Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.
My first book, AIDS INC., was published in 1988. The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19.
In 1987-88, my main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, I had blithely assumed the obvious answer was yes. This created havoc in my investigation, because I was facing contradictions I couldn’t solve.
For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.
Finally, in the summer of 1987, I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.
I’m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here, but once HIV was out of the picture for me, many pieces fell into place. I discovered that, in EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus.
AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive symptoms and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”
Several years after the publication of AIDS INC, I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research: DOES HIV EXIST?
Was the purported virus ever truly discovered?
And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?
The following 1997 interview, conducted by brilliant freelance journalist, Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:
How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?
These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.
Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”
Here I’m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.
Christine Johnson: Does HIV cause AIDS?
Eleni Papadopulos: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.
CJ: Why not?
EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists.
… CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?
EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]
CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.
EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.
CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s a virus in the cultures?
EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.
… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [an enzyme] and will replicate when placed in new cultures. Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate.
EP: Exactly. It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other material in cell cultures. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.
The technology is complicated, but the concept is extremely simple. You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose, ordinary table sugar, made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier, or more dense, towards the bottom. Meanwhile, you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus. If you’re right, retroviral particles will be released from the cells and pass into the culture fluids. When you think everything is ready, you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further. In other words, they drift down the density gradient until they reach a spot where their own density is the same as that region of the sugar solution. When they get there they stop, all together. To use virological jargon, that’s where they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.
That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.
CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you’ve caught?
EP: Not only that. It’s the only way to know if you’ve caught a fish. Or anything at all.
CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?
EP: This is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.
CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.
EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.
CJ: And what was that method?
EP: All the steps I have just told you. The only scientific method that exists. Culture cells, find a particle, isolate the particle, take it to pieces, find out what’s inside, and then prove those particles are able to make more of the same with the same constituents when they’re added to a culture of uninfected cells.
CJ: So before AIDS came along there was a well-tried method for proving the existence of a retrovirus, but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method?
EP: They used some of the techniques, but they did not undertake every step including proving what particles, if any, are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient, the density that defines retroviral particles.
CJ: But what about their pictures?
EP: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…
—end of interview excerpt—
If you grasp the essentials of this discussion, you’ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV, because the methods for proving its existence were not followed.
Worse yet, it appears that Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier, the two scientists credited with the discovery of HIV—as well as other elite researchers—were aware they weren’t employing correct methods.
And so…as I’ve reported, there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus, SARS-CoV-2, since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done. And by large-scale, I mean: attempting to find and photograph the virus in a cohort of, say, 1000 people who are supposed to be “pandemic patients.” I’m NOT talking about one or two electron-microscope photos accompanying a study.
But even that isn’t the end of the story. There is one further potential limiting factor in virus research. I became aware of it about a year ago. Analysis of electron microscope findings is fraught with difficulty and doubt. Are scientists actually looking at what they think they’re looking at in these photos? I refer readers to the work of neurobiologist Harold Hillman, who concluded that researchers were, for the most part, looking at artifacts, not actual cells or entities within cells. Another suppressed controversy.
After more than 30 years of investigating medical research fraud, my general conclusion is, the deeper you go the stranger it gets. Or to put it another way, the worse it gets.
In order to determine whether a “virus” actually exists, the particles must be purified (freed from contaminants, pollutants, and foreign elements) so that they can be isolated (separated from everything else). Only once this occurs can the particles assumed to be “virus” then be proven pathogenic through experimentation. Only purified particles can be used to visualize as well as biochemically and molecularly characterize the “virus” in order to determine specific proteins, antibodies, genomic sequence, electron microscopy imaging, etc. Without purification, one can not determine that the “virus” exists at all and the non-specific laboratory results obtained from unpurified material are absolutely meaningless.
###
Luc Montagnier unleashed his “retroviral” monster onto the world in 1983 and it grew into a beast of its own kind during the proceeding decades. Countless lives have been destroyed by the fear of the HIV diagnosis as well as the subsequent subjection to toxic black label pharmaceuticals.
“HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS.” ~ Luc Montagnier, VI Int’l AIDS Conference, Jun 24 1990
If you have been following the news recently, you may have heard that there is currently a new “highly virulent strain” of HIV running around the Netherlands (I think there is a pun in there somewhere). You may also have heard that there is a brand new experimental HIV mRNA vaccine that has shown promise in animals. If you have really been paying attention, you may have even heard of French virologist Luc Montagnier, the man credited with the discovery of HIV, and his various critical statements against the dangerous use of mRNA vaccines for “Covid-19.” If so, you are also most likely aware that during this increased attention geared towards HIV and mRNA vaccines, Luc Montagnier died very recently on February 8th, 2022. While he lived to be the ripe old age of 89, many are suspicious of the timing of his death in light of the current HIV resurgence.
While I do find the timing of all of these events interesting, that is not what this article is about. I have always planned to dive into Montagnier’s original HIV paper but I have held off as the HIV/AIDS scam has been exposed brilliantly by many others before me. However, I have always felt that the HIV fraud is the perfect gateway into understanding the “Covid-19” fraud as the numerous parallels to what is going on today are uncanny. We can see the same misuse of PCR and antibody testing, the same rebranding and reuse of toxic pharmaceuticals, the same collection of various symptoms under one giant umbrella disease, the same propaganda spreading fear of the infected, and the same Anthony Fauci spearheading the whole thing. Even though it is not my intention to touch on all of these aspects in one article, the best place to start unravelling this tangled web of deceit begins with the man who was credited with unleashing the HIV monster upon the world, Luc Montagnier.
In 1983, Montagnier was sent a lymph node sample from a 33-year-old (note the age) male determined to have the symptoms of AIDS. From this sample, Montagnier and his team uncovered what they claimed was a new “retrovirus,” originally known as L.A.V., for lymphadenopathy associated “virus.” After several indirect experiments, the team concluded that further studies were needed in order to determine whether or not the new “virus” had any role in the etiology of AIDS. After this initial discovery of the potential “viral” cause of AIDS, there was a bit of drama in 1984 when American virologist Robert Gallo claimed to have uncovered the cause of AIDS himself with the discovery of HTLV-3. Long story short, it was later determined that Gallo had used/borrowed/stolen a sample from the same patient as Montagnier and uncovered the same “virus.” The “virus” was eventually renamed HIV in 1986 and in 2008, Luc Montagnier was awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery while Robert Gallo pouted off in a dark corner somewhere.
One of the nicest aspects of writing about Montagnier’s original HIV paper now in 2022 is that in retrospect, Montagnier himself tore apart his own evidence for the existence of his “retrovirus” in the decades following the publishing of his 1983 paper. A perfect example of this is found in a 1997 interview Montagnier did with scientific journalist Djamel Tahi. I have provided highlights from this interview below yet I definitely recommend reading the whole discussion sometime. While reading, note the assumptions made by Montagnier about his “virus,” the various contradictions in his statements, and the revelations about the relation (or lack thereof) of HIV to AIDS. This interview provides an in-depth look into the illogical mindframe of a virologist stuck in unproven theories and pseudoscientific dogma:
Interview with Professor Luc Montagnier by Djamel TAHI – (Pasteur Institut, July 1997)
Djamel TAHI: A group of scientists from Australia argues that nobody up till now has isolated the AIDS virus, HIV. For them the rules of retrovirus isolation have not been carefully respected for HIV. These rules are: culture, purification of the material by ultracentrifugation, Electron Microscopic (EM) photographs of the material which bands at the retrovirus density, characterisation of these particles, proof of the infectivity of the particles.
Luc Montagnier: No, that is not isolation. We did isolation because we “passed on” the virus, we made a culture of the virus. For example Gallo said: “They have not isolated the virus…and we (Gallo et al.), we have made it emerge in abundance in an immortal cell line.” But before making it emerge in immortal cell lines, we made it emerge in cultures of normal Iymphocytes from a blood donor. That is the principle criterion. One had something one could pass on serially, that one could maintain. And characterised as a retrovirus not only by its visual properties, but also biochemistry, RT [reverse transcriptase] activity which is truly specific of retroviruses. We also had the reactions of antibodies against some proteins, probably the internal proteins. I say probably by analogy with knowledge of other retroviruses. One could not have isolated this retrovirus without knowledge of other retroviruses, that’s obvious. But I believe we have answered the criteria of isolation. Totally.
Djamel TAHI: according to several published references cited by the Australian group, RT is not specific to retroviruses and moreover your work to detect RT was not done in the purified material?
Luc Montagnier: I believe we published in Science (May 1983) a gradient which showed that the RT had exactly the density of 1.16. So one had a ‘peak’ which was RT. So one has fulfilled this criterion for purification. But to pass it on serially is difficult because when you put the material in purification, into a gradient, retroviruses are very fragile, so they break each other and greatly lose their infectivity. But I think even so we were able to keep a little of their infectivity. But it was not as easy as one does it today, because the quantities of virus were nonetheless very feeble. At the beginning we stumbled on a virus which did not kill cells. The virus came from an asymptomatic patient and so was classified amongst the non-syncithia-forming, non-cytopathogenic viruses using the co-receptor ccr5 . It was the first BRU virus. One had very little of it, and one could not pass it on in an immortal cell line. We tried for some months, we didn’t succeed. We succeeded very easily with the second strain. But there lies the quite mysterious problem of the contamination of that second strain by the first. That was LAI.
Djamel TAHI: Why do the EM photographs published by you, come from the culture and not from the purification?
Luc Montagnier: There was so little production of virus it was impossible to see what might be in a concentrate of virus in the gradient. There was not enough virus to do that. Of course one looked for it, one looked for it in the tissues at the start, likewise in the biopsies. We saw some particles but they did not have the morphology typical of retroviruses. They were very different. Relatively different. So with the culture it took many hours to find the first pictures. It was a Roman effort! It’s easy to criticise after the event. What we did not have, and I have always recognised it, was that it was truly the cause of aids.
Djamel TAHI: How is it possible without EM pictures from the purification, to know whether or not these particles are viral and appertain to a retrovirus, moreover a specific retrovirus?
Luc Montagnier: Well, there were the pictures of the budding. We published images of budding which are characteristic of retroviruses. Having said that, on the morphology alone one could not say it was truly a retrovirus. For example, a French specialist of EMs of retroviruses publicly attacked me saying: “This is not a retrovirus, it is an arenavirus”. Because there are other families of virus which bud and have spikes on the surface, etc.
Djamel TAHI: Why this confusion? The EM pictures did not show clearly a retrovirus?
Luc Montagnier: At this period the best known retroviruses were those of type C, which were very typical. This retrovirus wasn’t a type C and lentiviruses were little known. I myself recognised it by looking at pictures of Equine infectious anaemia virus at the library, and later of the visna virus. But I repeat, it was not only the morphology and the budding, there was RT…it was the assemblage of these properties which made me say it was a retrovirus.
Djamel TAHI: About the RT, it is detected in the culture. Then there is purification where one finds retroviral particles. But at this density there are a lot of others elements, among others those which one calls “virus-like”.
Luc Montagnier: Exactly, exactly. If you like, it is not one property but the assemblage of the properties which made us say it was a retrovirus of the family of lentiviruses. Taken in isolation, each of the properties isn’t truly specific. It is the assemblage of them. So we had: the density, RT, pictures of budding and the analogy with the visna virus. Those are the four characteristics.
Djamel TAHI: But how do all these elements allow proof that it is a new retrovirus? Some of these elements could appertain to other things, “virus-like”…?
Luc Montagnier: Yes, and what’s more we have endogenous retroviruses which sometimes express particles – but of endogenous origin, and which therefore don’t have pathological roles, in any case not in aids.
Djamel TAHI: But then how can one make out the difference?
Luc Montagnier: Because we could “pass on” the virus. We passed on the RT activity in new Iymphocytes. We got a “peak” of replication. We kept track of the virus. It is the assembly of properties which made us say it was a retrovirus. And why new? The first question put to us by Nature was: “Is it not a laboratory contamination? Is it perhaps a mouse retrovirus or an animal retrovirus?”. To that one could say no! Because we had shown that the patient had antibodies against a protein of his own virus. The assemblage has a perfect logic! But it is important to take it as an assemblage. If you take each property separately, they are not specific. It is the assemblage which gives the specificity.
Djamel TAHI: With what did you culture the lymphocytes of your patient? With the H9 cell line?
Luc Montagnier: No, because it didn’t work at all with the H9. We used a lot of cell lines and the only one which could produce it was the Tampon (!?) Iymphocytes.
Djamel TAHI: When one looks at the published electron microscope photographs, for you as a retrovirologist it is clear it’s a retrovirus, a new retrovirus?
Luc Montagnier: No, at that point one cannot say. With the first budding pictures it could be a type C virus. One cannot distinguish.
Djamel TAHI: Could it be anything else than a retrovirus?
Luc Montagnier: No…well, after all, yes…it could be another budding virus. But we have an atlas. One knows a little bit from familiarity, what is a retrovirus and what is not. With the morphology one can distinguish but it takes a certain familiarity.
Djamel TAHI: Why no purification?
Luc Montagnier: I repeat we did not purify. We purified to characterise the density of the RT, which was soundly that of a retrovirus. But we didn’t take the “peak”…or it didn’t work…because if you purify, you damage. So for infectious particles it is better to not touch them too much. So you take simply the supernatant from the culture of lymphocytes which have produced the virus and you put it in a small quantity on some new cultures of lymphocytes. And it follows, you pass on the retrovirus serially and you always get the same characteristics and you increase the production each time you pass it on.
Djamel TAHI: But there comes a point when one must do the characterisation of the virus. This means: what are the proteins of which it’s composed?
Luc Montagnier: That’s it. So then, analysis of the proteins of the virus demands mass production and purification. It is necessary to do that. And there I should say that that partially failed. J.C. Chermann was in charge of that, at least for the internal proteins. And he had difficulties producing the virus and it didn’t work. But this was one possible way, the other way was to have the nucleic acid, cloning, etc. It’s this way which worked very quickly. The other way didn’t work because we had at that time a system of production which wasn’t robust enough. One had not enough particles produced to purify and characterise the viral proteins. It couldn’t be done. One couldn’t produce a lot of virus at that time because this virus didn’t emerge in the immortal cell line. We could do it with the LAI virus, but at that time we did not know that.
Djamel TAHI: Gallo did it?
Luc Montagnier: Gallo?…I don’t know if he really purified. I don’t believe so. I believe he launched very quickly into the molecular part, that’s to say cloning. What he did do is the Western Blot. We used the RIPA technique, so what they did that was new was they showed some proteins which one had not seen well with the other technique. Here is another aspect of characterising the virus. You cannot purify it but if you know somebody who has antibodies against the proteins of the virus, you can purify the antibody/antigen complex. That’s what one did. And thus one had a visible band, radioactively labelled, which one called protein 25, p25. And Gallo saw others. There was the p25 which he calledp24, there was p41 which we saw…
Djamel TAHI: About the antibodies, numerous studies have shown that these antibodies react with other proteins or elements which are not part of HIV. And that they can not be sufficient to characterise the proteins of HIV.
Luc Montagnier: No! Because we had controls. We had people who didn’t have AIDS and had no antibodies against these proteins. And the techniques we used were techniques I had refined myself some years previously, to detect the src gene. You see the src gene was detected by immunoprecipitation too. It was the p60 [protein 60]. I was very dexterous, and my technician also, with the RIPA technique. If one gets a specific reaction, it’s specific.
Djamel TAHI: But we know AIDS patients are infected with a multitude of other infectious agents which are susceptible to induce crossreactions.
Luc Montagnier: Yes, but antibodies are very specific. They know how to distinguish one molecule in one million. There is a very great affinity. When antibodies have sufficient affinity, you fish out something really very specific. With monoclonal antibodies you fish out really ONE protein. All of that is used for diagnostic antigen detection.
Djamel TAHI: For you the p41 was not of viral origin and so didn’t belong to HIV. For Gallo it was the most specific protein of the HIV. Why this contradiction?
Luc Montagnier: We were both reasonably right. That’s to say that I in my RIPA technique…in effect there are cellular proteins that one meets everywhere – there’s a non-specific “background noise”, and amongst these proteins one is very abundant in cells, which is actin. And this protein has a molecular weight 43000kd. So, it was there. So I was reasonably right, but what Gallo saw on the other hand was the gp41 of HIV, because he was using the Western Blot. And that I have recognised.
Djamel TAHI: For you p24 was the most specific protein of HIV, for Gallo not at all. One recognises thanks to other studies that antibodies directed against p24 were often found in patients who were not infected with HIV, and even certain animals. In fact today, an antibody reaction with p24 is considered non specific.
Luc Montagnier: It is not sufficient for diagnosing HIV infection.
Djamel TAHI: No protein is sufficient.
Luc Montagnier: No protein is sufficient anyway. But at the time the problem didn’t reveal itself like that. The problem was to know whether it was an HTLV or not. The only human retrovirus known was HTLV. And we showed clearly that it was not an HTLV, that Gallo’s monoclonal antibodies against the p24 of HTLV did no recognise the p25 of HIV.
Djamel TAHI: At the density of retroviruses, 1.16, there are a lot of particles, but only 20% of them appertain to HIV. Why are 80% of the proteins not viral and the others are? How can one make out the difference?
Luc Montagnier: There are two explanations. For the one part, at this density you have what one calls microvesicles of cellular origin, which have approximately the same size as the virus, and then the virus itself, in budding, brings cellular proteins. So effectively these proteins are not viral, they are cellular in origin. So, how to make out the difference?! Frankly with this technique one can’t do it precisely. What we can do is to purify the virus to the maximum with successive gradients, and you always stumble on the same proteins.
Djamel TAHI: The others disappear?
Luc Montagnier: Let’s say the others reduce a little bit. You take off the microvesicles, but each time you lose a lot of virus, so it’s necessary to have a lot of virus to start off in order to keep a little bit when you arrive at the end. And then again it’s the molecular analysis, it’s the sequence of these proteins which is going allow one to say whether they are of viral origin or not. That’s what we began for p25, that failed…and the other technique is to do the cloning, and so then you have the DNA and from the DNA you get the proteins. You deduce the sequence of the proteins and their size and, you stumble again on what you’ve already observed with immunoprecipitation or with gel electrophoresis. And one knows by analogy with the sizes of the proteins of other retroviruses, one can deduce quite closely these proteins. So you have the p25 which was close to the p24 of HTLV, you have the p18.. in the end you have the others. On the other hand the one which was very different was the very large protein, p120.
Luc Montagnier’s 1997 interview is a highlight reel of revelations. We can see clearly, as Montagnier repeated on more than one occasion, that he himself (and Robert Gallo according to his knowledge) did not purify any “virus.” Why is this important? In order to determine whether a “virus” actually exists, the particles must be purified (freed from contaminants, pollutants, and foreign elements) so that they can be isolated (separated from everything else). Only once this occurs can the particles assumed to be “virus” then be proven pathogenic through experimentation. Only purified particles can be used to visualize as well as biochemically and molecularly characterize the “virus” in order to determine specific proteins, antibodies, genomic sequence, electron microscopy imaging, etc. Without purification, one can not determine that the “virus” exists at all and the non-specific laboratory results obtained from unpurified material are absolutely meaningless.
As most virologists do, Montagnier claimed that even though he did not purify the “virus” and therefore did not have direct evidence for its existence, he had plenty of non-specific indirect evidence that when added together, became “specific” to the “virus.” It was the accumulation of indirect evidence that proved his “virus” existed. In essence, he had a circumstantial case based upon evidence that was not drawn from direct observation. This would be considered a weak case in a court of law.
Looking at his circumstantial case, Montagnier admitted that without purification, images of particles taken from electron microscopy could not be definitively claimed to be “retroviruses” or “viruses” of any kind based on morphological appearance alone. He stated that it was necessary to have knowledge of other “retroviruses” first in order to discover a new one. He himself referred to an atlas of images of other “retroviruses” in order to claim that his unpurified particles were also “retroviruses.”
However, what Montagnier did not admit is that this atlas of “retroviruses” was also made up of images of unpurified particles. Therefore, none of the particles imaged in his atlas could be considered “retrovirus” particles until evidence of purified/isolated “retroviruses” are released. Purification would have had to have occurred with the very first “retrovirus” ever discovered and imaged in order for this method of identification to be valid. Montagnier admitted that while purification is a necessary step, it is impossible as the more you purify the sample, the more damage occurs to the particles and the less “virus” you have at the end. Since he stated that they did not purify the culture used to obtain the EM images of “HIV,” there is no proof that the random particles claimed to be HIV are in fact a “virus” at all.
Montagnier also tried to claim that antibodies/antigens, such as the p24 protein, are specific to HIV and that they can be used as part of the evidence for the existence of his “virus.” However, as Djamel expertly pointed out, these proteins are not specific to HIV as there are over 60 conditions (such as pregnancy, tuberculosis, the flu vaccine, etc.) with related proteins that can trigger positive HIV tests. Montagnier ended up admitting that no protein is sufficient for diagnosing HIV thus nullifying any claims he made about the specificity of antibodies/antigens and their value in being used as indirect evidence for the existence of an unseen “virus.”
The biggest revelation by Montagnier in this 1997 interview is his belief that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. While he believed he had discovered a new “retrovirus” based on an accumulation of weak indirect evidence, according to his statement it was not pathogenic. If we take his indirect evidence and break it down, Motagnier did not have purified “virus” particles which means his EM images are useless, his antibody tests are meaningless, and the genomic sequence is worthless. Without purified particles, he had no proof of pathogeniticity as he had no valid independent variable in order to establish cause and effect. It is amazing that Montagnier believed he had a “virus” at all as in every meaningful way possible, he did not have evidence of one.
All of that being said, for those still interested in reading Montagnier’s original 1983 paper containing no evidence of any “virus” whatsoever, here is the paper in its entirety:
Isolation of a T-Lymphotropic Retrovirus from a Patientat Risk for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
Abstract. A retrovirus belonging to the family of recently discovered human T-cell leukemia viruses (HTLV), but clearly distinct from each previous isolate, has been isolated from a Caucasian patient with signs and symptoms that often precede the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). This virus is a typical type-C RNA tumor virus, buds from the cell membrane, prefers magnesium for reverse transcriptase activity, and has an internal antigen (p25) similar to HTLVp24. Antibodies from serum of this patient react with proteins from viruses of the HTLV-I subgroup, but type-specific antisera to HTLV-I do not precipitate proteins of the new isolate. The virus from this patient has been transmitted into cord blood lymphocytes, and the virus produced by these cells is similar to the original isolate.
From these studies it is concluded that this virus as well as the previous HTLV isolates belong to a general family of T-lymphotropic retroviruses that are horizontally transmitted in humans and may be involved in several pathological syndromes, including AIDS.The acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) has recently been recognized in several countries (1). The disease has been reported mainly in homosexual males with multiple partners, and epidemiological studies suggest horizontal transmission by sexual routes (2) as well as by intravenous drug administration (3), and blood transfusion (4).
The pronounced depression of cellular immunity that occurs in patients with AIDS and the quantitative modifications of subpopulations of their T lymphocytes (5) suggest that T cells or a subset of T cells might be a preferential target for the putative infectious agent. Alternatively, these modifications may result from subsequent infections. The depressed cellular immunity may result in serious opportunistic infections in AIDS patients, many of whom develop Kaposi’s sarcoma (1). However, a picture of persistent multiple lymphadenopathies has also been described in homosexual males (6) and infants (7) who may or may not develop AIDS (8).
The histological aspect of such lymph nodes is that of reactive hyperplasia. Such cases may correspond to an early or a milder form of the disease. We report here the isolation of a novel retrovirus from a lymph node of a homosexual patient with multiple lymphadenopathies. The virus appears to be a member of the human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) family (9).
The retrovirus was propagated in cultures of T lymphocytes from a healthy adult donor and from umbilical cord blood of newborn humans. Viral core proteins were not immunologically related to the p24 and p19 proteins of subgroup I of HTLV (9). However, serum of the patient reacted strongly with surface antigen (or antigens) present on HTLV-I-infected cells. Moreover, the ionic requirements of the viral reverse transcriptase were close to that of HTLV. Recently, a type-C retrovirus was also identified in T cells from a patient with hairy cell leukemia. Analysis of the proteins of this virus showed they were related to, but clearly different from, proteins of previous HTLV isolates (10).
Moreover, recent studies of the nucleic acid sequences of this new virus show it is less than 10 percent homologous to the earlier HTLV isolates (11). This virus was called HTLV-II to distinguish it from all the earlier, highly related viruses termed HTLV-I. The new retrovirus reported here appears to also differ from HTLV-II. We tentatively conclude that this virus, as well as all previous HTLV isolates, belong to a family of T-lymphotropic retroviruses that are horizontallytransmitted in humans and may be involved in several pathological syndromes, including AIDS.
The patient was a 33-year-old homosexual male who sought medical consultation in December 1982 for cervical lymphadenopathy and asthenia (patient 1). Examination showed axillary and inguinal lymphadenopathies. Neither fever nor recent loss of weight were noted. The patient had a history of several episodes of gonorrhea and had been treated for syphilis in September 1982. During interviews he indicated that he had had more than 50 sexual partners per year and had traveled to many countries, including North Africa, Greece, and India. His last trip to New York was in 1979.
Laboratory tests indicated positive serology (immunoglobulin G) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus. Herpes simplex virus was detected in cells from his throat that were cultured on human and monkey cells. A biopsy of a cervical lymph node was performed. One sample served for histological examination, which revealed follicular hyperplasia without change of the general architecture of the lymph node. Immunohistological studies revealed, in paracortical areas, numerous T lymphocytes (OKT3+). Typing of the whole cellular suspension indicated that 62 percent of the cells were T lymphocytes (OKT3+), 44 percent were T-helper cells (OKT4+), and 16 percent were suppressor cells (OKT8+).
Cells of the same biopsied lymph node were put in culture medium with phytohemagglutinin (PHA), T-cell growth factor (TCGF), and antiserum to human a interferon (12). The reason for using this antiserum was to neutralize endogenous interferon which is secreted by cells chronically infected by viruses, including retroviruses. In the mouse system, we had previously shown that antiserum to interferon could increase retrovirus production by a factor of 10 to 50 (13). After 3 days, the culture was continued in the same medium without PHA. Samples were regularly taken for assay of reverse transcriptase and for examination in the electron microscope.
After 15 days of culture, a reversetranscriptase activity was detected in the culture supernatant by using the ionic conditions described for HTLV-I (14). Virus production continued for 15 days and decreased thereafter, in parallel with the decline of lymphocyte proliferation. Peripheral blood lymphocytes cultured in the same way were consistently negative for reverse transcriptase activity, even after 6 weeks. Cytomegalovirus could be detected, upon prolonged co-cultivation with MRC5 cells, in the original biopsy tissue, but not in the cultured T lymphocytes at any time of the culture.
Virus transmission was attempted with the use of a culture of T lymphocytes established from an adult healthy donor of the Blood Transfusion Center at the Pasteur Institute. On day 3, half of the culture was cocultivated with lymphocytes from the biopsy after centrifugation of the mixed cell suspensions. Reverse transcriptase activity could be detected in the supernatant on day 15 of the coculture but was not detectable on days 5 and 10. The reverse transcriptase had the same characteristics as that released by the patient’s cells and the amount released remained stable for 15 to 20 days. Cells of the uninfected culture of the donor lymphocytes did not release reverse transcriptase activity during this period or up to 6 weeks whenthe culture was discontinued.
The cell-free supernatant of the infected coculture was used to infect 3-day-old cultures of T lymphocytes from two umbilical cords, LCl and LC5, in the presence of Polybrene (2 ,ug/ml). After a lag period of 7 days, a relatively high titer of reverse transcriptase activity was detected in both of the cord lymphocyte cultures. Identical cultures, which had not been infected, remained negative. These two successive infections clearly show that the virus could be propagated on normal lymphocytes from either newborns or adults.
That this new isolate was a retrovirus was further indicated by its density in a sucrose gradient, which was 1.16, and by its labeling with [3H]uridine (Fig. 1). Electron microscopy of the infected umbilical cord lymphocytes showed characteristic immature particles with dense crescent (C-type) budding at the plasma membrane (Fig. 2).
Virus-infected cells from the original biopsy as well as infected lymphocytes from the first and second viral passages were used to determine the optimal requirements for reverse transcriptase activity and the template specificity of the enzyme. The results were the same in all instances. The reverse transcriptase activity displayed a strong affinity for poly(adenylate-oligodeoxythymidylate) [poly(A) -oligo(dT)], and required Mg2+ with an optimal concentration (5 mM) slightly lower than that for HT (14) and an optimal pH of 7.8. The reaction was not inhibited by actinomycin D. This character, as well as the preferential specificity for riboseadenylate *deoxythymidylate over deoxyadenylate * deoxythymidylate, distinguish the viral enzyme from DNA-dependent polymerases.
We then determined whether or not this isolate was indistinguishable from HTLV-1 isolates. Human T-cell leukemia virus has been isolated from cultured T lymphocytes of patients with T lymphomas and T leukemias [for a review, see (9)]. The antibodies used were specific for the p19 and p24 core proteins of HTLV-I. A monoclonal antibody to p19 (15) and a polyclonal goat antibody to p24 (16) were used in an indirect fluorescence assay against infected cells from the biopsy of patient 1 and lymphocytes obtained from a healthy donor and infected with the same virus. As shown in Table 1, the virus-producing cells did not react with either type of antibody, whereas two lines of cord lymphocytes chronically infected with HTLV (17) and used as controls showed strong surface fluorescence.
When serum from patient 1 was tested against infected lymphocytes from the biopsy the surface fluorescence was as ntense as that of the control HTLV-producing lines. This suggests that serum of the patient contains antibodies
that recognize a common antigen present on HTLV-I-producing cells and on the patient’s lymphocytes. Similarly, cord lymphocytes infected with the virus from patient 1 did not react with antibodies to p19 or p24. Only a minor proportion of the cells (about I percent) reacted with the patient’s serum. This may indicatethat only this fraction of the cells was infected and produced virus. Alternatively, the antigen recognized by the patient’s serum may contain cellular determinants that show less expression in T lymphocytes of newborns.
We also cultured T lymphocytes from a lymph node of another patient (patient 2) who presented with multiple adenopathies and had been in close contact with an AIDS case. These lymphocytes did not produce viral reverse transcriptase; however, they reacted in the immunofluorescence assay with serum from patient 1. Moreover, serum from patient 2 reacted strongly with control HTLV-producing lines (not shown). In order to determine which viral antigen was recognized by antibodies present in’ the two patients’ sera, several immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out. Cord lymphocytes infected with virus from patient I and uninfected controls were labeled with [35S]methionine for 20 hours. Cells were lysed with detergents, and a cytoplasmic S10 extract was made. Labeled virus released in the supernatant was banded in a sucrose gradient.
Both materials were immunoprecipitated by antiserum to HTLV- I p24, by serum from patients 1 and 2, and by serum samples from healthy donors. Immunocomplexes were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions. Figure 3 shows that a p25 protein present in the virus-infected cells from patient 1 and in LC1 cells infected with this virus, was specifically recognized by serum from patients I and 2 but not by antiserum to HTLV-1 p24 or serum of normal donors.
Conversely, the p24 present in control HTLV-infected cell extracts was recognized by antibodies to HTLV but not by serum from patient 1. A weak band (lane 2, Fig. 3B) could hardly be seen with serum from patient 2, suggesting some similarities of the p25 protein from this patient’s cells with HTLV-1 p24. When purified, labeled virus from patient I was analyzed under similar conditions, three major proteins could be seen: the p25 protein and proteins with molecular weights of 80,000 and 45,000. The 45K protein may be dueto contamination of the virus by cellular actin which was present in immunoprecipitates of all the cell extracts (Fig. 3).
These results, together with the immunofluorescence data, indicate that the retrovirus from patient 1 contains a major p25 protein, similar in size to that of HTLV-I but different immunologically. The DNA sequences of these and other members of the HTLV family are being compared. All attempts to infect other cells such as a B-lymphoblastoid cell line (Raji), immature or pre-T cell lines (CEM, HSB2), and normal fibroblasts (feline and mink lung cell lines) were unsuccessful.
The role of this virus in the etiology of AIDS remains to be determined. Patient 1 had circulating antibodies against the virus, and some of the latter persisted in lymphocytes of his lymph node (or nodes). The virus-producing lymphocytes seemed to have no increased growth potential in vitro compared to the uninfected cells. Therefore, the multiple lymphadenopathies may represent a host reaction against the persistent viral infection rather than hyperproliferation of virus-infected lymphocytes. Other factors, such as repeated infection by the same virus or other bacterial and viral agents may, in some patients, overload this early defense mechanism and bring about an irreversible depletion of T cells involved in cellular immunity.
doi: 10.1126/science.6189183.
That’s an impressive circle. Montagnier looks quite pleased with his creation.
In Summary:
According to HIV discoverer Luc Montagnier, they did “isolate” HIV because they “passed on” the “virus” and they made a culture of the “virus”
He stated that Robert Gallo (American virologist who plagiarized Montagnier’s work) said: “They have not isolated the virus…and we (Gallo et al.), we have made it emerge in abundance in an immortal cell line.”
But before making it emerge in immortal cell lines, Montagnier claimed his team made it emerge in cultures of normal Iymphocytes from a blood donor
Montagnier stated that it is obvious one could not have isolated any retrovirus without knowledge of other “retroviruses”
To pass a “virus” on serially is difficult because when you put the material in purification, into a gradient, “retroviruses” are very fragile, so they break each other and greatly lose their infectivity
At the beginning they stumbled on a “virus” which did not kill cells
It was the first BRU “virus,” yet they had very little of it and could not pass it on in an immortal cell line
They were later successful with the second strain yet Montagnier stated that there lies the quite mysterious problem of the contamination of that second strain by the first which was LAI
Quick sidenote: BRU and LAI are considered the first strains of HIV
“The original isolate HIV-1 Bru, formerly called LAV, was derived from patient BRU. HIV-1 Lai was derived from patient LAI and contaminated a HIV-1 Bru culture between 20 July and 3 August 1983. The culture became, in effect, HIV-1 Lai, identifiable by a unique motif in the V3 loop. Because of this contamination two, rather than one, HIV-1 isolates were sent to the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology at the National Cancer Institute on 23 September 1983.”
When asked about the lack of purification for EM imaging of HIV, Montagnier stated that there was so little production of “virus”it was impossible to see what might be in a concentrate of “virus” in the gradient
What they saw were some particles but they did not have the morphology typical of “retroviruses” as they were very different
He claimed it was “a Roman effort” with the culture as it took many hours to find the first pictures
On the morphology alone one could not say the EM images were truly a “retrovirus”
A French specialist of EMs of “retroviruses” publicly attacked Montagnier saying: “This is not a retrovirus, it is an arenavirus” as there are other families of “virus” which bud and have spikes on the surface, etc.
He stated that it was not only the morphology and the budding, but that there was reverse transcriptase
It was not one property but the assemblage of the properties which made them say it was a “retrovirus” of the family of “lentiviruses”
Taken in isolation, each of the properties isn’t truly specific
The four properties were:
The density
Reverse Transcriptase
Pictures of budding
The analogy with the visna “virus”
Montagnier stated that we have endogenous (human origin) “retroviruses” which sometimes express particles – but of endogenous origin, and which therefore don’t have pathological roles
The first question put to them by Nature was: “Is it not a laboratory contamination? Is it perhaps a mouse “retrovirus” or an animal “retrovirus?”
Montagnier stated that it was important to take it as an assemblage as if you take each property separately, they are not specific and it is the assemblage which gives the specificity
When culturing the “virus,” they used a lot of cell lines and the only one which could produce it was the Tampon (!?) Iymphocytes
He admitted that when viewing EM images, one cannot distinguish if the particle is a “retrovirus” or not
They used an atlas of previous “retroviruses” to determine if the “virus” had the morphology of one as it takes a certain familiarity to distinguish them
Montagnier repeated they did not purify the “virus” because if you purify, you damage the “virus” particles
He stated that for infectious particles, it is better to not touch them too much
Analysis of the proteins of the “virus” demands mass production and purification and so it is necessary to do that
In that regard, Montagnier claimed that they partially failed
They did not have enough particles produced to purify and characterise the “viral” proteins as it couldn’t be done
They couldn’t produce a lot of “virus” at that time because the “virus” didn’t emerge in the immortal cell line
Montagnier stated that he believed Gallo also did not purify and he believed Gallo had launched very quickly into the molecular cloning part
He also said that you cannot purify the “virus” but if you know somebody who has antibodies against the proteins of the “virus,” you can purify the antibody/antigen complex
However, this is a complete contradiction as he claimed that purification needed to be done in order to characterise the proteins of the “virus,” so if you can’t purify the “virus” to characterise the proteins, you would be unable to know which proteins act against the “virus”as well as any specific antibodies reacting to them
Montagnier claimed antibodies are very specific and that they know how to distinguish one molecule in one million
With monoclonal antibodies you fish out really ONE protein and all of that is used for diagnostic antigen detection
There are cellular proteins that one meets everywhere – there’s a non-specific “background noise”
An antibody reaction with p24 is considered non specific and it is not sufficient for diagnosing HIV infection
Montagnier agreed that no protein is sufficient to diagnose HIV
When asked why, at the 1.16 density gradient band, 80% of the particles are “non-viral” and only 20% are HIV, Montagnier explained that at this density, there are microvesicles of cellular origin, which have approximately the same size as the “virus,” and then the “virus” itself, in budding, brings cellular proteins
Effectively these proteins are not “viral” and are cellular in origin
He stated that with this technique one can’t differentiate them precisely
If you purify the “virus” to the maximum with successive gradients, you always stumble on the same proteins
Montagnier stated that the other proteins only reduce a little bit as you can take off the microvesicles, but each time you lose a lot of “virus,” so it’s necessary to have a lot of “virus” to start off in order to keep a little bit when you arrive at the end
And then again it’s the molecular analysis, it’s the sequence of these proteins which is going allow one to say whether they are of “viral” origin or not
However, what Montagnier doesn’t seem to understand is that if you can not purify the “virus” in order to determine which proteins belong to the “virus,” sequencing proteins will not tellyou if they are “viral” or not
This “virus” is a typical type-C RNA tumor “virus,” buds from the cell membrane, prefers magnesium for reverse transcriptase activity, and has an internal antigen (p25) similar to HTLVp24
Antibodies from serum of this patient react with proteins from “viruses” of the HTLV-I subgroup, but type-specific antisera to HTLV-I do not precipitate proteins of the new isolate
Remember, Montagnier admitted they did not purify the “virus” and that purification was necessary in order to characterise the proteins of the “virus, so how would they know if the antibodies are reacting to “virus” proteins?
The “virus” from this patient has been transmitted into cord blood lymphocytes, and the “virus” produced by these cells is similar to the original isolate
From these studies it is concluded that this “virus” as well as the previous HTLV isolates belong to a general family of T-lymphotropic “retroviruses” that are horizontally transmitted in humans and may be involved in several pathological syndromes, including AIDS
The pronounced depression of cellular immunity that occurs in patients with AIDS and the quantitative modifications of subpopulations of their T lymphocytes suggest that T cells or a subset of T cells might be a preferential target for the putative infectious agent
Alternatively, these modifications may result from subsequent infections
The depressed cellular immunity may result in serious opportunistic infections in AIDS patients, many of whom develop Kaposi’s sarcoma
However, a picture of persistent multiple lymphadenopathies has also been described in homosexual males and infants who may or may not develop AIDS
The “retrovirus” was propagated in cultures of T lymphocytes from a healthy adult donor and from umbilical cord blood of newborn humans
They tentatively (i.e. subject to further confirmation; not definitely) concluded that this “virus,” as well as all previous HTLV isolates, belong to a family of T-lymphotropic “retroviruses” that are horizontally transmitted in humans and may be involved in several pathological syndromes, including AIDS
The patient the “virus” came from had a history of several episodes of gonorrhea and had been treated for syphilis in September 1982
Oddly enough, syphilis has the exact same symptoms of AIDS and the usual treatment is a series of Penicllin injections, which coincidentally (or not) can destroy a person’s “immune” system
Laboratory tests indicated positive serology (immunoglobulin G) for “cytomegalovirus” (CMV) and Epstein-Barr “virus“
Herpes simplex “virus” was detected in cells from his throat that were cultured on human and monkey cells
Cells of the same biopsied lymph node were put in culture medium with phytohemagglutinin (PHA), T-cell growth factor (TCGF), and antiserum to human a interferon
The reason for using this antiserum was to neutralize endogenous interferon which is secreted by cells chronically infected by “viruses,” including “retroviruses”
After 15 days of culture, a reverse transcriptase activity was detected in the culture supernatant by using the ionic conditions described for HTLV-I and “virus” production continued for 15 days and decreased thereafter, in parallel with the decline of lymphocyte proliferation
Quick sidenote: Montagnier stated here that the “virus” was cultured for 30 days, as it took 15 days for the reverse transcriptase activity to be detected and another 15 days for the “virus” production to decrease. Interestingly, in a paper he wrote in 2003, Montagnier stated this:
“The initial clinical isolate, unlike HTLV, had no transforming or cytopathic effects on T lymphocytes. Barré-Sinoussi notes in her commentary that the lymphocyte culture I started from the patient’s lymph node biopsy died after 4 weeks. But this was anticipated as soon as we realized that the cells were not transformed, because normal cultures of the same type also die within this time period.The need for succesive use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to maintain a viral culture was therefore a likely hypothesis that proved to be correct. The virus would later be classified as non-syncytium-inducing, as is usually the case for viruses isolated from recently infected HIV patients who are either asymptomatic or present with lymphadenopathies. However, the first typical cytopathic effect, formation of large syncytia, was not observed until 5 months later, in a third clinical sample (HIV LAI) from a patient who had full-blown AIDS.”
It appears they cultured the “virus” for 30 days knowing full well that regular cultures of the same type die within this 4 week time frame. Montagnier stated that they did not even notice the cytopathic effect (CPE) until they had a third clinical sample 5 months later. CPE is claimed to be structural changes in host cells that are caused by “viral” invasion and yet, this was absent in their first two samples.
On day 3, half of the culture was cocultivated with lymphocytes from the biopsy after centrifugation of the mixed cell suspensions
Cells of the uninfected culture of the donor lymphocytes did not release reverse transcriptase activity during this period or up to 6 weeks when the culture was discontinued
The cell-free supernatant of the infected coculture was used to infect 3-day-old cultures of T lymphocytes from two umbilical cords, LCl and LC5, in the presence of Polybrene (2 ,ug/ml)
FYI, Polybrene was shown to negatively impact the proliferation and maintenance of growth potential of human keratinocytes here
Electron microscopy of the infected umbilical cord lymphocytes showed characteristic immature particles with dense crescent (C-type) budding at the plasma membrane
“Virus-infected” cells from the original biopsy as well as infected lymphocytes from the first and second “viral” passages were used to determine the optimal requirements for reverse transcriptase activity and the template specificity of the enzyme
A monoclonal antibody to p19 (15) and a polyclonal goat antibody to p24 (16) were used in an indirect (i.e. not directly caused by or resulting from something) fluorescence assay against infected cells from the biopsy of patient 1 and lymphocytesobtained from a healthy donor and infected with the same “virus” (why did they not use healthy donor lymphocytes without the added “virus?”)
Cord lymphocytes infected with the “virus” from patient 1 did not react with antibodies to p19 or p24
Only a minor proportion of the cells (about I percent) reacted with the patient’s serum
This may indicate that only this fraction of the cells was infected and produced “virus”
When purified, labeled “virus” from patient I was analyzed under similar conditions, three major proteins could be seen: the p25 protein and proteins with molecular weights of 80,000 and 45,000
The 45K protein may be due to contamination of the “virus” by cellular actin which was present in immunoprecipitates of all the cell extracts (i.e. “purified” with contaminants…otherwise known as not purified)
All attempts to infect other cells such as a B-lymphoblastoid cell line (Raji), immature or pre-T cell lines (CEM, HSB2), and normal fibroblasts (feline and mink lung cell lines) were unsuccessful
The role of this “virus” in the etiology of AIDS remains to be determined (ultimately, Montagnier believed his “virus” did not cause AIDS)
Other factors, such as repeated infection by the same “virus” or other bacterial and “viral” agents may, in some patients, overload this early defense mechanism and bring about an irreversible depletion of T cells involved in cellular immunity
Luc Montagnier unleashed his “retroviral” monster onto the world in 1983 and it grew into a beast of its own kind during the proceeding decades. Countless lives have been destroyed by the fear of the HIV diagnosis as well as the subsequent subjection to toxic black label pharmaceuticals. The stigma of the positive test result is the “viral” scarlet letter unfairly placed upon a person in a toxic state due to lifestyle choices and/or environmental factors. It does not matter that Montagnier attempted to steer his monster from the lethal killer it was made out to be into a harmless passenger inside the human body. It does not matter that he believed HIV did not cause AIDS. It does not matter that he believed that co-factors other than a “virus” should be examined in regards to AIDS. It does not matter that he believed HIV could be eliminated based on healthy diet/lifestyle choices. It does not matter that he admitted to not purifying any “virus.” Montagnier’s legacy is tied to the beast of his own creation. He opened Pandora’s Box and released this fraudulent curse upon the world. For that, I doubt he will rest in peace.
In an October, 2021 Forbes article, AstraZeneca marketed an experimental “injectable antibody therapy cocktail” to a fearful public. Without valid research, or proof, it claimed its cocktail to be effective at preventing severe illness or death in people with mild or moderate Covid-19 infections. It claimed its therapy cut the risk of death or severe illness by two-thirds (67%) if given within five days of showing symptoms.
The cocktail was marked as experimental for a reason.
Neither AstraZeneca, nor any vaccine maker, has ever revealed the ingredients of its experimental antibody or mRNA cocktail to the public. Neither have they provided informed consent as part of the offer.
Everything is an offer to contract, whether it be a personal, medical, or a business relationship. Every vaccinated subject must sign that they take full responsibility. Because no one else will.
According to the AMA, Informed Consent is required in all medical contracts in order to provide the nature, purpose, burdens, and risks of the proposed medical intervention so the patient can formally consent. The informed consent process falls under 45 CFR 46, for human subjects in research, which sounds a lot like conducting human experimentation. Americans were warned by the Secretary of State in March of 2020 that COVID is a live exercise.
In the beginning, COVID injectables were deployed as Emergency Use Authorized, or EUA, meaning, Off-label, Experimental Research, Unapproved, and without Informed Consent. In other words, use at your own discretion. Until recently, if you wanted to know what was inside the injectable mRNA cocktails, you were handed a blank piece of paper. However, what was hidden is now being revealed.
In November 2020 Dr Andreas Noack, a German chemist and one of the EU’s top graphene experts, released a video explaining that he had discovered graphene hydroxide contained in the COVID-19 experimental treatments. He described how the graphene hydroxide nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of recipients and how they would not show up on an autopsy or normal toxicology tests given their atomic size. On 26th November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about graphene hydroxide, he died in suspicious circumstances.
Professor Dr Pablo Campra, University of Almeria, Spain also examined Covid-19 experimental treatments in November 2021 using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. He too confirmed the presence of graphene.
The charges center around the nano-ingredient, graphene hydroxide (GHO), discovered in EUA COVID injections. Considered to be a trade secret, GHO is not found on any label. Therefore, no one would be the wiser, except that GHO can be identified for its polymeric signature properties using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. Other methods used to verify the serums morphologies and contents include: Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments.
Damage Report
Trade secrets aside, Graphene hydroxide is well known in the world of science. A Pubmed database search generates over 18,000 published studies on ‘Graphene oxide’. Whether called graphene oxide (GO), or graphene hydroxide, (GOH), it is nanotechnology invisible to the human eye. Graphene has optical, thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties, with applications in silicon-based semi-conductor devices. Once inside the human body, graphene acquires magnetic properties and becomes a superconductor. The human superconductor.
Graphene is isolated from crystalline graphite. It is a flat monolayer composed of single-atom-thick, two-dimensional sheets of a hexagonally arranged honeycomb lattice. A summary of the findings detailed in the attached toxicology report reveals that Graphene nanomaterials (GFNs) can penetrate the body’s natural barriers and damage the central nervous system.
Summary of Graphene hydroxide (GOH) in biological systems:
Epigenetic toxicity comes from toxic environmental exposures which exert undesirable genetic effects on living organisms. Epigenetic toxins are found in water, air, food, and medical drugs, including nanotech. The current focus of graphene nanotech utilizes its electromagnetic properties as a carrier and adjuvant in vaccines. For instance, UV Fluorescence test results from the Pfizer BioNanoTech vaccine, show nanomaterial present in the vial that corresponds perfectly to that of graphene oxide (340 nm).
Due to its magnetic properties, Graphene oxide nanoparticles have the ability to absorb radiation from frequency 5G technology. Unfortunately, most MSDS sheets ignore contact by injection, and electromagnetic effects. If injected into the body, these nanoparticles have the ability to not only cause biological harm, but also to absorb radiation and convert gigahertz signals to terahertz signals, thousands of times higher than those created by silicon, alone. The European Union research group called EUCALL states:
What makes this feat possible is the highly efficient non-linear interaction between light and matter that occurs in graphene. The researchers used graphene containing a large number of free electrons that originated from the interaction between graphene and the substrate onto which it was deposited. When these electrons became excited by an oscillating electric field in room-temperature conditions, they rapidly shared their energy with bound electrons in the material.
It is best to lower expectations for justice to prevail in the UK case, or any case, of criminal corporations who geo-engineer humanity using experimental cocktails. After all, it is the individuals hidden behind the “corporate entity” who write history. For as long as humans have lived on earth, biology, along with history, has been altered. (See Arthur Firstenberg’s book, The Invisible Rainbow). Nothing changes when criminal defendants are identified as “corporate entities,” without names and insurance bonds. It becomes impossible stop the interconnected crimes, let alone stop the madness.
History and biology continue to be rewritten and transformed. While fraud is allowed to continue under the guise of ineffective public shaming rituals that pass for justice, humanity is entering a new Transhuman Age. With so many corporate criminals protected by bubble indemnity, there is a question that must be asked. Is the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act of 2007 and other Acts like it, a distraction, established to legalize the Act of Corporate Homicide, rather than deter it?
