Prosecutor John directly:

“Mr. John, I will not forgive you for one thing! I will never forgive you that when I was kidnapped from Mexico at the airport, when I was taken away in handcuffs by the armed officers, I looked back and saw my wife standing there alone, crying bitterly! I don’t forgive you for that and it will come back to you, Mr. John. It will come back to you!”

Dr. Fuëllmich is emotional about the memory of this terrible and monstrous day. The chairman intervenes and asks him to moderate himself, although he has spoken very calmly. Presumably, the chairman fears that the palpable tension could escalate and he wants to prevent further boiling up of emotions.

The defence lawyer took the floor and recalled the defendant’s situation, which has been going on for almost four months now. It calms down again and Dr. Fuëllmich reaffirms that his deportation from Mexico, without an international arrest warrant, was a deportation by the German state. Prosecutor John frowns. But Dr. Fuëllmich is not deterred and says that he only sees all this now, through the study of his file, and was himself horrified that he had been secretly investigated for 1.3 years, that there had been a dedicated line of the complainants on him, and all this without his even once being a questioned; without the right to be heard.

That suddenly, and without being given a reason, his wife’s bank account in Germany was seized. He opens one of the file folders and reads out an email, the contents of which make me shudder:

“Hello Mr. John, as of now it is planned to lure Reiner Fuëllmich to the consulate under the pretext that he still has to correct a signature on the passport (!) and then have him arrested by the Migration Authority. A date has not been set. Probably week 36 or 37.”

In my opinion, prosecutor John is a bit uncomfortable with this situation. He slides back and forth on his swivel chair and turns with it sometimes to the left and sometimes to the right, looks at his laptop. He doesn’t comment. Dr. Fuëllmich says to him, “Yes, it was a kidnapping.” He goes on to speak, still addressing the public prosecutor: “As I can now see from the file, you have neither observed the principle of ‘audiatur et altera pars’ (listen to the other side) nor the principle that must be observed in particular when applying §266 of the Criminal Code, namely to investigate not only incriminatingly, but also exculpatory. That has not happened here. In no way was there any search for exculpatory material.”

Again, no reaction from the prosecutor, not even when Fuëllmich tells him that. In his opinion, he was “put on the cross” and goaded by Hoffmann and A. Fischer and that everything was to be kept secret at the request of both of them regarding who the complainants were, because they were afraid of violent outbursts on the part of Fuëllmich, who would have also allegedly threatened them with a Winchester. Fuëllmich reads all this out of the file.

I make a brief comparison of what I have heard with the images of Justus Hoffman in my head. A friend sent me pictures from the website of a Berlin martial arts school showing Hoffmann, a tall, stocky young man with a bull’s neck in a white martial arts outfit, who is a black belt. Furthermore, I remember a report by the Bild newspaper on him, which shows that he courageously put an armed intruder in the stairwell to flight, according to the report. There is a picture of him leaning against the banister of the hallway. So, I think to myself, you were afraid of Reiner Fuëllmich, who often used the metaphor: “Then you have to get the Winchester out of the cupboard!”, which means something like: “I take out the club when I vehemently advocate for something.” …

That the prosecutor could really have believed such chatter?

The chairman wants to start with the questioning and Dr. Fuëllmich answers all questions and explains the meaning of § StGb 266, what it means and how easily it can be abused, quotes comments from renowned professors on this and other details. It is an extremely interesting short lecture and I am impressed by the legal knowledge and the talent to express it in such a way that even a layman understands what it is about.

Then he talks about his father, a passionate detective who taught him the pursuit of justice. He goes on to describe the beginnings of the Corona Committee. That he was at his ranch in California with his wife in the spring of 2020, heard about the hype about Corona and wondered. He wanted to recover on the ranch from years of strenuous work, the proceedings against large and fraudulent corporations and had initially decided to stay in the USA until the scaremongering about Corona was over.

But he was persuaded by his wife to return to Germany and see what was going on there. None of this was normal and he wanted to research what the global Corona pandemic was actually about. So he came back to Germany, and after phone calls with his friend at the time, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, with whom he worked at Transparency, who introduced him to lawyer Viviane Fischer.

After some discussions, it was decided to launch an information campaign, in the style of expert interviews, and in addition to himself and Viviane Fischer, two other people were to be part of the team, namely a well-known professor of finance and a well-known microbiologist. But after the first meeting together, both declined. Law professor Dr. Martin Schwab, who also worked at Transparency, introduced Fuëllmich and Fischer to two young, students of Schwab,

Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer, who then co-founded the “Corona Committee Vorschalt UG” as “substitutes”, which, however, was never registered. As shareholders, all four were entitled to exclusive representation in equal shares. In the beginning, Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer were present at the meetings, but did not get involved much and did not take care of the organizational work.

It quickly became clear to Fuëllmich that they had nothing to contribute and did not have any legal experience or other expertise. Hoffmann would not have been admitted to the bar until 2019. At some point, the two wanted to “do their own thing”, as they apparently thought they had received enough media prominence through the Corona Committee meetings and withdrew from the Corona Committee, founded their own project, the so-called “Mask Force” and moved into a one-room law firm, joined forces with lawyer Marcel Templin, also a student of Martin Schwab, and founded the law firm “Hafenanwälte”. They disappeared from the Corona Committee and it was probably not a big loss.

Vivane Fischer and Fuellmich continued to work and, according to Fuëllmich, the two “port lawyers” reappeared some time later. Their projects did not go as hoped and they demanded money from Viviane Fischer and Dr. Fuëllmich for their “work” in the Corona Committee. They were also equal shareholders and had to be informed about everything, even though they were not heard from, seen or known where they had gone for months. The accountant had kept telling everyone involved to register the UG. This was finally to happen, but there was a stalemate in the shareholders’ meeting, there was no agreement, and since V. Fischer and Fuëllmich were on one side and Hoffmann with A. Fischer on the other, there was no consensus. As a shareholder, it was therefore not possible to agree on a result and, according to Fuëllmich’s testimony, the port lawyers prevented the registration of the upstream UG with their behaviour and disappeared again.

After the founding of the first company “Corona Committee Vorschalt-UG”, which, as is well known, had never been registered and to which all four lawyers belonged as equal partners, Dr. Fuëllmich had founded a new company, namely the Corona Committee Foundation, with Viviane Fischer as equal shareholders and managing director, after both had signed up for their “work” after disputes over the contrary monetary claims of Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer in the articles of association, in committee and other disagreements.

Fuëllmich, with certainty, reaches for a file and reads out the passage in the articles of association that states that no shareholder is entitled to personal expenses, and can only reclaim his share in the business in the amount of €125 in the event of resignation. He emphasizes again and again that he and Viviane Fischer agreed that no monetary demands should be made here, let alone have been made. Firstly, this was covered by the statutes and, secondly, it would be an outrageous demand, since it would have been from donations for the committee’s work and certainly no expense allowances would be allowed to be paid.

Apparently, the “port lawyers”, who failed with their own project “Mask Force”, wanted to obtain a benefit through their admission to the Corona Committee Vorschalt-UG at the time and their supposedly resulting and bestowed “prominence”. A dispute ensued, after which Fuëllmich and V. Fischer parted ways with the other two and, as mentioned, founded the Corona Committee Foundation, in which they both hold a 50% stake and are the sole representatives. Fuëllmich emphasized that they still are, as this company was incorporated and still exists.

Turning to the public prosecutor, Fuëllmich says that he, Mr. John, had been abused by these people, because they had cleverly orchestrated their plan to bring their claims into the criminal proceedings by way of a complaint, since they would never have gotten that far through civil law, and would also have had to pay a huge sum in advance in court costs considering the large amount in dispute. So they didn’t pay anything, and perhaps they were promised the committee’s donations as a “reward” if they took part in the hunt for, Fuëllmich, as V. Fischer said in a news broadcast; publicly calling for the hunt of Fuëllmich, with the hunter’s cry ‘Halali’.

The chairman asks many questions, which Dr. Fuëllmich answers in detail and reports on how the work with the Corona Committee and the entire project took on a life of its own in quick succession and gained an enormous reach through his international contacts, such that a huge number of inquiries, tipoffs, requests for help in the form of emails, telephone calls, letters to the address in Berlin, (which is also the postal address of lawyer Viviane Fischer) and the number of viewers of the live streams increased rapidly from week to week. And with this flood of input, the important customer relations work also came to the fore.

Many people who wrote to the postal address in Berlin did not receive a reply. They did the only logical thing and then wrote to the law firm Fuellmich in Göttingen, as they quickly found its address on the Internet. The law firm was flooded with inquiries and his staff were was quickly occupied exclusively with the care of the people who had contacted the Corona Committee. This went on for some time and Viviane Fischer claimed that she had managed this flood of inquiries with a friend, who received a few hundred euros a month for it, which would not be true, according to Fuëllmich. This amount of work could not be done with an assistant, and it was jointly decided that the law firm Fuëllmich would receive a monthly payment to cover the remuneration of the employees who worked for the Corona Committee Customer Relations and for the corresponding social security contributions. Fuëllmich himself would not have received any of it.

He goes on to explain that there was a very high willingness to donate, which was not expected at all. It was then possible to work more professionally and, due to the international reach, simultaneous translators were hired, IT was expanded, a manager was hired and additional technology was purchased, and media specialists were paid.

The Corona Committee became more and more popular and suddenly Hoffmann and A. Fischer appeared again, with demands for money. The fact that this was not possible according to the statutes alone and that the donations were to be used for the committee’s work was repeated again to Fuëllmich and V. Fischer. However, Hoffmann and A. Fischer insisted that they were still co-shareholders of the original UG, that they were entitled to all information, and that a settlement agreement could be reached. Neither Fuëllmich nor V. Fischer agreed to this and threw them both out and banned them from entering.

The chairman asked Dr. Fuëllmich whether the preliminary UG had ever been dissolved, which he replied in the negative, since they had been of the opinion under company law, after discussing with company lawyers, that this was considered obsolete due to the long withdrawal of the two and due to the lack of contribution and the lack of interest in cooperation, since the preliminary UG had never been registered and no result could be achieved due to the stalemate.

There was talk of corporation tax assessments which, as apparently claimed by Justus Hoffmann, he and A. Fischer had received, in a not inconsiderable amount. The chairman asks whether Fuellmich knows about it. Fuellmich doubts this, since he himself was also a shareholder and had not received any such notices and he could not imagine that only two shareholders received corporation tax assessments while the others did not. Whether the Vorschalt-UG is now a “small GmbH”, since it has never been registered, or whether it must be treated as a GbR, that also has to be clarified in these proceedings.

After the rift, an attempt at mediation was made via Zoom under the direction of Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab. However, this failed, because Hoffmann and A. Fischer demanded sums of money as compensation, which would come from the donations (which, however, were made for the committee work by the donors). Fuëllmich and V. Fischer rejected this settlement agreement. He would not accept money for nothing, according to Fuëllmich.

When Dr. Fuëllmich complained about V. Fischer’s lack of diligence and organization, and of his having traveled to the USA for three months, where he took part in the “Crimes against Humanity Tour” with renowned scientists such as Dr. Judy Mikovitz, a dispute arose with V. Fischer. She didn’t want him to stay in the U.S. for so long and only continue to accompany the committee via Zoom.

There had been more and more disputes, also with regard to the treatment of guests in the Corona Committee, which culminated in his priorly planned, publicly declared exclusion from his own Corona Committee, which took place live on 02 September/ 09 February 2022 by V. Fischer and the media officer Oval Media. V. Fischer had told Fuëllmich that there would be no meeting that day, because the wife of manager Corvin Rabenstein was expecting her second child and therefore the meeting had to be postponed. This was an outright lie, because the meeting took place, albeit without Dr. Fuëllmich, and Viviane Fischer accused him of embezzlement and irregularities with donations, without him having been present to address these accusations.

Coincidentally, the complaint by Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer against Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich was also filed on 2.9.2022 and comprised 30 pages, so it must have been planned and created long in advance. What exactly prompted Viviane Fischer to do this, Fuëllmich speculates. However, he repeats that there had been discrepancies for some time regarding V. Fischer’s way of working and lack of organization. Nevertheless, he did not really know the exact reason why she made common cause with the two port lawyers, although she knew that they were constantly asking for money and had made this severance payment proposal and also asked Wolfgang Wodarg whether there could not also be money for the committee work and that of V. Fischer for mentioning Justus Hoffmann’s name, in her book.

Dr. Fuellmich considers Justus Hoffmann to be the mastermind and sees Antonia Fischer more as a follower. He had also warned V. Fischer about the two, but she did not take this to heart and now she herself would also be legally attacked by both of them.

The chairman asked for details of the funds withdrawn under loan agreements. Once €100,000 to Viviane Fischer and €200,000 and €500,000 to Dr. Fuëllmich. He explains that during this time there were many known cases in which important and renowned experts had to deal with considerable reprisals in the course of their educational work and that Prof. Hockertz’s account had been terminated or garnished and that this was also threatening Prof. Bhakdi’s association MWGFD, which Viviane Fischer also mentions in her book, namely that Prof. Bhakdi had this as a warning. The Corona Committee already had the fifth account in a row, as the others were all terminated without giving reasons.

Since Dr. Fuëllmich is not a friend of banks, since he had sued almost all banks for the injured parties in the context of the junk real estate scandals that triggered an economic crisis, there was not much hope for help from this side. A quick solution had to be brought about, in which the people’s donations, which were urgently needed for the continued work of the Corona Committee, would have to be secured from state access, and in such a way that it would be safe and also retain its value, or could also increase it. A store of value. A part was invested in gold and the sums already mentioned were withdrawn openly and in the books by means of loan agreements. Viviane Fischer would have used the money for her livelihood and Dr. Fuellmich invested a large sum to increase the value of his property, which he wanted to sell as planned, as he was of the opinion that expropriations would occur in Germany through the back door through burden-sharing laws. In this way, the money would be secured from the state’s grasp in any case.

After the danger situation had eased and the house had been sold, it had been planned to return the money to the committee, which he could easily have done at any time, publicly confirming this several times, since the house had a value of around €1.3 million. His wife owned the ranch in California and there were always internationally known people who would have granted him a loan on the basis of his real estate assets, and whom he also names as witnesses.

Viviane Fischer had secured her loan through the advance sale of her fictitious book, which would only have generated interest among people through the name of Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich named as co-author on the bookcover, something which came entirely from V. Fischer, and this is also mentioned in the contract with Dr. Fuëllmich, “to put words in his mouth”, can pay back, according to Fuëllmich’s assumption.

I remember from various chat histories that many people are probably still waiting for their already paid book to be sent to them…

The chairman asks whether Dr. Fuëllmich would have known at the time of signing the loan whether V. Fischer had real estate as collateral. Fuëllmich said he believed that her statement that she had real estate was true, as he also knew her husband had personally visited the farm in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, where she raises sheep. However, he only found out later that there was a marriage contract and that the real estate was not owned by V. Fischer and relied on her statements. It was assumed on both sides that everyone owned debt-free real estate, which was and is demonstrably the case with him.

It seems to me that the chairman does not seem to understand exactly why it was so important to both of them to take the large sums of money from the bank account, transfer them to a secure store of value and thus invest them as far as possible by bringing them into stores of value and/or protect them through safe consumption, so that state access would never have been successful and the work of the Corona Committee would never have been endangered at any time.

Dr. Fuëllmich once again explains the immense influx, the importance of the work, the importance for the public and the overwhelming interest in the committee, especially the international one, which had only come about through his contacts and his work in the USA.

He explains how he came to study in the USA and get his license in California and briefly touches on the cases in which he represented consumers against large corporations. He mentions the Kuehne & Nagel cases, in which a contingency fee of 40 million was agreed if the case was won, the cases against Deutsche Bank and almost all the other banks that had been involved in the junk real estate scandal that had robbed thousands of people of their assets and homes, and thus made it clear to the court that he would have had no reason at all to to fraudulently appropriate donations from the committee, to embezzle them and therefore to leave the country and destroy the work of the Corona Committee.

He and his wife had already made the decision to leave Europe at the end of 2020, as there were fears of a collapse of the German economy, combined with burden-sharing demands on property and land owners, which would come true right now, namely that he had been correct in his forecasts.

At some point, the presiding judge asks the prosecutor if he has any questions for the defendant. He declines. In fact, apart from reading the indictment, he didn’t say much. I just want to believe that he and the judges, as well as the two jurors will start to think at the hearing of Dr. Fuëllmich and perhaps one of them may have a flash of insight; small rays of hope that illuminate the darkness that still wafts over the whole, complex matter …

The presiding judge decides that an additional date must be set for the interrogation of Dr. Fuëllmich and sets the coming Friday, i.e. in two days. I see this as a good sign, because he explains that there are still many questions he would like to ask. So he still seems to be interested in listening to Dr. Fuëllmich’s explanations and needing further answers on the matter. This gives me hope and I leave the courthouse feeling a little lighter than I had entered it that morning.

The next day begins with the already familiar security procedure. This time I don’t have the dog treats in my coat pocket, I say, and the court staff laughs. The mood is more relaxed than the day before. You have already “sniffed” each other and trust that each other is okay. They are really friendly people and that makes me think. After all, aren’t we sometimes too quick to condemn people who work as public authorities and label them as “systemlings”, as “lemmings” who simply follow the authorities and their employers? I decide to be more mindful of such creeping and evaluative thoughts in the future. After all, we all want to create a better new world…

In the courtroom, I talk to a visitor and tell her that I found the NDR report, which was adopted 1:1 by all other media houses and portals and which also contained many false allegations, very one-sided and meaningless, and how one can manage to get out of such a complex situation as this, for which the large economic chamber of the regional court has (provisionally) scheduled ten days of hearings, It was probably not without reason that he was able to deliver such a meagre work, which did not contain anything meaningful or informative about yesterday’s day of negotiations. Meanwhile, the NDR editor sent for today’s hearing sits right next to us and has to listen to everything. There are coincidences…

I take my place in the press area and she comes up to me. She gives her name. “May I ask what medium you write for?” she says. I politely take her outstretched hand in greeting, say my name and reply that I am a freelance journalist and would choose the media to which I would offer my articles and reports.

She asks where she can read my report on the proceedings. “Let’s exchange phone numbers later,” I suggest. “Then I can tell you everything.” She nods and then leaves and takes a seat in her chair. We should see each other again during the break …

The presiding judge opens the hearing and immediately begins further questioning of the accused. Today, the class action lawsuit is being discussed, and what exactly it would be. Dr. Fuëllmich explained to the Board what exactly a class action is and what advantages this procedure would have in terms of taking evidence and compensation for damages in the event of a positive outcome for the group of plaintiffs.

I really enjoy listening to Dr. Fuëllmich’s explanations and every time, even after the hundredth listen, I learn something new. The Chamber also listens carefully to him and I wonder if the judges have ever heard of a class action, since this possibility does not exist in Germany. I also remember how Dr. Fuëllmich told me about his career, that he had also taught at universities and given lectures to students. You can see that and the information content is immense.

He explains that, independently of the Corona Committee, he has teamed up with a large team of international lawyers to file class actions in several countries for the legal processing of the so-called Corona pandemic. The findings, expert opinions and expert opinions from the work of the Corona Committee should serve as a basis for the taking of evidence. Incidentally, these were publicly available to anyone who wanted to bring forth a lawsuit themselves. In order to make it possible for small businesses and self-employed persons such as hairdressers and the like, to enforce claims for the economic damage caused by the ordered Corona coercive measures, a lump sum of €800 was agreed for everyone who wanted to join the class action.

Marcel Templin, also one of the “port lawyers” and a former student of Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab, whose expertise as a law professor had always been trusted, was supposed to administer these funds on behalf of the IG Sammelklage (interest group), and he would also have initially received the powers of attorney of the clients.

Unfortunately, Marcel Templin did not provide adequate support to the clients. All such work was done by Fuëllmich, and attempts were made to get some class action lawsuits in different countries through the courts. He names Canada with his lawyer colleague Michael Swinwood, Australia, the USA and South Africa, and mentions that he is still continuing this work, especially with his South African colleague Dexter Rynefeldt, who can also testify as a witness. So far, however, none of the class action lawsuits have been accepted by the courts, but this would not detract from the amount of work done in preparation, etc. But they will continue to work on it.

All work, such as the preparations as well as the client information letters, etc., was carried out by Dr. Fuellmich and Templin was only formally entrusted with the administration. At the same time, Dr. Fuellmich was busy 24/7 with the educational work in the Corona Committee. But Templin’s work continued to be unsatisfactory. There was an increasing number of complaints from clients because they did not receive any answers to their contacts and the worst-case scenario occurred, namely that all the addresses of the clients, i.e. the affiliated companies, were suddenly published on the Internet. Fuëllmich could not say whether it was stupidity due to insufficient data backup, or intent. The clients were furious and complained to Fuëllmich’s law firm. He explained to them that the client data was managed by Marcel Templin and that he had made this mistake with which he, Fuellmich and his law firm had nothing to do. He tried to calm everyone down and limit the damage as much as possible. The clients no longer wanted their data to be managed by Templin, but by Fuëllmich himself, and so Fuëllmich advised them to terminate their mandates with Templin and to reissue the powers of attorney to him, Fuëllmich. All this happened, and about 90% of the powers of attorney came back to Fuëllmich. Thus, Templin would no longer have had the right to act on behalf of the clients and the class action. Fuëllmich demanded the return of the remaining client funds, since the powers of attorney were now also with him. However, Marcel Templin did not publish them. He kept it.

The chairman asked why Fuëllmich had received a loan of €600,000 from the funds of Templin’s class action. Fuëllmich justifies this by stating that under no circumstances did he want to issue clients with an advance cost note, as he felt that this was extremely inappropriate right at the beginning of this mandate. However, since he would receive remuneration for the work he had done and what was still to be done, he had decided with Templin to take out the loan. A contract had also been concluded on this. After the fiasco with the data leak and the clients’ dissatisfaction with Marcel Templin and the retrieval of the powers of attorney, which was completed in August 2022, Templin terminated the loan and demanded the sum back immediately.

Fuëllmich had used the loan to pay off some money he owed his ex-wife from the divorce proceedings of the past, as it was a kind of advance note. Shortly afterwards, on 2.9.2022 [September 2, 2022], he was removed from his own committee and discredited by Viviane in the public meeting of the Coronas Committee, about which he was lied to about it’s not having taken place.

The highlight, however, which also makes the judges look a bit incredulous, is the strangeness that the planned sale of Fuëllmich’s unencumbered property has led to the fact that the majority of the purchase price of around € 1.3 million did not go to the account of the seller, i.e. Dr. Fuëllmich, but to the account of Marcel Templin. On the Göttingen property, which was free of encumbrances, there was an already settled, i.e. an empty owner’s mortgage, which could have been filled again with a loan if necessary, without having to use notarial services in a costly procedure. In the meantime, Fuëllmich’s mortgage bank has been taken over by Warburg Bank. Fuëllmich explains that he was in contact with the clerk in person, by email and by phone and tried to clarify the error. He had also entrusted his lawyers with the task. During the cooperation regarding the class action, Dr. Fuëllmich had made an offer to Marcel Templin to register a land charge. According to the established case law of the Federal Court of Justice, such an offer is valid for a maximum of four weeks and must also be accepted during this period, Dr. Fuëllmich explains. But Templin had never done that. It was only after more than a year that he accepted this offer, which had already expired, shortly before the sale of the house, which was no longer legally valid, and claimed that he had a mortgage in his name, and had the money from the sale of the house transferred to him, and that too as a person Marcel Templin and not, for example, as a representative of the interest group class action.

Furthermore, the sum of €600,000 granted as a loan was not transferred to him, but the entire purchase price of the Fuëllmich property minus a smaller sum that Dr. Fuëllmich received, so that more than €1 million would have to be in Marcel Templin’s account, including the remaining client money of Fuëllmich’s clients who had terminated the mandate at Templin and transferred it back to Dr. Fuëllmich.

There is incredulous astonishment in the hall and the very concentrated and level-headed chairman waits a few seconds before he says: “But Dr. Fuëllmich, how can it be that the notary instructs the buyer’s bank to transfer almost all the money from the sale of the house to Mr. Templin’s account?”

“Yes, that’s what we ask ourselves all the time and that’s why we’re sitting here today,” is Fuëllmich’s answer.

And the chairman replies: “Then we will have to question Mr. Kleinjohann in detail. Do you release him from his duty of confidentiality? Fuëllmich answered in the affirmative.

Fuëllmich, well prepared, picks up a file again and immediately opens the appropriate page and reads aloud: “If you want to get into the house and don’t want us to put it in foreclosure, and you don’t have any more property, Mr. Röstel, then you should transfer the money to Mr. Templin’s account.”

Fuëllmich explains that one of the two buyers, in this case Mr. Röstel, had been put under massive pressure with the story about the danger of foreclosure of the property he had just acquired because of an alleged land charge in favor of Marcel Templin, and that he could only avert this if he transferred all the money to Templin. Dr. Fuëllmich speaks here of blackmail of the buyer.

He reads from a chat history between V. Fischer and Justus Hoffmann, among others. V. Fischer asks why Templin would have received the entire sum, which would have been only €650,000. Hoffmann replies: He just negotiated well. Wink smiley.

Fuëllmich mentions again that 90% of the client powers of attorney were back with Fuëllmich at that time (namely, since August 2022) and Templin had no authorization at all for this at that time. Especially not as a private person. The chairman asked if the documentation could be sent to him. The lawyer answered in the affirmative. They will scan all of them and send it to them.

The exact circumstances will be clarified in the course of the proceedings, witnesses must be heard, etc. Nevertheless, it seems inexplicable to the chairman how it happened that the money from the real estate sale could end up with Templin instead of Fuëllmich. But the chairman seems determined to get to the bottom of the matter. Now it also becomes clear why Dr. Fuëllmich took the € 700,000 loan amount from the Corona Committee as a store of value, and could not repay it after the sale of his property, and how he was robbed of his belongings and his existence by way of fraud.

One of the two associate judges speaks up and asks questions for the first time. What would happen to the property in the USA, the ranch that belonged to his wife? If his wife had not agreed that he should use the proceeds of the sale of the ranch to repay the loan amount, would Fuëllmich have been able to ensure that he would have been able to dispose of the money after all? Fuëllmich says yes, and says that such a thing would never have happened and that he was and is always in agreement with his wife. The assessor probes. Fuëllmich reaffirms that he and his wife decide everything together and act together. The lawyer intervenes and mentions that it would also be a community of accrued gains and that there was no prenuptial agreement. The associate judge is now satisfied …

Dr. Fuëllmich gets emotional when he says, “My wife is the most important person in my life, she is very smart, very reserved, and a petite, delicate person, an angel.” He could hardly bear the fact that she, too, would be damaged by the matter. An absurdity!

You can tell he’s worried about his wife. How horrible it must be to worry about a loved one and not be able to see her… I remember that at some point in the course of the proceedings, Dr. Fuëllmich said, speaking about all the adverse circumstances that both of them have had to endure: “That will be decided by international lawyers and courts”.

I cling to these words, for a long time, which he keeps repeating: without justice there can be no peace. And we must first ensure justice! That is what I wish for all the victims of this terrible crime against humanity!

Now, finally, another charge comes into play. Subsidy fraud. Of course, this sounds much better to the sensationalist press than: irregularities in the application for Corona emergency aid.

The law firm of Fuëllmich would have received €15,000 in emergency aid. Whether Dr. Fuëllmich knew that they may have been applied for unlawfully, whether he had filled out the form and how the amounts declared had been calculated, and what about the form that had to be filled out when it came to calculating whether and what amounts would have to be repaid, Fuëllmich replied that he had not filled out any forms. His lawyer points out that the Corona emergency aid regards applications from the first half of 2020 and that the Corona Committee was founded in the second half of 2020 and has nothing to do with the emergency aid. Dr. Fuëllmich reports that there have been payment defaults and requests for postponements from clients who have suffered and expected to lose sales due to the Corona measures, and since the law firm Fuëllmich would almost exclusively serve small, medium- and solo self-employed entrepreneurs who were affected by the Corona measures such as lockdowns, etc., there would have been some clients who had been affected and to whom Fuëllmich granted a reprieve.

In addition, he had been on the ranch in the USA in the first half of 2020 and everything the accountant of the law firm said and did always had hand and foot and there would have been no reason not to trust her statements. He would not have filled out any forms, neither when applying nor when billing.

At the latest with this accusation, I am convinced that Dr. Fuëllmich will be absolved of any wrongdoing with regard to money at any price. Almost every entrepreneur has applied for Corona emergency aid, the offer of the state, which has prevented companies from generating sales, and where there is already case law from the Düsseldorf Administrative Court, which ruled in favor of the three plaintiffs, who did not want to and do not have to pay back the emergency aid. And I think about which boss or managing director who has an accounting department or a tax consultant would have sat down at the computer himself to fill out some constantly changing forms …

I can only shake my head, because the fact that accusations about Corona emergency aid are still being conjured up is really the crowning glory of all the charges, which are made up of a confusing mixture of Corona Committee, class action, port lawyers and colleagues, real estate money fraud and Corona emergency aid money.

What immense damage has been caused by these people, because all these things could have been discussed openly and personally and clarified under civil law. The Corona Committee was demonstrably destroyed, the number of website visits clearly proves this, the party dieBasis, whose chairmen Fuëllmich and Fischer were at the time, shaken, the resistance severely damaged, loss of trust wherever you look, split in the resistance, hopelessness … damage that cannot be quantified with money, let alone repaired.

I wonder if the initiators of the trial against Fuëllmich sometimes ask themselves at night: was it worth it? And do they think about their children? Will they perhaps have to give themselves new surnames in the distant future, out of shame?

I’m trying to imagine what it felt like, with all this knowledge now gushing out of Dr. Fuëllmich for the first time, after almost four months of enforced silence, and knowing that the money from his property was made by one of his adversaries who brought him here with his colleagues… To have to watch this public Tribunal Five against an absent delinquent, powerless, back then, when Viviane Fischer, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Robert Cibis, from Oval Media who was the life partner of V. Fischer at the time, Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer sat together and the public could witness how this conglomerate streamed live there and made fun of Dr. Reiner Fuëllmich, devaluing him, discrediting him, slandered, without the opportunity for him to comment on it …

Among them lawyers … (Hear the other side, too.)

Why they did this is still incomprehensible to me, and why they didn’t get him to do it, with everything they did and claimed publicly. I’m looking forward to when they will actually have to step into the spotlight in the courtroom, without their own protection, which you have by just talking into a camera.

Because now this publicity is being created, caused by themselves in the context of this negotiation, and I hope that everything will be on the table, that they will sow what they have reaped. I believe in cause and effect, in the laws of nature, and in the fact that everything you do, and especially with what intention you do it, will return to the one who sent it out. It’s already beginning… The third day of the trial is scheduled exclusively for the questioning of the two complainants, Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer.

copyright Jiota for ICIC Law News [jiota@icic.law]

Connect with ICIC Law News at Telegram

Connect with Reiner Fuëllmich at Telegram

Connect with ICIC Law website

The Illegal Kidnapping and Persecution of Reiner Fuëllmich

by Greg Reese, The Reese Report
February 13, 2024



It appears as if German lawyer, Reiner Fuëllmich, who recognized the COVID crimes against humanity as early as 2020, has been set up. Fuëllmich was spearheading a project known as the “Second Nuremberg”, and co-founded the Corona Investigative Committee. His Committee consulted about a hundred and fifty scientists and experts from around the world, as well as former employees of the World Health Organization, and their findings showed them that the COVID measures were the first steps in a plan to destroy regional economies in order to make populations dependent upon global supply chains, and were intended to reduce the population and install a world government under the United Nations.

The Corona Committee received a lot of donations which they believed were not safe due to the recent history of bank accounts being seized by complicit governments. One million Euros in gold was purchased and put in holding. To fund operations, both Reiner Fuëllmich and Viviane Fischer took out secured loans. Reiner’s loan was for seven-hundred-thousand euros and was to be repaid with the proceeds from selling his home. All documented and agreed upon by the committee.

Members of the Corona Committee met with a law firm in August of 2022, and filed criminal charges against Fuëllmich. Committee members, Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer, claimed that Fuëllmich embezzled seven-hundred-thousand euros, the loan that he officially took out. They claimed he was a violent anti-Semite and that if he were given the opportunity to comment before criminal proceedings began, they would not file the complaint.

Two warrants were issued for his arrest, from Germany and from the E.U., without Reiner’s knowledge. Without an international arrest warrant, German and Mexican authorities illegally abducted Fuëllmich at the German embassy in Mexico. He was then flown to the Frankfurt Airport where he was arrested and put in jail. International law experts are calling his arrest an illegal kidnapping.

According to documented company plans, Fuëllmich’s loan was to be repaid after the sale of his property. But the very same people that filed the complaint against Fuëllmich, sabotaged this agreement. The contracts stated that the profits of the Fuëllmich property was to be transferred to a Fuëllmich account so that he could repay the loan. But the notary, who is sworn to be neutral and independent, instructed the buyers to transfer the one-point-one-five-eight million euros into Marcel Templin’s account. Which made it impossible for Reiner to repay the loan.

The loans were transparently agreed upon in written contracts. There was no secrecy and the company was aware of the loans at all times. The evidence that proves this has been officially submitted to the court, who has chosen to ignore it and has muzzled the defense and ordered they not be allowed to mention it.

The evidence shows that Hoffmann, Templin, and the notary, illegally obtained access to the profits of Fuëllmich’s property. And not only is the court ignoring this evidence, they have summoned these same people as witnesses against Fuëllmich.

The complaint states, “Fuëllmich has also made himself liable to prosecution for embezzlement by purchasing the gold bars without the consent of the shareholders, obscuring their existence and possessing them for himself.” But the purchase of the gold bars is also documented. They are in holding and can only be accessed with the signatures of both Reiner Fuëllmich and Viviane Fischer. This is shown in company documents which were never given to the public prosecutor. But they have been submitted by the defense, and are being ignored by the court.

Furthermore, while the court froze Fuellmich’s accounts, they failed to freeze the one-point-one-five-eight million euros in Marcel Templin’s account. Which is presumably still there, and appears to be the payoff for this internal coup.

The trial is happening now in Gottingen, Germany and the plaintiff’s sloppy accusations are beginning to fall apart. One reporter at the trial said: “The case was totally destroyed, and one could only sit there in amazement.” A journalist from BittelTV said that, “Reiner will not only be released but also compensated. The people who did this to him in my opinion will be charged themselves.”

It is beginning to appear as if justice may finally be served.

 Produced in Collaboration with the Truth Barrier

Connect with Greg Reese substack | website

February 2, 2024: Reiner Füellmich’s Hopeful Message for His Supporters Re the Ongoing Court Proceedings — “We’ll See Who Goes to Jail”

Message of Reiner Füellmich – English – 2.2.2024

by Bittel TV
February 2, 2024

Transcript of Reiner’s statement prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

So the start of the criminal case against me was quite frustrating because the DA’s office had been investigating me for over a year in secret. This is in violation of my right to get a fair hearing, but it is also in violation to the long-standing rule that a German investigator, criminal investigator, has to also look at the other side, and has to give them a fair hearing so that mitigating circumstances, for example, or facts that contradict the whole thing, will be heard by him and taken into account.

But now that the actual trial has started and the hearing of the evidence, the hearing of witnesses, will start next week, there is a markable shift in both the courts and the DA stance.

So I must say that things look pretty good as both the court and the DA, and of course the public too, are beginning to see that something is very, very wrong. There are two totally conflicting narratives.

One is my accusers’ narrative. Remember my accusers are the people who were substitutes in the Corona Investigative Committee at the very start. But then, soon after, decided to leave in order to pursue their monetary interests, then [?] came back, wanted money from us.

Now, their side of the story, or their story is, ‘Reiner stole money from the Corona Investigative Committee’s account in order to finance his high life.’

That’s a lie.

Our story is, and this, by the way, coincides with my former co-host’s story because we both took loans. Our story is, at a time of grave risk for the money in our bank account, in the Corona Investigative Committee’s bank account, when we were informed by Sucharit Bhakdi’s outfit that their account had been attached by the DA’s office, we decided to act immediately. And we took money out of that account, both she and I did, in order to save it and keep it from such an attachment, so that we would be able to continue with our work. Because had our account been attached, our bank account been attached, we wouldn’t have been able to pay for the translators, for the IT, for the management, etc., etc.

So that’s why we did it. As we did it, openly, not in secret. We did it through loan contracts, written loan contracts, and these loan contracts were duly listed in the Corona Investigative Committee’s books.

And as the court agrees now, I was always able and ready to repay the loan.

Why would I not? I was the face of the Corona Investigative Committee. I had probably conducted 70% of all the interviews and I had started to, let’s say, organize or coordinate an international legal response.

So why would I take the money that we needed for this task and use it for, I don’t know, buying a Ferrari or whatever? We didn’t do that.

I was always ready to repay the loan and also able to repay the loan. How would I have done that?

Well, the plan was both for me and for Vivianne — in my case, at least it was to sell our home. My wife and I had planned to sell our home as early as late 2020 because we were seeing that Germany’s economy would collapse very soon due to the, well, idiots that are running our government. And so we had planned to sell our home.

We did sell our home for 1.345 million euros, which would have easily enabled us to repay, or me to repay the 700,000 that we had taken out of the Corona Investigative Committee’s Account.

However, it was impossible for us to do that because those who accused me, the three Berlin attorneys [TCTL editor’s note: Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer], the two substitutes and the other guy, they, through extortion and fraud, forced the buyer of my home and the notary public (who plays the role of an escrow agent in Germany), forced them to pay out the purchase price, not to me or my wife’s account, but rather a total of 1.158 million went directly into those people’s accounts, bank accounts, who accused me of having committed a crime.

So ultimately, only one of these two stories, only one of these two narratives can be true. And as it turns out that my story is true, then we’ll see who goes to jail.

So things are beginning to look a lot better than they did a while ago. And I will write something up for you so that all of you can read and, or even record another statement so that you can see and understand, just like my students, many years ago, understand what is going on here, the details of what is going on.

But I’ll be in touch. I’ll keep you posted. Thank you.

Connect with Bittel TV

An Overview of What Reiner Füellmich Is Facing as His Trial Starts & the Circumstances Leading Up to His Arrest

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: The following article was mentioned in a post at Elsa Scheider’s Truth Summit substack. The article was published in German and was mentioned on Bittel TV (German podcast) in an update about Reiner Füellmich’s situation. Elsa’s substack is the best source that I’ve found for keeping up with Reiner’s situation. She speaks German and English, has connections with Reiner’s legal team and with Inka, Reiner’s wife. This article was translated from German to English using deepl translator. (Füllmich is the spelling used in the original article.) ~ Kathleen

The Prejudgement of Dr. Füllmich

Even before the main trial against Dr. Reiner Füllmich begins, the courts indicate what they intend to do – a short trial and a quick verdict against the critical lawyer and human rights activist: they impose a muzzle on a Füllmich lawyer with a penalty clause, ignore motions by the defence, disregard legal deadlines and construct a case that does not even exist. Has the verdict been reached before the first day of the trial has even begun?

by Wolfgang Jeschke, Laufpass
January 30, 2024

The judges of the courts entrusted with the various aspects of the Füllmich case are guaranteed a place in history. Like so many terrible jurists from Germany’s past, they too will be honored accordingly. The suspicion is obvious that the judges here have to deliver a verdict to the system and disregard the rights of the persecuted.

Illegal abduction and deprivation of liberty

After the illegal abduction of Füllmich from Mexico (due to the lack of an international arrest warrant, the lawyer was only arrested at Frankfurt Airport. The abduction was coordinated with the Mexican authorities, who accompanied Füllmich to the FRG and then handed him over to the FRG police); now follows the second act in the illegal persecution of the unbending critic.

Reiner Füllmich is to be silenced. He was locked up because of accusations made by his alleged comrades-in-arms in the Corona Committee: Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer. They drafted a lavish criminal complaint, which ultimately led to Füllmich’s arrest and his deprivation of liberty, which continues to this day.

Of the many accusations that Hoffmann and his accomplices had woven into their sometimes blatantly false suspicions, only one accusation remains for the criminal proceedings in the current partial opening: Dr. Füllmich is said to have embezzled 700,000 euros and used it for his own purposes. A bizarre accusation, as there are contracts and receipts for the 700,000 euros.

The 700,000 euros were to be parked in a secure store of value that the state could not access. So Füllmich parked the money in his own sphere. After selling his house, the loan was to be repaid in accordance with the contract. During the coronavirus crisis, the system blocked and/or seized the accounts of many critics. Securing the company’s capital was intended to ensure the long-term viability of the Corona Committee. The same applies to the purchase of physical gold, which was stored at Degussa as a crisis-proof investment.

There are contracts with the Corona Committee for the loans to Füllmich, concluded with his then co-partner Viviane Fischer, who also took over a loan of 100,000 euros. She signed the loan agreements and is also authorized to sign for the Corona Committee’s gold reserve. Füllmich and Fischer can only access the gold reserves together.

The court apparently understood that Füllmich and Fischer had transparently documented the transactions together. However, instead of taking note of the fact that these were normal civil law agreements between managing partners, they constructed a collusive – illegal – collaboration between the two heads of the then Corona Committee and an “embezzlement” by Dr. Füllmich.

But if Viviane Fischer is involved, why are there no proceedings against the Berlin lawyer? Or to put it another way: why were the investigations against Viviane Fischer dropped? The reason given for dropping the investigation against Viviane Fischer was that she could have repaid the loan. Which she did, albeit belatedly. The same applies to Füllmich – if over one million euros of the purchase price of his house had not been diverted to another account.

Muzzle for the defense

Deconstructing the allegations is quite simple: the loans were based on contracts, were listed in the company’s financial documentation and were to be repaid. In Füllmich’s case, after the sale of his property. However, this was thwarted by the people who filed the complaint against Dr. Füllmich. They succeeded, in this case the lawyer Marcel Templin in particular, in diverting EUR 1,158,000 of the purchase price to his own account. As a result, Füllmich lacked the funds to repay the loan.

Dagmar Schön, one of Reiner Füllmich’s lawyers, had pointed out in a Bittel TV program that a large part of the sum that Füllmich had allegedly appropriated was already in an account of one of the complainants. This clarified two things: 1. why Dr. Füllmich was unable to repay the loan and 2. that more than the loan amount was already under the control of the Corona Committee co-partners.

Hoffmann and his accomplices did not like this clarification by the lawyer Schön – they obtained a court order from the Berlin Regional Court that Dagmar Schön was not allowed to state the true fact that considerable funds (1,158,000 euros) from the house sale were in Marcel Templin’s account. The Berlin judge Wiesener thus ordered a ban on stating a proven fact – in other words, the judge prohibited Wiesener from stating a truth that would exonerate the defendant and incriminate the complainants. The court has the documents that prove that this large sum of money was diverted to Marcel Templin’s account.

The justification for the ban on making statements is downright absurd: the money that the buyer of the property had transferred to Marcel Templin was not identical to the money that Füllmich had received through the loan agreements. Is Judge Wiesener living in old crime novels where money was moved around in suitcases? In times of digital transactions, there is no money that could have a physical identity. Money paid by bank transfer is never identical to a ‘sum of money’ that was used to pay for something else, unless it is cash. Moreover, it is completely irrelevant what money Reiner Füllmich wanted to use to repay his loans. What is significant, however, is that 1,158,000 million euros are in the account of the complainant Marcel Templin without legal grounds and Reiner Füllmich was thus deprived of the power of disposal over his assets. Judge Wiesener’s interpretation of this point appears to be completely inappropriate and unworldly.

A further problem arises from the decision of the Berlin judge Wiesener: the prohibition on making statements, which was imposed on the defense with the verdict, violates the rights of the accused. While the public prosecutor’s office sends out press releases in which the accusations are publicly described, the defense has been prohibited from expressing exculpatory circumstances. Until a verdict is reached, however, a defendant is presumed innocent. He himself and the defense have the right to make exculpatory statements.

The lawyer Dagmar Schön appealed against the verdict. The Court of Appeal allowed her appeal and stated, among other things: “However, the application made by the plaintiffs for the injunction is already inadmissible.” To avoid unnecessary litigation, the plaintiffs in the injunction should consider withdrawing the action as it had no prospect of success. So there are still ordinary judges in the country after all.

The notary and the 1,158,000 euros

The role of the notary who notarized the property sale will be examined in more detail. Notaries act as public officials. Notaries are obliged to be neutral and independent and have a duty of confidentiality. Their task includes not only the notarization of contracts, but also the official duty of executing the notarized legal transaction.

In the Füllmich case, the contracts state that the purchase price for the Füllmich property is to be transferred to a Füllmich account. This was notarized by the notary. However, after the contract was concluded, the notary instructed the buyers to transfer large parts of the purchase price to Marcel Templin’s account. In doing so, the notary may have breached his fundamental notarial duties and his duty of neutrality. His conduct in the course of the real estate transaction will be the subject of a separate investigation.

Biased judges – political process?

Dr. Füllmich’s lawyers have filed several motions for recusal against judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock of the 5th Criminal Chamber – Commercial Criminal Chamber – of the Göttingen Regional Court. A chain of misconduct to the detriment of the person being prosecuted is shown therein. Everything points to the fact that Reiner Füllmich is to be given a short trial.

The three judges disregarded statutory deadlines (which is an official misconduct), ignored the appeal for detention and did not take it into account in the partial opening order of the trial. The three judges also rejected an application by the defense for an extension of the deadline, which was based on the illness of both lawyers.

The motion for recusal also complains that the fact that the public prosecutor’s office allowed the defense to inspect the files after a long delay was not taken into account. The incomplete transmission of the files, the decision on the detention complaint without an oral hearing, the opening of proceedings before the conclusion of the investigations and other reasons suggest that the judges of the 5th Criminal Chamber were biased.

Likewise, the Göttingen judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock did not take into account numerous exonerating circumstances that speak for the innocence of the persecuted person. In particular, the fact that Reiner Füllmich wanted to and was able to repay the loans was not taken into account. This is the only way the accusations can be upheld – by the court ignoring facts and framing the “case” in such a way that a conviction can result:

Serious misconduct at the expense of the defendant:

In the opinion of the defense and established case law, Judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock were guilty of serious misconduct. They were obliged to check the electronic receipt of files, as they knew that the defense’s pleadings were received by the court electronically. The three judges also knew that further documents would be submitted by the defense. At the same time, there was an application for an extension of the deadline until January 5. For these reasons, they were obliged to check whether the documents had been received in the court’s electronic mailbox.

If they had dutifully carried out this check, they would have found that something had been received on the night of January 3rd – namely a well-founded complaint of detention. Judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock should have given priority to dealing with this detention complaint and could not have opened the proceedings. They did not do so. This conduct is a serious misconduct. As a result, this serious misconduct must also be punished by disciplinary action. This alone justifies the application for recusal against Judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock – because an application for recusal is justified whenever there is serious misconduct that must also be punished by disciplinary action.

Furthermore, the criminal complaint against Justus Hoffman and Antonia Fischer for false accusations and the question of whether Justus Hoffmann and Marcel Templin – possibly together with the notary who notarized the deed – illegally obtained access to the majority of the proceeds from the sale of the property remain unconsidered. Despite these suspicions, Hoffmann and his accomplices are summoned as witnesses against Reiner Füllmich.

The summoning of witnesses who are unable to make any material contribution to the charge of embezzlement also appears curious. For example, the notary who notarized the sale of the Füllmichs’ property is to testify. It makes no sense to call him and others as witnesses, as they cannot make any contribution to the question of breach of trust. On the contrary: in court, witnesses can always invoke Section 55 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and refuse to testify if they could incriminate themselves. The more intensively you look into the case, the more the bogeyman that is being set up here becomes apparent. The suspicion that this is intended to be a short political trial becomes more and more substantiated.

With their behavior, the judges are violating the principle of the presumption of innocence and denying Reiner Füllmich the right to a fair trial guaranteed under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Schindler’s cunning?

The presiding judge Schindler, who has a particular penchant for violating the rights of the accused, recently had his own motion for recusal overturned. The defense had already announced at the beginning of the year that it wanted to mandate two additional lawyers to defend the accused. So that the two lawyers could familiarize themselves with the case, defence lawyer Katja Wörmer had requested that the start of the trial be postponed.

Schindler also rejected this request to postpone the start of the trial. He was apparently of the opinion that he had to determine what the representation of the defendant should look like. He did not consider it necessary to call in additional lawyers. In times when the judiciary is controlled by the executive, anything seems possible. Even the court’s decision on the staffing of the defense of a persecuted person.

In rejecting the motions, Schindler refers to a “manageable subject matter of the proceedings” – meaning that the court is obviously already finished with the investigation and assessment of the facts and only wants to pass judgment in line with the prosecution. The judges violate the rights of the persecuted person in such a clear manner, commit malpractice and give the impression that they want to deny the persecuted person a constitutional procedure. It seems as if they want to be relieved of their responsibility for the political process by means of an application for bias. Or (the worse alternative): They were promised benefits in return for a harsh and swift guilty verdict – promotions, career-enhancing transfers or something else. We will also keep an eye on this.

The application of Section 266 StGB by judges Schindler, Wedekamp and Hoock also seems more than questionable. In its case law on Section 266 StGB, the Federal Court of Justice states: “What is required is not only that the perpetrator is given a wide scope of action, but also that there is a lack of control, i.e. his actual ability to access the trustor’s assets without simultaneous control and monitoring by the trustor.”  However, the loans were officially and transparently contractually agreed. They were booked with the company. There was no secrecy and the company was aware of the loans at all times.

The Berlin judge who imposed the muzzle on Füllmich’s lawyer Dagmar Schön does not consider Section 266 StGB to apply: “The mere non-repayment of a loan does not constitute a criminal offense and certainly does not constitute embezzlement within the meaning of Section 266 StGB.” So why Section 266 StGB is being applied here seems more than questionable. Unless, of course, the judges have been taken in by the complainants Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer. The mandatory element of financial loss on the part of the lender is also missing.

The complaint dated 02.09.2022 is an excess of accusations with numerous contrived accusations and interpretations of criminal law that would probably not have passed in any university exam. The complaint reads like a hodgepodge of accusations – along the lines of: something works, something sticks. In any case, Hoffman, Templin and Fischer do not consider the case law of the Federal Court of Justice – why should they? It would invalidate the main point of the indictment.

Abuse of criminal jurisdiction

One can continue to speculate about the motives of the complainants. It smells and tastes of a collaboration between the system and the persecutors. It seems obvious that they are also abusing criminal jurisdiction in order to promote their own financial interests and shape civil law disputes with the help of the criminal division. The inflated civil law dispute between shareholders is now being dragged before the criminal court.

The disputes between the members of the Corona Committee are classic civil law disputes between shareholders. They therefore belong in mediation discussions or civil law proceedings. However, civil proceedings cost money and sometimes take a long time. Shifting the clarification of claims to a creatively designed criminal complaint avoids costs and can shorten the proceedings. And since you have done the system a favor here, you can expect a positive verdict. Because the system wants to silence Füllmich. This is only possible with a guilty verdict, for the imposition of which it must in turn clarify the civil law issues in the same proceedings. 2 in 1: The FRG silences a critic and the complainants get their Judas wages.

It seems obvious that the complainants are misusing the criminal chamber to clarify civil law issues. Perhaps also in order to have their civil law dispute resolved quickly with the help of the criminal chamber, because it can be assumed that the criminal courts in Germany make short work of critical people. Paragraph 1 of Section 262 of the Code of Criminal Procedure makes this possible: “If the criminal liability of an act depends on the assessment of a civil legal relationship, the criminal court shall also decide on this in accordance with the provisions applicable to proceedings and evidence in criminal matters.”

However, in view of the facts of the case, the evidence available and the conduct of the complainants, the court could also apply section 262, paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: “However, the court is authorized to suspend the investigation and to set a time limit for one of the parties to bring the civil action or to await the judgment of the civil court.”

Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer have since been charged with false accusations. Many of their accusations are demonstrably untrue. For example, Marcel Templin already has 1,158,000 euros from the sale of the Füllmich family’s house. Another example: The complaint states, “Füllmich has also made himself liable to prosecution for embezzlement by purchasing the gold bars without the consent of the shareholders, obscuring their existence and possessing them for himself.” The gold bars are stored at Degussa. Removal is only possible with the joint signatures of Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer.

How long will the court allow itself to be led around by the nose here? Just reading the criminal complaint insinuates the intentions of the complainants. Not only do they point out possible misconduct that the public prosecutor’s office would have to prosecute – they also provide an assessment of the facts in their “pleading” and thus prepare a verdict, so to speak.

Misleading the public prosecutor’s office?

The public prosecutor’s office should also gradually realize that it is being deceived and instrumentalized. Recognizably false accusations, but also obvious misleading by the complainants, should set the public prosecutor’s office on edge. One example: the complainants had misled the public prosecutor’s office by submitting incomplete minutes of the company’s founding meeting. This was the only reason why the public prosecutor’s office assumed that the shareholders did not have sole power of representation.

On the other hand, the conduct of the public prosecutor’s office is also remarkable: while Reiner Füllmich’s accounts were frozen and his assets arrested in the course of the arrest, the public prosecutor’s office apparently did not confiscate or freeze the EUR 1,158,000 from the account of the lawyer Templin. What happened to the money? Why is the public prosecutor’s office not taking action here?

The key question, however, is: Why is the public prosecutor’s office investigating embezzlement under Section 266 StGB at all? Even a cursory examination makes it easy to see that the conditions for embezzlement are not met here. The actions of Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer were documented (loan agreements and accounting lists) and therefore known to the company. There is even an indication in the email correspondence that Füllmich had informed the complainants Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer about a loan.

Finally, there is a lack of another essential element for the existence of embezzlement: there is no financial disadvantage for the Corona Committee. The loans should and could have been repaid. The funds for this were to be generated from the sale of the house. The loans were not paid out to a destitute borrower: the Füllmich family’s property (a large house in Göttingen) always had enough substance to enable the loans to be repaid. The public presentation gives the impression that Füllmich secretly pocketed money and used it privately. But how he used the loan is irrelevant. The money was to be placed in a safe place and later repaid – and this was ensured until the illegal appropriation of the purchase price of Füllmich’s house. Without a financial disadvantage on the part of the Corona Committee, there is no offense of unlawful appropriation.

The obvious inconsistencies give many friends of the Enlightenment hope that Dr. Reiner Füllmich will soon be released. That this hope may be unfounded is shown by the many verdicts against critics of the measures, lawyers, doctors and journalists in the FRG and the Western world: the “legal system” is once again proving to be the servant of a repressive system that will accept neither criticism nor resistance. The clearest voices are to be silenced. No matter what the cost – even if it means giving up the rule of law.

Connect with Laufpass (German)

Recap: Reiner Fuellmich Explains the Circumstances Leading Up to His Arrest

Truth Comes to Light editor’s commentary:

I received a request from a supporter of this site: “Would you please put what we know about Reiner Fuellmich’s situation into one post so I can share it around. A lot of people suddenly want to know his side of the story.”

Most of the updates that I’ve shared thus far come directly from Elsa Schieder’s Truth Summit substack. Sometimes I simply post links at our telegram, substack notes, minds and brighteon channels without putting them up at this site.

Below you will find part one of Reiner’s message which was posted December 5, 2023, as well as parts two and three which were posted December 13, 2023.

For regular updates on Reiner’s situation (or statements made by Corona Committee members making the allegations that caused his imprisonment) I recommend following Elsa Scheider’s substack.

Most updates are made in German at Bittel TV. Elsa speaks German and thus can provide a bridge for the rest of us to understand what is being shared.