The way to rewrite history and biology is an individual process of knowing who you are and of rejecting The Transhuman Agenda.
Disclaimer: The author encourages you to consult your health care practitioner before making any health changes, especially any changes related to a specific diagnosis or condition. No information in this article should be relied upon to determine diet, make a medical diagnosis, or to determine or prescribe a treatment for a medical condition. This information is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended to build synapses for thinking.
Dr Robert Gallo made his famous announcement at a press conference on 23 April 1984 that “his” HIV virus was the probable cause of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). From that moment on, the race was on to find a pharmaceutical weapon against it.
At the height of AIDS epidemic in 2005, the rhetoric about HIV danger and death penetrated every corner of the world. The rapid test for HIV was accepted as the test for AIDS, which divided people into positive and negative camps.
Flashback to June 2015, ten years after the height of the AIDS epidemic:
AIDS-related deaths have fallen by 35 percent since the peak of the epidemic in 2005 and the number of new infections continues to decline annually. That’s the good news. Nonetheless there are thought to be around 35 million people living with HIV globally; 19 million don’t currently know their HIV-positive status. Of those people who need antiretroviral drugs, only just over a third have access. That’s the bad news.
We have the scientific know-how to end AIDS and every month seems to bring news of another biomedical advance that could change the trajectory of the epidemic once and for all.
Last week the preliminary findings of the Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment trial confirmed that early treatment is best for HIV.
No one thought that HIV might be lab-created. No one knew that just before Gallo’s April 1984 announcement, someone had filed a United States Patent number: 9499480 for HIV/AIDS Virus invention, a designer bi-product of the U.S. Special Virus program.
No one knew that Gallo, himself, was ‘Project Officer’ for the federal Special Virus Program that ran from 1962-1978. See complete list of HIV patents. No one knows that engineered evidence is found from the ‘multiply-spliced’ nature of the HIV ‘tat’ sequence in Dr. Gallo’s 1971 Special Virus paper, “Reverse Transcriptase of Type-C virus Particles of Human Origin.”
From 1985 to 1992 there were 12,000 deaths each year from AIDS. In 1992 the number increased suddenly to 15,000. Why? Because they added 5 new diseases to the AIDS definition! The actual number of cases of AIDS was on the decline until they added more diseases to the list, and still the number of new cases grew very slowly. – Dr. Robert Wilner, Deadly Deception, 1994.
HIV — it has never been found in sufficient numbers to cause disease.” –Peter Duesberg, 1991
The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. – Kary Mullins, inventor of the PCR test.
Today, the official narrative still claims that no cure exists for AIDS, and that only toxic FDA antiretroviral drugs, including A.Z.T., D.D.I., and D.D.C., will slow down the progression of the disease.
“Why condemn a continent to death because of HIV, when you have other explanations for why people are falling sick?” – Dr John Papadimitriou, professor of pathology at the University of Western Australia in Perth and a co-author of the Journal of Nature Biotechnolgy study that found HIV tests to be inadequate.
Comparison of HIV and Coronavirus Tests. September 2020:
Sometimes testing can give you a false sense of security. That happened in the HIV epidemic, when people got a negative test and they presented it to their sex partners and spread disease, nonetheless. – Cue Mark Schlissel, M.D., Ph.D., President of University of Michigan,
The U of M president knew of the flaws of the rapid HIV test. He knew the patterns of history. And for that he received pushback for equating the COVID-19 pandemic with the AIDS epidemic to justify the University’s decision not to widely test students. He was made to apologize for unrelated reasons, but added to his response:
My comments were intended only as a critique of the effectiveness of massive testing of asymptomatic students for the virus that causes COVID-19 in an effort to prevent its spread. – Cue Mark Schlissel, M.D., Ph.D, President, U of M 2020
The COVIDIAN Age
In the COVIDIAN Age, it is accepted that Coronavirus is a virus. However, Coronavirus is a family name that includes MERS-Cov, SARS-Cov, HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, and many others. Coronavirus is not Corona virus. It is also accepted that people with underlying diseases are more susceptible to COVID19. This is likely due to a weakened innate immune system. Immunosuppressed people no longer have a functional defense system and are more likely to suffer from any infection, whether it be called a cold, a flu, toxic overload, or ‘COVID.’
The Twist:
Ironically, new research shows the opposite; that patients with advanced stages of AIDS show less severe COVID symptoms and recover faster than others.
A July 2021 study in the Journal Immun Inflamm Dis, titled “The clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in HIV-positive patients: A systematic review of current evidence” shows evidence that the majority of HIV patients show no severe symptoms and completely recovered from COVID19 infection.
Similar to The Age of AIDS, COVID patients will soon be offered antiretroviral drugs. On December 14, 2021, Merck and Pfizer pharmaceutical companies announced the development of COVID antiretroviral drugs. The companies claimed their drugs attack different parts of the virus. Ten days later, on December 24, 2021, the FDA authorized “emergency use” of Merck’s antiviral drug to treat COVID19. FDA had previously “authorized” the first antiretroviral Molnupiravir in late November. Note: authorization does not equal approval.
Today, the FDA claims that the antiretroviral pill “should be initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis of Covid-19 and within five days of symptom onset,” – FDA Statement, December 22, 2021
In 1994, Dr. Robert Wilner wrote: “Any antiviral therapy that is immune-suppressive and aimed at treating HIV is unnecessary, dangerous, unethical and bad medicine — you are already immune to HIV!
There is no test to find out a person’s “HPV status.” Also, there is no approved HPV test to find HPV in the mouth or throat. – CDC HPV Fact Sheet, 2022
We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. – Journal of Euro Surveillance, 2020
Why blame a pandemic on innocent animals? It sounds like this: “ANIMAL X” could be hiding a deadly virus that could trigger a pandemic worse than the Black Death and kill more than 75million people. They tried to blame Ebola on a bunny.
Did the Species Barrier disappear to allow for animal research to develop profitable drug models?
After mRNA injectables, why are AIDS patients successfully fending off the worst COVID symptoms and recovering faster without an immune system?
Do HIV patients somehow recognize the lab-created Coronavirus as similar? Does the mRNA nanotech somehow protect people without an immune system? Is that why antiretroviral will be required for COVID patients?
Disclaimer: The author encourages you to consult a doctor before making any health changes, especially any changes related to a specific diagnosis or condition. No information in this article should be relied upon to determine diet, make a medical diagnosis, or to determine or prescribe a treatment for a medical condition. This information is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended to build synapses for thinking.
This clip is from the Corona Investigative Committee’s “The Virus of Power” series of interviews , Session 90, which took place on February 4, 2022. See the entire Session 90 here (6+ hours long).
In this interview, Dr. Kaufman and Dr. Lanka challenge “germ theory” and the “science” at the foundation of virology. Of course, this is highly controversial because it shakes the foundation of modern medicine, questions the endless stream of vaccines and toxic medicines produced by big pharma — not to mention the generations of doctors, scientists and medical professionals who have dedicated careers to this “science”.
Committee member Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, who has been invaluable in exposing the pandemic fraud and is a key source of medical insight for the committee, challenges Dr. Kaufman and Dr. Lanka, and vehemently defends the prevailing view regarding viruses as cause of disease. See Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg’s presentation during Session 90 here. His presentation occurred earlier in the session, prior to this conversation with Drs. Kaufman and Lanka.
Below the Corona Investigative Committee video, we are providing documents, videos and articles for understanding the work of Dr. Lanka, Dr. Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan and others.
Please do your own research and come to your own conclusions.
Video by Oval Media can be found at Corona Investigate Committee Odysee channel.
A worldwide addiction to wireless technology – cell phones, computers, GPS, smart appliances, electric cars, smart watches, TVs – is activating the hidden world of yeast, fungus, mold, mycoplasma, Lyme spirochetes, and protozoan parasites in the human body. The outcome is a rise in chronic infections that are misdiagnosed as a number of disease conditions.
The industries responsible for creating this silent and sinister epidemic fail to take responsibility. Thus, the line between what will protect you, and what will not, has never been less clearly defined.
Fatigue
Weakness
Muscle cramps
Headache and pain
Light sensitivity
Sinus problems
Abdominal pain
Diarrhea
Joint pain and stiffness
Cognitive issues
Mood dysregulation
Temperature regulation or dysregulation problems
Excessive thirst
Increased urination
Nervous system issues
Naturopath Dr. Klinghardt, of the Sophia Health Institute, shared an in vitro mold experiment comparing a mold plate shielded from electromagnetic fields to an unprotected mold plate exposed to ambient electromagnetic fields. The unprotected mold, mycoplasma, and spirochete (Lyme) reacts defensively by releasing more potent biotoxins, and by multiplying more than 600 times. This biological response can be observed anywhere in Nature; it is the desire to survive and thrive. In 2011, the amount of cell phone radiation in a cubic inch of air was several million times higher than it had been a decade before that.
Billions of people worldwide harbor tropical worms and don’t know it. They don’t know that cell phones and cell towers trigger and aggravate them. They don’t know that mold, parasites, and other microbes, defend themselves to become chronic infections. The medical industry does not check for these infections, or rule them out, even though there are over one million worm species, alone, classified as helminths.
Helminths take many forms, but all of them harm their host in some way. In humans, they can live in the intestinal tract, urinary tract, bladder, or bloodstream, causing a variety of illness from malnutrition to organ failure” – Dr. Monica Botelho of Portugal’s National Institute of Health.
In endemic regions — predominantly sub-saharan Africa and Southeast Asia — flukes are responsible for the majority of all bladder and liver cancer cases. – Dr. Joachim Richter, Associate Professor at Charité Berlin and co-editor with Botelho.
Digestive issues — Gas, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting. Abdominal pain — Upset stomach, stomach cramps, stomach pain, tenderness. Stool — Greasy loose stool, worms, parasites, mucus, eggs or candida yeast in stool. Eating — Cravings for sweets, constantly hungry, increased or loss of appetite. Energy, wellbeing — Feeling tired, fatigue, exhaustion, mood swings, anger and depression, muscle and joint pain, body aches. Skin — Skin rashes and skin issues such as eczema, hives, rosacea. Sleep — Poor sleep, insomnia, nightmares, night sweats, teeth grinding in sleep, anus itching at night. Genitals — Vaginal itching around the vulva, anal itching, rash, vaginal infections. Overall health — Unexplained weight loss or weight gain, nutritional deficiencies, dehydration, fever.
Parasites Among Us
Worms R us. When in balance, worms live with us in harmony Out of balance, they can invade and overpower any part of the body, including the eyes. There are hundreds of large parasites that can enter the body by various modes, take up residence, and cause a variety of life-threatening diseases, including cancer. For worms to make a home in the body, the body must be conducive to their existence. The body is best suited for worms if it is depleted of essential minerals and nutrients, thus acidic.
It has long been established by study of Ascaris lumbricoides (phylum and species) in man as well as in laboratory hosts, that the larvae, on hatching in the small intestine, migrate through the liver to the lungs. On the eighth to ninth day after infestation, they move farther into the bronchii and then, via the trachea and esophagus, return to the intestine. It has also been shown that the larvae in their migration and development often cause extreme eosinophilia, symptoms such as shortness of breath and cough.
– Naval Captain David P. Osborne, chief of surgery, Bethesda Naval Hospital
A search of Pubmed will net hundreds of published, peer-reviewed studies describing Dirofilaria in humans, a mere drop in the worm bucket. Dirofilaria immitis is a canine parasite that can infect humans, specifically it is a roundworm, otherwise known as a nematode. For instance, whereas Dirofilaria immitisinfects the heart and lungs, Dirofiaria repens infects the eye.
Patented Transgenic Insects
Dirofilaria, or heartworm, is transmitted by mosquitoes. An egg gets deposited through the proboscis, which is the long, flexible tube mosquitoes use to pierce the skin. There is plenty of evidence showing that mosquitoes are genetically engineered and patented.
Filarial infection of the breast is not rare, explain the authors. “The larvae enter the lymphatic vessels of the mammary gland, causing lymphangitis, fibrosis, and disruption of lymphatic drainage.” In late, inactive phases, the larvae appear on mammography as serpiginous calcifications. – Medwire News, 2005
Slowly, the information worming its way out into the public is that parasitic infestations represent the internal conditions called “cancer.” All cancers are, in fact, parasitic infections (with high Candida levels) even if not all parasitic infections present as cancer. Worms cause cancer. based on an acidic tissue environment.
In the Age of Information, ignorance is a choice. Today, more people diagnosed with cancer have taken matters into their own hands and begun sharing information to heal. Their choice of medicine? An inexpensive pet dewormers/antihelminths called Fenbendazole found at the local pet store. Why don’t doctors tell patients that Fenbendazole is being studied as an anti-cancer drug?
It destroys microtubules that sustain the structure of the cancer cell and its ability to divide and multiply rapidly.It interrupts the cancer cells’ ability to process sugar, and cancer cells must metabolize sugar to survive.
It boosts the production of a cancer-killing gene called p53, a gene cancer patients may lack. When p53 becomes mutated or can’t keep cancer cells in check, cancer cells can proliferate.
The de-wormer also works against parasites, which might be the origin of some cancers.
Before you decide to blame all cancers on worms, realize that helminths are also being used as Immunotherapy (Helminthic Therapy) for Crohn’s disease and for malignancies. In a strange twist of fate, the earthworm’s immune system have shown an ability to kill cancer cells (in vitro). Could it be that a worm’s metabolism depends on a balance of oxygen supply and demand like their human hosts? Yes, indeed.
Is that why oxygen deprivation from EMF fields harm both host and worm?
Add Pulsed EMFs And Mix
The forces in EMFs are caused by EMF radiation, broken down into two categories:
High frequency EMF include: x-rays, gamma rays, or ionizing radiation, and
Low to mid frequencies include: electric power lines, radio waves, cell phones, wireless networks, smart meters, TVs, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, or non-ionizing radiation. These are the most dangerous emission, known to cause direct damage to DNA or cells.
Wireless communication (cell towers, phones, etc) is more dangerous because it produces pulsed EMFs. Pulsed EMFs are much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs. When introducing pulsed electric and magnetic fields into a population infested with parasites and yeast, you have a recipe for dis-ease disaster.
If our microbes perceive radiation fields as an attack on their lives, then so should we. Humans are 1:10 human cells to microbes. What affects our smallest inhabitants also affects us. When our microbes perceive an attack from man-made frequencies, they release biotoxins in defense of their lives, even if it damages their host. Sit down before you watch this freakishly large worm (parasitic nematode) slither out of a dead spider host.
Biotoxins are released from microbial metabolism and die-off. This process drives inflammation in humans. As our microbes struggle to survive, they congest the host’s liver and impair digestion. The liver is unable to produce bile to digest fats which leads to a deficiency of fatty acids and eventually fatty liver disease, unrelated to alcohol.
Our microbes cause stress on the whole body, which leads to “Leaky Gut,” now an accepted term. Leaky Gut gave rise to the previously unknown field of neurogastroenterology, and the disorders of IBD, IBS, and Crohn’s disease. When the gut is “leaky,” microbes and their biotoxins leak into the bloodstream to infect other organs, including the brain, also known as “leaky brain.” In the brain, symptoms resemble depression, anxiety, and other neurological conditions.
Magnetic Fields
Sleep is critical for cell repair and regeneration. When electrical and magnetic fields barrage the body day and night, the stress hormone cortisol is stimulated which prevents normal elimination (constipation) and detoxification. As cortisol rises, melatonin falls. Sleep is elusive. Magnetic fields also alter the movement of minerals and metals the body. When iron is displaced, it leads to anemia.
In 2005, Extremely low frequencies (ELF) have been documented as a possible carcinogen in children diagnosed with leukemia. More than a decade later, ELF exposures have only increased.
I personally suspect that the exposure to electromagnetic fields in the home and the microwaves from cell phone radiation are driving the virulence of many of the microbes that are naturally in us, and makes them aggressive and illness producing. Shielding patients from EMFs has been a more successful strategy to treating Lyme disease and to get people neurologically well than any of the antibiotics or any of the antimicrobial compounds. ~Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD
What makes this feat possible is the highly efficient non-linear interaction between light and matter that occurs in graphene. The researchers used graphene containing a large number of free electrons that originated from the interaction between graphene and the substrate onto which it was deposited. When these electrons became excited by an oscillating electric field in room-temperature conditions, they rapidly shared their energy with bound electrons in the material.
Solutions
1. EMF Shielding Tools
With the rise of EMF fields a new EMF shielding industry was born. Now you can use the benefits of wireless technology and shield yourself from is health depleting effects using the following tools:
Use a blue light blocker covering for all your computer/laptop/tablet screens including cell phones.
Use blue blocking glasses when you are working on the computer (this does not protect skin.). Some people will use a blue light blocker (a thin film that covers the screen) and then also a 100% blue blocker of hard thick plastic at night. However be aware that many of the thinner unnoticable blue light coverings on the market do not protect 100% blue light.
Download a program (e.g.., Iris) onto your device that will automatically reduce blue light at night.
2. Natural Mold and Parasite Detox
First of all, know the symptoms of mold poisoning and parasitic infections. Secondly, prevent infections of mold, yeast, and parasites, by keeping your immune system strong and allowing it to work for you by acquiring natural infections. Eat clean, organic foods. Drink clean water, and avoid drinking city water, espeically if the water tower has 5G technology on top of it. Seek out natural spring water. Avoid factor-farmed foods, such as sugar and processed grains, coffee and red meat, which generate an acidic pH in the body. Choose natural medicines vs. synthetic medicines. Seek out natural healers to assist. And be aware of parasitic relationships among your peers. As within so without.
If you have a parasitic infection, try adding food grade diatomaceous earth. There are two strong herbs that can kill nematodes. The most famous one is Thyme. Thyme is a culinary herb, but it also kills hook-worms, roundworms, threadworms, skin parasites and several types of harmful bacteria. Other natural antifungal/antiparasitic herbs include: Black walnut hulls, high in iodine; wormwood, clove oil, oregano oil, and consider a cleanse diet. For other remedies, consult a natural health care practitioner.
When the worm population in the human body overwhelms the immune system, it is called a hyperinfection. At this stage, it may be difficult to kill the worms with herbs unless you eat clean. Using frequencies to target parasites through a Rife machine or homeopathic (energy) preparations can directly target parasites in the body, gently and safely. However, the Rife machine does not always solve the problem since parasites can shift their frequency and hide in the body to evade death. A diet and lifestyle change will be necessary by changing your habits to prevent the problems of living in the brave new world.
Disclaimer: The author encourages you to consult a doctor before making any health changes, especially any changes related to a specific diagnosis or condition. No information in this article should be relied upon to determine diet, make a medical diagnosis, or to determine or prescribe a treatment for a medical condition. This information is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice.
What proof would I accept? What sort of proof would convince me that SARS-CoV-2 exists?
Suppose, for example, a study described how researchers actually DID separate a virus from all the material surrounding it in their cell-soup in the lab?
Would that be enough?
And the answer is no.
Why?
Because I don’t trust studies based on research conducted in elite labs where no independent outsiders are allowed. And that’s the situation, when it comes to purported virus isolation.
These labs are like the famous bunkers where key government officials are taken, in the event of a massive attack against the country.
Try getting in off the street.
And who are these researchers in the super-secret labs? To put it another way, what sort of establishment do they represent?
Is it a clean establishment with a track record of honesty? Or is it a cartel with a criminal history?
If it’s a cartel, why should I accept the “scientific methods” of these researchers or their honesty?
As my long-time readers know, I’ve spent decades exposing lies and crimes of the medical cartel. Chapter and verse. (For example this: Medical weapons of mass destruction)
When it comes to vital issues that mean the difference between life and death—drug/vaccine-fueled destruction of human life; mistreatment and errors in hospitals; faked disease case and death numbers; inaccurate, meaningless, and deceptive diagnostic tests; the fabricated existence of a whole range of phony diseases and disorders and syndromes; the true numbers of medically caused deaths—medical authorities have been lying and sliming their way out of accountability for MANY decades.
And all this doesn’t touch on the history of public health declarations of epidemics that have turned out to be duds.
Nor does it include the overall history of Rockefeller medicine, which is based on the fatuous notion that there are thousands of separate and distinct diseases, each one of which is caused by a germ that must be treated by a profit-making drug.
Nor does it include the history of vicious suppression of innovative treatments developed by individuals who’ve worked outside the mainstream.
Therefore, suspicion is warranted. Is absolutely necessary. And “suspicion” is a vast understatement.
I refuse to trust the researchers who simply claim they’re isolating viruses.
When it comes to the so-called basic building blocks of MANY so-called diseases—which ARE “the viruses”—all the discovery-research HAS BEEN conducted by insiders in their off-limit labs. Without independent witnesses. Without educated witnesses who can watch and question each and every step of “the accepted method” for isolation of new viruses.
Frankly, you would have to be crazy to accept anything coming out of these insider-club labs.
So NO. I don’t accept such findings.
Before I describe how outsiders SHOULD be allowed to witness and participate in secret lab work, let me give you two quotes to consider.
They come from decidedly mainstream and elite editors of elite medical journals. These editors have read and explored and probed and lifted the fake cover from published medical material for decades. Material they themselves have published. Therefore, these are CONFESSIONS.
ONE: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption)
TWO: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness…”
“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of ‘significance’ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale…Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent…” (Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?”)
Suspicion is warranted. It’s absolutely necessary. And again, “suspicion” is a vast understatement.
More than a year ago, I mentioned how virus-isolation research—if the word “research” applies at all—should be done.
And I issue this now, as a challenge, to the entire insider-club of virologists, all of whom claim their established method of finding and sequencing new viruses is scientific and rigorous:
Let’s have a film crew on site. As you work. In your lab. Looking over your shoulders and recording every move you make.
And with the film crew, let’s have several knowledgeable, outside, independent researchers. People whom you would ordinarily refuse to give the time of day. People who are insightful. Possibly, people like Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan.
As the film crew works, and as you conduct and describe your step-by-step “isolation” of a new virus, these outsiders can stop you at any moment and question you. In depth.
“Why did you just do that?” “Why didn’t you record that step?” “Explain that answer you just gave me. It makes no sense.” “Exactly what did you just withdraw from the solution in the dish, and how do you know what it was?”
This is not a public relations exercise or an educational documentary for medical students. This is REAL. This is research about your research. No holds barred.
You give a slippery answer to a question; you evade with a vague generality; you try to pull rank; you get nailed to the wall. On film.
THIS is the procedure I want.
All the way from start to finish. Including the so-called sequencing of the “new virus.”
And then we would know a great deal more about what you’re actually doing and not doing in your labs. In the absence of what I’m proposing and demanding, THERE IS NO REASON TO ASSUME THE PROCESS OF VIRUS-ISOLATION IS LEGITIMATE.
Virologists, your work affects every human on Earth. Profoundly. To see this, all a person has to do is look around him these days, at what is called “COVID.” It proceeds from your so-called discovery of SARS-CoV-2.
I view you virologists as I would view the court magicians and soothsayers and high priests who surrounded and advised the leaders of tribes and nations in ancient times.
Those “experts” huddled with the leaders in their very private rooms and spun stories and predictions, and recommended strategies to deal with supposed ongoing and looming crises.
And then the leaders took actions that affected the lives of all the people.
So it is now. With you virologists.
So my demands are entirely within bounds. If you have a shred of honesty, and if you stop and think about it, what I’m demanding is prosaically simple:
You account for every step you take. In real time. Where you work. Right there, you submit yourselves to the detailed scrutiny of independent outsiders.
That’s my bottom line.
And I challenge any scientist, analyst, investigator, doctor, researcher, reporter, alt. reporter who says what I’m demanding is not necessary. You’re wrong. You’re dead wrong.
You either haven’t thought things through, or you’re lying.
Someone is going to tell me what I’m demanding, as proof, is impossible. It would never happen. “They” would never let it happen. They would never let independent outsiders into their holy labs.
You think I don’t know that?
If outsiders can’t get into their labs, what does that tell you?
And someone will say, “We just have to rely on the best evidence we have.”
No we don’t. Because the best available evidence is no evidence.
In a vast sea of death-dealing medical lies, a sea that has existed for more than a hundred years (actually much longer), if experts tell you they’re discovering viruses in labs you can’t enter, and they say you must believe them, and you buy that…
I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon. Full cash only, no payments.
Here it is: Virologists are saying and writing they’ve found a purple man with pink hair and green lips and four arms living a thousand miles under the surface of a planet in the next solar system over. And he causes disease.
Then they’re saying, “Prove us wrong.”
On top of that, they’re saying, “You can’t watch us work while we discover such creatures.”
Conclusion: the purple man doesn’t exist.
Virologists, text me when you’ll let my people into your lab.
Until then, get lost.
Dear reader, the elephant in the room is trust, not data.
When it comes to the “discovery of viruses,” there are no reliable data. We, on the outside, are told that what happens behind locked doors is irrefutable. Period.
We’re told we just can’t understand what the pros are doing. The problem is our lack of knowledge, our lack of training.
We’re the peasants toiling in the valley. Our better, the baron, is up in his castle on top of the mountain. He’s planning our lives, he’s taking care of us.
Sure. Of course. Uh-huh.
Sounds familiar. It’s pretty much the history of the world.
Or it was, until people who came before us finally staked out a territory called freedom, which involved opening locked doors and finding out what lay behind them.
Consider a parochial example: the mafia. They, too, plan behind closed doors. They concoct methods of carrying out crimes. They record their profits. Then, finally, a prosecutor announces, “We were able to get into their books. We saw the details. We made arrests.”
I want my independent accountants to get into the virologists’ books. But not after the fact. I want my people to BE there while the virologists are creating the books, entry by entry, in the lab.
“Why did you just make that entry? Where did your conclusion come from? Who are you trying to kid? You’re just fabricating this stuff? You know, that’s called RICO. That’s a RICO case. Continuing criminal enterprise. They’ll send you away for a long time…”
And all of a sudden, the high and mighty virologist, who’s been able to con the world with his hustle, who knows how to come off sounding superior in every way, feels a dent in his armor. A big dent. He smells his own blood.
And he starts talking.
He wants to make a deal. He’ll roll over on his colleagues. He’ll expose the whole sham.
“…You don’t understand. It’s the money. It’s all about the money. Where it comes from. We have to do this kind of work. Otherwise, we starve. They cut us off. I know the people on the funding committees. I’ll give you their names. They take orders, too. The whole thing is a system. I can draw you a map. I can’t go to jail. I have a family. I’m paying eighty grand a year just to send my kids to college. There’s the mortgage, and the cottage on the Cape…”
The whole bluff POPS and deflates, and we begin to hear words we understand, at last. The words of confession. The down-to-earth sordid truth.
There was never a towering mystery in the castle on the hill.
There was just the passing of the buck. The soiled buck. From hand to hand.
The “science” was the front.
“…You see, it works this way. The pharmaceutical companies have to have new viruses. For every fake virus, they develop a real drug and a real vaccine. It’s marketing. That’s what they’re doing. That’s what they’ve always been doing. This is much bigger than anyone realizes. I’m just a little fish. The big boys run the whole show. They pay the Congress and the FDA. They pay everybody…”
He keeps talking. He can’t stop. He’s way past “isolation, purification and sequencing.” They’re in his rear-view mirror. Now he’s fighting for his freedom from prison. Now he’s telling the truth.
And the ever-present storm clouds over the valley where we peasants toil are blowing away. The air is fresher.
We’re breathing easier.
The big-cheese baron is really a shrunken little man—when he takes his perp walk in chains.
In part 2, we will examine the history of modern agribusiness, Bill Gates’ plan to centralize control of the world’s seed supply and the depopulation threat posed by gene drive technology.
Every day we consume food grown in the toxic chemicals produced by the global agriculture conglomerates, who, like their pharmaceutical compatriots, may be described as profit-hungry monstrosities, well versed in the art of killing.
As explained by Dr Vandana Shiva in her book Oneness vs the 1%, the agrichemical industry we know today is nothing more than a continuation of the toxic tools and poisons from the post World World 2 labs of IG Farben.
A century ago, the money and oil of the Robber Barons came together with the finances and toxic technologies from the labs of IG Farben to form the Toxic Cartel that evolved the tools of killing. This is how a century of ecocide and genocide through poisons and toxic chemicals began. Chemicals developed to kill people in Hitler’s concentration camps during WWII became the agrichemicals for industrial agriculture when the war ended. This industrial agriculture was then forced on people everywhere.”[1]
Interessengemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG, more commonly knows as IG Farben was a German chemical and pharmaceutical giant formed in 1925. IG Farben was formed from a merger of 6 separate chemical companies – BASF, Bayer, Hoechst, Agfa, Chemische Fabrik Griesheim-Elektron, and Chemische Fabrik vorm.
Two years later in 1927, IG Farben partnered with Standard Oil (one of the largest oil refiners in the world, founded by John D. Rockefeller) to exchange patents and dominate economies on both sides of the Atlantic.
Standard Oil sent IG Farben their patents regarding the coal hydrogenation process and IG Farben reciprocated by offering up their own patents on the process of manufacturing synthetic rubber.
Some years after partnering with Standard Oil, IG Farben helped found the Auschwitz concentration camp, where they used Jewish prisoners as slave labour to produce synthetic rubber and liquid fuels.
At the end of the war, the Nuremberg War Criminal Tribunal convicted 24 IG Farben executives for crimes against humanity including mass murder and slavery. However, most of them were released within 2-6 years and immediately began consulting for American agritech companies.
IG Farben and its partner corporations, which included Bayer, were Hitler’s suppliers of Zyklon-B, a cyanide-based pesticide that was used to murder Jews in the extermination camps.
In 1948, IG Farben bigwig and Nazi party member, Fritz ter Meer, was convicted of “mass murder and enslavement” and sentenced to 7 years in prison. After his early release in 1950, he became chairman of the board of directors for Bayer, a position he held until 1964. What is today called the “Bayer Science & Education Foundation”, an initiative that awards scholarships to chemistry students, was originally set up to honour ter Meer.
After merging with Monsanto in a $62 billion dollar deal, Bayer became the largest agrichemical company in the world (The takeover was financed by European taxpayers without them even knowing about it).
Monsanto, an American agrichemical giant and mass-producer of genetically modified crops, was founded in 1901 by John Francis Queeny.
The company’s first product was the artificial sweetener, saccharin, which it sold to Coco-Cola. In 1977, the FDA proposed restricting the use of Saccharin on account of research suggesting its consumption was associated with an increased risk of cancer, primarily of the urinary bladder.
Not only is saccharin associated with an increased risk of cancer, but artificial sweeteners of all kinds have been linked with increased rates of diabetes, obesity, intestinal dysbiosis as well as an acceleration of atherosclerosis and ageing.
During World War 2, Monsanto contributed to research for the Manhattan project, which would eventually lead to the creation of the atomic bombs that were used to murder thousands of innocent people in Japan.
Around the same time, Monsanto became one of the leading manufacturers of polystyrene – a synthetic, non-biodegradable plastic whose production generates massive amounts of hazardous waste.
Moreover, styrene has been linked to adverse health effects in humans, including cancer. The styrene molecule is metabolized to styrene oxide, a highly reactive (and toxic) epoxide that can interact with DNA, causing harmful mutations.
Monsanto was also known for producing DDT, a highly toxic insecticide that played a serious role in the 20th-century polio epidemics.
Despite years of Monsanto propaganda, insisting that DDT was perfectly safe, by 1972 the research indicating its toxicity had mounted to the point that it was banned throughout the US. But this did not dissuade Monsanto from its goal of poisoning the world, for, in the 1960s, they became one of the principal producers of Agent Orange, a herbicide used for chemical warfare during the Vietnam war.
During the 10-year aerial bombardment that saw gallons of Age Orange rain from the Vietnamese skies, millions of innocent people were seriously poisoned, resulting in deaths, disabilities, birth defects, and widespread, irreversible environmental destruction.
Spina bifida, cerebral palsy, missing or deformed limbs and intellectual disabilities were some of the serious birth defects caused by Agent Orange that are still affecting Vietnamese children today. Agent Orange is also responsible for killing an estimated 300,000 US veterans.
These days, most people know Monsanto as the producer of glyphosate (the active ingredient in “Roundup”, a highly toxic herbicide promoted heavily around the world). Glyphosate has been implicated in the rise of food allergies, including “celiac disease”, a severe intolerance to gluten causing skin rashes, gut dysbiosis, nausea, diarrhoea, and depression.
Unsurprisingly, there have been virtually no studies conducted in the US, the largest consumer of GMO frankenfoods (Americans eat their bodyweight in GMOs each year), to assess glyphosate levels in human blood or urine.
However, a large study in Europe found quantifiable levels of glyphosate in the urine of nearly half of the participants, all of which were city dwellers who could only have been exposed to glyphosate through food consumption.
The merger of Bayer and Monsanto came alongside the merger of Dow Chemical and Dupont, as well as Syngenta and ChemChina. These mergers placed the vast majority of the global agriculture industry in the hands of just three corporations.
Through these various mergers and acquisitions, the biotech industry has become a modern-day IG Farben – functioning as a singular global chemical-military-industrial complex, the real owners of which are the investment firms like Vanguard and Blackrock.
The mergers are more like musical chairs, organised by the real owners, investment funds like Vanguard, Blackrock, Capital Group, Fidelity, State Street Global Advisors, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), and others. This game of musical chairs has two objectives—to expand markets and shrink liability.”[1]
Three-fourths of the world’s GMO seeds come from Monsanto labs. Monsanto extracts royalties for its seeds and the high cost of the seed and chemicals push farmers into a debt trap.
As farmers fall deeper into debt, the wealth of Monsanto grows. There have been cases of GMO seeds blowing over onto the land of unsuspecting farmers who are then sued and forced to surrender their produce. Monsanto illegally introduced its Bt cotton in India in 1995, leading to an epidemic of suicide in regions along India’s cotton belt.
ROCKEFELLER AGRICULTURE
The role of the Rockefellers in the rise of chemical farming and GMOs is not to be understated, for they were instrumental in the promotion of new agricultural technologies that resulted in modern “agribusiness”.
This began during the early days of World War 2 when the Rockefeller Foundation funded a secret policy group called the War and Peace Study Group of the New York Council on Foreign Relations. The purpose of this group was to shape the US post-war economy in order for it to replace the British Empire as the new global superpower[2].
It was within this context that John D. Rockefeller III was pursuing his eugenics agenda through the American Eugenics Society as well as his Population Council. At the same time, his brother Nelson was seeking new methods to increase worldwide food production.
One of the post-war goals of the War and Peace Study Group was for the US to dominate global agriculture and food production. This led to the infamous “green revolution” promoted in India and other developing countries in South America and parts of Asia.
One of the results of this increased agricultural efficiency was the mass exodus of peasants from the farmlands to the city slums where they were exploited for cheap labour by various US multinational companies[3].
This elite propensity for experimenting on more “primitive” communities represents the occult contempt for the “lower” orders of society.
Nowhere is this contempt more obvious than in the “philanthropy” of Bill Gates who, in 2019, unleashed genetically modified mosquitos in Burkina Faso under the fallacious pretext of “fighting malaria”. But more on Gates and his gene drive technology later.
Before moving on, it’s important to consider the parallels between eugenics and genetics, which, some researchers have branded the “new eugenics”. In the 1980s, researchers at the Rockefeller Foundation were determined to map the structure of the gene and, according to Philip Regal, the ultimate motivation behind this quest was “to correct social and moral problems including crime, poverty, hunger and political instability”.
As William Engdahl notes, research into genetics was carried forward by generous grants given to up and coming scientists, eager to make a name for themselves in a new and exciting field:
Many of the younger generation of biologists and scientists receiving Rockefeller research grants were blissfully unaware that eugenics and genetics were in any way related. They simply scrambled for scarce research dollars, and the dollars all too often had the name and strings of the Rockefeller Foundation attached.”[3]
Perhaps a fuller understanding of the Rockefeller pursuits in eugenics and genetics is gained by seeing the two as separate but related parts of a materialist agenda mirroring the alchemical pursuit for the transformation of man. Regal describes this alchemical pursuit as follows:
From the perspective of a theory reductionist, it was logical that social problems would reduce to simple biological problems that could be corrected through chemical manipulations of soils, brains, and genes. Thus the Rockefeller Foundation made a major commitment to using its connections and resources to promote a philosophy of eugenics.”[3]
In relation to this Rockefeller initiative, Regal goes on to mention Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis, a highly esoteric work that speaks of a hidden scientific elite with the goal of “enlarging of the bounds of human empire, to the effecting of all things possible”.
In Bacon’s work, “Atlantis” refers to America. Therefore, as noted by Dr Farrell and Dr. De Hart in their book “Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas”, according to Bacon, America “was to become the great laboratory for a grand esoteric experiment being run by a hidden and ancient elite.”[2]
Now let us return to the history of Rockefeller involvement in global agriculture…
It was in 1941 when Nelson Rockefeller and then US vice president, Henry Wallace sent a group to Mexico to meet with the Mexican government regarding the possibility of increasing food production. Noteworthy is that Henry Wallace was a high-ranking Freemason who convinced fellow Freemason, President Franklin D. Roosevelt to place the occult symbol of the uncapped pyramid and the eye of Horus on the US one-dollar bill[2].
The Rockefeller take over of global agriculture involved the promotion and spreading of genetically modified crops around the world. But in order for their GMOs to catch on, the Rockefellers needed to manipulate the perceptions of scientists engaged in genetic and environmental research.
They did this by deploying US university professors to select Asian universities to train a new generation of scientists. The best of these graduates were then sent to the US to pursue a doctorate in agricultural sciences, ensuring they were wholly indoctrinated into the Rockefeller outlook on agriculture and food production[2].
In the 1970s, the Rockefeller Foundation, with aid from the World Bank, FAO and UNDP, established a worldwide network of agricultural research centres, called CGIAR (“Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research”). The alleged goal behind the creation of CGIAR was to coordinate global agricultural research in an effort to reduce poverty and improve food security in developing countries.
Thus, the Rockefellers constructed a global network of scientists and institutions ready to play their part as ambassadors of this new agricultural paradigm. This had the result of “socially engineering” a scientific culture that promoted the use of genetically modified crops and new agriculture technologies.
The Rockefellers went on to invest hundreds of millions of dollars into genetic research that would further the development of GMO crops and increase their uptake around the world. Thanks to patent law, this transformed many a humble farmer into a captured slave, indebted to big agribusiness conglomerates.
The CAS is linked to the Open Forum on Agriculture Biotechnology (OFAB) which in turn is an offshoot of the African Agriculture Technology Foundation (AATF), an organization founded by the Rockefellers.
Perhaps the biggest boon for the agribusiness industry came n 1986, when US Vice President Herbert Bush hosted a “special White House strategy meeting”, inviting executives from Monsanto to discuss plans relating to the deregulation of agritechnologies.
This meeting resulted in the adoption of “substantial equivalence” – the erroneous notion that agronomy (traditional methods of animal/plant breeding) was “substantially equivalent” to genetic modification – thereby evading the increasing pressure from scientists calling for more rigorous testing of GMO crops[3].
Thanks to the Rockefellers, the US people are now the largest consumers of GMO foods. In fact, the research literature clearly indicates that large populations around the world have been forced to consume GMO toxins despite a complete lack of any reliable safety data, and overwhelming evidence to suggest that such toxins cause biological harm.
Animal studies have demonstrated that exposure to GMO toxins causes an increase in inflammatory cytokines associated with nearly all human diseases. If these changes also occur in humans then this would go some way towards explaining the massive increase in autoimmunity, autism, and other chronic and allergic diseases[4].
Both the WHO and the American Medical Association (AMA), which, ironically, claims to “promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health” have been utterly complicit in allowing this global experiment to take place[4].
Though this shouldn’t come as a surprise considering the profound early influence that the Rockefeller Foundation had on the AMA and their role in the capture of American medical education.
This began with the publishing of the “Flexner Report” in 1908 which lay the groundwork for a reformation of medical education, encouraging the acceptance of a drug-based curriculum. Universities that failed to conform to the tenets of drug-based medicine and research were deprived of their funding and eventually forced to close down[5].
BILL GATES AND THE AGENDA FOR CONTROL
Since 2003, the Gates Foundation has poured nearly $6 billion into global agriculture. In 2017, Gates became the largest funder of CGIAR, which now holds the largest and most widely used collections of seed crops in the world. Gates’ interest in world agriculture serves two purposes:
To centralize control of the world’s seeds supply and,
To shift global farming towards a reliance on technology and external inputs, sold to farmers by the agritech conglomerates in which he holds stock.
By far the largest funder of the CGIAR, Gates has successfully accelerated the transfer of research and seeds from scientific research institutions to commodity-based corporations, centralizing and facilitating the pirating of intellectual property and seed monopolies through intellectual property laws and seed regulations.”
The impetus for this restructuring came from the organization’s largest funders, notably the Gates Foundation. CGIAR claims the change is necessary because,
“A unified and integrated CGIAR will be much better equipped to tackle threats to food, nutrition and water security posed by climate change.”
The recommendation for this dramatic restructuring came from CGIAR’s System Reference Group (SRG), at the time co-chaired by Tony Cavalieri, Senior Program Officer at the Gates Foundation, and Marco Ferroni, ex-head of the Syngenta Foundation.
In other words, the CGIAR reformation will result in greater centralization of the global agriculture industry, with a greater blurring of lines between the private and public sectors.
In direct contradiction to Gates’ claims of helping smallholder farmers, a detailed analysis of the grants given by the Gates Foundation revealed that the majority went to research institutes and not farmers.
These grants were also directed towards lobbying groups that pressure government to institute policies that favour big agribusiness such as introducing laws allowing the privatization of seeds.
One of Gates’ primary objectives is to open up the African market and institute a corporate takeover of the region. In aid of this goal, he founded AGRA (The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa) in 2006. Through the promotion of commercial seeds and inorganic fertilizers, AGRA set out to double crop productivity, increase incomes and halve food insecurity by 2020.
In July 2020, Timothy Wise of Tufts University published an analysis of AGRA’s impact in Africa. His research found that not only did AGRA fail in reaching a significant number of smallholder farmers (a finding that is consistent with the analysis on Gates Foundation grants, the majority of which are directed towards scientists, not farmers), but that undernourishment increased by a startling 30% in AGRA countries.
Overall staple crop yields have grown only 18% over 12 years. Meanwhile, undernourishment (as measured by the FAO) has increased 30% in AGRA countries. These poor indicators of performance suggest that AGRA and its funders should change course.”
Many Africans are now beginning to question Gates’ involvement in the region, calling for the end of his industrial agriculture model. In September 2020, SAFCEI (Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute) sent an open letter to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation warning that the Foundation’s current approach to food security will do more harm than good. The letter states that
The Gates Foundation promotes a model of industrial monoculture farming and food processing that is not sustaining our people”.
In June 2021, AFSA (The Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa) wrote to AGRA’s major institutional donors calling for them to shift their support away from big agribusiness and towards sustainable, agroecological approaches to farming.
Together, AFSA’s member network represents millions of African citizens across 50 countries. AFSA stated that they received very few responses to their letter and that none could provide any evidence that AGRA had achieved any of its stated aims.
In the shadow of AGRA’s failure, in 2020, the Gates Foundation launched “Gates Ag One”, a subsidiary of the Gates Foundation. The alleged aim of Gates Ag One is to “Advance innovations that improve agricultural outcomes for smallholder farmers”.
Gates Ag One is headed up by Joe Cornelius, a former executive at Bayer, and Al Gallegos, who has previously held positions at both DuPont and Monsanto.
Thus “Gates Ag One”, though claiming to empower small farmers will actually lead to the further enrichment of corporations. As Navdanya writes:
They are hoping to artificially accelerate the process of introducing “new technologies” to farmers through increased investment and public and private partnerships while having total freedom in their business model as a separate entity to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”
The rhetoric expounded by Gates and his posse of corporate backers is that smallholder farmers are unproductive and unable to provide for a rapidly evolving world. Gates claims that what they really need is “new digital tools and technologies”.
However, considering the failure of the Green Revolution, the soil crisis and the widespread health effects of chemical inputs, is that really true? Or is Gates Ag One simply the latest attempt to bring world agriculture firmly under the control of Big Agribusiness?
GENE DRIVE ORGANISMS AND SCULPTING EVOLUTION
The Gates Foundation, along with US military group DARPA, has been the driving force behind the development of gene drive technology. Gates’ funding of gene drive technology began in 2005 with an $8.5 million grant given to Austin Burt and Andrea Chrisanti, biologists working at Imperial College, London.
This line of development eventually led to the invention of CRISPR in 2015, a genetic engineering tool that allows scientists to cut, insert and replace genes in a DNA sequence. According to a report by ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration),
Gene drive organisms are created by genetically engineering a living organism with a particular trait, and then modifying the organism’s reproductive system in order to always force the modified gene onto future generations, spreading the trait throughout the entire population.”
As mentioned earlier in this article, one of Gates’ initiatives led to the release of genetically modified mosquitos in Burkina Faso. However, this was but the first phase in a long-term project, the third phase of which is the release of GDO mosquitos (modified via gene drive technology). ETC Group explains the significance of this [emphasis added]:
…A a gene drive is designed to interfere with the fertility of the mosquito: essential genes for fertility would be removed, preventing the mosquitoes from having female offspring or from having offspring altogether. These modified mosquitoes would then pass on their genes to a high percentage of their offspring, spreading auto-extinction genes throughout the population. In time, the entire species would in effect be completely eliminated.”
Following calls in 2016 for a global moratorium on the use of gene drive technology, the Gates Foundation paid $1.6 million to Emerging Ag (a private PR firm) to coordinate the push-back against proponents of the moratorium.
Emerging Ag recruited and coordinated over 65 experts, including a Gates Foundation senior official, a DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Project Agency) official, and government and university scientists, in an attempt to flood the official UN process with their coordinated inputs.”
Another group developing gene drive technology is the Sculpting Evolution group, run out of the Gates-funded MIT Media Lab, the same institution that received donations from Jeffery Epstein, and the same institution that houses Robert Langer, co-founder of the controversial biotech company, and Covid-19 “vaccine” manufacturer, Moderna.
The leader of Sculpting Evolution is Kevin Esvelt, one of the pioneers of CRISPR and (allegedly) the first person to identify the potential for gene drive systems to alter wild populations of organisms.
Esvelt’s lab seeks to apply “robotics and machine learning to evolve new molecular tools and techniques”. Another of their aims is to “Work with the guidance of interested communities to safely and humanely edit wild populations and ecosystems”.
The Sculpting Evolution Group also advises governments on “pressing issues of biodefense”.
Our challenge is to prevent the immense power of biotechnology from being misused. Historical pandemics killed tens of millions of people, and engineered agents could be even more destructive.”
One of the ways Sculpting Evolution proposes thwarting future pandemics or bioweapon attacks is by the construction of a “Global Nucleic Acid Observatory” (NAO) to “monitor humanity and the environment for any and all biological threats”. The group claims that by continual genomic testing at sites around the world, the “NAO could detect any virus or invasive organism undergoing exponential growth”.
In support of this radical proposal, the group references a case study from Israel [emphasis added]:
In 2013, Israel’s poliovirus-specific environmental monitoring program detected a nascent outbreak in wastewater samples from the town of Rahat using plaque assays and swiftly initiated mass oral vaccination, eliminating the virus before even a single child came down with paralytic symptoms”.
The disturbing nature of such a system thus becomes immediately apparent: governments would be able to initiate vaccination programs and institute other pandemic measures without the need for, or proof of, an actual threat, only the claimed “detection” of one. This begs the all-important question: who would decide when a “threat” is detected, and on what basis?
While virologists expound on the dangers of zoonotic coronaviruses and climate scientists rage on about the evils of carbon dioxide, the real environmental crises go largely unnoticed. And perhaps that is the point. We will explore these other crises – crises that threaten our very existence as a species – in part 3.
[1] Shiva, V., Shiva, K. Oneness vs the 1%. 2018.[back][back]
[2] Farrell, P., J., de Hart, D., S. Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas. 2011.[back][back][back][back]
[3] Engdahl, W. Seeds of Destruction. 2007.[back][back][back][back]
[4] Vasquez, A. Inflammation Mastery (4th ed). 2016.[back][back]
[5] Griffin, G., E. World Without Cancer, the Story of Vitamin B17. 2001.back
Ryan Matters is a writer and free thinker from South Africa. After a life-changing period of illness, he began to question mainstream medicine, science and the true meaning of what it is to be alive. Some of his writings can be found at newbraveworld.org, you can also follow him on Twitter and Gab.
Peter Duesberg is a molecular biologist and a molecular and cell biology professor at the University of California, Berkeley. At one time, he was an acclaimed scientist who was the world’s foremost expert on AIDS. That all changed when he was blackballed by Anthony Fauci and the scientific establishment for the temerity of revealing the truth that HIV does not cause AIDS. Duesberg was slandered as a homophobe for revealing the scientific evidence that AIDS was caused by the use of certain dangerous recreational/pharmaceutical aphrodisiacs by the sodomite community that over time broke down the immune systems of the users who then developed AIDS. He revealed that the prevalence of AIDS in Africa is simply explained by recategorizing as HIV the endemic immune deficiencies that were always understood to be caused by malnutrition, tainted drinking water, and various infections.
Dr. Duesberg reveals how Fauci pushed the toxic drug called AZT (Zidovudine) to people who were found to have antibodies to HIV. Those patients were poisoned by the drug (AZT) that was supposed to treat them. AZT, in actuality, caused AIDS, which eventually killed the patients. That is much like the present regime of treating COVID-19 with unsafe and ineffective mRNA vaccines and toxic therapeutics like Veklury® (remdesivir) while suppressing safe and effective therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.
Duesberg’s book exposes the incompetence, megalomania, and in some cases criminality of Anthony Fauci, and other NIH, FDA, and CDC officials. It reveals the genesis of the establishment of what has become a cabal of ruling technocrats in government which has now brought Orwellian oppression across the United States and indeed the world through the COVID-19 scare and mandatory experimental vaccinations.
There were very powerful interests who tried to kill Duesberg’s book before it ever saw the light of day. The publisher, Regnery, in its preface to the book explains how Peter Duesberg went through two publishers who backed out of publishing the book at late stages, apparently due to some hidden pressure from an unseen hand.