For those who don’t want to give their email to substack, you can use an RSS feed reader to alert you to new content. You can do the same to follow Truth Comes to Light’s substack or Truth Comes to Light website. There are many feedreaders out there. I use https://feedreader.com/. 

~~~

A few of you have written to me asking why I stand in support of Reiner when “the evidence” shows he is guilty of something or other. I’ve always responded with words akin to the fact that Reiner has always felt to me to be a man of integrity. He clearly wanted to know the truth about all that was unfolding and he also wanted all of us to share in what he discovered. It was also clear that he was the driving force behind the Corona Committee, the one with the ability to cordially ask deep questions and tie the information together.

The work of the Corona Committee was phenomenal. They opened the minds of people worldwide to the globalist agenda to dominate us all on all levels of our being.

Did I always agree with Reiner? Of course not. I’ve yet to find one person on the planet with whom I always agree, or who always agrees with me.

One area in particular that Reiner did not dive deeply into is the question of whether viruses have ever been isolated. The committee did interview Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Andrew Kaufman. See the link here. This was quite a display, revealing a lot about the characters of the committee members. Wolfgang Wodarg led the interview. He spoke with disrespect and perhaps distain toward his guests. Reiner Fuellmich stayed in the background and seemed to be playing the role of peacemaker, admitting that he didn’t know whether viruses exist or not. The behavior of  Viviane Fischer and Wolfgang Wodarg shocked me. Please watch the video and make your own assessment.

Many in the “medical freedom movement” speak out regularly about how it doesn’t matter if viruses exist or not, implying, or sometimes stating directly, that those in the “no virus” camp should stop rocking the boat.

Is it important that we come to understand whether viruses exist or not? Of course it is. The entire multi-billion dollar industry of virology and vaccination is built upon lies.

These invisible mini boogeymen (viruses) have spawned a deadly industry of vaccines, which are forced upon children and animals, and sometimes adults (especially when travelling).

Children and pets have been maimed for life and many have died. Many adults become debilitated. Countless animals have suffered in diabolical laboratories where they are injected with toxic brews, cut open, living constantly in fear, pain and distress.

How fellow humans could even conceive of, or participate in, such cruelty is beyond understanding.

All of this horror has come about because a few faux scientists put out a “germ theory” about stealthy, invisible monsters lurking in our natural world. And, having been lulled into obeying “consensus reality”, the majority of humans followed along, no questions asked, just because “the experts” or their overlords told them to.

We must come to understand that all vaccines are toxic. They are toxic sludge. They always cause harm. Always.

We have to stand up. Children have to be freed from this nightmare. Animals have to be freed as well. The “science labs” of torture must be shut down.

We must be free to travel without ghoulish mandates forcing us to allow strangers to inject us with poison in exchange for passage.

Having said that, Reiner’s contribution to humanity is priceless. The powerful database of information, collected via interviews with people from all over the world, is a gift to all of humanity. He clearly went above and beyond. He was learning and expanding his own awareness as he went along, and he had the generosity of spirit to share his path of discovery with the rest of us.

Did he make mistakes with this money situation? Very likely. He’s already stated as much. Yet, I’d venture a guess that most of us have things in our past to which others have commented “What could you have been thinking?” “How did you not know that?” “I could have told you that was a big mistake.” and so on.

Only time will tell how this all plays out. Regardless the outcome, I will always be grateful for Reiner’s work on our behalf. Thank you, Reiner. 

~ Kathleen Stilwell January 18, 2024

Part One

[This is an excerpt from Elsa’s post of December 5, 2023. Other parts of her post relate to letters sent to embassies and organizing a caroling group.]

First , a message from Reiner, read by Roger Bittel (bittel.tv). English translation:

Hello everyone,

After six weeks of imprisonment, I would like to deeply thank all the people who write to me. There are thousands. I read everything. Everything in those letters from appreciation of the quality of the work done and above all the positive energy sent to me is a rescue boat that will bring me to freedom so we can continue to bring forward our joint work. Because it isn’t over. The corona pandemic was only the test run to find out what people will go along with when we put them into panic through psycho-terror. We must look behind the panic propaganda, so we can see the truth. Without justice there is no peace and no returning to a humane world.

That also holds for my case. Today for the first time I want to address the charges against me that are meant to damage my international reputation as a lawyer but also me as a person. I will together with my legal team ensure that the full truth comes to light, and that those who have done this are brought to justice.

I will go into the background of everything and show how the money from the sale of the house of myself and my wife were simply taken from us – that is, our entire financial existence was taken -.and that is how the entire Mexican plot was created which led to my arrest and much more.

I thank all of you,

Reiner Fuellmich

(In German: www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8asxqlFWl0 From 5:00 to 7:40.)

Parts Two and Three

UPDATE. REINER FUELLMICH SPEAKS OUT. His Personal Statement, Parts 2 and 3.

Posted December 13, 2023

Like every week at 8 pm in Europe (2 pm Eastern), this Sunday, December 10, 2023, Roger Bittel gave his update.

This time he had major news. Reiner had written a personal account, and it was read aloud for listeners. The first part was read aloud last week (English translation here).

It was a long statement. I started to translate. Fortunately, on the 13th, a German friend sent me the written German text, so could use deepl.com to do most of the translating. Massively helpful. I did reread, to check.

And now, December 18th, I have received the official translation from the Reiner team. So here it is.

“The Truth” – Personal Statement by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Part 2: The beginning of the Corona Committee

Dear friends, activists, and fellow human beings interested in the truth,

this is the 2nd part of my “Personal Statement” to make the events of the last weeks, months and years transparent for all of you.

How did it come about that serious allegations of embezzlement were made against me publicly and in a criminal complaint by four former comrades-in-arms in the Corona Committee? Who were the people I trusted when I worked with the Corona Committee? How did it come about that I am now sitting in a high-security prison in Germany – and completely innocent?

Above all, I have to reproach myself, because my professional gut feeling clearly betrayed me (or I didn’t listen closely enough), and I simply didn’t attend enough to details in the daily TO-DOs, otherwise I would have noticed the planned coup much earlier.

But first things first:

My wife Inka and I lived with our dogs on our ranch in Northern California until the beginning of June 2020 and I did my legal work mainly from there. When the plandemic started in 2020, we were both immediately convinced – that something was amiss here. I quickly packed my bags, because I wanted to help shed light on the plandemic in Germany. After all, I had 30 years of experience as a litigator and spent many years studying medical and pharmaceutical law at the University of Göttingen. In addition, I had many contacts from my work in medical law.

Dr. WW, whom I trusted at the time, put me in touch with Ms. VF. At the first face-to-face meeting in Berlin, I was bothered by some of her behavior, but I decided to take off my critical glasses, ignore my gut feeling and trust a friend.

We agreed to establish the Corona Committee because it was clear in June 2020 that the German Bundestag, which was actually responsible for this, would not start its own investigation, for reasons that were not yet apparent to me at the time. The Corona Committee was to clarify these key questions immediately:

1.     How dangerous is the supposedly novel corona virus really?

2.     How reliable and suitable is the PCR test for detecting corona infections?

3.     How harmful are the Corona measures, i.e. the lockdowns, the mask requirement, social distancing and the threat of so-called vaccinations?

Scientists, doctors, economists, lawyers, politicians, etc. should help support us in clarifying the questions. Two German scientists, a professor of finance and an expert in immunology and vaccinations were already part of our circle. Unfortunately, they did not agree with the contracts of VF drawn up by her notary and therefore they left us.

I recall that one of them also distrusted VF from the start.

We needed replacements quickly. Two years earlier, while working for the anti-corruption NGO Transparency International, I had met law professor Martin Schwab and had been friends with him ever since. He, in turn, had introduced me to two lawyers from Hamburg whom he had promoted. Trusting in Prof. Schwab’s expertise, I asked the two of them if they wanted to move up as a replacement for the scientists in the Corona Committee. Today I know that this was the beginning of the end. Both quickly showed that money meant more to them than clarification and enlightenment.

The Corona Committee quickly met with completely unexpected success. Since we conducted the expert surveys in German and English via video-stream, our Friday broadcasts quickly became popular worldwide. Many people had been convinced that we would later use the findings from these interviews as evidence in international damages proceedings such as in class action. We were in the right place at the right time with our work. I was and still am convinced of  that.

Internally, unfortunately, things looked different. I quickly noticed that VF and the others showed little interest in our work in contrast to myself, who concentrated almost completely on this work. In addition to the interviews in the committee, I gave five international interviews at that time, and thereby, endeavored to provide information about our work worldwide and not just in Germany.

After I had learned from critical experts that a PCR test could under no circumstances detect an infection, and it had been deliberately abused here, I published a 50-minute video in German and English in September 2020. There I explained that the Corona measures, which had already led to more and more victims and damage at that time, could be qualified as crimes against humanity, and that it would be best to clarify them legally with the means of Anglo-American law. To my surprise, the video was viewed millions of times before it was suddenly deleted by YouTube/Google.

On the basis of this video, the American colleague Robert F. Kennedy jr., whom I first met in Berlin in August 2020, founded the “PCR Test working group” on his platform CHD, with the help of its president Mary Holland. I also belong to this group. Since October 2020, respected scientists, doctors, lawyers, etc. have been meeting there every week to discuss all aspects related to the plandemic.

At the same time, I regularly summarized our long interviews at the Corona Committee on Sundays on Roger Bittel’s platform “Bittel.TV”. The enormous popularity of the Corona Committee led to a large number of inquiries as early as August 2020. In particular, small and medium-sized enterprises wanted to know how they could get compensation for the damage suffered as a result of the lockdowns. And fellow lawyers from all over the world wanted to be connected with the experts. At that time, many lawyers still believed that a judicial hearing of evidence with our PCR test experts would quickly bring down the entire panic, based on deception and manipulation.

This led to the collection of funds (700 € per person) for a possible class action. The funds are all there, but have been fraudulently diverted to another account. I will report on this in detail elsewhere.

Due to my almost 30 years of litigation experience, I was rather sceptical that a solid legal approach would quickly succeed in Germany and also in the rest of the world. Therefore, I advised to conduct damages litigation in an Anglo-American country, where there is the possibility of class actions and a real right of evidence and punitive damages for intentional damages. My international colleagues are working flat out on this. The issue of class action lawsuits is as present as ever and we are convinced that it will ultimately bring success.

Part 3 – The end of the Corona Committee – Unfortunate circumstances or a long-planned coup?

Dear friends, activists and fellow human beings interested in the truth,

in the 3rd part of my personal statement, it will quickly become apparent to you that I was more and more a lone fighter in matters of the Corona Committee and that my co-partners pulled a common string to get rid of me and also to ruin me privately. I share responsibility here. As a human being, but even more so as a lawyer, I should have seen the events coming and prevented them.

Back to my account. So, while I was on my way, also with international lawyers, for the CA and putting all my energy into it, strangely enough, the other members didn’t seem to be so aware of the importance of the Corona Committee‘s work. None of them attended the strategy meetings. None of them made any effort to publicize the work of the Committee, especially beyond the borders of Germany. From the end of 2020 onwards, JH and AF in particular were only interested in how they could earn as much money as possible with Corona mandates with their newly founded office community.

When, at the end of 2021 / beginning of 2022, together with the group of international lawyers, I conducted the Model Grand Jury investigations with the help of our experts to show that, and how, a legal clarification of the plandemic could work, these lawyers no longer played a role at all. However, the Model Grand Jury Investigation became a success that attracted worldwide attention.

The work of the Corona Committee was now so popular that by the end of 2020 we had already received a lot of donations. However, we only needed part of this to pay for our technology, IT, translators and expenses for my office, etc. There was a large amount of money in our donation account. This money was not safe from our point of view. A blocking or seizure of the accounts would have rendered us immediately incapacitated. Therefore, VF and I decided to leave only the amounts directly required for the work of the Corona Committee in the donation account and to keep the funds that were not needed at first safe from possible access.

The State Office for Criminal Investigation in Lower Saxony, as I know today, had asked the public prosecutor’s office to investigate VF, RF, AF and JH and a colleague who had temporarily managed the donation account because of suspicious money laundering reports from the banks, which had repeatedly terminated our donation account. These investigations were later discontinued.

To make sure that we would not be vulnerable because of the securing of the money, we concluded loan agreements, which were also openly shown in the annual financial statements. Of course, there would have been no point in transferring the loans from one disclosed account to another open account. So we decided to invest them in my German property (as an equivalent value) and in gold as a safe store of value. The house had a value of €1,345,000. We wanted to sell it anyway and look for a new place to live in Germany. Therefore, the money I took out on a loan basis was safe, as I believed at the time. But things turned out differently. I will report on that.

In addition, I invested 1.1 million EUR in donations in gold. This was also openly disclosed in the annual financial statements. VF also entered into a contract with Corona Committee to obtain a loan. This withdrawal also served to secure our money. The loan went over € 100,000 which is also reported in the annual financial statements.

In July / August 2021, JH and AF suddenly contacted us again to get information about the donations. I suspected that their legal efforts had been unsuccessful. In the meantime, I had learned that they had no structure in their office and, in particular, had not even been able to hire at least one secretary. I hadn’t checked this at the beginning of our collaboration, a mistake on my part in hindsight.

Since JH and AF had effectively left the work of the Corona Committee and also because they had recently been working closely with a person who, as I know today, infiltrated the political party “dieBasis” together with a Freemason, we initially refused to provide this information.

But in order not to waste energy on avoidable arguments, we finally handed in an overview of income and expenditures. It quickly became clear that they wanted to “hijack” the Corona Committee and at least eliminate me from it. When the attempt failed, JH proposed in a written settlement that he and AF would leave the company if we pay them half of the donations to an account of their mentor, Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab. Of course, VF and I rejected this and asked JH and AF not to show up in the committee anymore.

We didn’t hear from them for about a year. At the end of 2021, with my consent and with the help of their notary, VF created a new company for the operation of the Corona Committee. VF and I held a 50 percent stake in this company. This new Corona Committee has its own account, so it no longer has to rely on lawyers’ escrow accounts. All the rights of the old company were also transferred to this new company. I agreed to the contracts submitted to me by VF.

At the beginning of 2022, working with VF had become increasingly difficult. That’s why I accepted the offer to participate in the Crimes Against Humanity Tour in the US. This meant that I would spend almost three and a half months traveling through nine U.S. cities and giving lectures with two well-known U.S. scientists, Dr. Judy Mikovits and the economist and expert on technology and transhumanism, Patrick Wood. However, from there I continued all the activities related to the Corona Committee: I continued the interviews via Zoom, gave an average of five interviews per week, participated in the conferences of the PCR Test Working Group and summarised the meetings of the Committee every weekend on Bittel.TV. In addition, I worked with international colleagues to initiate legal proceedings with the aim of large-scale damages lawsuits. At the time, I was on the verge of burnout…

After my return from the U.S., I realized that VF’s chaotic incompetence and indifference to our guests, which I had grudgingly accepted until then, had increased even more. That’s why I confronted her in July 2022. I informed her that I would be going back to our ranch in California with my wife and dogs, also to be closer to the relevant legal action, but that I would continue the committee work as usual. Also, I desperately wanted more input from her!

Immediately afterwards, as I know today, VF got in touch with JH and AF again, as well as their law firm colleague MT. In August 2022, there was a meeting and a discussion. Following this meeting, the joint public defamation campaign against me started on 9-2-.2022 and criminal charges were filed against me on the same day. I didn’t know anything about that at the time. Due to the coincidence of the date of the “dismissal” and the criminal complaint, it is clear to me today that “the other side” was never interested in resolving the disputes.

A week before 9-2-.2022, VF had informed me that there would be no Corona committee broadcast on that day because our TV manager’s wife was going to have her second child. A lie, as I later realized. But I believed that lie and did not appear, VF and WW had – as VF puts it – “a clear shot“ at me. VF appeared in front of the Corona Committee’s camera dramatically dressed in black. She declared, without informing me as her partner, that I was no longer allowed to appear at the Corona Committee. So she decided unilaterally and completely arbitrarily that I was no longer allowed to be present in the Corona Committee that I had shaped until then, in whose company I owned 50 percent then as now!

In order to justify her illegal and unlawful actions, she and WW, also in front of the camera, stated that I was to be accused of financial irregularities and that I was otherwise “a loudmouth”. WW was particularly fond of this label.

I didn’t want to unnecessarily burden the Corona Committee and its worldwide reputation with internal problems. A vain hope.

A short time later, VF, WW, JH, AF and VF’s partner at the time appeared in front of the camera for an hour-long Reiner Fuellmich tribunal. This campaign eventually culminated in several increasingly insane videos from VF claiming that “the children of the committee staff must be starving“ because of me. Apparently completely unhinged, she finally called for a “hunt for me” and crowned this call with a “Halali”, a German hunting call that signals the end of a hunt. Not only I, but also the viewers were shocked, as could be seen from the comments in the chat.

The content of the 30-page criminal complaint, which JH also filed on behalf of AF and MT, reads even crazier. JH, AF and MT knew in 2020 that € 700,000 had been secured by me by loan agreement and secured with my property. They also knew that the sale of my house has been planned for a long time and was imminent. Our property was sold on 03/10/2022 for € 1,345,000.00 in our absence through a notary. As mentioned, we have never seen any of this money to this day! How this coup took place, I will explain in the next part.

And it gets even worse: After receiving the criminal complaint, I should have been heard, in accordance with the principle audiatur et altera pars. But I was denied this. Today I know the reasons: JH claimed to the prosecution that I was threatening him “with a Winchester”. And because that didn’t seem dangerous enough, he went on to claim that I, as a member of the party “dieBasis”, would radicalize other members and call for violence against him. In addition, I was an anti-Semite and he would feel threatened because of his ethnic origin.

Because of these completely fictitious threat scenarios, my wife and I were denied the right to a fair clarification of the situation by the authorities for more than a year. Apparently, the public prosecutor’s office felt pressured by these threat scenarios. JH even told the authorities that the other two plaintiffs would withdraw the criminal complaint if the prosecution granted me a fair hearing. Literally, he writes: “… if Fuellmich or any of the other defendants were given the opportunity to comment before criminal proceedings were initiated, the witnesses (i.e. VF, JH, AF and MT) would refrain from filing the criminal complaint for fear of threats, violence and defamation.”

Subsequently, my wife’s private account was seized. When our lawyers asked for my wife to be heard, they were told that they would not receive any information because she was also under investigation. A European arrest warrant was then issued for me on 3-15-2023, of course without me being granted the right to be heard.

In the meantime, my wife and I had left for a trip to Peru regarding the class action lawsuit. On the way back we wanted to visit friends in Mexico and fly back to Germany from there. There, we received information from our hometown that the authorities were allegedly looking for me. Unfortunately, the colleagues from my law firm did not receive any information from the authorities about the situation. So we couldn’t really assess the new scenario back home, so we stayed in Mexico for the time being.

As a counterpart to the Corona Committee, I now had my own label “ICIC”, with which, as before in the Committee, I interviewed international experts on global crimes against humanity. A small working group from the former Corona Committee had followed me and so we were able to quickly get back to work.

Nevertheless, in October 2023, everything plunged into complete chaos again. It ended with the execution of the above-mentioned European arrest warrant against me in Frankfurt, after I had previously been deported from a non-European country (Mexico) under police protection. – A thriller that, as I know today, was anything but a coincidence. I’ll tell you about that in the next episode.

As a result, I’ve been sitting in prison for weeks now. The real perpetrators are still free. They also possess the class action lawsuit money and the money from my private home. I can prove that. All documents are safely stored with my legal team. How the “agitators” brought all this to a “successful” conclusion for them, I will report on in the next episode.

PS. To donate for legal and other expenses, here is the link: https://www.givesendgo.com/GBBX2

Connect with Truth Summit

Connect with International Crimes Investigative Committee at telegram

Cover image credit: Camera-man

January 3, 2024: Personal Message From Reiner Fuellmich

sourced from Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel
January 3, 2024

👇📝💌💥 PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM REINER FUELLMICH AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR 👇📝💌💥

Rosdorf, 03.01.2024

Dear friends, supporters and companions! ❤️

I wish everyone a Happy New Year and assure everyone that I will continue. We will not let up with our educational work and the subsequent legal investigation into the plandemic.

Of course it is very difficult for me to be away from my wife and my dogs and my family and friends. But it helps me a lot that I always receive new information through the many letters and postcards, as well as very personal messages and stories. All this helps me a lot. That’s why I can still say with full conviction and determination: Some crack under pressure, I don’t!

The international colleagues with my friend Dexter and all the others are also still ready to ensure justice for all. This time the broken system will not be able to stand in front of evil.

In a somewhat longer communication in the next few days, I will be able to explain important details concerning both the case against me and our international legal work.

There is no doubt that things are moving faster and faster in our direction. But there is also no doubt that the other side is fighting for its survival, i.e. remains highly dangerous. Do not be intimidated or even discouraged: We will expose everything that must come to light and we will ensure that the collapse of the system and the transition to a new human coexistence without corruption and without violence is made possible with the help of justice.

❤️ I thank you again for your support, and I thank our ICIC team for their work. ❤️

I believe that the criminals who are trying to paralyze and financially bleed me and my wife, my family and my friends will not only fail, but each and every one of them will pay. We can be slowed down, but we cannot be stopped.

Best regards, Reiner Fuellmich

✳✴✳✴✳✴✳✴

ICIC editor’s addition: Here are the details for 📬POST to Reiner.

Please note the following information:

👉 It is NOT ALLOWED to ADD stamps or money to the post in Rosdorf Prison.

👉 The mail will be read and delivery may take two days to two weeks.

The address is:

JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Großen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany

✳✴✳✴✳✴✳✴

@icic_law_official
@icic_law_news
@ReinerFuellmich
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish
@ICICommittee22
@ICICommittee

Follow Reiner Fuellmich at Telegram

Cover image is combination of evergreen photo by MolnarSzabolcsErdely and ICIC photo of Reiner Fuellmich

See Related:

Reiner Fuëllmich’s Attorney Dagmar Schön Shares an Update on His Pending Court Case

Free Reiner Fuellmich!

Reiner Fuëllmich’s Attorney Dagmar Schön Shares an Update on His Pending Court Case

TCTL editor’s note:

Yesterday, October 28, 2023, Reiner Fuëllmich’s attorney, Dagmar Schön, joined Elsa Schieder for an update on the situation regarding Reiner’s arrest. (Follow Elsa at her Truth Summit substack for updates.)

Below the video, you will find a summary with excerpts from the interview. This interview was a pre-scheduled group chat that Elsa has set up for those interested in staying updated on Reiner’s situation.

Below the summary. you will also find an email address that can be used to contact Reiner (via Dagmar Schön).

In the interview, Dagmar shares what she actually knows thus far from the facts. Dagmar and Elsa also share perspective on the psychological/consciousness interplay in all of this and the unique characters of those involved.

Dagmar makes it clear that Reiner’s legal team has not made a public statement about the charges in the case  because they have just received all the paperwork detailing the charges.

~ Kathleen

Summary with excerpts prepared by TCTL. Timestamps are approximate.

Following a greeting by Elsa, Dagmar shares an update on Reiner’s situation.

00:00:40

Dagmar met with on Reiner on Monday and Tuesday of last week. On Monday, her colleague, Katja Woermer, was also there.  Dagmar describes Reiner as being in good spirits and looking well. She explains that she and Reiner have been friends for a very long time and that this is important because he can trust her.

Dagmar moves on to describe the series of events around his arrest, as they unfolded.

Dagmar:

“So Reiner was arrested in Frankfurt on October 12th on a warrant dated March 15th, this year, ’23, which had been an European arrest warrant since May 24th. First it was a normal warrant, and then from end of May it was a European warrant.

“Yes, that was an excellent means of coercion, this arrest warrant. Nevertheless, unfortunately, not enforceable in Mexico since Mexico is not part of the EU.

“And therefore, the enlightened citizen asks himself, how could Reiner Fuëllmich be arrested then? Was he really arrested only in Frankfurt or perhaps already in Tijuana?

“I wish that many first class lawyers, the stars among the international law experts, would engage with this case and send us their analysis. This case must cause concern among all lawyers worldwide.

“Mr. and Mrs. Fuellmich had lost their German passports. They had reported this to the consulate in Tijuana and applied for new passports with a new visa. On October 12th, they were registered at the consulate to pick up their new temporary passports and visas.

“The consul himself wanted to receive them at the airport. However, it was not the consul who was waiting at the airport, but six officials from the Mexican Immigration office who were only looking for Reiner Fuëllmich, and took him in. After that, there was no escape for him anymore.

” He found himself in state custody. The only question is which state? It may be that the obvious answer to this is not the right one at all. This is a question that many experts in international law should look at very closely. Which state was acting here?

“Normally, no one is expelled from Mexico because they no longer have a valid visa, especially if they didn’t have one because their passports had been lost, and they had just applied for and were supposed to get a new one. It was the case with Mrs. Fuëllmich. She got visa and passport without any problems. She could stay in the country and was not taken into custody.

“Reiner Fuëllich was first flown to New Mexico, and from there by Lufthansa to Frankfurt. There, he was met by the German police upon landing. And one day later on October 13th, the grounds for this action, the European arrest warrant, was disclosed to him. His two lawyers, Katja Woermer from Essen and I from Munich, both were present.

Reiner was accompanied on the flight from Mexico to Germany by two Mexicans, one of whom spoke English. Reiner asked him… (He’s a person who talks with everyone you know. You know him.) And asked him, who actually pays for these flights because that was quite a costly action which was taken here. You know, three flights from Mexico to Germany and then two flights back for the two Mexicans. The answer, one could guess, was Germany. Germany has paid for these flights.

“The question for the experts of international law is, therefore, could there be a legal basis for the actions of the German public prosecutor’s office in Göttingen? Is it the determined state for such an action or was it an illegal kidnapping, as some international articles have already suggested.

“The public prosecutors office in Göttingen based his arrest warrant on a criminal complaint filed by three young Berlin lawyers, two of whom were even members of the Corona Committee — had been…”

[…]

“…This criminal complaint is 30 pages long and is indeed a remarkable piece of writing, but not because of its legal brilliance. Prosecutors to whom we gave it to read were surprised that an investigation had been initiated at all on the basis of this document and the accusations formulated in it — other prosecutors told us.

“These facts also fueled a suspicion Reiner Fuëllmich’s arrest may have been motivated by political, rather than legal, considerations.

“We need international support through articles, legal analysis and also financial support. In fact, the money that Reiner Fuëllmich is accused of collecting is not with him but, hard to believe, with the person who filed a criminal complaint — at least with one of them. Because over one million euros were transferred to his account, which actually had to be transferred to an account of Reiner Fuëllmich. There he should have been transferred to, but he somehow managed that it was transferred to his account. It’s a bit [of] a complicated thing. So this is not easy to explain in this situation.

“The criminal complaint is dated on September 2, 2022. September 2, 2022 was exactly the day on which Viviane Fischer, together with Wolfgang Wodarg, announced Reiner’s departure from the Corona Committee, into the camera, allegedly because of financial irregularities.

“So it was 30 pages long, this complaint. That means nobody could write this in one day, so they have probably worked on it for several weeks already. So communicating with Reiner and, behind his back, they were planning his execution. It’s amazing.

“And all people who somehow he still considered as friends. Anyone who has watched the Corona Committee since 2020 could see that Reiner Fuëllmich did 90% of the work here. Because during this time he also created a network of international lawyers and initiated various class actions.

“If he had billed his legal work, which he certainly could have done, he would probably have been entitled to far more than the 700,000 euros that he’s now being accused of being illegally collected by him.

“Everyone who knows Reiner knows that his work is not about money and fame. He received a lot of letters in which people confirmed that he has saved their lives — actually really their lives — with the Corona Committee during the Corona measures. And it’s really what we should keep in mind.

“This one person wrote in a comment, I think it was on the Bittel broadcast. ‘Reiner carried us through dark times. Now we carry Reiner.’

“I hope that many people hear this and follow it.”

00:13:00

Dagmar now takes questions from the participants. The first question was about how Reiner spends his days in jail. There were other follow-up questions in this segment, asking for comparisons with US legal system, Reiner’s access to current global news, etc.  Detailed answers to these questions can be found in the video.

Dagmar:

“How he spends his days? I mean, you know we didn’t really talk about this because we had so many other things to talk. But when we came on Monday, he had already written nine pages — handwriting — the whole history of the Corona Committee again. You know, a summary of all the incidents. And I think… you in these jails, you have a strict schedule during the day. And you get — at six o’clock in the morning, your day starts and then breakfast and then, you know, like the days they also go pretty fast.

“And I think Reiner has a lot to think about and to reconsider. And I feel that’s even the very positive thing on this.”

00:18:00

Dagmar was questioned about whether she’ll be making future appearances on Bittel TV (where the first announcement about Reiner’s situation took place). She said she would not be appearing again at Bittel.

A question was asked about whether there is an estimate of timing in terms of future court appearances.

Dagmar:

“No, we have to apply for, to check this situation with a judge. But first we have to look at the files we got. You know, we just got them now. And we have to look in the files. And then we can apply.

“Because we first have to know what is there — what they think that is their proof. And then we can apply and then we will see. I mean, in our view, they would have to let him go very quickly. That’s Katja’s and my opinion because it has no valid…

“It’s a civil conflict between persons who made a private company. So usually this has nothing to do with criminal law. And that’s a big indication that it’s a political case. And we will see how long they will keep him…”

00:27:00

A question was asked about the process that put Reiner in jail before he has been convicted of anything and whether or not he can get out on bail.

Dagmar:

“Of course, you’re innocent until there’s a summons. But if there’s some accusation and there’s a danger that you escape the power of the judiciary, you know, they can put you in jail. And that’s why they — because he was in Mexico they couldn’t get to him. So nowadays they — of course, there’s a danger that he might go back to Mexico. So it’s difficult to get him out.

“But I think they want to show something, you know, and do some some example for other people who try to keep their head out of the window and say something about the truth and what’s going on. But they do all the time already you know, with doctors.

“And so we just have to see that we get him out as quickly as possible. But state power is quite a power, you know. They can basically do what they want…”

00:29:00

Questions were asked about writing letters to Reiner, public support for Reiner and getting more publicity for his situation.

“I mean, you know you can write letters but it will take quite a while until they’ll reach him. Because they told me in the jail last week if you send them to the jail then they first go to the court. And then they are checked. Every letter from outside will be checked and then they go back to jail. Yeah, so it takes probably weeks until he gets it.”

00:30:00

A question was asked about public support for Reiner in Germany.

“I have not seen it yet…

“So I think send him your invisible support, you know, with prayers and I think he really feels that. He at least says so. And I think he’s also in a good shape because so many people are giving him this support. So the most important thing is now that he can soon talk with his wife on the phone. This is most important for him…”

A few articles by Uncut News (one a rebuttal by Viviane Fischer) were mentioned by Marion from Germany.

A question was asked about getting international alternative publishers to share more regarding Reiner’s arrest.

“But first we have to really know what is in the files, you know, because what should they say if we don’t even know what’s in the files?… The only thing that is really factual, clear, is how they how they got him and how they got him out of Mexico…

“We would very appreciate high-ranking. legal expertise on this subject. So try to find your top lawyers in your country, in your city. Talk to them and tell them they have to look in this case because this can hit everybody.”

Heike Funke (member of ICIC team) mentioned that they will be creating a webpage where comments in support of Reiner can be posted.

A question was asked regarding the discord between Reiner & Viviane Fischer.

Dagmar:

“The real mistake of Reiner was that he didn’t confront the problems with her right away when they appeared. If  he would have — and that’s a trait in him. He has really difficulties in private relationships to address problems. He does it outside but with private he always tries to smooth them out, not to confront them. To smooth so that the work can go on. But this can be a major mistake, as this case shows now.

“She has not done any work she was obliged to do in the Corona Committee. And so he took all on himself. He did all the work then and his law firm. Instead of confronting her — if he had confronted her she would have been out after three months and the whole problem would have not appeared…”

Elsa added some insight.

Elsa:

“…I know from an interview with me, he knew within the first few minutes that it wasn’t a good match… And yet he always felt, ‘I can make it work’ as opposed to ‘this is the wrong person’. Better to have nobody or better to be without a team than to have the wrong team member…”

00:52:00

Dagmar:

“You know this, Elsa. I did also much work on myself. I know it’s difficult to confront these topics in yourself, but if you don’t, one day they hit you so in the face. And sometimes they even bring you into jail. I mean, what bigger the cost could be, like this now…”

[…]

“…I met him in 2015 and I invited him to this company to set up a legal platform to investigate in the judiciary. That’s where he met Schwab and Wodarg. I had already my experience with Wodarg in this thing, which was not very positive.

“And when I talked to him about my things I had done, you know my spiritual path… I mean… he had no idea about what I was talking. So he was really now in a pressure cooker for all these insights with the Corona Committee. He learned a lot. He opened so much. I mean, things for which I had maybe 10-20 years, he had to open to now in 2-3 years. That’s an immense inner work he has done and has allowed to happen to him — an opening he has allowed to happen to him…

“…I think in some strange way, I think this forced retreat — forced meditation retreat, he has now to endure — will change him a lot more. It will open dimensions probably he’s not aware yet, of insights. Because he was always running. And I know that Inka, his wife, she was always afraid that he’s working too much, that he’s still always confronting a burnout. Because this interview, and that interview, and then Africa. And this and that. So he never could really relax…

“Even after Martin Schwab has shown his his real face and his real attitude, he still was always not really facing what he was doing. He still was always trying to make it look good. But now this is changing. Because they really — Wodarg really damaged…

“And Viviane, I always see her as a desperate five-year-old… I think she had a lost child syndrome, breaking up, when he tried to go to the U.S… Then she got really angry.

“But Wodarg — she would not have done the 2nd of September 22 without Wodarg. She would not have done it. So he was actually the main actor here. And he has no excuse, no excuse at all, because he was a politician for 20 years. He was 15 years in parliament. He has experienced so many times that you can just kill a person like Reiner with one rumor, especially about money…”

[…]

“…And Martin Schwab, I think he just fulfilled the wish of his father who was a very famous professor of law. He still is…

“He just tried to fulfill the wish of his father to become also a professor, and that he became. But in this difficult task, all the other developments of his person somehow didn’t get enough energy…”

[…]

“…It’s true they have been very jealous of him because he has this energy and this power, and this ability to connect with so many people.

“And still to be so precise and clear. And that you can feel his heart. You can feel that he’s a real person…

“…If a real person talks then our hearts open because that’s the heart-to-heart connection that happens then.”

While this case is ongoing you can send a message to Reiner via Dagmar:
rainschoen@kanzlei-schoen.de

Connect with Elsa Schieder

Free Reiner Fuellmich!

by Peter Koenig, Global Research
October 18, 2023

The famous lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, founder of the International Crime Investigative Committee (ICIC), formerly the German Corona Commission, was deported last Thursday, 12 October, from Mexico City to Germany, to be arrested for alleged financial irregularities at arrival in Frankfurt, on Friday, 13 October. He was immediately put in pre-trial detention.

In Mexico, Reiner had to consult with the German embassy for passport issues and, to his shocking surprise, was immediately arrested and flown to Germany – accompanied by two guards, no personal belongings, no clothing, not even a toothbrush. His wife is not accused and was allowed to remain in Mexico.

From Frankfurt, Dr. Fuellmich will eventually be transferred next week to Göttingen, where he will be kept for an undetermined period in pre-trial detention because they unjustly suspect him of attempting to escape.

His confinement was based on a 30-page arrest warrant written already in September 2022.

He is falsely accused for financial fraud, precisely by those people who themselves have questionable criminal records and who supposedly worked with him during the 2+ years Dr. Fuellmich was running the German Corona Commission from Berlin.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich will be defended by two excellent lawyers, Dr. Dagmar Schön and Dr. Katja Woermer. They filed immediate counter-accusations against the predator-accusers.

Lawyer Dr. Dagmar Schön presented Reiner’s story on Sunday evening, 16 October 2023, on BittelTV, where 33,000 spectators and supporters listened to his case.

Reiner is well known and highly appreciated throughout the world for his fine work, defending victims of government-induced COVID crimes, and other crimes against humanity, perpetrated by governments and government institutions around the world.

The attempt to censure and outright silence him has failed bitterly – and the very German government, which disrespects human rights, freedom of speech and is guilty of lying and distributing false information on the media, has now found no other way than arresting Reiner illegally.

They will not succeed. Justice will eventually prevail. A higher justice, way above the manmade twisted laws – justice that reigns over Mother Earth and the Universe – always rules.

This case will be followed closely and updated periodically.

Connect with Global Research

See Related:

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

This following message was sent on October 16 to our substack mailing list subscribers and was posted at our telegram, minds and brighteon social accounts.

As many of you know, Reiner Fuellmich was arrested three days ago in Mexico and was flown to Germany where he is now in prison.

His friend (and now his defense attorney) Dagmar Schoen made an announcement on Bittel.tv (in German). BittelTV telegram channel: https://t.me/s/bitteltv

Elsa Schieder, PhD provided an English transcript of this announcement at her The Truth Summit substack. She provides additional background information, including the involvement of Viviane Fischer (of Corona Investigative Committee) in the charges made against Reiner Fuellmich. She also shares information on ways to offer support for Reiner Fuellmich.

Here is the transcript of the announcement made by Dagmar Schoen:

Reiner and his wife lost their passports and visas quite some time ago, needed to get them replaced. As they have been staying in Mexico, this led to their needing to go to the German embassy in Tijuana, Mexico. The first time they went, on Monday, they needed to come back. Dagmar was already uneasy, but everything seemed all right.

A time was arranged, for Friday, for them to pick up the documents. So the embassy knew exactly when they would be arriving.

When they went back on Friday, Reiner’s wife got her documents and was allowed to go. Reiner was arrested. He had nothing with him, only the clothes he was wearing. No toothbrush, even.

A warrant for his arrest had been issued in March. A second warrant was issued in May. One was from Germany and the other from the EU. Obviously he was not informed.

As Reiner was in Mexico, which is outside the jurisdiction of the EU, the warrants could not be enforced.

So there needed to be a way to get him onto German soil.

Reiner’s needing a new passport and visa gave those who wanted him arrested the perfect opportunity.

When he entered the embassy on Friday, there were 6 men waiting to detain him, take him to the airport, escort him to Germany.

The charges, as Dagmar found out when she had the official papers opened, were 30 pages long – so this was something carefully planned and executed.

They related to allegations of Viviane Fischer, a former team member on the Corona Committee, about financial wrongdoing.

Three people signed the charges against Reiner.

Perhaps the craziest aspect of the charges is that the money Reiner allegedly took is in the bank account (or anyway, was in the bank account) of one of the 3 people.

As additional information becomes available, I will post links at Telegram, Brighteon Social, Minds and Substack Notes, as well as include them in our New Posts newsletter.

~ Kathleen

Courtesy of Elsa Schieder:

Address to Write to Reiner Fuellmich

David Icke with Reiner Fuellmich: On the Step by Step Takeover of Humanity & Our Natural World | The Solution Is in the Power of  ‘No’ & Our Refusal to Acquiesce

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

Below you will find Reiner Fuellmich’s recent interview with David Icke. Some excerpts are provided to give you a sense of the overall tone. This conversation covers a wide number of topics related to our multi-dimensional, multi-frequency reality.

Along with a discussion of the ways humanity has been controlled throughout history and the awakening of so many people because of the global crimes against humanity during ‘the plandemic’ , there are also brief mentions of hidden technology, the secrecy around Antarctica (and Admiral Byrd’s expedition), Hollow Earth, underground bases, non-human manipulation of humanity, Rudolf Steiner’s (1861-1925) prediction of mind-control vaccines, etc. 

Reiner Fuellmich:

“I mean, I get bored with that because I don’t want to talk the umpteenth time about how they misused the PCR test in order to create cases that didn’t exist. I don’t want to talk about whether or not this is personality changing. I don’t want to talk about whether this is going to make people infertile. We know that it does.

“We have to step beyond this because we’re wasting our time talking about the same things over and over and over again simply because it’s so fascinating to see how blatantly they manipulated us and made us believe in totally idiotic concepts.

“If we don’t understand the whole picture, if we don’t see that, we’re not going to be able to get out of this self-created illusion.

“So in that sense, I’m extremely glad that you have put the dots together. It makes perfect sense to me and it coincides with everything that I’ve learned over the last three years.”

[…]

“I mean, yes, my friend Dexter Ryneveldt (he’s an attorney from South Africa) and I and all the other international attorneys were working on getting out the whole picture, not just the pieces of the puzzle but the whole story, in a legal proceeding. Because this is what people expect. We’re talking about justice.

“Ultimately, there will be justice. Justice will have to be done.

“But you won’t get justice inside the system, which you have just described because it’s totally, it’s the spider web. It’s totally under their control.

“So we’ll have to step outside the system and probably into a system that not just provides the legal framework as we think it should be as lawyers, but also connects with spirituality or consciousness, whatever you want to call it. Step outside the system so that they will not be able to touch us.

“Dexter’s example was, as an eagle you can’t fight a snake [on the ground] and win against it. You can’t come down and fight it at the ground. You have to pick it up into the air, which is where it can’t survive if you really want to destroy it.

“And ultimately, I think this is what this is about. It’s about either them or us. We have to either destroy them or they will destroy us. And this is what people have to understand.”

[…]

“But, you know, sometimes it helps to have a kind of a symbolism. For me as a lawyer the most important takeaway from what you’re telling us today is that we do have to go after the gophers.

“I know it’s just symbolism but it shows everyone that it’s us who are calling the shots. And if we don’t want to play along, if we want justice, if we want to hold these people responsible, then we will.

“There’s nothing that can stop us. And if we cut off this conveyor belt, so to speak, we’re destroying the spider web. And all of a sudden we will be able to see who we really are. I think this is really what it boils down to.”

David Icke:

“Well, they’ve been taking over our society over a long period of time and going step by step towards their ultimate goal.

“And I have this phrase, ‘know the outcome and you’ll see the journey‘.

“If you don’t know the outcome then everything seems random. When you know what the outcome is planned to be, the random becomes very clear stepping stones to that outcome.

“So the outcome is planned to be, first of all, a different type of human, far more synthetic in nature. This is why synthetic biology is a massively expanding area of science. This is all connected into the jabs as well — as you will have talked to many people about this.

“Up to this point, they have had to control information to manipulate perception because perception is what they’re after. They want a technological way of controlling perception. So they don’t have to do all this manipulation of information.

“So religions served the perceptual indoctrination very well. And now we’ve got science, which is overwhelmingly not science at all in its true sense.

“But what they want — and this is why they’re now coming out with it; they’ve gone from hiding it to sales-pitching it — they want to connect artificial intelligence to the human brain and the human body so that our perceptions will come direct.

“Not manipulated. Direct. You will think what AI thinks.

“And so you have this guy, Ray Kurzweil at Google, a futurist. And people say, he’s got an 80% accuracy in predicting the future.

“Well, if you know what the plan is, there’s a bloody good chance you’re going to be right.

“I mean, people say to me, how did you predict all this? Well, because I uncovered the plan.

“I’m not predicting the future. I’m predicting what the plan wants.

“And if nothing intervenes in the plan it will become the future.”

[…]

“We don’t have to fight the enemy. There’s no need to fight. We have to stop cooperating with it. Because the enemy has no freaking power…

“We are the cause of what’s happening in the world by acquiescing to authority. We take it back, the house of cards is all over the floor.”

[…]

“And you know, again, not only can you not control eight billion people… unless you recruit gophers from the eight billion people to impose your will upon the eight billion people. These are police officers. These are the military.

“And when people like that start to realize (and other people in the system start to realize) what they’re playing the part of without realizing it, who their real masters are, and the fact that their kids and grandkids are going to have to live in the world they’re helping to create — if they would then walk away and stop doing what they’re doing, then the whole thing starts to fall apart.”

[…]

“And so it’s a time of great danger, but it’s also a time of great opportunity — that we can create true freedom as opposed to the illusion of freedom…”

Connecting the Dots to See the Real Dangers

by Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)
October 1, 2023

In this first of two parts of ICIC’s interview, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and co-host attorney Dagmar Schoen talk with British veteran of the alternative media scene David Icke. He is an author, researcher and investigative journalist.

Reiner Fuellmich and Dagmar Schoen question him about his personal awakening process and the beginning of his involvement with the other side of the story, the real side, that initially turned his world upside down. He recounts his startling experiences that, ultimately, broadened his horizon and understanding of reality, as opposed to the mainstream’s narrative. These processes led him to leave his old life behind, defying all reprisals, and to dedicate his life to the uncovering of hidden knowledge and truths, beyond the fabricated “reality” we have been fed.

Icke describes in detail the structure and the far-reaching entanglements of a pyramidal organizational structure designed by a small, but very well-organized conglomerate. This conglomerate was, indeed, able to infiltrate almost all areas of our social structures over many years by installing stooges in politics, business, NGOs, etc.

Those who pull the strings, who act in secret, have positioned themselves like a spider in the center of this network, so that they have everything under surveillance. They must maintain their position of power at all costs in order to survive at the expense of humanity – which is waking up to this reality ever faster.

David Icke addresses issues that at first glance seem to have nothing to do with each other, explaining the entanglements and then connecting the dots so that an overall picture emerges of the great deception to which we have been and are being subjected. None of this is an accident, as the last three and a half years have shown us.

The connections are becoming clearer and clearer, revealing that this inhumane agenda is aimed at total control of humanity, combined with dehumanization through technocracy to replace anything human, indeed, creation as a whole. David Icke’s work reveals the workings of a persistent and perfidious psychological terror that is being deliberately used against us.

If we realize that we as humanity are vastly superior to this inhumane conglomerate, that it is dependent on us and can only survive through our energy and creative power, then this exploitation and deception will cease immediately. For this, the determined refusal to participate on our part is sufficient. We need only communicate this to these creatures by using the powerful word “No!” And we must understand that we are now at a point in time that even our legal systems analyze as a situation of self-defense.



Connect with ICIC website | Odysee

Connect with David Icke website | Ickonic membership

Cover image credit: StoryTaler

Michael Tellinger With Reiner Fuellmich: ‘One Small Town’ vs the Globalist Agenda’s ’15-Minute Cities’ — On Creating a Life Outside the Enslaving Government Systems

TCTL editor’s note:

Below, you will find a conversation between international attorney (US & Germany) Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, attorney/economist Dexter Lejay Ryneveldt from South Africa, & Michael Tellinger (founder of Ubuntu and One Small Town intiatives) also from South Africa. Also in attendance is Emil Borg, the new One Small Town (OST) ambassador for Sweden.

As some of the readers here will know, the One Small Town (OST) initiative has gone through many challenging phases over the past 17 years, learning from failures and gaining wisdom through discussion and experience of many of its supporters. Many years of trial and error — blood, sweat and tears — have gone into the creation of this OST model.

Those of us who have lived long lives and have experienced the falling apart, again and again, of our work and our dreams, know what it takes to remain trusting and persistent in spite of the odds.

In this interview, Michael presents the basic details of what One Small Town (OST) initiative is, its history and its evolution from the Ubuntu Contributionism vision. He also discusses the new digital Infinity token and explains that it differs from cryptocurrency coins, and that they are keeping it separate from the current global financial system.

Reiner and Dexter asked some key questions during this interview and will be doing a follow-up interview with Michael after they have the chance to do additional research and look into the details of the OST initiative.

As Reiner said in the interview:

“The one thing that most people, when it comes to setting up your own self-sufficient systems, have been worried the most about is what do we do about the monetary system.”

As this conversation is of great importance to many of us, the follow-up interview will be posted here at TCTL when it is available.

Below the video is a basic description provided by ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee).  The video can be found at ICIC channels at Odysee and Rumble.

I have added show notes and a transcript to make review of this information easier. This is a lot of information for most of us to take in. You’ll likely have your own questions about this initiative.  Some may want to join the One Small Town initiative and/or offer support to this vision by purchasing Infinity tokens.

Following the transcript, you will find links to One Small Town and Michael Tellinger websites where you can do further research.

My thanks go to paying substack supporters and others who have made donations via the donation page at here at TCTL. You make this work and the maintenance of this website possible, providing access to thousands of readers around the world. 

~ Kathleen Stilwell, editor & curator, Truth Comes to Light



One Small Town vs. 15 Minute Prisons

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, ICIC
with Michael Tellinger, Dexter Lejay Ryneveldt & Emil Borg
August 14, 2023

In this episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich talks with Michael Tellinger, a scientist, author, explorer, humanitarian founder of the ‘One Small Town‘ initiative, as well as Emil Borg, New National Ambassador for One Small Town Sweden, and Dexter Ryneveldt, lawyer and economist in South Africa: possible solutions to help free ourselves from the dependencies of the systems and live a dignified and free life.

Especially in the so-called Corona pandemic with its inhumane measures, it became abundantly clear that the prevailing governmental systems have nothing good in mind for humanity and that they have long been pursuing a subtle global agenda to install totalitarian mechanisms. This is to make humanity controllable and fully dependent on their system at their will.

These brutal procedures have made many people wake up rather uncomfortably, and question the authorities as well as the reality in which we live.

Michael Tellinger presents the idea of the “One Small Town Initiative” in detail.

He has been involved with its development since 2005 and has dedicated all his time, possessions and manpower to this project, as he is completely convinced of this possibility of living together without depending on and being abused by a governmental system.

He talks about the beginnings of the ‘One Small Town’ project, formed from the so-called Ubuntu movement and Contributionism, a system in which people contribute their skills and talents for the benefit of the community. In this way, everyone can benefit from each other’s skills.

It’s about realizing how much power and potential a small town of several thousand people has, where everyone co-operates with everyone else at all levels instead of competing.

If the mindset changes, there is an infinite abundance of opportunities to live with each other, from growing food, to starting businesses, to creating property and to participate in these same local small town businesses.

The basis of this project lies in returning ownership to those, away from global world corporations, and towards those who provide and work to create real value.

Why is this kind of free coexistence impossible within the framework of political systems?

How exactly does the underlying exchange of goods and services work from an economic perspective?

Is this method feasible, and how does one manage not to fight against the system, but to create one’s own independence within the legal framework?

Where do one-small-town companies already exist?

What explains their rapid growth worldwide and how can people become part of these projects?

Transcript & Show Notes prepared by TCTL editor:

00:00:42

Introduction

Reiner:

Dear friends, today we will try and talk about, not the problems, but the solution to those problems that we’ve been talking about for so long — for at least three years.

Some people have been talking about these problems for even longer — those who have realized that we’ve been lied to by those who we used to trust.

But today we have Michael Tellinger from South Africa. We have Emil Borg from Sweden. And we have my friend and colleague Dexter Ryneveldt from South Africa to discuss how we can get away from under the thumb of the system and have much better lives than we do under the system.

So thank you very much for making the time. It’s an honor, and it’s a pleasure, of course, Michael, to have you. And same with you, Emil. It’s always fun to talk to you.

So what do you do in South Africa? You have been working on these solutions for, not just for the last three years, but for much longer, right?

00:01:50

The Evolution of Ubuntu Contributionism & One Small Town Philosophy

Michael:

Yes, I have, Reiner. Thank you very much. It’s great to meet you and I’m very excited to have this conversation with you. Thanks to Emil for setting this up. And great to meet you, Dexter, out here in South Africa as well.

Yes, look, the One Small Town initiative has been around for a long time. Initially I started talking about this idea in 2005 already and slowly but surely it evolved.

We’ve walked the talk, we’ve paid the price, we’ve — it’s taken blood, sweat and tears. Everything I’ve had. Everything I have. Every cent I’ve ever earned has been poured into this. So it’s been my lifelong passion the last two decades at least. And here we are.

Something that started as a crazy idea that everybody laughed at me. They wanted to beat me up for even suggesting these kind of crazy ideas. And it was was really a thing about people. It needed to evolve and also grow into a time when the level of consciousness was a little bit higher around the world.

And I think this, especially the whole COVID plandemic and the lockdown that people felt attacks, they felt the abuse of governments, they felt — they realized how abusive governments can be and how they can completely and utterly overstep their boundaries.

That helped a lot of people wake up, and it really — during the lockdown is when the One Small Town movement really exploded.

So just a little bit more background. So the One Small Town movement grew out of what I started calling Contributionism and the Ubuntu movement out in 2007, 2006-2007.

So it all started with the Ubuntu movement, with the idea called Contributionism: a system in which people contribute their skills and talents towards the benefit of their community, so that everybody benefits from everybody’s skills and talents. And it’s slowly but surely evolved, gotten better and stronger over time.

We also had a period that we went through politics. We got involved in politics in South Africa. I registered the Ubuntu Party in 2010. We participated in three elections — 2012, 2014 and 2016.

So in essence, I ran for president in 2014 during the national elections as the leader of the Ubuntu Party.

And I must tell you, that’s when I truly discovered how crooked the political arena is and how the entire outcome of the elections is prepared. It is laid out for us. It is not elected, it is selected.

And that taught me really to use the One Small Town philosophy. We then participated in the 2016 elections in South Africa again, but just in the municipal elections under the One Small Town banner. By then we’re in transition from trying to promote the philosophy of Ubuntu because it was a bit vague. And it turned into the One Small Town philosophy where you take small towns and you turn them around by waking people up and showing them that if they cooperate and collaborate, they can achieve so much more.

In fact, any small town of several thousand people has infinite potential to create abundance for themselves.

The only thing that people have to do is change the way they think. And start to, instead of competing against each other, start to cooperate and collaborate on every level — starting with growing food, starting as many businesses as they can, and creating the ownership of the businesses in our small towns.

The ownership start needs to come back to the people away from the large corporations, away from the multinational retailers, away from the multinationals that control everything.

And that’s where I realized in 2016 that this is most likely not going to happen on the political arena. And then we exited the political arena in 2016 and One Small Town became a non-political and nonprofit community development program. But since then it’s just exploded.

Just to add a little bit more before I stop yapping, the Ubuntu Party, actually with the philosophy of unity within community and people cooperating, and the whole philosophy of Contributionism — which I must say really appeals to people and still appeals to people around the world in larger and larger numbers because it’s such a simple, beautiful philosophy of people contributing towards their own prosperity.

The philosophy of Contributionism turned into the Ubuntu Party in a number of countries, so we had the Ubuntu Party in Canada, in the UK, in Australia. And we almost launched in the USA and that didn’t happen. The Canadian Ubuntu Party fell apart because of inner conflict, and then after the 2016 elections it became very clear that going into politics is not a solution.

You cannot inject a seed of consciousness into the political beast and think that the political beast is going to change.

But the important thing here is that we walk the talk. I walk the talk and therefore I have the experience to talk about all these things where most other people do not have these experiences.

The Failure of Intentional Communities

We also engaged with intentional communities around the world, whether it’s Esalen or Damanhur and other — many, many other communities that I met the founders of such communities around the world, only to realize that all of these communities are a huge disaster and a huge failure on every possible level.

And that’s where it just gave more and more strength and credence to the One Small Town initiative, which is completely and utterly different from any other community upliftment project or an initiative. And this is why it is suddenly growing around the world at such a rapid rate.

And that’s my little introduction, just to familiarize people with who I am and where I come from and what we’ve done in the last 17 years.

00:08:12

Reiner:

I think it’s great that I’m finally meeting someone who really knows what they’re talking about, because I’ve been propagating, and most people on our side of the fence have been propagating, the disconnection, the shutting ourselves off of the system — because the system is not only thoroughly infiltrated and utterly corrupt, therefore you can’t fix it, but it is also not worth fixing. Because it’s based on the wrong virtues. In fact, there are no virtues except materialism. And it’s fighting each other. It’s competition in the worst sense imaginable.

So I can’t wait to hear more about this because we all know that we cannot trust the global corporations. We cannot trust the global NGOs because they’re all run by the same very few, very evil, people.

And we also know — because I’ve been into politics as well, for about, I don’t know, a year maybe. And then I got out because I was totally frustrated. I realized this is totally corrupt because you’re part of the system when you enter politics.

So there’s no other way than to reimagine ourselves as free, independent, sovereign people who can do whatever they want. And we should do it for our own benefit, and not even think about that old rotten system that is now definitely coming apart. This whole house of cards is collapsing.

00:09:47

A New Paradigm: Competition Within a Cooperative Spirit

Michael:

I think what you said there is absolutely 100%. I resonate with every word you say.

It’s also important for me to stress that the One Small Town initiative is not a system — we’re not fighting the system.

You know, like you said, this the system that we’re in is broken. It cannot be fixed, and it’s not worth fixing. Because, as you said, it’s built on the rotten foundation. Foundation of greed, control, competition — destructive competition.

So within the One Small Town initiative, we still have competition, but it’s competition within a cooperative spirit. And that’s a completely different thing.

You know, as long as you have competition within a cooperative spirit then you achieve things. And the achievements that you create actually benefit the community. And not become a detriment to the community because now… So I’ll go into more detail later.

So I just want to stress to everybody watching this that the One Small Town initiative, we’re creating a new reality. We’re creating a new paradigm, a new system that will slowly but surely make the current system obsolete.

So there’s no violence, no opposition, no conflict. We don’t have to fight anyone or anything or any government. We just build this up in our small towns in larger and larger numbers across the world.

All the small towns are connected to each other through our centralized blockchain, our centralized exchange mechanisms and sharing and so forth. I’ll go into more detail about this.

And this is how we slowly but surely take back the power to the people and especially into the small towns.

Hubs of Innovation, Creativity & Investment Opportunity

So the small towns not only become hubs of innovation, of excitement, of technology, of creation, of happiness and everything else we’ve always imagined for our families and our future. But also the small towns suddenly become the most exciting investment opportunities for the conscious investors of the world.

Because once the investors with the billionaires and the millionaires realize that the Small Towns is a safe and ongoing investment opportunity with unlimited potential for growth, watch the stampede.

I anticipate that once the first billionaire or millionaire joins us and invests into a number of the cornerstone businesses in a Small Town, and… by doing that, really, exposes the opportunity.

Watch the stampede of conscious investors around the world move away from the very, very scary and questionable investment opportunities on the stock markets and the normal kind of investment opportunities that are running dry very, very quickly.

And when people realize that by investing into a community where you go into a partnership with an entire community, you’ve literally created for yourself a safe haven for you and your family. The safest town that you can imagine, where everybody works together because the businesses that we start all belong to us.

The profits that we make belong to us. They don’t go offshore to some shareholders sitting in a boardroom somewhere else. And the technology and innovation that we create is used to help the community, and not help a few rich individuals on some board, in some foreign country, that are selling us electricity and withholding medicines and cures for disease from us. And that goes for the supply of food, obviously.

So with the One Small Town initiative, we have a very small, very simple plan of action, how to initiate it, how to start it.

Start it small and grow it as quickly as we can. And as people see this excitement and the joy in their fellow town folk, that creates the domino effect that becomes unstoppable.

00:13:56

Two Worlds That Cannot Be Rejoined

Reiner:

And one more thing. In that previous discussion I just had with that person who — a nice guy — who believes in this utopian dream of reviving the public television and radio stations. I told him I think this is utopia, but I wish you the best of luck.

For me, however, the reality looks like this. And this is based on another interview I had the day before, which deals with a scientist who is now deeply into spirituality.

And it resonates with what some of the people from the Maori who we speak with in terms of bringing justice to the world. In terms of what they call restoring the peace for the world, it resonates with their spirituality.

We already have a divided world. We have two worlds. And I think that they cannot be rejoined. It’s impossible. Because the other side of the fence, they’re either in cahoots, knowingly in cahoots, with those who are pulling the strings, or too stupid — stupidity out of cowardice because they don’t dare use their brains. Or too stupid to realize that they’re being used for evil purposes.

So if they want to join us, if they want to join your One Small Town initiative, fine. Of course we’ll welcome them, but we don’t really worry about them. I don’t.

I think we should, on our side of the fence, focus on what’s good for us because we’re the ones who are creative.

It’s not the large corporations. Guess why they’re buying up all these small and medium sized businesses: because they don’t have their own creativity.

So let’s keep that power for ourselves and make use of it for our own benefit.

What is your take? Go ahead, Michael.

00:15:52

“If It’s Not Good for Everyone, It’s No Good at All.”

Michael:

So, Reiner, I just say, you know, if you have any questions about One Small Town, please shoot them at me. Because I feel, I don’t want to just feel like I’m talking away here. So if you have any specific questions about how does this work, how does that work, please feel free to shoot them at me.

But I just want to outline a little bit for your viewers that might be new to this. Go to our website onesmalltown.org. Watch all the videos. And you’ll also realize that some of the videos go back, you know, one year, two years, five years, 10 years, 15 years. Some of the videos are very old. And you’ll see how we’ve evolved, how this thing has grown and matured into what it is today.

That’s why it is so strong. That’s why I can speak with such confidence and passion about how this thing works. How One Small Town has all the solutions that you can think of for all the problems. And the solutions already built into the One Small Town model.

Not because I’m smart, but because the solutions have evolved over the years from the One Small Town model and just presented themselves.

Because if it’s not good for everyone, it’s no good at all. That’s one of our slogans.

And one of the other important slogans that’s really important for people to try and digest here is that we’re not fighting the system.

We’re not opposing anyone. We are using the tools of enslavement as tools of liberation. This is really important.

And this is why most, not most, every other sort of intentional community initiative that has been attempted around the world — even the great Osho out in California, in Oregon, was it? Which could have been an incredible solution, but the ego got in the way.

And every other intentional community that has started has been a failure. And we can say that because if it was a success we’d be using it. We’d be doing it and we’re not.

So One Small Town comes and brings together all the lessons we’ve learned from all the failed experiments and presents a very simple transitional phase for people that are sick and tired, people that resonate with what we are talking about here, people that know there’s a better way, there’s a better life.

That we can live in a utopian world. That Utopia is a good word. It’s not a bad word. It’s been made a bad word by the negative people in the world, right?

So yes, we’re striving and we’re creating a utopian world for ourselves. And this is a step-by-step introduction of how to get from here to there. And it does not have to take a long time.

But in the process of going from here to there, we have to realize that the reason why the corporations are so successful and have such a strong stranglehold on all of humanity is because of their systems, their structures and their control mechanisms.

So what we are doing, we’re using the same kind of systems and structures and control mechanisms so that we can create success.

But these structure systems and control mechanisms are controlled and managed by the people of the community. They are the owners of these systems.

It just helps them to navigate the treacherous seas and oceans of corruption, and theft and deceit, and so forth so that it provides our blockchain and our online platform.

One Small Town (OST) Token & Blockchain Platform — An Alternative Exchange System

The One Small Town platform and blockchain provides a secure environment for investors to know — if they invest into a brewery or growing food or medicinal plants or whatever else it is — that they’re investing into our small town.

They can follow their investment. They know exactly how the money is being used, that it’s going where it’s intended to go.

That all the members from our community — that are 60% or 90% shareholders in some cases of all the businesses — that they see, exactly how much profit we’ve made in each and every business and how many dividends are going to be distributed every month to all our members.

Everything is completely transparent in every town and every One Small Town initiative and community. And this is why we have to put these structures into place.

This, however, has caused a little concern with some of the slightly more “spiritual” — and I use the word with love — some more sort of hippie-minded members, right.

They go ‘Wow, you guys are behaving just like the corporates now. You know, like, wow, man, I really don’t like the way you’re doing this. You’re just acting just like the corporates.’

And the answer is yes, we are. For your own safety. Because if we don’t do this, everyone’s gonna rip you off, dude. And everyone’s gonna run away with all your hard work and you’re gonna have nothing to show for it.

And this is why all the hippie colonies of the past, and all the intentional communities of the past have failed, for this very simple reason.

And to just to add one final thing before I hand over to you: to do this, we’ve created what our what we call the One Small Town platform and blockchain. And that then also, about just more than a year ago, spawned out of the blue, the most exciting opportunity that we realized — is that because we have this as a membership. One Small Town has a voluntary membership that people join for free. You don’t have to pay an entrance membership fee or nothing. You just join for free. Go online, sign up as a member. You instantly become a member and you open your digital wallet.

On the Infinity Token & Contribution of Three Hours a Week

So what we’ve created is an Infinity token. Which is really the token. (Excuse my noisy Rife machine right here that’s just finished treating my feet.)

So what we’ve suddenly had an epiphany is that, instead of using —

Before I go there, I need to say that the only thing that One Small Town members have to do is that, when when you become a member, you’ve pledged to contribute three hours a week towards your businesses, towards your community. Three hours a week. It’s all it takes, right?

People that know what I’m talking about will understand. That turns our community into an incredibly powerful labor force. If you have a town of 10,000 people, suddenly you have 30,000 hours of free labor a week. Because we contribute our time voluntarily towards our own businesses, towards fixing our town.

Now, the difference between our 30,000 hours of labor a week and a large corporation. You know how much a large corporation would pay for 30,000 hours of labor. It’s very simple to do the calculation. That’s what they can’t afford. And yet we can afford it, and we do it with love and willingly for free.

And this is why a small town of 10,000 people, that every member just contributes three hours a week, suddenly becomes a fierce competitor to any global-multinational corporation.

Immediately and instantly. We can grow anything, build anything, manufacture anything, distribute anything. Because we choose to do it together, and we are the owners of these businesses. It’s a very powerful position to be in.

And to manage all of this, we’ve had to create the system that is foolproof and cannot be cheated, etc.

So in the process we had to find a way of — how do we know when somebody arrives to do their three hours in one of our businesses or, you know or cutting the grass in the park or helping the orphans, or delivering food to the elderly, or whatever it is that we do (we’re gonna do all kinds of things in our community).

And that certainly presented us with an incredible opportunity. Instead of just using a punch card system — you know the old punch card system that you clock into your job and clock out — suddenly we use technology with QR code readers. And we created what is known as the Infinity Token, which is a membership-asset-backed-NFT token which is created every time one of our members contributes three hours towards one of our businesses or community.

So suddenly we’re now also sitting with the fact that all our members, the moment they contribute their 3-hours a week, over and above the dividends that we distribute to ourselves from the profits of our businesses, and the food and everything that we grow, that we distribute to ourselves every month.

We also reward ourselves with our own Infinity tokens that are growing in value at a rapid rate, because it’s the only truly asset-backed-NFT community token that’s backed by true and real human sweat equity.

And the more members we have around the world contributing three hours a week towards their businesses, the more the value of the Infinity token grows.

And to finish this little ranting monologue is — to utilize these Infinity tokens, we’ve created what we call the One Small Town digital wallet that every member instantly gets in your account. When you open your account online, you get your digital wallet and you start collecting your Infinity tokens every time you contributes three hours towards the One Small Town initiative.

And you can send those tokens from your digital wallet instantly for free to any other member around the world. As long as they’re member, you can send it to them via their e-mail (boom) and I send it from me to your digital wallet instantly, outside of any banking system, outside of anybody’s prying eyes. And you and I can exchange anything we want by exchanging these tokens.

So we’ve created an alternative currency system, if you can call it. An alternative exchange system. It exists. It’s real and everyone, everywhere in the world can use it right now.

00:25:57

Dexter Ryneveldt Questions the Financial Reality & Implications

Dexter:

I’m actually very, very impressed what you have said in the synopsis that you have given, Michael, as to what is the basis for you guys working and working towards, like you say, Utopia, the One Small Town initiative.

One of the things that I just want to find out from you. I know here in South Africa, one of the big things within the communities we are talking about, and you have mentioned cooperative units.

So what I want to find out from you, and in particular when it comes to the financial implications and things.

I want to find out, when we talk about cooperative units, organizations that are the One Small Town initiative is actually driving.

Is it actually registered with the South African Reserve Bank or are you actually trying to keep it not connected to any system here in South Africa?

00:27:01

The Financial Organization of OST – 17 Years in the Making

Michael:

Yeah, no, it is a completely independent system. The One Small Town company is registered as a nonprofit company.

The way we operate right now is that every One Small Town initiative is actually registered as a pool under the One Small Town nonprofit company. So they operate as a pool. So they’re also then seen as a nonprofit company.

Remember that we’re not providing work. We’re not creating work, so we don’t fall under the labour law. Because everybody that contributes their three hours a week is a co-owner of the business.

So they’re just working in their own business. So it’s not a job.

So we’ve eliminated all these potential problems with government and labour and any of that.

So yeah, this is why it’s taken 17 years to get to this point. It didn’t happen overnight. Slowly but surely, we found the problems and the solutions were presented to us.

One Small Town Trading Platform About to Go Live

And now with the Infinity tokens, that has opened up a door, not only to reward ourselves with our own Infinity tokens and be able to exchange them amongst ourselves. And also sell them and trade them on our One Small Town trading platform, which is about about to go live probably about four weeks from now.

And again, this is a private trading platform. This is not trading on on any open cryptocurrency markets or any of that. You have to be a member of One Small Town.

In other words, the Infinity token cannot be crashed. It cannot devalue. No one can steal your tokens. You can’t lose them because it’s an NFT that can be traced.

And so it’s a very, very different system from any other cryptocurrency or NFT scenario. We operate in a way that we don’t fight the system. If they’re taxes to be paid, we’ll pay the taxes.

You know, so we don’t want to create any ripples. We don’t want to resist or fight anyone. We use the tools of enslavement as tools of liberation.

And one of those tools of liberation is finding the smartest tax advisers there are, so that we as a community, that very soon could be turning over millions and maybe billions of dollars or rands or euros per town —

(Please, remind me to come back to this where I can make such an outrageous statement.)

If we’re turning over billions of euros in our little town, we’re going to find the best bloody tax adviser.

Just like Bill Gates and these rich bastards. They pay zero tax because they have very smart people doing their tax for them.

00:29:43

Dexter:

So if I understand you correctly, when we talk about — when you talk about the Infinity token, the Infinity Token is basically based on each and every individual member of the One Small Town initiative, where they give three hours of their time, and there is then an investment. And then from that investment, that creates the value. And from that value, that can be an exchange globally.

That’s basically the foundation of this Infinity token.

00:30:17

On the Challenges Faced by OST Organizing Resources & Finances

Michael:

It is a foundation. And more and more people are getting excited about it.

It’s taken a little while for the crypto heads and the, you know, those kind of people that are so stuck in Bitcoin mind. It’s just, it’s sickening. But they’re starting to realize how faulty and how insane that world is. And how sane and safe our world is.

And that penny is starting to drop for people to say, wow, hold on, this is a far more safer environment. I invest in this. I contribute in this. And I’m gonna talk to you more about our additional investment tokens we’re about to launch related to the businesses and the profits of the businesses.

So this is an infinite potential for growth on every level you can image. And it’s a safe environment, completely safe.

Blockchain. Membership protected. Investor protected. Members protected. Everyone is protected. No one can ever run away with you. No one can collapse it. No one can collapse your investment. The stock markets can’t collapse it.

It is bulletproof, right? So it’s controlled by the people and the members.

Right now we can determine the value of the Infinity token. That’s how we actually launched the Infinity token. We launched it at $1.00.

Based on the value — the launch value was actually $40 and the reason we can say that is because the average three hours of labour — If you had to work in the United States or Europe or — and some of the Western countries — where you looked at all the different possible scenarios. So for a three-hour shift you would earn on average $40, U.S. dollars. For a three hour shift.

So that is in real life, real terms, the true value of the Infinity Token. It’s $40. Right? And we launched it at $1.00.

So at this stage, it is grossly undervalued. So anyone that buys the Infinity Token now is buying it at an incredibly discounted rate because it’s going up and up and up towards $40. Whether the people like it or not, that’s what the true value of it is.

And then it’ll just go higher and higher. And the reason it’s gonna go higher and higher is that because — there’s an algorithm. We created an algorithm. Our programmers created an algorithm to determine the value of the token.

So it’s not just me sitting here deciding what the value is. The algorithm is linked to the issuing of the tokens. And basically every time one of our members — every time a member joins and every time members contribute their three hours, the blockchain picks up on it and it increases the value of the token by my minute little fraction.

So if we have a few hundred members working and contributing, it goes up slowly. If we have a few thousand members, it goes up faster. Once we have a dozen thousand or 100,000 members, watch the value of the Infinity token go higher and higher. Very, very quickly and steadily.

And then finally the other true value of the token, which is really playing games with people’s minds is this one:

So imagine you now live in a small town situation where we’ve created really abundance and utopia for ourselves. We’re growing vast amounts of food. We’re keeping a portion of the food for ourselves. The rest of the food we sell, to export internationally. We bring the dividends back. We distribute our dividends.

We build laptops and fridges and bicycles and nail clippers. And bread and milk and cheese. And I mean everything you can imagine. Because that’s what we do, we choose to do it. It’s our decision. Right?

And now the more we grow and build and create, the more we’re gonna have every week and every month.

Where do we put it? We have to put it somewhere, right? So this suddenly gave birth to the One Small Town superstore, like a Walmart. So suddenly we open a superstore that belongs to the people, the community.

But because everything we put in there, we have manufactured, we have grown, and made the bread and milk and bicycles and laptops, whatever. Whatever goes into the One Small Town superstore is made by us. That means we can sell it for a much cheaper price than Walmart or anybody else.

You see the interesting situation that’s developing here. Right? So even the greedy, multinational retailers are gonna not be able to compete with our own retail store — that makes all our products and food available to everyone that wants to buy.

They come in there and they buy in fiat currency. They don’t buy it in tokens. They pay dollars or pounds or whatever. And this is where we get fiat currency and cash to still manage and meet the needs in a in a system.

So we are not jumping out of the system. We are still using, you know, profits in cash and euros and everything to help distribute to the people, so they can still live in this crazy world we find ourselves in.

But slowly, but surely, we’ll transition into a whole new world in which that money is no longer needed.

But, this is how it works. So the benefits to members of One Small Town, there are three benefits.

First one, you get tokens. Every time you can do about 3 hours, you get a token in your digital wallet. You can contribute up to three hours a day. So in one month you can earn 31 tokens. The maximum you can earn in a month — 31 tokens a month.

Or, minimum, to get your benefits, one token per week, right? So one three-hour shift a week. That’s a minimum you have to contribute to get the labor, the free labor force, that we know we can allocate people towards a number of businesses. So we know we’ve got the labor force to perform certain tasks.

And the second benefit we give to ourselves from the One Small Town is all the profits from all the businesses are pooled collectively and distributed evenly to all the members.

So you don’t have to work — Just because you worked in the bakery and you didn’t work in the in the stables doesn’t mean that you’re not going to get benefit from the stables. You get benefit from everything because you’ve contributed towards your businesses in your community.

So you’ve pooled — The One Small Town initiative is a is not a bartering trade, a one-to-one exchange. It is a one-to-many exchange. 

I contribute towards the well-being of my community. So does everybody else. And therefore we share in everything that we create. And we distribute it evenly to all of us. That’s why it’s called contributionism.

So I benefit from everybody’s input and they benefit from my input and that’s why it’s such a perfect leveling of the playing fields.

So even if you’re a surgeon and your doing brain surgery for three hours, you’re still going to get one token. And if I’m cutting the the lawn or draining the sewage pipes in the hospital, I get the same token that you get as a surgeon, because if the sewage pipes aren’t cleaned, you ain’t doing any surgery. Right?

So this is the absolute leveling of the playing field. Everybody’s treated equally and their contribution is valued equally. And that’s what most people truly appreciate because now they feel appreciated for who they are and what they do, not diminished because they’re doing some measly work.

But the third thing — the benefits that we get — is at the end of each month —

So it’s the tokens, the dividends, the distribution of the profits and then the basket of goods. Every month at the end of the month, you go to the One Small Town superstore. And all the food that we’ve created, we keep keep a portion of everything that we do. Whether its laptops, we make a limited number of laptops to distribute to our members. The rest is sold. If it’s bread or cheese or milk or corn flour or whatever.

So you go to the One Small Town superstore. You put in your membership card. And it prints out a ticket and says this month you get a bag of this, you get a bicycle, you get nail clippers, you get a helmet or whatever it is that we created.

So you go there and get your basket of goods for free. The only thing you have to sacrifice is one Infinity token. That’s to show that you received your basket of goods.

Alright, now obviously every month we’re going to distribute food. Food is number one. So you’re always going to have food distributed to all our people. So they never, ever go hungry.

And there’ll be building materials. There’ll be bricks and cement and God knows what. Windows and doors and, you know. Who knows what we’re going to be manufacturing. It could be a car.

So what is the value of that one Infinity token that you’ve had to sacrifice to get your basket of goods?

The value of that token is the total value of the basket of goods that you just received. And the people will know this. My God, for one token he got all the stuff that doesn’t add to the value of the token on the algorithm. But in the minds of the people, the people know that that’s what the value of the token is.

So just to understand, we didn’t include the value of the basket of goods into the algorithm of the value of the token, because the moment we do that we breach the Securities and Exchange Act. So suddenly we’re dealing in Securities and Exchange and we can’t do that.

So I’m just telling you how complex this has been and how many different things we’ve had to think about not to break the law. And yet give the people as many benefits as they possibly can get. And make the Infinity token very, very lucrative around the world.

00:39:58

Reiner:

Emil, go ahead. You’ve been silent.

Emil:

Sometimes you should talk and sometimes you should just be quiet. And I think this is a time to be quiet, to be perfectly honest.

My role in this is to be Michael’s disciple in Sweden. I’m trying to, not trying, going to start One Small Town in Sweden. And I’m the ambassador for Sweden. That’s my role in this. I’m going to be on the ground, and, yeah, make sure that we get it all the way through. Make it happen.

OST Not Dependent on the System — Inside the System But Disconnected From It

Reiner:

So what I gather from this, Michael, is that the One Small Town idea can exist inside the system but disconnected from it. It has some connections, but it isn’t dependent on the system.

You’re totally self-sufficient if I understand you correctly. But you’re still complying with the rules and regulations of that, I believe, collapsing system so that through this transition period you can already build these One Small Towns.

And when the time comes and the system collapses, which it sure will, then you can do your own thing completely without being bound by any rules and regulations outside of the One Small Town ideas, right?

00:41:34

Changing the Way People Think: 

Michael:

Yeah, that’s exactly it. And that’s how we call it One Small Town and not one small settlement. Because, you know, when people think that we’re, you know, we’re going out buying a piece of land and building houses. No, no, no, no, no. That’s a failed system. That doesn’t work.

There are very exclusive potential situations in which it can work, but it’s a huge nightmare.

Why should we start from scratch? We have hundreds of thousands of small towns and villages around the world. We don’t have to build anything from scratch.

Towns exist. They have everything. All the infrastructure. They have halls and factories and streets and sewage and electricity and farms and everything we need.

All we need to do is change the way the people think. And realize that if we just cooperate and collaborate, anything becomes possible. So I want to come back to the potential of the small towns.

If you look at any international corporation. The average annual turnover of a company that has 4,000 or more employees is $1 billion or more per annum.

Just let that sink in. I’d like your viewers to think about what I’m saying here.

So if you have an international company of 4,000 employees that work in a 9-to-5, with all the expenses that come with them and the offices, and all the crap and the corporate stuff, and et cetera. All the labor costs. Four thousand employees. Your average minimum turnover is $1 billion or more. Some of the companies I looked at it doing $16-$20 billion turnover per annum with four or five thousand employees.

Can you imagine what we can achieve with 10,000 members in a One Small Town situation where each one of our members contributes three hours a week? And some of them three hours a day.

Because now they’re not just employees at a company wasting time, wasting company resources. Taking this home. Taking that home, you know. Suddenly we have members of the community that are co-owners of that business, that are shareholders in that business, that depend on the profit of that business. That take that business and approach it very, very differently.

So when they go and contribute their three hours towards that business, they do it with a very different mindset.

One Small Town Businesses as Investment Opportunities

Suddenly, as an investor, if I invest into a business in a small town, I — the investor, by the way, can never own more than 30% of the business. That’s the maximum that we allow.

So the business plans are set up so that investors invest the funding capital and they retain 30% of the business. The 60% belongs to the community because the community does the work, the labor. And 10% is retained for the One Small Town management locally, nationally and internationally. Because, you know, that’s how we’re going to be able to have funds to keep running the different One Small Town offices.

There is no money coming into those offices other than the success of the businesses created by the small town businesses. So it’s the bottom up, not top down.

Well, it’s again an example how the people, the people power, create the success on every level.

So as an investor from outside, my investment, I go into partnership with an entire community. That means every member of that community is my partner. And wants my business to succeed as much as they want it to succeed, or as much as I want it to succeed, because they have a vested interest in the profits.

So this is a game changer on every possible level.

The other big thing that we’ve done, that we’re about to do, is to start issuing investor tokens, and this is a way to allow communities themselves to crowd fund their own businesses.

So every business plan — so this is how it works:

We get together. You launch One Small Town in your community. You become the ambassador. You start signing up members and every member that you sign up pushes the value of the Infinity token a little bit more. You start doing this.

You have a creative think tank with your members. What kind of businesses can we start? What kind of businesses can we start with very little money, if any? What kind of businesses can we do business plans for that we need, you know, maybe $10,000, $50,000, $100,000? And what kind of businesses cost us $5 million or $10 million? And what kind of businesses do we think we can start when it cost us $100 million or more? And start developing these business plans because we gotta think big.

How much food can we grow? How much land is available?

We have different models to go into partnerships with farmers and land owners and traditional leaders in the Americas and countries where you have traditional leaders that own vast amounts of land.

Where very lucrative and exciting partnerships for the land owners, for farmers, even municipalities and governments if they’re not using the land.

So we start coming up with ideas for the businesses. And then we start writing business plans for those businesses. Those business plans get loaded onto the One Small Town platform and they get connected to a project management system that gets connected to an accounting system. Just so that it’s online and all your accountants can use it. Plus it’s all free of charge. There’s no cost to any other One Small Town members.

And then the project management system is connected to the accounting system. And the accounting system then allocates the investment funds to that specific business on a monthly drawdown based on what the business plan requires.

So it is a completely transparent situation that everyone can see what’s going on. No one can steal the money and run away with it.

And to come back to the investment thing. (So, Emil, if you want to say anything, just raise your hand and I’ll let you chip in.)

But the key thing here is that every business plan will need the investment amount. So we want to allow our communities, or give the opportunity to the people in our communities, to become shareholders in their own businesses first. And not some outside rich people that always own the businesses in your town.

So every business that we start that lands up on the platform, we issue a token. If it’s, say, a dairy — we’re starting a dairy. So we issue 1,000,000 dairy tokens for the town of Nora.

Let’s use our example town in Sweden. We decide we’re gonna start a One Small Town dairy and we need to raise $2,000,000 to start that business. And run for two years until we become profitable.

We need to raise $2,000,000. So we issue 1,000,000 Nora dairy tokens at $2.00 each to raise $2,000,000.

So we’re never gonna release more or less than 1,000,000 tokens for any business, right? And the million tokens will then have a value based on how much we need to raise. So we’re going to issue 1,000,000 tokens at $2.00 each to fund the Nora dairy. And then we open that up to all our members in Nora to buy those tokens. So they become shareholders in that business. That funding is 30% of that business.

So I literally am buying a piece of 30% by the number of tokens that I’ve bought. And those tokens — now you’re benefiting in two ways. Now you earn a token and you’re getting annual dividends, profits, from that dairy. So you got two benefits here.

You’re not just a shareholder, you’re also a token holder. And that token might become a lot more valuable than the dividends from that dairy at some point in the future.

So you see what we’re doing here? We’re really, really using the tools of enslavement as tools of liberation on every possible level.

This is just explaining how we are about to fund some of the exciting new businesses. If we can’t raise the $2,000,000 for the dairy, then we open it up to the country. And hopefully we’ll raise it from the people in the rest of the country. If we can’t raise it there, then we open it up to the world. And this way we try and retain the investment from the people of the community first. Then the country. And then the rest of the world. To keep the money local.

So it’s not just ‘buy local’. Like a lot of towns and communities are going ‘buy local’, ‘buy local’. We’re doing a lot more than that.

We invest local, manufacture local, grow local, buy local, export local and bring in the profits into our community to benefit us locally.

00:50:49

How Will OST Protect Itself from Mr. Global?: “The system is rigged to always destroy humanity.”

Reiner:

You know, Dexter is not just a lawyer, he’s an economist too. So he’ll ask the questions that concern the economics or the money, the monetary system.

I have one question in particular.

It is almost certain that the other side — Mr. Global, that world which is about to collapse, but it’s still there — that they’re going to try and do everything in their power to stop this from evolving. Infiltrate. Invent all kinds of legal or whatever rules.

How are you going to protect yourselves against that?

Michael:

Yeah, it’s a very important question. And this is why I made it very clear right up front — is that we don’t fight the system. Because the moment we start fighting the system, we’re gonna lose.

People need to understand this. You cannot beat the system. The system is rigged to always destroy humanity, so we can’t fight them.

So we are playing by their rules. We’re using their tools. We’re using their money. We’re using the banks. We’re using the legal systems, using everything that they’ve created to enslave us. But we’re using that to now benefit us and help us.

That’s why I call it — We’re using the tools of enslavement as tools of liberation.

And in every small town —

I jumped — I actually digressed a little bit earlier when I spoke about what is the potential of the profits being made in a small town.

So right now our objective is that any town of 10,000 people or more should be turning over — through the businesses that they start — should be turning over $1 billion, a minimum $1 billion per annum.

If you’re not doing that, then you’re doing something wrong.

It’s not going to happen overnight, but that’s our goal. That’s our objective. That’s where we’re heading.

And you know, money talks, bullshit walks. Unfortunately, that’s the world we live in.

And the stronger our communities become financially, the more difficult it is to knock them over or to undermine them. So every One Small Town community needs to become as financially strong as quickly as possible. Because then it’s very difficult to infiltrate, to overturn, to undermine, because that financial strength in fiat currency becomes the strength of that community — to stand united and protect that wealth that they’ve created for themselves while they’ve got this whole other wealth behind them.

There’s infinite supply of food and technology. And I’m not even going to talk about the other technology, but just to let you know that we have all the technology you can imagine that will be implemented in these small towns.

I’ll let your imagination run wild. I’m not even going to mention the technology, because that gets dangerous.

Reiner:

Well, I would think, Michael, that as I am absolutely convinced that all the creative people with all the intuition, and all that what makes us human, are on our side of the fence, they will be attracted to this.

And therefore there will be competition between the One Small Town concept and the other side. But they can’t win.

I mean, they’re collapsing anyhow. But if this kind of a competition sets in, there’s no one there to support their ideas and their systems because they don’t have any ideas. All the people with the ideas are going to be on our side of the fence.

So it does look very, very promising.

I’ll have to look into this in much more detail, of course, and I will, but that’s exactly what we’ve been talking about for at least three years.

You’ve been dealing with this for much longer. But many people who have only woken up through this wake-up call — which corona is, as far as I’m concerned — they will, all of them, have understood that the system will not survive.

And we have to get out from under it, so to speak, and we have to create our own. And this sounds extremely promising.

What do you think, Dexter, as an economist?

00:55:07

On the Importance of Decentralization & Safeguards Against Future Centralization

Dexter:

I completely agree with you, Reiner. One of the words that basically comes to mind is decentralization.

Based on what you have said, Michael, I want to find out how are you going to ensure that your initiative is not gonna get to a point where everything is centralized.

Because that’s one of the biggest obstacles that humanity is actually faced with, especially when one has regard to huge, big corporate companies. Their main goal, and that’s basically for the elite, is to say we have to centralize because when we centralized we can then control.

So from what you’ve said, you confirmed that power, authority, sovereignty is basically given back to the people.

So then the big question is how are you going to ensure at all times that there is not going to be a point where one will actually have to deal with a centralization issue itself?

00:56:16

Michael:

A very important question, Dexter. And this is why it’s taken so long to develop the system and learn from our experiences and answer questions like this.

You know, I have — since 2005 I have done lectures in more than 35 countries, probably in more than 500 cities of the world.

I’ve done evening lectures, one-day workshops, weekend workshops and week-long workshops on the One Small Town. And so you can imagine how many questions I’ve faced over the years.

And I can tell you there has never, ever, ever been a time that, within the group of people participating in the One Small Town workshop, that we did not solve the problem that was brought up by the people in that meeting, in that workshop.

So this is the most exciting thing that I can share with you. So think about this.

Decentralization is really — this is the foundation of One Small Town, where every community is its own master. But we’ve created the platform and the blockchain through which all these communities are interconnected. That if that community in Cape Town suddenly needs — they realize that we haven’t grown enough apples for next season, then the system is used to put up there ‘we’re going to be short 200,000 apples’. And some other One Small Town up in Caribou or whatever is gonna say, ‘hey, we’ve created too many apples’. And they put it up there. So it becomes an exchange mechanism between the small towns.

And that exchange mechanism becomes free because this is part of the ethos of the One Small Town initiative.

Not only that, but one of the most exciting and attractive attributes of this, or benefits, is that if you’re a member of One Small Town in Germany, right, and you decide you want to come visit your cousin in Cape Town or outside of Cape Town somewhere for a few months, you arrive there and you go to the town and it happens to be a One Small Town. So you arrive at the One Small Town office. You give them your membership card. They scan it and they know exactly what you have contributed and what value you have presented to your small town in Germany, where your skills and abilities are. If you’re a master carpenter that you are training others, you know young students, to become carpenters, or you’re a master cake maker or an engineer or whatever.

They know exactly who you are and what you can contribute to their small town outside of Cape Town. And they say, ‘hi, welcome, Michael. Welcome to our town’. And they log you on to the system as a member of that specific town, and immediately, based on your experience, the blockchain then allocates you to where you are most needed with your special skills, abilities and talents.

And you start that week. You get a message on your phone, saying please, you know, report here for three hours. Or you can then tell them I’d love to teach art. Or I’d love to teach this. And then they’ll log you in as a teacher that’s going to be teaching this. And for that you get your tokens. And at the end of the month you go to the One Small Town superstore, get your food and everything else that you get in your basket and you get a portion of all the profits, dividends, from all the businesses — profits that we’ve created in our businesses.

So you can literally move to another town anywhere in the world slot into that community and be able to not just survive, but live very, very well, have everything you need and be respected and honored within that community from the moment you arrive because the people know what you’re contributing to their community.

So it is a completely decentralized system. No one can ever centralize this. It’s impossible.

01:00:11

On the Threat of Track & Trace Technology

Reiner:

What about the dangers of tracking and tracing with this system?

Michael:

Well, that’s a very important question. And those dangers will always be there.

And my answer to questions like this is, the same technology that is used to track and trace people is available to neutralize the tracking and tracing technology.

And we know those kind of people. We have the people that can cure disease. We have the people that know how to generate electricity.

They are many. They are all on our side.

They all participating in larger and larger numbers, but that’ll come out of the woodwork as this thing progresses.

And that includes telecommunication. It includes, you know, frequencies. It includes broadcasting. It includes everything.

The same people that work for these big telecommunication companies are just ordinary people that may have started out in a small town somewhere. And they are thousands and thousands and thousands of very smart people that do not like the system.

And the moment they have an opportunity to do something good for a small community that they want to be part of, guess what they’re going to choose.

Dexter:

Then I want to find out, Michael, when it comes to the value of the Infinity token, I’ve heard you actually say it can actually be pegged to the dollar. And we know — it’s common knowledge — the dollar, when we talk about the dollar, we talk about the fiat currency.

And I think that’s one of the major concerns for humanity as well.

Is it going to be possible at some point that your Infinity token can actually be pegged to any mineral commodity like gold, silver, diamonds, etc.?

Michael:

Yes, it is. The only reason we pegged it to the dollar is just to give people the perception of the value.

The token is infinitely powerful because somebody just worked for three hours. So, you know, how much value is somebody’s three hours worth? And imagine a million people around the world working three hours a week?

Imagine 20 million or 100 million people working three hours a week. By the time we get to that level, the value of the token becomes irrelevant really, quite frankly.

You see, so what we’re doing is transitioning from this system, the current system, into a new system. And with that transitioning, using the current banking systems and the ratios and rationale that people can relate to.

But as it grows and gets bigger and bigger, people pay less and less attention to the value of the token, because they’ll be exchanging the token between themselves.

Out of sight. Out of mind. No one can interfere with how many tokens I send you. It’s free. It’s instant.

I send it from my wallet to your wallet. You can give me your house. You can sell me your house. I’ll send you 1,000 tokens and you transfer the house to my name, you know. So people will be doing all kinds of trades.

But for me, the most important part is for the people at the lowest level, the people that have nothing. And you know, South Africa. This is a very important part for South Africa.

So my heart always looks at how do we handle third world situations or impoverished countries where people have nothing. They don’t have jobs. Most of our towns have 60-70-80% unemployment.

You know, the people in Europe can’t imagine that kind of situation. So it’s a very different situation.

So we start looking at community kitchens. Something as simple as a finding a hall where a church has already got a kitchen. The church becomes a member of the One Small Town community. Now when they cook food for the people, they’re actually getting an Infinity token. They’re a member of One Small Town.

When we start making dividends from our businesses, each one of those church members starts to receive dividends and Infinity tokens and everything else.

So it brings the community together. The food community kitchen becomes the heart of the community. Where those that have nothing — they wake up in the morning with nothing — they at least now have somewhere to go.

They can join and go and clean the streets. Or help in this business or that business. And at the end of a three hour shift they get their token and they go to the community kitchen and get a nice plate of food.

So that’s a life changer for people in those kind of situations. You know, first world countries don’t understand that.

We understand that very, very clearly here. And in Brazil and India and other countries like that, you know.

So I’m very, very passionate about those kind of things — that foundational, beautiful structure that really helps the people on the ground in the One Small Town initiative.

Dexter:

Can you mentioned just a few examples here in South Africa, whose got the Small Town initiatives, Michael?

Michael:

Yes. So we started out in Kuruman. And we got very excited in Kuruman, because we had the mayor there that really liked the idea. And we all believe that it was gonna work because the mayor and the council is going to help promote it to the people and so forth.

Well, you know, unfortunately — and I don’t want to speak ill of the mayor or anyone there, because there are some wonderful people there, and they truly — their heart was in it.

Unfortunately the political system prevented it from happening. You know, meeting after meeting, council meeting after council meeting, resolution after resolution. And six months later, nothing is happening. And that was our baptism by fire — to learn that we cannot work with councils. We cannot work with politicians. We cannot work with mayors.

And there was just a reminder of why I got out of politics, why the Ubuntu movement and the One Small Town initiative got out of politics.

This was just a quick reminder.

So now we have a number of small towns that are brewing, that are buzzing. But ambassadors are still learning. And they’re trying to figure out how to how to get this off the ground. And this is brand new.

Remember, we’re building this from the ground up. You know this isn’t — we’re creating something that’s never been done before. So some some ambassadors are really a lot more active. Or they see it clearly or they have more experience.

So in Barrydale, Western Cape, that’s our newest One Small Town. And I expect that’s going to be the town that’s really going to rock and roll, and show and lead by example.

We’re doing so many exciting things in Barrydale already. And our ambassador there, Graham Abbott, is just an incredible guy — an incredibly talented and very, very experienced entrepreneur, self-driven guy.

And these are the kind of ambassadors that we need — people that are self driven, that have got diverse experience and all kinds of businesses and activities. How do you start things up? How to find solutions for problems that seem insurmountable? These are the kind of people we need as ambassadors because they’re the guys are going to start — the guys and gals — they’re going to start this thing up right.

Reiner:

I think that’s what it really — it is not always the leaders, the so-called leaders of a community you need to talk to.

But if it’s a really, a real grassroots movement, you have to talk to the people themselves.

We just realized that in New Zealand. You have to talk to the Hapu, the people themselves. Some of the leaders have sold out to the government, to the corporate government, so that’s why you need to get the hearts and minds of the people themselves.

I think that’ll make all the difference.

01:07:46

Examples of Current One Small Town Initiatives

Michael:

Yeah, yeah, absolutely, right. We’ve learned the same. Exactly the same here.

So you know, every traditional leader in South Africa that we talked to just loves it. They they love it, they want it. They’re offering us land.

So in terms of land, especially in the areas that there’s loads of land available among the traditional leaders, we have a lot of land that we can go grow things.

So yeah, just to give you an example in Lebanon. By the way, Lebanon is by far the most the biggest success we have with One Small Town. Our ambassador there, Fayez Mu*** [spelling unknown], in the last nine months has performed miracles.

It’s truly spectacular what has happened. They have started the One Small Town Art Gallery. They’ve got lands that they’ve started to plant. All kinds of medicinal plants, including oregano, to extract oregano oil for medicinal purposes. It’s a very high profit yielding business.

They’ve they’ve got lots of land allocated to them, going into partnership with farmers to grow all kinds of other medicinal plants, medicinal honey. Beekeeping. All the products also made from from beekeeping. All health products and shampoos and soaps, et cetera.

They’ve got primary water in a very, very deep well that the water is absolutely beautiful and healthy. That’s been tested. That they are about to start bottling. As primary, healing water for bottling and export as a One Small Town product from Ras el-Metn, Lebanon. Like Fiji Water, you can buy everywhere in the world. Well, very soon you’ll be able to buy Ras el-Metn primary water.

They’ve started the art gallery, which is, and I’d love to talk to you about the art gallery, which — we’re changing the rules of selling art around the world completely. Which is one of my pet projects because I’m an artist at heart as well.

And the other big thing that we’re launching in Lebanon, in Ras el-Metn, is our first health and wellness center. A five-story building with some of the latest alternative healing modalities. Where 40 of the top doctors in Lebanon have have volunteered 30% of their time to come and help and work in this health and wellness center — and only take a small portion — only take a 30% cut of what they do for that health and wellness center.

This is unheard of, so we are opening the hearts and minds of medical professionals who — many of whom are just, you know, money driven and success driven.

We’re now finding those healers and health industry professionals that want to do good, that want to help people, that want to heal people. And this is going to be our first beautiful example of a health and wellness center.

We’re about to launch the health token. I think we’re gonna be launching 1,000,000 tokens for $5 because we need to raise $5,000,000. And again, we start locally and then go outwards and raise that $5 million for 30% of that of that investment.

And the business plan for that is mind blowing. It’s absolutely mind blowing. It’s incredibly detailed and the most exciting part of it is that it actually shows a profit of around $7 to $8 million just in the first year after launching. No, no, it’s crazy. It’s crazy.

So now that business plan has become a model for a health and wellness center for every other country, every other small town with with slight, obviously, adaptations for the new specific environment.

But now we have — this is how it’s going to happen. Every time we launch a new business plan for a certain situation, that business plan becomes the property of One Small Town members all over the world. They can take it and use it for their community to launch that business in their community, raise funds on an adapted version of that business plan for their community.

It could be a brewery, it could be a cement factory. It could be built making cornflakes. It could be whatever you can image.

Reiner:

So it’s the exchange of the best ideas then.

Michael:

Yeah, exactly. Exactly. Yeah.

Dexter:

Michael, excuse me. You’ve been talking about the Infinite token. And I’m thinking do you have an app?

Michael:

Yes, it’s not an app within the One Small Town website, One Small Town platform. It’s a secure blockchain platform environment, so it’s like an app within that.

In fact, I think, if I’m right we’re launching the digital wallet. It was either launched today or tomorrow, in the next day or two we’re launching the One Small Town digital wallet, which means that any member, anywhere in the world, if you’ve got Infinity tokens in there, you can send them free of charge, out of sight or mind of any bank or government, to anyone you want in the world, as long as they are a One Small Town member. It’s instant. And it’s for free (boom).

Let me tell you, I’ve seen this happen. The excitement that you experience and the joy when you see that happen, when somebody sits next to you, they say I’m going to send you Infinity token now. And they just click (boom) and it appears in your wallet. You go, ‘oh, my God’.

You just realized how powerful that is. You just realized that we have created an alternative trading system. An alternative exchange system.

Should the global banks collapse tomorrow, we already have a solution for it. We don’t have to build anything.

It exists, it’s ready. And anyone in the world can use it immediately. And it’s free.

01:13:58

On Using the Same Technology the Globalists Use to Control Us, to Liberate Us

Reiner:

So you’re using as you’re saying the tools of enslavement as tools of liberation. You’re using all of the tech, all of the available technology. But instead of what they’re doing — they’re using it to control us — you’re using it to liberate us.

That’s the ultimate goal of this. You’re simply making use —

Everything has two sides as we all know. You can use energy for good and for bad purposes.

So what you’re doing is you’re using all of the technology that they’re using for bad purposes for good purposes.

It’s a very simple approach, but it makes a lot of sense. And if you can protect —

Michael:

That’s exactly what it is.

What I need to add — it’s very important that you brought us back to that thought — is because I’ve noticed that some of our members, and even sometimes people that want to become ambassadors —

(And historically some of our ambassadors that weren’t quite ready to take on the role, maybe because we also don’t know how to interview ambassadors. How do you know whether it’s going to be a good ambassador or a bad ambassador? We don’t know. We take a chance with everyone we bring on board. We’re building this from the ground up.)

So I’ve also noticed that many of our members — well not many — some of our members that are still little hippie-minded, little freedom-bunny-minded, and, you know I love spirituality — I’m the most spiritual bunny in the world if I want to be — but at the same time, I realize that that’s not going to put bread on the table. I need to go and plant the food, to make create the food.

So we’ve had to implement this very strict control mechanism. The way that corporations control their systems ,so no one can steal from them.

We’ve had to set this in motion and set this up for our members to use, so that they can’t get ripped off. No one can run off with their ideas or their money or their businesses.

And sometimes some of our slightly, you know, airy-fairy members don’t yet, don’t quite get it. They think that we now want to become draconian corporations that want to control everything.

No, not at all. We’re not controlling anything. We’re just giving you the platform to use for your own control and protection.

But if you want to be part of One Small Town, you have to be on the platform. Otherwise you can’t be part of One Small Town.

Otherwise, how will the system know whether your members have done work for three hours somewhere in a Siberian village? You’re out there in the Amazon jungle or in the bloody Outback in Australia. How will we know if somebody’s going to contribute their three hours?

So, just like you said. We’ve built this very powerful system, this tool, this monster that is aiding and helping the people to be able to connect and share. And no one can rip them off and no one can steal anything that they’ve created.

So it’s there for the benefit of the community, not for my benefit. Believe me, I’ve sacrificed everything I have to get to this stage. And when I say everything I have, I’m not kidding.

Reiner:

It sounds and looks great.

I will, and Dexter too, we will take a very close look so that we will be able to connect you with all the right people. Because
I think that’s ultimately what it takes.

This idea, if it is going to fly worldwide, needs a lot of supporters from our side of the fence.

The other side, we don’t care about, but from our side of the fence. And they have to be absolutely — they have to be convinced that it works.

And they have to be — I’m sure it work — but they also have to be convinced that it’s safe from infiltration and control.

01:17:53

An Idea Whose Time Has Come

Michael:

Yeah, it’s very important. Thank you for saying that, Reiner.

And it’s people like you — and your influence is vast globally, obviously. Especially during this COVID era, you’ve become a a global celebrity on the social media.

So I’m very grateful that you took this interview or this conversation with us. With me and with Emil.

Thank you, Dexter, for participating. So you’re an absolute joy. I didn’t even realize that you were going to join us from South Africa. So it makes my makes my heart jump even more with joy. So it’s wonderful.

And this is working. It’s an idea whose time has come. It’s taken 17 years to get here.

But watch this space. It’s growing exponentially. And a year from now, who knows where we’re going to be.

We might have 100,000 towns signing up to the One Small Town initiative on the platform. Because the intention is that it becomes a completely automated process that we don’t have to intervene. And that’s why we’re working very, very hard to make sure that everything works — the platform, the blockchain, works.

Because once people want to sign up, it’s gotta be smooth. We can’t have gremlins in there.

Taking a Closer Look at the Technology & the Possibility of Surveillance

Reiner:

Yes, I can see that and the one thing that most people, when it comes to setting up your own self-sufficient systems, have been worried the most about is what do we do about the monetary system.

What about the —

We don’t want to be controlled by CBDC. We want to be absolutely free and not controlled by anyone.

Now, the tools you’re using can be used for two purposes. As I said before, for a good purpose and for a bad purpose.

And from what it sounds like — we’ll have to take a much closer look — but from what it sounds like you’re using it for a really good purpose. So that people will not have to be afraid that somebody is watching over their shoulder and trying to see what they’re doing 24/7.

That’s the one big worry that most people have. So we’ll have to convince them that there is no risk, no danger of this happening in this system.

Otherwise, I applaud you. This is great.

This is probably exactly what everyone’s been looking for from our side of the fence.

Emil:

If I can put in a word with that whole fear. When you make everything local, that fear disappears.

But what happens if someone wants to take control of you when your local environment is running and functioning?

They can’t do it so. So the solution is simple.

Michael:

Yeah, that’s a very important point to bring up.

Yeah, Reiner, thank you so much for your interest.

Thank you, Dexter.

If if you want to discuss anything at any stage, if you want to jump on a zoom call or quiz me on anything, please feel free to do so.

We’re building this up and we do need the influence of people like you, and all the others that you have in your pool of influence.

Let’s get this growing. Remember, this is free.

No one is forced to join One Small Town. And the beautiful thing is that you don’t have to jump off the cliff into uncharted waters to try something new.

No, nobody has to leave their job. Nobody has to stop doing what they’re doing. All they have to do is become a member and contribute three hours a week. That’s all it takes.

Getting More People on Board

Reiner:

It sounds so fantastic, but it also feels good.

So, we’ll have a follow up meeting on this, because we’re gonna have to get some more people on board. Some more people who really, really will be able to help set this up.

I know there are a lot of people out there who’ve been kind of waiting at the sidelines to see if there’s something coming up where they can chip in. A lot of very well-intentioned and very smart people.

But I think maybe this is it.

Michael:

Those are the kind of people that I know you have, obviously, a good reach to. But even more so, I hope that this message also reaches the conscious millionaires and billionaires out there, who know that the investment markets are rotten to the core, that are looking for new conscious, humanitarian investments with consequence and infinite potential for growth.

One Small Town is exactly that. You’re investing into communities, entire communities, that you’re going to help turn upside down and turn into to hubs of creative creation, creative new businesses, food production, health and Wellness, everything you imagine as a powerful individual, powerful financial support. You can take a small town and completely turn it upside down.

From the small towns around the world that are collapsing at an increasingly rapid pace, we can turn that around. And we just need the conscious millionaires and billionaires to realize that One Small Town is that new opportunity that they never imagined would present itself.

Reiner:

The stock market is crashing anyway.

Dexter:

Thank you so much, Michael. I really love what you have presented.

I think for me, one of the core message is that you are basically, through your initiative, you are putting power back into the hands of the individual, back into the hands of the communities.

And I think it is going to be a great success, especially when actually talking from a South African developing country’s point of view. When you look at communities, communities are basically the backbone of any society.

So you cannot even start talking about the society if you don’t look after the best interest of communities.

And as far as what I can see, and to what you have presented, I don’t have any doubt in my mind that this is something that is going to be successful.

This is something that is going to ensure that humanity can continue to thrive for generations to come.

So I wish you all the best, and I am definitely going to take up your offer. I will get your contact details. I’ll actually visit your website as well, get in touch with you. And I would love to actually have another zoom meeting with you.

Thank you so much, Michael. Great success.

Michael:

Thank you, Dexter.

Reiner:

I have nothing to add to that. Now that Dexter has said it, I can only confirm it.

Yeah, this sounds like the best idea. This is the way out of this collapsing system. That’s it.

Michael:

Well, I’d like to thank you, gentlemen.

Emil, thank you for setting it up.

Dexter, thank you for joining us from Cape Town, I believe.

And Reiner, it’s a great honor and pleasure to meet you. I’ve followed your work especially throughout this COVID period, this, this plandemic. And I’m deeply grateful for this meeting.

And I want to end on this note.

If it’s not good for everyone, it’s no good at all.

Reiner:

You’re right.

Thank you very much, Michael. It’s been an honor and a pleasure. Talk to you later.

Connect with One Small Town

Connect with Michael Tellinger

Connect with ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee

Info on Infinity Tokens

(If you have trouble finding a workable link to buy tokens, try here.
Use the menu on the left side to select ‘Buy Tokens’)

See Related: 

One Small Town & the Restoration of Human Freedom: Michael Tellinger Interview With Jerm Warfare

Michael Tellinger: Money Was Created to Enslave Humanity

Reiner Fuellmich: On Standing With the Māori People of New Zealand Who Never Ceded Their Independence

Cover image credit: TheDigitalArtist

Reiner Fuellmich With Peter Mac Isaac: Why Are Canada´s Forests Burning? 

by Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee



In this episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich talks with Peter Mac Isaac, former provincial game warden in Canada about the current situation there, particularly with regard to the devastating forest fires from which humans, animals and nature are still suffering.

This series of wildfires began suddenly in the spring and the causes are being blamed on the narrative of man-made climate change.

Peter Mac Isaac is not afraid to openly express his personal opinion on this and has already had to suffer reprisals from the Canadian government, which has censored his expressions of opinion in every way.

This dictatorial approach of the government under Justin Trudeau to suppress freedom of expression is reminiscent of the harsh persecution of the “Truckers for Freedom” movement in the so-called “Corona Pandemic”, when many courageous people rebelled against the incipient totalitarianism in Canada and received broad popular support.

As an expert in the field of nature and forest protection, Mac Isaac denounces the government’s fatal handling of the forest fires.

Why were no experts called into action and why were they even discouraged from assisting on the ground?

In his opinion, one of the simplest terrorist methods is to frighten people with fires so that they will accept without protest any measures that the government orders, such as a “climate lockdown”.

It was modeled on the “Corona pandemic” with its inhumane measures, after which new sociopolitical and social control mechanisms could be installed.

Through his reporting on the situation in Canada at that time and through the comparison with almost all other countries in the world, it becomes quite clear that everything that happened then and is currently happening are meticulously planned and orchestrated actions carried out by a certain group, namely “Mr. Global” and the correspondingly corrupt and unscrupulous henchmen.

He points out the importance of not being intimidated by this small group, of standing up and speaking the truth out loudly.

It only takes 3% of the people on the planet to initiate a momentum of change, the other 97% who suffer from fear and cognitive dissonance will then join and also find the courage if they have role models.

Because if we do not change anything today, this task will become more and more difficult for our children and our children’s children. We must not remain inactive, the time to stand up is now!

Connect with ICIC

Cover image credit: CharlVera

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich With Dr. Gerd Reuther: Medical History Shows Vaccines Never Did Anything but Harm

 [English translation is embedded in video.]

Medical History Shows, Vaccines Never Did Anything but Harm

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)
July 22, 2023

In this episode of ICIC, Dr Reiner Fuellmich talks to Dr Gerd Reuther, medical doctor and radiologist, about the historical background of medicine and the genesis of diseases and epidemics over the centuries, from the pre-Christian era to the present day.

He points out numerous connections and parallels to so-called pandemics of antiquity and current events, i.e. the “Corona pandemic”. The criers of these “pandemics” have always used the same methods earlier and to this day: the creation of fear and panic.

It sheds light on the role of the Church and its representatives and how far their powerful arm has reached in science, research as well as medicine at all times. These areas were entirely under the control of the Church, and even today these exercises of power continue.

One could call this behaviour opportunistic, since throughout history the Church has always turned to those who were in power. It is currently showing this pattern again, namely when it unhesitatingly fired up the Covid vaccination propaganda. Compared to then, not much has changed:

It was and is about trivial monetary claims to power and ownership, manipulating people for their own benefit, keeping them in dependencies, e.g. on the pharmaceutical industry, and exerting control over life itself.

Historical events such as outbreaks of plague and cholera are analysed and examined for their truthfulness. The history of the origin of “vaccination” and what the belief in its effectiveness is based on are also discussed in detail.

Since when have disease patterns and symptoms been defined and documented, and why were there no “civilisation diseases” in the past? How can it be that not all people fall ill with one and the same “pathogen” and what role do the improper handling of toxins and the natural immune system play?

Dr Gerd Reuther and his wife Dr phil. Renate Reuther, historian and English specialist, have summarised all these medical-historical findings and events compactly on 150 pages in a book entitled “Hauptsache Panik” (Panic is the main thing), which, despite its historical focus, is more up-to-date than ever. For only those who know the past can shape the present and change the future.

Connect with ICIC — telegram | odysee | rumble

Cover image credit: OpenClipart-Vectors & squarefrog

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich With Andrew Johnson on Undisclosed “Black Technology”, the Truth About 9/11, Planned UFO False Flag Events, Steven Greer’s “Disclosure Project”, Directed Energy Weapons, the Cover-Up of Free Energy Already Available, “Psychological Terrorism” & the Attack on Human Consciousness

[TCTL editor’s note: For those who prefer to read the transcript, ICIC has provided subtitles embedded in the videos. This is a 3-part series of videos covering, and cohesively tying together, a wide array of topics related to the hidden history of humanity and the great cover up of the diabolical actions of those who seek to control us. Andrew Johnson has done decades of painstaking research and offers his books free in PDF version. This empowering video series shines light into many dark areas, exposing the game plan of psychopaths who have created the illusion that they rule the world. ~ Kathleen]

9/11, UFO False Flags & Free Energy

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee
with Andrew Johnson, Check the Evidence
July 3, 2023
originally recorded June 14, 2023

In this first of a three part episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich talks with British computer scientist and physicist Andrew Johnson, who in the course of his detailed research on the 9/11 attack and other topics also came across various concepts of state-sponsored terrorism.

It is now an open secret that secret groups within governments, for example, fund terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or fundamentalist groups like the Taliban and others.

Johnson tells how he was drawn into the so-called “truth movement” and began publishing his researched physical facts first in physics forums for discussion.

After all, before he came across these government secret projects and saw the documentary film titled “9/11, The Great Illusion” by Texan George Humphrey, he himself also believed in the narrative of steel and concrete buildings collapsing and pulverizing due to airplane impacts.

Against the background of his physics studies and the presentation of his extensive research, the images presented to the public take on a completely new meaning.

He explains with the help of vivid images and video footage why it is an impossibility to make 1,360-foot towers simply collapse in free fall in less than 10 seconds, as well as many other strange inconsistencies.

In the end, what technology really destroyed the WTC towers and caused them to be literally pulverized?

Can airplanes develop this tremendous destructive power?

Was the attack on the WTC a false flag, and does the so-called “9/11 truth movement” itself also serve to cover up facts and findings and withhold scientific contradictions from the public by not discussing them in the first place?

How far has research progressed and are there already groundbreaking technologies that are being withheld from us?

Once you start thinking and doing your own research, you will never have to believe again. You will become a knower because you will see global events in context and be able to connect the individual dots.

“Have the courage to use your own mind!” is what the philosopher Immanuel Kant demanded in his definition of “enlightenment”.



Video available at ICIC Odysee & Rumble channels

In this second of three episodes of ICIC, the conversation with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and the British computer scientist and physicist Andrew Johnson continues.

Andrew Johnson uses numerous images and video material to establish the connections between the events surrounding 9/11 and many phenomena and events that at first glance appear to be independent of each other.

He connects many dots in his vivid lecture that, when viewed over a longer period of time, create “aha effects” and a desire for further knowledge.

Johnson dives into the depths of narratives in detail, debunking red herrings and deception, pointing out physical analogies, recounting the “coincidental” occurrence of Hurricane Erin a few days before the WTC attack, what unusual effects and impacts storms and tornadoes can have on materials, what field effects are, and what the phenomenon of so-called “cold fusion” is all about.

Why was all funding for this important project completely denied?

What is the significance of the University of Alaska’s recordings of fluctuations in the Earth’s magnetic field with six magnetometers that began shortly before on the day of the WTC attack and changed shortly thereafter, coinciding with the plane crash in New York City, a city 3,000 miles away?

Is this a coincidence or does it prove that magnetic fields have something to do with the events of 9/11?

Why have very few people heard of the so-called Disclosure Project 2001 and why do people suddenly disappear who, for example, made themselves available as witnesses in this project?

Researchers who have worked in depth on the subject of 9/11, the UFO issue and the existence of secret space programs, the use of Free Energy or the exposure of the man-made climate change narrative, and still do, are attacked in the same way as the scientists who dared to question the so-called “Corona Pandemic”.

It is always the same pattern followed by the masterminds and all their paid stooges — even in the “truth forums” — which is why one can assume that these forums, supposedly interested in enlightenment, have also been infiltrated or even founded specifically to prevent a scientific and fact-based discussion.

If one looks at the total picture of all strange events of the last years and centuries, everything is reminiscent of the so called “Corona pandemic”, in which it was ordered not to question anything and all scientists who claimed something else were muzzled by all means.

The purpose was to exert control over our minds, souls and bodies.

Only in a state of fear and ignorance can the masterminds of the “New World Order” agenda control and manipulate us, lie to us and deceive us.

Believe nothing anymore, question everything and check everything yourself.



Video available at ICIC Odysee & Rumble channels

In this third and final episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and British computer scientist and physicist Andrew Johnson talk about more shocking and strange details surrounding the complexities and hidden connections of the topics discussed at length.

Both believe that these hitherto hidden circumstances, events, symbolisms and synchronicities must be made available to the public as widely as possible, without interruption, so that people can begin to see more clearly, use their own minds and finally stop just believing what they are told.

Questions must be asked so that we can and, above all, want to examine for ourselves the things we are taught through the media, “experts,” and in school.

Johnson reports on his experiences and his view of what possibilities we can use to find out about these hidden truths. We, too, have their systems at our disposal, which we can access in order to expand our knowledge, e.g. the Internet. He advocates listening to one another, having discussions with one another, gathering as much different information as possible and then sharing it as well.

He sees intuition as another helpful tool and guide through the thicket of infiltration, lies and deception, as well as constant information gathering and disclosure, to recognize those who have been baited and obviously used as stooges to protect the interpretation of truth or right that their patrons want.

All of this supports the upright people who stand against this tide of manipulation and reprisals against dissenters, such as the courageous judge from Weimar, whose case has caused a worldwide sensation and outrage.

Many questions remain to be answered.

For example, the question of who the masterminds of this inconceivable scenario are.

Does it go even further than the relevant known and notorious organizations such as the “WEF”, the “Committee of 300”, the “Bilderbergers” and “Masonic lodges”?

What perfidious intelligence is behind all this and is capable of planning and coordinating such complex structures over such a long period of time?

What role do so-called “psychological operations” like “Q” and the “Anons” play?

How are Trump, Putin, Assange and Snowden to be classified, and can we explain heaps of phenomena of “synchro-mysticism” (predictive coincidences)?

Is there salvation from “outside” or are we better off relying on ourselves and our common sense?

Questions like these are the beginning to return to self-responsibility and sovereignty, because every person has the power to free him or herself from these shackles of confusion.

Light must be brought into all dark areas, then the big picture will become visible and the darkness will disappear.

Video available at ICIC Odysee & Rumble channels

Connect with ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee)

Connect with Andrew Johnson

Connect with Dr. Judy Wood

Download PDFs:

9/11 — Finding the Truth, A Compilation of Articles by Andrew Johnson
Focused around the research and evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood

What really happened on 9/11? What can the evidence tell us? Who is covering up the evidence, and why are they covering it up? This book attempts to give some answers to these questions and has been written by someone who has become deeply involved in research into what happened on 9/11. A study of the available evidence will challenge you and much of what you assumed to be true.

9/11 — Holding the Truth, A Compilation of notes, commentary and articles by Andrew Johnson
Focused around the 9/11 research and evidence compiled by Dr Judy Wood

Additional Free PDF books by Andrew Johnson

See Related:



Matt Ehret With Reiner Fuellmich: Who Rules the World? Since When?

 

“There’s been two Americas, which is why I named my book series ‘The Clash of the Two Americas‘, because I’m really just trying to find ways to get people to appreciate that there’s not just one America.

“Just like that there’s not just one Britain. There’s not just one Russia. There’s not one China. There’s not one any country.

“That’s a simplistic story given to naïve — basically, it’s a children’s story that has been masquerading as historical fact. It’s not true.

“There are fifth columnists operating against the interests of their people, traditions and cultures embedded within every country to varying degrees.

“And if you don’t appreciate that, you can’t really understand truly anything about how history unfolded — present, or past or deep past.”