This book is now out of publication. But there is still robust demand for the book which has driven the price up. While Amazon offers the audible version of the book at a reasonable price, as of January 28, 2022, the hardcover version was priced at $1,260.00 and the paperback was priced at $536.00.
Regnery is the third publisher to have contracted to publish Inventing the AIDS Virus. Addison Wesley initially announced the book in 1993. St. Martin’s signed it in January 1994 and subsequently assigned its contract to us in January 1995. We announced it, initially, in the fall of 1995 and finally published it in February 1996. Bryan Ellison, Duesberg’s former research assistant and original co-author, became disenchanted with Duesberg’s and his publisher’s insistence on careful documentation and self-published his own version under the title Why We Will Never Win the War on AIDS in 1994. We sued Ellison for breach of contract and copyright violation and, after a two-week federal court jury trial, were awarded a six-figure verdict and an injunction against Ellison’s edition. Inventing the AIDS Virus has been edited by at least five editors, has been agonized over by the publishers of three major publishing firms, and concurrently praised and damned by countless critics.
Excerpt from the foreword by Nobel Laureate Kerry Mullis, creator of the PCR test:
We have not been able to discover any good reasons why most of the people on earth believe that AIDS is a disease caused by a virus called HIV. There is simply no scientific evidence demonstrating that this is true.
We have also not been able to discover why doctors prescribe a toxic drug called AZT (Zidovudine) to people who have no other complaint than the presence of antibodies to HIV in their blood. In fact, we cannot understand why humans would take that drug for any reason.
We cannot understand how all this madness came about, and having both lived in Berkeley, we’ve seen some strange things indeed. We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake.
I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time. Read this book.
Kary B. Mullis
Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1993
Prior to his untimely death on August 7, 2019, Kerry Mullis had this to say about Anthony Fauci and his ilk:
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
Notice the book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, on the table in front of Mullis during the interview.
“Viruses are small obligate intracellular parasites, which by definition contain either a RNA or DNA genome surrounded by a protective, virus-coded protein coat.”
Medical Microbiology, 4th edition, 1996
The question regarding the existence of pathogenic viruses remains an important one as the belief in such viruses dictates billions of dollars of resources and research funds. In the past two years we have also seen how an alleged virus can be used as a political tool to bring populations to heel. It is not the first time this has happened: for example, the “discovery” of HIV in the 1980s set up a multi-billion dollar industry and has also been used politically in most corners of the world. (The fallacies regarding the existence of the HIV particle and it causing AIDS are outlined in Virus Mania. For those wanting to dive more deeply into the arguments, I would recommend The Perth Group’s magnus opus on this topic.)
Independent journalist Jeremy Hammond who promotes himself as exposing “dangerous state propaganda” surrounding COVID-19 and the dangers of the vaccines, thus made the following curious statement in 2021:
“the false claim that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated (i.e., never proven to exist) greatly harms the credibility of the health freedom movement and is grounded in total ignorance of the science (the virus is constantly being isolated and whole genome sequenced by scientists all over the world)”
Jeremy Hammond, 9 March 2021
I would argue that the ignorance falls in Hammond’s lap as he appears to reach his conclusion by essentially repeating the claims made by virologists and reassuring the audience that their methodologies are valid. In recent weeks we have also seen Dr Joseph Mercola presenting Hammond’s interview and Steve Kirsch’s blog (that also makes appeals to virology authority) as “evidence” that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Kirsch states that he relies on “expert opinions of people I trust” which means that he has put the argument into the hands of others rather than investigating the issue himself. But is it wise for these health freedom fighters who are battling establishment COVID “experts” to not also question the establishment virologists?
Dr Andy Kaufman produced a point by point refutation of Hammond’s support of modern virology’s “isolation” methodology here, while Dr Tom Cowan warned that we are just getting started with dismantling virology’s nonsense here. Dr Sam Bailey has published many videos covering the virus isolation issue – most of which have been banned from YouTube but can still be found on Odysee. Additionally, in an essay I co-authored with Dr John Bevan-Smith, we describe the first pillar of the COVID-19 fraud as virology’s misuse of the term “isolation”. In summary, because virologists were unable to physically isolate any viruses last century, they simply changed the definition of the word so that even virologists admit the term is now used loosely. A strange state of affairs when the scientific method calls for precise terminology.
My observation over the past two years has been that many scientists, doctors, and journalists are happy to jump over this “isolation” chasm and cite the “coronavirus genomes” deposited in databases as proof that the virus must exist. For example, Steve Kirsch writes in his blog that:
“I know that Sabine Hazan verified that the sequence of the virus obtained from ATCC matched exactly what she found in people who have the virus.”
Steve Kirsch, 10 January 2022
He cites Hazan’s paper “Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from patient fecal samples by whole genome sequencing” as the evidence for this statement. Kirsch admits that he doesn’t know how the genomes were created, but his…
“scientist friends seem happy with them. At $2,000 a shot, I don’t think they’d market the product if it was contaminated and useless. Am I wrong?”
Steve Kirsch, 10 January 2022
Unfortunately, he appears to have been duped by the high-tech façade of virology’s genomics genie where “viruses” are created from various detected genetic sequences. In fact, sometimes the sequences are not really detected at all, as Dr Stefan Lanka is exposing in what may be virology’s death blow.
We can use Hazan’s paper as an example of the flawed methodology used in creating these “virus genomes”. The research team obtained faecal samples from 14 participants and proceeded to see what genetic sequences they could detect in the samples. We strike the first issue in the ‘methods’ section when they state that “included throughout sample processing was the SARS-CoV-2 positive control from ATCC (Heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2, VR-1986HK; strain 2019-nCoV/USA-WA1/2020)” How did they know that the sample contained the inactivated virus? Because the ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) claims that it does on their website where they state “this strain was originally isolated from a human case in Washington state and was deposited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” And how did the CDC know that they had the virus? Because they claimed they found it in this paper here.
But where was the virus?
In the CDC’s paper, they say that they collected “clinical specimens from a case-patient who had acquired COVID-19 during travel to China and who was identified in Washington, USA”. It was concluded that the patient had COVID-19 based on a PCR result that detected some sequences said to come from SARS-CoV-2. But at this point they had no proof of any virus – all they had was some detected genetic sequences from a patient with an alleged viral infection. After performing a test tube tissue culture experiment on their clinical sample and claiming that there was evidence of a virus due to non-specific cytopathic effects, they began to construct their “genome”. They state that “we used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing.” This is another sleight of hand because the “viral lysate” was not demonstrated to come from a virus, it is simply a soup of broken up culture cells and other additives.
Similarly misleading was the claim they “extracted nucleic acid from isolates”. They have implied that they have isolated a virus and that they know which RNA sequences came from inside it. However, this would require the alleged viral particles to be truly physically isolated by purification, which they failed to do. And I say alleged because even if they purified the particles, it would still have to be shown that they meet the definition of a virus – including being parasitic and the causal agent of disease – something that was not demonstrated by these authors or any others.
In any case, how did they know which genetic sequences belonged to the “virus” in the first place? They “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).” And where did this “reference sequence” come from? This relates to Fan Wu, et al’s paper describing the 41-year-old man who was admitted to the Central Hospital of Wuhan on 26 December 2019 with bilateral pneumonia and despite no new clinical features, was said to have a condition that was later called “COVID-19”.
The specimen was of crude lung washings, so it contained a mixture of human cells and potentially all sorts of other micro-organisms and genetic fragments. They simply asserted that there was a virus in the brew. From this mixed sample they blindly generated tens of millions of different sequences and then put their software to work to see how they could fit them all together. To do this “fitting” the software searched for “contigs” or areas where different fragments appear to have overlapping sequences. Of the hundreds of thousands of hypothetical sequences generated in this fashion they identified that the longest “continuous” sequence the computer could create was about 30,000 bases long and concluded that this software creation must be the genome of the presumed new virus.
They thought this was the genome because their hypothetically generated 30,000 base sequence was 89.1% similar to, “a bat SARS-like coronavirus (CoV) isolate—bat SL-CoVZC45”. The “genome” for the bat CoV “isolate” was generated in 2018 after “19 degenerated PCR primer pairs were designed by multiple alignment of available SARS-CoV and bat SL-CoV sequences deposited in GenBank, targeting almost the full length of the genome.” So in other words, they already knew the sequence to look for based on sequences that had previously been deposited in GenBank. But how did the producers of these already deposited sequences know that they had found viral genomes? Welcome to the circular reasoning of modern virology.
To explain the loop that virologists appear to be trapped inside, this 2019 paper published in Virology is illustrative of the problem:
“Three main methods based on HTS [High-throughput sequencing] are currently used for viral whole-genome sequencing: metagenomic sequencing, target enrichment sequencing and PCR amplicon sequencing, each showing benefits and drawbacks (Houldcroft et al., 2017). In metagenomic sequencing, total DNA (and/or RNA) from a sample including host but also bacteria, viruses and fungi is extracted and sequenced. It is a simple and cost-effective approach, and it is the only approach not requiring reference sequences. Instead, the other two HTS approaches, target enrichment and amplicon sequencing, both depend on reference information to design baits or primers.”
Maurier F, et al, “A complete protocol for whole-genome sequencing of virus from clinical samples,” Virology, May 2019.
Essentially this gets to the root of the problem. The “viral” reference genomes are being created through metagenomic sequencing but this is done on crude specimens (such as lung washings or unpurified tissue cultures) and then declarations that the selected sequences are viral in origin. So already there are two problems: firstly, there was no step (i.e. purification) to show that the sequences come from inside “viruses” and secondly, as described above, the computer generated “genomes” are simply assembled hypothetical models from small genetic fragments, not something that has been proven to exist in nature as a whole 30,000 base sequence. However, these in silico models then effectively become the “virus” and an entity such as SARS-CoV-2 is created. Once the first of such a sequence is deposited on a database, the “virus” can be “found” by others through the same flawed metagenomic techniques. Or as stated in the Virology paper, it can be “found” through target enrichment and amplicon sequencing (usually PCR), but this requires you to have a reference sequence…that is, a template that was invented in silico by metagenomic sequencing where the provenance of the genetic fragments was unknown.
There is no part in the above process that establishes either:
1) the genetic composition of any imaged or imagined particles; or
2) the biological nature of such particles, i.e. what they actually do.
It’s a good-looking nano-particle alright, but what is it made of and what does it do?
So, now can we return to Hazan’s paper to see that it is a pointless exercise in virological nonsense. They state that along with their “SARS-CoV-2 positive control from ATCC”, the “patient genomes were compared to the Wuhan-Hu-1 (MN90847.3) SARS-CoV-2 reference genome”. Accession number MN90847.3 refers to the updated “genome” said to have been found in the 41-year-old man from Wuhan as discussed above in Fan Wu, et al’s paper. The circle is complete – at no stage was it demonstrated that there was any virus by following this evidence trail of “genomes”. Fan Wu’s team never found a virus, they simply asserted that their genetic sequence computer simulation was a “new RNA virus strain from the family Coronaviridae” without proving that the sequence existed in nature or came from inside a virus. Hence, there was no “detection of SARS-CoV-2 from patient fecal samples” as the title of the Hazan paper claimed, unless “SARS-CoV-2” means genetic sequences of who-knows-what from who-knows-where. It doesn’t matter where or how often these sequences are detected – they have never been proven to be viral in nature. So, when Steve Kirsch stated that Hazan “verified that the sequence of the virus obtained from ATCC matched exactly what she found in people who have the virus,” he is mistaken.
I was not planning on doing any more articles nor devoting any more of my time to Steve Kirsch after my response to his claim that “SARS-COV-2” has been isolated. It was clear to me after reading his blog post that he did not understand what he was writing about. Even if it wasn’t clear to anyone reading, Steve took the liberty of outright admitting that he did not understand the topic as he relied on “experts” to tell him what to think and believe:
I rely on expert opinions of people who I trust for certain issues like whether or not the virus has been “isolated.” -Steve Kirsch
After the blog post came out, there were some exchanges between Steve and Christine Massey, who has done an amazing job of destroying the “virus” isolation lie with her Freedom of Information requests. She confronted Steve about his “isolation” claim and brilliantly pointed out why he was wrong. Instead of conceding that she was right and that he clearly did not understand the topic, Steve hunkered down on his ridiculous claim and pushed her for a 5 hour live debate with his “experts” in order to let the audience decide which side was right in the “SARS-COV-2” isolation argument. Disregarding the ridiculousness of the 5 hour time frame and the desire for the audience to decide a winner, Steve was attempting to sit on the sidelines and play matchmaker by pitting his “experts” against Christine. Once she enlisted the help of a team of her own experts, Steve seemingly panicked and decided to exit stage left.
This is just a brief summary of what transpired over the course of a few weeks in January 2022 and I may not have done the exchange justice. However, while the debate-that-never-was is an interesting story, it is not my main focus. In fact, I would have left this whole Steve Kirsch situation in the wastebasket where it belongs until I saw his parting shots at the “virus does not exist” community. In his attempt to save face by passing the responsibility of debating Christine and her experts off to his readers (which shouldn’t be shocking as he is seemingly skilled at passing responsibility off to “experts”), Steve shared some additional outlandish claims made by his “experts” regarding “virus” purification. Here are a few brief highlights from his post:
Does anyone want to debate “Does the virus exist?”
If course it does, but there are followers of Sam Bailey, Stefan Lanka, Thomas Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, and Christine Massey who claim it doesn’t.
“I’m not willing to invest my time in this debate, but if you want to challenge Sam Bailey, Stefan Lanka, Thomas Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, and Christine Massey, please let me know in the comments.”
“Basically, purifying a virus is difficult and there is no reason in today’s world to do it, so it isn’t done. The FOIA requests they issue are a publicity stunt that they know will fail. That’s very disingenuous of them not to reveal that.”
“Also, the people I talk to fully acknowledge there is no purified virus, but that it isn’t needed because they can do everything they need to do without it. Lanka et al. claim it is needed. So it’s now just a matter of opinion. Neither side is going to convince the other side. That’s what happened.”
“The reason nobody has purified the virus is there is no need to do so in today’s world where gene sequencing is readily available.”
First, I would like to point out Steve’s apparent Freudian slip while attempting to declare the “virus” exists: “If course it does.” Not a typo on my part. I’m not here to play grammar police as I make plenty of spelling errors myself. I just thought it was an amusingly ironic way to start his post. Since Steve is unwilling to invest his time in a debate, maybe he could devote it to proofreading?
Now that the fun is out of the way, let’s get to the nitty-gritty on “virus” purification. According to Steve’s “experts,” the purification of a “virus” is too difficult and is no longer necessary. They believe that in today’s world of molecular virology, purifying “viruses” does not need to occur as a genome can be obtained from the genetic soup full of host and other unknown “non-viral” RNA/DNA. They believe that it is possible to obtain a genome for an unknown “virus” by piecing it together from the millions of reads of random RNA aquired from these unrelated sources within the sample. Thus, Steve and Co. want you to believe that purification, i.e. the very steps used to rid a sample of contaminants, pollutants, foreign material, etc. in order to isolate it, is not necessary any more as technology has advanced beyond these primitive methods. Putting aside the fact that the admittance by Steve and Co. that purified “SARS-COV-2” does not exist destroys their previous claims of “virus” isolation, does Steve’s “expert” advice on purification hold up?
No. Not at all. At least, not according to these experts:
“That such “purification” is an indispensable prerequisite for detecting viruses and creating valid antibody and PCR tests based on them is also stated by scientists who are the most renowned in the world, among them:
White and Fenner: “It’s an essential pre-requisite.” Luc Montagnier: “It is necessary.” Robert Gallo: “You have to purify.” Marcel Tanner: “If a pure SARS-CoV-2 isolate cannot be documented by the IVI [=Institute of Virology and Immunology] in Bern, then we have a problem.” (siehe here). Françoise Barré-Sinoussi: “… you have to purify the virus from all this mess.” Jean-Claude Chermann: “Yes, of course… Absolutely.” David Gordon: “It’s a natural step from obtaining the virus in cell culture to then obtain purified virus.” Dominic Dwyer: “The purification, as far as one can go, is important in analysis of any virus or bacteria, for that matter well.” Wan Beom Park: “In the outbreak situation, isolation of causative virus is indispensable for developing and evaluating diagnostic tools, therapeutics, and vaccine candidates.”
I’m not positive who Steve’s “experts” are, but the people listed above are well-known and respected scientists and virologists. While they may disagree with the fact that “viruses” do not exist, they all accept that purification of a “virus” is an absolutely necessary and essential step. It is a prerequisite.
Those listed above are not the only experts claiming purification is necessary. An interview with Professor: Dr. Osamu Nakagomi from the Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Molecular Epidemiology, who is an expert on the subject matter, states as much as well:
Fundamentals of Ultracentrifugal Virus Purification
“In recent years, in virus research, it has become a standard practice to purify and analyze genomes and identify viruses from samples using commercial kits. Since for the established viruses their genomes have already been known, virus identification is possible even in a mixed state. However, to carry out detailed investigation on the nature of viruses, it is first necessary to refine the virus particles in order to yield a high level of purified materials.”
Please discuss the necessity of ultracentrifugation in virus research.
“When extracting virus genome using the classical method, the virus particles must first be purified. Then the virus genome extracted from the particles is examined. Ultracentrifugation plays an important role in the process. Purifying the virus particles makes it possible from the beginning to ensure that we are dealing with the rotavirus genomes in the virus particles.Currently such analysis is performed almost all the time after hastily extracting the genome without actually purifying the specimen. This practice is common since the genome of rotavirus is well established and it is a common knowledge that if the genome (Fig. 1 ) characteristic of rotavirus is present, there is no doubt that the genome is present in rotavirus particles as well. However, suppose, for example, that we are dealing with the problem of determining what kind of host cell organelles or virus proteins and genomes are aggregated in an infected cell, ultracentrifugation becomes indispensable. Moreover, while studying new viruses, it becomes increasingly necessary to investigate whether or not the genome is present in the particle. In such cases, purification with an ultracentrifuge becomes a necessity. Information on the buoyant density, size and sedimentation coefficient (Svedberg value, S value), all of which are taken into consideration in ultracentrifugation, is in fact the fundamental aspect of virology which taken together are called the physiochemical properties of viruses.”
I wonder if Steve and Co. would be able to point out “SARS-COV-2” from these unpurified EM images if we took out the labels?
As can be seen by Dr. Osamu Nakagomi as well as the experts listed above, purification is entirely necessary, especially in instances with “novel viruses” such as “SARS-COV-2,” which Steve and Co. admit has never been purified. Without purification, there are numerous host cell organelles and other proteins, microrganisms, bacteria, etc. within the sample and thus there can be no claims of isolation. There would be no way to be able to determine that the RNA used to create the “SARS-COV-2” genome came from one source. In fact, the only time Dr. Nakagomi states purification is not necessary is when the genome is already known and established, thus purification is a neccesary step to obtain the initial genome. Yet this creates a bit of a conundrum. Where has it ever been shown that the particles assumed to be “viruses” were ever purified and isolated directly from a sick human in order to obtain the original genome for any “virus?” At some point in the history of “viral” genomes, this purification and isolation process must have been carried out before any genome for any “virus” could have been obtained and considered accurate and reliable. However, it has never been done, especially for “coronaviruses” as I outlined here.
The “SARS-COV-2” genome was nonexistent and there was no prior knowledge of its sequence. The genome was created from unpurified broncoalveloar fluid (BALF) from one patient and cobbled together in a computer from other unpurified reference genomes made in a similar way. In a document by the WHO regarding sequencing genomes using metagenomics, such as was done for the original “SARS-COV-2” genome, it is admitted that high “non-viral” host material will also be sequenced. They claim that purification steps such as centrifugation and filtration are supposed to be done yet even purifying samples will still lead to a high number of “off-target, non-viral” reads:
Genomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2
“Depletion of host or other non-SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in a sample leads to a higher proportion of SARS-CoV-2 reads in generated sequence data and therefore a higher chance of recovering a full genome.SARS-CoV-2 metagenomic approaches therefore typically include steps to remove host and bacterial cells, through either centrifugation or filtration prior to RNA extraction, or chemical or enzymatic removal of unwanted DNA/RNA. This is easier for liquid samples, from which cells can be more easily separated, such as bronchoalveolar lavage (Table 4). Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and DNA content are also commonly depleted during library preparation for virus RNA sequencing, and carrier RNA is often omitted from extractions or replaced with linear polyacrylamide. Despite such measures, samples may still contain high quantities of off-target host DNA/RNA that may also be sequenced. Metagenomic approaches therefore generally benefit from input of samples with high virus loads (such that a reasonable proportion of the genetic material in the sample is virus).”
“Metagenomic sequencing typically produces high numbers of off-target, non-virus reads. It is also often (though not always, depending on the sequencing platform and multiplexing) more costly than targeted capture-based or amplicon-based sequencing approaches, because more data have to be produced to generate one SARS-CoV-2 genome. Moreover, pretreatment steps that are particularly beneficial for metagenomics, such as centrifugation, are not typically performed for molecular diagnostic assays so new extractions that incorporate pretreatment steps may have to be performed for metagenomic sequencing.”
Another source on the advantages and disadvantages of genomic sequencing states that contamination, such as that by bacteria which is sure to be present without purification, will lead to inaccurate genomes:
“Factors outside the control of the service provider tasked with isolation and sequencing of DNA can negatively influence the quality of the genome sequence and therefore its interpretation. This can include the quality of the DNA sample provided for analysis, such as low quantity, high bacterial contamination, or sample degradation. Such factors can even prevent the procedure from being undertaken. In such a circumstance, the client might be obliged to deliver a new sample.”
Since Steve and Co. admit that “SARS-COV-2” has never been purified, yet purification is a prerequisite for “novel viruses” in order to obtain an accurate genome, how can they claim that this step is unnecessary?
It’s probably due to the other fact which Steve admitted to: purification is difficult. However, I would go one step further and say that when dealing with nano-sized particles, purification is impossible. I will not go into too much detail in this post as I have outlined the purification problems here and here. However, it has been admitted numerous times that it is impossible to separate “viruses” from exosomes and other extracellular vesicles that co-sediment together. There is no one method, whether ultracentrifugation, filtration, precipitation, etc., that can completely purify the “viruses.” Although you can find similar statements in some of the posts I linked, I will provide a recent article which focused on the need for purifying RNA for epigenetic studies. The authors supply various purification methods and then admit that none of them alone are sufficient to purify “viruses” from host-derived impurities. These impurities then impact the creation of the genome and any study relating to it. Even when combined, they can only claim that these methods will increase “virus” yield and quality, not completely purify the particles.
“The relatively low abundance of viral genomic material within the nucleic acid milieu of clinical samples places constraints on the utility of epigenetics-related applications, like m6A RNA methylation ELISAs, to specifically study the virus epigenome. Such assays require highly pure input material, free from host-derived impurities whose epigenetic modifications can also be detected and interfere with results.”
“The methods included above are generally not sufficient, when performed alone, for adequate purification of viruses. Studies focused on the virus epigenome require highly pure input material, without interference from the epigenetic modifications of host DNA, RNA, or protein. Combinations of the aforementioned methods can increase viral recovery, yield, and quality.”
Even when the purification steps are performed on samples, there will always be many known and unknown identical particles with various sources of genetic material within the sample. Contamination is a widespread problem both in cell culturing and genomics. This makes electron microscopy imaging and the creation of a genome utterly meaningless and useless as proof of a “virus.” In order to hammer this point home, here are a few highlights from a 1996 Manuel on “virus” purification:
“Virus purification is the physical separation of virus in a concentrated form from the host cell milieu in which it has grown. Viruses need tobe purified for many studies in which properties or structure of the virus must be distinguished from those of the host cells or culture medium, such as analyses of structure of viral polypeptides, function of membrane glycoproteins, etc.”
Criteria of purity
“The observation of particles in the electron microscope, whilst not a good criterion of purity, does allow the detection of ‘unwanted structures’.
It would be expected that constituents of the medium would form a major part of the contaminants of purified virus preparations. This can be monitored by gel diffusion tests, where antisera raised against e.g. calf serum, or uninfected cells can be reacted with virus preparation.”
As can be seen, “viruses” must be purified in order for the structure and physical properties of the “virus” to be distinguished from host cells and the culture medium. The constituents of the culture medium are said to be the bulk of the contaminants in purified “virus.” This would include the fetal bovine serum which is added to nearly every culture which is a completely separate source of RNA from the host source. They fail to mention the added animal RNA which would come from the Vero cells regularly used for culturing as in the case of “SARS-COV-2.” All of this “non-viral” material would need to be eliminated first along with the host material as well as possible contamination from bacteria, exosomes, MVB’s, other microrganisms, etc. before a genome could be considered valid. Otherwise, there is no realistic way of knowing which RNA belongs to which source within the mixture and whether or not the computer-generated genome is an amalgamation of the RNA stitched together from those numerous sources.
It is clear that purification is an absolutely necessary process, even though the methods themselves are flawed and unable to completely purify these preparations. This is why Steve and Co. claim it is “difficult” (i.e. impossible) to purify “viruses,” that it is no longer necessary, and why they want to skip over this step entirely. They know it is impossible. They know that they can not supply a single study where the particles claimed to be “viruses” were completely purified and isolated directly from a sick host. They can not even show this in papers where “viruses” are cultured. They want you to believe that technology has advanced to a point where it can pick through these unpurified mixtures of RNA in order to piece together a theoretical representation of an unseen “virus” in the form of a genome. Even if this was a logical argument (it’s not), a genome from unpurified samples would be at best INDIRECT evidence, not DIRECT evidence of a “virus.”
Fortunately, even disregarding the sources I’ve shared above which completely dispute Steve and Co., we can rely on logic and critical thinking to understand that their claims are ridiculous. In order for a genome to be considered valid evidence, the entity being sequenced must be shown to actually exist in reality first. One can not just assume an unseen “virus” is within the unpurified sample from the start without ever verifying that it actually exists to begin with. This requires that the particles claimed to be “viruses” be found in a state completely free of contaminants, pollutants, and foreign material as well as separated from everything else. In order for this to occur, the sample must be put through the steps of purification (centrifugation, filtration, precipitation, etc.) so that it can be shown to exist in an isolated state. Only then can proof of pathogeniticity be aquired using the purified particles as a valid independent variable in order to establish cause and effect. Only then can the particles identified in EM images be said to be the “virus.” Only then could a genome be aquired. Only then can the “virus” be fully characterized.
Without purification, Steve and Co. have no “virus.”
And so we get to the crux of the problem with relying on “experts” to do the thinking for you. Steve has relied on his “experts” to tell him that the purification process is unnecessary. He allowed the “experts” to tell him that the definition of isolation means to add many things together rather than what it actually means which is to exist in a state separated from everything else. He did not do a cursory bit of research to understand that his so-called “experts” are wrong. However, their inaccurate claims are now his to defend. Sadly, Steve is adamant that, while he was willing to invest the time to write a blog post about his unwillingness to do a debate, he is not willing to invest his time to actually defend his claims in a debate. So the way I see it, Steve has three options:
Find the time to debate Christine and her experts to defend his ridiculous claims.
Find new “experts” who understand the methods used for the purification and isolation of “viruses” and why they are necessary.
Find the time to do his own research and utilize critical thinking and logic to discern truth for himself rather than relying on “experts” to do the thinking for him.
I’m hoping Steve chooses option # 3. However, I’m not holding my breath.
When the media reports that illegal mandates are ending, it is necessary to read between the lines. Because there is always more to the story.
On January 19, 2022, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson was reported to say that so-called Plan B measures would lapse on Jan. 26, as face masks would not be legally enforced anywhere and COVID passes would not be mandatory.
Our scientists believe it is likely that the Omicron wave has now peaked nationally… because of the extraordinary booster campaign, together with the way the public have responded to the Plan B measures, we can return to Plan A.
While this may sound positive on its surface, the idea of legally enforcing illegal mandates is an oxymoron. By reading between the lines, we see that OMICRON is an anagram for moronic and oncomir (i.e., tumor forming). And the wave represents 5G mm wave frequencies.
If mandates are on the outs, then they have served a purpose, by design. What’s next? In the world of sports metaphors, it is the jab followed by the right-hook punch, which translates to a strategy of injections plus added wave frequencies.
The new, faster level of 5G connectivity will significantly augment Verizon’s “5G Ultra Wideband” network, which, until now, has relied solely on extremely-fast-but-very-hard-to-find millimeter wave spectrum.
Did the Federal Aviation Administration fail to plan for this oversight?
The Jab-5G Right Hook Punch
The new mRNA injections are known to contain graphene oxide (nanometals) which is part of a self assembly process of nanobots (i.e., nanotechnology). Graphene oxide acquires magnetic properties and is extremely toxic. It’s toxicity is dependent on the electromagnetic radiation it absorbs. Once injected, it has an affinity for the central nervous system and electrical organs, such as the heart. Consequences include fainting, arrhythmias, or syncope, and sudden death. To understand why boosters will be recommended every 3 months to keep the graphene oxide in the body, watch this explanation. This is the jab.
The Jab-5G Strategy could be a very effective knock-out punch for a global government to exert more control over large populations, including the depletion of the human species. This is a crime against humanity, a strategy first tested in China and South Korea in 2019.
On June 29, 2019, China’s new law, The Vaccines Administration Law was promulgated. Soon after, 2 billion doses of COVID vaccine were deployed in China, enough for 1 billion people, or 76 percent of China’s 1.4 billion population.
By now, it is widely known that 5G towers utilize frequencies that affect all life at the level of DNA. These are microwave, radio wave frequencies that range from 3 kilohertz (kHz) up to 300 gigahertz (GHz). Within this range is the range is the absorption spectrum of oxygen molecules, at 60 GHz.
Since 2008, 5G research scientists have shown that the coiled portion of the sweat duct in the upper skin layer is regarded as a helical antenna in the sub-THz band. In their December 2019 article in Bio Heat Transfer, they warn:
One must consider the implications of human immersion in the electromagnetic noise, caused by devices working at the very same frequencies as those, to which the sweat duct (as a helical antenna) is most attuned. We are raising a warning flag against the unrestricted use of sub-THz technologies for communication, before the possible consequences for public health are explored.
DNA, Water & Your Health
Helical is also a word used to describe DNA, in skin cells or any cell. DNA is more than a series of four base pairs (CGAT). DNA is a transmitter, a receiver, and a translator of information. There is a deep relationship between DNA, water, and your health. Water molecules surround the structure of your DNA, through hydrogen bonds, making it highly responsive to stimuli, such as light frequencies. [Read more in The Nature of Healing].
Now, add cell towers that emit 5G frequencies strategically placed atop water towers all over the U.S. What happens when the structure of water is altered by incoherent frequencies before entering your body? What happens to your DNA? Do you need to consider a safer water source? Do you wonder why your government has not vetted 5G technology for safety and health as it relates to water or air travel?
The symptoms of sub-THz band frequencies appears similar to “COVID” symptoms and includes: lack of oxygen, seizures, and a phlegm-less cough. While the 5G frequency network has been launched in every continent without verifying safety, millions of people have consented to experimental mRNA vaccines that utilize “gene therapy” technology.
Knock-Out Punch
An Editorial published in the July 2020 J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, suggests that 5G waves are a critical factor to sudden deaths attributed to an influenza-like condition dubbed COVID. Read that article in full (that has been retracted), here: 5G Technology and Induction of Coronavirus in Skin Cells:
In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells.
The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells.
The authors write:
When an electromagnetic wave passes the cell membrane and the nuclear membrane, it induces an extra magnetic field within the DNA inductor and interacts with its fields.
A DNA is built from charged particles and according to laws of physics, by any motion of these particles, some electromagnetic waves emerge. Also, the structure of a DNA is similar to the structure of an inductor in a receiver and can produce some waves. Thus, a DNA could emit some waves and interact with external waves. However, most waves have a length more than the size of cells and pass them without any effect. Only limited waves with lengths smaller than millimeter could penetrate into cell membrane and interact with DNA inductors. These wavelengths could be observed in 5 G technology.
After the jab was rolled out in the U.S. in December 2021, doctors presented strong evidence of the destructive effects of the immune system, at the Doctors for COVID Ethics Symposium. Introducing a synthetic spike protein into the body, via injection, directs the DNA to express proteins it was never meant to express. The Doctors for COVID Ethics (DCE) write:
A natural infection with coronavirus will, in most individuals, remain localized to the respiratory tract. In contrast, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes.
Note: Millimeter waves are currently used by the U.S. Army as a crowd control dispersal weaponry called Active Denial Systems.
Solutions
With contradictory media messages that serve to confuse, know who you are. Under your skin suit, you are first and foremost a part of Nature, a being of light frequency. Every thought, emotion, and action, is a frequency you emit through your DNA, your biological internet. Understand that artificial frequencies introduced into the environment are scrambling and altering your natural frequency. How do you negotiate life in a boxing ring
Return to Nature. Eliminate all WI-fi devices, or hard wire them. If you have a Smart meter on your house or apartment, you can block those waves using a Smart Meter Guard or Block. Eat clean, organic foods to keep your immune system at peak performance. Drink clean, filtered water. Use herbs that promote a strong immune system. Research the use of the mineraloid, Shungite, as protection carried on your body. Make sure you cleanse Shungite regularly. All of these tools work to help to maintain a strong natural frequency.
Stop watching and listening to media talking heads. Shut off the Tel-A-Vision, which emits a low frequency for TV programming. Scrutinize leaders who offer no real solutions, but only fear based sound bites. Raise your own frequency by spending time in Nature, and by meditating to keep you from beLIEving the propaganda.
Understand that you are your own healer and this life is the self-healing journey. Part of the journey is to see through fear-based illusions. Once you find your center, you can ground yourself, like a martial artist or kick boxer. Then you can duck the jabs and right hooks. You can avoid the knock-out punches altogether.
“…I think there has been, you know, a total wave right of criticism of the the truth that viruses don’t exist and cause disease. And we see that, seemingly at the same time, that the pandemic seems to be drawing near an end. Right?
We see suddenly lifting restrictions all over the world.
And even Bill Gates predicted in 2022 that would be the end of the pandemic.
The Wall Street journal printed an editorial saying that…essentially last three weeks a major drop in cases, and it signifies, you know, what do they call it — the herd immunity. Right? Which is another thing we can debunk.
So, as they’re kind of ending out of this — and, you know, I’m sure that there’s more planned in the future. And I don’t know if it’s going to be a health crisis or not. But if this does peter out, they want to make sure that as we, you know, get this relief and come out of it — and probably they want us to look at them in a favorable light.
But they want to make sure that we still believe in deadly and dangerous viruses.
And they want to make sure that we still believe that there are safe vaccines, even if we question the safety of these particular genetic injections.
That we retain those important beliefs, so that they can still continue to profit and manipulate and, you know, run operations in the future.”
~ Dr. Andrew Kaufman
Video available at Dr. Tom Cowan BitChute channel.
See Dr. Mercola’s article “Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is a Real Virus” here.
Are you tired of wearing a cloth mask that resembles a face diaper that does nothing to filter the air?
There are other mask models to consider that have stood the test of time, and may help you stand out in a crowd, instead of blending into it.
Who Were The Plague Doctors?
One such model is the Bird Beak Mask. Since the 16th century, this menacing-looking mask has been a fashion statement of Plague Doctors who used it to filter their air stream while treating victims of plague and burying the dead. However, to everyone else, the beaked mask and coverings were a sign of death, the Grim Reaper in the flesh.
The Plague Doctors were the well-educated, well-connected, well-known and wealthy men from rich families, even if they were terrible healers. The sole purpose of the Plague doctor was to treat plague patients, even if the cause was as elusive as the cure. History tells a story that plague victims’ bodies piled up quickly, were carted away, and unceremoniously dumped into mass graves. Hundreds were burned at a time. Entire villages simply ceased to exist.
The plague doctors’ duties were far more actuarial than medical. Most did a lot more counting than curing, keeping track of the number of casualties and recorded the deaths in log books.
These doctors were not allowed to mingle with the general public (much like the political and Hollywood elite, today), and were said to self-quarantine for long periods of time after treating patients. History writes of Plague Doctors living lonely lives in isolation, but who really knows, since many of them just up and disappeared after the plagues, never to be heard from again.
Plague doctors were sometimes requested to take part in autopsies, and were often called upon to testify and witness wills and other important documents for the dead and dying. Not surprisingly, many a dishonest doc took advantage of bereaved families, holding out false hope for cures and charging extra fees (even though they were supposed to be paid by the government and not their patients). – Doctorsreview.com
Before or by the 17th century, three dominant Theories of Disease Transmission were accepted:
1) By Miasma Theory, or “bad air”
2) By divine mandate through the Will of God, or by the Planets or Comets
3) By some unknown device jumping from person to person.
The Costume
To ward off miasma, and other possible transmitters of disease, the Plague Doctors’ costume was developed to look like a featherless, black “Big Bird.” The six-inch beak area over the nose also came with round eye openings and a black wide-brimmed Morocco leather hat that indicated the profession of doctor.
The beak functioned as a respirator and contained herbs, such as wormwood, spices, dried flowers, camphor, and a vinegar sponge that protected against miasma or “bad air.” The shape of the beak is said to have slowed the passage if air before being absorbed by the herbs and traveling to nostrils and lungs. The full-length impermeable coat was made from waxen leather. The hands were gloved. And the canes were used to examine victims without touching them.
Building on the theory of miasma, some plague doctors in France set the scented material inside their masks on fire in the hopes that the smoke would help to clear the bad air. – Doctorsreview.com
In fact, the costume of the 16th century was dusted off and reused in the 17th and 18th centuries, since plagues seemed to suddenly appear every 100 years, like clockwork. Each plague came with a narrative of “the most feared disease in the world, capable of wiping out hundreds of millions of people in seemingly unstoppable global pandemics.” Sound familiar?
Unfortunately, with each plague, the Plague Doctors were never able to prevent or cure the plague. No matter how certain the Plague Doctors believed in their treatments and “cures,” they universally failed. Could the poor outcomes have been due to the treatments?
The Treatments
These were the times of blood letting, where Plague Doctors bled a vein to release “bad blood” or “hot blood.” Sometimes vinegar, arsenic and mercury were fed to infected individuals. Food might be rubbed on the patient’s body, including onion, herbs, pigeon, or snake, dead of course. Sometimes doctors would burst an inflamed lymph node in the neck, groin, or armpits.
Doctors tried to purge a fever by sitting a patient close to a fire, and there was always the option of smothering patients in their own feces, or dropping them off in the sewer overnight if they couldn’t produce enough of their own waste. Patients were told that the plague was punishment from God. And it was reported that some devout patients asked to be beaten into repentance with the doctor’s cane or a whip. But that may just be a story.
According to Historian, Winston Black, the Plague Doctors did not have clients. “Instead, they went around the city during a plague outbreak, making decisions about which houses to lock up or condemn, which neighborhoods to quarantine, and so on.”
The beak doctors, as they came to be know, dropped like flies or pretty much lived under constant quarantine, wandering the countryside and city streets like pariahs… until of course desperate families needed them.
During the Middle Ages, there were alternative treatments. Botanists were known as herbalists; they collected, grew, dried, stored, and sketched plants. Many herbalists became experts in identifying and describing plants according to their morphology and habitats, as well as their uses. The best medieval treatment that healed was a salve made of onion, garlic, wine, and cow bile that has shown promise 1000 years later against today’s “modern” Superbugs. This salve can kill 90 percent of the methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria cultures.
MRSA is a serious public health concern; it is a difficult infection to treat, as it has naturally developed resistance to modern antibiotics, and has thus been given the classification of “superbug.”
Were victims of the plagues victims of parasites?
Worms and Parasites
Whenever the body’s immune system is depressed or suppressed due to toxic exposures, including radiation or harmful frequencies, and malnutrition, that is a proven recipe for pathogenic microbes and parasites to move in.
Some have recorded that ancient Rome was known to fertilize crops with human feces, which may have provided a vector for parasitic infections in the early documented plagues. Likewise, eating raw fish and unfermented fish sauce was another opportunity for tapeworm infestation in ancient Rome, especially if people were exposed to other toxins.
Research in the 2016 Journal Parasitology, from the University of Cambridge, shows that Romans experienced parasites as whipworm, roundworm, and a fish tapeworm. Even with sanitation, they suffered from ecto-parasites such as fleas, lice, and bedbugs at the same rate as Vikings and Medieval Europeans.
What about exposures not recorded or lost vital records? Or altered records describing toxins from water or air? What about new frequencies unleashed during plague-ridden times that mimic flu symptoms in the body?
Today, people are faced with toxic exposures, radiation, and particle dust (PM 2.5) that enters the blood and lungs to create chronic lung diseases. Harmful frequencies and malnutrition are also hazardous to health and ignored, for the most part, by health authorities. These exposures all change the pH of the body’s tissues to draw in pathogens and could be main reasons why most people harbor parasites today.
Under the “COVID” scare, the National Institutes of Health promotes the anti-parasitic animal, drug “Ivermectin,” without using the term parasites. While this drug may work for some people, similar to another anti-parasitic FDA-approved, non-toxic drug, Fenbendazole, it does not work for everyone. The presence of parasites represents a warning that the body’s immune system is breaking down. In fact, most if not all cancers represent parasite infestation, even if the presence of parasites does not always indicate cancer. Parasites in humans also reflect parasitic human relationships. And there are plenty of those, from friendships and marriages, to relationships between doctors and patients, and between citizens and governments.
When parasites overwhelm the body it is called hyperinfection. The symptoms of parasites include chronic cough, fever, chills, chest pain, and fatigue, symptoms similar to flu. From the 16th century to the 21st century, if medical doctors have not improved their success rates over diseases, it may be due to lack of knowledge.
Most doctors diagnose disease without testing for parasites. Why not test when there are multiple ways parasites take up residence in the body? One reason is the price tag for an antiparasitic prescription, which can reach over $8000 for fourteen 200-mg tablets of prescription Albendazole, once the insurance companies get involved. According to Goodrx.com, 4 tablets of Albendozole cost approximately $115.00 if you purchase them yourself. Surgery is more also profitable, at over $100,000, than prescribing antiparasitic tablets.
Doctors continue to choose dangerous prescription medications such as the FDA-approved drug Veklury (remdesivir), as well as harmful procedures (ventilation), that can cause death. New antiviral medications for COVID come with adverse health risks. Neurotoxins, aluminum and mercury (Thimerosal) are still found in some injections, called vaccines, “to safeguard against contamination,” believe it or not.
Biophysicist and naturopath, Dr. Hulda Clark (1926-2009), provided a recipe for making Lugol’s solution in her 1995 book, “The Cure for All Diseases.” In her book, she tells readers to ask pharmacists to make Lugol’s Solution. At the time her book was published, a pint of Lugol’s Solution, sold in brown glass bottles, cost about $20. Lugol’s popularity among physicians of the 19th Century is reflected in the poem:
If ye don’t know where, what and why, prescribe ye then K and I
The atomic symbols, K and I, are symbols for potassium and iodine. Farmers can still purchase iodine crystals if the DEA can verify the location of their farm with a satellite photo. The DEA also allows the sale of a 2% Lugol’s Solution, since the 5% dilution is banned.
If simple solutions to health exist, why, then, are are doctors still failing to create health or avert the diseases that plague populations?
The Plague Makers
Running silently underneath the publicized disease plagues that build fear of communicable diseases, and death tolls, are the unseen plague makers.
From The Bubonic Plague of 549 to the Black Death of 1348 to the Cholera and Typhoid scares of the 1890s [and the promotion of the Germ Theory], to the 1918 Spanish Flu, there have been dozens of so-called plague infestations. See an “approved” historical timeline of some plagues and epidemics. Read about the coincidental timeline of electricity in The Invisible Rainbow.
Each new plague and pandemic was accompanied by a hidden more sinister plague of new restrictions on the rights of the people under “quarantine authority.” Government quarantines began in the 19th century.
Among such restrictions include The National Quarantine Act of 1893 and the 1902 Pan American Sanitary Bureau, the first of a series of international health organizations formed in the 20th century—culminating with the World Health Organization in 1948—that helped to bring issues of quarantine and the control of disease to a global stage. There was the 1944 Public Service Act and the 2001 Patriot Act after September 11 terrorist attacks, and many Acts in between.
All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts… William Shakespeare, As You Like It
The common denominator among all plagues was not only the alleged “germ,” or the fear, or the advertised death toll, but it was also the consequences of an ignorant population that allowed “authorities” to tell the stories that removed their freedoms. Could the biohazards just as well have originated from contaminated air, or new frequencies, or both?
History repeats itself if unchecked. And we, as humans, repeat the same events under new names perpetually, over and over again, if unconscious. Mass extinctions of people and freedoms happen simultaneously, through wars and plagues. Each time they happen, it is through ignorance, because people choose to become victims over and over again.
Did the Plague Doctors disappear without a trace, or did they assume a different title, with different tools, and a new costume? Is it time to recycle the herb-filled beak mask as an air purifier for anyone who wants a functional mask during the latest plague known as COVID?
Perhaps prior to 2020 the issue of virus isolation was of minimal interest to the vast majority earth’s inhabitants. Most people blindly accept the medical establishment’s claims that viruses exist and can cause disease. They otherwise don’t give it a second thought. Sometimes you get unwell, and a doctor informs you, “it’s probably a viral illness” – but almost every time, you get better again.
However, the increasingly negative impacts from government instigated policies in the name of the “corona” crisis has resulted in some healthy new interest in the subject. Social cohesion in households and communities is being strained, businesses are being run into the ground, and suspicions about the requirement to be injected every four months to maintain protection against an invisible enemy are on the rise. If no virus has been isolated then its very existence is pure speculation. A phantom menace that has no confirmed physical presence, merely a ruinous psychological construct manifesting as a living nightmare. And those who ignore the pivotal issue of virus isolation are blindly accepting a premise on which all manner of lies can be built.
But there are scientific papers that prove isolation?…
The confusion surrounding virus isolation stems from the fact that many published scientific papers state in their titles or claim in their abstracts that they successfully “isolated” a virus. In 2020 and 2021, we lost track of the number of times we were sent such papers as apparent proof of the “SARS-CoV-2” virus. Similarly, industry-funded “fact-checking” sites have a propensity to link to such papers to reassure their spoon-fed readers that the “virus” has been isolated. Unfortunately, such disinformation sites fail to inform their audience that the virologists are not referring to actual physical isolation of any virus and have instead substituted the meaning of the word isolation for something that means almost the opposite.
Researchers such as Christine Massey have tirelessly collated Freedom of Information requests from governments around the world to clearly expose the fact that the alleged causal agent of COVID-19 has never once been physically isolated. While at least one government supported microbiologist has claimed this is disingenuous as the requests are worded in such a way that they are not consistent with the methodology of modern virology, this misses the whole point: the modern virologists are not isolating viruses in the way that the public and probably most of the medical profession are led to believe. Instead, they moved the goalposts.
The excuses for this sleight of hand should be rejected and the isolation of a virus should mean the same as it does with any other entity on the planet – that is, in its pure form, separated out from other material. It is done with things that are smaller than alleged viruses, such as proteins, and things that are bigger such as bacteria. It is not a technological limitation or because of some special property that precludes this process from being essential to the process of real isolation.
The most definitive evidence of a virus would be finding it directly in a host such as a human.
However, despite the fact we are told that a single sneeze could contain 200 million SARS-CoV-2 particles, when we take a mucous or blood sample from a patient not one virus particle can be found. And what about taking samples from hundreds or even thousands of people said to be infected and have a disease such as COVID-19 and then combining them altogether? I’m not sure if this has ever been tried but apparently even then if we purified such a sample, the excuse is apparently the same: we wouldn’t find any viruses in there! So, we are expected to believe that a patient is overwhelmed with trillions of viral particles but we can’t find any on or inside them.
Magic Tricks and the Electron Microscope
The virologists of old were convinced that with the advent of the electron micrograph and more efficient purification techniques they would be able to find all sorts of viruses in sick individuals. However, it became apparent they would have to abandon this process around the middle of the 20th Century as the attempts were fruitless – no viruses were found. These days when most virologists talk about isolating viruses, one of the techniques they cite is tissue culture experiments in test tubes. It has been outlined why these are not only unsuitable proxies, but the stress of the test tube conditions alone on abnormal cells can produce the effects, no virus required. Similarly, detecting genetic sequences in these culture experiments is also unsatisfactory as there is no proof that such sequences come from inside any of the particles they are calling “SARS-CoV-2” and even if they did, that this is enough to qualify them as viruses. A virus is said to be a particle with a proteinaceous coat surrounding a genome that can infect and parasitise a host and then infect other hosts.
Therefore, anyone asserting that they have isolated a virus needs to show that what they have is actually a virus and not just test-tube observations and various biological molecules that can be detected without any viruses required.
How to Isolate a Virus
STEP 1: Identify a number of individuals with specific symptoms and signs that are thought to be caused by a virus.
This can’t be done with COVID-19 as it is an ethereal clinical disease that is “diagnosed” with a PCR result. There are no specific symptoms, signs or confirmatory investigations. However, for the purposes of this essay we will assume that we are talking about a well-defined clinical disease. We know that the virologists will not be able to find any viruses directly in a patient as outlined above, which doesn’t look good, but we’ll let them have another shot.
STEP 2: Perform a tissue culture experiment with a patient sample.
Briefly, this involves adding a crude sample (e.g. sputum) to some cells in a test tube and seeing if it produces any viruses. In early 2020 it was declared that a “virus” called SARS-CoV-2 had been “isolated” with this method. In reality Na Zhu, et al, had both failed to physically isolate any particles or show any of these particles to be viruses.
So, what should have been done? Na Zhu, et al should have repeated their experiment multiple times and then purified the particles they called “2019-nCoV” (later “SARS-CoV-2”) by means of a technique such as density gradient ultracentrifugation. This technique was already well established in the 20th Century and as illustrated below in Figure 1 could be used satisfactorily to obtain much more purified samples that could be confirmed by electron microscopy.
At this point we could more confidently claim that we had physically isolated viral-like particles and could analyse their composition, including their genetic structure. All very interesting (and beyond what has been done) but the proof that theses particles are viruses, that is infectious and disease-causing, still needs to be established.
STEP 3: Infect a live animal, eg a monkey with the purified particles.