~~~

“One thing that somebody taught me, as just good advice, some years ago was that — they could see that I was a bit demoralized and that I was giving too much credence to the power of oligarchies who’ve always seemed to be there with so much power of manipulation, conspiracies and killing good people. And it was really demoralizing me.

“And this person, an old friend of mine, made the point:

“If you look really close you’ll find that empires can never create. They can always corrupt and subvert, but they can’t actually create.

“So the type of quality of creativity emergent out of any type of oligarchical system is a reactive creativity. It’s a perverse creativity. It’s creative to the extent that it has to, at the very best, masquerade as something truth and good, but with the underlying substance of wanting to undermine and destroy that good in the future…”

~ Matthew Ehret

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee
published June 16 & June 17, 2023

Who Rules the World, and Since When? Part 1

In the first part of this ICIC program, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Matthew Ehret, journalist, lecturer and founder of the Canadian Patriot Review, take us back to the historically and geopolitically relevant beginnings of a globally ruling conglomerate that has infiltrated all socio-political structures over centuries up to the present day and revealed its full power in the so-called “Corona Pandemic”.

Matthew Ehret explains with vivid visuals the (geopolitical) history, navigating from the fall of Rome and the emergence of the Vatican, Canada and the British Empire to the City of London and the WEF (World Economic Forum) to the mergers in Freemasonry and theso-called three-letter organizations in the US.

What are the connections between these eras and structures and which actors are known as masterminds? Do they continue to have influence on the development of mankind? If so, how do they exercise it?

Are the historical “facts” we are taught really incontrovertible? Or is it worth taking a deeper look into to the past in order to connect the dots through independent research by way of intelligent and soulful individuals who shed light on history in the service of a better future?



Video available at ICIC Odysee & Rumble channels.

Who Rules the World, and Since When, Part 2

In the second part of ICIC’s program entitled “Who rules the world and since when?”, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Matthew Ehret, journalist, lecturer and founder of the Canadian Patriot Review go into greater detail to contextualize apparently orchestrated historical and geopolitical activities, which at first glance appear to be distinct and separate from one another.

Matthew Ehret’s vivid explanations go on to name names, numbers, data and facts, which together show how the effects of atrocities and their perpetrators and henchmen from the past are still present today, indeed, are being ever further expanded in order to be able to finally implement pre-established goals.

They address questions such as:

Who created constructs like NATO or the EU and why?

Is there a repetition going on, in the style of a “British Empire”, in order to dominate the world and subtly convince people of the necessity of a one-world government as the only, saving solution and thus to gain control over everything and everyone?

Is it not at all about the welfare of humanity, about saving the environment, the climate or health, but but rather about depopulation, eugenics, abuse of power and the suppression to the point of eradication of everything that constitutes being human?

If you take personal responsibility, do your own research, gather and check information without bias, an ever clearer picture of the big picture reveals itself.

It shows that these self-proclaimed “elites” and their masterminds have always used methods such as “create a problem and deliver the solution”, “divide and conquer” and the gullibility of people to be able to realize their inhumane and malicious agendas for the purpose of self-interest and total control over humanity.



Video available at ICIC Odysee & Rumble channels.

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich — ICIC website | Rumble | Odysee | Telegram

Connect with Matt Ehret — Substack | Rumble | Canadian Patriot website

Cover image based on creative commons work of: OpenClipart-Vectors

Reiner Fuellmich: The Māori People of New Zealand vs Perpetrators of the Plandemic

by Stop World Control with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
June 1, 2023

Something will happen in New Zealand, that could impact the world…

An international team of attorneys and scientists joined with the indigenous Māori people of New Zealand. They will start legal proceedings to bring those who are responsible for the covid plandemic to justice.

The justice system of the independent Māori people from New Zealand is ideal to start these lawsuits, because they are beyond the control of the western financial establishment.

These western elitists have corrupted most of the worldwide judicial system to ensure they would never be held liable for their crimes against humanity.

The upcoming legal proceedings will set a judicial precedent for the rest of the world as the evidence that will come to light can be used in any other court.

Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich explains more in this interview with Stop World Control.

 

Connect with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Connect with Stop World Control

Cover image credit: Andrew Turner & Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo

Partial transript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:

David Sorenson:

…This is David Sorenson from stopworldcontrol.com. I have Reiner Fuellmich here with me, who has some very inspiring news and very encouraging news for all of us, which also includes a message for all of humanity.

And it comes from a corner of the earth that most of us would never expect it.

So Reiner, can you tell me a little bit about what you’re involved with?

Reiner Fuellmich:

Yeah, it’s not just myself. It’s the group of international attorneys who have already done something to show the world that we know how to deal with the people who are behind this plandemic. And that was the model grand jury.

But it was myself and Dexter [Dexter Ryneveldt]. Dexter was actually approached. Dexter is a very good friend and attorney from South Africa.

He was approached by someone from New Zealand to get in touch with the Māori because they have something totally unique. They have an independent government. And they also have an independent judiciary.

I’m saying it’s unique because there’s other indigenous people who claim the same thing. But if you take a closer look, you will immediately see there’s a big difference. Because all of the others have either — their sovereignty was taken away at some point by colonialists, for example, or by conquistadors. And then they later were granted their sovereignty back, but only within the framework of the new system. Or maybe they even ceded their sovereignty, and then entered into contracts.

But this is different with the Māori. They have a totally independent government and judiciary.

In 1835 they signed their Declaration of Independence. THEY did this.

This is not a treaty; it’s a Declaration of Independence. And they asserted their sovereignty.

This was with respect to all the settlers who were coming into the country. At that time, I think it was 80,000 Māori and, I don’t know, 3,000 or so settlers. And they said ‘Oh, that’s fine. You can stay here. You can settle here. We’re going to protect you. But we’re the bosses.’
Meaning the tribal leaders. The tribal chiefs are the bosses.

And that is what makes this so unique. On top of this — this is another piece of information that is important — at the beginning of the pandemic or plandemic, as we must now call it, because we know there was never a novel, a dangerous novel coronavirus. It was just a fake. They misused the. PCR test, but we’re not going to go into that.

But at the beginning of this plandemic, the Māori had their own way of looking at things. And that’s when the government — the other, the puppet government (we’ll get into that in a minute) — when they decided to take away the Māori governments’ and the Māori judiciaries’ independence, their sovereignty.

Now, what does that tell you? It tells you that, of course, the puppet government realizes that someone else is in charge, or else they wouldn’t want to take someone else’s sovereignty away, right?

So this is what they did. And in the meantime, this is what I gather (Dexter and I gather) from the talks that we have had for months now with representatives of the Māori government. They had six judges that were supposed to do the job. And none of them was able to do it because they all had to concede ultimately, ‘yes, you’re independent’. Because that’s what the Declaration of Independence says.

Well, there’s two versions of this Declaration of Independence. One is in the Māori language. That is, of course, the one that counts and rules. And then there’s an English translation. The one that the Māori wrote in their language makes it absolutely clear, beyond any doubt whatsoever, that they are the ones who have the sovereignty and who rule the country. Their tribal leaders, rule the country.

David Sorenson:

And, just to be clear, the Māori Indians are people from New Zealand.

Reiner Fuellmich:

Yeah, I should have added that. They’re from New Zealand.

But, as I told you before we started the recording here, they’re not alone.

The other day, I was in another zoom conference with a group of American and Canadian Indians and representatives of South American Indians. And I think they don’t even they didn’t even know that the Māori were a couple of steps ahead of them, but they said ‘We’re going to do the same thing. We’re in the process of doing the same thing. We’re using our own indigenous judiciaries in order to institute proceedings.’

And plus, they said, ‘We’re in talks with 108 Pacific Rim nations. So this. Is bigger than just the Māori. But the Māori are special.

David Sorenson:

What I find very interesting about this, Reiner, is that both New Zealand and Canada, which apparently are nations where a big consciousness of sovereignty is present, that is being activated. But both those nations are part of the British Empire. They are under the rule of the Crown. You know, United Kingdom, Australia. And that’s why the tyranny has been worse in those nations than anywhere else in the world. Because they are the British elites from the City of London.

They have a lot of influence in other nations, but they have completely seized control over Australia, New Zealand and Canada. And it’s so interesting to see that in those nations that resistance is happening.

Reiner Fuellmich:

Yes, you’re absolutely right. They’re all part of the Commonwealth, and that’s why there’s so much power of the original British Empire over them.

You could also, if you look at it from the perspective of the intelligence services, the Five Eyes countries, that would include the United States. The United States are a little bit different though, because in the US they have a lot of people in the population who are armed and have experience with guns. The Second Amendment. So they play a different role.

But as far as the judiciary is concerned, I think the most important one to turn to is the Māori government and its judiciary.

The Māori governments’ Declaration of Independence of 1835 is called He Whakaputangaa and their law or lore is called Tikanga law. And the interesting thing about them is, on the one hand they’re pretty powerful.

If you look at their haka dances, you will see they have nothing to do with genderism and all that stuff. They know what a real man and what a real woman is. And their law, or lore is designed to not just restore the peace among the Māori.

So, for example, if someone is accused of having stolen something from someone else — this is an example they gave me — then, if their Tikanga law, when they apply it, comes to the conclusion, and the judges come to the conclusion ‘yes, he did it’ then the sentence or the decision may be ‘yes, you victim, can go over and take three times as much from the person who stole from you as he took.’

What does that allude to? In my view, this sounds like punitive damages. And since their law is not only designed to restore the peace among the Māori, but it also explicitly says, if that’s necessary, it will be used to restore the peace among the world.

You can see what this may lead to. But these are only the first steps that have now been taken.

And of course, we’re going to be attacked, we’re going to be infiltrated, just like always when something big is happening on the horizon. And we’re going to be framed: ‘They have nothing to do with us. They are idiots. They’re right wing Nazis.’ The usual, you know.

But I think the momentum that we already have now is so strong that they may be able to slow us down, but they’re not going to be able to stop us.

And that when I say us, I mean the Māori because they are at center stage here. Plus the help of the international lawyers. But I think a lot of other people will join this.

We did an interview with Vera Sharav today. And she says this is perfect. This is perfect. The indigenous people are so much closer to nature and spirituality. We should have listened to them a long time ago. And why not have them lead the way this time?

Mike Yeadon and many others will be there as expert witnesses so that the whole truth — the whole truth and not just procedural issues — will come to light.

David Sorenson:

So the plan is to start tribunals with lawyers and experts all over the world on behalf of the Māori people, against the elites essentially, who are behind the whole plandemic.

Reiner Fuellmich:

That is correct. And it’s basically two steps. Two steps.

Step number one is going to be them asserting their authority as the true government of the country. That means that they will have to go after those who are pretending to be the government, the puppet government, as you might call them.

A hundred and something members of Parliament who voted for vaccines, et cetera, et cetera. They’re going to challenge their… not challenge their authority. They’re going to assert their own authority and explain to the world and to the New Zealanders as a whole, ‘We are the ones who rule this country. Our tribal chiefs, we’ve been ruling this country since (I don’t know) the 1400s or so, and nothing has changed because we never gave up our sovereignty as stated in, enshrined in, the Declaration of Independence.’

So that’s step number one. Assert the authority.

And step number two: Go after those who are responsible in New Zealand at first.

And the very unique thing about that is that, for the very first time, we will be able to not just look at procedural aspects or technical aspects. For example, by stating… they did not have the authority.

Because this is what happened a number of times before. There was this great decision written by a woman. A federal judge in Florida last year came down on April the 14th or 18th I believe, and it said the government, the CDC in that case, does not have the authority to issue mask mandates for planes and airports, trains and train stations. That was a brilliantly written decision, but it it did not go into the merits of the case. It did only deal with: does the government have the authority or not?

This time we’re gonna go one or two or three steps further because we’re gonna look at what happened behind the scenes. We’re gonna look at the merits of the case.

And the merits of the case are: There was never a dangerous novel a coronavirus. They invented cases by misusing the PCR test and they wanted these cases in order to declare a public health emergency of international concern, which is an invention by the WHO, which doesn’t have anything to do with the people. They have no authority. There’s no democratic foundation for any of this.

But they use this declaration of this public health emergency of international concern in order to justify using untested new drugs on people.

They misused the PCR test, lied about asymptomatic infections in order to create cases that didn’t exist, in order to be able to declare a public health emergency of international concern, ultimately, in order to be able to use untested new drugs on people. And as we now know from whistleblowers, from Brooke Jackson, for example, from scientists like Sasha Latypova and lawyers like Katherine Watt.

But there’s an interview, a very famous recent interview that Robert F Kennedy Jr. did with Sasha Latypova. They never, ever conducted any trials. They just pretended that they conducted trials. They did something that Robert F Kennedy Jr. called Kabuki Theater in order to make the people believe that real trials had actually happened under the control of the FDA or CDC, when in reality, they didn’t conduct any trials. And the people who were in charge was the military, was the Department of Defense.

And we just we just spoke about this because most Americans know, of course, that propaganda exists. Just like Germans, and others know that propaganda exists. Except they always thought that propaganda, meaning lies, are being used against the enemy.

Since 2014 — and this is something most Americans don’t know, and the rest of the world doesn’t either — since 2014, under the Obama administration, it was made legal to use propaganda against your own people. Well, the famous or infamous Smith-Mundt Act was changed a little bit and since then it is absolutely legal — this happened behind the backs of the people; they don’t know about — it is absolutely legal to use propaganda against your own people.

And something similar, something very similar, if you look at what happened with the so-called vaccinations happened with healthcare, which we know isn’t really healthcare.

You know about the interview we did with Călin Georgescu and when he said everything is the opposite of what they telling us. When the UN talks about peace, they mean war, because people who run the UN are the oligarchs who make money financing wars. When they talk about transparency, they mean lies.

In this case, when they’re talking about healthcare and vaccinations, they’re talking really about using — because this is what it ultimately is (The Department of Defense was in charge. These drugs were not tested.) — using bio weapons, not against the enemy, but against your own people. Because that is what happened. That is what this boils down to.

And those are the facts. Those are the merits of the case that we need to look into. We need to expose this in a court of law by way of getting this, the experts testify, before these courts, this court of law, using Tikanga law…

Mentioned in the above interview:



See Related:

Reiner Fuellmich: On Standing With the Māori People of New Zealand Who Never Ceded Their Independence

https://truthcomestolight.com/maori-people-of-new-zealand-perform-haka-war-dance-in-protest-against-forced-vaccination/

‘Covid-19 Kill Box’ Presentation by Katherine Watt: Video & Transcript

The Role of the US DoD (and Their Co-Investors) in “Covid Countermeasures” Enterprise.

Dr. Mike Yeadon: Why I Don’t Believe There Ever Was a Covid Virus

Reiner Fuellmich: On Standing With the Māori People of New Zealand Who Never Ceded Their Independence

by Reiner Fuellmich
sourced from Reiner Fuellmich Telegram channel
April 23, 2024



Connect with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich at Telegram

Cover image credit: Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: Below you will find a transcript of the video plus additional information on the history of the Maori tribes of New Zealand

Transcript:

I have an important announcement to make.

I am a free, independent human being free in thought and free in action. I alone decide what I want and what I don’t want. And I want real justice.

The Māori in New Zealand, too, are free, independent human beings.

Unlike all other human beings, though, they have never lost or ceded their independence.

It is enshrined in their Declaration of Independence, “He Whakaputangaa”, which was written in 1835.

Their equally-independent, hundreds of years old lore is called Tikanga. It is designed to restore the peace for the Māori and for the whole world.

The Māori remind us who we are — free and independent people who make their own choices and who will not let anyone tell us what to do and what not to do.

My friend and colleague Dexter Ryneveldt and I, on behalf of the international group of lawyers, for many weeks, have spoken with representatives of the Māori government and others who will support this move.

We, all of us, will restore the peace for the Māori and for the world. Because this is what Tikanga lore is explicitly there for, precisely for this moment.

I am Reiner Fuellmich and I stand with the Māori because we love life.

Background information on on Maori people from Te Wakaminenga o Nga Hapu o Nu Tireni website:

On the Māori Government:

1. What is the Māori Government and what is their role?

The Māori Government is the administrative arm of Te Wakaminenga o Nga Hapu o Nu Tireni. The Māori Government help to operationalise decisions made in the national Te Wakaminenga o Nga Hapu o Nu Tireni, or a hapu wakaminenga.

2. What is a Wakaminenga?

It is a Confederation or general assembly of the United Tribes where they met to make decisions and frame laws according to their national constitution “He Wakaputanga o Tino Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni 1835

(Declaration of Independence o Nu Tireni 1835)

3. What jurisdiction does the Māori Government operate under?

The Maori Government operate under “Native Māori Jurisdiction”. It is the first nation jurisdiction of Nu Tireni (New Zealand). It is also recognised in pre and post-treaty British imperial law.

4. What are Māori?

Māori are the native indigenous people of Nu Tireni. Māori are also the first nations people.

5. Why are Māori allowed their own government?

Maori had their own government before Te Tiriti o Waitangi was signed. The Māori Government was first recognised in 1805 and earlier. It is also recognised in pre and post treaty British imperial law.

A Message From the Māori Government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni

The Māori Government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni is the governing body of the Sovereign Nation of Aotearoa Nu Tireni, which existed prior to 1840 and continues to exist in accordance with the Declaration of Independence of 1835  (He Wakaputanga). 

Based on four [4] pillars

• Self-determination
• Sovereignty
• Framing of laws for trade and justice
• Guarantee by the British Crown of protection and access to the Commonwealth in return for mutually agreeable cooperation on equal standing.

The Sovereign Nation of Aotearoa Nu Tireni welcomes all the living men and women of Aotearoa Nu Tireni to unite under its protection and benevolent adherence to all human rights as described in the Nuremberg Code and The UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, including the freedom to choose, be fully informed and to pursue wellbeing and happiness. We reject all forms of coercion and manipulation.

Together, united as the Sovereign living men and women of Aotearoa Nu Tireni, we reject the rules and control of the current totalitarian NZ Government, a corporation listed on the NYSE.

This corporation does not represent the aspirations and values of the living men and women of this country, ignoring our voices is an insidious attempt to impose a ‘new’ normal without our consent.

Thereby we freely choose to abandon the aforementioned NZ Corporation and give our full support to the sovereign nation of Aotearoa Nu Tireni and its representatives and elected government, Māori Government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni.

Read more…

The Declaration of the Independence of New Zealand, signed by a number of Māori chiefs in 1835, proclaimed the sovereign independence of New Zealand prior to the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840.

Barrie Trower With Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: 5G/Microwave as a Weapon (Pt. 2)

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)
February 19, 2023



In the second episode of ICIC titled “5G – Microwaves as a Weapon”, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich continues the revealing conversation with Barrie Trower, former career soldier in the Royal Navy and intelligence officer with MI5 and MI6 and one of the best known experts in the field of microwave radiation and frequencies. They delve into deeper areas of the uses of microwaves, frequencies, 5G, and biological and chemical weapons hidden from the gullible and unsuspecting public.

Scientist Barrie Trower, who also worked as a university lecturer, uses documents and collected data to reveal a dark and disturbing world behind global government facades, where mind-control, heinous human experimentation, geoengineering, weather manipulation, and the dangerous misuse of HAARP have played a major role in world affairs for decades, and have continued to do so even after World War II through projects such as “Operation Paperclip.”

Barrie Trower uses examples to explain how easy it can be for profit-driven and irresponsible individuals in positions of power to take over and control entire countries and their populations via the destruction of agriculture, expropriation, abusive migration, and the use of microwave frequencies, 5G, or HAARP.

These perfidious and dangerous machinations must be made known and aware to the people in order to protect and defend themselves against them. This is the mission of the courageous whistleblower Barrie Trower. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich would like to do his part with ICIC to bring those responsible to justice through a neutral jurisdiction.

https://video.icic-net.com/c/english/videos

https://www.youtube.com/@iciclaw

https://rumble.com/c/c-2316350

Connect with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Cover image credit: tegawi

Addiction and Harm From Cellphones by Barrie Trower
Download PDF

(Alternate PDF Location)

See Part 1:

Barrie Trower With Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: 5G/Microwave as a Weapon (Pt. 1)

Barrie Trower With Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: 5G/Microwave as a Weapon (Pt. 1)

by Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)
February 12, 2023

In this episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich conducts an exclusive interview with Barrie Trower, one of the best known experts in the field of microwave radiation and frequencies, which have been researched and used as weapons in intelligence agencies since the early 1950s. Barrie Trower, a former career soldier in the Royal Navy and intelligence officer with MI5 and MI6 is a scientist and has also been a university lecturer. His knowledge in the field of microwave and 5G radiation is of considerable explosive nature and he feels obliged to bring it to the public, which, just like other whistleblowers, has already put him in life-threatening situations.

He reports precisely about the hazardous, entropic effects of microwaves and the possibility to manipulate nature (e.g. HAARP) and even program the human brain.

The main focus of his research and warnings is on the fatal, pathogenic effects of the misuse of microwave radiation and pulse frequencies, which disable the natural protection of the human system after only six minutes, on women, pregnant women, embryos, fetuses and on newborns. The damage caused is so severe that it brings entire female generational lines to a halt, endangering human reproduction. Even embryos exposed to these radiations can show cellular changes that lead to cancer.

Barrie Trower, a courageous whistleblower and expert warns of the eminent threat to all life on Earth from 5G microwave radiation, and his urgent warning is more timely than ever.



Connect with International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)

Addiction and Harm From Cellphones by Barrie Trower
Download PDF

(Alternate PDF Location)

Cover image credit: pixundfertig

A Million Mengeles? Dr. Reiner Fuellmich With Patrick Wood and Joseph Molitorisz — On the Self-Appointed Elites Obsessed With Playing God & the Chilling Origins of Technocracy

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, International Crimes Investigative Committee
January 22, 2023



In this episode of ICIC, Reiner Fuellmich, his co-host, philosopher Joseph Molitorisz, and their guest, economist and author Patrick Wood, take us on a journey through the chilling origins and evolution of Technocracy, the nefarious figures and ideologies behind its mechanistic power structures and its cunning and covert implementation through social engineering.

Self-appointed “Elites” have hijacked politics and established “puppet nations” from the comforts of their NGOs. They disguise their evil intentions with appealing catchphrases and Orwellian-Speak while insidiously luring the masses into their dystopian world of Transhumanism.

Obsessed with playing God and drunk with power, they have emerged from the shadows and are arrogantly hiding in plain sight.

It is high time for mankind to wake up, stand up, expose and reject their anti-human agenda and co-create a beautiful New World.

Connect with International Crimes Investigative Committee

Reiner Fuellmich & Hans Tolzin on the Shady History of Virology: Have Viruses Ever Been Isolated or Purified?

Isolation vs. Filtration

by International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)
January 8, 2022

German with English subtitles:



[Video available at ICIC-Net and mirrored at TCTL Odysee and BitChute and channels.]

In this episode of ICIC, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and medical journalist Hans Tolzin explore the history virology, the studies upon which modern science relies, and the alleged “evidence” supporting the existence of invisible and dangerous viruses.

Hans Tolzin details the medical historical background of virology starting with the first trials and publications by scientists at the beginning of the 20th century. He reveals serious gaps in field research and points out that there are numerous significant insufficiencies that have never (officially) been pursued or corrected, such as the gross neglect of differential diagnosis.

It is not only the virus theory that gives rise to major criticism. The apparent lack of care and ignorance in professional circles is also worrying. For it is on these assumptions that organizations and institutions are based which are responsible for the health of the world’s population, which propagate medicines, therapies and vaccinations, and which people blindly trust and believe.

After these findings, valid questions arise: Is there really a so-called “isolate” of a virus, especially a “corona” virus or do the available images show something completely different, and if so what? Why is no attention paid to this question and why are discrepancies in the definition of terms tolerated in science?

Mr. Tolzin speaks not of an “isolate”, but rather, of a “high purification” in order to obtain indisputable proof of a “virus”. His findings raise further, controversial questions and have the potential to shed light on the shady history of virology.

Connect with International Crimes Investigative Committee

Cover image credit: geralt

See Related: 

Challenging the Foundations of Virology: Corona Investigative Committee With Dr. Stefan Lanka & Dr. Andrew Kaufman

The Path Paved by Dr. Lanka: Exposing the Lies of Virology

Dr. Stefan Lanka & Dr. Tom Cowan: How We Got Into This Mess — The History of Virology & Deep Medical Deceptions

Mark Bailey With Jeremy Nell on Virus Hunting

A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition)

The Viral Delusion (2022) Docu-Series: The Tragic Pseudoscience of SARS-CoV2 & the Madness of Modern Virology

‘The End of Germ Theory’ Documentary: An Easy-to-Understand, Step-by-Step Analysis of the History of Germ & Virus Theory, the Erroneous “Science” Behind Vaccination & a Close Look at What Really Makes Us Sick — The Big Pharma Cartel & the Deep Deception of Viral Pandemics

Legal Options in Canada – Class Action Lawsuit in British Columbia

by International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC)
December 11, 2022

In this first episode of “Impromptu” , Dr. Fuellmich talks with Kip Warner of Vancouver, British Columbia, about a pending class action lawsuit filed against the provincial health commissioner and the B.C. Crown challenging the “declaration of a state of emergency.”

They also discuss the separation of powers, or lack thereof, their hopes for the Anglo-American legal system, and agree that the Covid crisis has taught the public important lessons in civics.

With the addition of the “Impromptu” broadcast format, ICIC expands its ability to speak on an ad hoc basis about a current and particularly important event or issue and to highlight it in a condensed manner.



To keep up to date on the lawsuit, follow the work of The Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy (CSASPP).

Connect with ICIC

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: (September 28, 2022) A Statement Regarding the Events of the Past Few Weeks

by Reiner Fuellmich
September 28, 2022



Original video available at Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel.

Video mirrored at TCTL BitChute, Odysee & Brighteon channels.

Reiner Fuellmich: On His Recent Separation from the Corona Investigative Committee & Where His Work Will Be Focused Going Forward

Reiner Fuellmich Explains his absence on the Corona Committee and tells us what’s next!

by Farmer_Jones
September 18, 2022



Original video available at Farmer_Jones BitChute channel. Mirrored at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute & Brighteon channels.

Truth Comes to Light Editor’s Notes (September 19, 2022):

Discussed during this interview —

• What is happening with the Corona Investigative Committee.
• Why Reiner Fuellmich has been absent from recent committee sessions.
• What caused the separation. Viviana Fischer is now in control of the Corona Investigative Committee.
• Reiner is creating International Crimes Investigative Committee (ICIC), broadening the scope to look at all parts of the Great Reset, including the Ukraine crisis, global warming, breakdown of supply chains, etc. There will be a focus on showing people what they can do to stop this and to go for damages.
• Farmer Jones brings up the Dr. Wagh [Poornima Wagh] controversy.
• Farmer Jones mentions “fact checkers” involved in investigating Poornima Wagh and their attacks on Reiner Fuellmich. He speculates on possible set up of Dr. Lee Merritt as well.
• Reiner explains issues with his telegram account which is being controlled by an IT person who is aligned with Viviana Fischer. Wolfgang Wodarg is now aligned with Viviana Fisher and her new version of the Corona Investigative Committee.
• Reiner will be setting up a new telegram account and will be back within 10 days to 2 weeks within information about the International Crimes Investigative Committee.

References:

Reiner Fuellmich interview with Stew Peters: https://rumble.com/v1jyjft-dr.-reiner-fuellmich-speaks-out-on-vax-genocide-global-class-action-lawsuit.html

On September 2, 2022, this announcement by Viviane Fischer was posted at the Corona Investigative Committee telegram channel: https://t.me/CoronaInvestigativeCommittee/131

For background on Poornima Wagh controversy:

Virologist Dr. Poornima Wagh With Dr. Lee Merritt: “It’s Not Just Virology That’s a Scam. Most of Pathology Is Actually Fraudulent.” “People Are Waking Up Very Quickly.” “I Think This Is the Beginning of a Tsunami.”

Dr. Lee Merritt on the “Occult” Controllers of Science | She Also Responds to the Recent Controversy About Her Interview With Poornima Wagh

Poornima Wagh With Regis Tremblay: On the Questioning of Her Credentials & Public Assaults on Her Character [Updated September 3, 2022] 

©2022 Truth Comes to Light. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

Connect with Farmer_Jones at BitChute

Attorneys Reiner Fuellmich & Michael Swinwood With Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: The Corona Crisis and the Criminalization of Justice

“We’ve really reached a fork in the road. And that fork in the road is — to your left is the apocalypse and to the right is the awakening.” ~ Michael Swinwood

by Reiner Fuellmich, Michael Swinwood with Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research
September 2, 2022



[Video available at Odysee and BitChute.]

Prof. Michel Chossudovsky interviews Reiner Fuellmich and Michael Swinwood on the legal issues underlying the corona crisis.

Show Notes [compiled by Truth Comes to Light editor]:

• Fraudulent PCR test

• Genocide of indigenous people for centuries — “all roads lead to Rome”

• Jesuits involvement in Europe and South America — control with threat of death for those who do not comply. Michael Swinwood: “Notice, they actually described the way law is. They said, ‘If you accept the crown and the cross, we will grant you privileges and exemptions.’ That’s law everywhere… This is the beginning of the social credit system that’s coming our way.”

• Vatican and United Nations both support the corona measures.

• Michael Swinwood: “How do you put together a legal procedure when the game is fixed? The game is fixed… And this is what  people don’t seem to understand nor will they accept. That the institutions that you spoke of [Vatican, UN, WHO] were designed and made to bring about what we’re in right now.”

• Within the founding document of United Nation’s UNESCO, Julian Huxley, who wrote the document in 1946, said, “Eugenics philosophically and psychologically is not well accepted but it’s about time that it is.”

• Aaron Russo said Nick Rockefeller told him nine months before 9/11 that there would be a big event, then there would be a war on terror, and then we’re going into Iraq…

• Michael Swinwood talks about the lawsuit that he filed challenging the PCR test and how it was deemed “frivolous and vexacious”.

• Michael Swinwood: “What we have right now is that 80% of the world is dead asleep.”

• Reiner Fuellmich gives an account of lawsuits around the world. He spoke of three criminal cases against Bill Gates in India.  He shared about lawsuits in Europe and the United States and the difference in the responses from governments when positive judgments were given.Reiner Fuellmich: “In my view, right now, the only place where it makes sense to file a — either criminal complaint or a civil case against the people who are behind this (those who we can see — the Bill Gateses, the Faucis, the Drostens and all the others, Black Rock, Pfizer) — the only place where it really makes sense is the United States. But you do have to do two things. You have to find the right venue where there’s a judge or a court who will give you a fair hearing because that’s what it takes. You have to get a fair hearing in order to be able to show the evidence to the court of law. And the other thing is you have to find the right attorney. It’s not just someone who has all the experience and knows all the law but someone needs to be on our side ’cause you can’t trust anyone else.”

• Michel Chossudovsky asks about covid vaccine deaths and possibility of lawsuits.

• Reiner Fuellmich shares the ruling of a judge in Italy and also a judge in Sicily challenging the legality of mandatory vaccination.

• Michel Chossudovsky talks of the effects on mental health including children committing suicide.

• Michael Swinwood mentions that four states in the US — Virginia, Kentucky, Massachusetts & Pennsylvania — are actually commonwealths and not states. They belong to “her majesty the Queen”. He talks about the implications of attempting to bring lawsuits in those states.

• Reiner Fuellmich talks about why it is not “a slam dunk” to win lawsuits against all the criminals even though the evidence is clearly there. “The system has been infiltrated for at least the past 30 years through this Young Global Leaders program of the World Economic Forum, which has been in existence since 1992 — which is the result of a CIA-funded program. The World Economic Forum was founded by Klaus Schwab but he did it because he first went to the CIA-funded program at Harvard University where he met Henry Kissinger… The same thing happened with medicine, the judiciary, the media — everything has been infiltrated.”

• Michael Swinwood talks about what lawyers are really up against when taking on these giants who have incomprehensible amounts of “blood money”.  “The second world war was brought on by the same people who are bringing this on. The first world war was brought on by the same people who are bringing this on. It’s all family related. It’s all the elitists. And it’s all these people who have been talking this way forever. “

• Filmmaker Aaron Russo’s experience with the globalists is mentioned again [see America: From Freedom to Facism]. Although they never clearing stated which film they are referring to, they might be referring to the interview with Alex Jones shortly before Aaron Russo’s death.

• Reiner Fuellmich: “We’re not giving up, Michel. That’s not it. We just want the people to understand what we’re facing. Because once they understand, we’re going to have their support even if it takes this case outside of the system.”

• Michel Chossudovsky: “It’s no use having a protest movement because we’re not protesting. We’re questioning the legitimacy of the decision makers.” 

• Reiner Fuellmich: “We have to expose the fact that these people have always played and paid both sides.”

Reiner Fuellmich: “This doesn’t mean, however that this is totally hopeless. It’s not. Because more of us are waking up. Here in Germany, it’s maybe 10 to 20 percent of the population that is beginning to understand what is going on. The resistance is growing by the day. In the United States, the polarization is much more in our favor. It’s between 40 and 50 percent of the people who do not want to go along with this anymore. And they have guns. And that makes a big difference… That’s why I think that this war will be decided — in our favor, of course — in the United States…

“This is speculation of course, but if you look at the totality of the evidence, if you look at how the government does not dare defy or ignore a federal judge’s decision, how the people do not want to play along — most of them — and how they are even armed. That makes a big, big difference.”

• Michel Chossudovsky: “I think you’re absolutely right. In a sense, it comes from the heart of the beast, so to speak. There’s an element of dialogue and analysis in the United States, which I think is very important. But, I think just to put it in perspective, what we are living is very similar to the Spanish Inquisition… It’s the globalist inquisition… The inquisitorial doctrine that they have is extremely fragile. The narrative is extremely fragile. And that narrative, that consensus, has to be broken.”

• Reiner Fuellmich: “Michel, the most important thing that people have to understand is that if they don’t open their eyes to the true facts, it’s going to be — this is a question of life and death… They’re coming after us. They’re trying to kill us. These vaccines are non-vaccines. They’re designed to kill us.”