Mind you, we are not talking about bogus experiments as described in Sam’s SARS-1 video.
Pouring large volumes of mixed tissue culture fluid directly into an animal’s lungs to see if it will cough or develop some lung tissue changes does not constitute evidence of a virus. Pouring any biological muck into an animal’s lungs will cause these reactions. That’s why control experiments are suspiciously absent in such experiments. The purified particles, said to be viruses (which we are told are airborne and highly infectious) alone could be simply sprayed into the animals’ cages and they should get sick. Following that, any monkey introduced into the cage subsequently should also get sick if there is a contagious pathogen.
The Case for Human Experiments with “Viruses”
In fact, given that the world has been subjected to draconian restrictions, ruinous lockdowns, and population-wide experiments with “vaccines” in the name of an alleged virus, the case can be made for human experiments involving the “virus”. In the tradition of Max von Pettenkofer (who swallowed cholera bacillus in 1892 to show that it could not cause cholera by itself), we would be happy to inhale any purified particles said to be the SARS-CoV-2 “virus”, like many (we’re sure) who have investigated virology. It’s not particularly bold when one is aware that not once in history have any particles alleged to be viruses by themselves been shown to cause disease in any animal. Of course, such experiments would not be considered ethical today because the “deadly virus” was declared to exist, cause disease, and transmit via aerosol even though no such evidence was produced. However, one would suspect that these experiments are avoided due to the long history of the failure to demonstrate human to human transmission of any alleged viral illness.
Perhaps the complete lack of clinical evidence that influenza passes between humans as talked about below is the most embarrassing chapter for the “highly infectious virus” claimants.
The virus model was suspect long ago but it’s a model that will continue to be peddled as it pays dividends for industry participants – indeed, the development of their playbook over the decades is outlined in Virus Mania.
The End of Virology
Forget hypothetical computer generated “genomes” from non-purified samples and PCR tests that are calibrated to these simulations: none of these require the existence of a virus. Forget electron micrographs of cell “culture” experiments purporting to show viruses: these are simply vesicles of unknown significance until shown otherwise. What we need to see is purification of these particles and then a demonstration that they can parasitise a host and are the causal agent of a disease. The reality is that nobody is isolating viruses because carrying out the correct experiments would reveal that the particles are not viruses at all and virology would be finished.
To bring in the New Year of 2022, you might have heard that The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has delayed or cancelled thousands of flights over the holidays in the U.S. that have stranded thousands of travelers worldwide. You may be one who lives to tell the tale.
However, the story of the cancelled flights depends on who is doing the telling. The mainstream media says one thing, while the affected FAA pilots, themselves, say another.
As with everything in mediaprogramming, “the news” may be little more than Tall Tales used to influence the reader. Especially when U.S. statues allow the media to legally propagandize the American people under the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, incorporated into the 2013 NDAA.
Everything is an Act because All the world is a stage. This is why it is important to do your own research and draw your own conclusions.
The Media Version
The media proposes one version; that cancelled flights worldwide are caused by the Omicron variant.
That’s right. Without evidence, or medical credentials, the mainstream media casts aspersions onto an invisible agent that cannot speak for itself. How convenient.
Media opines all over the page. Media blames flight cancellations on “higher numbers of travelers than last year,” and “staffing shortages” that apparently leave the industry never to return. What is the real story?
The pilots tell a different story. As early as October, 20221, the Pilots Union had warned of staffing shortages if American Airlines refuses vaccination exemptions.
Perhaps mainstream media should spend a little time trying to get their story straight for readers who read between the lines?
The Pilots Version
According to direct sources, cancelled flights are due to a nationwide walkout by pilots.
FAA pilots are suing the FAA for “putting both pilots and the general pubic at risk of death and/or serious injury, by operating in contravention of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations §61.53, also known as the Federal Aviation Regulation 61.53).”
In general terms, pilots are suing the FAA after being forced to fly after taking non-FDA approved vaccines against FAA Regulation. The reason is the subject of a letter from FAA pilots directed to the FAA, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Justice, as well as several airlines, demanding that they medically flag all vaccinated pilots and have them re-examined for blood clotting problems as well as their cardiac health.
Currently, not only have all pilots flying commercial airlines not had at least one year of post-marketing time elapse post-FDA approval of the agent injected into their bodies, these pilots of flying with an entirely UNAPPROVED product in their systems that is now unfortunately proving to cause all manner of clotting, embolic and thrombosis-related side effects (which side effects are known to occur with greater frequency and severity when at altitude). Additionally, across all populations, the inoculations are resulting in significant increases in myocarditis and subsequent heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiac arrests and deaths. This is especially true in the younger male cohort, to which many pilots belong.
Indeed, we are aware of pilots who have died post-vaccination. We are also aware of pilots who are suffering side effects, many of whom have been afraid to report them, for fear of being grounded, but some of whom have been forced to seek medical care and report them due to the significance of the vaccine-related adverse effect….
Does that mean that colds and flu cases will resurrect themselves once again after disappearing for more than a year? Is that why new reports show Omicron symptoms are similar to cold symptoms? As one Reuters opinion claims, Omicron, itself, may have picked up a piece of the common cold virus:
the omicron variant likely acquired a mutation — one of its more than 30 mutations, mind you — from a snippet of genetic material from the common cold. Meaning, yes, the omicron variant mutated to include parts of the common cold’s genetic makeup.
Jabs Still Not FDA-Approved
Meanwhile, the “FDA-approved” mRNA vaccines are still NOT approved. From the pilots letter to Sen. Ron Johnson’s (R, Wisc) admission in October, 2021, there is no FDA approved COVID vaccine in the U.S. The so-called approved “Comirnaty version” of the vaccine was still not commercially available in the United States as of October 2021. Pfizer states Comirnaty is the same vaccine that originally received emergency use authorization. If so, then why maintain Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) status?
That’s a mixed bag of messages. Is it Comirnaty or Criminality? Legal or illegal? Truth or dare? Virus or no virus? Variant or no variant?
Media’s contradictions and inconsistencies should always be investigated by the customer, i.e., the reader, especially when the media is allowed to tell Tall Tales under the law.
Almost two years in, the “Great Reset” has reached a certain stage of maturity. Years of planning, infiltration, manipulation, and social engineering have come to fruition. The many simulations are now being tested in the real world. The actors who trained and rehearsed for their parts as presidents, prime ministers, health officials, trusted doctors, and media personalities have taken their place on stage, miraculously prepared to save humanity from a catastrophe never experienced by mankind. The operation was always too big to go on covertly, so eventually the perpetrators had to announce their plans, the war had to be declared, and troops assembled on the field of battle.
We know more or less who the perpetrators are — the globalists, the central bankers, a certain megalomaniac software developer, eugenicists, pharmaceutical companies, Vanguard, Blackrock, the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, Satanists, aliens working on other wavelengths, and so on.
But what about the other side? Here we see people across the spectrum, very few wealthy or holding power, often oriented toward nation, home, family, personal responsibility, and religion — in other words, conservatives. Conspicuously absent from any resistance to the Reset are liberals and leftists, the anti-war and anti-imperialist left, so-called “progressives”, socialists, anarchists, and union leaders — the very people one thought would be the first to stand up against corporate tyranny and totalitarian control. Leftists opposing the Reset quickly became former leftists. This group spent the past two years dealing with what seemed the betrayal of a lifetime, as they watched their ideals of liberation from oppression carried to the point of absurdity. They watched anti-racism turn into racism, sexual liberation into gender chaos, anti-fascism into fascism. Opposition to all forms of discrimination gave way to support for discrimination . . . against the “unvaccinated.” Belief in “my body, my choice” somehow turned into support for no-choice medical mandates. The new radicals came like puppets of the state to disrupt medical freedom rallies, wearing face masks and calling people “Nazis” for not wearing them.
November 7, 2021, Boston Common.‘”Solidarity Against Hate” and “Green Monster Antifa” protesting against a rally for medical freedom.
But then the disillusioned leftist realized that all this was actually consistent with socialism, in which the needs of the collective come before individual rights, and that the left actually has more in common with the utopian leaders of the World Economic Forum than it does with the virus-spreading working class who, afterall, were always too thick to understand the higher goals of socialism. In the surprise ending of the Great Reset, Act I the left revealed its true identity — they were the real authoritarians all along! But even with this revelation, the left lost none of its insufferable self-righteousness.
As devastating as the Great Reset operation could be for the future of humanity, it’s a wonder that we still carry our old grievances and prejudices with us. Millions of people have already been killed or injured by mRNA injections, yet different sides in the freedom movement can’t seem to get over their differences. The left has to come to terms with its delusions, but so does the right.
First of all, let’s acknowledge that with all the power the globalists have, it is inconceivable that both sides would not already be heavily infiltrated. The oligarchs would no doubt agree with their former client Vladimir Lenin when he said, “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” We can assume that many in the ranks of Antifa, for example, are undercover cops, FBI agents, informants, and temp work thugs. From Charlottesville in 2017 to the Black Lives Matter riots in 2020 to Boston Common in 2021, we saw them all in action, working in silent agreement with their supposed sworn enemy, the police.
We can also assume that people who look and talk just like Trump-supporting MAGA conservatives are also on the job, as witnessed in the obvious manipulation by agents working with police to entrap protesters in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021. The left has been familiar with FBI infiltration since the COINTELPRO days of the ’60s. Conservatives becoming active in politics today may not have this experience. They could maybe learn a few things about agents provocateurs and, for that matter, be cautious about “backing the blue”, until they find out just which side “the blue” are actually on. Cops are generally known to serve the powerful. But conservatives don’t consult the left about their experience with the police. Nor is the left talking to conservatives about why wokeness isn’t providing any solutions. The two sides are not talking.
Anti-imperialists have been opposing US foreign wars since the Mexican War in 1846. The list of wars initiated by the US from then to now — criminal wars that had nothing to do with self-defense — is too long to list. Conservatives have generally supported US warmaking and, because of their patriotism, they honor and support the soldiers who fight the wars. But where was the honor in decimating Afghanistan and Iraq, to mention just two? Love of one’s country does not justify starving and bombing people in another country who never harmed the US. Anti-imperialists would not be surprised that the American empire may be about to pay a moral debt for its wars of aggression. They opposed the wars while patriots supported them, and there are some hard feelings there. The reckoning that seems to be coming to America will be hard for the patriots. But it will also be hard for the left when they realize that all along they have been the shameless dupes of the ruling class, who seduced them with high-sounding goals only to put them and everyone else into a prison where they the guards will have control of not only our bodies but our minds. If there was ever a time to fight fascism, this is it. But the left has been AWOL in this struggle, and that is a shame they may never live down.
The control of most of humanity by machines projected by the Great Reset will, if it comes true, make the disputes between left and right seem quaint. We’re going to have much worse problems if we don’t end this soon.
Richard Hugus is the founder of Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates. “We are residents of Cape Cod, Massachusetts who support freedom of choice in all matters having to do with our own and our childrens’ health.” Connect with them here.
What if schools teach not to question reality because your views and ideas are not important to reality and would be ignored or censored anyway?
What if over time, you did your own investigations, and formed your own opinions that made you question reality? Would you share them with the world under the threat of being called a heretic or a lunatic? Lunatic comes from the Latin lunaticus or “moon-struck.”
In 1965, the Space Science Board convened a NASA summer conference in Massachusetts on the future of lunar exploration. Then, an unknown research scientist, Professor R. Foster, was interviewed by an Australian TV interviewer on the subject of the moon. The soft-spoken Foster gave a memorable and unconventional 9:33-minute uncut interview about the nature of the moon, when he began:
…the moon is not a piece of rock, but it is a plasma phenomenon, cosmic plasma, and this fact will eventually be confirmed. I made certain predictions that had been confirmed in 1958 and the situation now is coming close to a complete confirmation.
Foster was then asked what the result would be if he were proved correct in his theories? He replied:
the result would be profound and decisive because it will give proof that the complete re-investigation of the laws of nature is necessary because is the moon is a plasma no man will ever land on it…”
Listen to R. Foster describe the moon from his perspective:
Foster never got the chance to prove his theory. Soon after this interview in 1965, R. Foster disappeared from view and was erased from history, and nearly all search engines.
Who is R. Foster? Why was this mysterious scientist interviewed four years prior to the 1969 televised moon landing and then never again? Did he serve to provide a form of disclosure? Did the interview mean to stir controversy? Did anyone land on the moon if Foster was correct about the moon being made of plasma?
Why have only a few investigators found any information to prove Foster’s existence?
One investigator claims to verify that Roy Foster was a Professor of Earth Science and Chemistry at the University of Dundee Scotland, the only R. Foster to be found in the Mitchel and Longman 1983 Directory, “Materials Research Centres: A World Directory of Organizations and Programmes in Materials Science.” Roy Foster is listed as the head of the Chemistry department at Dundee alongside Professor J. S Brimacombe.
Another investigator found that there are 654 pages in the 1983 Directory, with references to both Brimacombe and R. Foster, found on page 527 under the heading Chemistry Department, in section 644. Here is the link to the referenced page. Apparently, Foster and Brimacombe were researching absorption spectra in Ultra Violet Wave Mechanical Studies, and the mechanism of oxidation of Gaseous fuels. He is the only recorded R. Foster from RSE with his earliest recorded association with RSE dating to 1926.
Questioning Reality
R. Foster questioned the nature of reality. Perhaps, he was tired of being ignored for his ideas and opinions. Perhaps he saw the futility of NASA’s direction in space. Perhaps he felt empowered to speak his truth while he had the opportunity to do so:
Once the moon is proven not to be a piece of rock but something of far less mass, and the gravitational theories are out and discarded, new concepts have to be involved which will show that the lawfulness of nature in the cosmos is identical to that of a hydrogen atom, or atomic processes, and when this is understood and worked out in full, it will be found that the physical processes of the Earth are quite different in geophysics than to what is at present assumed, and that lawfully, in certain periods, mostly during the ice ages which occur every 200 million years, – and there is a reason for that – the axis of the earth suddenly tilts over, and when this happens then you get the floods of the Bible which were recorded before. – R. Foster ABC interview uncut, 1965
What if the nature of the world is not what it appears to be? Could parts be a digital projection? What if the movie, The Truman Show is a form of disclosure, representing more truth than fiction? Why has no one gone to La Lune since 1969? Hear what Buzz Aldrin had to say when interviewed by a girl named Zoey in 2015.
What if you witnessed a floating city in the sky? Would you talk about it? Would you believe what you saw or question the nature of reality? If people are being misled by CGI displays, are they being distracted from something that looms much larger?
In his 9 minutes of fame, did R. Foster sound a warning of a future biblical flood? Was he referring to things beyond the physical to the spiritual? Was he pointing to other proofs, including the Hopi Prophecy of a future earth changing moment?
[TCTL editor’s note: On December 13, 2021 “We Are the 99%” reached No. 1 in the singles chart at Amazon UK. As of today, December 21, it is No. 4 in the charts. You can help them reach No. 1 again by purchasing and downloading from one of the links below.]
Please download our record now from Amazon or Apple and help make it Christmas no.1 to let the rulers know we know and are saying no, non, nein, niet, not a chance.
Well we finally released what has become the worldwide protest anthem of the 2020’s, We are the 99%, aka ‘Stick Your New World Order Up Your Arse’ – a comedy song written back in 2013 by Darren Nesbit on waking up to the reality of the world many of you are also aware of.
They tried to stop us – even the recording session for ‘We are the 99%’ got stopped because of the ‘controversial’ nature of the lyrics – and one distributor also refused to allow it, using the reason of ‘medical misinformation’ – as if anyone is going to get health advice from a comedy song.
[…]
Please download, stream, play loud and share everywhere..Could be a fun end to the year..
The fallout of the COVID experiment is being witnessed by Covid jab recipients over the world as direct adverse effects. By officials, the same effects are being tallied as collateral damage.
With little to no information presented at the time of deployment in early 2021, the mRNA injections have now adversely affected over 2 million people are part of a global capture. The numbers are likely to be 100 times higher.
…. based on the Harvard Study commissioned by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), in Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, it only captures less than 1% of the actual ADRs, so adapting that figure to Vigiaccess, we can say that the total ADRs would be an astonishing 200M already.
At least one medical journal study shows some of these Adverse Drug Effects (ADRs). Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Without searching the medical literature, now people can visit the global database of adverse reactions by the World Health Organization’s (WHO), that tracks the numbers of Adverse Drug [Direct] Effects (ADRs). VIGIACCESS.ORG
VIGIACCESS
According to the VigiAccess website, VigiAcess was launched by the WHO in 2015 to provide public access to information of reported potential side effects of medicinal products. Dr John Gideon Hartnett’s websiteprovides category headliners for Adverse Drug Reactions from mRNA injections. Dr. Gideon writes on his website:
The WHO has a database for adverse reactions from drugs called VigiAccessTM. Here I searched it for those adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines and got the following. It has a total of 2,183,912 adverse reactions from the various experimental COVID shots. You’ll note that the reactions occur throughout the body.
This list shows that the experimental gene-altering drugs given to people have to be the worse medical experiment ever performed in world history.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders (88123)
Cardiac disorders (107441)
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders (1188)
Ear and labyrinth disorders (72880)
Endocrine disorders (2967)
Eye disorders (80478)
Gastrointestinal disorders (452265)
General disorders and administration site conditions (1333876)
Hepatobiliary disorders (4356)
Immune system disorders (30771)
Infections and infestations (146156)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (106796)
Investigations (298364)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders (50000)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (643099)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) (3233)
Nervous system disorders (946519)
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions (4922)
Product issues (3653)
Psychiatric disorders (103711)
Renal and urinary disorders (17621)
Reproductive system and breast disorders (84169)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (231914)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (301917)
Social circumstances (15353)
Surgical and medical procedures (19548)
Vascular disorders (118763)
The age groups most affected are 18 – 44 years (39%) and 45 – 64 years (31%). That’s bad news for the 18 – 44 year olds considering their risks from acquiring a natural infection of COVID are practically zero. The result is life-long immunity.
Females represent 69% and males 30% of all those Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR). The residual 1% is labeled as unknown.
It lists ADRs by year as follows. This is strange that some ADRs are listed in years prior to 2020. How’s that possible if only COVID-19 vaccine ADRs are listed?
ADR Reports per year:
Year Count
2021 2181543
2020 2254
2019 82
2018 29
2017 2
2016 1
2014 1
Continued from Dr. Gideon: Compare this VigiAccess list to the US VAERS database which has currently 752,801 (Sept 2021) adverse events and 15,937 deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. If I scale the VigiAccess data by the ratio of adverse reactions to deaths in VAERS I get 46,234 deaths expected in the VigiAccess data. That seems more reasonable number for the world. But from whistleblowers we have heard that these statistics are heavily under reported and the real numbers could be 100 times higher.
For fallout reports from Canadian recipients, watch the documentary I Am Not Misinformation.
Natural Immunity is Innate
Innate means from within. Your innate immunity is granted to you at birth by your Creator. There is no other defense system that can heal your body other than the wisdom of your own body. You are your own healer. You only need to give your body the right tools to heal yourself. And those tools all come from Nature.
We are told that medical doctors take an oath to First, Do No Harm. Yet, they are also licensed to be able to dispense drugs that can, and do, cause harm. A license is permission to do something otherwise deemed to be illegal. How do they justify the contradictions?
While some medical schools ask their graduates to abide by the Hippocratic Oath, others use a different pledge — or none at all. And in fact, although “first, do no harm” is attributed to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, it isn’t a part of the Hippocratic Oath at all. It is actually from another of his works called Of the Epidemics.
Here is a line from one translation of the Hippocratic Oath:
I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.
Collateral Damage
The great divide forming in society stems from a man-made divide based on misinformation and censorship. The Pro vs. Anti vaccine narrative is part of the narrative. This model is designed by social engineers using a Psy Op (psychological operation) to divide families and friends alike. All Pro-Anti Psy Ops serve only to separate people and promote fear. Avoid them.
Further, it is illegal for any doctor, politician, or employer to force or coerce anyone to take or accept a medical product in order to function in society. Each person must be his own advocate, with total rulership over his or her own body since each is responsible for his or her own health. When it comes to health, if you do not stand up for your body and your mind, you may find yourself on a database of vaccine injuries as Collateral Damage.
The ‘covid gods’ aren’t acknowledging natural immunity. They are not acknowledging vaccine injuries. They are not acknowledging the fact that even if you are fully vaccinated you can still get covid. You can still transmit covid. So what’s the point of a mandate? Of course that’s not what we’re getting from the covid gods. – Senator Ron Johnson on the Senate floor, Dec. 8, 2021 Wisconsin,
Senators and politicians are re-presentatives. They claim to speak for you with their voice. But no one can re-present your body, your mind, or your voice. No one owns your body except you. If you know who you are, do your own research, and follow the money, you can make an informed decision for your health without re-presentatives. The virus hitting humanity is a virus of the mind, affecting the ability for people to access their thinking brains and speak their truths. The virus comes from fear and disconnection, not from China, and not from bats.
The main ingredient in hand sanitizer is paranoia – Author Unknown
To reverse “the virus” that causes all plandemics, move from fear to love. Reconnect with yourself and with those around you, with your neighbors. Reclaim the narrative that describes true health with an attitude of gratitude. The risk to any sickness is low if you know who you are, and that your body comes with the the best defense system in Nature, already built in.
Michael also shared some fascinating insights on why everything we think we know is a lie, and why it’s beneficial to “unlearn” conventional education.
byFiveTimesAugust
Music & Lyrics by Bradley James Skistimas
January 15, 2021
Lock down all towns Everybody slow down Give ‘em everything you have Mask up, vax up Get your body trashed up Better do what they ask
It’s alright, okay Sorry, but ya can’t pray Gotta keep the church doors closed No superstitions A saint politician Will tell ya what you need to know
Citizen fools And brand new rules Make everyone a hero now So keep your distance No resistance Only do what you’re allowed
Cash that check Go dance in the wreck But just don’t speak your mind Get your facts from the paid contracts ‘Cause never would they tell a lie
They don’t know me And they don’t own me
Oh God help us all Look what we’ve become Oh God help us all And fix what we have done
See no evil Bow to the needle Didn’t we turn out great? Sick is the new health Poor is the new wealth Truth is whatever they say
Expert lectures Media protectors Tell me who to love and hate Jail in the network Hail to the Zuck-burg Head down, just behave
Liberty, freedom, angels, demons Someone’s in control (Well) no way, no how I wouldn’t say it too loud Don’t you know they’re on patrol?
Need more likes Post up, let’s fight There’s no way that you’re wrong Gott listen to the science ‘Cause it’s all about compliance You agree or you’re gone
They don’t know me And they don’t own me
Oh God help us all Look what we’ve become Oh God help us all And fix what we have done
Sell my info Hacked in, don’t know Show me what I need to buy Sex consumption, no corruption Just as advertised
You’ve been labeled And I’ve enabled Better apologize Propaganda Racist slander Time to organize
Shot, bang, who’s next? Brain dead, useless Show it on the TV screen Tell me who to vote for Gotta to start a new war Wouldn’t want to live in peace
Divide and Conquer Weak, not stronger Everybody know your place Do it now, won’t hurt Dig into your own dirt Virtue found it’s grave
They don’t know me And they don’t own me
Oh God help us all Look what we’ve become Oh God help us all And fix what we have done
Incite violence Enforce silence Mainstream message Won’t you guide us? You know what is best For our own good
Anti-this and anti-that Cancel this and cancel that Take it to the streets And the neighborhoods
Worship actors Food and drugs Brand yourself Give them your blood Don’t believe your eyes Don’t look around
Fake news, rumors, Ok boomer Ignorance will stain our future Will ya make it through Or burn it down?
WHEN: Saturday December 11, 2021, 12 noon to 2 PM (rain or shine)
WHERE: Capetown Plaza, 790 Iyannough Rd., Hyannis across the street from the Cape Cod Mall, in front of the former K Mart.
Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates has been holding monthly demonstrations since December 2020 when gene manipulating injections were rolled out to supposedly fight the “covid 19 pandemic.” These injections are by no means voluntary, as many of us are not allowed to work, go to school, or enter public spaces without proof of having taken them. They are now being criminally mandated for children as young as 5 years old when they are known to cause more illness and death across all age groups, but especially the young, than the illness they are purported to cure.
We are opposed to government tyranny being implemented in the name of public health. We are not funded and we are not affiliated with any political party or organization. We always have a good turnout, the atmosphere is healthy and family friendly, and the response from passersby is overwhelmingly in support. Bring large letter signs with your message (no signs for political candidates please). Join us December 11.
We stand for:
— the right to remain human. We do not want to be genetically modified with mRNA injections, or made “transhuman.” The openly declared transhumanist agenda of the Great Reset and its plan for “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity” is absolutely insane.
— the right to live. The mRNA injections are killing people (see tables below). We obviously have the right to reject them for ourselves and our children.
— the right to the pursuit of happiness. Happiness will not be achievable if we have lost our health to medically induced chronic disease.
— the right to work. Government mandating employers to require vaccination means anyone asserting the natural right to bodily autonomy will lose their job. How is this not coercion? Governments do not have the power to say something should be injected into our. bodies. Nor, obviously, do employers.
— our right to refuse medical interventions. No to vaccine mandates by which state and federal government forces employers, colleges, and businesses to require vaccination certificates and terminate anyone who refuses.
— the right to breathe. End mask requirements on public transportation, in healthcare facilities, and especially in schools. Forcing children to wear masks is child abuse. Mask have no health purpose. They are used for psychological conditioning only. They are dehumanizing.
— the right to bodily autonomy. No one should be forced to take a vaccine, wear a mask, be swabbed, tested, or scanned.
— the right to informed consent. This was established in 1947 in the Nuremberg code. No substance should be injected into anyone’s body without their full understanding of all possible harmful effects. A long list of adverse effects, including death, has already been established with the C19 injections. There should be no negative consequences should we refuse this or any other medical intervention. Violators of the Nuremberg code should be prosecuted.
— parental rights. The state has no right to bypass parents’ authority on whether their minor child should wear a mask, be tested, or be given any pharmaceutical product. In some places, governments are pushing for children as young as 12 to accept a shot without parental consent.
— the right to education. Education at K-12 schools, universities, and colleges should not be withheld as leverage to enforce government medical decrees. Nor should pharmaceutical products be promoted by schools or administered on school grounds as they have been.
— the right to freedom of movement. This right is violated when any kind of travel requires masking, testing, or proof of vaccination.
— the right to privacy. The 4th Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Our vaccine status and medical history is not the business of store clerks, ticketing agents, transportation companies, restaurants, bars, grocery stores, or entertainment venues.
— the right to due process. Open meeting laws continue to be illegally suspended in towns, counties, and states across the country “due to coronavirus” and elected officials who are uncomfortable with democracy seem to like it that way. Virtual meetings undermine due process by restricting public access and participation. Also, the numerous executive and administrative edicts bypassing the legislative process are a violation of the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments.
— the rights of freedom of speech and press. These rights are guaranteed by the 1st Amendment. End the blatant Soviet-style government-media censorship of people with dissenting views about the covid narrative.
— the right to equal protection of our civil and Constitutional rights. Refusal of service by any transport company, public venue, ticket vendor, grocery store, or other business on the basis of arbitrary “vaccine passports” is a form of discrimination which we should be protected from under the law. Loss of this right amounts to coercion through medical tyranny and will lay the groundwork for a “social credit score” system in which all citizens no longer have equal rights.
Resources:
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data late Monday showing a total of 913,268 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 19, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
The data included a total of 19,249 reports of deaths — an increase of 396 over the previous week — and 143,395 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,269 compared with the previous week.”
Note: VAERS/CDC is known to under-report adverse events because the CDC is controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. Yet they are forced to admit to this many adverse events. In the past, far lower numbers were cause to remove a pharmaceutical product. Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson products are allowed to continue because the CDC no longer has any safety threshold.
— Here are the statistics of the VAERS counterpart in Europe:
— “According To CDC’s Data, Covid Vaccine Is 43 Times More Effective To Take You To Haven [Heaven]”, Nov 11, 2021 Short video for “vaccine worshipers” by Tony Lin (satire).
— Steve Kirsch put together the following table of the most common adverse events (see https://www.skirsch.io/ for his explanation of the x factor):
https://www.skirsch.io/
Graph above based on mortality rate from England. Blue — “vaccinated”, red — not”vaccinated”. Source:
“The Way You Design the World in Your Mind is the Way you Relate to It in the Real World”: By Dr. Vandana Shiva, 12 minute video, Global Research, December 05, 2021.
After Skool 17 March 2021
If you were offered an investment opportunity that had an estimated 20% chance of success, or an 80% chance of failure, would you invest?
In the game of professional baseball, a 20% batting average represents a top batter. In 2021, some of the best teams with the highest batting averages are the New York Yankees, with a .268 average, the Baltimore Orioles with a .272 average, and in third place, the Los Angeles Dodgers, boasting a 263 average.
Ball games aside, would you accept a 20% chance of success for a medical product that has no track record for success and comes with a growing list of adverse events in your body?
Low safety and efficacy ratings for flu vaccines are nothing new. Remember the Swine Flu epidemic fiasco that never was? The Swine Flu vaccine mirrors the fact that flu vaccines are built to fail. Medical history demonstrates vaccine failure since the Smallpox vaccine. The polio vaccine “Cutter Incident” caused 40,000 cases of polio in 1955, and paralyzed between 13,000 and 20,000 children every year. Cutter Labs was thought to be the maker of the problem vaccine. The polio vaccine was later found to be contaminated with the Simian (monkey) virus that caused cancer.
The court ruling against Cutter Labs opened the floodgates to a wave of litigation. As a result,`vaccines were among the first medical products almost eliminated by lawsuits‘. By design, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was introduced in 1986 to protect vaccine manufacturers from litigation, with the disastrous consequence of leaving the people unprotected. Ultimately, the Cutter Incident was investigated and tracked to Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, which was later absorbed by Pfizer Inc. Read about The Wyeth Problem, now functioning as Pfizer Inc, maker of the new mRNA vaccine.
Why are vaccine makers not liable when their products fail? Because vaccine science was created to be protected against liability, loss, or damage by design. Vaccine science assumes zero risk and asks the customer to assume all the risk.
Scientism declares, “the science is settled and discussion is pointless.” Scientism runs on the engine of Social Engineering in order for the priest-scientists to control the behavior of the population through an inter-network, eventually connected to an artificial neural network. Democracy is replaced by Technocracy. Natural immunity is replaced by artificial immunity.
Scientism underlies both Technocracy and Transhumanism. – Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising
True science explores the natural world using the time tested science method of repeated experimentation and validation. Alternatively, Scientism is a speculative worldview and humanity’s relation to it, where scientists and engineers are the priests that find their own solutions, which can only be determined behind closed doors. These solutions are called mandates.
In 2020, The Physicians for Informed Consent presented 9 Flu Vaccine Facts based on research from medical journals demonstrating that mandates have no basis in science. The top facts are:
1. There is a 65% increased risk of non-flu respiratory illness in populations that get the flu vaccine.
2. The flu vaccine does not reduce demand on hospitals.
3. The flu vaccine does not prevent the spread of the flu.
4. The flu vaccine fails to prevent the flu about 65% of the time.
5. Repeat doses of the flu vaccine may increase the risk of flu vaccine failure.
6. Death from influenza is rare in children.
7. The flu vaccine does not reduce deaths from pneumonia and flu.
8. Patients don’t benefit from vaccination of healthcare workers.
9. Flu vaccine mandates are not science-based.
Scientism means scientific definitions can change on a whim.
Changing Definitions of Immunity Under Religious Doctrine
Vaccination Pre-2015: Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease.
Vaccination 2015-2021: The act or introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
Vaccination September 2021: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Vaccination opposes the definition of Natural Immunity, which refers to the natural exposure to an infectious agent or other antigen by the body. The body responds by making its own antibodies. Vaccination destroys natural immunity.
Before Scientism, colds and flus came and went on their own as part of natural immunity. Colds and flus were a right of passage and part of a natural cycle of health in the population. The CDC recognizes natural immunity for chicken-pox and measles, mumps, and rubella. But not for COVID-19?
The infectious process, once part of being human. After enough people successfully clear infections, naturally, the whole community is protected through Herd Immunity, but even that definition has been altered from Herd Immunity to Community Immunity.
Clearing infections was not an outside event. It is what the body’s innate immune system is built to do, which results in the production of antibodies that strengthen the immune system to fend off bigger problems later on. When you say goodbye to the Germ Theory, there is no need for any injection, since the Germ Theory is still a theory after all these years.
While the phase out of the neurotoxin, mercury in flu vaccines, the neurotoxin, aluminum, was phased in as an adjuvant to hyperstimulate the immune system. However, not disclosed was the increase in autoimmune disease from aluminum adjuvants (also known as A.S.I.A. ) Also not disclosed was the fact that artificial immunity, replaces life-long immunity.
An influential voice in medical research, Peter Doshi, PhD, associate professor of pharmaceutical health services at Maryland School of Pharmacy, and senior editor at the British Medical Journal became a controversial voice when he published his research. In 2013, Doshi wrote in a BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease”:
1. vaccines are being pushed on the public in unprecedented numbers, they are less effective and cause more side effects than alleged by the CDC. 2. no evidence exists to show that this reduction in the risk of influenza for a specific population — here in the United States, among healthy adults, 3. officials need only claim that vaccines save lives, and it is assumed there must be solid research behind it,” 4. influenza is a case of “disease mongering” in an effort to expand markets and points to the fact that deaths from flu declined sharply during the middle of the 20th century, long before the huge vaccine campaigns that kicked off the 21st century. 5. …even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.
Medical Industry Stance
The medical industry has always stated that a cold and flu vaccine could not be made for the following reasons:
4. Due to the limitations of current technologies, there is no way for one vaccine to protect against all possible types and strains of the viruses that cause the common cold or its variants.
5. The pneumonia vaccine, for example, contains 23 different bacterial strains. Researchers are trying to use similar technology to get 80 to 100 viral strains into a single common cold vaccine, however, since 2013, the conclusion from the Cochrane Library and Database suggests that “There are no conclusive data to support the use of vaccines for preventing the common cold in healthy people.”
Meanwhile, children and adults are reported to suffer and die from “symptoms of the flu” without reporting on vaccination status. However, just because the science says you cannot build a cold/flu vaccine that is safe and effective does not mean that pharmaceutical companies won’t build them. After all, these companies have a reputation to uphold where is money to be made, and no liability for damages from their products. Vaccine makers are moving fast, from egg-based vaccines to recombinant mRNA vaccines that were rushed as “experimental,” without FDA approval, into the arms of millions of people worldwide.
COVID CON-tradictions
The syndrome of symptoms called COVID is often compared to the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic. However, no one knows that 1918 deaths have been reported to have resulted from a bacterium, not a virus. The 2008 NIH published report by Anthony Fauci on the 1918 Spanish flu states:
….most victims succumbed to bacterial pneumonia following influenza virus infection. The pneumonia was caused when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created when the virus destroyed the cells that line the bronchial tubes and lungs.
..as in 1918 — a similar pattern of viral damage followed by bacterial invasion could unfold, say the authors. Preparations for diagnosing, treating and preventing bacterial pneumonia should be among highest priorities in influenza pandemic planning.
Similar to the flu vaccine, vaccine makers of mRNA COVID injections say recipients are not protected from acquiring new COVID breakthrough infections/variants. In the medical literature, Breakthrough Infections occur only in vaccinated people.
Definition: a “breakthrough case” is when a fully vaccinated person later gets the disease they were vaccinated for. – SC Department of Health, Nov. 2021
mRNA injections will also not prevent a recipient from transferring “COVID symptoms” to others via shedding. However, that is where the similarities between Flu vaccines and COVID injections end. The science says that Immunocompromised people are 3X more likely to get COVID . So why promote boosters?
No data exists on the (COVID) vaccines’ effectiveness in immunocompromised patients because they weren’t included in the initial clinical trials. This is true of all vaccine trial studies.
According to MedicalXpress, “We also don’t know for sure whether this vaccine is safe and effective in different types of people, such as pregnant women, the elderly, or those with a chronic illness.” Yet, these groups all received a green light for injection. In medical circles, when doctors do not know the origin or cause of disease, they call it idiopathic. When there is no data and no proof of safety or effectiveness, they call it a mandate.
From the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), no data are currently available on the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in persons with autoimmune conditions.
In November of 2021, the story changed to: COVID infections in fully vaccinated people are more severe in the immunocompromised. According to the study, the proportion of people with breakthrough infections was three times higher among immunocompromised individuals (0.18%) than among the reference group of non-immunocompromised people (0.06%).
In a November of 2021 roundtable discussion on the COVID mRNA vaccine, held in Wisconsin, Peter Doshi stated:
I argue these products which everyone calls mRNA vaccines are qualitatively different from standard vaccines. So I found it fascinating to learn that Merriam Webster changed the definition of vaccine early this year…. mRNA products did not meet the definition of vaccine that has been in place for over 15 years, but the definition was expanded such that mRNA products are now vaccines.
What is 20% of nothing? Are you willing to invest in pseudo-science?
How have so many people been deceived, duped, and distracted when many people have developed natural immunity from infections since their birth? For those wanting to see the data, there are more than 135 studies affirming natural immunity of COVID19, see this website
We’re not in a pandemic of the unvaccinated. If hospitalizations and deaths are almost exclusively occurring in the unvaccinated “why would booster shots be necessary?”. And why would the statistics be so different in the UK, where most COVID hospitalizations and deaths are among the fully vaccinated?” – Peter Doshi,
Because there is no virus. SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve spent the past year and a half proving that. [0]
But fantasies do exist. So do covert ops with intentions to deceive.
Thus, the “scientific world” is agog over the new South African variant, named B11529 (aka Omicron, Botswana). Woo. The ghost is coming out of the closet. Beware. COVID cases are rising…
“We don’t know whether the vaccine will be effective in the face of the new variant. New lockdowns may be necessary. Travel restrictions are coming. Batten down the hatches.”
I mean, really.
As you know, for the past few months stories in the press have been claiming the vaccine-conferred immunity is sinking like a stone. This story is absurd because, again, there is no virus. So there was no conferred immunity to begin with. But anyway, that’s the story that’s been circulating. So NOW…
“It turns out one major reason for the diminished effectiveness of the vaccine is…
“The NEW VARIANT. The South African B11529.”
Uh-huh. “The vaccine is having a tough time preventing infection caused by the new variant. We may need to enforce boosters every three months…”
Keep the fear going. Push harder for the vaccine. Explain away its failures. Fabricate rising case numbers, blaming them on the new variant. Institute heavy new lockdowns.
“The South African variant is deadlier than the Delta, which is deadlier than the original.”
And none of the three exists.
What does exist is fantasy, piled higher and deeper and thicker.
The variant is Fauci. The variant is Bill Gates. The variant is CDC/WHO. The variant is the World Economic Forum. And the Chinese regime. And presidents and governors. And the mainstream press.
And don’t forget this. Vaccine injuries and deaths have been escalating all over the world. In the US alone, reported injuries have broken above 600,000 [1]. As I’ve mentioned, the well-known Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare study [2] concluded that, to obtain a true number of injuries, multiply the reported figure by 100.
Something is needed to explain all these injuries and deaths. That is, to lie about them.
And right on time, here comes the new variant.
“These people who seem to be injured by the vaccine are really keeling over from the original virus, the Delta, and woo, the South African B11529.”
Also: Recently, we’ve seen a spate of press stories with the theme—“scientists are mystified by the low COVID case numbers in Africa, where the vaccination rates are very low.” [3] Boom. That story is now gone. Wiped out. Now it’s THE WORLD IS BEING ATTACKED BY THE SOUTH AFRICAN B111529 VARIANT.
Here is one of my articles covering the non-existence of SARS-CoV-2:
—Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists—
The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”
But what if the virus doesn’t exist?
People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.
“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”
I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [4], and he provided his analysis in detail.
I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [5].
First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.
The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.
They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.
There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.
Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”
Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:
STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”
KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”
STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”
KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”
STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”
KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”
STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”
KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”
KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [6]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”
STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”
STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”
KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”
STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”
—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—
My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.
Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.
And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?
Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [7]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?
The answer is no.
—end of Kaufman article—
And while I’m at it, here is another piece I wrote last year about how virus-propaganda (fairy tales) must be managed, in order to make the masses stand up and salute:
—The “hot zone” theory of new frightening diseases—
Remember? There was a 1994 book by that name— and then “experts” began piling on—it went something like this:
“Out of the deep dark rainforests of Earth (cue sounds of native drumming), as a result of modern plane travel, viruses we’ve never encountered before will spread epidemics across the globe. Our immune systems, ill-equipped to recognize or deal with these strange killer germs, will fold up under the pressure, and all of civilization will be threatened with extinction.”
Let’s see. Since planes fly back and forth, and since all sorts of Westerners travel TO the rainforests, why haven’t we seen whole native tribes wiped out by viruses from the deep dark streets of Brooklyn?
It would even seem that viruses, common in, say, Norway, would cause trouble in Oregon.
Why does it have to be “viruses from jungles?” Or other faraway places like China? Why can’t we have the Second City Virus, emanating from a slaughterhouse in Chicago and infecting people in Nigeria? Why can’t we have a Big Easy virus from New Orleans traveling to Beijing?
Is it possible that jungles and Africa and China and Mexico are typically chosen for virus fairy tales because, in the minds of many Westerners, they satisfy a requirement of “strange,” “different,” “primitive,” and so on? We’re talking theater here—and when you stage a propaganda play (fiction), you want to tap into the reflex instincts of the audience. The Hartford Virus, the Des Moines Virus, the Vancouver Virus just don’t fit the bill.
Because they can’t drive up the fear that jungles or Africa or China can.
Unless you’ve been living in an ice cave in the Arctic, you know selling fear of THE VIRUS is big business. To do that, you have to strike the right notes.
I personally would be interested in a Beverly Hills or a Scarsdale or a Park Avenue epidemic virus story. I’d like to see the media try to sell that one.
What about a Bill Gates Seattle virus that some Patient Zero unknowingly carries on a plane flight to Mexico City?
Think it through. We NEVER hear killer virus stories about germs traveling from Europe and America to Asia and Africa. Why not? Because such a story won’t sell. It won’t bite.
This is called a clue.
It tells you that virus-stories are shaped and managed and written and managed and broadcast according to a plan that has nothing to do with actual disease.
If a monkey in Africa can bite a man and thus transmit a virus to the West, then a salesman in Duluth can sneeze on a man at a local airport and thus send a virus to Ethiopia.
But amazingly, through secret communication among viruses, it never happens that way. The germs have decided what the traffic pattern is, and the CDC and the World Health Organization are just discovering What Is.
Sure they are. And if you buy that, I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon.
Humanity is entering a new era, a new world, a new reality. Some call it the Age of Aquarius others call it The Golden Age, or The One World Order. Whatever you chose to call it, the next Age is written in the stars, from Astrology to Hollywood.
Recall the quote from Harry Potter And The Goblet of Fire:
Dark and difficult times lie ahead. Soon we must all face the choice between what is right and what is easy.
Whether this new reality is preplanned or part of a celestial game with the rules missing, to enter into this space is nothing more than a test for each player, as well as a test of humanity. The test is not written or verbal. It is a test of wits, and a test of strength and stamina.
Why else would you agree to participate in a surreal experience, like a dream, with previous memories wiped, and abuses of the psyche?
In his purposeful and prophetic quote, Professor Albus Dumbledore revealed the one truth that separates humans from each other….free will, choosing between what is right and what is easy.
Put another way, if you know something to be wrong, then you can stand your ground and speak your truth, or not. But do what you know to be right.
No matter what the rest of the world tells you. No matter if the world tells you that you are wrong, do what you know to be right.
In this life, you are the captain of your ship. You come in alone, and you leave alone. You alone make the decisions that guide you through the weather of your life, even as others weave their ships into your wake along the way.
You live in your body but you are not your body. You are not your mind. You accept the Earth suit to attend Earth school, to play a game. But the Earth suit is made of matter, and matter is 99.999% energy, and so are you. When all is said and done with your suit, only you remain. Dust to dust. Energy to energy.
You are responsible for everything that affects you in this reality. No one else is responsible for you. No one else can take medicine to make you well. No one else can exercise for you to lose weight. You cannot gain wisdom for someone else to understand you.
While You can’t take it with you, from a physical standpoint, you do evolve on the unseen level of yourself, your higher self. There is no greater measure of you than that ethereal part. For that part of you to do the wrong thing is to fail the test presented to you, and for which you signed up.
The current test of humanity is ripe with gut wrenching choices. Do not fear life. But see each challenge as an opportunity from which to grow on another level.
A tip: Know what you tolerate and what you do not. Then you use your free will.
What separates you from the crowd?
Choice. Free will.
On this ride of a lifetime, if you perceive that another group holds all the cards, look again. They do not.
You decide your outcome. You take the helm.
Do you go right or go easy?
Know Your Higher Self. Use YourHigher Voice. Stand Your Higher Ground. Live Your Higher Truth.
When you steer your own ship, you hold your own cards. Play your own hand.
Recall the lyrics of singer, Kenny Roger’s song, The Gambler:
You got to know when to hold ’em, Know when to fold ’em, Know when to walk away, And know when to run. You never count your money When you’re sittin’ at the table. There’ll be time enough for countin’ When the dealing’s done.
“When government and technology are working together, the potential for abuse increases exponentially. To save ourselves, both of these forces must be permanently put in their place.”
A month ago, illegal and criminal coercion toward covid injections in the workplace was announced by the Biden Administration. Many have lost their jobs for rightly refusing this unsafe, ineffective, and possibly life-changing medical procedure. Now it has been announced by the pharma-owned FDA and CDC that children 5 to 11 years old may be given the shot. Comments from the public and renowned doctors and scientists were overwhelmingly against this, but as with so may other boards across the country, the officials at the table voted unanimously in favor, as if they never heard a thing. This shot will now be mandated in spite of the fact that older children who have already been injected have experienced heart problems and other serious reactions, including death. Neither of these age groups have ever been in danger, and the shots can only hurt them. Next it will be children newborn to 4. What are we to make of a government willing to sacrifice children to pharmaceutical company profits, or ends even worse?
Coerced injections, worthless for their stated purpose, and now provably harmful, are clearly a means to some end. This might include social control through digital passports, totalitarian surveillance, the re-engineering of humanity through genetic manipulation, the reduction of the world’s population (a longtime dream of eugenicists), hooking people up to the “internet of bodies”, or all of the above. One thing is certain — none of this was ever about public health. That lie is impossible to believe as we watch health care workers being fired, leaving hospitals understaffed; as news of injection injuries is censored; as ER doctors ignore injection injuries and fail to report them; as the medical establishment is seen to be under the obvious control of politics and corporations; as goalposts are moved, new rules invented, and definitions changed; as sanitation workers are let go and garbage piles up in the streets; as fire fighters and first responders are put on “leave without pay;” as workers across the country lose their jobs and can no longer provide for themselves or their families; as mental health declines from isolation, fear, and stress; as natural immunity is suddenly no longer recognized; and as effective medicines are withheld while harmful medicines are protocol. The goal is apparently not to promote public health, or indeed social order, but to destroy it. One might think that government would respond to the obvious deterioration of society, but the last two years have shown that this is actually what governments want. This is a war from the inside out. Our own government is trying to kill us.
We have been fed a string of lies 20 months long, but lies over time have a way of wearing thin. In the attempt to explain contradictory evidence, official explanations become more and more elaborate, and the more this happens the easier it is for us to see both the lies and the liars. Our great advantage is that the truth doesn’t need the vast resources of states and corporate media to be told. When it came to the point where the state was forced to just censor the truth outright, this was just another lesson for us. The bigger the coverup, the more obvious the crime. Clarity grows every day.
The tyranny we are facing didn’t just start in March 2020. We are in the midst of a system that had already surrounded us when the “pandemic” operation began. This is why such an obvious hoax gained so much territory so quickly across the world. The operation itself was carefully planned, but it was built on an established foundation. For almost 60 years — counting back to the John F. Kennedy assassination — the world has been subjected to a long list of planned attacks in which black operators created a traumatic public event, manipulated the public into believing the event was carried out by a selected patsy, and made desired institutional changes on the basis of that event. The September 11, 2001 attack seemed the pinnacle of any ambition these operators could possibly have, until covid 19 came along and somehow struck 193 countries with the same catastrophic results all at the same time. Manufactured case and death statistics then started rolling in, videos of people dying in the streets were produced, and the narrative of a terrible, unprecedented public health emergency was everywhere around us. The real event was seasonal respiratory illness hyped as a “pandemic”, with maybe a dash of real bioweapon thrown in. The patsy was bats in China spreading a mysterious deadly virus. And the deep institutional change looks like a wholesale re-organization of national economies, resources, and populations to suit the one-world-government fantasy of Vanguard investment bankers, secret cabals, and the openly conniving Davos elite. Far more people were immediately killed by health care policy and medical malpractice in the early days of the covid operation — for example, the elderly sent to die in nursing homes, the ventilator murders — than the 3,000 who died on September 11. Without death and gore, there is no trauma, and the scale of this op required plenty of trauma. As intended in the 9-11 operation, the US proceeded with a series of wars against the enemies of Israel. As intended in the Covid 19 operation, the oligarchs have proceeded to destroy economies worldwide. 9-11 led to millions of deaths; covid 19 (the operation) will bring many more.
Dark actors with evil schemes have been honing their craft throughout history, but have never been able to fool more people than in the age of Edward Bernays, mass media, and social engineering. Today, a world-shaking falsity can be created out of thin air. The 1969 “moon landing” is a good example. Fortunately that psy-op was carried out without mass murder. It was an astounding feat. From the battleship Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin, to “weapons of mass destruction”, to the 7-7 London bus bombing, to 9-11, to the Boston Marathon bombing, to the Las Vegas hotel shooter massacre, to the January 6 “insurrection”, and scores of other entrapments, fakes, and shootings; served by a veritable industry of crisis actors, informants, patsies, undercover police, agents, infiltrators, provocateurs, assassins, and spies; huge lies have been relentlessly sprung upon an unwitting, crisis-weary public, and the lies have succeeded for the most part because people can’t believe anyone would commit crimes of such magnitude.