• Michael Swinwood: “I think it’s really important to understand also that there’s a spiritual component to all of this. And that we can go on and talk about the facts, and the evidence, and all of the things. And you can conclude very rapidly that what you are dealing with are lies, manipulations and inducements to bigger fear. That’s essentially how you can summarize what we’re really in.
  

“But if you understand from a cosmic perspective, we do live in a cosmos. It’s not just the planet earth. We live in a solar system. We live in planets that are having their own transmutations and that’s what’s happening on the mother earth in this moment in time.

“We’ve really reached a fork in the road. And that fork in the road is — to your left is the apocalypse and to the right is the awakening. The apocalypse is what the elitists seek to promote. Their script — you’ll find their script in the Book of Revelation…

“But really humanity is faced with that fork in the road where they have to make a bigger choice. The bigger choice is about what they do inside… Because all of this is an inside job. We’re being treated to an inside job but we need to work on our own inside. Because as we change ourselves, we change the world… The challenge for each individual human being is to come to the realization of just what spirituality means to them. It doesn’t have to be identified as a religion. It just has to be identified as a relationship to Spirit…”

Connect with Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich & Corona Investigative Committee

cover image modified from creative commons image by Foundry  

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: International Criminal Proceeding Resembling a Grand Jury Investigation — as a Procedural Foundation for Future Indictments — to Begin Early February 2022

[Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: February 5, 2022 update — The interview below took place at the end of January 2022. See Day 1 of the Grand Jury proceedings that took place today. You can follow the work of the Corona Investigative Committee, including Grand Jury proceedings at Odysee.]

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

The following transcript is a brief excerpt from the video (found below the transcript) wherein Reiner Fuellmich explains the nature and purpose of upcoming international criminal proceedings which are being organized  by the  Corona Investigative Committee.

Please see the Jesper Johansson‘s article below the video for further details. The press conference in Brussels, mentioned by Reiner Fuellmich in the video, can be found here: “A Call to Europe: The Future of Our Children is at Stake” – CHD Europe – Press Conference, Brussels January 23 , filmed by Oracle Films, View at Children’s Health Defense Europe.

Transcript excerpts:

“We’re gonna start an international criminal proceeding — which is a model proceeding — very soon, probably at the end of next week.

[…]

There’s going to be three days of discussions with the experts.

[…]

And this proceeding, of course, is not going to be filed in one of the existing courts of law, of the old system.

But we’re using an institution, a procedural institution, which is the American grand jury investigation, as a procedural foundation for what we’re doing.

We have real lawyers, a real judge, real experts and real witnesses with whom we will tell the story. And that is the main objective.

[…]

We want to get indictments against those figureheads who we think we should go after.

That’s Drosten. He invented the PCR test, claiming that his version of the PCR test can tell us something about infections. Full well, knowing that he’s lying.

Two, Mr. Fauci in the United States. He’s the one who pushed the corona issue there.

And three, Tedros, whose WHO recommended these lies to the entire world. Two lies basically —  asymptomatic infections, which don’t exist, and the PCR test can tell us about infections.

Then Bill Gates, as one of the figureheads who are making money out of this.

And probably Pfizer and Black Rock.

Pfizer as a representative of the pharmaceutical industry. They’re making a lot of money right now. And Blackrock as the financial institution for which much of the money is being funnelled into our systems to gain control, through the global corporations, over all of us.

But this particular proceeding is only designed to get indictments.

Its second biggest purpose is to give people… through a real legal proceeding, a full picture of what’s really going on — on all three levels.

There’s one level which deals with the question ‘Is are really a pandemic?’. Well, there is a pandemic, but it’s not a corona pandemic, it’s a PCR test pandemic.

And as soon as you reach this conclusion, the question is ‘Well, if it’s not about health, what is it about?”.

Two things that they want to divert our attention from. One is the criminal activities that they, the other side, has been conducting through the financial industry — which is really a misnomer because this is not an industry. They don’t produce anything. They they destroy everything. So a better word is probably financial mafia because they’ve been looting and plundering our public coffers for the last three, four decades, maybe longer.

And it was about to implode, this whole system was about to implode, during the swine flu. And, no, that is not a coincidence. It was then that it was very, very obvious to all of us that the so-called financial industry had been stealing money from us.

The major platform on which they discuss this is, of course, the Davos clique’s World Economic Forum in Davos [Switzerland]. It was very, very obvious at the time that they have really been stealing our money.

[…]

We now understand, of course, that our politicians are not our politicians anymore, but they’re their puppets. Many of them have gone through their own politician production facility which is the Young Global Leaders program.

[…]

The real goal of this pandemic is to be able to shut down, destroy, our economies for the benefit of American platforms — like Uber, as far as the taxi business is concerned, Amazon, for all retail business. And we don’t quite know what to make of the role of the Chinese and this. What we do know is that they are part of a group of people who are dividing the spoils amongst themselves — because they’re trying to take over our car industry, probably the US car industry as well.

So this is quite a complicated picture but not too complicated. And we believe that through this proceeding, we can make this visible to everyone.

And once people understand this — and this is the ultimate goal of this — they will understand that it’s they who have to get up and fight.

They not only have a right to resist but they have a duty to resist. Because this is about life and death.“

~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

 



”No mercy for these b*stards” – Reiner Füllmich announces Grand Jury Proceeding in February

by Jesper Johansson, Perspektiv
January 26, 2022

The head of the Corona Committee, Dr. Reiner Füllmich, announced that the Grand Jury Trial will take place in early February, during which evidence against the four architects of the pandemic will be presented to a panel, structured like a court of law, based on natural law. The end result of a grand jury proceeding is a decision whether or not to indict. In this case the general public will be the jury. The result of this process will be a better informed public that knows about the big picture and thereby understands why indictments must occur. Dr Füllmich believes the narrative have now shifted, and that he, with the help of the people with good intentions all over the world, now is ready to send the perpetrators of the pandemic ”straight to hell”.

At 2:01:20 in to the following link, you can watch the press conference in Brussels 2022-01-23 featured in the interview with lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich, lawyer Vivianne Fischer and WHO whistleblower Dr Astrid Stuckelberger:

https://tube.childrenshealthdefense.eu/videos/watch/8f79f755-36eb-4699-a473-681a09c1259b?

More information about WHO whistleblower Dr Astrid Stuckelberger: https://www.astridstuckelberger.com/bio/

International lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich and lawyer Vivianne Fischer are both part of the Corona Investigative Committee team:

https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/

Prosecution notification of the SWEDISH DRUG AUTHORITY to the Uppsala Prosecutor by assistant professor, physician and doctor Björn Hammarskjöld. Eighteenth of January 2022 (In Swedish):

http://eueeshealthcare.bloggproffs.se/2022/01/18/aklagaranmalan-av-lakemedelsverket-till-aklagarkammaren-i-uppsala-av-ass-professor-lakare-och-doktor-bjorn-hammarskjold-2022-01-18/

Prosecution notification of the SWEDISH DRUG AUTHORITY to the Uppsala Prosecutor by assistant professor, physician and doctor Björn Hammarskjöld ADJUSTMENT. Twentieth of January 2022 (In Swedish):

http://eueeshealthcare.bloggproffs.se/2022/01/20/aklagaranmalan-av-lakemedelsverket-till-aklagarkammaren-i-uppsala-av-ass-professor-lakare-och-doktor-bjorn-hammarskjold-komplettering-av-datum-2022-01-20/

Prosecutor’s complaint against the SWEDISH DRUG AUTHORITY to the Uppsala Prosecutor by assistant professor, physician and doctor Björn Hammarskjöld DIARIEUTSKRIFT AM-9377-22 (In Swedish):
http://eueeshealthcare.bloggproffs.se/2022/01/23/aklagaranmalan-av-lakemedelsverket-till-aklagarkammaren-i-uppsala-av-ass-professor-lakare-och-doktor-bjorn-hammarskjold-diarieutskrift-am-9377-22/

According to professor Hammarskjöld the Swedish government has spent 2.6 Billon € on testing for rtRT-PCR tests up until week 2 of 2022. Hammarskjöld citizises the decision since there has not been a single life saved by the money spent doing all these tests.
Just during weeks 1 and 2 of 2022, there has been almost one million tests done costing 110 Millon € (In Swedish):

https://kostkunskap.blogg.se/2022/january/regeringsblasningen-eller-vad-kostar-ett-rtrt-pcr-test.html

Transcript from the interview:

0:50 Summary of the last interview ”Reiner Füllmich and 50 lawyers: The vaccines are designed to kill and depopulate the planet”.

02:15 Press conference in Brussels with Astrid Struckelberger, Reiner Füllmich and Vivianne Fischer who were participating in the large rallies taking place. When Füllmich was about to hold his speech at the rallies, the police dispersed the crowd.

04:30 Indictments will happen against the people accused of causing the world wide problem with the pandemic; Drosten, for promoting his version of the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test kit claiming these tests can say something about infectious diseases. Anthony Fauci, head of the NIAID for pushing the false narrative in the USA, Tedros Adhanom for spreading inaccurate and unscientific recommendations through the WHO such as asymptomatic infections and the PCR-tests for diagnosis. Bill Gates as a figurehead for profit in this agenda. Pfizer as a representative for the pharmaceutical industry and Blackrock as a global financial company.

06:15 Why is the pandemic happening? Füllmich views this as a distraction from criminal activity the same way the mafia works. He takes as an example how the financial crisis in 2008 stole assets from the people without the politicians doing anything about it.

08:35 The real goal number 2, according to Füllmich, is to shut down our economy, in favor of companies such as Über and Amazon, by destroying the retail system. The struggle is about life and death. The public institutions are waking up to the corruption and starting prosecutions against the perpetrators in the USA.

10:35 ”No mercy to those b*stards”. ”The people who are pulling the strings are truly evil”.

12:23 The grand jury investigation will go on for four weeks. How to get people to understand the new system of justice that will be used to handle the case against the suspects? Natural law, which Füllmich means leads directly to human rights, will be used. He believes the world is in a state of war and thus, the natural law which can be used in war are applicable in handling the pandemic crimes. Why following bad orders is not an excuse and may lead to jail.

15:10 A tour in the United States will start in March and will go on until May in order to inform the American people about the truth regarding the pandemic. Famous persons within this field will participate.

16:27 What date will the grand jury begin? Füllmich would say that his assumption made in the interview published on the tenth of January saying ”the narrative will shift within two to three weeks” was accurate. Boris Johnson in the UK was getting massive criticism for ‘partying’ and not following his own restrictions.

19:45 Professor Björn Hammarskjöld has filed a complaint to the Medical Board of Sweden (Läkemedelsverket) due to components in the vials not listed in the medical description. Professor Hammarskjöld has himself witnessed two persons becoming magnetic in the area of injection of the so called corona vaccines.

21:40 Norwegian doctors i Oslo discovered material in the vaccines which is not supposed to be given to humans and is not legal according to citizen journalist Ulf Bittner.

23:04 Pfizer did not include the information on these so called vaccine chemicals in the documents submitted to the EMA – Why not? Almost all the studies on the vaccines are totally false, according to Füllmich. This, he believes was done in order to mislead the people.

25:35 LOT-numbers and lethality

26:39 WHO whistleblower Astrid Struckelberger comments on the African tactics of experimentation. WHO created the cases needed to declare a pandemic. Bill Gates who is funding the WHO, involved Drosten to construct the foundation to declare a global pandemic on false premises by PCR- results.

28:48 How close are you to getting the full picture of what is going on? The experts giving their testimonies to the Corona Committee include; former vice- president of Pfizer Dr Mike Yeadon, Nobel prize winner Professor Luc Montagnier, former investment banker and Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Cathrine Austin Fitts, and developer of mRNA technology Dr Robert Malone. Füllmich believes the full picture of what is happening is almost complete. Legal proceedings are being done so that people will understand and then find the will to to take their freedom back.

31:50 The people participating in the trials are also filing cases in their own courts of law. Füllmich hopes people who believe the narrative of the pandemic is false will follow their example.

33:25 How likely is it that anyone will enforce the punishment to the people prosecuted if they are convicted – when taking in to consideration that the trial is happening outside the normal judicial system? Füllmich explains there will be no sentences and the process is being done as an investigation which will lead to indictments. The judiciaries in Europe are too corrupt to be used for this purpose.

37:15 Professor Hammarskjöld sums up the costs of the performed PCR-tests in Sweden. According to Hammarskjöld, nearly one million PCR-tests have been done during the first two weeks of 2022 in Sweden at a cost of 110 euro per test. The total amount of money spent on the Swedish PCR-tests he reports are now 2,6 billion Euros. This can be compared to the annual costs of the ICU care units, which is only 3 billion Euros. Ten people are dying per day with covid in Sweden.

39:31 There are two camps in the Corona Committee regarding the existence of the virus. One claims there has been a scientific, correctly performed isolation of the virus, while the other claims the opposite. This is however not something that Dr Füllmich views as a question which has importance to the case or has relevance to the trials. He believes the entire system needs to be rebuilt from scratch, and this includes the field of science and research.

Connect with and support the work of Perspektiv

Reiner Fuellmich Update on International Lawsuits & Continued Exposure of Globalist Agenda: “The Vaccines Are Designed to Kill and Depopulate the Planet.”

“…Everyone who is involved in this is going to be held liable — the politicians, the media people, everyone.

The most important thing, as you’re alluding to the European Union, is that this is only possible to happen because it was done from far away. Because people are trying to make us do what they want us to do — people who we have nothing to do with, people who we never elected. This is a totally undemocratic process that we’re looking at, the result of which is killing us.

If we in all regions– in Sweden, in our regions in Germany, in our separate little regions in Denmark. all of these places — if we had been in charge, this would never have happened.

That is why we have to disconnect from all of these global corporations which are nothing but predators. They don’t produce anything. They just steal…

We have to set up our own our own supply chains, agricultural supply chains, health supply chains, energy supply chains, and we have the means to do it.

We — those who will not get the shot — we are the ones who have all the good people with us, the smart people. All the others who are following orders, they know nothing. They don’t understand anything. In the end, they’re going to need us to save them, if there is a way to save them.

But we have to keep in mind that it is the regions. We have to connect with each other, to exchange the best ideas. But only we in our communities, in our separate regions, only we know what is best for us.

And we will not ever let any of these bastards tell us what to do, ever again. This is not going to happen. We’re exposing them and this is going to be the end of the line for them.”

~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Reiner Füllmich & 50 lawyers: ”The vaccines are designed to kill and depopulate the planet” 

by Jesper Johansson, Perspektiv
with Ulf Bittner, citizen journalist & blogger
January 10, 2022



Original video available at Perspektiv Rumble channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

After hearing the witness statements to the German Corona Investigative Committee by former vice president of Pfizer dr Mike Yeadon who has been a scientist for 36 years, lawyers with Reiner Füllmich draw the same conclusion: The injections normally called Corona vaccines are designed to experiment on the human race and to find out what dosage of a yet unknown toxin is needed in order to kill people.

The mortality rate linked to the vaccines, according to Yeadon, is traceable in terms of lot numbers of the different batches, as some batches appear to be more lethal than others. When taking a look at the evidence available, the main goal with the injections all over the world is global depopulation, according to the lawyers involved.

Dr Füllmich told Perspektiv that the lawyers preparing an international law suit were no longer in doubt: Poisoning and mass murder through so called Corona vaccines is intentionally being perpetrated on the peoples of the world.

Citizen Journalist Ulf Bittner from EU/EES Healthcare blog and Sverige Granskas stated in the interview that the situation with traceable lot numbers and injuries and death related to lot numbers is similar in the different health care regions of Sweden. Bittner is in contact with a vaccine coordinator who has provided documents to keep track of how many people have been injured and lost their lives related to the different batches of the so-called vaccines.

01:00 Different numbers on the barcodes on the bottom of the vaccine doses are placebo which has been given to politicians according to a Slovenian chief nurse. Is it the same in other countries?

1:54 Mike Yeadon and the LOT numbers of some shots of the brands Moderna, Johnson& Johnson and Pfizer/Biontech are related to much higher mortality than for the other manufacturers.

3:52 The producers of the so-called vaccines are experimenting with the correct dosages to kill people according to Dr Füllmich. This according to the Corona Investigative Committee, constitute compelling evidence for punitive damages and attempted mass murder. They are intentionally killing people.

08:30 Lawyers from India have filed complaints for premeditative murder.

09:55 Mike Yeadon as a witness for the coming legal action against the perpetrators.

10:44 Everyone who critizises the wrongdoings of the governments of the world is being called a ‘right wing extremist’. This has also happened to the internationally renowned scientist Mike Yeadon.

13:05 CDC withdrew the recommendation for the PCR-tests diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 from 31/12-2021. PCR- tests are the foundation of the pandemic. Why is Anthony Fauci now doing a 180-degree turn?

17:25 At least a million dollars per person will be claimed in punitive damages if the lawsuit is successful.

18:33 Previously only ten percent of all adverse effects were reported. In the situation the world is right now, the team estimated that in fact only one percent of all adverse effects were being reported.

19:25 CEO of Life insurance company from Indiana USA with 100 billions of dollars in assets said: ”Over the span of this past year there has been an excess mortality of 40 percent”. This is believed to be due to the injections.

21:05 What substance in the vials makes them so lethal? Is it Graphene Oxide/graphene hydroxide?

22:37 Any vaccin is a poison, it is the dosage which makes the difference. This is not a vaccine, as a vaccine provides immunity, while these products demand incessant injections. Either a vaccine works or it does not.

24:40 This is not gene therapy either, since a gene therapy means exchanging a broken gene with a fixed one. This is more like experimenting on people, and trying to kill us.

25.15 The doses are not tested by governments, while governments will be keeping the contracts hidden from the public for at least 55 years. How is this affecting the possibility of getting people punished? Dr Füllmich goes through all the lies paving the way for the tyrannical situation the world is now in.

28:25 The vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The producers are experimenting on lethal doses of poison. Everyone now taking part in intentional malicious infliction of harm will be punished.

30:05 How sure are legal experts about the conclusion that Mike Yeadon has drawn from this, that it is all about depopulation and intentionally killing people through injections? If close to 50 lawyers are of the same opinion, it is regarded as “irrefutable proof”.

32:08 Batches of injections in Sweden can be traced by an application.

32:45 Füllmich is in cooperation with people working within the secret service of Germany who do not wish to take the injections.

34:15 Dr Lee Merritt on combat pilots in the USA refusing to get the shots. According to Dr Füllmich, Dr Merrit explained: ”They understood that if they were forced to [get vaccinated] they were going to get killed.”

35:15 Information is being collected on batches in Sweden from every region, the Swedish health authorities (Folkhälsomyndigheten) and medical board (Läkemedelsverket). Every batch is traceable through an application. There is economic reward for the Swedish regions which manage to get more people injected. One of the expert lawyers involved in the upcoming court hearings is a specialist on Nuremberg Trials.

38:45 How will the trials be performed, and through what legal structure? A common design, the same structure as for the Nuremberg trials.

39:40 Free choice should reign for members of the European Union. Consumers of health care have consumer rights. Fraud means misleading the people and consumers of health care.

42:00 The so called vaccines are an adulterated product put on to the market. According to Mike Yeadon there is a law in the US that will make everyone liable for the harms created by the adulterated product. Toxins are being put into the vials other than the known lipids etc, which the people who took the vaccines never consented to.

43:40 The importance of decentralization of power and national independence rather than global organizations such as the European Union telling the people what to do. Disconnecting from the banking system, NGO:s and creating independent and strong agricultural supply chains, energy supply chains etc.

46:15 When are the trials going to take place? How will the indicements happen and how will the trials be held? One of the goals is to inform people and expose the wrongdoings by involving the alternative media so that the mainstream media won’t be able to ignore the trials. The crew is working on a new system of law in the USA, Africa and Germany.

50:48 Dr Füllmich believes the world is close to a tipping point and the whole narrative will fall apart very very soon, maybe in a couple of weeks or months.

54:13 Robert Malone, Robert F Kennedy and Mike Yeadon and others involved in exposing the agenda are in contact with each other, and a tour is planned with these whistleblowers in the USA in March

Connect with Jesper Johansson & Perspektiv at Rumble

Reiner Fuellmich at Worldwide Freedom Rally in London: “Without Any Doubt the Dark Side Will Lose This Inhuman Battle Against Life and Creation”

by Oracle Films
July 29, 2021



Video is available at Oracle Films Odysee and BrandNewTube channels.

Transcript — prepared by Truth Comes to Light editor:

Dear friends, something is happening.

The entrenched front of the makers of corona is crumbling and dissolving. And that is because the power of US. The power of humanity is greater than the power of those on the other side, the inhumans.

Humanity with emotions will always prevail over digitalization and artificial intelligence.

I say this after the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee has, since its inception on July 10th 2020, heard testimony from more than 110 highly-respected experts from all over the world on the questions of how dangerous is the virus, how dangerous are the anti-corona measures to human life and health and to the economy, and how reliable is Drosten PCR test underlying all these measures worldwide.

Well, in the meantime, even the WHO has conceded that the virus, regardless of whether it is fully or semi-artificial or natural, is no more dangerous than the common flu — with an infection finality rate of .14 percent.

And accordingly, Singapore agrees and has removed all measures. These measures are as deadly and destructive as a third world war would be.

And the Drosten PCR test, which was declared by the WHO — under control of Bill Gates and the Chinese — as the gold standard for detecting infections is an outrageous fraud.

First, a PCR test per se cannot detect infections. And second, the Drosten PCR test, with 45 cycles of amplification, has been set to show 100 percent false positives as so-called corona cases.

Because, from 24 cycles on, the test lacks anything even remotely scientific. And at 35 cycles it produces at least 97% false positives according to Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer. Only these so-called cases, which have in reality been faked with the test — with the help of this test with the basis for the determination of ‘a public health emergency of international concern’ in February of 2020.

The acronym, by the way, for ‘public health emergency of international concern’ is PHEIC, pronounced ‘fake’.

This is the termination of a public health emergency of international concern, in turn, was needed by the global alliance of the pharmaceutical and tech industries in order to achieve the goal of so-called vaccinations, which was their true stated intention right from the beginning.

Only on the basis of this public health emergency of international concern, that is on the basis of this state of emergency, is it possible at all — according to the rules of the WHO — to use untested drugs on humans by way of this emergency approval.

All other steps — the social distancing, the lockdowns, the mask mandates, etcetera — served only to give the population: firstly, a visible reason for an otherwise illusionary panic created solely through psychological operations and, secondly, to subjugate them so that they would ultimately agree even to the so-called vaccinations.

In reality, of course, these vaccinations are experimental gene therapies without any scientific study as a basis. There is neither a reason nor even a necessity for them.

Firstly, there is no evidence for a pandemic. Only the fake Drosten PCR test with its false positives is responsible for the public health emergency of international concern, as explained above. And, secondly, there are effective alternative treatment methods. And, as a rule, a human immune system that is very well equipped to fight viruses — even man-made viruses.

Apart from that, the vaccinations lack any effectiveness, as a very recent study by Science Files has just proven concerning BioNtech Pfizer.

And, on top of all this, these shots are extremely dangerous as the latest official figures from the U.S. prove. There, according to VAERS — the official register for adverse events after vaccination — 45.000 people have died after vaccination in 180 days since the beginning of these so-called vaccinations.

However, as our colleague Tom Renz learned from a whistleblower. these numbers were kept secret and false numbers were given — namely only about 11,000 deaths after vaccination. Even worse.

In normal times, it can be assumed that, at most, between one and 10 percent of all the real vaccination adverse events are reported at all. But we do not have normal times.

The mainstream media and the politicians, which are both under control of the global corporations and the global NGOs, are doing everything in their power to make registration of vaccination adverse events as difficult as possible. So that, in truth, we are in all likelihood looking at approximately 500,000 dead after vaccination in the U.S. alone.

This puts the other side in a panic because this is not part of their plan. That is why this other empathy and emotional side now drops all masks. In France, for example, the government is threatening to make vaccination mandatory and introduce compulsory vaccination. And in the U.S.. the president wants to censor even private communications — even if it concerns completely correct statements whose only problem is that they’re not in line with the official fraudulent lie as announced by the government.

In the meantime — in India, in South Africa, in the U.S., in Canada and in France — very large legal battles have been set in motion or are now being set in motion.

In Portugal, Austria and Germany excellent court decisions have come down stating that the completely unsuitable Drosten PCR test cannot be the basis for any anti-corona measures.

The Berlin Corona Investigative Committee already now has accumulated extremely incriminating evidence which proves that this was never about health.

Rather, Mister Global — as former investment banker in U.S. Deputy Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Catherine Austin Fitts calls the global corporations, NGOs and their backers — Mister Global is exclusively pursuing these goals with their measures:

– Destruction of regional economies to make the world’s population dependent on global supply chains.

– Shifting the wealth of the world’s population from the bottom to the very top — that is to the super rich.

– Population reduction, which means genocide. And gaining total control over the remaining population.

We are obviously dealing here with megalomaniac psychopaths and sociopaths who should have been stopped a long time ago. But now the time has come for this.

That is why millions of people are demonstrating all over the world today.

One other aspect needs to be emphasized. In addition to our legal work and in addition to our efforts and shining a bright light on these dark truths there is a third level, namely the spiritual or religious or cosmic (call it what you will) level. And this level is crucial.

This is what a story shows us, which a German doctor told us last week. He wanted to withdraw money at an ATM and went to the lobby of a bank for that purpose. There stood an elderly woman wearing a mask, who fearfully backed away from him because he was not wearing a mask. She said he had to wear a mask because otherwise she was afraid of infecting herself and then her husband. The doctor told her ‘no’, she shouldn’t be afraid. And then he went up to her, took off her mask and took her in his arms. The woman began to cry and said that no one had hugged her for more than a year.

That’s what this is all about. It is humanity versus inhumanity. We are human. We can laugh, cry, sing, dance and hug. The other side can’t. Because the other side has no access to the spiritual side.

Therefore, without any doubt, the other — dark side — will lose this inhuman battle against life and creation.

Connect with Oracle Films

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich and Corona Investigative Committee

Dr. David Martin w/ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: “This, My Friends, Is the Definition of Criminal Conspiracy…This Is Not a Theory. This Is Evidence.”

The video clip below is one interview from the 60th session of the Corona Investigative Committee, livestreamed on July 9, 2021, which can be found at Corona Ausschuss – Ausweichkanal channel.

In this interview, Dr. David Martin shares a summary of his decades of research related to this global takeover via “scientific and message control”, following a trail left via US patents. His company M-CAM has reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around SARS coronavirus, including a comprehensive review of the financing.

Contributing to the conversation are Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg,  Attorney Viviane Fischer and Prof. Martin Schwab (legal advisor to Corona Investigative Committee). See below for partial transcript and links.



[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Partial transcript, provided by Truth Comes to Light editor.

Dr. David Martin:

“…we took the reported gene sequence, which was reportedly isolated as a novel coronavirus — indicated as such by the ICTV (the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses of the World Health Organization). We took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly “novel” and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020. And what we found, as you’ll see in this report, are over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.”

###

“As a matter of fact, very specifically in 1999, Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill… where the NIAID built an infectious replication defective coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words, we made SARS. And we patented it on April 19, 2002 before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia which, as you know, followed that by several months. That patent — issued as US patent 7279327 — that patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew that the ACE receptor, the ACE-2 binding-domain, the S1 spike protein (and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen) was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.”

###

“…my organization was asked to monitor biological and chemical weapons treaty violations in the very early days of 2000. You’ll remember the anthrax events in September of 2001. And we were part of an investigation that gave rise to the congressional inquiry into not only the anthrax origins… And our concern was that coronavirus was being seen as not only a potential manipulable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate. And so our first public reporting on this took place prior to the SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001. So you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here 20 years later, having 20 years earlier pointed that there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus.

But after the alleged outbreak…I will always say alleged outbreak because I think it’s important for us to understand that coronavirus as a circulating pathogen, inside of the viral model that we have, is actually not new to the human condition and is not new to the last two decades. It’s actually been part of the sequence of proteins that circulates for quite a long time.

But the alleged outbreak that took place in China in 2002 going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filing by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. And this topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise. Because in addition to filing the entire gene sequence on what became SARS coronavirus, which is actually a violation of 35 US code section 101, you cannot patent a naturally occurring substance. The 35 US code section 101 violation was patent number 7220852. Now that patent also had a series of derivative patents associated with it. These are patent applications that were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter. But these include US patent 46592703P (which is actually a very interesting designation), US patent…7776521. These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus but also covered the means of detecting it using RT-PCR.

Now the reason why that’s a problem is if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself, and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100 percent of the providence of not only the virus itself but also its detection — meaning you have the entire scientific and message control.

And this patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research coronavirus. The only problem with that statement is it’s a lie.

And the reason why it’s a lie is because the patent office, not once but twice, rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because the gene sequence was already in the public domain. In other words, prior to CDC’s filing for a patent, the patent office found 99.9% identity with the already existing coronavirus recorded in the public domain. And, over the rejection of the patent examiner and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overrode the patent office’s rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS coronavirus.

Every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the patent office. This is not something that’s subtle. And, to make matters worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. Last time I checked, if you’re trying to make information available for the public research you would not pay a fee to keep the information private.

I wish I could have made up anything I just said, but all of that is available in the public patent archive record — which any member of the public can review. And the public PAIR, as it’s called that the United States patent office, has not only the evidence but the actual documents which I have in my possession.

Now, this is this is critically important. It’s critically important because fact-checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel coronavirus, designated as SARS-CoV-2, is, in fact, distinct from the CDC patent. And here’s both the genetic and the patent problem. If you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003, again in 2005, and then again in 2006, what you find is identity in somewhere between 89 to 99 percent of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what’s called the novel subclade of SARS-CoV-2.

What we know is that the core designation of SARS coronavirus, which is actually the clade of the betacoronavirus family, and the subclade that is been called SARS-CoV-2 have to overlap from a taxonomate point of view. You cannot have SARS designation on a thing without it first being SARS. So the disingenuous fact-checking that has been done saying that, somehow or another, CDC has nothing to do with this particular patent or this particular pathogen is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences and it’s also beyond credulity when it comes to the ICTV taxonomy — because it very clearly states that this is in fact a subclade of the clade called SARS coronavirus.

Now, what’s important is on the 28th of April — and listen to the date very carefully because this date is problematic. Three days after CDC filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus in 2003 — three days later Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, company that was set up in Maryland — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals on the 28th of April 2003 filed the patent on antiviral agents on treatment and control of infections by coronavirus. CDC filed three days earlier. And then, the treatment was available three days later.

…So ask yourself a simple question. How would one have a patent on a treatment for a thing that had been invented three days earlier?

…The patent in question, the April 28th 2003 patent 7151163, issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, has another problem. The problem is, it was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was actually allowed.

So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero.

It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published — because CDC had paid to keep it secret.

This, my friends, is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory. This is evidence.“

###

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“This could well blow up into a RICO case ultimately.“

###

Dr. David Martin:

“…It is a RICO case. And the RICO pattern, which was established in April of 2003 for the first coronavirus, was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS-CoV-2 show up — when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the vaccine research center at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel subclade.

How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?“

###

“…the 5th of June 2008, which is an important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Program in the United States. actively took an interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon.

June 5th 2008, Ablynx, which as you know is now part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the novel feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. And you heard what I just said. This is the 5th of June 2008.

Specifically, they targeted what was called the polybasic cleavage site for SARS-CoV, the novel spike protein, and the ACE-2 receptor binding-domain, which is allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2. And all of that was patented on the 5th of June 2008.

And those patents, in sequence, were issued between November 24 of 2015 — which was US patent 9193780. So that one came out after the gain of function moratorium. That one came after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East.

But what you find is that then in 2016, 2017, 2019 a series of patents all covering, not only the RNA strands, but also the subcomponents of the gene strands, were all issued to Ablynx and Sanofi…we have countless others…all identifying in patent filings that ranged from 2008 until 2017.

Every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published by the single reference publication, the novel bat coronavirus…the paper that has been routinely used to identify the novel virus, unfortunately, if you actually take what they report to be novel you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS-CoV-2 — specifically as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, ACE-2 receptor binding-domain and the spike protein.

So the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious — you know where I’m going with this. Okay?

There was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that. And by 2016 the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralph Baric, was not only poised for human emergence but it was patented for commercial exploitation — 73 times.”

###

“My favorite quote of this pandemic was a statement made in 2015 by Peter Daszak…reported in the National Academies Press publicatio, February 12, 2016, and I’m quoting: ‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.’“

###

“…every study that’s ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring.”

###

“And I’m going to give you the biggest bombshell of all to prove that this was actually not a release of anything, because patent 7279327 — the patent on the recombinant nature of that lung-targeting coronavirus — was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in 2018.

Now here’s the problem with that. Under the Bayh-Dole Act, the U. S. government already has what’s called a ‘march-in right’ provision. That means if the US government has paid for research, they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand or at their whim.

So explain why in 2017 and 2018 suddenly the National Institutes of Health have to take ownership of the patent that they already had rights to, held by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And how did they need to file a certificate of correction to make sure that it was legally enforceable? Because there was a typographical error in the grant reference in the first filing. So they needed to make sure that, not only did they get it right, but they need to make sure every typographical error that was contained in the patent was correct on the single patent required to develop the Vaccine Research Institutes’ mandate, which was shared between the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, in November of 2019, and Moderna, in November of 2019, when UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine — a month before an outbreak ever happened.”

###

“And just to answer a question that was asked slightly earlier, the script for this was written first January 6, 2004…At the conference called SARS and Bioterrorism… introduced the notion of what they called the New Normal… which is the language that became the branded campaign that was adopted by the World Health Organization… The first introduction of the New Normal campaign, which was about getting people to accept a universal pan influenza, pan coronavirus, vaccine was actually adopted January 6, 2004.

…I’m not going to belabor many more points other than to say that it was very clear that…Moderna knew that it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to the development of a vaccine in March of 2019. And this is a very important date because in March of 2019, for reasons that are not transparent, they suddenly amended a series of rejected patent filings, which is a very bizarre behavior. But they amended a number of patent filings to specifically make reference to an intentional or accidental release — I’m sorry — their term ‘deliberate release’ of coronavirus. So in March they amended four failed patent applications to begin the process of a coronavirus vaccine development…”

###

“…and we know, as I made reference to before that in November, they entered into a research and cooperative research development agreement with UNC Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein to put inside of the lipid nanoparticle — so that they actually had a candidate vaccine before we had a pathogen allegedly that was running around.

What makes that story most problematic, beyond the self evident nature of it, is that we know that from 2016 until 2019, at every one of the NIAID Advisory Council board meetings, Anthony Fauci lamented the fact that he could not find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine — which is what was his favorite target he was trying to get the population to engage in this process. And what becomes very evident with Peter Daszak, Ecohealth Alliance, UNC Chapel Hill and others — and then, most specifically by March of 2019 in the amended patent filings of Moderna, we see that there is a epiphany that says ‘what if there was an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen?’. And what makes that particular phrase problematic is it is exactly recited in the book ‘A World at Risk’ which is the scenario that was put together by the World Health Organization in September of 2019.

So, months before there’s an alleged pathogen — which says that we need to have a coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release — which by September 2020 must put in place a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control and the acceptance of a universal vaccine mandate.“

###

“That was September of 2019. And the language of an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was written into the scenario that ‘must be completed by September 2020’.”

 Download PDF:

The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier 

Learn more about the Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de​
For anonymous reports: https://securewhistleblower.com​
Connect with the Committee on Telegram: https://t.me/s/Corona_Ausschuss​

Connect with  OVAL Media on Telegram: https://t.me/s/OVALmedia​

Connect with Dr. David Martin: https://www.davidmartin.world/

see related: Dr. David Martin Releases ‘The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier” | 205 Pages, 22 Years of Research

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich w/ Investigative Journalist Whitney Webb: The Devil Is in the Details — On the Hidden Hands Behind the Unfolding Global Takeover

The video below is clipped from the 59th session of the Corona Investigative Committee which was live-streamed to YouTube on July 2, 2021.  The entire recording of this session has since been removed by YouTube censors.

The primary participants in this wide-ranging conversation are Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Whitney Webb. Additional questions and comments are offered by Attorney Viviane Fischer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.

Groups, corporations, governments and individuals mentioned in this detailed exposé include Google, Microsoft, AstraZeneca, Deutsche Bank, Bravo Capital, Sequoia Capital, Wellcome Trust, Jenner Institute, GlaxoSmithKline, US military, CIA, DARPA, the Pentagon, UK government, UNESCO, Bill Gates, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Jeffrey Epstein, Regina Dugan, Vaccitech, Galton institute, George Church, Israeli intelligence, Robert & Isabel Maxwell, Melanie Walker, Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum, Davos Agenda, Amazon, Wellcome Leap… and the list goes on.

Reiner Fuellmich:

“If I take a look at the names that you’re mentioning, I mean many of these people are obviously stark raving mad.”

Whitney Webb:

“Yes, a lot of people in these elite circles are totally crazy. But that’s because, of course, that they have completely isolated themselves from any sort of interaction with regular people or the general public, and basically live in these in these bubbles where they have these obsessions like achieving immortality through transhumanism and all these different technologies they’re developing.”

…

“This is how the elite view us now — hackable animals.”

…

“In my opinion the elite definitely thought that, specifically by now, they would have artificial intelligence much more advanced than it has been. They’re very desperate to trigger what they refer to as ‘the singularity’. It’s very possible that they’ll never be able to do that because essentially the singularity is making a conscious machine. And these are the most unconscious people in the world trying to replicate consciousness.”

by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Corona Investigative Committee & Whitney Webb, Unlimited Hangout
July 2, 2021



[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Follow the work of Whitney Webb at Unlimited Hangout: http://unlimitedhangout.com/

Learn more about the Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de​
For anonymous reports: https://securewhistleblower.com​
Connect with the Committee on Telegram: https://t.me/s/Corona_Ausschuss​

Connect with  OVAL Media on Telegram: https://t.me/s/OVALmedia​

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the Planned Pandemic, International Lawsuits & Moving From Globalist Control to Regional Community Organization

by Jorn Luka, The Trueman Show
June 10, 2021



Original video available at Jorn Luka YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Connect with Jorn Luka

UK Investigative Reporter Brian Gerrish w/ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & Viviane Fischer — Corona Investigative Committee

Brian Gerrish:

“What we are facing is calculated. And it’s a mistake to call it madness because it’s very precise, it’s very calculated. And we need to understand that in order to be able to deal with what we’re facing.”

Reiner Fuellmich:

“That’s very interesting to hear because we have come to the conclusion that the other side, as we call them, is using two major tools. One is, of course, psychology — psychological operations. And of course the other, which transports this psychological operation, is the mainstream media.”

by Corona Ausschuss and Oval Media
May 28, 2021



This interview is an excerpt from a series of interviews: Sitzung 54: Zwischen Nudging und Nebenwirkungen which can be found on youtube.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Topics include:

• The global manipulation of humanity during this planned “pandemic”
• Mind control via psychological operations including Neuro-linguistic Programming (NLP)
• Awakening humanity and visions for the future

Link to Mind Space document as mentioned by Brian Gerrish
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf

Connect with Brian Gerrish at UK Column
https://www.ukcolumn.org/
Read more about Brian Gerrish’s background
https://www.ukcolumn.org/writer/brian-gerrish

Learn more about the Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de​
For anonymous reports: https://securewhistleblower.com​
Connect with the Committee on Telegram: https://t.me/s/Corona_Ausschuss​
Connect with  OVAL Media on Telegram: https://t.me/s/OVALmedia​

James Corbett w/ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & Viviane Fischer — Corona Investigative Committee

“Until we understand the real agenda here — which is to control humanity at the
genetic level — I don’t think we’ll be able to get a grasp at what’s going on.”
~ James Corbett

by Corona Ausschuss and Oval Media
May 31, 2021



Original video available at Corona Ausschuss Odysee channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute and Brighteon channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Topics discussed include:

• The Great Reset
• The history of eugenics in its many forms
• The biosecurity state
• Technocratic control of humanity
• Unfolding global lawsuits
• Global efforts to raise awareness and to create the society we want

Link to James Corbett’s documentaries including How Big Oil Conquered the World: https://www.corbettreport.com/corbett-report-documentaries/

Connect with James Corbett: https://www.corbettreport.com/

Learn more about the Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de​
For anonymous reports: https://securewhistleblower.com​
Connect with the Committee on Telegram: https://t.me/s/Corona_Ausschuss​
Connect with  OVAL Media on Telegram: https://t.me/s/OVALmedia​

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich With an Update & Overview of International Legal Efforts: “This Is a Fight of Good Against Evil.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich in Conversation with James Delingpole

Dr Reiner Fuellmich in da house!

by James Delingpole
May 22, 2021



Video available at James Delinpole’s Rumble, Odysee and Vimeo channels.

Topics covered:

• Reiner Fuellmich’s background
• How Reiner Fuellmich became aware that something was seriously wrong with the official narrative about the pandemic
• How the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee was formed and how it proceeded to grow into what is now an international endeavor.
• The fraud of the PCR test and the man who “invented” it without ever having seen the virus (Christian Drosten)
• The agenda behind this planned pandemic which has been planned for at least 10 years. He mentions Event 201 which took place in October 2019 and it’s connection to The World Economic Forum.
• The role of pharmaceutical companies creating a “public health emergency of international concern” and the end game of getting everyone vaccinated with an experimental gene therapy.
• How the stage was set to push this genetic experiment onto the whole world with the rollout of Emergency Use Approval in the US and Conditional Use Approval in Europe.
• How covid cases, that previously did not exist, were created by using the fraudulent PCR test
• Upcoming lawsuits — with 200 to 300 lawyers cooperating worldwide in various class action and individual lawsuits.
• The damages caused by this agenda that includes population reduction (including serious adverse affects by untested “vaccines”) and destruction of small businesses.
• GAVI, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & ties to The Great Reset agenda.
• The role of the mainstream media in pushing and protecting this corporate agenda.
• Censorship of truth by mainstream media, social media, youtube and google — and the corruption within governments that pushes the agenda.
• How some of the agenda is not going according to plan. One of the worst effects is all these adverse effects from the vaccinations that are happening worldwide.
• Regarding the possibility of class action lawsuits for those who were harmed or kill as a result of the covid vaccines, and in light of the fact that the manufacturers of the vaccines claim immunity from such suits, Reiner Fuellmich responds:
  “They claim that in the United States and in some other parts of the world there’s no liability for them. They’re immune. They claim immunity. But there’s no immunity from intentional infliction of harm. And this is what this is.”
• Crimes against humanity — The Nuremberg Code and it’s protections against medical interventions without full informed consent.

Connect with James Delingpole via his Delingpod podcast or Rumble, Odysee and Vimeo channels

Cyprus Attorney Alexis Stylianou w/ Reiner Fuellmich on Legal Efforts Against the Anti-Corona Mandates: “This Is Child Molestation on a Grand Scale”

Clip from video by Oval Media and Corona Ausschuss
May 14, 2021



Available at Odysee, BitChute and Brighteon.

This video is a clip from Special Session: International Legal Offensive – Part 3.

Cyprus Attorney Alexis Stylianou shares legal efforts and upcoming cases in Cyprus. The global lockstep approach to this corona crisis agenda is discussed.

Reiner Fuellmich also gave an update on the search and seizure at the home of the Weimar, Germany judge who ruled that schools could not require students to wear mask or social distance. See articles here and here for background information.

Brief excerpts from the conversation:

Alexis Stylianou

We agree this whole thing is the biggest scam ever in the history of the planet. So we’re first going on the illegality of measures because basically the health minister is just passing on decrees and they never go through parliament. So it’s basically rule by decree.

[…]

We’ve got another another thing which I’m planning to lodge very, very soon. It’s going to be another complaint to the police. In Cyprus we have to go to the police first before we can file a private criminal proceeding. so first we have to report to the police and if they don’t do anything then we go privately as a private criminal case.

So we’re going to do it using the Oviedo Convention which states that you can’t force anyone to — or you can’t force or coerce anyone to do a medical intervention on their body without their free and informed consent. So the decrees by the minister which is telling us that in order to go to work you need to do a PCR test or a rapid test, that is coersion. That is definitely not doing it with your free will…

In Cyprus luckily enough when this convention was ratified into law they actually made they actually made it into criminal offences.

Reiner Fuellmich:

And now all of a sudden you have the government violating this law.

###

Alexis Stylianou

I don’t know what what vaccinations are going to — what role the vaccinations are going to play in all this because there’s going to be a lot of deaths I suspect…from the vaccinations.

Reiner Fuellmich

In my view the most important argument is — because we want to attack at the foundation of this– is that the Drosten test is a lie and that the notion of asymptomatic infections is a lie.

But as far as the so-called vaccinations are concerned, they are important because something has gotten out of hand. Something went wrong. This is not part of the plan…

…Now something went wrong. All of a sudden people are alarmed and many people do not want to get vaccinated anymore. Like we heard from the from our friend, Leslie Manookian from the United States, a little less than 30 percent of the population got vaccinated. And all of a sudden this whole thing dried up. Interest in vaccinations is completely gone. All of the vaccination centers are empty.

Alexis Stylianou

We’ve had one of the person on the team of health experts from the government say that there’s a chance that five to ten percent of people who will be vaccinated will not respond to the vaccine and might die…

…So when you think about that– imagine if they vaccinate 60 percent of the population we have. That would be around, I think, four to five hundred thousand people. What’s 10 percent of that? Sixty thousand people to die. And they’re telling this to the public.

Reiner Fuellmich:

This is called predictive programming. They’re preparing us…

###

Reiner Fuellmich:

We’ve listened to a number of other experts today who explained to us about the dangers of masks and the dangers, in particular, of the PCR test. This is child molestation on a grand scale — what’s happening in the schools with the PCR tests.

[…]

We must stay in touch because that’s the way to win this. We have to have this international legal community. And maybe in the end an international corona court.

The livestream of Special Session: International Legal Offensive – Part 3 appears to have started after the session had already begun. Because they were running late, not all of those scheduled to speak were available. Featured:
▫️Tony Roman (Restaurant Owner, USA)
▫️Gina Cloud (Human Rights Activist, USA)
▫️Elli Dillmann (Representative of Concerned Lawyers Network)
▫️Peter Weis (Attorney, Slovakia)
▫️Michael Verstraeten (Attorney, Belgium)
▫️Prof. Saji N Hameed (Prof. of Atmospheric Sciences, India/Japan)
▫️Alexis Stylianou (Attorney, Cyprus)

Learn more about the Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de​
For anonymous reports: https://securewhistleblower.com​
Connect with the Committee on Telegram: https://t.me/s/Corona_Ausschuss​
Connect with  OVAL Media on Telegram: https://t.me/s/OVALmedia​

Attorney Michael Swinwood With Reiner Fuellmich: “The Consciousness of Humanity Is Really What’s at Play Here”

Michael Swinwood is a Canadian lawyer. In this video he shares conversation with the Corona Investigative Committee (Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer) while he is visiting Peru.

Dominic Desjarlais, also from Canada, briefly rejoins the conversation. He had shared his testimony earlier in this session of the special committee.



This video is a clip from Corona Investigative Committee’s Special Session: International Legal Offensive – Part 1 by Oval Media and Corona Ausschuss and can be found at our Brighteon and Odysee channels.

See: Corona Investigative Committee: International Legal Offensive Part 1 — In Conversation With Lawyers from Germany, Italy, Great Britain, United States, Canada, Austria, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile

Excerpts from Transcript:

Michael Swinwood

…Here’s an intelligent human being. Criminal law lawyer. Very, very experienced. Very sharp. Very street smart. In complete fear. And not wanting to investigate because “those people” [Fauci et al.] are intelligent and they’re telling the truth.

So, that consciousness is predominant. It’s in a lot of places. Where people do not wish to make the investigation. So this is where the danger lies. The danger lies in those who don’t want to pay attention to what’s happening around them, see what’s happening around them, and do something about it.

They are quite content to listen to officialdom lying to them and then follow their instructions. That’s what the problem is. 100%.

~*~

You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make ’em drink. And the horse has to be thirsty.

~*~

So the consciousness of humanity is really what’s at play here. And how we’re able to influence or raise the consciousness of humanity is really the task.

~*~

The consciousness is stuck. The reason it’s stuck is because of brainwashing.

~*~

The idea that we’re operating under the rule of law it’s not so. We’re operating under the rule of covid. And the rule of covid is: There’s a pandemic and you should shut up.

~*~

By increments we’re implementing tyranny… So, why is there a spiritual component to this?… Well, the essence of the spiritual component is, number one — all of us are divine beings having a physical experience, that’s the first thing. People don’t know, people don’t understand that aspect of things because of dogma. The dogma has been put on people to take away the idea of their own divinity and put it in the hands of someone else. Between you and Spirit. And, therefore, that tyranny started with that idea.

That laying dogma on people and pulling them away from their own relationship to Spirit. So what we have to come to grips with as human beings, as individuals, is our own connection to Spirit. Because everything that you see everywhere happens because of Spirit. It’s the breath of the divine that allows everything to grow and breathe and be. And so within that, that’s a very powerful force.

Much more powerful than the tyrannical force of this insane consciousness that is imposed on humanity. It represents the dark force. And what we represent in the end is the light force.

So, therefore, we have an added reservoir in addition to law. And what that added reservoir is our relationship to Spirit that we can connect with every single day. And, therefore, give yourself the ability to have magic, magic, come into your life. And you’ll be amazed at how things will change just by virtue of making that connection…

I am a firm believer that if we think that way and act that way that it’s going to impact the agenda… I think you’ve put your finger on it before — they’re bound to make mistakes. They’re bound to make mistakes. And we have to be alert to the mistakes they make and go where that entry allows us. So I think the combination of and a real understanding of our connection to Spirit, and enforcing that upon ourselves every day — in other words, making a remembrance…

Reiner Fuellmich

I think we’re all in agreement on this. I wouldn’t have said a little more than a year ago, but if you look at what’s happening it’s global insanity and there’s no other way to make sense of this than on a different level. And that — what else can it be than spirituality. And the law alone won’t suffice this time.

Dominic Desjarlais

I agree it’s a combination of both. Do our job as lawyers. But also, our job as lawyers has to be to educate people and raise people’s consciousness and awareness about this whole thing.

Michael Swinwood

So that leads me to the second thing is — Do you think we can organize enough lawyers to take an approach together to either in the International Rights Tribunal or some other international forum?

Reiner Fuellmich

Yes, I do. In fact, Michael, when we started today’s session — hours and hours ago — we started with the German portion. And there’s a former judge who’s advising us and who has been advising us for a while. He’s a retired judge. He is a — he and his wife are child activists. Very smart man. Very experienced. And we, all of us, are beginning to realize that this is about the children. And he — it is about institutionalized child abuse. Probably much worse…

This group of lawyers plus this group of experts that we have — yes, we are a very powerful group of people and we can even make it to the International Human Rights Court or the International Criminal Court.

 

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich and Corona Investigative Committee

Leslie Manookian With Reiner Fuellmich: “People Have No Idea How Controlled Everything They See Is”



This video is a clip from Corona Investigative Committee’s Special Session: International Legal Offensive – Part 1 by Oval Media and Corona Ausschuss and can be found at our Brighteon and Odysee channels.

See: Corona Investigative Committee: International Legal Offensive Part 1 — In Conversation With Lawyers from Germany, Italy, Great Britain, United States, Canada, Austria, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile

Excerpts from Transcript:

Leslie Manookian

People have no idea how controlled everything that they see is. And when I say everything they see, I mean not just the newspaper, not just television news, but in the medical journals, what the hospital research centers, what all of the research centers and government agencies are putting out.

And the reason for that is twofold.

One is that the vast majority of research — I mean almost all research is done either by the pharmaceutical industry or taxpayer/government grants that are taxpayer funded. And government has policies, right? They promote vaccines. They promote all sorts of things. They promote the pharmaceutical industry in many, many ways.

And the pharmaceutical industry is the number one advertiser in all media outlets — 70% of television news in the United States in a non-election year…

They also are the biggest purchaser of what is called medical journal reprints. So, when medical journals are put out, doctors subscribe and libraries and other institutions subscribe, and that’s one portion of the revenue stream for these journals. But a gigantic portion — if I remember correctly, 40% in some cases, maybe 50% — is actually what’s called journal reprints. And so what happens is the pharmaceutical industry funds the research.

They oftentimes have ghost-written research so they just pay someone to write it. And this has been revealed in lawsuits against Eli Lilly and other corporations over time. And then they’ll just put a doctor’s name on it who wants to show that they’ve been “published”. And then they get it published in a peer-reviewed journal. And then they pay for reprints of that peer-reviewed journal.

So they get an article, really glossy and nicely printed of their research that’s been published in a journal. And then they send it out all over the world.

So if you’re a medical journal, and that’s 40% of your revenues, are you going to be very discerning about what you publish? Or are you going to publish things that are very sympathic to the pharmaceutical industry? And that’s what happens.

And then there’s another piece of it which is really important…

In 1992 the Prescription Drug User Fee Act was passed in the United States by the Congress. And it was updated, I think, in 2007 and then more recently. And what this did was actually facilitate industry capturing FDA. Okay?

So it used to be that FDA was funded by, just by taxpayer dollars. Right? It was a government entity. Now, FDA drug approvers, drug reviewers, 50 to 60% or their salaries are paid directly by the pharmaceutical industry itself. More than that even in some years…

So you have a situation where the FDA drug reviewers are beholding to the pharmaceutical industry itself, rather than to the people that they are supposed to be protecting — the public. So it is just so corrupt.

And then there’s a third wheel of this, which is that it’s not just the pharmaceutical industry but in the first decade of this century the Gate’s foundation gave a billion dollars — a billion with a B — to the media in the United States. Okay? A billion dollars. And what did they do it for? They gave them — “gave” them, right? — they gave them a billion dollars in order to make sure they were trained, and educated to portrays the Gates’ foundation perspective “accurately”.

Reiner Fuellmich

Accurately. Yeah. Whatever that means… The thing is it’s more than a spider web, it’s a swamp of corruption.

Leslie Manookian

It’s massive collusion.

Reiner Fuellmich

It’s everywhere. It includes all areas of society. It includes politics. It includes industry. It includes — probably includes some of the courts as well. We know that it does here in Europe. We know it does in Germany. And there are few people out there who are capable of understanding what’s going on.

We do have to have a great reset but quite different from what the other side wants it to be. Quite different.

Leslie Manookian

For the last 20 years they’ve been really laying the groundwork for “this moment”. What they did was, in the United States in particular, they introduced — after 9/11 — they introduced the Patriot Act which allowed warrantless search and seizure, and mass surveillance for Americans. And that was literally produced and passed 45 days after 9/11. That’s just impossible. Right? And within a couple of weeks the Model State Emergency Powers Act legislation was introduced and it’s been ratified in whole or in part by, I think, 43 states last time I looked. And what that did was confer extraordinary police power to health departments and governors in the event of a disease outbreak.

Reiner Fuellmich

Of course, once they have that power they will never give it up again.

Leslie Manookian

Exactly. And then in 2005 the PREP Act which conferred more power on the secretary of Health and Human Services and provided immunity from any kind of prosecutions — or legal and financial liability for vaccines — or any kind of medical products used during an emergency. And then you fastforward to 2012, [20]13 and [20]16 and they legalized propagandizing American citizens, set up the program to do it and funded it. So anything that you read or watch or see anywhere in the media could possibly pure lies and subversion by our intelligence agencies in order to manipulate and control the populace.

Reiner Fuellmich

You know the good thing is that it’s all coming out into the open now. All of it. All of it. Slowly but surely. But it’s picking up speed actually because the other side, in some ways, seems to be panicking. You mentioned when we talked last time that there is some evidence that this — not ours, not the one that I was just talking about but their “Great Reset” has failed, or is failing in the United States. Because some of the states just don’t play along anymore.

Leslie Manookian

…Think about that. If only 84 million people in America have been fully vaccinated, that’s about a quarter of our population. That really suggests to me that they are not in control of the narrative…

This is a global takedown of democracy. It’s a global coup. It’s an effort to destroy western civilization.

 

Connect with Leslie Manookian and Health Freedom Defense Fund

Connect with Reiner Fuellmich and Corona Investigative Committee

Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on “This Infectious Disease Theater” & the People Behind It

by Stéphane Blais, Foundation for the Defense of the People’s Rights and Freedoms
April 19, 2021

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich speaks with Stéphane Blais, president of the Foundation for the Defense of the People’s Rights and Freedoms (Canada). Also participating in the conversation is Canadian attorney Dominic Desjarlais who is part of the international team of lawyers aligned with the Corona Investigative Committee.



Original video was livestreamed to Foundation for the Defense of People’s Rights and Freedoms on facebook.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Excerpts from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s statements are provided by Truth Comes to Light:

02:51 — Dr. Reiner Fuellmich shares his background and the work that prepared him and his colleagues to form the Corona Investigative Committee

“In the course of this, throughout these 26 years that I have been going to court, I have come to learn that the power of these large corporations — plus the many people who are behind these corporations, who invest their money in these corporations — is enormous. It is so big that they not only influence politicians but they also influence, through the politicians, the courts of law in this country…”

“My colleagues and I kind of knew what this was all about. Except, of course, none of us for the magnitude of this. This is not just one or two or three corporations. It’s a whole bunch of corporations. Plus the people who invested in them. This is a huge power structure.

The good thing is that most of the people who are involved in this on the other side are trying to stay in the shade — trying to stay in the shadows so that people won’t know who they are. But those who are out there, who can be held responsible for the blatant lies that they told world’s community — those are the ones we are going after and I think we’re making headway right now.”

05:52 — Stéphane Blais asks a question about how Corona Investigative Committee was formed.

“…We started out — it is actually three lawyers here in Germany who got together and decided we have so many questions and it so obvious that the government will not answer these questions. One of the questions is, by the way, who does our government work for? Do they work for us, the people, or is it some corporate interest that they now represent? And, because we realized — this is in the summer of last year. I was still in the United States with my wife and my dogs. We have a ranch in northern California. And I realized that this government, German government, will not give us any answers to any of our questions.

The three most important questions are, of course: How dangerous is the virus?  How much damage do these anti-corona measures do — both healthwise and as far as the economy is concerned?  And, how reliable is the PCR test?

The third question is the most important one because everything — all the anti-corona measures, the lockdowns, the mask mandates — everything is based on the Droesten PCR test.

So we started out asking these questions and didn’t get any answers. And that’s when we decided on July 10th of last year that we will set up this Berlin Corona Investigative Committee. And ever since then we interviewed, I think, over a hundred experts, internationally-reknowned experts from all over the world — including, for example, Dr. Mike Yeadon, the former vice president of Pfizer. But many others…”

08:16 — Stéphane Blais asks about what conclusions the committee has come to thus far.

“…The first question ‘how dangerous is this virus’ is very easily answered in the meantime because even the WHO, in accordance with the findings of one of the most quoted scientists in the world, Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, they have come to the conclusion that this virus is no more dangerous than the common flu, with an infection fatality rate of .14% — I think that’s what the WHO says. Or, this is very recent from John Ioannidis, .15%.

Now, of course, once you get to this point, once you get to this answer, the first question is: “What is this all about?”. I mean, if this is a virus, just like the common flu, what’s happening here? Is this really about health or is there something else going on? And the something else is really important because the second question was ‘how dangerous or how much damage do the anti-corona measures do?’.

And it’s so obvious that this is, as one German cleric pointed out on television, this is like World War III, except there’s no open fighting going on. Yet…”

10:57 — Stéphane Blais asks if the committee has identified any of the people who are at the heart of this crisis.

“We had a chance to interview a few people who used to work for the WHO. And they told us that the whole crisis started here in Germany.

We have a person by the name of Professor Dr. Christian Drosten. He works at Charite University Hospital in Berlin. He was instrumental during the swine flu, which was 12 years ago. Same thing, same story, same actors. Turns out after a year, that was a mild flu.

But 12 years ago the WHO changed their definition of what a pandemic is. Before that it used to be a disease that spreads worldwide (element #1). Element #2 — causing many serious illnesses. And element #3 — causing many, many deaths.

Then they changed that definition and cut out the two later elements and all of a sudden you can start a pandemic only when you have a disease that spreads worldwide. So basically, any common flu can be made into a pandemic. And that’s what they did with the swine flu in 2009 and [20]10 — which eventually turned out to be a mild flu…

The only reason why it was possible to stop matters from getting any worse — I mean, they got bad enough because even then they started to push vaccines as the only solution to that pandemic.

But the only person who kind of stepped in and blew their cover is our friend Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg who was then in a position of power because he was both a member of the German parliament and a member of the Council of Europe.

And he was able to expose this hoax, which it really was. But he was not able to keep the vaccines from getting bought by many of the member countries of the WHO…

The contractual contents are still undisclosed. It’s being kept secret. So a lot of money was being wasted on vaccines then. And many people — and they used these vaccines on many people, not so much in Germany but in other countries.

And the result is that you have, I think 1,300 children — I mean they’re not children any more but back then they were children, mostly from Scandinavia — who are permanently disabled because they suffer from narcolepsy.

So that’s the guy who started this whole thing. This time again — Drosten.

The other person who was involved is the president of the German RKI, Robert Koch Institut, which is the equivalent of the American CDC.

His name is Lothar Wieler. He’s a veterinarian. Strange choice for the head of the RKI.

And then there’s Mr. Tedros who runs the WHO.

But there’s lots of other players who we managed to identify — most of them politicians who are in very, very close cooperation with these guys.

The thing is, we — by accident we found a video of, I think it was May 2019. It was called “Global Health Summit”. And it was a video on a congress that was being held by the German CDU, which is the Christian Democratic Union, which is leading party in this grand coalition which rules our country currently. And the very bizarre thing is that, at this conference there are not just the functionaries, the leaders of that party (of the CDU) but there was also Drosten, there was Wieler, there was Tedros, and the two chief lobbyists of the world’s most important health foundations — The Welcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were also there.

The same people who, a little less than a year later, started the pandemic. The same people who are now the chief advisors of our government.”

16:10 — Stéphane Blais  inquires about what is being done legally and whether international lawyers are cooperating with these efforts.

“There are a lot of lawyers out there who are working on this problem but they have not been connected. And that’s what I try to do. I try to put everyone on the same page so that we would all agree that it’s important to attack the very foundation of this pandemic…”

So the best way to do — to tackle this problem, whatever it is, “virus” — is to let it ride its course. Just like with the common flu. Some of the states in the United States, including Texas and Florida, have opened up again. And what do you see? Nothing! Everything is cool.

So we have decided, rather than getting lost in discussions about whether or not lockdowns make sense or mask mandates make sense — they don’t, we know that…

Rather than getting lost, in my opinion, rather fruitless discussions, we need to attack at the very foundation. And that’s the PCR test.

And again, we need to talk about Mr. Drosten — who is a very strange person.

He calls himself a professor and doctor of virology. We know that he has never written a — what is called a habilitation thesis — which you usually do in order to become a professor of something.

And it turns out that two scientists who tried to find out who this person really is had to realize that his doctorate is probably a fake doctorate.

Supposedly he wrote his doctoral dissertation in 2002 or [200]3. But it was never listed with the national archives. It appeared there for the very first time in June of last year. And that’s when, for the very first time, his doctoral dissertation all of a sudden showed up.

And as his alma mater, which is Frankfurt University, says — well, we didn’t have a copy of it but we were so grateful for him to provide us with a copy.

So this is so bizarre. We think this guy’s a fake. Complete fake.

But what he did is, he’s probably the main — the poster boy for all of this. He is the — here in Germany and because of the WHO’s recommending his PCR test all over the world, he is at the core of this.

So if we manage to prove in a court of law that his two statement — that there’s asymptomatic infections and that the PCR test can tell you about who is infected — if we manage to prove in a court of law that this is false, that these are false statements, we can prove that he made them knowing he was making false statements.

If we manage to show in a court of law — and we just did that in the first case that was decided on April the 8th in a family law court — if we manage to prove this, the whole house of cards is going to collapse.

Because what do you need the notion, the idea, of asymptomatic infections for? Well, up until corona, everyone who didn’t have any symptoms was healthy. Right?

Now you needed to get people to panic all over the world in order to direct their attention towards corona — so they wouldn’t know that the real goal of this whole “plandemic”, as we now call it, is the destruction of the middle class. Not just of the German middle class, but of the world’s middle class.

And in order to create panic you have to make everyone afraid of everyone.

And that’s why he came up with the idea that there are asymptomatic infections. The rest of the world refers to him when they talk about asymptomatic infections.

Fauci, for example, was talking about “the German scientist” when he was explaining about asymptomatic infections. And he meant, of course, his German counterpart Drosten.

And, turns out, there is no such thing as asymptomatic infections. A very recent study conducted in Wuhan China involving, I think, 10 million people came up with the result that there’s no such thing as asymptomatic infections.

And in the meantime, even Fauci and others agreed that if there were asymptomatic infections they would not play any role at all in this entire infectious disease theater.

So — but you needed this notion, this idea, to make everybody afraid of everyone.

Plus you needed this as a foundation for mass testing.

Because why would you test healthy people? You would only test people are healthy — who look healthy, without symptoms — if you believe they are potentially dangerous. That’s what asymptomatic infections are there for…

He knows that this is a false statement because when… he and a couple of other people wrote a preprint in — I think this was February of 2020. And it came to the attention of another scientist by the name of Kai Kupferschmidt.

In this preprint he claims that there is asymptomatic infection and he points as an example — he points to a woman from Wuhan who traveled to Germany (to Frankfurt, Germany) and then on to Bavaria and infected a lot of people. Then he says she didn’t have any symptoms.

Now this scientist by the name of Kai Kupferschmidt says ‘No, no, no, you’re wrong.’ She did have symptoms. She probably got infected because her parents had “covid” and she was taking anti-flu medication. You don’t take anti-flu medication because it tastes so great. You take it because you want to fight the symptoms of something. So she did have symptoms.

Nevertheless, he knew this — Drosten knew this — and he still published his paper.

But still, precisely at that time, he was working on this PCR test. And he published his Drosten protocol, which was then recommended by the WHO and onto the rest of the world as the gold standard for detecting infections.

On March 23rd of — I think it was March 23rd of 2020 — and in this paper he claims that his test can detect infections.

Now, he knew that this is wrong because six years earlier he had given an interview to a German business magazine. This was in the context of the MERS virus which is another strain of the coronavirus. And back then that his PCR test, or any PCR test for that matter, is not reliable because people (in this case he was referring to a nurse) — people who test positive may very well be perfectly health because their immune system is taking care of whatever virus may have attached to them.

Second false statement is the one about PCR tests. In his Drosten PCR test protocol — again, it’s something that he published with a bunch of others. But he’s the guy who is at the forefront of this.

He claims that he invented in early 2020, probably around New Year’s Eve, when — keep in mind that he and all the others were telling the world ‘ah, this is nothing problematic…this is just like a mild, mild flu.’…

The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who got a Nobel Prize for it — a very smart, very witty person who unfortunately died in August or September of 2019 — he kept telling the world over and over again: This PCR test is a great tool in order to make things visible that the human eye otherwise can’t see. But it cannot tell you about whether or not somebody is sick or infected. It cannot…

But those who are behind this, those who are profiting from this scheme — the pharmaceutical and the tech industry and the financial industry — they’re making lots of money with all these so-called infected people through the tests and now through the so-called vaccines which, as we know, are not really vaccines.

28:49 — Attorney Dominic Desjarlais joins the conversation to ask legal questions. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich shares about recent court decisions, the progress of current lawsuits and what is coming next.

…And this is probably the most important aspect of this. Since the facts of these cases — the fact that lockdowns destroyed the economy and caused huge damages for business owners. They’re the same all over the world. Because all of the lockdowns are based on the Drosten test. All of them.

We know this because the two women who I mentioned earlier, who used to work for the WHO, explained to us in detail — and I’m including this in my new complaint — that the only basis for the anti-corona measures, for the pandemic in fact, was the Drosten PCR test…

And we have to keep in mind that, according to what we’ve learned in the meantime through the interviews that we conducted at the Corona Investigative Committee, we have come to the conclusion that this is a planned pandemic. It was never about health. But, according to what we learned, this has always been about shifting the remaining assets of the world’s taxpayers to these huge corporations…

48:25

Ultimately, if we have enough of such decisions, the ones that I just mentioned — by the Portuguese court, by the Vienna court, now by the German court — it’ll be enough to take those who are behind this — to hold them responsible in the courts of law.

Because ultimately it’s not going to be possible to recover all the damages for all the damage that was caused by Drosten — who is probably just a marionette for those who are pulling the strings, for those who are profiting off of this. It’s not going to be possible to recover all the damages from these individual people.

Rather, we’re going to have to get to those who are behind this — to really what the Americans call the deep pockets. And those are the large corporations who are currently making billions, billions, billions of dollars. And who have, apparently, no empathy whatsoever because they can see that people are dying, that people are killing themselves because they are frightened, because they’re panicking.

So ultimately, what we’re going to have to do is file — and our friend and colleague Michael Swinwood has done so, as he explained to me — file in the Anglo-American legal system class actions or — this is another alternative — we may have to come up with a separate international court of law simply for the purpose of dealing both with the criminal and the civil law side of this — well, of these crimes against humanity…

I think it’s probably not enough for us lawyers to file lawsuits. We have to continue, all of us, we have to continue with our work of making what is going on as transparent as possible — to educate the people about what’s happening…

What they’re trying to do is — not just keep us in panic mode, because that’s the only way they can keep us under control, because as you know we are many, many more than the other side. Plus we probably have the smarter people. We have the people who — as one of the professor’s of psychology explained to us — who have moral competence.

Moral competence means that you’re capable of asking questions rather than just blindly following orders and that you’re capable of discussing other opinions rather than just shooting the other person simply because he has a different opinion from your own…

We have to keep our hand extended, so that if one or two or three or even hundreds of people want to take our hand, they want to talk to us, we are able to explain what’s really going on.

It’s a very serious point in time — very dangerous — but we are making progress..

1:00:39

We have learned from a whistleblower that this whole scheme, this whole Great Reset or whatever you want to call it, was originally scheduled to happen much later. Then they pulled it forward in time from 2050 or so to 2030, and then they got, as this whistleblower explained to us, even greedier and pulled it forward to 2020. And that’s a little too soon. Because not everything was in place that they needed. And that’s our biggest chance…

I think people have begun to understand — people who are on our side — have begun to understand that we play a pivotal role in this whole plandemic.

If we manage to stay on our feet, if we manage to not allow them to bring us to our knees — and we definitely will — then the rest of the world will know it is possible to fight this thing…

We will win this together — all of us.

See related from October 2020:

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on The Corona Crime Scandal | International Network of Lawyers Will Argue the Biggest Tort Case in World History

or read transcript of that video here: 

Transcript of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s “Crimes Against Humanity” | Announcing the Largest International Class Action Tort Case in World History

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Rabbi Chananya Weissman, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: On the Extreme Medical Tyranny in Israel & Global Crimes Against Humanity

Corona Investigative Committee — Discussion from perspective of Jewish religion, biology, spirituality and individual freedom, including comments by lawyer Viviane Fischer.



This is an excerpt from 5+ hours of testimony. Original video is available at OVALmedia Ausschuss YouTube channel under title: Sitzung 47: Auspacken, Anpacken.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Excerpts from Transcript

Rabbi Chananya Weissman

I really love Israel. But at the same time it’s to my great shame and horror to see the way the government of Israel — really not the people of Israel — but it’s the government, it’s the people in charge, have turned against their own people as we’ve seen in many parts of the world…

…

We are in very great danger here. And all of the human race is in great danger because this tyranny is happening everywhere…

…

We’ve seen this television show over and over again. You know, the actors change, the lines change a little bit, but the plot is always the same. And it’s time we finally, as both the Jewish people and the human race, we finally get things right.

Look, Israel — the modern state of Israel — has been around for approximately 70 years and the politicians in parliament have never been able to agree on anything. I mean you have Jews, you have Arabs, right wing, left wing, religious Jews, not religious Jews, anti-religious Jews, everything under the sun. And they all hate each other and they argue about everything. But for the first time in the history of modern Israel every person in the government agrees on one thing — that we don’t have basic human rights. We don’t have medical autonomy and it is virtuous to force people to vaccinate. Somehow they’ve all gotten together on the same page on this one issue — that we don’t have human rights anymore.

All of them have sold out. I mean, Israel’s government signed a deal with Pfizer. I’m sure everybody knows this already. Most of the contract has been blacked out. The key parts have been blacked out…

…

I think it’s fair to assume that they obligated themselves to vaccinate as many people as possible — possibly everybody, even children. And the government is not working for us. And this is true of the governments all over the world. They’re not working for the people. They’re working for the wealthy people, the the corporations, you know, the people who are pulling their strings. They’re not working for the common man. They don’t care about our lives. They don’t care about our health. They don’t care about us at all. They only care about their own interests. So it’s some kind of a blend of money, power and evil — which may vary from government to government and person to person. But that’s really what it all boils down to. It’s money, power and evil.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

I think this is real — to realize and to understand this is extremely important, because if people don’t understand this they’re just going to go ahead and they’re going to follow orders.

So, what do you think? Is there — are we coming closer to a a tipping point or a turning point in Israel. Because we feel that in parts of the world this tipping point is in within reach. Not in close reach, but it is within reach because the other side is getting extremely nervous and making many, many mistakes…

Rabbi Chananya Weissman

Well, I think the tipping point is definitely getting close at this point. You can basically split the population into two groups of people — those who still have their minds turned on and have a conscience and can think clearly and those who don’t…

…

There’s only two ways that this can turn out — either we’re going to win or we’re going to lose. Either truth is going to win out or terrible things are going to happen. There’s no middle ground anymore.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

I mean, as far as we’re concerned, as lawyers we believe that the only way out of this is by having the international legal community cooperate. Maybe setting up — we’re just debating this and I think we’re going to start doing working on this very soon — maybe setting up a Nuremberg 2-0 type of international tribunal.

But apart from the legal efforts that are definitely necessary I think much more transparency, much more education of the public, has to happen without being too confrontative — because if we if we become aggressive that’s just what the other side wants.

Because, as you explained, they’re splitting the population. Here or in the United States is probably 50/50. Maybe here in Germany, at maybe 20 or 30 percent on our side who are critical and 60-70 percent who are completely in line with the government. Well not completely. Some of them are beginning to have doubts. How do you assess the situation in Israel?

Rabbi Chananya Weissman

There are lawyers who are very bravely trying to go through the legal system. The problem is that they’re being blocked at every turn because the judges are also corrupt, the legal system is also corrupt. They’re all in on it.,,

,,,

I see us as all soldiers fighting in an army and we have to figure out our own personal missions using our skills and talents. But we have to realize at the same time, that through natural means there is no way out of this. Only God can save us. And this is one of the articles I wrote — that this is actually a war against God. What the people in charge and power are doing — they are fighting against God. They want to know everything and own everything, and control everything and be in charge of who lives and who dies, and whose job is essential and whose life is essential. They want to be God.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

They’re now trying to discuss — and this is something that Professor Schwab told us about — that there’s a new decision by the European Court of Human Rights saying it’s absolutely okay for countries, for nations, to mandate vaccinations. This is something that’s very, very disturbing. And if this concerns children, and I think that decision did concern children, then we’re not just — we’re talking about not just child abuse. This comes really close to ritual child abuse. And this, I think, is a stark warning for everyone.

That’s why last night when we discussed another — a new international class action that’s going to be filed in Canada for only children. That’s why we think that this is important. We have to have people focus on what is going on, in particular with respect to our children.

I think, and we think, this could be a turning point if we manage to draw people’s attention to what this means in particular for children.

…

Following comments by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (in German), Dr. Reiner Fuellmich continues…

Rabbi Weissman, you may know that he [Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg] is — he was the one who was more or less responsible for stopping the last attempt at an international pandemic. That was the swine flu. Because he was then in a position of political power. He was a member of the German parliament and he was also a member of the Council of Europe.

And he’s saying he loves to listen to what you’re saying because he’s — all of a sudden he sees the parallels between theology and biology. He also points out that we have probably been too — what’s the word? maybe complacent is a good word — too complacent over the past decades or so, because if we hadn’t been, if we had been more careful, we would have known, we would have seen what was going on — that evil things are happening.

He says that there was an awakening after World War II. Many people learned some things. Some didn’t. But, as a result, there was 70 years of peace, at least here in Europe after World War II. This time, he says, we’re going to have to learn much more.

And we will probably have to reorganize our societies in a dramatic way. Maybe organize ourselves in regional ways. So that instead of the top-down governments that we’re now seeing — which are not even governments…top-down rules from private enterprises like the WHO, like the World Economic Forum — that we get rid of these binding and oppressive regulations and find our own regional regulations amongst ourselves. And then connect with each other. Which he thinks this is probably part of what you are also alluding to.

Of course, on a theological, on a religious level, but he does say that this purely biological approach which he sees parallels between this and the theological approach. He does think that this is probably directed in the same manner. Would you agree with that or how do you see this?

Rabbi Chananya Weissman

Regarding the parallels between now and the Holocaust and what we should have learned. Look people today don’t get good history lessons. And, unfortunately, when people learn about the Holocaust they only learn about what happened after the final solution. Right? When the people are being burned in ovens and gas in the chambers. They learn about the horrors of the Holocaust. But that’s not the education that they really need to focus on. They need to focus on what happened before the final solution.

When Hitler took power in the early 1930s it took him several years to consolidate his power and to condition enough of the people to make the final solution possible. That’s the time in which we’re living today. We have to nip this in the bud. We have to cut it off at the at the very roots. Because once they implement the final solution we’re basically powerless to stop it.

So that’s the education that people should have been getting, and for the most part have not been getting. And we also have to recognize that even those who did learn their lessons from history, the bad guys also learned their lessons from the Holocaust. They learned what worked well, what didn’t work so well, and during these 70 years of, you know, peace that we’ve basically enjoyed for the most part, they’ve been fine-tuning their methods and they’ve been planning their next battle.

The Holocaust never really ended. There was just a cease-fire the bad guys were still out there and they are perpetuating their evils as well. And they’ve been doing this constantly. They haven’t taken any time off.

Regarding the final point, yes, it’s true we should not be counting on the government to run our lives for us. That is not the role of government in Judaism…

…

The doctors today are only concerned about keeping people sick and needing their services and making money. If people didn’t get sick so much, and people didn’t need to go to doctors all the time, the doctors wouldn’t be able to make any money. And the drug companies wouldn’t be able to make any money… They need us to always be putting drugs in our body, being afraid of illness, having chronic illnesses, taking a drug every time we don’t feel well or in a bad mood. We need to take drugs all the time. That’s the modern view of science — that we need chemicals in our body all the time.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Viviana [Viviane Fischer] is pointing — she’s trying to find some common ground for all of us apart from religion, and maybe on top of religion, she’s saying what this basically means, what you’re saying, and what she’s saying, is that we have to do good things. We have to do — you can call it follow… either follow the rule of law or follow ethical and moral rules or follow God. It doesn’t probably make much of a difference as long as we’re doing good things, as long as we remember, for example, the oath of office that many of us have sworn to do good things for the people — and not for the industry, for the tech or pharmaceutical industry…

Lawyer Viviane Fischer

Our basic law is not focused around the common good, you know, because we have the dignity of the individual as a result of… what happened during the Holocaust. This is what our constitution is based around…

I mean, you can still pervert it, you know, but I think if we all go back to this sort of this moral grounds… this ethical idea of the individual being… that you just cannot kill the dignity of the individual… it’s similar… it has aspects of what you say… then you can say it’s a God-given dignity.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

…If you take God out of the equation, as you said, or maybe spirituality. Because our colleague Michael Swinwood from Canada, he’s the one who’s about to file the new class action for children.

He used to be a very successful, powerful attorney — a business lawyer basically — and then 20 years ago he decided this is it, I’m not going to have anything to do with this anymore. And then he started to work only for the natives — the natives in Canada, the natives in the United States and in South America. And turned to spiritualism. And he comes up with the very same or very similar conclusions as you do.

It is, I think, it makes no difference if you call it spirituality or religion, if you do take God or spirituality out of the equation, you’re probably lost. I tend to agree with that because it becomes clearer by the moment that laws alone and rules alone will not be the solution. We need more than this…

Corona Investigative Committee: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & Vera Sharav on Historical Ties of the Unfolding Medical Tyranny to the Holocaust

— We Must Work Together Internationally to Stop This

Truth Comes to Light editor’s note:

The video below is an excerpt from the 5+ hour Session 44 of the Corona Investigative Committee, livestreamed on March 19, 2021. The full session (mostly in German without English translation) is found HERE.

This interview with Vera Sharav is in English, with German translation.

Vera Sharav is a public advocate for human rights. She is the founder and president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) which serves as an information resource and public interest watchdog organization whose goal is to unlock the walls of secrecy in biomedical research and bring accountability to that endeavor. AHRP Infomails have a wide following: they are read by physicians and scientists, public health officials, journalists, lawyers, and patient advocacy organizations. Read more about Vera Sharav HERE.

Excerpts from Vera Sharav’s testimony:

“Today some people are starting to understand why the German people didn’t rise up. Fear kept them from doing the right thing.

Medical mandates today are a major step backward toward a fascist dictatorship and genocide.”

~-~

“What sets the Holocaust apart from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment. The entire medical establishment. Every step of the murderous process was endorsed by the academic and professional medical establishment.

Medical doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the veneer of legitimacy to infanticide, mass murder of civilians.

T4 was the first industrialized medical murder project in history. The first victims were disabled German infants and children under three. They were identified by midwives who reported their existence to the state.  The next victims were the mentally ill, followed by the elderly in nursing homes.

The murderous operations were methodical and followed protocol very, very carefully. Questionnaires were sent out to all psychiatric institutions requiring detailed information about each patient. A committee of 54 psychiatrists made the final life and death decisions for each patient.

Now the objective of T4 was to eliminate the economic burden of those the regime and the doctors deemed “worthless eaters”.  And it was also to empty beds to make room for wounded soldiers during the war.

T4 also served as a testing ground for various lethal chemical and pharmaceuticals. The financial beneficiaries of the Nazi genocide were the corporate elite. Their record of collaboration with genocidal regimes is uninterrupted. Without the financial support of Wall Street bankers and collaboration by major U.S., German and Swiss corporations — that provided the chemical, the industrial and the technological material  — Hitler could not have carried out this unprecedented, industrialized, murderous operations.“



Original video “Sitzung 44: Die Wurzeln des Übels” is available at Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – Live Streams YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, and Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

___

Related information:

Link here read more about the T4 Program, also called T4 Euthanasia Program

Link here to Schwab Family Values investigative report by Johnny Vedmore

___

Link with the work of Vera Sharav at Alliance for Human Research Protection

Link with the work of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Corona Investigative Committee

Corona Investigative Committee w/ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & RFK, Jr.: 1st International Livestream

by Corona Investigative Committee with Oval Media
February 17, 2021



Original video is available at Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – Live Streams YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Commentary and excerpts by Truth Comes to Light editor.

This is the first time The Berlin Corona Investigative Committee is being broadcast internationally. Conversation and testimony is shared with lawyers from around the world.

This livestream is 4 hours long. The first hour of this livestream involves conversation between attorneys Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Dr. Fuellmich translates RFK, Jr.’s statements into German as they go along.

Later in the video, testimonies are made in German and periodically Dr. Fuellmich translates a summary into English.

Included are two lawyers from the Austrian Corona Committee who have won 22 cases before the Austrian Constitutional Court.

A high-ranking justice from Italy shares, in Italian, evidence that he and his collegues have gathered which is relevant internationally. English translation is provided.