Perhaps it’s time to rethink our relationship to the source of much of this manipulation — the TV screen. We literally are not seeing something real when it comes to us through this medium. The image on the screen is not reality. It may easily show us what someone else wants us to believe. The format is a wide open field for propagandists. Our personal experience is limited. TV makes our experience seem almost unlimited and we come to believe this expanded experience is authentic. We have been seduced by media and technology to such an extent that today much of our “reality” is not even real — it is virtual. It all comes down to epistemology — what is real and what we actually know is one of the central questions of philosophy. But for the sake of our survival, gaining knowledge through our own direct experience, dealing with people face to face, being there in person, interacting with the natural world in our immediate (non-mediated) surroundings, seems like the first step to take to escape the brainwashing that we get from electronic media. Like junk food, electronic media is pervasive and addictive. We are not physically or psychologically prepared to deal with it. We are simply not capable of ‘knowing’ all the people, places, ideas, and events brought to us in the avalanche of content on the internet. The hosts of the virtual world, like Facebook and Google, are happy to see us occupied on smart phones and social media with a previously unimaginable circle of hundreds of “friends.” We may even organize with our hundred friends to break Facebook and Google into a thousand pieces, but Silicon Valley doesn’t care because they gain so much more from collecting and selling our data.
Technology once seemed to be there to make life easier, but then it quietly enslaved us. To fight technocracy — that is, government which derives its power from technology — we have only to look at the technocrats’ means of control — QR codes, data bases, surveillance cameras, license plate readers, algorithms, artificial intelligence, body scanners, microchips, video games, blockbuster movies, cable TV, smartphones, and credit scores — and get them one by one out of our lives. It is certainly within our means to get rid of the devices we ourselves carry. Are you opposed to “vaccine passports”? Then don’t carry or own the smartphone that makes them possible.
Facebook recently announced it wants to change its name to “Meta”, the Latin word for ‘beyond.’ To the forward-thinking predators running Facebook, the “metaverse” is the next frontier in the attempt to capture and control human minds. With a VR (virtual reality) headset, one actually believes he’s in a given program, and may even believe he’s interacting with the program. The next step will be ano-headset, or wireless, VR platform. Since the oligarchs want to use those of us who survive the Frankenshots as slave labor, they would want us to be more than just passive batteries in a pod with cables stuck to our heads, as in The Matrix. Mobile humans having reality fed to them wirelessly would be a huge improvement. Perhaps the technology for that is contained in the “vaccines”, with their strange magnetic effects, so far unacknowledged and unexplained. Indeed, this may be why Bill Gates said that “unfortunately everyone on the planet will have to be vaccinated.” Obviously, the privileged few can’t have unauthorized humans walking around in their own reality!
The ongoing operation for the digital enslavement of humanity is insane. We are not a Frankenstein experiment. We are not software programs. We are not computers. We are not ones and zeros. We are not transhuman. We are miracles created by God, not to be tampered with. It is time to de-digitize the world around us and return to our spiritual connections and our humanity. Like government, technology is there to serve us, not the other way around. Like government, technology is not to be trusted. When government and technology are working together, the potential for abuse increases exponentially. To save ourselves, both of these forces must be permanently put in their place.
These days many of us are in the streets protesting. The benefit of this is not that we might attract the attention of politicians who hold us in contempt, but that we see and talk to each other in person, and give those on the sidelines strength in seeing healthy and strong opposition to the madness. When it comes time to actually confront the authorities, they will have no choice but to listen, and they aren’t going to like it. On the way to that day, and perhaps in order to reach it, we have to get 60 years of very sophisticated, highly manipulative media programming well out of our heads. Hoaxes and false flags will then be immediately obvious, and will no longer be used against us. The “pandemic” and the cast of characters fomenting this two year atrocity will disappear like a bad dream. It’s as if we can beat this operation simply by evolving.
Richard Hugus is the founder of Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates. “We are residents of Cape Cod, Massachusetts who support freedom of choice in all matters having to do with our own and our childrens’ health.” Connect with them here.
At that time, Japanese officials had administered 118,310,106 doses of the COVID vaccine. If they suspended more than two million doses due to contamination, just how many contaminated doses had been administered? How many people received a contaminated jab?
Nobody knows. That’s above their pay grade.
What about monitoring recipients who might have been contaminated?
What is the definition of a contaminant? Why the mystery?
According to some, popular contaminants already exist in vaccines, including mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, nano-contamination of metals and polysorbate 80, to name a few. However, the CDC and FDA do not consider these CDC-known toxins / carcinogens as “contaminants.” For instance, aluminum is not a neurotoxin. In a vaccine, aluminumis an adjuvant to stimulate the immune response.
So who is responsible for the contamination of COVID products that are injected?
Indemnity Scheme
In our “advanced world,” no one is responsible. Furthermore, there is never enough evidence that will ever prove a cause for adverse effects when it comes to vaccines, including COVID vaccines. Just calling an injection a “VACCINE” automatically makes it immune from any liability.
Under the PREP Act, companies such as Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability if something unintentionally (or intentionally) goes wrong with their COVID vaccines. That means that you cannot sue them if you have severe COVID vaccine side-or-direct effects, and the government likely won’t compensate you for damages. What other industry or company has that kind of protection?
No other.
What is the difference between the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act and The PREP Act? The script? The actors?
The 1986 Act works as a remedial measure, under which vaccine-manufacturers are not be held responsible for compensating any vaccine-related injury claims. Instead, the Act is supposed to provide compensation to eligible individuals for damaging effects of their vaccines. The program covers 16 routine vaccines for children entering public schools. However, as claims have mounted, few are ever paid out in the private vaccine court. There is no provision for damages based on pain and suffering. However, the vaccine court is profitable for vaccine lawyers who get paid no matter who wins or loses.
The PREP Act is an expansion of the 1986 Act, as it shields companies manufacturing the experimental COVID vaccines not approved by the FDA, called Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) vaccines. The justification this time? The Act ismeant to jumpstart U.S. defenses against an outbreak like COVID-19 by shielding from lawsuits makers of critical products, from diagnostic tests to vaccines, as well as doctors and drug distributors.
Both Acts require claimants to prove their injuries are “the direct result” of a vaccine. So far, most COVID vaccine cases have been denied compensation for the simple reason that, according to the lawyers, there is virtually no definitive research on injury causation to reference.
As a result of human complacency to schemes, any vaccine adverse side-or-direct effects may not become apparent until millions of people have received the vaccine. Recall the fiasco of the Swine Flu epidemic that threatened to become a pandemic? Remember the inaccuracy of case definitions and “mistakes” that blew the whole thing out of proportion? Is it happening again?
According to Science, The Wire, India has the world’s largest childhood immunisation scheme, larger than all the European and Middle Eastern countries combined.
Why is there is no informed consent prior to injection, only after?
When the leaders of “the free world” call a mass injection campaign a scheme, the people need to pay attention.
In May 2021, the New York Times reported that Emergent BioSolutions, whose Baltimore plant ruined millions of coronavirus vaccine doses, disclosed for the first time on Wednesday that more than 100 million doses of Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine are now on hold as regulators check them for possible contamination. In June, the FDAinstructed Johnson & Johnson to throw out 60 million doses of the COVID-19 vaccine produced at a Baltimore plant out of concern that they may have been contaminated, and because they were not suitable for use.
Contamination or Additive?
Accident or Project?
Truth or lie?
In any good mystery there are always more questions than answers. And there are always criminals who plan not to get caught. Expect that criminals of this scheme have covered their trails (indemnity) and made others vulnerable (contamination) so they get away when their scheme begins to unravel.
Next The Children
As of September 2021, with reports of widespread contamination, and ongoing investigations, the FDA has told journals such as Scientific American to promote the expansion of injections to children ages 5 to 11.
By appointment only, Pfizer Friday Nights For Kids began at area Fire Stations across the U.S. during Halloween weekend, a time for rituals and blood sacrifices. What better way for kids to spend a Friday night than getting their first COVID jab?
This morning I woke feeling sad. I cannot count how many sad mornings there have been for the past twenty months. On my early morning walk I watched a bank of clouds swallow up the sunrise. My family and friends tell me to stop reading and listening. They tell me to take breaks.
But you do not take breaks from friends who are suffering with so many degrees of struggle and loss. You cannot let the clouds swallow them up too. You read and listen to help those who cannot — to help them navigate in this nightmarish storm. And maybe you can rescue some who do not yet realize they are drowning.
My first listen today was of a dad and a young daughter speaking before a city council. They were choking on the stranglehold the mandates are putting on their community.
You want to know what he does for a living?
He runs the heart and lung machine that maybe your grandma or brother were on during open heart surgery. He says there are only two in his local hospital who do that work and neither will take the jab. So people will die when they are fired for their choice. Some will call him foolish or selfish and some will call him a hero.
He struggled to remain composed. He said he has tried to see his way around it and through it but, in the end, standing for freedom is the only thing that makes sense for the long term. Because, well, we do not know what they will ask us to do next.
My sad did not end there. We needed a few things at a local store whose name you would know. There were bright red signs on every cooler door and on end caps and more. “Hiring Event – Today!” Other local stores have signs that say “Immediate Interviews”. Lines are long and shelves have gaps.
Manned tables were placed strategically. People were stopping by. There sat a tall man with a long beard – older. I overheard. The woman in control harshly said, “You cannot fill out an application online?” Him: “No.” Her again: “Do you have a cell phone you could fill one out on?” Him, dejected: “No.”
I walked away, knowing he was not going to get a job, no matter what. He wanted a job. He was willing to work. But he was not even good enough for a large chain retail discount store who were having a “Hiring Event – Today!”. What a false hope they held out to him and others.
With my cart filled with more than we need — because one never knows — I checked myself out. I opened my wallet to pay cash because right now, more than ever, it is important to use cash. That is another right being threatened.
After feeding the machine my money I made my way to the parking lot. It was still cloudy like my heart. I loaded the groceries into my van and drove out the side exit, heading home.
I live in rural Iowa near a very small town. I shop in a town that is bigger, but still small — less than 30,000 residents. So seeing what I saw next is rare — a beggar by the side exit of the store parking lot. Even more rare, it was a young woman.
I could have looked the other way. That is sometimes easier in the bigger cities when you cannot tell if it is a ruse or real. But I chose to read her sign. The first phrase had me.
“I have kids.”.
I pulled over. I opened my wallet, still well supplied. The tears from the dad and daughter talk threated to spill again. I put the window down and looked into the grateful eyes of a young East Indian woman — a surprise in this small town.
Her accent when she said “God bless you” confirmed her origins. A couple of scars on her face said she had suffered. I could only get out “You, too” when I handed her less than I should have. Whether her need was real or not — God bless her.
Turning left, I headed north. A sudden realization came as did the tears. My kids’ generation rarely carry cash. If you do not carry cash, how do you help in a situation like that? If people do not carry cash how does someone in need ask for help?
Sharon James — along with her husband, children & visiting grandchildren — has lived and worked for nearly 35 years on a century farm in Iowa.
She is an avid researcher and life-long learner with a degree in education and strong interest in natural healing. Her now-adult children were all home schooled.
On October 26, 2021, Victorians were appalled to learn about the new legislation being pushed by the maniacal, power-drunk psychopath (Dan Andrews, Premier of Victoria, Australia) in which gives himself and his cronies unlimited, dictatorial power over all Victorians. This has ignited the fire within many Australians who are now strongly speaking out against this horrific medical tyranny.
Images credit: screenshot from Real Rukshan video footage
Near the end of this article you can watch empowered protestors standing strong and speaking from the heart, and hear MP Ryan Smith as he addresses Parliament:
“I’ve never seen a worse piece of legislation that gives…
unprecedented and draconian and dictatorial power.”
Deranged Psychopath, Premier of Victoria
Many of us continue to ask the questions: How does anyone trust this person? How can people believe anything that he says?
Words and paradoxical statements that come out of his mouth seem to be made up at whim. He often smirks, as if holding back a laugh, while announcing dictates that severely harm the lives of all Victorians.
Yes, the duper’s delight, it’s a giveaway smile When you see it up close, you know something’s not right ~ Van Morrison
In Victoria and throughout Australia, we are dealing with mass murderers who are intoxicated by their own power. They look with glee upon the pain, hopelessness, and uncertainty that they inflict upon the Australian people. The ongoing psychological and physical assaults, which the population has been forced to endure for nearly two years, are relentless, bringing even the most resilient almost to their knees on occasion.
It is becoming more evident, as each day unfolds, that the intent of these barbaric rulers is to isolate and discriminate against all who choose freedom and bodily autonomy. For most, there will be no work if not vaccinated. Unvaccinated will have strict limitations on goods and services. They will also be excluded from many establishments and venues.
We’ve seen blatant murder of the elderly and immunocompromised, and they are now being targeted to be the first recipients of the toxic booster shots. The bureaucrats forced this action, knowing full well this would likely be the demise of people who have unwittingly put their trust in these monsters.
It’s clearly getting “late in the day” here in Australia.
If this new legislation goes through, it will carry catastrophic consequences for us all. If the obedient masses turn a blind eye and allow this law to be passed, they will condemn their own children to a life of servitude and slavery, that is if their children survive.
Those found “intentionally and recklessly” breaching health orders would face two years in jail or a $90,000 fine, while the Premier would get draconian powers to declare pandemics.
Excerpts from article by TOTT News:
In June 2021, TOTT News reported that the Andrews government was in secret negotiations to introduce legislation granting cabinet the sole power to declare pandemic emergencies at any time — effectively leading to a state of permanent virus warfare.
Today, the Andrews government has moved on these plans, introducing a piece of legislation that gives the Premier sweeping powers to declare pandemics.
Images credit: screenshots from 9 News video footage
The legislation gives provision for the government to enforce public health orders to certain types of people, and take into account “their characteristics, attributes or circumstances”. Opposition Leader Matthew Guy argued the legislation would enable the government to discriminate against certain groups of people and shadow attorney-general Tim Smith described it as “terrifying”.
Excerpts from article by Miriah Davis and Charlie Moore, Daily Mail Australia
The Victorian Opposition has described the laws as an ‘attack on democracy’ and vowed to oppose them at every turn.
‘Under these laws Victorians face a $21,909 fine for failing to wear a face mask and business a $109,044 fine if a customer fails to check-in properly,’ Opposition leader Matthew Guy said.
The bill has been drafted after consultation with three crossbench MPs to guarantee it will pass this week or next month despite the opposition from the Liberals and Nationals.
The new laws will replace the state of emergency powers which expire on December 15 when they will have been in place for 21 months.
The Opposition fears they could be used to re-impose lockdowns in the near future.
‘These new laws aren’t about streamlining State of Emergency powers but about making it easier for the State Government to control people’s lives,’ Mr Guy said.
‘Daniel Andrews wouldn’t be passing these laws unless he planned on using them.
‘The thought of handing even more power to the person who got us into this mess is simply unacceptable.
‘This extreme legislation is a threat to every Victorian family, small business and local community. It must be stopped.’
Victorian opposition leader Matthew Guy accused the Andrews government of drafting “the most extreme” pandemic legislation of any state or territory in Australia.
“Placing so much power in the hands of one person … would be unprecedented,” he said.
“We see these laws as an incredible attack on democracy, usurping the parliament, usurping the cabinet process, which is what exists in New South Wales, and then allowing the Premier to effectively rule by decree, for months on end.
“In short, this bill is the most extreme of its kind[s] that we’ve seen in Australia. While a pandemic requires different approaches, it doesn’t require a law as extreme as this.”
The government will be able to limit movement of the population, ban gatherings, shut down businesses and enforce quarantine if needed…
It also outlines the ability to apply pandemic orders to “classes of person” who can be identified by “their characteristics, attributes or circumstances”.
Victorians Rise Up
Although some have wondered if enough Australian people would ever wake up and stand up, the uprising is now clearly seen and it is growing every day.
A group of Victorians peacefully marched to the gates of Flemington Racecourse in Melbourne to raise awareness of the Andrews governments discriminatory vaccinated economy on Melbourne Cup Day. pic.twitter.com/Uk2IxVqEEW
Ryan J. Smith, a Liberal Party member of the Victorian Legislative Assembly, offers powerful words in opposition to this legislation.
Partial transcript prepared by Truth Comes to Light:
Acting speaker, I have been in this place for 15 years and, without fear of exaggeration, I can honestly say that I’ve never seen a worse piece of legislation that gives — not the government of the day, but the premier of the day –unprecedented and draconian and dictatorial power.
Now putting aside for the moment, that when an ordinary, pedestrian, run-of-the-mill bill comes in this place, the minimum that the opposition, and indeed, the people of Victoria have — the minimum time that they have to review the legislation is two weeks. That’s the standard in this place. Two weeks.
This legislation came to us this morning — a scant seven or eight hours ago — 120 pages of legislation that will have the most far-reaching impacts on every one of the six and a half million people that live in the state. [It] will have huge impacts on all those people in a way — in a greater way — then the government has had impact on them in the past two years.
Now I shouldn’t have to stand up in this place, I think, Speaker, and explain to those opposite the difference between intent and what is actually in a bill. I shouldn’t have to explain that.
Because this bill allows the government to do an extraordinary number of things that ordinary Victorians would be horrified with.
And to hear the government in their press conferences get up and say ‘Ah yeah, but we wouldn’t use it that way’ is just a ridiculous comment from a government that just is trying to pull the wool over ordinary Victorian’s lives.
This bill will allow detention without cause.
This bill will allow arbitrary arrest.
This bill will allow discrimination of people based on race, sexuality, sex, gender, disability, religion, political beliefs.
That’s what this bill allows.
And if the health minister and the premier don’t want to use the bill for those things, then put clauses in that narrow it. Because, at the moment, that’s what the bill allows.
And it is just an unbelievable situation that the government, the Labor Party — you come in day after day and talk about the commitment to getting rid of discrimination, insuring that we don’t discriminate against any class of person ever — come in with a bill that actively allows one man, the premier of the state, to discriminate against all sorts of classes.
And if we think for a moment, if Victorians actually think for a moment, that this premiere, who has let them down so badly in the last 18 months, who has stripped two years out of our children’s lives, who damaged their education. their well-being , their mental health — has been the cause of thousands of businesses to go bankrupt and closed the doors. You only have to walk down the street, out the front doors of this parliament, to see For Lease signs on empty shops — over and over and over again.
Do you think people who were trapped on the other side of the New South Wales border — for weeks and weeks and weeks — believe that this premiere will not use these draconian powers to continue to hurt them?
Do you think that Victorians who were sent scrambling for the border at New Year’s Eve last year, sitting in a queue until three or four in the morning with babies and children — do you think they believe this premiere won’t use these dictatorial powers?
Do those parents who have home-schooled their kids, week after week after week — do you think they believe this premiere when he says he won’t use these dictatorial powers?
Do you think they believe a premier who says ‘Hey Victorians, we don’t want to be like New South Wales. We’re just going to have a short, short lockdown. Seven days…
It is a joke but I have to say it anyway. You know, it’s too serious to joke but, you know, they say the worst part of a seven-day lockdown is the first three weeks.
It is ridiculous that this government expects that people will believe that they won’t use the powers that are in this legislation.
If you’re not going to arbitrarily arrest people, then take it out of the bills.
If you’re not going to discriminate based on religion or political persuasion they take it out of the bill.
If you’re not going to arbitrarily detain people — Premier, take it out of the bill.
If you’re not going to declare a pandemic and give yourselves the opportunity to impose these orders and directions on Victorians when there isn’t a pandemic in the state, let alone the country, then take it out of the bill.
It’s in the bill because you’re going to use it.
No Victorian believes you are not going to use the powers because they have heard, day after day, the premier get up in front of a press conference… lecture them, tell them off, never take any blame…
[…] We’ll oppose this every step of the way — in this place, in the upper house, and out on the streets. […]
It’s hard to keep up with all that’s happening throughout Australia. Governments continue their push for total control of every aspect of our lives. At the same time, large numbers of Australians are waking up, standing up and speaking out against this assault on their freedom.
image credit: screenshot from Rebel News video report
I haven’t been able to find information related to Australian Federal Police and vaccine mandates. The fact that it’s so hard to find makes me suspicious.
Australia’s bureaucrats have created a “special” list of people who don’t have to obey the “no jab, no job” rule.
We can confirm that among the exempt from mandatory vaccination are security guards and lawyers — all of whom have more physical contact with the public, by far, than the average citizen. Criminal lawyers not only interact with the public and courts regularly but also visit clients in jail. Yet they are exempt and the average person is not.
Then there is the exemption for court staff who have contact with all the people entering the courts each day.
This is “the elephant in the room” that no politician, nor any person enforcing these mandates on others, is prepared to address. Why aren’t they asking? Is it not bleeding obvious? We would all love to hear Daniel Andrews’ rationale and reasoning behind this.
As if to prove there is no limit to this tyrannical insanity, Victoria’s Premier Daniel Andrews announced that people who are “fully vaccinated” against Covid-19 will only remain as such if they agree to receive all existing and future booster shots. See the article Daniel Andrews gives Vaccine Mandate EXEMPTIONS, but only for his mates by The Expose:
Many of us have wondered why the state of Victoria seems to be leading the way along the path to total tyranny. However, after learning that Victoria has been sold out to the globalist Strong Cities Network and China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the dots are starting to connect. Melbourne is the only city in Australia that has this “strong cities” classification. (Somehow the whole state of Victoria is included on the strong cities list.) [6/10/2023 update: Strong Cities website link for Victoria has been deleted. It had been found at: https://strongcitiesnetwork.org/en/city/victoria-australia/]
Is this a clue as to why Victoria is experiencing a “special treatment” — a faster transformation than the rest of Australia into a full police state?
Meanwhile, Victorian Police are no longer reserving their bash and assault operations just for protestors. They are now attacking ordinary citizens who are just going about their everyday business (who the police suspect may be committing a crime because they are, “God forbid”, sitting on a park bench). The crime here, which resulted in a woman being pinned to the ground by police, was that she did not want to give her name and address. See Avi Yemini steps in for woman violently arrested in Melbourne,
image credit: screenshot from Rebel News video report
Division by Tyrannical Design — The Vaxxed vs the Unvaxxed — (Hunger Games Revisited?)
A particularly important aspect and intention of this government psyop is to divide the population into two camps, the unvaccinated versus vaccinated, where the vaccinated attack the unvaccinated.
Image credit: screenshot from Real Rukshan video report.
We get a glimpse of that dynamic at the recent peaceful protest in St. Kilda, Victoria — an inner seaside suburb of Melbourne. As some protestors walk together through the streets, others picnicked on blankets outside of restaurants where they are not allowed inside unless they are vaccinated.
In the video of this event by Real Rukshan — at 00:45 timestamp — the camera pans to an outdoor café area beneath the Woolworths Supermarket sign. A presumably “vaxxed” man leans over his segregated eating area to yell at the passing protestors. When approached by police, he makes a hasty and cowardly retreat back to his chair behind the safety of the awning.
When caught up in the division psyop, people appear to share a common trait — a belief that they are entitled to verbally denigrate, insult and attack anyone who dares to hold a different opinion to theirs. Another common trait I’m observing in these “righteous souls” is COWARDICE.
In the video below, reporter Avi Yemini of Rebel News is covering a protest on Oct. 22nd, attended primarily by nurses and teachers. He is filming on Spring St., opposite Parliament House in Melbourne’s Central Business District. As he passes a segregated outdoor dining area, a man yells insults at him. As Avi approaches the man to give him a chance to express his views to a wider audience, the man becomes very aggressive and hostile. Of course, those in support of medical tyranny have reported that the irate man is the victim in this situation.
Taking a Stand Against These Crimes Against Humanity
Australians are rising and pushing back in greater numbers every day. There are many examples, including lawsuits, protests and individuals standing up to employers and bureaucrats. Here are just a few examples:
“Senior Constable Belinda Hocroft, who is attached to the Dog and Mounted Police unit, has filed civil proceedings in the Supreme Court of NSW against the health minister seeking a declaration that the government does not have the power to pass orders which essentially coerce people into being vaccinated.”
“So if it’s public consultation they want, let’s give it to them. We have under a week to do it, but it is critical we do, because this legislation is a further attempt to remove our sovereignty as they are doing with our bodily autonomy through forced vaccination. Again, it is up to us to say NO!”
“On the 16th of October, thousands marched through the streets of Brisbane in a “stand against tyranny”.
Chants echoed through the streets, bringing the city to a standstill for an hour and a half. This crowd had a lot to say and had one dominant message of ‘freedom’.”
Nelleus is an independent reporter, dedicated to freedom, and committed to revealing the truth about unfolding events in Australia, .
“There is no compromise, we will always stand with you for the truth.”
Following my heart led me to a conception of science, medicine and the world at large that was radically different from anything I was taught in school. My ideas, such as the heart is not a pump, blocked arteries are not the main cause of heart attacks, vaccines are ineffective and unsafe, cancer is not a genetic disease, and the “war on cancer” has been an utter failure, have been the subjects of three of my books.
Recently, because of current events, I turned my questioning gaze on the widely accepted theory —so accepted that it now lives in our culture as truth — that germs (bacteria and viruses) cause disease.
Tom’s views echo those of Dr Andrew Kaufman and Dr Sam Bailey, and Dr Stefan Lanka who won a massive court case upholding his claim that there is no evidence linking measles to a virus.
Since the early 1990s, German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka has been at the forefront of challenging the medical theory stating that viruses are the cause of infectious diseases such as hepatitis, AIDS, the flu, polio, herpes, or measles. Caroline Markolin has presented Dr. Lanka’s activities in her lecture video “Virus Mania” in great details (watch Part 2 of the recordings on this website – starting at 08:08).
Based on his studies in virology, Dr. Lanka discovered that viruses are vital components of simple life-forms that do not exist in complex organisms such as humans, animals, or plants. His research shows that the viruses believed to cause “viral infections” are in reality ordinary cell particles that have been misinterpreted as constituents of the viruses in question. Dr. Lanka also determined that viruses don’t have a destructive effect on the host, as commonly believed. These findings are in full accordance with the discoveries of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer who demonstrated already in the 1980s
that contrary to the standard theory, microbes do not harm the organism but play instead a supportive role during the healing process of diseases (see Fourth Biological Law of the New Medicine).
The “measles virus trial” between Dr. Stefan Lanka and German medical doctor David Bardens has by now received international attention (see the 2015 reports in CTV News Canada and BBC News). The court case has not only heated up the ongoing “virus debate”. It also fuelled the discussion about the justification of childhood vaccination and of vaccination in general.
Here is a brief overview of the court proceedings:
On November24,2011, Dr. Lanka announced on his website that he would offer a prize of € 100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. The announcement read as follows: “The reward will be paid, if a scientific publication is presented, in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven and in which, among other things, the diameter of the measles virus is determined.”
In January2012, Dr. David Bardens took Dr. Lanka up on his pledge. He offered six papers on the subject and asked Dr. Lanka to transfer the € 100,000 to his bank account.
The six publications are:
Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patientswithmeasles.ProcSocExpBiolMed.1954Jun;86(2):277–286.
Many people assume the history of the current pandemic is a mere two years long. But did you know that mask mandates are a repeat from a century ago? Did you know that the script of the Coronavirus flu pandemic is recycled from the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918? For what purpose? Read on…
In April, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged the use of cloth face masks in public settings to slow the spread of “Coronavirus,” a virus which has never been isolated. In fact the CDC admits no virus has EVER been isolated based upon Koch’s postulates, the gold standard.
With no proof of any viral threat, many state Governors “acted” in unison to implement executive orders or official guidelines to wear masks or face coverings. As illegal lockdowns (i.e., house arrests) were lifted at the end of May 2020, and people returned to work, governments again advised Americans to wear “the skam.”
On October 8 2020, Randell Kelton filed a complaint against Texas Governor Greg Abbot because he exceeded his authority under the rule of law. A dozen states followed suit by ending their own mandates. However, Kelton’s complaint was followed by federal lawsuits by various groups urging the governors to continue mandating “skams” in schools and other places.
Back and forth went the mandates, a masked distraction for two years. Yet, history has shown that masks failed in 1918 [see 1919 study by Wilfred H. Kellogg] just as they are failing now.
Who to trust? What does W.H.O. say?
Mask Failure
The World Health Organization (W.H.O) recommended that people do NOT wear masks unless they are sick or caring for someone who is sick. Mike Ryan, Exec. Dir. of WHO Health Emergencies program said, “There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there is some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly.”
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…. It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.
According to the UK Stay at Home Guidance, “We do not recommend the use of facemasks as an effective means of preventing infection. Face masks play an important role in clinical settings, such as hospitals, but there is very little evidence of benefit from their use outside these clinical settings.
The current recommendations regarding masks is that if you yourself are sick with fever, you can wear a surgical mask to prevent transmission to other people. If you are healthy, there is not thought to be any additional benefit to wearing a mask yourself because the mask is not airtight and does not necessarily prevent breathing in of these viral particles. – Dr. Nipunie Rajapakse, a Mayo Clinic infectious diseases specialist.
We do not know whether masks shorten the travel distance of droplets during coughing. Further study is needed to recommend whether face masks decrease transmission of virus from asymptomatic individuals or those with suspected COVID-19 who are not coughing.In conclusion, both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.
Face masks should be used only by individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever. Face masks should also be worn by health care workers, by individuals who are taking care of or are in close contact with people who have respiratory infections, or otherwise as directed by a doctor. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill. Face masks should be reserved for those who need them because masks can be in short supply during periods of widespread respiratory infection. Because N95 respirators require special fit testing, they are not recommended for use by the general public.
By filtering particles, face masks makes it harder to breathe. “N95 masks are estimated to reduce oxygen intake by anywhere from 5 to 20 percent. That’s significant, even for a healthy person. It can cause dizziness and lightheadedness. If you wear a mask long enough, it can damage the lungs. For a patient in respiratory distress, it can even be life threatening.”
Experts make it sound that eye goggles would offer more protection than a cloth mask.
Truth Disclosed
Why is the medical narrative purposely contrary to the government narrative? Why does the mask skam continue, even after the “safe and effective” experimental vaccine was deployed?
Because the truth must be disclosed somewhere.
The Coronavirus is not a true virus, nor is it infectious. There is no proof. Therefore, the mask is a test of the people’s ability to discern the truth with their eyes wide open, even if their mouths are concealed.
Know that truth can be disclosed in any form, including fiction, science fiction, and as published medical studies. But truth is not disclosed in the media.
With media dishing up propaganda, it is time to be discerning. Inconsistencies and contradictions in media are there to create a diversion and an emotional response known as a Psychological Operation. A Psy Op. As with any PsyOp, people must be able to parse truth from fiction. You can do this by considering that everything is reversed.
If there is no infectious virus, there is no need to wear a mask. Masks are a test to see who follows orders for the new Global Reset, a new system of rules. To see what is coming next, you only need to look beyond the diversion.
Techno Reset
The hidden connection between the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic and the previous 1918-20 Spanish Flu pandemic is not found in an invisible virus that does not exist.
No, the hidden connection is found in the roll out of “next generation wireless communications technology.” In 1900, wireless radio transmission had just been invented and hailed as a miracle. Then, broadcast radiation spread across the continents. Soon after, reports of 50 million people died as a result of the “1920 pandemic.” Everything was reset, from medicine to the economy to expectations to the population itself.
Fast-forward to 2020 and 5G, the 5th generation radiation technology that has also spread across continents and is being dialed up now. Along with the 5G rollout spreads a strange condition among the public with similar symptoms to the 1920 pandemic: headaches, nausea, fever, dizziness, weakness, dry cough, runny nose, shortness of breath, and death. The flu? Covid19?…
Or the effects of radiation poisoning, transmitted unseen through the airwaves by the same organizations, the same propaganda, the same coverup?
Is the novel Coronavirus just a new version of the Spanish flu, aka an invisible enemy that is not a virus? While everyone has been sleeping under house arrest, donning and debating masks, 5G towers and power lines have been installed, deployed, and activated in schools, church parking lots, and farm fields.
There is no overt war. But there is a covert war under the guise of an unseeable virus that never existed. The true threats are not only to health, under the guise of an “FDA-approved vaccine,” but also to freedom.
Be ready for Google and Apple apps that track your every move. Prepare for Artificial Intelligence, or A.I, running the show such as the Covi Pass digital health passport with RFID chip technology, approved by the United Nations. Be ready for a crypto-currency system tied to your body. Investment advisor, Catherine Austin Fitts, says:
When they decide to shut down our bank accounts and say you all get on crypto, universal basic income and take that injection or you can’t transact on the financial system, this is instituting a totalitarian system through the financial system. . . . When they shut that trap door, what you need to think about is where are you going to buy food?
In this century, you will have a choice to accept or reject the new tools becoming available. These tools will convince you to sacrifice freedom for security as a new Technocratic society is revealed.
Technocracy: A global system designed to implement central resource and control through rule-based micromanagement. The growth of Technocracy is made possible by digital systems and software, artificial intelligence, and the “one-way mirror” managed through 24/7 surveillance by intelligence and enforcement agencies-funded by our tax dollars. –Patrick M. Wood, with Catherine Austin Fitts, May 26, 2019
We are nearing the mid-point in October 2021 and I think we are now in deep trouble here.
What can I say? It’s insanity. The lunatics have taken over the asylum!
Never, ever have I seen anything like this in Australia, let alone Melbourne, including the behaviour and disjointed dialogue from the criminals masquerading as police.
Hardened criminals can be more articulate in their verbal communication than Australian police. These people are so out of control that they are unable to speak properly when barking orders.
It makes me wonder: Have they been fully vaccinated and now have totally lost their minds? Or is this the way these types of people behave when they know that they are inflicting pure evil on innocent and vulnerable people?
These are clearly criminals, committing criminal acts on the people, and it’s now “Helter Skelter”.
We understand that this is a fight for our souls and our humanity, both in a personal sense and for humanity’s survival as a race.
A lot has happened in the past few weeks with far-reaching implications for us that we will need to attend to.
The facist regime in Victoria announced at 11:59pm October 7, 2021 that the majority of the workforce in Victoria must have their first vaccination and second vaccination on dates ranging from October 10, 2021 to October 26, 2021, depending on their occupation.
A letter was sent to employers telling them that by October 15, 2021 they were to go around to every employee, with a “Starsi”- style ledger, and record which staff members were vaccinated and those who were not. If the employee’s vaccination status was not determined, then they were to be recorded as unvaccinated. If unvaccinated employees have not had their first vaccination by October 22, 2021, or have not made an appointment to do so, then they are fined $5000.00AUD. The employer is fined $50,000.00AUD if they fail to sack the employee.
It was then announced a day or two later that police, security guards, court workers and lawyers would be exempt from the vaccination order so that they can remain employed. These “health authorities” have no jurisdiction over judges and magistrates, therefore they are also exempt.
So, for many, we pretty much have full Martial Law in Melbourne, Victoria. Will the next phase be food shortages and possible cyber attack?
Below, I’ll share some links to recent events, speakers, protests, etc. that are being shared among freedom fighters here.
photo credit: nation.lk
September 19 — Elderly Australian woman knocked down and PEPPER-SPRAYED by police during Melbourne protest against lockdowns. Link to article. Also see related: Message to the Morons in Uniform – Your Fascism Will Return to Haunt You.Link to video.
photo credit: screenshot from Aussie Cossack video
September 24 — Military troops (navy and army) were flown into Sydney and put up at the Marriott Hotel in Darling Harbour (590 rooms at $600 a night), as reported by Aussie Cossack. Link to article and video.
photo credit: Rebel News
September 29 — Police target Rebel News reporter Avi Yemini’s security guard.Link to video.
photo credit: Rebel News
September 29 — Victoria Police try to BAN media from filming their violent conduct. Link to article and video.
photo credit: screenshot from ABC News Australia video
October 4 — Australian Aboriginal Dies Six Days After Second Dose of Pfizer Covid Vaccine, Sending Shock Waves Through the Indigenous Community. Link to article and video.
photo credit: Asia Pacific Today
October 6 — Professor Edward J. Steele, a molecular and cellular immunologist, is one of very few academics that have come out to say anything against the false rhetoric here. Most of the truth has come from outside this country. Link to article and video.
photo credit: Rebel News
October 6 — PAPERS PLEASE: Police try new tactic to STOP free press in Melbourne.Link to article and video.
October 8 — Senior Police Sergeant in Victoria, Australia Speaks Out Against Unethical Policing: “I Won’t Be a Police Officer After the End of This Interview”. Link to article and video.
Hospitals and laboratories are required to follow these rules and report official covid-19 data based on these rules. It appears that these rules were designed in a way to conceal the number of covid cases in the vaccinated and to conceal the number of deaths caused by the covid-19 vaccines.
Concealing the true numbers? Isn’t that a crime?
Not anymore, since truth has become falsehood!
In case you did not get the memo, to conceal means to reveal!
According to the CDC, Centers for Disease Control, or rather, The Centers for Disease Creation, even after people receive their first dose, they are not considered vaccinated. In fact…
Persons were considered fully vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the second dose in a 2-dose series (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines) or after 1 dose of the single-dose Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine¶; partially vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the first dose and <14 days after the second dose in a 2-dose series; and unvaccinated <14 days after receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no CAIR2 vaccination data were available.
The only reason to insist on multiple shots is because the shots do not work. What other purpose could multiple injections offer? Are some shots placebos to sell the vaccine as “safe and effective?” Will The White House demand boosters every six months for those gullible enough to comply? Are politicians practicing medicine without a license?
…the higher the injection dose, the higher the reported side effects, further strengthening the causal ties between the vaccine and the side effects:
In fact, 100% of study participants experienced side effects at the 100 ug or 250 ug injection volumes, during the second round of vaccination, meaning the vaccine becomes increasingly toxic with subsequent injections.
To reinforce this truth, an August 30, 2021 Israeli study, not yet peer reviewed compared SARS-Covid vaccine immunity to natural immunity.
Guess what. Natural immunity wins!
“Jaw-Dropping Academic Study Shows Natural Immunity Superior to Covid Vaccine.”
The Israeli researchers discovered that immunity acquired through infection from COVID-19 is superior to immunity from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The study also found that fully-vaccinated but uninfected people were significantly more likely to have a “breakthrough” COVID infection than people who had previously been infected and recovered from the disease.“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalisation caused by the Delta variant,” the authors conclude.Earlier Study
There was also a July 2021 study called “Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells”
COVID tests do not measure immunity.
When employers, businesses, and theaters tell you to get a Covid test if not vaccinated, in order to enter the building, or keep your job, they are operating illegally, and misleading you to get an inauthentic test.
That is because a Covid test is the wrong test to test for antibodies to an infection you may already be immune to. Only an antibody test is evidence of your body’s immune response to a past infection.
A natural way to look for an answer would seem to be checking for certain antibodies in your blood that target the coronavirus. These are specific proteins made by your immune cells in response to the vaccine or the virus — proteins that serve as a key part of the body’s arsenal in preventing COVID-19.
There are dozens of tests on the market that scan blood samples from a blood draw or a finger prick for the presence of these antibodies. Some tests just let you know if you have them — or not. Others can actually give you scores that reflect your levels. – Dr. Hadir, Infectious Disease expert.
The New Normal
What is the moral of the story?
Change your perspective to see the truth. Do not trust the ever changing narrative as “normal.” Question the narrative.
“CDC says fully vaccinated people spread the Delta virus and should wear masks.”
When you see everyone going in one direction, consider going the other way.
The truth is coming out in the symptoms of the vaccine which shows the destruction of the natural immune system, from the inside out.
Are you paying attention now? Is Covid19 a pandemic or a crime against humanity?
If the vast majority of deaths occur within the first two weeks after vaccination, and all these deaths are advertised as “unvaccinated deaths,” understand that the world has shifted and nothing is the same.
With a background in biostatistics, Christine Massey has been using Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests as a research tool, as a diamond drill, to unearth the truth about SARS-CoV-2. As in: Does the virus exist?
Her approach has yielded shocking results.
In a half-sane world, Christine’s work would win many awards, and rate far-reaching coverage. In the present world, more and more people, on their own, are waking up to her findings and completely revising their perception of the “pandemic.”
Here is my recent interview with the brilliant relentless Christine Massey:
Q: You and your colleagues have made many FOIA requests to public health agencies around the world. You’ve been asking for records that show the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. How did you develop this approach?
A: In 2014, a lady in Edmonton submitted a freedom of information request to Health Canada asking for studies relating to the addition of hydrofluorosilisic acid (industrial waste fluoride acid) to public drinking water (water fluoridation). HealthCanada’s response indicated that they had no studies whatsoever to back up their claims that the practice is safe or effective.
A few years later, some high quality government-funded studies showed that common fluoride exposure levels during pregnancy are associated with lower IQs and increased ADHD symptoms in offspring. Nevertheless, dentists and the public health community continued to promote and defend the so-called “great public health achievement” of forcing this controversial preventative dental treatment onto entire communities, and were dismissive of those studies. So I used freedom of information requests to show that various institutions promoting and defending water fluoridation in Ontario, Alberta and Washington State could not provide or cite even one primary study indicating safety with respect to those outcomes.
So once I learned from people like David Crowe, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Thomas Cowan that the alleged [COVID] virus had never been isolated (purified) from a patient sample and then characterized, sequenced and studied with controlled experiments, and thus had never been shown to exist, I realized that freedom of information (FOI) requests could be used to verify their claims.
Most people are not going to take the time to check all of the so-called “virus isolation” studies for themselves, so FOIs were a way to 1) ensure that nothing had been overlooked, and 2) cut to the chase and back-up what these gentlemen [Kaufman, Cowan, Crowe, Lanka] were saying, if they were indeed correct.
So in May 2020 I began submitting FOI requests for any record held by the respective institution that describes the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient, by anyone, anywhere on the planet.
Q: How many public health and government agencies have you queried with FOIA requests?
A: I have personally queried and received responses from 22 Canadian institutions. These are public health institutions, universities that claim to have “isolated the virus”, and 3 police services – due to their enforcement of “COVID-19” restrictions. I have also personally received responses from several institutions outside of Canada including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). I await responses from a number of additional institutions.
Many people around the world have obtained responses to the same/similar, or related, [FOIA] requests, from institutions in their own countries. One person who has done a lot of work on this in New Zealand and other countries is my colleague Michael S. Also a fellow named Marc Horn obtained many in the UK. A handful of other people obtained several responses, and lots of people have obtained 1 or 2.
I have been compiling all of the responses that are sent to me on my FOI page, and as I type this (October 4, 2021) we have FOI responses from 104 institutions in well over 20 countries all relating to the purification/existence of the alleged virus. Additionally, there are court documents from South Africa and Portugal. In total, 110 instructions are represented at this moment on my website. There are FOI responses from more institutions that I haven’t had a chance to upload yet.
Q: How would you characterize the replies you’ve gotten from these agencies?
A: Every institution without exception has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing purification of the alleged virus from even 1 patient sample.
Twenty-one of the 22 Canadian institutions admitted flat out that they have no such records (as required by the Canadian legislation). Many institutions outside Canada have admitted the same, including the CDC (November 2, 2020), Australia’s Department of Health, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health, the UK Department of Health and Social Care…
And in some cases, silly excuses were provided. For example, the Norwegian Directorate of Health’s response was that they do not own, store or control documents with information about patients. Public Health Wales told Dr. Janet Menage that they have not produced any such records, and that while they would normally be willing to point her towards records that are in the public domain it would be too difficult in this case.
Brazil’s FDA-like injection-approver, the Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), told Marcella Picone that they have no record of virus purification and are not required to by law, thus it is (in their minds) not their obligation to make sure that the virus actually exists.
Q: What is the exact text of your FOIA requests?
The text has varied somewhat over time. For example, in the beginning I used the word “isolation”. But since that term gets abused so badly by virologists, I now stick to “purification”.
In all requests I specified exactly what I meant by isolation/purification (separation of the alleged virus from everything else), and that the purified particles should come directly from a sample taken from a diseased human where the patient sample was not first adulterated with any other source of genetic material (i.e. the monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells and the fetal bovine serum that are typically used in the bogus “virus isolation” studies).
I always clarified that I was not requesting records where researchers failed to purify the alleged virus and instead cultured something and/or performed a PCR test and/or sequenced something. I also clarified that I was requesting records authored by anyone, anywhere – not simply records that were created by the institution in question. And I requested citations for any record of purification that is held by the institution but already available to the public elsewhere.
The latest iteration [of the FOIA request] is posted on a page of my website where I encourage others to submit requests to institutions in their own country: Template for “SARS-COV-2 isolation” FOI requests.
Q: These agencies are all saying they have no records proving SARS-CoV-2 exists, but at the same time some of these agencies sponsor and fund studies that claim the virus does exist. How do you account for this contradiction?
I will address this by way of an example.
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is the only Canadian institution that failed to provide a straightforward “no records” response thus far. Instead, they provided me with what they pretended were responsive records.
The records consisted of some emails, and a study by Bullard et al. that was supported by PHAC and their National Microbiology Laboratory, and by Manitoba Health and Manitoba’s Cadham Provincial Laboratory.
Neither the study nor the emails describe purification of the alleged virus from a patient sample or from anything else. The word “isolate” (or “isolation” / “purify” / “purification”) does not even appear, except in the study manuscript in the context of isolating people, not a virus.
…in the Materials And Methods section we find that these researchers performed PCR “tests” for a portion of the E gene sequence (not a virus), and they incubated patient samples (not a virus) on Vero cells (monkey kidney cells) supplemented with fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin, and amphotericin B, and they monitored for harm to the monkey cells.
No virus was looked for in, or purified from, the patient samples. No control groups of any kind were implemented in the monkey cell procedures. No virus was required or shown to be involved anywhere in the study, but “it” was blamed for any harm to the monkey cells and “it” was referred to repeatedly throughout the study (I counted 26 instances).
Nevertheless, this was the sole paper provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
And although the researchers did not claim to have “isolated” the alleged virus in this paper, they performed the same sort of monkey business / cell culture procedure that is passed off as “virus isolation” by virologists in country after country. (Because virology is not a science.)
…Note the admission in the [study] Abstract: “RT-PCR detects RNA, not infectious virus”.
…So I wrote back to the Public Health Agency of Canada and advised the that none of the records they provided me actually describe separation of the alleged virus from everything else in a patient sample, and that I require an accurate response indicating that they have no responsive records.
In their revised response, the Agency insisted that the gold standard assay used to determine the presence of intact virus in patient samples is visible cytopathic [cell-killing] effects on cells in a cell culture, and that “PCR further confirms that intact virus is present”.
…As you have pointed out to your readers again and again: No one has isolated/purified “the virus”. They simply assume that patient samples contain “it” (based on meaningless PCR tests). They adulterate patient samples with genetic material and toxic drugs, starve the cells, then irrationally blame “the virus” for harm to the cells. They point to something that has never been purified, characterized, sequenced or studied scientifically, in a cell culture and insist “that’s the virus”. They fabricate the “genomes” from zillions of sequences detected in a soup. It’s all wild speculation and assumptions, zero science.
So the people responsible for the blatantly fraudulent claims made by these institutions are either wildly incompetent or intentionally lying.
—end of interview—
To bolster Christine’s final comments, these agencies will respond to FOIA requests with: “we have no records of virus purification”—and then sponsor studies that claim the virus HAS BEEN purified and discovered, because…
The standards for purifying the virus in the studies are no standards at all. They’re entirely irrational.
However, because Christine is very precise and accurate in her FOIA requests, when it comes to what purification means, the agencies are compelled to reply…
“Well, in THAT case, we have no records of virus purification…”
Meaning: There are no records showing the virus has been isolated; there are no records showing the virus exists.
The evidence is in. Gene-manipulating injections advertised as a “vaccine for covid 19” have killed and injured millions of people. Instead of providing immunity to an alleged virus, the shots actually harm the immune system and turn it against us. The spike proteins created by the shots spread out to attack major organs in the body, leading to a thousand and one different health problems, including heart attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis, strokes, blood clots, spontaneous abortions, neurological disorders, depression, and death. Yet the medical establishment is urging everyone, including pregnant women and children, to get the jab. The ghost standing in as US President recently decreed that if people refuse the shot they will lose their job. This is coercion to accept a medical intervention known to be a danger to human health — a crime against humanity. Half the population of the country is now facing this coercion.
This only makes sense if we reason that the authorities want to harm us, or that there is something so important in the injection that they don’t mind harming us, as long as we get the injection. Bill Gates said early in 2020 that everyone on the planet should be “vaccinated.” Perhaps his dream was that when that is accomplished there will be no one left who will not be genetically modified (to Gates’s secret specifications) and thus no one left to hold him to account.
One of the most insidious arguments put forward by the authorities is that we are facing a health crisis so serious that individual freedom must be sacrificed for the common good, and therefore no one has a moral right to refuse the Frankenshot. This argument quickly comes down to whether human beings have inalienable rights — rights given to us by God, which the state does not have the power to take away or overrule. To accept or reject any substance being given to us is obviously such a right. And after this we can discuss the details — that the purpose of the “vaccine” is unclear, that its contents are unknown, that it has proven harmful to millions of people, that we were not informed of adverse effects, that natural immunity should be recognized, that tests establishing the alleged disease were fraudulent, that there is no emergency, that there are safe alternative treatments, et cetera. But if we understand that the state is a lesser power, then we understand that it does not have the authority to order substances injected into our bodies.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
~ U.S. Declaration of Independence
The cabal behind the medical tyranny we are facing doesn’t believe we have God-given rights because they don’t believe there’s a God in the first place. They apparently think that since they are billionaires, and billionaires have a lot of weight to throw around, that they can be gods. They also seem to believe there is nothing they are forbidden to do to other people because other people do not have souls — they are just biological entities evolved through random nature which the rich, by virtue of their power, are free to manipulate and improve upon. To technocrats, nothing is sacred. So it makes sense to them to risk injuring pregnant women and children and even experiment on the whole human race (beside their chosen few). Those who resist are now being segregated and punished, like Palestinians in their own land. Perhaps occupied Palestine is the oligarchs’ model for our future.
The ultimate goal may be the power that previous master-slave relationships were not able to achieve — a “read/write” capability in which the master has full surveillance power over the slaves and gives the orders for them to follow. Subtracted from the slave population, of course, will be those few billion dissidents and “useless eaters” who don’t fit in with the plan. They will be terminated. From this point of view it also follows that the genetic makeup of any living thing is just software which today’s sophisticated scientists can splice, delete, modify, or re-create as the masters see fit. From this point of view humans are no different than GM corn, soy, or cotton. GM humans can be used to bring in a nice profit as well because the masters will own their patents. Perhaps Monsanto agribusiness is another model for our future.
Taken to its logical extreme, reality itself is in the hands of our would-be masters. With proper control of the media, people can be made to believe anything, like that an illness similar to the flu is a “pandemic,” or that someone who has no symptoms of illness is actually sick, or that the unvaccinated are selfishly threatening everyone else with death, or that anyone who strays from the narrative is spreading “misinformation,” or that if someone goes into convulsions directly after getting jabbed it is not due to the poison that was just injected into them, or that a serum that injures and kills is “safe and effective.” In this world, the truth is what the powerful say it is, regardless of the facts. The powerful are a locomotive big enough to just run past any anomalies and contradictions, leaving us bewildered.
However, the ambitiousness of this insane program foretells its failure. History is full of great tyrants with grand plans who came in with spectacular fame but suddenly fell in disgrace, erased by time. The oligarchs’ main weakness is their lack of any sense of limits. Gaining some power, they then want it all. They reach too far, too soon, and expose themselves in the process. And then common humanity — always patient to a fault — finally decides to stand up and become a locomotive itself, running back over the entire plan and returning us to sanity.
If the world is going to see a great reset, it will not be the one Klaus Schwab and his Davos gangsters had in mind.
We should take heart. So much has been revealed! It’s as if the world’s worst criminals burst into the courtroom and offered up a horrendous public confession.
Richard Hugus is the founder of Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates. “We are residents of Cape Cod, Massachusetts who support freedom of choice in all matters having to do with our own and our childrens’ health.” Connect with them here.
Truth Comes to Light editor’s note: Small gatherings of people who stand for freedom are as inspiring to hear about as the millions who are filling the streets in major cities. It all starts with one individual who has the courage to speak the truth. What is happening in Cape Cod, where there numbers increase with each protest event, is an example of how it happens everywhere — one courageous person at a time.
In this fourth round with the Worldwide Demonstrations, Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates needed more room than we have at our usual spot on Main Street in Hyannis, and we had that room at Capetown Plaza in front of the now-closed KMart, facing a busy Iyanough Road. There were too many honks of support to count. The few curses leveled at us were even uplifting, as they were so unhinged. People are clearly angry about Biden’s “get the shot or get fired’ order, announced earlier in the week, and are not going to tolerate it. Some were there because they are about to lose their jobs for refusing the shot. This was our biggest demonstration since we started in December 2020. Best of all was to see families there and children seeing their parents and other adults standing up for them.
Below are pictures from our block-long demonstration:
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021 (Photo by Jams M.)
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Protest against medical tyranny, Sept. 18, 2021
Richard Hugus is the founder of Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates. “We are residents of Cape Cod, Massachusetts who support freedom of choice in all matters having to do with our own and our childrens’ health.” Connect with them here.
Over a year ago, I proposed (insisted on) a procedure to prove SARS-COV-2 exists.
This procedure is essential—and needless to say, it hasn’t been done, and will never be done.
Why? Because the outcome could completely and utterly destroy the COVID narrative.
Here is the procedure: You line up 500 people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and you take tissue samples from them.
You properly process these samples, through centrifuging, etc., in order to extract and arrive at what you believe is the virus.
You put that material under an electron microscope and photograph it.
You then place the 500 photos from the 500 “pandemic patients” side by side.
You ask yourself three burning questions.
One: In each and every photo, are there many identical viruses?
Two: Are these viruses in every one of the 500 photos?
Three: Is the virus one you’ve never seen before?
If the answer to question one and two is yes, you appear to have found a common virus for the 500 patients. If the answer to three is yes, it’s a virus never seen before.
If the answer to either question one or two is no, you’ve failed to find the common virus you’re looking for. You’ve failed to prove a viral cause for what you’re calling COVID-19.
If you see many identical virus particles in some, but not all, of the photos, you may or may not have found a virus. To decide that issue, you need three conditions: the researchers are honest and independent; a new team of such researchers will repeat the whole procedure, from the beginning, to see whether their findings match those of the original team; and you need truly qualified experts to determine whether the particles in the electron microscope photos are actually viruses or something else.
Note: This is why one or two photos from a study mean NOTHING.
All right. Moving on, there are other factors involved in the process of discovering a virus. These factors are ISOLATION and GENETIC SEQUENCING.
They’re both covered in a Statement on Virus Isolation, authored and published by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell. I reprint it here in full:
Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) [1]
“Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.” — Oxford English Dictionary
The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:
* the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
* the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
* “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
* it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.
In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages [2a] and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues. [2b] (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.) [2c]
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:
1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.
If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?
Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
—end of Kaufman, Cowan, Morell Statement—
Finally, here is a repost of my article about a claim of virus isolation. Dr. Kaufman does a step-by-step analysis of a quote from a typical study that purports to describe how SARS-CoV-2 was isolated:
—Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists—
The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”
But what if the virus doesn’t exist?
People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.
“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”
I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [3], and he provided his analysis in detail.
I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [4].
First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.
The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.
They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. THAT’S THEIR KEY “EVIDENCE.” This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.
There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.
Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus” they never isolated. “We didn’t find it, we don’t know anything about it, but we sequenced it.”
Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:
STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”
KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”
STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”
KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”
STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”
KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”
STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”
KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”
KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [5]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”
STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”
STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”
KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”
STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”
—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—
My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.
Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.
And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists?
Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 300 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [6]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?
The answer is no.
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
[2a] Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215734 — accessed 2/15/21
[2b] “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.573511/full — accessed 2/15/21
[2c] “The Role of Extraellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May
Cherry-picking – the action or practice of choosing and taking only the most beneficial or profitable items, opportunities, etc., from what is available.
What happens when the drug companies that are held up as “models of science” are frauds?
What happens when the information from lawsuits against drug companies are sealed and the only visible consequence is a fall in stock price?
What happens when drug companies suppress and cherrypick the data in their studies to show favorable results in order to gain FDA approval?
Captive Audience
In today’s world, the BIG FOUR drug companies are given the green light to release new, emergency authorized vaccine products to a captive audience without clear safety and efficacy data.
Despite a sordid history of pharmaceutical crimes that caused suffering and death, these companies continue to cause harm because current law does not require pharmaceutical firms to disclose their research and data. So even if scientists have knowledge that a particular drug is more harmful than originally thought, they do not disclose it.
In fact, under the current laws and rubber stamping, pharmaceutical companies not only survive, they thrive. As they pass through the gates of the court system for their countless fraud cases, they prove their guaranteed net worth, and in turn, are given bigger accounts to make their products on a grander scale, for a global market.
The BIG FOUR vaccine market players are: AstraZeneca, Pfizer Inc., Moderna Therapeutics, and Johnson and Johnson. The cast of characters includes lots of lawyers.
AstraZeneca could be considered the poster child for an ideal company in the untested Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) vaccine market. In 1997, AstraZeneca released its FDA-approved drug Seroquel, a drug for depression, bipolar, schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder with the side effect of diabetes and weight gain. In 2010, AstraZeneca paid $520 million to settle fraud charges.
AstraZeneca knew about the risk of weight gain and diabetes in 2000 and not only failed to warn physicians and patients but marketed in a way that represented there was no risk. – Edward F. Blizzard, a Houston-based lead lawyer on the cases
The case against AstraZeneca began in 2009 and can be found here. An excerpt of the original article:
AstraZeneca Plc “buried” unfavorable studies on its antipsychotic drug Seroquel, according to an internal e-mail unsealed as part of litigation over the medicine.
The drugmaker failed to publicize results of at least three clinical trials of Seroquel and engaged in “cherry picking” of data from one of those studies for use in a presentation, an AstraZeneca official said in a December 1999 e-mail unsealed yesterday under an agreement between the company and lawyers for patients. The London-based company faces about 9,000 lawsuits claiming it failed to properly warn users that Seroquel can cause diabetes and other health problems.
More than 15,000 patients have sued AstraZeneca, claiming the company withheld information of a connection between diabetes and Seroquel use from doctors and patients. Many of the lawsuits also claim AstraZeneca promoted Seroquel, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, for unapproved uses.
AstraZeneca fell 114 pence, or 4.8 percent, to 2,243 pence in London trading. The shares have declined 20 percent this year.
“AstraZeneca has studied Seroquel extensively and shared all relevant and required data with the FDA — both before and after the agency approved it as safe and effective,” Tony Jewell, AstraZeneca’s spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement.
Repeat Offenders
ASTRAZENECA
When they know they have made a mistake, drug companies do not admit it. They simply claim to “share all relevant and required data with the FDA”, while quietly burying pertinent health effects evidence. AstraZeneca’s publications manager, John Tumas, wrote in 1999:
The larger issue is how do we face the outside world when they begin to criticize us for suppressing data.” He said three drug trials had been “buried.” Referring to a fourth, he said, “We must find a way to diminish the negative findings. But, in my opinion, we cannot hide them.
In 2009, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history went to Pfizer Inc., which was made to pay a $2.3 billion penalty for fraudulent marketing. This federal lawsuit was triggered by six whistleblower who filed lawsuits under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. Each whistleblower received payments totaling more than $102 million from the federal share of the civil recovery, a mere drop in the bucket for Pfizer Inc. For a long list of Pfizer’s billion dollar crimes, go here. However, today, there are fewer federal whistleblowers, because they have fewer rights than those in the private sector.
Moderna admits that their EUA vaccine is “an operating system that gives their technology ‘a software like quality.’” On its website, Moderna claims:
It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
Moderna is developing a new class of mRNA drugs aiming to turn human bodies into drug factories by directing cells to produce therapeutic proteins.
In 2017, Moderna generated negative headlines based on the mRNA tech is it using now: Mysterious $5 Billion Biotech Moderna Hit With Legal Setback Related To Key Technology. The company that sub-licensed the delivery system to Moderna, which wraps the mRNA into balls of fat, belonged to a company called Arbutus, whose license was terminated the year before, in 2016. However, Moderna claimed it could continue its human trials using the controversial delivery technology because it fell under a patent research exemption.
Repeat offender, Johnson and Johnson, aka J&J, has a long, sordid history of crimes, fines, and violations in the medical “product” business. See the J & J Corporate Rap Sheet here. J &J is at the heart of one of the biggest criminal pharmaceutical cases that resulted in a payout of $2.2 billion for marketing the anti-psychotic Risperdal in 2013.
J&J didn’t tell the FDA that at least three tests by three different labs from 1972 to 1975 had found asbestos [carcinogen] in its talc – in one case at levels reported as “rather high.” – Lisa Girion, Reuters December 2018
On April 14th, the FDA recommended the one-shot dose of J&J’s vaccine be paused due to an increase in “rare and severe” blood clots to the brain, or Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia. Before you could say that ten times fast, the shot resumed on April 23rd.
The bottom line for the pharmaceutical theatre? Money, to the tune of $60 billion, and rising, for one new and untested mRNA injectable product!
Since the show must go on, so will the cherry picking.
That is why J&J, and the others, will continue the business of manufacturing, marketing, selling, and illegally pushing their toxic products on the public, via doctors, pharmacists, nurses, commercials, faked research with their cherry-pickin’ scientists.
Why will future drugs, even cancer drugs, be marketed as vaccines? Because the PREP Act provides immunity from liability for vaccine makers, similar to its predecessor, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which indemnifies vaccine makers in case of side-effects; to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines. In other words, collateral damage is expected.
If my immunity is as good, indeed, very likely better, than that conferred by the vaccine, there doesn’t seem to be any rational basis for discriminating against my form of immunity and requiring me to get a different form of immunity.
“We should understand that what the authorities pretend to be incompetence and
unfortunate mistakes are actually intended goals. They haven’t destroyed economies
or immiserated, injured, and killed thousands of people by mistake. They know what
they’re doing, and they’re doing their best to cover it up.”
The “pandemic” is an attack on human freedom being conducted in increments. We started out with a three week quarantine to relieve supposedly overwhelmed hospitals and health care workers. Now, 18 months later, “there will be consequences” for people who refuse to get “vaccinated” says Trudeau in Canada. In Australia, people who have been under strict lockdown for months are now being told not to talk to each other or bring their children to playgrounds. Internment camps have been mentioned, and some say they are being built for those who refuse the jab. Children are being taken away from “unvaccinated” parents. If current jab rates are any indication, half the world’s population may end up in the camps, but that’s not an insanity too far for our would-be masters.
The globalists seem to care very much about getting something injected into us. They know better than we do what that is and what it is supposed to do — we can only speculate. Is it a slow-acting poison like glyphosate, promoted for many years by the same cast of characters? Is it a tool for chronic disease to keep the pharmaceutical industry and the medical establishment in business, like conventional vaccines? Is it a sterilizing agent to reduce the world population? Is it a code to genetically modify human beings? Is it the foundation of the circuitry that will connect us to 5G so that we can be completely surveilled? Or is it 6G, which will have enough bandwidth to bring us into the completely manufactured reality of The Matrix? We don’t know. But clearly there is a hidden agenda.
Some say the agenda of mass immunization is to institute “vaccine passports” to bring in totalitarian social control. But if this was the only goal, why would the clever technocrats, with all their careful planning, have chosen to inject people with a “vaccine” that doesn’t prevent or stop transmission of the alleged virus and is so harmful that not long after it was rolled out it started killing and injuring people in such large numbers that it couldn’t be covered up? The genius technocrats would have been much better off using a saline solution, then declare victory over the “pandemic” with no side effects. No, it seems that there is something important in the shot, and that the idea is to change all of humanity with it. If so, there will have been no crime more diabolical in the history of the world. While patriots thought their love of country and their guns would protect them, Klaus Schwab walked right in the front door and robbed them blind. Full-on psychological warfare of 2020 became biological warfare in 2021, and not a shot was fired. Our enemy were kindly medical personnel with syringes. Bullets don’t stop nano-scale mRNA.
In a 2017 TedX talk, Tal Zaks, the Israeli chief medical officer of Moderna, bragged about “hacking the software of life.” At this point, science revealed hubris perhaps not seen since the development of the atom bomb. We learn from Greek tragedy that there is always a reckoning when man meddles with forces he knows nothing about — in this case, the human genome. “Whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad.” The same story goes back to the ancients.
As they go mad, the globalists are on a race to the bottom. They want to get as many people injected as they can before people realize the injections are not only not stopping disease, they are causing it. The masters of the universe have to suppress clear proof that safe conventional medicines effectively treat whatever the illness is called “covid” — how we hate the word! They want as many people as they can enrolled in their social credit system before people realize they’ve fallen into a trap. They want so much of the crime accomplished that it can no longer be reversed.
The race is desperate. New York Mayor deBlasio has declared that the 8 million people who live in the city be segregated according to their injection status, just like Jim Crow. Dictator Dan is re-enacting the Milgram experiment on the entire population of Australia. Emmanuel Macron wants the French to starve to death if they don’t get the “pass sanitaire.” Joe Biden has told employers outright to require the jab as a condition for work, since the federal government can’t legally do it. He has social media doing the same thing with censorship. Colleges and universities are making injection status a condition of enrollment, destroying careers and higher education. Variants of “the virus” are being hyped to create more fear, when there was never a valid test for the original. The dark ritual of masking is coming back. Children are again being muzzled in school, and our entire society is being humiliated as the most innocent and least protected among us — children — are publicly abused. The children themselves may come to see their parents and all adults as cowards for not protecting them. The “unvaccinated” are being vilified, with virtue signalers openly suggesting they deserve to be punished. All this is happening apace because so many people will be getting sick from the injections that there will be no way to cover it up. The globalists are acting more like mad scientists than confident leaders serene in their power . . . because they are mad.
We should understand that what the authorities pretend to be incompetence and unfortunate mistakes are actually intended goals. They haven’t destroyed economies or immiserated, injured, and killed thousands of people by mistake. They know what they’re doing, and they’re doing their best to cover it up. The next flu season may bring disaster, with large numbers of people getting sick because their immune systems have been seriously damaged by the jab. At that point, the plan may be so obvious that even the brainwashed will wake up.
It is up to us to put a stop to the mass injection program. If only one person changes their mind after seeing our protests, we will have made a difference. It is not too late.
Richard Hugus is the founder of Cape Cod Against Medical Mandates. “We are residents of Cape Cod, Massachusetts who support freedom of choice in all matters having to do with our own and our childrens’ health.” Connect with them here.
In this powerful interview by Kate Sugak, Andrew Kaufman includes an overview of the erroneous germ theory, as well as insights into the globalist agenda of using “anti-covid” mandates, “vaccinations” and vaccine passports in an attempt to dominate all of humanity.
Andrew also addresses the widely-shared notion that vaccinated people are “shedding” spiked proteins. He brings a clear view of what we actually know and what, so far, is just speculation. At approximately the 37-minute mark, Kate asks Andrew about these “shedding” reports.
Beneath Kate’s interview, we share some excerpts from the video, including what Andrew says about this growing fear about the vaccinated.
Dear friends, I am happy to inform you that I had a long-awaited conversation with the legendary Andrew Kaufman. Andrew Kaufman is an American medical doctor and researcher who has done a tremendous job to open the eyes of hundreds thousands of people around the world to the truth about viruses and the falsehood of the germ theory of disease. Topics we discussed:
Andrew’s story, how he began to notice that there is something was wrong with what he was taught in medical school about diseases and infection. How did he come to understanding that the germ theory of disease, which is the base of modern medicine is wrong, and viruses do not exist at all?
Then we talked in more detail about the germ theory and why microbes do not cause disease. What causes disease in humans and what we mistake for contagion.
We also discussed the epidemiological study in which Andrew took part, the purpose of which was to understand whether people vaccinated against Covid-19 are dangerous for the unvaccinated or not, as well as Andrew’s point of view on why the “pandemic” was arranged and what way out from this he sees.
Excerpts from video transcript prepared by TCTL editor:
Andrew Kaufman
Really the spirit of science and the philosophy of science, not how it manifests in reality today but what it really gets at, is always doubting everything. And if you propose a theory and then you have some experimental evidence that supports it, that definitely adds weight to it. But my job as a scientist is actually to try and disprove it. And if I fail to disprove it, that’s what really makes it valid and true. So it has to withstand the attempts to disprove it. And that’s how we we really need to obtain scientific validity. And all I’m really saying is that these theories that have been put out there as truth actually have already been disproven.
###
Kate Sugak
Another questions that I have that is a very important because we have these videos in the Russian-speaking community that show extreme fear of people that are vaccinated — that can be contagious or can be dangerous to the unvaccinated…
Andrew Kaufman
Let me just start off by saying that it’s already known that, with gene therapy — because we’re really talking about gene therapy here, these are not not vaccines in any traditional sense — that there is this possibility of what they call shedding.
And, in fact, the FDA in the United States has a specific guidance document — that if your gonna develop gene therapy you need to do some testing to show that this is not an issue with your product.
And the reason is — because you’re making a foreign protein in whoever receives this injection. And that foreign protein could be in your body fluids and, which means, that it can be passed to other individuals.
And the foreign protein may have its own toxicity. Right? Because, think about if they’re developing a gene therapy for cancer, they might want to produce a toxic drug that kills the cancer, for example, and you don’t want that to get into you know your kids or your neighbors.
So, they’re supposed to test the body fluids to see — is this foreign protein or foreign gene product actually there. And they should test the urine and the feces, sweat, saliva, tears, etc.
But since they re-labelled these gene therapies as vaccines they got around this requirement somehow. And, to my knowledge, haven’t even done testing — or at least that’s been publicly released — that shows there’s actually a spike protein being made anywhere in the body.
There was one small study from Canada done by independent groups on the Modern product, but it was a really strange protocol, and in a very small number of people. And I’m not sure that I even trust the results. But they did show some spike protein up to 14 days after the first injection. Only in the blood. They only looked at the blood.
So we don’t really know. And also, if the spike protein gets out into the environments — like, let’s say, it is in the saliva and you start talking and your saliva goes out in front of you and flies on the wall or on a table. Well then if there’s spike protein in that it will be denatured pretty quickly because, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, that needs to be kept frozen. Right? So at room temperature it would not stay intact. So there’s a lot of complexity…
So overall there is, at least a theoretical problem here. Right? But we have a lot of missing information.
So I did get to look at the data from some survey research done by a small group of independent people and it was really more consumer type of research because these people came from that industry and wanted to get to the bottom of this issue.
And so what what we could find from this… So basically these were people who had some kind of symptoms and were exposed to someone else who was vaccinated or other people — what I call vicarious exposure — by different degrees. And so, when we looked at the correlation between the degree of exposure — like, obviously, it’s a higher degree of exposure if it’s your spouse versus like some people that you work with at a part time job. Right?
So when we compare that to the presence of symptoms that were new symptom that could be related, what we found is really there was only a signal for intimate partners…
But I think there’s enough anecdotal evidence that also there may be something within with infants and nursing mothers. So, in other words, maybe there is something in the fluids and that if you pass it directly into another person, where it doesn’t sit in the environment… It’s like through intimate contact like sex or open mouth kissing or nursing. Right? So, in other words, a body fluid from the vaccinated person’s going directly into the body of an unvaccinated person.
That there may be a possibility of some kind of symptoms in that case. We don’t know from the research the severity of the symptoms in the person vicariously exposed. Only that there is a signal there. So further research will know…
There’s good news here because one — having casual contacts or a hug or working with people or even living with people that are like roommates — does not appear to be a risk.
And this is really positive because this is another issue that can divide the people against each other. And dividing people against each other allows the power elites who are trying to grab more power to do so…
That’s the strategy — essentially the strategy to develop communism or totalitarianism.
…
I feel pretty confident that it’s not a major issue except possibly for intimate partners. So that is enough information to inform people about what decisions to make in their life. And so I’m comfortable with kind of leaving that issue there…
The main thing that I would say is don’t go anywhere near any of these experimental vaccines. And if you don’t go near them, then you you’ll be fine from that perspective. There’s plenty of other things you’ll have to deal with but separate decisions.
###
So you know this is, in my opinion, an agenda that’s been long planned. And, basically, a march toward a technocratic totalitarian society.
And you can look back in lots of different writings about these kinds of plans and how the social engineering and cultural programming has taken place over the recent generations throughout the century.
In the twentieth century we’ve had just incredible examples of totalitarian takeovers. Right? And you could look at that these were all kind of experiments planning for this big one.
This is part of the UN agenda for the 21st century. And many other groups have talked about this. Obviously, the Great Reset in the World Economic Forum. They’re all the same thing.
It’s even printed on our money — a new order for the ages. Novus ordo seclorum is what’s on the dollar bill.
So this fake pandemic, or psychological operation of a pandemic, is specifically the way of generating enough fear to get people disoriented and in enough chaos that they agree to give up their freedoms in exchange for safety.
And this is the classic way, over and over again, that dictatorships have taken power. And so that’s exactly what you’re seeing and witnessing across the world right now — is the actual culmination of this plan that’s been going on.
Now, there’s only really one thing that you can do to stop this — both for yourself and for the rest of humanity. And is to simply say no.
You have to say no to everything. You have to say no to social distancing, masks, health questions, temperature guns. And, of course, most importantly, the jab and the passports.
And, in fact, the passports is really the turning point. Because once people are enrolled in this digital surveillance program, they will no longer be free or be able to be free.
And taking shortcuts or asking for permission, like asking for an exemption and things like that, is not saying no. And it essentially gives your approval for what is being done, not only by governments now, but by private businesses, employers and other agencies, in trying to coerce you to do things to your body.
Our bodies are our own property and no one else has the right to tell us or coerce us what to do with them. And so that would be my advice — is to learn how to say no, accept the consequences of that, and realize that it will work out well for you if you do this for the right reasons and have the right intention.
But there will be some short-term sacrifice and we need to be prepared for that. Because, if we’re not, then there’s going to be absolutely no freedom in the long term. And it will be much, much worse.
And anything that you think you’re risking and giving up now, you’re not going to have that in a few years anyway. You’re not going to have your same career and job, or ability to go on vacation and enjoy your family, and have luxury items or any of those things. Those things are all going to go away.
Now is the time that we have to say no and take some risks in order to stop the culmination of this plan.
With a silent nod by government, the mainstream media is now reporting that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has approved the Pfizer COVID19 injection. This message is part of a new phase to spark more mandates in order to participate in society.
However, there is no official approval by the FDA, or any other agency, for use of any COVID19 vaccine.
No rubber stamp. No assurance. No joke.
The COVID19 vaccine has NOT been approved, only BioNTech’s COMIRNATY shot, which requires years of additional safety studies through 2025.
FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA.
Is that COMIRNATY or CRIMINALITY?
Vague By Design
Under the law, government legitimizes the media to spread propaganda.
Propagandize – promote or publicize a particular cause, organization, or view, especially in a biased or misleading way.
HR-5736, The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 allows government to prepare and disseminate misleading information through film, video, and other materials to influence a domestic audience. This law previously applied abroad, to foreign audiences, as part of a media war machine.
If you read carefully, there is truth within all lies.. For there you will find that in this “FDA approval,” no authority is presenting any assurance that this change impacts safety or effectiveness of this experimental injection.
8 The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.
While much of the world believes in the lie that the Pfizer mRNA injections are now FDA-approved, when they are not, governments are coercing companies to mandate the injections to their employees, or face heavy fines. Whether something is approved, or not, does not equate to a mandate. Mandates continue to be illegal under the law. If you accept a mandate, you are volunteering for that order through your consent.
But what does “illegal” mean in a lawless society? – Larry H. DDS
Six Feet Under
Why does masking and social distancing at 6 feet remain in effect? Where does the number ‘6 ft’ come from?
Six feet under refers to the depth of a grave, but pay no attention to details.
With the false stamp of approval for an experimental injection, the propaganda has shifted to “get the jab or lose your job.” This mantra first began in the medical healthcare setting with employees who have been coerced to take the annual flu vaccine or lose their job. Even with evidence that repeated flu shots are less effective.
Normalizing medical tyranny in the healthcare system was published in a 2009 study titled, Mandatory Vaccination of Healthcare Workers, Whose Rights Should Come First? Using fear of the H1N1 flu virus, hospitals began coercing its frontline staff to get the annual jab to increase vaccination rates. At the same time, the World Health Organization issued dire predictions of a pandemic that could cause fatalities throughout the world.
Federal government officials will not force people to get the COVID injection. That is not the role of government. They do, however, strongly encourage your employer, the restaurant where you want to eat, the concert venue you want to visit, or the country where you want to travel, to do it for them, with mobile vaccination units coming to restaurants.
News headlines send the message that there are now two classes of people: Approved and Unvaccinated.
Past government mandates did nothing but empower officials. So why are people still listening to government officials? Want to stay home to work? Not allowed. Rather wear a mask, social distance, and get tested instead of getting the shot? Not allowed. Want to use a religious or medical exemption letter to decline a shot? It may not be accepted. Read between the lines.
Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.
We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021
Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022
Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023
Study Completion: June 30, 2025
Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025
5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.
Agenda: PLANDEMIC
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean and professor of law at the UC Berkeley School of Law is a social engineer and top propagandist. He is often quoted in the media to promote the official agenda. In 2015, Chemerinsky called for all children to be vaccinated for measles unless there is a medical reason for not doing so. Today, he suggests that “freedom does not include the right to endanger others, and COVID vaccines should be mandatory.”
Not widely reported, nine states have enacted 11 laws with bans on vaccine mandates (Arizona and Arkansas have each enacted two), and vaccine passports. However, some of these laws are tied only to vaccinations that have emergency use authorization (EUA), so the prohibition will no longer apply once all vaccines get “full approval” from the FDA. Also these laws apply to state and local governments only, so employers and private schools can still pass mandates.
Each of these devices that are injection have the capacity to also have a small chip. What that chip does is it has the unique serial number for each dose.”..the RFID chip gives “officials information on who has and has not been vaccinated” and “tracks the location of the patient so that officials can know where the vaccinated officials are. – Jay Walker, then-CEO of ApiJect Systems America Inc., December 19, 2020.
Know Your Limits
With the mass contradictions and outright lies being spread faster than you can say “virus,” there is a simple solution.
Know who you are.
Are you a slave to the system or do you have freedom of choice?
Know where you live.
Do you live at an address or do you live in your body?
Know your limits.
You can always reserve your rights, and freedom to choose, with or without mandates. You Are Law offers a template letter of Conditional Acceptance. There is also this Letter of Declination, written by an RN called Agent J. to make your own. Read it. Know it. Use it if you like. Also know that under lawless governments, it may not work. So you will need to know when and where to stand your ground and draw your line in the sand.
Statement of Declination for Offer of Influenza Vaccine Product
I, YOUR NAME, a living woman/man retain and reserve all of my God-given rights including sole possession and sole use of all my biological materials which are granted to me by my Creator.
My employer and location of employment have offered an influenza vaccination product to me pursuant to and satisfying the requirements of YOUR STATE Health & Safety Code COPY AND PASTE INFLUENZA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE HERE.
I retain the right to decline all attempts to access, influence and or otherwise alter any and all of my God- given biological material and or biological systems which are unique, flawless and original design and craftsmanship of my Creator and of which my Creator has granted me sole possession, proprietorship and use of.
I require that any and all product offered to me by my employer or workplace be both entirely retrievable from and also removable in its entirety from my body, person, and womanhood at the conclusion of each and every work period and or work shift and also and again at the completion of my contractual obligations with my location or employment, and or employer.
Pursuant to my above statement, I decline the offer for influenza vaccination product.
In the video below, Ted Kuntz, president of Vaccine Choice Canada, has a powerful conversation with Dr. David Martin regarding Canadian involvement in the development of the highly-toxic “covid vaccines”. Dr. Martin adds to information he has previously shared in other interviews, revealing additional details about this global criminal conspiracy, treason and “willful act of crimes against humanity” by public officials. Transcript highlights are provided below the video.
Video is available at Vaccine Choice Canada Rumble and BitChute channels.
Transcript Highlights prepared by Truth Comes to Light
David Martin
In 1998 we did the first ever audit of the patent systems of the United States. of Canada. of Australia, of the European Union and elsewhere. And what we found, quite tragically, is that an enormous number of crimes were being committed using the patent system to, in fact, stand in the way of progress — not to advance the innovation useful arts for which they were established.
And, specifically, in 1999 we uncovered what became the roots of our awareness of the current pandemic that we’ve been exposed to. In 1999 we uncovered the biological and chemical weapons patents that were proliferating around the country and around the world.
And in 1999, going into 2000, we first reported on the weaponization of biologic materials in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties. And among those weaponizations was in our first published report, for a number of intelligence and law enforcement community, our identification of the chimeric alteration and recombinant technologies around coronavirus — which in 1999 were first developed to serve as a means by which we could build a vaccine vector, at the time thought to be useful for the treatment or prevention of HIV.
The problem with that work was it very specifically, beginning in 1999 with NIAID’s funding, directed by Anthony Fauci. It was very clear that what they had done, in their gain-of-function research in 1999, was take what was a normally occurring pathogen and turn it into what was then referred to as an ‘infectious non-transmissible pathogen”. In other words, they actually made it more dangerous to the human. And they made it more dangerous so that it could be used as a potential for vaccine vectors going forward. And that was in 1999…
…
This particular injection that we’re dealing with right now — this particular injection is an mRNA model, computer generated, not derived from a living or an organic material — this is a computer simulation of an mRNA strand which was thought to be a means by which we could turn the human body into a pathogen creator.
By that I mean the formation of the coronavirus-associated spike protein. And for the first time in vaccine history — and once again, I’m using that term because it’s what we’re calling it — and it is not, in fact, a vaccine. It’s a gene therapy to create a bioweapon. But for the first time in vaccine history, we are relying on the immune system to respond to a pathogen creation that we first inject into people.
So, the fact of the matter is, we have an unprecedented outcome. And if we go back and look at the patent record, if we go back and look at the laboratory record, and if we go back and look at the funding record, we see that the current pathogen called SARS-CoV-2 was clearly chimerically altered and was clearly chimerically developed in the laboratory so that it can be used both as a weapon and as a medical countermeasure in 2015.
University North Carolina at Chapel Hill — and we reported on this quite significantly — funded by NIAID, developed and violated the International Convention on Biological and Chemical Weapons — by taking a foreign uploaded model of SARS-CoV-2, and turning it into a recombinant, chimeric pathogen — which they said, and I quote, “was poised for human emergence”. And poised for human emergence not in 2019 as we’ve been told by the propaganda — but that publication was published in February of 2016. Published from work that was done from 2013 to 2015.
There is no novel coronavirus. There is a weaponized version of a computer simulation of a fragment that is, in fact, modelled to be the spike protein analogous to what we’ve been told is the spike protein associated with SARS-CoV-2.
The problem is we do not have anything that is actually derived from an actual pathogen. And we do not have anything that’s actually responsive to the immune system that was, in fact, responsive to a pathogen.
This is a computer simulation meant to harm and destroy what we call humanity.
Ted Kuntz
You know, David, just listening to you — I mean nothing that you said is new — and yet to hear it again still shocks me. That we are at this place, at this time, globally killing humanity.
David Martin
Yes. And, according to Pfizer, we have what they refer to in their own documents as an “acceptable death rate”.
I don’t know how many of you can sit with that statement. But the notion that there is something called an “acceptable death rate” is something I find morally repugnant.
But I find, more interesting than that, Canada’s role in this — which has achieved almost no fundamental coverage in any media or even in the counter culture media. And most Canadians don’t realize that Canada itself — and not just Canada but specifically the University of British Columbia — beginning in 2005 realized that, if it was going to be relevant in the biotech space, it had to be the country and it had to be the research hot-bed for establishing the delivery mechanism whereby mRNA vaccines could be developed.
The University of British Columbia, working in partnership with the Inex Pharmaceuticals in 2005, developed the lipid nanoparticle technology that ultimately became the basis of the formation of a company in British Columbia called Tekmira Pharmaceuticals.
In 2009 Tekmira had a very interesting set of challenges. And this was commensurate with the 2008 declaration by the World Health Organization that the coronavirus was, in fact, irradicated as a condition associated with SARS.
And because of the lack of funding, in 2008 both Canada and the United States struggled with the fact that they had developed the technology that was supposed to be for a vaccination of coronavirus and for a number of other viral models. But the problem was they ran out of funding.
And so there was a series of reorganizations. And in those reorganizations, two companies were formed: Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals. Acuitas is the one that, unfortunately, the government of Canada has not told the citizens of Canada is the reason why both Moderna and Pfizer have the ability to deliver the current bioweapons program.
And I think most people would be shocked to find out that when you have the prime minister of Canada getting up in front of a camera in the spring of 2020 telling the world that the only way forward is to allegedly return to a new normal when there is a vaccine.
What Trudeau did not tell the public was that he had a financial stake in the outcome of that being the selected pathway forward.
What he didn’t tell the Canadian public was that Canada’s blight on the moral record of what has been historically an amazingly wonderful set of innovations coming out of the Canadian research institutions and research laboratories, in fact created the mechanism whereby you could take mRNA and inject it into a population and try to stabilize that injection.
The lipid nanoparticle technology that was developed, and ultimately passed to Arbutus, was the subject of a licensing agreement that was made with Acuitas Pharmaceuticals in British Columbia (private company) who conveniently had very little reporting requirements. And Acuitas misappropriated the lipid nanoparticle technology and ultimately made it available to both by BioNTech and Moderna.
It is absolutely critical for us to understand that without the Canadian contribution of the lipid nanoparticle technology from British Columbia we would have no meaningful response in the form of what’s being called a vaccination and we would not have a bioweapons program.
That’s a pretty important statement to make to an audience largely of Canadians. And it would be very interesting to find out why it is that Trudeau has not admitted to the public, and has been unwilling to actually put into the public record, the, what we know to be. at least billions of dollars of concessions. And it could be — I mean if we look at just Pfizer-BioNTech’s own situation — we know that in the case of Pfizer-BioNTech, that last quarter alone somewhere between eight and nine billion dollars came in the form of the revenue off of all of the interventions that are being sold off as as coronavirus vaccines.
In the last quarter alone, this would place this tiny little British Columbia company — which in 2009, people, was functionally owned by one person. I mean we need to kind of bear that in mind — one person actually owns this company. Thomas Madden who is the CEO of Acuitas –in 2009 he was largely the sole owner of it. He actually appropriated the technology in a labor dispute, which functionally was a trade secret argument around this.
And when we actually look at what happened in 2016 — and this is a very important point, people — in 2016 somebody in Canada knew that there was something going to happen with this particular vaccine platform. Because in 2016 Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals got into litigation on whether or not the license for the lipid nanoparticle technology that Acuitas had from Arbutus was, in fact, capable of being extended to other pathogens.
And in 2016 there was a significant amount of litigation and the license that Acuitas had to use lipid nanoparticle technology, developed by Tekmira, developed by Arbutus, the license was actually terminated in 2016. That coincides with the weaponization of SARS-CoV-2…
…There’s no public information to tell us what precisely transpired in 2016 — which allowed this particular dispute to erupt between these two Canadian firms, all based in the history of Tekmira. But somewhere in 2016 somebody knew that there was a lottery win to be had.
And my guess is that somewhere inside of the Canadian health system, and somewhere inside NIAID and the Vaccine Research Center, and somewhere inside the UNC Chapel Hill records, we will find that Trudeau government was fully aware by at least 2018 that we were going to have a significant pandemic requiring this core technology to be unleashed on the world — courtesy of the Canadian collaboration on lipid nanoparticles.
And there’s no question that by the time we get to 2019, March 19 specifically of 2019, we know that Arbutus, Moderna, Pfizer-BioNtech and others were, in fact, working on a vaccine for respiratory pathogen. And we know that information because they amended their patent filings to say exactly that.
Ted Kuntz
So let me just unpacked this a little bit, David.
Your revealing evidence here — that this technology has been in the works in Canadian University of British Columbia, supported by government of Canada, for a number of years now.
It was clear that there was a goldmine to be had here because there was a fight over it.
And when Trudeau announced in 2020 that we needed a vaccine to get back to normal, he didn’t say ‘Listen we’re part of the solution here. We’ve developed technology is gonna save the world.’ He didn’t talk about how great Canadian technology is.
I know you don’t like to speculate, but why would he not celebrate and announce that to the world?
David Martin
Well, I think it’s very clear that he has, for a significant period of time, become extremely compromised in the fact that he pretends, on the one hand, to be a victim of a public health crisis and, on the other hand, not unlike the governor of New York, the spokesperson for the alleged level-headed response of draconian lockdown and countermeasure approaches — which create the market demand that says that we’re going to remove civil liberties, we’re gonna remove the right for people to actually engage in any civil discourse. But, in fact, what we’re gonna do is pretend like we are somehow the victims of a natural set of events that have unfolded.
The fact of the matter is, he knows very good and well because he was party to — and the government certainly was party to agreements with Pfizer, with Moderna and with others — where there was no question that Canadian firms knew good and well that the lipid nanoparticle technology was actually a frontline contender for a respiratory pathogen simulation.
And, by no later than September of 2019, the Canadian government was fully aware and participating in what was supposed to be a global exercise to test the readiness of the world to deal with a respiratory pathogen pandemic that was planned and published in September of 2019.
And the Canadian government was very much a party of that. So there’s no chance that this was not fully known, fully anticipated, fully premeditated.
And there is no question that the script that Trudeau read from was a script that was in fact marketing what would become a federal restraint of trade violation in Canada — which was a very important restraint of trade.
By making the allegation, before we even knew what the actual pathogen was technically, what we know is: that Trudeau’s statements biased the market place against the consumer, so that there was, in fact, declared by the government a single pathway, a single market opportunity, out of this particular pandemic.
And by telling the world that the only way forward was a vaccine, what that did was, it actually precluded the use of life-saving countermeasures that were medicines that could have helped and could have supported the health of people.
And instead of that, we watched people die while we were waiting for an economic windfall. And that economic windfall is going to a private corporation whose accountability is not to a shareholder, is not anything that has public visibility. It has the private benefit of being a private British Columbia company they can be used as a front for all manner of things.
And it is, in fact, without question, participating in one of the greatest crimes in terms of racketeering and collusion that this world has ever seen.
Ted Kuntz
Well, David, that was the question in my head. What kind of crimes are these? I mean this is treason, amongst other things. This is criminal. This is homicide.
David Martin
Yeah, and it’s important for us to really focus in on this because most people have have heard me talk about the racketeering and antitrust laws that are violated. And both the U.S. and Canada have very robust antitrust laws.
The fact of the matter is there’s three fundamental elements of antitrust and all three are violated.
The first is that you cannot do what’s called market allocation. In other words, you cannot use either a public or a private institution where colluding parties get together and say we are going to tell the consumer what their only option is. That’s a market allocation violation of a racketeering thing.
You also cannot suppress information and coerce people into accepting a single scenario when the market forces are not at play. In other words, you cannot suspend from market consideration other alternatives — so that you pick the only winner in which, by the way, you’ve already placed bets on the table in the form of funding and you also have an economic gain.
And you can guarantee yourself that the Canadian government knows very good and well that it has huge economic gains to gain from the use of the lipid nanoparticle technology. And it had everything to lose if the lipid nanoparticle technology didn’t win.
So we know that the collusion was there. We know that the racketeering was there. We also know that there was insider information, non-transparent transactions from what’s called interlocking directorates — where individuals who have the ability to set prices, to allocate research dollars and to ultimately set acquisition policy to take that technology on board — is in fact by very definition the racketeering that is anti-competitive, antitrust.
Now why is this important? It’s important because these are all felony violations. And what makes a felony violation far more important than a civil crime, is that a felony violation actually pierces the veil of corporate liability.
And this is a very important point, people need to understand. The reason why I’m so obsessed with going after felonies, and not going after civil cases, is because the felony violation of antitrust laws which is prima facie established in this pandemic, would, in fact, mean that the manufacturers would not have the protections provided here in the United States under the 1986 Act, under the PREP Act and, in Canada, under those acts equivalents.
In other words, no corporation gets civil liability immunity if they are complicit in a felony crime.
And once we establish that that is, in fact, the case –which by the way does not require legal expertise — this is a prima facie case, meaning the facts present themselves — there is no question that this was an act of racketeering and collusion.
There is no question that this is an act of willful manipulation of market forces in violation of statutes both sides of the border. And the fact of the matter is, the minute this becomes felony violation, all of the liability flows back. Civil and criminal liability flows back to the manufacturer.
And I can guarantee that the day Pfizer and Moderna have to be on the hook for the lives they’re harming and the lives that they’re taking — there is no question that the entire terror campaign would shut down the next day…
…
The civil society of the world has been duped to believe that we should be arguing about face masks and social distancing, whether businesses stay open or not. We have been duped into having a conversation that is the wrong conversation.
There is a crime that is being committed. Our public officials are complicit in that crime. And there is no question, as a civilization, we owe it to ourselves and future generations to make sure that we are not silent while those who are in positions of elected authority are committing willful acts of crimes against humanity.
Ted Kuntz
With this information should there not be a criminal investigation starting this minute?
David Martin
There absolutely should be. Here in the United States we have the unfortunate reality of not having the benefits of some of what you guys have in Crown law. But the fact of the matter is, in Canada as well as the rest of the Commonwealth, you actually have a mechanism where you can allege and actually initiate criminal proceedings without relying on the Justice Department we have in the U.S.
We know that our DOJ here in the United States is entirely corrupt. We know that they have been willfully incapable of prosecuting any of the known crimes — which by the way, include here in the United States. One of the one of the best known crimes, that apparently we can now get away with, which is lying to Congress.
As most of you now Anthony Fauci has now on two documented occasions actually lied to Congress — which is a violation of…Section 1001 of the Criminal Statute. But lying to Congress is something that Fauci started doing in the fall of 2020 when he willfully failed to disclose the financial interests that NIAID had in a number of the technologies that were being promoted in this particular pandemic, failed to disclose NIAID and NIH’s financial interest in a request that was made by Congress.
In a report submitted to Congress, Anthony Fauci lied about his financial position which is, in fact, a felony…
…
We know that there are countless crimes which are felony violations on both sides of the border.
And we know that it will not be until the public forces this into action that any action will be taken…
…
There is no question that your prime minister has violated, not only the laws of Canada, but has participated in a bioweapons treaty violation.
And let me be very precise on why I say that, because when I make an allegation it has to stick. And the allegation comes from the definition of a bioweapons program.
Inside the definition of biological and chemical weapons, the manufacture or the ability to provide the means by which you manufacture a biological weapon, defined under the statute as a fragment or a modeled fragment of a pathogen known to cause human harm.
The fact that it is Canadian-company technology that is required to deliver this particular weapon means that the government of Canada is complicit in violating biological and chemical weapons laws. And that falls to the prime minister. So when I make the allegation I’m dead serious about it…
Ted Kuntz
…The impact of this, the consequence of this, is so significant. It needs to be heard. It needs to be broadcast from coast to coast.
We need to recognize what we’re facing. And we’re facing the active crimes against humanity as we speak…
David Martin
…I am unwilling to be silent because I know that I actually have information, and I have compiled information.
And the bad news for people like Trudeau is, if you think that this is the only piece of information I have on things that he’s been involved in, that’s the tip of the iceberg.
The fact of the matter is, I’m very comfortable making public allegations against public seated people in authority because I happen to know that this is not one situation, this is not isolated. This is the beginning of a contest and I would be more than delighted to find out how deep they want to go head-to-head with me on what I know about their actions…
…
In 2014 the veterinarian Peter Daszak, who ran EcoHealth Alliance, the company that has been criticized for its role in laundering NIAID funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But it’s important for you to all realize that in 2014 Peter Daszak specifically said at a public meeting, ‘We need the public to accept a medical countermeasure for pan coronavirus vaccine.’ And I’m quoting from him. ‘We need the media to create the hype and we need to use the hype to our advantage. Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of a process.’
Those are the published words of the guy who was the Wuhan Institute of Virology SARS-CoV-2 architect…
…
And if we, in fact, have the perpetrators of this crime telling us that they are going to do the crime, why are we left sitting at a gate in 2020 or 2021 going ‘Oh, man that just sounds like a conspiracy’.
Well, it sounds like a conspiracy because it is a criminal conspiracy. It is a racketeering conspiracy meant to harm and destroy human life…
Ted Kuntz
David, could you connect some dots for us? Why is this injection so important to their agenda? What piece does it play in the larger agenda?
David Martin
Well, once again, let’s go back and visit that statements made by Peter Daszak.
As you all know we had a period of time where the idea of a vaccine became quite popular among a certain ilk within the established public health community.
We know that, beginning with the 1986 Act, there was a means by which pharmaceutical companies were very interested in sheltering themselves from liability because they knew they were entering a phase where the increased danger of their actions was going to ultimately mean that business was not viable.
If you know you’re going to harm a population, you need to make sure that you do the groundwork to make sure, from a litigation standpoint, you move yourself as far away from prosecution as possible.
We know that, beginning in 1986, there was a commitment on the part of the people who bought Congress, bought elected officials in the U.S., in Canada and around Europe — and in 1986 there was a willful act to take what was supposedly a loss-leading public health product, like vaccines, and turn it into a money-maker.
And it turns out, it’s a great idea to do that. Because if what you’re going to do is ultimately trying to sell people on a whole host of other pharmaceuticals, it is exceptionally good to build the autoimmune disease pattern which builds habituation to classic pharmaceutical intervention. That began in 1986.
And as we moved into the 1990s, it became very clear that the HIV campaign, which was supposed to be the giant payday — where we had the ability to somehow finally get everybody to be afraid of the pathogen — didn’t pay off very well because it was classified as a lifestyle-oriented disease. And then what we had in the mid 1990s was the birth of the obsession about what was called a universal influenza vaccine.
The desire on the part of industry was to make sure that every person would get addicted to taking the influenza shot every year. It’s a great money maker. It’s a wonderful way for the industry to keep jabbing people on an annual basis.
And the problem with that is, as we all know, the influenza vaccine was far less effective than people hoped it would be. And the public, not surprisingly, wasn’t willing to fall for it — which led to a series of meetings which took place at the NIAID advisory council, together with international partners, to come up with a way to build a mechanism whereby we could convince the world that we needed to have a universal vaccine program for the world.
The World Health Organization, NIAID, the Vaccine Research Center, and their international collaborators got together and said, basically what we need is — we need to have an event which allows a mass campaign of terror to be unleashed, so that the public accepts something.
And so they went down the pathway of a universal influenza and a universal coronavirus vaccine.
Tragically, there is, in fact, no evidence that either of the pathogens was isolated. There was no evidence that we had a basis to create this mass campaign of terror. And, even in what was reportedly a pandemic, we actually didn’t have people getting sick from the pathogen.
One of the reasons why the World Health Organization made it abundantly clear that “covid” could be declared with no laboratory evidence is because, if in fact there was a requirement for laboratory evidence, we would actually have to test for a virus.
But you didn’t have to to have Covid-19. You had to have a series of clinical symptoms.
Ironically, what we have now is a situation where we are, in fact, injecting people — and this is where we need to get very clear on this and remember, people, if you don’t hear anything else, remember the word vaccine is misleading.
What is happening is the mRNA computer simulation of an S1 spike protein, thought to be modeled off of the possible SAR-Cov-2 — and so you got all of those preconditions.
This is not a virus. This is not to disrupt a virus. This is actually an injection to make your body produce a foreign pathogen. That’s what this injection is…
…
Every single public statement that says that this is a covid vaccine is a lie…
…
We do not have an injection that is, in fact, associated with the actual pathogen model that is called SARS-CoV-2. And, as a result, we must call it what it is — a foreign-supplied computer model, delivered to the world from China at some point in the early hours of 2020, sometime between January 7 and January 20.
It is a computer model of a simulated pathogen which was simulated from sample populations of as many as 40 people prior to the 30th of December. That model that was uploaded to servers around the world was then used to identify a computer model of what might be the mRNA strand that would code the spike protein…
…
Our elected officials have willfully coerced the population, using acts of domestic terror…
Ted Kuntz
What can we do now? What’s the most important thing we ought to be focusing our energy and our attention on now?