Senta Depuydt, a journalist with Children’s Health Defense Europe, shares updates for France and Belgium, and European Union.

The participants reveal the deaths and atrocities related to covid vaccines and detail many successes that have already taken place in the courts.  Discussion includes ways to continue and expand international cooperation for challenging global medical tyranny via the COVID-19 mandates.

Inspiring examples are shared of how people throughout the world are rising up and gathering together to stand against the lockdowns and tyrannical mandates.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich addresses the question from Austrian lawyers about how people who have been damaged by lockdowns and mandates might receive compensation. His suggestion is to  focus on going after the corporations and the individuals who are responsible, not the governments.

A lawyer from the Netherlands describes his challenges — with dramatic ups and downs — in taking on the mandatory curfew.

A lawyer from Spain shares small, yet significant, successes.

The situation in Israel was discussed, including a social experiment called “consciousness engineering“, which focuses on the entire population. The horrific unfolding experience for all Israeli citizens, along with serious vaccine injuries, was shared.

Conversation with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich also addressed the attempted global takeover via The World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and much more.

Excerpts from conversation between Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

RFK, Jr. shares a clip from a video  “where a whistleblower from a nursing home in Germany reported some atrocities in that nursing home in conjunction with the administration of vaccines.” [see this short segment of the livestream event, with the shared whistleblower video and comments by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich HERE.]

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich responds:

“The thing that is disturbing about this is because we are getting more and more calls from other whistleblowers — from other nursing homes in this country. Plus we’re getting information from other countries. Sweden, for example. Norway, for example. Gibraltar, for example. There are also incidents in England and in the United States that match these descriptions…

It means that people are dying because of the vaccine.

So, of course, we’re going to have to go and look into the details. We’re going to have to have autopsies performed.

But what we’re seeing in this video clip is worse than anything we ever expected.

And, if that is true, and if this is representative for what’s going on in the other nursing homes and in other countries, then we have a very serious problem.

And so do the people who make the vaccines, so do the people who administer the vaccines…

It looks more and more as though we’re dealing with homicide, maybe even murder.

We’re going to have to look into the details.”

RFK, Jr. speaks of the economic devastation for the average person, while at the same time those who are orchestrating the lockdowns are making billions of dollars.  He also speaks on the media (and social media) censorship of information related to the vaccine

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich responds:

“The odd thing is that this very same thing is going on, not just in the United States, not just here in Germany, but all over the world — which does seem to point at some kind of, shall I say “lockstep”, or plan behind this.

Because it cannot be a coincidence — at least, not in my mind as an attorney, as a lawyer. It cannot be a coincidence that this is going on worldwide.

Now we know that the people who we were just talking about — the people who are profiting from this crisis — have so much money that they also, of course, have invested in the so-called mainstream media.

But…isn’t anybody worried about the fact that the notion of free speech, the idea of free speech as the very basis for any functioning democracy, is now in the hands of private corporations who have never been elected by anyone?”

RFK, Jr.:

“One of the problems that we have in the United States that you don’t have in Europe is that in 1997 we changed the law in our country to allow pharmaceutical companies to do direct consumer advertising on television.

So, today the big television networks can make up to 70% of their revenues on pharmaceutical products. What it means is that pharmaceutical companies are dictating the content of what we see on the news…

Anderson Cooper gets 12 million dollars a year and about 10 million of that comes from pharmaceutical companies…

Rupert Murdock, who runs Fox News also runs/owns the biggest vaccine company in Australia.

And so you have the press in our country that has absolutely been taken over by the pharmaceutical industry.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“This problem seems so big, and the resulting damage seems so horrendous all over the world, that many of us have been thinking that maybe the national courts will not be able to cope with this. So the idea has been floating — and we’ve been discussing this with a number of our colleagues from all over the world — that maybe we’re going to need — once we get this to stop — we’re going to need, in order to go and deliver justice, we’re going to need something like a Nuremberg trial, second generation. Is that something that lawyers you work with have also been thinking about?”

RFK, Jr. explains the obstacles that have been created globally that would make it difficult to be treated fairly and the challenges we face.  He focuses on getting the public involved and focusing on the parts of the national and local court systems that still have integrity.

“We need to try to figure out ways, first of all, of communicating to the public.

So, we’re off of social media. The mainstream press is now captured by the pharmaceutical industry. But there are now other, evolving, ways for people who are learning to communicate to each in other ways.

We need to establish credible ways for people who care about democracy, who care about civil rights, who are concerned about the ascendency of the medical cartel to begin really revolting against the increase and unacceptable power of those power centers.

And one of those ways in through communication.

The other is, in many of our independent nations, there are opportunities in the courts — where you still have integrity in the courts and judicial system of some of our countries. And it’s getting smaller and smaller, more constricted.

But, to me those present the best opportunity. Public organizing, public communication and the use of the courts.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

“And I think what also makes sense — what we’ve been doing for months now…

I think it also makes a lot sense for all of us to continue to cooperate and share the evidence that we have, so that we’re all on the same page and that we’re all on the same level… Because the problem is universal. It’s almost identical worldwide…

I think it’s really important to show that, as you said, those parts of the judicial system that still have integrity are still functioning — and that we — you and I and the rest of the people who are working with us — are doing the best we can to show and to get as many decisions as possible from the courts of law that say:

PCR tests cannot tell you anything about infections. And that there are no asymptomatic infections. And even if there were that doesn’t play a role. As many of these decisions as possible.

Because the PCR test. the Drosten PCR test, was and still is the centerpiece of this whole thing.

If we destroy that narrative, I think this house of cards is going to come down crashing soon.”

 

Connect with the Corona Investigative Committee

Connect with RFK, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense

Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich & Dr. Nicole Delépine, MD on the Importance of Recent German Court’s Decision That the Lockdown Is Unconstitutional

German Court in Weimar Declares Lockdown Unconstitutional

by Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
January 28, 2021

A LANDMARK legal decision declared that regional containment policies – including lockdowns, social distancing, prohibitions on gatherings by family or friends are UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The judge called the lockdowns a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives.”

The judge ruled that the government violated the “inviolably guaranteed human dignity” under basic German law. This momentous, affirmative, liberating decision was handed down by a court of law in Weimar, Germany; the city whose name was adopted by the first German republic: 1919—1933, until it was overturned by the Nazi regime. Hundreds of thousands of German people have demonstrated throughout the summer and fall of 2020, some protesters compared their struggle to anti-Nazi resistance; which led Germany’s Foreign Minister Heiko Maas to bristle.

Forensic analysis of official data convinced the court that the epidemic situation that was used to justify the lockdown laws does not exist. The judge ruled that the government lacked sufficient legal grounds to impose the restrictions since there was no “epidemic situation of national importance.” He declared that the measures were an attack on the “foundations of our society.”

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, the lawyer who initiated the first German and American complaints and procedures stated:

“We consider this judgment to be extraordinary and of fundamental importance. It is transferable to all violations of Covid19 measures. It is also transferable to the current Renewed Containment and all applicable coronavirus regulations. Because the “numbers of cases” are decreasing, as are patients in intensive care units! The judge confirms this with an excellent demonstration.”

The battle over government dictatorial overreach and the assault on the rights and dignity of citizens in a democracy will be won in the courts of law.

The decision has been described by German media as “politically explosive”!

Below Dr. Nicole Delépine, MD, provides an in-depth analysis of the body of evidence that supports this momentous decision. She notes that one factor that helped Germany resist the epidemic better than other countries – such as France – is probably due to the early treatment of patients with hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics, vitamins, etc. She concludes that This crisis is purely political with a health pretext.

* Dr. Delépine is a member of the Distinguished Advisory Board of the Alliance for Human Research Protection.

After PCR tests, the principle of confinement condemned by justice.  Published on 1/26/2021 3:50 PM

German court declares regional lockdown UNCONSTITUTIONAL, politically major decision

Author (s): Nicole Delépine for FranceSoir

Tribune: German court declares regional containment UNCONSTITUTIONAL, politically major decision [1]

Will Weimar again be the site of legal revolutions as at the time when the constitution ending the empire was drawn up after the First World War? [2] In any case, the judgment declaring confinement unconstitutional caused a stir in Germany and gave rise to several articles. Let us hope that it will also awaken French consciences, giving them the courage to take legal action against these liberticidal and unjustified measures inspired by the WHO which guides our governments [3] and promises them financial aid via the IMF like the President of Belarus has clearly stated [4] .

The Weimar judgment considered major

The social distancing rules imposed by the Thuringian government are deemed incompatible with the country’s Constitution. Thanks to forensic analysis of official data, the judgment affirms that the epidemic situation used to justify the law does not exist. The lawyer Reiner Fuellmich who initiated the first German and American complaints and procedures comments as follows [5]  : “ We consider this judgment to be extraordinary and of fundamental importance. It is transferable to all violations of Covid19 measures. It is also transferable to the current Renewed Containment and all applicable coronavirus regulations. Because the “numbers of cases” are decreasing, as are patients in intensive care units! The judge confirms this with an excellent demonstration . ”

Story

On the occasion of a judgment of a man having according to the accusation “violated” (here is a very big word), the strict confinement imposed by the government of the central state of Thuringia last spring, the legality of the measures imposed in Germany to curb an epidemic of questionable severity is back in the headlines. This is all the more interesting given that some countries, including ours talk about containment while the epidemic is stagnating or decreasing, that there are effective early treatments and that the overwhelming majority of hospitals are not full, contrary to what our authorities announce here and there.

Facts

This gentleman had celebrated a birthday with his seven [6] friends. On 24.04.2020, the person concerned was in the evening with at least seven other people in the backyard of the house X-Straße 1 in W. to celebrate the birthday of one of the participants. The eight participants in total were distributed among seven different households. However, a stay in public space is only authorized alone, in the circle of members of his own household and, moreover, at most with another non-domestic person ”according to local regulations.

The Weimar judge condemned a restriction limiting private gatherings to members of the same household and to a person outside of the same household, a rule which the accused had not respected. The judge said that the regional government itself had violated the “inviolably guaranteed human dignity” guaranteed by Article 1 of the German Basic Law by imposing such restrictions.

The accused was acquitted and relieved of the need to pay a fine of 200 euros ($ 243).

 No sufficient reason for confinement

According to the court, the government did not have sufficient grounds to impose these restrictions since there was no “epidemic situation of national importance” at the time and the health system was not at risk of failure. collapse, the Robert Koch Institute having reported that the multiplication coefficient of Covid-19 had then fallen below 1.

At no time is there any real danger that the health service will be overwhelmed by a “wave” of patients with COVID-19. According to the register established on March 17, 2020, an average of at least 40% of intensive care beds in Germany were permanently available. In Thuringia, 378 beds were registered occupied on April 3, 36 of which were in covid-19 patients. During this time, there were 417 vacant beds. On April 16, two days before the publication of the regulation, 501 beds were recorded occupied, 56 covid-19, and 528 beds were vacant … Thuringia recorded its highest number of covid-19 patients notified in the spring at 63 (April 28). Thus, at no time has the number of patients with COVID-19 reached a level that could have justified fears of an overflow of the health system.

This estimate of the real dangers of COVID-19 in spring 2020 is confirmed by an assessment of data from 421 clinics belonging to the Qualitätsmedizin Initiative, which found that the number of cases of acute respiratory infections (severe ARI) hospitalized in Germany in first half of 2020 was 187,174 – lower than the figure for the first half of 2019 (221,841 cases), even though that figure included cases of ARI caused by covid. The same analysis showed that the number of cases in intensive care was lower in the first half of 2020 than in 2019 …

The judge also said that the regional government did not have the right to introduce such far-reaching measures since it was for the legislator to do so (parliament and not district courts).

The Weimar court said the spring containment of Thuringia was a “catastrophically flawed policy decision, with dramatic consequences for almost every area of ​​people’s lives . ” [7]

Health situation and confinement: disproportionate decision

The confinement imposed in Thuringia represents “the most complete and deepest restrictions on fundamental rights in the history of the Federal Republic, ” the court said, calling these measures a ” disproportionate ” attack against the ” foundations of our society. ”

 Consequences of a regional ordinance

The decision is not legally binding outside of Weimar, although each German court can render a judgment on the constitutionality of orders issued by any authority other than the Bundestag, federal parliament or regional parliament. Unless a law has been passed, each court can contradict the regulations if they appear unjustified

Impact of the Weimar judgment among some officials and local media

Like the other countries submitted to the WHO’s international health council, containment measures are regularly re-imposed, and clearly unrelated to the virulence of the epidemic, which varies depending on the region, but faithfully following Ferguson’s scheme, which had been planned in March 2020 (report 9) the succession of six confinements, in order to be able to move on to the major reset planned by the economic and world forum in Davos (read Klaus Schwab’s brief available on the internet of the same name ). This crisis is purely political with a health pretext.

Germany is once again applying strict containment quite similar to that imposed by the federal government in November and which has been extended and reinforced several times since then [8] . Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cabinet extended the restrictions until mid-February.

 Appeal of the region against the judgment of the Weimar court

The Thuringian Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office lodged a complaint against the court decision, requesting that it be reconsidered and possibly overturned, with the case being handed over to another judge. The judgment must be “revised to develop the law and ensure a unified jurisdiction” regarding the containment and its violation, a spokesperson for the prosecutor’s office, Hannes Gruenseisen, told local media.

Containment is going badly in Germany, especially since the country has resisted the epidemic much better than France, probably due to the early and discreet treatment of patients with hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics and vitamins, etc., from the start, isolation patients, and consequently suffers [9] a lower mortality rate (622 / million at 26/1, according to the WHO. France on the contrary has prohibited early treatment and practiced so-called blind confinement because mixing patients and healthy leading to an explosion of direct (1113 / M) and indirect mortality due to lack of care and other complications of confinement.

Germany has seen protests against this measure on several occasions in various cities during the fall and winter of 2020. At one point, protesters even compared their struggle to anti-Nazi resistance, which did not go over well with Germany’s Foreign Minister Heiko Maas.

Rationale for quashing the charge 

The person concerned had to be acquitted for legal reasons because the articles on which the accusation was based are unconstitutional and therefore canceled. [10]

The court itself decided on the constitutionality of the norms, since the obligation of submission according to the consistent case law of the Federal Constitutional Court applies only to official federal and state laws, but not to district statutory orders.

“Judgment is powerful [11] :

The judge concluded that there were no “unacceptable gaps in protection” that could have justified resorting to general regulations. These measures “violate the inviolable guaranteed human dignity” in article 1, paragraph 1 of the Federal Constitution. “

“Devastating accusation against the federal government .

 It is striking how coldly Judge Weimar concluded this months-long discussion: the blanket contact ban is a harsh civil rights intervention. It is part of the fundamental freedoms of the individual in a free society to determine for himself with whom (on presumption of consent) and under what circumstances he or she will come into contact.

The free encounter between people for all conceivable ends is also a fundamental basis for society.

The state’s obligation in this case is categorically to refrain from any intervention that deliberately regulates and limits that measure. Questions of how many people a citizen can invite to their home or how many people a citizen can meet in a public place to walk, play sports, run errands or sit on a park bench have absolutely no legitimate interest for the state.

By imposing a blanket ban on contact, the state – albeit with good intentions – attacks the foundations of society by imposing physical distance between citizens (“social distancing”).

 No one, even in January 2020, could have imagined, in Germany, to be prevented by the state under penalty of a fine from inviting their parents to their home without banning other members of their family from the house, while that they were there. No one could have imagined that it would be forbidden to sit with three friends on a park bench. Never before in Germany had the state had the idea of ​​imposing such measures to counter an epidemic.

Even the 2013 risk analysis “Pandemic caused by the SARS-like virus” (Bundestag publication 17/12051), which described a scenario of 7.5 million deaths in 3 years, does not consider a general ban on contacts (or ban on leaving home or general suspension of public life). Besides the quarantine and isolation of infected people, the only anti-epidemic measures he speaks of are the closure of schools, the cancellation of mass events and the question of hygiene recommendations (BT 17/12051, p . 61f).

“Although it appears that a shift in values ​​has taken place over the months of the Covid crisis, with the consequence that many people find procedures once considered absolutely exceptional more or less ‘normal’ – which, of course, also changes the outlook on the Constitution – there is no doubt that by imposing a blanket contact ban, the democratic parliament has broken what was previously considered an obvious taboo.

“It should also be noted – as an aspect worthy of special attention – that the state, by imposing its general ban on contact in order to protect itself against infection, treats every citizen as a potential health threat. of third parties. If every citizen is seen as a threat from which others must be protected, that citizen is also deprived of the possibility of deciding what risks to take – which is a fundamental freedom.

 A citizen’s choice to visit a cafe or bar at night and run the risk of respiratory infection in the name of social interaction and fun in life, or to exercise caution because he has a weakened immune system and therefore prefers to stay at home, is suppressed under the provisions of a general contact ban. “

The report then details the judge’s examination of the collateral damage caused by the confinement.

– Declines in profits, losses suffered by companies, traders and independent professionals as direct consequences of the restrictions imposed on their freedoms. Losses for suppliers of directly affected companies; losses resulting from disruption of supply chains leading to production stoppages; losses resulting from travel restrictions.

-Wage losses due to reduced hours or unemployment

– Bankruptcies and destruction of livelihoods and consequent costs of bankruptcies and destruction of livelihoods ”.

For Berlin, the Senate administration reported a 23% increase in child abuse for the first half of 2020 [12] .

According to a representative survey (Steinert / Ebert), during the spring confinement period, around 3 percent of women in Germany were victims of physical violence at home, 3.6 percent were raped by their partner, and in 6 , 5 percent of all children’s homes were severely punished.

The number of statistically recorded suicides in Germany is not yet available for 2020, but the Senate administration in Berlin has reported a potentially significant increase in the number of suicides.

During the spring containment, more than 908,000 operations were canceled in Germany, not only so-called non-emergency operations, such as implantation of knee and hip joint prostheses, knee arthroscopy, cataract surgeries, etc., but also 52,000 cancer operations. [13]

According to a meta-analysis published (British Medical Journal) in November [14]  this delay already increases the risk of death by 6 to 13% depending on the type of cancer, an eight week delay for breast cancer of 13%, a twelve-week deferral of 26 percent. Without being able to quantify in more detail, there is no doubt that the cancellation of the operations also resulted in deaths in Germany.

A study conducted by the Clinique du Haut-Rhin Waldshut-Tiengen [15] examined excess mortality in the district of Waldshut (170,000 inhabitants) in April 2020. On average, 165 people died there between 2016 and 2019 in April, compared to 227. in 2020, an excess mortality of 37%. Of the 62 additional deaths, only 34 could be associated with covid19, 28, or 45% of excess mortality are due to other causes of death . The study authors attribute these cases to reduced use of emergency medical facilities. Twice as many people have been found dead in their homes than the comparative average. These figures indicate that deaths are due to underutilization or delay in the use of health care.

 Short, medium and long term damages were pointed out by the court

(1) Loss of schooling, teaching and impairment of psychosocial development of children due to failure or restrictions of school education or closure of other educational institutions

(2) Loss of cultural suggestions or experiences due to the closure of theaters, concert halls or opera houses and many other cultural institutions

(3) Loss of possibilities for artistic development by prohibitions which prohibit common music in orchestras or choirs.

(4) loss of community experiences / personal social cohabitation by banning meetings in associations, demonstrations, gatherings, closing bars, etc.

(5) Reduction of social development opportunities for children by closing kindergartens

(6) Isolation of children in accommodation without contact with other children by closing schools, kindergartens and play areas

  The judgment report emphasizes that school is not only a place for the transmission of knowledge, but a place of social learning. School closures virtually suppress social learning and hinder the integration of children and young people.

Teaching by parents is difficult, particularly in certain disadvantaged areas. The social divide is therefore reinforced. The learning of German among children of migrant families is also seriously disrupted. “Knowledge of German? Catastrophic for a third of the pupils [16] .

Economic consequences of containment  According to the Weimar judgment, we note

“(1) Aid provided by the Federal State and the Länder to economic agents

(2) Tax losses due to the limitation of economic activity due to confinement

(3) Partial unemployment benefits and unemployment benefits that had to be paid following confinement

(4) Social assistance for people dependent on social assistance

The “coronavirus shield”, a legislative package adopted on March 27, 2020, in Germany alone represented 1.173 billion euros (353.3 billion euros in aid, 819.7 billion euros in guarantees). The latest federal budgets were 356.4 billion euros (2019) and 346.6 billion euros (2018). Even if the guarantees provided are not per se “lost”, the overall charges are expected to reach the aggregate level of several federal budgets.

 Health and economic damage in southern countries secondary to confinements in rich western countries

The collateral damage already occurred or to be expected is enormous. The reasons are the interruption of tuberculosis control programs, childhood disease immunization programs, interruptions in food supply due to collapsed supply chains, etc.

The UN predicts the famine of more than 10,000 children per month during the first year of the pandemic (more than 10,000 children die of hunger each month due to covid19 [17]

 In Africa alone, according to Federal Development Minister Müller, 400,000 additional victims are expected from malaria and HIV and half a million deaths from tuberculosis as a result of confinement (more victims by confinement than by virus: In Africa, crises have been dramatically worsened, according to an article by John Ioannidis [18] 1.4 million more deaths from tuberculosis are even expected over the next five years .

In the long term, containment-related excess mortality will likely be significantly larger than the death toll from COVID 19.

Since the containment policy in Thuringia is part of a general policy of almost all western industrialized countries, this damage is the indirect consequence also attributable to the pro rata and is therefore in principle linked to the examination of proportionality .

For this reason alone, the standards to be assessed here do not meet the requirement of proportionality. Added to this are the direct and indirect restrictions on freedom, gigantic financial damage, immense damage to health and spiritual damage.

The word ” disproportionate  ” is too colorless to indicate the dimensions of what happened. The containment policy implemented by the Land government in the spring (and today again), of which the general ban on contact was (and remains) essential, is a catastrophic political error, with dramatic consequences for almost all sectors of human life, for society, for the State and for the countries of the South of the whole world ”.

 Constitutionality of standards

In the case of legal ordinances which have not been adopted by the Bundestag or a regional parliament, each court is authorized to decide for itself their constitutionality. The articles cited [19] by the prosecution are not constitutional, because they are not based on a law passed in parliament.

They are unconstitutional for formal reasons, as provisions which deeply infringe on fundamental rights are not covered by the legal enabling basis in the Infection Protection Act.

The legislator must himself take all the essential decisions in fundamental normative fields, in particular in the field of the exercise of fundamental rights – insofar as this state regulation is accessible – and must not delegate them to the executive. regional.

The more essential legal regulations or other executive acts interfere with fundamental rights, the more specific the provisions of the implementing law must be.

 Attack on human dignity 

Thus with regard to isolation and prohibition of contact with people outside the family, a general prohibition of contact poses – at least – the question of the violation of the guarantee of human dignity.

 Here the prohibition poses a problem because it constitutes a serious attack on the general freedom of action and also on the freedom of assembly, association, religion, profession and art, not only because it is addressed to all citizens, regardless of whether or not they are suspected of disease or contamination.

By prohibiting all citizens from meeting with more than one person outside the household, by prohibiting it not only in the public space, but also in freedoms in the family nucleus, the general prohibition of contact inevitably leads to other restrictions on fundamental rights.

Federal law provides that if persons suspected of disease, contamination of a communicable disease have been identified, the restriction can only be taken “to the extent necessary to prevent the spread of the disease”, the latter not being nothing more than an explicit reference to the principle of proportionality already in force.

These are only absolute minimum conditions. The law can only carry individual measures, such as the closure of (individual) seaside resorts and not a general ban on contact.

To the extent that a general contact ban can be constitutionally compliant, at least precise regulation of the organizational conditions should be required in order to concretize precisely the necessary dangerous situation, but concrete provisions would also be necessary from the point of view legal consequences.

The principle of the rule of law is the imperative of precision in legislation. Laws cannot simply impose general regulations, which would give the authorities the license to act on whims, which would amount to an arbitrary rule.

According to the Federal Infection Protection Act (API), “competent authorities” must impose “the required security measures”. Normally, this means that spreaders or those suspected of spreading infection may be placed isolated or contaminated areas closed.

The more a legal act of the executive intervenes in fundamental rights, the more the regulations of the enabling law must be PRECISE.

Intervention-intensive measures which, in themselves, require a specific regime, can only be authorized in the context of “unforeseen developments” using general clauses, this condition is not fulfilled as it stands.

 Responsible local containment in proportion to the consequences in industrialized countries, linked to the proportionality test .

“There is no doubt that the number of deaths attributable to the measures of the containment policy exceeds by several times the number of deaths avoided by it. For this reason alone, the standards to be assessed here do not meet the requirement of proportionality. Added to this are the direct and indirect restrictions on freedom, gigantic financial damage, immense damage to health and spiritual damage”.

The word “disproportionate” is too colorless to indicate the dimensions of what happened.

[1] Un tribunal allemand déclare le confinement régional INCONSTITUTIONNEL dans une décision «politiquement explosive» (exoportail.com)

[2] Nom donné au régime de l’Allemagne après la Première Guerre mondiale (1919-1933).

Née de l’effondrement du régime impérial, la première république allemande, proclamée par le social-démocrate Scheidemann à Berlin, le 9 novembre 1918, ne prend forme qu’après l’écrasement de la révolution spartakiste (novembre 1918-janvier 1919). Elle tire son nom de la ville où se réunit en février 1919 une Assemblée nationale dominée par les sociaux-démocrates et les modérés, dont les travaux aboutissent à la promulgation (août 1919) d’une Constitution qui fait de l’Allemagne un État fédéral, le Reich, composé de 17 États (Länder) autonomes, eux-mêmes représentés au Reichsrat.

Encyclopédie Larousse en ligne – République de Weimar

[3] Le conseil mondial de l’OMS dicte très officiellement la conduite sanitaire des pays signataires dont la France (francesoir.fr)

[4] 950 Millions d’euros lui furent promis s’il confinait son pays. Il a dit non et raconté que d’autres pays avaient refusé mais soupçonnait que les plus obéissants avaient cédé au mirage de l’argent facile.

[5] Tribunal d’instance Weimar 6 OWi-523 Js 202518/20 : Free Download, Borrow, Streaming : Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/tribunal-dinstance-weimar-6-owi-523-js-202518-20 via

@internetarchive

[6] pas une rave partie à 2000 qui au passage n’a d’ailleurs pas  entrainé aucune vague de malades du Covid, ni même de poussée de contaminations, ni le moindre cluster

[7] Tribunal d’instance Weimar, jugement du 11.01.2021 – 6 OWi-523 Js 202518/20 from Éditions Dédicaces    https://www.rt.com/news/513443-german-court-covid-unconstitutional/ et https://openjur.de/u/2316798.html

[8] Néanmoins toujours moins rigide qu’en France

[9] Nous n’en avons eu confirmation que très tardivement

[10] Le tribunal a décidé lui-même de la constitutionnalité des normes, car l’obligation de soumission selon l’article 100 Abs.1 GG selon la jurisprudence constante de la Cour constitutionnelle fédérale (BVerfG, arrêts du 20 mars 1952, 1 BvL 12/51, 1 BvL 15/51, 1 BvL 16/51, 1 BvL 24/51, 1 BvL 28/51) s’applique uniquement aux lois officielles fédérales et des États, mais pas aux ordonnances statutaires.

[11] 2020news traduction de  Northumbrian Nomad

[12] Le niveau journalier du 02.07.2020, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/corona-krise-trifft-frauen-und-kinder-besonders-gewalt-eskaliert-in-berlin-immer-haeufiger/25970410.html).

[13] https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article208557665/Wegen-Corona-In-Deutschland-wurden-908-000-OPs-aufgeschoben.html).

[14] Hanna, Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ 2020, 371, https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4087)

[15] (Kortüm, Corona-Independent Excess Mortality Due to Reduced Use of Emergency Medical Care in the Corona Pandemic: A Population-Based Observational Study, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.27.20220558v1)

[16] ». MONDE du 11.01.2021, https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/plus224000152/Geschlossene-Schulen-Was-das-fuer-Kinder-in-sozialen-Brennpunkten-bedeutet.html),

[17] https://rp-online.de/panorama/coronavirus/mehr-als-10000-kinder-verhungern-jeden-monat-krise-durch-corona-verschaerft_aid-52446949).

[18] Global perspective of COVID-19 epidemiology for a full-cycle pandemic, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13423),

[19] III.L’article 2, paragraphe 1, et l’article 3, paragraphe 3, paragraphe 1, 3. ThürSARS-CoV-2-EindmaßnVO

Connect with AHRP

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Interview About the International Lawsuits: “It’s Quite Clear That This Is Like World War III, and Probably Worse”

Reiner Fuellmich : “cette pandémie a été mise en scène” [VOSTFR]
Translation — Reiner Fuellmich: “This Pandemic Has Been Ataged” [VOSTFR]

by FranceSoir
December 21, 2020

Debriefing in partnership with BonSens.org

We welcome Reiner Fuellmich. After a general presentation and his analysis on the pandemic, he tells us about the actions he is leading, the legal and judicial situation in Germany where the system is locally under the influence of certain companies, international cooperation and “loaded dice” by the PCR tests of the much criticized Dr. Drosten.



Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: This video made use of YouTube’s transcript option and, unedited, it naturally contains a lot of errors. Below, we are providing some excerpts where you will find corrected names, etc.

[Original video available at FranceSoir YouTube channel. As a service to protect truth from censorship and to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Topics of discussion include:

• Background of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s involvement with the lawsuits
• Key lies that are the basis for the fraudulent pandemic
• Class action in the United States, Canada and Australia
• Malpractice lawsuits internationally
• Various lawsuits for individual situations

Excerpts:

I did remember, however, that there was a similar thing that happened years ago but I couldn’t quite remember the details of this. And that’s why I called my friend Wolfgang Wodarg who was a medical doctor. And I asked him about what he thought about it. He explained to me that I was remembering the right thing — it was the swine flu, which was 12 years ago. And he said it looks very much like the swine flu all over again — because it’s the same people playing the same roles. Panic. Making people panic. The same professor Drosten of Charity University, the same Neil Ferguson of the Imperial College in London. Same people.

And he told me to take a closer look at what some of the other experts said, because we knew very quickly that the only person who the German government relied on was this infamous, now infamous, professor Drosten. So he pointed out to me that there’s Ioannidis of Stanford University and Michael Levitt of Stanford University. Plus a number of German scientists who have a entirely different view of the situation.

___

…it’s quite clear that this is like World War III, and probably worse. A lot of people are committing suicide.

___

So the final question was, ‘what about the PCR tests?’. And when we looked at this, it turns out that there’s one major player who’s — now it’s called the Drosten paper which was published on, I think January 23rd. This major player is professor Drosten — who as it turns out is neither a professor nor is he a doctor. Because the dissertation, that finally was found by the people… who had been looking for it for months and months and months, turns out to be a piece that was probably produced in June of this year, but not in 2003 or 2002 as he as he claims it was.

So that got us really interested in this, because if somebody lies about his academic background then the next question is — is he telling the truth as far as what he’s saying in this now infamous Drosten paper, in this paper he claims that he had invented a new PCR test which was capable of detecting infections.

In another paper, that was published a little later, he claims that there are asymptomatic infections. Now you have to read this together because — what does that mean? If there really are asymptomatic infections, that means that people out there who have no infections whatsoever are dangerous because they may be infectious. If it’s not true then we don’t have to worry about that.

Up until then it was quite clear that anybody who didn’t have any any symptoms is not infectious — is a healthy person. I mean, who goes to see a doctor when they don’t have any symptoms? But all of a sudden this brand new claim stated there are asymptomatic infections. And this is, I think, really important to know because, if there were asymptomatic infections, then it would make sense to be afraid of everyone. If not, then the whole thing collapses like a house of cards.

The other thing is, what about the PCR tests? And it turns out that PCR tests — even though a PCR test is a great thing to amplify things that the human eye normally cannot see — it doesn’t and cannot tell you anything about infections. The inventor of the PCR test Kary Mullis said this over and over and over again. I listened to all of his videos. Great guy. Intelligent. Witty. Smart.

___

So we listened to, I think in the meantime, over a hundred experts from all over the world — scientists, doctors, economists, lawyers — and as far as the scientists are concerned — the immunologists, the biologists, all of them said ‘No way can a PCR test tell you anything about infections’.

Because the one major problem it has — first of all it isn’t designed and it isn’t admitted for diagnostic purposes.

___

So what do we have here? We have two blatant lies. These are false statements. And we know that this man made them knowingly because he’s supposedly an expert on PCR tests. And we know that he lied on purpose because there’s an interview with him from six years ago, I think that was during the MERS flu, which is also a corona virus, a different one, but still. And that’s when he said that the PCR tests are so sensitive that they test positive to almost anything — and that, in many cases, it tests positive on healthy people. So he knew what was going on. And, even then, he also knew that the mainstream media played a big role in this. Because in this interview, he said ‘and you also have to take into consideration’, he pointed out that the mainstream media are causing quite a ruckus, quite an uproar.

___

If there are no asymptomatic infections, what’s going on? So we arrive at the conclusion — that is our current conclusion — that there’s some other agenda being pushed, which has nothing to do with health, and everything to do with control and power and money.

___

A class action is something that you can use when you have a huge, or a large number, of people who suffered damages because of one single damaging action. In this case it’s the lockdowns. The Drosten-PCR-test-induced lockdowns. And that’ll be a problem for Mr. Drosten and the people who he cooperates with — W.H.O. and others who are behind this — because they sold these PCR tests, these Drosten PCR tests, throughout the world.

___

…it looks as though the mistakes were made on purpose in order to drive up the numbers of infections which are really only false positives.

___

…The first complaint that we filed is — we’re representing our friend Wolfgang Wodarg because he was accused by a group of what is now called “fact checkers” (which is nothing else but people who are bought and paid for by youtube, twitter, facebook in order to defame people who express an opinion that is not in agreement with the government’s opinion, in particular when it comes to covid and PCR). So these people called him a liar because he explained that PCR tests cannot tell you anything about infections. Now if they call him a liar, they have to prove that he’s the liar. So we’re suing them for defamation… Today we’re sending out another brief to Drosten himself, explaining to him that he has to retract his ideas, but that, even at this point, he is civilly liable for the damages that he caused.

___

The most important thing is, of course, to get these class actions started, both in the United States and in Canada, and if possible, also in Australia. How this works is as follows: A person who suffered damages in the United States, or in Canada, or in Australia, because of these Drosten-PCR-test-induced lockdowns can file a complaint against Drosten, against the W.H.O. — or anyone else who, in the United States, Canada or in Australia claims that the PCR test that they’re selling tells you something about infections.

Now, if then, they explain to the judge that they’re not the only ones who are suffering harm, but that there’s thousands and thousands of more people who suffer the same kind of damage, they can ask the court to let this case go forward as a class action. Meaning, if the judge decides, yes, this makes sense to be tried as a class action, then anybody who suffered the same kinds of damages can join this class. What the judge will then do is publish this. And, if it’s going to be an international case, then he’s going to publish this worldwide in all the mainstream media — so that anyone who suffered damages because of this same illegal action can join the class. They don’t have to, but they can. They can still file their own complaints but the power of this class action is that you have — in the end, you have probably hundreds of thousands, I think even millions, of plaintiffs who are all in this one case together. But only one case, for the so-called representative plaintiff — someone who suffered typical damages — one case is tried. If this case is won then everybody else wins too.

___

We’re cooperating with all of our colleagues in Italy and France, in Spain, Austria, Switzerland — all of the countries from which lawyers have approached us. And they all get everything they need from us.

___

There are other actions that are going to be filed for malpractice. Yes. Because we know that, in particular when it comes to New York and Bergamo, Italy… The pictures of these places were shown all over the world in order to scare people, in order to tell them ‘this is what’s going to happen if you don’t do as we are telling you’. Because they needed these pictures in order to make people panic — put them in panic modes — so that they won’t ask any questions but do as they’re told. Wear masks, for example. Social distancing, for example. You have to have a lockdown, for example.

We know now from talking to the doctors from New York and from the United States, and from talking to a network of doctors in Italy and in other places that these pictures were staged.

___

…We’re waiting for a trial date to be set by the court here in Berlin. I know that, very soon, there’s going to be a similar complaint to be filed someplace in the United States — within the next couple of days I think. And I know that within the next couple of weeks a real PCR class action case will be filed in Canada.

___

I wish we had acted sooner, but it took us a while to understand what was going on. And you can’t go to court unless you have the full picture. Now we have the full picture, we believe. In our opinion, this is a staged pandemic — staged for completely other purposes than health care.

As I said, this is about money, power, and control over the people. And so this is actually the last step. Collecting damages should be the last step.

What we’re all working on right now — because we have to get our priorities straight — is to… we’re filing criminal complaints and administrative law complaints in order to stop the EMA [European Medicines Agency] — the European commission that decides on whether or not to admit these vaccines — in order to stop them from admitting these vaccines, because as we know now they’re extremely dangerous.

They’re not vaccines. This is genetic engineering.

___

[speaking about situation in Germany] I think there are about thirty percent of the population who are completely in line with the government, and who, if they had a choice but probably would wear three or four or five masks on top of each other. But then, there’s 20 percent who are of the opinion that there’s something seriously wrong and this should be stopped very soon. But 50 percent of the people — that’s what we estimate — are beginning to ask more and more questions. And, if I read my sister correctly, and other nurses and doctors who I spoke with, at least 90 percent of the people do not want vaccinations.

Tomorrow we’re meeting with a large group of lawyers and we’re going to decide who’s going to do what. Some of us are going to go to administrative law courts, some of us are going to work with the tort law cases — which is my specialty– and others are going to do criminal law.

___

More and more doctors are coming out of hiding and are approaching us, the Corona Committee, through our whistleblower tool. So things are beginning to boil…

See related: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on The Corona Crime Scandal | International Network of Lawyers Will Argue the Biggest Tort Case in World History

Trial Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: International Lawsuits Take on the Fraudulent Pandemic, Based on the Big Lies Around PCR Tests & Asymptomatic Infections

Reiner Fuellmich | Full Length Interview in Berlin | Planet Lockdown 

by Truth Matters
December 25, 2020

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German American lawyer with experience going after large companies like Deutsche Bank.

He is a member of the German Corona Investigative Committee. He discusses the current situation and his efforts to bring justice to the situation.

This interview was done as apart of the full length documentary. We are releasing the full interview for the betterment of public understanding of the situation.

The full film, when released, will be available at https://www.PlanetLockdownFilm.com



Original video is available at Truth Matters YouTube channel.

[As a service to protect truth from censorship & to share widely, mirrored copies of this video are available at Truth Comes to Light BitChute, Brighteon, Lbry/Odysee channels. All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Please follow links provided to support their work.]

Excerpts:

“Our focus is on the PCR test because if we manage to convince a court of law that this is a fraudulent enterprise — the PCR test being marketed with the assertion that it can detect infections. If we can convince a court of law that this is a false statement, then the whole house of cards is going to come crashing down because there’s nothing else.

That is the tool that they’re that they’re using in order to keep people in panic mode. And there’s no basis for this panic because, as I just pointed out, even according to the WHO which couldn’t quite escape the conclusions of  John Ioannidis, the mortality is, or lethality is, roughly the same as that of the common flu.”

___

“And also there’s already herd immunity. That’s another thing that has been overlooked. So there’s absolutely no reason for vaccines except for the pharmaceutical industry to make money and probably cause a lot of damage as far as health. And even there’s probably going to be a lot of fatalities too because these vaccines haven’t really been tested properly.”

___

“This is not gonna be one single lawsuit. It’s gonna be a number of different lawsuits that are going to be filed both on here in Germany on this side of the Atlantic and in the United States.”

___

“The intent is, or the intention that we think is important here, is to uncover the whole thing–  to use what we’ve learned through the corona committee — to use these pieces of evidence and the experts that we’ve heard in order to convince a court of law that this is a staged pandemic and that there’s other goals, other people who are behind this, and trying to push completely different goals. This has nothing to do with the world’s health.”

___

“We know that there’s something in the background but it’s not important for our lawsuit. For a lawsuit, we can concentrate on one thing only. These people lied when they’re telling the general public that PCR tests can tell us something about infections. “

___

“…but trying to use fear so that people will believe everyone, even their closest neighbors and relatives is a danger to them could be a super spreader, even if they’re completely healthy and show no symptoms. That’s why I’m saying. It’s not just a lie about ‘PCR tests can tell us something about infections’. In addition, they needed to lie about ‘people can be infectious even if they don’t show any symptoms’.”

___

“One of the law professors who advises us in the background pointed out to me, in this tort case there are two really important lies that have to be put front and center: One is PCR tests can tell us something about infections. The truth is it cannot. In particular, not the way these PCR tests, the Drosten tests are set up…”

___

“Lie number one, you cannot tell anything about infections by using these PCR tests because what they do is they test positive to almost everything, including, for example the debris, the fragments, of a common cold, of of your immune system’s fight against the common cold.

Lie number two, even more important I think, is — he says that there are asymptomatic infections. Which basically means anyone who is surrounding us, our relatives, our friends, and who shows no symptoms, who’s perfectly healthy or appears perfectly healthy, could be a threat. That’s what this induces. That’s what this fraud — there are asymptomatic infections — induces. It tells us, ‘oh my god, everybody could be potentially dangerous’. That is not true.”

___

“We have had not just lawyers who are trying to help, more and more lawyers who are coming out of hiding more or less, but we’ve also — The Corona Committee, that is — we’ve also had judges calling us, getting in touch with us, and asking us how they can help. “

___

“From what I’ve read and the people who we talked to here on this committee, historians and journalists, this is the so-called Great Reset that some very rich players of the corporate world, including Bill Gates, but also including Klaus Schwab. He’s using his World Economic Forum as a meeting forum for the corporate elite, self-appointed corporate elite, and the self-appointed political elite — to influence them, to manipulate them, to basically lobby them. What the goal is probably — probably population reduction is one of the goals, so that the resources of the world will last longer for those who will survive this. That, in my opinion, is one of the goals, maybe the basic goal.”