David Martin
Well, as a Commonwealth country, what I would say is that you need to reexamine your statutory basis of action and make sure that your members of parliament are inundated with the information that we’re sharing right now.
Complicity with allowing government-committed crime in Canada is something that must, must be done immediately. And if you are living north of the U.S./Canada border, you know, your member of parliament must be informed that there is an active racketeering and criminal conspiracy that is actively harming the public and it is using the resources, the wealth, and the innovation of Canada to violate international and domestic bioweapons and bioterrorism statutes.
So, the first thing is to make sure that people hear this message.
The second thing is to hold them accountable…
…
The crimes that are being committed are racketeering, bioweapons and, in fact, at least reckless homicide, if not willful murder of massive members of our population. And we cannot sit idly by and allow that to persist…
…
It actually is human to stand with the truth. And I am delighted to stand, not only with the certainty of what I know, but I’m delighted that we have the thousands of people who are participating in this conversation — who are ultimately going to now have a firm foundation upon which they can stand to make sure that they have the ability to have the candle of truth against the torrent of the darkness of those who wish to destroy us.
Parasites, like any life form, have a purpose. They are there to clean up the mess, the toxins that accumulate over time. Chemicals and metals in food, air, and water are chief among the garbage heap that draw parasites. However, there is also the 4G and 5G frequency exposures which intensify our parasites, yeast, and our smallest inhabitants.
Like all life, parasites appear when the environment favors their presence.
In the body, parasites favor an acidic pH tissue state of < 6.4 pH. By their activity of living, multiplying, and dying off, your body’s cells and tissues can drop as low as 3-4 pH, and you can lose your ability to exchange oxygen efficiently. The body becomes an open door to more pathogenic microbes, yeast, mold, and fungus. Cancer cells thrive. Cancer is simply a word for cells that grow out of control; growth for the sake of growth is similar to sprawl. When it comes to pathogens, people can have parasites without cancer but cannot have cancer without parasites. Cancer reflects parasites.
There are many reasons for the continued uptick in humans of parasites, yeast, fungus, mycoplasma, Lyme disease, and its multiple co-infections. Physical parasites reflect emotional or energetic parasites. Do people alway ask you for things? Do they unload their problems on you and leave? Are people around you agitated, irritated, detached? Do you feel bothered?
Do you make it a habit to drink alcohol or spirits, or abuse drugs? Alcohol and drugs create holes in the aura of the energy body. These holes act like portals, or open doors, to attract parasitic relationships. Auric attachments impede the body’s energy flow and ability to clear itself physically.
In the physical body, Lyme is a parasitic disease affecting over 400,000 people each year, twelve times more than the 35,000 annual cases that the CDC reports. Because Lyme is “The Great Imitator,” and shares symptoms with other disease labels, it is often misdiagnosed.
sweet cravings, constantly hungry, increase or loss of appetite
Energy, Wellbeing
tired, fatigue, exhaustion, mood swings, depression, muscle/join pain, body aches
Skin
skin rashes, eczema, hives, rosacea
Sleep
poor sleep, insomnia, nightmares, night sweats, teeth grinding in sleep, anus itching at night
Genitals
itching around genitals, infections
Overall health
unexplained weight loss or gain, nutritional deficiencies, dehydration, fever
Misdiagnosed
In 2006, a group of Spanish scientists in Salamanca, Spain, conducted a study that followed the lifecycle of the Wolbachia bacteria that lives inside the Dirofilaria immitis worm and they obtained 80 blood serum samples of human patients who were diagnosed with pulmonary dirofilariosis. Dirofilaria immitis is the scientific name for a heart worm that infects the heart and lungs of its hosts, transmitted by a mosquito bite. Type “Dirofilaria” into YouTube and you will see videos of people who have worms inside their eyes. A search of the Pubmed database turns up 36 papers describing Dirofilaria in humans. Six of the studies are canine-human studies and thirty relate to humans. Ascaris Lumbrico is another parasitic species.
There are hundreds of large parasites that can easily enter the human body, take up residence and cause a variety of life-threatening diseases. Dirofilaria is a roundworm, otherwise known as a nematode, and there are millions of species. Adult worms can lay eggs every three and a half days and the eggs are microscopic. Eggs that hatch inside the human body become larvae that are also microscopic. Either of these forms can move through bloodstream and become embedded anywhere.
Medical doctors misdiagnose fatty tumors in the lung and other areas of the body as cancer. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), if genetic testing were done, doctors would find worms.
Removing fatty tumors will not prevent these tumors from returning, unless you address the underlying cause. Cancer is not a big question mark without a solution. If investigated properly, a systemic infection of parasites and worms may be found. If you are concerned about a recent insect bite or a developing rash, you can request an analysis for Lyme from Ticlab.org.
Mycoplasma is a genus of parasitic bacteria that lacks a cell wall around its cell membranes. This characteristic makes them naturally resistant to antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis. Though rarely investigated by doctors, Mycoplasma pneumonia is most often seen in children and youth under age 40. It lives in the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract and air sacs around the heart.
The growing number of people living with parasites is not only a consequence of misdiagnosis, but also reflects the myriad ways humans modify their environment, including the addition of new frequencies. There is also evidence that some of these resistant bugs are created in labs where scientists conduct secret bioweapon experiments. But they wouldn’t do that, would they?
With recombinant DNA insertion experiments now widely reported, it is not hard to find the trail that leads to a manufactured flu-like pandemic. In 2017, when the Federal government lifted a ban on making pathogens more deadly, Frankenstein’s door swung wide open to unleash man-made parasites on a large scale. The release of this information was not in the form of a public warning. Such a disclosure is meant to be a form of ‘informed consent,’ even if no one sees it. We have informed you. Do you consent?
I personally suspect that the exposure to electromagnetic fields in the home and the microwaves from cell phone radiation are driving the virulence of many of the microbes that are naturally in us, and makes them aggressive and illness producing. Shielding patients from EMFs has been a more successful strategy to treating Lyme disease and to get people neurologically well than any of the antibiotics or any of the antimicrobial compounds. ~Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD
By connecting these dots for yourself, you can begin to see the full picture of how biowarfare includes multiple avenues; both in the manipulation of patented microbial genomes, and in the use of electromagnetic frequency technology. The layering of 4G and 5G microwaves is a human experiment since 60 GHz frequencies interferes with both water and oxygen molecules to create a hypoxic state in living organisms. Equally egregious are the Biotech companies given large grants from governments, authorized to develop the vaccines against the patented viruses, without any accountability or liability for their products.
How we interact with our surroundings determines whether we adapt and survive or not. Outer terrain reflects inner terrain.
Terrain Theory
As part of nature, our disease state reflects a relationship with our microbes and our tissue states. Claude Bernard, a rival of Louis Pasteur and his Germ Theory, understood that germs do not invade to cause disease, but rather the germ is a product of the condition of the terrain or tissue state, created within a cell. A virus is not an organism because it requires the components of a cell to survive. Once it leaves the cell it does.
In 1870, Bernards’s colleague, Antoine Bechamp, observed that when conditions of pH, nutritional status, and toxicity shifted, so did the microbes. Bacteria shape-shifted to diverse stages of itself without losing its essence as it worked to adapt with its surroundings. The scene playing out was not one of divide and conquer but rather of one for all and all for one.
Dr. Enderlein later described this shape-shifter as the “endobiont,” as the basis of all life, working in tandem with the body’s terrain in peaceful coexistence.
As the endobiont evolves to a higher valence state, from bacterial to fungal and parasitic, its waste products poison body fluids and produce a new stage of disease. Parasites go unnoticed until they begin to cause digestive distress, fatigue, chronic diarrhea or constipation, blood pressure issues, and many other common symptoms, including but not limited to tumors. Unfortunately, these symptoms are usually attributed to other causes.
The disease process is not linear but multidimensional and electrodynamic with the whole system moving in harmonic resonance based on the unique patterns of each individual, always in an effort to achieve homeostasis, as reflected in Nature. In his book Holographic Blood, Harvey Bigelsen MD, writes, “Disease is a living process.”
CANcer Is Also CANdida
As a continuum of symptoms, acute disease is expressed as bacterial or viral, whereas chronic disease is fungal. Ultimately, cancer is a fungal adaptation. CANcer equals CANdida, both yeast and fungus. Once the body has exhausted all internal resources and begins to lose ground, the endobiont, as a fungus, begins the recycling process to gradually consume the organism.
Recently, many people have turned to the anti-parasitic drug Ivermectin with good results. Now scientists are saying Ivermectin can work on the symptoms of COVID for less than $1 a day. Does that mean that people with COVID have parasites? Is all that is needed a return to a healthy balance of our microbes? A stronger immune system?
This is the universal story of life, adaptation, death and rebirth. If healing is to occur, intervention on all levels, is necessary. When balance returns to the terrain, the endobiont reverts back to its natural state. Bechamp called this process pleiomorphism, an understanding of how the one aspect, or one microbe, reflects The Whole.
Our microbes are in flux based on conditions of dysbiosis that we create through our emotional health. We invited them to live with us through our own ignorance. Parasites R Us. All disease begins when physical and emotional landscapes clash with our ability to balance terrain. So we should ask what makes each of us susceptible to parasites at this time, more so than any other time?
Harmony in Nature
Why is all of this information hidden from the public? Modern medicine is mostly an allopathic for-profit system. Allopathic physicians use drugs and surgery to combat disease using codes billed by insurance companies. If there is a worm causing a blockage in a blood vessel, would a doctor want to prescribe an antiparasitic drug, or perform a profitable surgery?”
Meanwhile, Nature advertises two strong herbs that kill nematodes. The most famous one is Thyme, a culinary herb. Thyme also kills hook-worms, roundworms, threadworms, skin parasites. and several types of harmful bacteria. Another herb is Neem, derived from the leaves of Neem trees that are native to India and Pakistan. When the worm population in the human body overwhelms the immune system, it is known as a hyperinfection. At this stage, it is difficult to kill the worms with herbs. Frequency machines, used by natural health practitioners, can neutralize specific pathogens by their frequencies.
Friendly technology exists. We only have to look to Nature for the answers. What happens on the outside reflects what happens on the inside. Our relationships, whether harmonious or chaotic, all mirror the relationship we cultivate within ourselves. Our interactions create rhythmic waves of emotions that ripple out. The individual reflects the whole, as illustrated in Nature.
A parasitic relationship is a snapshot of emotional health. Parasites show up in life when we choose to give up our power to narcissists. When we allow others, including government officials, to tell us who we are, and what we need, we are challenged to either reclaim our bodies, or adapt and conform to the suckers that will feed off of us at our expense. Do we choose to play victim or do we choose harmony?
The Germ Theory that underlies conventional medicine describes the body as victim to an invisible germ. Yet, rarely are medical tests done to identify which germs are the cause of symptoms. Is it because, when it comes to viruses, we each create them within our own cells?
We have allowed only those qualified by a medical license to identify the “germ” and to ‘call the shots’ as the solution. This ideology loses credibility under the weight of false information. For instance, in 2014, the Council on Foreign Relations released a report finding that the highest vaccinated populations are also those with the greatest number of outbreaks for the same infectious diseases. The US, Canada, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, and Japan—each with the highest number of mandated vaccines—led the list of nations.
The Office of Medical and Scientific Justice, in Sweden, analyzed the report, and suggested the theory of herd immunity is flawed and offered several possibilities to explain the report: 1) vaccines are increasingly becoming ineffective and causing “immune dysfunction,” and 2) “vaccine antigen responses” may be reprogramming viruses while weakening the immune systems of the most vaccinated individuals.
Humans are 10:1 microbial cells to human cells. Just as humans perceive an attack on their biology, so too, do our microbes. As a defense mechanism against frequencies and drugs, they release biotoxins, which ultimately drives inflammation in the human body and worsens chronic infections of bacteria, fungus, yeast, and parasites.
When we choose to kill off our microbes with long-term antibiotics, we kill our smallest inhabitants, our endobionts. We kill off ourselves. Antibiotic = antilife. Our choices cause our endobionts to shift into more pathogenic forms – into Superbugs not recognized by antibiotics. The endobiont doesn’t die. It adapts to its changing environment. In the same manner, humans do the same.
In this world, nothing dies without being reborn. Everything adapts.
No-Fear Approach To Thwart Parasites
There is no need to fear parasites, germs, or death. We only need to realize our true Nature, which is always changing in relation to our surroundings. In order to bring balance back to the body, individual countries, and the collective Whole of Humanity, we only need to see ourselves as part of a symbiotic Whole.
There is no single remedy and no single method to healing. The Lyme spirochete is able to survive a 28-day course of antibiotics when treatment is begun four months after infection. So, the best approach is a multi-faceted approach: 1) support the immune system, 2) reduce inflammation, 3) detoxify, 4) prevent co-infections, 5) use adaptogenic herbs, and 6) rest and nourish the body.
By seeking natural herbs such as Japanese knotweed, medicinal mushrooms, homeopathic remedies, sometimes in combination with conventional drugs used at the outset of infection, you can stop the progression of Lyme and reset the body’s self-healing system to reverse the conditions in which parasites thrive. You simply have to understand the parasite’s needs and wants as you would your own.
We create our terrain from the inside-out. Healing is an inside-out job. Most medical treatments are outside-in procedures. Parasites show us what is happening within our bodies and our minds. They teach us to identify and work with underlying emotions. They show us what we have allowed to invade our thoughts and feed off our bodies. Our choices, each moment, determine health or disease, as shown by the endobiont, which adapts with us.
We heal all relationships when we heal ourselves first. When we exchange emotions of fear and emptiness with those of love and wholeness, we achieve harmony. When we let go of people and things that no longer serve us, in favor of those that do, we are complete and whole. Only then do we reclaim our power and come into a state of harmony and balance with our bugs.
by Richard Hugus, End Massachusetts Medical Mandates
August 11, 2021
WHEN: Saturday August 28, 2021, 12 noon to 2 PM, rain or shine
WHERE: Hyannis, MA, 300 block of Main Street near village green and statue of Iyanough (parking on North St. behind Main St. stores).
July 24, Hyannis
It is time to recognize that mandates for quarantine, “social distancing”, face covering, and the engineered gene injections being called “vaccines” are not about protecting public health. Public health is actually being harmed by these measures. So what is really going on? One view is that our government has been so corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry that government itself is pushing people to take pharmaceutical products even when these products have proven to be unsafe. There are precedents for this with the MMR, DPT, HPV, flu and other vaccines. Overall, vaccines have harmed, not helped, the human immune system. They have degraded the health of our society to such an extent that almost half of the children in the US today have some form of chronic illness — all for the sake of pharmaceutical company profits.
But a wider agenda is also apparent. That agenda is totalitarian social control implemented through the invention of a worldwide pandemic “emergency” which would inspire enough fear in people to make them give up their rights, separate them from others, separate them from their own instincts, and even from their spirituality. This war of the globalists against all of humanity has been cynically named “the great reset.”
Klaus Schwab,, founder of the World Economic Forum and author of The Great Reset. (Does it look like Mr. Schwab has a happy future in mind for us?)
Wars are fought for economic, not moral, reasons. This war is no different. Huge amounts of money have been transferred to the wealthy as a result of attacks on small business and the middle class and the further impoverishment of the poor. The wealthy want money and control of resources, as always. They don’t care if people are dying. In fact, for eugenicists like Bill Gates and other globalists who think they know best what is good for the world, depopulation is a desired goal. This may be why the authorities don’t seem to care about long-term effects of the covid injections, or about harm to reproductive organs and miscarriages that are already happening. Against all reason, pregnant women are being encouraged to get the shot. So are children. In the face of such criminality, there is nothing left for us to do but protect ourselves from our government. Whether it is working for big pharma or the globalists, we know for sure government isn’t working for us.
According to the latest data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), “between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 30, 2021, a total of 545,338 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,366 deaths. There were 70,105 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period.” VAERS is known to capture only a small percentage of adverse events, as they are greatly under-reported. And the CDC, representing the pharmaceutical industry (not us), has no interest in finding out or publicizing accurate numbers, or in following up on reports. So we can assume there have been many more deaths and injuries than cited above. There is already enough evidence that the CDC is committing a crime just allowing covid injections to continue, much less promoting them.
The purpose of standing out August 28 will be to do what we can to save more people from being harmed. The mass injection program needs to be stopped now. We must also stand up for children who may be forced to wear masks in the upcoming school year. Masks don’t protect anyone; their purpose is to condition us to accept medical tyranny and perhaps an eventual social credit score system, starting with “vaccine passports.” Using children as pawns to achieve this goal is frankly evil. We need to expose the perpetrators of this crime against humanity and see to it that they are prosecuted. If we don’t, the oppression will only continue.
This call is for a peaceful, non-partisan protest following up on our many previous demonstrations. Bring large-letter signs or banners with your message.
We stand for:
— the right to remain human — i.e., not to be genetically modified or made “transhuman.” The openly declared transhumanist agenda of the Great Reset and its plan for “a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity” is absolutely insane.
— the right to live. These injections are killing people. We obviously have the right to reject them for ourselves and our children
— the right to the pursuit of happiness. Happiness will not be achievable if we have lost our health to medically induced chronic disease.
— our right to refuse medical interventions. No to the de facto vaccine mandate by which the state of Massachusetts and the federal government encourages employers, colleges, and businesses to require vaccination. certificates (or torture us with testing). No to explicit vaccine mandates likely to follow the corrupt FDA’s approval of the spike protein clot shots.
— ending mask requirements on public transportation, in healthcare facilities, and especially in schools. Forcing children to wear masks is child abuse.
— the right to bodily autonomy. No one should be forced to take a vaccine, wear a mask, be swabbed, tested, or scanned
— the Nuremberg code and the right to informed consent. No substance should be injected into anyone’s body without their full understanding of all possible harmful effects (which are as yet unknown with experimental mRNA injections). There should be no negative consequences should we refuse a medical intervention.
— parental rights. The state has no right to bypass parents’ authority on whether their minor child should wear a mask, be tested, or be given any pharmaceutical product.
— the right to education. Education at K-12 schools, universities, and colleges should not be withheld as leverage to enforce government medical decrees.
— the right to freedom of movement. This right is violated when any kind of travel requires masking, testing, or proof of vaccination.
— “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” (4th Amendment). This is our right to privacy . Our vaccine status and medical history is no one’s business.
— the right to due process: Open meeting laws continue to be illegally suspended in Massachusetts “due to coronavirus” and our elected officials seem to like it that way. Virtual meetings undermine democracy. Government-sponsored medical procedures without informed consent, and government edicts bypassing the legislative process are also a violation of the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments.
— the 1st Amendment freedom of speech and press. End the blatant Soviet-style government-media censorship of people with dissenting views about the covid narrative
— the right to equal protection of our civil and Constitutional rights. Refusal of service by any transport company, public venue, ticket vendor, grocery store, or other business on the basis of arbitrary “vaccine passports” is a form of discrimination which we should be protected from under the law. Loss of this right amounts to coercion through medical tyranny and will lay the groundwork for a “social credit score” system in which all citizens do not have equal rights.
Have you been vaccinated against COVID but afraid of vaccine failure? Do you wear a mask, or two, for added protection? Do you fear being around others? Feeling pressured to get the jab to keep your job? Have you tested positive for COVID post-vaccination? Do you fear the virus is mutating into a Totalitarian dictatorship?
Everyday there is a new story, “news-story,” designed to cause confusion and fear. Confusion equals control. FEAR equals ‘false information appearing real.’
The rule is now simple: get vaccinated or wear a mask until you do. – President Biden
The answer? Know bad advice campaigns when you see them.
Bad Advice Campaigns
The bad advice campaigns began in early March of 2020, when “the experts” advised you to wear a mask to “flatter the curve.”
However, mask mandates did not flatten any curves. They only turned curves upside down.
Then, one day in January 2021, after nine months of gestating fear, you were told by “the experts” to get vaccinated to stop viral transmission, avoid death, that life would return to normal and the masks could come off.
However, masks did not come off, reports said COVID cases increased, and variants resulted.
…even if you’ve been fully vaccinated and protected from severe illness from COVID-19, you could have the Delta variant in your system and spread it to someone who isn’t vaccinated. –President Biden
Yes, some fully vaccinated people will still test positive, and some will show some symptoms of COVID-19. That’s expected with almost every vaccine there is for other diseases. – President Biden
One major hurdle for COVID variants remains: there is no approved test to identify a COVID variant. If there is no delta variant test, then how exactly are people being diagnosed with a “delta variant’ or other variants?”
The problem is that the tests in question for detecting variants have not been approved as a diagnostic tool either by the Food and Drug Administration or under federal rules governing university labs ― PBS News, February 26, 2021
The media is deliberately seeding misinformation to the masses. Expect more confusion to come.
After December 31, 2021, the CDC will withdraw its request to use the PCR Diagnostic Panel for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Without PCR testing, blood tests will be the only available tests, which require weeks for a result. Will there be a new distraction, a new variant? A new vaccine? An alien landing?
Don’t be duped. With no real proof of a true source of infection, it is fear and growing vaccine reactions that are responsible for pandemic cases and deaths. If the reports prove anything, they prove that we are all casualties of an informational war that will result in potentially millions of deaths, due to collective human ignorance. The goals of misinformation can be found in the 10 messages of The Georgia Guidestones.
Spike In Vax Reactions
The blatant contradiction is that injectable products, sold as “safe and effective,” come with no proof of safety or effectiveness. The experimental mRNA vaccines produce a spike protein in your body, a known toxin, which spikes a cytokine storm with unpredictable results. The CDC reports a Russian Roulette of symptoms, ranging from anaphylaxis, to heart palpitations, blood clots, and death.
o Heart failure, heart injury, heart attack, myocarditis (Chen et al., 2020; Sawalha et al., 2021)
o Pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary thromboembolism and thrombosis, lung tissue damage, possible pulmonary fibrosis (McDonald, 2020; Mishra et al., 2020; Pasqualetto et al., 2020; Potus et al., 2020; Dhawan et al., 2021)
o Increased venous and arterial thromboembolic events (Ali and Spinler, 2021)
o Diabetes (Yang et al., 2010; Lima-Martinez et al., 2021)
o Neurological complications, including encephalopathy, seizures, headaches, and neuromuscular diseases. Also, hypercoagulability and stroke (AboTaleb, 2020; Bobker and Robbins, 2020; Hassett et al., 2020; Hess et al., 2020)
o Gut dysbiosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and leaky gut (Perisetti et al., 2020; Zeppa et al., 2020; Hunt et al., 2021)
o Kidney damage (Han and Ye, 2021)
o Impaired male reproductive capacity (Seymen, 2021)
o Skin lesions and other cutaneous manifestations (Galli et al., 2020)
o General autoimmune diseases, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (Jacobs and Eichbaum, 2021; Liu et al., 2021)
o Liver injury (Roth et al., 2021)
State governments ended previous illegal mandates due to a criminal complaint filed by Randall Kelton in Texas court against Governor Abbott. See the Governor Criminal Complaint. However, the role of magistrate then passed to corporations and employers who claimed they could mandate you, as an employee, to get the Emergency Authorized Use (EAU) medical product (vaccine) that did not have FDA-approval.
Do you trust experts who began a pandemic with bogus cases? New “surges” are spreading in vaccinated populations. Did the vaccines fail? Have they failed before?
‘Primary Vaccine Failure’ in Highly Vaccinated Populations
Disease outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations are nothing new. As expected, disease is spreading among vaccinated people in highly vaccinated populations, expressing the disease as what experts call ‘breakthrough infections’, or covariants.
Fast forward to July 2021, when the CDC again shifted 180-degrees in its message to recommend that fully vaccinated people should continue to wear a mask because the unvaccinated could put the vaccinated at risk of infection. This logic is the same as requiring you to wear a raincoat to keep someone else dry, or exercise for others so they can lose weight. Vaccine failure is no longer mentioned.
The “experts” will always advise everyone to get vaccinated voluntarily, even as there is a global die-off of recipients being test animals to experimental vaccines. “Get the booster. Get all the boosters!”
Insurance Companies Off The Hook
Because of the uncertainties from unauthorized tests and experimental vaccines, insurance companies in India and Korea are limiting what they will cover if someone becomes sick from the COVID injections. They write:
Contrary to popular perception, existing health insurance policies are unlikely to cover the cost of vaccination and adverse reactions, if any. Only policies designed purely for the COVID vaccination process — there is none at the moment — will cover the costs.
Wuhan scientists conducted a major study in Wuhan China, where the problem began, involving almost 10 million people, and found zero cases of asymptomatic transmission. See the Study, not reported to the public. What U.S. insurance companies will do remains to be seen as news breaks out, along with new variant surges.
Treatments Vs. Healing
These are historical times. It’s the time to dissolve the pandemic of fear and liberate yourself.
First, it is important to know there is a difference between treatment (vaccination) and healing (immunization). The former is synthetic with no guarantees. The latter is natural and proven by the you, the healer as you heal yourself. Just as each healer heals him/her self, each liberator, liberates her/himself.
Since April 2021, the FDA has only approved one treatment, an antiviral drug called Veklury, widely known as remdesivir, a toxic treatment for a wide array of COVID symptoms. Studies conclusively show this drug to be ineffective. Other medical treatments include the drugs invermectin, which is used in Africa for parasitic infections, and hydroxychloroquine. In combination with the mineral zinc, hydroxychloroquine is reported by some doctors to offer relief of COVID symptoms.
As a group, synthetic drugs and vaccines dismantle the body’s immune system. Without an immune system, you are susceptible to be invaded by technology that is proven to be fatal. Instead of synthetic solutions, there are natural solutions. Zinc, alone, or quercitin, a zinc ionophor, can offer relief to flu-like symptoms. This is because people with infections are deficient in zinc and other minerals. Their immune systems are out of balance to prevent infection and to push out toxins that lead to illness. When replenished with the right minerals, the body swings back into balance.
With many adverse effects of these vaccines now widely reported, such as AstraZeneca confirming a link between its shot and blood clots, and 18 countries suspending its vaccine, while other paused the use of the J&J experimental shot, no one has a clear indication or information about the safety or effectiveness of the shots to make an informed choice. To inject or not to inject?
Dissolving Fear
Is your head exploding trying to make sense of the contradictions and inconsistencies from the experts in the media?
Fear not! When you know you are a spiritual being, you can dissolve all fear. You can awaken to truth.
Mandates are not laws. Unless a legislature passes a law requiring mass injections (which cannot happen due to problems with the solution), there is no requirement, and there never could be. Not participating in a medical experiment is a legal and lawful right because people have the right to refuse medical interventions.
People are discovering that they need only trust their own judgment when it comes to unproven medical products and politicians who practice medicine without a license. Especially since vaccine makers are not liable for any damages from their products. You cannot sue vaccine makers for side effects or direct effects from their products. Neither will the government compensate you for any damages. Who is responsible for damages?
You are.
You came here with everything you need. Simply know who you are. Two Greek words carved on a temple in Greece are γνωρίστε τον εαυτό σας, meaning Know Thyself. Are you a body or a spirit with a body?
The strength and integrity of your spirit is matched only by your internal defense system, known as your innate immune system. Your immune system is the key to thwarting infections and invaders of all kinds. If you already survived the symptoms of ‘COVID,’ then you have already produced a stronger immune system. There is no point in vaccination, as the Cleveland Clinic suggests.
No injections are necessary because infections come and go naturally, as they have done throughout human history for centuries, long before vaccines were known or viruses were patented as ‘real.’
There is no need to fear an infection in your body if you understand that your body heals itself if given the right tools, which are the tools of Nature. Once healed, your body becomes stronger because it has created antibodies that now guard your immune system against future invasions so that you never experience that particular natural invader again. You have created innate immunity that lasts a lifetime. A synthetic vaccine cannot do that.
Your body shows you symptoms as its sign language, to show you how to heal yourself because you are your own healer. Your symptoms are nothing to fear. Infections reflect mineral deficiencies, which cascade into other deficiencies.
Natural options to strengthen the immune system include adding minerals such as zinc, magnesium, iodine, boron, and selenium; herbs such as nettle, and goldenseal, and Elderberries; vitamins such as vitamin D, which your skin makes from the sun; and vitamin C from green onions made into soup, and Sumac berries, or White pine needles made into tea.
Natural healing options come from Nature, which is noninvasive and not patentable. Nature is freely offered right outside your door. You simply have to open the door and step outside to find a natural, free farmacy at your feet.
The Power of Choice
Whenever there are uncertainties for your health, there must always be many choices in how you respond. Choice is the solution, along with ensuring that your immune system is nourished and strong. That is why there is never a one-size-fits all approach to health or freedom issues. All individuals are unique, so all solutions must be unique.
That is the essence of Health Freedom. Each person is endowed, by birth, with natural, Universal rights that are reflected in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration reflects personal responsibility for your health, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Your health and life is reflected in your own innate immune system. By building your immune system to reverse the symptomatic language of your body, you connect to your higher powers, to your spirit.
It’s been YOU all along. Others do not set themselves on fire to keep you warm or wear a raincoat to keep you dry. Others are not responsible for how you heal yourself.
The right and responsibility to decline any product or treatment is a birthright, especially when it comes to your body. Connect with who you are and let that be contagious.
A mandate to accept a medical product to keep your job is illegal. Mandates are merely offers that you can decline or refuse. No government, governor, employer or church can force or coerce or dictate any mandate since there is no law to follow or enforce, no legislation to point to. But there is guidance to protect your right to choose.
Five Solutions
One medical professional, known as Agent J, who continues to be employed as a nurse in a hospital, unvaccinated, after being mandated to get the shot, has created a Right To Decline form to protect her freedom. She offers it freely for others. See her Declination Statement.
2. The RighttoRefuse.org is a health freedom organization and website tracking legislation in 45 states that protect rights of individuals to make their own health decisions, including workplace coercion and banning vaccine passports. To date, 15 states have passed at least one Right to Refuse bill.
4. Stop listening to the media. Validate the information you receive to get to a clean view of things, untainted by fear.
5. Don’t play their war games!
In any war, it is incumbent that you make a plan. Whatever choices you make, there is no reason to be afraid of other people, since you decide what’s best for you. It’s your body, so it’s your choice. Your body belongs only to you, and only you are responsible for what you put into it. You are not responsible for what others decide for their own bodies. Trust yourself!
When airplanes routinely dump megatons of toxic garbage into our atmosphere as they have been doing for twenty years plus now, the most obvious question is: What are the biological impacts? What are the environmental implications of very small coal fly ash particles entering our bodies and fouling our biosphere? As one might guess, the implications are grave. Although the geoengineers will undoubtedly tell us that everything is fine, the best available evidence shows that the general population’s health is being negatively impacted, at least hundreds of thousands of people are dying, and our environment is being summarily wrecked as well. These are the biological impacts of the New Manhattan Project.
Particulate matter
The inhalation of aerosolized particulate matter has generally harmful human health impacts. This is not a matter of debate. Common sense and many studies show this. A slew of studies referenced at the end of this chapter shows that inhalation of fine particulate matter is associated with: Alzheimer’s disease, risk for stroke, risk for cardiovascular disease, lung inflammation and diabetes, reduced renal (kidney) function in older males, morbidity and premature mortality, decreased male fertility, low birth weight, onset of asthma, and increased hospital admissions.
Coal fly ash
As far back as October of 1979, a study was performed about the health effects of aerosolized coal fly ash. Unsurprisingly, the authors of the study found that exposure to aerosolized coal fly ash through the lungs causes harm. In other news, the geniuses at the World Health Organization found that bullets fired from guns can kill people.
We should be thankful that the good Dr. Marvin Herndon has recently produced a series of peer-reviewed, published journal articles detailing the health effects of exposure to that specific material being routinely pumped out of jet aircraft. His first paper in this area titled “Coal Fly Ash Aerosol: Risk Factor for Lung Cancer,” published in February of 2018, was co-authored by Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, MPH, the Medical Director of the Monroe County, Florida Department of Health. Herndon and Whiteside found that coal fly ash has lots of nasty, cancer-causing stuff in it. The authors write:
“CFA [coal fly ash] contains a variety of potentially carcinogenic substances including aluminosilicates, an iron oxide-containing magnetic fraction, several toxic trace elements, nanoparticles, and alpha-particle-emitting radionuclides. Silica, arsenic, cadmium, and hexavalent chromium are found in CFA and all have been associated with increased lung cancer risk.”
Further, the authors write, “Chronic exposure to aerosolized CFA, emplaced in the atmosphere for climate intervention, may be an important, yet unrecognized, environmental risk factor for development of lung cancer.”
Doctors Herndon and Whiteside
As we can see from the passage above and as many have feared, Dr.s Herndon and Whiteside have found that at least some of these atmospheric coal fly ash particles are nano-sized. This is a concern because when nano-sized particles are inhaled, they are so small that they go directly into the blood stream and right into the brain, often causing a host of neurological disorders. Nano-sized particles are so small that one ingests them through one’s skin.
Herndon and Whiteside teamed up again for the March 2018 publication of their paper “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for Neurodegenerative Disease.” The authors write:
“The recent finding of spherical exogenous magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in the brain tissue of persons with dementia suggests an origin in air pollution produced by coal fly ash. The primary components of coal fly ash, iron oxides and aluminosilicates, are all found in the abnormal proteins that characterize Alzheimer’s dementia. The presence of these substances in brain tissue leads to oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Energy absorbed by magnetite from external electromagnetic fields may contribute to this neuropathology.”
Later, in May of 2018, Herndon and Whiteside were published once again. This time, their paper titled “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for COPD and Respiratory Disease” found that:
“Aerosolized CFA [coal fly ash] is a particularly hazardous form of deliberate air pollution. Ultrafine particles and nanoparticles found in coal fly ash can be inhaled into the lungs and produce many toxic effects including decreased host defenses, tissue inflammation, altered cellular redox balance toward oxidation, and genotoxicity. Oxidative stress and chronic inflammation can predispose to chronic lung disease. Recognition and public disclosure of the adverse health effects of geoengineering projects taking place in our skies, and their concomitant cessation will be necessary to prevent an ever-widening epidemic of COPD and other respiratory illnesses.”
Rounding out this duo’s series of papers on the Human health impacts of chemtrails, Herndon and Whiteside wrote a November 2019 paper titled “Geoengineering, Coal Fly Ash and the New Heart-Iron Connection: Universal Exposure to Iron Oxide Nanoparticulates.” The authors write:
“Coal fly ash is a rich source of nano-sized metal, iron oxide, and carbonaceous particles. Previous findings revealed that coal fly ash is widely utilized in undisclosed tropospheric aerosol geoengineering. Proper iron balance is central to human health and disease, and the harmful effects of iron are normally prevented by tightly controlled processes of systemic and cellular iron homeostasis. Altered iron balance is linked to the traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The iron-heart hypothesis is supported by epidemiological, clinical, and experimental studies. Biogenic magnetite (Fe3O4) serves essential life functions, but iron oxide nanoparticles from anthropogenic sources cause disease. The recent finding of countless combustion-type magnetic nanoparticles in damaged hearts of persons from highly polluted areas is definitive evidence of the connection between the iron oxide fraction of air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Spherical magnetic iron oxide particles found in coal fly ash and certain vehicle emissions match the exogenous iron pollution particles found in the human heart. Iron oxide nanoparticles cross the placenta and may act as seed material for future cardiovascular disease. The pandemic of non-communicable diseases like cardiovascular disease and also rapid global warming can be alleviated by drastically reducing nanoparticulate air pollution. It is crucial to halt tropospheric aerosol geoengineering, and to curb fine particulate emissions from industrial and traffic sources to avoid further gross contamination of the human race by iron oxide-type nanoparticles.”
Now that we have seen the Human health impacts of aerosolized coal fly ash, we will now take a look at the Human health impacts of some known constituents of coal fly ash.
Aluminum
As evidenced by voluminous rainwater sample lab reports (ch 1), chemtrails have been shown to consist significantly of aluminum oxide. Aluminum is a common component of coal fly ash. As we have learned from Dr.s Herndon and Whiteside, these particles can be nano-sized.
Aluminum nanoparticles are nasty stuff. A material safety data sheet (MSDS) produced by US Research Nanomaterials, Inc. says that they can cause: respiratory problems, skin irritation, eye irritation, tumors, Alzheimer’s, pulmonary disease, neoplasms, and gastric or intestinal disorders. This MSDS also states that people coming in contact with aluminum nanoparticles should wear a respirator and a fully protective, impervious suit.
A 2016 paper titled “Assessing the Direct Occupational and Public Health Impacts of Solar Radiation Management with Stratospheric Aerosols” says that Aluminum aerosols will target these bodily systems: respiratory, cardiovascular, hematologic (blood), musculoskeletal (muscles & bones), endocrine (glands), immunologic, and neurologic (brain). They also say exposure to small atmospheric aluminum particles can cause cancer and death.
It appears coincidental that Wright-Patterson Air Force Base has studied the biological impacts of aerosolized aluminum. In March 2001, the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson published a study titled “In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages.” Scientists exposed rats to airborne, nano-sized aluminum oxide particles. The authors concluded:
“Aluminum oxide nanoparticles displayed significant toxicity after 96 and 144 hours post exposure at high doses (100 and 250 µg/ml). Aluminum nanoparticles also showed slight toxicity after 24 hours at high doses (100 and 250 μg/ml). When these cells were dosed at lower non toxic levels (25 μg/ml) Al 50, 80, 120 nm caused a significant reduction in phagocytosis. Even at a dose as low as 5 μg/ml Al 50 nm still caused a significant reduction. None of these nanoparticles caused the induction of nitric oxide, TNF-alpha, or MIP-2, important components in inflammatory responses. In summary, based on viability aluminum nanoparticles appear to be slightly toxic to rat alveolar macrophages. However, there was a significant reduction in phagocytic function of macrophages.”
In other words, they found that even at low doses, forcing rats to breathe in tiny aluminum particles screwed up their lungs. The induced lack of phagocytes means that the rats’ immune systems (especially in the lungs) became unable to fight off invading harmful organisms.
“In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages” was but one of a series of studies produced by Wright-Patterson pertaining to aluminum nanoparticle exposure. Wright-Patterson also produced a 2010 study titled “Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function” in which they found that inhaled aluminum nanoparticles impair human immune systems. The authors again noted that nanoparticles have more deleterious health effects than do larger sized particles. Curiously, “Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function” also states that we are prone to inhale aluminum nanoparticles because they are used in jet fuels. This information, makes yet another case for aluminum-spiked jet fuels. All this is extremely interesting when one considers Wright-Patterson’s involvement in the New Manhattan Project such as that which was documented in chapter 5.
A 2009 paper titled “Manufactured Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles Decrease Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Brain Vasculature” found that, due to brain cell death, aluminum exposure can cause: Alzheimer’s, stroke, reperfusion, hypoxia, mitochondrial disease, and general vascular dysfunction.
In a 2012 paper written by one of the world’s top neurosurgeons (now retired), many neurological diseases are linked to aluminum exposure. Russell Blaylock’s “Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders” found a link between aluminum exposure and: Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, Pick’s, HIV dementia, multiple sclerosis, viral encephalopathies, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS / Lou Gehrig’s disease). In this paper, Dr. Blaylock also found that aluminum exposure is linked to: impaired cognition, poor memory, impaired learning, poor attention, social withdrawal, irritability, reduced food and water intake and depression. Not only that, but Dr. Blaylock cites another paper here showing how extremely small aluminum particles like the ones used in today’s New Manhattan Project can intensify adverse health reactions.
Dr. Blaylock has provided us with some impressive evidence for a causal relationship between chemtrails and Alzheimer’s here. He tells us that the aluminum nanoparticles we constantly inhale are carried directly to the part of the brain that is first affected by Alzheimer’s disease AND most severely affected by Alzheimer’s disease. On March 28, 2013 Dr. Blaylock went on the Linderman Unleashed radio program. The host asked him how he became chemtrail aware and Dr. Blaylock said this:
Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD
“Well, you know, the connection has been the aluminum in the vaccines. I wrote several articles about the effects of the adjuvants in vaccines including the mercury and the aluminum effect.
“Then I found some articles about the chemtrails and there was a lot being said about it and I wasn’t too sure whether it was true or not because in my state we rarely saw them. But as I started looking on the Internet and I would see these states in which there were these criss-cross patterns and they were very tight patterns and geometrical shapes where it was obvious that it was a purposeful covering of the atmosphere with these patterns and the trails were so long. Well now, you know, we’re starting to see them in my state and as I look at them, they go from to horizon to horizon. Well, you know, I’ve been alive long enough to know that jets never did that in the past and I see the same patterning effect now where they’re criss-crossing; it’s an obvious pattern.
“And so I look into the literature and some of the reports and YouTube videos and they were saying that they were dropping as one of the ingredients, aluminum. Well, I had done a fair amount of writing and research on the effect of aerosolized chemicals in the nose when you breathe them. And what we knew was that these particles tend to travel along the olfactory nerves which are the smell nerves in the nose. And it travels directly to the part of the brain that has to do with memory and emotions; the hippocampus, the interlinal area, and the prefrontal cortex. And that you can trace these chemicals traveling along that nerve and depositing in this area of the brain.
“The other thing that was known is that if you aerosolize aluminum, it’s one of the metals that passes very easily along this track and directly into the brain. So it bypasses the blood-brain barrier and goes directly into the brain and accumulates. Well, if you do it in animals, it produces lesions, or damage in that area of the brain and the animal will begin to show changes of memory and learning and emotional changes.
“When we look at people who have Alzheimer’s disease, ironically, the highest concentration of aluminum in the brain is that same entry point; what’s called the interlinal cortex. And the levels continue to accumulate. So we have compelling evidence that aerosolized aluminum alone will enter the brain and produce damage to that critical area of the brain.
“The worst of all is the nano-sized. Nano-size means you make it such a small particle that it easily penetrates skin. It penetrates barriers in the body that normally metals cannot pass through. When you nano-size and produce these incredibly small particulate matter, it passes very easily. So when you nano-size aluminum and you use it in these aerosols through the nasal passages, it enters the brain in very high concentration and they find that the nano-sized aluminum in the brain is infinitely more toxic.
“Now one of the toxic reactions to aluminum is intense inflammation and activation of cells in the brain that are the immune cells called microglia. Aluminum is a very potent activator of these immune cells and that triggers the release of a powerful substance called glutamate which is an excitotoxin that causes cells to die from an excitatory mechanism. Kinda complex mechanism, but it is a combination of inflammation and excitotoxicity. And I coined the term in the medical literature called immunoexcitotoxicity to describe that process. So, we know that occurs. We know it occurs very easily.
“Now, the reports are coming out now that what they’re spraying is nano-sized aluminum and the idea is the old concept of preventing global warming. And they nano-size the aluminum so it will stay in the upper atmosphere longer; supposedly as a reflective compound metal. The problem with that, even from a climatological description is that if you make it into cirrus-like clouds rather than reflecting it upward and out of the atmosphere, it reflects the heat downward and actually causes global warming. So, you know, you could envision that they’re doing this on purpose to make the atmosphere heat up so they can say, ‘See, the atmosphere is warming up.’
“But what I’m concerned about mainly is the medical effect and that’s because of these very strong connections between aluminum passing through this pathway into the brain [which] is so strongly connected with Alzheimer’s disease and other diseases of memory.
“If you’re aerosolizing this and spraying literally tons of it over the world, people are constantly breathing that aerosolized, nano-sized aluminum which will easily penetrate filters in your air-conditioning system [and] enter your home. So you’re breathing it 24 hours a day; producing high levels of aluminum in this part of the brain. And the consequences could be absolutely devastating. It could cause a huge increase in Alzheimer’s disease and inflammatory neurological disorders.
“I watched a YouTube which was a geoengineering conference that the government had put on. And in the conference, one of the questions somebody in the audience asked was: What is the medical effect of spraying aluminum in the atmosphere? And the speaker said, ‘Well, uh, we don’t really know. But we’re in the process of researching that.’ Well, of course that was an absolute lie. We do know what it does. But the fact that they were admitting that in fact they were going to spray, they gave it in the future tense that they were going to spray aluminum, the evidence now from the examination by biologists and scientists around the world is that the aluminum level in the lakes and streams and trees is increasing enormously. Some areas have incredible elevations of aluminum in the groundwater and in the vegetation. So if this indeed is happening, we’re looking at a medical catastrophe that’s worldwide.”
There is lots of other highly credible evidence available linking aluminum exposure to the diseases mentioned here. If you want more information, please search the term ‘aluminum toxicity.’ Expediency demands that we move on.
Barium
Rainwater sample test results from around the world consistently show barium as well, and barium can also be a component of coal fly ash. Barium is highly toxic. Barium material safety data sheets (MSDS) readily available online will inform you that barium is extremely hazardous in case of inhalation. Severe exposure to barium can cause lung damage, choking, unconsciousness and death. Many other barium oxide MSDSs go on and on in a similar fashion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that barium oxide reacts violently with water while the atmosphere has lots of water in it and our bodies consist mostly of water. My science advisor says that barium titanate and barium sulfate have been used in atmospheric dispersions as well.
The aforementioned paper “Assessing the Direct Occupational and Public Health Impacts of Solar Radiation Management with Stratospheric Aerosols” says that barium compounds used as atmospheric sprays target these Human bodily systems: respiratory, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, renal, metabolic, and neurologic. They also say barium compounds dispersed by aircraft as part of geoengineering programs can cause death.
Strontium
Rainwater sample test results as well as others such as ambient air sample test results collected by Dr. Herndon have also been showing a presence of strontium. Strontium can be a component of coal fly ash. It is not surprising, but, like aluminum and barium, strontium is highly toxic as well.
A strontium MSDS from Sigma-Aldrich states that it is corrosive. It causes burns when it comes in contact with the skin and can be absorbed through the skin. If one inhales it, the MSDS states that it is, “…extremely destructive to the tissue of the mucous membranes and upper respiratory tract.” The MSDS continues:
“Inhalation may result in spasm, inflammation and edema of the larynx and bronchi, chemical pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema. Material is extremely destructive to tissue of the mucous membranes and upper respiratory tract, eyes, and skin.”
The Sigma-Aldrich MSDS finishes up by noting that the chemical, physical, and toxicological properties of strontium have not been thoroughly investigated.
Strontium hydroxide is even worse. Being that there is lots of water in the atmosphere, the atmospheric strontium produced as part of the New Manhattan Project may react with it and form the extremely caustic strontium hydroxide. Not only that, but don’t forget that our bodies are comprised of mostly H2O. Strontium in the atmosphere and inside of us has lots of opportunities to become strontium hydroxide. The Sigma-Aldrich MSDS cautions potential users to never expose strontium oxide to water because it reacts violently.
Because strontium can be a component of coal fly ash, it is interesting to note that studies have been done concerning exposure to the strontium found in ‘fly ash.’ The CDC writes:
“Rats were exposed to aerosols of 85Sr [strontium] carbonate, phosphate, fluoride, oxide, or titanate (particle sizes and doses not specified) (Willard and Snyder 1966). Greater than 99% of the initial lung burden of 85Sr was cleared from the lung 5 days after inhalation of the carbonate, phosphate, fluoride, or oxide, whereas 60% of the 85Sr remained in the lung after inhalation of the more insoluble strontium titanate.
“In rats exposed to airborne fly ash (sieved to have a particle diameter of distribution of 90% less than 20 μm) for 6 hours, strontium was eliminated from the lung with a half-time of 23 days (observations were made for 30 days) (Srivastava et al. 1984b). One day after the exposure, the tissue: plasma strontium concentration ratios were 0.3–0.5 in the liver, kidney, small intestine, and heart. The report of this study does not indicate whether whole-body or nose-only exposures were utilized in the study; therefore, it is not possible to know for certain how much of the absorption may have resulted from ingestion of fly ash deposited on the animals. Furthermore, given the relatively large particle size of the fly ash, it is likely that deposition in the respiratory tract was largely in the tracheobronchial and nasopharyngeal region, from which the strontium may have been cleared mechanically to the esophagus and swallowed. Nevertheless, studies in which 89Sr-enriched fly ash was instilled into the trachea of rats indicate that strontium in this form was partly absorbed and appeared in plasma and other tissues within days of the exposure (Srivastava et al. 1984a).”
The CDC goes on to note that the fly ash strontium administered to the lab rats ended up mostly in the bones. After that, it appeared in (in order of prevalence): muscle, skin, liver, and kidneys. Those heady days of just dumping dry ice into clouds are long gone.
Mercury
Dr. J. Marvin Herndon produced a December 2017 paper co-authored by Mark Whiteside, MD in which the authors write specifically of the Human health impacts of mercury. It has been well known for a long time now that mercury is one of the most toxic substances on the planet and we now know that mercury is a common constituent of the coal fly ash currently being sprayed by the megaton. The authors write:
“Despite strengthened mercury emission regulations, mercury measured in rainwater is increasing. Since it is known that the upper troposphere contains oxidized, particle-bound mercury, it is likely that covert aerosolized coal fly ash sprayed into this region is a major source of mercury pollution. Mercury affects multiple systems in the body, potentially causing neurological, cardiovascular, genitourinary, reproductive, immunological, and even genetic disease.”
CDC rates of associated diseases
As this chapter has explained, chemtrails are associated with many diseases. As we have been assaulted by this New Manhattan Project for over twenty years now, it is no surprise that the best available data shows rates of the associated diseases going up significantly. Historical rates of every disease associated with chemtrail spray are not presented here due to a lack of CDC data. Every associated disease with available CDC data is presented.
Let’s start with the most strongly correlated disease: Alzheimer’s. According to the latest data from the CDC, from 1999 to 2014, age-adjusted rates of death from Alzheimer’s increased 54.5% with the 2014 number of total deaths at 93,541. That means that in 2014 alone we saw tens of thousands of additional American deaths from Alzheimer’s. If one adds up all the additional deaths from Alzheimer’s between 1999 and 2014, we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of additional deaths. Let us recall that large-scale domestic spraying operations began in 1996.
Age adjusted rates of Alzheimer’s disease 1999-2014
In a 2013 report, the CDC found that while deaths from other diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and stroke decreased significantly, Alzheimer’s deaths increased 39%. They write, “Mortality from Alzheimer’s disease has steadily increased during the last 30 years.” Knowing what we now know, it is reasonable to assume that chemtrails have contributed greatly to this.
Not only have the rates of adult Alzheimer’s disease been increasing, but a disease that used to be relegated to the elderly is now showing up in children. Reports have been pouring in from around the world documenting research into Niemann Pick Type C disease, also known as ‘childhood Alzheimer’s.’ As previously mentioned, Dr. Blaylock has seen this phenomenon as well.
~ ~ ~
Dr. Blaylock says that there is also a correlation between aluminum exposure and Parkinson’s. The latest data from the CDC shows that between 1999 and 2017, the age-adjusted rate of Parkinson’s disease in people aged 65 or older went from 41.7 per 100,000 to 65.3 per 100,000.
CDC rates of Parkinson’s disease 1999-2017
Despite what the tobacco companies said in the 1950s, routinely breathing in particulate matter is bad for your lungs. It is for this reason that we now take a look at the CDC data pertaining to diseases associated with the routine inhalation of particulate matter such as COPD, asthma, and lung cancer. Although the CDC found that the rate of chronic pulmonary disease (COPD) was stable between 1998 and 2009, they also found that the prevalence of asthma rose during a similar period (between 2001 and 2010). The CDC also reports that between 1995 and 2011, smoking went from 35% among students and 25% among adults to 18% and 19% respectively. Concurrently, the CDC reports significant drops in the rate of lung cancer between 2002 and 2011.
Rate of smoking from 1965-2011
With these big drops in the rate of smoking, one might assume that the rate of COPD and asthma would go down as well, instead of remaining stable. Chemtrails probably kept the rate of COPD stable while contributing to the prevalence of asthma. Lung cancer probably decreased because chemtrail exposure has not been as carcinogenic for your lungs as smoking. It’s good to know that there are more carcinogenic things for your lungs than routine chemtrail exposure. Smoking cigarettes apparently fits that category. Moderate chemtrail exposure is probably better for you than inhaling burning plutonium too, but that doesn’t mean it’s ok.
Overall life expectancy
Very recently, we here in America have seen a slight reduction in our life expectancies. According to CDC data, for the first time in many decades, between 2016 and 2017 overall life expectancy at birth fell by .1 years.
CDC life expectancy 1970-2017
One might think, with all the much-touted breakthroughs in medicine, a growing health care industry, expanded access to better nutrition such as organic foods and supplements, and the like, that we would be experiencing longer average life expectancies, not shorter. Might chemtrails have something to do with it?
Early exposures
Although it appears that our bodies have been finding ways to better cope with this daily onslaught of aerosolized toxic waste, around the times when people were first exposed, emergency rooms filled up. William Thomas’ aforementioned 2004 book Chemtrails Confirmed chronicles many of these examples. Thomas recounts the words of a registered nurse:
“Approximately December 16th or the 17th, while traveling north, I could see ‘stripes’ in the sky. It appeared as if someone took white paint on their fingers and from north to south ran their fingers through the sky. These contrails were evenly spaced and covered the whole sky! They covered it completely! When I was finished with the next visit, approximately 45 minutes, I came out of the house and found the whole sky was white. There was no definition in cloud pattern.
“Within the 24 hours I became very weak, feverish, and my asthma began to act up. I didn’t think too much about it, until my boyfriend told me that many in his family started coming down with the same complaints. I also started noticing a lot of my patients and their family members were coming down with these symptoms at the same time. In our area we have one main hospital which I was the Supervisor of for four years. I worked there a total of six years. I stay in close contact with the nurses and physicians and am planning on investigating into this more. At that time, they complained of being extremely busy with respiratory diagnoses.”
Another passage from Chemtrails Confirmed recounts the experiences of a restaurant owner from Oklahoma. The passage reads:
“On January 24, 1999 [Pat] Edgar reported that on, ‘Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday and Thursday of last week, we were really hit hard with the contrails. I mean real bad. Everybody in this town is sick right now; sicker than a damn dog. It’s all in their head and their sinuses, and it hangs in the throat, (sore necks), ears ringing.’
“Edgar added: ‘Some customers that frequent our business have stated that they have been to the doctor and the offices have been full of sick people. Same thing at the Indian clinic.’
“‘People have to wait for hours because the waiting room is full. Some people have reported being on their third and fourth round of antibiotics and they are still ill. We noticed excessive contrails Thursday, Feb. 11th.’
“Edgar became ill the following day, and visited a doctor. From a friend he learned that Sparks regional hospital had over 500 people seeking medical attention at the emergency room for flu, or flu-like symptoms.”
Others appearing in Thomas’ book tell similar stories.
Bodily contamination testing
When we ingest aluminum, some of it eventually comes out in our hair and fingernails. There are many reports online of people finding high levels of chemtrail toxins in their hair and fingernails. Certain laboratories can analyze hair and fingernail samples for aluminum and other substances. If you are curious about your bodily contamination, one may get their hair tested by the Great Plains Laboratory or Analytical Research Labs. One can find their websites online.
Biospheric implications
There is evidence that chemtrails are changing soil pH. This could be very bad for our biosphere. As mentioned in the first chapter, anti-geoengineering activist Francis Mangels has a Bachelor of Science in forestry from the International School of Forestry at Missoula, spent 35 years with the U.S. Forest Service as a wildlife biologist and worked several years with the USDA Soil Conservation Service as a soil conservationist. In order to document the effect of chemtrail spray upon soil pH, Mr. Mangels wrote on Oct. 30, 2009:
“The soil scientists from the USDA Soil Conservation Department visited private property east of Shasta Lake, California, on Oct. 27, 2009. Mr. Bailey, Komar, and Owens tested the pH with standard federal meters. All agreed the pH should be 5.5.
“Under Douglas fir, the ph was 7.4, astoundingly basic for that habitat.
“Under Poderosa pine, at the precise soil-needle interface, I would expect a pH of 5. At that point, Bailey’s meter showed 6.5. This is high for a microhabitat that should be very acid. Old soil surveys indicate this soil should be very acid, around pH of 5.5.
“I bought a house in Mt. Shasta old black oak/pine pasture in 2002, tested the pH at below 6, good for vegetable gardening. It was a major reason for purchase, and proceeded with highly acid composting of leaves and grass to drive the pH down or at least keep it low, as every master gardener knows. I added a touch of sulphur and avoided wood ash to insure acidity, and proceeded to teach organic gardening courses out of my yard through COS. The pH tests were an embarrassment because now my garden is pH 7, sometimes higher. This is the opposite of what should happen.
“The pH meter of Jon McClellan proceeded to show pH in McCloud gardens also running close to 7 or 8, which is too high for heavy organic mulch with no ashes. General lawns were also running over pH 7 under oaks and pines and fir trees. This is contrary to everything I learned in college and the Soil Conservation Service for 35 years. The old data sheets say these soils should be running at a pH of 5-6.”
Francis Mangels
In the movie What In the World Are They Spraying?, Mr. Mangels says that when soil pH changes, soil arthropods (a vital link in our ecosystem) start to go away. This type of disruption could have negative effects up and down the food chain.
Reports of massive plant and animal die-offs potentially due to chemtrails are widespread. Spraying vast regions of the Earth with tens of thousands of megatons of toxic waste is probably contributing to the alarming rate of animal species extinction as well. Although many other factors are in play here, the chemtrails surely don’t help. The Center for Biological Diversity reports that:
“Scientists estimate we’re now losing species at 1,000 to 10,000 times the background rate, with literally dozens going extinct every day. It could be a scary future indeed, with as many as 30 to 50 percent of all species possibly heading toward extinction by mid-century.”
Once again, our Spartacus with the dragon energy, Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD has been on the case. Dr. Herndon has again teamed up with the Medical Director of the Monroe County, Florida Department of Health, Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, MPH to publish a series of peer-reviewed, published journal articles addressing the biospheric implications of the ongoing and uncontrolled geoengineering experimentation and we will go over them here.
Let’s start at the bottom of the food chain. In June of 2019 Herndon and Whiteside published a paper titled “Role of Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash in the Global Plankton Imbalance: Case of Florida’s Toxic Algae Crisis.” In this paper, the authors provide evidence for the assertion that the coal fly ash sprayed by the megaton into our biosphere is causing, among other things, an overabundance of harmful plankton blooms which, in turn, has more harmful effects. The authors write:
“Our objective is to review the effects the multifold components of aerosolized coal fly ash as they relate to the increasing occurrences of HABs [harmful algal blooms]. Aerosolized coal fly ash (CFA) pollutants from non-sequestered coal-fired power plant emissions and from undisclosed, although ‘hidden in plain sight,’ tropospheric particulate geoengineering operations are inflicting irreparable damage to the world’s surface water-bodies and causing great harm to human health (including lung cancer, respiratory and neurodegenerative diseases) and environmental health (including major die-offs of insects, birds and trees). Florida’s ever-growing toxic nightmare of red tides and blue-green algae is a microcosm of similar activity globally. Atmospheric deposition of aerosol particulates, most importantly bioavailable iron, has drastically shifted the global plankton community balance in the direction of harmful algae and cyanobacterial blooms in fresh and salt water.”
A little further up the food chain we find insects. Herndon and Whiteside have been working in this area as well. In August of 2018 their paper titled “Previously Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bee and Insect Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” was published. In this paper, the authors substantiate a multitude of harmful, observed effects upon insects from chemtrail spray. We can stop wondering why bee populations are being decimated. The authors write:
“The primary components of CFA [coal fly ash], silicon, aluminum, and iron, consisting in part of magnetite (Fe3O4), all have important potential toxicities to insects. Many of the trace elements in CFA are injurious to insects; several of them (e.g., arsenic, mercury, and cadmium) are used as insecticides. Toxic particulates and heavy metals in CFA contaminate air, water, and soil and thus impact the entire biosphere. Components of CFA, including aluminum extractable in a chemically-mobile form, have been shown to adversely affect insects in terrestrial, aquatic, and aerial environments. Both the primary and trace elements in CFA have been found on, in, and around insects and the plants they feed on in polluted regions around the world. Magnetite from CFA may potentially disrupt insect magnetoreception. Chlorine and certain other constituents of aerosolized CFA potentially destroy atmospheric ozone thus exposing insects to elevated mutagenicity and lethality levels of UV-B and UV-C solar radiation.”
This information goes a long way towards explaining the tremendous drops in global insect populations lately. It’s almost too scary to look into, but an Internet search of the term ‘insect populations’ will bring pages and pages of relevant results. Of course, many are blaming it on the dreaded global warming/climate change, but insect populations have done just fine throughout previous fluctuations in Earth’s average temperature. In fact, insect populations have most probably done better in warmer climates, so maybe we should look instead at the gigantic aircraft routinely dumping megatons of toxic waste into our biosphere.
As noted, Francis Mangels has been observing a lack of insects as well. He logically attributes it to geoengineering. On July 19, 2017, Francis emailed to the author the following:
“Several streams were sampled for aquatic insects, and I likewise fished them hard to get stomach samples of trout. Total sample over 1000, lately around 400 stomach samples. Methods used were fairly casual, using typical nets for streams in gravel substrates that appeared similar. Standard data was orders of aquatics per square foot, accuracy about 80% due to equipment. It was very easy to see which streams would have the most trout.
“The bottom fell out of the sampling from 2000 to 2008, and it continues today. All major orders of bugs took severe hits from an unknown source. Then I was contacted by Dane [Wigington], and logic said only sky pollution could hit all the streams at once in the same way.
“Likewise, the trout I caught before then always were loaded with bugs and etc. food both terra and aquatic. Ever since about 2006, the trout stomachs were almost empty, and I quit taking data because there was no data to take, for the most part. A bug here and there, mostly terrestrials, very small amounts and the trout got skinny over the years (except for those freshly planted, that soon lost the fat and got skinny too, as we say, poor condition factors). Very clear streams went almost barren, no bugs or trout either.
“Net sweeps in lots showed plenty of earwigs, pill bugs, ants, aphids, box elder bugs, any SUCKING types. However, the caterpillar types for the most part became very scarce, as did moths and butterflies as you would expect (leaf eaters eat the aluminum). I turned in a huge collection to the American butterfly association of CA, but damned if I could do it now….Lepidoptera are around, but rare now except for the cabbage butterfly and a few swallowtails. Point is, this distribution showed in the trout stomachs, which caused me to do the sweeps.”
Further up the food chain we find birds. Dr.s Herndon and Whiteside published a paper in November of 2018 titled “Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: A Previously Unrecognized Primary Factor in the Catastrophic Global Demise of Bird Populations and Species.” In this paper, the authors find that coal fly ash is causing unprecedented bird die-offs.
The authors write, “Bird populations and species world-wide are experiencing die-offs on an unprecedented scale.” A little later, the authors continue, “Aerosolized CFA [coal fly ash], a particularly toxic form of air pollution, contains multiple metals and elements well-known to adversely affect all portions of the avian life cycle, in aerial, terrestrial, and marine environments. Studies from around the globe reveal systemic contamination of birds by these elements.” The authors conclude that, “Coal fly ash, including its use in ongoing atmospheric geoengineering operations, is a major factor in global bird die-off. The accelerating decline of birds parallels the catastrophic decline of insects, due in part to the same type of aerial pollution.”
Doctors Herndon and Whiteside have also looked at the biological impacts of chemtrails upon bat populations. In January of this year (2020), they published a paper titled “Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bat Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering.” In this paper, the authors find that bat populations worldwide are suffering a precipitous decline. The authors write:
“Bats are excellent mammalian bioindicators of environmental contaminants and it is known that their tissue contains high levels of metals and persistent organic pollutants. From a review of the literature, we show that the pollutant element ratios in bat tissue and bat guano are consistent with an origin in CFA-type air pollution. These findings suggest that CFA [coal fly ash], including its use in covert climate engineering operations, is an unacknowledged factor in the morbidity and mortality of bats. Bats, therefore, are an important ‘canary in the coal mine’ pointing to the urgency of halting covert climate engineering and greatly reducing ultrafine particulate air pollution.”
~ ~ ~
As we saw at the beginning of this section, with all the professionally observed soil pH anomalies, plants are not doing very well under this New Manhattan Project either. Doctors Herndon, Whiteside and other co-authors have been doing work in these areas as well. In a series of published, peer-reviewed journal articles, they have found that a combination of factors, all caused by the spraying of coal fly ash, are causing mass die-offs of global vegetation. They found that trees, in particular, are weakened by increased UV radiation, desiccation, and toxicity – all caused by chemtrails. Once a tree is weakened by this trifecta, it becomes susceptible to insect infestations, fungal infections, and other biotic factors such as bacteria and viruses.
The result of all this is dry, dead and dying vegetation. An abundance of dry, dead and dying vegetation makes forest fires occur more often and burn more furiously. Herndon et al. find that this is most probably why we have seen such tremendously large forest fires lately. The increased levels of UV radiation noted by Herndon et al. as being harmful to vegetation, are also harmful to Humans as well as phytoplankton, coral, and insects.
Silver iodide
The conventional weather modification industry has been openly spraying vast areas of the United States with silver iodide since 1947. The super-secret New Manhattan Project only started spraying us with coal fly ash in 1996. Hence, the vast majority of the weather modification and atmospheric sciences literature is geared towards the dispersion of silver iodide. Although silver iodide is not what is used in today’s New Manhattan Project, as a side issue, let’s take a look at the scientific evidence (or lack thereof) concerning the biological impacts of silver iodide. Past is prelude.
Considering that this issue is the most obvious question and of grave importance, the lack of publicly available research pertaining to the biological impacts of silver iodide dispersion is quite shocking. You may read the 746 page, 1978 Congressional Research Service report on weather modification. You may read all 21 of the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences reports or all of the National Science Foundation annual weather modification reports. You may read scores of weather modification reports, book after book, and myriad reports and papers about weather modification and the atmospheric sciences. But nowhere in any of these documents may you find an adequate examination of biological impacts and specifically human health impacts caused by exposure to atmospheric silver iodide. Only after reading a stack of documents about a yard high, did your author finally find a report containing an adequate discussion of this topic.
A popular silver iodide material safety data sheet describes silver iodide as, “Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, [and] of inhalation.” Unbelievably, the authors of this data sheet write that much of the toxicology information is NOT AVAILABLE. They’ve been spraying us with this stuff since 1947 and the toxicology information is not available?! Equally as unbelievable, to date, no publicly available, long-term studies have been done.
It is widely suggested that exposure to silver iodide causes argyria – characterized by a blue-grey discoloration of the eyes, skin, mucous membranes, and internal organs. Does that sound healthy? Another MSDS produced by Fisher Scientific reads:
“Chronic ingestion of iodides during pregnancy has resulted in fetal death, severe goiter, and cretinoid appearance of the newborn. Prolonged exposure to iodides may produce iodism in sensitive individuals. Symptoms could include skin rash, running nose and headache.”
In spite of this information, the historical weather modification literature notes a lack of data. A 1966 National Science Foundation report stated, “The present state of knowledge places uncomfortable limits on the prediction of the biological consequences of modifying the weather.” A 1969 Bureau of Reclamation report noted, “There has so far not been a single biological field study completed and reported in the literature specifically designed to identify any aspect of the ecological effects of weather modification.” A 1972 study conducted by the Council on Environmental Quality stated, “Projects may have significant adverse environmental effects, ranging from immediate hazards to life and property to long-term alterations in land use patterns and threats to ecological systems.”
Weather modifiers have exhibited a pattern of dismissing the potentially harmful effects of substances used in weather modification activities. In 1967 weather modifier Archie Kahan, writing for the Bureau of Reclamation, dismissed concerns about the use of silver iodide as he conflated the biological impacts of silver iodide with its efficacy as a nucleant and any possible hazardous weather that might arise from its use.
In 1972, decades after silver iodide was first used as a nucleant, Bernard Vonnegut and another atmospheric scientist by the name of Ronald Standler wrote a biology paper published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology that mollified concerns about their activities. Although the biological impacts of prolonged silver iodide dispersion has implications not only for Human health, but also for the health of the entire biosphere, the paper concerns itself almost exclusively with impacts upon Human health. The questionable biological impacts of their activities pertaining to plant and animal life is glossed over only briefly. They note that prolonged exposure to silver iodide has been known to cause Humans to exhibit an ashen appearance, but they claim that this is not of particular concern. They also dismiss concerns about silver iodide’s ability to cause a yellowing of the skin when exposure is topical. They even dismiss two examples of individuals having been significantly harmed by exposure to silver iodide. Their paper is full of phrases like ’seem to be’ and ‘we do not expect’ because much of what is presented in the paper is assumptions and extrapolations based on other people’s work rather than any scientific findings of their own.
The vast majority of research done in this area does not even concern itself with Human health impacts or biospheric contamination. Rather, it focuses on the ancillary issue of how plants and animals may be affected by either more or less rainfall. The work that is publicly available is mostly cursory. In the vast majority of cases where the subject is even so much as broached, the literature quickly follows with assurances that there are probably no adverse effects and that further study is not necessary.
Thankfully, some research indicating silver iodide’s negative biological impacts has surfaced. It is not good news, but we need to hear it. Evidence suggests that it is exceptionally bad for organisms further down the food chain. The aforementioned 1969 Bureau of Reclamation report also noted:
“Silver compounds are much more toxic to fish than to terrestrial vertebrates. Some of the higher concentrations of Ag recorded in precipitation from seeded storms are comparable to the lowest concentrations lethal to fish in the short run. In one set of experiments, sticklebacks were able to withstand no more than 0.003 ppm Ag in water at 15-18° C. The fish survived one week at 0.004 ppm, four days at 0.01 ppm, and but one day at 0.1 ppm.”
This 1969 report also found silver to be, “…highly toxic to microorganisms….” The report continues:
“Many investigators have placed Ag at or near the top of the list among heavy metals in toxicity to fungi, slime molds, and bacteria. Water containing 0.015 ppm Ag from contact with specially prepared metal has exhibited bacteriocidal activity. 0.006 ppm Ag has killed E. coli in 2 to 24 hours, depending on numbers of bacteria. Bacteriocidal activity in this context usually implies death of 9.99% or so of the cells present.”
Killing fungi, E. coli, and slime molds may sound like a good thing. But in the context of our complex and interdependent biosphere, it is not. Our overall ecosystem needs slime molds and the like. These things are vital links in the food chain.
Why does the conventional weather modification and atmospheric sciences literature not sufficiently address the issue of silver iodide’s biological impacts? They wouldn’t have anything to hide, would they? That which is not disclosed is often more incriminating than that which is. Although today’s Weather Modification Association claims it is completely safe, they have a conflict of interest and they do not have enough data to sufficiently back up their claims.
The bottom line is that there is evidence showing that silver iodide has negative biological impacts. We cannot know for sure that spraying this stuff is safe if no public long term studies have been done. But they have been going ahead and doing it anyway – just like today’s geoengineers.
Conclusions
Although it is currently not feasible to completely assess the damage to Earth’s biosphere caused by this New Manhattan Project, the available evidence does not paint a pretty picture. This is an area of study and body of work which should be vastly expanded and updated in the coming years and decades. We already know that massive quantities of atmospheric coal fly ash are bad for Humans, animals, insects, plants, and the overall environment. In Humans, the rates of diseases linked to exposure are on the rise. Many people became very sick when first exposed. The historical precedent set by the conventional weather modification industry mandates irresponsibility. When geoengineers say that their activities are harmless, we have plenty of good reasons to not believe them.
References
“An Open Letter to Members of AGU, EGU, and IPCC Alleging Promotion of Fake Science at the Expense of Human and Environmental Health and Comments on AGU Draft Geoengineering Position Statement” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, published by New Concepts in Global Tectonics Journal, September 2017
Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human health effects of air pollution Environmental Pollution 2008, 151, 362-367.
Calderon-Garciduenas, L.; Franko-Lira, M.; Mora-Tiscareno, A.; Medina-Cortina, H.; Torres-Jardon, R.; et al. Early alzheimer’s and parkinson’s diese pathology in urban children: Friend verses foe response – it’s time to face the evidence. BioMed Research International 2013, 32, 650-658.
Moulton, P.V.; Yang, W. Air pollution, oxidative stress, and alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2012, 109, 1004-1011.
Beeson, W.L.; Abbey, D.E.; Knutsen, S.F. Long-term concentrations of ambient air pollutants and incident lung cancer in california adults: Results from the ahsmog study. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106, 813-822.
Hong, Y.C.; Lee, J.T.; Kim, H.; Kwon, H.J. Air pollution: A new risk factor in ischemic stroke mortality. Stroke 2002, 33, 2165-2169.
Haberzetti, P.; Lee, J.; Duggineni, D.; McCracken, J.; Bolanowski, D.; O’Toole, T.E.; Bhatnagar, A.; Conklin, D., J. Exposure to ambient air fine particulate matter prevents vegf-induced mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells from bone matter. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 848-856.
Potera, C. Toxicity beyond the lung: Connecting pm2.5, inflammation, and diabetes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, A29
Mehta, A.J.; Zanobetti, A.; Bind, M.-A., C.; Kloog, I.; Koutrakis, P.; Sparrow, D.; Vokonas, P.S.; Schwartz, J.D. Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and renal function in older men: The va normative aging study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124(9), 1353-1360.
Dai, L.; Zanobetti, A.; Koutrakis, P.; Schwartz, J.D. Associations of fine particulate matter species with mortality in the united states: A multicity time-series analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122,
Dockery, D.W.; Pope, C.A.I.; Xu, X.P.; Spengler, J.D.; Ware, J.H.; et al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U. S. Cities. N. Eng. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1753-1759.
Pope, C.A.I.; Ezzati, M.; Dockery, D.W. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the united states. N. Eng. J. Med. 2009, 360, 376-386.
Pires, A.; de Melo, E.N.; Mauad, T.; Saldiva, P.H.N.; Bueno, H.M.d.S. Pre- and postnatal exposure to ambient levels of urban particulate matter (pm2.5) affects mice spermatogenesis. Inhalation Toxicology: International Forum for Respiratory Research: DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2011.563508 2011, 23.
Ebisu, K.; Bell, M.L. Airborne pm2.5 chemical components and low birth weight in the northeastern and midatlantic regions of the united states. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1746-1752.
Tetreault, L.-F.; Doucet, M.; Gamache, P.; Fournier, M.; Brand, A.; Kosatsky, T.; Smargiassi, A. Childhood exposure to ambient air pollutants and the onset of asthma: An administrative cohort study in quebec. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124(8), 1276.
Bell, M.L.; Ebisu, K.; Leaderer, B.P.; Gent, J.F.; Lee, H.J.; Koutrakis, P.; Wang, Y.; Dominici, F.; Peng, R.D. Associations of pm2.5 constituents and sources with hospital admissions: Analysis of four counties in connecticut and massachusetts (USA). Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 138-144.
“The Effect of Reaerosolized Fly Ash from an Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustor on Murine Alveolar Macrophages” a paper by Patricia C. Brennan, Frederick R. Kirchner, and William P. Norris, published by Argonne National Laboratory, 1979
“Coal Fly Ash Aerosol: Risk Factor for Lung Cancer” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, February 2018
“Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for Neurodegenerative Disease” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, March 2018
“Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: Risk Factor for COPD and Respiratory Disease” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, May 2018
“Geoengineering, Coal Fly Ash and the New Heart-Iron Connection: Universal Exposure to Iron Oxide Nanoparticulates” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, November 2019
“Weather and Climate Modification: Report of the Special Commission on Weather Modification” by the National Science Foundation, 1965
Aluminum oxide material safety data sheet by US Research Nanomaterials, Inc., 2013
“Assessing the Direct Occupational and Public Health Impacts of Solar Radiation Management with Stratospheric Aerosols” a paper by Utibe Effiong and Richard L. Neitzel, published in Environmental Health, 2016
“In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages” a report by Andrew Wagner, Charles Bleckmann, and E. England of the Air Force Institute of Technology, Krista Hess of Geo-Centers, Inc., Dayton, Ohio, and Saber Hussain and John J. Schlager of the Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Applied Biotechnology Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB, published by the Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Applied Biotechnology Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB, 2001
“Nanosized Aluminum Altered Immune Function” a paper by Laura K. Braydich-Stolle, Janice L. Speshock, Alicia Castle, Marcus Smith, Richard C. Murdock, and Saber M. Hussain, published by the American Chemical Society, 2010
“Manufactured Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles Decrease Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Brain Vasculature” a paper by Lei Chen, Robert A. Yokel, Bernhard Henning, and Michal Toborek, published by the Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, December, 2008
“Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders” a paper by Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, as published in Current Inorganic Chemistry, 2012
“Gila Activation Induced by Peripheral Administration of Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles in Rat Brains” a paper by X. Li, H. Zheng, Z. Zhang, M. Li, Z. Huang, H.J. Schluesener, Y. Li, and S. Xu, published in Nanomed, 2009, 5, (4), 473-479
Strontium oxide material safety data sheet by Sigma- Aldrich, 2007
“Aluminum Poisoning of Humanity and Earth’s Biota by Clandestine Geoengineering Activity: Implications for India” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by Current Science, 2015
“Strontium” a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
“Contamination of the Biosphere with Mercury: Another Potential Consequence of On-going Climate Manipulation Using Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash” a paper by Dr. Mark Whiteside and J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, December 2017
Inhaled Particles and Vapours a book edited by C.N. Davies, published by Pergamon Press, 1961
“Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality in 20 U.S. Cities, 1987-1994” a report by Jonathan M. Samet, MD, Francesca Dominici, PhD, Frank C. Curriero, PhD, Ivan Coursac, MS, and Scott L. Zeger, PhD, published by the New England Journal of Medicine, volume 343, number 24, 2000
Pulmonary Deposition and Retention of Inhaled Aerosols a book by Theodore F. Hatch, Paul Gross, the American Industrial Hygiene Association, and the United States Atomic Energy Commission, published by Academic Press, 1964
“Mortality from Alzheimer’s Disease in the United States: Data for 2000 and 2010” a report by Betzaida Tejada-Vera, M.S., published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013
“Deaths from Alzheimer’s Disease – United States, 1999-2014” an article by Christopher A. Taylor, PhD, Sujay F. Greenlund, Lisa C. McGuire, PhD, Hua Lu, MS, and Janet B. Croft, PhD, published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May 26, 2017
“Age-Adjusted Death Rates for Parkinson’s Disease Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years – National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1999-2017” an article by Nancy Han, MS and Barnali Das, PhD, published by the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sept. 6, 2019
“Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Adults Aged 18 and Over in the United States, 1998–2009” a report by Lara J. Akinbami, MD; and Xiang Liu, MSc, published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011
“United States Life Tables, 2017” an article by Elizabeth Arias, PhD and Jiaquan Xu, MD, published by National Vital Statistics Reports, June 24, 2019
“National Surveillance of Asthma: United States, 2001-2010” a report by the Centers for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, November, 2012
Chemtrails Confirmed a book by William Thomas, published by Bridger House Publishers, 2004
What In the World Are They Spraying? a documentary film by Michael Murphy, Paul Wittenberger, and Edward G. Griffin, produced by Truth Media Productions, 2010
“Role of Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash in the Global Plankton Imbalance: Case of Florida’s Toxic Algae Crisis” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, June 2019
“Previously Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bee and Insect Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, August 2018
“Aerosolized Coal Fly Ash: A Previously Unrecognized Primary Factor in the Catastrophic Global Demise of Bird Populations and Species” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, November 2018
“Unacknowledged Potential Factors in Catastrophic Bat Die-off Arising from Coal Fly Ash Geoengineering” a paper by Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Asian Journal of Biology, January 2020
“Previously Unrecognized Primary Factors in the Demise of Endangered Torrey Pines: A Microcosm of Global Forest Die-offs” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, Dale D. Williams, and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, August 2018
“California Wildfires: Role of Undisclosed Atmospheric Manipulation and Geoengineering” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, October 2018
“Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth’s Surface: Human and Environmental Health Implications” a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD, Raymond D. Hoisington and Dr. Mark Whiteside, MD, published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, March 2018
Silver iodide material safety data sheet produced by ScienceLab.com, 2010
Silver iodide material safety data sheet produced by Fisher Scientific, 2009
National Science Foundation Report No. 66-3 as it appeared in a hearing before the Subcommittee on Oceans and Atmosphere of the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, Feb. 17, 1976
“Ecological Effects of Weather Modification: A Problem Analysis” a report by Charles F. Cooper and William C. Jolly, produced by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Atmospheric Water Resources, published by the University of Michigan, 1969
“Some Comments About Weather Modification Affects on Man’s Environment” by Archie M. Kahan, Office of Atmospheric Water Resources, Office of Chief Engineer, Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, published by the Department of the Interior, 1967
“Federal Regulation of Weather Modification” a report by the Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, D.C., 1972 as it appeared in a hearing before the Subcommittee on Oceans and Atmosphere of the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, Feb. 17, 1976
Environmental Impacts of Artificial Ice Nucleating Agents a book edited and co-written by Donald A. Klein, published by Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1978
“Weather Modification Association Position Statement on the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodide as a Cloud Seeding Agent” a paper by the Weather Modification Association, published by the Weather Modification Association, 2009
“Estimated Possible Effects of AgI Cloud Seeding on Human Health” a paper by Ronald B. Standler and Bernard Vonnegut, published by the Journal of Applied Meteorology, Volume 11, August 11, 1972
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. The greatly revised and expanded second edition of his book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project is now available. Join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com.
All life adapts to its environment. All life adapts to survive. Humans adapt to variations in space, time, temperature, pressure, fear, and intimidation. We are variants.
So, too, are our microbes. Humans are more microbe than human, 10:1.
This fact was shown with Bordetella pertussis, a bacterium blamed for whooping cough, which adapted itself to survive the vaccine. According to the February 7, 2013 New England Journal of Medicine study, the authors concluded that adaptation of B. pertussis was “in response to vaccine selection pressure.”
The one thing the experts know is that 21 COVID variants are coming down the pipeline. Here is one list showing their Greek names and birthdates/release dates between June 2021 (Delta) and February 2023 (Omega).
Variant
Name
Birthdate
A
Delta
Jun 2021
E
Epsilon
Jul 2021
Z
Zeta
Aug 2021
H
Eta
Sept 2021
θ
Theta
Oct 2021
I
Iota
Nov 2021
K
Kappa
Dec 2021
λ
Lambda
Jan 2022
M
Mu
Feb 2022
N
Nu
Mar 2022
Ξ
Ksi
April 2022
O
Omicron
May 2022
Π
Pi
June 2022
P
Rho
July 2022
Σ
Sigma
Aug 2022
T
Tao
Sept 2022
Y
Upsilon
Oct 2022
Φ
Phi
Nov 2022
X
Chi
Dec 2022
Ψ
Psi
Jan 2023
Ω
Omega
Feb 2023
Yet still, no one knows the true costs to health from injected spike proteins and nanotechnology inherent in COVID vaccines. No time for research. And no clinical trial vaccine data is available for people to analyze for themselves before making a choice whether to inject, or not to inject, because clinical trials continue, live, in the population. And experimental vaccines are being deployed by chosen vaccine makers who have never produced this type of medical product before.
No responsible party for negative consequences. Vaccine makers are not liable for damages from their experimental products. Doctors are not responsible for reporting any adverse reactions from the COVID vaccines to authorities, even though the CDC-authority has a reporting system called The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS collects less than 1% of adverse events reports from medical doctors who fail to report them. See the latest results for COVID vaccine reactions here.
The PCR Ruse
Meanwhile, the PCR test that drives the numbers of reported cases up, along with deaths, surges, and fear, has been deemed invalid by the CDC. The CDC has quietly withdrawn its request to use the PCR test to identify COVID vs. Flu This means that no valid tracking test exists for the virus, that was never isolated, and that shut down the world, eliminated jobs, and caused suicide, hardship and regret for neglecting elderly family members who died alone.
If no valid test exists to track the coronavirus [one word], then what does that say about coronavirus itself? Is it real? Is it corona virus? Or is it just a word masquerading as a virus? Is it a bacterium? A figment of someone’s imagination? What does it say about the power of “the experts” and their mandates who attempt to track a figment?
What does it say that 120 patents for a number of bacterial and viral pathogens were filed from NIH, NIAID, US armed services infectious disease program, and the international agencies that collaborated with them?
A pandemic of fear has morphed into a pandemic of illness. Yet still, there are over 500,000 adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines since injections began. See the updated COVID adverse reactions reported to VAERS.
Transmuting The Transhumanist Agenda
There are no consequences for the those who take part in modifying the genetics of the whole population. Under conditioning through the media, social engineers are taking advantage of human ignorance, by modifying human behavior right along with the genome. As long as the population consents to the biologic invasion, humanity becomes a farm of genetic material, ripe for DNA harvesting.
Yet, each human has free will and the power to say NO.
You have the power to not consent to biologic invasion and takeover of your humanity. Simply do not consent to anything that comes from fear. Declare out loud. “I Do Not Consent to manipulation of my biologic identity.” I Do Not Consent to harvesting of my property. I Do Not Consent. Say it out loud and know it because no one has the right to violate your property, your body, your DNA, your mind, or your free will.
Under mind manipulation, whether through the media, through government dictates, through frequencies emitted from towers or devices, or through intimidation by others, it is important to maintain a strong mind and your willpower. Mind over matter has never been more critical. The Corona-agenda was never about a runaway virus or Greek covariants. The agenda is about creating a Transhuman variant out of humanity via conditioning to be controlled. Know your mind.
Do you consent?
These are history-making times and you are part of it, here to do your part to liberate yourself and humanity from synthetic slavery. No one else saves humanity, just as no one else can heal you. We each save ourselves. We each heal ourselves.
Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh my! – Dorothy, The Wizard of Oz
The Blame Game is underway in a test of global proportions.
Humans are participants in a Global Reset, with global control by one official voice, where all sovereign nations must work together in unison. Only if all heads-of-state play from the same page in the same Playbook can they achieve their end goal of uniformity. They do so by first dividing people by their identity, and then eliminating it altogether by making humans one amorphous blob.
First, governments must create a “compelling interest:”
Compelling interest – Legal Definition. n. In constitutional law, a method for determining the constitutionality of a statute that restricts the practice of a fundamental right or distinguishes between people due to a suspect classification.
Blaming the Unvaccinated
The classification and separation of a species is nothing new. Subclassifications are essential for an elite power structure to dissect and maintain control. In humans it happens because people allow it to happen.
Suspect classifications in humans include: racial status (BLM), gender status (male vs. female), non-gender status, religious status, educational status (degrees), social status (Caste system in India), marital status, political status, disease status (lepers, patients), vaccinated status, and now, health status. All dictated by a sole authority, such as the United Nations U.N., whose sole purpose is to unite nations.
Using new logic, a disease-free, asymptomatic person is a threat to everyone. Healthy people are weapons.
New Logic: A vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against, because someone else is not vaccinated.
As world governments build a case for a global reset using an unapproved global vaccine, and a bogus PCR test, they utilize the media, by design, as a means to an end.
This dynamic process comes directly from the Playbook of the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. First, create the problem – a health threat to divide people. Second, foment a reaction – fear and frenzy through media. And finally, roll out the solution – uniformity via a global vaccine program with the elimination of rights and freedoms.
New Logic: Unvaccinated equals unclean.
Warnings Not Reported
Not reported in The News are the real threats to human health, once they are connected to each other.
1) The CDC Quietly Withdraws PCR Test to Identify COVID.
PEG is an excipient found in the Pfizer and Moderna shots, known to cause anaphylaxis in some cases. Both the U.S. CDC and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advise that:
A 2016 study published in Analytical Chemistry found that about 7% of people who have been exposed to PEG from various products have a level of antibodies to the compound that is high enough to cause an anaphylactic reaction.
Polysorbate 80, also known to cause allergies, and other adverse effects should never be injected. Though it is not well tested, it is found in the following approved vaccines: DTaP (Infanrix);DTaP—IPV (Kinrix);DTap-HepB-IPV (Pediarix);DTaP-IPV-Hib (Pentacel);Influenza (Agriflu);Influenza (Fluarix);Meningococcal (MenB-Trumenba);Pneumococcal (PCV13—Prevnar13);Rotavirus (RotaTeq);Tdap (Boostrix).
Nanoparticles are the game changer as suspicions grow that they, too, cause allergies, blood clots, heart problems, and unknown effects.
In an interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media, Dr. Montagnier said he believed that the mass vaccination programs for COVID may actually be causing SARS-CoV-2 mutations like the Delta variant and, thus, prolonging the pandemic.
You may wish to stay ahead of the variant curve by knowing which variants will be announced at what time. A short list of “variants of concern” are published by state health departments. But the full list of variants thru 2023 is already known, though not televised in The News.
Here is one list showing their Greek names and birthdates/release dates between June 2021 (Delta) and February 2023 (Omega).
Variant
Name
Birthdate
A
Delta
Jun 2021
E
Epsilon
Jul 2021
Z
Zeta
Aug 2021
H
Eta
Sept 2021
θ
Theta
Oct 2021
I
Iota
Nov 2021
K
Kappa
Dec 2021
λ
Lambda
Jan 2022
M
Mu
Feb 2022
N
Nu
Mar 2022
Ξ
Ksi
April 2022
O
Omicron
May 2022
Π
Pi
June 2022
P
Rho
July 2022
Σ
Sigma
Aug 2022
T
Tao
Sept 2022
Y
Upsilon
Oct 2022
Φ
Phi
Nov 2022
X
Chi
Dec 2022
Ψ
Psi
Jan 2023
Ω
Omega
Feb 2023
4) Delta Tower
Is it a coincidence that Delta towers are announced to support 3G, 4G, and 5G frequency deployment during the reign of the Delta variant? New Delta tower antenna poles allow “multiple Operators” for roof top “monitoring solutions.” The new 5G towers and their frequencies are microwaves known to affect human health.
Nanotechnology through injections suggests a whole new level of unknowns when it comes to microwave frequencies. One study titled, “5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells” suggests that 5G frequencies are absorbed through the skin to produce the symptoms of COVID.
Further, Patent #: US5800481 published on Sep 1, 1998 and filed on Dec 28, 1995, confirms the skin – microwave frequency connection:
In man, autonomic and cortical resonances of the nervous system can be excited by inducing subliminal heat pulses in the skin by means of a resistive heat patch, laser, heat lamp, or microwave radiation, or through a slow air jet that carries a small periodic fluctuation in temperature. Deeply subliminal skin temperature oscillations of frequency near 1/2 Hz induced in a subject by any of these means cause sleepiness, drowsiness, relaxation, a tonic smile, ptosis of the eyelids, a tense feeling, sudden loose stool, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise pulse frequency used. For certain higher frequencies, the induced subliminal skin temperature oscillations cause fractured thought and a slowing of certain cortical processes. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of tremors, seizures, and emotional disorders. There is further application in the form of nonlethal weapons, involving a pulsed infrared laser or a pulsed microwave beam, tuned to a sensory resonance pulse frequency
Moderna is careful to call its mRNA injection an “operating system.”
Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer… In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
At the same time, Moderna admits that healthy human immune responses can destroy the mRNA sequences before they get into the person’s cells. According to Bloomberg, Moderna wants to transform the human body into a vaccine making machine, though the company began making chemotherapy agents for cancer, not as a vaccine manufacturer for SARS-COV2. Are these devices injecting people with prophylactic chemotherapy for cancer that has not been diagnosed by a medical professional?
Even if a healthy immune system can disable injected nanotechnology early on, nanobots can jeopardize normal enzyme reactions, molecular bonds, and hormone balance. In other words, the body can turn on its own cells in an autoimmune (self attack) response as it does with approved vaccines. In medical circles, this is called called A.S.I.A. or Autoimmune Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants.
If someone does come to your door to encourage you to get the COVID-19 vaccine, you have no obligation to tell them whether you have been vaccinated, said Kayte Spector-Bagdady, lawyer and associate director for the Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School.
HIPAA does not apply to public health outreach volunteers, and it doesn’t apply to information you offer to tell,” Spector-Bagdady said in an email to the AP. “If you are uncomfortable, just don’t open the door – or do and just get some information without giving any in return!”
7) Question The News
To question The News is to make journalists accountable for their information or misinformation. Some rhetorical questions to pose:
Since when have all sovereign nations agreed on anything as a unified group?
In this ‘live exercise,’ will each new variant require a new experimental injection?
Have recipients volunteered for an experimental shot under false pretenses? See premise of the TV mini Series Ascension.
Will life insurance companies insure their members if they accept any unapproved medical procedures, tests, or vaccines? Are you covered in the COVID experiment?
Is the mRNA “operating system” designed to program humans and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems or hack biological functions to create a transhuman, subhuman species? Both? What happens to the human soul and spirit?
Is it news, propaganda, fraud, or a political reality show? Are they all one and the same?
Answer: New Logic
Health Freedom and The Right to Refuse
Common Sense: In a free society each individual is responsible for determining the costs and benefits of any medical treatment — the decision to get vaccinated is no different. – Commentary by Dr. Neil Shah, MD
In a free society common sense trumps New Logic every time. How do the rights of a healthy person infringe upon the rights of others simply by not being vaccinated?
They don’t.
We, the people, must demand that the government leave us alone. A global governmental entity is only able to succeed in its agenda to remove inherent rights if the people consent to immoral dictates.
Government mandates of coerced medical treatments only hold power if people allow it.
The protection of the legal concepts of informed consent, where patients have the right to significant information about a medical intervention that would impact whether to accept or decline a product or procedure, is imperative to supporting a person’s fundamental right to make decisions about their own bodies. Incentivizing a person to make a decision one way or the other, outside of information discussed in the doctor/patient relationship, would be unethical. When government and corporations interfere with the doctor/patient relationship and health and medical decision-making by giving rewards to patients for compliance with government goals, then a dangerous abuse of power is initiated. Gimmicks and coercive policies not only undermine informed consent, but also reduce consumer confidence in public health policy. In our country, all individuals have the fundamental right to make health decisions for themselves and their families without coercion or discrimination.
In a truly free society, the freedom to choose is non-negotiable and not open to interpretation by science or by any other means. When we allow government to remove the principle of choice, it binds freedom itself to a contract and choice becomes obsolete. Natural rights are a birthright and can neither be given away nor denied by any government or court.
The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies, either municipal, state or federal, or even from the Constitution. They exist inherently in every man, by endowment of the Creator, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution, and restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government. The people’s rights are not derived from the government, but the government’s authority comes from the people. The Constitution but states again these rights already existing, and when legislative encroachment by the nation, state, or municipality invade these original and permanent rights, it is the duty of the courts to so declare, and to afford the necessary relief. The fewer restrictions that surround the individual liberties of the citizen, except those for the preservation of the public health, safety, and morals, the more contented the people and the more successful the democracy. (City of Dallas v. Mitchell, 245 S.w. 944, 945-46, Tex.Civ.App. – Dallas (1922).
The choice to keep your identity and power is yours and no one else’s, even in attempts to reset the world stage. The evolution or devolution of humanity is dependent on whether each individual chooses to be healthy or to risk disease, whether each chooses to be weaponized by a government entity, or not.
You can hate me, try to break me Talk me down and denigrate me You can try to silence every word But I will not be leaving quietly, no
I won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly
And you can mock me, try to out smart me You can shame me and try to blame me You can do your best to shut me up But I will not be leaving quietly, noI won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly
I’m gonna stand here And I’ll fight for every word I’m gonna shout the truth Until you know it’s heard
I’m gonna stand here And I’ll fight for every word I’m gonna shout the truth Until you know it’s heard
You can scold me, attempt to control me Ban me and censor and label and troll me You can push me and try to kick me out But I will not be leaving quietly, no
I won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly
And you can mute me, Strike and dispute me Dumb down the rest, yea, but I’ll keep refusin’ You can pretend like you’ve seen the last of me But I will not be leaving quietly, no
I won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly
I’m gonna stand here And I’ll fight for every word I’m gonna shout the truth Until you know it’s heard
I’m gonna stand here And I’ll fight for every word I’m gonna shout the truth Until you know it’s heard
You can hate me, try to break me Talk me down and denigrate me You can try to silence every word But I will not be leaving quietly, no
I won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly, no
I won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly, no
I won’t leave I won’t leave I will not be leaving quietly
Written & Performed by Bradley James Skistimas Copyright 2021 Seven Places Music (ASCAP)
Drs. Tom Cowan, Andy Kaufman & Stefan Lanka: On the Myth That Virology Is Real Science & What We Don’t Yet Know About These Highly Toxic Covid “Vaccines”
In the video below Dean Braus brings together Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andy Kaufman to discuss mRNA vaccines, nanoparticles in vaccines and related topics. Dean begins the conversation with discussion of the following quote:
“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.” ~ Heraclitus of Ephesus
There is an audio issue with much of Dr. Lanka’s contribution to the conversation, which included some discussion of Dr. Lanka’s CPE (Cytopathic Effect) experiment and ongoing research, as well as the refusal of mainstream medical science to give his research consideration. To understand more about his work, please see links to related articles, videos and pdf files that I’ve provided at the end of this article.
Below are a few brief excerpts from the wide-ranging conversation:
Tom Cowan:
…The theory that we base our entire science and our entire medicine on — which we are only made of substance — it is simply incorrect.
…We are forced into a way of seeing the world — forced into saying that must be true. And yet we all know it’s not.
…At some point we have to acknowledge that the theory of medicine science is just wrong and we should abandon it.
Andy Kaufman:
…We are living in a time when science is not interested in finding the truth. It’s basically motivated by…political goals and and other purposes — financial incentives.
…As Tom alluded to, we’ve known that virology is not a valid science for a long time. And it’s very important — the control experiments — because they provide the empirical evidence that disproves the dogmatic virology theory.
…An average person can understand the significance of this control experiment because we’re saying that the alleged proof of the existence of a virus, and everything that is based upon that, comes from the experimental procedure itself — and not from the presence of anything real.
…I think there are a lot of unknowns right now. Like, we certainly know that these so-called vaccines — or these gene therapies — that they’re quite toxic. And we have incredible numbers of people experiencing very serious adverse effects and we have incredible numbers of people dying. But the truth is that we don’t really even know what’s in these injections.
We know from the past that undisclosed ingredients make it into vaccine products… We know that there is recent evidence that has perhaps not been validated but it’s still out there from La Quinta Columna about graphene. We know that in the past there has been DNA from fetal cell lines that’s been added to vaccines without being disclosed. And then we have observed some unusual phenomenon with respect to magnetism. And then if you look in the literature you see that there is an extreme amount of research published on nanotechnology for biomedical applications. And many of those are specifically for infectious disease and specifically for vaccine technology.
…And then we have this story about you know the gene therapy. And we know that this is been unsuccessful so far in other clinical pursuits.
…What we have seen as an explosion in GMO technology in other industries — in manufacturing, nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals and, as well, in agriculture and food especially, where we know that they alter the genotype and phenotype of organisms. So we know that they can hack our system in some ways that can change our physiology.
…So we don’t really know if this product actually integrates into the genetic machinery of the host or the protein manufacturing machinery of the host. And we don’t really know if the spike protein is actually made in our body. So, in other words, there’s evidence that the spike protein is toxic .. You can buy a commercial preparation… it’s an actual substance. Now whether it’s found in nature or not is a separate discussion. But it has been bought from those manufacturers and sold for research studies and shown to have a certain toxicity. But we don’t know if the toxicity from these products is from that spike protein because we don’t even know if it’s really made.
…We also don’t know with certainty if there is nanotechnology in addition to the lipid nanoparticles that are said to deliver the mRNA or the so-called adenovirus vector that’s in the Johnson & Johnson product. But we don’t know if there’s other nanotechnology. Like are their magnetic nanoparticles? Are there graphene nanoparticles? Is there hydrogel?
Tom Cowan:
…An RNA vaccine is trying to take over that which is basically the interaction of the human being with the world of light and sound and spirit and thoughts and emotions — and translate that into a living being.
Who’s ever doing this wants “them” to be the ones who determine what protein you make.
…The bad news is they’re trying to make us make what they want. The good news is — it doesn’t work like that, so they may not ever be able to do it.
…Like Andy said, nobody even has measured really whether they actually can get them to make spike proteins. My guess is they can’t really.
The Treatments
Sharon James — along with her husband, children & visiting grandchildren — has lived and worked for nearly 35 years on a century farm in Iowa.
Nelleus is an independent reporter, dedicated to freedom, and committed to revealing the truth about unfolding events in Australia, .
